Study of Training and Development: Audit and Evaluation Division March 2002

Study of
Training and Development
FINAL REPORT
Audit and Evaluation Division

March 2002
Study of Training and Development
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................I
I.
INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................... 1
BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................... 1
OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE .................................................................................................... 1
II. METHODOLOGY........................................................................................................ 2
III.
FINDINGS .................................................................................................................. 3
ACCESSIBILITY OF TRAINING ............................................................................................ 3

Employee Opinion Surveys ............................................................................................ 3
Access by Group and Level ............................................................................................ 3
Official Languages ......................................................................................................... 4
Employment Equity ........................................................................................................ 5
Availability of Information ............................................................................................ 8
Required Training .......................................................................................................... 9
Cost Considerations...................................................................................................... 11
EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................. 11
Planning and Support for Training and Development............................................... 12
Tools, Methods and Practices to Evaluate Training................................................... 13
IV.
RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................................................... 15
APPENDIX A MANAGEMENT ACTION PLAN.......................................................17
March 2002
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Training and development are integrated elements of Statistics Canadas corporate human
resource strategy. This strategy is supported by four pillars: entry-level recruitment of the
best and the brightest; training for skill building; career broadening to develop versatility
and to help nurture future leaders; and providing a positive work environment that helps to
win the commitment of career employees.1
As a result of its efforts, the Agency has achieved recognition as a best-practice
organization in career development.2 Notwithstanding this success, senior management is
committed to finding ways to even further strengthen its management of training and
development, as well as to identifying any opportunities that may exist to enhance
employee access to training and development.
The objectives of the study were to assess the overall accessibility of training and
development, as well as the extent to which training and development is managed
effectively. The scope of the study included formal training courses, with particular
attention to flagship courses. Language training, computer-based training and surveyspecific training were not included.
This work was accomplished through extensive interviews with managers, employees and
training professionals as well as through researching of relevant training information and
other documentation. Data gathering and analysis were carried out in the year 2000.
Findings on Accessibility of Training
Accessibility was examined from several perspectives: group and level, employee opinion
survey findings, employment equity, cost considerations, official languages, availability of
information and required training. While some improvements to the accessibility of
training can be made, corporately the findings indicate that training is generally available.
The timeliness of required training for ES recruits is acceptable, for the most part.
However, the proportion of CS recruits receiving required training in a timely manner has
declined, over time. Some clarifications are still required concerning what constitutes
required training and to whom it applies.
Findings on Effective Management
Two components of effective management were examined: planning and support for
training and development; and evaluation tools, methods and practices. In general, the
study found that planning and support for training and development at the corporate level
are incorporated into organizational plans and activities. At the divisional level, however,
integrated planning and support is less evident.
March 2002
Although the study did not examine the functionality of the human resources system,
Global, and the sub-system, Global-Orbit, a number of those interviewed raised concerns
regarding the completeness and usefulness of information in the system.
Training literature reviewed during the conduct of the study consistently underlined the
importance of using a number of different indicators to formally evaluate training. These
include: participant reaction; learning; behaviour; and results. Participant reaction is the
most commonly used technique within most organizations, and Statistics Canada is no
exception. However, the Agency also carries out evaluation using the other three
indicators, although to a lesser extent.
Recommendations
This study makes the following four recommendations:
1. Senior management should encourage divisions that are not yet doing so, to plan and
support training at a divisional level in order to ensure a more strategic, co-ordinated
approach to the management of employee training.
2. For new training courses or programs, course designers should include measures to
evaluate learning and behaviour (performance).
3. For existing courses, a plan should be established to identify ways in which to integrate
evaluation measures that address learning and behaviour (performance).
4. Any user surveys undertaken as part of the renewal of the Global system should include
consultations with training administrators and divisional managers in order to ensure
that the systems capabilities better support their planning, management and
information needs.
Appendix A contains the management action plan developed in response to these
recommendations.
Conclusion
The studys findings on the accessibility of training are generally positive for all groups of
employees and therefore we made no recommendations. As a helpful tool, information for
line managers has been collated, focusing on promising practices and possible solutions to
barriers identified by employees. We expect it will assist managers in meeting challenges
of a workplace recognized for a very positive culture surrounding human resources
management.
March 2002
ii
Of the four recommendations pertaining to effective management, the first one is most
important since with a coordinated approach, accountability is heightened, better planning
occurs and similar problems get addressed in a like manner. Therefore, it offers the most
potential for improvement in divisions where such practices are not in use.
Recommendations 2 and 3 are in keeping with the federal government direction towards
performance reporting and results-based management. There is no standard methodology
for translating this into action, providing scope to the organization to determine what is
appropriate.
Fellegi, Ivan. On career development at Statistics Canada Optimum, The Journal of Public Sector
Management, Vol. 29, No. 4 (1999), pp. 31-37
Lam, Nathalie et al. Career Development in Best-practice Organizations: Critical Success Factors
Optimum, The Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 29, No. 4 (1999), pp. 22-30
March 2002
iii
I.
INTRODUCTION
Background
Training and development are integrated elements of Statistics Canadas corporate human
resource strategy. This strategy is supported by four pillars: entry-level recruitment of the
best and the brightest; training for skill building; career broadening to develop versatility
and to help nurture future leaders; and providing a positive work environment that helps to
win the commitment of career employees.1
As a result of its efforts, the Agency has achieved recognition as a best-practice
organization in career development.2 Notwithstanding this success, senior management is
committed to finding ways to even further strengthen its management of training and
development, as well as to identifying any opportunities that may exist to enhance
employee access to training and development.
Objectives and Scope
Objectives
The objectives of the study were to assess the overall accessibility of training and
development, as well as the extent to which training and development is managed
effectively.
Scope
The study focussed on:
Formal training courses e.g. computer courses, general overview courses, flagship
courses, marketing courses, and Public Service Commission courses. Particular
attention was paid to flagship courses which include: the Survey Skills Development
Course (SSDC) (households and businesses); the Survey Support Certificate Course
(SSCC) Level 1; SSCC Level 2; and the Data Interpretation Workshop.
Employees hired under the Public Service Employment Act (public servants)
The study did not focus on language training, computer-based training, and survey-specific
training.
Fellegi, Ivan. On career development at Statistics Canada Optimum, The Journal of Public Sector
Management, Vol. 29, No. 4 (1999), pp. 31-37
Lam, Nathalie et al. Career Development in Best-practice Organizations: Critical Success Factors
Optimum, The Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 29, No. 4 (1999), pp. 22-30
March 2002
Criteria
The criteria for this study reflect standards set in Statistics Canada policy and guidelines; a
review of literature on training and development; and a training evaluation model widely
recognized by training and development professionals. This model was used in an audit of
training and development by the Office of the Auditor General in British Columbia.3
The specific criteria are as follows:
With respect to accessibility of training and development:
1. That there are no barriers to access to training and career development programs for
Statistics Canada employees.
2. That employees targeted for required training as part of Statistics Canada recruitment
and development programs receive such training within the specified time frames.
With respect to effective management of training and development:
3. That planning and support for training and development is a part of corporate and
divisional plans and activities.
4. That tools, methods and practices exist to assess training and development
performance.
II.
METHODOLOGY
The following methods were used to carry out this study:
A review of training and development information contained in policies; guidelines;

