Ratio Analysis of Indus and Pak Suzuki
Ratio Analysis of Indus and Pak Suzuki
Ratio Analysis of Indus and Pak Suzuki
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In the name of Allah, the most beneficent and most merciful who gave us
strength and knowledge to complete this report. This report is a part of our
course Financial Management. This has proved to be a great experience.
We would like to express our gratitude to our teacher Mr. NAZIM ABDUL
MUTALIB who gave us this opportunity to fulfill this report.
CASE
CASE
CASE
COMPANY PROFILE
CASE
CASE
CASE
CASE
Pak Suzuki Motor Company Limited was formed as a joint venture between
Pakistan Automobile Corporation and Suzuki Motor Corporation (SMC) Japan. The Company was incorporated as a public limited company in August
1983 and started commercial operations in January 1984. The initial share
holding of SMC was 12.5% which was gradually increased to 73.09%.
Pak Suzuki is pioneer in Automobile Business having the most modern and
the largest manufacturing facilities in Pakistan with an Annual production
capacity of 150,000 vehicles. The vehicles produced include cars, small vans,
Pickups, Cargo vans and Motorcycle. Pak Suzuki holds more than 50% Market
Share.
Following the aggressive policy of Indigenization, Suzuki vehicles have a
healthy local content upto 72%. This was made possible by strong support of
our vendors.
Pak Suzuki has the largest Dealers network offering 3S (Sales, Service and Spare Parts)
CASE
CASE
10
RATIO ANALYSIS
A statistic has little value in isolation. Hence, a profit figure of Rs.100 million
is meaningless unless it is related to either the firms turnover (sales
revenue) or the value of its assets. Accounting ratios attempt to highlight the
relationships between significant items in the accounts of a firm. Financial
ratios are the analysts microscope; they allow them to get a better view of
the firms financial health than just looking at the raw financial statements.
Internal uses
Planning
Evaluation of management
External uses
Credit granting
Performance monitoring
Investment decisions
Making of policies
CASE
11
CASE
12
Rati
o
Curr
ent
Rati
o
Formula
Rati
o
Curr
ent
Rati
o
Formula
CASE
Current
Assets/C
urrent
Liabilitie
s
(Rs. In
Million)
Current
Assets/C
urrent
Liabilitie
s
(Rs. In
Million)
Calcula
tion
170604
51/
554798
0
Value
2012
3.08
Calculati Value
on
2013
1837236 2.98
5/
6166119
Calculat Value
ion
2014
231075 2.53
73/
911747
9
Calcula
tion
240889
75/
103959
19
Value
2012
2.32
Calculati Value
on
2013
2218760 2.99
1/
7412684
Calculat Value
ion
2014
200383 3.35
12/
597603
4
13
3.35
3.08
2.98
3
2.5
2.99
2.53
2.32
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
The current ratio helps investors and creditors understand the liquidity of a
company and how easily that company will be able to pay off its current
liabilities. This ratio expresses a firm's current debt in terms of current
assets. So a current ratio of 4 would mean that the company has 4 times
more current assets than current liabilities.
A higher current ratio is always more favorable than a lower current ratio
because it shows the company can more easily make current debt payments.
In above year wise comparison, Current ratio of Pak Suzuki is on decreasing
trend which shows The company can find difficulty to pay its debts in future.
But on the other way, Indus motor is showing a significant trend in current
ratio.
The current ratio also sheds light on the overall debt burden of the company.
If a company is weighted down with a current debt, its cash flow will suffer.
