District Cooling Best Practices: Design Process and Key Issues

District Cooling Best Practices
Design Process and Key Issues

International District Cooling Conference
January 14-17, 2007
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Mark Spurr
Agenda
Load estimation
Focus on delta T
Condenser cooling options
Infrastructure integration
Designing for operations
Load estimation
Proper estimation of cooling loads affects the

design, operation and cost-effectiveness of
the district cooling system
Ensure sufficient but not excessive plant and

distribution capacity
Provide the ability to cost-effectively meet range
of loads
Provide a basis for accurate revenue projections
Cooling load estimation is addressed

extensively in ASHRAE and many computer
programs
Load estimation
Conventional methods tend to overstate loads

Design practices that contribute to high load
estimates include
Using extreme design temperatures

Assuming dry bulb & wet bulb peaks are coincident
Underestimation of load diversity
Safety factors
Three major aspects of load projections
Peak demand
Peak day hourly load profile
Annual cooling load profile
Load estimation
Case-specific variables
Weather
Building envelope, particularly windows
Lighting and computers
Number of people in occupied areas
Outside air for ventilation
Occupancy schedule
Load diversities
Operational practices and controls
e.g. shutting down fresh air intake at night would substantially

reduce dehumidification and cooling requirements
Ku
wa
it
Me
cca
Riy
ad
h
Ab
uD
ha
bi
Do
ha
Du
ba
i
Ma
na
ma
Ca
i ro
Am
ma
n
Temperature (C)
Load estimation
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
Dry bulb
Mean
coincident
wet bulb
Load as % of peak
Peak day load profiles

110%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Hotel
Residential
Office
Retail
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Hours
System diversified peak day load profile
% of peak load
(50% office, 15% hotel, 22% residential, 13% retail)

110%
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Peak day
load
profile
Average
daily load
2 4
6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Time of day
Annual cooling energy

and load duration curve
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
16
00
24
00
32
00
40
00
48
00
56
00
64
00
72
00
80
00
88
00
80
0
0%
0
Percentage of peak hourly load
100%
Hours per year with load at or below a given level
Annual cooling energy

and load duration curve
Load duration curve useful for evaluation of

plant options because it provides information
how many operating hours a given element in
the dispatch order will be used
Annual load profile also enables calculation of
the total annual energy, and thus the annual
Equivalent Full Load Hours (EFLH)
Critical for rate structure development and
revenue projections
In example shown, EFLH =3,978
Delta T, Delta T, Delta T!
Chilled water flow is inversely proportional

to the temperature differential (delta T)
between the supply and return
The larger the district cooling system delta
T, the less flow is required
Smaller pipes and pumps

Less pumping energy
Full capacity of chillers
Limitations on how large the delta T can go

Dropping supply temperature limited by
evaporator freeze-up and efficiency
penalties on the chillers
If chilled water storage is used, supply
temperature is limit 4C or 39F (maximum
density of water)
Coil performances
System and operational effects
For higher return temperature in building

HVAC, coil costs are higher but costs are
reduced due to
Smaller pipes, fittings and valves

Smaller pumps and less pumping power
For new construction, life-cycle costs should

be analyzed for the entire system (building
HVAC, ETS, distribution, plant)
Optimize delta T within integrated life

cycle costs
Typical recommendation for new
construction
3.3-6.7C (38-44F) supply
12.2-16.7C (54-62F) return
Condenser cooling
Cooling tower make-up options
Untreated seawater
Desalinate seawater (likely Reverse Osmosis)
Treated sewage effluent (TSE)
Seawater for direct condenser cooling
Cost
Environmental impact
Impact of future land reclamation
Infrastructure integration options
Plant siting
Consideration of condenser cooling options is

critical for district cooling plant siting
Need to consider access to both power and
water at an early stage in system planning
Depending on condenser cooling option, plant
site may require pipeline access corridor to
Seawater for tower make-up or direct cooling

Treated sewage effluent for tower make-up
Other water sources
Designing for operations
If approached as a long-term utility business, should

involve the Operations and Maintenance staff in the
design process
Challenge: fast pace with which most district cooling
systems are being designed
Experienced operating staff can provide input that can
reduce life-cycle costs and improve reliability
Desirable for O&M staff to take ownership of these
systems
Thanks for your attention!

Mark Spurr
Phone: 612-607-4544
Email: [email protected]

District Cooling Best Practices: Design Process and Key Issues

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

District Cooling Best Practices: Design Process and Key Issues

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

District Cooling Best Practices: Design Process and Key Issues

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

District Cooling Best Practices

Design Process and Key Issues

Proper estimation of cooling loads affects the

Ensure sufficient but not excessive plant and

Cooling load estimation is addressed

Conventional methods tend to overstate loads

Using extreme design temperatures

Three major aspects of load projections

e.g. shutting down fresh air intake at night would substantially

Peak day load profiles

System diversified peak day load profile

(50% office, 15% hotel, 22% residential, 13% retail)

Annual cooling energy

Percentage of peak hourly load

Hours per year with load at or below a given level

Annual cooling energy

Load duration curve useful for evaluation of

Delta T, Delta T, Delta T!

Chilled water flow is inversely proportional

Smaller pipes and pumps

Delta T, Delta T, Delta T!

Limitations on how large the delta T can go

Delta T, Delta T, Delta T!

For higher return temperature in building

Smaller pipes, fittings and valves

For new construction, life-cycle costs should

Delta T, Delta T, Delta T!

Optimize delta T within integrated life

Cooling tower make-up options

Seawater for direct condenser cooling

Infrastructure integration options

Consideration of condenser cooling options is

Seawater for tower make-up or direct cooling

Designing for operations

If approached as a long-term utility business, should

Thanks for your attention!

You might also like