The Mechanism of The Oxidation of Glucose by Bromine
The Mechanism of The Oxidation of Glucose by Bromine
The Mechanism of The Oxidation of Glucose by Bromine
MECHANISM
OF THE OXIDATION
BY BROMINE.
BY
(From
the Laboratory
(Received
H.
H.
BUNZEL.
of Biochemistry
for
of
publication,
I.
OF GLUCOSE
the
University
December
8,
of Chicago.)
rgq.)
INTRODUCTION.
In order to understand
metabolism better the behavior of the
different fuelstuffs under various conditions
outside the body
must first be investigated.
A series of studies in this direction
was accordingly
started,
particularly
on the physico-chemical
behavior of the sugars (1-7).
In a preceding investigation
by Mathews and the writer (7),
the following conclusions were drawn regarding the oxidation of
glucose by bromine:
(a) Glucose behaves both as a weak acid and as a weak base.
In an alkaline or neutral solution it dissociates into metal or
Hf ions and C,H,,O,- ions; in an acid solution it forms a salt of
the acid by addition, yielding C,H,,O,+ ions and the anion of the
corresponding
acid.
(b) Both of the glucose ions are oxidized by bromine side by
side, the oxidation of the first being depressed by the addition of
H+ ions, while the other remains unaffected.
Velocity equations were worked out on this basis, taking into
consideration
the two kinds of glucose ions, the concentration
of the H+ and OH- ions and of the bromine and the hypothesis
was tested under very diverse conditions by measuring the rate
of oxidation in the presence of various acids in different concentrations and varying amounts of bromine.
The hypothesis was
found to agree with all the facts observed.
In the experiments
just cited the concentration
of the sugar
was purposely taken SO large that its change of concentration
was negligible.
It seemed necessary, therefore, to vary also the
I.57
Oxidation
158
of Glucose
by Bromine
concentration
of the sugar, to observe its rate of disappearance
and
to ascertain
whether
the equations
alluded to in the above article
hold true under
these conditions.
It was desirable
also, to
ascertain
especially
whether
the oxidation
of the positive glucose
ions leads to the formation
of gluconic
acid exclusively.
The methods
were the same as those in the previous
investigation.
The acidity
developed
during
the reaction
was determined in some of the experiments
by titration
with 0.1 N sodium
hydroxide
using phenolphthalein
as the indicator,
and by subtracting
the amount
of hydrobromic
acid formed,
the amount
of gluconic
acid was determined.
II.
DEVELOPMENT
OF
EQUATIONS.
Cl-
Br,
HOH
C,H,,O,
dt
=K.C&&
>
CoH-
HCl
+ 2 HBr
only this
being added
this
reaction
Cnrz(free)
reaction
to make
IVLLS
the
is
_.
_.
H.
H.
is determined
by the amount
the case of hydrochloric
acid
C,H,,O,
I.59
+ H++
CC6H1206+
Bunzel
Cl=
for
C,H,,+o, + Cl-
KCC~H~~O~
c+
Inasmuch
as the ionic dissociation
of the glucose is very small,
the amount
of C,H,,O,+ ions will be practically
directly
proportional
to the concentration
of the glucose
solution
and also
directly
proportional
to the concentration
of the H ions.
(11) The hydroxylions
are of course all derived from the water
present.
Their
quantity
is determined
by the equation
:
K
CHzO
H,
COH
(Total)
CBr
CBr-
CBrz
- (Total)
ZCBr
2 CBr
CBr,
.oj Br,
BrT - Br,
Br,
CBr,-
Consumed
Consumed
2 Br
05
%
2 Br
Total
Br
.=.5 +
.___~_
Consumed
Br
Total
Consumed
Br
Total
2 Br
+ 2 Br
_____.~
2
consumed
>
Consumed
By subtracting
able with sodium
the free Br,.
