Troy VIIB Chronology

!"
#$!%
!

!

"
#$ %
&'(&

) *++,
-

!) *++

") *++"
.

*
)('+,&''/

#0.12$3
POTTERY OF TROY VIIB

CHRONOLOGY, CLASSIFICATION, CONTEXT
AND IMPLICATIONS OF TROJAN CERAMIC ASSEMBLAGES
IN THE LATE BRONZE AGE/EARLY IRON AGE TRANSITION
VOLUME 1 (TEXT & CATALOGUE)
D i s s e r t a t i on
zur
Erlangung des akademischen Grades
Doktor der Philosophie
in der Philosophischen Fakultt
der Eberhard-Karls-Universitt Tbingen
vorgelegt von
Pavol Hnila
aus Martin, Slowakei
2012
Dedicated
to the memory of
Manfred Osman Korfmann
PREFACE TO THE ONLINE PUBLICATION

The Tbingen Troia project plans a special volume of the final publication series dedicated
to the Late Bronze Age where the pottery of Troy VIIb and my results shall be presented in an
abridged form in German. I came to the conclusion that an online publication of my thesis is
currently the best option to present the material in detail, in English. The content of this online
publication is basically identical to my 2009 thesis, even the pagination and the catalogue
numbers are the same, only the following minor changes were made:
1. The descriptions of several sherds that were reviewed in the summer of 2009 (after the
thesis was submitted) have been updated here.
2. The field photographs are reproduced in color, whereas in the 2009 thesis they were in
greyscale.
3. In the 2009 thesis, I was using the designation of Protogeometric (Troy VIIb3). For
the sake of future clarity, I now prefer using Protogeometric only, without the Troy
VIIb3 addition in parentheses.
Discussions about the stratigraphy and pottery of Troy among the Troia project team members continue and some of my conclusions will perhaps need modification. The feedback and
suggestions made by the limited group of scholars who have already responded to my dissertation also deserve more attention. For the study of typology, more ink-drawings of the pottery would be helpful. I plan to address all these issues in future publications.
Berlin, 15th May 2012
CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
FOREWORD
III
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
INTRODUCTION
PREVIOUS RESEARCH
AREAS EXCAVATED BY THE TBINGEN AND THE CINCINNATI TEAMS (1988-2008)

Citadel, 4. Outer Perimeter of the Citadel Wall, 5. West Lower Town, 6. South Lower Town,
7.
METHODOLOGY
The pottery processing workflow, 8. System Limitations, 10. Statistics and their challenges,
11.
CHRONOLOGY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TROY VIIB PERIOD 13

WHEN DOES THE IRON AGE BEGIN?
13
DISCUSSION ON SUBDIVISIONS OF TROY VII

Troy VIIb1, 15. Troy VIIb2, 16. Protogeometric period (Troy VIIb3), 17.
14
ABSOLUTE DATING
19
CLASSIFICATION OF POTTERY
21
WARE GROUPS
21
Anatolian Grey Wares, 21. Tan Ware and Brown Slip Ware, 22. Mycenaean ware, 23.
Protogeometric Painted pottery, 24. Plain Wares, 24. Blegens Other Painted wares, 25.
Wheelmade Coarse Wares, 25. Handmade Coarse Wares, 26. Handmade Lustrous Wares, 27.
Pithoi, 29. Organic lumps, 29. Earlier Wares, 30. Post-Bronze Age Wares, 30. Unidentified or
imported, 30.
31
SHAPES
Cups and kantharoi, 32. Bowls, 33. Kraters, 34. Jugs, amphoras and flasks, 35. Jars, 35.
Deinoi, 36. Pyraunoi, Baking pans, Sieves, Stands, 36. Pithoi, 37.
DECORATION
Decoration Techniques
Painted Decoration, 38. Incisions and grooves, 39. Ribs and ridges, 39. Finger imprints,
40. Knobs, 40. Channeled decoration, 40. Stamped decoration, 41. Combined techniques,
41. Other techniques, 41.
Decorative motifs
Position of the decoration
POTTERY IN CONTEXT
REMARKS ON TROY VI-VIIA SETTLEMENTS
CITADEL
Habitation in Squares E8-9
OUTER PERIMETER OF THE CITADEL WALL
38
38
42
42
43
43
43
Area outside Gate VIU
47
48
WEST LOWER TOWN
The Street (A7/8, A8, zA8, z8), 49. South House (A8), 54. Terrace House (A7, z7, z8), 56.
The Pithos Storeroom, 61.
64
TROY VIIB1 SETTLEMENT
CITADEL
64
Street, 64. House 761, 68. Room B, 73. Rooms C and D, 74. Room G, 76. Room H,
77. Room I, 77
Area outside Gate VIU in Square A7
Burnt layer (25.02-26.17 m), 78. Pit under West Wall of House 79, 81.
Square D9
Deposit at the foot of Troy VIIb2 wall, 83
78
82
WEST LOWER TOWN

North Houses
84
Organic deposit with numerous fallow deer bones (z6, z7), 84. Pit with Restored
Vessels Cut into the Fill of Room 5, 87.
90
THE CITADEL
90
Street, 90. House 761, 93. Room B, 98. Rooms C and D, 104. Room E, 105. Room
G, 105. Room H, 109. Room I, 109. Room J, 112. Room K, 113.
Northeast Bastion (Tower VIg, Square K4)
113
Well Bb inside the Northeast Bastion, 113.
Area outside Gate VIU (A7 East)
128
House 791, 128. House 792, 130. House 792 Annex, 131.
Buildings adjoining the citadel wall in D9
133
Fill of the Troy VIIb cells, 133. Deposits to the south of the cells, 134. Deposits
covering the Troy VIIb2 cell rooms, 135.
Surroundings of the North-East bastion (K4, K4/5, KL4, L4)
136
Rooms 1 and 2, 137. Room 3, 139. Room 4, 139. Room 5, 140. Room 6, 142. Room
7, 143. Room 8, 144. Room 9, 145. Room 10, 145. Room 11, 146. Room 12, 147.
Room 13, 149. Room 14, 150. Room 15, 150. Room 16, 150. Room 17 containing a
dog skeleton, 151. Southwest House in front of Gate VIR, 151. House wall to the
west of the Bastion, 152. Deposits Covering the Troy VIIb2 ruins, 152.
WEST LOWER TOWN
North Houses
154
North House A, 154. North House B, 156. Pit under Vertical Stones Feature 1, 161.
Terrace House Ruins
162
Deposit above the Porch, 162. Pit with Cooking Pots in the Central Room of the
Terrace House, 163. Area above the Street, Pithos Storeroom and South House, 164.
South House Ruins
166
Deposit over the Northeast Wall, 166.
SOUTH LOWER TOWN
Habitation in Squares KL16/17, H17
167
Pit with clay reed impressions, 168. The South Pit, 169. The West Pit, 170. Evidence
from the Survey, 170.
PROTOGEOMETRIC TROY
CITADEL
Above the Street, 172. Ruins of Room G, 173. Ruins of Room H, 174.
172
172

Area outside Gate VIU (Square A7)
175
Destruction debris to the west of House 792 and its Annex, 175.
Square D9
177
Protogeometric terrace wall, 177. Stone Tumble, 178. Burnt layer above the tumble,
179.
Surroundings of the Northeast Bastion (Squares KL4-5)
180
180
WEST LOWER TOWN / SANCTUARY (SQUARES Z/A6/7/8)
Ruins of the Terrace House, 181. Ruins of Pithos Storeroom, 189. North Houses, 193.
Vertical Stones Feature 2, 197.
REMARKS ON GEOMETRIC TROY
CITADEL
Ruins of Room B, 199. Ruins of Room G, 200.
199
199

Area outside Gate VIU
201
Geometric Terrace Wall, 201. Wall 793, 203.
Square D9
205
Late Protogeometric/Early Geometric deposits over the tumble, 206. Late Geometric
House and related deposits, 207.
207
Geometric pit with Sandy Fill Disturbing the North House B, 208. Posthole in the
Geometric Cult Building, 208. Geometric Horizon Above The Terrace House and the
Pithos Storeroom, 208. Pit above the North Room, 209.
POTTERY FROM UNCERTAIN CONTEXT
POTS AND PEOPLE: IMPLICATIONS
210
214
CONTINUITY AND CHANGE
214
SYMBIOSIS, ACCULTURATION AND ASSIMILATION
216
SUMMARY
219
BIBLIOGRAPHY
221
CATALOGUE
VOLUME II (PLATES)
PLANS
PL. 1-10
WARE GROUPS CHARTS
PL. 11-13
SHAPES CHARTS
PL. 14-24
DECORATION CHARTS
PL. 25-26
FIELD DOCUMENTATION
PL. 27-88
DETAIL PHOTOGRAPHS
PL. 89-95
CONTEXT CHARTS
PL. 96-111
RIM PROFILES
PL. 112-198
DRAWINGS
PL. 199-216
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This report owes its birth to late Manfred Osman Korfmann, to whom I am deeply grateful
for entrusting me the study and publication of the appropriate ceramic material from the
Tbingen Troy excavations. My warmest gratitude belongs also to Ernst Pernicka, who
agreed to overtake the supervision of my thesis in the difficult time after the death of Manfred
Korfmann. The help provided by both my supervisors in creating optimal conditions to work
on this report was always appreciated and cannot be sufficiently stressed.
My work on the dissertation became financially possible thanks to research grants from
German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and from Troia Foundation. The Tbingen
based research training group Graduiertenkolleg Anatolien und seine Nachbarn, whose
member I had the honor to be between 2001 and 2004, created a stimulating intellectual atmosphere and provided me with a travel grant for Bulgaria.
I am especially indebted to Maureen Basedow and Ralf Becks for their trust and eternal patience when sharing their views of stratigraphy into every detail with me. Both have kindly
provided me with materials concerning their research in progress and I benefited greatly from
the stimulating discussions with them. Ralf Becks also read and commented an earlier draft of
the context section of this report. My cordial thanks also go to Carolyn Aslan, who discussed
pottery related issues with me, who professionaly proofread the entire text and whose competent improvement proposals helped to shape the final version of the current work.
I also wish to express my thankfulness to Stephan Blum, Christiane Frirdich, Marta
Guzowska, Penelope Mountjoy, Peter Pavk, Magda Pieniek-Sikora, Wendy Rigter, Billur
Tekkk, Mariana Thater, and Diane Thumm-Dorayan who did not hesitate to give their
opinion when answering my questions concerning their respective areas of expertise. Except
that, Diane Thumm-Dorayan, the chief of the Tbingen teams pottery processing unit, was
always extremely kind and helpful when solving nearly every practical issue related with my
work on pottery at Troy. I am also thankful to Farkas Pintr, who explained me in depth the
implications of various chemical and petrographic pottery analysis methods.
Monika Mck-Aksoy deserves special thanks for producing most of the drawings and inkdrawings and Gebhard Bieg for many of the photographs of the pottery. Both stayed friendly
and did not protest despite often being overwhelmed with my requests. A number of drawings
on my behalf were prepared also by Fsun Aksa and lk Demirta. I thank also to Sinan
nlsoy, who never refused help, when I was in need of slide scans.
Numerous Troy team members should be thanked for their work on preliminary processing,
measuring and coding of the sherds. But at least two of them Eva Rosenstock and Brbel
Schlenker needs to be singled out, since their careful records proved to be of special value and
saved me a lot of time.
Bogdan Athanassov, Elena Bozhinova, Jakov Petrovi Gerkovi, Barbara Horejs, Henrieta
Todorova came as guests to Troy and gave valuable comments concerning the Troy VIIb pottery.
I am grateful to Rstem Aslan who helped to organize my research stay in the anakkale
Archaelogical Museum, to the director of the museum Nurten Sevin, as well as its staff. All
the archaeologists of the anakkale Archaelogical Museum were very kind and refrained on
their library for months, in order to make my space-demanding work there possible.
Dimitris Matsas showed me the Early Iron Age material from Samothrace and I am thankful
for his extraordinary hospitality during my visit on the island. I thank also to Alix Hnsel for
the possibility to have a look on the Schliemann collection in the depository of the Museum
fr Vor- und Frhgeschichte in Berlin.
Special thanks are due to a colleague and a dear friend of mine, Petar Zidarov, who perfectly organized my journey to Bulgarian museums and who arranged meetings with Bulgarian
specialists. Of all those friendly people whom I met during my journey over the country, I am
in particular thanful to Georgi Atanasov, Ilija K. Ilijev, Plamen Karailjev, Tatyana KunchevaRuseva for introducing me to their respective museums collections and to Diana Gergova,
Krassimir Leshtakov, Georgi Nehrizov, Totko Stoyanov for finding spare time to discuss research topics with me.
I also most sincerely appreciate the tolerance of Klra Kuzmov and Mria Novotn, heads
of the Department of Classical Archaology of Trnava University and my former colleagues,
who kept at minimum my teaching and administrative duties in order to promote the progress
on my thesis.
Last but not least, I am heavily indebted to all my family members who patiently supported
me in material and in moral way during the entire preparation of this work. My greatest
thanks belong to my wife, Alessandra Gilibert, who was not only of moral support, but also
read drafts of this thesis and offered valuable advices.
II
FOREWORD
The present doctoral dissertation will serve also as the final excavation report on the pottery
of the Troy VIIb period recovered during the 1988-2008 campaigns at Troy.
The main aims are: 1) to verify the chronological divisions proposed by Blegen and subsequently challenged by researchers in the last two decades; 2) to address a number of sociological implications resulting from the coexistence of different pottery traditions in the Troy VIIb
period; and 3) if possible, to establish a pottery classification system chronologically more
sensitive than Blegens.
The emphasis of this work is the context of the ceramics, which is key to nearly every open
question. The entire organization of the report is dictated by the desire to offer the reader a
comprehensive picture of the pottery within its context. Contexts that yielded only fragmented
chips are treated equally to contexts with large restored vessels. Of course, not every single
sherd could be published in the catalogue. Yet, the reader will find a representative selection
of wares and shapes in accordance with the fragmentation degree for each stratified context.1
Sherds that could not be incorporated into the catalogue were counted, coded in the classification system and summarized in the statistical overviews.
The chronological and social conclusions presented here are based on my current understanding of the Troy stratigraphy. In cases of any insecurity, these are clearly stated. Preserving access to the rough data so that the explanatory framework adopted in this research may
be easily verified has been an absolute priority. The possibility to reinterpret results on the
basis of earlier data is one of the most fascinating experiences when working with Blegens
Troy publications, and I strongly wish that the same will apply to this work.
The catalogue section uses photographs of the sherds instead of the usual drawings. This solution was chosen because the photographs represent the pottery assemblages closer and
communicate well the fragmentation of each context, offering an important impression, which
would otherwise be lost. The photographs of all vessels were scaled to a uniform size for each
individual context. 2 Contrary to most pottery reports, the description of the catalogued sherds
is not in the text, but in the plates. A written description of the published sherds and vessels is
placed on the left side of the catalogue, while the images are on the right side. This choice
With the exception of Mycenaean sherds, which are studied by Penelope Mountjoy and will be presented in a
separate volume.
2
Generally, the scale is 1:2, but in case of contexts with large vessels it is 1:3.
III
should facilitate the catalogue usage and reduce browsing back and forth between text and
plates.
The choice of the main sorting criterion in pottery reports is always a dilemma: shall the
sherds be sorted by find context, or by comparative typology? I decided to use different sorting criteria for different report sections, so that at the end various methods can be applied to
optimize the search. The description of contexts and of the pottery assemblages, as well as the
catalogue itself, follow a chronological scheme, subdivided further according to four large
distinct areas of the site. The drawings are organized typologically and chronologically, with
no regard for the context. The field photographs are presented in groups according to excavation areas, and only subsequently subdivided according to the stratigraphic scheme. In this
way, the change in time becomes best evident. In order to facilitate orientation, references to
the catalogue are found in the text volume, in the ware group plates, and in the typological
drawings. Conversely, in the catalogue there are cross-references to the text, to the drawings
and to the ware group plates. Therefore, the necessity for concordance lists is almost completely eliminated.
Although the sherds were photographed in color, printing them in color was avoided, since
the pictures were made under changing light settings, 3 in various surroundings, 4 and with different cameras, 5 often resulting in apparent surface colors remarkably different from the real ones. Since satisfactory color management could not be achieved during primary data collecting, it would have been senseless to pursue it during later processing. The firing temperature was not strictly controlled in the Troy VIIb period, and at least in the case of the handmade pottery, the color often varies significantly over one and the same vessel. As a result,
the color criterion is not really relevant and only basic color categories are used in this research. 6
Different times of the day, with or without artificial lamp reflectors.
Troy Photo laboratory and the library in the anakkale Archaeological Museum.
My private Nikon Coolpix 5700 (with a significant red cast), and a Troy Projects Olympuses (with a subtle
brown cast).
6
For the same reason it does not make sense to use Munsell color charts for the Troy VIIb pottery.
IV
ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
diameter
reference to a detailed photograph
reference to a drawing
# in italics
reference to a shape profile code number
# in bold
reference to a Catalogue number
Beh.
Behter, designation of an excavation unit in the Tbingen Troy project
BA
Bronze Age
BS
Blegen shape
Dia
Slide from the Tbingen Troy project archive
Dig
Digital image from the Tbingen Troy project archive
EIA
Early Iron Age
H.
Height
LBA
Late Bronze Age
PBA
Post-Bronze Age, based on the division of the excavated strata and material at
Troy between two teams. The division line between BA and PBA was postulated at c. 1000 BC. PBA material had been studied and will be published by
the Cincinnati team directed by Charles Brian Rose.
PG
Protogeometric
SW
Black and white photograph from the Tbingen Troy project archive
Tb
Field notebook of the Tbingen Troy project archive
Th.
Thickness
INTRODUCTION
PREVIOUS RESEARCH
The history of research preceding and including the work of Blegens team on Troy VIIb are
summarized in the final publication of the Cincinnati expedition. 7 The overview offered here
concentrates on developments following the publication of Blegens Troy volumes in 1950s,
with an emphasis on the excavations going on at Hisarlik on annual basis since 1988, and on
the resulting changes. 8
The Troy VIIb pottery published by Blegen served as a sound basis for comparative studies
in the neighboring areas. In the Balkans, Trojan parallels helped to establish a local chronological scheme for the Early Iron Age as far as the Lower Danube region. 9 In Greece, the parallels from Troy were used in recognizing and defining the Barbarian ware phenomenon. 10
Similarly on Cyprus. 11
The corpus of parallels for the handmade pottery of Troy VIIb has grown considerably since
Blegens times. The most important published comparanda come from sites Sboryanovo in
northern Bulgaria; 12 from Kastanas, 13 Agios Mamas (Olynth), 14 and Assiros 15 in Greek Macedonia; from the island of Thasos, 16 and from Talcabayr, 17 and Lalapaa 18 in Turkish Trace.
Especially the intensification of research in Turkish Trace has, due to its vicinity, an immediate relevance for Troy. Thanks to surveys in this region, an archaeological terra incognita in
Blegens times, numerous Early Iron Age sites were suddenly found all around Edirne and
Blegen et al. 1958, 139-48.
Basic overviews of the recent excavations concerning the Troy VIIb strata have been published only in a
handful of short preliminary papers until now: Koppenhfer 1997; Becks and Thumm-Dorayan 2001; Becks
2003; Becks et al. 2006a.
9
Hnsel 1976.
10
Rutter 1975 who prefers a designation Handmade Burnished Ware.
11
Pilides 1994.
12
Stoyanov 1997.
13
Hochstetter 1984.
14
Horejs 2007.
15
Wardle and Wardle 2007.
16
Kukul-Chrysanthak 1992.
17
zdoan 1987.
18
Akman 1997.
[1]
Krklareli, but also near Tekirda and Istanbul. 19 Interestingly, no Early Iron Age site were
identified on the Asian coast of the Sea of Marmara, though surveys by the same team were
conducted there too. 20 The only site with similarities to Trojan Knobbed ware south of Thrace
is situated on Ava island in the Sea of Marmara. 21 The contemporary pottery from Central
Anatolia, though handmade, does not bear any specific similarities with the Trojan assemblage. Genz has convincingly argued that the Central Anatolian examples are based on local
traditions going back to the Early Bronze Age. 22
The chronological perceptions have also changed since Blegens times. Blegens dating,
based on the Mycenaean synchronisms, were challenged even before the new excavations had
begun. 23 Certainly, however, the most radical change concerns Blegens concept of a hiatus.
In his final publication, 24 Blegen maintained that Troy remained unoccupied between c. 1100
BC and 700 BC, i.e. for nearly 400 years, until Aeolian colonists arrived. 25 Blegens thesis
has been challenged by the new research. First, Dieter Hertel published sherds from the
Drpfelds and Blegens excavations, dating to the Protogeometric and Geometric period, and
he proposed a continuity between Troy VIIb and Troy VIII. 26 More evidence emerged during
the 1994 excavation campaign, as a result of which a new period called Troy VIIb3, contemporary with the Early-Mid Protogeometric period, was introduced. 27 The hiatus was thus
reduced to 250 years. Brian Rose also noted that if no diagnostic Iron Age sherds are present,
it would be impossible to date Gray and Tan Wares to the Iron Age, they would automatically
become Late Bronze Age. He argued strongly for their reexamination. 28 This fact, combined
with the presence of painted Protogeometric pottery and some types of fibulae, led Rose to
conclude: Despite the limited nature of the evidence, we may safely eliminate the long19
Meneke ata near Tekirda has had ongoing excavations for a few years. The Early Iron Age pottery
from the surveys was published in Czyborra 2001.

20
zdoan 1993.
21
zdoan 1993.
22
Genz 2004.
23
See discussion in Mountjoy 1999.
24
During the excavations, however, he favored a general continuity between Troy VIIb and Troy VIII: There
was here no sharp break in the sequence, nor was there any period in which the site was uninhabited. (Blegen
1934, 236).
25
Blegen et al. 1958, 147.
26
Hertel 1991.
27
See p. 17-19.
28
Rose 1995, 91.
[2]
prevailing notion of a four-hundred year gap in habitation between Troy VII and VIII. The
Iron Age settlement may not have been large, but the site was clearly not abandoned for any
major period of time after the end of the Bronze Age. The removal of this gap makes much
better sense in light of settlement patterns in the region. 29 Roses early statements were confirmed after an undisturbed stratigraphic sequence containing the transitional Late Bronze
Age/Early Iron Age strata was excavated in D9 between 1998 and 2000.
Already the 1991-1993 excavations in the D9 area had recovered limited remains of Troy
VII houses, which were preliminary dated to the Troy VI and Troy VII Periods. 30 At the end
of the 1993 campaign, when the excavation of the area was temporarily halted, the state of our
knowledge about the end of the LBA was still shaped by the idea of a hiatus. The area was yet
believed to have a potential to yield evidence about the Dark Ages in the future. 31
It was not until 1998 when the excavations in D9 were resumed with the clear aim to understand more about the Dark Ages and to answer the discontinuity/continuity question. 32
Maureen Basedow overtook the supervision of the area and she was followed in 1999 by Peter Jablonka. Their careful excavations led to the identification of a series of transitional
strata. 33 This stratigraphic basis enabled Carolyn Aslan to attribute the pottery from the strata
to successive Protogeometric, Geometric and Archaic phases. 34 Aslans publication changed
dramatically our understanding of the Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age transition at Troy;
suddenly, hardly any space for a hiatus was left.
With the new D9 transitional sequence a number of previously excavated contexts were reinterpreted, and several Geometric structures were identified in the Sanctuary, but potentially
also near the South Gate. 35 Discussions are currently under way whether the Protogeometric
and Geometric settlements can be connected with Aeolian Greeks or not. 36
The new chronological conception had consequences for the research on Troy VIIb and the
handmade coarse wares. Aslan found out that the handmade coarse wares continue to occur in
29
Rose 1995, 91.
30
Korfmann 1992, 28 and Abb. 24, 25; Korfmann 1993, 14-19, Abb.18, Taf. 2.2; Korfmann 1993, 19-21.
31
Korfmann 1994, 19-20.
32
Jablonka 2000, 30.
33
Jablonka 2000, Jablonka 2001.
34
Aslan 2002.
35
Basedow 2006; Basedow 2007; Basedow 2008.
36
See Hertel 2003 and Hertel 2008a for the summary of evidence in favor of the Aeolian Greeks presence, and
see Rose 2008 for the contrary.
[3]
the assemblages in significant quantities not only during the Early Protogeometric, but also in
the Late Protogeometric-Early Geometric Period (950-800 BCE). 37 New horizons have been
opened for studying the development of handmade pottery since the range of possible crossdatings with fine pottery and imports has considerably grown.
A number of sophisticated scientific methods were developed since Blegens time for pottery provenance studies: neutron activation analysis, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, X-ray
diffractometry, electron microprobe analysis. All of them were applied also on the Troy VIIb
pottery, opening thus new horizons for testing hypotheses about the origins of various pottery
classes. 38
AREAS EXCAVATED BY THE TBINGEN AND THE CINCINNATI

TEAMS (1988-2008)
A short overview of areas where Troy VIIb pottery has been found since the beginning of
Manfred Korfmanns excavations, is offered here. The various excavation trenches are summarized into four larger, distinct areas, according to which the material is organized in the
entire report (Pl. 1.A).
CITADEL
Blegen excavated substantial areas inside the citadel with Troy VIIb layers. Very little of
Troy VIIb was left to be excavated inside of the citadel after the 1930s. Only two places existed where the original Troy VIIb strata of the mound were still standing: the pinnacle in
squares E8-9 (Pl. 4) and the area of the Northeast bastion in KL4/5 (Pl. 2). These were natural
candidates for investigating the stratigraphy by the Tbingen team. Both areas offered an opportunity to compare the recent results with the earlier ones. For example, the eastern half of
House 761 was excavated in the 1930s by John L. Caskey from the Blegens team. It was
then the westernmost space in a row of buildings along the inner face of the citadel wall. The
remaining western half of what seems to have been a single-room unit was cleared in 1994-6
by the Tbingen team, predominantly by Donald Easton, whose superb documentation of
conducted excavations has been an inspiring source of information and ideas while writing
this report. Both halves of the house, excavated separately with a gap of sixty years, can be
37
Aslan 2002, 91. Small quantities were noted also for Late Geometric Period, but they were considered to be
residual.
38
Knacke-Loy 1994; Guzowska et al. 2002; Pintr 2005 and Grave and Kealhofer s.a.
[4]
joined virtually. A similar situation can be observed in the case of Well Bb inside the Northeast Bastion, which was first excavated by Drpfeld and then again in 1997 and 1998.
A part of the E8/9 pinnacle, as well as the deepest levels in Well Bb in K4 and all the strata
below the Greek and Roman Athena temple, have been intentionally left intact for future generations of excavators.

Several widely dispersed excavation areas in the immediate vicinity of the citadel are treated
together, because they share common characteristics (Pl. 1.A). Most importantly, all the areas
are adjoining the outer face of the citadel fortification wall. This is a new development in
Troy VIIb2 times, contrasting to the previous phase when the area directly outside the walls
was left prevalently empty or functioned as a street. It is a fortunate situation that the excavated areas offer us a chance to compare the situation in the west, in the south and also along the
east section of the fortification wall. No fortification wall of Troy VI is preserved in the north,
although there can be little doubt that it originally existed. 39 In any case, the slope was too
steep on the north side and no houses adjoining the outer face of the fortification wall could
have stood there.
Directly in front of Gate VIU, Blegens team found an orthostate wall (Wall 792) and another wall of massive blocks designated as Wall 793 (Pl.6). Slightly to the north, House 791
was discovered. It is a complex building with small cell-like rooms. 40 Blegen attributed the
three structures to Troy VIIb2. 41 At the beginning of the Tbingen excavations the area was
badly overgrown with vegetation. When the vegetation was removed, it became evident that
the previously uncovered structures had suffered considerable damage (Pl. 37.A-37.D). The
Tbingen team excavated again in the area in order to clarify issues of the access to the
walled-up Citadel Gate VIU, the Troy VIIa/VIIb transition, and further questions concerning
earlier strata. As a result of the new excavations, several subphases of House 791 were identified, and Wall 793 was redated to Troy VIII. A matching corner to Blegens Wall 792 was
found; 42 the structure is therefore referred to in this report as House 792. Furthermore, a terrace wall has been newly identified, probably dating to the Geometric period.
39
For the summary of evidence see Becks 2005.
40
Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 366.
41
Blegen et al. 1958, 238-41.
42
For details of the stratigraphy and building sequence see Becks 2006, ch. 3.1.1.1.6.3.
[5]
In D9, another cluster of Troy VIIb cells along the outer face of the citadel wall was excavated (Pl. 9). The excavations in D9 were started in 1989 with the aim of extending Schliemanns trench to the south, behind the line of the fortification wall in order to obtain a continuous profile section through the entire tell. Traces of settlement outside the walls of the citadel were recovered. 43
Finally, a surprisingly large concentration of Troy VIIb cell rooms was found outside the
Northeast bastion, in squares KL4/5 (Pl. 10).
WEST LOWER TOWN

New excavations revealed substantial remains of Late Bronze Age habitation outside the
southwest limits of the Troy VI Citadel, in the area of the later Greek and Roman Sanctuary
(Pl. 5-7). The first walls in this part of the site were discovered already by Blegens team, 44
but nothing suggested the density, the magnitude and the character of settlement activities
which have come to light since.
The structures unearthed have a remarkable size and quality, and were evidently part of a
substantial and important quarter of the Troy VI/VIIa Lower Town, not just a cluster of humble, extramural houses. The designation West Lower Town is adopted here, even if during
the Troy VIIb phases, the complexity level of the area decreased. The term Sanctuary used
for the Post-Bronze periods is better avoided when speaking of earlier strata. 45
From the topographic point of view the Troy VIIb remains in front of Gate VIU also belong
to the West Lower Town. Yet, they are architectonically and functionally different, and rather
related to similar structures along the south and east segments of the citadel wall. All structures along the citadel wall are therefore treated together in separate chapters. 46
The overall architectonic development of the West Lower Town is complex, ranging from
the Troy V Phase until the Byzantine period. The Troy VIIb features are mostly isolated. The
sequences and superpositions of several transitional Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age strata or
43
Korfmann 1994, 19.
44
45
The presence of ritual objects, such as ceramic cultic stands, a bull-shaped rhyton (Rigter and Thum-
Dorayan 2004), a thymiaterion (?), the bronze statuette of a god in Hittite style points to religious activities in
this area (or part of it) already in the Late Bronze Age. The question of continuity in sacral use of the area is
surely an interesting and challenging one, but it is beyond the scope of this report and it cannot be approached
solely through the analysis of stratigraphy and pottery.
46
Chapters devoted to Outer perimeter of the citadel wall.
[6]
features above each other are rare and they could not have been excavated in a space sufficiently large to clear all stratigraphic relationships into the necessary level of detail.
SOUTH LOWER TOWN

Pits and scarce habitation remains of Troy VIIb were recovered in a large continuous area
that was excavated c. 200 meters to the south of the South Gate of the citadel, in squares
KL16/17 (Pl. 1.B).
[7]
METHODOLOGY
The pottery processing at Troy must necessarily account for the classification systems implemented by previous excavators. When I first started to work on the Troy VIIb pottery back
in 2001, several systems were used simultaneously. First, there was Blegens nomenclature of
wares and shapes. Second, there was the numeric coding system introduced by the Tbingen
project. Third, there was the processing and description system developed by the Cincinnati
PBA team. Finally, there was my own desire side to apply the recent methodology of pottery
processing proposed by Cambridge Manuals in Archaeology. 47 In the end, I opted for the
Tbingen system with some modifications, aimed at making comparisons with Blegens results easier. The Cincinnati database was used for basic dating information concerning the
transitional sherds or for later material that is sometimes intrusive.
THE POTTERY PROCESSING WORKFLOW

The pottery analysis in this report is based not only on the notes of the author, but also on
the coded descriptive data taken by Troia team members during the preliminary processing in
the field. The whole workflow is summarized here.
After being retrieved from the place of their discovery, the sherds were registered, washed
and dried on a daily basis. The responsible pottery processors waited until the trench master
finished the specific excavation unit and until all the buckets with the material went through
the registration and washing procedure. 48 Afterwards, all sherds from an excavation unit were
searched for joins; all diagnostic sherds were labeled with ink and lacquer. The weight of the
entire assemblage was noted. Body sherds were divided and counted according to ware categories. Diagnostic sherds (in the Trojan BA pottery jargon all rims, bases, handles, but also
decorated body sherds) were processed in detail. Their thickness, height, ware, color, exterior
47
Orton et al. 1993.
48
In rare cases this system was not applied consistently, which led to duplications in assigning the identifica-
tion numbers to the diagnostic sherds.
[8]
and interior surface treatments, shape profile code, diameter, percentage, 49 decoration type,
decoration motive, decoration position and secondary features (as residues, smudging etc.)
were noted. All notes were taken on paper forms following a numerically coded system. In
the winter, the forms were retyped to computer databases. After the registration of the diagnostic sherds was finished, Mycenaean and Post-Bronze Age sherds were stored separately
and sent to specialists. Restored pots and sherds that were considered especially representative, unusual or important, were drawn and/or photographed.
This workflow was applied to all stratified contexts from the Tbingen excavations. Nonetheless, it turned out that the quality of the input data has not always been constant, and in the
end, it depended heavily on the degree of experience and ceramic knowledge of each ceramic
processor. 50 Besides, during the excavation it was only rarely possible to search for joins
across excavation units, even if they came from one and the same context. The search becomes meaningful only if the overall stratigraphy has been understood and all excavation
units have been attributed to specific stratigraphic contexts. The stratigraphy, the dating and
the interpretation of the transitional Late Bronze/Early Iron Age deposits, however, are problematic, and there is yet no consensus among the Troy team members on the topic. 51 As a
result, I have worked extensively with original field materials (slides, black & white photographs, field notebooks, plans and profile drawings) in order to form my own understanding
of the stratigraphy and of all the contexts used in this report. My primary aim during the field
campaigns was to review all the stratified Troy VIIb material and to search for as many joins
as possible, in order to obtain more complete sherd profiles. I photographed all the stratified
Troy VIIb pottery assemblages with a digital camera. 52 These digital photographs were of
crucial importance for the search of joins and they were also of immense help for the later
analysis. Additionally, I have chosen considerably more sherds to be drawn and photographed
than had been the case during the preliminary processing. The quantity of material was so
overwhelming that besides the regular summer campaigns I had a research stay in the Archaeological Museum of anakkale in the spring and autumn of 2004, in order to complete
49
The percentage is in my database and in the catalogue of this report in real percents, i.e. the fully preserved
part will have percentage 100. In contrast, the Troy project coding system uses a method, where a circle is divided into 40 parts. In consequence all the values taken from the Trojan recording system were multiplied by 2.5
when entered into my database.
50
The degree of experience changes even by one and the same pottery processor over time.
51
See Becks in Becks et al. 2006b vs. Basedow 2006; 2007; 2008.
52
If the assemblages were too big, only diagnostic sherds were photographed.
[9]
photographs of Troy VIIb assemblages. The excavation units were subsequently spread context-specific over a necessary number of tables and searched for joins. This activity resulted
in completing of a number of profiles and also in restoring vessels.
The digital pictures and the notes were incorporated into a relational Microsoft Access database. All the analyses in the current report are based on this database, designed especially for
processing needs of Troy VIIb pottery. 53 The content of the database is planned to be published online as part of the new Troy project database, conceived as a searchable online archive.
SYSTEM LIMITATIONS
There are limitations to the workflow and the methodology, causing some shortcomings and
missing information.
Far reaching in consequences for pottery studies, was a crucial decision in the early days of
the project the division of excavation and finds processing between the Bronze Age team
from Tbingen and the Post-Bronze Age team from Cincinnati. The problems could not be
foreseen at the beginning, since the defined study time limits of both research groups was
presumed to be divided by a secure hiatus of c. 400 years. As the hiatus gradually disappeared 54 both groups became involved with material from the transitional strata. By then,
however, both groups had already developed their own standards, with different priorities,
different methodology and with data stored in different databases. This was still a good solution for the bulk of material, since pottery of each period has its specific needs. Yet, it was
problematic for the transitional period. If the relevant excavation units were not recognized as
such during the primary processing, the supposed PBA sherds were separated from the rest of
the excavation unit and they were sent to the PBA team. The Mycenaean sherds and sometimes even unknown sherds were also stored separately. When the stratigraphic analysis made
the importance of such transitional contexts evident later on, it was not always easy or even
viable, after a gap of several years, to reconstruct the original assemblage.
As probably in every large and long lasting project, some cancellations, changes and additions in the documentation and coding system are inevitable with progressing time. At Troy,
53
The data may differ considerably from the preliminary observations as noted in the Tbingen Troy project
database.
54
See pp. 1-4.
[10]
the processing and the documentation systems went through several improvements since the
excavations started in 1988. As my analysis involved more and more processed sherds, it became evident that some new or different observations, features and coding are vital in order to
characterize the specifics of the Troy VIIb handmade pottery. 55 It became extremely important to keep track of all the changes and previous categorizations in order to prevent data
chaos and retrieve previously processed sherds. Since it was practically impossible to review
all the sherds over and over again as new categories were developed and the system optimized, the final database is a compromise between the original system and a few new criteria
that became incorporated during the work. Inevitably, some categories needed to be joined
into bigger groups during the analysis; 56 other categories were kept split, but were analyzed
only on limited datasets. 57
STATISTICS AND THEIR CHALLENGES

Which criteria should be used for comparative purposes? What quality and quantity of material is convincing enough? Should we use weight, or rather the absolute count of the sherds?
Shall we compare all the sherds or only the diagnostic ones? Or only the rims?
Let us review some statistical difficulties faced when working on Troy VIIb pottery:
1. The PBA sherds were not individualized, but only counted as body sherds by the BA
team. Any statistics of the diagnostic sherds would miss them and would be unavoidably distorted (with very rare exceptions when a PBA sherd was originally understood as a BA and
individualized as diagnostic).
2. The statistics limited to rims or diagnostic sherds would be further distorted if any Mycenaean sherds were present in the context, since all of them were treated as diagnostic, even if
they were standard body sherds with only a band of paint. They would be accordingly
overrepresented, if only diagnostic sherds should be counted.
3. If we use the statistic of all the sherds, there exists a serious risk of error. The counts have
various degrees of credibility depending on the fragmentation state of the sherds and on the
experience of the primary processor.
55
The distinction between the quality of surface treatment of handmade pottery (burnishing vs. polishing), a
code for channeled decoration, a code for a raised band with finger imprints.
56
The concept of Ware groups is used instead of individual wares as defined during the excavation.
57
Surface treatment, some decoration elements.
[11]
4. If only the rims are counted, the total number of sherds will be very low for every single
specific context and thus hardly convincing in statistical terms. Furthermore the number of
PBA rims from BA contexts cannot be reconstructed in most of the cases.
5. Even if all the sherds are counted, there will inevitably be distortions. These are deeply
rooted in the very system of the ware definitions at Troy. For example, most of the sherds
from Mycenaean vessels would be identified as Tan Ware if they lack any painting. Mycenaean ware would thus be underrepresented in the statistic of total count and overrepresented in
the statistic of diagnostic count. There is hardly any golden way to avoid statistical distortion,
since if we take only the rims, a similar objection can still be made: if the rim is not painted, it
would be classified as Tan ware.
6. The pithoi would be also considerably underrepresented if only rims were to be counted.
7. Since the degree and the quality of burnishing can vary even on a single vessel, it is
sometimes impossible to decide whether a single piece definitely belongs to a Handmade
Coarse Ware or a Handmade Lustrous Ware.
In view of all these difficulties, I decided that the best solutions is a compromise in using
various sets for various purposes. Counts of all the sherds, including the undecorated body
ones, shall be used for ware statistics, while only the rim counts shall be used for any shaperelated analysis.
[12]
CHRONOLOGY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TROY

