Assignment 3:: Tech-to-Pop Translation
Assignment 3:: Tech-to-Pop Translation
Assignment 3:: Tech-to-Pop Translation
[Description]: Your boss wants to draw new talent, investors, young minds, and, generally, engage
the public with the work of your field through a popular presentation of your research. Specifically, she
wants you to address a gap in general knowledge, a misconception, or some other problem your field
has. She asks you to analyze what other companies in your area are doing with popular translation and
public engagement. Your job is to present a report of 3 different types of popular translations of a
similar technical concept (try your hardest to find at least 1 example actually about your topic or a
similar topic). The rhetorical translation moves you analyze (whether it be in Radiolab, TedTalks,
RSAanimate videos, Neil Degrasse Tysons Cosmos, famous scientists tweets, social media,
comicbook translations, museum exhibits, or something else you know about) should be specific
instances (include quotes, screencaptures, and pictures) and substantially different (theres no reason to
present your boss with 3 of the exact same tactics). Youll start by describing the concept you are
addressing in an easy to understand way and end by proposing some kind of popular production based
on your research. In writing your proposal-report youll want to consider a few things:
[General Requirements]:
[Note]: This assignment is purposely open and could be stretched in a variety of different directions.
If you want to actually create a solution rather than analyzing three popular examples, thats a
possibility. If you want to describe and attempt to solve some kind of real user-centered design
problem (like the pill bottle example weve looked at) thats also a possibility. Before you stretch the
assignment, however, please get an approval slip from me.
[Example Problems]: A lack of women in the field of engineering; a misunderstanding about the
dangers of fracking (or a fear of the wrong parts of fracking); a lack of knowledge of what to do in a
tornado; a lack of interest/knowledge of young people in your major.
Exigence:
Should
introduce
the
purpose/objective
of
your
report.
Why
are
you
writing?
What
problem
is
your
popular
translation
analysis
and
proposal
attempting
to
solve?
Audience:
Should
introduce
the
specific
audience
you
are
attempting
to
create
your
popular
translations
for
(5th
grade
science
students;
home
owners
in
flood
plains;
etc.).
Ideally,
this
audience
analysis
will
take
the
form
of
a
user
persona
as
looked
at
in
class.
Intro:
Should
briefly
intro
the
three
specific
sources
youve
chosen.
Dont
analyze
them,
yet,
just
tell
your
reader
what
they
are.
II. 3 Analyses: What are your examples? What are they doing? Why are they doing it?
Should
include
some
reasoning
behind
youve
chosen
each
source.
Why
choose
this
example
and
not
another
one?
How
is
each
source
suitable
for
your
audience
and
problem?
Describes
the
rhetorical
moves
of
the
source
with
specific
examplesWhat
is
this
popular
translation?
What
does
it
do?
How
does
it
do
it?
And
why
does
it
do
it?
How
will
it
specifically
serve
your
audience?
Basically,
describe
why
this
source
is
designed
in
the
way
it
is?
Similar
to
our
radio
lab
analysis.
Each
source
should
have
some
kind
of
image
or
infographicthree
images
not
two.
Should
include
pros
and
cons
of
each
source.
Should
include
several
points
of
comparison
between
the
sources.
How
are
they
similar
and
different?
Summarizes
the
takeaways
from
your
analysis
section.
From
your
pros
and
cons,
what
have
you
learned
to
avoid
and
what
have
you
learned
works
well
from
your
analysis.
Applies
what
youve
learned
from
your
analysis
section
to
solve
the
problem
from
your
introduction.
Generates
a
specific
proposal
of
some
kind
of
popular
translation
(an
activity,
movie,
workbook,
presentation)
that
applies
the
techniques
youve
learned
from
the
analysis
section.
Calculates
the
feasibility
of
your
final
proposalwhy
is
this
the
best
option
according
feasibility
measures
like
time,
capital,
manpower,
etc.