1 See literature
this value
thiosulphate
160
Oxidation
of Glucose
by Bromine
By examining
(a) and (b), it becomes evident
at once that,
provided
sufficient
acid is added
to suppress
completely
the
oxidation
of the negative
ion, the H ions hasten the reaction
according
to (a) exactly
to the same extent as they retard
it
according
to (b).
This allowed
us to neglect the concentration
of the H ions provided
it was over o. I N.
The velocity of the reaction
is accordingly
proportional,
under
these conditions,
to two variables
only; the concentration
of the
glucose and the concentration
of the free bromine,
and is represented by the equation
$
On integration
this
K=
= K (a - x) (b
X)
becomes
I
t (a -
b)
log
nat
b(a
x)
a (b -
x)
where
K is the velocity
constant,
t the time
elapsed
since the
beginning
of the exlzeriment,
a and b the concentration
respectively of the active bromine
and sugar at the start, and x the
amount
of bromine
and sugar consumed.
In a part of the experiments
a known amount of sodium bromide solution
was added, so that the concentration
of the Brions in the final mixture
was 0.3 N.
As the Br, in these experiments was only 0.01 N at the start, the slight increase on the concentration
of the Br- ions during the reaction
due to the formation of HBr, was negligible.
In the remainder
of the experiments, however,
where the concentration
of the free bromide
at
the start was larger or where the reactions
were so slow that it
seemed undesirable
to depress their rate still more by the addition of bromide
the value for Br, had to be calculated
separately
By taking
the constantly
changing
for each determination.
value for Br- in consideration
we obtained
a differential
eqation, which we were unable
to integrate.
For that reason the
values for K were calculated
for short time intervals,
always
using the time of the last preceding
determination
as a starting
point.
To approximate
the concentration
of the Br the writer
added to the concentration
of the HBr present at the preceding
H.
H. Bunzel
determination
(including
that
which
is present
as Br,) one
half of the HBr formed during the time interval
considered
and
subtracted
the concentration
of the bromine
present in the form
of Br,.
I
--
t _ .--------..
05 + Br-(,t
H Brt,
-~ ~-~--
&tart)+
The formula
used in the experiment
of the Br- ion was made .30 at the
1
K=
t %(a
III.
~~ --.-
- H Brt,
2
-~m~~~m-(a - b)
-
.[III]
b)
EXPERIMENTAL
tive glucoseion?
In all the experiments
just quoted the change in the concentraThe change in contion of the bromine
only was determined.
centration
of the sugar was assumed to be one molecule of sugar
oxidized
for each molecule
of Br, used up.
This assumption
gave a constant
value for K.
To test the hypothesis
further
that glucose went thus into gluconic
acid, it was necessary
to
measure at least in one experiment
the degree of acidity
of the
mixture
at varying
time intervals
and thus to determine
the
amount
of gluconic
acid formed.
It should of course be found
then that for each molecule
of bromine
which disappeared
from
the solution,
one molecule
of glucose has been used up and the
Oxidation
162
of Glucose
TABLE
Concentration
of H,SO,
0.37~;
by Bromine
I.
Concentration
of Na Br 0.30
I (MINUTES).
__
2.OOM* -t.-
1.00
0.50
0.25
0.10
0.05
0.00500
0.00520
0.00516
0.00496
0.00515
11.60
10.68
9.70
8.98
7.53
5.80
4.91
10.01
9.25
8.82
7.89
7.05
6.48
3.28
10.40
9.29
8.41
7.25
5.30
10.32
10.00
9.74
9.29
8.20
6.83
5.31
9.92
6.31
5.44
1.93
10.30
8.37
7.64
5.85
* nr refers
to a molecular
solution
K (log n&t).
N.
YE*?4
(log nat)
.--
0
10
20
30
50
82
100
0
15
25
50
75
100
260
0
50
100
165
300
0
30
50
100
200
350
570
0
1060
13%
3825
0
970
1185
2350
0.0290
0.0312
0.0298
0.0301
0.0295
0.0301
/
I
0 0300
0.0342
0.0338
0.0330
0.0310
0.0304
0.0300
0.0276
0.0298
0.0306
0.0314
I
1
i
0.0299
0.0293
0.0312
0.0291
0.0322
0.0330
0.0328
)
:
I
/
I
,
0 0314
I
I
~
0.03'21
0.0301
0.0298
0. 0334
0.0310
0.0303
0.0357
0.0343
0.0x35
TABLE
No NaBr
added.
