JP3 02 Amphibious Operations
JP3 02 Amphibious Operations
JP3 02 Amphibious Operations
Amphibious Operations
18 July 2014
PREFACE
1. Scope
This publication provides overarching joint doctrine to plan, conduct, and assess
amphibious operations.
2. Purpose
This publication has been prepared under the direction of the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff (CJCS). It sets forth joint doctrine to govern the activities and performance
of the Armed Forces of the United States in joint operations and provides the doctrinal basis
for US military coordination with other US Government departments and agencies during
operations and for US military involvement in multinational operations. It provides military
guidance for the exercise of authority by combatant commanders and other joint force
commanders (JFCs) and prescribes joint doctrine for operations, education, and training. It
provides military guidance for use by the Armed Forces in preparing their appropriate plans.
It is not the intent of this publication to restrict the authority of the JFC from organizing the
force and executing the mission in a manner the JFC deems most appropriate to ensure unity
of effort in the accomplishment of the overall objective.
3. Application
a. Joint doctrine established in this publication applies to the Joint Staff, commanders
of combatant commands, subunified commands, joint task forces, subordinate components of
these commands, the Services, and combat support agencies.
Preface
Intentionally Blank
ii
JP 3-02
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
REVISION OF JOINT PUBLICATION 3-02
DATED 10 AUGUST 2009
Added discussion for command and control (C2) of amphibious forces ashore.
iii
Summary of Changes
iv
Aligned planning for amphibious operations with the joint operational planning
process.
Added definitions for the following: amphibious advance force, amphibious air
traffic control center, amphibious warfare ship, and prelanding operations.
JP 3-02
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... xi
CHAPTER I
OVERVIEW OF AMPHIBIOUS OPERATIONS
CHAPTER II
COMMAND AND CONTROL
General .......................................................................................................................II-1
Table of Contents
Section D. Command and Control of Operations Ashore
Section A. Planning
Overview of the Planning Phase .............................................................................. III-2
Tenets of Amphibious Planning............................................................................... III-2
Planning Directive ................................................................................................... III-3
Planning Methods .................................................................................................... III-3
Primary Decisions .................................................................................................... III-4
Assessment ............................................................................................................. III-12
Operational Environment ....................................................................................... III-13
Movement Planning Responsibilities .................................................................... III-13
Sea Routes .............................................................................................................. III-14
Staging Areas ......................................................................................................... III-15
Sea Areas ............................................................................................................... III-15
Geographic Reference Points ................................................................................. III-18
Coordination During Passage ................................................................................ III-18
Approach to the Operational Area ......................................................................... III-18
Littoral Manuever .................................................................................................. III-19
Ship-to-Shore Movement ....................................................................................... III-20
Landing Plan .......................................................................................................... III-27
Over the Horizon.................................................................................................... III-36
Seabasing Considerations ...................................................................................... III-38
Operations in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and
Nuclear Environments ........................................................................................... III-40
Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Operations............................................. III-42
Cyberspace Operations .......................................................................................... III-43
Section B. Embarkation
vi
JP 3-02
Table of Contents
Section E. Action
Organization and Command Relationships During the Action Phase .................. III-53
Overview................................................................................................................. IV-1
Section A. Intelligence
Introduction.............................................................................................................. V-1
vii
Table of Contents
Section C. Communications
Overview................................................................................................................ V-18
GLOSSARY
Part I
Part II
viii
JP 3-02
Table of Contents
FIGURE
I-1
II-1
II-2
III-1
III-2
III-3
III-4
III-5
III-6
III-7
IV-1
V-1
V-2
V-3
V-4
C-1
ix
Table of Contents
Intentionally Blank
JP 3-02
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
COMMANDERS OVERVIEW
Amphibious operations
require the unique ability to
operate across air, land,
and sea.
Applications
Characteristics of
Amphibious Operations
xi
Executive Summary
Command and Control
The organization of the
amphibious force should be
sufficiently flexible to meet
the planned phases of the
contemplated operation and
any development that may
necessitate a change in
plan.
Command and Control (C2) The JFC establishes unity of command over AFs by either
retaining operational control (OPCON) over the Service
of Amphibious Forces
or functional component commands executing the
(AFs)
amphibious operation or by delegating OPCON or tactical
control of the AF. The JFC may also delegate this
responsibility to a subordinate commander. If the JFC
organizes along functional lines, functional component
commanders will normally exercise OPCON over their
parent Services forces and tactical control over other
Services forces attached or made available for tasking.
Depending upon the purpose and scope of the mission,
subordinate commanders that may be designated as the
CAF include the joint force maritime component
commander (JFMCC) or the commander of a naval task
force or group under the JFMCC.
AF Organization
xii
JP 3-02
Executive Summary
combat service support units. The LF may be composed
of United States Marine Corps and United States Army
forces, other US forces, and multinational forces. When
Marine Corps forces are employed as the LF, they will be
task organized into a Marine air-ground task force, the
Marine Corps principal organization for missions across
the range of military operations. The Marine air-ground
task force is functionally grouped into four core elements:
a command element, a ground combat element, an
aviation combat element (ACE), and a logistics combat
element.
C2 of Surface and
Undersea Operations
During Amphibious
Operations
C2 of Air Operations
During Amphibious
Operations
xiii
Executive Summary
Air operations conducted within the AOA are controlled
by the ATF and/or LF air staff as designated. When the
JFC establishes an AOA within the JOA, the supported
commander is responsible for all actions within the AOA.
Any joint air operations that support operations in the
AOA or would have an impact on operations in the AOA
should be controlled by, or coordinated with the CAF.
Under the ATF, the Navy tactical air control center
(Navy TACC) typically onboard the amphibious
flagship controls all air operations within the allocated
airspace regardless of mission or origin to include
supporting arms and assault breaching. The Marine
Corps tactical air command center (Marine TACC),
when established ashore, provides the facilities for the
ACE commander and staff to conduct air operations.
If the ACE is afloat, the Marine TACC may be
incrementally phased ashore. Initially, a Marine tactical
air direction center is established ashore subordinate to
the Navy TACC and is responsible for air operations in
the landward sector of the operational area. The direct air
support center is an organization within the Marine air
command and control (C2) system that serves as the
central coordination point for all direct support air
requests.
C2 of Operations Ashore
xiv
When afloat, the CLF and staff plan, direct, and monitor
the LF actions from the landing force operations center on
the ATFs flagship. When C2 is phased ashore, the LF
combat operations center assumes control from the
landing force operations center. The supporting arms
coordination center incrementally phases responsibility
for fire support coordination to the force fires
coordination center and fire support coordination center
as control is shifted ashore. Supervision of the direct air
support center transitions from the Navy TACC to the
Marine TACC as air control is passed ashore. Depending
on the type and scope of amphibious operation being
conducted, C2 may remain afloat and not transfer ashore.
Forward-deployed Marine expeditionary units conducting
small-scale operations routinely exercise C2 afloat. For
larger-scale amphibious operations, this may be more
difficult, and the CLF should consider the shipboard
limitations in communications systems and available
spaces to conduct C2 in order to determine how much of
the C2 can remain afloat and which elements of the C2
may need to transition ashore.
JP 3-02
Executive Summary
Conduct of Amphibious Operations
General Concepts for the
Conduct of Amphibious
Operations
Planning
Embarkation
Executive Summary
documents in the form of movement orders and
embarkation and loading plans.
Rehearsal is the period during which the prospective
operation is practiced to:
Rehearsals
Test the adequacy of the C2; all plans, such as ship-toshore movement, communication, naval surface fire
support; and the timing and sequence of detailed
operations.
Test the integration and combat readiness of
participating forces.
Familiarize all echelons with the plan.
Test communications and information systems.
Movement
Action
xvi
JP 3-02
Executive Summary
temporarily seize an area in order to secure information,
confuse an adversary, capture personnel or equipment, or
to destroy a capability. An amphibious demonstration is
a show of force intended to influence or deter an enemys
decision. An amphibious demonstrations intent is to
deceive the enemy, causing the enemy to select an
unfavorable course of action. An amphibious assault
involves the establishment of an LF on a hostile or
potentially hostile shore. An amphibious assault requires
the swift buildup of combat power ashore, from an initial
zero capability to full coordinated striking power as the
attack progresses toward AF objectives. The assault
begins on order after sufficient elements of the assault
echelon arrive in the operational area and specified
operational criteria for landing are met. For an assault, the
action phase ends when conditions specified in the
initiating directive are met, as recommended by the
CATF and CLF and approved by the JFC or designated
commander. Amphibious withdrawals are operations
conducted to extract forces in ships or craft from a hostile
or potentially hostile shore. They may be conducted under
enemy pressure or under operational urgency in
permissive, uncertain, or hostile environments to obtain
forces needed elsewhere or to remove forces whose
mission is completed. AFs support to crisis response
and other operations focuses on providing a rapid
response to crises, deterring war, resolving conflict,
promoting peace, and supporting civil authorities in
response to domestic crises. AFs routinely conduct
support to other operations such as security cooperation,
foreign humanitarian assistance, noncombatant
evacuation operations, peace support operations, recovery
operations, or protecting US facilities and personnel
abroad.
amphibious assault,
amphibious withdrawal,
and AF support to crisis
response and other
operations.
Intelligence
Because amphibious
operations are
xvii
Executive Summary
characterized as the most
complex and difficult of
military operations,
intelligence activities must
consider all aspects of the
operational environment
that drives timely and
informed decision making.
Fire support
Communications
Logistics
xviii
JP 3-02
Executive Summary
applicable Service component through the chain of
command as established in the initiating directive. From
the combat service support standpoint, the ship-to-shore
movement is divided into two time periods. The selective
unloading period is responsive to the requirements of LF
units. Movement of combat service support elements to
the landing beaches or landing zones closely follows the
combat elements. Normally, general unloading is
undertaken when sufficient troops and supplies have been
landed to sustain the momentum of the attack and when
areas are able to handle the incoming volume of supplies.
Protection
Seabasing
xix
Executive Summary
Intentionally Blank
xx
JP 3-02
CHAPTER I
OVERVIEW OF AMPHIBIOUS OPERATIONS
A landing on a foreign coast in the face of hostile troops has always been one of
the most difficult operations of war.
Captain Sir Basil H. Liddell Hart (1895-1970)
1. General
a. An amphibious operation is a military operation launched from the sea by an
amphibious force (AF) to conduct landing force (LF) operations within the littorals. The
littorals include those land areas (and their adjacent sea and associated air space) that are
predominantly susceptible to engagement and influence from the sea. Amphibious
operations require the unique ability to operate across air, land, and sea. Amphibious
operations require integrated command and control (C2) to achieve unity of effort, increased
speed of action, and coordinated application of sea control and power projection capabilities.
The term amphibious operation has often stirred visions of wave upon wave of amphibious
assault vehicles (AAVs) and landing craft approaching a well-defended beach in straight
lines, such as those well-known amphibious assaults that were necessary in World War II.
While those amphibious assaults are a matter of historical record, they are not the only, or
even the most likely form of amphibious operations. AFs have and continue to conduct
operations as a part of larger military operations in permissive, uncertain, and hostile
environments. Current AFs are more operationally maneuverable with the ability to launch
from over the horizon (OTH), and, in some cases, proceed directly to the objective by air and
surface means.
b. An AF is an amphibious task force (ATF) and LF together with other forces that are
trained, organized, and equipped for amphibious operations. An ATF is a Navy task
organization formed to conduct amphibious operations. This may include various
combinations of Navy, Military Sealift Command (MSC), and Maritime Administration
assets. An LF is a Marine Corps or Army task organization formed to conduct amphibious
operations. An AF is a self-deploying, self-sustaining, combined arms team capable of
conducting simultaneous, disparate, geographically dispersed or concentrated operations.
c. Effective C2 of amphibious operations is complicated by the nature of the
operational environment, the integration of disparate forces with different but supporting
tasks, and the coordination required to optimize supporting forces. AFs and amphibious
operations, no matter their makeup or application, are complex, and inherently joint.
d. The ability to operate within the maritime domain, conduct operations from OTH,
dynamically size and organize the force, and limit reliance on infrastructure ashore allows
amphibious operations to be conducted during any phase of a larger joint operation or
campaign.
I-1
Chapter I
e. Sustainment of AF, especially the LF during the earliest stages of execution, is
complex and presents unique planning considerations for commanders and their staffs.
f. Amphibious operations are generally categorized into five types: raid, demonstration,
assault, withdrawal, and AF support to crisis response and other operations.
2. Applications
a. Amphibious operations use maneuver principles to transition ready-to-fight combat
forces from the sea to the shore in order to achieve a position of advantage over the enemy.
During combat operations, maneuver, in conjunction with fires (organic and supporting), is
essential to gaining access where the enemy least expects it. It provides a position of
advantage in order to destroy or seriously disrupt the enemys cohesion through a variety of
rapid, focused, and unexpected actions that create a turbulent and rapidly deteriorating
situation with which the enemy cannot cope. In noncombat situations, the AF projects
appropriate forces and resources ashore to provide the most timely and effective support.
Certain amphibious operations (e.g., assaults and raids) seek to exploit the element of
surprise and capitalize on enemy weakness by projecting and applying combat power
precisely at the most advantageous location and time. Other types of amphibious operations
may be conducted more deliberately with an intent of making various audiences aware of
intended actions (e.g., demonstrations and crisis response and other operations).
b. The ability to conduct amphibious operations from the sea, without the requirement
for diplomatic clearance or host-nation support, provides the joint force commander (JFC)
with flexible and sustainable options. Additionally, the ability to conduct OTH operations
enhances security, aids force protection efforts, provides additional maneuver space, and
improves the ability to achieve surprise. Conducted alone, or in conjunction with other
military operations, amphibious operations can be designed to support a number of JFC
objectives as characterized by the five types of amphibious operations.
3. Types of Amphibious Operations
a. Amphibious Raid. An amphibious raid is a type of amphibious operation involving
swift incursion into or temporary occupation of an objective followed by a planned
withdrawal. Amphibious raids may be conducted to temporarily seize an area in order to
secure information, confuse an adversary, capture personnel or equipment, or to destroy a
capability. They may also be executed in conjunction with a larger JFC mission to defeat
specific enemy centers of gravity (COGs).
b. Amphibious Demonstration. An amphibious demonstration is a show of force
where a decision is not sought and no contact with the adversary is intended. A
demonstrations intent is to deceive the adversary, causing the adversary to select an
unfavorable course of action (COA). For the JFC, an amphibious demonstration may serve
as a supporting operation in a campaign in order to deny the use of areas or facilities to the
enemy or to fix enemy forces and attention in or on a specific area. It can also be used to
demonstrate the capability and resolve of the joint or combined force, thus reinforcing
diplomatic efforts to ease tensions and maintain regional security.
I-2
JP 3-02
I-3
Chapter I
amphibious operation to establish the level of maritime and air superiority necessary for the
amphibious operation to occur. The JFC or JFMCC may employ a support force, which is a
temporary organization comprised of initial and crisis response forces and SOF in the AO,
which assist in preparing the AO for amphibious operations by conducting operations such
as surveillance and reconnaissance, beach studies, military deception (MILDEC), seizure of
supporting positions, mine countermeasures (MCM), preliminary bombardment, underwater
demolitions, and air interdiction. Integration of other Service components and SOF will
enable complementary supporting operations. An AF, in conjunction with other joint assets,
must have the capacity to continuously support forces ashore during all phases of an
amphibious operation.
c. AFs are task organized based on the mission. AFs routinely deploy with similar
task organizations and can be quickly reinforced or augmented with other assets. No
standard organization is applicable to all situations that may be encountered in an
amphibious operation. The C2 capabilities of the ATF and LF facilitate the accomplishment
of multiple and diverse missions and the integration of joint and multinational forces.
d. Unity of Effort. The inherent complexity of amphibious operations normally
requires the JFCs personal attention and timely decisions for numerous planning,
integration, and support activities to achieve unity of effort. Regardless of the command
relationship between commander, amphibious task force (CATF) and commander, landing
force (CLF), all commanders require shared intelligence, a shared understanding of the
operational environment, a common operational picture, understanding of the JFCs intent,
and open communications between the staffs. The effects of modern weapons and sensors
can extend hundreds of miles both seaward and landward, further highlighting the need for
closely integrated application of capabilities throughout the operational area. The JFC or
JFMCC should integrate all of the naval assets such as strike, undersea warfare, and surface
warfare (SUW) while at the same time coordinating the joint capabilities required for an
amphibious operation. In addition, commanders of theater special operations commands and
Navy and Marine Corps component commanders should also establish complementary
relationships that support amphibious operations.
5. Capabilities
a. AFs can be tailored and scaled to support a specific mission or situation and
repositioned to respond to a changing situation or modification of the concept of operations
(CONOPS). AFs can alleviate unnecessary political and logistical burdens on host nations
by operating from the sea base and reducing the footprint ashore. This adaptability and
versatility allows additional options for the JFC that do not limit the activities of the other
components.
b. AFs can operate in a wide variety of terrain, weather conditions, and environments,
to include chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) environments.
c. Routinely forward-deployed AFs provide the JFC with a force proficient in timesensitive planning and capable of rapid response in crisis situations. They can perform a
I-4
JP 3-02
I-5
Chapter I
the continental United States. While a forward-deployed AF accommodates the most likely
missions to be encountered during deployment, surged AFs typically conduct planning and
embarkation for a specific mission and may include compensating for any capability
shortfalls in the forward-deployed AFs.
8. Phases of an Amphibious Operation
Amphibious operations generally follow distinct phases, though the sequence may vary.
The phases are planning, embarkation, rehearsal, movement, and action (PERMA) (see
Figure I-1).
a. While planning occurs throughout the entire operation, it normally dominates staff
actions prior to embarkation. Successive phases bear the title of the dominant activity taking
place within the phase and are covered in more detail later in the text.
b. When AFs are forward deployed, or when subsequent tasks are assigned upon
completion of the original mission, the sequence of phases may differ. This sequence
accounts for the new mission, reconstitution of forces, and initial cross-decking of staff
components or forces to support planning, preparation, and future actions. This sequence
flows from embarkation, through planning, rehearsal, movement to the operational area, and
ends with action. An amphibious operation could be planned or executed within any of the
six phases of a major operation or campaign as discussed in JP 3-0, Joint Operations, and JP
5-0, Joint Operation Planning.
9. Terminating an Amphibious Operation
The criteria for how and when to terminate amphibious operations are discussed during
operational design. The termination of the amphibious operation is predicated on the
accomplishment of the amphibious mission per the specific conditions contained in the
initiating directive. Upon completion of the amphibious operation, the establishing
authority will provide direction for retasking or reassignment of the AF.
I-6
JP 3-02
Embarkation
The embarkation phase is the period during which the landing force with its equipment
and supplies, embark in assigned shipping. The landing plan and the scheme of
maneuver ashore will influence which staffs and units are embarked on which ships,
the number and type of landing craft that will be embarked, and how the units will be
phased ashore. The organization for embarkation needs to provide for flexibility to
support changes to the original plan. The extent to which changes in the landing plan
can be accomplished may depend on the ability to reconfigure embarked forces.
Rehearsal
The rehearsal phase is the period during which the prospective operation is
rehearsed to:
Test the adequacy of plans, timing of detailed operations, and combat readiness
of participating forces.
Provide time for all echelons to become familiar with plans.
Test communications and information systems.
Rehearsal may consist of an actual landing or may be conducted as a command
post exercise.
Movement
The movement phase is the period during which various elements of the amphibious
force move from points of embarkation or from a forward-deployed position to the
operational area. This move may be via rehearsal, staging, or rendezvous areas. The
movement phase is completed when the various elements of the amphibious force
arrive at their assigned positions in the operational area.
Action
The action phase is the period from the arrival of the amphibious force in the
operational area, through the accomplishment of the mission and the termination of the
amphibious operation.
I-7
Chapter I
Intentionally Blank
I-8
JP 3-02
CHAPTER II
COMMAND AND CONTROL
1. General
a. The organization of the AF should be sufficiently flexible to meet the planned phases
of the contemplated operation and any development that may necessitate a change in plan.
Sound organization provides for unity of effort through unity of command, centralized
planning and direction, and decentralized execution.
Refer to JP 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States, for more details on joint
force organization.
b. All joint forces include Service component commands that provide administrative
and logistic support. The JFC may conduct operations through the Service component
commanders or, at lower echelons, Service force commanders. This relationship is
appropriate when stability, continuity, economy, ease of long-range planning, and scope of
operations dictate organizational integrity of Service forces for conducting operations. The
JFC has full authority to assign missions, redirect efforts, and direct coordination among
subordinate commanders. The JFC should allow Service tactical and operational assets and
groupings to function generally as they were designed with the intent being to meet the
requirements of the JFC while maintaining the tactical and operational integrity of the
Service organizational structure.
c. JFCs may decide to establish a functional component command to integrate
planning; reduce JFC span of control; and significantly improve combat efficiency,
information flow, unity of effort, weapon systems management, component interaction, or
control over the scheme of maneuver.
d. The commander, amphibious force (CAF) is the officer in overall command of an
amphibious operation. The CATF and CLF are subordinate commanders to the CAF. The
terms CATF and CLF are used throughout this publication solely to clarify the doctrinal
duties and responsibilities of these commanders. CATF is the Navy officer designated in the
initiating directive as the commander of the ATF. CLF is the officer designated in the
initiating directive as the commander of the LF for an amphibious operation. During
operations, amphibious commanders may be referred to by either their operational command
titles (e.g., amphibious squadron and Marine expeditionary unit [MEU] commanders) or
assigned task force designators (e.g., Commander, Task Force 62.1).
II-1
Chapter II
e. Command relationships during multinational operations are based on international
standardization agreements or on bilateral agreements between nations and will be defined in
the initiating directive.
Refer to JP 3-16, Multinational Operations, and Allied Tactical Publication-8, Doctrine for
Amphibious Operations, for more information on North Atlantic Treaty Organization
amphibious operations.
SECTION A. COMMAND AND CONTROL OF AMPHIBIOUS FORCES
2. Overview
The JFC achieves unity of effort in pursuit of amphibious objectives by
establishing unity of command over AFs. The JFC establishes unity of command over
AFs by either retaining operational control (OPCON) over the Service or functional
component commands executing the amphibious operation or by delegating OPCON or
tactical control (TACON) of the AF. The JFC may remain the common superior to the
CATF and CLF, thereby directly performing the role as the CAF. The JFC may also
delegate this responsibility to a subordinate commander. Depending upon the purpose and
scope of the mission, subordinate commanders that may be designated as the CAF include
the JFMCC or the commander of a naval task force or group under the JFMCC. If, and when
delegated, forces, not command relationships, are transferred between commanders. When
forces are transferred, the command relationship that the gaining commander will exercise
(and the losing commander will relinquish) over those forces must be specified.
a. The JFC will organize the AF in such a way as to best accomplish the mission based
on the CONOPS.
b. The command relationships established between the CATF and CLF and other
designated commanders are important decisions. The relationship chosen by the common
superior commander, or establishing authority, between the CATF, CLF, and other
designated commanders should be based on the mission, nature and duration of the
operation, force capabilities, operational environment, and recommendations from
subordinate commanders. While the full range of command relationship options as outlined
in JP 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States, is available; in amphibious
operations, Service component commanders normally retain OPCON of their respective
forces. If the JFC organizes along functional lines, functional component commanders will
normally exercise OPCON over their parent Services forces and TACON over other
Services forces attached or made available for tasking.
(1) Typically a support relationship is established between the commanders
and is based on the complementary rather than similar nature and capabilities of the
ATF and LF. However, it is not the intent to limit the common superiors authority to
establish either an OPCON or TACON command relationship.
(2) Support is a command authority. This relationship is appropriate when one
organization should aid, protect, complement, or sustain another force. The designation of
II-2
JP 3-02
II-3
Chapter II
Supported Commander
Assault
CLF
Demonstration
CATF
Withdrawal
CATF or CLF
Legend
CATF
CLF
ensuring that the supported and supporting commanders understand the degree of authority
that the supported commander is granted.
(a) If not specified in the initiating directive, the CATF and CLF will
determine who has primary responsibility for the essential tasks during mission analysis in
the planning process.
(b) In an operation of relatively short duration, the establishing authority will
normally choose one commander as supported for the entire operation.
(c) When there is no littoral threat to the ATF the establishing authority may
designate the CLF as the supported commander for the entire operation.
(d) During the movement phase, the CATF may be designated the supported
commander based on having responsibility for the major action or activity during that phase.
The CATF may be designated the supported commander based on capabilities for airspace
control and the CLFs air defense for the entire operation if, for example, the LF does not
intend to establish a Marine Corps tactical air command center (Marine TACC) ashore.
(e) Considerations for shifts in the support relationship include, but are not
limited to the following:
1. Responsibility for the preponderance of the mission.
2. Force capabilities.
II-4
JP 3-02
Chapter II
tasks required to meet the operational requirements. The largest ATF to conduct an
amphibious operation would be led by a fleet commander. This could be an amphibious
assault using amphibious warfare ships from both coasts, or an amphibious assault against a
powerful enemy. A mid-size ATF would be led by an expeditionary strike group (ESG). A
small ATF could be led by an amphibious ready group (ARG) commander, and a single ship
could also serve as an ATF conducting theater security cooperation or other operations.
(1) Navy forces that are part of the ATF or support the ATF may include:
(a) ARGs. Forward-deployed ATFs are normally organized into ARGs with
three amphibious warfare ships (an amphibious assault ship (general purpose)
[LHA]/amphibious assault ship (multipurpose) [LHD], amphibious transport dock [LPD],
and dock landing ship [LSD]). These ships, each with its flight deck and well deck (with the
exception of LHA-6 and LHA-7), can, or will be able to embark, deploy, and land elements
of an LF in an assault by tiltrotor aircraft, helicopters, landing craft, amphibious vehicles,
and by combinations of these methods. An ESG may be formed to provide additional
amphibious warfare expertise and advocacy in the event of more complex operations. ESGs
are prepared to provide a deployable, scalable, flag officer led command element (CE) with
task organized naval forces to fulfill CCDR and fleet commander operational requirements
up to Marine expeditionary brigade (MEB)-sized amphibious operations. ESGs may be
supported by other forces (e.g., antisubmarine warfare [ASW] platforms or SUW platforms)
based on mission and CCDR requirements.
1. The LHD and LHA each has a full length flight deck and hangar to
support helicopter, tiltrotor, and vertical/short take-off and landing aircraft. Well decks
provide for ship-to-shore movement of landing craft and AAVs. The CATF and CLF and
their staffs are normally embarked on these ships.
2. The LPD lands troops, equipment, and supplies using landing craft,
AAVs operating from its well deck, and helicopters operating from its flight deck.
3. The LSD lands troops, equipment, and supplies using landing craft and
AAVs using its well deck. It has the ability to render limited docking and repair services to
small boats and craft.
(b) Movement Group(s). Composition of these groups includes amphibious
warfare ships from the assault echelon (AE), assault follow-on echelon (AFOE) shipping and
follow-up shipping and, if employed, pre-positioning forces.
(c) Control Group(s). Personnel, ships, and craft designated to control the
waterborne ship-to-shore movement.
(d) Navy Tactical Air Control Group. A ship-borne organization
established to operate a Navy tactical air control center (Navy TACC) and a tactical air
direction center (TADC) for control of air operations within the AOA or operational area.
(e) Surface Fire Support Group(s). Surface combatants assigned to the ATF
to provide surface fire support of the assault landings and LF operations ashore.
II-6
JP 3-02
Chapter II
forces. If LF capabilities are required by the CATF, the CLF will make decisions as to the
appropriate LF capabilities to be made available TACON to the CATF. If USA forces
comprise part of the LF, they will be task organized with appropriate combat and
sustainment capabilities to support the LF. Army forces may provide intratheater ship-toshore transport to include landing craft, cargo handling, logistics, traffic control, and
engineering capabilities. When Marine Corps forces are employed as the LF, they will be
task organized into a Marine air-ground task force (MAGTF), the Marine Corps principal
organization for missions across the range of military operations. The MAGTF is
functionally grouped into four core elements: a CE, a ground combat element (GCE), an
aviation combat element (ACE), and a logistics combat element (LCE). The basic structure
of the MAGTF never varies, but the number, size, and type of Marine Corps units
comprising each of the four elements are mission dependent.
(1) Organizations that can be assigned as LF include the Marine expeditionary
force (MEF), MEB, MEU, and in some cases, a special purpose Marine air-ground task force
(SPMAGTF).
(a) MEF. A MEF is the largest MAGTF and is the Marine Corps principal
warfighting organization. The size and composition of a deployed MEF can vary greatly
depending on the requirements of the mission. A MEF is normally built around a GCE
infantry division, a Marine aircraft wing, and a Marine logistics group; the largest respective
Marine Corps ground, air, or logistic units. A MEF is capable of missions across the full
range of military operations, including amphibious assault and sustained operations
ashore in any environment. It can operate from a sea base, land base, or both, and typically
deploys with more than 45,000 personnel with up to 60 days of sustainment. The ACE
consists of a Marine aircraft wing with fixed-wing, rotary-wing, and tiltrotor groups. The
LCE is a combat logistics force that is organized to provide the full range of CSS to the
MEF. The MEF headquarters can serve as a joint task force (JTF) headquarters. When
operating as part of a JTF, the MEF commander can operate as a functional component
commander. MEFs are capable of self-sustained forcible entry to overcome challenges to
access. It can seize and hold beachheads, airfields, and ports to enable the introduction of
follow-on forces. The MEF can then remain in theater to conduct the full range of military
operations in support of the joint operation or campaign.
(b) MEB. The MEB is a tailorable and scalable mid-sized MAGTF that is
typically led by a one-star general officer. It is normally built around a GCE of a reinforced
infantry regiment. The ACE consists of a Marine aircraft group with fixed-wing, rotarywing, and tiltrotor squadrons. The LCE is a combat logistics regiment that is organized to
provide the full range of CSS to the MEB. A MEB is capable of deployment and
employment via amphibious warfare ships and intratheater airlift and sealift. It can operate
by itself with a self-sustainment capability of 30 days. It may include up to 19,000 personnel
with up to 30 days of supply (DOS). The MEB can conduct forcible entry operations. The
MEB is designed to aggregate with other MEBs, MEUs, and other pre-positioning force
assets to fight as the MEF.