VIIB PERIOD
WHEN DOES THE IRON AGE BEGIN?
The Early Iron Age is defined differently in the Aegean, in the Balkans and in Anatolia.
This leads to terminological problems especially at Troy, a site situated in the contact zone
between three geographic areas. Prior to the early 1st Millennium BC in all of the named regions iron artifacts occurr only very sporadically. Thus, the simple presence of iron artefacts
is not a decisive chronological criterion for defining the Iron Age. Although it is in consequence just a matter of naming convention, no unity was reached about the beginning of the
Iron Age. In Central Anatolia, the Early Iron Age is generally accepted to begin immediately
after the collapse of the Hittite Empire. 58 In the Balkans, the Iron Age starts with the appearance of channeled pottery. 59 In the Aegean the majority of scholars speak about the Early
Iron Age from the beginning of the Protogeometric pottery phase. 60 As a result, depending on
the system used, the Early Iron Age at Troy would begin with Troy VIIb1 according to the
Anatolian framework, with Troy VIIb2 according to the Balkan framework, or with with the
Protogeometric period in the Aegean framework.
Each chronological framework has its own pros and cons. Blegen understood Troy VIIa and
VIIb1 as Late Bronze Age and Troy VIIb2 as an Early Iron Age. 61 The Tbingen team prefers
the Anatolian framework. 62 And finally, the Cincinnati Post-Bronze Age Troy team uses the
Aegean chronology. 63 Until any conventional naming becomes widely accepted, it is most
58
See Genz 2003; Genz 2004 and Genz 2006 for overview.
59
Hnsel (1976, 237) defines ltere Hallstattzeit (early Hallstatt epoch) with the beginning of Troia VIIb2 on
the one hand and the Basarabi-Horizon on the other (ca. 1100-800 BCE).
60
Dickinson 2006, Fig. 1.1.
61
Blegen et al. 1950, 22-3.
62
Becks et al. 2006a, Korfmann 2006, Abb. 5.
63
See e.g. Aslan 2002, 81; Basedow 2008.
[13]
suitable to refer to all Troy VIIb subphases as a transitional Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age
period.
DISCUSSION ON SUBDIVISIONS OF TROY VII

Troy is well-known for its relative chronological sequence. Since its discovery by Schliemann, the site has been used as a reference point for chronological and comparative studies in
the Aegean, Anatolia and the Balkans. Drpfeld defined the Troy VII period, and subdivided it in two subphases Troy VII1 and VII2. 64 Later, Blegen felt the necessity to split the
second stage into two further subphases. In Blegens system, Drpfelds VII1 became Troy
VIIa and Drpfelds VII2 was divided into Troy VIIb1 and Troy VIIb2. 65 Blegens chronological subdivisions became widely accepted soon after their publication.
Doubts about the appropriateness and validity of Blegens system started to be raised during
the Tbingen excavations in the 1990s. The doubts concerned the naming of phases, the
number of phases and also the very criteria on which the phases had been originally based and
defined. Important changes to the existing designation system were discussed and a new
phase designated as Troy VIIb3 was proposed. 66 In spite of these relatively new developments
and open and critical attitudes, the author of this report has come to the conclusion that
Blegens phasing still is the best solution to subdivide the relative sequences of the Troy VIIb
settlement. The only necessary change concerns the existence of Protogeometric material,
whose presence and importance at the site was definitely underestimated by Blegen. 67
In his last years of research at Troy, Manfred Korfmann returned to what had been in fact
the original idea of Blegen, 68 and in a deliberate attempt to stress the continuity of material
culture, he favored the substitution of Troy VIIa with Troy VIi and of Troy VIIb1 with Troy
VIj. 69 Korfmanns approach has the advantage of stressing the cultural continuity but the
cumbersome character of the proposed namings bears a risk of confusion among both scholars
and the broad public. Thus, the present report uses the Blegens original phase designations.
64
Drpfeld 1902, 183-201.
65
Blegen et al. 1958, 142-4. Blegen (1934, 236) originally distinguished also Troy VIIc.
66
See below, the section on the Protogeometric period.
67
For summary of Blegens attitudes concerning the Iron Age see Basedow 2007; Basedow 2008.
68
69
Korfmann 2006, p. 7, Abb. 5.
[14]
TROY VIIB1
Blegen used several criteria for defining the Troy VIIb1 phase. From the stratigraphic point
of view, the phase followed a distinct conflagration horizon that marked the end of the Troy
VIIa phase. It also preceded the buildings of the Troy VIIb2 phase, which were characterized
by an orthostate building technique. 70 From the ceramic point of view, a relatively limited
spectrum of new vessel types in Anatolian Grey Ware and in Tan Ware emerged. The vessels
were frequently provided with sharply-molded ring bases. A new class of coarse ware, decorated with finger imprints, became popular. 71 These criteria notwithstanding, Blegen could
still not differentiate between Troy VIIb1 and VIIb2 in approximately one third of the published contexts. Furthermore, the wheelmade pottery shapes viewed by Blegen as diagnostic
for Troy VIIb1 are nearly always single or very rare examples, often fragmentary. Finally, the
typical Troy VIIb1 handmade pottery is clearly complementary to the Knobbed Ware of
Troy VIIb2, a fact that further supports skepticism about Blegens chronological divisions.
One of the aims of this research project was to reexamine the existence of the Troy VIIb1
phase and in an early phase of research it appeared that the existence of VIIb1 cannot be substantiated. 72 It was not until the last two processing campaigns that a better understanding of
the stratigraphy and the identification of specific ceramic assemblages confirmed the existence of Troy VIIb1 as a distinct phase according to the terms defined by Blegen. Yet, it does
have to be stressed that the phase is absent in a number of areas, while incorrectly attributed
elsewhere.
As for our present state of knowledge, the Troy VIIb1 phase was a period with considerably
reduced settlement activity. The habitation area seems to have been located exclusively on the
citadel, where some buildings were rebuilt while others were abandoned. 73 The area outside
the citadel fortification wall was left empty, and only thin waste deposits accumulated there. 74
In the west lower town, the densely built, impressive Troy VIIa structures were reduced to
70
Blegen et al. 1958, 142-3.
71
72
Hnila at Coopration europenne dans le domaine de la recherch scientifique et technique (COST)-
Workshop (Schloss Hohentbingen, Institut fr Ur- und Frhgeschichte und Archologie des Mittelalters, Eberhard Karls Universitt Tbingen, on 29th October 2006). The doubts expressed in this workshop were reflected
in publications of other members of the Troy team (see Rose 2008, 410; Aslan 2008).
73
See p. 68.
74
See pp. 78-83.
[15]
ruins by a devastating conflagration, and only occasional pits and a short ditch were dug there
during the Troy VIIb1 phase. 75
TROY VIIB2
The Troy VIIb2 phase has distinct, clearly recognizable pottery. Blegens basic and still valid criterion was the appearance of Knobbed ware. The surface of this new class of handmade pottery is almost always carefully polished and lustrous, actually more often decorated
with channeling, and incisions than with knobs, which are indeed rare. Accordingly, the term
handmade lustrous ware is preferred throughout this report. 76 A handful of sherds of handmade lustrous ware were reportedly found in Troy VIIb1 contexts, 77 but they constitute an
absolute exception and should best be viewed as intrusions.
From the architectonic point of view, the definition of Troy VIIb2 has become less straightforward as in Blegens times. The use of orthostates (flat stone slabs set on edge) served for
Blegen as a criterion to delimit the Troy VIIb2 phase architecturally, but cannot be considered
a feature exclusive to the phase any more. In fact, Blegen himself noted that orthostates had
sometimes been used in what he believed were genuine Troy VIIb1 strata 78 or Troy VIII strata. 79 During the recent excavations, orthostates were found in Protogeometric (Pl. 28.B-28.E,
30.B-30.D) and Geometric strata (Pl. 31.C-31.D, Pl. 57.E) as well. 80
The Troy VIIb2 settlement impresses one with a remarkable upsurge in construction activity. The citadel becomes once again densely built, 81 large edifices appear again in the west
75
See pp. 83-89.
76
See p. 27 for more details.
77
E.g. Blegen et al. 1958, 188 (Street 751 West); 233 (Area 789).
78
Blegen et al. 1958, 143 writes: The use of small orthostates that becomes characteristic and almost univer-
sal in the later phase is rare, if it occurs at all, in the initial stage. Orthostats were found in the north face of the
northern wall of House 762 (Blegen et al. 1958, 196). Wall A in Area 786 (HJ-6/7), which has orthostats,
seemed to Blegen to have been built soon after period VIIa (Blegen et al. 1958, 226, 229). In this latter case it
would be evident supraposition of orthostate walls, since Walls B and F which were built over the wall D contained also orthostates (Blegen et al. 1958, 227, Fig. 351, 352). Also the east wall of House 771 is an orthostate
wall, although it is not clear which phase of VIIb it should be dated to (Blegen et al. 1958, 191).
79
Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 64 (House 814), 274-4, Fig. 168 (House 850).
80
See Basedow 2008.
81
See pp. 90-127.
[16]
district of the lower town 82 and the strip outside the citadel fortification wall starts to be used
as a construction terrain for the first time, all along its east, south and west perimeter. 83 Troy
VIIb2 settlement activities are attested even in the south lower town. 84 The Handmade Lustrous Ware, found in large proportions in the Trojan assemblages, has evident parallels in the
Balkans. Thus, it is most tempting to attribute the changes in settlement character and density
to the arrival of a new population from the Balkans.
It is uncertain how the Troy VIIb2 settlement came to its end. Some houses were destroyed
by fire, others show no traces of violence and might have been abandoned and allowed to
slowly disintegrate. The painted Protogeometric pottery is found only above the ruins of the
Troy VIIb2 settlement. 85
PROTOGEOMETRIC PERIOD (PREVIOUSLY TROY VIIB3)

This report prefers not to speak about Troy VIIb3. This phase was added to the existing
periodization system after the 1994 excavation campaign, 86 as a result of reinterpretations of
Blegens research combined with fresh observations from newly excavated areas. Walls that
had just been excavated were interpreted as a distinct architectural phase, characterized
ceramicly by the presence of painted Protogeometric pottery along with Knobbed Ware. 87
The phase was named Troy VIIb3 because it was believed to represent a direct continuity in
architectural tradition and material culture from the previous occupation. 88
In spite of the Troy VIIb3 attributions, the author of this report came to the conclusion,
that Blegen was basically right when he wrote neither by our predecessors nor by the Cincinnati Expedition was even a single fragment of real Protogeometric Ware recovered from a
82
See pp. 153-166.
83
See pp. 128-153.
84
See pp. 167-170.
85
See the chapter below.
86
Korfmann 1995, 22; Rose 1995, 91 and footnote 30. See also Hawkins and Easton 1996, 115 and footnote
17.
87
Lenz et al. 1998, 196, Figs. 3, 4, 5.
88
A rare notion about Troy VIIb4 (?) appeared in a preliminary publication (Korfmann 1995, 22), but was
never closer elaborated. The architecture to which it had first referred is currently attributed to the Geometric
perod (for overview of the Geometric phases at Troy see Basedow 2007; Basedow 2008).
[17]
stratigraphically certified deposit of Troy VIIb. 89 In fact, the painted Protogeometric sherds
uncovered by the Tbingen team were found always above Troy VIIb2 structures and deposits, in contexts which either seem ruined, 90 represent a different architectonic tradition, 91 or
imply a ritual function. 92 Theoretically, these contexts may be called Troy VIIb3, since they
lay directly over Troy VIIb2 strata. However, the lack of architectonic continuity, or better,
the radical break in settlement structure and architectonic plan, makes it more convenient to
stress the discontinuity by using a new phasing system. The assembled evidence is still rather
meager, yet a dramatic drop in building activity and in population density can be retraced over
the entire site. It is apparent that the new phase represents the beginning of a new tradition.
Since this tradition found its continuation in Geometric and Archaic times, the designation
Protogeometric seem the best. 93
The pottery assemblages of the Protogeometric period have been described in detail by Carolyn Aslan. 94 Aslan highlighted the fact that in this period the Handmade Coarse Wares and
painted Protogeometric amphoras are found together. Yet, the possibility that the Handmade
Coarse Ware and Handmade Lustrous Ware are for a large part residual should not be discounted. First of all, it is at present still impossible to individuate a distinct typology of
Protogeometric handmade pottery, which could help single it out from examples of the same
group dating to the previous period. Furthermore, at least some of the PG contexts in which
relatively numerous Handmade Lustrous Ware sherds were found are secondary accumulations behind terrace walls. 95
89
Blegen et al. 1958, 146. The only sherd which Blegen considered to be a genuine PG sherd was found in
debris fallen over the ruins of House VII, with sherds of Phase VIIb1 but probably out of context.
90
Ruins of Citadel Houses Room G (see p. 173) and Room H (see p. 174), pits in the ruins in the West Low-
er Town (see pp. 180-193) and deposits from above the ruins of Terrace House (pp. 175-180).
91
Small wall above the Street in E8/E9, which is effectively blocking the Troy VIIb street and passes over the
Troy VIIb houses (p. 172f).

92
Vertical stones feature 1 in z7 filled with ashy earth which has most likely belonged to a hearth (see p. 193-
198). Since similar structures are attested for the Geometric period when the whole area was certainly used as a
Sanctuary, ritual funtion is likely to apply already to the Protogeometric period. See Basedow 2007 and Basedow
2008 for summary about the epoch and with comparanda.
93
For critical attitudes concerning the VIIb3 designation see also Basedow 2008, 130.
94
Aslan 2002.
95
In A7 (see p. 175) and in D9 (see p. 177).
[18]
ABSOLUTE DATING
The absolute dates used at Troy are based on synchronisms with painted Mycenaean and
Protogeometric pottery, with a well-defined repertory of shapes and decorative motifs, as well
as well-established cross-synchronisms from Egypt, Cyprus and the Levant.
Mycenaean pottery from Troy is being studied and published by Penelope Mountjoy.
Mountjoy argues that the Troy VIIb1 phase must have been longer than the one generation
proposed by Blegen. 96 This fact is indicated not only by the depth of the deposits but also by
Blegens scientific agenda: squeeze Troy VIIb1 into a short lapse of time in order to keep up a
supposed synchronization with the Granary style pottery of the Greek mainland (at Blegens
time and in terms of Furumarks conception the Granary style was dated to LH IIIC Early).
Blegen believed that Granary style pottery started to appear at Troy during the VIIb1 phase
continuing into VIIb2. 97 Mountjoy, on the other hand, concludes that the Troy VIIb1 phase
starts in the Transitional LH IIIB2-IIIC Early phase, extends through LH IIIC Early and perhaps continues to LH IIIC Middle. 98
Concerning the Troy VIIb2 phase, Blegen could not determine its duration from the available evidence. He guessed that the phase must have lasted at least two or three generations. 99
According to Mountjoy, Mycenaean LH IIIC Middle and LH IIIC Late pottery, but no pieces
of Submycenaean were found in the Troy VIIb2 levels. 100 Mycenaean pottery became quite
limited in numbers.
The Troy VIIb3 phase was dated to the late eleventh and early tenth century BC.101
Catling stresses the assumption that PG amphorae of Group III were not associated with
Troia VIIb3 102 and those of Group II belonged to Troy VIII. 103 According to him, in absolute terms the range of Protogeometric amphorae from Troy is as follows:
96
Mountjoy 1999b, 323.
97
98
99
Blegen et al. 1958, 143. Mountjoy (1999b, 333) notes, there are two superimposed VIIb2 floor levels in
House 761, 768, Area 789, and three in House 769.

100
101
Lenz et al. 1998, 196.
102
Catling 1998, 178.
103
Catling 1998, 167.
[19]
Group I: c. 1025-950 BCE; 104

Group II: c. 800 to 675 BCE (maximum possible range 850 to 650 BCE), with the peak of
their production between 750-700 BCE; 105
Group III: c. 1000-890; 106
Group IV: c. 1000-890. 107
The dates were challenged by dendrochronological C14 wiggle-matching of samples from
Assiros in Greek Macedonia, which suggested a date of 1070 BC or even 1100 BC for the
beginning of the Protogeometric period, significantly earlier than previously accepted. 108 If
correctly analyzed, the samples imply dating Troy VIIb2 to 1140-1120 BC and the Early
Protogeometric period to 1120-1070 BC. 109
A number of C14 and dendrochronological samples were taken from the Trojan Troy VIIb
material, but their usefulness is limited until now because of too broad a range. The data obtained by pottery synchronisms are still considerably more precise.
104
Catling 1998, 176.
105
Catling 1998, 170, 177.
106
On general stylistic grounds they clearly belong to a more developed stage of PG or SPG than Group I, but
are almost certainly earlier than Group II. If they come from the Thessalo-Euboian region as their calcareous
clay suggests, they are unlikely to be later than the early ninth century, or earlier than the tenth. Catling 1998,
177.
107
Catling 1998, 178; Lenz et al. 1998, 197.
108
Newton et al. 2003.
109
Wardle et al. 2007, Fig. 7.
[20]
CLASSIFICATION OF POTTERY
WARE GROUPS
The Tbingen Troy project adopted the Blegen ware definition scheme in 1988, but during
twenty years of continual excavations and finds processing many existing classifications were
modified or discontinued, and a number of new wares were introduced. In order to enable
comparisons with previous results, it was attempted in this report to keep the Blegens original ware definitions wherever possible. The wares used for classification purposes by the
Troy project were simplified into more substantial ware groups defined on the basis of
shared fabric, surface treatment or color characteristics. All the statistical overviews use only
the attribution to the ware groups, whereby the sherds incorporated into the catalogue were
attributed to specific wares.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARES

Anatolian Grey Ware is the most distinctive of all fine wares at Troy. This name is preferred
over the former term Grey Minyan Ware. The criteria Blegen used for definition of the
ware are still valid. 110 Fabric of Anatolian Grey Ware vessels is refined and contains hardly
any conspicuous tempering, the surface is usually covered by a self-slip, which only extremely rarely flakes off (Pl. 89.B). The surface is always polished at least on one side. Polishing is
usually continuous, only in few instances traces of burnishing remain visible (Pl. 89.A). Colors vary from light grey to almost black, occasionally dark brown occurs.
The fabric and surface treatment are remarkably consistent over time and do not show any
differences in comparison with Troy VI-VIIa periods. Even the absolute majority of Archaic
examples of Anatolian Grey Ware are indistinguishable from their Bronze Age predecessors. 111
According to Blegen, during the VIIb phases Grey ware is more popular than the Tan Ware,
in contrast to Troy VIIa phases, where Tan ware dominated the assemblage. This observation
was completely confirmed (Pl. 12.A, 13).
110
111
Only a small number of Archaic grey ware vessels are distinct in terms of surface treatment they pos-
sessed a thick slip and were highly polished, up to a degree unseen in Late Bronze Age predecessors.
[21]
TAN WARE AND BROWN SLIP WARE

Tan Ware shares the same characteristics as Anatolian Grey Ware, the only difference being
the color, which was deliberately intended to be beige or buff. A specific brown color variety
was separated as a new ware by the Troy project, because of its presupposed chronological
implications. In addition to the color, the variety is distinctive by presence of numerous tiny
mica particles in the slip. The slip is sometimes very thick and flakes off more frequently than
the usual exemples of Tan Ware. On the other hand, in several instances the slip was very thin
and it was evidently applied with thick brushes or sponges (Pl. 89.C).
The Brown Slip Ware is believed to have been produced only beginning in the Troy VIIa
period, during the course of which it became extremely popular, surpassing in nearly all excavated areas the amount of traditional Tan Ware. Since the Brown Slip Ware was not always
consistently differentiated during the processing, it is grouped together with Tan Ware in statistical overviews presented in this report.
The importance which both wares enjoyed during the Troy VIIa period, when they constituted the dominant group of pottery, did not persevere further. The times of Troy VIIb saw a
dramatic decline in numbers of Tan Ware and Brown Slip Ware vessels being used on the
site. The Brown Slip variety continued to be produced, but only as one of many color varieties
of Tan Ware, not the dominant one.
The popularity of Tan ware seems to diminish further still as Troy VIIb advanced, though
the ware did not completely disappear. Certain varieties of Tan Ware are present in Archaic
levels, but only in small quantities and it is also possible that some of them are residual or
misfired. If the form is unclear or the decoration is missing, the fragments are virtually undistinguishable from the standard Bronze Age predecessors. 112 It is also possible that the fabric
of the late Geometric/Early Archaic G2/3 ware owes its formation to the former tradition of
Tan Ware. Some firmly fired Troy VIIb examples could perhaps represent transitional fabric
(Pl. 89.D).
112
Rose 1995, 91.
[22]
MYCENAEAN WARE
There has been some confusion about the nature of the Mycenaean pottery occurring at Troy
and how much of it was actually imported. Penelope Mountjoy suggests that most of it was
locally made. She distinguishes two types so called Ginger Ware comprising Mycenaean
shapes made in Tan Ware and decorated in Mycenaean style, but painted in matt colors and
with usually an unburnished surface. 113 Already Blegen thought this type was locally made.
Mountjoy, however, suggests that the bulk of Mycenaean pottery at Troy was locally made,
including those with lustrous paint. In her view the locally made lustrous paint that dominated
during Late Troy VI was gradually replaced by the locally made matt paint in the time of
Troy VII. 114 She bases her statement on visual observations of the sherds, inclusions in them
and identical appearance of the clay matrix from LH IIA to LH IIIC. Especially the frequent
presence of gold mica (biotite) and soft firing was taken as a criterion of local or East AegeanWest Anatolian, clearly non-Argive provenance. Furthermore Mountjoy also pointed out the
fact that Mycenaean shapes found at Troy were mostly open vessels used as fine table ware
and thus unsuitable as export containers and only rarely imported as such. 115 The results of
neutron activation analysis of the Mycenaean sherds have confirmed most of conclusions, but
were less straithforward concerning the differentiation between the Trojan and the Argive
pottery matrix. 116
The amount of Mycenaean pottery diminishes significantly during the Troy VIIb period.
The presence of some developed forms and decoration proves sufficiently, that contacts with
the South Aegean were not completely cut. 117
The Mycenaean pottery will be treated in a separate volume by Penelope Mountjoy and for
this reason no sherds are catalogued. The presence or absence of Mycenaean sherds in specific contexts and their relative frequency in the pottery record can be found out in statistical
charts.
113
114
Mountjoy 1997, 262.
115
Mountjoy 1997, 259-63.
116
Mountjoy and Mommsen 2006, 97-102.
117
In addition to the examples published by Blegen and Mountjoy there is one interesting complete Mycenae-
an stirrup jar from the Schliemann Troy Collection deposited in the National Museum at Athens dated to LH
IIIC Middle (Demakopoulou 1988, Kat. Nr. 125).
[23]
PROTOGEOMETRIC PAINTED POTTERY

The painted Protogeometric pottery replaced the Mycenaean Ware in a sense. The presence
of Protogeometric pottery was played down by Blegen and the attention to this pottery class
was for the first time drawn by Hertel. 118 Four main groups of painted Protogeometric pottery
were defined at Troy. 119 Painted Protogeometric pottery of Group I was found together with
handmade wares typical of Troy VIIb on several instances. The pottery of Protogeometric
groups II and III occurred only very rarely together with handmade wares, whereas the Group
IV never.
Most examples of Protogeometric pottery from Troy were already published. 120 The sherds
catalogued in this report are grouped according to the contexts in which they were found.
They are presented as a part of a sample, which should demonstrate the entire pottery spectrum of the respective contexts.
PLAIN WARES
According to Blegen, plain ware stops during the Troy VI Middle period. This might be true
of the typical plain ware which was defined for the Troy VI period as an evenly fired fine
fabric with beige color on the surface and also in the paste. It was observed that a number of
buff, orange and red colored variants of untreated plain wares do occur in Troy VIIa and also
in Troy VIIb times. According to the impressions from the primary processing it was expected that Plain Ware is very rare during Troy VIIb2 phase, but that it occurs more frequently in transitional, i.e. Protogeometric and Geometric layers. Due to their presupposed
chronological relevance, the plain wares were separated as a special ware group in this report.
During most of the post-excavation pottery processing, there was only a single coding category for the plain ware of Troy VI-VII time. Because of this, the statistics cannot distinguish
how much of plain ware is to be attributed to earlier, residual material and how much is genuine in the Troy VIIb layers.
118
Hertel 1991.
119
Catling 1998.
120
Lenz et al. 1998.
[24]
BLEGENS OTHER PAINTED WARES

Blegen also separated a category called other painted wares. They were mostly indistinguishable from types that are fairly common in Troy VIII and are usually attributed to the
seventh centuryTheir occurrence in several areas in the stratum of Troy VIIb1, below the
deposits of Knobbed Ware, presents a perplexing and still unexplained problem. 121 Most of
the published examples can be securely attributed to Late Geometric and Early Archaic G2/3
Ware. 122 Their appearance in the layers of Troy VIIb1 can be thus explained only in terms of
later intrusions. However, in case of few sherds 123 a local Mycenaean carinated crater with
lozenge chain was proposed. 124
In the current classification, all painted sherds from Troy VIIb layers that could not be classified as either Mycenaean, Protogeometric or Post-Bronze Age, are attributed to Unknown
or imported ware group.
WHEELMADE COARSE WARES

The majority of coarse wares were hand-formed during the Troy VIIb times. The
wheelmade coarse ware group as defined in this report includes all the remaining coarse
wares of Troy VIIb, which were thrown on the wheel. The difference in production technique
was not stressed sufficiently by Blegen, but it seems to us to be the crucial differentiating criterion for grouping Troy VIIb coarse wares. The presence of wheelmade coarse wares side by
side with much more numerous handmade coarse wares is an interesting phenomenon that
opens a series of questions concerning social and chronological issues. 125
The Gritty ware, which was the most typical coarse ware of Troy VI and VIIa times, went
completely out of use in subsequent periods and the few pieces found in Troy VIIb contexts
are likely residual. The wheelmade coarse ware examples occurring in Troy VIIb strata can be
rather classified as Burnished Ware, Troy VI Coarse Ware and likely a new variety, which
might be best described as Wheelmade Semi-Coarse Ware. The wheelmade semicoarse
ware is more compact than other wares and it is not dissimilar to cooking pottery, which is
121
122
Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 276.27-28, 277.14-15, 279.22, 23.
123
Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 22a-c.
124
125
They are addressed in chapter on Implications.
[25]
occasionally found in Geometric and Archaic layers and which Blegen possibly had in mind
when describing coarse pottery of Troy VIII.
126
Since several large examples were found as
early as Troy VIIa, there might be a local tradition for production of wheelmade semicoarse
ware going on since the Late Bronze Age. Examples of fabrics are included in the plates volume (Pl. 89.E 90.H).
HANDMADE COARSE WARES

Interestingly, Blegen did not pinpoint any difference between the pottery assemblages of
Troy VIIa and VIIb regarding the coarse wares. Rather the contrary, he has stressed a continuity. 127 This is striking, since the previously most widespread coarse ware Gritty Ware disappeared. 128 Yet, it was noted in Blegens publication that all of the coarse ware is handmade
in the Troy VIIb1 period. 129
The results of the Tbingen excavations suggest that Troy VIIb handmade coarse wares are
clearly different from the bulk of previously produced Troy VI-VIIa coarse wares. The Troy
VIIb vessels are handmade, and their surface is in most cases burnished. Burnishing of the
surface is so common that a designation Handmade Burnished Ware is appropriate for most
of the sherds. Untreated examples also exist though and nothing seems to indicate a different
purpose or chronological difference between both varieties. The distinct decoration of raised
band and finger imprints is also very typical for handmade coarse ware vessels during the
entire duration of Troy VIIb.
126
Concerning the definition of the typical coarse ware of Troy VIII, one is left only with intuition in an at-
tempt to filter the necessary criteria for a comparison with Troy VI-VIIa and VIIb from the published records.
The coarse fabric of Troy VIII is referred to as similar to Grey Minyan, but without slip and burnishing and
another variant, which is hard gritty: thick-walled vessels show a fabric like that of the Gray Ware of Troy
VIII, but lack slip, burnish and decoration. There are fragments also of hard, gritty wares, some of which are
sandy in texture. (Blegen et al. 1958, 257) or coarse domestic vessels in hard gritty wares. More than a few
of these are handmade jars with thin walls, sandy in texture and scored, especially on the interior, the outer surface often showing a smooth finish. (Blegen et al. 1958, 291).
127
The coarse ware used for domestic crockery is likewise of local manufacture, evolved from forerunners in
Troy VIIa and earlier, but taking on some distinctive new characteristics in Phase VIIb1. (Blegen et al. 1958,
154).
128
For description of Troy VIIa Gritty Ware see Blegen et al. 1958, 24.
129
The ware of this category, all handmade, occurs in abundance in, and is characteristic of, Phase VIIb1.
(Blegen et al. 1958, 158).
[26]
On several occasions it was observed that the surface treatment can vary considerably over
one and the same pot. Sometimes, a pot was very well burnished near its rim, whereas the
base was hardly smoothed or even left completely untreated. Furthermore, the recognition of
burnishing and its coding into computer sheets was very subjective and different from person to person during the primary processing of the pottery. For these reasons, burnished and
unburnished sherds are not distinguished in the statistics. Only the description of catalogued
pieces was done with the aim of distinguishing between burnished and unburnished varieties.
It cannot be excluded that there was some local tradition in producing handmade pottery,
since several vessels published by Blegen from the VIIa Phase were explicitly described as
handmade or they make that impression.130 They must have been almost identical with the
Coarse fabric of Troy VIIb because in at least one instance Blegen considered the possibility
of an intrusion from VIIb. 131 Several handmade vessels from supposed Troy VIIa levels were
also found during the Tbingen excavations but they clearly remain an exceptional minority.
Examples of fabrics are included in the plates volume (Pl. 90.I 91.Q).
HANDMADE LUSTROUS WARES

This is a new designation, which roughly corresponds to what Blegen understood under his
term Knobbed Ware. Since the knobs occur only in very small quantities and speaking
about Knobbed ware without knobs is rather confusing, the term Handmade Lustrous
Wares seems more neutral. It encompasses also the undecorated specimen and stresses the
primary differentiating feature in comparison to the handmade coarse ware, namely, the polished lustrous surface, which seems to have been intended or desired. It was produced by
careful polishing of the entire surface so that it becomes continuous, whereas the burnishing
of handmade coarse ware pots was much less careful and the surface is covered by a number
of burnished strips in various direction interrupted by unburnished areas.
No real differentiating criteria have been stated in Blegens publication. Blegens description of these wares are very similar and even a remarkable closeness of both wares was noted
in certain respects. The main reasons that probably hindered both wares being related were 1)
the presumption of their chronological difference and 2) their distinctiveness in terms of
130
Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 227: 35.638, 35.639, 35.1093, Fig. 229: 35.438, 33.148.
131
Possibly a product of Troy VIIb, but the associated potsherds are all assignable to Troy VIIa. (Blegen et
al. 1958, 111 speaking about the Fig. 229: 35.438).
[27]
shapes. 132 In terms of ware definition it seems that it was only the dark color and fine luster
that made the handmade sherds to be statistically counted as Knobbed ware in Blegens
reports, even if no knobs were present. 133 Consequently all handmade sherds with less careful
burnishing or with lighter surface colors were probably taken for Coarse ware. The definition of Knobbed ware was not without ambiguities, since sometimes the sherds were described as Knobbed Ware and related fabric, which although handmade and bearing some
similarity, depart from the standard repertory of Knobbed Ware. 134 It is unfortunately not
clear what the departing criteria were like, but it seems to have been primarily the color. 135 On
another occasion a sherd with evidently Knobbed ware decoration was counted as a Coarse
Ware only because it was found in what was believed to be a VIIb1 context.136 The reason
seems to be most probably that it was not burnished enough.
Concerning Blegens interpretation of the chronological differences about the wares it
should be stressed that in several areas the sherds of Knobbed Ware occurred in the course of
Blegens excavations apparently already in Troy VIIb1 contexts, which were mostly inter-
132
In a few respects this distinctive coarse ware with its handmade technique and its use of plastic ornament
looks as if it may be somehow related to Knobbed Ware. Whether there is a real connection here or only a fortuitous resemblance has not been determined. It is in any event clear that the coarse ware appears in profusion in
Troy VIIb1 whereas Knobbed Ware only makes its debut in the ensuing Phase VIIb1. It should be noted, too,
that in no instance do we find distinctive pots of the same shape in the two wares. (Blegen et al. 1958, 159).
133
This is at least the impression that one gets when reading Blegens description of the VIIb1 context in
Square J-K 5: Among the many fragments of handmade vessels with more or less burnishing of the surface,
classed as coarse ware (below), only two showed the dark color and fine luster associated with developed
Knobbed Ware of the succeeding phaseThey may have percolated down from above or may represent an earlier version of this type of pottery. (Blegen et al. 1958, 233).
134
Blegen et al. 1958, 215. Another striking indication of the difficulties with the differentiation is documented
for the Area in front of Gate VIU where much of the Coarse Ware has been counted as Knobbed Ware and was
interpreted as a material from thick-walled handmade pots evidently representing a coarse variety of Knobbed
Ware. (Blegen et al. 1958, 240). Similarly, in House 761 four or five other sherds show a burnished surface
like that of Knobbed Ware but are perhaps rather to be classed with the coarse ware of Phase VIIb1. (Blegen et
al. 1958, 202).
135
as it is suggested in following passage in Blegen (Blegen et al. 1958, 215): Fragment of small one-handled
cup in handmade reddish-brown burnished ware, unusual if not unique in Period VIIb (Fig. 282, No. 9).
136
Blegen et al. 1958, 201, Fig. 285:7 (a note at the Figure label states that it might be better classed as
Knobbed ware)
[28]
preted in terms of later contaminations. In one instance the existence of an earlier version of
Knobbed Ware was postulated as an alternative explanation. 137
Knobbed ware was treated by Blegen as a Fine fabric in his statistics. This fits if the function of the ware and its fine surface treatment are considered. Both features are clear implications for a tableware. On the other hand, the fabric is very coarse, tempered with many mineral particles. The firing is not very hard, although in most cases the sherds give an impression
of being more compact than the Gritty Ware typical of Troy VI-VIIa. Only rarely the fabric is
gritty. 138 Most of the sherds are covered with a self-slip, coat or engobe of finer clay, which
occasionally flakes off or is uncovered in places, previously covered by bands or handles. 139
Sometimes even the coarse shapes such as jars seem to have been produced with evident
care and fairly decent surface polishing as e.g. 860 (K4.696.48).
Examples of fabrics are included in the plates volume (Pl. 92.A 94.E).
PITHOI
A number of wares were used for pithos production, the most common of them was designated as Red Coarse Ware. The pithoi in this report are only generally classified as belonging
to the category, no closer distinction was attempted. A more detailed study is under way by
Diane Thumm.
ORGANIC LUMPS
A few pieces of organic lumps were found in various excavations areas. They were treated
as organically tempered pottery during preliminary processing but their purpose is not clear.
They might have been part of big trays or alternatively parts of hearths, small ovens or claylined pits. 140 None of them shows burnt residue on the interior or heavy smoke traces on the
exterior, making their interpretations as baking pans unlikely.
137
see the quotation in the Footnote No. 133.
138
E.g. cup 1133 with channeled decoration.
139
E.g. 621.
140
See e.g. the rims of hearths published for Troy III (Blegen et al. 1951, Fig. 31) and Troy V (Blegen et al.
1951, Fig. 192).
[29]
EARLIER WARES
All the wares that are believed to occur exclusively in earlier periods on the site, were summarized into the group of earlier wares. Their actual proportion might vary, since the recognition of earlier wares is heavily dependent on the experience and training of the pottery processors. Excavation units were processed over a couple of years by a number of various people,
and the data cannot be fully consistent.
POST-BRONZE AGE WARES

Troy VIIb levels were often superposed or disturbed by later strata and features. In an attempt to statistically evaluate the impact of possible disturbances, sherds that were recognized
as Geometric or later, were attributed to the ware group of Post-Bronze Age wares.
UNIDENTIFIED OR IMPORTED
Sherds that could not be classified into any of the previous groups were attributed for statistical purposes into this category. Most of them are too small to be securely identified, but a
small number with fabrics unusual for the site can be best explained as imports. Some of their
fabrics are illustrated in detail (Pl. 94.E 94.H).
[30]
SHAPES
Blegens publication introduced a coding system for shapes that was based on the vessels
function. According to the system, Trojan vessels were divided into four main categories,
labeled A to D (Pl. 14-20). Category A designated vessels for eating and drinking; category B vessels for pouring; category C vessels for storage; and category D was reserved
for miscellaneous, unusual or rare shapes. 141 Blegens classifications are clear to comprehend and easy to use. It facilitates diachronic analysis. For these reasons, as well as for the
sake of preserving comparability, the Blegens classification is referred to in the current catalogue wherever possible.
The primary classification system used in this report is a simpler one. It divides the pottery
shapes into broad vessel categories, without implying their function. Such classification suits
better the needs of heavily fragmented material. As a matter of fact, the number of complete
or restored Troy VIIb vessels retrieved by Blegens team is incomparably higher than that
retrieved by the Tbingen team. The reasons for such a disproportionality in fragmentation
are manifold, including the highly efficient pottery restoration workshop implemented by
Blegen, but the main reason is without doubt the volume of excavated deposits inside the citadel houses. Only a few of the houses were left untouched by Blegens team and these were
only partly excavated by the Tbingen team. Thus, even if Blegen warned that his list of
shapes falls far short of completeness and many types almost surely escaped recognition, 142 his typological chart is still the best reference for Trojan shapes during the Troy VIIb
phases. Examples that could not be paralleled to the Blegen chart are extremely rare and are
explicitly referred to in the chapters about the appropriate vessel category. Quite the contrary,
a fair number of shapes found by the Blegen team was not encountered at all during the recent
excavations.
In this report, the attribution of the sherds to specific vessel categories is based on the drawings and, most of all, on the shape profile coding system 143 developed by the Troy project
over the years (Pl. 112-198). The Trojan coding system was also the source for the statistical
analysis of the data. The coding system is numerical and all the relevant numbers are listed
under the respective vessel categories. The statistical analysis is based exclusively on rims.
141
Blegen et al. 1958, 159-76.
142
143
Brseformen in the Tbingen Troy project excavation jargon.
[31]
This decision was adopted in order to avoid distorting effects by multiple entries of parts of
one and the same vessel (e.g. handles or bases). In this way, the overviews represent the minimal shape counts for each category.
CUPS AND KANTHAROI

