Four Roles in Social Change

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

T RAINING FOR C HANGE HANDOUT

WWW.TRAININGFORCHANGE.ORG

Four Roles in Social Change


Helper

Advocate

EFFECTIVE

INEFFECTIVE

EFFECTIVE

INEFFECTIVE

Assists people in
ways that affirm
their dignity and
respect
Shares skills and
brings clients
into decisionmaking roles
Educates about
the larger social
system
Encourages
experiments in
service delivery
which support
liberation

Believes charity can


handle social problems,
or that helping
individuals can change
social structures
Focuses on casualties and
refuses to see who
benefits from
victimization
Provides services like job
training which simply
give some people a
competitive edge over
other people, without
challenging the scarcity
which gives rise to
competition

Uses mainstream
institutions like
courts, city hall,
legislatures to get
new goals and
values adopted
Uses lobbying,
lawsuits, elite
networking/coaliti
on-building for
clearly-stated
demands, often
backed by research
Monitors
successes to make
sure they are
implemented

Realistic politics:
promotes minor
reforms acceptable to
power-holders
Promotes domination
by top-down
professional advocacy
groups
More concerned with
organizations status
than the goal of their
social movement
Identifies more with
powerholders than with
grassroots
Does not like paradigm
shifts

Organizer

Rebel
EFFECTIVE

INEFFECTIVE

EFFECTIVE

INEFFECTIVE

Protests: says no!


to violations of
positive American
values
Employs nonviolent
direct action and
attitude, including
civil disobedience
Targets powerholders and
institutions
Puts problems &
policies in public
spotlight
Uses strategy as
well as tactics
Does work that is
courageous,
exciting, risky
Shows in behavior
the moral
superiority of
movement values

Promotes antileadership, antiorganization rules and


structure
Attached to an
identity as lonely
voice on societys
fringe
Uses tactics without
realistic strategy
Has victim attitude,
behavior: angry,
judgmental, dogmatic
Uses rhetoric of selfrighteousness,
absolute truth, moral
superiority
Can be strident:
personal upset more
important than
movements needs

Believes in people
power: builds massbased grassroots
groups, networks
Nurtures growth of
natural leaders
Chooses strategies
for long-term
movement
development rather
than focusing only
on immediate
demands
Uses training to build
skills, democratize
decisions, diversify
and broaden
organization and
coalitions
Promotes alternatives
and paradigm shifts

Has tunnel vision:


advocates single
approach while
opposing those doing
all others
Promotes patriarchal
leadership styles
Promotes only minor
reform
Stifles emergence of
diversity and ignores
needs of activists
Promotes visions of
perfection cut off
from practical
political and social
struggle

From Bill Moyers Doing Democracy


Training for Change www.TrainingForChange.org

You might also like