(c) MEU. A MEU is organized as a MAGTF with approximately 2,400
Marines and Sailors and consists of a CE, a reinforced infantry battalion, a reinforced
II-8
JP 3-02
II-9
Chapter II
communications equipment, are normally spread-loaded in order to ensure loss of a single
platform does not equate to a complete loss of particular capability. Individuals or small
units may be attached to a team only for landing and, once ashore, detach to perform their
specialized tasks. Sound planning, well-established unit standard operating procedures, and
effective rehearsals are essential to ensuring that landing teams can rapidly transition into the
organization for the LF mission.
(c) Organization for Embarkation. Based on information provided by the
CATF about the available ships, the CLF determines the organization for embarkation. The
CLF is normally embarked on the flagship with the CATF in order to promote effective
coordination during subsequent phases of the operation. Similarly, for larger operations
subordinate echelons within the LF are embarked in the corresponding groups and squadrons
of the ATF, with subordinate commanders within the LF embarked on the same ships as their
opposite numbers from the ATF. Just as key resources are spread-loaded in the organization
for landing, the same principle applies to the organization for embarkation. Even if the
organization for the LF mission calls for them to be employed in larger formations, units
with a high equipment density, such as artillery, armor, and light armored reconnaissance,
will normally be sub-divided into smaller elements and assigned to regimental landing teams
and BLTs for embarkation and landing. This is done so that the loss of a single ship does not
result in catastrophic loss of LF capability.
For more information see Chapter III, Conduct of Amphibious Operations, Section B,
Embarkation, and JP 3-02.1, Amphibious Embarkation and Debarkation.
(3) In amphibious operations, the LF may potentially transfer from the JFMCC to
the joint force land component commander as the operation progresses; however, the CATF
and CLF supporting relationship may remain with the amphibious warfare ships acting as a
sea base. An example of this is Task Force-58 during Operation ENDURING FREEDOM in
which the ATF remained under the JFMCC and the LF transitioned to the joint force land
component commander after land operations in Afghanistan commenced.
(4) LF control organizations, which may be temporary and situational dependent,
formed to support amphibious operations include: the tactical-logistical (TACLOG) group
and the landing force support party (LFSP) for ship-to-shore movement; the beach operations
group (BOG), the port operations group (POG), and the arrival airfield control group
(AACG); and the Marine TACC.
d. Other Forces. Amphibious operations are often supported by other forces that are
not part of the AF. These forces will serve for specific tasks, such as help in amphibious
advance force operations, protecting the AF or shaping the operational environment.
Supporting naval and air resources, as well as SOF, are assigned by the JFC or appropriate
component commander to support the mission of the AF (and LF, when landed) during the
amphibious operation. The support request may be originated by CATF or CLF. The
initiating directive should provide the relationships of these forces with the AF. CATF or
CLF will exercise coordination and control, as prescribed in the initiating directive, over
forces not a part of the AF when such forces are operating within the AOA after the arrival
of the amphibious advance force or the main body. When such forces are merely passing
II-10
JP 3-02
II-11
Chapter II
SECTION B. COMMAND AND CONTROL OF SURFACE AND UNDERSEA
OPERATIONS DURING AMPHIBIOUS OPERATIONS
5. Command and Control of Surface Forces
The sea combat commander, when assigned, plans, directs, monitors, and assesses SUW
and ASW tasks to protect the force from surface and subsurface threats during AF movement
to the AOA and as the LF transitions to and from the landing area. If a sea combat
commander is not assigned, the duties may be assigned to separate SUW and ASW
commanders. The mine warfare commander (MIWC) has similar responsibility for threats
from naval mines. The officer in tactical command (OTC) determines who will be
assigned to these positions; they may not be assigned within the AF. The surface warfare
commander (SUWC) is responsible to the CWC for protection of the force against surface
threats. The SUWC collects, evaluates, and disseminates SUW surveillance information and
plans and manages the employment of SUW forces. SUW forces include air, surface, and
subsurface naval and assigned joint operational elements that are capable of executing SUW
tasks. US Navy ships are multi-mission and may be assigned primary missions other than
SUW. Other joint force assets may be tasked to participate in the SUW mission and may
function in both supported and supporting roles.
For more information on SUW operations, see NWP 3-20, Navy Surface Warfare Manual.
6. Command and Control of Antisubmarine Warfare Forces
a. ASW missions will be centrally planned, typically under the direction of the JFMCC
or a Navy component commander, and executed in a decentralized manner in support of the
JFCs CONOPS. ASW is extremely complex, requiring the coordination and integration of
multiple platforms and systems in order to mitigate the risks posed by enemy submarines.
b. The theater ASW commander is normally designated as a task force or task group
commander subordinate to a Navy component commander or JFMCC. The theater ASW
commander supports other maritime commanders (i.e., CATF) in the conduct of tactical
ASW to defend the AF and typically provides ASW support to afloat forces as they transit
through the joint operations area (JOA) and while they operate in the AOA.
For more information on ASW, see NTTP 3-21.1, Antisubmarine Warfare Commanders
Manual.
7. Command and Control of Naval Mine Warfare Forces
a. Naval MIW in support of amphibious operations includes both the employment of
naval mines by friendly forces and the use of air, surface, and underwater platforms to
conduct MCM and remove or reduce the enemy mine threat to friendly AF. The MIWC is
responsible for all aspects of MIW. The mine countermeasures commander (MCMC) is
responsible for all MCM forces, and is usually subordinate to the MIWC. Normally, both of
these commanders will be assigned to support amphibious operations. However, in smallerscale operations, or where the use of friendly mines is not anticipated, the MCMC can also
act as the MIWC.
II-12
JP 3-02
II-13
Chapter II
(a) Central Control Officer (CCO). This Navy officer is normally located
aboard the CATFs flagship to coordinate all surface ship-to-shore movement. If there is
only one colored beach, there is no need for a CCO and thus, the primary control officer
(PCO) will work directly for the CATF. The CCO:
1. Plans and supervises the surface ship-to-shore movement.
2. Organizes the Navy control group to best support the landing plan.
3. Maintains liaison with the tactical air officer (TAO).
4. Maintains liaison with the TACLOG group.
(b) PCO. The PCO is embarked in a primary control ship assigned to control
the movement of the landing craft and amphibious vehicles. A PCO is assigned for each
colored landing beach to:
1. Provide detailed plans, called primary control ship intentions message,
to conduct the ship-to-shore movement for amphibious operations across a colored beach no
later than 48 hours prior to the activity.
2. Coordinate landing craft operations within a designated area following
the initial action.
3. Maintain the current location and status of ships, landing craft, and
boats assigned to conduct a landing on a colored beach.
4. Monitor surf and weather conditions and recommend the termination of
boat operations should conditions warrant.
5. Maintain the status of debarkation or embarkation.
6. Land scheduled waves at the colored beach at the specified time.
7. Arrange for fueling boats and provide rest and food for boat crews.
8. Provide liaison to the surface-borne TACLOG group detachment.
9. Conduct landing craft or amphibious vehicle salvage operations.
(c) Secondary Control Officer. When designated, the secondary control
officer embarks in the secondary control ship and is the principal assistant to the PCO. The
secondary control officers primary duty is to assume PCO duties in an emergency or if the
PCO has to go off-station. The secondary control officer will maintain duplicate control
records and plots required of the PCO and monitor PCO radio circuits.
Detailed description and use of these control measures can be found in NTTP 302.1M/Marine Corps Warfighting Publication (MCWP) 3-31.5, Ship-to-Shore Movement.
II-14
JP 3-02
II-15
Chapter II
then issued to the joint air operations center for execution. Beyond the AFs organic air
requirements, AF air planners support the JFACCs ATO and the air operations directive
with excess sorties passed to the establishing authority for tasking. Likewise, the air
operations directive is used to deconflict and coordinate organic sorties and by the theater air
control system for overall control of AF assets.
For more information, see JP 3-30, Command and Control for Joint Air Operations.
10. Defensive Counterair
a. The AADC bears overall responsibility for air defense activities of the joint
force, to include defense from missile threats. The AADC may designate subordinate
regional air defense commanders (RADC) for specific geographic regions to accomplish the
joint force mission. Additionally, sector air defense commanders (SADCs) may be
designated within and subordinate to RADCs. The RADC is normally established within
the ATF organization and is responsible for the airspace allocated for amphibious
operations, including but not limited to the AOA (if established). The CATF coordinates
joint air requirements in support of active defense plans and procedures with the AADC.
The CATF usually assigns an air and missile defense commander (AMDC), normally located
on the most capable air defense platform, to carry out air and missile defense operations.
The AMDC coordinates with the Navy TACC to maintain a current air picture.
b. When an AOA is established, the airspace assigned to the AF usually includes a
margin of airspace surrounding the AOA called the amphibious defense zone (ADZ).
An ADZ is the area encompassing the AOA and the adjoining airspace required by
accompanying naval forces for the purpose of air defense. The actual size and shape of an
ADZ is dependent on the capabilities of air defense platforms assigned to the CATF; the size
of the AOA; and agreement between the AFs RADC, the AADC, and adjacent AMDCs.
Within the ADZ, the appropriate AF air defense agency (RADC, SADC) maintains positive
identification of all aircraft and conducts air defense with the authority to engage in
accordance with established rules of engagement (ROE) and AADC established procedures.
c. Planning Considerations
(1) A coherent air defense plan requires commanders to conduct coordinated
planning with all supporting and adjacent commanders and the JFC to establish a robust C2
arrangement. Effective air defense operations require a control system that functions despite
a high volume of friendly aircraft operations within the operational area and the difficult
overland target detection environment present in amphibious operations.
(2) The area air defense plan is written with detailed engagement procedures that
are consistent with the airspace control plan (ACP) and operations in the AOA. The
geographic arrangement of weapons and the location of specific types of air defense
operations, as well as specific procedures for identification of aircraft, are important factors
to include in planning.
(3) The designated commander will request the airspace coordinating measures
(ACMs) to be included in the establishing directive (for a support relationship) or CONOPS.
II-16
JP 3-02
II-17
Chapter II
(8) At a minimum, the AOA or HIDACZ should cover the ATFs landing area and
extend inland to the LFs objectives, which may be beyond the fire support coordination line.
Additionally, the AOA or HIDACZ should be large enough to accommodate the flow of
aircraft into and out of the amphibious operations airspace.
(9) Range and maximum ordinate of joint force ground based artillery, rocket, and
mortar systems.
d. Under the ATF, the Navy TACC typically onboard the amphibious flagship
controls all air operations within the allocated airspace regardless of mission or origin to
include supporting arms and assault breaching. Regardless of where actual airspace control
is exercised, close and continuous coordination between airspace control and air defense
agencies is essential. Emphasis will be placed on simple, flexible air traffic control plans.
AFs operating in a nonradar environment will rely exclusively on procedural control.
Amphibious air control plans employ a combination of positive and procedural control
methods.
(1) Positive Airspace Control. Positive airspace control uses radar; electronic
warfare (EW) support; identification, friend or foe; selective identification feature; visual
means; digital data links; and elements of the air defense network communications system to
positively identify, track, and direct air assets.
(2) Procedural Airspace Control. Procedural controls supplement those methods
utilized in positive airspace control. Procedural control will be used when electronic or
visual identification, tracking, or communication means are unavailable or inadequate to
provide positive airspace control. Procedural airspace control relies on a combination of
previously agreed on and promulgated orders and procedures.
e. To facilitate unity of effort and minimal interference along adjacent boundaries, the
AF air control agency coordinates the items listed in Figure II-2 with the ACA. The JFMCC
may be designated the control authority for a specific airspace control area or sector for the
accomplishment of a specific mission and can thus establish ACMs in the AOA without
further coordination. Assignment of airspace allows the JFC to exercise C2 of forces,
Coordination Responsibilities
II-18
JP 3-02
The air traffic control section provides initial safe passage, radar control, and surveillance for
close air support aircraft in the operational area.
II-19
Chapter II
of ACMs and controls all air operations within the operational area for the duration of
the operation or until an air control agency is established ashore. Once a land-based air
control agency receives control of all LF air operations, the Navy TACC may become a
TADC supporting the land-based air control agency. The Navy TACC has five sections,
four of which control and integrate aircraft.
a. Air Traffic Control Section (ATCS). The ATCS is located in the Navy TACC and
provides initial safe passage, radar control, and surveillance for close air support (CAS)
aircraft and all other aircraft entering, operating within, or traversing the amphibious
airspace. It coordinates search and rescue operations and can provide early detection,
identification, and warning of aircraft. The ATCS also controls and routes rotary-wing CAS
aircraft and assault support aircraft and coordinates with the amphibious air traffic control
center (AATCC) onboard the large-deck amphibious warfare ship(s) during amphibious
operations. In amphibious operations, the AATCC is the primary direct control agency for
the helicopter and tiltrotor aircraft group/unit commanders operating under the overall
control of the Navy TACC.
b. Helicopter Coordination Section (HCS). The HCS coordinates rotary-wing air
operations with the AATCC in the ATF. HCS tasks are to:
(1) Coordinate assault support requests.
(2) Coordinate ship-to-shore movements.
(3) Resolve conflicts in rotary-wing tasking.
c. Air Support Coordination Section (ASCS). The ASCS provides quick reaction to
satisfy requests from the LF for CAS. It is located in the supporting arms coordination
center (SACC) and is the section of the Navy TACC designated to coordinate, control, and
integrate all direct support aircraft (i.e., CAS) and assault support operations. The SACC is a
single location on board an LHA or LHD in which all communication facilities incident to
the coordination of fire support from artillery, air, and NSFS are centralized. This is the
Navy counterpart to the fire support coordination center (FSCC) utilized by the LF.
d. Air Defense Section (ADS). The ADS, located in the Navy TACC, provides early
detection, identification, and warning of enemy aircraft and through liaison with the air
defense commanders receives missile warning information. The ADS provides the CATF
and CLF (until the CLF establishes a SADC or RADC) an oversight and coordination staff
for the conduct of offensive and defensive air defense.
e. Plans, Execution, and Support Section. The plans cell participates in targeting
effort as air operations subject matter experts through the targeting board. The sections
planning coincides with the ATO process. The section forwards excess air sorties and air
support requests to the establishing authority for tasking and allocation. The input from the
targeting board is processed by the ATO planning, production, and execution cell. This cell
normally produces the following amphibious products: the ACO, the ATO, SPINS, and
additional fire support asset requests. If the Navy TACC is acting as the joint air operations
II-20
JP 3-02
Chapter II
and missile defense. It also provides safe passage, radar control, and surveillance for CAS
aircraft en route to and from target areas. Until the Marine TADC or Marine TACC is
established ashore, the TAOC normally reports to the Navy TACC. The TAOC, or elements
thereof, typically deploy with the land elements of a MEB or a MEF. The TAOCs
capabilities incrementally increase as the size of the land force component increases.
17. Air Command and Control Procedures and Coordination
The air C2 procedures described below are frequently associated with an established
AOA or operational area.
a. Pre-D-Day Operations. Prior to the commencement of amphibious operations,
airspace control and air defense operations throughout the operational area will be the
direct responsibility of the ACA and AADC, respectively, as designated by the JFC.
Control is exercised through the designated air control agency. Subordinate TADCs, as
designated, monitor air control circuits in readiness to assume all or part of the duties of the
air control agency.
b. Amphibious Advance Forces. An amphibious advance force is a temporary
organization within the AF, which precedes the main body to the AOA or operational area.
Its function is to participate in preparing the objective for the main assault by conducting
such operations as reconnaissance, seizure of supporting positions, MCM, preliminary
bombardment, underwater demolitions, and air interdiction. If amphibious advance force
operations are conducted in the AOA or operational area, the designated commander
normally exercises air C2 through an amphibious advance force commander. The
amphibious advance force commander controls air operations in the designated area through
an air control agency tailored and trained for the mission. CATF typically assumes
responsibility for local airspace control and air defense operations on arrival of the AF in the
AOA or operational area.
c. Control of Attack Groups. An attack group is a subordinate task organization to an
ATF formed for operations in widely separated landing areas. The attack group is composed
of units designated to transport, protect, land, and initially support a landing group. The
CATF normally delegates authority for control of airspace and air operations in the
immediate area surrounding the respective landing areas to each attack group
commander. The attack group commander exercises control through a local air control and
defense agency consisting of airborne elements, an escorting surface combatant, or a TADC
on the appropriate attack group ship. Overall direction of air operations as they apply to the
amphibious mission is normally retained by the CATF and exercised through the designated
air control agency.
d. Air Tasking. The CATF and CLF are responsible for coordinating the air
support requirements for the AF through the preparation of an air allocation request. An
air allocation request message provides, among other things, the vehicle to identify unfilled
air requirements.
For more information, see JP 3-30, Command and Control for Joint Air Operations.
II-22
JP 3-02
II-23
Chapter II
SECTION D. COMMAND AND CONTROL OF OPERATIONS ASHORE
19. Transition from Afloat to Ashore
a. When afloat, the CLF and staff plan, direct, and monitor the LF actions from the
landing force operations center (LFOC) on the ATFs flagship. The LFOC provides
situational awareness to the CLF and staff. When C2 is phased ashore, the LF combat
operations center assumes control from LFOC. The functions of the combat operations
center ashore mirror those of the LFOC.
b. The SACC incrementally phases responsibility for fire support coordination to the
FFCC and FSCC as control is shifted ashore.
c. Supervision of the DASC transitions from the Navy TACC to the Marine TACC as
air control is passed ashore. The DASC is normally the first major LF air control agency to
come ashore, typically landing in the same wave as the FSCC.
d. As sufficient air defense assets are established ashore, the CLF will coordinate with
the CATF to assume SADC responsibility in the landward sector of the operational area.
20. Retaining Control Afloat
a. Depending on the type and scope of amphibious operation being conducted, C2 may
remain afloat and not transfer ashore. Forward-deployed MEUs conducting small-scale
operations routinely exercise C2 afloat. For larger-scale amphibious operations, this may be
more difficult, and the CLF should consider the shipboard limitations in communications
systems and available spaces to conduct C2 in order to determine how much of the C2 can
remain afloat and which elements of the C2 may need to transition ashore. By retaining C2
afloat, the CLF can take advantage of the support capabilities inherent in Navy platforms
while greatly reducing the requirement for C2 nodes and associated force protection
requirements ashore and enhanced movement and maneuver. To exercise C2 afloat, LF C2
should operate as an integral part of an overall naval C2 architecture. In many areas,
including fire support coordination, communications, and intelligence, LF and ATF staffs
may be integrated. LF tactical information systems should be fully integrated aboard ship
with both local area network connectivity and broadband multichannel ship-to-ship and shipto-shore communications connectivity.
b. If air control does not transition ashore, the Marine TACC may not be established,
and the Navy TACC would, therefore, continue to provide air control and support for the LF
ashore. In a similar manner, if fire support does not transition ashore, the FFCC and the
FSCC may not be established, and the SACC would continue to provide fire support
coordination, planning, and control.
c. When conducting amphibious operations, the CLF and the commanders of the GCE,
ACE, and LCE may conduct C2 from aboard ship. The CE may remain embarked, moving
ashore as the LF mission or operational situation allows. Although the GCE commander
may establish an airborne or forward CE ashore, the GCE main command post (CP) may
II-24
JP 3-02
II-25
Chapter II
Intentionally Blank
II-26
JP 3-02
CHAPTER III
CONDUCT OF AMPHIBIOUS OPERATIONS
1. Overview
The AF executes rapid, focused operations to accomplish the JFCs objectives.
Regardless of the type of amphibious operation, the CATF and CLF plan and execute
operations based on maneuver warfare philosophy and the following general concepts:
a. All actions focus on achieving the commanders objectives. The CONOPS guides
the decisive actions to exploit enemy vulnerabilities and attack enemy COGs and selected
decisive points.
b. The sea is used as maneuver space. Operations should create freedom of action for
the AF, while creating a tempo greater than the enemy can withstand. The CATF and
CLF should exploit advances in areas such as EW, precision targeting systems, waterborne
and airborne transportation craft that allow for the introduction of the AF at the time that
supports the JFCs CONOPS. Naval maneuver can be conducted from distances long before
closing the shoreline as the sea offers many avenues of approach. It involves fighting on,
above, under, and from the sea, including striking targets on a hostile or potentially hostile
shore while conducting amphibious operations. Collectively, naval maneuver capabilities
provide the ability to conduct operational maneuver from the sea.
c. A key to successful AF operations is the ability to maneuver across the littorals to
overcome area denial (AD) challenges, gain entry, and project power ashore as necessary.
Reduced signature of forces, flexibility of action, responsive fires, and control of dispersed
landing sites are essential to pit AF strengths against enemy weaknesses.
d. The preferred tactic for AFs operating against coastal defenses is to avoid or bypass
the strong points and to exploit gaps in these defenses. Both require not only the ability to
gain timely information but require the capability to process and disseminate accurate and
useful intelligence to commanders at all levels allowing for informed decision making. This
also requires strong operations security (OPSEC) and the flexibility to exercise initiative to
exploit opportunities and avoid or mitigate challenges. If unable to bypass the strong points,
the AF will be required to neutralize an adversarys antiaccess (A2) and AD systems.
e. The complexity of amphibious operations and the vulnerability of the AF as it builds
combat power ashore require the full integration of organic assets as well as those of other
joint and multinational forces. Clearly defining the roles and relationships of all forces
involved will promote coordinated support and unity of effort.
III-1
Chapter III
f. The remainder of this chapter has been structured to follow the phases of an
amphibious operation as discussed in Chapter I, Overview of Amphibious Operations.
The phases are planning, embarkation, rehearsals, movement, and action (PERMA).
SECTION A. PLANNING
2. Overview of the Planning Phase
a. The planning process described herein is designed for use by any sized AF
regardless of the type of amphibious operation. The focus of the planning process is to
link the employment of the AF to the attainment of operational and strategic objectives
through the design, organization, integration, and conduct of the amphibious operation
within the overall joint operation or campaign. The nature of amphibious operations gives
rise to planning procedures that are both intricate and unique. This intricacy stems from the
complex detail required to fully coordinate the landing of troops, equipment, and supplies by
air and surface means; maximize maneuver, speed, and available fire support; and minimize
the vulnerability of the AF. The uniqueness of amphibious planning stems from the
interrelationships between the components of the AF, between the AF and the joint force,
and between the AF and supporting organizations and agencies.
b. This section discusses the operational planning for amphibious operations. Detailed
planning considerations for supporting functions (e.g., fires, communications, logistics,
health services, and protection) are discussed in Chapter V, Support to Amphibious
Operations, and should be considered by planning staffs when developing the overall plan.
3. Tenets of Amphibious Planning
a. Planning for an amphibious operation is continuous, from the receipt of the initiating
directive through the termination of the operation. Amphibious planning requires
concurrent, parallel, and detailed planning by all participating forces. The planning pattern is
cyclical in nature, composed of a series of analyses and judgments of operational situations,
each stemming from previous situations. The tenets of successful amphibious planning are
commanders involvement and guidance and unity of effort.
b. Commanders Involvement and Guidance. The complexity of amphibious
operations requires AF commanders to drive the planning process. Top-down planning
is the active participation of the AF commanders that drives the process to gain knowledge
and promote understanding as a basis for decision making. Their guidance and intent are
central to planning and must be translated into a design for action by subordinates. AF
commanders decisions (e.g., AF AO, AF objectives, AF CONOPS, commanders critical
information requirements, and promulgated essential elements of friendly information) are
required before additional steps in the process can proceed.
c. Unity of Effort. AF commanders use unity of effort to focus their forces on mission
accomplishment. AF commanders should view their operational environment as an
indivisible entity, as operations or events in one area may have profound and often
unintended effects on other areas and events.
III-2
JP 3-02
III-3
Chapter III
6. Primary Decisions
a. AF commanders make certain primary decisions during the planning process before
further planning for an amphibious operation can proceed. The decisions and who makes
them are described below and reflected in Figure III-1. In some cases, these decisions may
have been made by the establishing authority and promulgated in the initiating directive. In
the case of mutual decisions, both CATF and CLF must concur, or the decision is
referred to the CAF or establishing authority for resolution.
b. During mission analysis, the following decisions are made:
(1) Determine AF Mission(s). AF commanders may decide on a coordinated
mission statement or develop separate but supporting mission statements. The determination
Decision
CAF*
CAF*
Primary Decision
CAF*
CAF*
Supporting Decisions
Select method of entry
CATF/CLF
CATF/CLF
CATF/CLF
CATF
CLF
CLF
Legend
CAF commander, amphibious force
CATF commander, amphibious task force
CLF
III-4
JP 3-02
III-5
Chapter III
3. The AF ability to adequately C2 forces from afloat platforms, phasing
ashore only those portions of C2 when needed. If unable to provide the necessary C2, a
beachhead may be required.
4. For ship-to-objective maneuver, the AF should be able to sustain the LF
from the sea base; otherwise a beachhead or lodgment will be necessary.
(b) Beachhead. As a type of lodgment, a beachhead is a designated area on a
hostile or potentially hostile shore which, when seized and held, facilitates the continuous
landing of troops and materiel and provides maneuver space for subsequent projected
operations ashore. The CLF determines possible beachheads for each landing site and
notifies CATF of the selections so they may be considered for incorporation into the landing
area plan. By using littoral maneuver, the AF may be able to maneuver around enemy
defenses, allowing the LF to attack and secure the beachhead from positions of advantage.
The CATF and CLF consider the following in delineating the beachhead area:
1. Suitability of landing sites, including favorable configuration of the
coastline from the LF perspective. Shorelines have three primary forms: convex, concave,
and straight. The convex shoreline in the form of large promontories or deltas is normally
the most favorable, despite its generally inferior hydrographic characteristics. It causes a
dispersion of defensive forces and prevents enfilade fire on the landing beaches. The
concave shoreline, particularly in the form of a bay or reentrant, is unfavorable since it
provides opportunity for convergent massing of enemy fires at any point in the area and
permits establishment of an organized system of interlocking sectors of fire, which are
extremely disadvantageous to the attacker. However, conditions such as the existence of
sheltered water and favorable beach characteristics may dictate the selection of a concave
shoreline despite its otherwise unfavorable characteristics. In such case, particular
consideration is given to the promontories, which form the shoulders on either flank of the
landing beach and provide naturally advantageous positions for defensive weapons. The
straight shoreline has no prominent indentations or promontories and is relatively less
favorable since it lends itself to enemy enfilade fire. It does, however, represent a
compromise between the advantages of a convex shoreline and the disadvantages of the
concave shoreline.
2. The vulnerability of the seaward areas of the beach and beach
approaches to enemy mining require direct input from CATF and MIWC. The most suitable
landing sites are typically the most likely to be mined and may be the least favorable when
MCM considerations are taken into account. Integration of the CATFs supporting MIWC in
the amphibious planning process is critical to the effectiveness of MCM support for the
amphibious operation.
3. Terrain inland from the beaches and routes of egress.
4. Suitability for the landing of landing craft, assault vehicles, aircraft;
and as a drop zone (DZ) for the LF.
5. Adequacy of maneuver space.
III-6
JP 3-02
Chapter III
to set the conditions necessary to conduct the operation, or time to clear additional sea
approaches. Seabasing more of the C2, logistics, sustainment, medical support, and other
capabilities allows forces using ship-to-objective maneuver to maintain momentum with a
smaller footprint ashore.
For more information on seabasing, see paragraph 20, Seabasing Considerations, and
NWP 3-62M/MCWP 3-31.7, Seabasing.
(d) Combined Methods of Entry. Amphibious operations may utilize
lodgments to support part of the amphibious operation, while conducting ship-to-objective
maneuver for other parts. In other words, a combination of the two may be necessary and
advantageous to successfully complete the mission. More mobile and lighter elements of the
LF, for example, may proceed directly to the objective, such as those in helicopters, tiltrotor
aircraft, and AAVs, while other elements (off-loading from landing craft and lighterage to
include vehicles, heavy cargo, and additional troops) may need a secure lodgment. Although
not required to initiate an amphibious operation, a lodgment may be needed later for
sustainment or to conduct reception, staging, integration, and onward movement for followon forces.
(3) Select Landing Areas. The landing area includes the beach, the approaches to
the beach, the transport areas, the fire support areas (FSAs), the airspace above it, and the
land included inland to accomplish the initial objectives. The selection of the landing area is
a mutual decision (see Figure III-2).
(4) Select Landing Beaches. For amphibious operations, a landing beach is the
portion of a shoreline required for the landing of an LF. Landing beaches are selected from
within the selected landing areas. Multiple landing beaches allow the LF to achieve a
position of advantage over the enemy by distributing firepower within enemy gaps that can
concentrate and maneuver toward the main objective. Landing beaches that cannot be
approached from several different directions should be avoided. Principal factors in the
selection of landing beaches (in addition to those previously described for selection of
landing areas) include:
(a) Suitability for landing craft (e.g., landing craft, utility [LCU]; landing
craft, air cushion [LCAC]; and AAVs).
(b) Offshore approaches and tidal conditions.
(c) The suitability, location, and number of beach support areas (BSAs), beach
exits, and nearby infrastructure. The BSA is to the rear of an LF or elements thereof,
established and operated by shore party units. It contains the facilities for the unloading of
troops and materiel and the support of the forces ashore; it includes facilities for the
evacuation of wounded, enemy prisoners of war (EPWs), and captured materiel. Landing
beaches are designated by color (blue, red, green, yellow, orange, white, and purple).
Subdivisions are further designated with the addition of a number (e.g., Green Beach 1, Red
Beach 1, and Red Beach 2). The highest numbered beach is 3.
III-8
JP 3-02
Naval Considerations
Coastline configuration.
Hostile capabilities.
Inland terrain.
Air Considerations
Ability to achieve and maintain local air
superiority and perform interdiction and
close air support.
Ability to support the defense of the
amphibious force.
Ability to command and control air assets.
Chapter III
(g) The selection of landing beaches is a mutual decision.
(5) Determine Sea Areas. A sea area is recommended by the CATF and
designated by the establishing authority to minimize the possibility of interference between
various elements of the AF and supporting forces. The CATF designs all sea areas to
support the amphibious operation. Included in the sea areas are the boat lanes, the LCAC
lanes, the inner and outer transport areas, the FSAs or fire support stations, the approach
routes for the ships to launch the AAVs, etc. The CATF determines the sea echelon plan,
which provides for the dispersion of amphibious warfare ships in either an on-call or
unscheduled status to minimize losses due to enemy attacks; and to reduce the area that must
be cleared for mines.
