Evaluate The Effectiveness of Australia's Monetary Policy in Addressing The Economic Issues Resulting From The Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009
Evaluate The Effectiveness of Australia's Monetary Policy in Addressing The Economic Issues Resulting From The Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009
Evaluate The Effectiveness of Australia's Monetary Policy in Addressing The Economic Issues Resulting From The Global Financial Crisis of 2008-2009
and borrowing between banks. The cash rate is the interest rate paid on these loans. In
buying securities from banks, the Reserve Bank deposits funds in their exchange
settlement accounts. This increases the supply of settlement funds, placing downward
pressure on the cash rate. Banks can then decrease their market interest rates and still
maintain profit margins. By decreasing market interest rates, the money supply
increases.
In order to manage the effects of the global financial crisis, the Reserve Bank has
decreased the cash rate from 7.25% in September 2008, to a present rate of 3% as of
April 20091. This overall cut of 4.25%, or 425 basis points, has significantly increased
the money supply within Australian economy by affecting aggregate demand. As the
money supply increases, investment and consumer spending increases, affecting
aggregate demand and economic activity. This was designed to counteract the affects
of the global financial crisis, which includes decreased investment and spending,
decreased economic growth, increasing unemployment, and inflationary pressures.
Through interest rate cuts, monetary policy has affected economic growth. Lower
interest rates, particularly on housing loans, increase the disposable income held by
the consumer, which may heighten consumer confidence. This increases the supply of
money within the economy, which is more likely to be spent or invested, acting as an
injection to the economy. This has an overall affect of increasing aggregate demand
for goods and services within the economy, which is responded to by increased
production by firms, stimulating economic activity. This is evident through retail
sales, which amounted to $18 500 million in August 2008, prior to the global financial
crisis, which fell to $18 203 million in September 2008 due to the stock market crash,
and have increased to $19 531 million as of April 20092.
Also, a stable cash rate of 3% over a consecutive period of five months from April to
August 20093 may have further increased consumer confidence due to consumer
speculation that interest rates are unlikely to rise. As evident, consumer confidence
was largely affected by the stock market crash of September 2008 beginning the
1
financial crisis, though loosening of monetary policy, in conjunction with direct fiscal
stimulus has effectively addressed decreased spending due to the global financial
crisis.
Decreased interest rates also directly influence the investment and spending of
businesses. Not only may they receive extra revenue from increased demand by
consumers, but lower interest rates directly result in an increase in funds available as
less is being paid on existing debts, also making borrowing of funds and investment
more likely. This may result in economic growth, as evident through national Gross
Domestic Product (GDP), at 0.4%4 in June 2008, prior to the global financial crisis. A
decrease to -0.5% in December 2008 can be directly attributed as an impact of the
crisis, with the cash rate at 4.25%. Monetary policy can be viewed as ineffective
within the September to December period, as the decrease in the cash rate by 3% did
not have an expansionary effect on GDP, which contracted by -0.6%. However, many
other factors contributed to this downfall, including global influences and negative
business and consumer speculation, as well as the existence of a time-lag between the
date of policy implementation and effect on the economy. The increase to 0.4% GDP
in March 2009, however, can be attributed to loose monetary policy increasing money
supply, as economic growth returned to pre-financial crisis levels, proving reasonable
effectiveness in addressing decreased economic growth.
A key issue resulting from the global financial crisis is increasing unemployment.
Through the expansionary effects of loose monetary policy, unemployment is directly
addressed. Through an increase in money supply, employers are encouraged to retain
labour in order to meet an increased aggregate demand. Since September 2008, there
has been a large increase in unemployment, from 4.3% in September, increasing
rapidly from 4.5% in December to 5.7% in March, and remaining relative throughout
March to July, at 5.8%.5 In December, unemployment was relatively low at 4.5%,
whereas GDP had sharply decreased to -0.5%. This suggests that the sharp increase in
unemployment in the months to come may have been influenced by employer
4
ABC 2009. GDP Growth- Seasonally Adjusted 1990- Present 31st August
http://www.abc.net.au/news/events/financialcrisis/charts/gdpgrowth.htm
5
ABC 2009. Unemployment Rate 1999-Present. 31st August
http://www.abc.net.au/news/events/financialcrisis/charts/unemployment.htm
speculation taking precaution for another quarter of negative growth, rather than the
condition of the economy as affected by the money supply. From May to August 2009
unemployment has stabilised, at 5.7% in May, and 5.8% throughout June to August.
This can be attributed as a flow-on effect of loose monetary policy, as of the
relationship between the 3% cash rate, stable money supply and consumer and
business spending, as evident through retail sales, which have remained relatively
stable, decreasing only -1.4% from May to June 2009.6
However, although unemployment has remained steady at 5.8% since June, an
increase in part-time work and decrease in full-time workers has been a strategy
undertaken by employers in order to maintain profit margins and increase labour
productivity within the firm to address the effects of the financial crisis. Although an
increased money supply exists, the most recent statistics in labour underutilisation
indicate that underemployed persons represent 7.7% of the workforce as of May7. The
0.4% increase in unemployment indicates decreasing production by firms, which may
show that underutilisation is remaining stable or subject to slight increase. This results
in lesser effective resource allocation within the economy, meaning that the aim of
stable economic growth and development over a medium term, as an objective of
monetary policy, is not fully achieved. In this, it is evident that monetary policy has
direct effects on money supply, as consumer confidence, aggregate demand and
production of firms contributes to the level of unemployment. Therefore, monetary
policy is reasonably effective in influencing unemployment, though has unpredictable
outcomes that are affected by a range of other factors.
Finally, the third aim of monetary policy is to maintain the stability of the currency,
through upholding a consumer price inflation target of 2-3%. In the event of the
global financial crisis, downward pressure has been placed on inflation due to
decreasing aggregate demand, rather than a tightened money supply, from 5%
consumer price inflation (CPI) pre-crisis in September 2008, to 1.5% in June 2009.
Rather, low inflation has been achieved while the money supply has increased, which
6