Experiment 7 (Refrigeration Unit)
Experiment 7 (Refrigeration Unit)
Experiment 7 (Refrigeration Unit)
GROUP MEMBERS
EXPERIMENT
DATE PERFORMED
SEMESTER
PROGRAMME
GROUP
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Title
Abstract/Summary
Introduction
Aims/Objectives
Theory
Apparatus
Procedures
Result
Calculations
Discussion
Conclusion
Recommendations
References
Appendices
TOTAL MARKS
Remarks:
Marks
Checked by:
Date:
TABLE OF CONTENT
Contents
Abstract
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Objectives
3.0 Theory
4.0 Apparatus
5.0 Experimental Procedures
Pages
3
4
4
47
78
8-9
6.0 Results
7.0 Sample Calculations
8.0 Discussion
9.0 Conclusion
10.0 Recommendations
11.0 References
12.0 Appendices
10 13
13 15
15 16
17
17
17
17
ABSTRACT
The aim for this experiment are divided into three because in this experiment, it has three sub
experiment. The objective for the first experiment is to determine the power input, heat
output and coefficient of performance of a vapour compression heat pump system hence its
name. The objective for the second experiment is to produce the performance of heat pump
over range of source and delivery temperatures. The objective for the third experiment are to
plot the vapour compression cycle on the p-h diagram and compare with the ideal cycle and
to perform energy balances for the condenser and compressor. For all the experiment, cooling
water flow rate was adjusted to 40 % but for the second experiment, the cooling water is
increase and decrease by 10%. For the first experiment, the power input was 160W while the
2
heat output of the system was 195.07W. This increase in power give the coefficient
performance of 1.219. For the second experiment, three different flow rate of the cooling
water were used which are 30%, 40% and 50%. The power input reading at flow rate at those
flow rates are 159W, 160W and 161W respectively. For the last experiment, the vapour
compression cycle on the p-h diagram is plotted at the discussion section. When the plotted
diagram is compared with the ideal cycle diagram, it can be seen that the diagram is almost
similar. As the conclusion, all objectives given in this experiment were successfully achieved.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The SOLTEQ Mechanical Heat Pump (Model: HE165) has been designed to provide a
practical and quantitative demonstration of a vapor compression cycle. Refrigerators and heat
pumps both apply the vapor compression cycle, although the applications of these machines
differ, the components are essentially the same. The Mechanical Heat Pump is capable of
demonstrating the heat pump application where a large freely available energy source, such
as the atmosphere is to be upgraded for water heating.
Heat pump technology has attracted increasing attention as one of the most promising
technologies to save energy. Areas of interest include heating of buildings, recovery of
3
industrial waste heat for steam production and heating of process water for instance, cleaning
and sanitation.
2.0 OBJECTIVES
As there are three experiments conducted in the whole experiment, the objectives
might be differing for each of them. The first experiment undergoes by the purpose of to
determine the power input, heat output and coefficient of performance of a vapor
compression heat pump system hence its name. Besides that, the second experiment of
production of heat pump performance curves over a range of source and delivery
temperatures having an objective to produce the performance of heat pump over range of
source and delivery temperatures. On the contrary, experiment number three which is the
production of vapor compression cycle on p-h diagram and energy balance study is handled
to fulfill the purpose of to plot the vapor compression cycle on the p-h diagram and compare
with the ideal cycle and to perform energy balances for the condenser and compressor.
3.0 THEORY
A heat pump is a mechanism that absorbs heat from waste source or surrounding to produce
valuable heat on a higher temperature level than that of the heat source. The fundamental idea
of all heat pumps is that heat is absorbed by a medium, which releases the heat at a required
temperature which is higher after a physical or chemical transformation.
restriction. The pressure is so low that a small portion of the refrigerant flashes
(vaporizes) into a gaseous. In order to vaporize, it must gain heat (which it takes from
that portion of the refrigerant that did not vaporize).
4. Vaporizing Process
The refrigerant flows through a heat exchanger called the evaporator. The heat source
is at a slightly higher temperature than the refrigerant, therefore heat is transferred
from it to the refrigerant. The refrigerant boils because of the heat it receives in the
evaporator and by the time it leaves the evaporator, it is completely vaporized. The
refrigerant has thus returned to its initial state and is now ready to repeat the cycle, in
a continuous manner.