II.
C,
= 0.
N H,
SO,
I
T.
Tot.
Br.
CB*-
I-
0.77
.l.Ol
8.88
0.55
0.275
0.110
0.55
Calculated
ineach
determination from
thebeginning of
the experiment.
0.100
5.78
4.20
3.19
2.67
11.02
8.82
6.50
4.04
1.94
.Sl
11.71
10.40
9.04
7.14
4.85
3.05
10.95
9.38
8.05
6.72
11.41
9.59
8.59
x.19
45.40
36.45
31.50
20.30
17.00
14.98
K (log nat)
IEAN K.
-_
0
10
30
45
60
70
00
15
35
65
120
185
0
15
35
65
120
185
0
50
100
160
0
3.00550
3.00444
3.00289
3.00210
0.00160
0.00134
0.00551
0.00441
0.00325
0.00202
0.00097
0.00041
0.00586
0.00520
0.00452
0.00357
0.00243
0.00153
0.0054s
0.00469
0.00403
0.00336
0.00571
( ).00017
( j.00026
C). 00089
c j.00342
( I.0283
(I.00024
().00021
().00020
CI.00578
Cj.00710
Cj.00788
( I.0308
().00017
(1.00024
(3.00024
I3.00015
I3.00006
( ). 00093
( j.00312
( I.00575
( ).00788
(I.0274
( I.00959
I I.
0297
I3.00010
I0.00022
I0.00029
I0.00028
I0.00022
( I.00055
( I.00177
(I.
0290
( I.00333
( I.00544
(I.00776
I 3.0306
,0.00010
/0.00021
/0.00025
(I.00069
(1.00203
(1.00332
I0.0288
10.0299
0.0292
100
170
0.00480
0.00430
0.00410
0.00015
0.00020
0.00023
(3.00076
I3.00121
I3.00161
0.0315
0.0310
0.0313
0.0313
0.090s
0.0729
0.0630
0.0406
0.0340
0.0300
0.0066
0.02185
0.0263
0.0233
0.0240
0.0113
0.0238
0.0517
0.0837
0.0936
0.0300
0.0282
0.027C
0.027E
0.026t
200
0
100
200
775
150
480
--
( I.0299
( I.0272
( I.0269
3.0286
(I.0290
(J.0322
(1.0282
D .02X3
I 3.0265
0.0285
I I
I 3.0304
0.0290
ICl.0290
Oxidation
164
of Glucose
TABLE
by Bromine
II-Continued
lK(log
nst)
MEAN
K.
I0.05
Meanvalue
7.49
4.30
31.12
28.50
24.62
100
320
0
100
320
of K (log nat).
0.03745
0.0215
0.1556
0.1425
0.1231
/
0.0110
0.01255
0.0300
0.0253
0.0313
0.0131
0.0258
0.0283
0.0296
).0302*
*The
cause of the divergence
of this constant
from the one found in the previous
paper by
Mathews
and Bunael,
i. e., 0.0169 is twofold.
There the sugar wau always present
in the same
concentration,
0.5 M, which wits regarded
iw unity;
moreover
it was thought
then that the glucose
used conkdined
one molecule
of water of crystallization,
which was proved
to be incorrect
by
polarimetric
measurements
carried
on later.
If the previous
value
of the constant
is transformed
on this basis, we obtain
as mean value for K (log nat) from our former
paper 0.0308,
which
agrees with the one found
above.
corresponding
amount
of gluconic
acid formed.
Furthermore
there ought to be for each atom of bromine
transformed
into
hydrobromic
acid, an acidity
produced
which is one and a half
that of the HBr calculated,
one-third
of this acid being due to
the gluconic
acid formed and two-thirds
of it to the HBr.