(6) Select LF Objectives. LF objectives facilitate the attainment of AF objectives
or uninterrupted landing of forces and materiel. LF objectives are selected by the CLF.
(7) Select LZs and DZs. An LZ is a specified zone used for the landing of all
aircraft. LZs may contain more than one landing site. A DZ is designated as a specific area
on which airborne troops, equipment, or supplies are air-dropped. The CLF selects LZs and
DZs.
(8) Select Forward Arming and Refueling Points (FARPs). Amphibious
operations will often require FARPs between the ATF and the objective to minimize the
sortie generation time required to support operations. These can be established within a
lodgment or at intermediate LZs or DZs. FARP sites will be selected based on ease of use,
ease of sustainment, and survivability.
(9) Select Date and Hour of Landing. The date and hour of the landing is
selected by the CAF or establishing authority and may be specified in the initiating directive.
D-day is the unnamed day on which a particular operation commences or is to commence.
H-hour, in amphibious operations, is the time the first landing craft or amphibious vehicle of
the waterborne wave lands or is scheduled to land on the beach. L-hour, in amphibious
operations, is the time at which the first helicopter or tiltrotor aircraft of the airborne ship-toshore movement wave touches down or is scheduled to touch down in the LZ. Since most
amphibious operations are complex and involve both surface and air ship-to-shore
movement, L-hour may also be expressed in terms of a time differential from H-hour (e.g.,
H-12 or H+30 minutes), to assist in coordinating and synchronizing the operation across a
common continuum. If L-hour and H-hour coincide, utilize H-hour. During planning, Hhour and L-hour are the scheduled or planned times for landing, but during execution,
they are the actual time of landing. For example, during planning, H-hour may be
scheduled for 0800; however, for various reasons on D-day, it is determined that H-hour
does not actually occur until 0900; accordingly, all events will now be based on the 0900 Hhour. If the CATF delays H-hour, the CATF will then promulgate a new H-hour.
Supporting actions, such as NSFS or airborne assaults, are scheduled and conducted in
relation to H-hour. In the case where the landing will be delayed from the planned H-hour,
some events scheduled in planning for the period just prior to H-hour may be repeated until
the new H-hour; others will be delayed and others will have to be cancelled. H-hour and Lhour are confirmed prior to commencement of the landing based on the weather,
III-10
JP 3-02
Availability of forces.
Readiness of forces.
Duration of daylight.
III-11
Chapter III
(1) Order and OPGEN/OPTASK Crosstalk. After step four of the planning
process (see paragraph 5 Planning Methods) and primary decisions have been completed,
the AF commanders develop their OPLANs, OPORDs, OPGENs, or OPTASKs. The staffs
should maintain constant communication to ensure continued harmonization of their
concurrent planning efforts. Depending on time available, once final drafts of the
OPORD and OPGEN/OPTASK have been completed, a crosstalk and confirmation
brief should be conducted between the commanders and staffs. The purpose of the
crosstalk is to compare these documents with higher and adjacent orders to facilitate unity of
effort and to identify any discrepancies or gaps. Following the staffs correction of any
discrepancies identified during the crosstalk, the OPORD and OPGEN will be submitted for
approval and a confirmation brief is scheduled. A confirmation brief is given by a
subordinate commander once planning is complete. The participants brief their scheme of
maneuver and fire support plan and the relationship between their units mission and the
other units in the operation. The confirmation brief allows the higher commander to identify
discrepancies between his or her order and the subordinates plan(s) and allows for corrective
actions, if required, prior to execution.
(2) OPTASK Amphibious Message. CATF, in collaboration with the CLF, will
develop the OPTASK amphibious message. This overarching OPTASK specifies the ATF
commanders intent, duties, and responsibilities; the operational area (e.g., AOA or
AO/HIDACZ); all geographic areas (e.g., surface: inner transport areas, outer transport areas,
beaches, landing craft, air cushion landing zones [CLZs], boat lanes; air: ingress, egress
routes; fires: FSAs and fire support stations, no fire areas, targets), timelines for the assault;
medical regulating instructions; and force protection instructions. The initial OPTASK
amphibious message should be promulgated no later than 72 hours prior to the assault to
allow sufficient time for the subordinate units to plan. Updates can then be promulgated as
more information becomes available.
For more information on OPGENs and the OPTASK amphibious message, see Allied
Procedural Publication -11, NATO Message Catalogue, and NTTP 3-02.1M/MCWP 3-31.5,
Ship-to-Shore Movement.
g. Transition is an orderly handover of an OPLAN, OPORD, OPGEN, or OPTASK as
it is passed to those tasked with execution of the operation. It provides those who will
execute the plan or order with the situational awareness and rationale for key decisions
necessary to allow for a coherent shift from planning to execution.
7. Assessment
Assessment is a process that measures progress of the AF toward mission
accomplishment and occurs at all levels. The assessment process begins during mission
analysis when the commander and staff consider what to measure and how to measure it to
determine progress toward accomplishing a task, creating an effect, or achieving an
objective. Assessment actions and measures, such as measures of effectiveness and
measures of performance, help commanders adjust operations and resources as required;
determine when to execute branches and sequels; and make other critical decisions to ensure
current and future operations remain aligned with the mission and end state.
III-12
JP 3-02
III-13
Chapter III
c. Postponement Plan. Postponement may be necessary because of weather
conditions, unexpected movement of major enemy forces, or failure to meet go/no-go criteria
after the AF has started its movement from final staging areas toward the operational area. A
postponement plan will be prepared by the CATF and is usually promulgated as part of the
OPLAN. Usually, postponement is on a 24-hour basis, which involves backtracking or
diversion of ships into a designated sea area. A longer postponement may involve
redeployment of the force to a staging area. Execution of the postponement plan will
normally be controlled by the JFC or designated commander, based on the recommendations
of the CATF and CLF, or other JFC.
d. Alternate Plans. The alternate plan for an amphibious operation may differ from
the preferred plan and will necessitate branch movement plans. Movement plans should,
therefore, be flexible enough for execution of alternate plans at any point between the final
staging area and the operational area.
10. Sea Routes
a. En route to the Operational Area. Sea routes and en route points to the
operational area will normally be planned by the CATF. Routes selected should lead from
all possible ports of departure to the operational area. Alternate routes should also be
provided to avoid interference between forces and to permit execution of alternate plans
should the threat of enemy attack or weather prevent use of primary routes. Routes and route
points should be named to facilitate reference. Small-scale charts, which show sea routes
and route points, are prepared and included in the OPLANs and OPORDs of appropriate
USS San Antonio (LPD-17) transits the Suez Canal en route to the operational area.
III-14
JP 3-02
III-15
Chapter III
CATF and approved by the JFC. The sea areas will be divided into a number of operating
areas as depicted in Figure III-4. These areas may be connected by mine-cleared lanes,
areas, and channels.
a. Ocean Operating Areas. Two kinds of ocean operating areas may be selected.
(1) Close Support Area. A close support area is the portion(s) of the ocean
operating area nearest to, but not necessarily in, the objective area. They are assigned to
CSGs, surface action groups, surface action units, and certain logistic CSS elements.
(2) Distant Retirement Area. A distant retirement area is located to seaward of
the close support area and divided into a number of operating areas in which the AF may
Sea Areas
Cushion
Landing Zone
Landing
Zone
Cushion
Landing Zone
AAV
Launching
Area
Fire Support
Area
Landing
Area
Causeway
Operating Area
CLA
Outer Transport Area
Transport Area
CLA
Not drawn to scale. Used for illustrative purposes only to show areas.
Legend
AAV
CLA
III-16
JP 3-02
Chapter III
13. Geographic Reference Points
A complete system of geographic reference points for the operational area and
surrounding ocean area should be determined during planning. The points may be used to
indicate routes (particularly where the direction of the routes changes), to depict the shape
and location of the areas discussed above, and for certain locations not related to areas or
routes. Reference points will be encoded and defined by exact latitude and longitude.
14. Coordination During Passage
a. Forces not a part of the AF that are supporting the AF must coordinate their
movement within the AOA with the ATF.
b. All commanders should remain cognizant of the general scheme and operational
areas of other forces and the need for maintaining the schedule and proceeding along
prescribed routes. If deviation is required, the commander of the group will determine
whether to break emission control (EMCON), if established, to advise other commanders of
the situation.
c. The AF, or elements thereof, may receive significant intelligence while en route to
the operational area when advance forces or forces external to the AF conduct pre-D-day
operations in the operational area or where remote sensor data is provided. During the
extended transit period, the LF CE requires access to intelligence, surveillance, and
reconnaissance products in order to determine the up-to-date enemy and friendly situation.
The AFs intelligence center is responsible for timely dissemination of pertinent intelligence
to the CATF and CLF. ATF ships receiving intelligence are responsible for passing it to the
embarked LFs.
15. Approach to the Operational Area
a. Approach to the operational area includes the arrival of various task groups in the
vicinity of the operational area. These forces aggregate as necessary according to assigned
tasks and proceed to designated positions in the operational area. During this critical period,
additional protective measures may be necessary. These measures may include:
(1) Counterair measures, including air strikes against enemy airfields within range
of the landing area.
(2) Location and neutralization of enemy submarines, surface craft, minefields,
and land-based threats that can interfere with the approach.
(3) Selection of approach routes that avoid lengthy exposure to fire from enemy
land-based threats.
b. Approach of the main body is usually more complicated than that of the amphibious
advance force due to the size of the force and its careful timing relative to H-hour. However,
if an amphibious advance force has been employed, they may have implemented many of the
necessary protective measures to protect the main body during its approach. In particular,
III-18
JP 3-02
a. Littoral maneuver provides ready-to-fight combat forces from the sea to the shore in
order to achieve a position of advantage over the enemy. It relies on naval and other joint
forces to establish sea control and maritime superiority to provide maneuver space and to
provide intelligence to uncover enemy defenses. The ability to conduct littoral maneuver
provides an advantage for the AF by imposing a continuous coastal threat on the enemy that
may cause dispersal of enemy forces, potentially dissipating enemy defenses. The mobility
provided by naval air and surface movement platforms is then employed to exploit those
gaps. Littoral maneuver allows AFs to operate across a wider geographic area, in a more
decentralized manner. Informed by awareness of the enemys A2/AD capabilities, the ability
to maneuver from OTH distances and evade detection by enemy sensors and weapons is
perhaps the critical consideration for littoral maneuver.
b. Littoral maneuver in amphibious operations is an integrated approach bridging the
boundary between land and sea. Ship-to-shore movement control provides the framework to
accommodate the necessary coordination, while the landing plan provides the detailed
documentation for executing ship-to shore movement to support littoral maneuver.
Seabasing increases littoral maneuver options and directly supports and enables the landward
maneuver component as discussed in paragraph 35, Landing Force Operations Ashore.
c. Littoral maneuver may be employed directly against an objective, including inland
objectives, as the main effort; to seize infrastructure, beachheads, or lodgments that enable
the arrival of follow-on forces; or to pose a continuous coastal threat that causes an adversary
to dissipate forces.
III-19
Chapter III
17. Ship-to-Shore Movement
It was to be a brutal day. At first light on 15 June 1944, the Navy fire support
ships of the task force lying off Saipan Island increased their previous days
preparatory fires involving all caliber of weapons. At 0542, Vice Admiral Richmond
K. Turner ordered, Land the landing force. Around 0700, the landing ships, tank
(LSTs) moved to within approximately 1,250 yards behind the line of departure.
Troops in the LSTs began debarking from them in landing vehicles, tracked
(LVTs). Control vessels containing Navy and Marine personnel with their radio
gear took their positions displaying flags indicating which beach approaches they
controlled.
John C. Chapin, Breaching the Marianas: The Battle for Saipan, 1994
a. The plan for ship-to-shore movement to land troops, equipment, and supplies at the
prescribed times, places, and in the formation required to support the LF scheme of
maneuver is developed by the CATF and CLF. Ship-to-shore movement is the portion of the
amphibious operation that includes the deployment of the LF from amphibious warfare ships
to designated landing areas and LZs and is perhaps the most critical part of the action phase.
b. The most difficult and complex ship-to-shore movement occurs during an
amphibious assault. The AE is comprised of units and craft assigned to conduct the initial
assault on the operational area. Assault troops, vehicles, aircraft, equipment, and supplies
that are not needed to initiate the assault, but are required to support and sustain the assault,
are known as the AFOE. The AFOE will usually come in after the AE has conducted the
initial assault. During ship-to-shore movement, the LF, landing craft, aircraft, and
amphibious warfare ships are most concentrated and vulnerable to enemy fire, not to mention
the natural hazards of weather, sea state, and surf conditions. Movement control
requirements are complex, and detailed coordination with supporting arms is essential.
c. Ship-to-Shore Movement Responsibilities. The responsibilities for the CATF,
CLF, and commanders of other assigned forces to the AF during ship-to-shore movement are
discussed below.
(1) The CATF, in close coordination with the CLF, is responsible for the
preparation of the overall ship-to-shore movement and landing plan. During execution of the
amphibious operation, CATF has overall responsibility for ship-to-shore movement but will
coordinate with the CLF to adjust for changing situations as revealed by intelligence sources
or LFs ashore. The CATF is also responsible for debarkation until termination of the
amphibious operation, at which time the responsibilities for off-load of the AFOE and
follow-up shipping and LOTS operations may be passed to another organization designated
by higher authority. In the case of an amphibious assault, the operation will normally be
terminated only after the entire AFOE is ashore.
(2) The CLF presents LF ship-to-shore movement requirements to the CATF.
The CLF provides information on the availability of organic assets (helicopters and
III-20
JP 3-02
Chapter III
(c) Army Landing Craft Utility 2000. These craft are not organic to an AF
or maritime pre-positioning force (MPF). However, when task organized, Army craft can be
utilized in support of amphibious operations. The LCU-2000 is a self-deployable
displacement craft used for the transport of combat vehicles and sustainment cargo. It
provides intratheater movement of cargo and equipment. It is also ideally suited for the
discharge or back load of sealift, including RO/RO vessels. All tracked and wheeled
vehicles, including main battle tanks, dozers, and container-handling equipment; they can be
used for unit deployment and relocation.
(d) Army Logistics Support Vessel (LSV). The LSV is self-deployable and
self-sustainable for 45 days. The vessel is capable of intratheater line haul of cargo to
support unit deployment/relocation, tactical and sustained resupply to remote, undeveloped
areas along coastlines and on inland waterways as well as ship-to-shore movement and
return of personnel, outsized/oversized cargo and equipment. The LSV is equipped with
both a bow and stern ramp.
(e) Landing craft, mechanized and MPF utility boats are not organic to
amphibious warfare ships and are used primarily for MPF support to amphibious operations.
(2) Amphibious vehicles are wheeled or tracked vehicles capable of operating on
both land and water. In addition to the capability to transport troops ashore and then proceed
on to inland missions, they can also be used to move a limited amount of cargo ashore when
transfer of cargo at the beach is not desired or when surf conditions, reefs, or other
hydrographic conditions prohibit beaching of landing crafts.
(a) The AAV is a fully tracked, amphibious vehicle tasked to land the surface
assault elements of the LF and their equipment from amphibious warfare ships to inland
objectives. Once ashore, AAVs conduct mechanized operations and related combat support.
(b) The lighter, amphibious resupply cargo are capable of transporting a small
amount of cargo in over-the-beach operations from ships to inland transfer points. However,
they are mainly employed to provide SZ salvage support for LCUs.
For information on transporting troops and cargo on landing craft, see JP 3-02.1,
Amphibious Embarkation and Debarkation. For additional information on employment
considerations, see NTTP 3-02.1M/MCWP 3-31.5, Ship-to-Shore Movement; NWP
3-02.12/Marine Corps Reference Publication 3-31A, Employment of the LCAC; MCWP 312, Employment of Amphibious Assault Vehicles (AAVs); and Navy Tactical Reference
Publication (NTRP) 3-02.1.2, Naval Beach Group Support Element Operations.
(3) Modular Systems (improved Navy lighterage system [INLS], Armymodular causeway system) are powered and nonpowered causeway and ramp module
sections locked together like building blocks to create a variety of floating structures and can
be used to support LF off-loads, particularly AFOE, either as a causeway pier, RO/RO
discharge facilities, or causeway ferries. INLS is normally used to support MPF in-stream
on-load and off-loads and is transported as part of the MPF equipment set. The Army
modular causeway systems are similar in function to the INLS; however, they are
III-22
JP 3-02
III-23
Chapter III
occasions, these categories may be landed before completion of on-call waves and prepositioned emergency supplies. This category usually includes certain combat support units
and most of the CSS units with higher echelon (division and above) reserve units of the LF.
Their landing is directed when the need ashore can be predicted with a reasonable degree of
accuracy. Nonscheduled units and previously designated supplies are normally requested by
serial until the commencement of general unloading. The responsibility for their landing is
assigned by the CATF to the commanders of the cognizant control organizations. In the
landing of nonscheduled units, the maximum coordination between ATF and LF control
organizations is essential to allow for responsiveness and efficient use of amphibious warfare
ships and craft. The control officers concerned regulate the movement of the ships and craft
in accordance with instructions from appropriate commanders and requests from the
TACLOG group. Any changes in the landing sequence, no matter how slight they may
seem, will invariably disrupt the flow of the off-load and may result in unintended delays.
The CLF requests the landing of the nonscheduled units and notifies the CATF of any
requested modifications to the landing sequence as early as possible. The CLF continually
reviews the progress of the landing and submits periodic and timely requests to the CATF for
landing needed units and items of supply.
(4) Scheduled Waves (Helicopter-Borne and Tiltrotor Aircraft). Air ship-toshore movement is normally completed during the initial unloading period. Helicopters and
tiltrotor aircraft usually make several trips to land and supply the LF units going ashore.
Scheduled waves are launched on a prescribed schedule to facilitate the timely arrival in the
LZs in accordance with the LF OPLAN. The prescribed launch times will be based on many
factors such as distance to the LZ, speed of the aircraft, and prevailing weather (wind)
conditions.
(5) On-call Waves (Helicopter-Borne and Tiltrotor Aircraft). Landing on-call
waves (helicopter-borne/tiltrotor aircraft) may preempt the landing of elements or items
in other landing categories. The number of on-call units or items should be kept to a
minimum if their high-priority status is to be preserved.
(6) Nonscheduled Waves (Helicopter-Borne and Tiltrotor Aircraft). The
landing of nonscheduled waves commences on completion of scheduled landings into the
LZs. Once started, this process may be interrupted to permit the landing of on-call or other
selected units or supplies based on the request of the appropriate LF commander.
Furthermore, unforeseen circumstances, such as the requirement for LF helicopters to
support other tactical missions, may interrupt the landing of nonscheduled waves. Once the
airborne ship-to-shore movement is completed, transport helicopters and tiltrotor aircraft are
employed to meet tactical and logistical requirements of LF operations ashore as directed by
the CLF. Helicopter and tiltrotor aircraft movement in these operations will be controlled by
appropriate tactical air control agencies.
(7) Pre-Positioned Emergency Supplies. Pre-positioned emergency supplies are
designated by the CLF to meet expected critical needs for CSS replenishment early in the
ship-to-shore movement. These serialized supplies, available for immediate delivery ashore,
are organized into prestaged airlifted supplies and, if employed in larger operations, may be
in floating dumps. Pre-positioned emergency supplies are located in proximity to the
III-24
JP 3-02
III-25
Chapter III
(9) MCM and obstacle reduction requirements including assault breaching
operations in the SZ and on the beach.
(10) Go/no-go criteria.
(11) Hydrographic conditions.
(12) Recovery and salvage of amphibious vehicles and landing craft.
i. Ship-to-Shore Movement Planning Sequence. Detailed planning for the ship-toshore movement can begin only after the LF scheme of maneuver ashore is determined and
the LF CONOPS is approved. The ship-to-shore movement planning sequence (see Figure
III-5) is a coordinated effort between the ATF and LF. The planning of the ship-to-shore
movement is an iterative process. The LF scheme of maneuver may affect the assignment to
shipping. This iterative planning process between CATF and CLF will ensure the best load
out and the best ship-to-shore plan that considers the air and surface plan, the A2/AD threat,
the number of landing craft that need to be embarked, etc. Included in the planning is the
selection of necessary approach and retirement lanes, checkpoints, rendezvous areas, and
Legend
AAV
CATF
CLF
LCAC
LCM
LCU
LF
III-26
JP 3-02
Chapter III
III-28
JP 3-02
(5) CLF consolidates these recommendations and publishes them in the LF landing
plan.
(6) Planning for the movement of supplies ashore and for the levels of supply
needed ashore is conducted concurrently with other ship-to-shore movement planning. If the
CLF uses the option of employing floating dumps, planning should include the composition
of the floating dumps.
e. CATF develops the naval landing plan documents required to conduct ship-toshore movement. The information contained in several of these documents is vital to the
CLF in the development of the landing plan.
(1) The landing craft availability table is the basis for assignment of landing
craft for the ship-to-shore movement. It lists the type and number of landing craft that will
III-29
Chapter III
United States Soldiers of the 8th Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, move out over the
seawall on Utah Beach (June 6, 1944).
be available from each ship in the transport group, specifies the total required for ATF use,
and indicates those available for troop use. It is prepared by the CCO.
(2) The landing craft employment plan provides for the assigned movement of
landing craft from the various ships to satisfy ATF and LF requirements. It indicates the
number of landing craft, their types, their parent ships, the ships to which they will report,
the time at which they will report, and the period during which they will be attached. The
plan is prepared by the CCO.
(3) The debarkation schedule is a plan that provides for the orderly debarkation
of troops and equipment and emergency supplies for the waterborne ship-to-shore
movement. Prepared jointly by the CO of each ship and the CO of troops embarked, it is
usually prepared after the troops are aboard and is distributed to all personnel responsible for
control of debarkation. The debarkation schedule may be accompanied by a ships diagram
depicting where LF units stage or muster for debarkation such as the hangar bay, upper or
lower vehicle storage, side port areas, boat deck, or any other location onboard ship.
Debarkation schedules are not normally prepared for units landing in AAV or aircraft. The
debarkation schedule contains the following information:
(a) The sequence in which landing craft, by type, depart the well deck.
(b) The individual boats and boat teams or supply loads from each troop
debarkation station and the boats into which they are loaded.
III-30
JP 3-02
The landing plan for Operation OVERLORD assigns beaches to US and Allied forces.
(4) The unloading plan establishes the sequence and designates the means for offloading the LF. It consists of the landing craft availability table and the landing craft
employment plan.
(5) The approach schedule indicates the time of departure from the rendezvous
area, LOD, and other control points; and time of arrival at the beach for each scheduled
wave.
(6) The assault wave diagram displays the assault waves as they will appear at a
specified time prior to H-hour. The diagram is prepared by the CCO.
(7) The landing area diagram is prepared by the CCO, and shows graphically the
most important details of the landing area: beaches, boat lanes with their LODs, LCAC
routes, CLZ transport areas, and FSAs in the immediate vicinity of the boat lanes.
(8) The transport area diagram overlays the objective area with an appropriate
scale chart that shows the area from the beach to 1,000 yards seaward of the outermost
transport area anchorage or underway sector. Key graphical features depicted include:
transport area(s) and assignment of ships to anchorage or underway sectors; boat and
approach lanes; LCAC routes and areas, LCAC departure point, LCAC control point, LCAC
penetration point, and LCAC LZ; LODs; AAV launching areas; causeway launching areas;
and beaches.
III-31
Chapter III
(9) A beach approach diagram is prepared by CCO as an overlay for a largescale chart of the landing beaches. The overlay depicts an area extending from each beach
seaward 500 yards beyond the LOD.
(10) If a sea echelon is used, specific information relating to the sea echelon area
is prepared as a diagram by the CATF in agreement with the CLF. The diagram contains the
locations and limits of the sea echelon area, transport lanes, and beaches.
f. The CLF is responsible for the LF landing plan. It is the compilation of detailed
plans prepared by the LF. The following documents designate the forces going ashore, and
promulgate the means, organization, sequence, and landing priorities:
(1) The amphibious vehicle availability table lists the number and type of
vehicles available for the landing, the LF units embarked in them, and the ships carrying
them.
(2) The landing craft and amphibious vehicle assignment table indicates the
organization of LF units into boat spaces, boat teams, and the assignment of boat teams to
scheduled waves, on-call waves, or nonscheduled units. It may also include instructions for
assigning floating dump supplies to landing craft or amphibious vehicles. The table, together
with the debarkation schedule, furnishes the ships CO with information for debarking troops
and floating dump supplies. The landing craft and amphibious vehicle AAV assignment
table is prepared and promulgated at the same time as the landing diagram.
(3) The landing diagram graphically shows the tactical deployment of boat teams
in scheduled waves. It provides the wave composition, showing AAVs and landing craft and
touchdown times for a colored or numbered beach. The landing diagram is prepared by a
representative from the GCE based on recommendations from subordinate commanders and
promulgated concurrently with the landing craft and amphibious vehicle assignment table. It
is distributed to all personnel responsible for controlling the formation of the boat group and
its waves during ship-to-shore movement and the information it contains is used in the
preparation of assault schedules.
(4) The LF serial assignment table reflects the organization of the LF for ship-toshore movement. It indicates the tactical units, equipment, and supplies that are to be loaded
into each landing craft, amphibious vehicle, or aircraft, and may be further broken down into
a serial assignment table (surface) and a heliteam wave and serial assignment table. A serial
is a group of LF units and their equipment that originate from the same ship and that, for
tactical or logistic reasons, will land on a specified beach LZ at the same time. A serial
number is assigned to each serial (group). Serial numbers are administratively assigned
numbers and do not in themselves prescribe a priority in landing. They are assigned only for
reference purposes, and the assignment in no way precludes the use of code names,
designations, or unit titles when expedient.
(a) Early in the planning stage, the CLF allocates a block of consecutive serial
numbers on the basis of administrative organization to each LF unit and Navy element to be
landed, regardless of their location in the AE or AFOE. Allocation begins at the highest
III-32
JP 3-02
Chapter III
each designated flight. It plans for the orderly enplaning of troops, supplies, and equipment
for the air ship-to-shore movement.
(12) The helicopter and tiltrotor aircraft landing diagram illustrates the routes
to and from LZs. It includes the transport areas, rendezvous points, approach and retirement
routes, departure and initial points, other control points, LZs and other details as are
necessary for clarity. The diagrams are prepared by the senior helicopter or tiltrotor unit
commander in coordination with the cognizant helicopter or tiltrotor transport unit
commanders and are submitted via the chain of command to the CATF for approval and
coordination.
(13) The assault support landing table (ASLT) is a detailed plan for the airborne
ship-to-shore movement of troops, equipment, and supplies. It provides the landing
timetable for helicopter and tiltrotor aircraft movement and indicates the assignment of
specific troop units to specific numbered flights. Analogous to the assault schedule and
landing sequence table prepared by surface-landed units, it is the basis for the aircraft units
flight schedules and the control of helicopter and tiltrotor aircraft movement by the
appropriate air control agency. The ASLT is prepared in close coordination between the
commanders of the units needing air movement and the helicopter and tiltrotor aircraft units
and with the AATCC, Navy TACC, and SACC.
(14) The GCE landing plan is developed by the senior GCE representative, who
does the major portion of the detailed planning and immediate supervision of the surface and
air ship-to-shore movement on the part of the LF. It is developed in coordination with the
related Navy organization and based on information provided by both CLF and CATF
concerning forces to be landed and landing assets available. Subordinate units down to the
battalion level prepare their own landing plans, including all relevant documents. These
plans may be incorporated into the landing plan of the next higher unit as an appendix or the
information contained in the documents incorporated in the documents of the GCE landing
plan.
(15) The ACE and LF aviation landing plan outlines the commanders plans for
establishing aviation units ashore in the landing area by both air and surface means. It
provides detailed plans for the landing of aviation elements that are embarked in amphibious
warfare ships and landed with assault units or as nonscheduled units.
(a) The aviation landing plan contains the following:
1. Plans for the echelonment and landing sequence of all aviation units to
be established ashore within the landing area.
2. Detailed landing documents for aviation elements that move ashore
before general unloading.
3. Applicable ship-to-shore control provisions.
4. Information on causeways, fuel handling systems, and the landing of
engineers and equipment necessary for aviation support ashore.
III-34
JP 3-02
Chapter III
(16) Serial numbers for nonscheduled aviation elements are allocated by the LF.
The assigned serials and an itemized list of personnel and equipment of aviation elements
that are to land in scheduled or on-call waves are submitted to the CLF for coordination and
approval. The division is then furnished the necessary information to provide for landing
nonscheduled aviation elements. These elements are incorporated into the force landing
sequence tables.
g. Ship-to-Shore Control. To monitor the landing of aviation elements early in the
ship-to-shore movement, the LF aviation commander provides representatives to the senior
TACLOG group. As changes or delays in the landing of aviation elements occur, the
commander may then be apprised of the situation. Schedules and tables required by aviation
representatives in the Navy TACC, in addition to those in the LF aviation landing plan, may
be in the air annex to the OPLAN or OPORD.
h. Airfields, Causeways, Fuel-Handling Systems, and Engineering Operations.
The availability of operational facilities required to establish aviation ashore determines the
time of landing aviation elements. Information on the projected dates when these facilities
will be complete, or engineering work will begin, is provided in the landing plan when
available. This information includes estimated dates for:
(1) Airfields achieving operational status.
(2) Installation of causeways for landing heavy aviation assets.
(3) Completion of fuel-handling systems from the beach to the airfields or
helicopter operating sites.
(4) Landing of engineers and commencement of work on airfields.
See NTTP 3-02.1M/MCWP 3-31.5, Ship-to-Shore Movement, for further detailed discussion
on the landing plan.
19. Over the Horizon
a. An OTH operation is initiated from beyond visual and radar range of the enemy
shore. The goal of OTH operations, especially during ship-to-objective maneuver, may be to
achieve operational surprise through creation of multiple threats and ultimately to shatter an
enemys cohesion through a series of rapid, violent, and unexpected actions that create a
turbulent and rapidly deteriorating situation with which an adversary cannot cope. It is also a
tactical option to hide intentions and capabilities and to exploit the element of tactical
surprise to achieve AF objectives.
b. The decision to conduct OTH operations may be a force protection decision to
mitigate threats to amphibious warfare ships from antiship missiles or shallow water
mines. This is especially true in A2/AD environments. OTH operations provide greater
protection to the AF from near-shore threats and provides escort ships a greater opportunity
to detect, classify, track, and engage incoming hostile aircraft and coastal defense missiles
while expanding the shoreline the enemy must be prepared to defend. Conversely, the
III-36
JP 3-02
Over-the-Horizon Operations
Advantages
Disadvantages
Enhanced operational or
tactical surprise.
