Modern Thai Resort
Modern Thai Resort
Modern Thai Resort
By
Khiensak Seangklieng
The Graduate school, Silpakorn University has approved and accredited the
Thesis title Design Guidelines for Modern Thai Architecture in Resort Contexts
submitted by Mr. Khiensak Seangklieng as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for
the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architectural Heritage Management and Tourism.
...
( Assoc. Prof. Wisa CHATTIWAT, Ph.D.)
Vice President of Academic Affairs
Acting Dean of Graduate School
.././
Chairman
(Professor Trungjai Buranasomphob, Ph.D.)
..//.
Member
..
Member
(Professor Vimolsdhi Horayangkura, Ph.D.)
..//..
Resort architecture is found in public buildings with modern functions for tourists and the general
public. Mostly, resort buildings are seemingly created and designed for commercial purposes, and not for
strictly aesthetic or cultural reasons. In addition, the basis and development of Thai character still remain
undefinableat least in a holistic approach. For these reasons, this research aims to reveal the hidden
architectural ideals reflecting Thai character in resort contexts.
Just before the end of last year the world was shocked by the tsunami disaster affecting to the west
coast of Thailand. As a result of this sad event people and architects have come to be even more concerned
about the importance and re-development of modern Thai architecture in resort contexts. Overall, the
research covered in this dissertation is comprised of several different kinds of data and several distinct
approaches. These include: 1) the results of previous research and related studies, 2) surveys of existing
building environments including architectural style, and 3) the opinions of architects and building dwellers.
This research focuses on many of the leading architects of modern Thai architecture with the aim to
dissecting and identifying the components Thai character for resort architecture and design. To test the
theories implicit in this study, questionnaires were delivered to both architects and the general public, 150
subjects in each group.
The results of the survey show that both architects and the public agree that modern Thai character
in architecture derives principally from the adaptation of traditional Thai architecture and the infusion of
modern technology. The character of modern Thai architecture in resort contexts is defined by and
elaborated through factors such as dimensions, including building organization and grouping; roof profiles
and details; the relationship among buildings and other features, such as floor patterns, ventilation, the ratio
of opening and void, posts and column, brackets, and landscapes. The intangible qualities and values of
modern Thai architecture reveals such factor as qualities of lightness, transparency, tranquility and coolness
and, sense of hospitality. Another factor considered is regional variation. To be successful in cultural and
aesthetic terms modern Thai architecture in resort contexts must consider factors of building organization
and grouping, architectural design, landscape features, interiorsall of which must defer as well to, specific
regions and reflect local architectural identities in both tangible and intangible qualities and values. The use
of appropriate materials and construction technology, which can have positive environmental impacts as
well, also have to be considered in architectural design. In addition, as demonstrated by the tsunami disaster,
Thai wisdom needs to be employed and integrated into design solutions. Both architects and the general
public have expressed different points of view on the same issues, due to their varied perception and
experience. Architects must allow the public to participate more fully in the design process, so that their
view point too can be taken into consideration.
________________________________________________________________________
International Program in Architectural Heritage Management and Tourism, Graduate School, Silpakorn university Academic Year 2003
Students signature .
Thesis Advisors signature.
Acknowledgements
First and foremost, I would like to express my deep gratitude to my supervisor Professor
Dr. William R. Chapman of the University of Hawii at Manoa for his overall guidance
and insights during the entire period of my research.
My gratitude also goes to Professor Dr. Vimolsidhi Horayangura, he was my thesis
advisor at Chulalongkorn University and now at Thammasat University as the Dean of
Faculty of Architecture and Planning. Without his initiative, enthusiasm, and sustained
commitment, this research could not have been conceived or written. Moreover, as my
teacher in research methods during that time, he gave me my first awareness of
responsible writing based on documentation. I have learned more from him in the process
of writing this dissertation.
I would like to express my gratitude to Professor Dr. Trungjai Buranasomphob, Director
of the International Program Architectural Heritage Management and Tourism at
Silpakorn University. Throughout the process, I have valued her thoughtful criticism, her
substantive suggestions for various references and examples, her support and guidance
all of which has been extremely helpful to my research.
My thanks and gratitude go to all the faculty of the program, Professor Dr. Ross King,
Professor Dr. William Logan, Professor Ken Taylor, and Dr. Russell Staiff for their
invaluable advice on various aspects about architectural heritage managements, cultural
landscape, architectural conservations, and tourism interpretation which together provided
me with a good foundation for my project.
Many thanks also to all architects and building dwellers who are mentioned in chapter 3.
Without their support and thoughtful information this study could not have been
completed.
I have been very fortunate during the course of my academic career to have encountered
many people whose insights at critical moments have contributed greatly to the ideas
presented in this research. First among these are the members of the Faculty of
Architecture and Planning of Thammasat University. Three colleagues in particular, are
Ajarn Too, Ajarn Apinan, and Ajarn Ann, should be singled out for their encouragement,
suggestions for literature, statistical analysis, and constructive criticism. Thanks also go to
the faculty at Silpakorn University in particular Professor Omsiri Panin and Associate
Professor Ruethai Chaichongrak, in supporting the architectural information particular in
traditional Thai architecture as well as their thoughts on what is important in modern Thai
architecture in resort contexts.
Much thanks go to my friends, Look Nam, Ittirit, Somkiet, Boonchai for their kind
hospitality and support.
Special thanks are due to Noy, Meo, Poo, Nong Malee, Nong Pom, for their help on
typing the documents.
I acknowledge with sincere thanks the contributions and financial support, P King, P
Joy, Ajarn Stien and P Buay, my dearest brothers Pairas, Toom and also my sisters P
Kin and Nong Rin for their patience and tender care.
Over the last three years, I have both been inspired and provoked by many of my students,
especially during field trips to the North, and also in the intense environment of our design
studios. Their inquiring minds have been thoroughly engaging.
Perhaps most importantly, thanks are also gratefully expressed to the various architects
and all of respondents who have kindly agreed to complete the questionnaires.
And of course, my thanks and love go to my wife, Noppawan Nok for her patience,
support, and love.
Lastly, I dedicate my efforts in this dissertation to my dearest father Lom, who first
encouraged my interest in creative ways as an architect, and to my mother for her patience
and endless love.
Table of Contents
Chapter
1
Page
Introduction.....
Significance of the Problem
Goals and Objectives...
Hypothesis..
Scope of the Study..
Research Methodology..
1
1
1
3
3
4
8
55
The Four Seasons Resort and Spa (former Regent Chiang Mai)
Anantara Resort and Spa, Hua Hin
Sila Evason Hideaway, Samui
Le Meridean Baan Taling Ngam, Koh Samui
Santi Buri Dusit Resort, Samui
Banyan Tree Phuket, Phuket
Grand Sheraton Laguna Beach, Phuket
56
64
71
77
82
88
97
Chapter
Page
102
107
114
120
125
126
132
139
141
151
154
157
158
158
158
159
160
161
163
Chapter
Page
284
284
284
Bibliography.
Appendix A: The Questionnaire (English)
Appendix B: The Questionnaire (Thai)..
Appendix C: The Glossary
Autobiography.
293
301
302
327
330
369
400
406
List of Tables
Table
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
Page
Table
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the importance for
resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements floors and flooring.
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards modern Thai
character on the basis of architectural elementswall panels..
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the importance for
resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements wall panels...
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards modern Thai
character on the basis of architectural elementsopenings and
voids..
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the importance for
resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements openings and voids.
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards modern Thai
character on the basis of architectural elementsfree-standing
posts and columns...
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the importance for
resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements free-standing posts and columns..
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards modern Thai
character on the basis of architectural elementsbrackets..
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the importance for
resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elementsbrackets.
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards modern Thai
character on the basis of architectural elementshandrails and
balusters.
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the importance for
resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements handrails and balusters.
188
189
192
194
197
200
202
206
206
207
209
Table
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
Page
Table
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
Page
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards modern Thai
character on the basis of intangible qualities and values
a sense of tranquility and coolness. 236
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the importance of
intangible qualities and values: A sense of tranquility and
coolness.. 239
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards modern Thai
character on the basis of intangible qualities and values
a sense of hospitality . 241
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the importance of
intangible qualities and values: A sense of hospitality.
243
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the
various aspects of site planning. 245
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to architectural
characteristics and design... 248
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the
landscape. 251
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and
non-architects (general public) towards the design guidelines for
modern Thai architecture relating to building technology and
construction.
254
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the interior
architecture and decorations.
257
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the laws
and regulations.
260
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects
and non-architects (general public) towards modern Thai
character via simulated models regarding the basis of
architectural characteristics and design...
264
Table
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
Page
266
267
269
270
272
273
275
276
278
279
281
Table
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
Page
282
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
Table
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
Page
Summary of the results regarding the basis of
landscapebridge walkways with the attitudes
of architects and non-architects (general public)
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
323
Table
80
81
82
Page
Summary of the results of the design guidelines
for modern Thai architecture regarding the basis
of building technology and constructions with
the attitudes of architects and non-architects
(general public)
324
325
326
List of Figures
Figure
1
2
3
4
5
9
10
11
12
13
14
Page
The research hypothesis and its process......................................
Organization of the seven chapters in this dissertation. .
The Research Process...
The guestroom spa The In-Room Spa-tel Concept Plan
The ecotourist resort perched on water Pangkor Laut Resort,
Lumut, Malaysia. Residing in the thatch-roofed over-water
cabins strung along the winding wood pier, guests enjoy
stimulating exposure to native culture and the wonders of
nature while immersed in the comforts of a luxury resort ..
The ecotourist resort of solar, wind, and rainwater Harmony
Maho Bay Camps, US Virgin Islands. Designed to run on
solar and wind power and to leave its hilly oceanfront site
as undisturbed as possible, the resort embraces fundamental
issues of sustainable architecture and eco-friendly technologies
while providing guests with a valuable and entertaining
hospitality experience ..
The ecotourist resort at the rainforests edge Sheraton
Timika Hotel, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. The main lodge housing
reception, lobby, restaurant, meeting rooms, and fitness
center rests on an expressed base of local river stone while the
guestroom bungalows are elevated on stilts above the
rainforest floor, preserving the fragile ecosystem ..
a): An aerial view showing the siting of houses on slightly
elevated ground to avoid flooding
b): An aerial view showing the dense concentration of
dwellings along rivers and tributaries. Access to water
was important for all aspects of Thai life, both domestic and
c): An aerial view showing a loose village arrangement
where each house is surrounded by rice fields
The walkways were built as the connecting part of the group
of Thai houses at Mahidol University .
a): Some terraces are extremely spacious and were therefore
used for special events and ceremonies
b): Traditional Thai house of a simple arrangement of
ruen norn, kitchen that connected with the chan (terrace)
for a single family..
The characteristics of architecture relating to the dressing
and a hat of each nations
High- pitched roofs are covered with terra cotta tiles
Stylistic multi-tiered roof and stepped roof structure of
formal architecture..
a): A roof with short overhangs of formal architecture of
Sukhothai period
b): A roof with long overhangs .
q
2
6
7
11
13
13
15
18
19
21
22
23
24
25
Figure
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Page
The low-pitched roof
27
The various shapes of square-based column with the
indented (blunted)-corners . 28
Examples of paneling on a traditional Thai house 30
On the either side of the porch over the steps at
Ruen Tap Khwan are pierced panels for ventilation.
It was built by King Rama VI ... 30
The differing styles of door of traditional Thai architecture 31
The window styles of traditional Thai architecture . 32
Detail showing the sliding panel or fa-lai ... 33
Wat Na Phra Meru, the proportion and arrangement of the
opening and void..
33
a) Details of the kalae. The motif, which is believed to
be derived from the horns of the water buffalo, has become
so identified with the northern style that it is oven used as
a symbolic device on modern building
b) Some examples of kalae. The exact significance
of this is unknown, particularly in more elaborately
carved versions like these, but designs often include
the traditional flame motif).. 35
Some of the most popular forms of na-jua 36
a) and b) Eave brackets
38
The raft-house arrangement in which three separate
houses sit on the same platform and also are connected by
the walkway bridge 39
(a) An analysis of the fundamental approach to the
creation of architectural form in traditional architecture
(Choti Kalyanaitra Traditional Thai architecture, in Thai
character (in Thai), Through applying pointed vertical direction
and curvilinear horizontal expression, the Buddhist philosophy
with regards to eternal life is transformed into an inspired
architectural statement in terms of elegance and lightness
(b) Stylistic multi-tiered roof and stepped roof of traditional
Thai architecture.. 41
The elegant loftiness and lightness of a traditional Thai roof 43
Samui Airportthe use of thatched roofing materials
is a traditional feature of vernacular architecture 43
Traditional Thai structures are built over water bodies . 44
Traditional Thai house with chan and tree 46
Traditional Thai landscape with tree planting within
the house compound .. 47
a) The raan nam or water pavilion is a traditional feature
of Northern Thai house. These shelves hold the earthenware
jars and water dippers used to welcome guests
b) The large toen of a kalae house 49
In search of new creative dimensions ... 51
r
Figure
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Page
Site plan of main building of The Four Seasons
Chiang Mai shows the building placement of the main
lobby and restaurant that are adjacent to the water
features and the sala 57
Front elevation and side elevation of main building,
shows the characteristic of Lan na-style northern
Thai architecture 58
Section of the main building, shows the building placement,
designed to fit with the existing conditions of the
landscape. 59
Architecture and landscape design of a pavilion
(line drawing by the author)..
59
Elevation and section of a pavilion with the architectural
elements and ornaments reflecting of Lan na-style
architecture.. 60
Architecture and landscape of The Four Seasons
(line drawing by the author) 61
Architecture and Landscape of The Four Seasons. 63
Site plan of main building shows the building organization
of the main lobby and restaurant that are adjacent to the
water features and the sala.. 65
Front elevation, side elevation, and section of the main lobby 66
Plan, elevation, and character of the guests pavilion 67
Architecture and landscape design. 68
Interior architecture of the main lobby.. 68
Architecture and landscape design of the project. 69
Site plan of the main building and villas. 72
Architecture and landscape design of the project.... 73
Architecture and landscape design of the project
73
Architecture and landscape of the project . 74
Architecture and landscape design of the pool villa. 74
Architecture and landscape design of the pool villa. 75
Architecture and landscape of the project (line drawing by
the author).... 78
Site plan of the resort complex 79
Site plan of the main building and resort complex. 84
Front elevation and back elevation of the main lobby.
85
Section of the main lobby.. 85
Architecture and landscape design of the main lobby. 86
Architecture and landscape design of a pavilion
(lined- drawing by the author). 86
Architecture and landscape design of a pavilion. 87
Site plan of the main building and the resort complex... 89
Floor plan, and sections of the pool villa... 90
Elevations and section of the pool villa. 91
s
Figure
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
Page
Architecture and landscape design of the pool villa
(line drawing by the author). .. 92
Architecture and landscape design of the pool villa
93
(line drawing by the author) .
Architecture and landscape design of the project. 93
Architecture and landscape design of the project 94
Architecture and landscape design of project.... 94
Architecture and landscape design (line drawing by the author). 95
Site plan of the main building and resort complex
98
Architecture and landscape design of the project.. 99
Architecture and landscape design.. 100
Site plan of the main building and resort complex. 103
Architecture and landscape design (line drawing by the author).. 104
Architecture and landscape design of the main building. 104
Site plan of the main building and resort complex. 108
Architecture and landscape design of the main building
and pavilions .. 109
Architecture and landscape design of a pavilion
(line drawing by the author). 110
Architecture and landscape design of the main building. 111
Site plan of the main building and resort complex .. 115
Architecture and landscape design of the project. .. 116
Architecture and landscape design of the project.. 117
Architectural design and character of the main building. 118
Interior architecture of the main building... 119
Site plan of the main building and resort complex. 121
Architecture and landscape design of the main buildings. 122
Architecture and landscape of the villas. .. 123
The process of constructing the questionnaire 156
The comparison of the opinions regarding the modern
Thai characterarchitects and non-architects
Comparison of opinions regarding design guidelines for
modern Thai architecture in resort contexts: attitudes of
architects and non-architects (general public)
Comparison of opinions regarding modern Thai architecture
in resort contexts using the simulated-models of case studies:
Attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public).
Comparison of opinions regarding modern Thai architecture in
resort contexts using the simulated-models of case studies:
Attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public).
Building organization and grouping: Semi-enclosed space
with chan (a central terrace) ..
Building organization and grouping: Uncovered-walkway
Building organization and grouping: covered-walkways.
t
164
165
166
166
167
168
168
Figure
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
Page
Building organization and grouping: Uncovered elevated
walkway .
Building organization and groping: Covered elevated
walkway
Traditional Thai house with chan and tree (line-drawing by the
author).
The raft-house arrangement in which three separate houses
sit on the same platform and also are connected by the walkway
bridge .
A roof with long overhangs ..
High- pitched roofs are covered with terra cotta tiles
Building and connecting space with chan (a central terrace)
and palai (covered verandah)
Building and connecting space with lan- long (open space)
Some terraces are extremely spacious and were therefore
used for special events and ceremonies
Detail showing the sliding panel or fa-lai (ventilating panel)..
The differing styles of door of traditional Thai architecture
Sao-loy with round-shaped profile .
Sao-loy with square-shaped profile ..
Sao-loy with indented corners ...
Sao-loy with square-bases and tops and with buo- shaped
or lotus-shaped capitals..
Building with brackets
Building without brackets.
Eave brackets, architectural element in tangible value ..
Tree at center of open space.
Trees adjacent to the building ..
Trees not adjacent to the building..
Traditional Thai house with chan and tree
(line-drawing by the author).
Building adjacent to the water feature.
Building raised on stilts over the water feature ...........
Traditional Thai structures are built over water bodies
Sala adjacent to the water feature.
Sala placed at the middle of the water feature .
Covered elevated walkway ..
Uncovered elevated walkway
The walkways were built as the connecting part of the
group of Thai houses at Mahidol University
The elegant loftiness and lightness of a traditional Thai roof .
Traditional Thai landscape with tree planting within the
house compound (line drawing by the author).
169
169
171
174
177
178
181
182
183
191
195
199
199
199
199
204
204
205
210
211
211
213
215
216
217
219
220
223
224
225
228
238
Figure
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
Page
The raan nam or water pavilion is a traditional feature of
Northern Thai house. These shelves hold the earthenware
jars and water dippers used to welcome guests (line-drawing by
the author)....
(The Banyan tree with aerial roots
A building complex with water pond (original)
A building complex with lily pond as simulated-feature.
A building complex with lawn as simulated-feature ......
Roof with gable-end and ornament (original)......
Roof without gable-end and ornament as simulated-feature
Sala with gable-ends and ornaments (original)
Roof without ornaments as simulated-feature
Buildings adjacent to waterscape (original)
Buildings not adjacent to waterscape as simulated-feature
building complex with kalae and ornament (original)
A building complex without kalae and ornament as
simulated-feature
Building with curved-roof and ornament (original)
Building with gable roof as simulated-feature
Landscape with lily pond (original)
Landscape with walkway as simulated-feature
Architectural development of modern Thai character
according to the results
Architectural development of modern Thai character
according to the appropriate designs.
The paradigm of design development of modern Thai
architecture in resort contexts.
New paradigm with global concept for the design
development of modern Thai architecture in resort contexts.
242
253
263
263
263
265
265
268
268
271
271
274
274
277
277
280
280
292
292
300
303
Chapter 1
Introduction
2
2.2 To examine the opinions of architects, especially leading architects who have
served as members of ASA award committees, about the concept, and
characteristics of modern Thai architecture in resorts contexts;
2.3 To study the opinions of the building users and owners, including those who are
involved in the selected case study projects, about the concept and characteristics
of modern Thai architecture in resort contexts;
2.4 To evaluate the perception of the concept and characteristics of modern Thai
architecture in resort contexts, on the part of architects and non-architects (general
public); in addition, to compare the opinions of each group.
2.5 To present a summary of outputs, based on assessments regarding architecture in
resort contexts.
3
3. Hypothesis
Resort hotels are designed seemingly for commercial purposes. They appear to be
more concerned with the direction of tourism development than higher motives, such
as aesthetics or heritage. The task of this project is to somehow bridge these two
modesto bring aesthetic and cultural development together while maintaining
commercial interests in the tourism sector. The hypothesis of this research is mainly to
prove that at present, Thai architects and non-architects are becoming more
concerned with architecturally responsible design, particular in design for
modern Thai architecture in resort contexts.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) would be expected to have
different points of view on the same issue due to their own perceptions and
experiences. This project attempts to rely more on public perception than other
approaches, briefly, to allow the average person to have an impact on design.
Overall, this research project is in effort to synthesize professional and lay
interests in design. It proceeds on the assumption that lay people have perceptions into
their own culture that might at times elude professionals.
The project believes that popular perception and professional perception can be
complementary paths to a new kind of sensitive and appropriate design approach.
4. Scope of the Study
The analysis of appropriate design in resort contexts requires specificity as well as
generality. To select a range of test cases several criteria were employed. Initially,
the test casereferring here to resort hotelshad to be of recognized national
standards. A second criterion would be recognition by the academic establishment
the place where architecture is taught. The third criterion was that the selected case
study should be a part of a world class assemblage, in this instance represented by
known resort companies. Finally, the test case had to possess the quality of having
attempted to achieve regional or national associate.
These may be summarized as follows:
4.1 Projects given the ASA (The Association of Siamese Architects Under Royal
Patronage) design award;
4.2 Projects winning conservation awards from Department of Fine Arts;
4.3 Projects associated with leading hotel companies of the world;
4.4 Projects which have expressed valueoriented design reflection of Thai
architecture or vernacular architecture. Typically, these projects have incorporated
traditional motifs and local materials in their design.
The selected projects with the critical criteria as above are:
4
1. The Four Seasons Resort and Spa (former the Regent Chiangmai), Chiangmai;
2. The Anantara Resort(former the Royal Garden Village), Hua-hin;
3. Le Meridean Baan Taling Ngam, Samui;
4. Santi-buri Dusit Resort, Samui;
5. Sila Evason Hideaway, Samui;
6. Rayavadee Premier Resort, Krabi;
7. Holiday Inn Resort, Phi Phi Island, Krabi;
8. The Tub-kaak Resort, Krabi;
9. Grand Sheraton Laguna Beach, Phuket;
10. Banyan Tree Laguna Beach Resort and Spa, Phuket;
11. Amanpuri Resort, Phuket;
5. Research Methodology
The methodology adapted in this study is a combination of literature review, an
examination of existing sites and interviews in conjunction with questionnaires. The
aim has been to develop a consistent and coherent methodology that will help guide
both understanding and decision-making in the context of design. The various steps
may be summarized as follows:
5.1 Examination of previous research and theories;
5.2 Selection of projects for case studies, based on past awards or expressed through
architectural identity and design;
5.3 Survey and analysis of the selected case-study projects using standardized
information and architectural graphic records; the project encompasses interviews
and questions. Ten users/owners and ten architects were interviewed.
The interviews touch upon what are identified as the salient characteristics of Thai
architecture;
5.4 Collecting data through interviews with 10 well-known architects;
5.5 Analysis of data and construction of a questionnaire that provide:
5.5.1
Data produced by interviews with the hotel owners, and users, including
visitors and those living near the sites.
5.5.2
Transferring the qualitative data into the quantitative data to construct the
final questionnaire for use with architects and the public (lay people).
5.6 Constructing the final questionnaire and collecting the data by using the
questionnaire-technique.
5.6.1
5.6.2
The pre-questionnaire will be tested with selected architects and nonarchitects (general public) by processing the test and re-test of 20 subjects
for each group. The statistic method of Pearson product moment
correlation will be applied in reconstructing the comprehensive
questionnaire.
5.6.3
5.7 Analyzing the responses to questionnaires by architects and non- architects (as
pointed in 6.1 and 6.2) and assessing the data by using the statistical method of
Mean, Standard Deviation (SD), T-test, and Chi-square. In addition the comparison
of social characteristics of the respondents are examined with the computerizedanalysis of SPSS program.
5.8 Conclusions and Suggestions
5.8.1
5.8.2
5.8.3
7
Figure 3: The Research Process
Statement and
significance of the
problem:
Within the resort contexts,
the investigation and
study through the creative
dimensions of modern
Thai character in both
tangible and intangible
qualities and values
including the design
guidelines still be needed
for architects design
considerations reflecting
the architectural identity
and cultural value with the
dynamism of modern Thai
society as well as tourism
development in a global
context.
Hypothesis:
At the present, Thai
architects are becoming
more concerned with
architecturally responsible
design, particular in
design for modern Thai
architecture in resort
contexts
Dissertation Title:
Design Guidelines for
Modern Thai Architecture
in Resort Contexts
Analyzing data
Analyzing data
regarding the opinions
of the questionnaire
respondents:
1) Opinions on the
characteristics of
modern Thai
architecture in resort
contexts.
2) Opinions on the
design guidelines for
modern Thai
architecture in resort
contexts.
3) Opinions on the
characteristic of modern
Thai architecture via the
simulated-models of the
case studies.
Conclusions and
Suggestions
Analyzing data of
design guidelines for
modern Thai
architecture in resort
contexts: Interviewing:
- Designed-architects
- Leading architects
Chapter 2
Literature Review and Related Studies
international climate. Green tourism, adventure tourism, nature tourism, communitybased tourism, heritage tourism are all labels that are generally encapsulated in the
ecotourism that many consider as on as an alternative to mass tourism. These
newer forms of tourism development comprise a market share estimated at
approximately 30 percent. While these newer forms of tourism do bring development
to more remote regions and hence poorer areas, it is not proven that they cause less
damage and provide more benefits than mass tourism (www.world-tourism.org).
Sustainable tourism development has been defined as tourism that maximizes the
potential of tourism for eradicating poverty by developing appropriate strategies in
cooperation with all major groups, indigenous and local communities (www.worldtourism.org). This definition builds on, and goes beyond the Western Cape Education
department (WCED), 1987 definition of sustainable development: development that
meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations
to meet their own needs.
Ecotourism does not necessarily mean sustainable tourism. Rather, it is a term that is
often used by operations as a marketing tool to promote a product that is perhaps based
in a pristine, rural setting, or an authentic cultural environment. It does not mean that
the product is sustainable in terms of its impact on local community livelihood and
resources.
However, it is the earlier, environmental definitions of sustainable development that
have now been embraced by the global travel and tourism industry. Their
responsibilities to this definition are largely targeted at environmental initiatives.
A final recent distinction needs to be made between responsible and sustainable
tourism. The current debate on sustainable tourism would, some argue make
sustainable tourism and unachievable ideal, not least because of the significant
contribution that air travel makes to climate changes (www.world-tourism.org). The
statement continues, it is there fore more useful to think about responsible tourism
with in the context of a wider sustainable development strategies.
1.3 2004: An Excellent Year for Tourism, but with a Tragic End
Tourisms evolution has been very positive overall in 2004. This fact is clearly
confirmed by the data collected from the various destinations and source markets and
also by comments made by the World Trade Organization (WTO) Panel of Tourism
experts. As a result travel confidence returned extraordinarily in 2004 and experienced
the highest growth since 1976. SARS was not considered a problem anymore, and the
geopolitical situation had much less impact than before.
However, just before the end of the year the world was shocked by the sad news is an
images of the seaquake and resulting Tsunami in the Indian Ocean, affecting the
northern provinces of the Indonesian Island of Sumatra, the Maldives, the eastern coast
of Sri Lanka and India, the Andaman and Nicobar Island, the west coast of Thailand
and to a lesser extent Malaysia, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Somalia, Tanzania, Kenya, and
Seychelles. The WTO publicly expressed the worlds sorrow over the unprecedented
10
damage and loss of life among both local populations and tourists. On its website the
organization expressed its deepest sympathy to the people of the effected countries and
offers its heartfelt condolence to the relatives and friends of all the victims of the
tragedy (www.world-tourism.org/tsunami/eng.html). It was evident that tourism and
the economies surrounding it were going to have to rethink the role that the industry
would play in development in the region and that appropriate designas well as resort
placement and organizationwas going to have to respond to the new needs made
evident by the tsunami disaster.
11
biotic medicine in the twentieth century, sports, fitness, and hydrotherapy programs
gradually have replaced the use of mineral water in spas.
In addition to the health spa areas, the spa resort provides other luxury
accommodation, including outdoor recreational features similar to beach, golf, and
tennis resorts. But spa resorts serve outside membership and visitors as well as hotel
guests.
Figure 4: The guestroom spa The In-Room Spa-tel Concept Plan (Rutes, Penner, and Adams, 2001: 86)
For design considerations, spa buildings are designed for multi-sybaritic experiences,
ranging from tension relieving massages to progressiveresistance exercise and
beauty and fashion consultation. Spa resorts maintain five-star standards and are
among the highest rated in service of any type of resorts, with the exception of the
super-luxury resort hotel category.
A conceptual plan of spa design is shown in figure 2.1, The guestroom spa, The inroom spa concept plan. An exciting concept advancing in the spa resort field includes
a whole town resort in with sophisticated spas in each of its guestrooms. Luxurious
whirlpools and high-tech massaging showers are provided in a special spa room,
offering a varied menu of personalized exercise programs and hydrotherapy massage
12
treatments. While greatly enhancing the function, value, and attraction of the
guestroom, the space required is equivalent to that of the bathroom in many luxury
hotels, combining elements now used on a piecemeal basis in conventional hotels. This
integrated concept is designed to upgrade the guestroom to meet expanding consumer
preferred, thereby raising the hotels attraction and rate as a spa resort.
However, it is vital in introducing this new prototype concept, that the design and
detailing of the in-room spa-tel be of the highest quality and the concept include such
features as automated self-cleaning systems in the wet areas and retain wheelchair
accessibility and maneuverability (Rutes, Penner, and Adams, 2001: 86).
Ecotourism, sustainable development, and green architecture are in many ways the
offspring of the environmental movement of the 1960s and 1970s, when back to
nature was the call. Over 30 years ago, The Whole Earth Catalog provided a
sourcebook of tools for living off the land for generation who embrace the principles
of ecological responsibility. It provided detailed technical information on alternative
energy and fuel sources, recycling, organic agriculture and other nonpolluting, ecofriendly technologies.
13
Figure 5:
The ecotourist resort perched on water Pangkor Laut Resort, Lumut, Malaysia. Residing in the
thatch-roofed over-water cabins strung along the winding wood pier, guests enjoy stimulating
exposure to native culture and the wonders of nature while immersed in the comforts of a luxury
resort (Rutes, Penner, and Adams, 2001: 103).