Cups and kantharoi are treated here together as a single group; due to extreme fragmentation
it is in many instances impossible to distinguish whether a specific vessel had one handle
(cups) or two handles (kantharoi). The fragmentary preservation is also the reason for difficulties in differentiation between certain forms of bowls and cups. If the profile shape is not unequivocal, for all statistical purposes the distinction between bowls and cups is made on the
basis of the rim diameter. Vessels with a diameter smaller or equal to ten centimeters are considered here to be cups or kantharoi; vessels with a diameter larger than ten centimeters are
considered to be bowls. Cups are certainly underestimated in the assemblage, but given the
absence of complete shapes and the insecurity about the presence of handles it would be unreliable to enlarge the dimensions criteria and filter away more from the bowls group. Another
difficulty is differentiating between Handmade Lustrous Ware cups/kantharoi and juglets. The
neck of a juglet is usually oblique in order to facilitate the pouring; however, since the rim
diameter tends to be very poorly preserved, in most cases this useful distinction criterion cannot be applied.
The popularity of cups grows considerably between the Troy VIIa and the Troy VIIb2 period, and reaches its statistic peak in the Protogeometric period (Pl. 22.A). This might point to a
gradual change in drinking and eating habits, a trend amplified by the introduction of Handmade Lustrous Ware. In fact, cups and kantharoi are especially common in Handmade Lustrous Ware, mostly decorated with channeling. Nonetheless, the most frequent ware group in
which the cups were produced is the Anatolian Grey Ware (Pl. 23.B). This ware keeps its
prominent position over the entire Troy VIIb subphases. This fact is surprising for various
reasons. During Troy VIIa, it is striking because the most common ware group for producing
fine pottery was the Tan and Brown Slip ware group; during Troy VIIb2, on the other hand,
one would rather expect a dominance of Handmade Lustrous Ware. 144
144
The most likely explanation is in the statistical division of the diameter. Most Handmade Lustrous Ware
vessels have diameter larger than 10 cm. Even if considerably more vessels could qualify for classification as
cups or kantharoi on basis of loop handles, their diameter would stay behind the limits for evident cups.
[32]
Typologically, the most common group is the S-shaped profile cups, followed by semiglobular cups. A few cups are bell-shaped with conical bases and date to the Protogeometric
period. To these probably also belongs the one-handled cup 1286. Although its ring-base is
low and not as pronouncedly conical as usual Protogeometric examples, good typological
parallels can be found in Early PG and Middle PG Lefkandi. 145 It is believed that the conical
foot becomes higher and sharper in the course of the PG period. 146 If this observation is correct, then the vessel from Troy might be a transitional example from the early stages of PG.
The following rim profile numbers qualify as cups or kantharoi (Pl. 112-198): 339, 508,
509, 541, 554, 564, 570, 578, 580, 589, 592, 593, 638, 656, 885, 1030, 1033, 1057, 1058,
1078, 1079, 1115, 1137, 1146, 1172, 1208, 1215, 1231, 1237, 1331, 1341, 1342, 1355, 1373,
1374, 1376, 1383, 1384, 1406, 1422, 1434, 1518, 1529, 1568, 1578, 1582, 1590, 1596, 1598,
1631, 1642, 1647, 1648, 1649, 1688, 1719.
BOWLS
Bowls of various types are the most frequent shape category. They constitute more than
60% of assemblages in every phase (Pl. 22.A). The peak is reached during the Troy VIIa period (nearly 86% !); the minimum is reached during the Troy VIIb2 period (62%). Bowls are
statistically distinguished from cups according to shape profile and the rim diameter: only
sherds with appropriate shape profile and with rim diameter larger than ten centimeters were
counted in the bowls category.
Bowls are subdivided into smaller subgroups, i.e. shallow bowls, hemispherical bowls, deep
bowls, carinated bowls, skyphoi, antisplash-rim bowls, and unspecified bowls. It should be
noted that the deep bowls group partly overlaps with the skyphoi and carinated bowls groups,
including sherds that were too fragmented to be classified more precisely as either skyphoi or
carinated bowls. Nonetheless, the most common types during the Troy VIIb1 period are the
skyphoi and carinated bowls Blegen shapes A71 and A93. Their frequency contrasts with the
preceding period, where skyphoi and carinated bowls were in a minority, whereas shallow
bowls and hemispherical bowls heavily dominated (Pl. 22.B). The Troy VIIb2 phase saw
some decline in the popularity of deep bowls, although they are still common. Antisplash rims
bowls are extremely rare and always very fragmentary. Most probably, they need to be
145
e.g. Lemos 2002, 10.4, 11.9, 24.11.
146
Lemos 2002, 27.
[33]
viewed as residual pieces from Early Bronze Age layers and not as a genuine Troy VIIb category. The category of unspecified bowls contains mostly representatives of various bigger
bowls that did not fit the kraters category.
Big changes can be observed in production preferences. Whereas during the Troy VIIa
phase more than 70% of bowl were produced in Tan Ware, during Troy VIIb1 the proportion
of Tan Ware bowls drops dramatically to c. 25%, mostly in favor of the Anatolian Grey Ware
(Pl. 23.A). During the Troy VIIb2 and PG phases the proportions are more balanced.
The following rim profiles qualify as shallow bowls (Pl. 112-198): 5, 10, 17, 19, 21, 40,
167, 179, 253, 352, 353, 400, 510, 522, 536, 546, 553, 566, 568, 650, 652, 1013, 1015, 1028,
1033, 1038, 1075, 1207, 1243, 1272, 1316, 1331, 1338, 1341, 1342, 1355, 1374, 1406, 1410,
1434, 1437, 1518, 1562, 1597, 1641, 1646, 1749, 1750.
As hemispherical bowls (Pl. 112-198): 132, 339, 366, 507, 577, 1025, 1173, 1383, 1396,
1529, 1596, 1632, 1649.
As deep bowls (Pl. 112-198): 65, 338, 398, 508, 509, 541, 545, 554, 567, 593, 638, 649,
656, 1030, 1034, 1050, 1237, 1376, 1598, 1643, 1690.
As carinated bowls (Pl. 112-198): 574, 604, 913, 1011, 1054, 1077, 1080, 1141, 1175, 1201,
1202, 1344, 1369, 1373, 1411, 1418, 1419, 1420, 1455, 1457, 1519, 1551, 1567, 1575, 1589,
1590, 1610, 1612, 1638, 1647.
As skyphoi (Pl. 112-198): 564, 565, 578, 579, 1578.
As antisplash-rim bowls (Pl. 112-198): 106, 1548.
As unspecified bowls were summarized following rim profiles (Pl. 112-198): 354, 548, 555,
557, 580, 583, 584, 589, 592, 616, 633, 634, 643, 885, 938, 1017, 1036, 1051, 1062, 1076,
1083, 1085, 1110, 1111, 1115, 1135, 1137, 1139, 1146, 1149, 1161, 1172, 1190, 1204, 1215,
1225, 1236, 1260, 1299, 1311, 1346, 1368, 1370, 1372, 1381, 1384, 1414, 1422, 1424, 1433,
1453, 1465, 1484, 1503, 1504, 1599, 1629, 1648, 1650, 1687, 1688, 1719.
KRATERS
Kraters are defined as large bowls of Blegen types C68, C69, C74, C75, C80. Both, their interior as well as exterior surface are treated. Also large Handmade Lustrous Ware vessels of
Blegens A104 type decorated with knobs are attributed to the kraters category.
Interestingly, the proportional presence of kraters remains largely constant throughout all
Troy VII subphases (Pl. 22.A). Nearly 90% of kraters were produced in Anatolian Grey or in
Tan/Brown slip wares (Pl. 23.E). They can be undecorated, decorated with horizontal ribs or
[34]
with multiple wavy lines, or with a combination of horizontal ribs and multiple incised wavy
lines.
The following rim profiles qualify as kraters (Pl. 112-198): 222, 325, 344, 351, 547, 581,
852, 947, 1040, 1049, 1081, 1109, 1123, 1161, 1165, 1180, 1181, 1200, 1343, 1431, 1447,
1486, 1497.
JUGS, AMPHORAS AND FLASKS

Jugs, amphoras and flasks correspond with Blegens category B (Pl. 16, 20). Since it is impossible to differentiate between jugs and small amphoras on the basis of fragmentary rims
(the only differentiating criteria is the number of handles), all the Blegens B-category shapes
are treated together as jugs. Some of the profile codes used for the definition of the group also
correspond to jars. In such instances the statistic distinction is made on the basis of the rim
diameters the division line is set to be fifteen centimeters. Rim sherds below or equal to
fifteen centimeters were accordingly classified as jugs.
The proportion reached by jugs, amphoras and flasks varies between 5% and 10% of the total assemblage (Pl. 22.A). As in the case of kraters, c. 90% of the vessels in this category are
produced in Anatolian Grey and in Tan/Brown slip wares (Pl. 23.C). Handmade wares are
certainly underrepresented in the statistics; the fragmentary state in which most of the rims
were found made it impossible to assign them to specific categories. Differentiation could be
achieved only when larger vessel parts were restored. In such instances the examples are catalogued.
The following rim profiles qualify as jugs, amphoras or flasks (Pl. 112-198): 219, 514, 526,
527, 528, 540, 556, 784, 885, 1037, 1065, 1130, 1162, 1262, 1314, 1315, 1317, 1429, 1432,
1556, 1604, 1605, 1633, 1634, 1686, 1693, 1706, 1738, 1744, 1752.
JARS
Jars are treated as a single category. Some of them surely functioned as cooking pots while
others served as storage vessels. Yet, smudged residues, smoke traces and calcaraous buildups
found frequently on Troy VI/VIIa coarse ware vessels are extremely rare on vessels from
Troy VIIb subphases.
An impressive change can be observed in the production of jars. During the Troy VIIa
phase, jars are rare; they constitute less than 4% of the total assemblages (Pl. 22.A). Out of
[35]
this small group, nearly 80% of jars were produced in Anatolian Grey Ware, Tan Ware and
Wheelmade Coarse Ware (Pl. 23.D). In the following Troy VIIb1 phase, the proportion of jars
rises up to 15% (Pl. 22.A), but their production in traditional wares drops by more than two
thirds, decreasing even further during the Troy VIIb2 and PG phases (Pl. 23.D).
During the Troy VIIb period, jars are mostly handmade, produced in Handmade Coarse
Ware, whether burnished or unburnished. The high number of examples in Handmade Lustrous Ware during Troy VIIb2 and PG periods indicated by the statistic analysis (Pl. 23.D)
might be caused by problems in differentiating between wide-neck amphoras and jars.
The following rim profiles qualify as jars (Pl. 112-198): 222, 325, 344, 351, 506, 539, 544,
556, 619, 636, 834, 1040, 1049, 1050, 1058, 1085, 1099, 1104, 1106, 1156, 1165, 1169, 1191,
1235, 1302, 1321, 1328, 1329, 1351, 1359, 1361, 1362, 1366, 1386, 1407, 1417, 1431, 1439,
1440, 1472, 1493, 1524, 1539, 1570, 1586, 1587, 1592, 1595, 1602, 1607, 1613, 1614, 1616,
1619, 1620, 1621, 1634, 1649, 1666, 1686, 1689, 1692, 1694, 1712, 1716, 1717, 1718, 1745,
1748, 1755, 1783.
DEINOI
Deinoi were single out as a special jar category because of their potential chronological implications, but they proved to be of little help because of thin statistical basis (Pl. 22.A, 23.F).
Deinoi appear in bigger numbers only much later, in the Geometric and Archaic periods.
The following rim profiles qualify as deinoi (Pl. 112-198): 786, 1456, 1462, 1584.
PYRAUNOI, BAKING PANS, SIEVES, STANDS

Pyraunoi (cooking pots combined with a stand) 147 were until few years ago absent in publications about Trojan pottery. The possibility of their presence was raised by Barbara Horejs,
on the basis of material published by Blegen from the Troy VI layers. 148 Several pyraunoi
were recognized by Alix Hnsel among the Troy VIIb phase pottery from the Schliemann
collection stored in the Museum fr Vor- und Frhgeschichte in Berlin. 149 Some of the sherds
identified by Hnsel are very fragmentary and seem to have been classified as pyraunoi only
147
See Hochstetter 1984, 155-64 for the detailed definition, typology and examples from Macedonia.
148
Horejs 2005, 81 and Horejs 2007, 151 quoting Blegen et al. 1953, 243 and Fig. 438, 17.
149
Hnsel 2008, 65-67.
[36]
on the basis of a vertical raised band decorated with finger imprints. There is, however, no
reason to believe that vertical raise bands were exclusive to pyraunoi, since a vertical or even
radially striated raised band is attested on jars unearthed during the Tbingen excavations.
Nonetheless, the examples with two preserved edges perpendicular to each other quoted by
Hnsel are convincing. It should be noted that both during the old or the recent excavations no
examples of transitional zones (where the vessels body joins the stand) have been found. These would have been the best evidence for the presence of pyraunoi at Troy. Absence of these
special parts implies that during the Troy VIIb subphases pyraunoi were not represented in
any statistically relevant quantity.
The situation with baking pans is similar. Their presence in Troy VIIb strata is in the best
case ephemeral, although they occur at the site quite frequently during the Early Bronze Age.
Sieves can be encountered slightly more often, but always extremely fragmented. No complete or restorable example was retrieved.
Stands are rare and occur only in Anatolian Grey Ware or in Tan Wares. Complete or restored examples are missing.
PITHOI
Pithoi were used en masse during the Troy VIIa period. In the succeeding phases, however,
there was a dramatic drop in their popularity. There are only rare examples dating to Troy
VIIb1 or VIIb2. One example, is No. 11 from Blegens House 731, which was placed above
the earlier pithoi and contained in its preserved part sherds of Knobbed ware. 150 Another
pithos was identified by Blegen in Area 770, near the still standing pillar of the already ruined
Pillar House. 151 Some pithoi were found in superposition by Drpfeld. 152 The excavation of
the Tbingen team in the West Lower Town area unearthed several pithoi provisionally dated
to Troy VIIb phases, but none of the dates could be confirmed by pottery analysis.
150
Blegen et al. 1958, 98, 221.
151
152
Drpfeld 1902, Fig. 38.
[37]
DECORATION
During Troy VIIb phases the proportion of decorated sherds is higher than in the preceding
period (Pl. 25.A). This increase is caused by the introduction of new handmade types of pottery, but also by more frequent application of decoration on wheelmade wares, as Anatolian
Grey Ware and Tan/Brown slip Ware (Pl. 25.B, 25.C, 25.D, 25.E).
Decoration techniques as well as decoration motifs vary, although preferences existed about
the use of specific techniques and motifs exclusively for specific wares or vessel shapes. Exceptions to the preferences are rare and likely due to influences from different pottery traditions. 153
Basic descriptions of techniques and motifs at Troy, together with numerous examples, were
already presented by Blegen 154 and have been recently summarized on the basis of the old
Schliemanns collection by Hnsel (Pl. 26.A, 26.B). 155 This report concerns exclusively the
material found during the Tbingen excavations.
DECORATION TECHNIQUES
The spectrum of decorating techniques is broad and encompasses painting, plastic applications, and a number of negative techniques like incisions, grooves, and furrow-stitch
(Pl. 25.F). In the following, specific decoration techniques are divided into major groups.
P A IN TE D D EC O R A T IO N
Painting is applied exclusively on imported Mycenaean and Protogeometric wares and on
their local imitations in Tan Ware. These painted wares have been already treated by specialists responsible for the processing and publication of the Trojan material, and have been partly published. 156 In order to document contexts where Troy VIIb2 handmade wares occur together with painted Protogeometric amphoras, selected examples are catalogued here as well.
153
See ch. Implications.
154
Blegen et al. 1958, 176-81.
155
Hnsel 2008, 72-3.
156
Penelope Mountjoy for the Mycenaean pottery see Mountjoy 1999b, Mountjoy 2006, Mountjoy and
Mommsen 2006. Carolyn Aslan works on the Protogeometric, Geometric and Archaic pottery from Troy see
Aslan 2002. See also the collective work of Lenz et al. 1998.
[38]
I N C IS IO N S A N D G R O O V E S
Incised decoration can be found in both handmade and wheelmade ware groups. Regular incisions produced by a comb- or fork-like instrument and forming multiple horizontal lines,
wavy lines or a combination of both are limited to the wheelmade pottery Anatolian Grey
Ware as well as, less frequently, Tan Ware. Multiple incised line decoration is most frequently applied to kraters and jars. Incisions in irregular form are often found on handmade vessels.
Occasionally, traces of white incrustation are still preserved in the lines. Originally, the use of
white fill must have had a strong contrasting effect on the dark polished background of the
handmade vessels.
Grooves, defined in the Trojan pottery jargon as wide negative incisions with U-shaped section, are less common. They occur on Handmade Lustrous Ware vessels and very rarely on
shoulders of pithoi.
A single example decorated with a furrow-stitch technique (Furchenstich) is attested from
Troy VIIb layers. It is probably a fragment of a kantharoid cup 1366. Although furrow-stitch
decoration was fairly common in northern Greece and in the Balkans in the Late Bronze Age,
it evidently remains an isolated phenomenon at Troy. The aforementioned example is very
likely an import. Unfortunately, its context is too unsure to be dated more closely.
R IB S A N D R ID G ES
A single horizontal rib placed in the middle of the shoulder is the most common decoration
on Anatolian Grey Ware and on Tan Ware kraters. Ribs can occur alone, but also in combination with multiple incised horizontal or wavy lines. Very rarely, ribs could be applied in vertical position, as in case of a handmade vessel 993.
Ridges or raised bands are, compared to ribs, wider. Their width is at least double of their
height. Here, only undecorated examples of ridges are counted into the ribs and ridges decoration category. Because of their chronological implications, ridges decorated with finger
imprints have been coded separately, in the finger imprints category.
Undecorated ridges are rare in Troy VIIb deposits. Their rarity is analogical to the situation
in Thrace and Greece and contrasts with the situation of the Lower Danube and Italy, as indicated by most recent distribution studies. 157
157
Jung 2006, Taf. 25.
[39]
F IN G E R IMP R IN TS
Decoration impressed by fingers is nearly always applied on raised bands placed on the jars
of the Troy VIIb period; only rarely it occurs directly on the surface of vessels. This type of
decoration is very popular in a vast area extending from the North Black Sea littoral through
the Balkans and Greece into Italy and up to Central Europe. 158 In the Balkans, it characterizes
the typical coarse ware pottery since the Late Bronze Age. At Troy, the decoration of finger
imprints starts to appear in noteworthy quantities during the Troy VIIb1 period. Earlier examples are just notable exceptions, and differ also typologically from the standard Troy VIIb
vessels.
159
Finger imprints are found in fair quantities until the Protogeometric period; during
Troy VIIb2 and PG they are even more frequent than during the Troy VIIb1 period.
Slashes made by a blade or imprints by small sticks or similar instruments are also counted
into the finger imprints category. Slashes are typologically interchangeable with finger imprints and occur on the same type of vessels and always on rims or on raised bands.
Decoration of finger imprints can be very rarely found on pithoi.
KNOBS
Knobs, protruding bulges without practical function, are a very distinct decoration element,
which gave name to the most famous of all Trojan ware groups of the VIIb period Knobbed
Ware ( Buckelkeramik). A neutral descriptive term Handmade Lustrous Ware is preferred
throughout this report because of the rarity of knobs among the decorated examples of handmade pottery and because of the confusion that arises when trying to differentiate between
Knobbed Ware with knobs and without knobs. 160 Very rarely knobs appear also on Anatolian Grey Ware cups, in most cases as evident imitations of the handmade lustrous ware archetypes (168, 231, 236, 472, 833, 834).
C H A N N E LE D D EC O R A TIO N
The term channeled decoration is used here to indicate deep closely spaced flutes. The
channeling technique appears at the beginning of Troy VIIb2, mostly used on cups, kantharoi
158
See Koppenhfer 1997, 334-7 for a quick overview.
159
E.g. the Troy VI Late funerary urn published by Blegen et al. 1953, Fig. 339.
160
See also p. 27ff.
[40]
and jugs. It covers the bellies of the vessels, but can sometimes be found also on the handles,
as if imitating twisting of the handles. In a number of cases the channeling is combined with
knobs on one and the same vessel (Pl. 26.B).
S TA MP ED D EC O R A TIO N
Stamped decoration is extremely rare. The most frequent motifs in stamped technique are
circles or circles interconnected with tangents. Some circles have dots in the middle. Also
horizontal lines and zig-zags were executed in stamped technique, with a special instrument
whose impressions resemble an imitation of a cord. No examples of such decorating instruments were found at Troy, but they are well known from the Balkans, made either of bone, or
of ceramic. 161
A single sherd 1367 decorated with punched dots and incised zig-zags stands out for its singularity. The best parallels to this sherd can be found on a handmade amphora from Assiros in
Greek Macedonia. 162
C O MB IN E D TEC H N IQ U ES
This category of decoration technique was introduced in the Trojan pottery coding system
for vessels combining two or more decoration techniques. In the case of Troy VIIb handmade
pottery, it usually means knobs combined with channeling or knobs combined with incised
decoration. In case of wheelmade pottery, the incised decoration is combined with horizontal
ribs.
O TH E R TEC H N IQ U ES
This group is reserved here for a few mushroom-shaped buttons, pronged attachments and
animal head protomes that have been found in Troy VIIb contexts. They were probably parts
of lids (in the case of buttons) or stands (protomes). One sherd is also decorated with a polished pattern, certainly a residual piece from earlier periods.
161
Hnsel 1976, Taf. 43.
162
Wardle and Wardle 2007, Pl. 18.
[41]
DECORATIVE MOTIFS
The motifs used on the handmade pottery were recently well summarized by Hnsel
(Pl. 26.A, 26.B). 163 Her overview includes motifs from vessels excavated by Schliemann,
Drpfeld, Blegen as well as those already published from the Tbingen excavations. This represents a robust base to which hardly any new motifs can be added.
The motifs used on the wheelmade pottery were fully described by Blegen. 164 His observations are here fully confirmed: the most favorite motifs for the decoration of wheelmade pottery were multiple incised wavy lines, frequently combined in registers with multiple horizontal lines. Unique on the entire site is a fragment of an Anatolian Grey Ware stand 146, with an
incised outline of a quadruped animal. The stand was found in a Troy VIIb1 context. It must
have been influenced by contemporary Mycenaean painted pottery.
POSITION OF THE DECORATION

The decoration is, understandably, almost always on the exterior parts of the vessels. Most
frequently on bellies and shoulders. Handles are also decorated, either with channeling, with
incisions or with plastic decorations. The lips of the vessels, are on the contrary decorated
only rarely.
163
Hnsel 2008, Abb. 14; 16.
164
Blegen et al. 1958,
[42]
POTTERY IN CONTEXT
REMARKS ON TROY VI-VIIA SETTLEMENTS
Deposits and features immediately preceding the Troy VIIb levels are presented for comparative purposes in this chapter. Discussion of change and new developments will follow in
the relevant Troy VIIb1 and Troy VIIb2 context chapters.
THE CITADEL
H A B I TA T IO N
IN
S Q U A R ES E8-9
Room B
Troy VIIa destruction
A thick deposit containing quantities of ash, charcoal, collapsed mudbrick, fallen stones and
pithos sherds covered the floor and the interior installations of the Troy VIIa phase of
Room B (Pl. 4, Pl. 61.A). The destruction buried many loomweights, which were found along
the exterior wall of two clay bins. Fallen stones were concentrated in the east and in the west
part of the room, lacking in the middle (Pl. 61.B).
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 97.A)
The pottery from the stone debris concentrations did not include sherds in handmade burnished
wares. 165 The assemblages comprised Troy VI/VIIa wares, including fragments of an unusual pithos
with impressed cord decoration.166
On the other hand, the burnt destruction deposits evidently included fragments of several handmade
burnished vessels. 167 For the moment it cannot be decided whether the whole phase needs to be redated to Troy VIIb, or if the handmade coarse wares start to appear already at the end of VIIa. Alterna-
165
Beh. E9.1153, 1203.
166
Beh. E9.1203.
167
There were few handmade coarse ware body sherds in Beh. E9.1147 (33.34-33.14) and several bigger di-
agnostic pieces in E9.1104, which also yielded many loomweights. Beh. E9.1073, destruction deposit with soft
blackened earth containing a stone pestle and another concentration of loomweights, although small, contained
few handmade coarse ware body sherds. In E9.1084 a fragment has been found of a handmade cooking pot made
in Gritty Ware.
[43]
tively the centre of the room may have been disturbed by a Troy VIIb pit that was not identified during
excavation.
The western clay bin yielded heavily burnt fragments of an undecorated handmade storage vessel
with charred grain. 168
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowl 3.
C. Krater 1.
TAN AND BROWN-SLIP WARES
A. Hemispherical bowl 4, shallow bowl 6.

D. Stand 2.
C. Cooking pots 10 and 12.

A. Carinated burnished bowl 5, which is possibly an imitation of a wheelmade shape.

C. Jar 8 decorated with a raised band and finger imprints. Large undecorated storage jar 13 was
found with charred grains in the west clay bin
D. Tray 7.
PITHOI
C. Pithos 11 with horizontal cord impressions.
Rooms C and D
Troy VIIa destruction above the floor in Room C (c. 33.50 34.50 m)
A space designated as Room C was uncovered to the west of Room B. Still another small
room, Room D, has been found to the west of Room C (Pl. 4). Room C in its defined boundaries is a very narrow room and does not have any entrance from the street. But this might be
due to the artificial designation of the spaces over several phases. It is not completely known
which walls existed at the same time and how the rooms were arranged.
168
Beh. E9.1091.1.
[44]
The entrance from the street was provided by a doorway in Room D. At the same time it is
possible that a doorway connected also Rooms C and B. On the south, Room C abutted the
Troy VI fortification wall, Room D abutted a house or room, designated as Room F.
Remains of two pithoi were found set below the floor of the Troy VIIa phase (Pl. 65.A). The
floor deposit was covered by stone debris (Pl. 65.C, 65.D, 65.E). The partition wall between
Room C and D was built during Troy VIIa times since the floor above it dates to Troy
VIIb1. 169
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 98.A, B)
The pottery from the debris was devoid of handmade coarse ware and suggests a VIIa date for the
debris itself. 170 A few handmade coarse ware sherds were found only in the upper part of the debris,
where a contamination from succeeding phases seems probable since several rebuildings evidently
took place. 171
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Carinated bowl 14, decorated handle from a bowl (?) 18.

C. Kraters 16, 17.
TAN WARE
A. Shallow bowl 15.

C. Krater 19.
HANDMADE BURNISHED WARE
A. Bowl 20.
Room F
Room F should be perhaps better called a house. On its southern side it is delimited by the
Troy VI fortification wall. To the north it neighbors Rooms D and E, to the east with Room C
(Pl. 4, Pl. 65.A).
Only a small portion of Room F was left to be excavated. Most of it was dug away during
Drpfelds campaign. Room F was covered by stone debris (Pl. 65.E).
169
See p. 75.
170
Beh. E9.323, 334, 1180, 1182.
171
Beh. E9.320.
[45]
Two clay bins have been still preserved in the northeast corner of the room, not dissimilar to
the Troy VIIa bins in Room B. Next to the bins, lower parts of two pithoi have been found.
Remains of two more pithoi were identified further to the west, where the corresponding deposits no longer remain.
The interior installations of Room F most likely date to Troy VIIa, even if they lay higher
than the contemporary floor in Room C. 172
No corresponding material was excavated except from the cleaning of the eroded surface of
the mound.
Room G
The deepest excavated deposits

Deposits excavated below the Troy VIIb1 stone deposit contained only very little handmade
coarse wares and gradually more traditional Late Bronze Age wheelmade coarse wares until
excavation eventually reached deposits with no handmade pottery. 173 A single fragmented
wall, running in west-east direction under Room G is related with the deposits (Pl. 67.A).
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 99.A)
Dating of the deposits to Troy VIIa is based on the overall character of the pottery assemblage.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
C. Krater (or bowl?) 27.

TAN WARE
A. Shallow bowls 21, 22, 23, 25. Hemispherical bowl 26. Bowl 29.
B. Jug 28.
C. Jar 30.
PLAIN WARE
A. Bowl 24.
172
At least by some 40-50 cm, probably even more. The Troy VIIa level in the Room C was found at c.
33.60.
173
Beh. E8.231, 238, 240, 243, 247, 356.
[46]
C. Cooking pot 31 in Gritty ware.

C. Jar 32.
Room I
Troy VIIa deposits
It is not clear how the area looked during the Troy VIIa phase. Troy VIIb activities partially
cut away the previous strata, especially on the north. There certainly was a street to the south
of the curved wall (Pl. 70.A). Most likely the curved wall found in the area functioned or at
least doubled as a retention wall for the higher lying terrace north of the street. The elevation
at its base is the same as the level of the oldest street pavement, suggesting that they are contemporary.
Lower bodies of at least two pithoi found in situ indicate that the area was used for storage
during Troy VIIa times (Pl. 70.D). The east pithos was overbuilt in the Troy VIIb2 phase by
the partition wall between Rooms I and J (Pl. 73.B).
An interesting clay-lined pit was pinpointed as a Troy VIIa closed context for comparative
statistic purposes. Its contents demonstrate a considerable change in ware proportions between Troy VIIa and VIIb1 in this specific area (Pl. 100.G).

AREA
O U TS ID E
G A TE VIU
Shell layer (24.90-26.00 m)

A layer characterized by a huge quantity of lagoon cockle shells, representing some kind of
refuse deposit was overlying an earlier wall of Troy VI date. 174 It was sloping down sharply
towards the west (Pl. 43.A). The most appropriate date for the accumulation of the refuse
seems to be either Troy VI Late or Troy VIIa.
174
See Becks 2006, Chap. 3.1.1.1.5.4.
[47]
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 102.B)
The ceramic assemblage contained rather fragmented sherds with an almost equal proportion between the Tan and Brown-Slip Wares, and the Anatolian Grey Wares.175 The proportion of Plain
Wares and Earlier Trojan Wares is rather high, but this is not surprising given that the layer was directly superimposed over considerably earlier phases of Troy VI. Troy VIIb handmade coarse wares
are absent.
WEST LOWER TOWN

The reconstruction of Troy VI habitation in the area that is being offered here differs from
the descriptions in preliminary reports. The modifications suggested here are based on reevaluation of pottery from the strata dated originally to Troy VIIb. The former Troy VIIb dating
relied on understanding of the stratigraphy during the excavation work still in progress. Most
of the ceramic material turned out to be earlier and the stratigraphic sequence, including several earlier architectonic features, need corrections.
The dominant feature during the Troy VI phase was a paved area, originally interpreted as a
street (Pl. 44.A). Most probably during the Troy VI Phase, a structure dubbed as the South
House was built south of the street and a terrace wall was built east of the street. Immediately
to the north of the street stood a long rectangular house. Remains of other rectangular houses
were found further to the north and to the west of the street. Another paved area has been discovered in the west part. 176
The Street area and the South House are treated here in more detail, because some of
their features originally dated to Troy VIIa originate most likely in Troy VI. The redating has
a number of consequences for later periods.
The West Lower Town saw a number of important architectonic changes in the course of
the Troy VIIa period. 177 To the north of the street arose a complex structure, named the Terrace House and other similarly oriented houses have been found further north. Several houses
and pithoi were also found in the western part of the excavated area. 178
The street and the South House probably were out of use by this time. If there originally
were any Troy VII strata above the house, they were either disturbed, eroded away or leveled
175
Beh. A7.1273.
176
Korfmann 1998, Abb. 27a; Korfmann 2001, Abb. 12; Becks 2006, Chapt. 3.1.1.3 and 3.1.1.4.
177
For a detailed treatment see Becks 2006, Chap. 3.1.
178
See Becks 2006, Chapt. 3.1.1.3-3.1.1.5.
[48]
in later times. Only pits, lower parts of pithoi and a single wall fragment indicate that during
the Troy VIIa phase the area was built over in a similar way as the better preserved parts in
the west and in the north.
The Street (A7/8, A8, zA8, z8)
A large area paved with flat stones was discovered in Square z8, between the Terrace House
and the South House (Pl. 44.A). It was interpreted as a street dating to the Troy VI Phase and
it was postulated that the street continued up to Gate VIU. 179 The paved area is contemporary
with the house of the Troy VI Late Period that stood immediately to the north of the pavement. 180
The existence of a wall placed perpendicularly across the supposed course of the street suggests that the area was closed and became a paved square rather than a street. Evidence is presented here that this composition must have been part of the original Troy VI design and that
the street could hardly have led to Gate VIU directly. If the pavement from z8 functioned as a
street, the street is likely to have continued with a hardened clay surface until a terrace wall
and then turned to pass as a rising ramp between the South House and the Troy VI Citadel
wall. 181 No stone pavement was found either close to the terrace wall or in the vicinity of the
South House.
When exactly the street fell into disuse is not clear. The terrace wall on the northeast was
cut by a pit that yielded a unique ceramic thymiaterion. 182 The street level was covered by
accumulations of earth, refuse dominated by cardium shells, and by stone tumble concentrated
between the corner of South House and the terrace wall. The pavement and also the deposits
lying above it were cut by various pits and pithoi, which signal a completely different use for
the area. The pithoi were not limited to the street area, a number of them were set inside the
so called Pithos Storeroom to the northwest of the former street. 183
179
Korfmann 1996, 38; Korfmann 1997, Abb. 34.
180
Korfmann 1998, 37. The floor which belonged to this phase yielded a rich pottery assemblage dated to Troy
VI Late.
181
Korfmann 1997, 40-1, where it is however interpreted as a Troy VIIa feature, after the Gate VIU has been
blocked.
182
See p. 210.
183
For the Pithos Storeroom see p. 61.
[49]
Although there are considerable difficulties with dating the pithoi, most of them are likely to
have belonged to the Troy VIIa phase. 184 Their dating is based on the general architectonic
and stratigraphic understanding of the area, as well as on Blegen, who excavated part of the
deposits above the street. Blegen found shattered remains of two further pithoi connected
with several restorable vessels that fit well into his post-earthquake period (=Troy VIIa). 185
Most of the difficulties with dating are due to fact that the Troy VIIa walking level above
the street seems to have been higher and has disappeared as a result of later activities or erosion. 186 Only the deep structures survived. Most of them are listed here and their pottery content is summarized, because their dates have changed in respect to original reports. 187
The terrace wall and the street (23.60-24.76 m)
The terrace wall was believed to have been built as a blocking wall over the area of the
former street after Gate VIU went into disuse, during the Troy VIIa Phase (Pl. 46.A, 46.B,
46.C). 188 No paving stones were, however, found next to or under the wall, only a hardened
clayish surface that might have been the continuation of the paved street. The wall was built
ten centimeters above the supposed street level. No foundation trench was observed. It is argued here that the blocking wall continued further to the north and south, that it had no
blocking, but rather a terrace-retaining function and that it dates already to the Troy VI Late
phase.
The lower courses of the blocking wall are indented in respect to the upper ones
(Pl. 46.B). The same peculiarity was observed several meters away, during the excavation of
the South Room of the Terrace House (Pl. 54.A). 189 Both structures belong most likely to the
same wall. The function of the wall was a retaining one, for it supported a terrace in the elevated area in front of the fortification wall. It was not built in order to block the street, since it
184
Only small parts of pithoi have survived and they were accompanied by hardly any dating evidence.
185
Blegen et al. 1958, 131-2.
186
The walking level in times of Troy VIIa could have been aproximately at c. 24.70 m, as the uppermost
stones of the blocking wall. The mouths of the two preserved Troy VIIa pithoi in the Pithos Storeroom of
Terrace House are at perfectly comparable elevations of 24.58 and 24.75 m.
187
They were believed to date to Troy VIIb or later times.
188
Korfmann 1997, 40.
189
This can be either an indication of two building phases or a distinction point between the basement and the
above-ground part of the wall (Korfmann 1997, 40). Or simply a means for attaining a better stability for the
wall (Ralf Becks in Tb A7/8. 1996, Final Report, p. 6).
[50]
continued further to the south into an unexcavated area under the Roman Altar, and also to the
north where it doubled as a rear wall of a Troy VI house, the predecessor of the Terrace
House. 190 The connecting point between the Troy VI house and the blocking wall was
found in a considerably disturbed state (Pl. 46.A, 46.C). Both structures are resting on the
same elevation and they are likely to have been built at the same time, Troy VI. 191
The paved surface (street) seems also to be contemporary with the indented terrace wall
and built as a part of the same design. The street could have hardly run directly to Gate VIU.
The level difference between the surface of the supposed street under the blocking wall and
Gate VIU is almost three meters. Without terracing it would need a ramp with a slope of 4.6:1
or 22%. 192 As Becks suggested, it would make more sense if the street running from the Lower Town had turned to the right in front of the terrace wall and then continued between the
terrace wall and the South House. Somewhat higher up it might have split and one branch
continued to Gate VIU. This arrangement would be more suitable to overcome the level difference than a direct ramp. 193
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGES
Only a very small part of the fill accumulated behind the blocking wall has been excavated and it
seems to have been disturbed (Pl. 46.A, 46.C). The pottery is not much help in dating. 194
The pottery from the deposits found in front of the blocking wall was not yet processed to a necessary level of detail, but the composition of the pottery assemblages does not contradict the proposed
Troy VI dating. Only in one excavation unit the pottery was mixed with much later fill (probably contaminated by Blegens backfill). 195
The wall rested on earlier prehistoric deposits (Troy VI Early?) from which no Troy VIIb or later
pottery is recorded. 196
190
See above, footnote 180.
191
Despite the disturbances, the walls seem to be joining, rather than abutting.
192
Korfmann 1997, 38 and Abb. 34 (Plan and Section).
193
Ralf Becks in Tb A7/8. 1996, Final Report, p. 6.
194
Beh. A7/8.575, 595. The assemblage seems to consist prevalently of earlier wares (Troy V-VI Middle).
From the deeper lying A7/8.595 one Hellenistic sherd and a few possible VIIb sherds came to light.
195
Beh. A7/8.894, 899, 960. In the first of them several potential Troy VIIb body sherds and three PBA sherds
(one of them Roman Terra sigillata) have been found.