Increased flexibility.
III-37
Chapter III
(2) Conduct surveillance and reconnaissance of the operational area with emphasis
on possible landing sites. Positioning the AF OTH allows the landing site location to remain
flexible. Landing sites may be chosen just before launching the first wave.
(3) Reliable communications and accurate navigation. OTH operations planning is
more complex than traditional amphibious planning due to the increased distances between
launch platforms, landing beaches, supporting fires, and control platforms. This in turn
requires greater coordination and communications capability. Flexibility must be maintained
throughout the operation since LZs and CLZs may be widely separated. The vertical assault
may land forces inland where they will be able to threaten key enemy positions, facilities,
and lines of communications (LOCs).
(4) NSFS may be a requirement for successful prosecution of an amphibious
assault. However, since one underlying reason for an OTH assault is the strength of coastal
defenses, the primary mission of NSFS may shift from destroying enemy forces at a
defended landing beach to isolating the landing area(s). Prelanding fire support in the
vicinity of landing sites may also be restricted, especially prior to D-day and H-hour, to
preserve tactical surprise. NSFS ships may initially be OTH with the ATF, closing the beach
with the initial waves of landing craft. Although these ships can use land attack missiles for
OTH fire support, their quantities are limited.
(5) OTH distances may be so great that the LCUs may not be able to be used
except for the scheduled waves. For example, if the ATF is 3050 nautical miles off the
coast, the transit time could be 46 hours one way for the LCU. This means that the LCUs
will be able to make only one landing per day. Further, the LCACs will be able to land
generally only threefour times per day under optimal conditions.
(6) If the amphibious operation is planned to be OTH, then more landing craft
should be embarked.
(7) If the amphibious operation is planned to be OTH, then the AAVs may not be
able to swim to the shore and thus, the LF will not be initially mechanized.
20. Seabasing Considerations
a. Seabasing is the deployment, assembly, command, projection, reconstitution, and reemployment of joint combat power from the sea without reliance on land bases within the
JOA. Operations from a sea base allow for rapid movement to the area of crisis and the
buildup of combat power while in international waters without political restrictions. The
decision to conduct seabasing operations depends on the tactical situation and the scope and
intensity of the assigned mission. In the decision-making process, a JFC can select and task
organize from a wide range of naval, joint, or multinational forces. In so doing, employing
the seabasing construct provides a JFC with options for closing, assembling, employing,
sustaining, and reconstituting forces for amphibious operations. Units that could constitute a
sea base should possess a wide range of capabilities that complement each other.
b. Planning Considerations. Seabasing enables operational maneuver for ship-toshore movement and improved operational access to the joint force during the action phase
III-38
JP 3-02
III-39
Chapter III
21. Operations in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear Environments
a. General. The threat of use or employment of CBRN weapons poses unique
challenges for AFs when planning and conducting amphibious operations. Most of the
associated challenges stem from the unpredictable nature of coastal and shore environments,
the nature of amphibious warfare ships infrastructures, the availability of assets to counter
these hazards or threats, and the difficulties of operating in a CBRN-contaminated
environment. AF commanders and staffs should carefully assess the potential risk of an
adversary employing CBRN weapons against an amphibious operation. Planners should
maintain a clear understanding of potential CBRN threats and hazards within their
operational area and include measures to minimize associated AF vulnerabilities.
b. Responsibilities. The AF needs to be capable of efficiently and effectively
continuing its operations in a CBRN threat environment. Within the AF, the CATF is
ultimately responsible for CBRN defense of the forces afloat, including the LF while
embarked. The CLF is responsible for CBRN defense of the LF once ashore.
c. Planning Considerations. AF commanders address potential CBRN threats or
hazards during the planning phase.
(1) Countering WMD plans may include provisions for the following:
(a) Requests for supporting operations to eliminate or reduce an adversarys
CBRN capabilities within the operational area prior to the arrival of the AF.
(b) Plans for amphibious advance force operations to further degrade an
adversarys CBRN capabilities and to detect contaminated areas that may interfere with the
CONOPS.
(c) Offensive and defensive preparations taken by the AF to minimize the
vulnerability to and mitigate the effects of CBRN attacks.
(2) The AFs joint intelligence preparation of the operational environment (JIPOE)
process should address the capabilities and limitations of an adversarys offensive CBRN
capabilities, including associated delivery systems, their C2 and release procedures, and
indicators of intent to employ these weapons. The AF commanders should provide target
planning and execution guidance for conventional weapons use and consult with US
Strategic Command and US Cyber Command for use of other capabilities, such as those used
for offensive cyberspace operations, to the full extent of available actions to create the
desired effects needed against an adversary employing any CBRN weapons. TIM within the
operational area should be located and characterized as it can produce similar effects.
(3) The principles of CBRN defense should be factored into planning to
specifically address avoidance of CBRN hazards, particularly contamination, protection of
individuals and units from unavoidable CBRN hazards, and required decontamination
procedures to restore operational capability. Application of these principles helps to
minimize vulnerabilities, protect the AF, and maintain the operating tempo in order to
achieve the AF objectives.
III-40
JP 3-02
III-41
Chapter III
(b) Sustaining operations in CBRN environments may require collective
protection equipment, which provides a toxic-free area for conducting operations and
performing life support functions such as rest, relief, and medical treatment. When
collective protection is not available ashore, plans must be developed, exercised, and
evaluated to move personnel away from contaminated areas ashore.
(6) When contamination avoidance is not possible, decontamination supports the
post-attack restoration of the AF and the resumption of operations to a near-normal
capability. Decontamination is conducted to reduce or eliminate the hazard risk to personnel
and to make equipment serviceable. Because decontamination may be labor and logistic
intensive and assets are limited, the AF commanders must prioritize requirements and
decontaminate only what is necessary. Decontamination is organized into four categories
that reflect operational urgency: immediate, operational, thorough, and clearance. In order to
maintain the operational tempo, the AF uses immediate and operational decontamination to
the maximum extent possible until the AF objectives are secured. Thorough
decontamination is normally conducted in the rear area, beyond the range of enemy directfire systems. It is conducted during an operational pause, following the completion of an
operation, and preferably prior to recovery to a ship. Clearance decontamination provides
decontamination to a level that allows unrestricted transportation, maintenance, employment,
and disposal. It prepares organizations or individual units for return to their home garrisons.
It involves those actions required to bring contaminated items into full compliance with
national work and occupational hazard standards. Clearance decontamination is conducted
after hostile actions have terminated, when the commander determines it is in the units best
interest, or when directed by higher authority. It involves factors such as suspending normal
activities, withdrawing personnel, and having materials and facilities not normally present to
the AF.
22. Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Operations
a. The proper execution of joint electromagnetic spectrum (EMS) management
operations enables the commander to command and control forces, gather intelligence,
execute both lethal and nonlethal fires missions, conduct movement and maneuver, and
protect and sustain the force. All of these functions are accomplished in a dynamic
environment and require continual planning, coordination, and management of the EMS to
ensure that the full complement of capabilities is at the commanders disposal.
b. Once the allotted EMS has been allocated to support specific forces or systems in the
AOA, it is no longer available for use. EMS can, however, be reallocated or reused,
depending on distance and power between emitters. The CATF and CLF should conduct an
operational assessment of the impact of sacrificing one potentially critical capability in order
to use another.
c. The AF should resolve electromagnetic interference daily.
d. EW planners should coordinate their planned activities with other activities that may
use the EMS. EW activity may create effects within and throughout the entire EMS and
cannot be limited to the AOA. AF EW planners should closely coordinate their efforts with
III-42
JP 3-02
III-43
Chapter III
CATF. The number and types of ships assigned to each of these groups is determined by the
size and composition of the LF organization for embarkation. The LF organization for
embarkation consists of embarkation groups, units, elements, and teams. Corresponding
embarkation echelons are formed within the ATF. For forward-deployed ARG/MEUs,
embarkation occurred when the ARG completed onload prior to deployment; however,
reorganization and redistribution of that load-out may be necessary to support specific
operations.
c. Responsibilities. CATF and CLF planning responsibilities are as follows:
(1) The CATF:
(a) Allocates amphibious warfare ships and AFOE ships.
(b) Provides ships loading characteristics pamphlets to the CLF.
(c) Organizes Navy forces for embarkation.
(d) Prepares movement orders for ships.
(e) Approves the load plan.
(f) Advises CLF on Navy support forces embarkation requirements, for
example, explosive ordinance disposal teams, sea air-land team, assault craft unit, and
beachmaster unit requirements.
(2) The CLF:
(a) Determines LF requirements for amphibious warfare ships and AFOE
ships.
(b) Develops LF organization for embarkation.
(c) Determines embarkation support requirements.
(d) Prepares detailed embarkation and loading plans.
(3) Other commanders should:
(a) Provide lift requirements.
(b) Organize units for embarkation.
(c) Participate in embarkation planning meetings.
See JP 3-02.1, Amphibious Embarkation and Debarkation, for embarkation and loading plan
considerations.
III-44
JP 3-02
III-45
Chapter III
(2) Pre-Positioning
(a) Geographic Pre-Positioning. The positioning of equipment in
strategically important areas of the world provides the ability to deploy forces more rapidly
by eliminating the need to strategically transport large amounts of materiel over great
distances to the objective area. Theater mobility resources are needed to move the prepositioned equipment.
(b) Maritime Pre-Positioning. The pre-positioning of equipment and
supplies on ships provides more flexibility than does geographic pre-positioning. The
mobility of ships permits early movement toward a trouble area. The need for airlift and its
underlying requirement for airfields, staging areas, and security make deployment of an MPF
dependent on supporting strategic mobility resources. MPF operations also require the
preparation of the ships and embarked watercraft and equipment before arrival in the
operational area, and assessment of the port or beach and arrival airfield. To accomplish
these requirements, planners must take into consideration the timing for deployment of the
off-load preparation party and the survey-liaison-reconnaissance party. Ideally, the off-load
preparation party should embark on the maritime pre-positioning ships squadron (MPSRON)
at least 96 hours prior to the MPSRONs arrival in the operational area. Positioning of the
MPSRON will dictate the timing of these deployments as will the necessity, if required, for
augmentation from the Selected Reserves of the Navy support element, amphibious
construction battalion, and cargo-handling battalion. The use of ISBs will be mandatory for
reconstituting the pre-positioned units and their fly-in elements, as well as configuring them
to fit into the landing plan. Reconfiguration will be accomplished through restructuring units
into the task organization necessary to carry out the landing plan.
(c) Army Pre-positioned Stocks (APS). The Army maintains the APS
program. APS has both land and sea components. It possesses port operations support
packages and joint logistics over-the-shore (JLOTS) capabilities for use when seaports do
not exist, are unavailable, or are insufficient.
SECTION C. REHEARSALS
...the landing for Utah, geographically separated from the other four beaches, was
considered by planners to be almost a separate event and so was given its own
formal rehearsal. This was Exercise Tiger. Additionally, there simply were not
enough assault training beaches to give it and Force O a simultaneous rehearsal.
Finally, as the last Assault Force to be formed up and given the least amount of
time to train, Force U might have been seen as the Assault Force requiring the
greatest amount of special attentionhence, a separate and additional rehearsal.
Christopher D. Yung, Gators of Neptune: Naval Amphibious Planning for the
Normandy Invasion (Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press, 2006), pp. 158-159
III-46
JP 3-02
III-47
Chapter III
28. Rehearsal Plans
a. Responsibility for preparation of rehearsal plans is the same as for preparation
of the OPLAN. Rehearsal plans require execution of the various tasks and functions
paralleling those required during the operation. They are issued separately from the
OPLAN.
b. The number, nature, and scope of rehearsals will be influenced by the following
considerations:
(1) The complexity of the tasks.
(2) Time available for rehearsals.
(3) State of training, for example: general amphibious proficiency in debarking,
proficiency at night in all light levels, proficiency in hot or cold temperature environments.
(4) Suitability of available areas.
(5) Special or unusual problems to be faced in the actual operation.
(6) Adequacy of communications system.
(7) Logistic and CSS availability to replenish, replace, or repair assets used.
(8) OPSEC to prevent disclosure of timing, location, or intent to conduct an
amphibious operation.
(9) Organic modeling and simulation capability.
(10) The rehearsals may be able to be used as part of a deception plan to deceive
the enemy of the intended location of the amphibious operation or even the time of the
operations. Rehearsals may be able to lure the enemy into complacency.
c. Factors influencing the dates on which rehearsals are conducted and the time
allocated for them include:
(1) Complete and careful execution of the entire rehearsal.
(2) Re-embarkation of all troops, equipment, and supplies.
(3) Replenishment, repair, or replacement of equipment and supplies used during
rehearsals, including landing craft, ships, or aircraft.
(4) After action reviews at all levels of command for evaluation and correction of
problems.
(5) Time to revise areas of the plan in which the rehearsal identified problems.
III-48
JP 3-02
Chapter III
movement plan. Knowledge of the adversarys surveillance capability will be a key
consideration in achieving surprise. Movement of the force to the operational area may be
interrupted by rehearsals, stops at staging areas for logistic reasons, or pauses at rendezvous
points.
30. Echelons of the Landing Force
a. The echelons of the LF may include the AE, the AFOE, and the follow-up shipping
and aircraft. The MPF ships of the afloat pre-positioning force (APF) may also be
employed.
(1) The AE is that element of a force that comprises tailored units and aircraft
assigned to conduct the initial assault on the operational area. The AE is embarked in
amphibious warfare ships. The AE ships are combat loaded with troops, equipment, and
supplies that typically provide up to 15 days of sustainment. Other elements included in the
AE are LF elements of the amphibious advance force that deploy with sufficient supplies to
accomplish their mission and sustain themselves until subsequent forces arrive.
(2) The AFOE is that echelon of the assault troops, vehicles, aircraft, equipment,
and supplies which, although not needed to initiate the assault, are required to support and
sustain the assault. The AFOE is normally required in the operational area no later than
5 days after commencement of the assault landing. The AFOE is divided into air-lifted
and sea-lifted forces and supplies. Required arrival time in theater, suitability of material for
air and sea lift, and lift availability, in that order, will determine transportation mode.
(3) Follow-up shipping and aircraft provide the landing of reinforcements and
stores after the AEs and AFOEs have landed. Follow-up material is carried by transport
ships and aircraft not originally part of the AF.
b. MPF and other APF operations that augment and reinforce the LF are scheduled to
best support the AF in conjunction with the anticipated arrival of the AFOE. The prepositioned force can provide equipment and supplies to a MEB or USA maneuver unit at a
secure location in the operational area. These additional troops, supplies, and equipment can
then be picked up and transported by ATF assets as they become available or other means to
reinforce or augment forces ashore.
c. The passage of designated movement groups may be interrupted by stopping at
points where they wait until called forward to the landing area by CATF. A regulating point
is an anchorage, port, or ocean area to which AE, AFOE, and follow-up shipping proceed on
a schedule and at which they are retained by CATF until needed in the transport area for
unloading. Regulating points also serve as a rendezvous point to which shipping proceeds
when empty to await makeup of a convoy or movement group for movement toward bases
outside the AOA. In this manner, congestion of ships in transport areas off assault beaches
can be reduced. This can contribute to passive defense against WMD and A2/AD weapons.
For additional information on MPF operations, see MCWP 3-32/NTTP 3-02.3, Maritime
Prepositioning Force Operations.
III-50
JP 3-02
III-51
Chapter III
volunteered and activated under the Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement/Maritime
Security Program.
(d) Up to two MSC-operated hospital ships.
(e) The Maritime Administration Ready Reserve Force consisting of former
commercial or military vessels of high military utility, including aviation logistic support
ships, an offshore petroleum discharge system (OPDS) ship, RO/RO and fast sealift ships,
and crane ships. These vessels are maintained in a five or ten-day readiness status by the
Maritime Administration and are under OPCON of MSC when activated.
(f) Ships provided by allied, partner nation, and friendly governments.
(g) Additional detachments provided by the Army can add capabilities such as
the logistic support vessel or LCU2000 to augment transport group task organizations when
conditions will permit Army land component command seaborne and beach landing
capability integration.
(h) Joint high speed vessels to support intratheater movement of personnel,
vehicles, and cargo to ISBs or movement to ports.
(3) Airlift Movement Groups. Airlifted supplies and equipment that may be
brought in as part of the AFOE are included in this group. A fly-in echelon to link up with
equipment delivered by the MSC is also included. Aircraft assigned can be organic military
or commercial, to include:
(a) Aircraft activated/volunteered under Civil Reserve Air Fleet.
(b) Aircraft requisitioned by the United States Government (USG).
(c) Aircraft provided by allied, partner nation, and friendly governments.
(4) Support Movement Groups. These movement groups may include CSGs,
MIW ships, screening ships, fire support ships, and other combatants and ships to support the
amphibious operation. As mentioned, it may be desirable to attach all or part of the support
groups to the amphibious and transport movement groups to provide protection while en
route to the operational area or AOA.
d. Post-D-Day Movement Groups. Movement groups of the AF scheduled to arrive
in the operational area after D-day will usually be assigned a screen for force protection.
e. Follow-Up Movement Groups. These movement groups consist of ships not
originally a part of the ATF but which deliver troops and supplies to the objective area after
the action phase has begun. The first follow-up elements may arrive in the operational area
before unloading of the AE or AFOE ships is complete. In such cases, OPCON or TACON
of these elements may be passed to the CATF. The CATF retains OPCON or TACON of
these elements until such time as the amphibious operation is terminated, the elements are
detached from the AF, or another off-load authority has been designated.
III-52
JP 3-02
III-53
Chapter III
(2) For the surface movement, the LF may be landed from ships by landing craft,
AAVs, or small boats (e.g., combat rubber raiding craft).
(3) The amphibious warfare ships, landing craft, AAVs, and organic aviation are
organized to correspond to the tactical organization of troops to facilitate control and
maneuverability. This organization includes boat waves, boat groups, and boat flotillas.
(4) A boat wave consists of the landing craft or AAVs within a boat group that
carries the troops, equipment, or cargo requiring simultaneous landing.
(5) The boat group is the basic organization of landing craft. One boat group is
organized for each surface LF element within scheduled waves at a designated beach.
(6) The boat flotilla is an organization of two or more boat groups.
(7) Although LCACs are landing craft, their employment differs from
displacement landing craft because their speed is greater and they can traverse over
obstacles. However, they are often maintenance-intensive and can easily be damaged by
enemy fires. Limited operations using one or more LCAC groups may be conducted from as
far as 100 miles offshore. However, this distance approaches the maximum capability of the
craft and requires careful planning.
d. The LF is organized to execute the landing and to conduct initial operations ashore
in accordance with the commanders CONOPS. The major subordinate elements of the LF
should be capable of independent operations during the initial stages of the landing and
operations ashore. For example, a regimental commander will need time to establish C2
over the separate battalions, which may have landed across different beaches and LZs.
Depending on the type of amphibious operation, the organization for landing should also
provide for:
(1) Maximum combat power at the point of landing.
(2) Depth to the assault to ensure flexibility and a sustained buildup of combat
power.
(3) Dispersion of the force as consistent with other requirements.
(4) Sufficient flexibility to exploit weaknesses found in the adversary defenses.
(5) Timely establishment and employment of tactical and administrative support
systems ashore.
(6) Closest possible resemblance to the organization for combat.
e. As discussed earlier, the Marine Corps will organize as a MAGTF to conduct LF
assault operations but will further organize into landing teams to facilitate the ship-to-shore
movement and initial operations ashore. As with the MAGTF, the Army LF also will
organize into landing teams that are based around ground maneuver units within the LF.
III-54
JP 3-02
Chapter III
equipment, and supplies in accordance with the LF landing plan. TACLOG groups also
serve as the primary source of information to the CLF regarding the status of LF units during
ship-to-shore movement. The TACLOG group provides the link between the LFSP and
advises the LF operations center and the Navy control organizations on the status of the offload.
33. Shaping the Operational Environment
a. Prior to the execution of the action phase of an amphibious operation, the CAF seeks
to shape the operational environment. Although these operations are usually referred to
in the context of an amphibious assault or amphibious raid, they may be used to
support other types of amphibious operations such as shaping the operational
environment for a NEO or FHA.
b. The JFC and JFMCC will use CSGs and other maritime and joint forces to prepare
the AOA or operational area prior to the commencement of the amphibious operation. The
support relationship between a CSG commander, other commanders shaping the operational
environment, and the CAF, CATF, and CLF should be outlined in an establishing directive.
The manner in which these operations are conducted will depend on the type of amphibious
operation. The forces required and the time period in which these operations are
conducted typically define the operation. Shaping operations include supporting and
prelanding operations.
c. Supporting operations are conducted to establish the requisite conditions for an
amphibious operation (e.g., establishment of air and maritime superiority). Supporting
operations are directed by the JFC or a designated commander and are to a large degree
based on requests for certain actions from the CATF and CLF. The JFC or JFMCC may
employ a support force, which is a temporary organization comprised of initial response
forces and SOF in the operational area to assist in preparing the operational area for
amphibious operations. The JFC or JFMCC will normally determine how to best organize
the support forces to shape the operational environment. These operations are normally
conducted by naval forces, air forces, and SOF and may occur at any time before or after Hhour.
(1) Supporting operations may include:
(a) Initiation of MCM operations. MCM operations emphasize the clearance
of mines in the transport areas, FSAs, and sea approaches to the landing beaches. MCM
forces do not have the capability to conduct their mission in a clandestine manner, do not
operate at a high rate of speed, and have limited capability for self-defense. Therefore, the
decision on whether and where to conduct MCM during supporting operations (or to
postpone their use until prelanding operations) should be made considering not only the mine
threat to the AF but also the operational requirement to conduct MCM. However, MCM
forces limitations also can be used to support operational deception.
(b) Hydrographic reconnaissance of the landing beaches and seaward
approaches. The Navys Fleet Survey Team may conduct quick response hydrographic
III-56
JP 3-02
III-57
Chapter III
(k) Operations that may induce the enemy to expose their A2/AD systems and
plans.
(l) Air interdiction.
(m) Underwater demolition.
(2) A JFC or JFMCC provided support force, such as forward deployed
ARG/MEUs, MCM assets, and other forces, can be task organized by the CATF and CLF as
a temporary organization within the AF to form an amphibious advance force prior to the
arrival of the AF into the operational area. The amphibious advance force facilitates better
coordination with the overall landing plan and LF CONOPS ashore. The LF CONOPS,
however, should not assume that the amphibious advance force will be available for tasking
as part of the support force. The CATF and CLF may assemble an amphibious advance
force from forces assigned to the AF. The CATF provides available forces and command
and information systems to help conduct the operation. CLF evaluates the missions assigned
to the amphibious advance force and may form a landing group or subordinate task
organization, designate a commander, and provide a staff and forces to accomplish assigned
tasks. A landing group commander is the officer designated by the CLF as the single tactical
commander of a subordinate task organization capable of conducting landing operations
against a position or group of positions. A reconnaissance group commander is used when
LF units conduct only reconnaissance and surveillance missions. The CLF determines LF
requirements for NSFS, priority intelligence requirements, air support, space support,
reconnaissance, and other areas and submits them to the CATF. The CLF also determines
any communications system requirements for the LF personnel who will accompany the
amphibious advance force. The CATF and CLF may need to modify embarkation and
landing plans (cross-deck equipment and personnel as required) to support amphibious
advance force operations. SOF support requirements and relationships with the amphibious
advance force commander should be determined prior to the arrival of the AF in the
operational area. Upon arrival of the AF, the amphibious advance force is usually
disestablished, and forces revert to control of designated commanders to either continue
conducting supporting operations or to conduct other JFC operations as directed. Certain
tasks may dictate that MCM, reconnaissance teams, and SOF, for example, remain with the
AF as part of the prelanding operations to minimize disruptions prior to the landing.
(3) Decision to Employ a Support Force. The JFC or other higher authority may
restrict or preclude the use of a support force based on the diplomatic or military situation.
The decision to employ force is made after weighing the advantages of operational and
tactical surprise and the requirements for preparation of the landing area. Knowledge of the
operational area, the indigenous population, extent of adversary fixed defenses, air defenses,
mines, and obstacles should be evaluated.
(a) Complete surprise is difficult to attain against an alert adversary and the
prospects of achieving it decrease with efforts to isolate the AOA/AO. Every effort should
be made to conceal the landing areas and AF objectives from the enemy until the
commencement of the ship-to-shore movement.
III-58
JP 3-02
Chapter III
9. LF requirement to support other forces prior to and after D-day.
(e) The reduced timeframe associated with prelanding operations is not
conducive for MCM with respect to the speed at which MCM forces conduct their mission.
As such, there are many factors that must be considered and risks weighed to inform a
decision for the use of MCM forces either in the support force operations or in prelanding
operations (or some combination of both).
(f) With the completion of prelanding operations, the AF will conduct
operations into the landing area to accomplish the decisive action.
34. Final Preparations for Landing
In some case, units may need to cross-deck prior to the ship-to-shore movement. Upon
completion of any pre-execution operations the ATF starts the final approach to assigned
positions for the landings. Ships prepare for the debarkation of the embarked troops,
equipment, and supplies in accordance with previously prepared plans. The commencement
of debarkation and the timing of the ship-to-shore movement depend on the designated Hhour. All elements must be prepared to modify plans on short notice to conform to changes
in H-hour.
35. Landing Force Operations Ashore
a. LF operations ashore begin with the landing of the first scheduled wave by surface
means, vertical insertion, or airborne landing. Elements of the LF quickly transition from an
organization for landing to an organization for combat in order to accomplish the LF
missions ashore. Once fully established ashore, the LF conducts tactical operations similar
to normal land operations but remains dependent on at-sea forces for support. As the
operation progresses and support is established ashore, the degree of dependence is reduced.
b. The CLF is responsible for the overall planning and execution of LF operations
ashore. To guide LF operations ashore during the action phase, the CLF and staff
develop the LF plan for operations. During the initial preparation of the plan, the LF staff
will need to develop the essential items necessary to frame the overall OPLAN. The LF
CONOPS ashore supporting fires plan, employment of LF aviation, CSS concept, and the
engineer breaching plan are produced based on the CLFs guidance and intent.
(1) The LF CONOPS ashore amplifies CLFs decisions and indicates how the
operation should progress. The development of the concept of LF operations ashore is an
evolutionary process. The concept developed during detailed planning is a refinement of the
initial concept developed during preliminary amphibious planning. Ultimately, the detailed
concept is included in the OPLAN. The operational and logistic requirements of subordinate
elements and changes in the adversary situation may necessitate modifications to this
concept, but it must always provide additional clarity to the LF commanders intent.
Included in the LF CONOPS ashore, the scheme of maneuver is a plan for the execution of a
tactical COA. It includes objectives, types of offensive maneuver to be employed,
distribution of forces, and necessary control measures. In formulating the scheme of
maneuver for an amphibious operation, the principles of ground combat remain valid.
III-60
JP 3-02
Chapter III
(2) When keeping the reserve afloat is no longer any advantage, it is landed and
positioned ashore to facilitate future employment. This action should not be undertaken until
sufficient area has been seized ashore to permit adequate maneuver space.
36. Subsidiary Landings
a. In an amphibious operation, a subsidiary landing is a landing, normally conducted by
elements of the AF to support the main landing, usually made outside the designated landing
area. An amphibious operation may require one or more subsidiary landings conducted
before, during, or after the main landing. If made before, the effect on the main landing must
be considered in terms of possible loss of surprise.
b. Subsidiary landings must be planned and executed by commanders with the same
precision as the main landing. Division of forces to conduct subsidiary landings is justified
only when such employment will be of greater value than commitment to the main landing.
Forces employed in subsidiary landings that precede the main landing may be re-embarked
and employed as a tactical reserve supporting the main landing. Subsidiary landings may be
executed to accomplish one or more of the following specific purposes:
(1) Seize specific areas to be used in support of the main landing, i.e., seizing
islands or mainland areas adjacent to the main landing area for use as:
(a) Artillery, missile, and rocket firing positions.
(b) Airfields or vertical and short takeoff and landing aircraft-capable
locations.
(c) Protected anchorage, temporary advanced naval bases, or logistics and
CSS sites from which the main landing can be supported.
(d) Air warning and control system sites.
(2) Seize an area to deny its use to the enemy in opposing the main landing.
(3) Divert enemy attention and forces from the main landing or fix enemy
defensive forces in place as part of a deception operation.
37. Re-Embarkation and Force Reaggregation
a. If embarkation is preparatory to immediate reemployment of the force, planning for
the backload of forces is conducted in accordance with the planning procedures set forth in
JP 3-02.1, Amphibious Embarkation and Debarkation, to the extent the tactical situation
ashore permits. Combat loading will be employed in preparation for a subsequent
amphibious operation and reaggregation of the AF. Each individual item is stowed so that it
can be unloaded at the required time.
b. Re-embarkation for movement to base areas will normally employ administrative
loading. Planning must consider the customs and agriculture regulations of the destination
III-62
JP 3-02
III-63
Chapter III
Intentionally Blank
III-64
JP 3-02
CHAPTER IV
TYPES OF AMPHIBIOUS OPERATIONS
1. Overview
The five types of amphibious operations are: amphibious raid, amphibious
demonstration, amphibious assault, amphibious withdrawal, and AF support to crisis
response and other operations. The types of amphibious operations apply to a variety of
missions across the range of military operations. While Chapter III, Conduct of
Amphibious Operations, provided basic considerations for amphibious operations with
respect to PERMA, this chapter provides additional planning considerations and specific
execution information for each of the five types of amphibious operations.
SECTION A. AMPHIBIOUS RAID
2. General
a. An amphibious raid is an operation involving a swift incursion into or the temporary
occupation of an objective to accomplish an assigned mission followed by a planned
withdrawal. An amphibious raid may be conducted to temporarily seize an area in order to
secure information, confuse an adversary, capture personnel or equipment, or to destroy a
capability. Amphibious raids are conducted as independent operations or in support of other
operations. Depending on the purpose of the raid, it may be conducted using clandestine
insertion means, relying on stealth to approach the objective, or overtly with full fire support
in a manner that may resemble the early stages of an amphibious assault. Naval special
warfare forces and Marine Corps SOF provide specialized amphibious raid capabilities.