Figure 6:
The ecotourist resort of solar, wind, and rainwater Harmony Maho Bay Camps, US Virgin Islands.
Designed to run on solar and wind power and to leave its hilly oceanfront site as undisturbed as
possible, the resort embraces fundamental issues of sustainable architecture and eco-friendly
technologies while providing guests with a valuable and entertaining hospitality experience
(Rutes, Penner, and Adams, 2001: 103).
14
Stanley Selengut, a civil engineer who has been called the godfather of ecotourism
resort development, utilized many of the ecological principles of sustainable design in
the creation of an experimental resort that he called Harmony (after the historic estate
on which the small resort is located). This resort was designed to run on solar and wind
power and leave its hilly ocean-front site as undisturbed as possible. Floor tiles were
made from slag and discarded glass, carpeting from last months plastic bottles.
Rooftop solar hot-water and photovoltaic collectors augmented by windmills provide
power. Passive systems, such as cross-ventilation, heat-resistant glazing, and a
wind-scoop at the roof peak, help to make the interiors comfortable. Gutters catch
rainwater, which then is stored in cisterns built into the foundations, for later use.
Interior wallpaper is made from recycled newsprint. Occupancy censors detect lack of
motion and turn off power in unoccupied rooms (Zeiher, 1996: 159).
Selengut maintains that ecotourism has much to do with providing a valuable
educational experience to the traveler. According to him, The qualities needed for
successful ecotourism are more attuned to the entertainment industry than real estate
development. Most resorts try to protect guests from experience, but we try our best to
put them into the experience (Rutes, Penner, and Adams, 2001: 104).
15
Figure 7: The ecotourist resort at the rainforests edge Sheraton Timika Hotel, Irian Jaya, Indonesia. The
main lodge housing reception, lobby, restaurant, meeting rooms, and fitness center rests on an
expressed base of local river stone while the guestroom bungalows are elevated on stilts above the
rainforest floor, preserving the fragile ecosystem (Rutes, Penner, and Adams, 2001: 104)
16
5. Concept of Authenticity
17
A sense of lightness
A sense of transparency
A sense of tranquility and coolness
A sense of hospitality
18
a)
b)
c)
Figure 8:
a): An aerial view showing the siting of houses on slightly elevated ground to avoid flooding
(Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 21).
b): An aerial view showing the dense concentration of dwellings along rivers and tributaries.
Access to water was important for all aspects of Thai life, both domestic and agricultural
(Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 21).
c): An aerial view showing a loose village arrangement where each house is surrounded by rice
fields (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 22).
19
Figure 9:
The walkways were built as the connecting part of the group of Thai houses at Mahidol University
(Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 67).
Normally the central chan (terrace) of a ruen khahabodi is very large and is designed
in such a way that it blends into the natural surroundings around the house. Typically
balustraded chan take up almost 40 percent of the total floor area. If the verandah
space is included with the terrace, the ratio of total outdoor area to indoor area will
increase 60 percent to 40 percent. Such an emphasis on outdoor space is an obvious
architectural response to the prevailing hot and humid climate (Chaichongrak et al,
2002: 39).
Lifestyles and climatic conditions give rise to a high demand for outdoor living.
Spaces for various functions, such as living, sleeping, dining, etc., are organized
20
around the open terrace called chan, connected by means of roofed verandah. The
verandah becomes an intermediate space between indoor living and the terrace, thus
creating an indoor-outdoor relationship. It should be pointed out that the heart of Thai
house is its terrace, because this forms the spatial organizing core of the entire
dwelling (Horayangkura, 2000: 23).
For a Thai house, a terrace is as essential as a bedroom or kitchen because it provides
much needed ventilation and continuous air circulation. The occupants can look
through the terrace balustrades to the fruit trees surrounding the house and then to
countryside beyond. It is this integration of inside and outside that is a particularly
appealing feature of much tropical architecture. The terrace functions as a multipurpose open area, used for relaxing, receiving visitors, organizing traditional
functions like the top-knot cutting ceremony, merit making, offering food to the monks
and weddings (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 52).
The roof of a traditional Thai architecture is a high-pitched gable form in the manila
style with extended eaves. The high pitch is necessary to prevent leaking, and the
wooden structure was often covered historically with palm leaf thatch or terracotta
tiles. In addition, the elevated roof lets out heat from inside the house, ensuring that the
interior is relatively cool. Wide, lower roof extensions protect the interior from rain
and glare (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 50).
The high-pitched roof with the graceful lines of a high-peaked bargeboard called panlom and curved feature at lower end know as ngao, together with its ornamented
gables, is impressive and uniquely Thai (Chompunich, 1988: 92)
Tan Hock Beng has explained that Thai architecture is defined through its roof. In Thai
architecture the meeting of roof and sky is given added phenomenological significance
through elaborately caved bargeboards or ridgeboards (1996: 56).
21
a)
b)
Figure 10:
a) Some terraces are extremely spacious and were therefore used for
special events and ceremonies (Chaichongrak et al, 2003: 52).
b) Traditional Thai house of a simple arrangement of ruen norn, kitchen
that connected with the chan (terrace) for a single family (Chaichongrak et al, 2003: 27).
22
Figure 11: The characteristics of architecture relating to the dressing and a hat of each nations (H. Shiranan,
1996: 112).
23
Figure 12: High- pitched roofs are covered with terra cotta tiles (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 25).
24
aesthetic harmony. The more lavish splendid and stylistic multi-tiered roof structure is
suggestive of more formal architecture (Horayangkura, 2001: 234).
Figure 13:
25
The steep roof with short overhangs is mostly found in the formal architecture in the
periods of Sukhothai and Auytthaya. Generally, architectural elements, such as eave
brackets, are not used as supports for the lower edges of overhangs; they directly
extend from the wall or the post of the covered verandah (Veerataveemas, 1996: 101).
a)
b)
Figure 14:
a): A roof with short overhangs of formal architecture of Sukhothai period (Chirathasanakul,
2003: 211).
b): A roof with long overhangs (Chaichongrak et al, 2003: 234).
26
- Brown:
- Yellow:
- Green:
- Low-pitched roof
The characteristic low-pitched roof driven by the forces of colonialism and more
general European influence, derived from the proportion of the classical Greek temple
(Chompunich, 1987: 32-33,38).
27
28
column
with
the
indented
(blunted)-corners
29
The word fa refers to a variety of wall coverings made of panels of timber, palm leaves
and bamboo fastened to hardwood or bamboo frames. They enclose the interior space
of the house and partition it into different sections. Wall panels on the front elevation
of the house are called fa ud naklong or fa humklong (cross panel) while partitions
between the bedroom the open hall are called fa prajan hong (room panels).
There are many types of wall panels, but the main ones are fa pakon (wooden panels),
fa loog fak (wood panels with a raised centre), fa look fak kradarn jiad, fa sai bua
(slatted wooden panels), fa samruad (with woven split bamboo), fa khat thae (bamboo
panels) and fa kradarn riab (simple wooden boards) (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 83).
An early form of prefabrication practiced in Thailand centuries before its advantages
were recognized by Western architects, fa are important designing elements in Thai
buildings. Using joints of wood held in place by wooden pegsnever nails in the older
housesthe components are then hung on the pillars. The walls slant outward from the
floor to the lower edge of the roof, which is either tiled, wood-shingled, or thatched
according to the relative wealth of the owner.
The outward-leaning walls are one of the marks that distinguish the northern house
from that of the central plains, in which both the pillars and the walls incline slightly
inward toward the top. This feature adds a graceful suggestion of height and movement
of lightness to the building (Warren, 1998: 50).
2.3.1 Openings and Voids
In traditional Asian dwellings, indoor and outdoor living spaces of resort architecture
often overlap. Sliding doors open onto private gardens, swimming pool and jacuzzi. At
each resort, guests have their own special place to contemplate the natural beauty
around them (Ettensperger, 2001: 28).
2.3.2 Partu (house door).
The width of the doors from the bedroom and kitchen to the verandah is usually three
times the length of the house-owners foot. The door is wider at the base and the tapers
inward at the top, as do the all the other uprights within the house structure. Its
components comprise a doorframe, door panels and pins, a threshold, and darn khu
(twin bolt).
30
Figure 17: Examples of paneling on a traditional Thai house (Warren, 1988: 221).
Figure 18: On the either side of the porch over the steps at Ruen Tap Khwan are pierced panels for
ventilation. It was built by King Rama VI (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 66).
31
For the main door onto the terrace, the width of this door is usually four times the
length of the owners foot. A small roof is added over the door frame to protect it from
rain and create a visual emphasis (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 88).
Figure 19:
The differing styles of door of traditional Thai architecture (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 89).
32
Figure 20: The window styles of traditional Thai architecture (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 90).
Nathang (windows) of the traditional. Thai house, these openings are cut into the wall
panels to provide light and air and are opened and closed with wooden panels
(Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 90).
The windows and doors of Lan na house open inward, with their frame on outside.
They are closed with a single panel, unlike those in the central Thai house, which
always have pairs of panels.
The walls of the ruen kalae differ from those of the central Thai house. The latter
consist of pre-fabricated panels, each as large as the span between two posts. The kalae
walls, on the other hand, are composed of just one large panel for each side. At the
corners of the house, the panels running the length of the house extend beyond the
ends of those covering the width, whereas, in the central Thai house, the panels
running the width of the house overlap the ends of those running the length. In
addition, northern wall panels do not slope inward (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 139140).
33
Figure 21: Detail showing the sliding panel or fa-lai (ventilation panel) (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 139).
Figure 22: Wat Na Phra Meru, the proportion and arrangement of the opening and void (Chiratasanakul,
2003: 224).
34
- Nor Na Paknam refers to the floor pattern: Flooring with square-based patterns and
with ties indented at the corners are similarly used in traditional Thai architecture.
2.6 Kalae
The best-known northern-style dwelling today is the one popularly called a Kalae
house. The name is derived from a prominent v-shaped design formed by extending
the roof supports beyond the ridge-pole of both ends of the structure. Kalae has been
variously translated as glancing crows and glancing pigeons. Some authorities
believe that its non-structural purpose may have been to discourage crows and other
large birds from lighting on the roof. Others think the feature symbolizes a pair of
horns, citing the fact that in ancient times buffalo horns were often placed on roof-tops
to show the wealth of the family. A number of studies are currently being made on the
subject, but thus far the answer remains a matter of conjecture.
On the simplest houses, especially those made of bamboo, the kalae are nothing more
than rather crude extensions, possibly serving a functional purpose by simplifying
construction and further strengthening the roof. On a house belonging to a more
prosperous family, however, they are often separate pieces, beautifully carved in a
shape that does indeed suggest feathers, or perhaps flickering flames, providing a
decorative effect not unlike the curved finials at either end of Thai temple roofs. Kalae
are also found on houses of some of the hill tribes who live in the northern mountains,
as well as those of the Thai Lu people in southern China and Laos; they are rarely seen
on houses in central and southern Thailand (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 139).
.
35
a)
b)
Figure 23: a) Details of the kalae. The motif, which is believed to be derived from the horns of the water
buffalo, has become so identified with the northern style that it is oven used as a symbolic device
on modern building (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 139).
b) Some examples of kalae. The exact significance of this is unknown, particularly in more
elaborately carved versions like these, but designs often include the traditional flame motif
(Warrne, 1998: 223).
36
37
1. Jua loog fak or jua prommaphak. In this instance the gable panel is
constructed from many rectangles of wood, placed in a horizontal and
vertical design very much like the fa pakon wall design.
2. Jua roob phra arthit. This design of this panel has a radiating sunburst
design, in which flat wooden slats are spread out with gaps between the
sunrays for ventilation. This design is popular for kitchens.
3. Jua bai prue. This type of gable panel is made up of horizontally
overlapping small flat planks. It is popular for the main house as well as the
kitchen. When it is used above a kitchen, the top section is usually left open
for ventilation.
3. Landscape
3.1 The Relationship between Buildings and the Waterscape
Ruethai Chaichongrak has pointed out the relationship of Thai people to the water
environment particularly in terms of human settlement. Early Thai settlements tended
to originate near canals and rivers because the livelihood of their inhabitants depended
mainly on water for domestic and agricultural use as well as for communication.
Riverside villages are still common features along most waterways (Chaichongrak et
al, 2002: 20-23).
38
39
areas. In some instances water jars are planted with water lilies and lotus and placed
around the chan (H.Shiranan, 1993: 75).
3.1.4 Sala (pavilions)
In Thai villages one can often see beautiful, small pavilions of many different styles
and sizes. Some are used simply for relaxation, while others have a specific function,
such as protecting a well (Panin, 2002: 151).
The deeply-pitched roofs and open-air pavilions (sala) that characterize traditional
Thai architecture evolved in response to the countrys climate. A high roof creates an
interior with enough space for hot air to rise. The roof overhang keeps the sunlight out.
A second steeped roof promotes ventilation by trapping the hot air in the space above.
In ancient Thailand, sala were open to the outdoors and were where Thai received
guests. People also came to the sala to enjoy the cool outdoor breezes and gaze at the
countryside around them (Ettensperger, 2001: 15-16).
3.2 Building Connection
3.2.1 Uncovered Elevated Walkway
Attached to the front trading section of each shop house is usually a wooden walkway
or bridge, one-meter wide, which connected all the various shop houses in the area
(Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 42).
Figure 26: The raft-house arrangement in which three separate houses sit on the same platform and also are
connected by the walkway bridge (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 42).
40
41
a)
b)
Figure 27:
(a) An analysis of the fundamental approach to the creation of architectural form in traditional
architecture (Choti Kalyanamitra Traditional Thai architecture, in Thai character (in Thai), 1982:
345) Through applying pointed vertical direction and curvilinear horizontal expression, Buddhist
philosophy is transformed into an inspired architectural statement in terms of elegance and lightness
(Horayangkura, 2002: 234).
(b) Stylistic multi-tiered roof and stepped roof of traditional Thai architecture (Choti Kalyanamitra,
1996: 54).
42
The wall is generally not an important building element in Southeast Asia. Hence the
use of load-bearing walls, with their resultant stereotomic quality, is uncommon. The
frame system is the main building component that contributes to a general sense of
lightness. The soaring temples of Thailand, with their sweeping, graceful curves, have
an airy sense of lightness, while the raised houses of traditional dwellings in many
parts of Asia have an elegant loftiness. Vertiginous effects are emphasized by the
slenderness of timber supports. The effects of light filtering in from the top also
contribute greatly to the sense of loftiness.
Such weightless effects also evoke cosmic and other animistic associations. In many
Southeast Asian societies, the house is seen as an animate entity. Extended ridge-lines
and outward-sloping gable-ends can be commonly found in various dwelling types in
Indonesia. A symbol of the Thai house, which gives it a characteristic sense of
lightness, is the bargeboardan element that closes off the end of the roof rafters
extending beyond the gable. This is the called pan-lom in Thai, which means shaping
the wind. Another recurring feature in Thai architecture are decorative gable-finials,
which can be found in Northern Thailand and Indonesia. The meeting of the roof and
the sky is thus given added phenomenological significance through such elaborately
carved elements (Beng, 1996: 55).
To sum up, a visual relationship between the architectural object and the perceived
subject is set up through three sensibilities: an emphasis on lightweight construction,
the use of materials, and the effects of light on it. Such poetic fusions of light and
materiality provide invaluable lessons for contemporary architects seeking to infuse
their works with a sense of lightness. As Pallasma proposes, architecture must again
learn to speak of materiality, gravity and the tectonic logic of its own making
( Beng, 1996: 59).
.
43
Figure 28: The elegant loftiness and lightness of a traditional Thai roof (Beng, 1993: 28).
Figure 29: Samui Airportthe use of thatched roofing materials is a traditional feature of vernacular
architecture (Seangklicng.1999: 61).
44
Figure 30: Traditional Thai structures are built over water bodies (Beng,1996: 83).
Tan Hock Beng points out that the sense of lightness in traditional Thai architecture is
further reinforced by the relationship between buildings and the use of water features
(Beng, 1996: 54).
2. A Sense of Transparency
The modernist concept of transparency refers to the use of transparent materials, such
as glass, to achieve demarcations in a spatial continuum. But in the traditional
architecture of Southeast Asia, dematerialization of the solid is expressed in many
ways. The important sense of transparency can be achieved through the deliberate
placement of structures, openings, and screens. Many Thai structures are engaged
through recurring themes of spatial layering. Spaces are layered to indicate degrees of
formality or ceremony, yet linked in a visually compelling manner.
The most obvious example is the traditional Thai house, where door and window
openings are often detailed with shutters that allow views into other parts of the
common terrace. Permeable walls and screens also demarcate different spaces, while
allowing a sense of transparency. Space can be inflected, manipulated.
In traditional buildings, such transparency is achieved without eschewing privacy and
enclosure. Screens are treated as interposing elements that accentuate distance and
difference. A sense of transparency is not simply one that reveals everything. Rather, it
suggests an expanse that lies beyond. Space can manipulated to be expanding and
dynamic or controlled and static. Confronted with continuous unfolding of changing
45
46
is necessary for the disclosure of the poetic moment inherent within architectural
objects.
One of the architects tasks is to open up a view into another realityone of
memories, imagination, and dreams. It is a task that helps us understand who we are.
This is perhaps most aptly illustrated by Noel Arnaunds remark that I am the space
where I am (Beng, 1996: 123). An architecture of tranquility silences everything else
around it while opening up this view into another reality.
In his address upon receipt of the Pritzker Prize for Architecture in 1980, Luis
Barragan asserted that I have always tried to allow for the interior placid murmur of
silence, and in my fountains, silence sings. For him, serenity is the great and true
antidote against anguish and fear. Today, more than ever, it is the architects duty to
make of it a permanent guest in the home, no matter how sumptuous or how humble.
Throughout my work I have always strived to achieve serenity, but one must be on
guard not to destroy it by the use of an indiscriminate palette (Beng, 1996: 135).
M.L. Piyalada Devakula Thaveeprungsriporn states the case of Tub Kwan, where an
actual tree itself stands at the center of the elevated terrace (chan), enriching it with a
cool refreshing sensationthe rom reun sensation (rom reun: a cool, refreshing
sensation commonly associated with tree shades one of the preferable aspects of a
place for the Thai) (Devakula, 2002: 104-106).
Figure 31: Traditional Thai house with chan and tree (line-drawing by the author).
47
Figure 32: Traditional Thai landscape with tree planting within the house compound
(line-drawing by the author).
48
Ruethai (2002: 79) and Khaisaeng believe strongly that trees planted within the house
compound be limited to certain trees. Specific quadrants for their planting are also
specified. To the east of the house, bamboo, kum, and coconut tree are recommended,
as these will bring happiness and good health. To the northeast, the planting of yor and
saraphi are recommended as these will ward off misfortune. To the south it is though
that one should plant mango, maplab or persimmon, and maprng as not only are the
fruits delicious but such trees will bring wealth. In the southwest, can be planted
chaiyapruek, rajapruek, sadaow, jackfruit, and pikun which as in the northeast section
are chosen to their ability to ward off misfortune. Similar in the west, tamarind,
mayom, and putsa are recommended to ward off ill-intentioned people and evil spirits.
To the northwest of the house, magrud used in tom yum soup, lime, sompoi, and mangua trees should be planted. Finally, in the north section, putsa and variety of sedges,
hemp and herbs are recommended to ward off black magic. Certain texts also
recommended matoom (Sukhawattana, 1990: 25).
Besides the delightful sensations they provide, trees bear rich, multifaceted layer of
ideas and meanings. First is the notion of trees as shelter, which is played out in many
ways in the Thai context-physical/formal, sensorial, and conceptual. All of these,
however, seem to revolve around a simple term kwam rom reuna cool, refreshing
sensation commonly associated with tree shade. Here, the term rom (umprella,
shade, shaded) denotes the physical/formal aspect of a shelter, while reun entails a
delightful sensation in term of sight, sound, and comfort. Together, they sum up in one
word the physiological, psychological, and aesthetic modes of experience (Devakula,
2002: 104-106).
.
4. A Sense of Hospitality
4.1 Toen, Chan, Verandah, and a Sense of Hospitality
On the toen, there is a shelf, khown as the raan nam, about 80 cm above the floor to
hold the dippers and jars of drinking water with which guests are welcomed and
members of the household refresh themselves. The reason the toen is called a multipurpose area is that it is a place of relaxation for the family, a reception area for guests,
the sleeping place for the father or sons, and the place where the bodies of family
members are laid out during funerals.
49
a)
Figure 33:
a) The raan nam or water pavilion is a traditional feature of Northern Thai house. These shelves
hold the earthenware jars and water dippers used to welcome guests (Chaichongrak et al,
2002: 118).
b) The large toen of a kalae house (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 119).
50
Traditional buildings in Asia provide protection from the rain and refuge from the hot
equatorial sun. Because of the tropical climate, buildings in Asia need less glass to
guard against cold weather. Wooden screens, louvered shutters, and chick blinds made
of bamboo strips provide privacy and allow fresh air to circulate throughout the villas.
Since light generates heat, most interiors are dark. Natural materials, such as teak,
rattan, and bamboo, are preferred because they retain opening little heat (or materials
use) (Ettensperger, 2001: 15).
- The main staircase of the house, leading to the upper floor, is covered by extended
eaves. These are supported by two posts, the so called sao laeng ma the post for tying
the watchdog.
Traditionally, an earthen jar and dipper are placed at the foot of staircase for
washing ones feet before entering (Chaichongrak et al, 2003: 113).
The plan of the elevated main level consists of the terrace (chan), the toen (general
purpose area), main house, kitchen, and the store room. Standing at the top of the
staircase the raised terrace extends in front of one. Near the staircase, a jar of cool
drinking water with a cup is provided for guests a Lan na custom showing hospitality.
The jar stands on a shelf which is about one m above the floor and is covered by a
small roof (Chaichongrak et al, 2003: 134).
The deeply-pitched roofs and open-air pavilions (sala) that characterize traditional
Thai architecture evolved in response to the countrys climate. A high roof creates an
interior with enough space for hot air to rise. The roof overhang keeps the sunlight out.
A second steeped roof promotes ventilation by trapping the hot air in the space above.
In ancient Thailand, sala were open to the outdoors and were where Thai people
received guests. They also came to the sala to enjoy the cool outdoor breezes and gaze
at the countryside around them (Ettensperger, 2001: 15-16).
51
influencing factors are changing rapidly. Eventually, we well come to an end in similar
to the show down of a pendulum in moving as against the inertia. As professor
Sompop Piromya, in referring to Prince Nariss concept in cultural continuity, has
succinctly pointed put we should not only use up our past heritage, but we should also
create new glories (Horayangkura, 2002: 104-106).
IMPELLING FORCES
52
53
54
The indigenous people called the Chao Le comprise up to percent of the coastal
population. The predominantly Muslim sea gypsies are a people who have survived at
the edge of land and water for many thousands of years.
Traditionally they live in stilt huts along rivers and lagoons. Their houses are structures
designed to withstand the tides and monsoon floods. Posts or pillars are also necessary
to keep away reptiles and insects as well as to avoid the stench of waste.
Lau and Yoichi have suggested design the building to be safe from tsunami disaster
that the house could be elevated up to provide a space to pass
In the northern and northeastern regions of Thailand flooding generally comes from
rain-water and storms; while in the central region, it is caused by overflowing rivers
from the north and high sea levels in November and December. People, animals, and
implements can be kept temporarily in the house during the floods (Chaichongrak,
2002: 48).
A traditional Thai house is raised above the ground to a just above head height. The
varying levels of the different sections of the house are determined by the different
functions and create a flow of space which is almost modern in feel.
There are many considerations, which had led to a raised house being highly desirable.
First, house provided security from animal predators and thieves at night. In addition,
the central region of Thailand is situated in low-lying areas inundated by frequent rain
and floods. Other areas are also subject to rainfall and flooding. Houses with a raised
floor provide a sense of security, privacy, and shelter. As a result, flood evasion was of
also primary importance.
Traditional Thai architecture was designed to provide a setting for Thai culture and to
answer to the needs of that culture. Traditional Thai buildings have also come to
incorporate inherent wisdom in their relation to their sites and environment. This
adaptation and evolution needs better to be understood by modern Thai architects, who
can incorporate this wisdom into buildings today.
55
Chapter 3
A Survey of the Case Studies
Chapter Overview
According to the investigation of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture in
resort contexts, appropriate design for the given region is a critical aspect of reflected
to architectural identity in modern Thailand. This chapter focuses on a survey of resort
architecture. To carry this out the case studies are required to add specificity to the
process. Case studies also help define the criteria for evaluation.
The specific projects chosen were selected onto basis of the following qualifications:
1. Projects given the ASA (The Association of Siamese Architects Under Royal
Patronage) design award;
2. Projects winning conservation awards from Department of Fine Arts;
3. Projects associated with leading hotel companies of the world;
4. Projects which have expressed valueoriented design reflective of Thai
architecture or vernacular architecture. Typically, these projects have
incorporated traditional motifs and local materials in their design.
The selected projects with the critical criteria as explained above are:
1. The Four Seasons Resort and Spa (formerly the Regent Chiang Mai), Chiang
Mai;
2. The Anantara Resort(formerly the Royal Garden Village), Hua-hin;
3. Le Meridean Baan Taling Ngam, Samui;
4. Santi-buri Dusit Resort, Samui;
5. Sila Evason Hideaway, Samui;
6. Rayavadee Premier Resort, Krabi;
7. Holiday Inn Resort, Phi Phi Island, Krabi;
8. The Tub-kaak Resort, Krabi;
9. Grand Sheraton Laguna Beach, Phuket;
10. Banyan Tree Laguna Beach Resort and Spa, Phuket;
11. Amanpuri Resort, Phuket;
56
The Four Seasons Resort and Spa (formerly the Regent Chiang Mai)
A. Project Overview
The Four Seasons Resort Chiang Mai, which opened in April 1995, clearly stands out
as one of the most outstanding projects in the fertile intermundane basin of northern
Thailand. The resort has recognized with conservation awards from Department of
Fine Arts in 1996, it is located on a five-hectare plot in the beautiful Mae Rim Valley
about 20 minutes drive north of Chiang Mai International Airport. The Four Season
Resort Chiang Mai pays tribute to the citys ethnic and cultural heritage. There are
altogether 67 pavilion suites distributed in clusters of two-storey, structures with either
king or twin-bed accommodation, each offering a luxurious 70 square meters of living
space. The pavilions are based on the style of the Lan na kingdom. The architecture
was designed by Arjan Chulatut Kitibutre of Chiang Mai Collaborative, who is a keen
advocate of the preservation of Lan na-style northern Thai architecture.
1.1
A survey of the site indicates that the resort architecture of The Four Seasons resort
and its surroundings have been designed with a keen sensitivity to the pristine
environment. The building organization follows the concept of an enclosed landscape
overlooking the dramatic Doi Suthep mountains.The raised teak pavilion and main
building are integrated with a five hectare area of rice terraces and lush landscape
gardens. The disposed buildings and are connected through walkways without roofcovering.
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.1
Roof Profile:
The high pitched-roof, identified as the Manila-style roof, distinguishes the buildings
of the resort. The material used for roofing is colored teak shingles.
1.2.2
Connecting Spaces:
The open spaces are connected to the outdoor areas of the main lobby and also to each
of the pavilions.
57
1.2.3
The inner floors of the buildings are mostly of wood; the outer floors, such as the
terraces and walkways, are paved with sandstone.
Figure 35: Site plan of main building of The Four Seasons Chiang Mai shows the building
placement of the main lobby and restaurant that are adjacent to the water features and
the sala.
1.2.4
Wall Panels:
The wall panels of pavilions are divided into two parts. The lower part of the building
is masonry and the upper wall panels are made of wood, generally with a horizontal
pattern as shown in figure 3.5. Consisting of alternating masses, columns, and voids,
the wall design is based on traditional features of Lan na design.
1.2.5
58
Free-standing posts and columns are adapted to serve as the principal architectural
elements in the area of the lobby and restaurant. Traditional designs are also employed
in the square-shaped columns of the pavilion suites.
Figure 36: Front elevation and side elevation of main building, shows the characteristic of
Lan na-style northern Thai architecture.
59
Figure 37: Section of the main building, shows the building placement, designed to fit with the
existing conditions of the landscape.
Figure 38: Architecture and landscape design of a pavilion (line drawing by the author).
60
Figure 39: Elevation and section of a pavilion with the architectural elements and ornaments
reflecting of Lan na-style architecture.
61
Figure 40: Architecture and landscape of The Four Seasons (line drawing by the author)
- Eave brackets
The eave brackets are designed as the supporting element for the lower roof edges with
the wide overhangs.
- Gable ends
The gable end and its patterns employ the bai-prue pattern.
- Handrails and balusters
Handrails are designed as a transparent feature with a vertical pattern.
62
- Kalae
Kalae placed at the top of gable follow a traditional pattern of Lan na-style.
1.3. The Landscape
1.3.1
The relationship between the landscape and the buildings, as defined by the building
organization, emphasizes surroundings such as the waterscape and trees and brings
these within the building group.
1.3.2
Waterscape:
It is noted that the pavilions are not in fact adjacent to the waterscape and swimming
pool.
1.3.3
Lily Ponds:
Lily ponds are found in the areas of main lobby and in open spaces between the areas
of the lobby and restaurant. The landscape is designed with the use of old Thai water
jars planted with water lilies and lotus on the walkways to the pavilions.
1.3.4
Landscape Components:
The landscape of The Four Seasons Chiang Mai is designed by using sala (Thai
pavilions), decks, and walkways as landscape components harmonizing with the
buildings context.
2.1
A Sense of Lightness:
2.2.1
The various forms of roof profile, the stepped roofs with spires and ornaments
combine to provide a sense of lightness in the overall complex.
2.2.2
The free-standing posts in the area of lobby also provide a sense of lightness as well as
that provided by the roof.
63
2.2
A Sense of Transparency:
A sense of tranquility and coolness at The Four Seasons is achieved by means of the
relationship between building placement and site contexts.
2.4
A Sense of Hospitality:
The initial impression by visitors and a sense of a warm welcome is emphasized by the
open-air lobby and restaurant. In addition, the landscape design, including architectural
components such as sala (Thai pavilion) and the entrance porches of the pavilions,
gives expression to a sense of hospitality as well as a sense of place.