196
Beh. A8.898, 901, 926, 929, 950, 953, 962, 965, 974.
[51]
The deposits above the blocking wall contained Bronze Age pottery mixed with various amounts
of Archaic, Classical and sometimes even Hellenistic sherds.197 They seem to be results of later terracing operations in the Sanctuary area.
Tumble above the street ( 23.57-23.84 m)

A concentration of collapsed stone lay above the area of the supposed street (Pl. 46.D). It
was uncovered along the middle part of the blocking wall, some 20-30 cm above its foundations. It continued with varying intensity for some six meters, sloping slightly down to the
southwest. Along the blocking wall it was on more or less the same elevation as the tumble
over the South House.
No Troy VIIb or later pottery was registered from this tumble. 198 Not only that, there was no
clear VIIb or PBA pottery in the superseding layers for more than half of a meter. 199 This
tumble is best to be seen in analogy to the stone tumbles discovered under the Terrace House
and in the south part of the Street, which were found on comparable elevations and which
date to Troy VI. 200
Big Pithos ( 22.59-23.88 m)
The pithos
201
is situated along the outer side of the robbed northeast wall of the Hellenistic
Mosaic Building (Pl. 44.A, 49.A, 49.B, 49.D, 50.C). This pithos is preserved to probably two
thirds of its former height. The uppermost part was cut during the Hellenistic terracing. The
remaining part has been consolidated with a white plaster band to prevent the pithos from
breaking. In the preliminary report from the 1994 season, the year of its discovery, the pithos
has been dated as probably from Troy VIIb. 202
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE
The date is not without problems. The inner fill of what remained of the pithos was full of small
rubble stones (Pl. 49.A). Some pieces of plaster, marble fragments, carbonized seeds and even a terracotta plaque have been discovered inside. The latest associated pottery was Late Hellenistic and Early
197
Beh. A7/8.838, 866, 935, 945.
198
Beh. A8.871, 898, 926.
199
Behs. A8.704, 712, 717, 720, 725, 729, 738, 743, 745, 757, 782, 788, 791, 793, 807, 813, 825.
200
Floor and destruction deposit in the Central Room of Terrace House between c. 23.50 and 24.00 m asl.
201
Strat. No. 30896a.
202
Korfmann 1995, 39.
[52]
Roman, even from the deepest inner part of the pithos. 203 On the other hand, the pithos setting pit offered a completely different picture.204 With the exception of two possibly Archaic sherds, 205 the pottery consisted exclusively of typical LBA wares Anatolian Grey Ware, Tan Ware and wheelmade
Coarse wares.
With the evidence we have today, it can only be concluded that the pithos was set into the earth
sometime between the Troy VIIa and Archaic Periods. Any closer date is a matter of speculation. The
fill is unlikely to have been original; it is rather a result of secondary reuse or refill after the discovery
of the pithos during later leveling operations.
Blegen Pithos ( 22.75-23.68 m)

A lower part of another pithos 206 has been found south of the Pithos Storeroom, in the area
of a former Blegen sounding (Pl. 50.D). It must have been discovered by Blegen and the fill is
thus secondary. Blegen explicitly mentions finds dating to Troy VIIa in connection with the
pithoi that he found in the area. 207
Pit with an imprint of a pithos foot ( 22.80-23.02 m)
A disturbance in the paving of the underlying street was recognized (Pl. 44.A, 49.B49.D). 208 The fill contained broken pithos sherds and a negative imprint of a once existing
pithos foot. 209
No diagnostic sherds are recorded for the context. The body sherds included a number of
unknown wares and even possible Archaic sherds. 210 The pottery needs to be reexamined
by specialists before any reasonable date can be offered.
203
PBA datings of the Behs. z8.860, 921, 938, 978, 986, 996, 1003, 1016, 1020, 1026.
204
Beh. z8.854, 872, 891, 1072, 1117, 1372, 1431.
205
Recorded by primary PBA processing from Beh. z8.891.
206
Strat. No. 30895a.
207
Cf.footnote 185.
208
Strat. No. 20223.
209
With dm = 23 cm; Tb z8.1995: 58.
210
Beh. z8.1304, 1313, 1316 Tb z8.1995: 54-5, 58. Four Archaic sherds were mentioned by P. Pavk for
z8.1316 in BA field notebook Tb z8.1995: p. 55 and in Appendices PBA Behlter von z8, Strungen im Areal z8. No notes about these Behlters exist in PBA records.
[53]
Disturbance to the north of the Big pithos ( 22.38-22.98 m)

Again, the stone pavement of the street was missing and therefore the area was separated as
a disturbance (Pl. 44.A, 49.B-49.D). 211 The handmade VIIb wares may be represented in very
small quantity (at most five sherds), but it is difficult to be definitive; they were all body
sherds. The rest was a Troy VI assemblage with a few pithos sherds and few undetermined
sherds, originally classified as PBA intrusions. 212
Small disturbance to the east of the Big pithos ( 22.50-22.84 m)
The material from this small disturbance 213 (Pl. 44.A) is rather fragmented. No handmade
VIIb sherds have been found. A few possible transitional sherds were registered during the
primary processing but none of them clearly PBA. 214
South House (A8)

The South House is situated to the south of the street. The stone pavement of the street,
however, did not continue up to the walls of the South House. The foundations of the South
House rested roughly at the same elevation as the pavement of the street in its preserved parts.
Both were rising up from southwest to northeast. The South House was originally dated to the
Troy VIIa Period, but only a small part of what might have been its floor was actually preserved. 215 No interior installations and no in situ finds, only a layer of collapsed stone was
discovered above the supposed floor level (Pl. 45.B). The foundation level comparable with
the Troy VI street supports rather a Troy VI date. As does the fact that two of the pits cut into
the deposits contemporary with the South House contained only Troy VI/VIIa, but no later
pottery. 216
The upper parts of the South House interior were covered by a thick layer of small stones,
different from the collapse found further down (Pl. 45.A, 45.D). They make an impression of
a deliberate fill, perhaps the survived walls were used as a terrace in the subsequent periods.
211
Strat. No. 20225.
212
Beh. z8.1319, 1323, 1348, 1351, 1357, 1360, 1363, 1369.
213
Strat. No. 20227.
214
Beh. z8.1383.
215
Korfmann 1997, 41.
216
See p. 55.
[54]
Several gaps were observed in the tumble (Pl. 45.A, 45.D). 217 However, two of these gaps
contained only LBA pottery218 and they were probably not pits. 219 Only the third gap can be
tentatively called a disturbance where possible Archaic and Geometric sherds have been identified. 220
Until the pottery is processed by a Troy VI/VIIa specialist, it is difficult to offer a precise
date. As for now, it seems that no deposits in the South House date to Troy VIIa except for
two possible pits dug outside it. Since both VIIa pits postdate the South House they strengthen
the evidence for dating the structure to Troy VI. In such a case, if the South House was at all
visible during Troy VIIa, it would be only in the form of a terrace filled with stones.
Stone fill over South House
The tumble at the uppermost preserved level of South House provided very fragmented and worn ceramic material. No Troy VIIb or PBA sherds have been identified so the house is likely a feature of
LBA origin. 221 The pottery seems to be characteristic rather of Troy VI than of Troy VIIa assemblages, but this needs to be checked in depth by specialists.
Pit next to the Northwest Wall of the South House ( 22.70-23.63 m)

This is in fact another disturbance in the Street area. 222 It came to light after the removal of
an overlying Hellenistic terrace wall, which does constitute a terminus ante quem for the pit
(Pl. 50.F). No stone pavement of the street was preserved directly in this area, but the pit had
cut an underlying Troy VI wall (Pl. 50.E).
The ceramic assemblage is comprised of typical Late Bronze Age wares. No handmade VIIb pottery
has been found and no obvious PBA wares either. 223
217
For the tumble and gaps see also Korfmann 1996, Abb. 32.
218
Beh. A8.594, 597. The assemblages are extremely small, each comprising only few sherds.
219
Dr. Halime Hrylmaz and Betina Jakob in Tb A8.1995: Final report, pp. 5-6.
220
Three Archaic and one possibly Geometric sherds from A8.600 (information from the PBA primary pro-
cessing).
221
Behs. A8.841, 844, 849, 1065.
222
Strat. No. 20214.
223
Beh. z8.1406 and zA8.346, 366, 369, 539, 576, 606. Only in the excavation Field Book for A8 from 1995
(p. 49) there is a note about two Archaic sherds from the Beh. zA8.539, dating them according to the primary
impression in the field.
[55]
Pit outside the North Corner of the South House (23.10-24.00 m)

A pit cut into the deposits that accumulated outside of the South House was excavated next
to the northwest corner of the building (Pl. 45.B). The pit was filled with big and middle sized
stones. The pit clearly postdates the construction of the South House and most likely also its
destruction. There is nothing in the pottery assemblage that would substantiate a Troy VIIb or
a later date; the pit seems to be at the latest Troy VIIa.
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 108.B)
Few sherds in the assemblage, almost all are considerably worn. 224 This is especially true for the
coarse wares, which are fragmented and in a very bad state of preservation. But their fabric bears
characteristics of Gritty ware of Troy VI/VIIa rather than that of handmade coarse ware of Troy VIIb.
Conspicuously few Tan Ware sherds have been found.
B. Only a single diagnostic sherd was present. It is an Anatolian Grey Ware rim fragment with a
thick vertical handle probably from a big jug or from an amphora. 225
Terrace House (A7, z7, z8)

The Terrace House complex has been preliminarily published by Ralf Becks, Wendy Rigter
and myself in 2006. 226 The views presented in this report are with a few minor modifications
based on the already published interpretation of the structure as a Troy VIIa building consisting of the Porch, Central Room, South Room, North Room and Pithos Storeroom. Modifications concern the Pithos Storeroom, 227 which is likely to have looked different by the end of
the Troy VIIa Phase and Room 5, which does not necessarily belong to the Terrace House
complex.
Some controversies about the reconstruction, date and function of the building still exist between the BA and PBA teams and an alternative view is offered by Maureen Basedow and
Aslan. 228 This alternative view sees the structure (also called the Hof Building) as a
224
Beh. A8.885, A8.1022.
225
A8.885.1.
226
Becks et al. 2006b.
227
See separate chapter, p. 61ff.
228
Basedow 2006. Also see Basedow 2007 and 2008 for more information about the late Protogeometric and
Geometric remains in the area of the terrace house. The material will be presented in more detail in the final
publication of the post Bronze Age remains in the West Sanctuary, forthcoming.
[56]
Protogeometric megaron consisting of the Porch and Central room. The North Room, the
South Room and Pithos Storeroom are recognized as prehistoric structures.
In none of the views is a Troy VIIb date is an option. No layer, no floor and no rebuilding of
Troy VIIb date have been identified. Nonetheless, because of the substantially diverging interpretations, selected contexts from Troy VIIa are treated here in detail in order to stress the
dating evidence, to discuss certain irregularities and to propose minor modifications. The Pithos Storeroom is treated in a separate chapter. The presence of Protogeometric pottery understood by Basedow as dating evidence for the habitation level of the Terrace House is interpreted differently in this report. 229
Porch Area ( 23.73-24.43 m)
The porch was partially paved with large flat stones (Pl. 56.A). The area was closer to the
surface than the rest of Terrace House. For this reason it was for a long time easily accessible
to animals digging holes and the deposits are heavily marked by their activities (Pl. 56.B).
Part of the pavement was destroyed in Hellenistic times (Pl. 56.B). 230
The pottery from Troy VIIa layers has been published by Rigter in the preliminary report.231 I also
examined it and agree that there is no clearly later VIIb material. 232
Central Room, Deposit above the pithos in the northwest corner ( 24.17-24.76 m)
This part of the room was well preserved because it was covered by stones and broken pithos sherds during its destruction, which effectively sealed it until the time of the excavation.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 109.E)
The only example of a vessel in handmade burnished ware associated clearly with the habitation
level of the Terrace House was discovered in the vicinity of a sealed pithos in the northwest corner of
the Central room. This was a miniature neck-handled juglet with a slightly cutaway neck 33. Although
the shape fits well into the Troy VIIb2 pottery spectrum and there are parallels to it from Troy VIIb
229
See p. 181ff.
230
Becks et al. 2006b, 31.
231
Rigter in Becks at al. 2006a.
232
Beh. z7.1883, z7/8.2266, maybe also z7.1955. See also p. 162.
[57]
levels 233, there is nothing else in the deposit that would legitimate this dating. The only other nearly
completely restorable vessel that was found in the very same context is a hemispherical bowl in Brown
slip Ware 35, which dates to Troy VII generally. The remaining sherds, as e.g. 34, are indicative of a
typical Troy VI-VIIa assemblage. 234
The juglet might have been handmade and burnished because it was the simplest way to produce it
in its miniature size. On the base of pottery, the date of this specific context cannot be specified more
precisely than Troy VII.
Central Room, The Hearth ( 24.16-24.39 m)

The hearth could have played a crucial role in reconstructing the architectural sequence in
the area of Terrace House. Because of serious divergences in dating of the structure, the ceramic material from the hearth itself was scrutinized by several team members. 235
Only fragmentary body sherds have been retrieved from the hearth structure. One of them is painted
with a brown linear band, but the surface and the faint paint of the sherd did not offer enough clues to
decide unequivocally whether it had belonged to a Pre-Mycenaean, Mycenaean or to a Protogeometric
closed shape vessel. 236 One more body sherd of unusual fabric also could not be satisfactorily attributed to any of the local or imported Ware groups known at Troy. 237 Accordingly, the ceramic date of
this assemblage cannot be offered.
South Room, Burnt debris above the floor ( 24.31-24.73 m)

Two distinct burnt layers divided by a clayish deposit have been found in the ruins of the
South Room, above its floor (Pl. 54.C, 54.D). They were both contemporary, since pieces of
charred wood extended from the lower to the upper burnt layer. 238 The whole deposit dates to
Troy VIIa. 239
233
Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 263: 37.1004, 37.880; Schmidt 1902, Nr. 3509. Their height is perfectly compara-
ble 8.7, 9.0 and 10.3 cm in comparison with 9 cm of the present example.
234
See Rigter in Becks et al. 2006b, 52-3.
235
Carolyn Aslan, Wendy Rigter and me.
236
The sherd was examined by Penelope Mountjoy and Carolyn Aslan.
237
z7.1235.2.
238
Becks in Becks et al. 2006b, 42.
239
Rigter in Becks et al. 2006b, 54-5.
[58]
The burnt debris above the floor contained almost exclusively Troy VI-VIIa sherds. 240
South Room, Stone collapse ( 24.68-25.32 m)

A dense packing of big and middle-sized stones came to light in the upper layers of the
South Room, especially in its eastern part (Pl. 55.C). It covered the upper burnt layer above
the Troy VIIa floor (Pl. 55.A). Many small finds of bronze, gold and glass have been found
immediately above the stones, in the excavation unit in which the stones were removed and
also in the rest of the room, on a comparable elevation where no stones have been found. 241
The stones have been interpreted as debris from the collapsed walls. 242 Maureen Basedow
came to an alternative conclusion - that an overlooked Late Protogeometric stone pit (designated by her as the Upper pit) is responsible for the high number of distinguished finds.243
Theoretically, a pit filled with stones and small finds could have been indistinguishable from
a deposit with a dense stone collapse. It might have easily escaped recognition in the field and
left no ceramic evidence of its date. A similar scenario is proved for a related context, 244 however, it is unlikely to have been repeated in this case, with a more substantial volume. At least
chips of later pottery should have been present in the fill.
It is argued in this report that the stones belong to a collapse that predates the deposition of
small finds. The biggest density of the stones was observed along the northeast and northwest
walls, in the corner, as it would be naturally deposited from disintegrating walls. Many of the
small finds came to light in the parts of the room where no stone collapse has been documented. Apart from that, the lowermost and clearly defined part of the stone collapse, which was
240
Beh. A7.736, 752, 769. Possible exceptions are a non-Mycenaean sherd given back to PBA team from
A7.736 and 1-2 uncertain Troy VIIb body sherds from A7.752.
241
A7.626, 628, 629, 641, 642, 643, 644, 646, 647, 651, 652, 653 (from Beh. A7.638). A7.681, 682, 683, 684,
685, 686, 687, 691 (from Beh. A7.675) and z7.144 (from Beh. z7.135).
242
Beck et al. 2006a, 75.
243
Basedow and Aslan, forthcoming.
244
The same excavation unit in which the stone collapse has been removed (Beh. A7.675) comprised also
stones that clearly belonged to an unrecognized pit, cut into the corner between South Room and Pithos Storeroom (Pl. 54.E, 55.C). A part of the pit that was excavated separately was dated by the PBA team to Hellenistic
and Early Roman times (Beh. A7.136, A7.131, A7.799; 24.62-25.16 m). Despite the presence of this pit, the
pottery assemblage from the stone collapse did not yield a single sherd later than Troy VIIa and did not differ
from the deposits lying underneath. The obvious conclusion is that the overlooked part of a later pit did not leave
ceramic clues for its date.
[59]
excavated separately (Pl. 55.A), did not yield any small finds at all. 245 A good number of
small finds were found in the clayish deposit above the stone collapse, and they were connected with Troy VIIb and with Protogeometric pottery. 246 The stone collapse itself produced
a Troy VIIa ceramic date.
The pottery from the stone collapse is exclusively Troy VIIa. No sherds typical for Troy VIIb or later have been identified either in the deepest parts,247 or in the large tumble above. 248 There are several
joins with the deposit above the stone collapse, 249 but they only comprise pottery in Tan Ware and
Mycenaean Ware.250 No Troy VIIb or Protogeometric sherds from upper layers had joins in the deposit with the stone collapse.
Room 5
A further room to the north of the North Room of the Terrace House was discovered during
the 1993 and 1994 campaigns and designated as Room 5 in the preliminary publication.251
The room gives an impression of being a part of the Terrace House complex but it could have
also belonged to a different house of the same period. 252 This uncertainty is due to the rear
wall, which was part of a long terrace wall running from the Street Area and continuing
through the Pithos Storeroom, South Room, North Room and into Room 5. A somewhat dis-
245
Beh. A7.707. These deeper-lying stones form a conspicuous, rounded concentration and indeed make an
impression of a pit fill. Given the much larger area of the stone collapse above them and missing evidence for
any pit in the burnt layer under them, it can be rather presumed that the collapsed stones filled an existing depression in the mudbrick collapse of the Terrace House.
246
See p. 182.
247
Beh. A7.707.
248
Beh. A7.675.
249
With Beh. A7.638.
250
Cf. Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b, 75-6.
251
Becks et al. 2006b, 45-6, Abb. 1, 22, 23, 24.
252
The rear wall seems to be shared and run continuously from the North Room to Room 5. Both rooms were
thus divided only by a partition wall that abuts the rear wall. The picture is rendered more complicated by the
fact, that the rear wall in the North Room is narrower than the partition wall. The rear wall becomes as wide as
the partition wall at the junction with it and continues in this size further to Room 5. This strange offset cannot
be adequately explained. It would make sense only if the rear wall of North Room abuted the corner of the
Room 5 House but this contradicts the excavation notes.
[60]
turbed continuation of the rear wall of Room 5 was found under North House A 253 and it
might have continued still further north where a stone tumble and possible remains of a wall
have been uncovered inside the Fimbria Building in Square z6. 254
The deposits inside the room comprised several superposed floors that date to the Troy VIIa
Phase. 255 An intact skeleton of a goat was found next to the middle of the rear wall. Its head
was turned unnaturally backwards, as if the animal was thrown there already dead. No pit
boundaries were discerned and the excavator, Donald Easton, concluded that the goat probably lay on the last Troy VIIa floor. 256
Two or more pits were dug into the fill of Room 5 in the Troy VIIb period. 257 The room
must have been out of use by this time, because one of the pits had cut the rear wall of the
room.
The Pithos Storeroom

The Pithos Storeroom owes its name to several pithoi found in the area between the street
and the Central Room of the Terrace House. The area was treated in preliminary reports as a
room that was an integral part of the Terrace House. 258 Doubts were raised by Maureen
Basedow 259 and they are partly shared in this report, strengthened by further evidence.
The published Troy VIIa ground-plan of the Pithos storeroom combines the evidence from
excavated pithoi with likely pithos pits into an arrangement with two rows of pithoi placed
with alternating positions in a long and narrow room. This was always a conjectural reconstruction because the supposed west end of the room was destroyed by Hellenistic activities
and the south wall was almost completely robbed out at some point in time. 260 The recon253
Uppermost preserved elevation 25.41.
254
Inside the Fimbria Building in z6, the lowermost elevation 25.35, cf. Tb z6/7:1994, p. 66-7.
255
These have been already published by Ralf Becks and Wendy Rigter in our shared article (Becks et al.
2006b, pp. 45-6 for the stratigraphy and pp. 56-7 for the pottery report).
256
Beh. z7.378 (the pottery) and z7.379 (the bones). The head of the skeleton has been crushed by compres-
sion (Tb z7N.1994: 51, 96). For a published photograph see Becks et al. 2006b, Abb. 24.
257
See below p. 87 and p. 161. According to the excavator, Dr. Donald Easton, another pit might have existed
in the angle between the rear wall of Room 5 and the south wall of North House A (Tb z7N.1994: Final Sketch
Plan, p. 88).
258
Becks et al. 2006b, 38-40.
259
Basedow 2006.
260
Korfmann 2002, Abb. 10; Becks et al. 2006b, 39, Abb.2-3.
[61]
struction can be correct for the early subphase of Troy VIIa, but needs to be corrected for the
final subphase.
A partition wall that was built over one of the preserved pithoi indicates that a change had
occurred in the overall disposition of space during the Troy VIIa phase. 261 As pinpointed by
Maureen Basedow, the odd placement of the partition wall gives the impression that the remaining part of the south wall of the Pithos Storeroom did not exist anymore at this time.262
Some pithoi evidently disturbed the south wall of Pithos Storeroom and still others were
found over the area of the former street.
The dates of these pithoi were never convincingly ascertained; it was believed that they
originated from various periods, ranging from Troy VIIb to Archaic. 263 Yet there exist no
stratigraphic indications for substantially differing dates of the pithoi inside and outside the
pithos storeroom. 264 Rather the contrary, the pithoi seem to have been set in two consecutive
stages within a relatively short period of time. The preserved setting pits never overlap, they
respect each other. The mouth levels of the preserved pithoi inside the storeroom differ only
16 to 30 cm and seem to be related with floor levels of Troy VIIa subphases. 265 No evidence
was found for dating any of the pithoi or pithos pits to periods later than Troy VIIa.
But what was the purpose of the pithoi if the Pithos Storeroom did not exist any longer?
Were the new pithoi placed into a court/square or similar open-air space? Or did they belong
to a different architectonic arrangement that should be reckoned with for the final stage of
Troy VIIa and that did not survive? A single possible wall fragment, unattributed until now, is
presented here in order to elucidate somewhat the given questions and offer an alternative
view for the organization of the area at the end of Troy VIIa.
Pithoi over the south wall ( 22.62-22.80 m)
At least one pithos setting pit was evidently cut into the south wall of the Pithos Storeroom. 266 A pithos foot was still found in situ on its bottom (Pl. 44.A, 49.C). The pottery from
261
262
Basedow 2006.
263
Mostly only the lowermost parts of pithoi or their setting pits filled with varying number of pithos sherds
survived.
264
Possible exception is the High pithos above the street, between the South House and the Blocking
Wall.
265
266
Strat. No. 20219 in Becks 2006.
[62]
the fill looks like a typical LBA assemblage, with an exception of a single painted band sherd
that was classified as Archaic by the primary processing. 267 Troy VIIb handmade wares were
not present. The date of the setting pit cannot be determined by the pottery analysis.
One other pit was cut into the south wall of the Pithos Storeroom. 268 The shape of the pit
and several pithos sherds found in its fill indicate that it was designed originally for accommodating a pithos. The assemblage looks similar as in the previous case, mostly typical Late
Bronze Age sherds. 269 Only the presence of one Troy VIIb handmade lug and two or three
unusual plain pale wares (Protogeometric or Geometric?) suggest the pithos was no longer in
place in the Protogeometric or Geometric period.
Unexplored pit from a removed pithos ( 24.42-24.62 m)
This pit is situated to the north of the two pithoi discovered by Blegen in the Pithos Storeroom, or House 749 as Blegen called it. The pit was filled with many broken pithos sherds,
with loose earth and with stones (Pl. 52.A, 52.D). It was not excavated, with the exception of
a few centimeters from its upper part. The diagnostic pottery consisted of just two pithos
sherds. 270
In all probability, the fill resulted from an attempt to lift the pithos, which got broken during
the operation. This needed to happen still in a time when the pithoi would have been visible,
during the Troy VIIa period.
Unattributed Wall Fragment (23.63/23.87-24.28)
One fragmented wall was discovered in the south part of the Pithos Storeroom (Pl. 48.C48.E). 271 It clearly superimposed the Troy VI debris and also the robbing trench of the south
wall of the Pithos Storeroom (Pl. 48.B). No corners were preserved, but the wall seems to
have originally abutted the south wall of the Pithos Storeroom (Pl. 48.F). The rest was destroyed by erosion or was robbed out. The wall was overlain or disturbed by a Hellenistic terrace wall (Pl. 48.E).
267
Beh. z8.1292, z8.1310.
268
Strat. No. 20218 in Becks 2006.
269
Beh. z8.1236, 1277, 1286, 1526, 1528.
270
Beh. A7.143. I was not able to examine the rest. According to the notes from primary processing, most of
the sherds belonged to pithoi, probably even to two or three different vessels.
271
Cf. Korfmann 1995, Abb. 20 (wall in z8, marked as being dated to Troy VI)
[63]
The attribution of the wall to a single phase or structure was always connected with serious
difficulties. Its orientation is different from the plan of the Terrace House and its Geometric
successors. It reminds one of the oddly oriented walls in the north part of the Pithos Storeroom. It might have been the last remain of otherwise perished structures connected with the
pithoi found above the ruins of the pithos storeroom and above the area of the former street.
Its most probable date is the last subphase of Troy VIIa, although a still later date cannot be
excluded. 272 On the basis of its elevation, the wall should be earlier than the Geometric deposit and also the Secornd Protogeometric pit in the Pithos Storeroom. The uppermost preserved
part of the Unattributed Wall Fragment has the same elevation as the southwest end of the
Central Room of the Terrace House. This indicates that at some point in time both structures
were visible, were integrated into the same complex and they later shared the same fate.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 108.D)
The pottery found in association with the wall was inconclusive due to considerable disturbances
and due to the proximity of the Hellenistic surface and Hellenistic terrace wall. No diagnostic fine
ware sherds have been found and the latest coarse ware body sherds were assigned a 350-300 BC
date. 273 On the other hand no PBA pottery and only a single possible Troy VIIb sherd have been recorded for the deposit immediately under this wall.274 The rest looked like a typical LBA assemblage.

CITADEL
H A B I TA T IO N
IN
S Q U A R ES E8-9
Street
The street excavated by the Tbingen team in squares E8 and E9 is the direct continuation
of Street 751 discovered by Blegen (Pl. 4). The material from the newly discovered street
segment is presented here in two parts the deposits to the west and to the east of the Street.
272
The relation of the wall to the Geometric deposit in the Pithos Storeroom is unknown, since the correspond-
ing deposits on this side of the Hellenistic terrace wall were cut away.
273
PBA team date for Beh. z8.689.
274
Beh. z8.696, z8.706.
[64]
It should not mislead that Street 751 was also divided in two areas Street 751 East and
Street 751 West in the final publication of the Cincinnati team. 275 The divisions of deposits
over the newly excavated street segment of course do not correspond to Blegens divisions
over Street 751. All parts excavated by the Tbingen team lay further to the west than Blegen
could reach.
Deposits in the east
No clear street surface have been identified here except for a small area in front of the door
to House 761. The deposits were separated because their level matched the level of the
threshold of House 761 (Pl. 60.A, 71.C).
The sherds are small to medium sized.276 Some of them are worn, but hardly any show signs of a
greenish cess residue. The pottery appears closer to a VIIa assemblage than the corresponding deposits
inside the House 761. Possibly, the street was sloping down towards the north and the stratum underlying the Troy VIIb1 street was included in the excavated units. The assemblage was dominated by fine
wares. The coarse ware are represented by handmade and also by wheelmade varieties. Hardly any
typical Troy VIIb1 decorated sherds were found. One sherd with a cess residue277 joined to a fragment
of the same vessel from Room B without cess residue. 278
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Skyphoi 36, 40, shallow bowl 37, bowl 38.

B. Jugs or amphoras 41, 47, 54. Jugs 46, 52 .
C. Krater or bowl 45.
TAN AND BROWN SLIP WARES
Surprisingly many pieces. A considerable number of them belong to the Brown-slip Ware variety of
Tan ware.
A. Shallow bowls 44, 51. Bowl or krater 49. Deep bowls 56, 57.
B. Jugs 42, 43.
C. Jar 39, 48, 53. Krater 50.
275
Blegen et al. 1958, 185-190.
276
Behs. E9.964, E9.966, E9.969, E9.975, E9.1009, E9.1033, E9.1035, E9.1037.
277
E9.265.1
278
E9.1007.15
[65]
WHEELMADE COARSE WARE
C. Cooking pots 55, 62. Jar or cooking pot 58.

HANDMADE COARSE WARE
Very few sherds in handmade wares.

C. Jars 59, 60, 61, one of them decorated with a raised band and finger imprints.
Blocking slab at the entrance to Room B

A large flat stone slab was discovered over the street, blocking the entrance to Room B, at
an elevation over the supposed Troy VIIb1 surface (Pl. 71.D, 71.E). The material presented
here was found at the bottom of the blocking slab. Material from higher elevations is included
in the Troy VIIb2 section. 279
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 101.C)
Small assemblage but with several larger sherds. 280

ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
B. Flask 64.
B or C. Jug or jar 66.
C. Krater 67.
D. Stand 63.
C. Krater or jar 68.

HANDMADE LUSTROUS WARE
A. Deep bowl 65.
279
See p. 92.
280
E9.846.
[66]
Deposits in the west

A small part of a street pavement attributable to the Troy VIIb1 phase was uncovered in between Rooms D and H (Pl. 71.A, 71.B). The pavement lay directly above a distinct burnt layer, likely from the same conflagration that destroyed also the Troy VIIa houses in the area (Pl.
73.A).
A rich assemblage with considerable numbers of larger sherds. Grey ware dominates. The extremely
low number of Tan and Brown-Slip Wares is striking. Handmade coarse wares are well represented. 281
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Carinated bowls 69, 70, 71, 75. Kylix 72. Bowls 73, 74, 77. Cup 76. Big bowl or basin 89.
B. Jug or jar 79, 106. Amphoras 83, 84. Jugs or amphoras 85, 88, 90. Juglet 86.
C. Kraters 78, 87, 91, 93, 94. Bowls or kraters 80, 82. Jar 92.
D. Stand 96.
Very small group.

C. Krater 95.
PLAIN WARE
A. Bowl 81.
C. Cooking pots 97, 98, 99. Jar or cooking pot 101.

A. Cup 110 in Handmade Lustrous Ware with a small knob and with channeled decoration. Single
fragment, likely intrusive.
C. Cooking pot with feet (?) 100. Jars 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 108, 109.
281
Beh. E8.416, 426, 433.
[67]
House 761
House 761 was given its designation by Blegen, who excavated half of it. The second half
was excavated by the Tbingen team (Pl. 4). The construction of House 761 was dated by
Blegen to the Troy VIIb1 phase, because it was built directly atop of the Troy VIIa destruction horizon. 282 At some time, still during the VIIb1 phase, the house was deserted and used
as a garbage place. House 761 contained an unusually rich deposit from the time of Troy
VIIb1, concentrated in the accumulation over the floor (33.20-33.70 m) and a thick debris
above the floor (33.70-34.90 m).
Blegen found the remains of a larnax were found against the north. 283 Similarly to J-K5, the
floor level was characterized by an ashy deposit with burnt matter and an unusually high proportion of animal bones. Blegen reported that the whole area was filled with thin minilayers
and lenses never covering the whole space and containing numerous objects and substantial
quantities of pottery. 284 The pottery is abundant, but surprisingly it turned out to be impossible to find many joining fragments. Many sherds are covered by grayish or greenish accretion.
Blegen thought it could have been a deserted house, where rubbish was deposited. 285
The excavation by the Tbingen team confirmed the dating of the lower deposits to Troy
VIIb1 and also their character as a garbage accumulation.
Pit in the Middle VIIa/VIIb1
There was a pit approximately in the middle of the excavated western part of House 761
with a diameter c. 1.5 m. The pit did not reach very deeply, only slightly underneath the level
of the Troy VIIa floor. It is too wide and too shallow to be a pithos pit. Its limits were marked
by sharply inclined flattish stones, still more of which were concentrated in the fill (Pl. 59.A,
59.B, 59.C). Stones of the same kind were found covering several other parts of the room.
The pit might have been dug deliberately into the ruins in order to recover some house belongings.
282
Blegen et al. 1958, 81 masses of severely burnt debris, including wood ash and a number of fallen
stones....
283
Blegen et al. 1958, 198, Fig. 39-40. It is interesting to note that somewhat more to the south a larnax base
was found in situ on the floor of the House 722 of Troy VIIa (cf. Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 33, Fig. 331). No comparisons of the two larnaka are given by Blegen.
284
285
[68]
There was little pottery in the pit itself, all of it Tan and Brown slip wares, well in place in
Troy VIIa strata (Pl. 96.B). 286
Stone Deposit VIIa/VIIb1
Packings of mostly flattish stones too irregular to be a smooth pavement but too regular to
be typical destruction debris were found in several places in House 761 - next to the doorway
(Pl. 59.D); 287 near the fortification wall; 288 and even in the northeast corner of the house excavated during Blegens era. 289 They are likely to have been the debris from the Troy VIIa
destruction, adapted during the building operation for House 761 as a subfloor packing. Next
to the doorway they were covered by white plaster.
The pottery from this deposit contains nothing diagnostic that would suggest a Troy VIIb1
(Pl. 96.C). The stone deposit contained typical Troy VI-VIIa wares and coarse wares were
represented only by the gritty, wheelmade variety. Handmade coarse wares are missing.
Somewhat deeper (33.44-33.02 m), there were fewer stones, the earth contained many orange clay particles and charcoal and the pottery assemblage was completely dominated by
Tan Ware and many pithos sherds. 290
Floor deposits VIIb1 (33.15-33.72 m)
Deposits with bones, shells and sherds that accumulated above the floor, and the floor itself,
were cleared in 1993 and 1996 (Pl. 60.A, 60.E). 291 The floor was covered by a white plaster.
It was best preserved near the entrance in the northwest corner, at the elevation of c. 33.4133.49 m, and it curved up to the threshold. It would correspond well to the floor as Caskey
exposed it in the eastern part of the house in 1930s.
The plaster floor rested on the deposit of flattish stones. In the southern part of the excavated area, near the fortification wall, no clear floor has been recognized but the same deposit is
supposed to have continued here and it is included in the pottery report.
A few bigger sherds of a pithos were found closely scattered in the southern part of the
House 761 and included a pithos foot that seems to have been preserved in situ (Pl. 59.A,
286
Beh. E9.1200, 1250, 1259.
287
Beh. E9.1044.
288
Beh. E9.112.
289
290
Beh. E9.1046.
291
Beh. E9.121, E9.971 and E9.1020.
[69]
59.B). The foot rested at c. 32.80 and was cut into the floor of Troy VIIa. The pithos seems
to have been only partially immersed into the ground, in contrast to the Troy VIIa pithoi
which were usually sunk up to their mouths.
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 96.D)
A big assemblage consisting of medium sized sherds.292 The absolute majority of the sherds are produced in Anatolian Grey ware. In comparison with the previous phase the quantity of Tan ware drops
dramatically. Many fine ware sherds are covered with a greenish and yellowish cess residue, whereas
the coarse ware sherds almost never have this residue. There are only a few joins among the sherds
from House 761. In one instance, a sherd from the street without accretion joins a sherd from the
house that was heavily covered with greenish cess residues. Interestingly, the pieces from the street
were not almost never covered with cess residue. The majority of coarse wares are produced by hand
in a manner typical for Troy VIIb1. Very few wheelmade coarse ware sherds have been found.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Skyphoi 111-117. Carinated bowls 118-120. Cup 121. Bowls 123, 125, 127-131, 132, 134, 135,
137.
B. Flask (?) 126. Jugs 133, 139, 141, 143, 145. Jugs, amphoras or jars 136, 138.
C. Bowl or krater 122. Jars 124, 144 . Kraters 140, 142.
D. A unique stand with an incised quadruped decoration 146.
HANDMADE COARSE AND HANDMADE BURNISHED WARES
B. Jug (?) 165. Amphora 163, 164.

C. Cooking pots 147, 148, 149, 150. Jars 151-162.
A. Bowl 166.
B. Jar or amphora 167.
Only few sherds in Gritty Ware and in Coarse Ware typical for Troy VI/VIIa.
292
Beh. E9.121, E9.971, E9.1020.
[70]
Rubbish deposit VIIb1

A deposit described as containing a great many bones and cockle shells was excavated inside House 761 in 1993 and 1996 (Pl. 60.A). 293 It was evidently the same feature that Blegen
excavated in the eastern part of the house rubbish accumulation with much ash, charcoal
fragments, numerable cockle shells, bones and broken pottery.
The division between rubbish deposits and the floor deposit is only artificial, no clear differences have been observed either in the field or in the pottery composition.
The pottery assemblage was dominated by Anatolian Grey Ware and Handmade burnished ware, in
approximately equal quantities. Much fewer sherds belonged to the Tan Ware. A substantial quantity
of the pottery is covered by greenish or yellowish accretions, thus further strengthening the interpretation of the deposit as a rubbish accumulation. No secure Knobbed Ware sherds have been identified in
the assemblage. It is highly interesting, that sherds from this context (including a Mycenaean krater)
join with pieces from square z8, from the area of the later PBA Sanctuary! 294
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Skyphoi 169, 171. Carinated bowls 168, 170. Bowls 174, 184, 185, 186, 190.
B. Juglet 173. Jug or amphora 176. Amphora 178. Jugs or jars 187, 189.
C. Kraters 175, 177, 179.
A. Bowl 183.
B. Kylix 172. Amphoriskos or juglet 180. Jug or jar 188.
C. Krater 182.
C. Cooking pots 181, 192.

B. Amphora (?) with a knob 198.

C. Jar or cooking pot 191. Jars 193-197.
293
Beh. E9.889, E9.894. Parts of Beh. E9.88 also belong to the context, but the excavation unit was too close
to the surface and it was contaminated by high numbers of PBA sherds.

294
E9.889.1,2 + z8.649, 1520.
[71]
Debris on top of the rubbish deposit VIIb1 (c. 34.41[34.25]-33.90 m)

Several bigger stones were lying within, but primarily atop the rubbish deposit (Pl. 60.B).
The earth was soft and filled with charcoal fragments, bones, shell and broken pottery. 295 The
presence of stones can suggest gradual disintegration of the house walls. It is interesting that
as the elevation grew higher, less and less pottery was covered with cess residue, until such
sherds completely disappeared.
The doorway itself, according to the excavator, Donald Easton, was not blocked at this level
by a rubbish deposit. Rather, it was blocked by a fill or debris that consisted of brown earth
mixed with small stones, without shells and ash. 296
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 96.F)
The pottery from the debris consisted mostly of Grey Ware sherds, followed by Coarse Ware. Only a
few Tan Ware sherds were present. Interestingly, several pieces of wheelmade semicoarse ware appeared in the context, as did several Archaic sherds.
The sherds from the doorway were mostly fine wares, predominantly of Grey Ware, with only a few
Tan Ware pieces. The coarse ware seems to have been limited to handmade burnished ware. Only a
few sherds demonstrated greenish and yellowish accretion so common for the rubbish deposits.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Skyphoi 199, 200. Carinated bowl 201. Bowls 204, 208.

B. Jugs or amphoras 202, 205. Jug 206.
C. Krater 207.
D. Stand 216.
TAN WARE
A. Shallow bowl 203.

B. Jug or jar 210.
C. Cooking pot 209, 211, 213.
295
Beh. E9.779, 786, 790 and top of the Beh. 889.
296
Beh. E9.964 (34.07-33.62 m).
[72]
C. Jar 212, 214, 215.

A. Cup (?) 217 with Troy VIIb2 decoration type.

C. Amphora 218.
Room B
This room is positioned to the west of House 761 (Pl. 4). It was completely excavated by the
Tbingen team in 1993-1997. The room abutted the Troy VI fortification wall in the south.
The remaining three walls were constructed during the Troy VIIa phase, but they evidently
demonstrate a complicated building and rebuilding history continuing until Troy VIIb2.
The room was restored after the Troy VIIa destruction. The west wall was built anew, sligtly
off-set in comparison with the previous phase. The door was moved from the west 297 to the
north wall.
Not much survived from inside the house from the Troy VIIb1 phase. The house was probably abandoned, and the deserted structure gradually disintegrated (many thin strata of clayish,
chalky and ashy matter) until it was rebuilt again in Troy VIIb2. Some loss in strata might
have been caused also by leveling. It is interesting to note that sherds from Room B are not
covered with the yellowish and greenish cess residue, in apparent contrast with deposits inside
House 761. 298
VIIb1 Floor (c. 33.50-33.80)
A floor was observed above the fallen stones of the preceding VIIa phase (Pl. 61.A, 61.B). It
was best preserved to the north of clay bins and it was clearly passing over them. 299 A small
pivot stone was found directly on top of the bins. This floor is most probably related with the
297
The existence of a door in the west wall was convincingly demonstrated by Becks 2006, ch. 3.2.4.2.1
(Room B).
298
The only exception is Beh. E9.907 which was a small pit in the northwest corner of Room B.
299
In other places it was not easy to differentiate between the two destruction layers and two stone fills, but the
floor can be reasonably reconstructed also next to the west wall of Room B (Dia 24403, under the destruction of
VIIb1?). The uppermost preserved level of clay bins was 33.75 m, the level of the VIIa wall which was out of
use and which must have been covered by the VIIb1 floor was 33.50 m (also the pot in the corner was cut at this
level). At the same time the deepest foundation of the VIIb1 blocking wall over former door was at 33.40 at its
northern end.
[73]
first rebuilding phase of the house, its level corresponds with the newly built west wall (Pl.
61.C, 64.C).
The pottery from the floor deposit included handmade coarse wares in the assemblage. 300 Some
sherds demonstrate traces of secondary burning. Only one of the handmade sherds shows typical Troy
VIIb1 decoration, finger imprints. It is interesting that the forms produced in handmade coarse wares
seem to imitate the wheelmade bowls (A49). The imitation was clearly intentional and includes the
thickened rim and the basering, very specific features of the wheelmade technique which have no justification in the handmade technique.
The pottery from the deposit immediately under the floor was devoid of handmade coarse wares and
the diagnostic sherds showed hardly any traces of secondary burning. 301 The same was true for the
reddish stony deposit which probably belonged to the decomposition of Troy VIIa mudbrick walls. 302
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowls 220, 222.

C. Kraters 219, 223.
TAN WARE
A. Bowl 221.
HANDMADE COARSE AND HANDMADE BURNISHED WARE
C. Jars and amphoras 224-228.
Rooms C and D
The floor of the Troy VIIa phase with two sunken pithoi was covered with a substantial
stone debris (Pl. 65.C, 65.D, 65.E). The division wall between Rooms C and D existed by
then, since it was superimposed by the same floor that covered also the stone debris. 303 The
division wall is drawn already on Drpfelds plan. 304
300
Beh. E9.1062, 1071.
301
Beh. E9.1095.
302
Beh. E9.1054, 1057, 1060.
303
Wall No. 15361 on Pl. 4.
304
The wall on Drpfelds plan continues further southwards as it was found during the Tbingen excavations,
but this it might have merged with the eastern wall of Room F that has the same orientation. No disctinction
was visible at Drpfelds time.
[74]
The northern wall was clearly repaired in an orthostate manner (Pl. 71.B), but whether this
happened during zhe Troy VIIb1 or Troy VIIb2 phase, it could not be decided. This rebuilding cut the division wall between Rooms C and D (Pl. 65.C, 65.D).
The level of the threshold in Room D lay at the same elevation as the pavement of the Troy
VIIb1 Street (Pl. 71.B).
Troy VIIb1 Floor with a Hearth (?) ( 34.40-34.60 m)
Deposits covering the division wall are generally less secure due to the limited space and
contaminations caused by proximity to the eroded tell surface. The deposit immediately above
the ruins of Room F and above the partition wall between rooms C and D contained several
handmade coarse ware sherds. 305
A possible hearth was uncovered c. 10-15 cm above the ruins in the southeast corner of
Room D, slightly covering the partition wall between Rooms C and D (Pl. 65.F). There were
only seven nondescript sherds in the oven itself and no handmade coarse ware example
among them. 306
The assemblage was dominated by traditional LBA wares; it included some larger sherds with several joins between them, the rest relatively fragmented. Only very rarely sherds were covered with
cess residue. Coarse ware is represented by both handmade and wheelmade varieties. No sherds decorated with finger imprints typical for Troy VIIb1 were found.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Skyphos 230. Carinated bowls 229, 233, 236 with a knob which might imitate a Handmade Lustrous Ware shape? Bowls 231, 232, 234, 237, 241. Shallow bowl 235.
B. Jug or amphora 244.
C. Several bigger sherds of a krater 247 decorated with alternating incised horizontal and wavy
lines. Large basin 239.
TAN WARE
C. Krater 240.
305
Beh. E9.303, 307.
306
Beh. E9.299.
[75]
C. Cooking pot or jug 238. Jar or jug 246.

C. Sherd 245 belongs almost surely to the storage jar 13 that was found in the Troy VIIa destruction
layer in Room B. Jar 248. A fragment with horizontal handle, belonging to another jar, was also found.
Room G
Another room along the northern side of Street 751 has been excavated by the Tbingen
team to the west of Blegens House 768 (Pl. 4). The floors of Room G date to the Troy VIIb2
period. 307 No architecture securely attributable to the Troy VIIb1 phase was found in Room
G. Only a stone deposit below the lowest Troy VIIb2 floor (Pl. 66.B, 67.B, 67.C, 67.D) yielded pottery that can be classified as a Troy VIIb1 assemblage.
Stone collapse under the lower floor of Troy VIIb2 (35.00-34.50 m)
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL 99.B)
Anatolian Grey Ware sherds dominate; the handmade burnished wares are present and at the same
time the assemblage is devoid of Troy VIIb2 shapes. 308 Interesting is presence of a number of cups.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Cups 249, 250, 251. Bowls 254, 262, 264.