reports; committee and meeting minutes; course calendars, outlines, and promotional
material; correspondence; and web-sites;
A total of 129 persons from 7 divisions were interviewed; these included: 21 trainers;
24 training professionals; 38 divisional managers; and 46 employees;
An examination of results from Statistics Canada and Public Service Employee Opinion
Surveys;
An analysis of data from the Global human resource system; and
Consolidation of summary data constructed from a variety of sources.
These inputs have enabled this study to: report on the extent to which the criteria were
met; provide tables related to access to training; identify barriers to training and suggest
solutions to overcome these barriers, wherever possible; and identify promising practices
related to training and development. Data gathering and analysis for this study was carried
out in the year 2000.
British Columbia. Office of the Auditor General. Maintaining Human Capital in the British Columbia
Public Service: The Role of Training and Development 1999/2000 Report 3.
March 2002
III.
FINDINGS
This section provides findings related to the accessibility, and effective management, of
training and development, primarily from a corporate perspective.
Accessibility of Training
Employee Opinion Surveys
The 1998 Statistics Canada Employee Opinion Survey and the 1999 Public Service
Employee Survey offer benchmarks to gauge how well Statistics Canada is faring with
respect to training and development in the view of its employees.
The 1998 Statistics Canada Survey found that 78.6% of indeterminate employees felt they
were treated fairly when requesting training although the results from all divisions were not
equally positive. For example, in nine divisions, less than 69% of respondents indicated
that they felt they received fair treatment related to their training requests, and in three of
these nine divisions, the percentage of respondents who felt they had been treated fairly
was only 56%. This suggests that opportunities still exist for improvement in some areas.
The 1999 Public Service Employee Survey indicated that Statistics Canada rated better
than the Public Service as a whole in response to questions about training and development.
Survey results showed that 76% of Agency employees agreed with the statement My
department does a good job in supporting employee career development. This compared
to only 48% of employees at a Public Service-wide level. In addition, the Survey showed
that 81% of Statistics Canada employees agreed that they received the training they needed
to do their jobs, compared to 72% of employees across the Public Service.
Access by Group and Level
Recruitment and development programs for the ES, MA and CS professional groups
include formal training programs e.g. for the CS group, there is a requirement to participate
in the SSDC course. As a result of program requirements, recruits in these professional
groups generally receive more training than employees not enrolled in such programs.
Although recruitment and development programs are viewed positively, some employees
believe recruits are privileged with the amount and type of training they receive.
Flagship course trainers report that the mix of participants has shifted over time to include a
higher number of new recruits than employees who have been with Statistics Canada for a
longer period of time.
March 2002
Training ratios
To calculate the training ratio for any group, the percent of training received by that group was divided by
the percent of the Statistics Canada population made up by that group. For example, if a group received
10% of the training days, and made up 10% of the population, its training ratio would be 1.00. If the group
received 15% of the training days, and had 10% of the population, its training ratio would be 1.50.
Table 1: Group training ratios4