64
A. Project Overview
The Anantara Resort and Spa Hua Hin is located directly on the beach in a secluded
tropical oasis. A uniquely Thai-style village resort set amidst 14 acres of lush gardens,
lotus ponds, and Thai antiques. Anantarara Resort and Spa Hua Hin offers seven
clusters of beautiful, two-story Thai-style villas in a tranquil and serene environment.
The resorts open-air lobby is filled with turn-of-the-century antiques, which
immediately give the visitor an impression of times gone by. The village offers all the
amenities of a luxury resort. The architecture was designed by Arjan Chulatut
Kitibutre of Chiang Mai Collaborative. Arjan Chulatut who is a conservationist with a
dedication to the preservation of traditional Thai architecture.
The complex is divided into two groups: first, the main lobby and restaurant and
second, the group of the villas. The landscaped ponds with lilies and lotus are placed at
the front of the lobby. The walkways which connect the villas are designed without the
roof-covering.
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.1
Roof Profile:
Connecting Spaces:
The open space of the interior is connected to the outdoor spaces. These include the
areas of the main lobby and restaurant.
1.2.3
The inner floor of the buildings is mostly of wood, the outer floors are terra cotta and
sand-washed finish.
65
Figure 42: Site plan of main building shows the building organization of the main lobby and
restaurant that are adjacent to the water features and the sala.
66
Figure 43: Front elevation, side elevation, and section of the main lobby.
67
68
69
1.2.5
The relationship between the landscape and the buildings as defined by the building
placement emphasizes the sites surroundings. The main lobby is adjacent to the
bodies of water feature of the lily ponds.
70
1.3.2
Waterscape:
On surveying, the building organization of the villas are adjacent to the trees in the
center of the open court.
1.3.3
Lily Ponds:
Lily ponds are found at the front of main lobby. The landscape is also designed by
using an old Thai water jars, planted with water lilies, placed on the walkways to the
villas.
1.3.4
Landscape Components:
Landscape components of Anantara, include the use of the sala, motif and also
walkways harmonizing with the site. Building placement also contributes to the overall
landscape design.
A Sense of Lightness:
2.2.1
The free-standing columns in the areas of lobby and restaurant provide a sense of
lightness, supplementing that engendered by the roofs.
2.2
A Sense of Transparency:
A sense of transparency is achieved through the building organization and the use of
glass as a wall panels.
2.3
A Sense of Hospitality:
71
A. Project Overview
Sila Evason Hideaway is located on a headland on the northern tip of Samui island,
approximately six kilometers from the airport. It is set amongst 20 acres of indigenous
plantings and offers stunning views of the surrounding sea and outlying islands. All
villas are located amongst natural vegetation, distributed along a gently sloping
headland, which ensures maximum privacy while offering panoramic views.
All villas are split-level in design and have an open-style bathroom. These features
create an atmosphere of space and light in the room, and also help maintain views of
the surrounding sea and islands from almost every location in the villa.
Infinity edge private swimming pools in most of the villas blend into the horizon and
help maintain a feeling of seclusion even though all of the resorts facilities are
nearby and servised by Pool Villa Butlers.
Sila Evason Hideaway is managed by Six Senses Resorts and Spas, which also
manages the Evason Phuket Resort and Spa, and Evason Hua Hin Resort and Spa in
Thailand.The Six Senses team has designed the Sila Evason Hideaway to reflect the
same standards that are recognized in these other fine resorts.
On assessing the site, the resort architecture has been designed to respect the physical
conditions. All villas are placed near and surrounded by natural vegetation.
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.1
Roof Profile:
The roof profile is a hipped form. The materials used for roofing is ya kha grass thatch
(Imperata aundinacea).
1.2.2
Connecting Spaces:
The overall open space is connected to the outdoor spaces between the areas of
restaurant and swimming pool and is also connected between the living space of the
villas and the villa pools.
72
1.2.3
The inner floors of the villas are mostly of wood for the living spaces and bedrooms;
for the area of bathrooms polished cement and ceramic tiles are used. The outdoor
spaces, such as pool decks, are mostly of hard wood with a sand-washed finish.
73
74
75
76
1.2.4
Wall Panels:
The wall panels used in the resort are a combination of plaster and painted and
decorated wood.
1.2.5
The relationship between the landscape and buildings is translated by the building
placement, placing most units adjacent to features such as waterscapes and existing
trees within the building grouping.
1.3.2
Waterscape:
On examination, the villas are generally placed adjacent to the waterscape. The
designers have employed an infinity edge for most water features.
1.3.3
Lily Ponds:
Lily ponds are found at the front of main lobby. The landscape is also designed by
using an old Thai water jars, planted with water lilies, placed on the walkways to the
villas.
1.3.4
Landscape Components:
The landscape of the Sila Evason Hideaway is emphasized through the use of wooden
decks and uncovered walkways that harmonize with the site context.
77
2.1
A Sense of Lightness:
The free-standing posts in the areas of the lobby and restaurant also provide a sense of
lightness in addition to that conveyed by the thatched roofs and water features.
2.2 A Sense of Transparency:
A sense of transparency is achieved through the building organization and groupings
associated with the site context.
2.3 A Sense of Tranquility and Coolness
A sense of tranquility and coolness is achieved through the relationship of buildings
and water features and also by existing trees within the surroundings.
2.4 A Sense of Hospitality:
All guests are given a sense of welcome primarily through the open-air lobby and
restaurant.
78
also a beach accommodation with seven single-story suites, a beach club, and a
swimming pool.
Baan Taling Ngam translates as house on a beautiful cliff. The resort is located on a
truly breathtaking site of more than six hectares. Certainly the most impressive aspect
of the resort is its location. As the management explains, the resort is all about space,
place and pace. It is sited on a verdant ridge with spectacular views of the islanddotted waters of the Samui archipelago. No matter where one is, the aquamarine blue
of the sea remains visible (Tan Hock Beng, 1996: 185).
.
Located about 60 meters above the beach, the resort is accessed from a steep winding
road that makes one anticipate the final approach. However, the design of the entrance
lobby lacks the drama implicit in the approach sequence. One has to enter deep into the
lobby before being confronted by the much anticipated view of the sea. But the
panoramic view is certainly a spectacular sight. There are views of the Gulf of
Thailand as well as the Ang Thong Marine National Park, a protected archipelago of
38 uninhabited islands.
Figure 54: Architecture and landscape of the project (line drawing by the author).
79
80
On examination, the resort architecture of the resort has been designed to improve the
existing conditions of the area. The building organization follows a pattern of
enclosed-spaces in the landscape, harmonizing with the resorts surroundings.
1.2 Architectural Components
1.2.1
Roof Profile:
The roof profile is characterized by a high-pitched form of gabled roofs with wide
overhangs. The material used for roofing is Monier roof tiles.
1.2.2
Connecting Spaces:
The open space is connected to the outdoor space between the areas of main lobby and
swimming pool.
1.2.3
The inner floors of the villas are mostly of wood. Polished marble and terra cotta floor
tiles are found in the areas of the lobby and restaurant.
1.2.4
Wall Panels:
81
The gable ends of the villas are designed with a combination of wood and decorated
stucco ornament.
- Handrails and balusters
Handrails and balusters are designed as transparent features and emphasize a vertical
pattern.
1.3 The Landscape:
1.3.1
Waterscape:
The main lobby and restaurant are flanked by a swimming pool and landscape
components.
1.3.3
Lily Ponds:
Lily ponds are found in the areas of main lobby and restaurant.
1.3.4
Landscape Components:
The landscape consists of a combination of walkways and bridges connecting the villas.
None are covered.
2.1
A Sense of Lightness:
2.1.1 The Roofs and A Sense of Lightness
A sense of lightness is provided by the wide overhangs and the use of eave brackets.
2.1.2 Sao-Loy (free-standing posts and columns)
The free-standing columns in the areas of main lobby also convey a sense of lightness
in addition to that provided by the wide overhangs.
82
A sense of transparency is achieved through the building placement and the building
groupings in association with the site context.
2.3 A Sense of Tranquility and Coolness:
A sense of tranquility and coolness is achieved by means of the relationship between
building placement and the adjacent the waterscape and plantings.
2.4
A Sense of Hospitality:
A. Project Overview
Santi Buri Dusit resort is located on a 23-acre site, faced by a 300 meter beach. The
resort provides guests with privacy and luxury in 59 individual villas and 16 deluxe
Equatorial Suites, each with a private verandah. The individual villas are designed to
suggest a traditional Thai house and are further enhanced by environmentally designed
bathrooms and functional spaces. As with the Villas, all interior furnishings are of
classic Thai design.
Among the extensive recreational and sports facilities offered are a 50-meter
swimming pool, two tennis courts, and an extensive health club with squash court,
aerobics studio, gym room, sauna, and traditional Thai massage. The architecture was
designed by Arjan Thanith Chareonpong, who is a keen advocate of the conservation
of Thai architecture.
1.1
On examination, the resort architecture of Santi Buri Dusit resort has been designed to
integrate and improve the existing conditions of the context. The building placement
follows a pattern of enclosed spaces in the landscape harmonizing with the resorts
83
surroundings. The walkways connecting the villas are designed without the roofcovering.
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.3
The inner floors of the villas are mostly of wood. Polished marble and terra cotta floor
tiles are found in the areas of the lobby and restaurant.
1.2.4
Wall Panels:
1.2.5
- Eave brackets
The eave brackets found at the villas are designed as the supporting elements for the
wide overhangs.
- Gable ends
The gable end of the villas designed in a combination of wood and decorated stucco
ornament.
84
Figure 56: Site plan of the main building and resort complex.
85
Figure 57: Front elevation and back elevation of the main lobby.
86
Figure 60: Architecture and landscape design of a pavilion (line drawing by the author).
87
The relationship between the landscape and buildings is translated by the building
placement, placing most units adjacent to features such as waterscapes and existing
trees within the building grouping.
1.3.2
Waterscape:
On examination, the villas are generally placed adjacent to the waterscape. The
designers have employed an infinity edge for most water features.
.
1.3.3
Lily Ponds:
Lily ponds are found in the areas of main lobby and restaurant.
1.3.4
Landscape Components:
The landscape of Santi Buri is emphasized through the use of walkways and bridges,
all lacking roof-covering, which connect the villas.
88
2.1
A Sense of Lightness:
2.1.1 The Roofs and A Sense of Lightness
A sense of lightness is provided by the wide roof overhangs and the use of eave
brackets.
2.1.2 Sao-Loy (free-standing posts and columns)
The free-standing columns in the areas of main lobby also provide a sense of lightness
complementing that conveyed by the wide overhangs.
2.2 A Sense of Transparency:
A sense of transparency is achieved through the building placement and grouping.
2.3 A Sense of Tranquility and Coolness:
A sense of tranquility and coolness is achieved through the relationship between
building placement and adjacent waterscape and the plantings.
2.4
A Sense of Hospitality:
89
Located on Bang Tao Bay on the northwestern coast of Phuket, the Banyan Tree
Phuket is the first of the luxury addition to the Banyan Tree chain. It is in many ways a
showcase for the groups concept. Its individual guest villas are spread over the vast
landscape, designed around a man-made lagoon. Together they exude a monastic
solemnity. Spread over both sides of the lagoon, the wall-enclosed villas are grouped
in tight clusters, evoking images of Balinese villages, except that they are roofed over
by ostensibly Thai structures.
The 86-villa resort has 52 garden villas and 34 pool villas. The 170-square meter
garden villa contains a private garden within its walled compound, whereas the 270square meter pool villas (34 in number) each have a private 9 x 3 meter swimming
pool. Each villa has its own garden and an open-air sunken bath. The Pool Villa also
features a raised Thai-style sala and dining area, as well as a paved patio with builtin barbeque pit.
Figure 62: Site plan of the main building and the resort complex.
90
91
The resort architecture of Banyan Tree has been designed to improve the existing
conditions of the areas of Laguna. The building organization is designed as an
enclosed landscape harmonizing with its surroundings.
92
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.1
The roof profile of the villas is a high-pitched roof adapted from traditional Thai
houses, while the roofs of lobby and restaurant are surmounted by stepped-roofs and
multi-tiered roofs.
Figure 65: Architecture and landscape design of the pool villa (line drawing by the author).
93
1.2.2
Connecting Spaces:
The open space of the main area is connected to the outdoor spaces between lobby and
main buildings. Each villa also features a raised Thai-style sala.
Figure 66:
Architecture and landscape design of the pool villa (line drawing by the author)
94
95
1.2.3
The inner floors of the villas are mostly of wood. The outer floors of the outdoor
terraces are terra cotta with a sand-washed finish.
1.2.4
Wall Panels:
Figure 70: Architecture and landscape design (line drawing by the author).
96
1.2.5
The landscape complements the building complex. Open spaces are provided adjacent
to buildings.
1.3.2
Waterscape:
The lobby and main building are adjacent to the waterscape features. The same is true
with the private villas, which also feature private swimming pools.
1.3.3
Lily Ponds:
Lily ponds are found in the areas of main lobby and other open spaces.
1.3.4
Landscape Components:
The landscape in Banyan Tree is organized by means of a sala and walkways. These
components harmonize with the buildings context.
A Sense of Lightness:
97
A Sense of Transparency:
A sense of tranquility and coolness is achieved through the relationship between the
building complex and adjacent waterscape and plantings.
2.4
A Sense of Hospitality:
The visual approach welcomes guests, a factor emphasized by the open-air lobby and
restaurant. In addition, the landscape design, with architectural components such as
sala (Thai pavilion) and entrance porch of the pavilions, expresses a sense of
hospitality.
98
An examination of the project indicates that the resort has been designed to improve
the existing conditions of the areas of Laguna. The building organization follows the
pattern of enclosed-spaces harmonizing with their surroundings.
Figure 71: Site plan of the main building and resort complex.
99
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.1 Roof Profile:
The roof profile of the villas is a high-pitched form adapted from the traditional Thai
house, while the roofs of lobby and restaurant are covered with a stepped-roof and a
multi-tiered roof.
1.2.2 Connecting Spaces:
The open spaces are connected directly to the outdoor spaces between the areas of the
lobby and the main buildings.
1.2.3
The floors of the villas are mostly of wood. The outer floors of outdoor terrace are of
terra cotta with a sand-washed finish.
1.2.4
Wall Panels:
100
1.2.5
101
Handrails and balusters are designed with a combination of patterns, including both
horizontal and vertical features.
The relationship between the landscape and buildings is determined by the building
placement adjacent to its surroundings.
1.3.2
Waterscape:
The placement of the main lobby and the main building are adjacent to the waterscape
as well as the private villas. The villas also feature a private swimming pools.
1.3.3
Lily Ponds:
Lily ponds are found in the areas of the main lobby and the open spaces.
1.3.4
Landscape Components:
The landscape of the Banyan Tree incorporates sala and walkways as the principal
landscape components harmonizing with the resorts context.
A Sense of Lightness:
2.1.1 The Roofs and A Sense of Lightness
The various forms of roof profile, such as the multi-tiered roof and stepped-roofs,
convey a sense of lightness, as do the wide overhangs.
2.1.2 Sao-Loy (free-standing posts and columns)
The free-standing columns in the areas of lobby and main buildings also contribute to a
sense of lightness, in addition that provided by the roofs.
2.2
A Sense of Transparency:
A sense of transparency is achieved through the organization of the buildings and the
overall layout and context.
102
A sense of transparency is also expressed through the use of traditional elements, such
as the free-standing posts.
2.3
A Sense of Hospitality:
103
pavilions and even the walkways are raised on the columns to protect the natural
configuration of the land. The buildings are connected by the use of an uncovered
walkway. Most of the existing trees of the plantation have been preserved, and the
pavilions are built around them. From the point of view of planning, the units are
simple and repetitive.
Figure 74: Site plan of the main building and resort complex.
104
Figure 75: Architecture and landscape design (line drawing by the author).
105
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.1
Roof Profile:
The roof profile of the Amanpuri is a high-pitched form, with a multi-tiered roof with
the wide overhangs as shown in figure 3.41. The material used for roofing is terra-cotta
roof tiles.
1.2.2
Connecting Spaces:
The open spaces are connected to the outdoor space between the reception pavilion
and the villa pavilions. A sala, or covered reception area, is open on all sides, and the
bedroom and bathroom of each pavilion open onto the sala and a large verandah.
1.2.3
The floors of the buildings are mostly of wood; all the floors are of local wood called
tabaek. The floors in outdoor areas are of terracotta floor titles with sand-washed finish.
1.2.4
Wall Panels:
The wall panels are mostly of painted plaster and wooden panels with vertical patterns.
In terms of opening and void, the design is based on the traditional openings of the
Thai house.
1.2.5
- Eave brackets
The eave brackets are designed as a supporting element for the lower roof edges with
the wide overhangs.
- Gable ends
The gable ends are simple, lacking in pattern and ornament.
- Handrails and balusters
Handrails are designed as a transparent feature, with a strong vertical pattern.
1.3. The Landscape:
106
1.3.1
The relationship between the landscape and buildings is emphasized by the building
placement adjacent to reflecting ponds and landscaped pools.
1.3.2
Lily Ponds
Lily ponds are found in the areas of the reception pavilion and the restaurant. The
landscape architect employed old Thai water jars planted with water lilies and lotus in
the open spaces and the walkways leadings to the villa pavilions.
1.3.3
Waterscape
On examination, the reception pavilion and salas are designed and placed adjacent to
the water features of swimming pools and landscaped-ponds.
1.3.4
Landscape Components
The landscape design of the Amanpuri employs sala, decks, and walkways as the
principal components of the resort. These elements are attractive and harmonize with
the buildings and site context.
A Sense of Lightness:
2.1.1
The graceful Thai rooftops with multi-tiered roofs provide a sense of lightness in the
resort.
2.1.2
The free-standing posts in the areas of reception pavilion and restaurant and the sala
also provide a sense of lightness, in addition to that provided by the roofs.
2.2
A Sense of Transparency:
A sense of tranquility and coolness at Amanpuri is enhanced by lotus ponds and water
features surrounding the public pavilions.
107
2.4
A Sense of Hospitality:
108
An obvious architectural treatment is the circular plan used in the design of the
pavilion. A semi-prefabricated technique was used in the construction because all
the building materials had to be transported by boat and assembled on site. A fullyfurnished prototype pavilion was even set up in Bangkok to get the specifications as
precise as possible, since it would be difficult to make any adjustments on site.
Figure 77: Site plan of the main building and resort complex.
109
Figure 78: Architecture and landscape design of the main building and pavilions.
110
Figure 79: Architecture and landscape design of a pavilion (line drawing by the author).
111
112
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.1 Roof Profile:
The roof profile is characterized of the villas by the high, circular curved-roofs adapted
from architecture of the southern region of Thailand.
1.2.2 Connecting Spaces:
Open spaces are connected to the outside between the areas of the lobby and the main
buildings.
1.2.3
The inner floors of the villas are mostly of wood. The outer floors of outdoor are of
terra cotta with sand-washed finish.
1.2.4
Wall Panels:
- Eave brackets
not found
- Gable ends
The gable ends follow examples of traditional Thai houses, but are adapted without
patterns.
- Handrails and balusters
Handrails and balusters are designed in a combination of patterns with both horizontal
and vertical features.
113
Waterscape:
The same is true of the main lobby area where buildings are adjacent to the waterscape;
the same is true of the private villas.
1.3.3
Lily Ponds:
Lily ponds are found throughout the areas of the main lobby and open spaces.
1.3.4
Landscape Components:
The landscape design emphasizes water features and walkways as distinct landscape
components harmonizing with the buildings.
A Sense of Lightness:
2.1.1 The Roofs and A Sense of Lightness
The various forms of roof profile, such as the circular curved-roof exemplified at this
resort, provide a sense of lightness, a quality conveyed as well by the wide overhangs.
2.1.2 Sao-Loy (free-standing posts and columns)
The free-standing columns in the areas of lobby and main buildings also provide a
sense of lightness, together with that provided by the roofs.
2.2 A Sense of Transparency:
A sense of transparency is achieved through building organization and grouping. A
sense of transparency is also expressed through the appearance of traditional elements
and the use of the free-standing posts.
2.3 A Sense of Tranquility and Coolness:
A sense of tranquility and coolness is achieved by the relationship between building
organization the location of buildings adjacent to the waterscape and plantings.
2.4
A Sense of Hospitality:
114
The approach and a sense of welcome is established through the open-air lobby and the
restaurant. In addition, the landscape design, together with architectural components,
such as the entrance porches of the pavilions, expressed a sense of hospitality and a
sense of place.
On examination of the site, the resort architecture of The Tub-Kaak Resort can be seen
to have been designed with respect to the physical conditions and existing features of
the environmental context.
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.1 Roof Profile:
The high-pitched roof with curved-edge is identified as a form of gable roof. The
material used for the roofs is the terra cotta roof tiles.
1.2.2 Connecting Spaces:
Open spaces within the resort are connected to the outdoor spaces between the areas of
main lobby and grouping of the villas.
115
Figure 81: Site plan of the main building and resort complex.
116
117
The free-standing posts and columns are utilized as the principal architectural elements
used in the areas of the lobby and restaurant.
- Eave brackets
not found
- Gable ends
The gable ends feature a combination pattern of wood and grass.
118
The landscape and buildings are placed in close proximity to the waterscape and
plankings.
1.3.2
Lily Ponds
Lily ponds are found in the areas of open spaces, situated close to the restaurant.
1.3.3
Waterscape
The main lobby, restaurant, and two-story villas are situated adjacent to the waterscape
and swimming pool.
119
1.3.4
Landscape Components
The landscape of the Tab-Kaak Resort, utilizes walkways, sala, and decksall
components harmonizing to the site context.
A Sense of Lightness:
2.1.1
The free-standing posts and columns in the areas of lobby and restaurant help provide
a sense of lightness together with that provided by the roof.
120
The Holiday Inn Resort is located on the Phi Phi Island, located approximately 45
kilometers from Phuket and Krabi. It is set among 25 acres of indigenous plantings and
offers stunning views of the Andaman sea and Phi Phi Island. All villas are located
amongst natural vegetation, which ensures privacy, while offering unsurpassed
panoramic views. There are altogether 50 villas, each offering a luxurious living space.
The villa designs are based on the example of contemporary vernacular architecture.
The resort architecture of the Holiday Inn Resort has been designed with respect to the
site context and existing conditions. The buildings are connected by bridge-walkways,
lacking roofs. Most of the existing trees of plantation have been preserved, and the
villas are built or raised columns, which helps protect the natural configuration of the
land.
121
Figure 86:
1.2
Architectural Components
1.2.1 Roof Profile:
The high-pitched roof takes the form of a Manila or blanor roof, a combined hip and
gabled form. The material used for the roofing is asphalt shingles.
1.2.2 Connecting Spaces:
The main lobby and swimming pool areas are closely linked to intervening outdoor
spaces.
1.2.3 Floors and Flooring:
The inner floors of the buildings are mostly of wood; the outer floors are of terra cotta
floor tiles with a sand-washed finish.
1.2.4 Wall Panels:
On examination, the wall panels of the villas and all buildings consist of plasteredwalls finished with painted surfaces.
122
1.2.5
123
Generally, building placement is adjacent to trees. The main lobby is adjacent to the
waterscape and lily ponds.
1.3.2
Lily Ponds
Lily ponds are found at the areas of the main lobby and restaurant.
1.3.3
Waterscape
The main lobby and restaurant are adjacent to the swimming pool and lily ponds.
1.3.4
Landscape Components
Landscape components of The Holiday Inn Resort make use of the sala and bridgewalkways that harmonize with the site contexts.
A Sense of Lightness:
2.1.1
124
2.1.2
The free-standing columns in the areas of the lobby and restaurant help provide a sense
of lightness, together with that provided by the roof.
2.2 A Sense of Transparency:
A sense of transparency is achieved through the building placement and by means of
having villas raised above the existing ground.
2.3 A Sense of Tranquility and Coolness:
A sense of tranquility and coolness is achieved by means of the relationship between
building placement and the waterscape and trees within the resorts surroundings.
The above examples provide an outline the approach employed in this study for
assessing the character and quality of architecture in resort contexts. Each example has
included an overview of the project and specific analyses of Thai characteristics
employed in each project. These have included aspects of Thai character in tangible
qualities and values and character in intangible qualities and values. Each of the
projects have been assessed using uniforms standard of assessment. Overall, these
have been exemplary projects that have done much to achieve a quality of regional and
national character. The following chapter will explore the criteria for evaluation in
further detail, with initial attention to the means of constructing a questionnaire for
evaluation.
125
Chapter 4
Chapter Overview
This chapter mainly focuses on the architectural and design aspects involved in resort
design and the responses of architects, users, and clients. The evaluation techniques
include both interviews and more formal questionnaires. The interviews have been
conducted with architects involved directly in the design of resorts, as well as betterknown architects from the broader architectural community both in Thailand and
abroad. The clients or users of the resort themselves have also been interviewed. The
subsequent application of questionnaires is intended to further refining the contents of
the interviews and create a quantitative basis of evaluation.
126
The purpose of this category of interview are mainly focused on the study of concepts,
perceptions, and the opinions of the specific resort designers on their work and those
of other designers.
1. Julatus Kittibutre ASA., design-architect for The Four Seasons Resort and Spa
and the Anantara Resort;
2. Thanit Chareonpong, Ph.D, ASA., design-architect for Santi-buri Dusit Resort;
3. ThaKoon Suwansukhum, ASA., design-architect for Le Meridien Baan Taling
Ngam;
4. Amata Loopaiboon, ASA., design-architect for Sila Evason Hideaway;
5. Anucha Tangsriviriyakul, ASA., design-architect for Rayavadee Premier
Resort;
6. Prakit Phananuratana, ASA, design-architect for the TubKaak Resort;
7. Phisit Sayampol, ASA., design-architect for the Holiday Inn Resort;
8. Sakao Boonsri, ASA., design-architect for the Grand Sheraton Laguna Beach;
9. Manoon Leeveerapant, ASA., design-architect for the Amanpuri Resort;
10. Pracha Pithayatorn, ASA., design-architect for the Banyan Tree Laguna Beach
Resort and Spa.
1) In your own opinions, what is the modern Thai architecture? And what is
its representation and characteristic?
Initial interviews with the design-architects provide insights into what they consider to
be the most important aspects of Thai architecture. In general, they explain that
modern Thai architecture refers to the design and construction technology of the
present-day architecture within the context of modern society. This includes a concern
with what might be regarded as modern Thai character and the conservation values of
Thai-ness as found in traditional Thai architecture. The opinions of design-architects
about modern Thai architecture can be summarized as follows:
127
1. Architectural components:
-
Roof profiles, multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs; roofs and their
relations to overhangs, etc.
Connecting spaces, such as chan (a central terraces), palai (covered
verandahs) etc.
Floors, including floor coverings and patterns
Wall panels, including patterns, openings, and ventilating walls (fa-lai)
Architectural elements and details such as sao-loy (free-standing post
and column), gable ends, eaves bracket, handrail and baluster
A sense of lightness
A sense of transparency
A sense of tranquility and coolness
A sense of hospitality
Architect Anucha Sriviriyakul (2002) states that modern Thai architecture is in fact a
reinvention, when Thai wisdom and modern technology are integrated. He argues that
we should create modern Thai architecture that serves present-day society by focusing
on architectural identity as well as appropriate technology.
Design themes and architectural concepts that the design-architects interviewed reveal
predominantly are:
1) The site context and conditions
Architects generally point out that the most important and challenging aspect in
designing resort architecture is to build in a global context and take into account
128
tourism and the overall impacts of tourism on sites. Most felt that the principal goal of
the design is to maintain both the sites context and traditional character. Architect
Anucha Sriviriyakul, who designed the project at Rayavadee, points out that a great
effort there was made to keep as many existing trees as possible. This kind of
environmental consciousness is also reflected in the work of many of other architects
as well (Sriviriyakul, 2005).
Architect Chulatut Kitibutre, who is one of the designers of The Four Seasons Chiang
Mai, also agrees that environmental concerns are paramount. He explained that the
Four Seasons resort is located on a striking terrain, surrounded by existing natural
conditions. The landscape elements offer surprises at every junction. Still, the area for
the part of the property remains devoted to the traditional landscape of rice terraces
and flower fields, both of which reflect the lifeways and identity of Lan na people and
culture (Kitibutre, 2005).
The design-architects interviewed universally point out that the Thai tradition of
designing with the climate to achieve maximum comfort in buildings is critical to
modern approaches. This is accomplished not only in providing overhangs of roofs but
also by understanding the environmental context of the site in the region. The
architects interviewed attempt to work in step with the natural environment rather than
design in conflict with it. Some architects states in addition that in the design of resorts,
appropriate responses have to be made to the tropical climate. Throughout it is evident
that climate is an important consideration and one that architects have to incorporate
into their design decisions.
3) Project requirements
Resort architecture is most often aimed at international standards, especially those
examples that reflect high cultural and architectural values. Tourists generally are
interested more in architecture with cultural values rather than buildings in more
anonymous modern styles. Architect Anucha Sriviriyakul stated that we should create
modern Thai architecture serving present society and focusing on the integration of
appropriate technology and Thai identity ( Sriviriyakul, 2005).
4) Reflecting Thai-ness
Architects interviewed for this project generally subscribe to the idea that resort
architecture should exhibit regionalism differences. The designs, they suggest, should
make use of indigenous styles and types thereby providing clear regional references.
129
- Northern region
Architect Chulatut Kitibutre, who designed the Four seasons Chiang Mai, points out
that his design is based on the traditional craftsmanship and style of the Lan na
Kingdom. Lan na architecture has many distinctive elements that may be incorporated
into modern design.
- Central region
The project of the Anatara Resort and Spa Hua Hin, applies the traditional Thai
dwelling of the kuti (monks residence) for the design of main lobby. The building
placement emphasizes open space. This is reflected in both tangible and intangible
qualities and values, through the use of architectural components such as roof profiles,
gable ends, chan, all of which combine to convey a sense of tranquility.
- Southern region
In the example of the Rayavadee Resort, a two-storey design was inspired by
traditional local architecture as well as by the mosques of southern Thailand. The
characteristic feature of gable ends and finials were utilized. The sunburst motif of the
Southern architecture was also used to convey a strong sense of regional identity.
5) Construction technology
The design-architects interviewed point out that the design team not only has to design
the building but also devise the method of construction. Workers also need to avoid
damaging the vegetation and limit the impacts of heavy equipmentanother important
consideration. In the project at Rayavadee, a semi-prefabricated technique was used
in the construction. This is because all of the building materials have to be transported
by boat and assembled on site. The same circumstances hold for the Holiday Inn
project that is located on Phi Phi Island.