B. Krater 259.
C. Stand or krater 261.
A. Bowls 252, 255. Shallow bowls 253, 256.

B. Jug 260.
C. Krater 258. Jar (?) 263.
PLAIN WARE
A. Bowl 257.
307
See p. 105ff.
308
E8.367, E8.407, E8.409, E8.411.
[76]
C. Jar 265 in Gritty Ware.

B. Amphora (?) 268. Jug 271.

C. Jars 266, 267, 269, 270.
Room H
Room H is positioned between Rooms I and G (Pl. 4). A floor dating to Troy VIIb1 must
have existed certainly, because a threshold is documented on the same level as the pavement
of the Troy VIIb1 street. The actual floor might have been deeper than the threshold level,
similarly as with the Troy VIIb2 floor in Room G.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE
The pottery cannot be separated because only a small area inside Room H was excavated and the
supposed floor deposit (at the level of Troy VIIb1 street pavement) was removed in the same excavation unit as the deposit above the Troy VIIb2 floor. 309
Room I
Deposits under the orthostate wall
Room I is a Troy VIIb2 structure with an orthostate wall (Pl. 4). Below the floor, and below
the foundation level of the orthostate wall a deposit was encountered that yielded a Troy
VIIb1 assemblage in a sense defined by Blegen. This deposit lay over a small wall fragment
whose orientation differed from the orthostate wall and also from the walls lying deeper down
(Pl. 70.A, 71.D). The wall fragment joined the south retention wall (Pl. 70.E). Very fragmentary state of preservation of the wall and of related deposits left little chance to ascertain its
date ceramically. 310 From the available evidence it can be only concluded that the wall fragment predated the Troy VIIb1 deposit presented here.
309
See p. 109.
310
Beh. E8.159 might have been contaminated by Drpfeld backfill. However, no VIIb handmade pottery was
found in the small assemblage.
[77]
Many large and joining sherds. 311

ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Shallow bowl 272, hemispherical bowl 273, carinated bowls 274, 275, 277. Unspecified bowls
283, 284. Cup 282. Kylix 286. Stemmed bowl 289.
B. Juglet 279.
C. Krater 276. Jar 278.
TAN WARE
A. Hemispherical bowl 287.

C. Kraters 280 and 281.
C. Jars 285, 290 and 291.

A. Bowl 288.

AREA
O U TS ID E
G A TE VIU
IN
S Q U A R E A7
Burnt layer (25.02-26.17 m)

A distinct burnt layer covered the shell layer of Troy VIIa times (Pl. 43.B). 312 The burnt
layer sloped down towards the west and it yielded a surprisingly rich assemblage of small
finds. 313
The date of the burnt layer is not completely clear. Already Blegen had problems with dating the layers from the area in front of Gate VIU. He recorded some Troy VIIa finds, explicitly stating that the pottery included a good deal of earlier and later material and that the
evidence from this area is of little value on its bearing on stratigraphic and chronological
311
Behs. E8.511, 521, 528, 531, 558, 567, 570.
312
See p. 47.
313
Among them various stone, faience and bronze beads, bronze pins, worked stones, a lead clamp, a bone
wheel, a loomweight and a spindle whorl (A7.1258-1270).
[78]
problems. 314 Although Blegen could not recognize any clearly marked stratum assignable to
Phase VIIb1 he supposed that it must have been originally present there, after the fire that
destroyed Troy VIIa and before building operations were undertaken by new inhabitants who
introduced Knobbed Ware. His proposal was based on sherds of fabric which in the other
parts of the site have been discovered to be characteristic of Phase VIIb1. 315 Since this kind
of pottery occurred in front of Gate VIU mixed with earlier and later sherds, Blegen omitted
the catalogue.
The Tbingen team took away the later structures, separated intrusive features and excavated the burnt layer in an undisturbed area. 316 In terms of Blegens understanding of the site, the
burnt layer would probably be best interpreted as the destruction at the end of Troy VIIa. On
the other hand, the layer yielded handmade coarse wares typical for Troy VIIb1. Even if these
sherds occurred in conspicuously low quantity (slightly above 4% of the total assemblage),
they are likely to have been genuine in the context, given the easy recognition and separation
of the layer during the excavation and the complete removal of the deposits lying directly
above. For this reason the deposit is presented here in the Troy VIIb1 section, although the
ware proportions show huge differences in comparisons with Troy VIIb1 deposits in the E8E9 squares and are much more typical for Troy VIIa assemblages all over the site.
A rich assemblage consists of more than 800 sherds with a total weight of 15 kilograms. 317 Fine
wares completely dominated, only one sixth were coarse wares.318 The overwhelming majority of
sherds were made in Tan and Brown slip wares, which amounts to more than half of the assemblage
total. They were more than twice as numerous as the Anatolian Grey Ware sherds. The coarse ware
was primarily represented by wheelmade fragments typical for Troy VI/VIIa. Surprisingly few examples of Troy VIIb handmade wares were present. Most of the sherds are well preserved; the worn residual sherds were only a small group. Interesting is the presence of organically tempered clumps of
clay or mud 312, similar to some found in a few other places in the West Lower Town.
314
315
316
Sources of the contamination mentioned in Blegen were most probably the backfill of Drpfelds soundings
(see Pl. 39.C, 40.A, 40.B, 40.C, 40.E).

317
Beh. A7.1254.
318
Earlier wares were excluded from this count (ca. 5% of the total assemblage).
[79]
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Sherds of variable fragmentation, from small chips to fairly big examples.

A. The only recognized shapes include one sherd of an A73 hemispherical bowl, a fragment of a
carinated deep bowl of A72 type 294 and another fragment of a not specifically identifiable bowl with
a stem and raised foot. The rest belonged to jugs, kraters and closed shapes.
B. Fragmentary upper part of a small jug 308. This jug resembles with its size and its short neck
Blegens type B28, although its lip is more thickened than Blegens example. Not enough is preserved
to find out whether the body was biconical or not.
Another jug fragment belongs to the trefoil type B35 and is catalogued as 310. The remaining jug
rims were too fragmentary for closer identification. Two big handle fragments with flat oval section
can be also counted in this category.
C. Decorated krater fragment 307 and a jar fragment 305. The base-ring 303, given its size, most
probably also belonged to a krater.
By far the biggest group in the assemblage. The most representative examples are catalogued. Majority of the sherds are the Brown Slip Ware variety.
A. Shapes recognized included numerous rims of A49-52 shallow bowls 292, A73 hemispherical
bowls 293 and A71 deep bowls 295. In a single instance occurred an A60 bowl with basket handle
297. Unique is also an A87 mug 296. The bases were mostly from open vessels, bowls and perhaps
kraters. Three flat bases 299, five ring bases 301, 302, the rest raised foot bases, only fragments of
which have been preserved.
B. Most representative of this category is a part of the rim, neck and shoulder 300 of a big jug (or an
amphora?) with a perforated upper handle attachment (B25). Other jug rims have been found in very
fragmented state and are not catalogued.
C. Several very fragmented jars and kraters. Two krater fragments decorated with a rib 304, 309, one
other with multiple incised horizontal straight and wavy lines 306. The only identified shape is C69.
Some of the ring bases mentioned under A might belong to kraters.
Mostly Gritty Ware of Troy VI-VIIa, very fragmented sherds. Several bigger body sherds were attributed to more compact wheelmade Coarse Ware. Among them a fragment of a jar or cooking pot
with everted rim 316.
This group is overrepresented in the catalogue due to its supposed importance for the dating of the
assemblage. Otherwise it was considerably smaller than the wheelmade coarse ware group.
[80]
The best-preserved piece consists of several fragments of a barrel-shaped jar of C86 type 311. It is
only very lightly burnished and the plastic band is only slightly raised. The band is decorated by two
slashes made by fingers, with unusually wide spaces between them. The piece 311b was found in the
above-lying excavation unit, but it clearly belongs to the same vessel and to this context. 319 It proves
that the jar had lug handles, in this case decorated by a single finger imprint.
Another interesting piece is 315, most likely a miniature bowl.
The rest are fragmented sherds. One sherd of a C85 or C86 jar, decorated with raised band and finger imprints 314. One other only very fragmentarily preserved sherd with incisions on rim and an indication of a lower handle attachment 313 might have also belonged to a wide-mouthed jar C85, although in its fragmentary state and with its irregular profile it makes an impression of some kind of
bowl.
Very small group. Fragmented sherds. Cup fragment with a handle attachment recognized.
PITHOS WARES
Several body sherds, some of them rather small. One sherd seems to have had a beige slip; the rest
was produced in Red Coarse Ware. Only one example demonstrates the flat raised band typical for
pithoi, the rest are plain.
Pit under West Wall of House 791( 24.95-25.60 m)

House 791 dated to Troy VIIb2 was built directly on top of a pit (Pl. 5, Pl. 39.B). The form
of the pit suggests that it could have been a former pithos pit filled up with burnt matter, ashes, bones, stones and broken pithos sherds (Pl. 38.E, 39.B). The pit fill consisted of several
thinner strata that were recognized and separated during excavation. 320 The overall amount of
ceramic material is small and nothing indicates a differing purpose or date for the strata and
thus the pottery finds from the entire pit are treated here as a single assemblage. A circular
interruption in the underlying stone pavement indicates that the pit might have continued
deeper (Pl. 39.B, 39.C). The character of the pit fill is reminiscent of the burnt layer, including
319
Beh. A7.1245 was excavated as the last part of the destruction debris to the west of House 792 and its An-
nex but it was dug too deeply in order to make sure that the underlying burnt layer was without intrusions. For
these reasons this specific sherd is counted together with the assemblage of A7.1242. The rest of the assemblage
is similar in composition to A7.1242, but is is not included in the catalogue.
320
Beh. A7.1157, A7.1171, A7.1181.
[81]
finds of a faience bead and a bronze ring. 321 Beads and bronze objects were found in the burnt
layer too. Dating of the pit to Troy VIIb1 is indirect. It is based on the similarity of the fill to
the burnt layer. The burnt layer was not encountered below House 791.
The fill yielded only 37 sherds, mostly rather fragmented and worn. More than a half of the pottery
was produced in earlier wares (Troy I-VI Middle). Anatolian Grey Ware was hardly present and Tan
ware was completely absent. Only three or four sherds of the assemblage were attributed to Troy VIIb
handmade wares. Even this low figure is conjectural since they were body sherds and are difficult to
identify with certainty.
There is nothing in the pottery assemblage that would securely confirm the expected Troy VIIb1
date. The composition of the pottery rather indicates proximity to much earlier deposits. The area
might have been leveled considerably, prior to the erection of House 791 (as it was clearly the case
under House 792) or the pit might have been already cut into levels predominantly earlier than Troy
VI/VIIa. A single sherd is catalogued.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Only one diagnostic sherd, and one another body sherd were found. It belongs to a bowl with
basket handles 317. Given the high proportion of the early material, it could be residual in the context.
COARSE AND PITHOS WARES
All are small to middle sized body sherds and their attribution to Troy II-V, Troy VI Coarse wares or
Troy VIIb Handmade Coarse Wares is not without difficulties. At least four of them seem to have
belonged to Troy VIIb wares.
EARLIER TROJAN WARES
This was the majority group in the assemblage. Rather fragmented and worn sherds, from Troy II to
Troy VI Middle. One Plain ware plate fragment typical for Troy II-III and even one antisplash rim in
Brown Ware of Troy I have been found.
S Q U A R E D9
The preliminary publication assumed the existence of a single Troy VIIb1 wall in D9, running parallel to the citadel wall. 322 The post-excavation analysis by Ralf Becks brought evi-
321
A7.1173 and A7.1183.
322
Jablonka in Korfmann 2001, 24, Fig. 20, 21.
[82]
dence that the wall in question was an integral part of a cell-building, dated to Troy VIIb2. 323
Consequently, no Troy VIIb1 architecture is attested in D9. The only ceramic assemblage of
Troy VIIb1 character originates from the deposit at the foot of the Troy VIIb2 cell building.
Deposit at the foot of Troy VIIb2 wall
The wall was built atop a pure Troy VIIa deposit. 324
The pottery from the deposit accumulated outside of the wall, near its foundations, demonstrates
change in comparison with the strata laying below. It matches the Blegens definition of Troy VIIb1
assemblages, which essentially consist of Troy VI/VIIa pottery types accompanied by handmade
coarse wares decorated with finger imprints, while at the same the Knobbed ware sherds are absent. 325
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowls 318, 319, 320, 322.

B. Jugs 323, 324.
C. Krater 325.
TAN WARE
A. Bowl 326, 327, 328, 329, 330.

C. Krater 321, 331, 332.
C. Fragments of burnished and perhaps also unburnished jars decorated with finger imprints 333,
334.
WEST LOWER TOWN

No architectonic remains that can be dated to Troy VIIb1 have been identified in the West
Lower Town. The phase is represented only by negative structures a pit and a long ditch or
cut filled with organic material (Pl. 5). This implies that the whole area was for some time
largely deserted and used for the deposition of garbage.
323
Becks 2006, ch. 3.1.2.1.5. For dating see p. 133 ff.
324
Beh. D9.3105, 3109.
325
Beh. D9.3095, 3101.
[83]
Only the pit occurred in a narrow stratigraphic sequence, embedded between Troy VIIa destruction and Troy VIIb2 house walls. The organic deposit is stratigraphicly less precise since
it was not in direct contact with either Troy VIIa or Troy VIIb2 architecture. The complex
relations with other features and the associated pottery make the Troy VIIb1 date the best
choice.
N O R TH H O U S E S
Organic deposit with numerous fallow deer bones (z6, z7) (24.90-25.60 m)
A very distinctive level which had been turned yellow and black by organic decay 326 and
which contained animal bones in unusual abundance was excavated over several meters in
squares z7 North and z6 (Pl. 5). Its content was relatively consistent: grey and yellow decayed
matter, shells, burnt mudbrick, ash. The bottom of the deposit is covered with burnt matter
(Pl. 32.D, 34.E). It was preliminarily dated to the Troy VIIb phase. Most of the bones belonged to fallow deer and showed usual signs of cutting for removing the marrow. According
to archaeozoological consultation none of them was burned and it is unlikely that the deer had
been sacrificed. 327 Even parts of a fallow deer skeleton (the legs), cut by a later pithos, have
been found in the deposit (Pl. 32.E). 328
The deposit sloped down westwards and ended in the form of a shallow ditch (Pl. 32.A32.D, 34.E). It could have come into being as accumulated rubbish dumped from the houses
on the outer perimeter of the citadel wall or the citadel itself.
The organic deposit is part of several stratigraphic relationships. A terminus ante quem is
somewhat easier to fix than a terminus post quem.
In its northern part, the deposit was cut by a pithos and also by a rounded pit. Some disturbance is visible also in the profile underneath the inner wall of the Fimbria Building (Pl. 34.E).
None of the cutting features could be reliably dated.
326
Rose 1995, 91.
327
Rose 1995, footnote 31 quoting Marin Fabi. For archaeozoological reports relating to Fallow deer cf.
Fabi 2002, Fabi 2003. In D9 the bones of fallow dear were pretty common in the food waste and their
proportion reached during the Early Protogeometric Period was 28.8% of all bones, afterwards it gradually sank.
328
Beh. z6.560.
[84]
In its middle part, the organic deposit is overlain by the orthostate wall of North House B329
dated to Troy VIIb2 and it is furthermore cut by the Geometric pit and the Archaic boundary
wall (Pl. 32.B, 32.D).
In the southern part the deposit does not meet directly either with the North House A or with
Room 5 (Pl. 32.A). Yet there are sufficient indications in the profiles that the Organic deposit
predates North House A dated to Troy VIIb2. 330 Stratigraphic indications also show that the
organic deposit postdates the destruction of the rear wall of Room 5, which was a Troy VIIa
structure, but these are far from secure. 331
In conclusion, a stratigraphic date at the very end of Troy VIIa or during Troy VIIb1 seems
currently the best fit for the feature. The absolute C14 date from the deposit offered a range
which is too broad - between 1740-1220 cal. BC. 332
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 108.H)
The pottery record for the organic deposit is also far from being clear. The deposit contained sherds,
which at the time of discovery were labeled as transitional, due to some irregularities in their surface
treatment. The pottery is treated here in a broader context, in relation with other stratigraphic features
that could help to limit the dates.
Excavation units from the north part of the deposit yielded sometimes only Troy VIIa pottery, sometimes also Troy VIIb handmade burnished and handmade lustrous wares, and sometimes also Geomet-
329
Pr. z6/7.1994:12.
330
Pr. z7N.1994:4; Pr. z7N.1997:1,2.
331
Indications mentioned in the field notebook and believed to have been documented on the profiles (Pr.
z7N.1994:1,2,3b).
332
Beh. z6.524 from Beh. z6.521 (Hd 19172, 3223109 bp, 13C -24.72).
[85]
ric or Archaic pottery, but nothing diagnostic enough. 333 The area was small, but rather complicated
and disturbed. 334 It was covered by a thick Archaic marl floor (Pl. 34.B).
The pottery from the pithos setting pit cut into the northern part of the deposit was not processed in
detail, but it would hardly suffice in its fragmented state to date the pithos conclusively. 335 No PostBronze Age pottery was recorded. The pottery from the rounded pit nearby contained some pithos
sherds, Grey Ware and Tan Ware sherds, Troy VIIb handmade pottery 1092, 1093 and also some
sherds decorated with painted bands, too fragmentary to decide even for specialists whether they were
Mycenaean or Post-Bronze Age. 336
The pottery from the middle area contained a majority of typical Troy VI/VIIa sherds and some Troy
VIIb Barbarian Ware sherds.337 Fragments of the Mycenaean pictorial Lion krater dating to LH
IIIB/LH IIIC Early (in Mainland Greece terms) have been found in the uppermost part of the deposit
or immediately above it.338
In the southern part the deposit yielded exclusively a typical Troy VI Late/VIIa assemblage, including Mycenaean sherds, without Troy VIIb handmade wares or any other later sherds. 339 Troy VIIa
pottery, some of it secondarily burnt, dominated even in the rubbish accumulation above the organic
deposit, although here a minuscule body sherd of Troy VIIb handmade burnished ware decorated with
a plastic band and finger impressions has been found. 340
333
Beh. z6.519: Grey and Tan Wares, Gritty ware, a lot of handmade coarse burnished, some handmade lus-
trous ware sherds, two painted (one black band, one red band); Beh. z6.521: rather fragmentary, no VIIb handmade wares, no PBA; Beh. z6.559: no Troy VIIb handmade sherds, several painted black banded and streaky
paint body fragments roughly dated as Pre-Archaic or Archaic(?); Beh. z6.564: very few sherds, no Troy VIIb
HMCW, some unusual fabric; Beh. z6.575: Grey and Tan Ware, some pithos sherds, some Handmade Burnished
Ware (with an undecorated raised band) and several painted Geometric or Archaic sherds; z6.685: this contained
almost exclusively Troy II-V pottery heavily covered with cess residues. It is completely different than the surrounding assemblages and it must have originated from some other excavation area. Evidently the labels were
confused during the post-excavation process.
334
A grey sandy deposit between the roundish pit and the south profile, on the same elevation as the disarticu-
lated skeleton of a fallow deer found hardly two meters away, yielded even a possible illegible coin (?) Beh.
z6.588 from the context z6.586.
335
Beh. z6.510.
336
Beh. z6.582.
337
Beh. z6/7.279, 296.
338
From Beh. z6/7.276. For the Lion krater see Mountjoy 2005. A fibula z6/7.276.3 was found in the same
Behlter.
339
Beh. z7.389, 392 (Mycenaean, not fully clear whether from the organic deposit or the Troy VIIa destruction
horizon), 405.
340
Beh. z7.384. Perhaps also four other body sherds and a later PBA tile fragment.
[86]
The catalogued pottery was retrieved from the middle area of the Organic deposit.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowl 358.
TAN WARE
A. Shallow bowl 355. Bowl 356.

B. Jug or jar 359.
C. Jar 357.
UNKNOWN WARES
B. Jug 360.
D. Pyraunos (?) 361.

C. Cooking pots and jars 362-369.
Pit with Restored Vessels Cut into the Fill of Room 5

( 25.14-25.75 m)
Fragments of several almost completely restorable pots have been found in a pit cut into
Troy VIIa levels of Room 5 (Pl. 5, Pl. 29.A, 29.B). The pit was covered by the southern wall
of North House A, which is a Troy VIIb2 structure (Pl. 29.C, 29.D, 30.B). It is not clear
where the walking level lay in the time when the pit has been used and whether there had
been any leveling before North House A was built. The uppermost centimeters of the destruction horizon of Room 5 are the most likely level related with the pit. The excavation units
from there 341 contained handmade pottery some of which had nearly identical counterparts in
the pit.
The fill of the pit was mixed with many fallen stones, burnt mudbrick, pithos sherds and
yellow sleazy patches. 342 Besides ceramics it contained an axe-head, a stone mould, a terra-
341
Beh. z7.348.
342
Donald Easton, Tb z7N.1994: 47. This description bears certain resemblance to the fill of Organic deposit
found ins a shor distance away.
[87]
cotta weight, two possible sling-stones, and small particles of slag. 343 The preserved part of
the pit starts almost immediately underneath the house wall and is approx. 60 cm deep. 344
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 108.G)
An extraordinarily rich assemblage with a number of large joining sherds restored into nearly complete vessels. The pottery belongs primarily to handmade coarse varieties but there are also examples
of wheelmade fine wares and finely polished lustrous handmade table ware imitating the traditional
Late Bronze Age wheelmade pottery. However, no evident sherds with knobs or other decoration typical for Knobbed Ware have been found. The figures in the chart relate to the number of sherds before
the succesful restoration and thus do not take into account any joins.
GREY WARE
A. An almost complete example of BS A71 deep bowl 335 and BS A49 shallow bowl 336.
The rest are undiagnostic sherds.
TAN WARE
Few sherds, all from shallow bowls.

A. BS A49 shallow bowl 337. Its attribution to the pit is not 100% secure. 345 One more fragment of
possibly another vessel of the same type can be nonetheless securely attributed to the context. 346
MYCENAEAN WARE
One painted sherd.

This was by far the most numerous group in the assemblage.

A. One-handled cup or hemispherical bowl 345. Too little preserved for a better reconstruction. Not
clear whether it possessed any handles.
C. Two nice examples of barrel-shaped jars BS C86 have been recovered. Both have lug handles. Jar
347 is decorated with raised band and fingers imprints, jar 344 has an undecorated raised band, which
343
Tb. z7N.1994: 95.
344
The pit was separated in Beh. z7.360 and z7.363. The finds of partly preserved pots z7.337 and z7.338
doubtless belong to the pit. Their level was 25.73 and 25.76 a.s.l. respectively. The deepest Beh. z7.411 ended
on 25.14 a.s.l. Parts of Beh. z7.333, 340, 348, 371, 399 can also contain material from the pit.
345
The excavation unit in which the upper part of the pit was removed was larger than the pit itself.
346
z7.363.3.
[88]
is rather rare at Troy. Body sherds and flat bases of three to four other jars were found in the same
context - 343, 346, 348, 349, 350, 351.
A few sherds show no traces of burnishing. Some of them might have belonged to untreated lower
parts of bigger, otherwise burnished vessels, but at least two vessels have been deliberately left completely untreated.
A. A cup or a small hemispherical bowl 345.
B. Probably a BS C44 juglet 341 belongs to this category. Its rim and the upper part of the handle
are not preserved. In case that the vessel possessed a high loop handle, it might have been a kind of
deep ladle.
A. A handmade polished imitation 342 of a carinated bowl. This shape is usually found only in Anatolian Grey or in Tan Wares. It is unclear whether it had any handles.
PITHOI
All but one are nondescript body sherds. The exception belongs to an unusual thickened angular rim
decorated with circular indentations 354.
ORGANICALLY TEMPERED CLAY
This group represented by 351, 352, 353 and several others nondescript lumps most probably cannot
be classified as pottery but rather as remains of some clay construction an oven, a hearth, or a claylined pit. The consistency of the clay objects is rather soft.
UNKNOWN FABRIC
Two unusual wheelmade whitish body sherds 338 and 339 were present in the deposit. These are
still without parallels even in the so called Transitional deposits to which they show the closest resemblance. Given the relatively secure stratigraphic context of the pit they rather represent unidentified imports of the Troy VIIb1 period.
[89]

THE CITADEL
H A B I TA T IO N
IN
S Q U A R ES E8-9
Street
The division of the street deposits to the east and to the west reflects exclusively the excavation process, during which a baulk existed between the areas. 347 No real differences were observed in the field. The distinction is kept here for easier localization of the finds and for possible comparisons with finds from inside the corresponding rooms (Pl. 4).
Troy VIIb2 deposits in the East (35.70-35.00)
Remains of several paved surfaces placed tightly above each other have been found between
Rooms H, J and Room B (Pl. 72.A-72.D). They were impossible to separate over the entire
course of the street.
The deposits in the east were not excavated down to the Troy VIIb1 pavement. 348
A rich assemblage with numerous examples of decorated Handmade Lustrous Ware sherds. Sherds
of all sizes are represented, including a number of large sized fragments, some of which join.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowl 374.
B. Jugs or amphoras 370, 371. Jug or flask 376. Jugs 377, 378.
C. Krater 379. Jar 380, 381.
TAN WARE
A. Carinated bowl 373.

B. Jug 375.
347
Between y=9289.50 and 9290.50.
348
See p. 65.
[90]
C. Cooking pots 410, 412.

B. Amphora 405.
C. Jars 387, 396, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 407, 411.
A. Kantharos 382 (found near the southeast corner of Room G). Cup, jug or deep bowl 383. Bowl or
amphora 385. Cups 389, 392, 393. Bowl 390. Deep bowl 394.
B. Cup or juglet 384. Juglet 388. Amphoras 397, 404, 406. Jug (?) 413.
C. Krater (?) 386. Kraters or amphoras 391, 395, 398. Jars 408, 409.
Troy VIIb2 deposits in the West (35.70-35.00)

No continuous stone pavement was found on the west, only a hardened surface filled with
smaller stones and a concentration of larger flat stones near the entrance to Room H
(Pl. 72.B). Drpfelds photograph shows a paved street at comparable elevation lower down,
between Room E and Rooms I-J (Pl. 73.B).
Smaller to medium sized sherds. Few joins. A number of sherds worn.

ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Skyphos 414.
B. Jug 415. Jug or amphora 416.
C. Footed krater 419.
TAN WARE
A. Shallow bowl 417. Bowl 420.

C. Jar 418.
C. Cooking pot 430.

A. Cups or juglets 421, 422, 423. Bowls 426, 431.

B. Amphoras 425, 427.
[91]
C. Krater or amphora 424.

C. Jars 429, 432, 433, 434, 436, 437. An unusual jar with elongated finger imprints 435.
Stone collapse above the street

The Troy VIIb2 street deposits were covered with collapsed stones (Pl. 72.A, 73.D). The
stone collapse layer probably marks the last phase of Troy VIIb2 settlement.
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 101.G)
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
B. Jug or amphora 439. Jug or jar 441. Amphoras 444, 445.

C. Kraters 438, 440.
D. Stand (?) 443.
C. Cooking pot 454.

A. Cup or jug 448. Cup 449. Bowl 452.

B. Jug 446 and 451. Amphora 453.
C. Krater or amphora 447. Jar 457.
B. Jug 450.
C. Jars 442, 455, 456, 458.
Large flat slab blocking the eastern doorway of Room B

A large stone slab was used to block the doorway to Room B from the street (Pl. 71.D,
71.E). It was probably put on a Troy VIIb1 surface in Troy VIIb2 times. The slab might have
originally belonged to a stair similar to one found by Drpfeld in House VIM. 349 Alternatively
it might have been a door lintel. 350
349
Drpfeld Photo No. 220, Negative in Archive of DAI Athens.
350
Becks 2006, ch. 3.2.4.2.2, Strae 751.
[92]
This is an interesting deposit, it contains hardly any handmade Troy VIIb pottery in its lowermost
level. 351 The deposits immediately to the west of the big stone slab contained a number of unusual
pieces. 352
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Cup 467.
C. Krater (?) 472 with conspicuous knobs.
D. Lid 468 with a poppy-head shaped finial.
C. Jar 470.
A. Cup or jug 469.

C. Jar 471.
House 761
It is unclear what was going on in House 761 during Troy VIIb2 times (Pl. 4). Blegen distinguished arbitrarily between floor deposits (33.20-33.70 m a.s.l.) and debris above the floor
(33.70-34.90 m a.s.l.). He noticed that the pottery sherds and the smallfinds were considerably
more numerous in the floor deposits, but otherwise the assemblage looked homogeneous to
him. 353
Donald Easton encountered serious difficulties during his 1995-1996 excavations when trying to date and interpret the finds in the remaining western part of House 761 with the help of
Blegens framework. He concluded that either Blegens dating of the upper deposit to Troy
351
Beh. E9.808.
352
Beh. E9.839, 846.
353
Blegen et al. 1958, 198-9.
[93]
VIIb1 must have been wrong or the very criteria, on which the division between Troy VIIb1
and VIIb2 was postulated, are doubtful. 354
This deserves a closer explanation. A hieroglyphic seal 355 was discovered in 1995 at the elevation of 34.46 which in terms of evidence published by Blegen for the eastern part of the
house would have to be interpreted as coming from the rubbish layers dating to Troy VIIb1.
But, that very same context also contained Knobbed ware sherds, and the wall of the same
phase in the neighboring room to the west (Room B) was built in orthostate technique. Both
these features were considered typical for Troy VIIb2 and contradicted Blegens dating of the
deposit to Troy VIIb1. 356
Easton reported a thick stratum of ash and cockle shells covered by powdery grey earth
with much broken pottery, charcoal and unusual quantities of shells and animal bones, which
corresponds well with expectations for a rubbish deposit. On the other hand, this was only the
case for the deposits below c. 34.26 m. Above this level he identified three possible surfaces. The hieroglyphic seal was found in the deposit slightly above the lowermost of these possible surfaces.
Floor deposits VIIb2? (34.28-35.20)
Contrary to what was concluded by Blegen, the results of the Tbingen team indicate that
House 761 was rebuilt and some kind of settlement activities other than refuse disposal was
resumed in it during the Troy VIIb2 phase. 357
Traces of at least three possible surfaces were identified by Easton in the upper parts of
the house: the first one, at c. 34.28-34.41 m, where sherds, bones and occasional pieces of
white clay seemed trodden into the ground, the second at c. 34.55 m, where there were
traces of a possible plaster floor, and the third at c. 34.80 m where few flat stones associated with fragments of lime plaster again looked like remnants of a floor. 358
None of the three possible hardened surfaces was evident and continual, and they were
mixed with a number of loose stones (Pl. 60.B, 60.C, 60.D). If House 761 served for habitation in its final phase, the deposits were severely disturbed.
354
Hawkins and Easton 1996, 115.
355
Beh. E9.573.
356
357
Becks 2006, ch. 3.2.4.2.3, Haus 761.
358
Beh. E9.573. Hawkins and Easton 1996, 115.
[94]
The pottery record shows some notable changes in comparison with Troy VIIb1 strata
(Pl. 96.G). The ceramic inventory is catalogued here according to divisions outlined by the
excavator, Donald Easton.
First probable surface - Context with the Hieroglyphic Seal
According to Easton, the hieroglyphic seal came most probably from the thin deposit accumulated above the lowest of three possible surfaces of House 761 excavated in 1995. 359 The
excavation unit in concern was started slightly above the level of the destroyed house, thus
potentially including sherds from ancient slope erosion. 360 The position of the seal was measured in situ: it lay 2-13 cm lower than the uppermost preserved stones in the corresponding
part of the house wall, at a distance of 55 cm from the wall. This means, that the seal was
found closely below the level of the slope erosion.
Fragment of an undecorated Knobbed Ware cup published in the preliminary publication may belong to the same context as the seal. 361 On the other hand, fragments of a Mycenaean krater,
amphoriskos and a Knobbed ware cup with incised decoration published 362 as coming from the same
context as the seal, more likely belong to the underlying rubbish deposit. 363
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Juglet or alabastron 473.

C. Krater 474.
A. Undecorated cup 475.

C. Jar 476.
359
360
Beh. E9.570. The house wall was still not visible when the excavation unit was opened.
361
Hawkins and Easton 1996, Fig. 8: E9.574.6. The Beh. E9.574 was excavated to the north of E9.570. The
uppermost stones in this part of the preserved western wall of House 761 were already visible and thus any contamination from the debris above the ruins is improbable.
362
Hawkins and Easton 1996, Fig. 5, 6, 8. The sherd in the lower part of Fig. 8 is wrongly labeled as
E9.70.45+59. The correct number is E9.790.45+59.

363
Beh. E9.790 was described as crumbly earth with many bones and shells. It was excavated between
34.21-33.96, several centimeters below the supposed surface above which the seal was found. See also p.
72.
[95]
Second probable surface

Most of what would be the second probable surface was described during the excavation as
hard sandy brown soil with occasional charcoal fragments. 364
The pottery is small to medium-sized sherds. 365 Corresponding unit above the doorway yielded a
small amount of pottery. 366
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Carinated bowl 477. Skyphoi 478, 483.

B. Jug 479.
C. Krater 480 with rich incised decoration.
TAN WARE
A. Bowl 484.
PLAIN WARE
B. Jug or amphora 481.

C. Cooking pot 486.

B. Jug 482.
C. Jars 485, 487.
Third probable surface and the Orthostate structure (34.63-35.20)

Easton linked the highest of the three possible surfaces to orthostates placed against the face
of the western wall of the house (Pl. 60.D). 367 Again, only fragments of whitish plaster and
few scattered stones have been found here. Given the presence of orthostates and Knobbed
ware sherds, the feature was dated to Troy VIIb2 period. 368
364
Tb. E9.1995: 73 (Beh. E9.761).
365
Beh. E9.761.
366
Beh. E9.773.
367
368
[96]
A small amount of pottery was found in the immediate vicinity of the orthostates and it was mostly
undiagnostic, however, it contained one fragment of a handmade burnished undecorated juglet that can
be classified as Knobbed Ware. 369
TAN WARE

A. Cup 488.
Deposits Covering the House

The southern part of the deposit was excavated in 1993. 370 The pottery was described as
predominantly BA, but about 15% was classified as PBA by the primary processing. 371 I was
unable to find more precise records about the dates of the PBA sherds.
In 1995 some fallen stones and accompanying deposits were removed in the northern
part. 372 These most probably represented the debris above the ruins of the house.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 96.H)
The pottery included an interesting piece of a wheelmade semicoarse pot that combines the finger
imprints decoration with a lug in what seems to be an advanced style.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Deep bowl (?) 490.

B. Jug 491. Jug or amphora 492.
C. Jar or cooking pot 497.

B. Jug 493.
C. Jars 494, 495.
369
From Beh. E9.674.
370
Beh. E9.74.
371
Out of total 67 sherds.
372
Beh. E9.602, 620, E9.626.
[97]
C. Jar 496.
Room B
Flat stones deposit (VIIb1/VIIb2)
A stone deposit or fill mixed with burnt matter lay above the Troy VIIb1 floor and covered
almost the whole room (Pl. 61.D). 373 Most of the stones in the upper part lay flat and they
look like an intentional fill or packing. As in House 761, the flat stones can be reasonably
interpreted as a subfloor packing intended to level the ground in preparation for the floor of a
next phase. It is likely that the flat stones are not all contemporary, but might represent several
rebuilding phases as the floor level was raising and renewed. The earlier stones are likely to
have come from the VIIb1 destruction but were adapted to suit new needs. The whole horizon
is about half a meter higher here than in House 761. The surface of the stone packing was
decreasing towards the middle of the room (Pl. 64.A).
The sherds from this context range from small to large in size. 374
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Skyphos 498. Deep bowl 503, bowl 508. Carinated bowl 513. Cup 520.
B. Juglet 499. Amphora 501 with an identical shape as painted PG amphoras. Jug 502. Bellyhandled amphora 521.
C. Jar 500. Jug or jar 501.
D. Attachments or pronged objects (?) with mushroom-shaped finials 506, 507.
A. Bowls 504, 505. Shallow bowls 510, 511, 514. Hemispherical bowl 515. Cup 516.
B. Jugs 518, 519.
PLAIN WARE
A. Shallow bowls 509, 511. Bowl 517.
373
With a possible exception of a pit along the middle of the north wall.
374
Beh. E9.977, 979, 985, 987, 989, 1007, 1027, 1014, 1017.
[98]
C. Cooking pot 524, 532.

D. Tray 522.
A. Cup 523, juglet 527. Deep bowl 531.

C. Amphora 525. Jars 526, 528, 533, 534. Jar or pyraunos/stand 530.
B. Jug 529.
Lower Floors VIIb2 (c. 33.90 /foundation of orthostate wall on the west/, 33.95 oven and
floor patches in the east)
A hardened floor with patches of white lime was found a few centimeters below the threshold of the east doorway (Pl. 62.A). At the corresponding level in the northwest corner, a stone
packing was found (Pl. 62.C). The northwest corner of the room seems to have had stone
packings all through the Troy VIIb periods. It is difficult to distinguish between individual
floors. The highest packing seem to correspond well to one of the thresholds in the western
doorway at ca. 34.10-34.20 m. How many levels there were in between, is impossible to say
with precision.
The floors were cleared and renewed several times. The earliest floor above the stone debris
of VIIb1 was linked with remains of a domed oven. 375 The oven overlay the pit in the middle
of the room (Pl. 64.A, 64.B, 64.D). It is probable that this floor is connected with the rebuilding of the west wall of Room B with orthostates (Pl. 64.C).
The pottery from the oven and ash-pits was undiagnostic, but several bigger interesting pieces of
pottery were revealed from the related deposits. 376 They included several Grey Ware bases, an amphora or a big jug fragment, big sherds of handmade coarse wares, an unusual decorated knob 377 and a
375
Beh. E9.902, 935.
376
Beh. E9.937, 939 and possibly also E9.915 and E9.917. Also belonging to this contexts is Beh. 946, but it
was too close to the eroded surface of the pinnacle and a contamination cannot be excluded.
377
E9.915.11. Interestingly another unusual decorated knob of completely different type was found in the
same area, only somewhat deeper E9.919.8.
[99]
sherd with prolongated finger imprints joining to several other sherds from the door blocking wall and
from E8. 378 Some of the sherds had been secondarily burnt.
Probably connected with one of the later floors or with a pit covered by the pavement in the northwest corner, was a handleless handmade coarse ware cooking pot, a sherd with a pronounced finger
imprints and several other diagnostic pieces, some of them with cess-like residue. 379
The deposits that had accumulated above the floor included a rim and a handle of another bigger
handmade coarse ware vessel. 380
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowls 539, 540, 553. Skyphos 542. Deep bowl 544. Bowl or krater 555.
C. Jars or jugs 552, 556. Jar 557.
D. Kraters 537, 545. Lid 538.
A. Shallow bowls 541, 546, 547, 550, 551.

B. Jug 549.
PLAIN WARE
B. Juglet 548.
EARLIER WARES
B. Jug 535.
C. Jars 554, 576. Cooking pots 569, 571, 574, 575, 577.
A. Cups 570, 572. Cup or jug 581.

B. Jug 573. Amphora 580.
D. Spouted jar or sauceboat 536. Not typical for Troy VIIb2 layers, rather a residual Early Bronze
Age sherd.
378
The pieces with elongated finger imprints evidently coming from one and the same pot include E9.915.1,
E9.917.1, E9.475.6, E8.329.18, E8.358.19.

379
Beh. E9.907.
380
Beh. E9.996.
[100]
C. Jars 559-568, 578, 579.

UNKNOWN WARES
C. Deinos 543.
Upper floors VIIb2

Floors were clearly renewed a couple of times above the oven remnants. They seem to had
been cut and mostly removed. One floor can be reasonably reconstructed twenty centimeters
above the oven, at the level of the threshold of the eastern doorway (c. 34.30 m) with a pivot stone resting at 34.12 m. It is related with one or two ash-pits (Pl. 62.B, 62.D).
The western doorway is probably the earlier one. At some point it was walled up and the
eastern doorway seem to have overtaken its function, however, there was a pivot stone at the
inner side of the western doorway even as high as 34.50 m, almost 30 cm above the threshold of the eastern doorway. The position of the pivot stone can hardly be accidental. Stone
packing (a threshold?) was found at the appropriate level also inside of the eastern entrance.
Perhaps there were times when both entrances were used simultaneously.
Traces of white plaster on the stones were found as high as c. 35.00 m.
The pottery included many handmade fragments, some of them from a pot with striated raised
bands, surprising quantity of Tan Ware, and some Knobbed Ware cup fragments. 381 Some Archaic
sherds have been found, 382 but the whole assemblage fits well the Troy VIIb2 date.
A. Cup or juglet 590.