Examples include the amphibious raids in the Pacific to support amphibious assaults in
World War II or the amphibious raid on Umm Al Maradim during Operation DESERT
STORM.
b. Generally, amphibious raids are conducted for the following reasons:
(1) Destruction. Amphibious raids may be required to destroy targets of such
importance that indisputable confirmation of destruction is essential. Targets not easily
destroyed by other means may be subject to destruction by a raid force. Political concerns
regarding civilian or cultural collateral damage may necessitate a raid. Targets for
destruction may include military or industrial installations, communication and energy
facilities, and transportation nodes, such as rail and port facilities, bridges, and tunnels.
Raids may have strategic, operational, or tactical significance.
(2) Capture or Killing of Key Personnel. These operations are normally directed
against specific opposition leaders, those personnel possessing intelligence value, and other
IV-1
Chapter IV
high-value targets. The capture or killing of these personnel requires detailed planning.
Timely and accurate intelligence is essential. The need to avoid advance warning of
execution may require the initial force to be small in size yet the targets location (e.g., in a
complex urban area or an isolated mountain cave) and enemy disposition may require a
uniquely organized reaction (covering) force. Friendly forces executing these types of
operations normally try to avoid deliberate engagement with local forces, concentrating
specifically on those forces protecting the target and with direct impact on mission
execution. Execution authority for these operations may reside with the JFC or higher
authorities.
(3) Combat Information. Amphibious raids may be conducted to collect
information regarding enemy forces including dispositions, strengths and weaknesses,
movement, reaction to attack, and weapons. They may be used to obtain information on
hydrography, beaches, terrain, and LZs. All AFs, regardless of assigned mission, perform a
secondary function of collecting and reporting information.
(4) Evacuation and Recovery. An amphibious raid may include tactical recovery
of aircraft and personnel and in-extremis hostage recovery.
(5) Diversion. An amphibious raid may be conducted as a supporting effort to
create a diversion or ambiguity in the enemy commanders perception of the situation. It
may support or be the deception operation. Assignment of alternate targets is undesirable
unless the objective is to create a diversion. In this case, authority to engage targets of
opportunity may be granted.
(6) Psychological. A successful amphibious raid against a lawful military
objective may impact the morale of enemy personnel. This may be desirable at the outset of
hostilities, after extended periods of inactivity, or after tactical or operational setbacks.
Raids conducted under such circumstances help maintain an offensive mindset within the
force.
(7) An amphibious raid may support forces engaged with the enemy by attacking
the enemy rear or flank.
(8) An amphibious raid may be conducted as part of or in support of
unconventional warfare activities.
c. Characteristics. Amphibious raids have recognizable characteristics whether
conducted as separate operations or as part of larger campaigns. The commander will
articulate the specific objective to be achieved by the raid force. Amphibious raids are
inherently dangerous; therefore, commanders assess and determine that raid objectives are
worth the risk. The amphibious raid force may exit or enter the objective area via a variety
of air, surface, and subsurface assets. Amphibious raids may be conducted by any force with
the skills and equipment suited for the mission. Amphibious raid forces depend on surprise,
detailed intelligence, timeliness of mission execution, and violence of action at the objective.
Thorough, integrated rehearsals are essential to precision and speed in executing an
amphibious raid. All participating forces should be drilled in every detail of debarkation,
IV-2
JP 3-02
Chapter IV
the objective area. Intelligence updates and final preparations are performed before
debarkation.
c. The following factors will influence the choice of landing areas for the raid force:
(1) Enemy disposition.
(2) Sea approaches.
(3) Hydrographic and beach characteristics.
(4) Availability of LZs.
(5) Avenues of approach to the objective and beach exits.
d. The estimated time that the amphibious raid force is to be ashore may influence the
choice of H-hour and, consequently, the conditions of visibility under which it may be
landed and withdrawn. These factors likewise affect the scope of logistic support.
e. The purpose of the raid, including its relation to other concurrent or imminent
operations that it may support, will influence the selection of its D-day. In addition, these
same factors may affect the availability of shipping, aircraft, and logistic and fire support
means for the raid.
f. Planning for the embarkation of forces assigned to participate in an amphibious raid
is similar to preparation for the amphibious assault, including consideration of OPSEC
measures. The most important consideration for embarkation and loading of ships, landing
craft, helicopters, and tiltrotor aircraft is the support of the tactical employment of the raid
force. Other considerations include capabilities of specific platforms, en route training and
rehearsal requirements, defense of the amphibious raid force, and flexibility for contingency
response.
g. Fire support planning is similar to that for an amphibious assault. However, because
the success of an amphibious raid usually requires surprise, amphibious raid forces will
generally not employ any fires to prepare the objective for assault or other fires in support of
their movement that might alert the enemy. EMCON should be maintained until surprise is
lost. Pre-H-hour fires may be an effective part of deception operations to draw enemy
attention away from the raid force or its objective. On-call fire support must also be planned
to support the amphibious raid force if it is detected en route and requires assistance to break
contact, conduct an emergency withdrawal, or continue to the objective.
h. Detailed planning for an amphibious raid requires intelligence that allows the CLF to
more precisely tailor the force size, conduct rehearsals, identify critical targets, and plan
support. The availability or lack of intelligence affects all aspects of the amphibious raid.
i. Planning for ship-to-objective maneuver is generally similar to that for an
amphibious assault except movement may be made entirely by air, subsurface, or surface
craft. The amphibious raid force emphasizes silent landing techniques to reduce visual,
IV-4
JP 3-02
IV-5
Chapter IV
to confuse the enemy as to time, place, or strength of the main effort. A demonstration
could involve a show of force in support of United Nations sanctions, as during Operation
RESTORE DEMOCRACY (1998) or could be integral to the scheme of maneuver for a
large-scale offensive action, as during Operation DESERT STORM (1991). Amphibious
demonstrations may be conducted in order to delude or confuse the enemy. In the
operational area, an amphibious demonstration may be conducted in or near the landing area
in conjunction with an amphibious assault. In still other cases, a demonstration may be
conducted outside the operational area by forces not attached to the supported AF to divert or
immobilize enemy strategic reserve forces that could threaten the amphibious assault.
Likewise, the demonstration could be used to divert enemy attention from other operations.
b. Characteristics. Effectiveness of a demonstration increases in direct proportion to
the degree of realism involved in its execution. The enemy must be convinced that the
amphibious demonstration force is preparing for an amphibious raid or assault. All visual,
audible, and electromagnetic aspects of the demonstration must appear to be authentic. A
demonstration normally includes the approach of forces to the demonstration area, at least a
part of the ship-to-shore movement, and employment of supporting fires. A brief but intense
preliminary bombardment will usually be more effective than deliberate harassing fire over
longer periods of time. Communications plans should support the deception. Tactical
deception units may be employed.
(1) Demonstrations Within the Operational Area.
An amphibious
demonstration may be conducted by a portion of the force within the operational area when it
is intended to influence enemy action within that area. The intended purpose may be to
cause the enemy to employ its reserves improperly, to disclose weapon positions, to distract
attention, to place an early burden on communications systems, to precipitate a general air or
naval engagement, or to harass. The decision to conduct such a demonstration is made
during the planning phase, in consultation with supporting commanders as appropriate.
(2) Demonstrations Outside the Main Operational Area. An amphibious
demonstration may be conducted outside of the main operational area to divert or immobilize
enemy strategic reserves or other forces capable of affecting the main effort, to distract
hostile attention from such an operation, or to precipitate a general air or naval engagement.
Such a demonstration may be executed as a supporting operation by a separate AF. The time
and place of the demonstration is decided by the JFC or higher authority based on the
recommendations of the CATF and CLF.
(3) Demonstrations in Support of Other Operations. An amphibious
demonstration may be conducted with the intent of supporting other operations in the theater
or designated operational area. A demonstration conducted before, during, or after
commencement of another operation may distract the attention of enemy commanders and
induce the enemy to divert major resources.
5. Planning and Execution of an Amphibious Demonstration
a. Location. The demonstration area should be near enough to the main effort to
permit subsequent employment of the demonstration force if that force is required for
IV-6
JP 3-02
IV-7
Chapter IV
(1) A demonstration before the main operation is conducted to:
(a) Draw enemy forces to the demonstration area and away from the area of
the main operation.
(b) Cause the enemy to disclose its positions.
(c) Provide protracted and systematic harassment.
(d) Divert the attention of the enemy from the main operation.
(e) Cause premature commitment of enemy forces.
(2) A demonstration may commence at the same time as the main operation if it is
desired to prevent redeployment of enemy forces and deceive the enemy as to the location of
the main operation.
(3) A demonstration may be conducted subsequent to the main operation to divert
enemy forces or fire from the point of the main effort. Successive demonstrations may be
executed at a number of points after the main operation commences.
c. Forces. The demonstration force must appear to be of such composition and size as
to cause the desired reaction. When the demonstration force is constituted from within the
AF, the LF reserve and the shipping in which it is embarked may be employed if the
presence of the reserve is not required in the immediate area of the main landing.
d. Supporting Arms. The demonstration force should execute supporting fires of a
nature and scope that provides credibility for the force and operation. Factors that may serve
to limit the amount of supporting fires are the availability of NSFS ships, aircraft, and
ammunition supply.
e. Rehearsals. Sufficient rehearsals should be held to aid the perception that the
demonstration is an actual amphibious raid or assault.
f. Action. The demonstration should occur over a long enough period to allow the
enemy to react. The movement of waves toward the beach or LZs should be conducted as a
normal ship-to-shore movement, except that boat waves normally do not actually beach and
helicopter and tiltrotor aircraft waves do not land. Empty landing craft must maintain
sufficient distance from the beach to preclude close enemy observation. At a prearranged
time or distance from the beach and LZ, or on signal, the boat waves and helicopter and
tiltrotor aircraft waves withdraw. On completion of the demonstration, the demonstration
force is dissolved and its elements are reassigned in accordance with the OPORD or
OPLAN.
IV-8
JP 3-02
Assault Sequence
Force Arrives in Operational Area
Mission Accomplishment
IV-9
Chapter IV
7. Planning and Execution of an Amphibious Assault
a. The LF mission is developed after careful analysis of the AF mission and only
after all specified and implied tasks are identified and understood. The mission is
translated into specific LF objectives by the CLF. These objectives serve as the primary
basis for determining the LF scheme of maneuver, fire support, organization for combat,
formation for landing, landing plan, and logistic support requirements. The CONOPS is the
principal means by which the commanders intent is promulgated, allowing subordinate and
supporting commanders to understand the commanders vision, and accomplish detailed
planning and execution of the operation.
b. In the amphibious assault, combat power is progressively phased ashore. The CLF
should consider which, if any, of the forces, could remain sea-based, such as C2 and
logistics. Initially, the LF is able to employ only a small fraction of its total potential
power. Tactical operations are initiated by small units that are normally only supported by
NSFS and attack aircraft. As rapidly as feasible, the preponderance of the LF is phased
ashore and functioning as a cohesive organization. The echelonment reflected in the
organization for landing provides for the orderly progression and development of combat
power.
For more information on LF echelons, see Chapter III, Conduct of Amphibious
Operations, Section D, Movement.
c. The time required to phase the LFs combat power ashore depends on many factors
to include, but not limited to:
(1) Degree of adversary interference with the landing.
(2) Availability, by type and number, of ship-to-shore movement assets.
(3) Availability, by type and number, of amphibious warfare ships.
(4) The location of the transport areas with respect to the beach.
(5) Capacity (including throughput considerations) of landing beaches and LZs.
(6) Extent of fire support available to the LF prior to establishing organic assets
ashore.
(7) Terrain, weather, and sea conditions in the landing area.
(8) Available maneuver space and trafficability considerations in the landing area.
d. The LF will seldom be able to secure control of the landward section of the landing
area in a single landing. Therefore, the CLF will have to phase forces ashore during
execution. Intermediate objectives and phase lines may be used to track and control the
phasing of forces ashore. Phasing can revolve around many mediums: time (in relation to Hhour, L-hour, or D-day); distance (intermediate objectives or phase lines); terrain (crossing
IV-10
JP 3-02
IV-11
Chapter IV
(e) Air defense units organic to the LF are established ashore early to provide
for the landward extension of an air defense system. They will be part of the CATFs
integrated air defense system until control is phased ashore.
(5) The LF scheme of maneuver should meet certain key requirements:
(a) Its primary purpose should be the seizure of objectives requisite to the
buildup and establishment of the LF ashore.
(b) Utilize all avenues of approach proximate to the selected beaches and LZs.
(c) Supportable by NSFS, missiles, and tactical air, especially prior to the
landing of artillery.
(d) The AE should be capable of initial success without dependence on other
assault units.
(e) Provide for the development of mutual support between units as the attack
progresses.
(f) Provide for early establishment of combat service support areas (CSSAs)
as required.
f. Use of reserve force.
(1) Commitment of the reserve in an amphibious assault may be more complex
than in normal land operations.
(2) When afloat, the reserve may be delayed pending availability of landing craft,
amphibious vehicles, helicopters, or tiltrotor aircraft plus the time required for debarkation
and movement ashore.
(3) Employment of the reserves may delay the movement of other assault
formations because all elements of the LF must share the same ship-to-shore movement
assets.
(4) Landing of the reserve by surface means depends on the availability of landing
craft as well as a suitable landing beach near the area of intended employment.
g. The AFOE is divided into air-lifted and sea-lifted forces and supplies. Required
arrival time in theater, suitability of material for air- and sea-lift, and lift availability, in that
order, will determine transportation mode.
(1) The AFOE is organized for landing and embarkation, respectively, based on
anticipated requirements of operations ashore. Units, personnel, and material configured in
shipload and planeload lots as dictated by landing and embarkation plans are then organized
into movement groups. Embarkation plans are prepared by the LF and appropriate
subordinate commanders containing instructions and information concerning the
IV-12
JP 3-02
IV-13
Chapter IV
b. Characteristics of Amphibious Withdrawals. While sharing many traits of the
amphibious assault, the amphibious withdrawal embraces the following distinguishing
characteristics:
(1) Except in the case of withdrawals associated with amphibious raids, planning
processes will usually be abbreviated.
(2) Time available to execute will be limited when enemy action against the
withdrawing force is substantial or when the requirement to re-employ the force elsewhere is
urgent.
(3) Facilities and equipment for embarkation, available fire support means, and
means for C2 of the withdrawal may be limited.
(4) The operation may be conducted under adverse weather conditions or
unfavorable terrain or hydrographic features.
(5) The force to be withdrawn may not have been inserted by an amphibious
operation and units may be unfamiliar with amphibious procedures, thus significantly
complicating the operation.
(6) Additionally, there may be the requirement to evacuate significant numbers of
foreign nationals for diplomatic or humanitarian needs as US forces are withdrawing.
9. Planning and Execution of an Amphibious Withdrawal
a. The amphibious withdrawal is normally executed in the following general sequence
of steps:
(1) Establish defense of the withdrawal and embarkation areas by air, naval, and
ground-covering forces while organizing and embarking LF personnel, supplies, and
equipment not required for support of operations ashore. As such, maintaining local air and
maritime superiority is essential to provide for the safety of the withdrawal.
(2) Progressively reduce troop strength and quantity of materiel and equipment
ashore. Depending on limitations in afloat cargo capacity and loading time, all usable
military materiel is either evacuated or destroyed.
(3) Consideration must be given to the difficulty of embarking heavy elements
such as artillery and armor. Ground elements being withdrawn that were not employed
ashore as part of an LF may be required to expeditiously reconfigure or modify their
equipment for the shore-to-ship movement and embarkation aboard amphibious warfare
ships.
b. As in the amphibious assault, defense of an embarkation area on a hostile or
potentially hostile shore requires closely coordinated employment of all available supporting
arms. Planning for and execution of a withdrawal is more complicated due to security
concerns and possible lack of port facilities. A larger US Navy covering force may be
IV-14
JP 3-02
IV-15
Chapter IV
11. Planning and Execution of Amphibious Force Support to Crisis Response and
Other Operations
a. NEOs. A NEO is similar to an amphibious raid in that there is a rapid insertion of forces
followed by a planned withdrawal. Forward-deployed ARG/MEUs are trained and certified to
conduct NEOs. Specific amphibious planning considerations for NEOs are:
(1) On arrival in the area, the CATF establishes and maintains positive
communications and effects liaison with local diplomatic representatives. The CLF should
be prepared to augment or duplicate communications.
(2) The evacuation site party conducts ground reconnaissance of proposed
assembly areas, evacuation sites, beaches, LZs, DZs, airports, and ports.
(3) The CLF may be tasked to augment existing security forces or to provide
forces to secure the evacuation area. Specific and detailed ROE should be promulgated.
(4) Screening and identification is a primary responsibility of the diplomatic
agency. When operational considerations dictate, screening and identification may be
executed ashore by other security forces, by the LF, or by elements of the ATF aboard ship.
Shipboard screening may be centralized or conducted aboard each ship. The AF may be
required to augment emergency medical and dental treatment ashore.
(5) Evacuation may be made by motor march, ATF shipping, commercial
shipping, aircraft, or a combination of these modes. If by motor vehicle, the CLF may be
tasked to provide convoy control, communications, and security. Shore-to-ship movement
may be made with organic surface and aircraft of the AF. Evacuation by air may be via
commercial aircraft from airfields or by use of LF aviation assets. The CLF may need to
provide security for the airfields and LZs.
(6) Delivery to safe haven may be accomplished by ships of the ATF. Passengers
are normally transported as soon as practical to the closest safe haven port or transported for
further evacuation from an available airfield or airport. The CLF may be tasked to provide
guides, baggage handlers, and shipboard security.
(7) Operations to protect civilians, noncombatants, and installations are
characterized by the necessity of as much detailed planning and liaison as time permits,
extensive coordination and communications between military and civilian agencies, highlevel interest requiring additional reporting, positive C2, and restrictive ROE. The
operational environment may range from civil disorders to major operations requiring the LF
ashore to be supported by NSFS. The installations being protected are normally the
throughput nodes for the NEO. The CLF could be expected to provide GCEs for security to
reinforce existing defense forces, ACE assets for transport or aerial fire support, and
logistical support to the forces ashore or to the installation involved.
For more information on NEOs, see JP 3-68, Noncombatant Evacuation Operations.
IV-16
JP 3-02
IV-17
Chapter IV
A Royal Thai Navy medium tactical vehicle drives onto the beach from Landing Craft Utility 785,
assigned to the Royal Thai amphibious and combat support service squadron, while participating
in a humanitarian assistance and disaster response training exercise during Cooperation Afloat
Readiness and Training Thailand 2012.
IV-18
JP 3-02
IV-19
Chapter IV
Intentionally Blank
IV-20
JP 3-02
CHAPTER V
SUPPORT TO AMPHIBIOUS OPERATIONS
1. General
This chapter discusses the supporting functions that should be considered by planning
staffs when developing the overall plan for the amphibious operation. They are the enablers
that support execution. Support for amphibious operations can be broken down into
intelligence, fire support, communications, logistics, protection, and seabasing.
SECTION A. INTELLIGENCE
2. Introduction
a. Amphibious Operations Intelligence. Because amphibious operations are
characterized as the most complex and difficult of military operations, intelligence activities
must consider all aspects of the operational environment that drives timely and
informed decision making. The JFC should consider the size and duration of the operation
and the organic intelligence capabilities of the AF when establishing either a joint
intelligence support element or an operational-level joint intelligence operations center to
support the AF. The joint intelligence support element or joint intelligence operations center
will be the central node in securing theater- and national-level intelligence support for the AF
and provide direct intelligence support to AF components. Amphibious operations differ
from other military operations because of the significant challenges posed by relatively fewer
AF intelligence assets in the operational area during the planning phase, a heavy initial
reliance on national and theater collection assets, and the transition of C2 ashore.
For more information, see JP 2-01, Joint and National Intelligence Support to Military
Operations.
b. The following intelligence capabilities are required to support amphibious
operations:
(1) Interoperable information systems that provide timely dissemination of
information for amphibious planning, rehearsals, and execution.
(2) Information management systems to include C2 applications and collaborative
information sharing to coordinate collection and dissemination efforts. These systems
support information management plans, which should be integrated into and fully support
mission requirements.
(3) Standoff collection assets capable of satisfying ATF and LF requirements from
OTH.
V-1
Chapter V
(4) Intelligence dissemination systems linking widely dispersed forces afloat and
ashore.
(5) Flexible intelligence assets capable of rapidly transitioning ashore with
minimal degradation of support.
3. Intelligence Support to Planning and Execution
a. Intelligence Process
(1) Planning and Direction. There are a number of unique considerations that
address ATF and LF intelligence requirements throughout all phases of amphibious
operations. During the embarked planning and direction phase, the ATF and LF intelligence
officers direct their personnel from the intelligence center established aboard amphibious
warfare ships to support the intelligence needs of the entire AF. The intelligence center
brings together all AF intelligence-related activities. While personnel and material remain
organic to their respective commands, they may task organize to perform intelligence work
necessary for completion of the mission.
(2) Collection. AF intelligence requirements are serviced by all available
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities (national, theater, and organic).
Supporting force or prelanding collection operations are often required to confirm and
further develop the operational picture. An aggressive prelanding intelligence effort will
provide support for target selection. However, the collection effort must not expose the
commanders intent. AFs should request national and theater collection assets to conduct
reconnaissance and surveillance of coastal areas early in the planning process to
determine the best landing areas to conduct the entry. Detailed astronomical, climatological,
meteorological, hydrographic, and topographic information to identify suitable penetration
points (e.g., beaches, LZs, DZs) is required as well.
(3) Processing and Exploitation. During processing and exploitation, raw
collected data is converted into forms that can be readily used by commanders, decision
makers at all levels, intelligence analysts, and other consumers.
(4) Analysis and Production. During the analysis and production phase, all
available processed information is integrated, analyzed, evaluated, and interpreted to create
products that will satisfy the AF commanders requirements. Individual intelligence sections
within the AF will normally concentrate on particular areas of expertise, satisfying their
units requirements while contributing a broad-scope product to the general intelligence
production effort. For example, LF intelligence could analyze the land operational
environment, to include the enemys C2, ground forces, logistics, and reserves, while ATF
intelligence could analyze enemy maritime forces and coastal defense threats. Air threats
could be analyzed from a combined AF perspective.
(5) Dissemination and Integration. Intelligence dissemination and integration
during amphibious operations presents significant challenges. AF and supporting forces can
be widely dispersed and may not assemble until late in the planning phase, if at all.
Advances in technology have improved intelligence dissemination between forces, but
V-2
JP 3-02
V-3
Chapter V
(2) COA Development. Intelligence operations support COA development in
several ways.
(a) Products from the JIPOE process may be included as an annex or
distributed as separate studies and reports, and should include, at a minimum:
1. Weather studies (mapping, charting, and geodesy).
2. Astronomical data in the operational area.
3. Climatological and meteorological studies.
4. Tidal and ocean current data in the operational area.
5. Hydrographic data in the operational area
6. Topographic data to include terrain impact on communications system
and trafficability analysis.
7. Beach and LZ studies.
8. Air facilities.
9. Ports and harbors.
10. Special studies on adversary and other relevant actors.
11. Sociocultural analysis on the civilian populace and culture.
For more information, see JP 2-01.3, Joint Intelligence Preparation of the Operational
Environment.
(b) Continuously update the view of the operational environment and
estimates of adversary capabilities, intentions, and activities.
(c) Provide focus on the adversary through identification of adversary COGs,
critical vulnerabilities, and potential COAs, with emphasis on the most likely and most
dangerous COAs.
(d) Assist in the prioritization of targets of interest.
(3) COA Analysis. Intelligence operations assist COA analysis to:
(a) Identify and refine most likely and dangerous adversary COAs and their
potential impact on the LF and actions and reactions to friendly COAs under consideration.
(b) Emulate the threat as a red cell during wargaming.
V-4
JP 3-02
V-5
Chapter V
monitor potential adversary reactions, identify new opportunities, and assess the
impact of friendly actions on the adversary.
e. By satisfying the CLFs critical information requirements and supporting the
LFs main effort, intelligence operations help generate operational tempo. They facilitate
operational tempo by supporting the decision-making process through accurate situational
awareness and by recognizing emerging patterns that enable the CLF and subordinate
commanders to rapidly make decisions.
SECTION B. FIRE SUPPORT
4. General
a. Properly planned and executed lethal and nonlethal supporting fires are critical to the
success of an amphibious operation. Since the availability and employment of one
supporting weapon system influences the requirements for the others, the fire support
requirements of all components of the AF should be considered together in planning the
employment of fire support means. Fire support planning and coordination in amphibious
operations are continuous processes seeking timely and appropriate application of force to
achieve the objectives within the operational area. Fire support planning integrates and
synchronizes the AF organic fires with nonorganic supporting fires to achieve the
commanders intent. Detailed integration of the ATF and LF fire support agencies is
necessary. Flexible, parallel C2 architecture that allows for decentralized fire support control
is used when applicable.
b. Both the ATF and the LF may require fire support during the amphibious operation.
(1) AFs in the AOA or AO normally require fire support for operations such as
beach reconnaissance, hydrographic survey, removal of beach and underwater obstacles, and
MCM. In addition, aircraft and ships capable of providing fire support must be allocated to
protect the force from air, surface, or subsurface attack.
(2) The LF normally requires fire support against shore targets before, during, and
after the initial landings. Once sufficient area is seized ashore, artillery can be landed to
provide additional fire support. Until ground fire support means (e.g., mortars, rockets, and
cannon artillery) of the LF are landed and ready to provide support, fire support is provided
by CAS, NSFS, and, in limited cases, direct and indirect fires from adjacent friendly forces.
(3) The LF may require fire support during amphibious withdrawal as the LF exits
the beach or landing zone.
(4) To the greatest extent possible, nonlethal fires should be planned in support of
all phases of an amphibious operation.
5. Responsibilities
Commanders at each level of the LF should:
V-6
JP 3-02
V-7
Chapter V
predicated on the designated commander providing clear and coordinated guidance to the
forces involved since unity of effort is essential.
(2) The SACC is established on initiation of planning. The SACC plans,
coordinates, and controls all organic and nonorganic fires within the operational area
in support of the AF. It is located aboard a ship configured with the requisite C2 facilities
to coordinate all forms of supporting fires (land, air, and sea-based). The designated
commander may choose either the ATFs supporting arms coordinator (SAC), the LFs force
fires coordinator (FFC) (if USMC), or FSC (if USA) to supervise the SACC. Whether the
SAC, FFC, or FSC supervises the SACC, fire support personnel from both the ATF and LF
operate the SACC. The organization of the SACC is typically the same for any size
amphibious operation; however, variations in the type of amphibious operation may require
specific needs. The organization described below is to be used only as a guide. SACC is a
single location on board an LHA or LHD in which all communication facilities incident to
the coordination of fire support from artillery, air, and NSFS are centralized. This is the
naval counterpart to the FSCC and DASC used by the LF.
(a) The ATF staff mans the NSFS section. This section monitors the naval
gunfire control net, support net, and other gunfire nets as appropriate. The LF staff provides
liaison to the section.
(b) The ASCS is manned by members of a Navy air control agency (e.g.,
tactical air control squadron or tactical air control group) and directed by the air support
coordinator who reports to the TAO. The TAO is the equivalent of the CCO and is in charge
of ship-to-shore movement by air. This section supports the Navy TACC by controlling,
supporting, or transferring control to subsidiary tactical air direction controllers afloat or
ashore. The section is located in the SACC and coordinates with the Navy TACC to assist in
the deconfliction of air missions, routes, and requests for fires. The LF staff provides liaison
to the section.
(c) The target information center (TIC) collects, displays, evaluates, and
disseminates information pertaining to potential targets. It should be manned by an ATF
target intelligence officer, ATF air intelligence officer, LF target intelligence officer, and
other personnel, as required. TIC members will normally operate in the SACC. The ATF
target intelligence officer representative to the FFCC supervises the TIC and maintains close
liaison with ATF and LF intelligence and operations staff. The LF target information officer
normally works in the intelligence center of the AF.
(3) The FFCC is the LF senior fire support coordination agency that plans,
executes, and coordinates all fires within the operational area. Prior to control being passed
ashore, the FFCC incrementally assumes responsibility for fire support planning and
coordination from the SACC. The FFCC is organized and supervised at the MAGTF level
by the FFC, who is responsible to the LF operations officer for MAGTF fires. The
organization operates at both the tactical and operational level addressing current and future
fire support issues. The FFCC coordinates those matters that cannot be coordinated by the
GCE (FSCC), ACE Marine TACC, or CSS operations center for integration of fire support
plans.
V-8
JP 3-02
Chapter V
apportionment and allocation process requires input from the subordinate commands within
the AF to ensure that their requirements are addressed.
(a) Direct support air requirements and any excess sorties are identified to the
establishing authority for further tasking.
(b) Normally, the JFC will apportion assigned air assets (by priority or
percentage) to support the AF. The JFC may also task supporting commands for air support
as required.
(3) During the planning phase of joint fires, commanders develop a CONOPS that
includes ATF supporting arms. Effective joint fire support depends on planning for the
successive performance of the four basic fire support tasks; support forces in contact, support
the CONOPS, synchronize joint fire support, and sustain joint fire support operations.
b. Targeting
(1) The AF normally conducts an integrated targeting board to provide broad fire
support and targeting oversight functions. Depending on the command relationships that the
establishing authority promulgates in the initiating directive, the designated commander
coordinates the targeting process for the AF through preparation and submission of target
nominations and FSCMs. The designated commander during the period within which the
targets are attacked has final approval authority over the fire support plan and target list.
Those targets to be serviced by organic assets are passed to the appropriate agencies for
servicing. Targets identified for servicing by nonorganic attack systems are forwarded to the
next higher-level targeting board for consideration. The AF will provide, at a minimum,
liaison officers to this targeting board (i.e., component level) and may provide liaison
officers to the senior joint targeting board (i.e., the JFCs joint targeting coordination board),
if established. AF targeting timelines are normally out to 7296 hours in order to match the
targeting timelines and planning cycle of the JFC.
(2) The AF may seek to shape their designated (but not activated) operational area
prior to the arrival of AFs through target nominations for attack by other components forces.