4.0 APPARATUS
The SOLTEQ Mechanical Heat Pump (Model: HE165) is a bench top unit with all
components and instrumentations mounted on the sturdy base. The heat pump consists of a
hermetic compressor, a water-cooled plate heat exchanger, a thermostatic expansion valve
and a water heated plate heat exchanger. The arrangements of the components are in a
manner similar to many domestic air-water heat pumps where they are visible from the front
of the unit.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Receiver Tank
Compressor
Condenser
Pressure Transmitter
Control Panel
Evaporator
Refrigerant Flow Meter
Experiment 2: Production of heat pump performance curves over a range of source and
delivery temperatures
1. The general start-up procedures were performed.
2. The cooling water flow rate was adjusted to 80%.
3. The system was allowed to run for 15 minutes.
4. All necessary readings were recorded
5. The experiment was repeated with reducing water flow rate so that the cooling water
outlet temperature increases by about 1C.
6. The experiment was then repeated at different ambient temperature.
Experiment 3: Production of vapour compression cycle on p-h diagram and energy
balance study
1. The general start-up procedures were performed.
2. The cooling water flow rate was adjusted to 80%.
3. The system was allowed to run for 15 minutes.
4. Readings like refrigerant flow rate, refrigerant pressure, refrigerant temperature,
cooling water flow rate, cooling water inlet temperature and compressor power input
were recorded.
6.0 RESULTS
Experiment 1: Determination of power input, heat output and coefficient of performance
Table 1: Data obtained and calculated for Experiment 1
Cooling Water Flow Rate, FT1 (%)
Cooling Water Flow Rate, FT1 (LPM)
Cooling Water Inlet Temperature, TT5 (oC)
Cooling Water Outlet Temperature, TT6
(oC)
Compressor Power Input, W
Heat Output, W
COPH
40.0
2.0
28.1
29.5
160.0
195.07
1.219
Experiment 2: Production of heat pump performance curves over a range of source and delivery
temperatures
Table 2: Data obtained and calculated for Experiment 2
9
Test
Cooling Water Flow Rate, FT1
Cooling Water Flow Rate, FT1
Cooling Water Inlet Temperature, TT5
Cooling Water Outlet Temperature, TT6
Compressor Power Input
Heat Output
COPH
%
LPM
o
C
o
C
W
W
-
1
30
1.5
29.1
30.8
159.0
177.65
1.117
2
40
2
28.1
29.5
160.0
195.07
1.219
3
50
2.5
27.4
28.7
161.0
226.42
1.406
Performance Curve of Power Input & Output versus Water Outlet Temperature
250
200
150
Power Input and Output (W)
Power input
Heat output
100
50
0
28.5 29 29.5 30 30.5 31
Figure 1: Performance curves for power input and output versus temperature of water delivered
0.8
COPH
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
28.5
29
29.5
30
30.5
31
10
Figure 2: Performance curves for power input and output versus temperature of water delivered
Experiment 3: Production of vapour compression cycle on p-h diagram and energy balance study
Table 3: Data obtained and calculated for Experiment 3
Refrigerant Flow Rate, FT2
Refrigerant Flow Rate, FT2
Refrigerant Pressure (Low), P1
Refrigerant Pressure (High), P2
Refrigerant Temperature, TT1
Refrigerant Temperature, TT2
Refrigerant Temperature, TT3
Refrigerant Temperature, TT4
Cooling Water Flow Rate, FT1
Cooling Water Flow Rate, FT1
Cooling Water Inlet Temperature, TT5
Cooling Water Outlet Temperature, TT6
Compressor Power Input
%
LPM
Bar (abs)
Bar (abs)
o
C
o
C
o
C
o
C
%
LPM
o
C
o
C
W
60.8
0.77
1.8
6.8
25.6
63.1
28.2
21.5
40.0
2.0
28.1
29.5
160.0
0.68
0.68
0.6
0.5
Pressure (MPa)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.18
0.18
0.1
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
h (kJ/kg)
11
242.86 kJ/kg
301.79 kJ/kg
87.40 kJ/kg
87.41 kJ/kg
40
5=2 LPM
100
Heat output=
COP H =
( 29.528.1 ) K=195.07 W
min 1 L 60 sec kg . K
Refrigerant flowrate ( )
1.26 LPM
100
60.8
1.26=0.77 LPM
100
=180 kPa=0.18 MPa
100000 Pa
100000 Pa
12
h (kJ/kg)
85.26
87.40
88.82
x gas =
hf (kJ/kg)
79.32
81.44
82.14
hfg (kJ/kg)
182.27
180.94
180.49
Hg (kJ/kg)
261.59
262.38
262.64
h3h g 87.40262.38
=
=0.967
hf h g 81.44262.38
h@60oC (kJ/kg)
299.98
298.73
298.42
T (oC)
60.0
63.1
70.0
h@70oC (kJ/kg)
309.73
308.61
308.33
h (kJ/kg)
298.73
301.79
308.61
0.700.68
( 298.42299.98 )298.42=298.73
0.700.60
min
60 sec
1L
m3
0.4589 x 103 kg /s
3
0.4589 x 10 kg 1000 J (
Heat transfer refrigerant=
301.7987.40 )
s
kg
98.38 J / s
2 L 1 L 1min 4180 J
( 29.528.1 )
min kg 60 sec kg . K
195.07 J /s=195.07 W
Energy balance on the compressor:
Power input=160 W
301.79242.86 )
s
kg
27.04 W
Heat loss surroundings=16027.04=132.96 W
