PAT I-32, Dangerous Traditions
PAT I-32, Dangerous Traditions
PAT I-32, Dangerous Traditions
Only traditions approved by the Apostles and recorded in the Scriptures are
authority for acts and practices of the Lord’s church.
The Apostles derived their authority from Christ and the Holy Spirit (Matt. 16:19;
John 16:13).
The Holy Spirit taught the Apostles all things one needed to know about the will
of God (John 14:16, 26; 15:26; 16:7-15). Thus, the Apostles were uniquely able to guide
the early church (Acts 2:42; 1 Cor. 15:3-11). The Apostles and other inspired writers
used this knowledge to write the New Testament (2 Pet. 1:20-21).
The Scriptures instruct us to follow the traditions of Christ and the Apostles, but
no one else. Paul said “keep the traditions as I delivered them” (1 Cor. 11:2; see also 2
Tim. 2:2). He instructed the Thessalonians to “hold the traditions which you were
Page 1 of 3
taught, whether by word or our epistle” (2 Thess. 2:15). Inasmuch as Paul established
the church in Thessalonica (Acts 17:1-4), and wrote the church two epistles, it is evident
that he was referring to the traditions taught by his inspired “word” or “epistle.” Paul
also instructed the Thessalonians to “withdraw from every brother who walks
disorderly and not according to the tradition which he received from us” (2 Thess. 3:6).
Thus, we are not free to follow any tradition, but only a tradition established by
apostolic authority.
Some people advocate following a tradition because it was observed a long time
ago, perhaps as early as the second century (101 A.D. – 200 A.D.). Where is the
authority for that? If that were the rule, how would we decide which of the uninspired
early Christians to follow? After which century will we no longer trust a tradition? Will
we follow traditions that can be traced back to the third century, but not traditions of the
4th century? Where is the authority for a cut-off date?
How do you decide which traditions to keep that are not mentioned in the
Scriptures? Chicken sacrifices? Snake handling? Torture? War? Baptizing dead
people? All of these have been done in the name of Christ; some are still practiced. The
Bible doesn’t say one wit about them.
Some people equate tradition with Scripture. A creed book and encyclopedia for
one faith have the following to say about tradition:
Creed Book: “Do you have to believe in Tradition? Yes, because it is the
Word of God and has equal authority with the Bible.”
Unfortunately, both the creed book and the encyclopedia contradict the Bible.
Even if it was a historical fact that multiple churches during the time of the
Apostles practiced a certain tradition, authority for doing the same today would not
exist unless it was supported by Scripture. Could you comfortably follow a tradition of
the church of Corinth, given all its problems? How about the churches in Sardis or
Laodicea (Rev. 3:1-6, 14-22)?
If a tradition is not supported by Scripture, we must assume the Holy Spirit did
not deem it “profitable” for us (2 Tim. 3:16-17). Otherwise, we must assume that the
Holy Spirit and the Apostles were incapable of carrying out their missions.
Page 2 of 3
Jesus condemned, “Teaching as doctrines the commandments of men,” (Mk. 7:7)
and said that worship based upon the tradition of men (Mk. 7:8) as opposed to the
commandments of God was worthless (Mk. 7:7). Paul warned that we can be cheated
through, among other things, the “tradition of men” (Col. 2:8).
Why would we worship the God of the Bible in a way not mentioned in the Bible?
One who worships Christ with a tradition not authorized by Scripture is no better off
spiritually than Nadab and Abihu, who were destroyed by God for worshipping Him in
an unauthorized manner (Lev. 10:1-3). Although people who worship God as they
choose, irrespective of God’s will, do not burn today, they risk an eternity of hellfire to
come (Rev. 22:18-19). Therefore, we should call Bible things by Bible names, do Bible
things in Bible ways, and not practice unscriptural traditions of men.
Page 3 of 3