Category5
Training Ratio
199293 199394 199495 199596 199697 199798 199899
2.14
2.19
1.57
1.63
1.24
1.80
3.79
ES 1-3
2.75
2.91
1.38
1.36
2.12
1.59
1.48
MA 1-3
1.53
1.50
1.52
1.73
1.51
1.35
1.47
CS 1-2
Entry level professionals excluded from calculations in this section:
1.21
1.38
1.37
1.21
1.32
1.36
1.50
SI 1-3
0.71
0.72
0.99
1.14
0.90
0.82
0.82
ES 4-7
0.75
0.56
0.89
0.92
0.54
0.67
0.78
MA 4-7
1.16
0.99
1.35
1.36
1.18
1.06
1.10
CS 3-5
0.90
1.12
1.21
1.09
0.67
0.79
0.79
SI 4-8
1.71
1.02
1.01
1.04
1.08
0.86
0.80
Other Officers
0.96
0.94
0.74
0.74
0.99
1.08
0.87
Support
Source: HRDD tables produced from Global system.
Based on Table 1, it would appear that for the Agencys mainstream groups, e.g. ES, MA,
and CS, access to training is more a function of level than category, with more training
being provided to recruits than to other levels of employees. In 1998-99, the ES training
ratio was higher than usual, reflecting recent recruitment and the addition of the new BEST
training to the course list targeting recruits. This finding supports Statistics Canadas
philosophy of ensuring formal training is a required element in the career development of
new recruits.
Official Languages
Interviewees indicated that while courses were offered less frequently in French,
improvements have been made over the last several years to increase the number of French
courses. There was general recognition that this was a challenging issue to fully resolve,
especially for computer courses where training materials do not always exist in French; in
addition, French language trainers are scarce and expensive.
This table uses training data from Global for indeterminate employees. It includes information about
training where training administrators have a request for training or its equivalent. For the most part, it does
not include information about training arranged within a division or branch unless the information was sent to
HRDD. It does not include information about language training. It is a conservative estimate of training.
5
The Other Officer category includes all other non-managerial groups not elsewhere included (e.g., AS,
PM, IS, PE, FI etc). The Support Group contains Support (CR, DA, OE and ST) and Operational (GL, GS,
PR) categories for 1992/93 to 1995/96. For 1996/97 to 1998/99, it excludes Operational categories. Average
strength for the Operational categories is low, at about 66 for the years 96-97 to 98-99.
March 2002
Since 1997, approximately 20% of the computer courses organized by the Information
Technology Services Division (ITSD) have been delivered in French. ITSD reported that
the majority of Statistics Canadas Francophones requested technical training using the
English version of a software package, but delivered by a qualified French instructor, using
manuals written in French, and supported by English screen shots. As a point of
interest, only 3.3% of employee computer systems are set up in French.
The availability of non-computer courses in both official languages is summarized as
follows. Eighty-six courses were listed. Of the 44 that provided course dates, the large
majority 36offered dates in both English and French. The remaining 8 courses listed
sessions in one language only, usually English. As of January 31, 2001, 41% of
indeterminate employees had French indicated as their first official language. However,
some of these employees still request training in English, and overall, fewer employees
request training in French than in English.
Overall, considering the operational constraints within which the service providers operate,
these findings show that they are reasonably successful in offering courses in both official
languages.
Employment Equity
To examine access to training and development by employment equity groups, data was
obtained from the Global human resource system regarding women, visible minorities,
Aboriginal persons, and persons with disabilities.
This data was used to analyze, and compare, the share of training received by these groups
by occupational group and within the context of Statistics Canada as a whole. The results
of this analysis provided generally positive findings.
Women
Information in Table 2 excludes entry-level professionals from the calculations as these
groups tend to have higher training ratios. This higher training ratio is due to the fact that
most recruits are required to take formal training as part of their recruitment and
development programs.
Taking all indeterminate employees at Statistics Canada into account, except for entry level
professionals, there is very little difference in the ratio of training provided according to
gender, although in some cases, the numbers indicate that women tend to have a marginal
edge over their male colleagues. Similarly, within most individual occupational groups,
women tend to receive more training, although this is not always the situation within the
Support category.
March 2002
Table 2: Group training ratios by sex (excludes entry-level professionals)