The
experiment
was performed
under the usual conditions.
As the
temperature
was not absolutely
uniform
in this experiment
but
oscillated
between
25
and 25.5O, no attempt
was made to calculate the velocity constants
in this experiment
and only the parallelism between
the changes of concentration
of the two compoFor this purpose
at various
time
nents named
were studied.
intervals
two portions
of the reaction
mixture
were removed
from the reaction
flask.
One of these portions
of IO cc. volume
was run into KI solution
and
titrated
with 0.1 N sodium
thiosulphate
solution
to determine
the Br, used up.
The other
portion
of 50 cc. had air blown through
it for 15 minutes
at room
temperature
to remove the Br,.
Then IO cc. of this portion
was
titrated
with 0.10
sodium
hydrate
and then with 0.1 N silver
nitrate
using a few drops of a saturated
potassium
chromate
H.
solution
as indicator
to
and the bromine
in the
To make certain that
ing the passage of air, the
solution
of hydrobromic
Time.
3,3j.............................
3.55
4.10 . . . . . . . . .
H. Bunzel
1%
determine
respectively
the total acidity
form of bromide.
none of the hydrobromic
acid is lost durfollowing
experiment
was carried out: .4
acid was made and air drawn through
it.
.._.
._.
_..__
Titer of 10 cc.
of HBr solution
j.ZSCC.
0.1 NNaoHsol
5.30
(
j.Zj
N.
Oxidation
of Glucose
by Bromine
666666
+
0
0
H. H.
IV.
DETERMINATION
OF
THE
Bunzel
TEMPERATURE
COEFFICIENT
OF
THE
REACTION.
12.66
11.50
10.01
7.40
5.45
j
I
I
0'
1000
2430
5410
8200
0.00633
0.00575
0.00500
0.00369
0.00273
0.00134
0.00136
0.00140
0.00144
0.00139
I
o. OVJOZ
.o.oo~gg
.j.sz for Id
CONCLUSIONS.
Oxidation
of Glucose
by Bromine
H. H. Bunzel
where
NH+
The writer
wishes to express his gratitude
to Prof. A. P.
Mathews,
for the theoretical
formulation
of the reaction
and for
his uninterrupted
interest
in the execution
of this work.
LITERATURE.
I.
Mathews
P. 1997 1907.
2. McGuigan,
3. Mathews
909.
4. Mathews
909.
5.
6.
7.
xxxi,
8.
909.
9.
1909.
IO.
544,
I I.
12.
905.
13.
14.
15.
and
McGuigan:
American
Journal
of
Physiology,
xix,
H.: American
and Walker:
Journal
of Physiology,
xix, p.
Journal
of Biological
Chemistry,
175, 1907.
vi, p. 2 I.
and
Journal
vi,
Walker:
of Biological
Chemistry,
p.
29,
Mathews:
Journal
of Biological
Chemistry,
vi, p. 3, 1909.
Bunzel,
H. H.: American
Journal
of Physiology,
xxi, p. 23, 1908.
Bunzel
and Mathews:
Journal
of the American
Chemical
Society,
p. 464, 1909.
Mathews
and Walker:
Journal
of Biological
Chemistry,
vi, p. 289,
Mathews
and
Walker:
Journal
Richards
and Stull : Zeitschrift
1902.
Roloff : Zeitsckrijt
fiir physikalische
Worley
: Journal
of the American
Nef: Annalen
der Ckemie,
cc&ii,
Cohen:
Zeitsckrift
fzir pkysikaliscke
Osaka:
Zeitsckrijt
ftir pkysikaliscke
of Biological
ftir
Chemistry,
physikaliscke
vi,
Chemie,
Chemie,
xiii, p. 353,
Chemical
Society,
lxxxvii,
p. 214, 1907.
Ckemie,
xxxvii,
Ckemnir,
xxxv,
P. 299,
xli,
p.
1894.
p. I 107,
p. 69, 1909.
p. 661, 1900.