CASE
14
QUICK RATIO
Rati
o
Quic
k
Rati
o
Formula
Rati
o
Quic
k
Formula
CASE
Quick
Assets/C
urrent
Liabilitie
s
(Rs. In
Million)
Quick
Assets/C
Calcula
tion
645933
9/
554798
0
Value
2012
1.16
Calculati Value
on
2013
7582973 1.23
/
6166119
Calculat Value
ion
2014
807846 0.89
2/
911747
7
Calcula
tion
165384
39/
Value
2012
1.59
Calculati Value
on
2013
1429349 1.93
3/
Calculat Value
ion
2014
155539 2.60
10/
15
urrent
Liabilitie
s
(Rs. In
Million)
103959
19
7412684
597603
4
Quick Ratio
3
2.6
2.5
1.93
2
1.5
1.59
1.16
1.23
0.89
1
0.5
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
The acid test ratio measures the liquidity of a company by showing its ability
to pay off its current liabilities with quick assets. If a firm has enough quick
assets to cover its total current liabilities, the firm will be able to pay off its
obligations without having to sell off any long-term or capital assets.
Higher quick ratios are more favorable for companies because it shows there
are more quick assets than current liabilities. A company with a quick ratio of
1 indicates that quick assets equal current assets. This also shows that the
company could pay off its current liabilities without selling any long-term
CASE
16
DEBT-EQUITY RATIO
Rati
o
Deb
tEqui
ty
Rati
o
CASE
Formula
Total
Debts/Sh
are
holders
Equity
(Rs. In
Million)
Calcula
tion
554798
0/
158008
84
Value
2012
0.35
Calculati Value
on
2013
6166119 0.35
/
1764515
8
17
Calculat Value
ion
2014
911747 0.47
7/
192366
82
Rati
o
Quic
k
Rati
o
Formula
Quick
Assets/C
urrent
Liabilitie
s
(Rs. In
Million)
Calcula
tion
103959
19/
170138
58
Value
2012
0.61
Calculati Value
on
2013
7412684 0.42
/
1769270
8
Calculat Value
ion
2014
597603 0.30
4/
199156
52
Debt-Equity Ratio
0.7
0.61
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.47
0.42
0.35
0.35
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
A lower debt to equity ratio usually implies a more financially stable
business. Companies with a higher debt to equity ratio are considered more
risky to creditors and investors than companies with a lower ratio. Unlike
equity financing, debt must be repaid to the lender. Since debt financing also
requires debt servicing or regular interest payments, debt can be a far more
CASE
18
Rati
o
Av.
Coll
ecti
CASE
Formula
A/c
Rec./Net
Sales
Calcula
tion
757108
/
162587
Value
2012
4.65
Calculati Value
on
2013
919206/ 6.48
141837
19
Calculat Value
ion
2014
108982 7.31
3/
149069
Per Day
(Rs. In
Million)
Rati
o
Av.
Coll
ecti
on
Peri
od
Formula
A/c
Rec./Net
Sales
Per Day
(Rs. In
Million)
Calcula
tion
141403
2/
213785
Value
2012
6.61
Calculati Value
on
2013
1730921 11.58
/
149525
Calculat Value
ion
2014
119664 7.55
1/
158510
12
10
8
6
6.61
7.31
6.48
7.55
4.65
4
2
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
The average collection period ratio measures the average number of days
clients take to pay their bills, indicating the effectiveness of the businesss
credit and collection policies. This ratio also determines if the credit terms
CASE
20
Ratio
CASE
Formul
a
Calcula
tion
Value
2012
Calculati Value
on
2013
21
Calculat Value
ion
2014
COGS/
Av.
Invent
ory
(Rs. In
Million
)
561853
97/
105621
94
5.32
4781882 4.46
0/
1072645
7
494812
48/
149760
01
Rati Formula
o
Invent COGS/
ory
Av.