A. Cups or jugs 587, 588. Cup 589.

B. Amphora 585.
381
Beh. E9.746, 754, 766, 794, 850, 857. Beh. E9.712 and E9.720 theoretically also belong to this deposit, but
they were heavily contaminated by Archaic sherds. Several G2/3 sherds almost surely came from the pit which
was cut into the western wall.
382
Beh. E9.850.
[101]
C. Jars 582, 583, 584, 586.
Destruction VIIb2
A destruction horizon of collapsed stones and burnt matter has been uncovered between ca.
34.60 and 35.20 m (Pl. 63.B, 64.D, 64.E, 64.F). Several intrusive G2/3 ware sherds were
found. 383 Their presence is to be explained by the pit, which cut the west wall from an evidently higher level (Pl. 62.D, 64.C). 384
The pottery was rather fragmented, and included an elbow handle decorated with channeling,
Knobbed ware cup fragment, several pieces of Grey Ware, but also some wheelmade coarse wares in
PBA style. 385 Some sherds had been secondarily burnt.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowl 608. Deep bowl 617.

B. Jugs or jars 615, 616. Jug or krater 613.
C. Jar 610.
D. Twisted handle 609 from an unidentified shape.
A. Bowl 614. Cup or bowl 611.

C. Jar 625. Cooking pot 622.

A. Bowl 612. Cups 618, 619, 620.

B. Cup or jug 623.
C. Jars 621, 624.
383
Beh. E9.595, 683.
384
Beh. E9.680, 691, 705, 724, 729, 732, 736, 739 (Behs. 595, 683 and 712 have also belonged predominanlty
to the context but were contaminated by G2/3 pit)

385
Beh. E9.595, 683, 705, 732, 739.
[102]
PITHOI
C. Pithos 626 decorated with horizontal and wavy lines made by a finger.
Depression in the Middle of the Room

A pit or at least an evident depression has been ascertained in the middle of the room, sloping towards the north wall (Pl. 64.A, 64.B, 64.D, 64.E). Its fill seems to have accumulated
above the stone debris, which already clearly sloped down. Only very few disordered stones
were recovered near the middle of the room.
The sherds were mostly medium sized.386 The fill of the depression included several joining fragments to the deposits underneath and above it.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Basin 591, bowls 592, 596. Skyphos 599.

B. Jugs or jars 598.
D. Stand (?) 594.
A. Bowls 597.
B. Jug or amphora 593. Jug or jar 595.
C. Cooking pot 607.

B. Jug 603.
C. Jars 600, 601.
A. Deep bowl 604.Cup or jug 605.

B. Amphora (?) 606.
C. Jar 602.
386
Beh. E9.937, 950, 996, 998, 1002, 1004, 1011.
[103]
Blocking wall of the west Doorway

The assemblage is dominated by fragmented, mostly nondiagnostic coarse ware sherds and
rather many pithos sherds. 387 A few Grey Ware sherds are present. One interesting coarse
ware sherd with individually dispersed elongated finger imprints joins several other pieces
from Room B and also from E8. The upper 10-15 cm contained PBA pottery, including Hellenistic and Early Roman. 388
Blocking of the East Doorway
The doorway was in its upper part blocked by tightly packed stones running up to the
VIIb3 wall, which did not have any face in this part. The pottery except for one pithos rim
sherd consisted of only five undiagnostic fragments. 389 The deposits somewhat lower did contain a majority of handmade coarse wares, no Protogeometric or later sherds have been identified. 390
Rooms C and D
Upper deposits ( 34.60-35.10 m)
No installations or floors were observed above the ruins of the Troy VIIb1 oven. 391 All the
deposits above oven and below the VIIb3 wall 392 are treated here together (Pl. 4). They
were approximately 50 cm thick.
The pottery included bigger sherds of Grey Ware jug. Some sherds in the assemblage were worn,
others with cess-like residue, few even secondarily burnt. 393 Handmade coarse ware sherds were well
represented, but did not include any exceptional pieces. A nice Knobbed Ware juglet fragment preserving the complete profile has been found in still higher level ( c. 35.50), on the northern side of
the VIIb3 wall. 394 Due to the securely later date of those deposit it is however almost surely a residual piece, originating from layers contemporary with upper deposits.
387
Beh. E9.451,475, 697.
388
Beh. E9.451,475.
389
Beh. E9.623.
390
Beh. E9.636.
391
See p. 75.
392
See p. 199.
393
Beh. E9.259, 261, 265, 275, 280, 435.
394
E9.160.6.
[104]
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Deep bowl 628. Bowls 630, 631, 633, 634, 635. Carinated bowl 636.
B. Jug 627.
C. Jar 629.
TAN WARE

B. Jug, jar or amphora 632.
C. Krater 638, 639.
PLAIN WARE
A. Bowl 642.
C. Jar 640, 643, 644, 645, 646.

B. Juglet 647.
C. Jar or amphora 641.
Room E
Room E was excavated by Drpfeld. Its wall to the street with the walled up doorway can be
seen on one of the unpublished Drpfeld photographs (Pl. 73.B). The northern wall was based
at c. 33.30-33.40 m and was thus some 20 cm deeper than the lowest pavement of the street.
No original deposits were excavated inside the room by the Tbingen team.
It is unclear what the rectangular structure drawn on Drpfelds plan looked liked and what
purposed it served. Nothing survived of it at the time of Tbingen excavations (Pl. 4).
Room G
Lower floor with the burnt deposit (ca. 35.00-35.20)
A distinct lime floor covered by a thick burnt deposit was found inside Room G at c. 35 m
a.s.l. (Pl. 66.C, 67.A). The fire left black traces on the orthostate walls, which offered evidence that the floor and the burnt layer were irregular and sloped down towards the south. A
[105]
step downwards might have existed in the doorway, since the burnt deposit lay there some 2030 cm lower than in the rest of the room. The street level seems to have been lower than the
floor level in the house during the phase that was destroyed in conflagration.
An oval structure plastered by white lime, originally interpreted as an oven and later as a
storage bin, was installed on the floor. Broken Knobbed ware cups were found lying on the
floor (Pl. 66.D).
Four partially preserved Knobbed ware cups and bowls were found on the floor and related burnt
deposit in the southeast part of the room. 395 The floor sloped down, the pots lay at elevation of 34.80
m. The rest of the assemblage was with few exceptions rather fragmented and worn and included a
heavily secondarily burnt Grey Ware vessel with multiple horizontal incised lines, a handmade rim
with an elongated knob or ear-shaped lug, one handmade coarse ware sherd with a raised band decorated with finger imprints and with an indication of a knob? 396 The assemblage from the excavation
unit in which the floor was removed looked almost like Troy VIIb1, with a domination of Tan Ware
and few handmade pieces. 397
The pottery from the oval structure is limited to a few sherds, none of them secondarily burnt. 398
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Hemispherical bowl 648. Bowl 650. Shallow bowl 651.

B. Jug 655.
C. Kraters 652, 653. Cooking pot 661.
TAN WARE

C. Krater 656.
C. Cooking pot 665.

Unidentified shape 666.
395
Beh. E8.211, 212 (anakkale Arkeoloji Mzesi, Inv. No. 8050), 218, 219.
396
Beh. E8.196, 200, 203, 215.
397
Beh. E8.225.
398
Beh. E8.169, 220, 223.
[106]
A. Cup or bowl 658. Cup 659.

B. Juglet 657.
B. Jug 664.
C. Jars 660, 662, 663.
Fill between the Lower and the Upper Floor (ca. 35.20-35.40)
A clayish deposit filled the space between the lower burnt floor and the presumed upper
floor (Pl. 67.D).
The pottery from these layers is characterized by the dominance of handmade well burnished wares,
with still a considerably high proportion of Tan Ware. 399 Although a few large sherds did occur, the
assemblage was generally rather fragmented.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
C. Jar 667.
D. Stand with a horse protome (?) 668.
C. Jar 670.
PLAIN WARE
A. Bowl 669.
A. Cups 671, 672, 674. Jug or deep bowl 673.

B. Amphoras 675, 678.
C. Krater 676.
A. Fragment of an unique antisplash rim bowl with a flattish knob 679.

399
Beh. E8.148, 161, 174, 180, 213.
[107]
B. Amphora or jar 681.

C. Jars 677, 680.
Upper floor (ca. 35.40-35.60 m)

No floor was recognized during the excavation in progress, but some evidence for it was
found later in the northern profile ((Pl. 67.D). For the sake of differentiation of possible floor
deposits, the pottery is treated here separately. If there was a floor, it was not continuously
preserved. Related deposits were mixed with a few fallen stones.
This horizon represents the last use of Room G whether as a house or at least as a ruin. At
least two courses of the house walls were still preserved above this level. A similar situation
was noted by Blegen in the neighboring House 768 on the east. The door was blocked up, the
walls rebuilt and a higher floor and debris yielded some 50 painted sherds which from the
greatest part were characteristic for Troy VIII. 400
The pottery assemblage was dominated by handmade wares; nevertheless it yielded a surprisingly
high proportion of Tan Ware. 401 Protogeometric and Archaic (?) sherds are reported to have been
found in the deposit. 402
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
B. Jug 683.
C. Jar or krater 682.
A. Cup 687. Large bowl or jug 688.

B. Cup or jug 685. Amphora or jar 686.
C. Jar 690.
C. Jar 684. Jar or jug 689.

400
Blegen et al.1958, 204-5, 208.
401
Beh. E8.116, 123.
402
Beh. E8.116 (Lenz et al. 1998, Cat. No. IC.5). There is also a note in the Final Report about the E8 field-
work in 1995 about one Protogeometric sherd from Beh. E8.236, from the fill of the doorway. I could not find
any record about this sherd. It is likely to have been mistaken for a LH IIIC or Submycenaean sherd with multiple (semi-) circles fringed with dots from the above lying Beh. 229, also from the the doorway (cf. Footnote 598)
[108]
Room H
Room H had at least two floors. A floor corresponding to the level of the Troy VIIb1 street
pavement must have existed, but was not unequivocally identified. 403 The second one lay
some 60 cm above the pavement of Troy VIIb1, as evidenced by a renewed door threshold to
Room H (Pl. 71.A, 71.B), and was sloping down towards north. 404 It was covered by a thin
layer of burnt matter, a situation analogous to Room G. The floor was placed a few centimeters above the base of the eastern wall.
The Floor deposit ( 34.50-35.10 m)
Large sherds with many joins, one nearly complete jar restored.405
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
B. Jug or jar 691.

A. Several joining sherds from deep bowls or jars 692, 693 with subtle triangular knobs have been
found above the floor and in the doorway area.
C. Jars or amphoras 695, 696.
C. Jar 694. A large biconical storage jar 697 with a raised band decorated with finger imprints and
lugs has been found broken on the floor in the southeast corner of the room.
Room I
Room I was uncovered by Drpfeld, who excavated part of the area down to the Troy VI
level. It appears as a single unnamed space without any door on Drpfelds published plan.406
403
See p. 77.
404
Floor level between c. 34.80-35.00 m a.s.l. Two big flat stones in the doorway area served as a threshold
( 35.11-35.16 m a.s.l.).
405
Beh. E8.371, E8.424.
[109]
Most of the walls disappeared, and only small remnants of original Troy VII strata were still
left in place at the beginning of the Tbingen excavations (Pl. 4). The Tbingen team worked
in the area in the campaigns of 1994-6. The work was resumed again in 2004 under the direction of Magda Pieniek-Sikora. It is thanks to her meticulous excavation that the architectural history and many details of Rooms I and J were understood despite the very limited area.
The walls defining Room I date to the Troy VIIb Period. The east wall, which is made of
orthostates, is still preserved (Pl. 69.C, 69.E). The southern wall, including a possible doorway, can be seen on Drpfelds photograph (Pl. 73.B). 407 It was an orthostate wall too. A corner where it meets with the east wall survived (Pl. 70.E). Remains of what must have been the
western wall of Room I and thus a partition wall between Rooms I and J can be seen on
Drpfelds photograph, lying over a pithos of an earlier phase. Pieniek-Sikora found additional evidence for the existence of the partition wall in the northern profile. All the floors
preserved in the room ran horizontally up to the point where they abruptly ended and where a
later robbing trench was observed. This place corresponds to the course of the wall as reconstructed on the basis of Drpfelds plan and photograph.
Lower floor
The eastern wall was based at c. 34.60. It sloped somewhat down to the south where it
joined the southern wall whose original substance was earlier (Pl. 70.E). The eastern wall is
built of two superposing courses of orthostates (Pl. 69.E). It makes an impression as if two
distinct building phases were represented but both orthostate courses were most likely built in
a single event. A lime plaster originally covered both orthostate courses of the wall (Pl. 69.C,
70.C).
Remains of at least two related floors have been distinguished. A broken Knobbed Ware
kantharos with flat channeling and hardly perceptible knobs has been found lying on the upper floor (Pl. 69.D). 408
406
Drpfeld 1902, Taf. III, Taf. VI.
407
Drpfelds Photo No. 553.
408
Beh. E8.524.
[110]
Except for the Knobbed ware cup only very few sherds were found in the deposit. The majority of
the assemblage was comprised of fragmented and worn sherds in Grey, Tan, Brown Slip, and
Wheelmade Coarse Wares, with a high proportion of still earlier wares (Troy VI). 409
A. Bowls 699, 700.

A. Kantharos 698.
B. Amphora 701.
Upper floor and the stone debris

The uppermost floor in the house, was observed at c. 35.00 m a.s.l. 410 The floor was covered by a destruction horizon with stone debris.
The pottery included a number of larger and joining sherds in Anatolian Grey Ware and also in
handmade wares.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Deep bowl 702. Bowl 705.

C. Jar 704. Kraters 706, 708.
A. Bowl 707.
B. Jug 703.
A. Jar 709. Cups or jugs 711, 712. Deep bowl 717.

B. Black highly burnished juglet 710 decorated with channeling on the body and a slightly raised
band with finger imprints on the neck. Jug 714. Juglet with channeled decoration 715. Jug 716.
409
Beh. E8.457, 459, 465, 480, 482. Early excavated Beh. E8.176 and E8.182 also belong to this context. Alt-
hough they were not as clearly separated during the excavation, they fit into the general picture outlined above.
410
Beh. E8.457 (including a part of the underlying destruction).
[111]
C. Jug or jar 713.

A. Cup 720.
B and C. Jug or amphora 718. Piriform jar 719.

PITHOI
C. Pithos 721 decorated with multiple lines made by fingers.
Deposits covering the room

Several interesting pieces have been found in the deposits partly from and partly overlying the stone
debris of the room. Since they came from an area considerably disturbed by erosion of the tell surface,
a danger of contamination exists. Nevertheless, some bigger examples deserve attention as they might
belong to the debris deposit or they might represent the last phase of Troy VIIb. 411
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
C. Krater 722.
A. Cup 726. Deep bowl 727.

B. Amphoras and jar/amphoras 723, 724, 725, 728, 730. Jug 729.
C. Jar 731.
Room J
Room J was excavated by Drpfeld. The southern wall of Room J and its doorway with
massive threshold and door-jamb stones can be clearly seen in one of Drpfelds photos
(Pl. 73.B). The division wall between Rooms J and K can also be seen in the same picture,
411
Beh. E8.137.
[112]
although it was not very well preserved. The room is rather narrow for regular habitation
(Pl. 4). It cannot be excluded that it was interconnected with either Room K or Room I. The
threshold was resting at an elevation of 34.51 m according to Drpfelds plan.
As in the case of Room I, nothing survived of the previously excavated walls with one possible exception: the place where the western wall of Room J disappeared in the north profile.
No associated Troy VIIb strata were preserved when the Tbingen excavation started. The
uppermost preserved features excavated by the Tbingen team date to Troy VIIa. They comprise several floors, an open fireplace, two pits in the northeast part, 412 and a bothros leaning
to the curved wall. 413
Room K
Room K was excavated by Drpfeld and its remnants had completely vanished by the time
the excavations were resumed by the Tbingen team (Pl. 4).
Drpfelds photo shows an interruption in the southern wall of Room K (Pl. 73.B). Although a doorway can be expected here, no upright door lintels were found here as opposed to
other rooms, and no door symbol appears in Drpfelds plan. Either it was destroyed by a
later disturbance, similar to those documented for Room B and Room G or the entrance was
in the west wall.
Room K seems to have been the last in a row of rooms on the north side of Street 751. A
paving to its west and to its south appears on Drpfelds plan. It must have been a corner
house in a place where two streets were meeting. The street on the west side of Room K continued inside the citadel. 414
N O R TH E A S T B A S TIO N (T O WE R VI G , S Q U A R E K4)
Well Bb inside the Northeast Bastion
An impressive structure designated as Felsbrunnen Bb (Rock-cut well Bb) was discovered by Drpfeld inside the Northeast Bastion (Tower VIg) 415 during the 1894 season. 416 It
412
Beh. E8.699 should somewhat precede the second pit E8.643.
413
Beh. E8.654, 724, 755, 758, 766.
414
Drpfeld Photo No. 291, 350.
415
The term bastion is preferred in this report instead of tower since it describes architectonically better
the fortification protrusion where the back walls are missing (cf. Klinkott 2004, 34).
[113]
was interpreted as a well, partly built of massive walls and partly cut deep into the calcareous
bedrock (Pl. 2, 75.A, 75.B).
The date of the latest regular use of Well Bb could not be ascertained since its bottom was
not reached by Drpfeld. The Tbingen team decided to complete the excavation of the well
below Drpfelds level. The re-opened sounding was expected to yield results illuminating
the water supply system of Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age Troy and the latest use of the
spectacular feature. It was also hoped that wooden and textile objects survived in the deepest
levels. 417
Analysis presented here suggests that Well Bb was a closed tholos-like structure with a
dromos tunnel and a rounded chamber covered by a vault. 418 After the well went out of use, it
was gradually filled with settlement refuse up to the dromos door level. 419 Whether this process started in Troy VIIb2 or earlier it cannot be answered unless the well is excavated to its
very bottom in the future. The accumulation of refuse certainly lasted until the Protogeometric
period, when it also stopped, as we know from Drpfeld. 420
It was assumed that the spectacular dimensions of the structure (c. 4.25 x 4.25 m wide),
coupled with its high walls and clayish packing behind, could imply at least a complementary
function as a cistern for collecting rain water. 421 Whether or not this was the case, the presence of water-bearing layers in the rock proves convincingly a primary function as a well, in
line with the original arguments of Drpfeld. Drpfeld at the same time suggested a likely
explanation for the unusual size of the structure, which seems to have been dictated by a desire to accumulate substantial quantities of water. 422 Water infiltrated into the shaft also during the excavations of the Tbingen team in the summers of 1997 and 1998. 423 The bottom of
the well turned out to be at 13 m.a.s.l., making the well even deeper than Drpfeld ex-
416
Drpfeld 1902, 144-51, Abb. 51-54, Beilage 22.
417
Korfmann 1998, 45.
418
I came to this conclusion indepently from Dieter Hertel, who published it recently (Hertel 2008b).
419
The deposits excavated by the Tbingen team are likely fill of the already abandoned well with refuse from
the citadel. These deposits yielded distinct pottery assemblage of Troy VIIb2 date, although some additional care
needs to be applied, as will be explained below.
420
Cf. the paragraphs about the uppermost deposits in the well, p. 126 ff.
421
Korfmann 1998, 44, 48; Klinkott 2004, 36, Footnote 10.
422
Drpfeld 1902, 146.
423
At a level of 16.90 m a.s.l.
[114]
pected. 424 The well shaft needed to have been cut eleven meters into the rock, whereas an
additional five meters of stone wall stood above it, making together an impressive sixteen
meters for Well Bb.
The shaft excavated by Drpfeld was found with its greater part already filled in at the time
of Blegens excavation. Blegen cleared away the accumulated debris inside the tower, but he
could not continue with the excavation of the well. 425 It is not stated in the final publication of
the Cincinnati expedition which part of the well was cleared and how deep a level was
reached.
When the excavations inside of the well were recommenced in 1997 by the Tbingen team,
Drpfelds sounding, Blegens clearing operations, and the accumulated backfill could not
have been distinguished from any original strata that might have survived (Pl. 77.A, 77.B).
Drpfelds published report,
426
with its plan and cross-section of the entire structure, 427 as
well as Drpfelds field notebook, 428 all give the impression that the whole width of the well
424
See p. 118 for more details.
425
In the course of our work we cleared away the rubbish and debris that had accumulated inside the tower
together with a considerable amount of lush vegetation and many briars; but like our predecessors we were unable to complete the excavation of the well or cistern, Bb, to its very bottom. A good deal of earth and many
stones had fallen into the pit, filling greater part of the shaft that Drpfeld had once opened; and the lofty bank of
earth and loose stone walls overhanging the area on the west, threatening the safety of our workmen, made deeper digging inadvisable without an elaborate system of shoring and propping. (Blegen et al. 1953, 82-3).
426
E.g. An seiner engsten Stelle hat der Brunnen im Felsen eine Breite von 4,25 m im Quadrat, oben und un-
ten ist er noch ein wenig breiter. (Drpfeld 1902, 145).

427
The plans (Drpfeld 1902, Fig. 51, 52) show the limits of the well in continuous border lines which sug-
gests that they were unearthed in their entire size. This contrasts with the Troy VI framing wall whose borders
appear on the plan mostly with a dashed line. Drpfeld also depicts a cross-section of the bastion and the well
(Drpfeld 1902, Fig. 53) and writes that the well at its narrowest point is 4,25 m wide, whereas underneath and
above it was somewhat wider, so he clearly must have exposed at least parts of the opposing sides.
428
Die groe Cisterne im Thurm VIg wird nach Norden erweitert und stellt sich als ein Quadrat heraus.
(Drpfeld 1894b, 47). Drpfeld refers on several occasions in relation with the excavation of Northeast Bastion
to the field notebook of Hermann Winnefeld. This notebook is, however, not included with Drpfelds materials
in the Central Archive of the DAI at Berlin and neither we could find any trace of it in other institutions (negative evidence comes from Zentralarchiv der Staatlichen Museen zu Berlin, Archiv des Museums fr Vor- und
Frhgeschichte, Gymnasium Wuppertal, Stadtarchiv berlingen. No answers came from the Archives of the
DAI at Athens and Rome.) I would like to express my gratitude to the archivists Uta Dirschedl (DAI Berlin),
Barbara Gtze (Staatliche Museen zu Berlin), Horst Junker (Museums fr Vor- und Frhgeschichte Berlin) and
Walter Liehner (Stadtarchiv berlingen) for their responses to my querries.
[115]
was excavated in 1894, to the level of 17.82 m where Drpfeld stopped. 429 On the other
hand, no change was observed in the fill below and above the level reached by Drpfeld during the Tbingen excavations. The pottery from the new excavations was also remarkably
consistent and with the exception of the uppermost units, completely devoid of any sherds
later than the Troy VIIb2 phase. This excludes an option of a refill from the overhanging,
slowly disintegrating profiles. 430
If Drpfeld uncovered the well in its entire area down to the level he stated and the whole
fill excavated by the Tbingen team is a result of post-excavation processes, how could the
assemblage be so consistent? Theoretically, the well might have been refilled by Drpfeld
with the same earth that was produced during its excavation or that originated from the neighboring Troy VIIb2 houses in the citadel. 431 But the high density of the sherds and the presence
of big diagnostic, sometimes even joining, pieces speak against any intentional backfill with
excavation dump.
This apparent discrepancy can perhaps be explained with one of the unpublished photographs from the 1894 season. The photograph shows steps or a ramp along the inner face of
the northwest framing wall of the well. 432 This ramp was needed in order to overcome serious
logistic difficulties with accessing and excavating the well in Drpfelds times and also in
order to prevent the poorly preserved northern framing wall from collapsing. The northwest
and northeast parts of the framing wall also do not appear on the plans prepared by Drpfeld,
although they became visible in the time of the Tbingen excavations (Pl.78.A, 78.B, 78.C).
Their absence on the plans implies that these parts were not uncovered in the time of
Drpfeld.
With all the information currently at our disposal, we concluded that the well deposits under
the ramp must have been left untouched by Drpfeld, otherwise the consistent character of the
pottery cannot be sufficiently explained. The quantity of the pottery, the cess residue covering
many sherds, the absence of sherds later than Troy VIIb2, the existence of joins with old
breaks and the presence of many big bones are the points against any intentional or unintentional backfill of an earlier sounding. The ceramic assemblage fits for what would be expected
429
Due to the danger of collapse Drpfeld used an iron rod to test through the mud layer and believed to have
found the bottom 1.5 m deeper, at 16.47 m a.s.l. (Drpfeld 1902, 145, Fig. 51).
430
The strata in the profiles above Well Bb contained painted Archaic and later sherds in big numbers. None
of these later types was discovered inside the well.

431
Squares JK-5.
432
Drpfeld Photo No. 542.
[116]
to be a refuse deposit in a former well, with its wet and aggressive milieu of a calcareous
background combined with thrown away organic waste.
In our understanding, the Tbingen excavations inside the rock-cut shaft were undertaken in
a largely undisturbed area but parts of some excavations units might have been contaminated
by the backfill. The division lines between the backfill and the original strata are not clear.
Given all the insecurities, the presentation of the material from Well Bb is offered with maximum emphasis on location of excavation units to make potential future reinterpretations easier (Pl. 2 and 3).
Drpfeld certainly excavated the south part of the well up to the deepest level reached by
him. 433 The excavation units of the Tbingen team were divided into several soundings areas,
designated here as A1, A2, A3, B and C (Pl. 2). 434 Sounding A1 and B stretch considerably
into the southern half of the well and there is a high probability of their contamination by the
backfill. 435 On the other hand, soundings A2, A3, and C are limited to the northern part of the
well and they might have been either completely or at least a substantial part covered by the
ramp and thus left untouched.
I have compared the character of the assemblages among the soundings in relation with the
growing depth, in order to disclose any irregularities that might differentiate the original strata
from the backfill. Essentially, a comparison can be produced in terms of wares, shapes and
sherd density. No big differences have been discovered in terms of ware composition. Also
the analysis of sherd density did not lead to unequivocal results (Pl. 11). It shows considerable
variations with depth. There is no clear difference between Soundings A2 and B, although B
should have been contaminated by the backfill to a significant degree.
The pottery from the cistern will be presented here in artificial groups defined by major features in the structure (water-bearing layers, framing wall, level reached by Drpfeld). No natural stratification has been observed by the excavators. The pottery makes an impression that
it took some time until the well was filled with the settlement debris up to the uppermost level. It looks like a gradual accumulation. There are not many earlier sherds, not many joins, the
sherds are often heavily covered by cess-residue. Many seem to have suffered from the ag-
433
The only position inside Well Bb (bedrock at 16.47 m a.s.l.) in his plan is located to the southwest corner.
434
Soundings A2 and A3 are step-like continuations of Sounding A in a reduced area as the depth increased.
435
Although in the case of Sounding B no contamination could be proved ceramically. The sounding is deeper
than the level reached when the Drpfeld photograph was taken, so there is a certain probability that the ramp
became wider lower down and thus even the deposits in Sounding B might be largely untouched.
[117]
gressive environment in the cistern which probably invoked changes of their surface (worn
effects) and in the color (all of them show lighter tones than the standard wares from other
areas of the site).
Well Deposits under the Level Reached by Drpfeld (16.90-17.50/70 m a.s.l.)

Drpfeld excavated the well until the level of 17.82 m a.s.l. and then used an iron rod to
find out the remaining depth. He reported a rock bottom to have been found at 16.47 m
a.s.l., under a mud deposit. The Tbingen team went deeper than 17.82 m in order to acquire
material from levels securely untouched by Drpfeld.
From a level of c. 17.50 m a.s.l. the well fill became yet more waterlogged and clayish then
above, but no real change in comparison to the deposits from higher elevations was observed.
At the level of 16.90 m a.s.l. several bigger stones were noted, under which the water was
leaking out rather quickly. 436 It might have been this stone layer that Drpfeld reached with
his iron rod test some forty centimeters deeper in the southwest corner. The regular excavation of the Tbingen team stopped at 16.70 m. a.s.l. An augur was employed to penetrate below. The augur-probe made it clear that deposits under 16.30 m a.s.l. are extremely liquid.
It signaled a bottom much deeper than expected at 13.00 m a.s.l. Due to logistic and security
considerations the project of excavating the well until its very end was abandoned and left for
future generations. 437
The sherds are small to medium-sized, some of them are covered with cess-residue. 438 All of them
seem to have become lighter in color and somewhat soapy in consequence of their long deposition
in the humid setting. The assemblage does not show any significant differences when compared to the
deposits from higher levels, except for a slightly augmented proportion of Anatolian Grey Ware and
Tan Ware and less Troy VIIb wares. Some of the handmade sherds are decorated with finger imprints.
No decorated examples of Handmade Lustrous Ware, so common in the deposits above, have been
found here, although the category is clearly represented. Their absence might be rather conditioned by
a relatively small number of sherds in the deposit. If the density of sherds is compared with the level
above, a sharp drop cannot be overlooked. Whereas the level reached by Drpfeld produced 101,42 up
436
Korfmann 1998, 47.
437
Korfmann 1999, 19.
438
Beh. K4.761, 938, 952.
[118]
to 467,74 sherds per m3, the two lowermost excavation units of the Tbingen team yielded only 30,85
and 33,33 sherds per m3 respectively (Pl. 11). This dramatic change is probably to be interpreted by the
presence of big stones in the deposits that reduced the volume of sherd-containing earth fill.
Dominating group in the assemblage.

A. Few remains of bowls, deep bowls and carinated bowls.
B. Jug of B25 type 733.
B or C. Ring-bases from non-classifiable closed-shaped vessels 732, 735, 736.
C. Body sherds from kraters, one with a horizontal ridge on shoulder.
TAN WARE
All sherds considerably paler than usual variants. The slip is in several instances hardly visible.
A. Bowl of A49 type.
C. Body sherd from a krater with horizontal groove. A big part of a base from a C61 piriform jar
734.
UNKNOWN WARES
One rim of a trefoil jug 737.

Rather numerous group.

A. Cup 745.
C. Remains of an undecorated barrel-shaped jar 738 and several other jars decorated with finger imprints 742, 743, 744. The ear-shaped lug handle 741 also belongs to this vessel category.
Considerably smaller group than the previous one.

A. Cup with a vertical handle 746.
B. Flat base of a small juglet 740.
C. Rim sherd from a bigger jar 739, a sherd with an unusual flattened rounded knob 747 belonging
to some bigger vessel and a sherd from a jar decorated with oblong knobs 748.
PITHOI
Several body sherds, some of them with raised flat and broad bands.
[119]
Second Water-Bearing Layer and the Level Reached by Drpfeld (17.50/70-18.40 m

a.s.l.)
Two water-bearing layers have been identified by the Tbingen team. The first (upper one)
at 20.10-19.70 m and the second (lower one) at 18.40-18.20 m a.s.l. 439 Both are used as division lines for grouping the excavation units in this report. Drpfeld stopped excavating only
shortly underneath the second water-bearing layer and for this reason the corresponding excavation units were included into the same group. Keeping in mind the insecurities concerning
the extent of Drpfelds excavation, this could be the lowermost level contaminated by the
backfill of Drpfelds sounding.
The fill was very moist and sludgy. It contained many sherds, big animal bones, irregular
stones and a lot of charcoal fragments. With the growing depth the presence of charcoal diminished. Between 18.20 and 17.90 m, burnt wood cladding still attached to the sides of the
well has been observed. As noted in preliminary publication, this attests to the existence of a
wooden internal structure which, at the time the well was filled up, was still damp enough not
to rot.
440
It is worth noting that Drpfeld also refers in his field notebook to big pieces of
wood inside the well, in the lowermost deposits that he reached. 441
The pottery assemblage consists mostly of smaller and medium-sized sherds, with the exception of a
number of fairly big pithos sherds.
442
The sherd density is highest in this level compared to all the
others.
A. Cup with a vertical handle 749. Carinated A93 bowls as 751, 752 and a ring-base of another bowl
750.
B. One worn fragment of a flask 764.
439
Korfmann 1999, 19.
440
Korfmann 1999, 19.
441
Die Vertiefung der Fels-Cisterne im Turme Vig wird bis zu einer Tiefe von 6 m unter die Oberkante des
Felsens fortgesetzt. Unten wird jetzt feuchte Erde (Schlamm) gefunden. Darin groe Stcke Holz, ein sicherer
Beweis dafr, da der Brunnen mit Holz berdeckt war. Eine weitere Vertiefung erscheint mir zu gefhrlich. Ich
constatirte daher mit einer Eisenstange, da der Felsboden noch etwa 1.3 m tiefer liegt. Die Arbeit wird hier
eingestellt. Drpfeld 1894b, 62.
442
Beh. K4.736, 930, 934.
[120]
B or C. Vertical jug handle from a smaller juglet 753 and a vertical handle from a jug or jar 754 decorated with incised signs. Lower belly with signs of detached (?) ring base 757.
C. Fragments of several kraters and jars. Some of them decorated with incised horizontal and wavy
lines as 758, 760, 761, others without decoration as 759 and one uncatalogued shoulder fragment.
Horizontal handle 763 and ring base 762 also belong to this category.
TAN WARE
Few sherds.
A. Ring base of a bowl.
B. Jug fragment 755. The only other diagnostic sherd is a vertical handle from a fairly big jug or
amphora.
Few coarse sherds were evidently produced on a fast wheel.

C. Jar or cooking pots 765, 766 and 768 are the best preserved representatives of this group. They
represent the type of coarse vessels with everted rims and disc-shaped or ring bases. These are rather
unusual for Troy VIIb deposits. Their fabric is different from the Gritty Ware of Troy VI/VIIa. It is
semi-coarse and compact. The fragment with a lug handle 767 can be also counted in this ware category, although it departs even more from the standard coarse wares of Troy VI/VIIa.
The biggest group, but the material is rather fragmentarily preserved.

C. Fragments of jars decorated with finger imprints or blade incisions 778, 777, 779. The lug handle
780 might have originated from the same vessel as 743 from the deposit lying beneath. Undecorated
jars are also represented.
Smaller group than the previous one, but with fine examples.
A. Elbow handle 769 from a bigger bowl decorated with fluting. Small fragment of a cup decorated
with vertical fluting and with incisions 773. Fragments from bigger bowls decorated with channeling
and with incised decoration 770, 772.
B. Probably a jug fragment 776.
C. Fragment of a jar or an amphora decorated with a knob encircled by an incised band filled with
criss-cross hatching 774. Jar with horizontal handles 771 and a flat base of a jar 775.
PLAIN WARES
Small group of mostly worn sherds of beige, orange and reddish colors.
[121]
PITHOI
Numerous sherds. Some of them decorated with raised flat bands.

UNKNOWN FABRIC
C. Fragment of a rim with spout from a closed-shape fine ware vessel 756 produced in an unusual
fabric, unknown from other Troy VIIb contexts at the site.
First Water-Bearing Layer (18.40-19.90 m a.s.l.)

The first water-bearing layer (the uppermost one) was detected in the rock between 20.1019.70 m a.s.l. The earth became gradually moister with the growing depth and was mixed
with stones and charcoal. Along with substantial quantities of pottery, a number of large animal bones were present in the fill. 443 From the level of 19.10 a considerably smaller area than
before has been excavated in order to speed up the work (Pl. 3, 11).
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 107.C)
A rather big and consistent assemblage. 444 Its composition shows little if any statistical
change in comparison with the previous one. Majority of the sherds are small to middle sized,
but several large sherds were present.
A. Examples of BS A71 skyphoi 783, 784. Other bowls are represented mostly only in the form of
their ring bases. Best preserved were 792 and 792.
B. Several fragments belonging to jugs and amphoras. The best preserved are 785, 786, 787 and 788.
Ring bases 790 and 795 also belong to the same category. Several vertical handles.
C. Amphoriskos 789. Krater with horizontal handles 790, and decorated jar 796. Ring base of
a fairly big jar 793 and a flat base of a jar or jug 800.
TAN WARE
Small group with few diagnostic pieces.

A. Two rim sherds of shallow bowls.
B. Rim sherds and long vertical handle from jugs. One example 781 is catalogued.
443
Korfmann 1998, 47.
444
K4.702,711,921,926.
[122]
Typical Troy VI/VIIa coarse wares with gritty fabric are practically non-existent. The few examples
of this group belong to semicoarse, rather compact fabric.
C. Cooking pot 798 and a strainer 798 (although its presence in this category is arbitrary). The
example 797 is decorated with a wavy line. Its presence in the Troy VIIb deposits is so far unique.
Rather numerous group, although not as numerous as the Handmade Burnished Ware.
A. Fragments of cups 803, 805, 808 and large bowls 810, 811, 812, 813, 814 with channeled and
incised decoration. Very unusual are a bowl 804 with a lip decorated by facetting and a deep bowl 806
combining incised decoration of concentric circles connected with tangents on the flattened lip and
stamped false-cord decoration under the rim.
A-C. Decorated and undecorated handles 807, 809 which belonged to cups, big bowls or jugs.
B. Flat base of a jug 815.
C. Big jars with horizontal handles 816, 817, 818. Rim of an undecorated jar 820. One fragment of
a handle from BS C84 amphora 819.
Most numerous ware group.

C. Jars decorated with finger imprints 822, 823, 826, 827, 830 and oblique blade incisions 820. Jar
832 decorated with an oblong vertical knob. Lug handles from jars in oval 828, horn-like 829, 831,
824 and horseshoe-like 821 shape.
EARLIER WARES
Probably a single sherd 802 which might be a residual piece from Troy I.
UNKNOWN FABRIC
Flat, slightly offset bottom of a jug or jar 801 which might be an import from Cyprus.
Upper Part of the Rock-Cut Shaft (19.90-24.17 m a.s.l.)

The pottery is catalogued separately for Sounding A2 and for Sounding B, due to differences that were to be expected according to their exposure to possible contamination.
Fallen stones were present in the deposit in Sounding A2, their number however decreased
with growing depth. At the same time the moisture of the earth fill increased. Harder and softer layers have been observed in the rock, parts of which broke off and necessitated further
security propping. An area, ten to twenty cm thick next to the northwest side of Sounding A2
[123]
demonstrated a harder composition than the rest of the fill. If this were the part unexcavated
by Drpfeld, than the majority of the excavated area would be backfill, which contradicts the
character of the pottery assemblage.
The deposits in Sounding B were also mixed with big fallen stones, in some areas with
mudbrick pieces and charcoal fragments. In the upper parts a few, but large animal bones
have been noted and became more numerous lower down. One stone was covered by charred
and uncharred wood. 445
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE FROM SOUNDING A2 (PL. 107.D)
Some differentiation is necessary even inside this group. The uppermost part of the deposit was contaminated by the backfill of the former Drpfelds sounding, although according to the pottery record
only on a very limited scale. 446 The rest of the deposit was consistent, devoid of Post Bronze Age
sherds and was characterized by the dominance of handmade coarse wares and Knobbed ware
sherds. 447 The majority of sherds are medium sized, although fairly large pieces are not exceptional.
A. Cup with a slightly protruding knob 833 that seems to imitate Knobbed Ware decoration scheme.
Shallow bowl 842.
B. Rim of a flask 839 with a handle attachment. Jug or similar smaller closed-shaped vessel 834
decorated with small round knobs. Amphora rim 835 and belly handled amphora of C84 type 840.
C. Jar or alabastron 838 with a tunnel-like handle on shoulder, jar with a facetted rim 836, undecorated krater 841 and a number of ring bases 843, 844, 845, 846.
D. Fragment of a D45 stand 837.
TAN WARE
Small group with few diagnostic sherds, mostly jugs.

B. Neck, rim and handle fragments from jugs. One example is catalogued as 847.
One sherd from a semi coarse, fairly compact cooking pot 848.
445
From Beh. K4.912.
446
Beh. K4.677 contained three PBA sherds - Roman and Byzantine.
447
Beh. K4.681, 687, 696.
[124]
A. Very unusual is a shallow bowl fragment 841 that seems to imitate the wheelmade shape. Fragments of cup and big bowls decorated with channeling 850, 853, 854 and with incised motifs 851.
C. Fragments of jars or amphoras decorated with knobs and with stamped decoration 855, 855, 857,
858, 851. One C85 jar fragment with an unusually angular handle 860.
C. Fragments of jars decorated with finger imprints as 861. Jar 859 seems to combine finger imprints
shortly below the rim with flat oblong vertical knobs on the shoulder.
EARLIER WARES
A small group of small, mostly worn sherds with earlier fabric.