130
4) What are your views about the abstract dimensions that identify modern
Thai character?
The following aspects of design summarize the responses of architects
interviewed for the project:
- Lightness
All architects interviewed reveal that a sense of lightness provided by the use of multitiered and stepped roofs, wide overhangs, free-standing posts and columns, raised
floors, and sloped-walls, convey Thai character. Organization of buildingadjacent to
waterscape features also evolved a strong sense of Thai-ness.
- Transparency
A sense of transparency in Thai character is provided by the use of a semi-enclosed
space punctuated by chan, free-standing posts and columns.
- Tranquility and coolness
A sense of tranquility and coolness in Thai character is conveyed by the relationship
between buildings and the waterscape or trees.
- Hospitality
A sense of hospitality in Thai character is provided by the use of sala (Thai pavilions),
palai (covered verandahs), chan (open terraces).
131
Design should not only reflect traditional architecture of the past, but
should be relevant to current social and physical contexts.
7) In case of tsunami disaster on Boxing Day (December 26) 2004, what are
your views about design concept for resort architecture?
All of the design-architects interviewed point out that their designs have not been done
with an eye to safety and protection in the event of a tsunami disaster. This is because
the architects have never experienced a case of natural disaster of this magnitude. The
devastating tsunami which was caused by the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake struck
many parts of the Asian and Andaman coastline of Thailand. The resulting tidal waves
destroyed not only countless lives, but also affected the tourism industry throughout
the region. The lesson of the tsunami is a clear signal to national and local
governments, developers, planners, and also architects that design principles for
sustainable environmentally conscious design need to be incorporated to resort
architecture. Traditional Thai wisdom and past practice also need to be integrated into
future projects.
132
Using new materials to create modern character such as the gable ends
and components using reflective glass
Respect for the concept of authenticity and regional architecture for the
interior architecture
133
teachers and also architect practicers. Ten architects were interviewed, eight belong to
Thai nationality, two international architects with considerably experiences in Thailand.
The interviewees are as follows:
134
Several of the architects interviewed reveal that the Amanpuri and Banyan Tree
projects appropriately use the model of the traditional Thai house but fail to address to
the issue of appropriate regionalism. These design products would no doubt impress
tourists, but on closes scrutiny fail to reflect different local traditions of building.
2. According to the illustrations of the case studies, how well did the projects
selected express modern Thai character?
The leading architects mostly agree that the case studies reflect modern Thai character
in terms of:
-
3. What are the principal ways that the significant characteristics of modern
Thai architecture are conveyed as shown by the illustrations of the case studies?
The chief identifying characteristics represented and expressed by the selected projects
can be summarized as follows:
- Tangible qualities and values
1)
2)
Roofs
Roof profiles, stepped-roofs and multi-tiered roofs, the roof slope,
overhangs, roofing materials and colors
Connecting spaces
building connected with chan (central terraces), buildings connected
with palai (covered verandahs), and, buildings connected with laan
long (open spaces)
Floors
Floors and their patterns, floors and their materials
135
Wall panels
Wall panels and their character, wall panels and their patterns, wall
panels and their materials
3)
4)
Landscapes
-
Waterscapes
Buildings adjacent to waterscapes, buildings raised on stilts over
waterscapes
Landscape components
Sala (Thai pavilions) elevated walkways, water features, etc.
4. What are your views about the intangible qualities and values that help to
identify modern Thai architectural character?
Interviews with academicians and leading Thai and international architects suggest a
strong coalescence of opinion on several significant factors. These are:
-
Lightness
136
A sense of lightness in Thai architecture is provided by the use of freestanding posts or columns, raised floors, slant walls, multi-tiered roofs
and stepped-roofs, and the relationship between buildings and
waterscape features.
-
Transparency
A sense of transparency in Thai architecture is provided by the use of
free- standing posts or columns, and semi-enclosed spaces.
Hospitality
A sense of hospitality in Thai character is achieved through the use of
sala (Thai pavilions), palai (covered verandahs), and chan (open
terraces).
Architect Matha Lek Bunnag explained that only very few architectural works are
creative outputs which are inherited with high cultural values. The creation of modern
Thai architecture should be developed through the practicing and research-based
design as well as the approach by attaining modern Thai architecture in a creative
dimension.
137
The leading architects interviewed share the common ideas on this topic. In general
they agree that:
-
7. Reflecting upon the tsunami disaster of December 26, 2004, what is you
view about design concepts for resort architecture?
All leading architects point out that the devastating tsunami destroyed and affected the
tourism industry throughout the region. It is evident that architects must rethink the
design principles for sustainable resort architecture. Architect Pisit Rojanavanich
(2005) suggests that architects should integrate traditional Thai wisdom into modern
Thai architecture in resort contexts to help guide against future of tsunami disasters.
8. What do you suggest would serve as useful guidelines for modern Thai
architecture in resort contexts?
Design guidelines for modern Thai architecture in resort contexts recommended by
leading architects include the following considerations:
1. Building organization and grouping
-
138
3. Landscape Design
-
Using the existing condition of site and its context to create a sense of
modern Thai architecture through the practicality of low costs
139
The interview process was mainly focused on the study of concepts, perceptions, and
opinions of the actual usersspecifically the clients or ownersof the projects
considered in this study. Interviewees were primarily on-site managers of the resorts
people who need to live within their newly created environments on a daily basis and
could thus be expected to provide variable insights into the qualities of design and
experience. The interview base was comprised of the following eleven people:
1. Mr. Andrew Harrison, General Manager, The Four Season Resort.
2. Ms. NongKran Chaipanya, General Manager,The Anantara Resort.
3. Mr. Ralf Spresing, Gerneral Manager, Le Meridien Baan Taling Ngam.
4. Mr. Peter Kaelli, General Manager, Santi-buri Dusit Resort.
5. Mr. Eric Halli, General Manager, Sila Evason Hideaway.
6. Mr. Chulabhong Sriaswasdi, Executive Director, Rayavadee Premier Resort.
7. Ms. Petcharat Kiatvoraniti, Hotel Manager, TubKaak Resort.
8. Mr. Michal Zitek, General Manager, Holiday Inn Resort.
9. Mr. Andrew Jessop, General Manager, Grand Sheraton Laguna Beach Resort.
10. Mr. Pancho IIamas, General Manager, Banyan Tree Laguna Beach Resort and
Spa.
11. Mr. Frideric Varnier, General Manager, Amanpuri Resort
140
2. What are your views about the intangible qualities and values that
identify modern Thai character?
In general these interviewees agree that the following qualities best conveyed a sense
of modern Thai character and culture are:
-
Lightness
A sense of lightness in Thai architecture is provided by these of freestanding posts or columns, raised floors, slant walls, multi-tiered roofs
and stepped-roofs, and also by the relationship between buildings and
waterscape features.
Transparency
A sense of transparency in Thai architecture is provided by the use of
free-standing posts and columns, and semi-enclosed spaces.
Hospitality
A sense of hospitality in Thai character is achieved through the use of
sala (pavilions), palai (covered verandahs), and chan (open terraces).
141
The building users generally agree that it is important and appropriate for resort
architecture to be designed with a modern Thai character in order to express and reflect
uniqueness. Specific concerns included:
-
The belief that modern Thai architecture not only expresses traditional
aspects of the past but should provide guidance for future social and
cultural development.
142
A. Thai Character
in Tangible Qualities and Values
Number of interviewees
mentioning the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
10
-Building organization:
Covered walkways
- Roof profiles
143
Number of interviewees
mentioning to the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
10
- Connected with
lan- long (open spaces)
10
- Solid panels
- Glass panels
- Ventilating panel
10
Architectural Elements:
Floors and Flooring
144
Number of interviewees
mentioning to the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
10
145
Number of interviewees
mentioning to the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
10
10
146
Number of interviewees
mentioning to the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
- Materials used
147
Number of interviewees
mentioning to the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
Landscape: Waterscape
148
Number of interviewees
mentioning the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
10
10
149
Number of interviewees
mentioning the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
- Overhangs
150
Number of interviewees
mentioning the following items
designbuilding
leading
architects
users
architects
- Free-standing columns
- Raised floors
10
- Slant walls
2. A Sense of Transparency
151
Number of interviewees
mentioning the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
- Open-air lobby
- Entrance pavilion
10
- Covered verandah
4. A Sense of Hospitality
10
10
10
152
Number of interviewees
mentioning the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
10
10
10
3. Landscape
- Using the existing condition of site
and its context to create a sense of
modern Thai architecture through
the practicality of low costs
153
Number of interviewees
mentioning the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
10
154
Number of interviewees
mentioning the following items
designarchitects
building
users
leading
architects
10
155
1.1 The pre-questionnaire will be tested with selected architects and non-architects
(general public) by processing the test and re-test of 20 subjects are to be
included in each group, and the statistic method of Pearson product moment
correlation will be applied for reconstructing the comprehensive
questionnaire.
1.2 Delivery the final questionnaire to architects and non-architects (general
public); 150 subjects to be included in each group.
156
157
Chapter 5
Social Analysis of the Respondents
Chapter Overview
This chapter focuses on the social analysis of the questionnaire respondents, they were
drawn from both non-architecture fields and architecture. The analysis uses the
statistical procedure which is fundamentally important to this study. Controlling the
variables is an essential aspect of the process and for acceptance of the data analysis.
The social variables, which are controlled, can be identified as follows:
1) Extraneous variables: The social characteristics of the respondents
including age, gender, educational level, and occupation (private sector or
governmental)
2) Independent variables: The respondents occupations and the character of
their works (non-architects and the architects)
158
4. Analysis of occupation
5. Analysis of income
5.1
Social Analysis and Comparative Study non architects and the architects
5.1.1
The comparative analysis of the age of the respondents, both non-architects (general
public) and the architects, using t-test measurement can be presented as follows:
Respondents
Mean
(year)
Std. Deviation
(SD)
Architects
30.17
5.88
0.21
(sig = 0.87)
Non-architects
30.03
5.51
Table 3 presents data related to the social character: age. The comparison of mean,
the average age in which both architects and non-architects (general public) is 30.17
and 30.03 respectively.
Considering t-test, p-value indicates no significant differences in terms of age
between architects and non-architects at the statistical significance based on an alpha
of 0.05. As the result, it becomes a controlled variable for further analysis.
159
Non-architects
Gender
X2
amount
percent
amount
Percent
Male
110
73.30
103
68.70
Female
40
26.70
47
31.30
Total
150
100
150
100
0.79
(sig = 0.68)
Table 4 presents data related to the social character: gender. The comparison of
mean, show the portion of female of the architects is slightly lower than of nonarchitects (general public). Percentage of architects and non-architects is 26.70 and
31.30 respectively. For male, the portion of the architects is slightly higher than of
non-architects (general public). That is, the percentage of the architects and nonarchitects is 73.30 and 68.70 respectively.
The comparative analysis of the educational level of the respondents, both architects
and non-architects (general public), using chi-square measurement can be presented as
follows:
160
Non-architects
Educational level
X2
amount
percent
amount
percent
Bachelor
115
76.70
110
73.30
Master degree
or higher
35
23.30
40
26.70
150
100
150
100
Total
1.22
(sig = 0.88)
Table 5 presents data related to the social character: educational level. The requirement
of professional degree of the architect is bachelor degree. Thus, the minimum
requirement of educational level of non-architects (general public) is also specified at
the same one. The portion of bachelor degree of the architects is slightly higher than of
non-architects. Percentage of architects and non-architects is 80.00 and 74.70
respectively. For the master degree or higher, the portion of the architects is slightly
lower than of non-architects. That is, percentage of architects and non-architects is
20.00 and 25.30 respectively.
5.1.4
The comparative analysis of the occupation of the respondents, both architects and
non-architects (general public), using chi-square measurement can be presented as
follows:
161
Architects
Non-architects
X2
amount
percent
amount
percent
Governmental
57
38.00
61
40.70
Private sector
93
62.00
89
59.30
150
100
150
100
Total
0.22
(sig = 0.43)
Table 6 presents data related to the social character: occupation. The comparison of
mean show the portion of governmental of the architects is slightly higher than of
non-architects (general public). Percentage of the architects and non-architects is 60.77
and 58.00 respectively. For private sector, the portion of the architects is slightly tower
than of non-architects. That is, percentage of the architects and non-architects is 39.30
and 42.00 respectively.
The comparative analysis using chi-square value, indicates no significant differences
in terms of occupation at the statistical significance based on an alpha of 0.05. As the
result, the social analysis reveals that occupation is under control as an extraneous
variable
5.1.5
The comparative analysis of the income of the respondents, both architects and nonarchitects (general public), using chi-square measurement can be presented as follows:
Architects
Mean
(Baht)
Std. Deviation
(SD)
21,318.07
7,924.82
1.45
(sig = 0.72)
General public
19,720.14
10,490.56
162
Table 7 presents data related to the social character: income. The comparison of
mean, the average income of the architects is slightly higher than of non- architects
(general public). The income (in baht) of the architects and non-architects is 21,318.07
and 19,720.14 respectively.
Considering t-test, p-value indicates no significant differences in terms of income
between architects and non-architects at the statistical significance based on an alpha
of 0.05. As the result, it becomes a controlled variable in independent analysis.
Summary:
The analysis uses of the statistical procedure which is fundamentally important to this
study. Controlling the variables is an essential aspect of the process and for acceptance
of the data analysis. The social variables of the respondents according to the basis of
age, gender, educational level, occupation, and income are tested by statistical
analysis. As the results, all variables can be controlled in social analysis
163
Chapter 6
Analysis of the Results
Chapter Overview
This chapter focuses on the analysis of the results, with architectural interpretation. It is
intended to search for and examine the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture in
resort contexts as set out in this study to better understand the implications of those
guidelines for future applications. Upon processing the data, the descriptive findings are
analyzed more clearly by means of case studies. In addition, related studies, previous
research, and interviews with the building users, design-architects, and leading Thai
architects are included. The data collection, which was derived using methodology
mentioned earlier, will in turn be collected in a comprehensive questionnaire. The purpose
of the questionnaire for both architects and non-architects (general public) is mainly to
investigate the perception and acceptance of architectural ideals for modern Thai character
in general and also specifically for modern Thai resorts. The analysis using statistical
method, is fundamentally important to this study. Controlling the variables is an essential
aspect of the analytical process. The social variables, which are controlled, can be
identified as follows:
Based on an alpha of 0.05, the analysis of the social characteristics of the respondents as
summarized in chapter 5 indicated no significant statistical differences.
164
architects
non-architects
Figure 90: The comparison of the opinions regarding the modern Thai characterarchitects and non-architects
The analysis of the modern Thai character covers the architectural aspects in both tangible
and intangible qualities and values, namely:
165
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.1.2
architects
non-architects
Figure 91: Comparison of opinions regarding design guidelines for modern Thai architecture in resort contexts:
attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
166
before
simulated
after
simulated
architects
non-architects
Figure 92: Comparison of opinions regarding modern Thai architecture in resort contexts using the simulatedmodels of case studies: Attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public).
before
simulated
after
simulated
architects
non-architects
Figure 93: Comparison of opinions regarding modern Thai architecture in resort contexts using the simulatedmodels of case studies: Attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public).
167
The data collected from the questionnaires needs to be analyzed and interpreted on the
basis of the level of agreement. Upon processing the data, statistical methods are used to
test and compare the opinions of the respondents. Different levels of opinion are coded
statistically as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
=
=
=
=
=
strongly disagree
somewhat disagree
neutral
somewhat agree
strongly agree
The attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public) towards the Thai character
on the basis of building organization and grouping:
Figure 94: Building organization and grouping: Semi-enclosed space with chan (a central terrace)
168
169
170
Table 8:
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of building organization and grouping.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
3.92
0.61
(1)
3.94
0.73
(3)
3.09
0.59
(3)
3.97
0.69
(2)
2.89
3.83
2.81
-0.26
(sig = 0.79)
-11.88*
(sig = 0.00)
0.59
(4)
3.32
0.98
(4)
-4.55*
(sig = 0.00)
0.58
(2)
3.99
0.65
(1)
-2.16*
(sig = 0.03)
0.48
(5)
3.17
0.85
(5)
-4.41*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 8 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of building organization and grouping.
The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) semi-enclosed space with
chan (a central terrace) (mean rating of 3.92), (2) uncovered elevated walkway (mean
rating of 3.83), (3) uncovered walkway, (4) covered-walkway, and (5) covered elevated
walkway.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of building organization and grouping. The significant
concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) uncovered elevated walkway (mean rating
171
of 3.99), (2) uncovered walkway (mean rating of 3.97), (3) semi-enclosed space with chan
(a central terrace), (4) covered-walkway, and (5) covered elevated walkway.
The semi-enclosed space with chan (a central terrace) is relevant to the resort architecture
in that the central terrace (chan) represents a characteristic of Thai architecture which can
often provide the largest uninterrupted space for the whole complex. It is multi-purpose
and accessible from the surrounding units. Architecturally, designers can also integrate its
character to modern Thai architecture in resort designs as well as the tourism development
in a global context. This result also relates to traditional Thai architecture in that the
terrace performs as a multi-purpose open area for relaxing, receiving visitors, organizing
traditional functions like the top-knot cutting ceremony, merit making, offering food to
monks and weddings (Chaichongrak et al, 2002:52). The lifestyle and climatic conditions
give rise to a high demand for outdoor living. Spaces for functions such as living,
sleeping, dining, etc. are organized around the open terrace called chan connected by
means of a roofed verandah. The verandah becomes an intermediate space between indoor
living and the terrace, thus creating an indoor-outdoor relationship. It should be pointed
out that the heart of Thai house is its terrace because it forms the spatial organizing core
for the entire dwelling (Horayangkura, 2000: 23).
Figure 99: Traditional Thai house with chan and tree (line-drawing by the author).
172
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05.
The p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond
with no significant difference on the issue of semi-enclosed space with chan (a central
terrace) (t = 0.26).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences are:
(1) uncovered walkway (t = -11.88), (2) covered-walkway (t = -4.55), (3) uncovered
elevated walkway (t = 2.16), and (4) covered elevated walkway (t = -4.41). For the
analysis above, the architects respond with a lower rating.
The architects generally agree that the semi-enclosed space with chan (a central terrace)
indicates the highest degree of the modern Thai character and consider it as the most
significant element. The uncovered elevated walkway was also seen as representing a
high degree of the modern Thai character by the architects while non-architects generally
agree that the uncovered elevated walkway indicates the highest degree of the modern
Thai character and consider it as the most significant element. The uncovered walkway
was also seen as representing a high degree of the modern Thai character by the nonarchitects.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
173
Table 9:
Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of building
organization and grouping.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
4.35
0.76
(3)
4.02
0.62
(3)
2.95
4.43
4.47
2.89
4.09*
(Sig = 0.00)
0.52
(4)
3.21
0.92
(5)
-3.00*
(sig = 0.01)
0.78
(2)
4.09
0.74
(2)
3.89*
(sig = 0.00)
0.85
(1)
4.46
0.72
(1)
-0.07
(sig = 0.94)
0.53
(5)
3.50
0.99
(4)
-6.58*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 9 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of building
organization and grouping. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively:
(1) uncovered elevated walkway (mean rating of 4.47), (2) covered-walkway (mean rating
of 4.43), (3) semi-enclosed space with chan (a central terrace), (4) uncovered walkway,
and (5) covered elevated walkway.
Non-architects (general public) also generally agree on the significant issues of the
importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of building organization and
174
Figure 100: The raft-house arrangement in which three separate houses sit on the same platform and also are connected
by the walkway bridge (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 42).
By interviewing, the design-architects mention that for the design of resorts uncovered
elevated walkways are more appropriated than covered ones. They state that the design
constraints include the existing conditions such as the contour, planting, and natural
drainage system.
175
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond no
significant difference on the issue of uncovered elevated walkway (t = -0.07).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences are:
(1) semi-enclosed space with chan (a central terrace) (t = 4.09), (2) uncovered walkway (t
= -3.00), (3) covered-walkway (t = 3.89), and (4) covered elevated walkway (t = 6.58).
Summary on the importance for resort architecture and designs: Organization and
grouping
Both architects and non-architects (general public) generally agree that the uncovered
elevated walkway indicates the highest degree of the importance for resort architecture.
They also consider it as the most significant element for the designs. The covered
walkway was also seen as representing a high degree of the importance for resort
architecture and designs.
Architects and non-architects (general public) respond with no significant difference on
the issue of uncovered elevated walkway. In contrast, they respond with significant
differences in the areas of: (1) semi-enclosed space with chan (a central terrace), (2)
uncovered walkway, (3) covered-walkway, and (4) covered elevated walkway.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Architectural Elements
The attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public) towards the Thai character
on the basis of architectural elements:
176
Table 10: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsroofs and roofing.
Architects
Non-architects
t
mean
1. Roof profiles
(e.g., gable roof,
Manila brano, etc.)
3.91
2. Stepped and
multi-tiered roofs
3.87
3.93
SD
rank
0.70
(3)
mean
SD
4.41
0.83
rank
(1)
(p-value)
5.66*
(sig = 0.00)
0.71
(4)
3.16
0.86
(5)
7.68*
(sig = 0.00)
0.68
(2)
3.17
0.88
(4)
8.54*
(sig = 0.00)
4.44
0.67
(1)
3.91
0.71
(3)
6.59*
(sig = 0.00)
2.85
0.43
(6)
3.15
0.87
(6)
-3.76*
(sig = 0.00)
2.86
0.44
(5)
4.40
0.84
(2)
-23.20*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 10 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsroofs and
roofing. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) roofs and their
overhangs (mean rating of 4.44), (2) roofs and their slopes (mean rating of 3.93), (3) roof
profiles, (4) stepped and multi-tiered roofs, (5) roof and a sense of gracefulness, and (6)
materials and colors.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsroofs and roofing. The
177
significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) roof profiles (mean rating of
4.41), (2) roof and a sense of gracefulness (mean rating of 4.40), (3) roofs and their
overhangs, (4) roofs and their slopes, (5) stepped and multi-tiered, and (6) materials and
colors.
The roofs and their overhangs are relevant to the resort architecture in that overhangs
(kansart )represent the characteristic of Thai architecture. A kansart is a low-hanging roof,
projecting on sides of the house at a lower level and with a less inclined slope than the
main roof. It provides further protection from the tropical sun and rain (Chaichongrak et
al, 2002: 84).
The steep roof with its long overhangs or kansart, helps protect the inner room from the
heavy rains that come regularly for three or four months out of the year (Warren, 1998:
55).
Nukool Chompunitch states that the protective elements of Thai house is its long
overhangs which are the integrated solution of Thai wisdom in Thai architecture. It is also
an appropriate design for tropical architecture as well as helping to define an architectural
identity (Chompunitch, 1987: 81).
In contrast, the steep roof with short overhangs is mostly found in the formal architecture
in the periods of Sukhothai and Auytthaya. Generally, architectural elements, such as cave
brackets, are not used as supports for the lower edges of overhangs; they directly extend
from the wall or the post of the covered verandah (Veerataveemas, 1996: 101).
Figure 101: A roof with long overhangs (Chaichongrak et al, 2003: 234).
In addition, the issue on the basis of architectural elementsroofs and roofing in terms
of roofs and their slopes are also relevant to the traditional Thai architecture in that the
178
principal characteristic of Thai architecture in terms of roof and its identity is the highpitched roof, with more slope than 45 (Chompunich, 1987:38).
Figure 102: High- pitched roofs are covered with terra cotta tiles (Chaichongrak et al, 2003: 25).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that the areas in which architects and nonarchitects respond with significant differences are: (1) roof profiles (t = 5.66), (2) stepped
and multi-tiered roofs (t = 7.68), (3) roofs and their slopes (t = 8.54), (4) roofs and their
overhangs (t = 6.59), (5) materials and colors (t = -3.76), and (6) roof and a sense of
gracefulness (t = -23.20).
Summary on modern Thai character in tangible qualities and values: architectural
elementsroofs and roofing.
The architects generally agree that the roofs and their overhangs indicate the highest
degree of the modern Thai character and consider them as the most significant element.
The roofs and their slopes were also seen as representing a high degree of the modern
Thai character by the architects while non-architects generally agree that the roof profiles
indicate the highest degree of the modern Thai character and consider them as the most
significant element. Roof and a sense of gracefulness was also seen as representing a
high degree of the modern Thai character by the non-architects.
Architects and non-architects (general public) respond with significant difference in all
the areas, they are: (1) roof profiles, (2) stepped and multi-tiered roofs, (3) roofs and their
179
slopes, (4) roofs and their overhangs, (5) materials and colors, and (6) roof and a sense of
gracefulness.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Table 11: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements roofs and roofing.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
1. Roof profiles
(e.g., gable roof,
Manila brano, etc.)
4.44
2. Stepped and
multi-tiered roofs
2.93
2.93
SD
rank
mean
SD
(2)
4.37
0.82
0.79
rank
(2)
0.78
(sig = 0.43)
0.57
(4)
3.15
0.87
(6)
-2.67*
(sig = 0.01)
0.55
(3)
3.16
0.87
(5)
-2.70*
(sig = 0.01)
4.45
0.67
(1)
4.01
0.63
(3)
5.86*
(sig = 0.00)
3.88
0.68
(5)
3.26
0.90
(4)
6.75*
(sig = 0.00)
2.85
0.44
(6)
4.40
0.84
(1)
-19.92*
(sig = 0.00)
180
The mean rating in table 11 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elementsroofs and roofing. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively:
(1) roofs and their overhangs (mean rating of 4.45), (2) roof profiles (mean rating of 4.44),
(3) roofs and their slopes, (4) stepped and multi-tiered roofs, (5) materials and colors, and
(6) roof and a sense of gracefulness.
Non-architects (general public) also generally agree on the significant issues of the
importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural elements
roofs and roofing. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) roof
and a sense of gracefulness (mean rating of), (2) roof profiles (mean rating of), (3) roofs
and their overhangs, (4) materials and colors, (5) roofs and their slopes, and (6) stepped
and multi-tiered roofs.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
no significant difference on the issue of roof profiles (t = 0.78).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences are:
(1) stepped and multi-tiered roofs (t = -2.67), (2) roofs and their slopes (t = -2.70), (3)
roofs and their overhangs (t = 5.86), (4) materials and colors (t = 6.75), and (5) roof and a
sense of gracefulness(t = -19.92).
Non-architects (general public) generally agree that the roof and a sense of
gracefulness indicates the highest degree of the importance for resort architecture.
They also consider it as the most significant element for the designs. The roof profiles
were also seen as representing a high degree of the importance for resort architecture and
designs as well as the opinion of the architects.
Architects and non-architects (general public) respond with no significant difference on
the issue of the roof profiles. In contras, they respond with significant differences in the
181
areas of: (1) stepped and multi-tiered roofs, (2) roofs and their slopes, (3) roofs and their
overhangs, (4) materials and colors, and (5) roof and a sense of gracefulness.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
palai
chan
Figure 103: Building and connecting space with chan (a central terrace) and palai (covered verandah)
182
lan-long
Figure 104: Building and connecting space with lan- long (open space)
Table 12: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsconnecting spaces.
Architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
4.42
0.76
3.93
Non-architects
rank
mean
SD
(1)
3.92
0.56
rank
(1)
6.47*
(sig = 0.00)
0.63
(2)
3.89
0.63
(2)
0.55
(sig = 0.59)
2.85
0.44
(3)
2.81
0.53
(3)
0.00
(sig = 0.41)
183
The mean rating in table 12 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the significant issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of
architectural elementsconnecting spaces. The significant concerns of their responses
are respectively: (1) connecting space with chan (a central terrace) (mean rating of 4.42 and
3.92), (2) connecting space with palai (covered verandah) (mean rating of 3.93 and 3.89),
and (3) connecting space with lan- long (open space).
The connecting space with chan (a central terrace) is relevant to the traditional Thai
architecture in that normally the central chan (terrace) of a ruen khahabodi is very large
and is designed in such a way that it blends into the natural surroundings around the
house. Typically balustraded chan take up almost 40 percent of the total floor area. If the
verandah space is included with the terrace, the ratio of total outdoor area into indoor area
will increase 60 percent to 40 percent. Such an emphasis on outdoor space is an obvious
architectural response to the prevailing hot and humid climate (Chaichongrak et al,
2002:39).
Figure 105:
Some terraces are extremely spacious and were therefore used for
special events and ceremonies (Chaichongrak et al, 2003: 52).
184
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference on the issue of connecting space with chan (a central terrace) (t =
6.47).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences
are: (1) connecting space with palai (covered verandah) (t = 0.55), and (2) connecting space
with lan- long (open space) (t = 0.00). For the analysis above, the architects respond with a
higher rating.
The architects and non-architects generally agree that connecting space with chan (a
central terrace) indicates the highest degree of modern Thai character and consider it as the
most significant element. The connecting space with palai (covered verandah) was also
seen as representing a high degree of modern Thai character.
Architects and non-architects (general public) respond with significant difference on the
issue of connecting space with chan (a central terrace). In contrast, they respond with no
significant difference in the areas of: connecting space with palai (covered verandah), and
connecting space with lan- long (open space).
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
185
Table 13: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements connecting spaces.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
3.94
2.95
3.94
SD
rank
mean
SD
(2)
4.41
0.82
0.64
rank
(1)
-5.58*
(sig = 0.00)
0.52
(3)
3.98
0.64
(2)
-15.23*
(sig = 0.00)
0.63
(1)
3.95
0.73
(3)
0.00
(sig = 1.00)
The mean rating in table 13 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elementsconnecting spaces. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively:
(1) connecting space with lan- long (open space) (mean rating of 3.94), (2) connecting
space with chan (a central terrace) (mean rating of 3.94), and (3) connecting space with
palai (covered verandah).
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the importance
for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural elementsconnecting
spaces. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) connecting space
with chan (a central terrace) (mean rating of 4.41), (2) connecting space with palai (covered
verandah) (mean rating of 3.98), and (3) connecting space with lan- long (open space).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects (general
pubic) respond with significant difference in the areas of the connecting space with chan
(a central terrace) (t = -5.58), and the connecting space with palai (covered verandah) (t = 15.23). In contrast, they respond with no significant differences in the area of the
186
connecting space with lan- long (open space) (t = 0.00). For the analysis above, the
architects respond with a lower rating.