Restrictions on the attack of certain targets may also be requested.
For additional information, see JP 3-0, Joint Operations, JP 3-09, Joint Fire Support, and JP
3-60, Joint Targeting.
c. Fire Support Coordination. From the beginning of the action phase until a short
time after the first waves land, the LF is normally supported by scheduled fires. Once
control agencies (e.g., forward observers and NSFS spotters) are ashore, the LF will
normally begin calling for fires to support operations. Coordination is accomplished at the
lowest echelon possible. This same principle applies in the planning of subsequent planned
fires. Planning is accomplished as required at each level of the LF before daily fire support
plans are transmitted to the next higher level for similar action.
For more details, see JP 3-09, Joint Fire Support.
V-10
JP 3-02
Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers are equipped with a 5-inch (127-millimeter) gun.
V-11
Chapter V
(3) When subordinate amphibious task groups are formed and separate landing
areas are designated, the CATF may delegate to each attack group commander control of
NSFS in the landing area.
(4) Control may be passed to the CLF once the necessary control facilities are
established ashore. The CLF then has the authority to assign NSFS missions directly to the
fire support ships. The CATF or designated subordinate retains responsibility for allocation
of available fire support ships. CATF also retains responsibility for logistic support and
OPCON functions other than control of fires.
d. NSFS Organization
(1) The ATF echelons involved in surface fire support are as follows:
(a) The AF is the highest echelon directly concerned with the NSFS of the
amphibious operation.
(b) The fire support group is usually subdivided into fire support elements for
efficient and effective delivery of gunfire support. When necessary for span of control
considerations, an echelon called the fire support unit may be interposed between the fire
support group and fire support element. The fire support unit will function similarly to the
fire support group; however, fire support unit commanders normally do not deal directly with
LF agencies. Each fire support group (or unit when established) is divided into smaller task
elements of fire support ships, regardless of type operating in the same general locality.
(c) The individual fire support ship is the basic echelon in NSFS. Its function
is to deliver gunfire support under the control or direction of the agency to which assigned.
The ship deals directly with the LF agencies.
(2) The LF organization for control and employment of NSFS provides special
staff or liaison representation at every level from and including the infantry battalion or
comparable troop unit to the highest troop echelon present.
(a) If established, the LF NSFS section provides NSFS communications and
facilities for LF headquarters, performs NSFS special staff functions, and directs fires of
assigned general support ships.
(b) The division NSFS section or team provides NSFS communications and
facilities for division headquarters, performs NSFS special staff functions, and directs
employment of assigned support ships.
(c) The regimental or brigade NSFS liaison team provides communications,
liaison, and direction of NSFS in support of an infantry regiment or comparable unit. In
addition, the team directs the fire of assigned general support ships.
(d) The battalion shore fire control party includes an NSFS liaison team and a
NSFS spotting team. The NSFS liaison team is specifically organized to handle NSFS
V-12
JP 3-02
V-13
Chapter V
(h) Closely timed neutralization of remaining adversary defenses to cover the
waterborne, airborne ship-to-shore movements, and support of the landing, deployment, and
advance of troops.
(i) Degrade adversary C2 ability.
(j) Isolation of the landing area and defense against adversary
counteroffensive action by massed fires on probable routes of approach with particular
provisions for countermechanized programs.
(3) The post D-day NSFS plans provide for:
(a) Fires on the flanks of the landing area and fires against targets of
opportunity.
(b) Defensive targets, night fires, illumination, countermechanized fires, and
any special fires utilizing the inherent capability of gunfire ships and available munitions as
required.
f. NSFS Support During the Landing
(1) Final Preparation of the Landing Area. This fire support is designed to
destroy or neutralize adversary defense installations that might interfere with the approach
and final deployment of the AF and to assist in isolation of the landing area. NSFS is used to
support underwater demolition and MCM operations. Immediately before H-hour, major
emphasis is placed on the destruction and neutralization of adversary defenses most
dangerous to the successful landing of LF teams.
(2) Fires in Close Support of the Initial Assault. During the initial assault,
NSFS is continued on those adversary installations that could prevent the landing until the
safety of the leading waves requires these fires to be lifted. The final approach of the leading
waves of landing craft, amphibious vehicles, or helicopters and tiltrotor aircraft necessitates a
shift of the scheduled fires inland from the landing beaches or outward from the LZs. The
major portion of the fires delivered in close support of the landings consists of prearranged
fires delivered on a closely fixed schedule in the assault landing teams zone of action.
Because the actual rate of advance and the estimated rate of advance may not coincide, the
CATF, through the SACC, retards or accelerates the movement of scheduled fires as
requested by the CLF. Close supporting fires continue until the shore fire control party with
the assault landing teams are in a position to conduct the fires of the assigned direct support
ships. At this time, the shore fire control party begins controlling fires.
(3) Deep Support Fires. Deep support fires usually are delivered by ships
assigned in general support. Each such ship is assigned a zone of responsibility that it covers
by fire and observation. Within assigned zones of responsibility and on a prearranged
schedule, ships neutralize known adversary targets, interdict adversary LOCs, attack targets
of opportunity, execute counterbattery fire, reinforce fires of direct support ships as directed,
and conduct missions assigned by the supported unit.
V-14
JP 3-02
V-15
Chapter V
c. The ATF and LF OPORDs should contain specific instructions on the procedures to
request EW and other forms of nonlethal fire support from resources within or external to the
ATF and on EW coordination cell actions required to coordinate or process these requests.
10. Offensive Air Support
a. Offensive air support requires an integrated, flexible, and responsive C2 structure to
process CAS and other air support requirements and a dependable, interoperable, and secure
communications architecture to exercise control.
b. Air Support Planning Responsibilities
(1) CATF determines overall air support requirements of the ATF, determines air
support capabilities, coordinates all air support requests, and prepares an air plan.
(2) CLF determines LF air support requirements, determines LF air support
capabilities, submits plans for deployment of aviation elements ashore, and prepares an air
plan.
(3) JFACC provides JFACC representation, determines JFACC air support
capabilities, submits deployment plans, and prepares supporting air plans.
c. Air Support Planning Considerations
(1) All aircraft operating within the objective area must be under centralized
control of a tactical air control system. A combination of positive and procedural control
measures may be required.
(2) Plans should usually provide for rapid seizure of existing airfields, airfield
capable sites, and sites for early warning and air control. This enables the early deployment
ashore of aviation elements and extends the radius of warning and control.
d. The LF plans for the employment of LF aviation to support the ship-to-shore
movement and scheme of maneuver ashore. Basic planning also establishes requirements for
air support from the other elements of the AF and joint force. Any adversary facilities to be
captured intact must be specified and placed on the no-strike list or restricted target list.
(1) Recommendations and requests from subordinate echelons of the LF are
evaluated and consolidated with overall LF requirements into a comprehensive request for
air support. When determining overall requirements, pre-D-day should be separated from Dday and post-D-day requirements.
(2) LF requests for pre-D-day air operations are to satisfy intelligence needs and
offensive air operations to reduce adversary forces and defensive installations in the landing
area. The scope of pre-D-day operations may be limited by the need for surprise. The
standard joint tactical air strike request is used for air support requests.
V-16
JP 3-02
V-17
Chapter V
FDC receives target intelligence and requests for fire and translates them into timely and
effective tactical and technical fire control in support of ongoing operations.
c. Some planning tasks such as counterfire procedures and scheduling of fires, may
occur in the supported units FSCC (division or regiment) when multiple supporting arms are
being integrated into the fire support plan. Remaining artillery fire planning tasks such as
fire direction, resupply, and positioning to meet the fire support requirements are then
performed at the appropriate FDC.
d. If it is not possible to coordinate artillery support at lower echelons, the requisite
coordination with air and NSFS assets is accomplished in the SACC.
See JP 3-09, Joint Fire Support, and NTTP 3-02.2/MCWP 3-31.6, Supporting Arms
Coordination in Amphibious Operations, for more information.
12. Multinational Considerations
a. Fire support coordination in multinational operations demands special arrangements
with multinational forces and local authorities. To maximize the fires of the multinational
force and to minimize the possibility of friendly fire, the CATF and staff should become
familiar with each nations capabilities and limitations in munitions, digital capability, and
training, to ensure that they develop good fire support coordination throughout the
multinational force.
b. Fire support coordination may be required with multinational partners that are
providing fire support from outside the designated AOA.
See JP 3-16, Multinational Operations, and Allied Joint Publication-3, Allied Joint Doctrine
for the Conduct of Operations, for additional information on multinational operations.
SECTION C. COMMUNICATIONS
13. Overview
Amphibious operations require a flexible communications system capable of
supporting rapid decision making and execution to maintain a high tempo of
operations. These systems must be reliable, sufficient for the mission, flexible, sustainable,
survivable, and as expeditionary as the AF. Communications system architecture should
provide strategic and tactical connectivity to a variety of tailored AFs, multinational partners,
USG departments and agencies, as well as other commanders and participants in the
amphibious operation. In austere tactical environments, such as may be seen in amphibious
raids, the communications network is not robust and may be severely degraded when
disturbed. The AF must have the ability to plan for, provide C2 for, and support all
functional areas (e.g., fires, aviation, intelligence, CSS) afloat and ashore.
For additional information, see JP 6-0, Joint Communications System, and CJCSM 6231.01,
Manual for Employing Joint Tactical Communications.
V-18
JP 3-02
V-19
Chapter V
(2) Acquire and assign necessary communications assets to subordinate elements
of the force.
(3) Prepare appropriate cybersecurity guidance.
(4) Provisions for necessary shipboard communications system and services in
support of the embarked LF.
(5) Develop a coordinated communications plan for the ATF for inclusion in the
overall communications system support plan.
(6) Develop and promulgate a plan for communications connectivity with other
maritime forces.
c. Specific communications system support planning responsibilities of CLF are to:
(1) Develop a coordinated communications plan for the LF component of the AF
for inclusion in the overall force communications system support plan.
(2) Develop and promulgate a plan for communications connectivity with the JFC,
other components, and other ground forces ashore.
(3) Request LF computer and network resources and support while embarked.
(4) Identify connectivity requirements prior to movement ashore for follow-on
operations, if required.
d. Due to the limited availability of AF communication assets, commanders of other
embarked forces should submit their communication requirements for inclusion into the
communications system support plans as early as possible.
15. Communications Planning Considerations
a. An effective communications system support plan:
(1) Provides an EMCON plan and information security posture that balances
OPSEC versus operational requirements.
(2) Supports defensive cyberspace operations and cybersecurity in order to defend
the network against unauthorized activity and to protect information from exploitation.
(3) Avoids mutual interference throughout the EMS. Communications system
support plans of the AF must be integrated into the JFCs joint communications electronics
operating instructions.
(4) Deconflicts friendly EA with other friendly frequency use.
(5) Provides friendly forces position reporting to the Global Command and
Control SystemMaritime common operational picture.
V-20
JP 3-02
Support planning.
Medical regulation.
V-21
Chapter V
e. Communications system connectivity should be established among all major
participating commands at commencement of the planning phase.
f. When AF are supporting other operations, such as FHA or NEO, the communications
plan should consider the capabilities and requirements of other USG departments and
agencies, intergovernmental organization, and nongovernmental organization
communications, as well as the local government or populace being assisted.
g. The LF communications plan is normally issued as an annex to the OPLAN or
OPORD and must be compatible with the overall communications plan of the AF. The
actual drafting of the communications plan is the staff responsibility of the LF G-6 [assistant
chief of staff for communications]. Throughout the preparation of the plan, the G-6 must
coordinate with each staff section of the LF as well as equivalent staff officers at parallel and
subordinate commands. The G-6 counterpart on the ATF staff is the communications
officer, or the N-6 [Navy component communications staff officer]. The G-6 and N-6
conduct concurrent and parallel planning to:
(1) Allocate shipboard radio equipment, spaces, and personnel to support LF
operations.
(2) Assign call signs, coordinated with the CATF to facilitate handling of LF
traffic over naval circuits during all phases of the amphibious operation.
(3) Identify cryptographic and authentication systems that must be used by ATF
and LF units.
(4) Develop communications security (COMSEC) procedures.
(5) Evaluate assigned radio frequencies for optimal performance, to prevent
mutual interference, and ensure adequacy of support for LF operations.
(6) Determine use of LF personnel to support the ships communications personnel
during the movement to the objective and during the initial stages of the action phase.
(7) Develop computer networks that support the LF communications while
embarked, including procedures for the receipt and distribution of message traffic.
h. The LF will embark in functionally operational spaces normally built on a Navy C2
infrastructure. These spaces will be complete with permanent access to voice, data, and
video systems necessary for the LFs situational awareness. They will form the LF
operational spaces, which are collectively known as the LF operations center. The
infrastructure is based on joint standards and architectures and allows units to draw upon a
baseline of communications system capabilities, regardless of their Service.
i. The LF communications system support by phase is as follows:
(1) Communications system connectivity between the AF commanders and staffs
must be established immediately at commencement of the planning phase. Units of the LF
V-22
JP 3-02
V-23
Chapter V
(e) Plans to allocate enough time to conduct an after action review of the
communications plan after the rehearsal and to modify portions of the plan as necessary.
(4) During the movement phase, the CATF normally establishes EMCON and
information security policies to restrict the use of equipment, particularly transmitters and
emitters, to prevent disclosure of locations, movements, and intentions of the force. The LF
plan must address how the commander will communicate with LF units embarked on
different ships, and possibly even separate movement groups, during EMCON. Some
potential alternate means are helicopter messenger, visual signals, or line-of-sight radio if
permitted by the EMCON condition. Other LF communications considerations include:
(a) Communications guard assignments for all elements of the LF.
(b) Communications officers with the ATF have an accurate list of appropriate
LF units (e.g., next senior and immediate subordinate) and their assigned shipping location.
(c) ATF communications officers have an accurate listing of message release
authority within the LF.
(d) ATF communications officers have an accurate listing of LF
communications personnel embarked in their respective ships. The list should also contain
clearance and access information of these LF personnel.
(e) Establishment of LF communications centers, or equivalents, on all ships
when major LF units are embarked.
(5) During the action phase, both the ATF and LF rely on radio communications
and tactical chat as the means for exercising C2. Accordingly, EMCON is modified by the
CATF prior to H-hour in order to test all circuits before the ship-to-shore movement begins.
During the initial portion of this phase, when the major LF headquarters are still afloat, LF
circuits are provided by facilities specifically installed in amphibious warfare ships for use
by LF personnel. LF communications must be complementary and generally parallel to
those established by the ATF. These parallel systems usually terminate at each significant
control center aboard the amphibious warfare ships (e.g., SACC, Navy TACC, AATCC, and
TACLOG group). The LF communications plan must address the many operational aspects
of the action phase.
(a) Communications for control and coordination of landing ships, landing
craft, and other waterborne vehicles moving from the transport area to landing areas are
provided primarily by the CATF through a Navy control group. However, LF radio nets
must be integrated into the groups plan so that LF commanders can properly monitor and
control the movements of the LF, especially important when the ship-to-shore movement
includes LF organic AAVs.
(b) Communication nets for the control and coordination of the assault support
helicopters are established and maintained through the Navy TACC and AATCC. LF
personnel will augment the AATCC and integrate LF communications into the overall
aviation C2 systems. Helicopterborne movement normally generates additional, long-range
V-24
JP 3-02
V-25
Chapter V
(4) When in transit from ship-to-shore, the CLF and appropriate staff members
require communications with LF units already ashore (including the CP advance party if
employed), LF units also in transit, LF units remaining on shipping, and appropriate ATF
agencies afloat. The communications facilities normally available to the CLF (e.g., C2
configured helicopter or AAV) will usually not be able to satisfy the total communications
requirement. Therefore, the communications facilities should be allocated to only the most
essential circuits.
For additional information, see JP 6-0, Joint Communications System.
SECTION D. LOGISTICS
16. General
The logistical effort required to sustain the seizure of Iwo Jima was enormous,
complex, largely improvised on lessons learned in earlier . . . operations in the
Pacific. . . . Clearly, no other element of the emerging art of amphibious warfare
had improved so greatly by the winter of 1945. Marines may have had the heart
and firepower to tackle a fortress-like Iwo Jima earlier in the war, but they would
have been crippled in the doing of it by limitations in amphibious logistical support
capabilities. These concepts, procedures, organizations, and special materials
took years to develop. . . .
From Closing In: Marines in the Seizure of Iwo Jima, 1994, Joseph Alexander
a. The CATF and the CLF have co-responsibility for determining overall logistic
requirements for the AF. Those requirements that cannot be supported from resources
available within the ATF are directed to the applicable Service component through the chain
of command as established in the initiating directive.
b. The requirement for afloat forces to provide support to the LF during the period in
which the LF logistic system is primarily sea-based has a significant influence on logistic
planning for an amphibious operation. Like all logistic systems, the AF logistic systems
must be responsive, simple, flexible, economical, attainable, sustainable, and survivable.
Development of effective logistic systems must take into account the planning considerations
and factors listed below:
(1) Planning Considerations
(a) Orderly assembly and embarkation of personnel and materiel based on
anticipated requirements of the LF scheme of maneuver ashore.
(b) Establish and maintain a logistic system in the operational area that will
provide adequate support to all elements of the AF and subsequent support of base
development and garrison forces as directed.
V-26
JP 3-02
V-27
Chapter V
(3) Notifies appropriate responsible agencies of any unusual requirements or
special supplies or equipment required as early as possible.
(4) Provides the means required to establish and operate a logistic system in the
designated AOA.
(5) Develops plans for movement and sustainment of detainees and civilian
evacuees.
(6) Develops overall plan for evacuation of casualties.
(7) Prepares logistics annex to the OPLAN.
b. The CLF:
(1) Determines overall logistic requirements of the LF, including units, special
equipment, and shipping.
(2) Allocates the means to meet LF logistical requirements. Requests support from
the AF for those requirements that exceed the LF organic capabilities.
(3) Determines logistic requirements that cannot be met by the LF. Those which
cannot are directed to the CATF, supported commander, or the appropriate Service through
the chain of command.
(4) Develops the plans for the supplies and equipment to be embarked, including
the supplies and equipment of other assigned forces for which the LF is responsible.
(5) Prepares the LF embarkation and ship loading plans and orders in coordination
with the CATF.
(6) Plans for the coordination, conveyance, and distribution of logistics required by
the LF.
(7) Prepares the logistics annex to the LF OPLAN.
c. Other designated commanders of the AF will submit logistics requirements to the
CATF or appropriate commander for those requirements that cannot be met internally.
18. Combat Service Support
a. The necessity to provide logistics to the LF when the logistic system is primarily
sea-based requires coordination between the AF commanders to develop a control and
delivery system that will provide the LF with the necessary support from embarkation
through rehearsal, movement, execution, and continued operations ashore. Wherever
possible, sustainment planning should include direct ship-to-user delivery.
b. Logistics planning should include considerations for initial supply and sustained
operations.
V-28
JP 3-02
Chapter V
1. On call shipping and aircraft to be ordered into the landing area by the
CATF, as requested by the CLF.
2. Fixed schedules for bringing shipping or aircraft into the landing area,
as planned by the CLF.
(b) Factors affecting selection of a sustainment method include:
1. Distance between the landing area and loading points.
2. Availability of forward sheltered ports or anchorages.
3. Requirement for convoy escort.
4. Availability of aircraft dedicated for sustainment lift.
5. Hostile activity on LOCs.
6. Plans for general engineering support, including facilities required to
accommodate supplies and the phase-in of LF units to handle supplies.
7. Availability of manning, materials handling equipment, and lighterage
to off-load shipping.
8. Availability of LOTS resources.
c. Logistics and CSS plans are prepared by the CATF, CLF, and other designated
commanders of the AF. These plans will include at a minimum:
(1) Supply and resupply responsibilities, schedules, and sources.
(2) Levels of supply to be carried in AE, AFOE, and follow-up shipping.
(3) Control and distribution of supplies.
(4) Plan for landing supplies.
(5) Engineering and construction requirements.
(6) Air delivery responsibility, procedures.
(7) Captured material disposition instructions.
(8) Salvage instructions.
(9) Retrograde.
(10) Casualties (support and evacuation procedures).
V-30
JP 3-02
Chapter V
g. Sea Echelon Level. The sea echelon level plan normally reduces the concentration
of amphibious warfare ships in areas near the beach. The majority of shipping will remain in
distant sea operating areas until called forward in accordance with established priorities. In
such cases, the out-of-sequence landing of supplies and equipment will cause delays in the
established schedule.
h. Embarkation, Movement, and Rehearsal Support. Although the primary
emphasis of CSS planning is to develop a CSS system to support the LF, the force must also
be supported while en route. Support required in the embarkation areas may include the
operation of camps and mess facilities in staging areas, road maintenance, and equipment
maintenance. LF CSS requirements during the movement phase are primarily provided by
the ATF but the LF must plan for administrative and maintenance requirements. CSS
requirements during and after rehearsals may be extensive (especially if equipment repairs
are necessary) and must be incorporated into the plan.
i. LF Aviation. Fixed-wing aviation elements located outside the landing area may
require a task organized CSS detachment for support. When LF aviation is phased ashore
into the AOA, the CSS requirements (especially engineering and transportation) may be
extensive.
20. Health Services Plan
a. The health services plan is usually issued as annex Q (Medical Services) to the
OPLAN and provides for medical support to all elements of the AF. The LF health services
plan will be issued as annex Q (Medical Services) to the LF OPLAN. The CATF and CLF
surgeons should develop the medical logistic support plan. See Figure V-3 for LF health
services planning considerations.
b. Planning Responsibilities
(1) The CATF in coordination with the CLF is responsible to:
(a) Establish a patient movement policy consistent with JFC and AF guidance
that assigns authority and annotates intratheater and intertheater patient movement
requirements and procedures.
(b) Establish medical support requirements and standards for the civilian
population in the operational area, when not prescribed by higher authority.
For more information, see JP 4-02, Health Services.
(2) The CATF surgeon should:
(a) Provide medical support for all embarked personnel between points of
embarkation and the AOA.
(b) Provide medical personnel, supplies, and equipment for all units based
ashore and not attached to the LF.
V-32
JP 3-02
Casualty estimates.
Medical needs for civilian population and enemy prisoners of war, if authorized.
V-33
Chapter V
(b) Provide for medical personnel to assist in the care for LF personnel while
embarked.
(c) Execute the patient movement policy established by the geographic
combatant commander for the AOA.
(d) Execute the patient movement plan from the shore to ship in the AOA as
directed.
(e) Determine the additional medical requirements of the LF that cannot be
met by organic medical LF capabilities.
See JP 4-02, Health Services, for additional information.
c. Patient Movement
(1) Patient movement policy is a command decision establishing the maximum
number of days that patients may be held for treatment. Patients who, in the opinion of
responsible medical officers, cannot be returned to a duty status within the prescribed period
are evacuated by the first available means, provided the travel involved will not aggravate
their condition. The policy will be established for the theater by the CCDR and executed by
the CATF in conjunction with the CLF for the AOA. The use of any specific patient
movement policy for the AOA serves only as a guide for medical planning and must remain
flexible to meet the changes in demand placed on the limited medical treatment capability
initially available.
(2) Plans for patient movement should be sufficiently detailed and widely
disseminated. These plans should include:
(a) Identification of primary casualty receiving and treatment ships (CRTSs)
and medical treatment capabilities.
(b) Locations and level of medical treatment facilities ashore.
(c) Communications procedures for patient movement coordination.
(d) Provisions for mass patient movement for situations that may require rapid
evacuation of multiple casualties to more distant secondary CRTSs.
(e) Specific provisions that may be required to ensure rapid evacuation of
casualties to more distant primary CRTS facilities.
(f) Provisions for contaminated casualties who may require quarantine.
(3) The preferred mode of patient movement is via aircraft. The speed, range, and
flexibility of aircraft serve to enhance the medical support capability of the LF. However,
patient movement plans should include provisions for maximum use of ground and surface
means.
V-34
JP 3-02
V-35
Chapter V
their capabilities of holding patients. Overloading should be avoided to allow for current and
future operations.
(2) Follow-on hospitalization and treatment support of the LF may be provided by
Navy, Army, or Air Force medical units, such as fleet hospitals and hospital ships,
expeditionary medical facilities combat support hospitals, or expeditionary medical support
units, respectively. These units may or may not be part of the AF.
21. Landing Force Support Party
a. The LFSP is a temporary LF organization, composed of ATF and LF elements
brought into existence by a formal activation order issued by the CLF. For planning
purposes, the basic LFSP structure consists of the LFSP commander, the shore party, the
beach party, special attachments, and ships platoons. The LFSP facilitates the ship-to-shore
movement and provides initial combat support and CSS to the LF. The CLF is responsible
for organizing a system to accomplish LFSP missions and other specific support functions
within the landing area. Other missions of the LFSP are as follows:
(1) Facilitate the landing and movement of personnel, supplies, and equipment
across the beach, into an LZ or through a port.
(2) Evacuate casualties and EPWs from the beach. Shipboard detention is only a
temporary measure permitted until the detained individual can be transferred to a shorebased facility. It is limited to the minimum period necessary to transfer detainees from a zone
of hostilities or as a result of operational necessity.
(3) Beach, retract, and salvage landing ships and craft.
(4) Facilitate the establishment of the LCE, ACE, and naval beach group.
(a) LFSP Commander. The designated commander of the LFSP controls
landing support operations within the landing area. The LFSP commander provides landing
support through close coordination with subordinate units, timely reinforcement, and
consolidation of shore party and beach party elements. Initially, LFSP operations are
decentralized to the shore party and beach party teams per established code (e.g., Green
Beach, Red Beach 1). When the shore party and beach party are established ashore and the
shore party commander has consolidated command of the shore party groups, TACON of the
shore party and beach party groups transitions to the shore party and beach party
commanders, respectively. Concurrent with this transition, the LFSP is established ashore
and the LFSP commander assumes TACON of the shore party, beach party, special
attachments, and all other LFSP units ashore. If the LFSP is not established ashore
concurrently with the beach party and shore party, TACON for landing support operations
resides with the shore party commander until the LFSP commander assumes TACON. The
LFSP personnel and equipment landed are minimal as the shore party and beach party form
the predominant part of the LFSP.
V-36
JP 3-02
Chapter V
V-38
JP 3-02
(1) The responsibility for embarking and landing the landing support units rests
with the tactical unit supported. For this reason, the landing support units are attached to the
tactical unit supported for embarkation and landing purposes only.
(2) The buildup of the LFSP ashore parallels the tactical buildup ashore.
(3) Landing support operations begin with the landing of the advance parties and
continue until the operation is completed or until the parties are relieved. Throughout the
operation, the landing support task organization changes as required to meet the situation
until the operation is terminated or the LFSP is relieved of its responsibilities. In the initial
stages of ship-to-shore movement, the LFSP headquarters is afloat and is typically phased
ashore as the operation progresses. A shore party team and beach party team are among the
first waves of troops ashore to each colored beach.
For additional information on the organizational structure and changes in C2 for the LFSP
and its associated shore party and beach party, see NTTP 3-02.1M/MCWP 3-31.5, Ship-toShore Movement.
22. Causeway and Lighterage Plans
a. The CLF presents causeway and lighterage support requirements to the CATF. The
CATF prepares the causeway and lighterage plan in consultation with the CLF considering
the following:
(1) LF requirements.
V-39
Chapter V
(2) Hydrographic conditions.
(3) Availability of required types of sealift.
b. The plan should include details on loading, transportation, launching, initial
operational assignment, and provisions for maintenance and salvage of the causeway and
lighterage equipment. It should also contain specific instructions for transition of control.
The plan should include provisions for retaining lighterage in the area after the AFOE
shipping departs, for use in unloading follow-up shipping, and for other support of tactical
operations. The plan is published as an annex to the CATFs logistic plan.
23. Engineer Operations
Engineer operations support movement and maneuver at strategic and operational levels
and provide infrastructure for force protection. In addition to normal engineer operations
(i.e., combat, general, and geospatial), special considerations should be made for MCM and
amphibious breaching; joint reception, staging, onward movement, and integration; OPDSs;
and amphibious bulk liquid transfer system connectivity. Involvement of the engineer staff
is essential in the planning and execution of all phases of amphibious operations.
a. Engineer Planning. The nature of engineer support for the LF in amphibious
operations ranges from limited combat engineer support for the assault units to general
engineer and CSS functions for the LF.
(1) Combat engineers will normally be attached to the assault infantry units to
perform a variety of tasks such as engineer reconnaissance, obstacle emplacement and
breaching, development of BSAs, LZ site preparation, construction of beach exits, combat
trails and roads, and tactical bridging.
(2) General engineers will normally perform vertical and horizontal construction,
provision of utilities (including potable water and mobile electric power), installation and
operation of bulk fuel systems ashore, maintenance and repair of LOCs, geospatial support,
environmental management support, advanced airfield preparation, and bridge
construction/maintenance. It is desirable for general engineers to relieve combat engineer
elements of responsibilities in rear areas as early as possible.
b. Naval Construction Force. The naval construction force is the combined
construction units of the Navy, including primarily the mobile construction battalions and the
amphibious construction battalions. These units are part of the operating forces and
represent the Navys capability for advanced base construction.
(1) When multiple naval mobile construction battalions (NMCBs) are deployed, an
accompanying naval construction regiment should be deployed to serve as the C2
coordinator for the CATF/CLF and assigned naval construction force units.
(2) The NMCB provides construction support to Navy, Marine Corps, and other
forces in military operations and conducts protection as required by the circumstances of the
deployment situation. The NMCB provides a major deliberate construction capability and is
V-40
JP 3-02
V-41
Chapter V
commander. The amphibious operation is not normally terminated until the AFOE is ashore.