All employees*
1994-95
M
F
0.94 1.08
1995-96
M
F
1.04 0.99
1996-97
M
F
0.95 1.04
1997-98
M
F
0.93 1.06
1998-99
M
F
0.93 1.06
ES 4-7
MA 4-7
CS 3-5
SI 4-8
SI 1-3
Other Officer
Support
0.81
0.71
1.21
0.90
1.29
0.91
0.69
1.02
0.98
1.27
1.01
1.21
0.99
0.80
0.81
0.56
1.14
0.66
1.32
0.90
1.20
0.77
0.39
1.01
0.67
1.29
0.79
1.35
0.75
0.63
1.01
0.82
1.45
0.69
0.82
1.46
1.36
2.05
1.74
1.44
1.08
0.75
1.44
0.83
1.81
1.22
1.21
1.08
0.72
1.12
0.51
1.38
0.68
1.32
1.22
0.92
0.93
1.00
0.27
0.99
1.42
0.90
1.00
0.96
1.11
1.44
0.75
1.55
0.87
0.90
*excludes the executive group in 94-95 and 95-96
Visible Minorities
Due to the relatively small number of visible minority employees, several groups have been
combined in Table 3. The Senior Professional category includes the ES 47, MA 47 and
CS 35 groups, and the Other Officers category now includes the SI group as well as AS,
PM, IS, PE, and others.
Table 3: Group training ratios for visible minorities (excludes entry-level professionals)
Visible Minorities
1995-96 1996-97
0.82
Senior Professional 1.02
1.07
1.9
Other Officer
0.6
0.55
Support
1997-98
0.79
1.15
1.54
1998-99
0.94
1.84
0.96
SC Population
1995-96
1996-97
1.16
0.91
1.13
1.14
0.74
0.99
1997-98 1998-99
0.85
0.88
1.08
1.17
1.08
0.87
For the Senior Professionals category, there is very little difference between the training
ratios for visible minorities and for Statistics Canada as a whole, although up until 1998
99, the training ratios for visible minorities were slightly lower. This pattern is reversed for
the Other Officers category, with Visible Minorities faring better over the last three years,
and particularly in 199697 and 199899.
Training ratios for the Support category are very similar for visible minorities and for
Statistics Canada as a whole. In 1998-99, the ratio for visible minorities was 0.96, and for
Statistics Canada as a whole it was 0.87. However, these ratios represent a decline for both
of these categories from the higher 199798 levels.
Aboriginal Persons
Due to the small number of Aboriginal employees, only the training ratio for the Support
category is included. Over the four years examined, (from 1996-97 to 1998-99) Aboriginal
employees have had consistently higher training ratios than Support category employees
March 2002
for Statistics Canada as a whole. Beginning in 1995-96, the ratios for Aboriginal
employee ratios were: 1.53, 1.25, 1.37 and 1.10 compared with 0.74, 0.99, 1.08, and 0.87
for Support category employees.
Persons with Disabilities
The small number of employees with disabilities has resulted in only two groups being
displayed in Table 4. The All Officers category now includes Senior Professionals, SIs and
other officers.
Table 4: Group training ratios for persons with disabilities (excludes entry-level professionals)
Persons with disabilities
1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99
0.72
0.85
1.03
All Officers 0.84
0.59
0.9
0.77
1.06
Support
SC Population
1995-96
1996-97
1.14
1.05
0.74
0.99
1997-98
1.01
1.08
1998-99
1.06
0.87
Over time, the training ratio for employees with disabilities in the All Officers category has
increased while the ratio for Statistics Canada as a whole has decreased slightly. By 1998
99, the two training ratios are virtually identical with a ratio of 1.
Similarly, for the Support category, the ratios for employees with disabilities have
improved over time, although there has been a greater year-to-year fluctuation. By 1998
99, the ratio for employees with disabilities is above 1, slightly more than 0.87 for Statistics
Canada as a whole. Overall, the increase in training ratios for employees with disabilities
suggests that concentrated efforts to improve the availability of training have had a positive
influence.
Statistics Canadas Employment Equity Committee provides strategic direction for all
employment equity initiatives, including special programs through CAD for employees
with disabilities and Aboriginal employees. The Committee is dedicated to supporting and
facilitating the full participation and inclusion of employees with disabilities in training
and development activities.6
The results of a December 1999 Statistics Canada Report on Persons with Disabilities at
Statistics Canada show the lack of awareness of what is available to employees with
disabilities in terms of
training and development opportunities
special tools available for regular work, competitions and training
funding for special tools and devices
a perceived attitude that persons with disabilities are restricted in their
access to training.7
6
GPC Factor Research, Statistics Canada and Persons with Disabilities: Job Satisfaction and Other
Workplace Issues, November 24, 1999, page 3.
7
Dion, Marcelle and Susan Lensen, A Report on Persons with Disabilities at Statistics Canada: Results and
Recommendations, December 1999, pages 910.
March 2002
Specific employment equity initiatives encouraged by the Committee include: better

