Frey Biomedical Inc: Process Line Configuration
Frey Biomedical Inc: Process Line Configuration
Frey Biomedical Inc: Process Line Configuration
Frey Biomedical was one of the largest independent companies supplying the foodprocessing industry. Its initial success had come with a food preservative, used mainly for
meat-based products, and marketed under the name of FBXX. Other products were
subsequently developed in the food colouring and food container coating fields, so that now
FBXX accounted for only 25 per cent of total company sales, which now were slightly over
$100 million.
Process Line Configuration
BRAYFORD
BI-LINE 8
Capital cost
$5,900,000
$8,800,000
Processing costs
Fixed: $150,000/mth
Fixed:$400,000/mth
Variable: $750/kg
Variable: $600/kg
Design
1,050 kg/mth
1,400 kg/mth
capacity
98%0.7% purity
99.5%0.2% purity
Quality
Manual testing
Automatic testing
Maintenance
servicing
After-sales services
Very good
Delivery
Three months
Immediate
The decision
The problem over which there was such controversy related to the replacement of one of the
process lines used to manufacture FBXX. Currently two such process lines were used, both had
been designed and installed by Brayford Corp., a process equipment manufacturer. It was the
older of the two Brayford lines which was giving trouble. High breakdown figures, with erratic
quality levels, meant that output level requirements were only just being reached. The problem
was: should the company replace the ageing Brayford line with a new Brayford line, or should it
commission another process line, the Bi-line 8 line, which would be manufactured by a
relatively new company, Bi-Line Inc. V.P. for Technology had drawn up a comparison of the
two units, shown in the table.
The body considering the problem was the newly formed Management Committee. The
committee consisted of the V.P. for Technology and the Marketing V.P., who had been with the
firm since its beginning, together with the V.P.s for Operations and Finance, both of whom had
joined the company only six months before.
What follows is a condensed version of the information presented by each manager to the
committee, together with their attitudes to the decision.
At the moment I am mainly interested in getting the right quantity and quality of FBXX each
month. Im worried that unless we get a reliable new process line quickly, we will have
problems. The Bi-line 8 line could be working in a few weeks, giving better quality too.
Furthermore, if demand does increase, the Bi-line 8 will give us the extra capacity.
Its all right for some of my colleagues to talk about a big expansion of FBXX sales; they dont
have to cope with all the problems if it doesnt happen. The fixed costs of the Bi-line 8 unit are
nearly three times those of the Brayford. Just think what that will do to my budget at low
volumes of output. As I understand it, there is absolutely no evidence to show a large upswing
in FBXX. No, the whole idea (of the Bi-line 8 plant) is just too risky. Not only is there the risk. I
dont think it is generally understood what the consequences of the Bi-line 8 would mean. We
would need twice the variety of spares for a start. But what really worries me is the staffs
reaction. As fully qualified technicians they regard themselves as the elite of the firm; so they
should, they are paid practically the same as I am! If we get the Bi-line 8 plant all their most
interesting work, like the testing and the maintenance, will disappear or be greatly reduced.
They will finish up as highly paid process workers.