.
Summary on the importance for resort architecture and designs: Architectural
elementsconnecting spaces
Architects generally agree that the connecting space with lan- long (open spaces)
indicates the highest degree of the importance for resort architecture. They also consider it
as the most significant element for their designs. The connecting space with chan (a
central terrace) was also seen as representing a high degree of the importance for resort
architecture and designs.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree that the connecting space with chan (a
central terrace) indicates the highest degree of the importance for resort architecture. They
also consider it as the most significant element for the designs. The connecting space
with palai (covered verandah) was also seen as representing a high degree of the
importance for resort architecture and designs.
Architects and non-architects (general pubic) respond with significant difference in the
areas of the connecting space with chan (a central terrace) and the connecting space with
palai (covered verandah). In contrast, they respond with no significant differences in the
area of the connecting space with lan- long (open space). For the analysis above, the
architects respond with a lower rating.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
187
Table 14: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsfloors and flooring.
Architects
Non-architects
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
3.91
0.65
(1)
3.16
0.86
(2)
t
(p-value)
8.58*
(sig = 0.00)
2.93
0.54
(2)
3.18
0.83
(1)
-3.04*
(sig = 0.01)
The mean rating in table 14 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsfloors and
flooring. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) floors and patterns
(mean rating of 3.91) and (2) flooring and materials (mean rating of 2.93).
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsfloors and flooring. The
significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) flooring and materials (mean
rating of 3.18) and (2) floors and patterns (mean rating of 3.16).
The floors and flooring are relevant to the resort architecture in that the floor represents
the architectural element of traditional Thai house which is made of 5 x 40 -50 cm teak
boards laid on a tong or rawd. They are joined by one cm. diameter wooden dowels at
1.00-2.00m intervals. Terrace floorboards are widely spaced with one-cm gaps for
rainwater drainage in order to prevent the floor from rotting (Chaichongrak et al, 2002:
83). Terrace cotta floor tiles are a formal way of covering floors in Thai architecture.
Usually they are characterized by their distinctive shapes and patterns, such as krabueng
na-wao, which follows a large square-shape (Saksri, 2003: 129).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference in the areas of: floors and patterns (t = 8.58) and flooring and
materials (t = -3.04)
188
Architects
mean
2.85
SD
Non-architects
rank
mean
SD
(2)
3.15
0.87
0.43
rank
(2)
t
(p-value)
-3.69*
(sig = 0.00)
3.95
0.62
(1)
3.17
0.84
(1)
9.10*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 15 reveals that architects and non-architects (general pubic)
generally agree on the significant issues of the importance for resort architecture and
designs on the basis of architectural elementsfloors and flooring. The significant
concerns of the architects and non-architects are respectively: (1) flooring and materials
(mean rating of 3.95 and 3.17) and (2) floors and patterns (mean rating of 2.85 and 3.15).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference in both the areas of floors and patterns (t = -3.69) and flooring and
materials (t = 9.10).
189
Table 16: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementswall panels.
Architects
mean
4.47
3.95
SD
Non-architects
rank
0.67
(1)
mean
3.93
SD
0.62
rank
(3)
t
(p-value)
7.23*
(sig = 0.00)
0.63
(3)
3.13
0.86
(6)
9.39*
(sig = 0.00)
2.87
0.42
(6)
3.16
0.86
(5)
-3.74*
(sig = 0.00)
4.45
0.67
(2)
4.38
0.83
(1)
0.76
(sig = 0.45)
3.93
2.87
0.63
(4)
3.89
0.63
(4)
0.64
(sig = 0.52)
0.41
(5)
3.99
0.57
(2)
-19.54*
(sig = 0.00)
190
The mean rating in table 16 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementswall panels.
The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) wall panels and character
(mean rating of 4.47), (2) ventilating panel (mean rating of 4.45), (3) solid panels, (4) wall
panels and patterns, (5) wall panels and materials, and (6) glass panels.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of architectural elementswall panels. The significant
concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) ventilating panel (mean rating of 4.38), (2)
wall panels and materials (mean rating of 3.99), (3) wall panels and character, (4) wall
panels and patterns, (5) glass panels, and (6) solid panels.
The wall panels and character are relevant to resort architecture in that fa (wall panel)
represents a characteristic of Thai architecture. The word fa refers to a variety of wall
coverings made of panels of timber, palm leaves and bamboo fastened to hardwood or
bamboo frames. They enclose the interior space of the house and partition it into different
sections. Wall panels on the front elevation of the house are called fa ud naklong or fa
humklong (cross panel) while partitions between the bedroom the open hall are called fa
prajan hong (room panels). There are many types of wall panels, but the main ones are fa
pakon (wooden panels), fa loog fak (wood panels with a raised centre), fa look fak kradarn
jiad, fa sai bua (slatted wooden panels), fa samruad (with woven split bamboo), fa khat
thae (bamboo panels) and fa kradarn riab (simple wooden boards) (Chaichongrak et al,
2002: 83).
In additions, ventilating panel is relevant to the traditional Thai architecture in that fa-lai
(ventilating panels) the side walls of the toen have moveable louver-like panel, called fa
lai, to provide ventilation. These are 0.80-1.20 m high and consist of two panels with
vertical slats set in the grooves of frame. When slid one way, the spaces align and air can
flow through; when slid the other way, the slats alternate with each other way, the slats
alternate with each other and the openings are closed (Chaichongrak et al,, 2002: 140).
191
Figure 106: Detail showing the sliding panel or fa-lai (ventilating panel) (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 139).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference in the areas of: (1) wall panels and character (t = 7.23), (2) solid
panels (t = 9.39), (3) glass panels (t = -3.74), and (4) wall panels and materials (t =
-19.54).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences
are: (1) ventilating panel (t = 0.76) and (2) wall panels and patterns (t = 0.64). For the
analysis above, the architects respond with a higher rating.
Summary on modern Thai character in tangible qualities and values: Architectural
elementswall panels
The architects generally agree that wall panels and character indicate the highest degree
of the modern Thai character and consider them as the most significant element. The
ventilating panel was also seen as representing a high degree of the modern Thai
character by the architects while non-architects generally agree that ventilating panel
indicates the highest degree of the modern Thai character and considered it as the most
significant element. The wall panels and materials were also seen as representing a high
degree of the modern Thai character by the non-architects.
Architects and non-architects (general public) respond with no significant difference in
the areas of: ventilating panel and wall panels and patterns. In contrast, they respond
with significant difference in the areas of: (1) wall panels and character, (2) solid panels,
(3) glass panels, and (4) wall panels and materials.
192
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Table 17: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements wall panels.
Architects
mean
3.94
2.93
SD
0.62
Non-architects
rank
(3)
mean
3.98
SD
0.68
rank
(3)
t
(p-value)
-0.59
(sig = 0.59)
0.55
(6)
3.17
0.81
(6)
-2.90*
(0.01)
4.45
0.66
(2)
3.91
0.54
(5)
7.79*
(sig = 0.00)
4.46
0.65
(1)
4.02
0.62
(2)
5.86*
(sig = 0.00)
3.93
3.92
0.63
(4)
3.96
0.61
(4)
-0.37
(sig = 0.71)
0.62
(5)
4.03
0.61
(1)
-1.46
(sig = 0.13)
The mean rating in table 17 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elementswall panels. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1)
ventilating panel (mean rating of 4.46), (2) glass panels (mean rating of 4.45), (3) wall
panels and character, (4) wall panels and patterns, (5) wall panels and materials, and (6)
solid panels.
193
Non-architects (general public) also generally agree on the significant issues of the
importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural elements
wall panels. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) wall panels
and materials (mean rating of 4.03) (2) ventilating panel (mean rating of 4.02), (3) wall
panels and character, (4) wall panels and patterns, (5) glass panels, and (6) solid panels.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
no significant difference in the areas of: (1) wall panels and character (t = -0.59), (2) wall
panels and patterns (t = -0.37), and (3) wall panels and materials (t = -1.46).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences are:
(1) solid panels (t = -2.90), (2) glass panels (t = 7.79), and (3) ventilating panel (t = 5.86).
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
194
Table 18: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsopenings and voids.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
1.The characteristics of
openings and voids
(e.g., awnings, folding
doors and windows,
sliding doors and
windows, etc.)
3.92
3.94
3.95
SD
0.62
rank
mean
SD
rank
(3)
4.01
0.56
(1)
-1.35
(sig = 0.18)
0.64
(2)
3.99
0.59
(3)
-0.74
(sig = 0.45)
0.62
(1)
3.99
0.56
(2)
-058
(sig = 0.56)
The mean rating in table 18 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsopenings
and voids. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) the materials
used for openings and voids (mean rating of 3.95), (2) the proportion and the arrangement
of openings and voids (mean rating of 3.92), (3) the characteristics of openings and voids.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsopenings and voids. The
significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) the characteristics of openings
and voids (mean rating of 4.01), (2) the materials used for openings and voids (mean
rating of 3.99), and (3) the proportion and the arrangement of openings and voids.
195
Figure 107: The differing styles of door of traditional Thai architecture (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 89).
The materials used for openings and voids are relevant to the traditional Thai
architecture in that nathang (windows) of the traditional. Thai house, these openings are
cut into the wall panels to provide light and air and are opened and closed with wooden
panels (Chaichongrak et al, 2003: 90).
196
The windows and doors of Lan na house open inward, with their frame on outside. They
are closed with a single panel, unlike those in the central Thai house, which always have
pairs of panels.
Considering statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05, the
p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with no
significant difference in the areas of: (1) the characteristics of openings and voids (t = 1.35), (2) the proportion and the arrangement of openings and voids (t = -0.74), and (3) the
materials used for openings and voids (t = -0.58). For the analysis above, the architects
respond with a lower rating.
The architects generally agree that the materials used for openings and voids indicate
the highest degree of the modern Thai character and consider them as the most significant
element. The proportion and the arrangement of openings and voids were also seen as
representing a high degree of the modern Thai character by the architects while nonarchitects generally agree that the characteristics of openings and voids indicate the
highest degree of the modern Thai character and consider them as the most significant
element. The materials used for openings and voids were also seen as representing a
high degree of modern Thai character by the non-architects.
197
Table 19: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements openings and voids.
Architects
mean
1.The characteristics of
openings and voids
(e.g., awnings, folding
doors and windows,
sliding doors and
windows, etc.)
4.48
3.93
2.95
SD
0.65
Non-architects
rank
(1)
mean
3.93
SD
0.51
rank
(3)
t
(p-value)
8.20*
(sig = 0.00)
0.68
(2)
3.95
0.59
(2)
-0.36
(sig = 0.71)
0.52
(3)
4.05
0.58
(1)
-17.10*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 19 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elementsopenings and voids. The significant concerns of the architects are
respectively: (1) the characteristics of openings and voids (mean rating of 4.48), (2) the
proportion and the arrangement of openings and voids (mean rating of 3.93), and (3) the
materials used for openings and voids.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the importance
for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural elementsopenings and
voids. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) the materials used
for openings and voids (mean rating of 4.05), (2) the proportion and the arrangement of
openings and voids (mean rating of 3.95), and (3) the characteristics of openings and
voids.
.
198
The characteristics of openings and voids are relevant to the resort designs in that the
traditional Asian dwellings, indoor and outdoor living spaces of resort architecture often
overlap. Sliding doors open onto private gardens, swimming pool and jacuzzi. At each
resort, guests have their own special place to contemplate the natural beauty around them
(Ettensperger, 200: 28).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference in the areas of: (1) the characteristics of openings and voids (t =
8.20) and (2) the materials used for openings and voids (t = -17.10).
In contrast, architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences in the
area of the proportion and the arrangement of openings and voids (t = -0.36).
Summary on the importance for resort architecture and designs: Architectural
elementsopenings and voids
Architects generally agree that the characteristics of openings and voids indicate the
highest degree of the importance for resort architecture. They also consider them as the
most significant element for their designs. The proportion and the arrangement of
openings and voids were also seen as representing a high degree of the importance for
resort architecture and designs.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree that the materials used for openings and
voids indicate the highest degree of the importance for resort architecture. They also
consider them as the most significant element for the designs. The proportion and the
arrangement of openings and voids were also seen as representing a high degree of the
importance for resort architecture and designs.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
199
Figure 111: Sao-Loy with square-bases and tops and with buoshaped or lotus-shaped capitals
200
Table 20: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsfree-standing posts
and columns.
Architects
Non-architects
mean
SD
rank
mean
4.46
0.70
(1)
3.99
2.85
3. Sao-Loy with
indented-corners
3.94
3.91
SD
0.60
rank
(3)
t
(p-value)
6.27*
(sig = 0.00)
0.43
(4)
3.19
0.82
(4)
-4.38*
(sig = 0.00)
0.64
(2)
4.01
0.56
(2)
-1.04
(sig = 0.29)
0.64
(3)
4.49
0.74
(1)
-7.11*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 20 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsfreestanding posts and columns. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively:
(1) sao-loy with round-shaped profile (mean rating of 4.46), (2) sao-loy with indentedcorners (mean rating of 3.94), (3) sao-loy with square-bases and tops and with buo-shaped
or lotus-shaped capitals, and (4) sao-loy with square-shaped profile.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsfree-standing posts and
columns. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) sao-loy with
square-bases and tops and with buo-shaped or lotus-shaped capitals (mean rating of 4.49),
201
(2) sao-loy with indented-corners (mean rating of 4.01), and (3) sao-loy with roundshaped profile.
Sao-Loy with round-shaped profile is relevant to the traditional Thai architecture in that
traditional Thai houses are particularly characterized by the use of stilts. These dwellings
evoke a sense of weightlessness and floatation. They also make full use of the tectonic
expressivity of timber (Beng, 1996:52).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference in the areas of: (1) sao-loy with round-shaped profile (t = 6.27), (2)
sao-loy with square-shaped profile (t = -4.38), and (3) sao-loy with square-bases and tops
and with buo-shaped or lotus-shaped capitals (t = -7.11).
202
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Table 21: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements free-standing posts and columns.
Architects
mean
4.43
2.85
3. Sao-Loy with
indented-corners
2.86
3.92
SD
0.72
Non-architects
rank
mean
(1)
4.01
SD
0.56
rank
(2)
t
(p-value)
5.49*
(sig = 0.00)
0.46
(4)
3.18
0.82
(4)
-4.31*
(sig = 0.00)
0.41
(3)
3.98
0.57
(3)
-19.33*
(sig = 0.00)
0.70
(2)
4.43
0.77
(1)
-6.03*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 21 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elementsfree-standing posts and columns. The significant concerns of the architects
are respectively: (1) sao-loy with round-shaped profile (mean rating of 4.43), (2) sao-loy
with square-bases and tops and with buo-shaped or lotus-shaped capitals (mean rating of
3.92), (3) sao-loy with indented-corners, and (4) sao-loy with square-shaped profile.
203
Non-architects (general public) also generally agree on the significant issues of the
importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural elements
free-standing posts and columns. The significant concerns of non-architects are
respectively: (1) sao-loy with square-bases and tops and with buo-shaped or lotus-shaped
capitals (mean rating of 4.43), (2) sao-loy with round-shaped profile (mean rating of 4.01),
(3) sao-loy with indented-corners, and (4) sao-loy with square-shaped profile.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that the areas in which architects and nonarchitects respond with significant differences are: (1) sao-loy with round-shaped profile
(t = 5.49), (2) sao-loy with square-shaped profile (t = -4.31), (3) sao-loy with indentedcorners (t = -19.33), and (4) sao-loy with square-bases and tops and with buo-shaped or
lotus-shaped capitals (t = -6.03).
Summary on the importance for resort architecture and designs: Architectural
elementsfree-standing posts and columns
Architects generally agree that sao-loy with round-shaped profile indicates the highest
degree of the importance for resort architecture. They also consider it as the most
significant element for their design. Sao-loy with square-bases and tops and with buoshaped or lotus-shaped capitals was also seen as representing a high degree of the
importance for resort architecture and designs.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree that sao-loy with square-bases and tops
and with buo-shaped or lotus-shaped capitals indicates the highest degree of the
importance for resort architecture. They also consider it as the most significant element.
Sao-loy with round-shaped profile was also seen as representing a high degree of the
importance for resort architecture and designs.
Architects and non-architects (general public) respond with significant differences in all
the areas of the free-standing posts and columns.
204
Table 22: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of architectural elementsbrackets.
Architects
mean
SD
4.45
0.68
Non-architects
rank mean
(1)
4.43
SD
0.77
rank
(1)
t
(p-value)
0.24
(sig = 0.81)
2. Building without
brackets
2.87
0.41
(2)
3.17
0.84
(2)
-3.90*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 22 reveals that the architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree that the building with brackets is more appropriate for modern Thai
character than the lacking one.
205
The building with brackets is relevant to the traditional Thai architecture in that eave
brackets, the supporting elements for the lower edges of roof on temples, royal palaces or
traditional Thai houses, appear in a variety of forms. Most commonly they in corporate
floral designs of creatures, both cased on mythological animals or realistic ones (Warren,
1988: 222).
.
Figure 114: Eave brackets, architectural element in tangible value (Warren, 1988: 222).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
no significant difference on the building with brackets, the architects respond with a
higher rating (t = 0.24).
206
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Table 23: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elementsbrackets.
Architects
mean
3.95
SD
Non-architects
rank
mean
SD
(1)
4.43
0.75
0.63
rank
(1)
t
(p-value)
-6.05*
(sig = 0.00)
2. Building without
brackets
2.85
0.43
(2)
3.17
0.82
(2)
-4.19*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 23 reveals that the architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree that the building with brackets is more important for resort architecture
and designs than the lacking one.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
207
significant difference on both the building with brackets and the lacking one. Architects
respond with a lower rating (t = -6.05and -4.19).
mean
SD
rank
4.47
0.70
(1)
Architects
Non-architects
mean
4.02
SD
0.61
rank
(1)
t
(p-value)
5.85*
(sig = 0.00)
2. Materials used
3.94
0.66
(2)
4.00
0.56
(2)
-0.84
(sig = 0.40)
3. Height and
proportion
3.90
0.64
(3)
3.98
0.58
(3)
-1.12
(sig = 0.26)
The mean rating in table 24 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the significant issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of
architectural elementshandrails and balusters. The significant concerns of the
architects and non-architects are respectively: (1) character and patterns (mean rating of
4.47 and 4.02), (2) materials used (mean rating of 3.94 and 4.00), and (3) height and
proportion.
208
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference on the issue of character and patterns, architects respond with a
higher rating (t = 5.85).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences
are: (1) materials used (t = -0.84), and (2) height and proportion (t = -1.12).
209
Table 25: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of architectural
elements handrails and balusters.
Modern Thai
Architects
character
in terms of tangible
mean
SD
rank
qualities and values:
Architectural
elementshandrails
and balusters
1. Character and
patterns
3.93
2. Materials used
3.89
0.65
(2)
Non-architects
mean
3.97
SD
0.62
rank
(2)
t
(p-value)
-0.54
(sig = 0.58)
0.64
(3)
3.99
0.59
(1)
-1.31
(sig = 0.19)
3. Height and
proportion
4.44
0.67
(1)
3.90
0.50
(3)
7.89*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 25 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of elements
handrails and balusters. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1)
height and proportion (mean rating of 4.44), (2) character and patterns (mean rating of
3.93), and (3) materials used.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the importance
for resort architecture and designs on the basis of elementshandrails and balusters.
The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) materials used (mean
rating of 3.99), (2) character and patterns (mean rating of 3.97), and (3) height and
proportion.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference on the issue of height and proportion, architects respond with a
higher rating (t = 7.89).
In contrast, the areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant
differences are: (1) character and patterns (t = -0.54) and (2) materials used (t = -1.31).
210
Landscape
211
212
Table 26: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of landscapetree locations.
Architects
mean
4.44
3.95
2.87
SD
Non-architects
rank
mean
(1)
3.99
0.69
SD
0.57
rank
(2)
t
(p-value)
6.10*
(sig = 0.00)
0.62
(2)
4.00
0.57
(1)
-0.77
(sig = 0.44)
0.41
(3)
3.21
0.80
(3)
-4.60*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 26 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of landscapetree locations. The
significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) tree at the center of open space
(mean rating of 4.44), (2) trees adjacent to the building (mean rating of 3.95), and (3) trees
not adjacent to the building.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of landscapetree locations. The significant concerns of
non-architects are respectively: (1) trees adjacent to the building (mean rating of 4.00), (2)
tree at the center of open space (mean rating of 3.99), and (3) trees not adjacent to the
building.
A tree at the center of open space is relevant to the resort architecture in that the central
terrace represents a characteristic of Thai architecture, the various units of a clustered
house are formed around a central terrace or chan. Open space and low balustrades
between the houses allow a continuous flow of space. Sometimes large trees are planted in
an opening in the middle of the terrace to provide shade and introduce a natural element.
Popular trees for this purpose are chan, champa, champee, jackfruit, and mango. Other
corners of the terrace are reserved for decorative plants like bon (Caladieum), wan
(various sedges and herbs), koson (Codiaeum variegatum), tako dat (trained Dyosparons),
and water lilies (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 56).
213
Figure 118: Traditional Thai house with chan and tree (line-drawing by the author).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference in the areas of: (1) tree at the center of open space (t = 6.10), and
(2) trees not adjacent to the building (t = -4.60).
214
tree at the center of open space was also seen as representing a high degree of modern
Thai character by the non-architects.
Architects and non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of: tree at
the center of open space, and trees not adjacent to the building. In contrast, architects and
non-architects respond with no significant differences in the area of trees adjacent to the
building, architects respond with a lower rating.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Table 27: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of landscape tree
locations.
Architects
mean
4.47
3.94
2.87
SD
Non-architects
rank
mean
SD
(1)
3.97
0.59
0.65
rank
(1)
t
(p-value)
6.94*
(sig = 0.00)
0.62
(2)
3.94
0.64
(2)
0.00
(sig = 1.00)
0.41
(3)
3.19
0.83
(3)
-4.19*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 27 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the significant issues of the importance for resort architecture and
designs on the basis of landscapetree location. The significant concerns of the
architects and non-architects are respectively: (1) tree at the center of open space (mean
rating of 4.47and 3.97), (2) trees adjacent to the building (mean rating of 3.94 and 3.94),
and (3) trees not adjacent to the building.
215
Considering statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05, the
p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference in the areas of: (1) tree at the center of open space (t = 6.94), and
(2) trees not adjacent to the building (t = -4.19).
In contrast, architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences in the
area of trees adjacent to the building (t = 0.00).
Summary on the importance for resort architecture and designs: Landscapetree
locations
Architects and non-architects generally agree that a tree at the center of open space
indicates the highest degree of the importance for resort architecture. They also consider it
as the most significant element for the designs. Trees adjacent to the building were also
seen as representing a high degree of the importance for resort architecture and designs.
Architects and non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of: tree at
the center of open space, and trees not adjacent to the building. In contrast, architects and
non-architects respond with no significant differences in the area of trees adjacent to the
building.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
216
Table 28: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of landscapewaterscape.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
3.95
0.62
4.46
rank
mean
(2)
4.00
SD
0.61
rank
(2)
-0.65
(sig = 0.51)
0.66
(1)
4.45
0.75
(1)
0.08
(sig = 0.93)
217
The mean rating in table 28 reveals that the architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the building raised on stilts over the water feature is more
appropriate for modern Thai character than the building adjacent to the water feature.
The building raised on stilts over the water feature is relevant to the traditional Thai
architecture in that traditional Thai houses are particularly characterized by the use of
stilts. These dwellings evoke a sense of weightlessness and floatation. They also make full
use of the tectonic expressivity of timber (Beng, 1996:52).
Figure 121: Traditional Thai structures are built over water bodies (Beng, 1996: 83).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
no significant difference in the areas of: (1) building adjacent to the water feature,
architects respond with a lower rating (t = -0.65) and (2) building raised on stilts over the
water feature, architects respond with a higher rating (t = 0.08).
218
Table 29: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of landscape
waterscape.
Architects
mean
1. Building adjacent to
the water feature
3.93
2. Building raised on
stilts over the water
feature
3.94
SD
0.62
Non-architects
rank
mean
SD
(2)
4.02
0.57
rank
(2)
t
(p-value)
-1.35
(sig = 0.17)
0.62
(1)
4.45
0.76
(1)
-6.28*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 29 reveals that the architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the building raised on stilts over the water feature is more
important for resort architecture with modern Thai character than building adjacent to
the water feature.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference on the building raised on stilts over the water feature, architects
respond with a lower rating (t = -6.28).
219
220
Table 30: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of landscapesala (Thai pavilion).
Architects
mean
3.92
4.45
SD
0.62
Non-architects
rank
mean
SD
(2)
3.99
0.64
t
(p-value)
rank
(2)
-0.90
(sig = 0.36)
0.67
(1)
4.03
0.58
(1)
5.69*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 30 reveals that the architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the sala placed at the middle of the water feature is more appropriate
for resort architecture with modern Thai character than the sala adjacent to the water
feature.
221
The sala is relevant to the resort architecture in that the Thai pavilion or sala represents a
characteristic of a traditional Thai architecture. The deeply-pitched roofs and open-air
pavilions (sala) characterize traditional Thai architecture evolved in response to the
countrys climate. A high roof creates an interior with enough space for hot air to rise. The
roof overhang keeps the sunlight out. A second steeped roof promotes ventilation by
trapping the hot air in the space above. In ancient Thailand, sala were open to the outdoors
and were where Thais received guests. They also came to the sala to enjoy the cool
outdoor breezes and gaze at the countryside around them (Ettensperger, 2001: 15-16).
Considering statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05, the
p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference on the sala placed at the middle of the water feature, architects
respond with a higher rating (t = 5.69).
In contrast, architects and non-architects respond with no significant difference on the
sala adjacent to the water feature, architects respond with a lower rating (t = -0.90).
222
Table 31: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of landscapesala
(Thai pavilion).
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
4.47
4.03
SD
0.66
rank
mean
SD
(1)
4.03
0.59
rank
(2)
6.05*
(sig = 0.00)
0.69
(2)
4.15
0.61
(1)
-1.68
(sig = 0.09)
The mean rating in table 31 reveals that the architects generally agree that the sala
adjacent to the water feature is more important for resort design with modern Thai
character than the sala placed at the middle of the water feature.
.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree that the sala placed at the middle of the
water feature is more important for resort design with modern Thai character than the
sala adjacent to the water feature.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference on the sala adjacent to the water feature, architects respond with a
higher rating (t = 6.05).
In contrast, architects and non-architects respond with no significant difference on the
sala placed at the middle of the water feature, architects respond with a lower rating (t = 1.68).
223
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
224
Table 32: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of landscapeelevated walkways.
Architects
mean
SD
1. Covered elevated
walkway
2.87
0.42
2. Uncovered elevated
walkway
3.95
Non-architects
rank
mean
SD
(2)
3.21
0.82
rank
(2)
t
(p-value)
-4.53*
(sig = 0.00)
0.63
(1)
4.13
0.66
(1)
-2.49*
(sig = 0.01)
225
The mean rating in table 32 reveals that the architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree that the uncovered elevated walkway is more appropriate for resort
architecture with modern Thai character than the covered elevated walkway.
The uncovered elevated walkway is relevant to the front trading section of each shop
house is usually a wooden walkway or bridge, one-meter wide, which connected all the
various shop houses in the area. The traditional Thai architecture that the character of a
building group of the single type, lacking covered-walkways, is an example of human
settlement in the past possessing the characteristics of village settlement and pattern
(Chaichongrak, 1996:7).
Figure 126:
The walkways were built as the connecting part of the group of Thai houses at Mahidol
University (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 67).
Considering statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05, the
p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
significant difference on both the covered elevated walkway and the uncovered elevated
walkway. For the analysis above, the architects respond with a lower rating (t = -4.53 and
-2.49).
Summary on modern Thai character in tangible qualities and values: Landscape
bridge walkways
Architects and non-architects (general public) generally agree that the uncovered elevated
walkway is more appropriate for resort architecture with modern Thai character than the
covered elevated walkway.
226
Architects and non-architects respond with significant difference on both the covered
elevated walkway and the uncovered elevated walkway, the architects respond with a
lower rating
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Table 33: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of landscape
elevated walkways.
Architects
mean
1. Covered elevated
walkway
2.87
2. Uncovered elevated
walkway
2.88
SD
0.41
Non-architects
rank
mean
(2)
3.35
SD
0.93
t
(p-value)
rank
(2)
-5.83*
(sig = 0.00)
0.41
(1)
4.03
0.60
(1)
-18.93*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 33 reveals that the architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree that the uncovered elevated walkway is more important for resort design
with modern Thai character than the covered elevated walkway.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that the areas in which architects and nonarchitects respond with significant difference are: covered elevated walkway that
architects respond with a lower rating (t = -5.83) and uncovered elevated walkway that
architects also respond with a lower rating (t = -18.93).
Summary on the importance for resort architecture and designs: Landscapebridge
walkways
Architects and non-architects (general public) generally agree that the uncovered
elevated walkway is more important for resort design with modern Thai character than
the covered elevated walkway.
227
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant difference are:
covered elevated walkway, and uncovered elevated walkway.
1. Overhangs
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
3.93
SD
rank
mean
SD
0.63
(5)
4.07
0.60
rank
(1)
-2.05*
(sig = 0.04)
3.93
3. Free-standing columns
4.47
0.62
(4)
4.06
0.61
(2)
-1.77
(sig = 0.07)
0.67
(1)
4.05
0.63
(3)
5.48*
(sig = 0.00)
4. raised floor
3.92
0.62
(6)
4.01
0.61
(5)
-1.30
(sig = 0.19)
5. Building adjacent to
waterscape
4.04
6. Slant wall
3.95
0.68
(2)
4.01
0.63
(6)
0.44
(sig = 0.66)
0.63
(3)
4.02
0.62
(4)
-1.01
(sig = 0.31)
The mean rating in table 34 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa
228
sense of lightness. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) freestanding columns (mean rating of 4.47), (2) building adjacent to waterscape (mean rating
of 4.04), (3) slant wall, (4) multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs, (5) overhangs, and (6)
raised floor.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa sense of lightness. The
significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) overhangs (mean rating of
4.07), (2) multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs (mean rating of 4.06), (3) free-standing
columns, (4) slant wall, (5) raised floor, and (6) building adjacent to waterscape.