communication regarding training and development opportunities to employees with
disabilities via the Internal Communications Network (ICN); and ensuring that trainers and
other staff make the necessary arrangements to accommodate the needs of any employee
with disabilities, when advised of such needs in advance of the course start date. In order
for this to be fully effective, participants are encouraged to provide as much advance
notification as possible.
Availability of Information
Much of the information related to training and development is available electronically at
two interconnected sites, and these sites were examined for ease of use, accuracy,
completeness, and interconnectivity.
Training administered by the Human Resource Development Divisions (HRDD) Training
Institute resides on a site on the ICN, while computer-related training information resides
on the ITSD Intranet site.
Both sites contain current training calendars and other key information e.g. a listing of
upcoming courses available in the short to medium term, and in some cases, over the longer
term; descriptions of courses and to whom they are targeted; and course eligibility
requirements and prerequisites. In addition, the HRDD ICN site contains background
material of a more general nature about training and career development at Statistics
Canada.
A web site for ES, CS, MA and SI recruits contains both general training information, as
well as training information specific to each recruitment and development program. While
the style of information provided on the site varied from program to program, the
information was easy to locate, and in most cases, it was up-to-date and interconnected
among programs.
Interviewees reported few problems in finding training information on these various sites,
and some interviewees specifically highlighted the usefulness of having course target
populations and prerequisites provided. Feedback from staff responsible for maintaining
and updating training information indicated that a number of enhancements were already
being implemented, while other options to further improve the quality of information were
under consideration.
HRDD and ITSD also highlighted the importance of the network of training co-ordinators
within divisions and branches as another effective way to keep managers and employees
informed about upcoming courses and other training-related information.
March 2002
Required Training
For the purposes of this study, required training is defined as those courses which need to
be taken to support a recruits (or another employees) ability to perform optimally.
However, not everyone shares the same understanding of what constitutes required training
or to whom it applies. This study selected and examined the following two courses that are
considered required training.
Encountering the Media - Statistics Canada policy requires divisions to ensure that
spokespersons and data contacts have the necessary training to do media interviews.
Discussions with the course instructor revealed that, in general, data contacts understand
the need for this course. Since its implementation in 1992, an analysis of participation
shows that 80% of data contact employees have taken this course.
Writing An Effective Daily Release - Since its implementation in the mid-1990s, 296
employees have taken this course. Discussions with the instructor revealed that there was
still some ambiguity surrounding the required nature of this course, and that it is difficult to
persuade some writers to take it. A sample of writers of major releases for The Daily
concluded that only 38% have taken the course. The Communications Division will
propose policy changes clarifying that this course is required for writers of The Daily.
Statistics Canada makes significant investments in its initial recruitment decisions and the
intake of new professionals, e.g. ES, MA, CS, and SI, is managed centrally. A corporate
Professional Recruitment and Development Committee forecasts future needs and engages
in recruitment. In order to gain broad exposure to the Agency, during the first two years,
most newly hired recruits are rotated among several positions, are aided by mentors, and
take required training before they graduate to a regular position.
This study focussed on training required by ES and CS recruits8. ES recruits take one or
two flagship courses within their specific program. CS recruits are required to take the
Survey Skills Development Course (SSDC). However, there has been a decline in the
proportion of CS recruits who take this training within the program.
In part, this is a reflection of the fact that there are a higher number of CS recruits than
there are in the ES category vying for a fixed number of available SSDC training seats.
This was particularly the case in 1997-98 when CS intake totaled 119 recruits versus 28 for
the ES category.
Newer recruit programs were not examined in detail, however, it is worth noting that some
of them, such as the SI program, also identify the SSCC as a required course, and this will
place even further demands on available SSCD seats.
Although the SI recruitment program has identified required training for its recruits, it was not examined
since it has been running for a shorter time period and didnt offer enough data for analysis.
March 2002
Table 5: ES recruit enrolment in required courses, as of December 2000