Turn
Invent
Over
ory
(Rs. In
Million
)
Calcula
tion
704007
88/
752957
1
Value
2012
9.35
Calculati Value
on
2013
5797203 7.35
8/
7883309
Calculat Value
ion
2014
512700 11.47
40/
446946
0
12
9.35
10
7.35
8
6
5.32
4.46
3.3
4
2
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
CASE
Column1
22
2014
3.30
CASE
23
Ratio
Formul
a
Net
Sales/T
otal
Assets
(Rs. In
Million
)
Calcula
tion
585311
37/
213617
29
Value
2012
2.74
Calculati Value
on
2013
5106133 2.14
3/
2386043
6
Calculat Value
ion
2014
536649 1.89
47/
283941
52
Rati Formula
o
Asset Net
s Turn Sales/T
Over
otal
Assets
(Rs. In
Million
)
Calcula
tion
769626
00/
275851
61
Value
2012
2.79
Calculati Value
on
2013
6382907 2.54
5/
2512955
7
Calculat Value
ion
2014
570636 2.19
62/
260564
48
Asset
s Turn
Over
CASE
24
2.74
2.79
2.54
2.5
2.19
2.14
1.89
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
This ratio measures how efficiently a firm uses its assets to generate sales,
so a higher ratio is always more favorable. Higher turnover ratios mean the
company is using its assets more efficiently. Lower ratios mean that the
company isn't using its assets efficiently and most likely have management
or production problems.
Indus motor have high ratios than Pak Suzuki. That means It is using its
assets more efficiently than Pak Suzuki to generate sales.
Ratio
Opera
ting
CASE
Formul
a
Net
Profit/
Calcula
tion
978022
/
Value
2012
0.017
Calculati Value
on
2013
1849357 0.036
/
25
Calculat Value
ion
2014
192149 0.036
4/
Net
Sales
(Rs. In
Million
)
585311
37
Rati Formula
o
Opera Net
ting
Profit/
Profit Net
Margi Sales
n
(Rs. In
Million
)
Calcula
tion
430271
5/
769626
42
Value
2012
0.056
5106133
3
536649
47
Calculati Value
on
2013
3357445 0.053
/
6382907
5
Calculat Value
ion
2014
387354 0.068
2/
570636
22
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
Column1
Analysis
CASE
26
2014
Ratio
Net
Profit
Margi
n
CASE
Formul
a
Gross
Profit/
Net
Sales
(Rs. In
Million
)
Calcula
tion
234574
0/
585311
37
Value
2012
0.040
Calculati Value
on
2013
3242513 0.064
/
5106133
3
27
Calculat Value
ion
2014
418369 0.078
9/
536649
47
Rati Formula
o
Net
Gross
Profit Profit/
Margi Net
n
Sales
(Rs. In
Million
)
Calcula
tion
656185
4/
769626
42
Value
2012
0.085
Calculati Value
on
2013
5857037 0.092
/
6382907
5
Calculat Value
ion
2014
579358 0.102
2/
570636
22
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.02
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
Net profit margin ratio is a profitability ratio that measures how profitable a
company can sell its inventory. It only makes sense that higher ratios are
more favorable. Higher ratios mean the company is selling their inventory at
a higher profit percentage.
High ratios can typically be achieved by two ways. One way is to buy
inventory very cheap. If retailers can get a big purchase discount when they
CASE
28
Indus motor has high net profit margin ratio than Pak Suzuki.
Ratio
Formu
la
Net
Incom
e/Outs
tandin
g
Share
s
(Rs. In
Million
)
Calcula
tion
978022
/
822998
51
Value
2012
11.88
Calculati Value
on
2013
1849357 22.5
/
8229985
1
Calculat Value
ion
2014
192189 23.4
4/
822998
51
Rati Formula
o
Earnin Net
gs Per Incom
Share
e/Outs
tandin
g
Share
s
(Rs. In
Million
Calcula
tion
430271
5/
78600
Value
2012
54.74
Calculati Value
on
2013
3357545 42.72
/
78600
Calculat Value
ion
2014
387345 49.28
2/
78600
Earnin
gs Per
Share
CASE
29
54.74
49.28
47.72
50
40
30
20
23.4
22.5
11.88
10
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
Earnings per share is the same as any profitability or market prospect ratio.
Higher earnings per share is always better than a lower ratio because this
means the company is more profitable and the company has more profits to
distribute to its shareholders.
Although many investors don't pay much attention to the EPS, a higher
earnings per share ratio often makes the stock price of a company rise. Since
so many things can manipulate this ratio, investors tend to look at it but
don't let it influence their decisions drastically.