The free-standing columns are relevant to the traditional Thai architecture in that
traditional Thai houses are particularly characterized by raising them on stilts. These
dwellings evoke a sense of weightlessness and floatation. They also make full use of the
tectonic expressivity of timber (Beng, 1996: 52).
In addition, multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs are relevant to the traditional Thai
architecture in that the soaring temples of Thailand, with their sweeping, graceful curves,
have an airy sense of lightness, while the raised houses of traditional dwellings in many
parts of Asia have an elegant loftiness (Beng, 1996:55).
Figure 127: The elegant loftiness and lightness of a traditional Thai roof (Beng, 1993: 28).
229
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that the areas in which architects and nonarchitects respond with significant difference are: (1) overhangs (t = -2.05), and (2) freestanding columns (t = 5.48).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences
are: (1) multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs (t = -1.77), (2) raised floor (t = -1.30), (3)
building adjacent to waterscape (t = 0.44), and (4) slant wall (t = -1.01).
The architects generally agree that free-standing columns reflect the highest degree of
the modern Thai character and consider them as the most significant element. The
building adjacent to waterscape was also seen as representing a high degree of the
modern Thai character by the architects while non-architects generally agree that the
overhangs reflect the highest degree of the modern Thai character and consider them as
the most significant element. The multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs were also seen as
representing a high degree of the modern Thai character by the non-architects.
Architects and non-architects respond with significant difference on the issues of:
overhangs, and free-standing columns. The areas in which architects and non-architects
respond with no significant differences are: multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs, raised
floor, building adjacent to waterscape, and slant wall.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
230
Table 35: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance of intangible qualities and values: A sense of lightness.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
4.44
SD
0.67
rank
mean
SD
(2)
4.08
0.58
rank
(2)
4.95*
(sig = 0.00)
3.95
3. Free-standing columns
3.93
0.63
(3)
4.04
0.60
(3)
-1.31
(sig = 0.19)
0.61
(4)
4.09
0.59
(1)
-2.19*
(sig = 0.02)
4. Raised floor
4.47
0.65
(1)
4.01
0.61
(5)
6.35*
(sig = 0.00)
5. Building adjacent to
waterscape
3.93
6. Slant wall
2.87
0.62
(5)
4.03
0.63
(4)
-1.46
(sig = 0.14)
0.41
(6)
3.15
0.82
(6)
-3.80*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 35 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of intangible
qualities and valuesa sense of lightness. The significant concerns of the architects are
respectively: (1) raised floor (mean rating of 4.47), (2) overhangs (mean rating of 4.44),
(3) multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs, (4) free-standing columns, (5) building adjacent
to waterscape, and (6) slant wall.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the importance
for resort architecture and designs on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa
sense of lightness. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) freestanding columns (mean rating of 4.09), (2) overhangs (mean rating of 4.08), (3) multitiered roofs and stepped roofs, (4) building adjacent to waterscape, (5) raised floor, and (6)
slant wall.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that the areas in which architects and non-
231
architects respond with significant difference are: (1) overhangs (t = 4.95), (2) freestanding columns (t = -2.19), (3) raised floor (t = 6.35), and (4) slant wall (t = -3.80).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences
are: (1) multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs (t = -1.31), and (2) building adjacent to
waterscape (t = -1.46).
Architects and non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of:
overhangs, free-standing columns, raised floor, and slant wall. The areas in which
architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences are: multi-tiered
roofs and stepped roofs, and building adjacent to waterscape.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
232
2. A Sense of Transparency
Table 36: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa sense of
transparency.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
1. Building organization
spacing of the building
2.86
0.41
(5)
3.16
0.82
(4)
2. Building organization
within
semi-enclosed space (e.g.,
building with chan)
4.07
4.44
-3.88*
(sig = 0.00)
0.69
(2)
4.04
0.65
(1)
0.43
(sig = 0.66)
0.67
(1)
4.01
0.63
(3)
-3.44*
(sig = 0.00)
4. Using glass as a
transparent material
2.87
3.92
0.41
(4)
3.13
0.85
(5)
5.66*
(sig = 0.00)
0.62
(3)
4.03
0.62
(2)
-1.47
(sig = 0.14)
The mean rating in table 36 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa
sense of transparency. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1)
building raised on stilts (mean rating of 4.44), (2) building organization within semienclosed space (e.g., building with chan) (mean rating of 4.07), (3) building with freestanding columns, (4) using glass as a transparent material, and (5) building
organizationspacing of the building.
233
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa sense of transparency.
The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) building organization
within semi-enclosed space (e.g., building with chan) (mean rating of 4.04), (2) building
with free-standing columns (mean rating of 4.03), (3) building raised on stilts, (4) building
organizationspacing of the building, and (5) using glass as a transparent material.
The building raised on stilts is relevant to the traditional Thai architecture in that the
traditional Thai house with a raised floor provides a sense of security, privacy, and shelter.
Generally, flood evasion was of primary importance. The characteristic of a traditional
Thai house is the raised floor on stilts. This arrangement protects the house from flooding
(Beng, 1996: 55).
Considering statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05, the
p-values obtained through a t-test show that the areas in which architects and nonarchitects respond with significant difference are: (1) building organizationspacing of
the building (t = -3.88), (2) building raised on stilts (t = -3.44), and (3) using glass as a
transparent material (t = 5.66).
In contrast, the areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant
differences are: (1) building organization within semi-enclosed space (e.g., building with
chan) (t = 0.43), and (2) building with free-standing columns (t = -1.47).
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant difference are:
(1) building organizationspacing of the building (2) building raised on stilts and (3)
using glass as a transparent material. In contrast, the areas in which architects and non-
234
architects respond with no significant differences are: (1) building organization within
semi-enclosed space (e.g., building with chan), and (2) building with free-standing
columns.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Table 37: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance of intangible qualities and values: A sense of transparency.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
1. Building organization
spacing of the building
3.93
0.62
(4)
4.01
0.61
(4)
2. Building organization
within semi-enclosed
space (e.g., building with
chan)
3.95
4.42
-1.11
(sig = 0.26)
0.62
(2)
4.00
0.61
(5)
-0.74
(sig = 0.45)
0.67
(1)
4.06
0.58
(1)
4.93*
(sig = 0.00)
4. Using glass as a
transparent material
2.87
3.95
0.41
(5)
4.02
0.60
(3)
-19.24*
(sig = 0.00)
0.63
(3)
4.03
0.61
(2)
-1.11
(sig = 0.26)
235
The mean rating in table 37 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of intangible
qualities and values a sense of transparency. The significant concerns of the
architects are respectively: (1) building raised on stilts (mean rating of 4.42), (2) building
organization within semi-enclosed space (e.g., building with chan) (mean rating of 3.95),
(3 building with free-standing columns, (4) building organizationspacing of the
building, and (5) using glass as a transparent material.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the importance
for resort architecture and designs on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa
sense of transparency. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1)
building raised on stilts (mean rating of 4.06), (2) building with free-standing columns
(mean rating of 4.03), (3) using glass as a transparent material, (4) building organization
spacing of the building, and (5) building organization within semi-enclosed space (e.g.,
building with chan).
Considering statistical analysis with t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05, the
p-values obtained through a t-test show that the areas in which architects and nonarchitects respond with significant difference are: (1) building raised on stilts (t = 4.93),
(2) using glass as a transparent material (t = -19.24).
In contrast, the areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant
differences are: (1) building organizationspacing of the building (t = -1.11), (2)
building organization within semi-enclosed space (e.g., building with chan) (t = -0.74),
and (3) building with free-standing columns, architects respond with a lower rating (t = 1.11).
Architects generally agree that the building raised on stilts is the most important element
for resort architecture. They also consider this element as the most significant for their
design. The building organization within semi-enclosed space (e.g., building with chan)
is considered the second most important element.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree that the building raised on stilts is the
most important element for resort architecture. They also consider this element as the most
significant for the design. The building with free-standing columns is considered the
second most important element.
236
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant difference are:
(1) building raised on stilts, and (2) using glass as a transparent material. In contrast, the
areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences are:
(1) building spacing of the building, and (2) building organization within semi-enclosed
space (e.g., building with chan), and (3) building with free-standing columns.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Architects
Non-architects
t
mean
SD
3.94
0.62
rank
mean
SD
rank
(1)
4.42
0.73
(1)
(p-value)
-6.08*
(sig = 0.00)
0.41
(2)
4.02
0.56
(2)
-20.28*
(sig = 0.00)
2.87
0.42
(3)
3.21
0.82
(3)
-4.84*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 38 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the significant issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of
intangible qualities and valuesa sense of tranquility and coolness. The significant
concerns of the architects and non-architects are respectively: (1) building adjacent to the
waterscape (mean rating of 3.94 and 4.42), (2) building adjacent to trees (mean rating of
2.87 and 4.02), and (3) tree planted at the center of the open space.
237
The building adjacent to the waterscape is relevant to the traditional Thai architecture in
that the traditional Thai house with a raised floor provides a sense of security, privacy, and
shelter. Generally, flood evasion was of primary importance. The characteristics of a
traditional Thai houses is the raised floor on posts. This arrangement protects the house
In addition, building adjacent to trees is relevant to the traditional Thai architecture in that
M.L. Piyalada Devakula Thaveeprungsriporn states the case of Tub Kwan, where an
actual tree itself stands at the center of the elevated terrace (chan), enriching it with a cool
refreshing sensationthe rom reun sensation (rom reun: a cool, refreshing sensation
commonly associated with tree shades-one of the preferable aspects of a place for the
Thai) (2002: 104-106).
Ruethai Chaichongrak (2002: 79) and Khaisaeng Sukhawattana believe strongly that trees
planted within the house compound be limited to certain trees recommended for planting
in the house compound. Specific qadrants for their planting are also specified. To the east
of the house, bamboo, kum, and coconut tree are recommended, as these will bring
happiness and good health. To the northeast, the planting of yor and saraphi are
recommended as these will ward off misfortune. To the south one should plant mango,
maplab or persimmon, and maprng as not only are the fruits delicious but such trees will
bring wealth. In the southwest, can be planted chaiyapruek, rajapruek, sadaow, jackfruit,
and pikun which as in the northeast section are chosen to their ability to ward off
misfortune. Similar in the west, tamarind, mayom, and putsa are recommended to ward off
ill-intentioned people and evil spirits. To the northwest of the house, magrud used in tom
yum soup, lime, sompoi, and ma-ngua trees should be planted. Finally, in the north
section, putsa and variety of sedges, hemp and herbs are recommended to ward off black
magic. Certain texts also recommended matoom (Sukhawattana, 1990: 25).
238
Figure 128: Traditional Thai landscape with tree planting within the house compound
(line-drawing by the author).
Considering statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05, the
p-values obtained through a t-test show that the areas in which architects and nonarchitects respond with significant difference are: (1) building adjacent to the waterscape
239
(t = -6.08), (2) building adjacent to trees (t = -20.28), and (3) tree planted at the center of
the open space (t = -4.84).
Summary on modern Thai character in intangible qualities and values: A sense of
tranquility and coolness
Architects generally and non-architects agree that building adjacent to the waterscape
indicates the highest degree of the modern Thai character and consider it as the most
significant element. The building adjacent to trees was also seen as representing a high
degree of the modern Thai character.
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant difference are:
building adjacent to the waterscape, building adjacent to trees, and tree planted at the
center of the open space.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Table 39: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance of intangible qualities and values: A sense of tranquility and
coolness.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
4.47
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
0.65
(1)
4.02
0.54
(3)
6.51*
(sig = 0.00)
0.62
(2)
4.05
0.54
(1)
-1.57
(sig = 0.11)
2.87
0.42
(3)
4.03
0.61
(2)
-20.83*
(sig = 0.00)
240
The mean rating in table 39 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the importance for resort architecture and designs on the basis of intangible
qualities and valuesa sense of tranquility and coolness. The significant concerns of
the architects are respectively: (1) building adjacent to the waterscape (mean rating of
4.47), (2) building adjacent to trees (mean rating of 3.94), and (3) tree planted at the center
of the open space.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the importance
for resort architecture and designs on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa
sense of tranquility and coolness. The significant concerns of non-architects are
respectively: (1) building adjacent to trees (mean rating of 4.05), (2) tree planted at the
center of the open space (mean rating of 4.03), and (3) building adjacent to the
waterscape.
Considering statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05, the
p-values obtained through a t-test show that the areas in which architects and nonarchitects respond with significant difference are: (1) building adjacent to the waterscape
(t = 6.51), and (2) tree planted at the center of the open space (t = -20.83).
Architects generally agree that building adjacent to the waterscape is the most important
element for resort architecture. They also consider this element as the most significant for
their design. The building adjacent to trees is considered the second most important
element.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree that building adjacent to trees is the most
important element for resort architecture. They also consider this element as the most
significant for their design. A tree planted at the center of the open space is considered the
second most important element.
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant difference are:
building adjacent to the waterscape, and tree planted at the center of the open space.
In contrast, architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences in the
area of building adjacent to trees.
241
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
4. A Sense of Hospitality
Table 40: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa sense of
hospitality
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
1. Open-air lobby
3.92
0.62
(4)
4.02
0.59
(4)
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
-1.32
(sig = 0.18)
2. Entrance pavilion
3.93
0.63
(3)
4.05
0.60
(3)
-1.58
(sig = 0.11)
4.37
0.69
(1)
4.53
0.73
(2)
-1.86
(sig = 0.06)
4. Covered verandah
3.93
0.62
(2)
4.46
0.72
(1)
-6.85*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 40 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the modern Thai character on the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa
sense of hospitality. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) sala
(Thai pavilion) (mean rating of 4.37), (2) covered verandah (mean rating of 3.93), (3)
entrance pavilion, and (4) open-air lobby.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the modern
Thai character on the basis of intangible qualities and values a sense of hospitality.
The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) covered verandah (mean
rating of 4.46), (2) sala (Thai pavilion) (mean rating of 4.53), (3) entrance pavilion, and
(4) open-air lobby.
242
The sala (Thai pavilion) is relevant to the traditional Thai architecture that the Thai
villages, one can often see beautiful small pavilions of many different styles and sizes.
Some are used simply for relaxation, while others have a specific function, such as
protecting a well. Entrance to a traditional house, at the top of the stairway leading to the
central platform, covered with a Thai roof. (Warren, 1998: 220)
The deeply-pitched roofs and open-air pavilions (sala) that characterize traditional Thai
architecture evolved in response to the countrys climate. A high roof creates an interior
with enough space for hot air to rise. The roof overhang keeps the sunlight out. A second
steeped roof promotes ventilation by trapping the hot air in the space above. In ancient
Thailand, sala were open to the outdoors and were where Thai people received guests.
They also came to the sala to enjoy the cool outdoor breezes and gaze at the countryside
around them (Ettensperger, 2001: 15-16).
In addition, entrance pavilion is relevant to the traditional Thai architecture in that on the
toen, there is a shelf, khown as the raan nam, about 80 cm above the floor to hold the
dippers and jars of drinking water with which guests are welcomed and members of the
household refresh themselves. The reason the toen is called a multi-purpose area is that it
is a place of relaxation for the family, a reception area for guests, the sleeping place for the
father or sons, and the place where the bodies of family members are laid out during
funerals.
Figure 129:
The raan nam or water pavilion is a traditional feature of Northern Thai house. These
shelves hold the earthenware jars and water dippers used to welcome guests (line-drawing
by the author).
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that the area in which architects and nonarchitects respond with significant difference is seated-verandah (t = -6.85). The areas in
which architects and non-architects respond with no significant difference are: (1) open-
243
air lobby (t = -1.32) (2) entrance pavilion (t = -1.58), and (3) sala (Thai pavilion) (t = 1.86).
Summary on modern Thai character in intangible qualities and values: A sense of
hospitality
Architects generally agree that sala (Thai pavilion) reflects the highest degree of the
modern Thai character and consider it as the most significant element. The covered
verandah was also seen as representing a high degree of the modern Thai character by the
architects while non-architects generally agree that the covered verandah reflects the
highest degree of the modern Thai character and consider it as the most significant
element. The sala (Thai pavilion) was also seen as representing a high degree of the
modern Thai character by the non-architects.
.
The area in which architects and non-architects respond with significant difference is
covered verandah. In contrast, they respond with no significant difference in the areas of:
open-air lobby, entrance pavilion, and sala (Thai pavilion).
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Table 41: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the importance of intangible qualities and values: A sense of hospitality.
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
1. Open-air lobby
3.93
0.63
(4)
4.01
0.56
(2)
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
-1.15
(sig = 0.24)
2. Entrance pavilion
3.93
0.62
(3)
3.99
0.57
(3)
-0.76
(sig = 0.44)
4.47
0.67
(1)
4.46
0.76
(1)
0.16
(sig = 0.87)
4. Covered verandah
3.95
0.62
(2)
3.98
0.59
(4)
-0.33
(sig = 0.70)
244
The mean rating in table 41 reveals that architects generally agree that certain
architectural elements relating to intangible qualities and values: a sense of hospitality are
important to resort architecture. Priority is given as follows: (1) sala (Thai pavilion) (mean
rating of 4.47), (2) covered verandah (mean rating of 3.95), (3) entrance pavilion, and (4)
open-air lobby.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree that certain architectural elements relating
to intangible qualities and values: a sense of hospitality are important to resort
architecture. Priority is given as follows: (1) sala (Thai pavilion) (mean rating of 4.46),
(2) open-air lobby (mean rating of 4.01), (3) entrance pavilion, and (4) covered verandah.
Based on an alpha of 0.05, the p-values obtained through a t-test suggest that architects
and non-architects respond with no significant differences in all areas.
Summary on the importance of intangible qualities and valuesA sense of
hospitality for resort architecture and designs:
Architects generally agree that sala (Thai pavilion) is the most important element for
resort architecture. They are also considered as the most significant issue for their designs.
Second, is the covered verandah.
Non-architects (general public) also generally agree on sala (Thai pavilion) as the most
important element for resort architecture. They also consider this element as most
significant for the designs. The open-air lobby was also seen as the second most important
element for resort architecture and designs.
Architects and non-architects respond with no significant difference in all the areas on a
sense of hospitality.
=
=
=
=
=
strongly disagree
somewhat disagree
neutral
somewhat agree
strongly agree
245
Table 42: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the various aspects of site
planning.
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
3.95
0.63
(2)
4.01
0.57
(4)
3.92
-0.95
(Sig = 0.34)
0.62
(4)
4.03
0.59
(3)
-1.51
(Sig = 0.13)
4.49
0.66
(1)
4.05
0.58
(2)
5.99*
(Sig = 0.00)
3.93
0.62
(3)
4.05
0.57
(1)
-1.65
(Sig = 0.10)
The mean rating in table 42 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the various aspects
of site planning. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) using
traditional Thai wisdom and design principles to guide building organization to better
protect the sites from tsunami threats (mean rating of 4.49), (2) respect to the site context
(mean rating of 3.95), (3) applying specific tangible steps to landscape design; these
include such features as the waterscape, tree planting, and other hardscape and
landscape components, and (4) low impact on the site.
246
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the various aspects of site planning.
The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) applying specific
tangible steps to landscape design, these include such features as the waterscape, tree
planting, and other hardscape and landscape components (mean rating of 4.05), (2)
using traditional Thai wisdom and design principles to guide building organization to
better protect the sites from tsunami threats (mean rating of 4.05), (3) low impact on the
site, and (4) respect to the site context.
The use of traditional Thai wisdom and design principles to guide building
organization to better protect the sites from tsunami threats is relevant and related to
the concepts of resort architecture that a traditional Thai house is raised just above the
head height. The varying levels of the different parts of the house are determined by the
functions and create a flow of space which is almost modern in design. There are many
considerations, which lead to a raised house being highly desirable. First, a raised house
provided security from dangerous animals and thieves at night. In addition, the central
region of Thailand is situated in low-lying areas inundated with frequent rain and floods.
Other areas are also subjected to heavy rainfall and flooding. A house with a raised floor
provides a sense of security, privacy, and shelter, with flood evasion being a primary
concern.
Landscape design can be a part of a built-in safety systemthe tree with its trunk and
aerial roofs protected people during the tsunami disaster. Natural landscape on higher
levels also provide safety platforms during tsunami events. Landscaping design could then
be incorporated into the master planning of resort development. It could further help
restore the balance between human and nature (Lau and Yoichi, 2004: 11).
In addition, respect to the site context is relevant and related to the concepts of resort
architecture in that an important aspect of designing a building is to build it in the way that
suits the site context together with building placement. Thus, the architect should
understand and be sensitive to the local climatic conditions (Buranasomphob, 1996: 28). A
sustainable resort planning process should start with a thorough analysis of the site and its
ecological resources, including local ecology, topography, vegetation, hydrology,
watersheds, solar energy access, and microclimate, this will allow. This identifies most
critical factors and leads to some conclusion regarding design strategies (Deda, 2003: 56)
Based on alpha of 0.05, the p-values obtained from a t-test suggest that architects and
non-architects respond with significant difference on the issue of using traditional Thai
wisdom and design principles to guide building organization to better protect the sites
from tsunami threats (t = 5.99)
247
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences
are: (1) respect to the site context (t = 0.95), (2) low impact on the site (t = -1.51), and (3)
applying specific tangible steps to landscape design; these include such features as the
waterscape, tree planting, and other hardscape and landscape components (t = -1.65).
Summary on design guidelines for modern Thai architecture: The various aspects of
site planning
The architects generally agree that using traditional Thai wisdom and design principles to
guide building organization to better protect the sites from tsunami threats is the most
important element for modern Thai architecture. They also consider this element as the
most significant design guidelines. Respect to the site context is also considered the
second most important element.
Non-architects generally agree that applying specific tangible steps to landscape design;
these include such features as the waterscape, tree planting, and other hardscape and
landscape components is the most important element for modern Thai architecture. They
also consider this aspect as the most significant design guidelines. Using traditional Thai
wisdom and design principles to guide building organization to better protect the sites
from tsunami threats is also considered the second most important element.
Both architects and non-architects respond with significant difference on the issue of
using traditional Thai wisdom and design principles to guide building organization to
better protect the sites from tsunami threats.
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences
are: respect to the site context, low impact on the site, and applying specific tangible
steps to site planning; these include such features as the waterscape, tree planting, and
other hardscape and landscape components.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
248
Table 43: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to architectural
characteristics and design.
Architects
2. Architectural
Characteristics and
Design
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
3.95
0.63
(4)
4.10
0.58
(3)
-2.18*
(sig = 0.03)
3.93
0.62
(6)
4.07
0.56
(4)
-2.13*
(sig = 0.03)
4.49
0.67
(1)
4.07
0.68
(5)
5.27*
(sig = 0.00)
3.93
0.63
(7)
3.13
0.78
(7)
9.67*
(sig = 0.00)
3.95
0.62
(3)
4.33
0.76
(2)
-4.72*
(sig = 0.00)
3.93
0.61
(5)
3.17
0.79
(6)
4.45
0.66
(2)
4.47
0.78
(1)
9.18*
(sig = 0.00)
-0.15
(sig = 0.87)
249
The mean rating in table 43 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the aspects of
architectural characteristics and design. The significant concerns of the architects are
respectively: (1) utilizing intangible elements of Thai character, such as a sense of
lightness, tranquility, transparency, and hospitality (mean rating of 4.49), (2) using
traditional Thai wisdom and approaches to current building that together help to reduce
the impacts of possible future tsunami disasters (mean rating of 4.45), (3) respect for the
concepts of authenticity and regional architecture, (4) design with Thai character in order
to be attractive to tourists and for commercial benefit, (5) respect for the traditional
hierarchical order of Thai architecture, (6) utilizing specific, tangible elements of Thai
character, such as sao-loy, roof profiles, to create a sense of modern Thai architecture,
and (7) to adapt and create modern Thai architecture in resort contexts in order to develop
sustainable tourism.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the aspects of architectural
characteristics and design. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively:
(1) using traditional Thai wisdom and approaches to current building that together help to
reduce the impacts of possible future tsunami disasters (mean rating of 4.47),
(2)
respect for the concepts of authenticity and regional architecture (mean rating of 4.33), (3)
design with Thai character in order to be attractive to tourists and for commercial benefit,
(4) utilizing specific, tangible elements of Thai character, such as sao-loy, roof profiles, to
create a sense of modern Thai architecture, (5) utilizing intangible elements of Thai
character, such as a sense of lightness, tranquility, transparency, and hospitality, (6)
respect for the traditional hierarchical order of Thai architecture, and (7) to adapt and
create modern Thai architecture in resort contexts in order to develop sustainable tourism
respect to the site context.
Utilizing intangible elements of Thai character, such as a sense of lightness, tranquility,
transparency, and hospitality is relevant to the concepts of resort architecture that modern
Thai architecture in terms of resort contexts should take account of longer term future
development the building be suitable for existing conditions in which both architectural
context and environmental context. Design strategies to create modern Thai architecture
that we might to utilize intangible aspects of traditional architecture to the design solutions
(Suvankiri, 2002).
In addition, using traditional Thai wisdom and approaches to current building that together
help to reduce the impacts of possible future tsunami disasters is relevant to the concepts
of resort architecture that the continuity of Thai character in architecture signifies the
existence of Thai wisdom. Serious investigations should be made regarding the
development of such ingenuity. The protective character of Thai roof, the ventilation
panel, the prefabricated components of wooden construction (without nails) and even the
250
refined decoration are generated through sustainable Thai wisdom (Horayangura , 2002:
210).
Traditional Thai architecture was designed to provide a setting for Thai culture and to
answer to the needs of that culture. Traditional Thai buildings have also to incorporate
inherent wisdom in their relation to their sites and environment. This adaptation and
evolution needs better to be understood by modern Thai architects, who can incorporate
this wisdom into buildings today
Based on alpha of 0.05, the p-values obtained from a t-test suggest that architects and
non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of: (1) design with Thai
character in order to be attractive to tourists and for commercial benefit (t = -2.18), (2)
utilizing specific, tangible elements of Thai character, such as sao-loy, roof profiles, to
create a sense of modern Thai architecture (t = -2.13), (3) utilizing intangible elements of
Thai character, such as a sense of lightness, tranquility, transparency, and hospitality (t =
5.27), (4) to adapt and create modern Thai architecture in resort contexts in order to
develop sustainable tourism (t = 9.67), (5) respect for the concepts of authenticity and
regional architecture (t = -4.72), and (6) respect for the traditional hierarchical order of
Thai architecture (t = 9.18).
The area in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant differences is
using traditional Thai wisdom and approaches to current building that together help to
reduce the impacts of possible future tsunami disasters (t = -0.15).
Summary on design guidelines for modern Thai architecture: Architectural
characteristics and design
The architects generally agree that utilizing intangible elements of Thai character, such as
a sense of lightness, tranquility, transparency, and hospitality is the most important
element for modern Thai architecture. They also consider this element as the most
significant design guidelines. Using traditional Thai wisdom and approaches to building
that together help to integrate against the effects of possible future tsunami disasters is
also considered the second most important element.
Non-architects generally agree that using traditional Thai wisdom and approaches to
building that together help to integrate against the effects of possible future tsunami
disasters is the most important element for modern Thai architecture. They also consider
this element as the most significant design guidelines. Respect for the concepts of
authenticity and regional architecture is also considered the second most important
element.
Both architects and non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of: (1)
design with Thai character in order to be attractive to tourists and for commercial benefit,
(2) utilizing specific, tangible elements of Thai character, such as sao-loy, roof profiles, to
create a sense of modern Thai architecture, (3) utilizing intangible elements of Thai
251
Table 44: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the landscape.
2. Landscape
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
4.47
0.66
rank
mean
SD
(1)
4.03
0.62
rank
(2)
5.90*
(sig = 0.00)
3.91
0.63
(3)
4.41
0.76
(1)
-6.12*
(sig = 0.00)
3.91
0.62
(2)
3.20
0.78
(3)
8.71*
(sig = 0.00)
252
The mean rating in table 44 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the aspects of the
landscape. The significant concerns of the architects are respectively: (1) using the
existing condition of site and its context to create a sense of modern Thai architecture
through the practicality of low costs (mean rating of 4.47), (2) incorporating tradition the
Thai wisdom and practice, including trees with aerial covering for the landscape design
and also as a protective measure in case of tsunamis (mean rating of 3.91), and (3) using
landscape components such as sala, lily ponds, and water features to create the landscape.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the aspects of the landscape. The
significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) using landscape components
such as sala, lily ponds, and water features to create the landscape (mean rating of 4.41),
(2) using the existing condition of site and its context to create a sense of modern Thai
architecture through the practicality of low costs (mean rating of 4.03), (3) incorporating
tradition the Thai wisdom and practice, including trees with aerial covering for the
landscape design and also as a protective measure in case of tsunamis.
Using the existing condition of site and its context to create a sense of modern Thai
architecture through the practicality of low costs is relevant to the concepts of resort
architecture that planning the setting is one of the first steps towards sustainable tourism
destinations. Landscaping is essential both to the preservation of local diversities and to
the creation of a sense of place. In several cases, restorative landscaping should be applied
to take the site back to what it once was (Deda, 2003: 57)
In addition, incorporating tradition the Thai wisdom and practice, including trees with
aerial covering for the landscape design and also as a protective measure in case of
tsunamis is relevant and related to the concepts of resort architecture that landscape design
can be a part of a built-in safety systemthe tree with its trunk and aerial roofs protected
people during the tsunami disaster. Natural landscape on higher levels also provide safety
platforms during tsunami events. Landscaping design could then be incorporated into the
master planning of resort development. It could further help restore the balance between
human and nature (Lau and Yoichi, 2004: 11).
253
Figure 130: The Banyan tree with aerial roots (Ettensperger, 2001: 1).
Based on alpha of 0.05, the p-values obtained from a t-test suggest that architects and
non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of: (1) using the existing
condition of site and its context to create a sense of modern Thai architecture through the
practicality of low costs (t = 5.90), (2) using landscape components such as sala, lily
ponds, and water features to create the landscape (t = -6.12), and (3) incorporating
tradition the Thai wisdom and practice, including trees with aerial covering for the
landscape design and also as a protective measure in case of tsunamis (t = 8.71).
Summary on design guidelines for modern Thai architecture: Landscape
The architects generally agree that using the existing condition of site and its context to
create a sense of modern Thai architecture through the practicality of low costs is the most
important element for modern Thai architecture. They also consider this element as the
most significant design guidelines. Incorporating tradition the Thai wisdom and practice,
including trees with aerial covering for the landscape design and also as a protective
measure in case of tsunamis is also considered the second most important element.