Pool Year (year recruited)
Total
Left Statistics Canada
Not yet completed/unknown
%
No course
1 course within program
2 or more courses within program
1 course within program, 1 late
Late
Total
N= (excludes those who left, or not finished)
91-92
61
2
8
92-93
13
0
0
93-94
22
2
1
94-95
16
0
0
96-97
102
11
3
97-98
28
1
15
%
4
22
63
8
4
100
51
%
0
23
69
8
0
100
13
%
5
47
37
11
0
100
19
%
0
31
56
6
6
100
16
%
2
24
74
0
0
100
88
%
8
23
69
0
0
100
13
Table 6: CS recruit enrolment in SSDC, as of December 2000

CS Pool Year (year recruited)
Total
Left Statistics Canada
Not yet completed
No course
Course within CS recruit program
Course late
Total
N = (excl. those who left, or not finished)
199495
61
5
0
199596
44
4
0
199697
65
12
0
%
12.5
85.7
1.8
100.0
56
%
20.0
50.0
30.0
100.0
40
%
30.2
54.7
15.1
100.0
53
199798 199899**
119
91
23
12
0
35
%
59.4
38.5
2.1
100.0
96
%
63.6
36.4
0.0
100.0
44
**all results not yet known
Data Sources for Tables 2 and 3:from Global, pool or recruit managers and course administrators.
The training situation is improving with longer-term planning, greater co-ordination, an

increase in the number of course sessions, and a smaller intake of recruits. The
establishment of the Recruitment and Development Division is also designed to ensure a
more integrated, strategic approach to the management of recruitment and development
programs.
March 2002
10
Cost Considerations
Managers were consulted regarding whether they felt they had sufficient flexibility in their
budgets to cover training costs or whether budget levels limited their ability to do so. For
the most part, managers did not see covering direct training costs as problematic. ITSD
training administration indicated that client divisions can be affected twice with respect to
computer training in French - first, because the courses are not always as available or as
timely, and second, because higher costs must be passed on to the division.
Under the University Certificate Program, Statistics Canada pays the costs and the
employee avoids the need to outlay tuition fees. For other courses at educational
institutions, it is Statistics Canadas practice to reimburse (emphasis added) tuition fees
and related course costs, in whole or in part9 Regional office staff do not have access to
the University Certificate Program by virtue of their locations. However, the spirit of the
University Certificate Program concerning up front payment could be applied in regional
offices. The manager responsible intends to clarify this with regional office directors.
Summary on Accessibility
While some improvements to the accessibility of training can be made, corporately the
findings indicate that training is generally available. The timeliness of required training for
ES recruits is acceptable, for the most part. However, the proportion of CS recruits
receiving required training in a timely manner has declined, over time. Some clarifications
are still required concerning what constitutes required training and to whom it applies.
Effective Management
This section highlights how training and development are managed from the perspective of
planning and support, and of evaluation.
An important element of planning and support for training and development is the strategic
direction provided by the corporate Training and Development Committee. This
Committee continually monitors the need for, and development of, training programs, and
it is one of a number of management committees that support the Agencys management of
human resources. Others include: Recruitment and Development Committee, Career
Streams Committee, and Employment Equity Committee. Where appropriate, human
resource proposals from these committees are integrated and presented for policy decisions
by the corporate Human Resource Development Committee. Ultimately, however, line
managers (supported by human resource specialists) are accountable for the management of
human resources, and this includes ensuring employees receive the appropriate training and
development.
The Training and Development Committee draws its 21 members from across the Agency,
mainly at the director level or above, in order to ensure the necessary background and
9
Training and Development at Statistics Canada, 1996 . Section 9.6

March 2002
11
experience on training issues. The work of the Committee is supported by formal meeting
agendas and minutes. The Committee reports to the Sub-Committee on Human Resources
Development. This latter committee is Syndicate E for long-term planning purposes. Here,
long term planning (LTP) proposals related to training and development are developed,
tabled, discussed, and if approved, implemented and monitored through steering
committees. Recent examples include the funding of the Management Development
Program, and the capacity expansion of the Survey Skills development course.
Planning and Support for Training and Development
In general, the study found that planning and support for training is integrated into
organizational plans and activities at corporate, divisional, and other levels. For example,
corporately, there are:
regular meetings of the Training and Development Committee to discuss priority

training and development issues;
easily accessible corporate training and development policies, systems, guidelines,
reports and other information in electronic and hard copy;
comprehensive web sites such as HRDDs Training Institute and ITSDs site relating to
computer training; Statistics Canadas departmental web site on the Internet also
contains information on its human resource strategies including training and
development;
divisional training committees;
training co-ordinators;
entrenched human resource management processes such as annual employee
performance review processes which address employee training; and
steering committees with subject matter experts, managers and others to guide the
development of new training courses and/or revisions to existing courses.
Global-Orbit, a sub-system of Global, is accessible to divisions to help manage training.