Normally, during transition from ship-to-shore operations to JLOTS operations, there is a
period in which the Navy and supported ground forces continue to conduct ship-to-shore
movement for initial sustainment using the basic control organization and procedures used
for the amphibious operation. In a representative situation, Navy LOTS forces would
provide the initial ship unloading capability reinforcing the CATFs existing amphibious
cargo discharge organization, thereby maintaining sufficient capability to facilitate the
delivery of follow-on supplies and equipment to the AF. Then, as Army transportation units
arrive in the area, they report to their Service component but functionally integrate into the
CATFs and the commander MPFs cargo discharge organization. Finally, the JLOTS shipto-shore C2 organization, when operationally ready and directed by the JTF, will assume
responsibility, and the Navy LOTS operation will transition to a JLOTS operation. At this
point, control of ship-to-shore assets is transferred from the Navy component commander to
the JLOTS organization, and any Navy ship-to-shore assets not already withdrawn will
remain under TACON of the JLOTS commander. Ultimately, the JLOTS operation may
transition to Army LOTS, using an agreed upon phased-transition procedure.
b. The MPF offers an augmentation capability for amphibious operations, but it is not a
substitute due to an inherent lack of forcible entry capability. An MPF operation provides a
means to augment a forward-deployed MAGTF; an ongoing amphibious operation; or
another joint, multinational, or combined force operation. When an MPF operation
augments an amphibious operation, the MPF mission and appropriate command relationship
guidance is included in the initiating and establishing directives.
For additional information, see JP 4-01.6, Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore, and MCWP 332/NTTP 3-02.3, Maritime Prepositioning Force Operations.
SECTION E. PROTECTION
25. General
Protection of the AF is essential for all amphibious operations, but especially during
ship-to-shore movement. The JFMCC will synchronize and coordinate operations between
the AF and other forces (SOF and other naval and joint forces) to counter and neutralize
enemy aircraft, submarines, surface combatants, small boats, land-based antiship cruise
missiles, coastal defenses, mines, and other potential threats to the AF en route to and within
the AOA to gain local maritime and air superiority. Maritime superiority permits the
conduct of amphibious operations without prohibitive interference by the opposing force.
During the planning phase of an amphibious operation, the active protection of the ATF and
LF is one of the most important considerations. The inherent nature of amphibious
operations limits the ability of CATF to employ passive protection measures once in the
AOA.
26. Rehearsal and Movement Security
In formulating plans for movement to the operational area, sea routes and rendezvous
points must be carefully selected. Sea routes through mineable waters, or close to enemy
V-42
JP 3-02
V-43
Chapter V
(4) Condition the adversary to particular patterns of friendly behavior to induce
adversary perceptions that are exploitable at a time chosen by the joint force.
(5) Cause the adversary to waste combat power with inappropriate or delayed
actions.
c. The MILDEC plan, if created, should clearly delineate both the goal and the
objective of the deception. This provides the commander with a solid understanding of how
the deception supports the overall operation and establishes a firm foundation for planning
and executing MILDEC operations.
For additional information on MILDEC, see JP 3-13.4, Military Deception.
28. Protective Measures
The LF must arrive in the landing area without critical reduction of its combat power.
Measures necessary for protection of the LF elements in transit from the sea include all
measures taken by any task force operating at sea. This includes operations to locate,
classify, and track surface vessels, submarines, and aircraft, and if required, applying force
against them. By establishing maritime superiority in both the open oceans and the AOA,
naval forces directly support the ability to project defense and assure access for the LF.
29. Defensive Counterair Operations
a. Defensive counterair includes all measures designed to detect, identify, intercept,
and destroy or negate enemy air and missile forces attempting to attack or penetrate through
friendly airspace. These operations employ both active and passive measures to protect US
or multinational forces, assets, and interests.
b. The dynamics of the defensive counterair mission often require flexibility during
decentralized execution that normally takes place at the tactical level. This flexibility
accomplished through battle management allows the direct, often real-time monitoring and
execution of operations based on the intent and within the scope of the commanders
objectives.
For additional information on defensive counterair operations, see JP 3-01, Countering Air
and Missile Threats.
30. Mine Countermeasures and Obstacle Avoidance or Breaching
a. Sea mines and MCM have figured prominently in the Civil War, Spanish-American
War, both World Wars, Korea, numerous Cold War crises, and in Operations DESERT
STORM and IRAQI FREEDOM. Admiral David G. Farraguts command in 1864 at Mobile
Bay during the Civil War to ...damn the torpedoes [mines], full speed ahead was made
easy by two months of extensive MCM operations that included reconnaissance, mine
hunting, and technical exploitation of captured weapons. Mines also contribute to A2/AD
environments. Elements of MIW which can be used in support of amphibious operations
include mining (offensive, defensive, and protective) and MCM (offensive, including
V-44
JP 3-02
V-45
Chapter V
Minefields and obstacles are placed along avenues of egress off the beach and in front of
defended positions.
craft and amphibious vehicles and attempts to deny access to the beach. Land-based
artillery, air defense systems, and crew-served weapons cover the engineer barrier.
(4) Beach Barrier. The beach barrier canalizes the LF for counterattacks.
Minefields and obstacles are placed along avenues of egress from the beach and in front of
defended positions. Land-based artillery, air defense systems, and crew-served weapons all
provide support to a counterattack.
c. Responsibilities. The CATF has overall responsibility for MIW within the sea areas
of the operational area. This includes the planning and execution of all facets of MIW
supported by MIWC and MCMC and assigned forces or the MCM commander (if assigned)
and providing the logistics support and force protection for MCM assets. The MIWC or
MCMC will direct air and surface MCM assets to include conducting MCM operations
including breaching outer mine barriers from deep water, to the very shallow water, and
underwater MCM forces conducting underwater MIW in very shallow water. The CATF is
also responsible for conducting assault breaching operations from the shallow water through
the SZ and up to the agreed upon line of demarcation. This line of demarcation is
determined during the amphibious planning process and mutually agreed upon by the CLF
and the CATF, supported by planning input from MIWC or MCMC. The CLF is responsible
for conducting mine and obstacle breaching and clearing operations from the line of
demarcation on the beach landward, and for follow-on clearance operations on the beach.
Above all, MCM and amphibious breaching operations must be synchronized. The
V-46
JP 3-02
V-47
Chapter V
on production and storage facilities, transportation assets, and forces used to plant
mines. Supporting operations may also be conducted for offensive MCM and to wear down
land forces. A key consideration in any potential littoral conflict is the establishment of ROE
that allow for early, aggressive, and proactive MCM operations.
(5) MCM Forces. The time required for MCM operations will usually require
MCM forces to commence operations prior to the arrival of the AF and, potentially, the
amphibious advance force. Legacy MCM ships have slow transit speeds and may require a
heavy lift ship to transport them to the AO if not already forward deployed. MCM
helicopters, MCM forces, marine mammals, and unmanned undersea vehicle platoons may
also require the use of amphibious warfare ships or other platforms in order to conduct
operations. The CATF and CLF should, therefore, consider that an amphibious warfare ship
or afloat forward staging base, for example, could be needed to support MCM operations,
and plan for any subsequent impacts on amphibious warfare ships load outs and the overall
landing plan. The vulnerability and relatively slow rate of speed in which MCM forces
operate should be taken into account when considering use of MCM during supporting
or prelanding operations. Due to the limited assets available for an MCM operation, the
CATF will need to prioritize the MCM effort in the AO. MCM operations have the potential
to compromise OPSEC of the impending amphibious operation with significant impact on
the success of the LF. Opposed landings are arguably one of the most difficult and
dangerous large-scale military operations and the element of surprise must be preserved by
all available means. Therefore, overt MCM operations that threaten the element of surprise
should be kept to a minimum and conducted as close as practicable to the arrival of the AF in
the AOA. Deception operations may maintain the element of surprise if overt MCM
operations are necessary. The principal techniques to accomplish active MCM are mine
hunting and minesweeping.
(a) Mine Hunting. During mine hunting, the MCM platform uses its
available assets to detect, classify, identify, and neutralize all mine-like contacts found. In
favorable hydrographic conditions, mine hunting is the preferred method for conducting
enabling MCM. Mine hunting does not require specific knowledge of the mine threat and
provides a means to estimate the remaining risk to transiting vessels. However, it is limited
by the acoustics, visibility, and topography of the underwater environments in the operating
area.
(b) Minesweeping. Minesweeping is the technique of clearing mines using
mechanical, explosive, and influence sweep equipment. Mechanical sweeping removes,
disturbs, or otherwise neutralizes the mine; explosive sweeping causes sympathetic
detonations in, damages, or displaces the mine; and influence sweeping produces either the
acoustic and/or magnetic influence required to detonate the mine. It is performed at slightly
faster speeds than hunting, but its success is largely a factor of environmental conditions and
the intelligence data available. Minesweeping does not allow an accurate estimate of the
remaining risk.
(6) Assault Breaching. The assault breaching mission is planned by
MIWC/MCMC using Joint Assault Breaching System mission-planning tools, coordinated
via the Navy TACC, and conducted by organic, supporting, or strategic strike air assets (US
V-48
JP 3-02
Estimated to cost about $1,500, an unsophisticated contact mine that was based on a
1908 Russian design caused some $96 million in damage in 1987 to the frigate
USS Samuel B. Roberts, shown above with damage to the hull as seen from dry dock,
almost causing the ship to sink.
Navy strike fighters or USAF bombers), using the Joint Direct Attack Munition. Lane
requirements of the LF and mine or obstacle construction will dictate size and composition
of the amphibious breach sortie. During assault breaching efforts involving munitions, large
lane widths exponentially increase the number of weapons required to neutralize beach
obstacles and mines. The CLF should carefully consider the SZ lane widths, the requirement
for surprise, and the tactical needs of the LF when relying upon delivered munitions.
Suppression, obscuration, security, reduction, and deception are additional elements that
should be applied to amphibious breaching operations to ensure success.
(a) Suppression. Effective suppression is the mission-critical task during any
breaching operation. Suppression protects forces conducting obstacle reduction and
maneuvering through the obstacle and fixes the enemy in position. Suppressive fires include
the full range of lethal and nonlethal fires from NSFS and CAS to EA.
(b) Obscuration. Obscuration hampers enemy observation and TA, and
conceals friendly activities and movement. EA prevents the enemy use of radar and radio
signals to observe and report the operation.
(c) Security. Support forces prevent the enemy from interfering with obstacle
reduction and the passage of the assault waves through the breach lanes. Security must be
effective against coastal defenses and counterattack forces. Vertical assault forces may seize
V-49
Chapter V
and deny routes of ingress into the landing area to prevent the counterattack of the landing
beaches.
(d) Reduction. Reduction forces, normally composed of aircraft dropping
Joint Direct Attack Munition, create lanes through the mines and obstacles, allowing the
assault waves to pass. The location of lanes depends largely on identified weaknesses in the
mine and obstacle belt. If the AF cannot find gaps or weak coverage in the obstacles, they
should apply concentrated force at a designated point to rupture the defense and create a gap.
Units reducing the obstacle mark the lane and report the obstacle type, location, and lane
locations to higher headquarters. Lanes are handed over to follow-on forces that further
reduce or clear the obstacles, if required.
(e) Deception. Deception operations are a necessity during assault breaching
efforts. Large lane sizes demand large numbers of weapons and multiple aircraft passes to
clear the SZ prior to the assault. This may draw immediate attention to the LF unless
alternate lanes are brought under fire as well.
For more information on MIW and breaching, see JP 3-15, Barriers, Obstacles, and Mine
Warfare for Joint Operations; NWP 3-15, Naval Mine Warfare; NTTP 3-15.24, Mine
Countermeasures in Support of Amphibious Operations; and ATTP 3-90.4/MCWP 3-17.8,
Combined Arms Mobility Operations.
31. Surface Warfare
a. To assure access for the AF, SUW-capable forces will be required to operate in the
open ocean, the approaches to the littorals, and the more difficult littoral environment. The
objective in each operating area is the same: gain and maintain maritime superiority to
protect the AF. Because of unconventional threats and asymmetric tactics that may be
encountered during amphibious operations, the SUW challenge expands well beyond the
traditional war-at-sea scenario which pits similarly constructed, clearly defined naval forces
against each other in a known theater of action. SUW capabilities should continue to include
response options for conventional threats, but naval and joint forces conducting SUW
operations should also be prepared for potentially more dangerous unknown enemies
employing nontraditional methods to challenge US objectives. Just as conventional enemy
surface combatants present a threat to maritime superiority, terrorists using small, lightly
armed boats loaded with explosives as attack platforms can similarly challenge maritime
security.
(1) SUW operations in an open ocean environment consist primarily of sea control
operations to gain and maintain maritime superiority in the surrounding area so that forces
can accomplish required missions. SUW in the open ocean environment typically involves
protecting vital sea lines of communication, convoy and merchant escort, and defense of
naval strike groups or strike forces.
(2) The inner and outer boundaries of the littoral (near land) operating
environment are not clearly defined. However, geography is a key factor. As the operational
environment transitions from the blue water to the littoral, the conduct of SUW becomes
V-50
JP 3-02
Chapter V
pose a serious threat to maritime forces. Combatants armed with gun systems, torpedoes, or
mines pose a secondary surface threat. The threat from torpedoes launched from surface
ships will increase as more modern guided torpedoes become readily available to potential
adversaries.
(2) Larger surface combatants belonging to countries with established navies
deploy offshore to protect designated areas or to operate in contingency areas, while smaller
surface combatants, antiship cruise missile equipped patrol boats, and fast attack craft/ fastinshore attack craft can be expected to operate in coastal defense roles in difficult littoral
environments The most widespread threat to surface superiority in a traditional warfare
environment comes from missile equipped patrol craft. Built to operate in shallow coastal
waters, they normally patrol in waters contiguous to the homeland. The inherent
characteristics of patrol craft are speed, agility, low-radar signature, and familiarity with the
operating area. These characteristics, combined with effective detection and C2 networks and
potent missile systems, make them a formidable foe, especially in a littoral environment.
Even when not armed with antiship cruise missiles, most surface combatants have some
SUW capability. Most combatants have surface-to-air missiles that have an SUW mode as a
secondary capability, and many have antiship torpedo systems and a mine-deploying
capability. Naval guns can also present a threat to surface forces and are found on nearly all
surface combatants.
(3) Submarines are the best equipped of all force types to operate in a covert or
clandestine manner in a hostile environment. Many submarines can threaten the AF well
beyond the effective operational radius of land-based aircraft that may oppose AF operations.
Diesel-electric attack submarines provide a readily deployable weapon system for a variety
of peacetime and wartime missions for the enemy. Diesel-electric submarines may be armed
with torpedoes, antiship missiles, guns, mines, or a mix of these weapons. Coordination with
the ASW commander is a key planning element for all SUW operations.
(4) The main air threat to forces conducting SUW operations comes from sea or
land-based multirole aircraft including bombers, fighters, maritime reconnaissance patrol
aircraft, and helicopters armed with guided and unguided weapons. Although designed
primarily to attack land targets, fighter-bombers are a threat because of widespread
availability and combat radius. They may be armed with antiship missiles, bombs, rockets,
or guns. Many littoral nations have maritime reconnaissance patrol aircraft, which can also
be armed with SUW weapons such as antiship cruise missiles, rockets, bombs, torpedoes,
and mines. Additionally, many types of military helicopters are readily available and could
pose a threat to SUW operations. They are capable of carrying a variety of weapons,
including antiship cruise missiles, rockets, and guns. Coordination with the air warfare
commanders and JFACC must be a part of every ATF SUW plan.
(5) Many nations have coastal defense systems that integrate coastal area
surveillance, engagement of enemy forces, and support of friendly forces operating in the
area. A coastal defense system usually includes radar stations (stationary or mobile), to
provide coverage in the area of interest and various weapons systems. Additional
information resources may include acoustic sensors, human intelligence, communications
intelligence, sightings by commercial surface vessels (e.g., fishing vessels), surface
V-52
JP 3-02
V-53
Chapter V
g. Successful coordinated ASW depends upon effective use of each ASW asset and a
well-promulgated acoustic and nonacoustic search plan. Sensor employment should be
carefully considered in the CONOPS. Sensor platforms defending a congested AOA should
be placed to optimize sensor performance while minimizing the threat to the sensor platform.
The ability of the sensor to discern an enemy submarine may be hampered by acoustic
properties of the littorals and the congested AOA.
V-54
JP 3-02
APPENDIX A
LANDING FORCE LOGISTICS PLANNING
1. Landing Force Logistics Planning
The types and quantities of supplies taken into the AOA directly affect the requirement
for air and surface transportation. For ease of control and planning for an amphibious
operation, requirements for supply support are stated under two major categoriesLF initial
supplies and sustainment.
a. Determination of Requirements. Overall requirements for supply support of the
LF indicate the total tonnage to be moved into the AOA or operational area during a given
period. Based on the statement of overall requirements for supply support, general
requirements for the logistic support of the LF, including requirements for amphibious
warfare ships and AFOE shipping and aerial resupply, are reported to higher authority.
(1) DOS. The first step in estimating overall requirements for supply support is to
determine the DOS. The DOS is based on standard Service planning factors and logistics
planning factors for the operation. In calculating the DOS, the requirements for each
separate class of supply are considered.
(2) Stockage Objective. The second step is to calculate the stockage objective for
each class of supply. In operations of limited scope, limiting the stockage objective to 30
DOS may be desirable. However, even the limited objective may not be reached until the
latter stages of the assault.
(3) Factors Influencing Stockage Objective. The amounts and types of supplies
carried in the amphibious warfare ships and AFOE shipping must be compatible with the
shipping space available and must meet the minimum requirements for support of the LF
until termination of the amphibious operation. Before the stockage objective can be finally
determined, the following factors must be considered:
(a) Adversary capabilities.
(b) Availability of fixed-wing cargo aircraft.
(c) Availability of shipping and distances involved.
(d) Availability of ports and airfields.
(4) LF operational reserve material/mission load allowance is a package of
contingency supplies pre-positioned in amphibious warfare ships to reduce loading time in
contingencies. The LF operational reserve material package comprises Classes I (packaged
operational rations), III(A) and III(W) (petroleum, oils, and lubricants), IV (field fortification
material), and V(A) and V(W) (ammunition). However, other selected items can be included
to support specific deployments and contingency operations at the discretion of the CLF.
A-1
Appendix A
b. The Plan for Landing Supplies. In coordination with the CATF, the CLF develops
plans for selective unloading of supplies in the objective area. The CATF allocates landing
ships and craft required to carry supplies from ship to shore and to establish floating dumps.
Together, in the plan for landing supplies, the CLF and CATF plan the ship-to-shore
movement of supplies and equipment so that it is responsive to LF requirements. TACLOG
groups are established to ensure that responsiveness is achieved. In developing the plan for
landing supplies, the following factors are considered:
(1) Types and amounts of supplies to be carried ashore by LF units as prescribed
loads.
(2) Types and amounts of supplies to be established in floating dumps and prestaged helicopter-lifted supplies and on-call supply packages for potential surge requests.
(3) Levels of supply to be established ashore.
(4) Techniques that ensure the orderly, rapid buildup of supply levels ashore, such
as:
(a) Use of landing craft and vehicles carrying assault troops to ferry
designated types and amounts of supplies ashore on each trip.
(b) Provision for the mobile loading of each vehicle of the LF not involved in
the lift of the assault elements ashore.
(c) Means for facilitating the transfer of supplies from ship to shore, including
the most efficient use of such items as pallets, containers, cargo nets, and slings.
c. Supply Operations Ashore. During the early stages of the attack, the ATF ships
are the primary supply source for the LF. Prior to the establishment of landing support
ashore, critical supplies are furnished directly to the requesting unit by the LCE or CSS
element, through the TACLOG group, from amphibious warfare ships. Subsequent to the
establishment of landing support units ashore, combat elements are supplied through shorebased CSS facilities. As the operation progresses, several supply installations may be
established within the beachhead by other CSS units of the LF. When adequate supply levels
have been attained in installations ashore and transportation means are available, supply
support of LF units will be provided from these areas. Supply sources may be augmented by
the aerial delivery of supplies by fixed-wing aircraft operating from bases outside the landing
area. The ships of the ATF continue as the primary source of immediate resupply for the LF.
(1) Supply control and distribution are accomplished at both the LF level and at
the lowest levels that have an organic supply capability (e.g., battalion). These levels are
most important within the overall function of supply, especially during the critical transition
from sea-based to shore-based supply support during an amphibious operation. Adherence
to the following principles during the transitional and ashore stages of the operation will
result in a control and distribution system that is reliable, flexible, and responsive.
A-2
JP 3-02
A-3
Appendix A
c. Planning Requirements. All LF units must determine their maintenance
requirements and compare them against their organic (unit-level) capabilities. Shortfalls
must be identified during the planning process and forwarded to higher and supporting unit
commands. An estimate of maintenance requirements includes an in-depth examination of
each of the following:
(1) Available personnel; required skills and quantity.
(2) Repair parts; consumables and secondary repairable items.
(3) Tools and equipment; by type, quantity, and location.
(4) Facilities support requirements during embarkation, movement, rehearsal, and
action (including BSAs and CSSAs).
(5) Procedures to request and report data requirements, routing, distribution, and
means of transmission.
(6) Transportation requirements for equipment recovery and salvage, contact
teams, and distribution of repair parts and materials.
(7) External maintenance units or agencies available for support.
(8) Liaison with other subordinate CSS units.
3. Landing Force Transportation Planning
a. Transportation consists of movement of personnel, supplies, and equipment by
water, air, or surface means. Transportation requirements are based on two factors: the
character of the operation and the types and quantities of supplies required in the
objective area. Transportation tasks may include unloading and transfer of supplies ashore,
forwarding of LF supplies and materials from the landing site(s), and operating the land
transportation system (e.g., marking of routes, convoy control) within the AO.
b. Transportation Requirements
(1) Transportation requirements are normally stated in tons of supplies and
equipment, gallons of fuel, or number of personnel to be moved during a particular period.
The estimated distances of these movements will also play a key role in the planning
estimate. Particular consideration must be given to the supply of aviation fuel. Although
initiating air operations ashore through the use of packaged fuel is possible, continuing
supply of aviation fuel requires the installation of bulk fuel systems and a high-capacity
mobile liquid fuel transport capability ashore as soon as possible.
(2) Detailed requirements state the specific numbers, types, and capacities of
vehicles, bulk fuel facilities, and aircraft required at specific times and places. They also
state the schedules of operation and routes to be traversed.
A-4
JP 3-02
A-5
Appendix A
Intentionally Blank
A-6
JP 3-02
APPENDIX B
ASSAULT FOLLOW-ON ECHELON
1. General
a. The AFOE is not to be confused with Marine Corps forces deployed by MPF.
When an ATF is being formed by the supported CCDR, USTRANSCOM allocates shipping
for the AFOE mission to the supported CCDR. These ships are then integrated into the Navy
component commanders operations and incorporated with the forces of the CATF. AFOE
sealift assets are positioned and loaded at port facilities, generally where ATF support cargo
and personnel can be most expeditiously and efficiently loaded to meet AFOE mission
requirements. Loadout of AFOE shipping is nearly simultaneous with the loadout of AE
shipping. The AFOE deploys in accordance with the CATFs amphibious OPLAN. The
ships assigned to the AFOE should be loaded, perhaps not necessarily combat loaded, but at
a minimum with off-load priorities that will support the LF scheme of maneuver ashore
anticipated at the planned off-load time in the AOA or operational area. The AFOE loads
need to be discharged swiftly to support the LF.
b. When AFOE ships are loaded and ready for sea, they will become OPCON to the
CATF or the designated subordinate if the ship is to sail as a unit of a Navy formation or
movement group. Because of the tactical employment inherent in amphibious operations,
CATF will have OPCON of the strategic sealift assigned. The AFOE is normally required in
the AOA or operational area early enough to commence off-load no later than five days after
the commencement of the assault. The AFOE will consist of additional merchant shipping
and support personnel and equipment to handle the added ship-to-shore movement. This will
require ships carrying off-load systems to be off-loaded as soon as possible (as early as D+1)
depending on the scope of the amphibious operation and size of the MAGTF. For example,
a single MEBs AFOE off-load should commence no later than D+5 to support the arrival of
its fly-in personnel and unit equipment by D+9 with the goal of all supplies being ashore by
D+15. Off-loading of the AFOE is accomplished by the normal Navy/USMC ship-to-shore
movement control and support organizations (e.g., PCO, TACLOG, LFSP). These
organizations will undergo changes in composition as the operation matures and the logistics
element establishes capabilities ashore. Upon release of the ships from tasking in the AOA
or AO, the CATF will transfer OPCON of the ship back to USTRANSCOM.
c. Should an MPF reinforce the amphibious operation and an in-stream off-load be
required, the MPSRON off-load is integrated into the overall ATF ship-to-shore movement
control structure, and the MPF lighterage may be used to support the AFOE off-load. If the
MPF off-load is separated by space and time from the AE landing, and/or conducted in-port,
stand-alone MPF arrival and assembly task organized structure (arrival and assembly
operations group, POG, BOG, and the AACG) will be used for the independent off-load.
d. An AFOE off-load to support the establishment of a theater airfield outside of the
AOA or operational area could take place as a separate operation requiring a separate offload organization.
B-1
Appendix B
For more information, see JP 4-01.2, Sealift Support to Joint Operations, JP 3-02.1,
Amphibious Embarkation and Debarkation, and NWP 3-02.21, MSC Support of Amphibious
Operations.
2. Organization and Responsibilities
a. The CATF and CLF are responsible for the AFOE debarkation and off-load, and the
amphibious operation does not normally terminate until the AFOE is ashore.
b. As the first elements of the AFOE approach the AOA or operational area, CATF
should already have a well-defined ship-to-shore movement organization in place. The
CATF continues to maintain overall control of ship-to-shore movement during AFOE
operations.
(1) The role of the PCO will expand to include control of assigned AFOE
shipping. Additional Navy support element personnel will be required to assist the PCO in
performing these expanded duties. Additional Navy cargo-handling battalions and NMCB
forces are required to support the off-load of strategic lift merchant ships.
(2) During extended joint operations, a transition from amphibious operations to
Navy LOTS could proceed further transition to JLOTS operation, which may be directed by
the JFC.
(3) As they become accessible, developed seaports and aerial ports are used to
supplement traditional beach operations and the normal ship-to-shore organization will be
expanded to include them.
c. The CATF administers afloat forces within the AOA or operational area through the
use of sea areas to deconflict operations of the various components of the ATF and
supporting units and platforms. In general, AFOE ships would be assigned to the sea
echelon area for holding purposes prior to introduction into the transport areas. The CATF
may designate sea echelon and transport area commanders, as required, to facilitate C2 of
shipping assigned to those areas.
d. As off-load of the AE is normally already completed, the CLF will have in place a
well-established BSA and a TACLOG, which will continue to assist and advise CATFs
ship-to-shore movement and control agencies. CLF continues to support off-loading of
AFOE strategic shipping and airlift and changes landing support organizations employed
during the debarkation of the AE, as required, and as the tactical situation permits. CLF
organizes the beachhead to facilitate the off-loading and the CSS buildup ashore and to
accommodate the off-load and movement of any containerized cargo. Throughout the AFOE
off-load, CLF maintains off-load control agencies, provides USMC personnel to perform
stevedore functions to assist in the off-load of merchant ships, and provides vehicle and
equipment operators for the off-load of embarked LF equipment and material. The CLF
does this through the following organizations:
B-2
JP 3-02
B-3
Appendix B
personnel, this team will provide USMC personnel to perform stevedore functions as well as
Navy personnel to support the operation of the ship off-load systems.
b. The conduct and sequencing of the off-load is constrained by the availability of offload systems. At anchorage, self-sustaining ships will be constrained by anchorage locations
and lighterage availability. Non-self-sustaining ships will be further constrained by the
availability of auxiliary crane ships to support the off-load. At the beach, cargo movement
from both self-sustaining and non-self-sustaining ships will be constrained by the number
and availability of beach off-load points. Key principles include:
(1) First priority should always be given to off-loading the lighterage to support
the AFOE off-load. If a MPF or MPSRON is supporting the operation, lighterage may be
available for use from the MPSs. Other heavy lift ships may bring lighterage from the naval
beach groups or from the Army.
(2) The lead time required for the installation of the elevated causeway
necessitates priority off-load of these components and delivery to the beach to begin
installation.
(3) The auxiliary crane ship will normally be given priority for assignment to offload anchorage. It will then be in position to receive non-self-sustaining ships alongside.
(4) If no pier facilities are available, RO/RO ships will normally be off-loaded
using an RO/RO discharge facility. Consideration should be given to aligning the RO/RO
anchorage with compatible beach off-load sites for assigned lighters (causeways preferred,
LCUs second) to maximize off-load.
(5) If the tactical situation ashore does not permit immediate off-load, the aviation
logistic support ship may be employed as a sea-based maintenance facility with limited
intermediate level maintenance capability.
(6) LF fuel requirements and lead time for preparation of installations ashore to
accept bulk fuel delivery may necessitate early assignment of anchorage and support craft for
an OPDS ship. The nature of fuel operations and the inland fuel distribution system will
normally drive selection of the location for the OPDS anchorage.
(7) Calm sea conditions or protected waterways are preferred for discharge of
lighter aboard ships and handling of small craft and barges. Extensive barge marshaling
areas may be required within protected waters.
c. When a merchant ship has completed its off-load, the ship will change OPCON back
to USTRANSCOM and return to the common user pool. Containerships should not loiter in
the AOA or operational area to retrograde containers.
d. Intertheater airlift could deploy AFOE forces and equipment directly to suitable
airfields in, or near, the AOA or operational area. Intratheater airlift could also be used to
transport AFOE forces from ISBs to airfields in closer proximity to the beachhead.
B-4
JP 3-02
B-5
Appendix B
Intentionally Blank
B-6
JP 3-02
APPENDIX C
COMPOSITE WARFARE DOCTRINE
1. Introduction
a. The Navy uses the CWC to defend the ATF at sea. There may be multiple CWCs
assigned to support the JFCs operation. Each CWC focuses on its own surveillance and
classification, identification, and engagement areas.
b. The CWC allows the OTC to aggressively wage offensive combat operations against
air, surface, and subsurface threats while carrying out the primary missions of the force, and
to shape the operational environment for the amphibious operation. Although assignment of
various warfare commanders will allow control of different capabilities in a single platform
by multiple commanders, only one commander may exercise TACON for the ships
movements and maneuver. The use of a CWC can apply to any naval task force or task
group operating at sea and is capable of flexible implementation and application.
c.