Non-architects generally agree that using landscape components such as sala, lily ponds,
and water features to create the landscape is the most important element for modern Thai
architecture. They also consider this element as the most significant design guidelines.
254
Using the existing condition of site and its context to create a sense of modern Thai
architecture through the practicality of low costs is also considered the second most
important element.
Table 45: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to building technology and
construction.
3. Building
Technology and
Construction
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
3.93
0.62
(3)
4.08
0.58
(1)
-2.10*
(sig = 0.03)
4. Incorporating aspects of
traditional Thai wisdom
such as ventilating panels,
and pre-fabrication
systems of wall panels
2.87
0.41
(4)
3.22
0.79
(4)
-4.84*
(sig = 0.00)
4.47
0.68
(1)
4.08
0.64
(2)
5.06*
(sig = 0.00)
4.41
0.72
(2)
4.05
0.56
(3)
4.71*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 45 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the aspects of
building technology and construction. The significant concerns of the architects are
255
respectively: (1) using materials which have little impact on the environment (mean rating
of 4.47), (2) incorporating aspects of traditional Thai wisdom such as ventilating panels,
and pre-fabrication systems of wall panels (mean rating of 4.41), (3) using materials
available in the local community, and (4) using new materials where appropriate to create
Thai character such as gable ends and other components using reflective glass or other
modern materials.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the aspects of building technology
and construction. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) using
materials available in the local community (mean rating of 4.08), (2) using materials
which have little impact on the environment (mean rating of 4.08), (3) incorporating
aspects of traditional Thai wisdom such as ventilating panels, and pre-fabrication systems
of wall panels, and (4) using new materials where appropriate to create Thai character
such as gable ends and other components using reflective glass or other modern materials.
Using materials which have little impact on the environment is relevant to the concepts of
resort architecture that as far as possible building materials will be locally sourced. They
will be chosen to minimize impact to the site or to minimize embodied energy and
materials involving unsustainably harvested timber or other plant species will be avoided.
Where possible and appropriate recycled and recyclable materials will be used
(Rochanakorn, 2005).
Based on alpha of 0.05, the p-values obtained from a t-test suggest that architects and
non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of: (1) using materials
available in the local community (t = -2.10), (2) using new materials where appropriate to
create Thai character such as gable ends and other components using reflective glass or
other modern materials (t = -4.84), (3) using materials which have little impact on the
environment (t = 5.06), and (4) incorporating aspects of traditional Thai wisdom such as
ventilating panels, and pre-fabrication systems of wall panels (t = 4.71).
256
The architects generally agree that using materials which have little impact on the
environment is the most important element for modern Thai architecture. They also
consider this element as the most significant design guidelines. Incorporating aspects of
traditional Thai wisdom such as ventilating panels, and pre-fabrication systems of wall
panels is also considered the second most important element.
Non-architects generally agree that using materials available in the local community is the
most important element for modern Thai architecture. They also consider this element as
the most significant design guidelines. Using materials which have little impact on the
environment is also considered the second most important element.
Architects and non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of: using
materials available in the local community, using new materials where appropriate to
create Thai character such as gable ends and other components using reflective glass or
other modern materials, using materials which have little impact on the environment,
and incorporating aspects of traditional Thai wisdom such as ventilating panels, and prefabrication systems of wall panels.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
257
Table 46: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the interior architecture
and decorations.
Architects
Non-architects
5. Interior Architecture
and Decorations
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
4.00
0.32
(2)
4.05
0.56
(2)
2.85
0.44
(4)
4.02
0.53
(3)
3.94
0.62
(3)
4.45
0.74
(1)
4.45
0.70
(1)
4.00
0.51
(4)
-1.00
(sig = 0.31)
-20.61*
(sig = 0.00)
-6.45*
(sig = 0.00)
6.37*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 46 reveals that architects generally agree on the significant
issues of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the aspects of
interior architecture and decorations. The significant concerns of the architects are
respectively: (1) applying the intangible qualities and values of Thai character, such as a
sense of transparency, tranquility, and a sense of hospitality to create the interior
architecture in resort design (mean rating of 4.45), (2) respect for the traditional
258
hierarchical order of Thai architecture (mean rating of 4.00), (3) respect for the concepts
of authenticity and regional architecture and also apply them to guide the interior
architecture, and (4) using the completed form of architectural work and structural
aesthetics to set the creative standards for interior architecture.
Non-architects (general public) generally agree on the significant issues of the design
guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the aspects of interior architecture
and decorations. The significant concerns of non-architects are respectively: (1) respect
for the concepts of authenticity and regional architecture and also apply them to guide the
interior architecture (mean rating of 4.45), (2) respect for the traditional hierarchical order
of Thai architecture (mean rating of 4.05), (3) using the completed form of architectural
work and structural aesthetics to set the creative standards for interior architecture, and (4)
applying the intangible qualities and values of Thai character, such as a sense of
transparency, tranquility, and a sense of hospitality to create the interior architecture in
resort design.
Applying the intangible qualities and values of Thai character, such as a sense of
transparency, tranquility, and a sense of hospitality to create the interior architecture in
resort design is relevant to the concepts of resort architecture that the importance of
modern Thai character in terms of interior design that new resort should be designed in the
concept with intangible qualities and values through integration (Suwankiri, 2005).
In addition, respect for the traditional hierarchical order of Thai architecture is relevant to
the concepts of resort architecture as Vimolsiddhi Horayangkura suggests that architects
should be concerned architecture as cultural heritage that architecture can be a significant
component of national cultural heritage. Thus, there should be architecture of high and
sustainable value that can be accepted as cultural heritage. One critical question that
should be raised is that the present architecture of international style can hardly be
considered as Thai cultural heritage. If being so, we are creeping toward self-destruction,
as the contexts and other influencing factors are changing rapidly. Eventually, we well
come to an end in similar to the show down of a pendulum in moving as against the
inertia. As professor Sompop Piromya, in referring to Prince Nariss concept in cultural
continuity, has succinctly pointed put that we should hot only use up our past heritages,
but we should also create new glories (Horayangkura, 2002: 104-106).
Based on alpha of 0.05, the p-values obtained from a t-test suggest that architects and
non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of: (1) using the completed
form of architectural work and structural aesthetics to set the creative (t = -20.61) (2)
respect for the concepts of authenticity and regional architecture and also apply them to
guide the interior architecture (t = -6.45) (3) applying the intangible qualities and values of
Thai character, such as a sense of transparency, tranquility, and a sense of hospitality to
259
create the interior architecture in resort design (t = 6.37). The area in which architects and
non-architects respond with no significant difference is respect for the traditional
hierarchical order of Thai architecture (t = -1.00).
The architects generally agree that applying the intangible qualities and values of Thai
character, such as a sense of transparency, tranquility, and a sense of hospitality to create
the interior architecture in resort design is the most important element for modern Thai
architecture. They also consider this element as the most significant design guidelines.
Respect for the traditional hierarchical order of Thai architecture is also considered the
second most important element.
.
Non-architects generally agree that respect for the concepts of authenticity and regional
architecture and also apply them to guide the interior architecture is the most important
element for modern Thai architecture. They also consider this element as the most
significant design guidelines. Respect for the traditional hierarchical order of Thai
architecture is also considered the second most important element.
Architects and non-architects respond with significant difference in the areas of: using
the completed form of architectural work and structural aesthetics to set the creative;
respect for the concepts of authenticity and regional architecture and also apply them to
guide the interior architecture; applying the intangible qualities and values of Thai
character, such as a sense of transparency, tranquility, and a sense of hospitality to create
the interior architecture in resort design. The area in which architects and non-architects
respond with no significant difference is respect for the traditional hierarchical order of
Thai architecture.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
260
Table 47: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture relating to the laws and regulations.
Architects
Non-architects
t
1. Present-day regulations
and laws are not
appropriate for modern
Thai architecture
and resort designs
2. To improve the
regulations and laws
governing new
construction in order
to both encourage more
cultural awareness of
modern Thai
architecture and
help protect sites from
potential future
tsunami disasters
(p-value)
mean
SD
3.92
0.66
rank
(2)
mean
SD
rank
3.95
0.50
(2)
-0.48
(sig = 0.62)
4.43
0.74
(1)
4.00
0.54
(1)
5.67*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 47 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the significant issues of the design guidelines for modern Thai
architecture relating to the aspects of laws and regulations. The significant concerns of
the architects and non-architect are respectively: (1) to improve the regulations and laws
governing new construction in order to both encourage more cultural awareness of modern
Thai architecture and help protect sites from potential future tsunami disasters (mean
rating of 4.43 and 4.00), (2) present-day regulations and laws are not appropriate for
modern Thai architecture and resort designs (mean rating of 3.92 and 3.95).
To improve the regulations and laws governing new construction in order to both
encourage more cultural awareness of modern Thai architecture and help protect sites
from potential future tsunami disasters is relevant to the concepts of resort architecture
that the limitations of present-day regulations and laws identified with misunderstanding
261
and unsuitable to create modern Thai architecture. The regulations articles such as the
portion of height, open spaces, zoning line, set-back regulations are still required to redeliberate as well as the regulation of environmental impact assessment (Rochanakorn,
2005)
Based on alpha of 0.05, the p-values obtained from a t-test suggest that architects and nonarchitects respond with significant difference in the area of to improve the regulations
and laws governing new construction in order to both encourage more cultural awareness
of modern Thai architecture and help protect sites from potential future tsunami disasters
(t = 5.67). The area in which architects and non-architects respond with no significant
difference is present-day regulations and laws are not appropriate for modern Thai
architecture and resort designs (t = -0.48).
Summary on design guidelines for modern Thai architecture: laws and regulations
The architects and non-architects (general public) generally agree that to improve the
regulations and laws governing new construction in order to both encourage more cultural
awareness of modern Thai architecture and help protect sites from potential future tsunami
disasters is the most important element for modern Thai architecture. They also consider
this element as the most significant design guidelines.
Architects and non-architects respond with significant difference in the area of to
improve the regulations and laws governing new construction in order to both encourage
more cultural awareness of modern Thai architecture and help protect sites from potential
future tsunami disasters. The area in which architects and non-architects respond with no
significant difference is present-day regulations and laws are not appropriate for modern
Thai architecture and resort designs.
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
262
6.3 To study the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public) towards modern
Thai architecture in resort contexts using the simulated-models of the case studies.
The data from the questionnaires needs to be analyzed and interpreted on the basis of the
level of agreement. Upon processing the data, statistical methods are used to test and
compare the opinions of the respondents. Different levels of opinion are coded statistically
as follows:
1
2
3
4
5
=
=
=
=
=
strongly disagree
somewhat disagree
neutral
somewhat agree
strongly agree
Case Study: Banyan Tree Laguna Beach Resort and Spa: Phuket
Banyan Tree Laguna Beach Resort and Spa is selected as the case study. The landscape
represents the building complex and open spaces are provided adjacent to buildings. The
lobby and main building are adjacent to waterscape. The same is true with the private
villas, also featuring private swimming pools. The landscape in Banyan Tree is organized
by means of a sala and walkways. These components are harmonized with the buildings
context.
The original landscape provides a sense of tranquility and coolness through the use of
water pond adjacent to the building complex as illustrated in figure of 130. Figure 131 and
figure 132 are simulated features which replaced these water ponds with lily pond and
lawn respectively.
263
(original)
264
Table 48: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the basis of architectural
characteristics and design.
Architectural
Characteristics and
Design
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
figure 130
(original: Water
pond)
3.91
0.63
figure 131
(simulated-feature:
Lily pond)
4.43
figure 132
(simulated-feature:
Lawn)
2.86
rank
mean
SD
rank
(2)
4.36
0.74
(2)
-5.66*
(Sig = 0.00)
0.71
(1)
4.39
0.77
(1)
0.39
(Sig = 0.70)
0.43
(3)
4.03
0.53
(3)
-20.83*
(Sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 48 reveals that architects and non-architect (general public)
generally agree on the significant features of the appropriate landscape design for modern
Thai character. The significant concerns of the respondents are respectively: (1) figure 131
(simulated-feature: Lily pond) (mean rating of 4.43 and 4.39), (2) figure 130 (original:
Water pond) (mean rating of 3.91 and 4.36); and (3) figure 132 (simulated-feature: Lawn).
The landscape design features which are significant to the modern Thai character and
related to the traditional Thai architecture are landscaped pools. Landscape pools reflect
the identity of a Thai garden and provide cool sitting areas. In some instances, water lilies
and lotuses are planted in jars and placed around the chan. (H.Shiranan, 1997: 75). The
use of water was also manifested in the layouts of ancient cities and palaces. At times,
entire cities took on an amphibious quality. Sukhothai, an ancient capital of Thailand,
boasted impressive water-bound temples. These temples were designed with elaborate
water features, ponds, and lakes.(Beng, 2003: 234)
265
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects respond with
no significant difference on a building complex with lily pond (t = 0.39).
The features in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences
are: (1) a building complex with water pond (t = -5.66), and (2) a building complex with
lawn (t = -20.83).
However, architects and non-architects (general public) have responded different points of
view on the same issue due to their different perception and experiences, but architects
should allow the latter to participate in design processes and considerations.
Case Study: Rayavadee Premier Resort: Krabi
266
Rayavadee Premier Resort is selected as the case study. The original roof profile of the
building was designed and inspired by the traditional Thai architecture as well as the
mosques of Southern Thailand. The original feature is curved roof with gable panel, gableend, and ornament as shown in figure 133. The figure 134 is the simulated- feature which
roofing without gable panel, gable-end, and ornament.
Table 49: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the original and simulatedfeature.
Architects
figure 133
(original:
Roof with
gable-end
and
ornament)
mean
SD
3.93
0.64
Non-architects
(p-value)
figure 133
(original:
Roof with
gable-end
and
ornament)
(p-value)
mean
SD
4.43
0.75
17.89*
figure 134
(simulatedfeature: Roof
without
gable-end
and
ornament)
(Sig = 0.00)
2.87
0.41
17.39*
figure 134
(simulatedfeature: Roof
without
gable-end
and
ornament)
(Sig = 0.00)
3.02
0.64
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that original building and simulated-feature
reflect with significant differences.
267
The mean rating in table 49 reveals that the non-architects generally find that the original
building with a circular curved roof, gable panel, gable-ends, and ornament is more
appropriate for resort architecture with the modern Thai character.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that the original building and simulated-feature
reflect with significant differences.
Table 50: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the basis of architectural
characteristics and design.
Architects
Architecture and
Characteristics
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
figure 133
(original: Roof with
gable-end and
ornament)
3.93
0.64
figure 134
(simulated-feature:
Roof without gableend and ornament)
2.87
rank
mean
SD
(1)
4.43
0.75
rank
(1)
-6.17*
(Sig = 0.00)
0.41
(2)
3.02
0.64
(2)
-2.47*
(Sig = 0.01)
The mean rating in table 50 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the original building with circular curved-roof, gable panel, gable-ends,
and ornament reflect more appropriate design to resort architecture for modern Thai
character than the lacking one. They also consider as the most significant element in the
designs.
268
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects (general
public) respond with significant differences in which both the original (t =-6.17) and
simulated model (t = -2.47).
Gable ends and ornaments are relevant to the traditional Thai architecture that Jua roob
phra arthit. This design has a sunburst pattern in which flat wooden slats are spread out to
represent sunrays with gaps in between the sunrays for ventilation. This design is popular
for kitchens. Ruethai Chaichongrak mentions that the gable ends of a traditional Thai
house frahses an element known as na jua. This comprises triangular wooden panels
constructed in three different designs that protect the gable ends of the roof from wind,
sun, and rain (2002: 86). In addition, another recurring feature is the decorative gablefinals found in Thailand. The meeting of the roof and the sky is thus given added
phenomenological significance through such elaborately carved elements (Beng, 2003:
34).
In addition, the characteristics of Southern roofs are the decoration of the gable ends and
the final above the gable (Posayanonda, 2002: 213).
269
Amanpuri Resort is selected as the case study. The original roofs feature of the building
was designed and inspired by the traditional Thai architecture as well as the traditional
Thai houses. The roof profile of the original is gable-ends with ornament as shown in
figure 135. The figure 136 is simulated feature which roofing without ornament.
Table 51: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the original and simulatedfeature.
Architects
figure 135
(original: Sala
with gableends and
ornament)
mean
4.43
SD
0.70
6.65*
Non-architects
(p-value)
figure 135
(original: Sala
with gableends and
ornament)
(p-value)
mean
SD
4.47
0.72
(sig = 0.00)
figure 136
(simulatedfeature: Roof
without gableends and
ornament)
3.92
0.65
7.01*
(sig = 0.00)
figure 136
(simulatedfeature: Roof
without gableends and
ornament)
3.97
0.49
The mean rating in table 51 reveals that the architects generally find that the original
building with roofs feature of the sala is more appropriate for resort architecture with the
modern Thai character.
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that both original building and simulatedfeature reflect with significant differences (t = 6.65).
270
Table 52: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the basis of architectural
characteristics and design.
Architects
Non-architects
Architecture and
Characteristics
figure 135
(original: Sala with
gable-ends and
ornament)
figure 136
(simulated-feature: Roof
without gable-ends and
ornament)
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
4.43
0.70
3.92
0.65
rank
mean
SD
rank
(1)
4.47
0.72
(1)
(2)
3.97
0.49
(2)
-0.56
(sig = 0.57)
-0.80
(sig = 0.42)
The mean rating in table 52 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the original building which roof profile with gable-ends and ornament
reflect more appropriate design to resort architecture for modern Thai character
than the lacking one. They also consider this element for the designs.
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that both architects and non-architects (general
public) respond with no significant differences in which both the original (t = -0.56) and
simulated model (t = -0.80).
271
Gable ends and ornaments are relevant to the traditional Thai architecture that the deeplypitched roofs and open-air pavilions (sala) characterize traditional Thai architecture
evolved in response to the countrys climate. A high roof creates an interior with enough
space for hot air to rise. The roof overhang keeps the sunlight out. A second steeped roof
promotes ventilation by trapping the hot air in the space above. In ancient Thailand, sala
were open to the outdoors and were where Thais received guests. They also came to the
sala to enjoy the cool outdoor breezes and gaze at the countryside around them
(Ettensperger, 2001: 15-16).
Case Study: Banyan Tree Laguna Beach Resort and Spa: Phuket
Banyan Tree Laguna Beach Resort and Spa is selected as the case study. The landscape
represents the building complex and open spaces are provided adjacent to buildings. The
lobby and main building are adjacent to waterscapes.
272
The original feature of the landscape provides a sense of tranquility and coolness that
achieved through the relationship between the building complex and adjacent to
waterscapes as shown on figure 137. The figure 138 is the simulated feature which
buildings not adjacent to waterscapes.
Table 53: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the original and simulatedfeature.
Architects
figure 137
(original:
Building
adjacent to
waterscape)
figure 138
(simulatedfeature: Building
not adjacent to
waterscape)
mean
SD
3.91
0.64
17.74*
(sig=0.00)
2.83
0.48
Non-architects
(p-value)
figure 137
(original:
Building
adjacent to
waterscape)
figure 138
(simulatedfeature:
Building not
adjacent to
waterscape)
(p-value)
mean
SD
2.97
0.57
-19.73*
(sig=0.00)
4.04
0.52
273
Considering the statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that both simulated-feature and original
buildings reflect with significant differences (t = -19.73).
Table 54: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the basis of architectural
characteristics and design.
Architectural
Characteristics and
Design
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
figure 137
(original: Building
adjacent to waterscape)
3.91
0.64
(1)
2.97
0.57
figure 138
(simulated-feature:
Building not adjacent to
waterscape)
2.83
rank
(2)
13.29*
(sig = 0.00)
0.48
(2)
4.04
0.52
(1)
-20.63*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 54 reveals that architects generally agree on the original
buildings adjacent to waterscapes reflect more appropriate design to resort
architecture for modern Thai character than the buildings not adjacent to waterscapes.
They also consider this element for their designs.
Non-architects generally agree on buildings not adjacent to waterscapes reflect more
appropriate design to resort architecture for modern Thai character than the original
buildings adjacent to waterscapes.
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects (general
public) respond with significant differences on the buildings adjacent to waterscapes (t
=13.29 ) and the buildings not adjacent to waterscapes (t = -20.63).
The landscape design in terms of building and waterscape is relevant to the traditional
Thai architecture that Ruethai Chaichongrak has pointed out the relationship of Thai
people to the water environment particularly in terms of human settlement. Early Thai
274
settlements tended to originate near canals and rivers because the livelihood of their
inhabitants depended mainly on water for domestic and agricultural use as well as for
communication. Riverside villages are still common features along most waterways
(Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 20-23). Access to water was important for all aspects of Thai
life, both domestic and agricultural. Thai houses in early settlements were erected along
the canals. Villages are arranged where each house is related to the waterscape, as well as
each house being surrounded by the natural environment.
Case Study: The Four Seasons Resort and Spa: Chiang Mai
The Four Seasons Resort is selected as the case study. The original roofs feature of the
building complex is designed and inspired by the traditional of Northern architecture. The
original feature is the building complex with kalae including ornament as shown in the
275
figure of 139. The figure 140 is simulated featurebuilding complex without kalae and
ornament.
Table 55: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the original and simulatedfeature.
Architects
figure 139
(original: A
building complex
with kalae and
ornament)
mean
SD
4.45
0.71
6.49*
Non-architects
(p-value)
figure 139
(original: A
building complex
with kalae and
ornament)
(p-value)
mean
SD
4.43
0.71
(sig=0.00)
figure 140
(simulatedfeature: A
building complex
without kalae and
ornament)
3.94
0.62
20.84*
(sig=0.00)
figure 140
(simulatedfeature: A
building complex
without kalae and
ornament)
3.01
0.59
276
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that both original building and simulatedfeature reflect with significant differences (t = 20.84).
Table 56: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the basis of architectural
characteristics and design.
Architectural
Characteristics and
Design
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
figure 139
(original: A building
complex with kalae and
ornament)
4.45
0.71
(1)
4.43
0.71
figure 140
(simulated-feature: A
building complex
without kalae and
ornament)
3.94
rank
(1)
0.24
(sig = 0.80)
0.62
(2)
3.01
0.59
(2)
13.22*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 56 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on a building complex with kalae including ornament reflect more
appropriate design to resort architecture for modern Thai character than the lacking
one. They also consider this element for their design.
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects (general
public) respond with no significant differences on a building complex with kalae
including ornament (t = 0.24) and respond with significant differences on a building
complex without kalae and ornament (t = 13.22).
Roof profiles with kalae and ornaments are relevant to the regional Thai architecture that
on the simplest houses, especially those made of bamboo, the kalae are nothing more than
rather crude extensions, possibly serving a functional purpose by simplifying construction
277
and further strengthening the roof. On a house belonging to a more prosperous family,
however, they are often separate pieces, beautifully carved in a shape that does indeed
suggest feathers, or perhaps flickering flames, providing a decorative effect not unlike the
curved finials at either end of Thai temple roofs. Kalea are also found on houses of some
of the hill tribes who live in the northern mountains, as well as those of the Thai Lu people
in southern China and Laos; they are rarely seen on houses in central and southern
Thailand (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 139).
The Tab-kaak Resort is selected as the case study. The original of the roof profile is the
curved-roof including ornament as shown on figure of 142. The figure of 143 is the
simulated-featurebuilding with gable roof.
.
278
Table 57: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the original and simulatedfeature.
Architects
figure 142
(original:
Building with
curved roof
and ornament)
mean
SD
2.85
0.43
-18.46*
Non-architects
(p-value)
figure 142
(original:
Building with
curved roof
and ornament)
(p-value)
mean
SD
3.21
0.80
-11.76*
(sig = 0.00)
figure 143
(simulatedfeature:
Building with
gable roof)
3.94
0.63
(sig = 0.00)
figure 143
(simulatedfeature:
Building with
gable roof)
3.97
0.54
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that both original building and simulatedfeature reflect with significant differences (t = -18.46).
279
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that both original building and simulatedfeature reflect with significant differences (t = -11.76).
Table 58: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the basis of architectural
characteristics and design.
Architectural
characteristics and design
Architects
Non-architects
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
figure 142
(original: Building with
curved roof and ornament)
2.85
0.43
figure 143
(simulated-feature:
Building with gable roof)
3.96
rank
mean
SD
rank
(2)
3.21
0.80
(2)
-4.79*
(sig = 0.00)
0.63
(1)
3.97
0.53
(1)
-0.19
(sig = 0.84)
The mean rating in table 58 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the roof profile of the simulated-feature with gable roof reflects more
appropriate design to resort architecture for modern Thai character than the roof
profile of the original with curved-roof including ornament. They also considered this
element for the designs.
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects (general
public) respond with significant differences on the roof profile of the original with
curved-roof including ornament (t = -4.79) and respond with no significant differences
on that the roof profile of the simulated-feature with gable (t = -0.19).
The curved roof profile of The Tab-kaak Resort, generally architects and non-architects
generally accept the original feature lower the simulated feature, that is due to the tangible
qualities of traditional Thai architecture still be faced to the perception of the respondents.
280
Le Meridean Baan Taling Ngam is selected as the case study. The original feature of the
landscape design is to provide a sense of tranquility and coolness through the landscape
with lily pond as shown in figure of 144. The figure of 145 is the simulated feature the
landscape with walkway.
281
Table 59: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the original and simulatedfeature.
Architects
figure 144
(original:
Landscape
with lily pond)
mean
SD
4.47
0.66
7.03*
Non-architects
(p-value)
figure 144
(original:
Landscape
with lily pond)
(p-value)
mean
SD
3.98
0.48
16.93*
(sig = 0.00)
figure 145
(simulatedfeature:
Landscape
with walkway)
3.95
0.65
(sig = 0.00)
figure 145
(simulatedfeature:
Landscape
with walkway)
3.01
0.62
The mean rating in table 59 reveals that the architects generally find that the original
feature of the landscape with lily pond reflects more appropriate design to resort
architecture for modern Thai character than the simulated feature the landscape
with walkway.
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that both original landscape and simulatedfeature reflect with significant differences (t = 7.03).
282
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that both original landscape and simulatedfeature reflect with significant differences (t = 16.93).
Table 60: Comparative analysis of attitudes between those of architects and non-architects (general public)
towards modern Thai character via simulated models regarding the basis of architectural
characteristics and design.
Architects
Non-architects
Architectural Characteristics
and Design
t
(p-value)
mean
SD
rank
mean
SD
rank
figure 144
(original: Landscape with lily
pond)
4.47
0.66
(1)
3.98
0.48
(1)
figure 145
(simulated-feature: Landscape
with walkway)
3.95
7.36*
(sig = 0.00)
0.65
(2)
3.01
0.62
(2)
12.16*
(sig = 0.00)
The mean rating in table 60 reveals that architects and non-architects (general public)
generally agree on the original feature of the landscape with lily pond reflects more
appropriate design to resort architecture for modern Thai character than the
simulated featurethe landscape with walkway. They also consider this element for the
designs.
Considering on statistical analysis using t-test, and the p-value based on an alpha of 0.05,
the p-values obtained through a t-test show that architects and non-architects (general
public) respond with significant differences in which both the original landscape with lily
pond (t = 7.36) and the simulated featurethe landscape with walkway (t = 12.16).
The landscape design is relevant that to access to water was important for all aspects of
Thai life, both domestic and agricultural. Thai houses in early settlements were erected
along the canals. Villages are arranged where each house is related to the waterscape, as
well as each house being surrounded by the natural environment.
283
Landscaped pools are a typical element in landscape design for traditional and Thai
gardens. Landscaped pools reflect the identity of a Thai garden provide cool sitting areas.
In some instances water jars are planted with water lilies and lotus and placed around the
chan. (H.Shiranan, 1994: 75).
284
Chapter 7
Conclusion and Suggestions
Chapter Overview
In the global contexts of tourism and resort development, resort architecture is still to
accommodate of tourists as well as helping to create the destination that attracts
tourists. Thus, the concept of authenticity and cultural values are integrated within
architectural design development. This research studies the creative dimensions of the
characteristics of modern Thai architecture, including design guidelines for modern
Thai architecture in resort contexts. The opinions of architects and non-architects
(general public) can be summarized as follows:
Summary of the Findings
285
Design considerations that architects need to consider most for defining modern Thai
character under the heading of building organization and grouping are: semienclosed space with chan (central terrace), and uncovered elevated walkways.
In addition, the results indicate that the most significant aspect of appropriate design
for architects are: uncovered elevated walkways; and buildings with coveredwalkways.
The areas in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects
(general public) are:
286
roof profiles
stepped and multi-tiered roofs
roofs and their slopes
roofs and their overhangs
materials and colors
roof and a sense of gracefulness
buildings connected with chan (central terrace)
floors and patterns
flooring and materials
wall panels and character
solid panels
glass panels
wall panels and materials
sao-loy with round-shaped profile
sao-loy with square-shaped profile
sao-loy with square-bases and tops and with buo-shaped or lotus-shaped
capitals
building with brackets
handrails and balusterscharacter and patterns
287
Design considerations that architects should consider with as the most significant
issues for modern Thai characterarchitectural elementsare: roofs and their
overhangs; roof profiles; roofs and their slopes; roof and a sense of gracefulness;
buildings connected with chan (central terrace); buildings connected with palai
(covered verandah); floors and patterns; flooring and materials; uncovered elevated
walkways; wall panels and character; ventilating panel; the materials used for openings
and voids; the proportion and the arrangement of openings and voids; sao-loy with
round-shaped profile; sao-loy with indented-corners; sao-loy with square-bases and
tops and with buo-shaped or lotus-shaped capitals; character and patterns of handrails
and balusters.
In addition, the results of the questionnaire indicates that the following elements are
the most important design consideration: roofs and their overhangs; roof and a sense of
gracefulness; buildings connected with lan- long (open spaces); buildings connected
with chan (central terrace) uncovered elevated walkways; ventilating panel; the
characteristics of openings and voids; materials used for openings and voids; sao-loy
with round-shaped profile; and height and proportion of handrails.
