Why We Choose CBLT As Teaching Method
Why We Choose CBLT As Teaching Method
Why We Choose CBLT As Teaching Method
The reasons why our group is choosing CBLT as the guidance/method of our
teaching will be discussed below, and we will divide our explanation of our
reasons systematically as follow:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Now, Please allow us begin from the first part of our explanations of using
CBLT the method of our Language Teaching.
1. CBLT as the Theory of Language and Learning
a. Competency-Based Language Teaching (CBLT) is the functional and
interactional perspective on the nature of language (Richards &
Rodgers, 2001, p. 143) which means that language learning always
needs to be connected to the social context it is used in.
b. In Competency-Based Language Teaching (CBLT) Language is seen
as a medium of interaction and communication between people
who want to achieve specific goals and purposes (Richards &
Rodgers, 2001, p.143).
c. Competency-Based Language Teaching (CBLT) especially applies to
situations in which the learner has to fulfill a particular role with
language skills which can be predicted or determined for the
relevant context (Richards & Rodgers, 2001, p.143).
d. Competency-Based Language Teaching (CBLT)
shares
the
how well they can perform on specific learning tasks. (tells us how
well students are performing on specific course or standards rather
than just telling how their performance compare to
group of
students)
c. Competency consists of knowledge attitudes, behaviors, for reals
tasks and activities competency
d. Syllabus consists of functional topics which have subparts.
e. Not
norm
referenced-
assessment
but
criterion-referenced
assessment
f. Assessment is done through student demonstration.
3. Learning Activities suggested by CBLT
a. Competency-Based Language Teaching (CBLT) activities are realworld tasks which may be related to any domain of life (Richards
& Rodgers, 2001, p.144) but especially to survival-oriented and
work-related situations in a new environment (Richards & Rodgers,
2001, p.144)
b. Typical areas, for which such competency-based activities have
been developed, are for example Job Application, Job Interview, or
Work Schedules (Mrowicki, 1986).
c. All these areas can be described as a collection of units of
competencies which consist of specific knowledge, thinking
processes, attitudes, and perceptual and physical skills (Docking,
1994, p.11).
In short we can say that learning activities suggested by CompetencyBased Language Teaching (CBLT) are:
a) Systematically designed activities
b) Real-world task activity linked to the field of work and to social
survival
According to Auerbach (1986) there are eight key features which are essential
for Competency-Based Language Teaching:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
g. Because CBLT can point out that the business of improving learning
competencies and skills will remain one of the worlds fastest
growing industries and priorities in the future.
h. Because In CBLT language learning always connected to the social
context.
i. Because in CBLT Language is seen as a medium of interaction and
communication between people.
j. Because CBLT can fulfill particular roles with language skills
k. Because Competency-Based Language Teaching (CBLT) shares the
behaviorist view of learning that certain life encounters call for
certain kinds of language
l. Because CBLT is gaining popularity in the whole world.
References
1. Auerbach, E. R. (1986). Competency-based ESL: One step
forward or two steps back? TESOL Quarterly 20(3): 411 415.
2. Docking, R. (1994). Competency-based curricula the big
picture. Prospect 9(2): 11 15.
3. Grognet, A. G., & Crandall, J. (1982). Competency-bases curricula
in adult ESL. ERIC/CLL New Bulletin 6: 3.
4. Hornby, A. S. (2000). Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary of
Current English (Sixth Edition). Oxford: OUP.
5. Mrowicki, L. (1986). Project Work English Competency-Based
Curriculum. Portland, Oreg.: Northwest Educational Cooperative.
6. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods
in Language Teaching (Second Edition). Cambridge: CUP.
7. Rylatt, A., &Lohan, K. (1997). Creating Training Miracles. Sydney:
Prentice Hall.