8.0 DISCUSSION
The first experiment was conducted to calculate the performance of a vapor compression heat pump
system. The power input of the heat pump obtained was 160 W while the heat output of the system
was 195.07 W. This increase in power is due to vapor compression heat pump cycle which involves 4
different processes; compression, condensation, expansion, and vaporization. At the vaporization
process, it receives heat from other sources, and the refrigerant is then subcooled at the condenser and
allows it to remove heat to the intended medium. This increase in power gives the coefficient
performance of 1.219. This would indicate that for each Watt of electrical energy supplied, 1.219 W of
heat energy is supplied to the medium to be heated. (Radermacher, 2005)
In the second experiment, three different flow rates in percent were used which is 30%, 40%,
and 50%. As the flow rate decrease, the cooling water outlet temperature increases whereas the power
14
input, heat output, and COPH decreases. The flow rate at 50%, 40%, and 30% gives the power input
reading of 161, 160, and 159 W respectively, heat output of 226.42, 195.07, and 177.65 W
respectively, and COPH of 1.406, 1.219, and 1.117 respectively. The heat output in relation to flow
rate can be expressed as:
q=
h
c p dt
Where q is the volumetric flow rate, h is heat output, c p is the specific heat capacity, is density, and
dt is temperature difference. This equation shows the linear relationship between heat output and flow
rate. This in turn directly affects the COP H as the lower heat output will yield lower COPH. (Flow
Rates in Heating System)
The third experiment encompasses the four processes in the heat pump. The compression
process increases the pressure of refrigerant which also cause an increase in temperature. This
elevates the refrigerant into superheated state. Then, the condensation process removes the heat,
causing a decrease in temperature. The expansion valve then reduces the pressure, causing a small
portion of the refrigerant to flashes into gas. This creates a mixture of liquid and gas refrigerant. The
mixture then undergoes the vaporization process at the evaporator to receive heat energy and all
refrigerant completely vaporizes and the cycle repeats. Figure 3 shows the p-h diagram of the r-134a.
The enthalpy calculated at h1, h2, h3, and h4 are 242.86, 301.79, 87.40, and 87.41 kJ/kg respectively.
These values create a p-h diagram almost similar to the ideal cycle: (Haile, 2002)
9.0 CONCLUSION
15
Overall, this experiment is considered success as the power input, heat output and coefficient
of performance of a vapour compression heat pump system has been determined. For the first
experiment, the power input of the heat pump obtained was 160 W while the heat output of
the system was 195.07 W. Increase in power gives the coefficient performance of 1.219. For
the second experiment, as the flow rate decrease, the cooling water outlet temperature
increases whereas the power input, heat output, and COPH decreases. The flow rate at 50%,
40%, and 30% gives the power input reading of 161, 160, and 159 W respectively, heat
output of 226.42, 195.07, and 177.65 W respectively, and COPH of 1.406, 1.219, and 1.117
respectively. The third experiment, the enthalpy calculated at h1, h2, h3, and h4 are 242.86,
301.79, 87.40, and 87.41 kJ/kg respectively. These values create a p-h diagram almost similar
to the ideal cycle.
10.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Make sure that equipment is properly set up as it will affect the reading. Ask help
from the lab assistant if required.
2. Allow the system to run for 15 minutes each time before the experiment is conducted.
3. Maybe the efficiency of the equipment should be monitored frequently as some of the
readings obtained are a bit off than what we are supposed to obtain.
4. Do a trial experiment before conducting the real experiment in order to detect if there
is any error or whether the equipment is functioning well or not.
5. Make sure that the water flow rate is in stable condition as unstable water flow would
affect the readings.
11.0 REFERENCES
1. Radermacher, R., & Hwang, Y. (2005). Vapor compression heat pumps with refrigerant
mixes. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
2. Haile, J. M. (2002). Lectures in Thermodynamics: Macatea Productions.
3. Flow Rates in Heating System. (n.d.). Retrieved 27th May 2015 from
http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/water-flow-rates-heating-systems-d_659.html
16