7.1.3 Landscape
As presented in chapter 6 on the characteristics of modern Thai architecture in tangible
qualities and valuesthe landscapethe areas in which architects respond with higher
rating than non-architects (general public) are:
tree at the center of open space
building raised on stilts over the water feature
the sala placed at the middle of the water feature
The areas in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects
(general public) are:
288
Design considerations that architects should consider with as the most significant
issues for modern Thai characterlandscapeare: tree at the center of open space;
trees adjacent to the building; building raised on stilts over the water feature; building
adjacent to the water feature; and the sala placed at the middle of the water feature.
In addition, the important and appropriate design that the architects should concern
with as the design considerations for modern Thai architecture in resort contexts are:
trees adjacent to the building; building raised on stilts over the water feature; sala
adjacent to the water feature; and uncovered elevated walkways
free-standing columns
building adjacent to waterscape
289
The areas in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects
(general public) are:
overhangs
multi-tiered roofs and stepped roofs
raised floor
sloped-wall
overhangs
free-standing columns
Design considerations that architects should concern with as the most significant issues
for modern Thai character in intangible qualities and valuesa sense of lightness are:
free-standing columns; building adjacent to waterscape; overhangs; and multi-tiered
roofs and stepped roofs.
In addition, the important and appropriate design that the architects should concern
with as the design considerations for modern Thai architecture in resort contexts are:
raised floor; overhangs; and free-standing columns.
2. A Sense of Transparency
As presented in chapter 6 on the characteristics of modern Thai architecture in
intangible qualities and valuesa sense of transparency, the areas in which architects
respond with higher rating than non-architects (general public) are:
290
The areas in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects
(general public) are:
Design considerations that architects should concern with as the most significant issues
for modern Thai character in intangible qualities and valuesa sense of transparency
are: building raised on stilts; building organization within semi-enclosed space (e.g.,
building with chan); and building with free-standing columns.
In addition, the important and appropriate design that the architects should concern
with as the design considerations for modern Thai architecture in resort contexts are:
building raised on stilts; building organization within semi-enclosed space (e.g.,
building with chan); and building with free-standing columns.
291
Design considerations that architects should concern with as the most significant issues
for modern Thai character in intangible qualities and valuesa sense of tranquility
and coolness are: buildings adjacent to the waterscape; and buildings adjacent to trees.
In addition, the important and appropriate design that the architects should concern
with as the design considerations for modern Thai architecture in resort contexts are:
buildings adjacent to the waterscape; buildings adjacent to trees.
4. A Sense of Hospitality
covered verandah
Design considerations that architects should concern with as the most significant issues
for modern Thai character in intangible qualities and valuesa sense of hospitality
are: sala (Thai pavilion); and covered verandah.
292
In addition, the important and appropriate design that the architects should concern
with as the design considerations for modern Thai architecture in resort contexts are:
sala (Thai pavilion); covered verandah; and open-air lobby.
Figure 146: Architectural development of modern Thai character according to the results.
Figure 147: Architectural development of modern Thai character according to the appropriate designs.
293
These consistent results suggest four preliminary observations. First, the analysis
shows that both architects and non-architects (general public) have a similar direction
of acceptance regarding to the development of modern Thai architecture by using the
intangible aspects reflecting through traditional Thai architecture.
Second, when Thai characteristics are applied into modern Thai architecture and
design, the style of architecture tends to be more similar to the traditional aspects.
These have obvious implications in terms of expressing Thai character.
Third, tangible qualities and values are still important factors linking the essences of
Thai character expressing through the new functionality of resort architecture.
Fourth, intangible qualities and values express together with tangible aspects. The
architectural characteristics of modern Thai architecture being similar to the traditional
Thai character or not, depend on the purpose of architecture itself.
The in-depth investigations into the impelling factors of national significance reveal
the roles of architecture as Vimolsiddhi Horayangkura suggests that architects should
concern with architecture as cultural heritage because architecture can be a significant
component of national cultural heritage. Thus, there should be architecture of high and
sustainable value that can be accepted as cultural heritage. One critical question that
should be raised is that the present architecture of international style can hardly be
considered as Thai cultural heritage. If being so, we are creeping toward selfdestruction, as the contexts and other influencing factors are changing rapidly.
Eventually, we well come to an end in similar to the slowing down of a pendulum in
moving against the inertia. As professor Sompop Piromya, in referring to Prince
Nariss concept in cultural continuity, has succinctly pointed out that we should not
only use up our past heritages, but we should also create new glories (Horayangkura,
2002: 104-106).
Tan Hock Beng stated that meaningful direction in contemporary architecture in
southeast Asia can only evolve if there is a deeper understanding and protracted reevaluation of indigenous building traditions in an ever-expanding field of possibilities
than is practiced at the moment. The challenge lies in dismantling many of the existing
false fronts designed to project a superficial reassurance of identity, and seeking
instead new modes of representation. Architects must understand the fundamental
lessons found in the rich local traditions of the region, and learn to synthesize them
into convincing forms determinedly contemporary and appropriate to changing
conditions (Beng , 1995: 216).
294
The areas in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects (general
public) are:
The area in which both architects and non-architects respond with significant
differences is:
Design guidelines that architects should concern with as the most significant issues for
modern Thai architecture in resort contextsthe various aspects of site planning are:
using traditional Thai wisdom and design principles to guide building
organization to better protect the sites from tsunami threats; respect to the site
context; and applying specific tangible steps to landscape design; these include
such features as the waterscape, tree plantings and other hardscape and
landscape components.
295
The areas in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects (general
public) are:
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences
are:
using traditional Thai wisdom and approaches to building that together help to
integrate against the effects of possible future tsunami disasters
Design guidelines that architects should concern with as the most significant issues for
modern Thai architecture in resort contextsarchitectural characteristics and
design are: utilizing intangible elements of Thai character, such as a sense of
lightness, tranquility, transparency, and hospitality; respect for the concepts of
296
authenticity and regional architecture; and using traditional Thai wisdom and
approaches to building that together help to integrate against the effects of
possible future tsunami disasters.
7.2.3 Landscape
using landscape components such as sala, lily ponds, and water features to
create the landscape
using the existing condition of site and its context to create a sense of modern
Thai architecture through the practicality of low costs
The area in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects (general
public) is:
incorporating tradition the Thai wisdom and practice, including trees with
aerial covering for the landscape design and also as a protective measure in
case of tsunamis
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences
are:
using landscape components such as sala, lily ponds, and water features to
create the landscape
using the existing condition of site and its context to create a sense of modern
Thai architecture through the practicality of low costs
incorporating tradition the Thai wisdom and practice, including trees with
aerial covering for the landscape design and also as a protective measure in
case of tsunamis
Design guidelines that architects should concern with as the most significant issues for
modern Thai architecture in resort contextslandscape are: using the existing
condition of site and its context to create a sense of modern Thai architecture
through the practicality of low costs; and incorporating tradition the Thai wisdom
and practice, including trees with aerial covering for the landscape design and
also as a protective measure in case of tsunamis.
297
The areas in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects (general
public) are:
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences
are:
Design guidelines that architects should concern with as the most significant issues for
modern Thai architecture in resort contextsbuilding technology and construction
are: using materials which have little impact on the environment; incorporating
aspects of traditional Thai wisdom such as ventilating panels, and pre-fabricated
systems of wall panels; and using materials which have little impact on the
environment.
298
The areas in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects (general
public) are:
The areas in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences
are:
using the completed form of architectural work and structural aesthetics to set
the creative standards for interior architecture
respect for the concepts of authenticity and regional architecture also to guide
the interior architecture
applying the abstract dimensions of Thai character, such as a sense of
transparency, tranquility, and a sense of hospitality to create the interior
architecture in resort design
Design guidelines that architects should concern with as the most significant issues for
modern Thai architecture in resort contextsinterior architecture and decorations
are: applying the abstract dimensions of Thai character, such as a sense of
transparency, tranquility, and a sense of hospitality to create the interior
architecture in resort design; respect for the traditional hierarchical order of
Thai architecture; respect for the traditional hierarchical order of Thai
architecture.
299
The area in which architects respond with lower rating than non-architects (general
public) is:
present-day regulations and laws are not appropriate for modern Thai
architecture and resort designs
The area in which architects and non-architects respond with significant differences
is:
Design guidelines that architects should concern with as the most significant issue for
modern Thai architecture in resort contextslaws and regulations is to improve the
regulations and laws governing new construction in order to both encourage
more cultural awareness of modern Thai architecture and help protect sites from
potential future tsunami disasters.
300
Figure 148: the paradigm of design development of modern Thai architecture in resort contexts.
The research findings indicate that architects should be concerned and not only with
the highest degree of modern Thai character as apart of the design process, but they
also incorporate the ideals of sustainable architecture into the design considerations as
well. Architects might integrate in the design approach through an understanding of
the tourists needs, site context, authenticity of the site, and so forth. They should also
be aware of the practicality for modern Thai architecture in both the Thai and global
context.
Vimolsiddhi Harangkura suggests that the conceptual framework for the creation of
modern Thai architecture should not be based on traditional design criteria, features,
components, etc. To be more appropriate to the contexts of modern society, these must
be developed through experimental researches. He argues that a notable period of
incubation for the development should be extended to foster more public recognition.
Likewise, he feels, the creative endeavor should not simply base on international or
foreign style without any integration with traditional or regional criteria. The approach
put forward here is that to attain a true modern Thai architecture is a truly creative
process. Creative thinking encompasses multiple contextual factors, the specific needs
301
of various social and user groups, appropriate and advanced technology that is well
integrated with local wisdoms, including the modern Thai character that has gone
through experimental research. Such a global concept, along the new wave of green
architecture, contributes overall to the notion of an environmental culture
(Harangkura, 2002: 211).
In addition, sustainable architecture, through the attention and respect of local cultural
traditions and the environmental impact, manages to merge natural and human-made
spaces and contributes to the creation of a sense of place. Architecture can either
facilitate or limit the process of discovery of the local culture, since it is its privileged
means of expression. If built according to vernacular design principles and traditional
style, the resorts become a monument to local architecture (Deda, 2003:57)
2. The future research should be conducted concerning theories and relevant topics
together with a survey focusing on the use of physical configuration of both past and
current Thai architecture. The results of survey will be used to make simulated models
to be applied together with questionnaires targeting at architects and general public.
The aim of research will be to compare Thai character and the suitability arising from
using various aspects of Thai character between the actual and virtual perception of
simulated models. It should also be aimed to compare the perception and acceptance of
Thai character between the two groups of the respondents.
3. The future research should be more specific on the architectural identity of regional
architecture in order to investigate the appropriate design for modern Thai architecture
in resort contexts particularly in terms of the architectural identity of authentic
concept.
4. The future research should also look more specifically into the appropriate design
in terms of hierarchical orders of Thai architecture.
5. As the results of this research, both groups of architects and non-architects
(general public) strongly express their own opinions on the tsunami disaster and
302
rethinking the design of resort architecture with appropriate solution that reflects the
Thai wisdom and indigenous architecture. Therefore, the future research should be
more specific in both architectural design and proper structure as well as the
integration through the design of landscaping.
6. Future research should also be more specific concerning the opinions of
international tourist in order to investigate appropriate design for modern Thai
architecture in resort contexts. This is particularly true in terms of the tourists
responses to the perception of architectural images, for the future design of the
architects, as well as the responses from the two groups of respondents.
Applications
The research findings reveal the design and its trend for modern Thai architecture in
resort contexts which could be the basis of design strategies for architect to consider in
the design process aiming at both of creativity and practicality. They include:
303
Figure 149: new paradigm with global concept for the design development of modern Thai architecture in resort
contexts.
304
Table 61: Summary of the results regarding the basis of building organization and grouping with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Comparison
Statistical direction
remark
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Architects
Nonarchitects
9
1.
Building organization and grouping: semienclosed space with chan (a central terrace)
2.
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
305
Table 62: Summary of the results regarding the basis of architectural elementsroofs and roofing with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general
public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
1. Roof profiles
Nonarchitects
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Non-architects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
306
Table 63: Summary of the results regarding the basis of architectural elements connecting spaces with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general
public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Comparison
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Architects
Nonarchitects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
307
Table 64: Summary of the results regarding the basis of architectural elementsfloors and flooring with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general
public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
Nonarchitects
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
308
Table 65: Summary of the results regarding the basis of architectural elementswall panels with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
309
Table 66: Summary of the results regarding the basis of architectural elementsopenings and voids with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general
public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Comparison
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Architects
Nonarchitects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
310
Table 67: Summary of the results regarding the basis of architectural elementsfree-standing posts and columns with the attitudes of architects and non-architects
(general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Comparison
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Architects
Nonarchitects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
311
Table 68: Summary of the results regarding the basis of architectural elementsbrackets with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Statistical direction
Comparison
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Architects
Nonarchitects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
312
Table 69: Summary of the results regarding the basis of landscapetree locations with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Statistical direction
Comparison
Nonarchitects
Architects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
Nonarchitects
313
Table 7 0: Summary of the results regarding the basis of landscapewaterscape with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
Statistical direction
Comparison
Nonarchitects
Architects
Nonarchitects
314
Table 71: Summary of the results regarding the basis of landscapesala (Thai pavilion) with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
Nonarchitects
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
315
Table 72: Summary of the results regarding the basis of landscapebridge walkways with the attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
1.
2.
} = significant difference
Statistical direction
Comparison
Nonarchitects
Architects
Nonarchitects
= no significant difference
316
Table 73: Summary of the results regarding the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa sense of lightness with the attitudes of architects and non-architects
(general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Statistical direction
Nonarchitects
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
1. Overhangs
3. Free-standing columns
4. Raised floor
6. Slant wall
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
remark
317
Table 74: Summary of the results regarding the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa sense of transparency with the attitudes of architects and non-architects
(general public)
grouping
Expression of
modern Thai character
Comparison
Statistical direction
NonArchitects
architects
Comparison
Statistical direction
NonArchitects
architects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
318
Table 75: Summary of the results regarding the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa sense of tranquility and coolness with the attitudes of architects and
non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Comparison
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Architects
Nonarchitects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
319
Table 76: Summary of the results regarding the basis of intangible qualities and valuesa sense of hospitality with the attitudes of architects and non-architects
(general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
1. Open-air lobby
2. Entrance pavilion
4. Covered verandah
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
320
Table 77: Summary of the results of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture regarding the basis of the various aspects of site planning with the attitudes
of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
1.
2.
3.
4.
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
remark
321
Table 78: Summary of the results of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture regarding the basis of architectural characteristics and design with the
attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
= no significant difference
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
remark
322
Table 78: Summary of the results of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture regarding the basis of architectural characteristics and design with the
attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public) (cont).
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Comparison
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
6.
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
Statistical direction
Architects
Nonarchitects
323
Table 79: Summary of the results of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture regarding the basis of the landscape with the attitudes of architects and nonarchitects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Statistical direction
Comparison
remark
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Architects
Nonarchitects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
324
Table 80: Summary of the results of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture regarding the basis of building technology and constructions with the
attitudes of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
1.
2.
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
}
remark
Nonarchitects
9
3.
4.
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
325
Table 81: Summary of the results of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture regarding the basis of interior architecture and decoration with the attitudes
of architects and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
Statistical direction
Comparison
Architects
} = significant difference
= no significant difference
remark
Comparison
Nonarchitects
Statistical direction
Architects
Nonarchitects
326
Table 82: Summary of the results of the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture regarding the basis of laws and regulations with the attitudes of architects
and non-architects (general public)
Expression of
modern Thai character
remark
Statistical direction
Statistical direction
Comparison
Comparison
Architects
Nonarchitects
= no significant difference
Architects
Nonarchitects
327
Bibliography
Chot Kalynamitr. (1993). Dictionary of Thai Architecture, Bangkok: The Office of the
National Culture Commission.
Choti Kalynamitr. (1996). Traditional Thai Architecture, Bangkok: Thammasat
University Press.
Curtis, E. (2001). Hotel: Interior Structure, New York: Wiley Acadamy.
Deloitte & Touche. (1992). Business strategy for sustainable development:
Leadership and accountability for the '90s, Winnipeg: International Institute
for Sustainable Development.
Ettensperger, E. (2001). Under the Banyan Tree, Singapore: Person.
Frampton, K. (1982). The Status of Man and the status of His Objects. Modern
Architecture and The Critical Present, Architectural Design Profile, London:
Garden House Press. pp. 6-19.
Jumsai, Sumet. (1988). Naga, Cultural Origins in Siam and the West Pacific,
Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University.
Kaiseang Sukawattana. (1995). Suan Thai (Thai Garden), Bangkok: Amarin Printing
& Publishing.
328
329
Yupma, H. (2000). HIP Hotels: Escape, New York: Thames & Hudson.
. (2001). HIP Hotels: Budget, New York: Thames & Hudson.
Zeiher, L.G. (1996). Ecology of Architecture, New York: Watson-Guptill.
330
331
Questionnaire
332
Faculty of Architecture
Silpakorn University
Graduate School
The information that you have provided in this questionnaire will only be used for the
purpose of this dissertation. They will not be disclosed, under any circumstances, to
the third party.
Khiensak Seangklieng
Ph. D. Candidate in Architectural
Heritage Management and Tourism.
333
Overview
334
Questionnaire Items
Questionnaires are divided into 4 parts as follows:
Part 1: To study the opinions and perception of modern Thai character in both
tangible and intangible qualities and values which are important and appropriate
design for resort architecture.
Instruction: please indicate the extent to which you agree with each of the following
statements and items by circling the appropriate number.
Coding scheme:
1
2
3
4
5
=
=
=
=
=
Strongly disagree
Somewhat disagree
Neutral
Somewhat agree
Strongly agree
Example :
Expression to modern Thai character
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
335
336
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
337
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
338
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
339
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
340
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
341
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
Figure 1: building connected with chan (central terrace) and palai (covered verandah)
Figure
2:
2) Connecting spaces
342
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
Expression to modern
Thai character
- Solid panels
- Glass panels
- Ventilating panel
4) Wall panels
343
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
344
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
6) Sao-loy (free-standing
posts and columns
6.1 Sao-loy with roundshaped profile
6.2 Sao-loy with squareshaped profile
345
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
7) Brackets
346
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
8) Handrails and
Balusters
347
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
9) Tree planting
348
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
3. Landscape: Waterscape
Thai character in tangible
qualities and values
10) Waterscape
349
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
11.1
Sala adjacent to the
water feature
11.2
Sala placed at the
middle of the water
feature
350
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
351
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
1. A Sense of Lightness
What is your point of view to the intangible qualities and values of modern Thai architecture in
terms of a sense of lightness that reflected to modern Thai character? And how is it important
to the resort contexts and the design?
1. A Sense of Lightness
Thai character in
intangible qualities and
values
1) A Sense of Lightness
1.1 Overhangs
352
2. A Sense of Transparency
What is your point of view to the intangible qualities and values of modern Thai architecture in
terms of a sense of transparency that reflected to modern Thai character? And how is it
important to the resort contexts and the design?
2. A Sense of Transparency
Thai character in
intangible qualities and
values
2) A Sense of Transparency
353
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
3) A Sense of Tranquility
and Coolness
354
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
4. A Sense of Hospitality
What is your point of view to the intangible qualities and values of modern Thai architecture in
terms of a sense of hospitality that reflected to modern Thai character? And how is it
important to the resort contexts and the design?
4. A Sense of Hospitality
Thai character in
intangible qualities and
values
4) A Sense of Hospitality
4.Entrance pavilion
355
Part 2: To study the opinions on the design guidelines for modern Thai architecture in resort
contexts.
Instruction: Please indicate the extent to which you agree with each of the follow statement
by circling the appropriate number
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
1. Design Guidelines for Modern Thai Architecture in Resort Contexts: The Various Aspects
of Site Planning
356
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
357
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
4. Design Guidelines for Modern Thai Architecture in Resort Contexts: Building Technology
and Construction
1) Using materials available
in the local community
358
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
5. Design Guidelines for Modern Thai Architecture in Resort Contexts: Interior Architecture
and Decorations
359
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
1
2
3
Strongly agree
4
5
6. Design Guidelines for Modern Thai Architecture in Resort Contexts: Laws and
Regulations
360
Part 3: To study the characteristics of modern Thai architecture using the simulated-models of
case studies.
Instruction: Please indicate the extent to which you agree with each of the following
statements and items by circling the appropriate number that represent the degree of modern
Thai character in resort contexts.
Coding scheme:
1
2
3
4
5
=
=
=
=
=
Strongly disagree
Somewhat disagree
Neutral
Somewhat agree
Strongly agree
Example: The figure of building as shown below, to be constructed in city of Phuket, please
indicate the extent to which you agree.
Figure 01:
How did the building express and reflect the authentic architecture?
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
361
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
How did the building and its context express and reflect degree of modern Thai character?
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
362
Figure 1
Figure 2
How did the building express and reflect the authentic architecture?
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1
Figure 2
363
Figure 1
Figure 2
How did the building express and reflect degree of modern Thai character?
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1
Figure 2
364
Figure 1
Figure 2
How did the building and its context express and reflect degree of modern Thai character?
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1
Figure 2
365
Figure 1
Figure 2
How did the building express and reflect degree of modern Thai character?
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1
Figure 2
366
Figure 1
Figure 2
How did the building express and reflect degree of modern Thai character?
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1
Figure 2
367
Figure 1
Figure 2
How did the landscape express and reflect degree of modern Thai character?
Levels of opinion
Strongly disagree
Strongly agree
1
2
3
4
5
Figure 1
Figure 2
368
Please indicate and the following statements and items by 9 in the or fill the information in
the blank.
Name-Last name .........................................................................................................................................................
Gender
Male
Female
Age
.........................years
Occupation
Architect
Other ..........................................................................................
Division
Private
Official
Educational
Bachelor
Higher
Other ................................................
Incomes
............................................Baht / Month
Address ..........................................................................................................................................
...............................
Recommend / Suggestions
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
369
370
1 2548
(Design
Guidelines for Modern Thai Architecture in Resort Contexts) Professor William R. Chapman, D. Phi.
( )
371
2-3
1
=
2
=
3
=
4
=
5
=
372
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1
2
3
4
5
1.
1.1
1.1.1
1.1.2
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
373
1
2
3
4
5
1.
1.2
1.2.1
1.2.2
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
374
1
2
3
4
5
1.
1.3
1.3.1
1.3.2
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
375
1
2
3
4
5
1.
1.4
1.4.1
1.4.2
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
376
1
2
3
4
5
1.
1.5
1.5.1
1.5.2
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
377
1
2
3
4
5
2. :
1)
1.1
(
1 2 3 4 5
(resort)
1
1.2
(
)
1.3
(
)
1.4
(
)
1.5
1.6
378
1
2
3
4
5
2. :
2)
2.1
1 2 3 4 5
2.2
1 2 3 4 5
2.3
1 2 3 4 5
(resort)
1 2 3 4 5
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
379
1
2
3
4
5
2. :
3)
3.1
1 2 3 4 5
3.2
1 2 3 4 5
(resort)
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
2. :
4)
4.1
1 2 3 4 5
-
1 2 3 4 5
-
1 2 3 4 5
-
1 2 3 4 5
4.2
1 2 3 4 5
4.3
1 2 3 4 5
(resort)
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
2. :
5)
5.1
(
1 2 3 4 5
)
5.2
1 2 3 4 5
5.3
1 2 3 4 5
(resort)
1
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
380
1
2
3
4
5
3
4
2. :
6)
6.1
1 2 3 4 5
6.2
1 2 3 4 5
6.3
1 2 3 4 5
6.4
1 2 3 4 5
(resort)
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
381
1
2
3
4
5
2. :
7)
7.1
1 2 3 4 5
7.2
1 2 3 4 5
(resort)
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
2. :
8)
8.1
1 2 3 4 5
8.2
1 2 3 4 5
8.3
1 2 3 4 5
(resort)
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
382
1
2
3
4
5
2
3. :
9)
9.1
9.2
9.3
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
(resort)
5
5
5
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
5
5
383
1
2
3
4
5
3. :
10)
10.1
10.2
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
(resort)
5
5
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
384
1
2
3
4
5
3. :
11)
11.1
11.2
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
(resort)
5
5
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
385
1
2
3
4
5
3. :
12)
12.1
1 2 3 4 5
12.2
1 2 3 4 5
(resort)
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
4
5
5
386
1
2
3
4
5
1.
1.
(resort)
1)
1.1
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1.2
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1.3
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1.4
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1.5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1.6
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
2.
2.
(resort)
2)
2.1
( )
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
2.2
( )
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
2.3
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
2.4
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
2.5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
387
1
2
3
4
5
3.
3.
3)
(resort)
3.1
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
3.2
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
3.3
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
4.
4.
4)
(resort)
4.1
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
4.2
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
4.3
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
4.4
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
388
1
2 3
4
5
1. :
1)
1
2
3
4
5
2)
1
2
3
4
5
3)
1
2
3
4
5
4)
1
2
3
4
5
2.
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
389
3.
1)
2)
3)
(aerial roots)
4.
1)
2)
3)
4)
390
5.
1)
2)
3)
4)
6.
1)
2)
391
1
=
2
=
3
=
4
=
5
=
:
1
2 3 4
5
392
1
.
1
2 3
4
5
1
393
2
.
1
2 3
4
5
1
394
3
.
1
2 3
4
5
1
395
4
.
1
2 3
4
5
1
396
5
.
1
2 3
4
5
1
397
6
.
1
2 3
4
5
1
398
1
2 3
4
5
1
399
9
( )
.........................................................................................................................................................
.........................
..........................................................................................
................................................
............................................ /
/
.........................................................................................................................................................................
/
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
400
401
GLOSSARY
Chan uncovered terrace of a traditional Thai house.
Khlong canal.
Kutti monks cell or chamber.
Lan na northern region of Thailand.
Naak or naga (Sanskrit) mythological serpent that lives in water.
Ngao lower end-piece of a bargeboard, usually in a pointed and curved form.
Pan-lom bargeboard.
Phra thinang throne hall, royal pavilion (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 242).
.
402
403
Magrud Citrus hystrix. Considered auspicious in the compound, the leaves of this tree
are used in many Thai dishes.
Makha Afzelia xylocarpa. A beautiful hardwood tree from mixed deciduous forests
used in construction and furniture. Employed in some modern houses for fine
staircases.
Makok Spondias pinnata, the Hog Palum Tree.
Mango Mangifera indica. A tall tree which produces the renowned, delicious oval
fruits. Numerous variants are found in Thailand.
Ma-ngua Citrus medica. This small tree was considered auspicious in the compound,
largely because of its medicinal properties.
Maplab Diospyros lotus. The Date Plum, an Asiatic persimmon with a small yellow
or purple black edible fruit.
Maprang Bouea burmanica. Considered auspicious in the compound, this tree
produces delicious orange fruit with a sweet-and-sour flavor.
Maroom Moringa oleifera. The Horseradish Tree, a short, slender, deciduous tree
that is widely used for various food products and can be employed in live fences.
Matoom Aegle marmelos. The Bengal Quince or Indian Bael Tree. A citrus
relative, associated in India with Siva worship. Grown in compounds.
Mayom Phyllanthus acidus. The Malay or Star Gooseberry. Another fruiting tree,
considered auspicious in the house compound.
Nipa palm See Jaak.
Payung Dalbergia sp.
Phai sisook Bambusa flexuosa. A species of bamboo.
Pikun Mimusops elengi. A flowering tree grown in compound, and a traditional
medicine.
Pradu Pterocarpus macrocarpus. A tree found widely in savanna and mixed
deciduous forests. It produces a beautiful, hard wood, much valued in construction and
furniture.
Putsa Zizyphus jujuba. A fruiting tree considered auspicious in the compound. The
small acidic fruits are much loved by both adults and children.
Rajapruek Cassia fistula. One of 9 auspicious woods buried in the post hole of central
Thai houses. Known for its wonderful cascades of glorious yellow flowers, it is often
404
planted to mark the birth of a child. The hard wood was traditionally employed for the
spokes of buffalo cart wheels.
Rung Shorea (Pentacme) siamensis. A deciduous hardwood tree characteristic of the
savanna forests of the North and North-East of Thailand. Much used in house
construction.
Sadaow Azadirachta indica. The famous Neem Tree. A fruiting tree auspicious in
the compound.
Sakhu Metroxylon sagu. The Sago Palm.
Sak thong Tectona grandis. One of the most celebrated and valuable timbers in the
world ; native to Thailand and Burma. Golden teak is used for house construction,
furniture and many decorative purposes.
Salatdai Euphorbia antiquorum. A tree from more seasonal areas of Asia. It has
paired spines and can grow enormous. Inauspicious in the compound.
Samae Avicennia alba. An important, fast-growing, mangrove tree, used in mangrove
reclamation.
Samrong Sterculia toetida. The skunk tree, noted for its distinctive odour.
Saraphi Mammea siamensis. Considered auspicious in the compound.
Sompoi Acacia concinna. Also seen as auspicious in the compound.
Song badarn Cassia surattensis. The Sunshine Tree or Glaucous Cassis.
Takien Hopea odorata. A tall evergreen tree, much used in construction. A
characteristic species of the semi-evergreen forest, as at Kho Yai National Park.
Taan Borassus flabellifer. Commonly known as the Sugar palm, the fruits are used
to make palm sugar and the fronds for thatch or matting.
Tako Dyospyros sp.
Teng Shorea obtusa. A deciduous hardwood tree characteristic of the savanna forests
of the North and North-east. Much used in construction.
Thong larng Erythrina orientalis. The Coral Tree, known for its claw-shaped redorange blossoms. Not native to Thailand but regarded as highly auspicious and The
Tree of the Gods. Its leaves are much used in Thai cooking. Its name means lots of
gold.
Wan Sedges widely used for matting.
405
Ya kha Imperator aundinacea. An important grass for thatching.
Yang In general, this term indicates a tree that produces some sort of resin; hence its
use for the rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis). In Thailand, it is more traditionally
employed as a classifier for a number of important trees used in construction in the
Dipterocarpaceae family.
Yor Morinda citrifolia. A tall tree which is considered auspicious in the compound.
The leaves are used in cooking (Chaichongrak et al, 2002: 243).
406
Autobiography
Name-Surname
Permanent Address
Contact Address
Educational Background
2003-Current
407
1987-1994
Professional Membership:
Association of Siam Architects (ASA, Thailand)
Registration
Registered Architect, Board of Registration In Architecture, Council
of Thai Architect
Professional Consultant:
Shapadu Corporation SDN BHD (Malaysia)
Shapadu Global Thailand
WVK Design Group Co.,Ltd.
Pornaramitrap Co., Ltd.
Seminars and Research:
408
Teaching Experiences:
2003-Current