C. Jar 862 is not worn, but its decoration does not have parallels in other Troy VIIb deposits whereas
it is reminiscent of the Troy I style. Jar 862 with its organic tempering is likely a residual piece from
Troy II-V.
PITHOI
Substantial group with many large sherds. Some decorated with a simple raised band, others 864,
865 with double wavy lines impressed by fingers.
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE FROM SOUNDING B (PL. 107.E)
Sounding B is situated along the middle part of the east side of the shaft (Pl. 2, 3). It passes clearly
into the south half of the shaft, into the area that is likely to have been excavated by Drpfeld. Interestingly, the composition of the assemblage does not show any substantially diverging characteristics
from the others (Pl. 11). 448 It means that either these deposits were largely undisturbed or all the others
were disturbed too, even if cannot be proven from the ceramic evidence.
Sounding B has the lowest proportion of Grey Wares from all the well deposits, although the drop is
not dramatic. The difference between Sounding A2 and B amounts to ten percent.
A. Few fragments of bowls, among them a large basin 866, probably a shallow bowl 867 and one of
the types with a raised ring base 866. One or two BS A71 skyphos fragments.
B. Handle from a jug 869.
448
Beh. K4.902, 904, 906, 908, 912, 917.
[125]
TAN WARE
Few and nondiagnostic examples.

Small group, almost none with typical gritty fabric.

C. Fragment of a cooking pot 871.
Few examples, rarely decorated.

B or C. Jar or amphora with incised horizontal lines 879.
C. Jar of undefined shape 874, jar decorated with finger imprints 878, and a jar with an unusual oblong vertical knob under the rim 882. Two vertical handle fragments 877 and 876, one of them decorated with fluting.
Framing Wall and the Hollow Vault (24.17-24.41 m)

According to Drpfeld, Well Bb was framed by a broad rectangular wall made of large
stones in Troy VI times, and by a thinner, slightly rounded wall made of small stones in the
Troy VII period. 449 The results of the Tbingen excavation suggest that the earlier framing of
the well predates somewhat the erection of the Northeast bastion itself, although both structures were built in the Troy VI period. 450
Only little has survived from the earlier wall and the published rectangular reconstruction 451
is not without alternatives. 452 The differentiation between the two phases is easiest on the east
where the later rounded wall abuts the massive earlier wall (Pl. 77.A). On the south and on the
north the preserved remains do not allow any clear differentiation. 453 The exterior part of the
west wall was not excavated deeply enough.
Parts of the later rounded framing wall were preserved up to five meters high. They demonstrate a slight vault-like inclination inside with a finished faade inside; the outer part being
only a fill of rubble stones and earth. 454 A tunnel-like entryway was preserved on the west, to
enable access directly from the citadel.
449
Drpfeld 1902, 145.
450
Korfmann 1998, 48.
451
Drpfeld 1902, Figs. 51, 52; recently Klinkott 2004, Tafel 1-4: Bb 1 Bb 2 Bb 3.
452
It might have been part of an earlier fortification system, a predecessor to the Northeast bastion.
453
No masonry seams have been observed.
454
Klinkott 2004, 36-37.
[126]
Drpfeld supposed that the framing walls of the well supported in both its phases a roof,
without offering any further details. 455 There are reasons to believe that Well Bb was covered
by a vault in Troy VII times. The evidence comes from unpublished Drpfelds photographs
and field notebooks where an extraordinary hollow vault-like feature is documented directly
above the place where Well Bb later came to light (Pl. 75.E, Pl. 76.C, 76.D). 456 The likeliest
explanation for the formation of the hollow space is the existence of a vault-like roof that collapsed at some point.457 The well was presumably filled up through the dromos doorway up to
the entrance level. The remaining space under the roof could not have been comfortably filled
and would have stayed empty until the roof collapsed. The roof needs to have been covered
by earth and this hardened layer package held through the ages, leaving a negative imprint of
a former vault.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 107.F, G)
The hollow vault-like space above the Well Bb proves that there was no disturbance from above into
the underlying deposits, which can be considered effectively sealed. Schmidt described the pottery
from the uppermost levels of the Well Bb as frh-geometrisch which occurred evidently side-byside with the Knobbed Ware and differed clearly from the fine Geometric pottery typical for the level
455
ber den oberen Abschluss des Brunnenschachtes sind wir nicht unterrichtet. Ich vermute, dass die ihn
oben einfassenden Mauern sowohl in der VI., als auch in der VII. Schicht ber die entsprechenden Fussbden
hinausgefhrt waren und ein zur berdeckung des Brunnens angelegtes Dach trugen. (Drpfeld 1902, 147).
456
Im Inneren des groen N.O. Turmes VIg wird in die Tiefe gegraben, es kommt in greren Tiefe (s. Oben
S. 6) nur noch entwickelte troische Topfwaare vor. Die der VII Schicht angehrige Mauer c (aus kleinen Steinen
erbaut) ist noch 2 m hoch erhalten. Um sie ganz aufzudecken wird ein Stck der Quadermauer d abgebrochen.
Bei a kommt eine gut erhaltene, aus regelmssigen Steinen erbaute Ecke der Burgmauer zum Vorschein. Vermutlich steigt dort die Treppe, die zum Innern der Burg fhrt hinauf. Ganz merkwrdig ist ein etwa 4m im
Durchmesser messender Hohlraum, der bei b zu Tage tritt. Der Raum ist kuppelfrmig mit Erde berdeckt. Es
mu unten im Innern des Turmes ein berdeckter Hohlraum zusammengestrzt sein und die darber liegenden
Schuttmassen sind nachgestrzt, bis sie sich in Form einer Kuppel gehalten haben. ber diesen Hohlraum liegt
der unterirdische Gang, in den die griech. Treppe oben ausluft. (Drpfeld 1894b, 14).
457
Drpfeld (1894b, 39) interpreted in his field notebook the hollow space as a result of the collapse of north
and east walls: Die N. Und O. Seite der Cisterne ist eingestrzt. Daher der ganze Raum mit Steinen und Erde
angefllt. Dadurch da die Steine zusammengesunken sind, scheint sich der Hohlraum gebildet zu haben, der
oben S. 14 erwhnt ist. The vault-like shape of the hollow space is too regular to be a result of an ordinary wall
collapse, it implies a vault-like structure. Whether it was a corbelled vault made of stones or a dome made from
less durable materials (wood combined with wattle-and-daub or mudbricks), specialist archictects need to decide.
(For the idea about possible use of organic material I owe my thanks to Dr. Elisabeth Riorden.)
[127]
above. 458 From his description of the frh-geometrisch it is clear that this was the type that we call
Protogeometric pottery. Drpfeld was very specific about the occurrence of Protogeometric pottery
already in his field notebook. 459
Even in the limited and contaminated deposits that were excavated by the Tbingen team inside the
area defined by framing wall, painted Protogeometric amphora fragments were found. 460 In addition to
Protogeometric pottery, the uppermost excavation units contained Knobbed Ware, but also Archaic
and Classical sherds. 461 Due to the high probability of contamination, no overview of the assemblage
was attempted, only the most significant pieces were selected and catalogued as Nos. 883-888.
A R E A O U TS ID E G A TE VIU (A7 E A S T )
New structures were built in Troy VIIb2 times atop the burnt layer. These included House
791, House 792 and House 792 Annex. Wall 793 dated by Blegen to Troy VIIb2 times is definitely a later, late Geometric or Archaic structure. 462
House 791
This building was discovered during Blegens excavation. Already in the preliminary report
Blegen noticed that the building is peculiar and not clearly understood, with few Knobbed
Ware sherds being found. The majority of the pottery consisted of Grey and Tan wares and
Blegen accordingly concluded that the house should date to Troy VIIb1, 463 yet in the final
report it is stated that the building belongs to VIIb2. 464 It was the general architectural plan
and the use of orthostates, not the pottery that supported the dating. No floors have been iden-
458
H. Schmidt in Drpfeld 1902, 297-303.
459
Die Grabung im Innern des Thurmes VIg wid fortgesetzt. Es zeigt sich ein runder Bau, der aus flachen
Steinen in unregelmssiger Weise erbaut ist. Anfangs fr ein regelmiges Rund von c. 5,60m Durchmesser
gehalten, stellt es sich bei grerer Tiefgrabung als Viereck mit abgerundeten Ecken heraus. Bedeutung noch
unbekannt. Im Inneren werden nicht nur entwickelt troische, sondern namentlich viele bemalte geometrische
Scherben gefunden (vergl. Winnefelds Tagebuch). Der Bau ist also in Schicht VII noch benutzt worden und
stammt wahrscheinlich aus dieser Schicht. Drpfeld 1894b, 34.
460
Beh. K4.629 and K4.674.
461
Beh. K4.674.
462
See p. 203ff for details.
463
Blegen 1937, 588.
464
Blegen et al. 1958, 241-3.
[128]
tified (except the stone pavements in Rooms 4 and 12) and the fill of the small rooms was so
badly mixed that Blegen omitted the catalogue. Knobbed ware was found together with sherds
of Troy II-V, VI, VII, and VIII, including a considerable number of Hellenistic ones. 465
This high degree of mixing is somewhat surprising since at least a part of the building was
covered by House 850 (Geometric), which itself was covered by many early Archaic stone
paved circles and thus both should have been sealed. 466 It is probably explained by tight telescoping of layers to several centimeters 467 and by the presence of later intrusions, which had
disturbed some of the stone circles. 468 It is also not excluded that House 850 was originally
larger and that parts of it were cut away during later activities. 469
This confusing situation was confirmed by recent excavations, which although limited in
scale, led to the recovery of considerable numbers of earlier and later sherds. Only limited
differentiation was possible thanks to the identification of possible sources of disturbance.
The Tbingen activity concentrated on the removal of the backfill, on the restoration of the
collapsed south wall, and on the exposure of the previously unexcavated parts between
Rooms 1 and 3. The function of the complex is still not fully understood, but the cells make
an impression of being a cellar storey of an otherwise unpreserved building, designed for
storage purposes. 470 Similar facilities have been uncovered in other areas of the site, abutting
the outer face of the Troy VI Citadel Wall.
Walls and Floors ( 26.00-26.20 m)
The south wall was found partly collapsed in 1996 (Pl. 37.B-37.D). The clearing operations
undertaken by the Tbingen team in House 791 uncovered stone pavement floors in Rooms 1
and 2 (Pl. 37.E, 38.A, 39.A). It was a surprising discovery, since Blegen documents no pavement for these two rooms. Most of the deposit above the pavement was fill that had eroded
into the area after the Blegen excavations, and it was not possible to separate the eroded fill
465
466
For details of stratigraphy and pottery about House 850 and the stone circles see Basedow and Aslan, forth-
coming.
467
The floor of House 850 was 30 centimeters above preserved top of House 791 and the stone circles were
immediately over the walls of House 850. See Blegen et al. 1958, 242, 273, Fig. 167.
468
E.g. Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 369.
469
Indications can be seen in Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 168.
470
See Becks 2006, ch. 4.2.2.3.
[129]
from any potential original cultural strata. As a result no secure information can be gained
from the deposit above the pavement.
Deposits to the west of House 791 ( 25.56-27.18 m)
A very limited area in the form of a thin strip was excavated along the walls of House 791 in
order to disclose them and at the same time to avoid removing the rest of the Roman Grandstand. 471 The pottery assemblage contained numerous sherds later than Troy VIIb. The PBA
material seems to date primarily to the Geometric and Archaic periods. 472 Since these later
sherds continued to be found almost down to the level of the foundations of House 791, the
west wall of House 792 was in all likelihood still visible after the end of Troy VIIb and it
might have been adapted as a retaining wall for the terrace in front of the Troy VI citadel
wall. 473
House 792 ( 26.10-26.63 m)

At the beginning of the renewed excavations, Wall 792 was no longer preserved but two
orthostate walls forming a corner were found immediately to the east of it (Pl. 40.A-40.E).
Blegen had not excavated them. Wall 792 was the northwest wall of evidently the same house
to which the newly discovered corner belonged. 474 All these structures are therefore referred
to here as House 792.
The room defined by the preserved corner seems to have possessed a stone-paved floor
(Pl. 37.B, 39.D). No other habitation horizons were ascertained in the preserved layers. The
orthostate walls were most probably at least partially cut into earlier strata in order to hold the
vertically set stones. The layers below the pavement, but within the house thus presumably
represent the construction level. The pottery assemblage contains sherds found between the
pavement and the foundation of the orthostate walls, as well as sherds found within the matrix
of the walls themselves when they were dismantled.
471
Beh. A7.1110, A7.1123, A7.1134, A7.1136, A7.1138, A7.1140, A7.1142.
472
The latest sherds from the uppermost excavation unit were attributed to Hellenistic and Early Roman peri-
ods (notes from the primary processing of A7.1110 by the PBA team). Their presence can be explained by vicinity to the foundations of the Grandstand.
473
See the passage Geometric Terrace Wall (26.00-26.50 and 26.80-27.20 m), p. 201.
474
See Becks 2006, ch. 3.1.1.1.6.3 for further details and plans.
[130]
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 102.F)
It is somewhat surprising that so few sherds in Troy VIIb wares were found, only a small number of
undecorated body sherds were present. The vicinity to Blegens post-excavation surface is most probably responsible for a single, small, Hellenistic sherd found in the fill. 475 The composition of the assemblage looks similar to the Troy VIIa/b1 burnt layer, with the majority of the sherds being in Tan
and Brown Slip wares, followed by Anatolian Grey Ware and Troy VI coarse wares. 476 Somewhat
surprising is also the high percentage of earlier wares. All the sherds are rather fragmented and most of
them are worn. No decorated Troy VIIb sherds were found. This suggests that in the time when House
792 was constructed not many such sherds were around on the surface.
House 792 Annex (25.62-26.07 m)

A small wall has been discovered to the south of House 792, filling the space between the
house and the fortification wall of the Troy VI Citadel. It is referred to in this report as House
792 Annex, because it seems to have formed one unit with House 792. The Annex was covered by the same destruction debris as House 792 (Pl. 42.B, 42.D) and its final stage accordingly dates to the same phase as House 792 and supposedly also 791, even if the construction
technique is different. The construction date is not clear. The annex might have been built
earlier or added later. The designation Annex should not mislead in this sense.
The annex wall consists of a single row of equally broad flat stones, but originally it might
have been broader. The remaining part is lost because the wall lay at the border of a deep
Blegen sounding (Pl. 40.A, 40.C, 40.E). The surviving part is built of middle-sized irregular
stones placed horizontally in dry masonry style. Orthostates are, in contrast to Houses 791 and
792, completely missing. If there ever was any floor to the Annex, it must have been on west
side, of which nothing was left by the time of the Tbingen excavations. The Annex wall does
not abut House 792. There is a narrow opening between them, too narrow for a regular door.
It is flanked by bigger irregular stones on both sides (Pl. 40.A, 40.E). The function of this
opening and of the space delineated by the Annex could not be ascertained. Perhaps it was
some kind of auxiliary construction for animals.
Both House 792 and the Annex show a distinct incline towards the west (Pl. 40.B), invoking
an impression of masses of earth accumulated behind the walls pushing the stones or as if
some land-slide or earthquake disturbed the static of the walls.
475
From Beh. A7.885.
476
Beh. A7.885, 887, 889, 1249.
[131]
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 102.E)
This assemblage contains sherds found between and under the stones of House 792-Annex. 477 They
should represent the construction level of the Annex. Immediately under the Annex wall, the burnt
layer was encountered. The composition of the pottery looks almost identical to the burnt layer, with
the domination of Tan and Brown slip wares and few handmade Troy VIIb examples.
With one exception rather fragmented material.

A. Recognized shapes: deep bowl (A71), hemispherical bowl (A73), not specifiable bowl with flattened rim (like A47-51).
B. Two different jug fragments (B 25 or B26), the bigger one is catalogued as 889.
Only small body sherds.

EARLIER WARES
One plain ware plate fragment in Troy II style, the rest various fragmented worn body sherds. The
plain ware sherds were worn, likely residual and accordingly their proportion should be added to earlier wares on the chart.
A handful of fragmented body sherds, seemingly wheelmade. Coarse and gritty varieties.
Few handmade sherds with typical burnishing.

C. A fragment of a vertical handle (attribution to the ware group is not fully clear) and two jar rims
recognized. One jar rim is plain. The other, 890, is decorated with standard finger imprints on the rim
and with crescent-shape finger imprints on the shoulder. No raised band. It looks very similar to 311,
but because of its decoration it represents a different vessel.
One body sherd and one fragment of a vertical handle, probably from a cup, 891.
477
Beh. A7.1251.
[132]
B U ILD IN G S A D J O IN IN G T H E C ITA D E L WA L L IN D9
Certain modifications proved to be unavoidable concerning the Troy VIIb strata in D9.478
The Troy VIIb2 building consisted of small cells, similar to structures unearthed immediately
outside the Troy VI citadel wall in A7 and KL4. The only difference is, that the cells in D9
seem to form a single row of rooms, as opposed to more complex ground-plans from the east
and from the northwest parts of the citadel wall (Pl. 9).
Fill of the Troy VIIb cells

Four small rooms of what might have been a larger cell-building are defined on the north by
an orthostate wall leaning to the Troy VI citadel wall (Pl. 87.B) and on the south by a wall
showing through in several places below the Protogeometric terrace wall. 479 The cells are
divided by partition walls built in the orthostate manner (Pl. 87.A-87.E). The entire complex
was covered by a tumble of small stones leaning to a terrace wall, which is dated to the
Protogeometric period. 480
Only limited areas were excavated inside of Rooms 1, 2 and 3. Traces of stone pavements
appeared in Room 1 and possibly also in Room 2. The interior of Room 4 was not excavated.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 103.E,F,G)
The pottery from inside of the rooms is mostly worn and fragmented. 481
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Rims and ring bases of various bowls, e.g. 893, 897. A mug or a similar shape decorated with
multiple incised wavy and horizontal lines 892.
B. Jug 896.
C. Krater (?) 900 with an unusual perforation of the base.
478
Cf. p. 82 and 177.
479
See Jablonka in Korfmann 2001, Fig. 20.
480
See p. 177 ff.
481
Room 1: Beh. D9.1330, D9.1336, possibly also D9.1318, D9.1321, and D9.1324 (but these might have
been already partly corresponding with the destruction deposits above the building). Room 2: Beh. D9.1327,
D9.1339 and D9.1353 (partly perhaps already related with deposits above the room). Room 3: Beh. D9.1931,
1935, 1939.
[133]
TAN WARE
A. Bowl 895 and 901. The basket handle is rather typical for Troy VI Late and VIIa.
C. Jar 899 in Gritty ware from Room 2 and a number of fragments of a cooking pot in Wheelmade
Semi-coarse Ware in Room 3.
A. Fragment of a cup 894 decorated with channeling.

C. Fragment of a jar or amphora with massive horizontal handles.
C. Jars 898 and 905 decorated with finger imprints, jars without any preserved decoration 902, 903
and a jar 904 with radially running raised bands decorated with finger imprints.
PAINTED WARES
The pottery assemblage from the upper part of Room 1 contained two painted Mycenaean sherds.
There is one possible body sherd of a painted Protogeometric amphora in Room 2.
Deposits to the south of the cells

The fill of the cells is probably contemporary with the deposits accumulated on a slightly
lower elevation to the south of the cell building. The topography was sloping down and these
deposits are likely to represent remains of settlement activities during the life time of the cells.
Only a small part of the south wall of the cell-building was unearthed. The uppermost preserved course of stones lay 10-20 cm underneath the foundations of the Protogeometric terrace wall, at an elevation between 25.83-25.40. It had the same orientation as the
Protogeometric wall; both were running parallel to the Citadel wall of Troy VI.
Deposits below the level of the south wall are dated to Troy VIIa. Deposits at the foot of the
south wall are dated to Troy VIIb1. 482 It was not until the stone debris deposit near the preserved top of the south wall where the first clear examples of Handmade Lustrous Ware started to appear.
482
See p. 83.
[134]
The pottery is rather fragmented, only few bigger sherds were present. Hardly any joins. 483
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowls and deep bowls 906, 907, 910.

B. Jugs or amphoras 909, 912, 916, 917, 918, 919.
C. Closed shaped vessel 911. Jars 913, 914 (?). Krater (?) 915.
TAN WARE
Very small group.

C. Jug or cooking pot 920.

B. Cup or jug 934.

C. Jars 935, 936, 937, 938, 939, 940.
A. Cups 921, 922 and bowl 923. A number of elbow handles from cups or jugs 926, 927, 928, 929,
930.
B. Jug or cup 924.
C. Krater or amphora 925, 931, 933. Jar or amphora with horizontal handles 932.
Deposits covering the Troy VIIb2 cell rooms
The deposits laying above the south wall and beneath the Protogeometric terrace wall yielded many
fragments of Handmade Lustrous ware vessels. 484
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Cup or kylix 1176, bowls 1177, 1179.

C. Jug or jar 1175, jug or amphora 1178, jar 1180.
483
Beh. D9.3092, 3098.
484
Beh. D9.3076, 3082, 3084, 3086.
[135]
D. The protome from a stand (?) 1187 has an almost identical counterpart from much later layers
some four meters to the south and 3.5 meters higher. 485
TAN WARE
B. Jug or jar 1181.

A. Bowls 1182, 1188. Cups 1183, 1185. Cup or krater 1184.

C. Bowl or amphora 1186, 1189.
C. Jars 1190-1197.
S U R R O U N D IN G S O F T H E N O R TH -E A S T B A S TIO N (K4, K4/5, KL4, L4)

The first fragments of Troy VII walls outside of the North-East bastion were revealed by
Drpfeld (Pl. 85.D). 486 Excavations of the Tbingen team led to a discovery of a whole complex of small rooms from the Troy VIIb2 Period (Pl. 10). Whether the complex was a single
building as House 791 uncovered by Blegen in A7 or a series of small cells agglutinated
gradually into a bigger complex, cannot be decided since no clearly defined external walls
have been found in the excavated area.
Some rooms of the complex abut directly the stone walls of the bastion; others were attached to a massive mudbrick structure that was constructed in front of the bastion in Troy
VIIa times (Pl. 80.B, 83.D). 487 Still other walls, belonging perhaps to a separate building,
have been cut into the mudbrick structure from above. 488
485
D9.2225.1. For parallels see also Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 271:21 (found in the VIIb1 floor deposits in
House 761 in the neighbouring Square E9). Interestingly, another very similar piece was also found in E9 during
the Tbingen excavations (E9.400.5). It comes from a Blegens dump removal. Nonetheless, the dump in E9
accumulated over previously excavated areas from the collapsed pinnacle above it, so the matching piece clearly
came from the citadel area. Comparison of all four pieces shows that they were protomes in the shape of a stylized horse placed above the handle.
486
Published in plans Drpfeld 1902, Tafel III, VI.
487
It was built of clay and mudbrick put over a stone sockle. The mudbricks were not laid in ordinary masonry
fashion but put loosely, always in horizontal position, into the clayish packing. Some of them were evidently
deformed or fragmented already at the construction time. Occasionally, stones were also present in the fill.
488
See chapter Southwest House in front of Gate VIR (26.50-27.25 m), p. 151.
[136]
When the small cells of the Troy VIIb phase were built, the mudbrick structure was still
standing to a considerable height. An impressive water drain in the interior of the structure
(Pl. 81.C, 81.D) was evidently no more in use, since it was effectively blocked by the new
cell-building scheme.
The small cells were almost certainly cellars and they functioned primarily as storage facilities. Only in a single instance, in Room 12, a floor-like deposit with remains of a hearth and
broken kitchen pottery has been recovered. Some cells, if not all, were accessible only from
the upper storey, by means of a ladder. This is best seen in Room 4 with its high preserved
walls and nonexistent doors or stairways.
Three architectonically distinct phases have been identified among the walls of the complex.
Most of the walls belong to the middle phase. The first phase is represented by a single corner
(Pl. 81.C, 81.F). The last phase consists of minor rebuildings, always in the same pattern.
Whereas the middle phase and the last phase can be securely dated to the Troy VIIb2 phase,
the date of the first phase is problematic. From the architectonic point of view, the dating to
Troy VIIb1 or early VIIb2 would make the best sense, but the associated pottery completely
lacks Troy VIIb wares. 489
The middle phase of the complex came to an end in a conflagration. 490 Too little was left
from the first phase to contemplate about its end. The remains of the final phase were also
very scarce and disturbed seriously by later slope erosion. No traces of any violent destruction
have been found, the complex might have been deserted. The naming of rooms in this catalogue follows the scheme adopted in the PhD thesis of Ralf Becks, starting the numbering in
the north. 491
Rooms 1 and 2
Only very limited parts of two rooms have been uncovered in the corner between the Northeast bastion and the foundations of the Roman IXM building (Pl. 79.A, 79.B, 79.E). They
were filled with fallen stones (Pl. 83.A).
489
See more details in chapter Room 12, p. 147.
490
Best evidence in Room 12.
491
Becks 2006, Ch. 3.1.3.3.5.
[137]
FILL OF ROOMS 1 AND 2 (PL. 104.A)
The fill of Rooms 1 and 2 contained mostly middle-sized sherds with some large exceptions in Grey
Ware. 492 Some of the sherds are worn. The deposit yielded one small Cypriot sherd and potentially
also other imports. Troy VIIb wares are represented, but only in small quantities.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Most numerous ware group with a number of bigger sherds, many of them evidently from the same
big closed-shaped vessel. However, hardly any joins.
B. Small jug 942 and amphora or big jug 947.
C. Fragment of a jug or jar 944 decorated with incisions.
Small group.
A. Carinated bowl 945 and a small bowl 946, both in Tan Ware. Flat base of a bowl 948 in Brown
slip ware.
B. Flat base of a jug 951, secondarily burnt.
PLAIN WARE
A high number of plain ware sherds is unusual for Troy VIIb2 deposits and it might indicate the
presence of imports, but which could not be more closely identified. Some of the sherds such as 943
are local, and might have been survivals from Troy VIIa times.
A number of nondiagnostic sherds, mostly in gritty varieties.

Mostly body sherds without any decoration. Only two sherds with diagnostic features.
A. Unusually ribbed handle from a cup or bigger bowl 949.
B. Probably a jug 950 in Handmade Burnished Ware decorated with finger imprints.
IMPORTED WARES
Small chip of an uncatalogued Cypriot jug in White Slip II Ware 493 and a storage vessel fragment
952 which might originate from Cyprus or Canaan. If the secondarily burnt jug base 951 does not belong to Tan Ware, it needs to be counted with this category.
492
Beh. K4.537, 539, 545, 547.
[138]
Room 3
Room 3 is a bigger room situated to the south of Rooms 1 and 2 (Pl. 79.A, 79.D, 79.E). The
division wall between the three rooms is shared. The room was covered by a mudbrick collapse (Pl. 79.D).
FILL OF ROOM 3 (PL. 104.B)
The fill of the room yielded a small number of sherds. 494 Among them was a rim from an undecorated handmade burnished jar.
Room 4
This room was built against the Northeast bastion and it was covered by an impressive
quantity of collapsed (or filled in?) stones (Pl. 79.B, 79.C, 83.A). This fill is strikingly different from the neigboring Room 3, filled at the same level exclusively with mudbrick remains.
The walls of Room 4 were still preserved to a considerable height thanks to their proximity to
the bastion, which effectively protected the room from erosion (Pl. 83.F). No door or stairway
to the room existed, unless they were placed in the southwest corner that was completely disturbed by a later pit (Pl. 86.B, 86.C).
FILL OF ROOM 4(PL. 104.D)
The assemblage consists almost exclusively of fragmentary and worn sherds without joins and with
little diagnostic pieces among them. 495 Hardly any Troy VIIb handmade pottery occurred. However, a
few fine hard-fired pale body sherds have been found here that might indicate either LBA imports or a
PG/Geometric date.496
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Small fragments of various bowls 953, 954, 957, 955.

B. Jug 958.
C. Kraters 955, 959, 962, some of them with incised decoration.
493
K4.457.14, published in Kozal 2006, cat. no. 137.
494
Beh. K4.444, 532.
495
Beh. K4.484, 488, 494, 505, 509, 517.
496
Beh. K4.509, 517. Similar sherds occur in Protogeometric and Geometric layers in D9.
[139]
TAN WARE
A. Uncatalogued ring base of a bowl.
497
B. Jug 960.
C. Jar with incised decoration 961 and krater 963.
PLAIN WARE
Some sherds belonging to this category are worn and are likely survivals from earlier strata. Some
plain ware sherds show unusual fabric and are counted as unknown fine wares.
C. Flat base 967 from likely a jar, with an unusual bulge in the middle of the inner side.
UNKNOWN, MOST PROBABLY IMPORTED, FINE WARES
A number of sherds that do not fit the usual categories. Mostly plain body sherds of light colors
(pale red and orange, beige). One sherd with a beige slip, without polishing.
A. Cup with everted rim 968. The shape and the fabric are otherwise not documented in Troy VIIb
levels.
B. Handle fragment 964 might have belonged to some imported ware; it resembles the
Protogeometric Group IB, although the shape differs.
C. Jar or another closed shape vessel 969 in an otherwise undocumented fabric.
C. Tripod cooking pot 965 typical for Troy VI-VIIa levels and jar with flat broad plastic band 966.
HANDMADE COARSE FABRIC
This group is either completely lacking or represented only by a few body sherds, which are difficult
to attribute securely to any group.
Room 5
Room 5 had an elaborate floor made of flat stones with small channels or spaces for the
placement of (probably wooden) division panels (Pl. 80.D, 81.B). This arrangement is reminiscent of the floor of House 791 on the western perimeter of the citadel wall, in front of Gate
VIU. 498 The stone pavement has been covered with earth mixed with burnt matter (Pl. 80.D).
The upper part of the room was covered by loose stones (Pl. 83.A).
497
K4.494.7.
498
[140]
FILL ABOVE THE STONE PAVEMENT OF ROOM 5 (PL. 104.E)
A lot of pottery is fragmented and worn, but a fair number of coarse ware sherds join and substantial
vessel parts have been restored.499 It is surprising that Troy VIIb handmade coarse wares are almost
non-existent; the coarse wares are with three or four exceptions all wheelmade. A Cypriot sherd and
most probably Canaanite amphora with incised signs also belong to this context.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Small to medium-sized sherds, no joins.

A. Bowl with incised wavy decoration 970, bowl with a raised ring base 971, bowl with thickened
outflaring rim 976 and deep bowl 973.
B. Flat base of a jug or jar 972.
C. Kraters 975 and 978.
Smaller group than the previous one. Almost all examples belong to orange and beige varieties of
Tan Ware. With few exceptions, only body sherds.
A. Shallow bowl 974 and an uncatalogued fragment of a ring base.
Nearly all sherds belong to the same category of semi coarse and compact fabric. The gritty variety
is represented only by chips.
C. Cooking pots with everted rims, vertical handles between lips and belly and disc or ring bases
979, 980, 981, 982, 983, 985. Handles have round or oval sections.
Small chips were present in the uppermost level where the walls started to appear. 500 Lower down in
the fill and above the pavement only a single sherd of a Handmade Burnished Ware jar 986 and was
found. The classification of the bowl 977 as Handmade Lustrous Ware is only tentative. The sherd was
too small, the fabric too fine and the surface more lustrous then it is usually the case.
IMPORTED WARES
Cypriot sherd 987 and a handle from a Canaanite (?) amphora 988 with incised signs.
499
Beh. K4.390, 425, 472, 480, 486, KL4.1226, KL4.1229.
500
Beh. K4.390.
[141]
Room 6
Room 6 was a small rectangular room neigboring the Troy VIIa Mudbrick structure on the
west, the apsidal Room 8 on the south, Room 5 on the north and Room 7 on the east
(Pl. 80.D). It was paved with flat stones and filled with fallen stones (Pl. 80.A, 80.B).
THE FILL ABOVE THE STONE PAVEMENT OF ROOM 6 (PL. 104.F)
The pottery is with few exceptions badly fragmented and worn, with few diagnostic pieces. 501 The
pottery included Handmade Burnished and also Handmade Lustrous Wares.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Fragmented, non-joining sherds.

A. Bowl decorated with unusual horizontal grooves 989, undecorated bowls 994 and 997, deep bowl
990, carinated bowl 996 and a raised ring base 991.
C. Fragment of a closed-shaped vessel with incised decoration 997.
TAN WARE
A. Skyphos 992 and an uncatalogued hemispherical bowl.

B or C. Ring base 996.
Represented in small qualities, but only in body sherds.

A. Cup or a bowl 993 with a small rim diameter with unusual decoration of vertical ribs.
C. Jar or Uncatalogued flat base of a jar.
B. Jug 999.
PITHOI
Not catalogued. One big rim, 502 one body sherd decorated with grooves made by a finger, 503 the rest
are undiagnostic.
501
Beh. K4.357, 406, 419, 421, 436.
502
K4.419.1.
503
Beh. K4.406.
[142]
Room 7
Room 7 looks like the biggest room of the whole excavated complex next to the Northeast
bastion, but it might have been originally divided by a partition wall. 504 It is situated to the
east of Room 6, to the south of Room 5 and to the north of Rooms 9 and 10. The slope erosion destroyed considerable parts of it already in ancient times, so the walls are preserved
only at deeper levels (Pl. 80.D, 81.B, 83.A, 83.D).
FILL OF ROOM 7 (PL. 104.G)
The assemblage is surprising because of the high proportion of Tan Ware, which is nearly as numerous as Anatolian Grey Ware. 505 The pottery is mostly fragmentary, but a few medium-sized Grey
Ware sherds are also present. Coarse ware examples are extremely rare except for one larger jar fragment extremely rare. Some ten sherds of various sizes belonged to different pithoi. The high numbers
of PBA entries is caused by the presence of numerous tiles and a handful of body sherds. 506
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowl 1001 and carinated bowl 1001. Bowl with basket handle 1000 might be a residual piece.
A. Shallow bowl 1003 and a flat base 1004.

Only one or two body sherds.

A. Handle 1005 with indicated button-attachment to the belly.

C. Jar 1006 with vertical handle and raised band decorated with finger imprints.
PITHOI
Fairly big examples. Some of them decorated with a broad raised band.
504
Becks 2006, Chap. 3.1.3.3.5.
505
Beh. K4.415.
506
PBA pottery database from primary processing dates them to Archaic and Classical period.
[143]
Room 8
An unusual rather small apsidal-like room was found attached to the mudbrick structure
(Pl. 80.B, 81.A, 83.B, 83.C). The room was covered by dispersed collapsed stone in the lower
level and by clayish fill in the upper level.
FLOOR OF ROOM 8 (PL. 106.D)
It was only at the level of the supposed floor where notable Troy VIIb handmade sherds have been
retrieved, although the assemblage is rather small. 507 Except for the catalogued examples, the material
was fragmented and undiagnostic.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Hemispherical bowl 1007.

B. Jug 1008.
A. Conical cup with a loop handle 1009.

C. Jar or amphora with oblong knob 1010.
FILL OF ROOM 8 (PL. 104.H)
Few joining sherds of a Grey Ware base of some bigger closed vessel, otherwise fragmented and
worn. 508 Hardly any handmade coarse wares.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
C. An amphora or jar 1013.

TAN WARE
A. A raised ring base from likely a bowl 1011 and a hemispherical bowl 1012.
COARSE WARES
Only few body sherds, mostly wheelmade.
507
Beh. K4.460.
508
Beh. K4.344, 362, 458.
[144]
Room 9
Very small room to the east of Room 8. Its south wall is curved (Pl. 80.D, 81.B, 83.A,
83.D). The room was covered by stone debris (Pl. 81.E, 83.B).
FLOOR DEPOSIT OF ROOM 9 (PL. 105.B)
The assemblage consisted of small and medium-sized sherds with majority of Grey Ware, followed
by Tan Ware and worn pieces of earlier MBA-LBA wares. No evident Troy VIIb sherds are present. 509
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Rather big group, mostly medium sized sherds.

A. Bowl with ring base 1015 and an uncatalogued hemispherical bowl.
B. Jug handle 1018 and an uncatalogued rim from another jug.
TAN WARE
A. Shallow bowl 1016 and hemispherical bowl 1017. Few other uncatalogued small bowl fragments.
Mostly chips in gritty varieties. The catalogued example is, however, of more compact, semi coarse
fabric.
C. Cooking pot or jar 1014.
FILL OF ROOM 9 (PL. 105.C)
The uppermost fill contained a considerable number of later PBA sherds, including several tile
fragments and a black glazed bowl.510
Room 10
Room 10, situated to the east of Room 9, was only fragmentarily preserved (Pl. 82.G, 82.H,
83.D). It was covered by a stone debris or fill (Pl. 81.E).
509
Beh. K4.464.
510
Beh. K4.431.
[145]
FILL OF ROOM 10 (PL. 105.D)
The pottery was very fragmented and seriously worn, hardly any Troy VIIb wares have been found.
Due to the proximity to the ancient eroded surface, it contained a few PBA sherds.511 The statistics can
be considered only with great care.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Uncatalogued chips from shallow bowl.

B. Jug 1029 and two more uncatalogued fragments from other jugs.
C. Krater 1021 and jar 1024 decorated with incised horizontal lines.
D. Stand 1025 with pronounced ribs.
A. Shallow bowl 1019 and uncatalogued fragments of hemispherical bowls. At least one more shallow bowl in Brown-slip ware.
C. Bowl or krater with horizontal handles 1023.
PLAIN WARE
A. Shallow bowls 1020 and 1025.

C. Cooking pot 1022 in semi coarse compact variety, cooking pot 1027 in gritty variety and jar 1028
in burnished variety.
Room 11
This room was placed directly in front of the impressive water drain going down from the
Northeast Bastion (Pl. 81.D). Remains of a stone pavement have been found in a limited area
near the outlet of the drain, missing in other parts of the room. The level of the stone pavement is higher than the mouth of the drain but it does not block the drain completely
(Pl. 81.C). The position of Room 11 directly in front of the water drain suggests that the drain
was already out of use in Troy VIIb times.
FILL OF ROOM 11 (PL. 105.E)
The sherds are small, fragmented and worn with very few diagnostic pieces. 512
511
Beh. L4.407, 447.
512
Beh. K4.282, 440, 511, 568.
[146]
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Kylix or bowl 1033

B. Flat base of a jug or jar 1032. Uncatalogued fragment of a jug with small rib on the neck/shoulder
junction
TAN AND BROWN-SLIP WARE
A. Hemispherical bowl 1031. Sharply profiled ring base of a bowl 1036.
C. Jar 1035.
IMPORTED WARES
A. Painted Cypriot bowl 1076.

C. Fragment of amphora or jar 1030 decorated with incised horizontal lines outside and also inside.
A. Cup 1038 with slight S-shaped profile, and with vertical handle.
C. Jar 1037 with a slightly oblique raised band decorated with finger imprints.
Room 12
Room 12 lies to the east of Room 11 and to the south of Room 9 (Pl. 81.C, 83.D). A fragment of an earlier wall corner has been discovered under the floor of Room 12 (Pl. 81.C,
81.F). The floor was made of lime. 513 The clayish deposit above the floor yielded the best
Troy VIIb2 inventory from the whole area, with broken pots in situ (Pl. 81.A-81.D). The
room was filled with burnt matter and fallen debris (Pl.82.E, 82.F).
UNDER THE FLOOR OF ROOM 12 (PL. 105.H)
The deposits underneath the floor yielded, with the exception of two possible Troy VIIb handmade
body chips, exclusively a Troy VI-VIIa assemblage. 514
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Shallow bowl 1047 and bowl base 1048. Uncatalogued fragments of hemispherical bowls.
513
Becks 2006, Chap. 3.1.3.3.5.
514
Beh. K4.603, 605, 613, 615, 1116.
[147]
C. Krater or similar shape 1046 with unusually everted flattened rim decorated with incised wavy
lines on the interior. Jar 1047 decorated with incised wavy and horizontal lines.
A. Fragments of several hemispherical bowls in Tan and also in Brown-slip Ware.

B or C. Ring base of a jug or jar 1051.
PLAIN WARE
Few sherds.
FLOOR OF ROOM 12 (PL. 105.F)
A rich deposit with several large parts of vessels found in situ. 515 Only one of the vessels is nearly
complete. A few fragmented sherds are also present. 516
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Cup 1039 with ring base and strap handle.

