Dhankar - Schools in Grave Danger

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Schools in grave danger

The Hindu, 28th October 2014

With public schools not performing and private schools teaching students to compete rather
than learn, Indias primary sites of education are at risk
Rohit Dhankar

he Rajasthan government recently decided to close down


more than 17,000 schools, the
Maharashtra government decided to close down about 14,000 schools
and the Odisha government is closing
down 195 schools because of low attendance by students. These are not stray incidents, but indicate the decline of the
public education system.
The problem with the private school
system can be illustrated with an example. Recently, a parent described to me
what teachers in his sons school said to
him regarding the childs poor performance in studies. Science, social science
and English teachers in the school asked
him, the father, to solve the problem! Are
incomplete work or misbehaviour... during school hours... not the responsibility
of the teachers to handle? the perplexed
man wondered. If my son misbehaves in
[the] house or does not read or write what
we tell him to, we as parents handle it. We
do not take it up with the teacher. Why
[do] teachers nowadays take up everything with the childs parents, he asks.
He opines that the teacher has to be TIME TO STUDY: Schools have an objective, learning, and the process
responsible for reading and writing and demands both teachers and students to be engaged. Picture shows
the parent has to be the facilitator by students in a government school in Chennai. PHOTO: M. KARUNAKARAN
buying books, pens and pencils.
for the exploration of ideas in a
This is a trend that persists in middle
The lack of understanding aside
sustained and coherent manner, and for
and upper-end private schools and is now
of what education
the development of intellectual rigour
catching on in lower-end schools too.
and mental discipline. All this is not posdemands and the awed
The decline of public schools
sible without careful selection of what is
Public schools are dying out simply beto be learnt and a sound judgment on how
policies of the past have
cause they dont perform. The problem
to teach. Therefore, the school as an orgaresulted in the closing
began in the late 1950s and 60s when
nised space demands professional knowlthere was growth in the number of
edge, deep sensitivity towards the
down
of
schools
today
schools, but no adequate attention was
intellectual and emotional needs of the
being paid to infrastructure and availabilchildren, and pedagogical judgment on
ity of trained teachers. In most States, demand for education. Some important the part of teachers. When all these are
teachers were paid meagre salaries and factors that contributed to this mindset pitted against each other, the idea of
administration was inefficient. A large were the demand for more schools, the school is distorted. This is precisely what
number of teachers in States like Rajas- lack of nancial and other resources, the our education system has been doing for
than were untrained. All this affected the pressure of democratic polity to be seen the last ve decades.
quality of education. Teachers lost moti- as addressing the problems, and a lack of
For example, the non-formal education
vation and became disgruntled.
concern. This mindset can be clearly seen scheme spent crores of rupees, and was
Some governments started devolving in all the programmes initiated after the implemented throughout the country
the job of teacher administration to the 60s non-formal education, Shiksha from the late 1960s to the early 1990s.
Panchayati Raj in the late 1950s. This Karmi, the District Primary Education The scheme completely discarded the
brought in the local politician, who in- Programme (DPEP), and Sarva Shiksha ideas of professional knowledge in teachterfered with teachers transfers. This Abhiyan (SSA). At each stage these initia- ing, teacher training and educational
and other factors such as a lack of facil- tives were critiqued, and obvious prob- planning and thus sent a signal throughities in schools, low salaries and irregular- lems in conceptualisation and planning out the country that anyone can teach. It
ity in disbursement of salaries caused the were clearly indicated by many educa- also discarded the idea of well-equipped
problem of teacher absenteeism in States tionists. But they also found their ad- separate spaces for schools; thus paying
like Rajasthan. This led to the growth of a vocates who built a certain kind of little heed to the need for any infrastrucself-centred attitude in newly emerging rhetoric to support them and advanced ture. It ignored the intellectual demands
teacher unions, who began to think of that rhetoric as examples of educational of both teachers and students. Overall, it
devalued education, the teacher, and the
their own welfare rst and foremost with- change.
idea of school.
out giving much thought to the functionBy the time the failure of this awed
ing of schools or the quality of education. The idea of school
One fundamental problem in these ini- scheme was realised, many innovators
One can hardly blame them for this
tiatives is that they undermine the very were ready with other initiatives such as
attitude.
Rather than seriously addressing the concept of school. Schools have an ob- Shiksha Karmi in Rajasthan. The DPEP
problems, education planners and ad- jective learning and the process de- was almost ready to be launched. The
ministrators devised quick-x and inex- mands both teachers and students to be balance between professional knowledge,
pensive initiatives to address the growing engaged. There is a time and place set intellectual rigour, sensitivity to the child

and infrastructural needs was never restored in any of these programmes, including SSA. This apparent lack of
understanding of what good education
demands and the awed policies of the
past have resulted in the closing down of
schools today.

Methods of learning
Meanwhile, the private sector stepped
in to cash in on parental anxiety regarding the state of education. Private schools
are growing at a phenomenal rate now.
Some analysts think that while the public
education system is deteriorating, the
private system is going from strength to
strength.
This false perception is perhaps deliberately created. Private schools function
for prot; this fact itself counters the idea
of a caring school. A good school is where
knowledge is cherished, where intellect is
developed, where there is sensitivity towards the child and where there are adequate resources. Maximisation of prot
prompts the owners to emphasise on
competition rather than conceptual
learning. Children in private schools are
forced to learn by rote and this undermines the value of understanding. Actual
learning demands conceptual clarity, and
is difficult and time consuming. Private
schools naturally encourage the rst
method. In other words, they impoverish
the very idea of learning to dilute the
demands for a good school.
However, the most damaging aspect of
the private schooling system is that private schools do not want to take responsibility for the moral growth and
behaviour of the child. Their ideal is to
turn themselves into consultant agencies.
If a child has moral and behavioural problems, these schools will call the parents to
solve the problem. For academic weaknesses they advise private tuitions. In either case, they abdicate the responsibility
of an educator. Their own job thus becomes minimised, which suits better
margins of prot.
The twin maladies of losing children in
government schools and minimising the
idea of school in the private sector are
putting our schools in grave danger. We
as a society seem to be far from realising
that civilisations depend on education
and schools are primary sites of education. If schools die, civilisations deteriorate. Unless we recognise the need for
rigour in understanding, planning and
implementation in education, we will be
unable to arrest this downward trend and
our schools will either close down or
transform into consultancy services,
leaving the space open for tuition shops.
Of course, this turning around will demand appropriate political and economic
decisions.
(Rohit Dhankar is professor and
director, academic development at Azim
Premji University, Bangalore, and
honorary secretary, Digantar, Jaipur.)

You might also like