C-1
Appendix C
CWC
2
Maritime AO
(JFMCC/CTF)
Operating
Area
CWC
1
Vital
Area
Classification, Identification,
Engagement Area
Legend
AO
CTF
CWC
area of operations
commander, task force
composite warfare commander
GCC
JFC
JFMCC
Figure C-1. Composite Warfare Commander Integration Within the Operational Area
C-2
JP 3-02
C-3
Appendix C
Intentionally Blank
C-4
JP 3-02
APPENDIX D
REFERENCES
1. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Publications
a. CJCSM 3500.04F, Universal Joint Task Manual.
b. CJCSM 6231.01, Manual for Employing Joint Tactical Communications.
c. JP 1, Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States.
d. JP 1-02, Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms.
e. JP 2-0, Joint Intelligence.
f. JP 2-01, Joint and National Intelligence Support to Military Operations.
g. JP 2-01.3, Joint Intelligence Preparation of the Operational Environment.
h. JP 2-03, Geospatial Intelligence in Joint Operations.
i. JP 3-0, Joint Operations.
j. JP 3-01, Countering Air and Missile Threats.
k. JP 3-02.1, Amphibious Embarkation and Debarkation.
l. JP 3-04, Joint Shipboard Helicopter and Tiltrotor Aircraft Operations.
m. JP 3-05, Special Operations.
n. JP 3-07, Stability Operations.
o. JP 3-07.3, Peace Operations.
p. JP 3-09, Joint Fire Support.
q. JP 3-09.3, Close Air Support.
r. JP 3-11, Operations in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear
Environments.
s. JP 3-12, Cyberspace Operations.
t. JP 3-13.4, Military Deception.
u. JP 3-15, Barriers, Obstacles, and Mine Warfare for Joint Operations.
v. JP 3-16, Multinational Operations.
D-1
Appendix D
w. JP 3-18, Joint Forcible Entry Operations.
x. JP 3-30, Command and Control for Joint Air Operations.
y. JP 3-31, Command and Control for Joint Land Operations.
z. JP 3-32, Command and Control for Joint Maritime Operations.
aa. JP 3-33, Joint Task Force Headquarters.
bb. JP 3-34, Joint Engineer Operations.
cc. JP 3-50, Personnel Recovery.
dd. JP 3-52, Joint Airspace Control.
ee. JP 3-60, Joint Targeting.
ff. JP 4-0, Joint Logistics.
gg. JP 4-01.2, Sealift Support to Joint Operations.
hh. JP 4-01.6, Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore.
ii. JP 4-02, Health Services.
jj. JP 5-0, Joint Operation Planning.
kk. JP 6-0, Joint Communications System.
ll. JP 6-01, Joint Electromagnetic Spectrum Management Operations.
2. Service Publications
a. Army Doctrine Publication 3-0, Unified Land Operations.
b. Marine Corps Doctrine Publication 1, Warfighting.
c. Marine Corps Doctrine Publication 6, Command and Control.
d. MCWP 3-13, Employment of Amphibious Assault Vehicles (AAVs).
e. MCWP 3-23, Offensive Air Support.
f. MCWP 3-25.10, Low Altitude Air Defense Handbook.
g. MCWP 3-43.1, Raid Operations.
h. Naval Doctrine Publication 1, Naval Warfare.
D-2
JP 3-02
References
i. NTRP 3-02.1.2, Naval Beach Group Support Element Operations.
j. NTTP 3-02.1.3, Amphibious/Expeditionary Operations Air Control.
k. NTTP 3-02.14, The Naval Beach Group.
l. NTTP 3-15.24, Mine Countermeasures in Support of Amphibious Operations.
m. NTTP 3-20.31, Surface Ship Survivability.
n. NTTP 3-21.1, Antisubmarine Warfare Commanders Manual.
o. NWP 3-02.21, MSC Support of Amphibious Operations.
p. NWP 3-09, Navy Fire Support.
q. NWP 3-15, Naval Mine Warfare.
r. NWP 3-20, Navy Surface Warfare Manual.
s. NWP 3-29, Disaster Response Operations.
t. NWP 3-56, Composite Warfare Doctrine.
u. NWP 5-01, Navy Planning.
3. Multi-Service Publications
a. ATTP 3-90.4/MCWP 3-17.8, Combined Arms Mobility Operations.
b. Marine Corps Reference Publication 3-31A/NWP 3-02.12, Employment of the LCAC.
c. MCWP 3-31.5/NTTP 3-02.1M, Ship-to-Shore Movement.
d. MCWP 3-31.6/NTTP 3-02.2, Supporting Arms Coordination in Amphibious
Operations.
e. MCWP 3-31.7/NWP 3-62M, Seabasing.
f. MCWP 3-32/NTTP 3-02.3, Maritime Prepositioning Force Operations.
4. Multinational Publication
Allied Procedural Publication-11, NATO Message Catalogue.
D-3
Appendix D
Intentionally Blank
D-4
JP 3-02
APPENDIX E
ADMINISTRATIVE INSTRUCTIONS
1. User Comments
Users in the field are highly encouraged to submit comments on this publication to: Joint
Staff J-7, Deputy Director, Joint Education and Doctrine, ATTN: Joint Doctrine Analysis
Division, 116 Lake View Parkway, Suffolk, VA 23435-2697. These comments should
address content (accuracy, usefulness, consistency, and organization), writing, and
appearance.
2. Authorship
The lead agent for this publication is the US Navy. The Joint Staff doctrine sponsor for
this publication is the Director for Operations (J-3).
3. Supersession
This publication supersedes JP 3-02, Amphibious Operations, 10 August 2009.
4. Change Recommendations
a. Recommendations for urgent changes to this publication should be submitted:
TO:
E-1
Appendix E
6. Distribution of Electronic Publications
a. Joint Staff J-7 will not print copies of JPs for distribution. Electronic versions are
available on JDEIS Joint Electronic Library Plus (JEL+) at https://jdeis.js.mil/jdeis/index.jsp
(NIPRNET) and http://jdeis.js.smil.mil/jdeis/index.jsp (SIPRNET), and on the JEL at
http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine (NIPRNET).
b. Only approved JPs are releasable outside the combatant commands, Services, and
Joint Staff. Release of any classified JP to foreign governments or foreign nationals must be
requested through the local embassy (Defense Attach Office) to DIA, Defense Foreign
Liaison/PO-FL, Room 1E811, 7400 Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-7400.
c. JEL CD-ROM. Upon request of a joint doctrine development community member,
the Joint Staff J-7 will produce and deliver one CD-ROM with current JPs. This JEL CDROM will be updated not less than semi-annually and when received can be locally
reproduced for use within the combatant commands, Services, and combat support agencies.
E-2
JP 3-02
GLOSSARY
PART IABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
A2
AACG
AADC
AATCC
AAV
ACA
ACE
ACM
ACO
ACP
AD
ADS
ADZ
AE
AF
AFOE
AMDC
AO
AOA
APF
APS
ARG
ASCS
ASLT
ASW
ATCS
ATF
ATO
ATTP
antiaccess
arrival airfield control group
area air defense commander
amphibious air traffic control center
amphibious assault vehicle
airspace control authority
aviation combat element (USMC)
airspace coordinating measure
airspace control order
airspace control plan
area denial
air defense section
amphibious defense zone
assault echelon
amphibious force
assault follow-on echelon
air and missile defense commander
area of operations
amphibious objective area
afloat pre-positioning force
Army pre-positioned stocks
amphibious ready group
air support coordination section
assault support landing table
antisubmarine warfare
air traffic control section
amphibious task force
air tasking order
Army tactics, techniques, and procedures
BLT
BOG
BSA
C2
CAF
CAS
CATF
CBRN
CCDR
CCO
CE
CJCSM
GL-1
Glossary
CLA
CLF
CLZ
CO
COA
COG
COMSEC
CONOPS
CP
CRTS
CSG
CSS
CSSA
CWC
DASC
DOS
DZ
EA
EMCON
EMS
EPW
ESG
EW
electronic attack
emission control
electromagnetic spectrum
enemy prisoner of war
expeditionary strike group
electronic warfare
FARP
FDC
FFC
FFCC
FHA
FSA
FSC
FSCC
FSCM
GCE
HCS
HIDACZ
INLS
IPE
ISB
GL-2
JP 3-02
Glossary
JFACC
JFC
JFMCC
JIPOE
JLOTS
JOA
JP
JTF
LCAC
LCE
LCU
LF
LFOC
LFSP
LHA
LHD
LOC
LOD
LOTS
LPD
LSD
LSV
LZ
MAGTF
Marine TACC
MCM
MCMC
MCWP
MEB
MEF
METOC
MEU
MILDEC
MIW
MIWC
MOPP
MPF
MPS
MPSRON
MSC
Navy TACC
NEO
Glossary
NMCB
NSFS
NTRP
NTTP
NWP
OPCON
OPDS
OPGEN
OPLAN
OPORD
OPSEC
OPTASK
OTC
OTH
operational control
offshore petroleum discharge system (USN)
operation general matter
operation plan
operation order
operations security
operation task
officer in tactical command
over the horizon
PCO
PERMA
POG
R2P2
RADC
ROE
RO/RO
SAC
SACC
SADC
SIPRNET
SOF
SPINS
SPMAGTF
SUW
SUWC
SZ
TA
TACLOG
TACON
TACP
TADC
TAO
TAOC
TIC
TIM
TTP
target acquisition
tactical-logistical
tactical control
tactical air control party
tactical air direction center
tactical air officer
tactical air operations center (USMC)
target information center
toxic industrial material
tactics, techniques, and procedures
GL-4
JP 3-02
Glossary
USA
USAF
USG
USMC
USTRANSCOM
WMD
GL-5
GL-6
JP 3-02
Glossary
amphibious defense zone. The area encompassing the amphibious objective area and the
adjoining airspace required by accompanying naval forces for the purpose of air
defense. Also called an ADZ. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
amphibious demonstration. A type of amphibious operation conducted for the purpose of
deceiving the enemy by a show of force with the expectation of deluding the enemy into
following an unfavorable course of action. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
amphibious force. An amphibious task force and a landing force together with other forces
that are trained, organized, and equipped for amphibious operations. Also called AF.
(JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
amphibious lift. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
amphibious objective area. A geographical area of sufficient size for conducting necessary
sea, air, and land operations, and within which is located the objective(s) to be secured
by the amphibious force. Also called AOA. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
amphibious operation. A military operation launched from the sea by an amphibious force
to conduct landing force operations within the littorals. Also called PHIBOP.
(Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
amphibious planning. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
amphibious raid. A type of amphibious operation involving swift incursion into or
temporary occupation of an objective followed by a planned withdrawal. (JP 1-02.
SOURCE: JP 3-02)
amphibious shipping. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
amphibious squadron. A tactical and administrative organization composed of amphibious
warfare ships used to transport troops and their equipment for an amphibious operation.
Also called PHIBRON. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
amphibious task force. A Navy task organization formed to conduct amphibious
operations. Also called ATF. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
amphibious tractor. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
amphibious transport dock. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
amphibious transport group. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
amphibious vehicle. A wheeled or tracked vehicle capable of operating on both land and
water. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
GL-7
Glossary
amphibious vehicle availability table. A tabulation of the type and number of amphibious
vehicles available primarily for assault landings and for support of other elements of the
operation. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
amphibious vehicle employment plan. A plan showing in tabular form the planned
employment of amphibious vehicles in landing operations, including their employment
after the initial movement to the beach. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
amphibious warfare ship. A combatant ship having organic capability to embark, land, and
support landing forces in amphibious operations and which has characteristics enabling
long duration operations on the high seas. (Approved for inclusion in JP 1-02.)
amphibious withdrawal. A type of amphibious operation involving the extraction of forces
by sea in ships or craft from a hostile or potentially hostile shore. (JP 1-02. SOURCE:
JP 3-02)
approach schedule. In amphibious operations, this schedule indicates, for each scheduled
wave, the time of departure from the rendezvous area, from the line of departure, and
from other control points and the time of arrival at the beach. (JP 1-02. SOURCE:
JP 3-02)
assault. 1. In an amphibious operation, the period of time between the arrival of the major
assault forces of the amphibious task force in the objective area and the accomplishment
of the amphibious task force mission. (JP 3-02) 2. To make a short, violent, but wellordered attack against a local objective, such as a gun emplacement, a fort, or a machine
gun nest. (JP 3-18) 3. A phase of an airborne operation beginning with delivery by air
of the assault echelon of the force into the objective area and extending through attack
of assault objectives and consolidation of the initial airhead. (JP 1-02. SOURCE:
JP 3-18)
assault breaching. A part of amphibious breaching in support of an amphibious assault
involving a fire support mission using precision guided munitions to neutralize mines
and obstacles in the surf zone and on the beach. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
assault craft. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
assault craft unit. A permanently commissioned naval organization, subordinate to the
commander, naval beach group, that contains landing craft and crews necessary to
provide lighterage required in an amphibious operation. Also called ACU. (JP 1-02.
SOURCE: JP 3-02)
assault echelon. In amphibious operations, the element of a force comprised of tailored
units and aircraft assigned to conduct the initial assault on the operational area. Also
called AE. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
assault follow-on echelon. In amphibious operations, that echelon of the assault troops,
vehicles, aircraft, equipment, and supplies that, though not needed to initiate the assault,
GL-8
JP 3-02
Glossary
is required to support and sustain the assault. Also called AFOE. (Approved for
incorporation into JP 1-02.)
assault schedule. In amphibious operations, this schedule provides the formation,
composition, and timing of waves landing over the beach. (JP 1-02. SOURCE:
JP 3-02)
assault shipping. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
assault wave. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
attack group. A subordinate task organization of the Navy forces of an amphibious task
force composed of amphibious warfare ships and supporting naval units designated to
transport, protect, land, and initially support a landing group. (Approved for
incorporation into JP 1-02.)
basic tactical organization. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
battalion landing team. In an amphibious operation, an infantry battalion normally
reinforced by necessary combat and service elements; the basic unit for planning an
assault landing. Also called BLT. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
beach. 1. The area extending from the shoreline inland to a marked change in physiographic
form or material, or to the line of permanent vegetation (coastline). 2. In amphibious
operations, that portion of the shoreline designated for landing of a tactical organization.
(JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
beach group. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
beachhead. A designated area on a hostile or potentially hostile shore that, when seized and
held, ensures the continuous landing of troops and materiel, and provides maneuver
space requisite for subsequent projected operations ashore. (JP 1-02. SOURCE:
JP 3-02)
beach party. The Navy component of the landing force support party under the tactical
control of the landing force support party commander. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
beach party commander. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
beach support area. In amphibious operations, the area to the rear of a landing force or
elements thereof, that contains the facilities for the unloading of troops and materiel and
the support of the forces ashore. Also called BSA. (Approved for incorporation into JP
1-02.)
boat group. The basic organization of landing craft. (Approved for incorporation into
JP 1-02.)
GL-9
Glossary
boat lane. A lane for amphibious assault landing craft, which extends from the line of
departure to the beach. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
boat wave. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
casualty receiving and treatment ship. In amphibious operations, a ship designated to
receive, provide treatment for, and transfer casualties. Also called CRTS. (Approved
for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
causeway launching area. An area located near the line of departure but clear of the
approach lanes to an area located in the inner transport area. (JP 1-02. SOURCE:
JP 3-02)
central control officer. The officer, embarked in the central control ship, designated by the
amphibious task force commander for the overall coordination of the waterborne shipto-shore movement. Also called CCO. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
close support area. Those parts of the ocean operating areas nearest to, but not necessarily
in, the objective area. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
colored beach. That portion of usable coastline sufficient for the assault landing of a
regimental landing team or similar sized unit. (Approved for incorporation into
JP 1-02.)
combat loading. The arrangement of personnel and the stowage of equipment and supplies
in a manner designed to conform to the anticipated tactical operation of the organization
embarked. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
combat service support area. An area ashore that is organized to contain the necessary
supplies, equipment, installations, and elements to provide the landing force with
combat service support throughout the operation. Also called CSSA. (JP 1-02.
SOURCE: JP 3-02)
command element. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
commander, amphibious task force. The Navy officer designated in the initiating directive
as the commander of the amphibious task force. Also called CATF. (JP 1-02.
SOURCE: JP 3-02)
commander, landing force. The officer designated in the initiating directive as the
commander of the landing force for an amphibious operation. Also called CLF.
(JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
commanding officer of troops. On a ship that has embarked units, a designated officer
(usually the senior embarking unit commander) who is responsible for the
administration, discipline, and training of all embarked units. Also called COT.
(JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
GL-10
JP 3-02
Glossary
control group. Personnel, ships, and craft designated to control the waterborne ship-toshore movement. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
covering fire. 1. Fire used to protect troops when they are within range of enemy small
arms. 2. In amphibious usage, fire delivered prior to the landing to cover preparatory
operations such as underwater demolition or mine countermeasures. (JP 1-02.
SOURCE: JP 3-02)
D-day. The unnamed day on which a particular operation commences or is to commence.
(Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
distant retirement area. In amphibious operations, the sea area located to seaward of the
landing area to which assault ships may retire and operate in the event of adverse
weather or to prevent concentration of ships in the landing area. (Approved for
incorporation into JP 1-02.)
dock landing ship. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
embarkation plans. The plans prepared by the landing force and appropriate subordinate
commanders containing instructions and information concerning the organization for
embarkation, assignment to shipping, supplies and equipment to be embarked, location
and assignment of embarkation areas, control and communication arrangements,
movement schedules and embarkation sequence, and additional pertinent instructions
relating to the embarkation of the landing force. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
establishing directive. An order issued to specify the purpose of the support relationship.
(JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
fire support station. An exact location at sea within a fire support area from which a fire
support ship delivers fire. Also called FSS. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
floating dump. Emergency supplies preloaded in landing craft, amphibious vehicles, or in
landing ships that are located in the vicinity of the appropriate control officer, who
directs their landing as requested by the troop commander concerned. (Approved for
incorporation into JP 1-02.)
follow-up. In amphibious operations, the reinforcements and stores carried on ships and
aircraft (not originally part of the amphibious force) that are off-loaded after the assault
and assault follow-on echelons have been landed. (Approved for incorporation into JP
1-02.)
follow-up shipping. Ships not originally a part of the amphibious task force but which
deliver troops and supplies to the objective area after the action phase has begun.
(JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
general unloading period. In amphibious operations, that part of the ship-to-shore
movement in which unloading is primarily logistic in character, and emphasizes speed
and volume of unloading operations. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
GL-11
Glossary
go/no-go. A critical point at which a decision to proceed or not must be made. (Approved
for replacement of go no-go and its definition in JP 1-02.)
helicopter coordination section. The section within the Navy tactical air control center that
coordinates rotary-wing air operations with the air traffic control center(s) in the
amphibious force. Also called HCS. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
helicopter direction center. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
helicopter transport area. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
helicopter wave. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
H-hour. 1. The specific hour on D-day at which a particular operation commences. (5-0)
2. In amphibious operations, the time the first landing craft or amphibious vehicle of the
waterborne wave lands or is scheduled to land on the beach, and in some cases, the
commencement of countermine breaching operations. (JP 3-02) (Approved for
incorporation into JP 1-02.)
hydrographic reconnaissance. Reconnaissance of an area of water to determine depths,
beach gradients, the nature of the bottom, and the location of coral reefs, rocks, shoals,
and man-made obstacles. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
initial unloading period. In amphibious operations, that part of the ship-to-shore movement
in which unloading is primarily tactical in character and must be instantly responsive to
landing force requirements. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
inner transport area. In amphibious operations, an area as close to the landing beach as
depth of water, navigational hazards, boat traffic, and enemy action permit, to which
transports may move to expedite unloading. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
integrated planning. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
landing area. 1. That part of the operational area within which are conducted the landing
operations of an amphibious force. 2. In airborne operations, the general area used for
landing troops and materiel either by airdrop or air landing. 3. Any specially prepared
or selected surface of land, water, or deck designated or used for takeoff and landing of
aircraft. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
landing area diagram. A graphic means of showing, for amphibious operations, the beach
designations, boat lanes, organization of the line of departure, scheduled waves, landing
ship area, transport areas, and the fire support areas in the immediate vicinity of the boat
lanes. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
landing beach. That portion of a shoreline required for the landing of an amphibious force.
(Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
GL-12
JP 3-02
Glossary
landing craft. A craft employed in amphibious operations, specifically designed for
carrying troops and their equipment and for beaching, unloading, retracting, and
resupply operations. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
landing craft and amphibious vehicle assignment table. A table showing the assignment
of personnel and materiel to each landing craft and amphibious vehicle and the
assignment of the landing craft and amphibious vehicles to waves for the ship-to-shore
movement. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
landing craft availability table. A tabulation of the type and number of landing craft that
will be available from each ship of the transport group. (Approved for incorporation
into JP 1-02.)
landing diagram. A graphic means of illustrating the plan for the ship-to-shore movement.
(JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
landing force. A Marine Corps or Army task organization, which is part of the amphibious
force, formed to conduct amphibious operations. Also called LF. (Approved for
incorporation into JP 1-02.)
landing force support party. A temporary landing force organization composed of Navy
and landing force elements, that facilitates the ship-to-shore movement and provides
initial combat support and combat service support to the landing force. Also called
LFSP. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
landing group. In amphibious operations, a subordinate task organization of the landing
force capable of conducting landing operations, under a single tactical command,
against a position or group of positions. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
landing group commander. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
landing plan. In amphibious operations, a collective term referring to all individually
prepared naval and landing force documents that, taken together, present in detail all
instructions for execution of the ship-to-shore movement. (JP 1-02. SOURCE:
JP 3-02)
landing sequence table. A document that incorporates the detailed plans for ship-to-shore
movement of nonscheduled units. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
landing ship. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
landing site. 1. A site within a landing zone containing one or more landing points. 2. In
amphibious operations, a continuous segment of coastline over which troops, equipment
and supplies can be landed by surface means. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
L-hour. 1. The specific hour on C-day at which a deployment operation commences or is to
commence. (JP 5-0) 2. In amphibious operations, the time at which the first helicopter
or tiltrotor aircraft of the airborne ship-to-shore movement wave touches down or is
GL-13
Glossary
scheduled to touch down in the landing zone. (JP 3-02) (Approved for incorporation
into JP 1-02.)
line of departure. 1. In land warfare, a line designated to coordinate the departure of attack
elements. Also called LD. (JP 3-31) 2. In amphibious operations, a suitably marked
offshore coordinating line, which is located at the seaward end of a boat lane, to assist in
the landing of landing craft and amphibious vehicles on designated beaches at the
scheduled times. Also called LOD. (JP 3-02) (Approved for incorporation into
JP 1-02.)
massed fire. 1. The fire of the batteries of two or more ships directed against a single target.
2. Fire from a number of weapons directed at a single target point or small area.
(JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
movement group. Those ships and embarked units that load out and proceed to rendezvous
in the objective area. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
movement phase. In amphibious operations, the period during which various elements of
the amphibious force move from points of embarkation to the objective area.
(Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
movement plan. In amphibious operations, the naval plan providing for the movement of
the amphibious task force to the objective area. (Approved for incorporation into
JP 1-02.)
naval beach group. A permanently organized naval command within an amphibious force
composed of a commander and staff, a beachmaster unit, an amphibious construction
battalion, and assault craft units, designed to provide an administrative group from
which required naval tactical components may be made available to the attack force
commander and to the amphibious landing force commander. Also called NBG.
(JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
nonscheduled units. Units of the landing force held in readiness for landing during the
initial unloading period, but not included in either scheduled or on-call waves.
(Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
numbered beach. In amphibious operations, a subdivision of a colored beach, designated
for the assault landing of a battalion landing team or similarly sized unit, when landed as
part of a larger force. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
numbered wave. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
on-call wave. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
organization for combat. In amphibious operations, task organization of landing force
units for combat, involving combinations of command, ground and aviation combat,
combat support, and combat service support units for accomplishment of missions
ashore. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
GL-14
JP 3-02
Glossary
organization for embarkation. In amphibious operations, an organization consisting of
temporary landing force task organizations established by the commander, landing force
and a temporary organization of Navy forces established by the commander, amphibious
task force for the purpose of simplifying planning and facilitating the execution of
embarkation. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
organization for landing. In amphibious operations, the specific tactical grouping of the
landing force for the assault. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
outer transport area. In amphibious operations, an area inside the antisubmarine screen to
which assault transports proceed initially after arrival in the objective area. (JP 1-02.
SOURCE: JP 3-02)
over-the-horizon amphibious operation. An operational initiative launched from beyond
visual and radar range of the shoreline. (Approved for replacement of over-the-horizon
amphibious operations in JP 1-02.)
parallel chains of command. In amphibious operations, a parallel system of command,
responding to the interrelationship of participating forces, wherein corresponding
commanders are established at each subordinate level of all components to facilitate
coordinated planning for, and execution of, the amphibious operation. (Approved for
incorporation into JP 1-02.)
plan for landing. In amphibious operations, a collective term referring to all individually
prepared naval and landing force documents which, taken together, present in detail all
instructions for execution of the ship-to-shore movement. (JP 1-02. SOURCE:
JP 3-02)
planning directive. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
planning phase. In amphibious operations, the phase normally denoted by the period
extending from the issuance of the initiating directive up to the embarkation phase.
(Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
preassault operations. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
prelanding operations. Operations conducted by the amphibious force upon its arrival in
the amphibious objective area or operational area and prior to H-hour and/or L-hour.
(Approved for inclusion in JP 1-02.)
primary control officer. In amphibious operations, the officer embarked in a primary
control ship assigned to control the movement of landing craft, amphibious vehicles,
and landing ships to and from a colored beach. Also called PCO. (JP 1-02. SOURCE:
JP 3-02)
primary control ship. In amphibious operations, a ship of the task force designated to
provide support for the primary control officer and a combat information center control
team for a colored beach. Also called PCS. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
GL-15
Glossary
regimental landing team. A task organization for landing composed of an infantry
regiment reinforced by those elements that are required for initiation of its combat
function ashore. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
regulating point. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
regulating station. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
rehearsal phase. In amphibious operations, the period during which the prospective
operation is practiced. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
rendezvous area. In an amphibious operation, the area in which the landing craft and
amphibious vehicles rendezvous to form waves after being loaded, and prior to
movement to the line of departure. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
scheduled wave. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
sea areas. Areas in the amphibious objective area designated for the stationing of
amphibious task force ships. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
seabasing. The deployment, assembly, command, projection, reconstitution, sustainment,
and re-employment of joint power from the sea without reliance on land bases within
the operational area. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
sea echelon. A portion of the amphibious warfare ships or other ships that withdraws from
or remains out of the transport area during an amphibious landing and operates in
designated areas to seaward in an on-call or unscheduled status. (Approved for
incorporation into JP 1-02.)
sea echelon area. In amphibious operations, an area to seaward of a transport area from
which ships are phased into the transport area, and to which ships withdraw from the
transport area. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
sea echelon plan. In amphibious operations, the distribution plan for amphibious shipping
in the transport area to minimize losses due to enemy attack by weapons of mass
destruction and to reduce the area to be swept of mines. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
selective unloading. In an amphibious operation, the controlled unloading from amphibious
warfare ships, and movement ashore, of specific items of cargo at the request of the
landing force commander. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
serial. 1. An element or a group of elements within a series that is given a numerical or
alphabetical designation for convenience in planning, scheduling, and control. 2. A
group of people, vehicles, equipment, or supplies and is used in airborne, air assault,
amphibious operations, and convoys. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
serial assignment table. A table that is used in amphibious operations and shows the serial
number, the title of the unit, the approximate number of personnel; the material,
GL-16
JP 3-02
Glossary
vehicles, or equipment in the serial; the number and type of landing craft and/or
amphibious vehicles required to boat the serial; and the ship on which the serial is
embarked. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
service troops. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
ship-to-shore movement. That portion of the action phase of an amphibious operation that
includes the deployment of the landing force from ships to designated landing areas.
(Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
shore party. A task organization of the landing force, formed for the purpose of facilitating
the landing and movement off the beaches of troops, equipment, and supplies; for the
evacuation from the beaches of casualties and enemy prisoners of war; and for
facilitating the beaching, retraction, and salvaging of landing ships and craft. Also
called beach group. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
subsidiary landing. In an amphibious operation, a landing usually made outside the
designated landing area, the purpose of which is to support the main landing. (JP 1-02.
SOURCE: JP 3-02)
supporting arms. Weapons and weapons systems of all types employed to support forces
by indirect or direct fire. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
supporting operations. In amphibious operations, those operations conducted by forces
other than those conducted by the amphibious force. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
tactical air officer. The officer under the amphibious task force commander who, until
control is passed ashore, coordinates planning of all phases of air participation of the
amphibious operation and air operations of supporting forces en route to and in the
objective area. Also called TAO. (Approved for replacement of tactical air officer
(afloat) and its definition in JP 1-02.)
tactical-logistical group. Representatives designated by troop commanders to assist Navy
control officers aboard control ships in the ship-to-shore movement of troops,
equipment, and supplies. Also called TACLOG group. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
tactical reserve. A part of a force held under the control of the commander as a
maneuvering force to influence future action. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02
with JP 3-02 as the source JP.)
target information center. The agency or activity responsible for collecting, displaying,
evaluating, and disseminating information pertaining to potential targets. Also called
TIC. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
transport area. In amphibious operations, an area assigned to a transport organization for
the purpose of debarking troops and equipment. (JP 1-02. SOURCE: JP 3-02)
GL-17
Glossary
transport group. An element that directly deploys and supports the landing of the landing
force, and is functionally designated as a transport group in the amphibious task force
organization. (Approved for incorporation into JP 1-02.)
vertical and/or short takeoff and landing. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
vertical landing zone. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
vertical takeoff and landing aircraft. None. (Approved for removal from JP 1-02.)
wave. A formation of forces, including ships, landing craft, amphibious vehicles or aircraft,
required to beach or land about the same time. (Approved for incorporation into
JP 1-02.)
GL-18
JP 3-02
JP 1-0
JP 2-0
JP
JP 3-0
3-0
JP 4-0
JP 5-0
JP 6-0
PERSONNEL
INTELLIGENCE
OPERATIONS
OPERATIONS
LOGISTICS
PLANS
COMMUNICATIONS
SYSTEM
All joint publications are organized into a comprehensive hierarchy as shown in the chart above. Joint
Publication (JP) 3-02 is in the Operations series of joint doctrine publications. The diagram below
illustrates an overview of the development process:
STEP #1 - Initiation
STEP #4 - Maintenance
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
Maintenance
Initiation
ENHANCED
JOINT
WARFIGHTING
CAPABILITY
JOINT
DOCTRINE
PUBLICATION
Approval
Development
STEP #3 - Approval
l
l
l
l
STEP #2 - Development
l
l
l
l
l
l