CASE
30
Ratio
Formula Calcula
tion
Dividen 205750
ds/
/
Net
978022
Income*
100
(Rs. In
Million)
Value
2012
21
Calculati Value
on
2013
329199/ 18
1849357
Calculat Value
ion
2014
411499/ 21
192189
4
Formula Calcula
tion
Divid Dividen 271520
endP ds/
0/
ayout Net
430271
Ratio Income* 5
100
(Rs. In
Million)
Value
2012
59.46
Calculati Value
on
2013
1965000 58.52
/
3357545
Calculat Value
ion
2014
231870 59.86
0/
387345
2
Divid
end
Payo
ut
Ratio
Ratio
CASE
31
60
59
58
50
40
30
20
21
21
18
10
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
Since investors want to see a steady stream of sustainable dividends from a
company, the dividend payout ratio analysis is important. A consistent trend
in this ratio is usually more important than a high or low ratio.
Since it is for companies to declare dividends and increase their ratio for one
year, a single high ratio does not mean that much. Investors are mainly
concerned with sustainable trends. For instance, investors can assume that a
company that has a payout ratio of 20 percent for the last ten years will
continue giving 20 percent of its profit to the shareholders.
Conversely, a company that has a downward trend of payouts is alarming to
investors. For example, if a company's ratio has fallen a percentage each
year for the last five years might indicate that the company can no longer
CASE
32
Rati
o
Boo
k
ROE
Formula
Calcula
tion
Net
978022
Income/S /
hare
158008
holders 84
Equity
(Rs. In
Million)
Value
2012
0.619
Calculati Value
on
2013
1849357 0.105
/
1764515
8
Calculat Value
ion
2014
192189 0.10
4/
192366
82
Rati
o
Boo
Formula
Value
2012
0.253
Calculati Value
on
2013
3357545 0.190
Calculat Value
ion
2014
387345 0.194
CASE
Net
Calcula
tion
430271
33
Income/S 5/
hare
170138
holders 58
Equity
(Rs. In
Million)
/
1769270
8
2/
199156
52
0.62
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.25
0.3
0.2
0.11
0.1
0
0.19
0.19
2012
0.1
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
Return on equity measures how efficiently a firm can use the money from
shareholders to generate profits and grow the company. Unlike other return
on investment ratios, ROE is a profitability ratio from the investor's point of
viewnot the company. In other words, this ratio calculates how much
money is made based on the investors' investment in the company, not the
company's investment in assets or something else.
That being said, investors want to see a high return on equity ratio because
this indicates that the company is using its investors' funds effectively.
CASE
34
RETURNS ON ASSETS
Rati
o
ROA
CASE
Formula
Calcula
tion
Net
978022
Income/T /
otal
213617
Assets
29
(Rs. In
Million)
Value
2012
0.046
Calculati Value
on
2013
1849357 0.076
/
2386043
6
35
Calculat Value
ion
2014
192189 0.068
4/
283941
52
Rati
o
ROA
Formula
Calcula
tion
Net
430271
Income/T 5/
otal
275851
Assets
61
(Rs. In
Million)
Value
2012
0.156
Calculati Value
on
2013
3357545 0.134
/
2512955
7
Calculat Value
ion
2014
387345 0.149
2/
280564
48
Returns on Assets
0.18
0.16
0.16
0.15
0.13
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.02
0
2012
2013
Pak Suzuki
2014
Column1
Analysis
The return on assets ratio measures how effectively a company can turn earn
a return on its investment in assets. In other words, ROA shows how
efficiently a company can covert the money used to purchase assets into net
income or profits.
CASE
36
Conclusion
After all the findings, it is concluded that financial ratios are the basic and most important
part of any business. It describes the firms financial position. As the data indicates that INDUS
MOTORS is an international brand and has expanded its business on the large geographical area
CASE
37
CASE
38
CASE
39
CASE
40
CASE
41
CASE
42
CASE
43
CASE
44