Although this study did not conduct a specific investigation of the functionality of Global, a
number of those interviewed expressed some concerns about the system; these included:
divisional information is not perceived as current; as a result, some divisions have

created their own databases to manage training information;
some managers and training co-ordinators were not aware of the existence, availability
or capabilities of Global-Orbit;
regionally, there was little or no assurance that training particulars were entered into
Global although managers indicated that training forms were routinely completed; and
forms for some self-arranged divisional training were not completed and/or entered into
the system.
March 2002
12
As a result, information contained within the Global system may not yet accurately
represent the full extent of all Statistics Canada training activity.
Divisions often plan training only at the individual employee level i.e. through discussions
and agreements between the employee and the supervisor at appraisal time. While this
type of communication and planning is important, a more strategic, integrated divisional
approach would add substantially to the process.
Some divisions have developed frameworks and practices to guide the training of
employees in their current jobs as well as to provide information related to career paths to
future jobs. Other divisions are in the process of developing, or planning to develop,
outlines of training courses appropriate to specific occupational groups and levels. These
initiatives should be regarded as generally positive as they will further strengthen the
planning and management of training within divisions. As well, the work being carried out
by the Career Streams Committee related to career paths and associated training, will
provide divisions with additional information and context within which to identify and
manage their own training needs and activities.
Some of the training professionals interviewed indicated that there is a need for additional
mechanisms to encourage more systematic linkages among various courses. Instructors of
one course can be isolated from instructors of another course and therefore know a limited
amount about the content of their colleagues courses. Opportunities should be identified
to enable greater sharing of information, including the highlighting of complementary
themes from one course to another (where they do not already exist) that instructors could
reinforce during delivery. Collectively, this would present a more integrated approach to
training.
Tools, Methods and Practices to Evaluate Training
Training literature reviewed during the conduct of the study consistently emphasizes the
importance of formally evaluating training using a number of different indicators, e.g.
participant reaction; learning; behaviour; and results. However, this literature also
acknowledges that organizations infrequently carry out such comprehensive evaluations,
choosing instead to focus more on reactions through identification of the ways in which
participants liked the design, content or presentation of the course.
To address the issue of evaluation, this study selected as a benchmark, a training evaluation
model that is widely recognized and used among training and development professionals.
This model, described in the following chart, was used by the Office of the Auditor General
of British Columbia and referenced in his 1999/2000 report.
March 2002
13
Table 7: Training Evaluation Model

Level What are you
How can you measure?
measuring?
1
Reaction
Did they like it?
(design, content and
presentation)
Questionnaires
Group discussion
Individual comments (incl.
supervisor)
Learning
Did they learn it?
How well?
What?
Knowledge & performance tests

(pre-post)
Observations
Simulations (during or after)
Work sample analyses
Skill demos by participants
Self-reports
Self, peer & supervisor reports
(e.g. identify when used new skill)
Case studies, surveys
Site visits
Work sample analyses
Participant-supervisor discussion,
planning to implement learning
Performance appraisals
Organizational performance
measures
Surveys
Cost-benefit comparisons
Behaviour
Did they remember?
Did they use it on the
job?
How well?
What parts of the
training?
Why do you measure?

People learn better when they
want training and react
positively to it. It also helps
trainers improve their content
and delivery.
Determines if participants
learned and what they learned.
Determines what was

remembered and if
participants can and do apply
learning on the job.
Relates the results of the

Results
activity to organizational goals

What difference did it
and objectives
make?
Did this change org.
effectiveness?
Source: Office of the Auditor General of British Columbia based on framework developed by D. L. Kirkpatrick;
Belcourt, Monica & Phillip C. Wright, Managing Performance through Training and Development (Nelson) 1995
Statistics Canada regularly uses participant reaction to evaluate, maintain and upgrade
training courses. According to trainers and training administrators, this practice is well
established and routinely carried out. However, this study found that the Agency is also
carrying out evaluation in other ways (to greater or lesser degrees) as highlighted in Table 8.
Table 8: Evaluation Levels at Statistics Canada
Level
Statistics Canada measures through
Reaction
Learning
Behaviour
(performance)
Results
Regular evaluation forms completed for courses, with follow-up.

Pilot courses are used and participants evaluations are used to modify content and
delivery methods.
Tests / quizzes sometimes used.
Flagship courses emphasize learning by doing.
Informal evaluation by supervisors is sometimes done.
Some follow-up evaluations have been conducted, particularly of flagship courses.
As courses are adjusted, input is sought, particularly for long courses.
Employee opinion surveys are conducted.
Some formal measures are being institutionalised through revamping of divisional
program reviews. Changes are planned to include indicators produced corporately.
Employee opinion surveys are conducted.
March 2002
14
To carry out the challenging process of accurately evaluating organizational effectiveness,

organizations often tend to use indirect measures. Statistics Canada periodically
administers its Employee Opinion Survey as one way to benchmark how well it is doing
from the point of view of its most important asset - its employees. Recently, initiatives
have been undertaken to improve the strategic planning and review of Statistics Canada
programs through the use of biennial and quadrennial performance reviews. As a part of
these processes, performance indicators related to training are being developed corporately.
In summary, therefore, although Statistics Canada most frequently uses participant reaction
as the key element of training evaluation, other measures exist, and are being applied, to
report on training and development performance. In this context, however, a greater use of
measures related to learning and behaviour (performance) is desirable.
IV.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Four recommendations are proposed:

1.
Senior management should encourage divisions that are not yet doing so, to plan and
support training at a divisional level in order to ensure a more strategic, co-ordinated
approach to the management of employee training.
2. For new training courses or programs, course designers should include measures to
evaluate learning and behaviour (performance).
3. For existing courses, a plan should be established to examine ways in which to integrate
evaluation measures that address learning and behaviour (performance).
4. Any user surveys undertaken as part of the renewal of the Global system should include
consultations with training administrators and divisional managers in order to ensure
that the systems capabilities better support their planning, management and
information needs.
Appendix A contains the management action plan developed in response to these
recommendations.
Conclusion
The studys findings on the accessibility of training are generally positive for all groups of
employees and therefore we made no recommendations. As a helpful tool, information for
line managers has been collated, focusing on promising practices and possible solutions to
barriers identified by employees. We expect it will assist managers in meeting challenges
of a workplace recognized for a very positive culture surrounding human resources
management.
March 2002
15
Of the four recommendations pertaining to effective management, the first one is most
important since with a coordinated approach, accountability is heightened, better planning
occurs and similar problems get addressed in a like manner. Therefore, it offers the most
potential for improvement in divisions where such practices are not in use.
Recommendations 2 and 3 are in keeping with the federal government direction towards
performance reporting and results-based management. There is no standard methodology
for translating this into action, providing scope to the organization to determine what is
appropriate.
March 2002
16
Appendix AManagement Action Plan

Prepared by L. Reid and reviewed by J-F. Gosselin and L. Brown
Recommendations
1.
Senior management should encourage

divisions that are not yet doing so, to plan
and support training at a divisional level
in order to ensure a more strategic, coordinated approach to the management of
employee training.
Action Plan on the Recommendations
2.
3.
For new training courses or programs,

course designers should include measures
to evaluate learning and behaviour
(performance).
A correlation will be done between the

presence of divisional training plans
and the results of the 2002 PS.
Employee Survey results. The
findings will be used to determine
subsequent actions required and best
practices will be shared with
divisional training co-ordinators.
Identify and share best practices with
Division Training Co-ordinators
For recommendations 2 and 3

A work group, under the direction of
the T&D Committee will be
established to assess the extent to
which appropriate evaluation
measures can be put into place and
their resultant benefits
Investigate the possibilities of
establishing macro measures to
determine the impact of the STC
training and development strategy on
the STC workforce
Responsible for Action

L. Reid
Estimated
Completion Date
April 2003
T and D Committee
L. Reid
Ongoing
J.F. Gosselin and L. Reid
January 2003
L. Reid and L. Brown
April 2003
For existing courses, a plan should be

established to examine ways in which to
integrate evaluation measures that address
learning and behaviour (performance).
August 2002
17
Appendix AManagement Action Plan

Prepared by L. Reid and reviewed by J-F. Gosselin and L. Brown
Recommendations
4.
Any user surveys undertaken as part of

the renewal of the Global system should
include consultations with training
administrators and divisional managers in
order to ensure that the systems
capabilities better support their planning,
management and information needs.
Action Plan on the Recommendations
Redesign the Global Training Module

as a part of Re-engineering of Admin.
Systems, including consultation with
users.
Responsible for Action

CMIS and HRDD
Estimated
Completion Date
April 2004
August 2002
17

Study of Training and Development: Audit and Evaluation Division March 2002

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Study of Training and Development: Audit and Evaluation Division March 2002

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Study of Training and Development: Audit and Evaluation Division March 2002

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Study of

Training and Development

Audit and Evaluation Division