B. Jug 1040.
A. Interesting imitation of a A93 bowl 1041, which is a unique piece of this kind.
B. Jug 1045, superbly polished and decorated with incised lines.
C. Amphora or krater 1044.
C. A remarkable, nearly completely preserved wide-mouthed jar 1042 with decoration combining
small knobs and raised bands with finger imprints.
PLAIN WARE
Small fragment with spout-like rounded interior 1043, showing traces of cutting by a thread. The
function of this piece is not understood.
515
Beh. K4.574, K4.589, K4.592, L4.489, L4.493, L4.495.
516
From Beh. K4.594, K4.596.
[148]
FILL OF ROOM 12 (PL. 105.G)
The assemblage from the upper part of the fill is rather big. It included handmade coarse wares,
wheelmade coarse wares and some pale colored fine wares, possibly PBA. 517
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowl 1053.
B. Jugs 1054 and 1055.
C. Fragment of a jar or jugs 1054 decorated with incised wavy lines. Jar with flattened rim and horizontal ribs 1057.
TAN WARE
A. Bowl or krater 1057 with an unusual ledge decorated with wavy lines placed under the rim.
B. Jug 1059.
IMPORTED WARES
B. Possibly a handle from a Protogeometric amphora 1061, although paint is missing and handles
with this section occur also earlier.
A. Krateroid vessel 1074 decorated with incised pattern.

C. Jar with horizontal handles 1060.
Room 13
This room is an eastern neighbor of Room 12. It was seriously damaged by the ancient slope
erosion and it was also cut by the foundations of Athena temple, so the exact dimensions are
not known (Pl. 81.C, 82.E, 82.F).
FILL OF ROOM 13 (PL.106.A)
The pottery was fragmented and mostly worn.518
Anatolian Grey Ware

C. Jar or amphora 1064.
517
Beh. K4.462, 513, 535, 543, 549.
518
L4.436, L4.462, L4.470, L4.472.
[149]
A. Cup with channeled decoration and subtle knobs 1066.

C. Jar 1063.
PITHOI
The pieces of interest comprise several pithos sherds decorated with horizontal and wavy grooves
made by finger, the best preserved being 1065.
Room 14
Rooms 14 to 17 were discovered in a separate sounding in square K4/5, situated some two
and half meters to the south of Rooms 11 and 12. Room 14 is the deepest of all the cells discovered in K4/5 (Pl. 84.D, 84.E). It is situated to the southeast of the Troy VIIa Mudbrick
structure. Its preserved remains lay below the foundation level of the Mudbrick structure.
The dating of Room 14 to Troy VIIb2 is tentative, based on its stratigraphic position under
the Archaic tumble that in the KL4 area directly covered the ruins of Troy VIIb2 rooms. The
pottery was not yet processed into a necessary level of detail.
Room 15
Room 15 adjoined the southern side of the Troy VIIa Mudbrick structure (Pl. 83.E, 84.A,
84.B). Room 15 is higher than Room 14 and it most probably represents a later phase. The
stony fill of the room was not excavated, but the stratigraphic relation to Mudbrick structure is
identical as in case of Rooms 6, 8 and 11, which makes the attribution of Room 15 to Troy
VIIb2 phase a certainty.
Room 16
A paved surface and a small water drain were found one meter to the south of Room 15 (Pl.
84.B, 84.D). Both rooms were built on the same elevation. The pottery from this area was not
diagnostic.
[150]
Room 17 containing a dog skeleton

Room 17 lies between Rooms 15 and 16 on a slightly higher elevation. Remains of a dog
skeleton had been recovered enclosed between small stone walls, which were a corner of a
cist or a small cell room (Pl. 84.A, 84.C). Bones of the dog were sampled for a C14 date, 519
but the result was not available at the time of writing this report. The stratigraphic sequence
between Room 14 and the stone cist with dog skeleton was disturbed by deep foundations of
the Roman IX M Building, but both features seem to be roughly contemporary. The lower
elevation of Room 14 is due to the sloping topography of the area.
FILL OF ROOM 17
The assemblage was very small and fragmented. 520 It did not yield any datable evidence.
Southwest House in front of Gate VIR (26.50-27.25 m)

A house corner was uncovered by the Tbingen team directly in front of Gate VIR, on its
outer side (Pl. 85.A, 85.B). It was dated to Troy VIIb in the preliminary reports. 521 The wall
was cut into the Troy VIIa Mudbrick structure (Pl. 85.C). It needed to be cut deep into earlier
strata, since its foundation is below the threshold level of the entrance to the gate of the
Northeast bastion that was closed by a blocking wall in Troy VIIa times. 522 A small corner
that appeared during Drpfelds excavation somewhat further to the south (Pl. 85.D) most
probably belonged to the same house. 523
DEPOSITS RELATED WITH SOUTHWEST HOUSE (PL.106.B)
Due to the limited excavated space the pottery was scarce and it was moreover very fragmented. No
handmade Troy VIIb sherds have been found. The only diagnostic sherds belonged to a Grey Ware
krater and a Grey Ware ring-base of a small closed shape. 524
519
The dog skeleton was inventoried as Beh. K4/5.126.
520
Beh. K4/5.123
521
Korfmann 1996, Abb. 33; Korfmann 1997, 52.
522
Drpfeld Photo No. 188, 285.
523
See reconstruction in Becks 2006, p. 200. Alternatively the walls could also belong to the Troy VIIa
Mudbrick structure.
524
Beh. K4.148, K4.306. Other excavation units K4.134, 142, 146 were excavated above the wall and next
to it, but they might have been partly contaminated by Drpfelds backfill. For Drpfelds sketch of the Gate
VIR area and the walled up doorway cf. Drpfeld 1894a, Fig. 15, 16.
[151]
House wall to the west of the Bastion

There is only one wall falling into this category, visible on one of Drpfelds photographs
(Pl. 86.A). 525 It is not clear whether it was standing outside or inside the citadel, since the
northern part of the Troy VI citadel wall was not found. According to the reconstruction of
the missing part of the Citadel wall undertaken by R. Becks, 526 the house in question would
be inside the citadel and it could be similar to ones built along the inner perimeter of the fortification wall during the Troy VIIa and VIIb periods.
Deposits Covering the Troy VIIb2 ruins

Rooms 1, 2, 3 and 4 were covered by collapsed stones (profiles visible on Pl. 79.A, 79.D,
79.E). Rooms 5 to 17 were covered by a clayish deposit followed immediately by a stone
tumble (Pl. 81.E, 83.A, 83.B, 83.C, 83.E, 83.F).
Deposits covering Rooms 1, 2 and 3
All three rooms were covered with loose stones and yielded an assemblage with few Troy VIIb examples and five evident Post-Bronze age sherds. 527
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
B. Jug and trefoil jug.

C. Fragments of kraters decorated with incised wavy lines. Krater 1067 was additionally decorated
also with small knobs.
TAN WARE
C. Fragments of undecorated kraters.

C. Krater or amphora 1068 decorated with channeling and stamped false-cord motif
525
Published in Becks 2005, Abb.3.
526
Becks 2005, Abb. 16.
527
Beh. K4.353, K4.366, K4.526, K4.530.
[152]
C. Jar 1069 decorated with atypically flattened rim and finger imprints on the upper side of the lip.
Debris above Room 8, 11, 12 and 13

A rich assemblage, consisting of medium-sized and even large-sized sherds, has been uncovered at
the uppermost preserved level of the walls and slightly above. 528. The majority belongs to Anatolian
Grey Ware and to Wheelmade Coarse Wares. All Wheelmade Coarse Ware sherds apparently originated from the same one or two vessels. Anatolian Grey Ware and Wheelmade Coarse ware have joins
in the deposits above Rooms 9 and 10 (Pl. 80.B, 86.D) 529 and above Rooms 11 and 12 (Pl. 83.A). 530
The deposits were formed by a clayish substrate with a tumble of small stones upon it. Several unusual
plain wares and one possibly Post-Bronze Age painted sherd were also present. Handmade Troy VIIb
pottery was completely absent.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Bowl with very sharply profiled ring base 1070.

C. Krater 1073 with incised decoration and horizontal rib. Disc base of a jar or an amphora 1070.
A. Shallow bowl 1074 with unusually sharp, angular profile. Shallow bowl fragment in Brown-slip
Ware, not catalogued.
C. Cooking pot 1071.
WEST LOWER TOWN

Troy VIIb2 activities in the West Lower Town are best attested in the area north of the Troy
VIIa Terrace House. Although the dense Archaic, Hellenistic and Roman building program
left no ground plan from Troy VIIb2 surviving, a number of fragmentary walls are likely to
date to this period. They were collectively grouped under the designation of North Houses.
The chosen naming convention should not mislead in indicating any relation with South
528
Beh. K4.279.
529
Beh. K4.454, K4.456.
530
Beh. K4.282, K4.496, K4.528.
[153]
House, except for relative geographic positions. South House was already out-of-use and no
longer visible by the time of Troy VIIb.
It is not clear whether all wall fragments of the North Houses are fully contemporary and
whether they belong to the same house or constitute separate units. To be on the safe side, the
walls were divided into two structures North House A and North House B.
The area of the North Houses is the only place in the Western Lower Town where several
features from the transitional Late Bronze Age/Early Iron Age period have been found in a
stratigraphic sequence.
The dating of the North Houses A and B to Troy VIIb2 is relatively secure and is supported
by their stratigraphic position as well as by finds of corresponding pottery. Minor uncertainties remain only in relation to the Pit under the Vertical Stones Feature 1.
No cultural stratum of Troy VIIb has been identified further to the south either above the
Terrace House, or above the Street or South House. The Terrace House ruins witnessed dense
Protogeometric activities, afterwards the walls were reused for a new Geometric Cult Building. A Hellenistic terrace wall has directly superseded the southern wall of the Central Room
of the Terrace House and continued over deposits accumulated above the Pithos Storeroom
and the street (Pl. 48.E). The ruins of South House were in a similar way tightly superseded
by Post-Bronze Age walls. If there were any Troy VIIb settlement activities, they would have
been conducted in higher elevations, forever lost due to later leveling operations or erosion.
Occasionally, nice examples of Knobbed Ware sherds have been recovered in much later
fills in various parts of the Post-Bronze Age Sanctuary. 531 Their presence indicates that the
extension of the original Troy VIIb settlement activities was considerably larger than what
actually did survive.
N O R TH H O U S E S ( 25.70-26.10
M)
North House A
Floor
North House A overlies the Troy VIIa ruins of Room 5 and also the Pit with restored vessels, which was cut into the VIIa ruins (Pl. 5, 6, Pl. 29.A-29.D, 30.A). North House A itself is
overlain by the Vertical Stones Feature 1 (Pl. 28.B-28.E). The southern wall of the house is
531
E.g. y/z.1511.3, 4.
[154]
abutted by a Crosswall that was built over the Vertical Stones Feature 1 (Pl. 28.B). 532 Two
Hellenistic walls cut North House A, one from the west and the other from the north
(Pl. 28.A, 28.B, 28.D, 28.E) .
Patches of whitish clay indicating a house floor were observed between c. 25.72 and
25.75 m a.s.l. in a very limited area between the Vertical Stones Feature 1 and both Hellenistic walls. These patches were not continuous and rested at some 5-10 cm lower than the foundations of North House A. But the floor cannot belong to any other structure. On the corresponding level (c. 20 cm below the orthostates) between the Vertical Stones Feature 1 and the
southern wall of North House A no patches of whitish clay, only some flat stones were uncovered. 533
The pit with restored vessels found underneath North House A dates to Troy VIIb1. 534 The
deposits excavated inside North House A date to Troy VIIb2, including a small pit which was
found in the southeast corner of the house and which was reported to cut its floor. 535
North House A has a long use history. Its southern wall was partly reused in the
Protogeometric period, even if by this time the eastern wall was already demolished and
overbuilt by the Vertical Stones Feature 1. 536 It is apparent that the southern wall outlasted the
VSF-1 and it must have been still standing when the Crosswall was constructed. This event
was probably contemporary with a pavement of pithos sherds and tiles, and is likely to postdate the Protogeometric period (Pl. 28.A).
The deposits over the supposed floor were separated in the expectation that they represent occupation debris of the house. 537 They yielded several joining Knobbed ware sherds with incised decoration,
but also one linear painted body sherd (Mycenaean? or Protogeometric?), pithos body sherds and one
PBA tile fragment. 538 Although precautions were taken and great care applied, it is not excluded that
the latest sherds are infiltrations from foundation trenches of the Hellenistic walls. Surprisingly, there
are no joins between the areas to the east and west of the Crosswall, which had not yet been built. It is
532
Designated in the field reports as Walls 217 and 289.
533
Beh. z7.330 (25.87-25.69 m).
534
See p. 87.
535
See p. 161.
536
See p. 193.
537
Beh. z7.237 (lower part), 255 (contained very fragmented and worn sherds), z7.344, z7.356.
538
All from Beh. z7.356.
[155]
possible that the finds from the area to the east of Crosswall were disturbed by the same pit that also
cut the remains of the Troy VIIa wall underneath. 539
The deposits overlying the walls yielded mixed pottery, including a good number of later PBA
sherds. 540 Again, at least for some of these, the proximity of Hellenistic deposits is the most likely
source for the presence of later material.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Only small fragments.

Only small chips, rather worn.

Several undecorated body sherds from storage vessels.

Many fragments from a single large bowl decorated with multiple incised zig-zag lines or triangles
1077. One fragment of a smaller undecorated bowl 1078.
PAINTED WARES
One linear painted body sherd from a closed vessel 1079. Likely from a Protogeometric amphora.
Could perhaps be best interpreted in relation with the group found in the Vertical Stones Feature 1.
PITHOI
Few body sherds.
North House B ( 25.18-25.79 m)

It is unclear how North House A looked further to the north and to the west of its preserved
southeast corner. The area was overbuilt with deep-reaching foundations of numerous Hellenistic structures and only limited parts of earlier strata could be excavated. Several wall fragments came to light, which might be directly related with North House A. Since they do not
physically bond with North House A, they have been cautiously summarized as North
539
See p. 161.
540
Beh. z7.263, 265.
[156]
House B in this report. This is rather a matter of naming convention and easier reference, not
an implication of any existing division between the two structures.
The best evidence for a structure existing simultaneously with the corner of North House A
has been retrieved several meters further to the north, in a baulk inside the Hellenistic Fimbria
Building. It is an external face of an orthostate wall that shows the same orientation, similar
masonry style (Pl. 29.D, 33.D) and comparable base levels 541 as the east wall of North House
A. The orthostate wall had no distinguishable foundation trench, it was built atop the Organic Deposit, 542 it was cut by a Geometric pit 543 and it was overlain by foundations of an Archaic boundary wall made of ashlars (Pl. 33.B-33.D). These stratigraphic relationships combined together with the likely contemporaneity with North House A represent the current evidence for dating the orthostate wall to Troy VIIb2.
Parts of the orthostate wall are missing because they passed through a disturbed area directly underneath the marl floor of the Archaic Cult Building (Pl. 32.C, 33.D, 34.B). The
orthostate wall runs in the north to a corner of a building that was founded at a slightly lower
level (Pl. 34.D). These deeper walls most probably date to Troy VIIa. 544 It is unclear whether
the orthostate wall continued still further to the north, outside of the Hellenistic Fimbria
Building. The place was disturbed by a perpendicular Archaic partition wall. At least the Troy
VIIa walls must have continued in that direction, but their traces were not evident in the narrow sounding north of the Fimbria Building (Pl. 35.A).
The deeper lying walls make the impression of having been reused during the lifetime of the
orthostate wall (Pl. 34.D), either as a northern limit of the house or as a division wall between
two rooms.
The western limit of the North Houses Complex is not known. The corresponding strata
were destroyed during building operations of Hellenistic Temple A. The south limit of North
House B is also uncertain, but here at least certain proposals can be made. North House B
541
The nearest part of orthostate wall is founded some 20-50 cm deeper than the east wall of the North House
A. The level of the preserved floor of North House B in its northernmost part is some 50-60 cm lower than the
preserved floor of North House A in the its southernmost part. But this seems to be dictated by the character of
existing topography, where the surface seem to have been decreasing to the north and also to the west.
542
Designated as Wall 340 in the Field notebook.
543
See p. 208.
544
The whole area was heavily disturbed and the pottery was processed only preliminarily. It is exclusively the
general understanding of the complex developments in the area and the missing evidence for any Troy VIIb1
architecture that makes the Troy VIIa date most likely.
[157]
may have been connected with North House A into a single complex. The southeast corner of
North House A would thus delimitate a large Troy VIIb2 Building. The crucial point where it
could have been decided, whether or not they were two freestanding buildings, is destroyed
by a Geometric pit and further obscured by a complicated situation in the corner formed by
several Hellenistic foundation walls (Pl. 30.D, 33.B, 33.C).
Although the inner face of the orthostate wall could not be excavated and it was left in the
baulks, two perpendicular walls on comparable elevations 545 have been exposed some six
meters to the west of the orthostate wall (Pl. 27.A-27.D, 35.C, 35.E). 546 They can be reconstructed as the division walls of the North Houses. The deposits related with the walls were
too disturbed to help with their dating. Stratigraphically, the division wall between A and B
was built over the Troy VIIa structures and under the foundations of the Archaic Cult Buildings boundary wall (Pl. 27.D). This suggests a Troy VIIb, Protogeometric or Geometric date.
The Troy VIIb2 date is preferred given the orientation of the preserved walls, their construction technique and their equal distances from each other. 547
Remains of a floor have been observed in the northwest area of North House B, abutting the
reused early wall. 548 An ash pit was connected with this or some slightly higher floor
subphase. 549 Further floor remains were encountered in the northeast part. 550 A hearth was
found on top of the floor remains. 551 The pottery associated with the floor deposits indicates a
Troy VIIb2 date.
545
Their base level is in accordance with that of the orthostate wall having taken into consideration the slightly
decreasing slope to the west.

546
Designated as Wall 857 in the Field notebook.
547
The supposed division walls are perpendicular to the orthostate wall and they are parallel to the south wall
of North House A and the northernmost wall of North House B. They divide the North Houses complex in almost equally wide compartments (3.4 m). They are built of bigger, partially worked stone blocks in the lowermost course and flat stones in the following course, the same technique that was used in the southeast corner of
North House A and by the orthostate wall of North House B.
548
The elevation (25.12 m) was the same or even slightly lower than the base of the presumable partition
wall ( c.25.18 m). The identical situation was observed in North House A, where the only possible floor had
the same elevation (25.70-25.75 m) than the base of the walls themselves ( c. 25.70-25.80).
549
Beh. z6/7.953.
550
Their elevation (25.19-25.21 m) was the same as the foundations of the orthostate wall ( 25.18-25.22).
The orthostate wall was likely the east wall of the house.
551
Beh. z6.529.
[158]
The existence of perpendicular walls substantiates a reconstruction of North House B to the

west of the orthostate wall. The only possible indication of habitation to the east of the
orthostate wall is a pithos that was set into the Organic deposit of Troy VIIb1 date. 552 The
pithos setting pit has clearly cut the fallow deer bones accumulation (Pl.32.E). The rim of the
pithos is not preserved because the uppermost part has been cut away by an Archaic division
wall (Pl. 32.C, 34.C, 34.D). 553 Not much is missing though and the pithos mouth level should
be reconstructed at c. 25.50 m. The pithos is not well understood. It might have belonged
to North House B if there were other walls and structures connected with the pithos to the east
of the orthostate wall, but no such structures were found. 554
Disturbed Floor Deposits
The deposits in the northeast part were disturbed, as indicated by the missing section of the
house wall. 555 The pottery they yielded was consistent, with hardly any sherds later than Troy
VIIb 556 and it contained several interesting handmade pieces.
The pottery from the northwest part was not processed. But in primary documentation the
floor deposit was reported to have been associated with numerous sherds of Barbarian
Ware. 557 Also the surrounding deposits were prehistoric. 558
The examined sherds are small to medium-sized, with several bigger pithos fragments with signs of
wear. The assemblage is dominated by handmade wares making up almost half of the total.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Mostly undecorated body sherds.

A. Several fragments of bowls. Among them deep bowl 1085 and cup or bowl with S-shaped profile
1089.
552
See p. 84.
553
I was unable to see the pottery from this feature (Beh. z6.510).
554
Some might have been shaved off during the Archaic building operations.
555
They were excavated as Beh. z6.517, 529, 532.
556
With only one uncertain exception of a painted streaky slip sherd from Beh. z6.545.
557
Beh. z6/7.959 was described as 100% Barbarian ware in the final report from that season (Tb z6.1997). I
was unable to locate the behalter in the storage containers at Troy.

558
Beh. z6/7.953, 954, 958 (?).
[159]
TAN WARE
Few sherds, fragmentary material.

B. Fragment of a closed shape vessel decorated with parallel horizontal grooves 1087 and a rather
carelessly burnished strap handle from some bigger jug or amphora 1090.
Few sherds.
A. An unusual handle with a pointed knob decorated with an incised star 1080 was found directly in
the hearth, accompanied only by five big pithos body sherds and one Handmade Coarse Ware body
sherd. The catalogued example probably belonged to a bigger cup or a krater-like vessel. Good parallels to the pointed knob on a handle (but without incised decoration) exist in the local grey ware pottery from graves on Tenedos (Bozcaada) island, dated to the last quarter of 8th and first quarter of 7th
century BCE. 559
A krater or similar shape with polished surface 1083. A bowl with an anti-splash rim 1088 is also
counted in this category, although it might have been a residual piece from the Early Bronze Age.
HANDMADE COARSE AND BURNISHED WARES
C. Fragments of a few jars, among them a burnished C85 jar with a raised band decorated with
oblique fingernails imprints 1081 and a smaller vessel with untreated surface and missing vertical
handle 1082.
PITHOS WARES
Rather big sherds in reddish fabric. Mostly worn on the surface, some also show traces of secondary
burning.
PROTOGEOMETRIC OR TRANSITIONAL WARES
Probably a single sherd 1086 is to be classified as a fragment of a PG Group IB painted amphora.
Disturbed (?) deposits under the Floor of North House B

Even the deposits from below the level of the orthostate wall foundations occasionally yielded Troy
VIIb handmade pottery (Pl. 108.D). 560 But the dominant component was Anatolian Grey Ware. Some
sherds dated to the early stages of Troy VI. 561 It is not clear to what degree they were affected by the
disturbances that destroyed the house wall and the floor.
559
Arslan and Sevin 2003, 249, Abb. 6: 1.2.
560
Beh. z6.545, 554, 592.
561
z6.592.1 from a pedestal foot of a A64 krater.
[160]
Disturbed Deposits immediately to the East of North House B

The deposits to the east of North House B (outside of the house?), although almost surely mixed
(Pl. 108.B), yielded a very nice example of a big stamped Knobbed Ware vessel fragment in Handmade Lustrous Ware 1091.
Deposits above the Floor of North House B

The North House has been covered by an Archaic marl floor in its northeastern part. In its northwestern part, an unusual line of postholes connected with an ash heap has been found (Pl. 35.D). Only
very little pottery was found here, all classified as prehistoric.562 Given the high elevation and the
probable ruined state of the North House B at that time, the structure is most probably later.
Pit under Vertical Stones Feature 1 ( c. 25.35-25.75 m)

Several fragments of Handmade Lustrous Ware have been found in a pit cut into rear wall
of Room 5. 563 The pit is reported to have cut also the floor patches belonging to North
House A, 564 but since the floor was never consistently preserved and the only area available
for obervation was 0.5 m2 large, it is difficult to be certain. 565 Attribution of the pit to the Troy
VIIb2 phase is based on the pottery.
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 108.F)
The assemblage included small and middle-sized sherds, a few of them worn. None of the sherds
showed knobs or other distinctive Knobbed Ware decoration. The presence of Handmade Lustrous
Ware and absence of any Protogeometric pottery indicates a Troy VIIb2 date for the context.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Small and middle sized sherds from mostly closed-shape vessels.

A. Ring-base from a bowl 1096. The only other diagnostic sherd was very small and originated from
a BS A49 bowl.
562
Beh. z6/7.930, 931.
563
Beh. z7.320.
564
Tb. z7N.1994: 78-9.
565
The floor might have been destroyed also during the later activities related with erection of the orthostats
belonging to VSF-1. This would cast a shadow of doubt on the impression of a pit cutting through a disturbed
floor.
[161]
Exclusively body sherds of Tan Ware. Some of them reddish.

A. Undecorated cup with a thick slip and fine polishing 1095. Otherwise only chips from two straphandles.
OTHER COARSE WARES
Small chips. Some of them are likely from wheelmade vessels, others from Handmade Burnished
Ware.
PITHOI
One middle-sized body sherd with a raised flat band, the rest only small chips.
POST-BRONZE AGE FABRIC
Five sherds of various evidently PBA fabric, likely Hellenistic. One of them with dark brown slip,
horizontal grooves and thick white paint. Their presence is certainly caused by the foundation trench
of the Hellenistic Fimbria-Building wall.
T ER R A C E H O U S E R U I N S
Deposit above the Porch
Troy VIIb pottery was found in a thin deposit between the Troy VIIa burnt debris and the
floors or walls of the Geometric Cult Building. The deposit was not preserved as a continuous
layer over the entire porch since in some areas the Geometric walls were directly above the
burnt deposit of Troy VIIa. Sherds of Troy VIIb have been rather frequently retrieved also
from contexts related with Geometric walls. It can be considered as further confirmation for
Troy VIIb use of the area, even if the nature of Troy VIIb activities remains obscure.
A good many Troy VIIb body sherds, one of them with fingernail decoration, have been found in a
deposit stratified over the Troy VIIa burnt debris and at the same time under the lime floor of the Geometric period.566 An even richer assemblage of Troy VIIb sherds has been recovered from the area in
566
Beh. z7/8.2261.
[162]
front of the porch, where the ground was stepping down. 567 Here, however, representative pieces of
wheelmade semicoarse cooking ware have been found which indicates that the assemblage was deposited later, likely in the Geometric period. The pieces worth mentioning from the handmade class belong to an undecorated Handmade Lustrous Ware cup 1098 and to a barrel-shape storage jar with
raised band (left undecorated) 1097. Other examples of handmade burnished and lustrous sherds were
retrieved in relation with the Geometric walls or their immediate vicinity. 568
Pit with Cooking Pots in the Central Room of the Terrace House
( 23.16-24.23 m)
This context was treated in detail in the preliminary publication. 569 There is little to add except that the pit (Pl. 6) was cut from a deeper level than the Big stone pit (Pl. 7) into levels
that date to Troy VIIa (Pl. 57.A, 57.C). No floor belonging to the Terrace House was observed near the pit during the excavation. The pit was covered by a thin clayish deposit atop
of which stood an apsidal structure from the Geometric Cult Building. 570
The thin deposit dividing the pit from the lowermost stones of the Geometric Apsidal structure could have resulted either from leveling operations or more likely from erosion
(Pl. 57.C). The stratigraphic date of the pit leaves either Troy VIIb1, Troy VIIb2 or
Protogeometric periods as options. The dating to Troy VIIb2 is preferred here based on the
presence of a Handmade Lustrous Ware amphora fragment and on the fact, that the painted
Protogeometric sherds seem to have originated from a higher deposit. 571
The assemblage, which is securely from the pit is exclusively comprised of handmade coarse burnished and unburnished wares, belonging to storage and cooking vessels. 572 The Brown slip ware jug
was found in the excavation unit that included upper parts of the pit and deposits above the pit. 573 In
contrast to other catalogued vessels there were no joins to the jug in the deeper, clearly defined and
separated parts of the pit.
567
Beh. z7.2153.
568
e.g. in z7/8.2253, 2261. See also z7.1822.26 (one-handlel pot?), z7.1883.10 (elbow handle), z7.1906.1
(cup?).
569
Under the designation Grube mit Steinen unter Apsidenstruktur (Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b, 70-4).
570
Basedow and Aslan, forthcoming.
571
For the interpretation of PG sherds see p. 188 ff.
572
The sherds from Beh. z7.766 are the only group securely attributable to the pit. Many joins were found in
excavation units z7.701 (above) and in z7.1232 (underneath), contaminated with later, resp. earlier sherds.
573
z7.701.
[163]
Some fragmentary sherds of Anatolian Grey Ware and Tan Ware were found in the lowermost excavation unit, but these are likely to be earlier residual pieces.574
B. A BS B25 jug 1103 in Brown-slip ware. As explained in the general description of the assemblage, its attribution to the pit is probable, but not secure.
HANDMADE COARSE WARE, UNBURNISHED
C. One barrel-shaped jar BS C86 with finger imprint decoration on the level of the lug handles and
on the rim 1099. It has no raised band, the finger decoration is applied directly on the surface of the
vessel. Another example of a barrel-shaped jar 1100 shows a raised band next to a lug handle, but it
lacks any decoration; it is fragmented and heavily worn.
B. Many fragments could be joined into what seem to be one-handled pots of BS B33 type or its variants. In none of the cases has a complete vessel been preserved, nonetheless the presence of a second
handle is improbable, according to the evidence of the smaller examples 1100, 1103, 1104.
C. The bigger vessel 1101 presents some difficulties because of its insecure reconstruction. Given its
size, it would make more sense if it originally had possessed two handles.
C. Likely a fragment of a big BS C84 amphora or its variant - 1105. Although the vessel does not
have any direct parallels, its size and thorough polishing leaves little doubt on attribution to the amphora category, since no cooking vessels or storage jars receive surface treatment of this quality.
A R E A A B O V E TH E S TR EE T , P ITH O S S TO R E R O O M A N D S O U TH H O U S E
Perhaps some postholes over the former street could date to the Troy VIIb period, but this
could not be proved (Pl. 6, 46.D, 48.A).
The ruins of the South House were superposed by a deposit with two boulders (Pl. 45.D).
These were directly overbuilt by Troy VIII walls (Pl. 45.E). 575 The walls of the South
574
Beh. z7.1232.
575
See Korfmann 1995, Abb.20 Square A8. The wall which continued from Square z8 is a Hellenistic terrace
wall. Two remaining walls were dated only generally to Troy VIII. The wall running in southwest-northeast
direction has superposed a somewhat earlier perpendicular wall. The latest pottery connected with both of them
was Archaic. Only a small patch of floor was found, too small to help with the dating. A pit with an amphora
from the Classical Period (mentioned in Rose 1995, footnote 4) was deepened into this fill.
[164]
House were no longer visible at the time when the Troy VIII walls were erected. Interestingly,
the northwest wall of the South House follows almost the same orientation as one of the later
walls; it is only slightly offset. This situation is analogical to the ruins of Terrace House and is
likely to have been dictated by the character of existing topography.
Although many excavation units above the ruins of the South House were preliminary attributed to the Troy VIIb Phase, after the reevaluation of the pottery it became clear that no
clear Troy VIIb stratum was found. The same conclusion applies for the Street Area, which
implies either complete absence of Troy VIIb activities, deep-reaching leveling or alternatively considerable erosion prior to Troy VIII times. Even the few centimeters of deposits preserved above the ruins of the South House and underneath the Troy VIII walls need to be dated to the Post-Bronze Age period. This is demonstrated by a fragment of a black-slip sherd
found sealed underneath one of the massive stone blocks, which lay over the ruins of the
South House (Pl. 45.D). 576
No Troy VIIb assemblage has been found, but a few singular sherds are worth mentioning. A unique
example of a wheelmade sherd decorated with circles connected with tangents 1107 has been revealed
slightly above the level of the street. Although the decoration fits perfectly to the Troy VIIb2 phase,
the sherd itself belongs to a cultic stand and is produced in an early micaceous variety of Anatolian
Grey Ware. These facts together with the find position close to the street surface indicate a much earlier date, perhaps Troy VI Early-Middle, unless the sherd belonged to some unrecognized disturbance
from later times. 577 The use of the circles interconnected with tangents motif is occasionally documented for Middle/Late Bronze Age Anatolia and the Amuq plain, 578 and thus need not to be considered as an exclusive hallmark of the Early Iron Age.
Troy VIIb pottery was found also in secondary contexts in the Pithos Storeroom, although it was rare and fragmented. One of the biggest examples 1302 measures only 13 cm.
576
Beh. A8.552.
577
It was found on the edge of an area where the street pavement was missing.
578
Bossert 1942, Taf. 629, 660.
[165]
S O U TH H O U S E R U IN S
Deposit over the Northeast Wall ( 23.62-23.87 m)
A feature of unknown purpose described as an arc structure overlay the northeast wall of
the South House (Pl. 6). The surrounding earth was mixed with charcoal (Pl. 45.C). The pottery is catalogued because it contained some unusual pieces. These are not yet fully understood because they do not fit the traditional categories of fabric, shapes and decoration. They
might be either transitional LBA/EIA or alternatively some rare earlier Troy VI pieces.
Their attribution to the Troy VIIb2 phase is only tentative. The deposits lying above were
already post-Bronze Age.
Only very few sherds have been recovered from the context, the composition of the assemblage is
therefore not statistically relevant. The absence of Tan Ware and the presence of unusual handmade
and wheelmade Coarse wares with gritty fabric and unburnished surface is nonetheless striking. 579
Their fabric reminds one of the Gritty Ware of Troy VI-VIIa, their decoration reminds one of Troy
VIIb.
EARLIER WARES
Very fragmented body sherds. Also counted in this category are four worn chips of burnt clay, some
of them with impressions of organic matter.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
B. Only two nondescript body chips and one noticeably thick trefoil jug fragment 1110.
COARSE WARES
Almost all sherds can be described as Gritty fabric. Most of them are wheelmade, the rest makes an
impression of having been formed without a wheel. Mostly unburnished.
C. Two jar fragments 1111, 1112 and one flat base of a cooking pot or a jar 1113.
579
Beh. A8.818.
[166]
SOUTH LOWER TOWN

H A B I TA T IO N
IN
S Q U A R ES KL16/17, H17
At least a sparse occupation during the Troy VIIb periods existed in the area of the South
Lower Town. Pits and humble architectural remains have been ascertained even as far as 200
m away from the citadel, in squares KL16/17 (Pl. 1.B). It is unclear whether the habitation
took the same form of mudbrick houses on stone foundations as in the citadel, or only huts
with wattle-and-daub construction.
Beside three pits, there were also layers attributed stratigraphically to the Troy VIIb phases.
The pottery from the layers was either mixed with evidently much later PBA sherds or the
assemblage was too fragmentary to enable secure dating. 580 The same is true for several other
disturbances attributed provisionally on stratigraphic grounds to the Troy VIIb phase. 581
These contaminations and insecurities are intrinsic to the nature of the deposits. The area was
left uninhabited after the end of Bronze Age until the settlement activity was resumed here in
the Hellenistic (in some places only in Roman) times. As a consequence, the uppermost
Bronze Age levels are mostly badly disturbed and yield mixed material.
A few meters to the north, a hearth covered by sherds from an undecorated handmade burnished vessel in Troy VIIb fashion was found. 582 The pottery from the nearby ash pit is very
fragmentary and contained only Troy VI-VIIa sherds, 583 as the underlying deposit did. 584 Perhaps the vessel was produced already in Troy VIIa times, as was the similarly profiled, but
much bigger pot found in the burnt layer of Troy VIIa over the clay bins in Room B in square
E9.
Generally, the area of KL16/17 and H17 makes an impression of a sporadic and dispersed
habitation in the Troy VIIb2 phase. The pottery assemblages do not show any clear differences in comparison with those from the citadel.
580
KL16/17.184 (1 sherd with finger imprints, most others typical LBA coarse wares), KL16/17.187,
KL16/17.199 (included 1 horizontal handle of a big burnished Handmade Lustrous Ware bowl).
581
KL16/17.193, 195,
582
Beh. H17.2150. The vessel has typical S-shaped profile, it is probably from an amphora. For the find con-
text see Jablonka 2006, Abb. 17 upper left; Abb. 18 dated there as Troy VIII.
583
Beh. H17.2116.
584
Beh. H17.2155.
[167]
Pit with clay reed impressions

A structure in a figure-of-eight-shape cut into Troy VI/VIIa deposits was discovered inside
an area defined by foundation of a Roman house (Pl. 1.B, 58.A, 58.B). Its bottom was hardened and its burnt and ashy fill yielded in addition to pottery also a number of clay lumps with
impressions of reeds. 585 Unless these were remains of a flat burnt roof of a typical house,586
thrown into a pit, they could have belonged to a hut with wattle-and-daub construction and
thus represent an example of architectonic style unknown from other areas of Troy VIIb habitation. No interior installations have been found.
The pottery from the fill dates the whole context to the Troy VIIb2 phase. It includes several fragments of different handmade vessels, both undecorated and decorated with finger imprints, and one
fragment of a channeled handle. The assemblage included also small proportion of worn earlier sherds.
No sherds later than Troy VIIb have been found.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Dominant group in the assemblage, but the material is rather fragmentary. No joins.
A. Remains of a few bowls and deep bowls. Catalogued examples include a carinated bowl with
everted rim 1114 and a deep bowl 1114.
C. Handle fragment from a jug, amphora or krater.
TAN WARE
Fragmented sherds. Orange, tan and reddish color variations.

A. Shallow bowls, the biggest preserved rim is catalogued as 1121.
C. Unusual fragment of a bigger jar or cooking pot 1124, decorated with horizontal grooves on the
shoulder and on the upper side of its thick flattened rim. The surface is worn and the attribution to Tan
Ware is only arbitrary. Alternatively it can belong to some earlier ware or an imported ware.
One small fragment of a closed vessel with shoulders inclined inwards and with everted rim (perhaps from C68).
Fragment from a cooking pot with a slightly everted rim.
585
KL16/17.530.
586
[168]
Some small, other rather big sherds.

A. Fragment from a handle (probably originally elbow-like) with channeled surface 1124.
B. Handle (not elbow-like) from most probably some jug 1125. Rim fragment with a thick flattened
lip on the exterior 1127 (possibly B43).
C. Several big sherds from a large undecorated wide-mouthed jar 1127, likely C85 shape. The only
other recognized shape was a belly-handled amphora C84, 1130.
Rather big group, but only fragmentary sherds.

B. Fragment of a rim with finger imprints on top 1131. Given its small diameter, it is likely from a
jug or small jar.
C. Shoulder fragment of a big storage vessel, decorated with raised band and round finger imprints
1129.
The South Pit

This pit was found four and half meters to the south of the pit with clay reed impressions
(Pl. 1.B). It was a shallow depression filled with stones and grey earth with small charcoal
fragments (Pl. 58.D). 587 The original level from which it was cut is unknown, the deposits
above the pit belonged already to PBA periods. 588
A similar pit (in terms of dimensions and stone fill) was found two meters to the west
(Pl. 58.D), but its fill yielded only a few sherds. They belong to typical Troy VI/VIIa wares 589
and are not considered in this report.
Few and fragmented sherds, with no joins. 590 The only big fragment comes from a Knobbed ware
cup with channeled decoration.
A. Upper part of a cup with channeled decoration and a handle 1133.

C. Jar fragment 1134 with a handle that was protruding over the rim.
587
Tb. KL16/17.1998: p. 150.
588
Beh. KL16/17.1013, 1016.
589
Beh. KL16/17.1115.
590
KL16/17.1087. Few sherds from the context are can be also found in Beh. KL16/17.1018.
[169]
The West Pit

In less than four meters distance to the west from the pit with clay reed impressions was another pit (Pl. 1.B). Its surrounding was badly disturbed by deep reaching Hellenistic and Roman intrusions (Pl. 58.C). The fill did not yield anything special, except for several joining
sherds of a handmade vessel decorated with knobs.
The assemblage contained small and some medium-sized sherds. 591 With the exception of the
Handmade Lustrous Ware group, the sherds were mostly fragmentary.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
One fragment of a vertical handle. The rest are body sherds.

TAN WARE
Two rim fragments of A49 (or similar) bowls. The rest are body sherds.
One small fragment of a vertical handle from a small vessel. The rest are body sherds.
A, C. Part of a vessel decorated with a horizontal ridge on the shoulder and slightly protruding elongated triangular knob on the belly 1134. The vertical handle 1138 perhaps belonged to the same pot.
The only other attested shape is a big bowl or basin with horizontal handles 1139.
E V ID EN C E FR O M TH E S U R V EY
One unmistakable elbow handle fragment 1140 typical for Knobbed Ware pottery was
found by the survey team in the area outside the Troy VI ditch. This is more than 500 meters
away from the citadel and it is unlikely that the sherd was washed down over such a long distance (Pl. 1.B). It needs to have come from the more immediate vicinity and it can be viewed
as an indication of Troy VIIb2 settlement (or burial?) activity even in an area so distant from
the citadel.
591
KL16/17.519, 713.
[170]
A fragment with a raised band decorated with finger imprints 1141 was also found far away
from the citadel (Pl. 1.B). The piece is unusual because it seems to be wheelmade. 592
Generally, the evidence from the survey is too scarce and lacks any striking concentration of
Troy VIIb sherds that would point to the existence of settlement or burial clusters outside of
the citadel. This does not necessarily mean that no such clusters existed. It is to a substantial
degree the nature of the evidence that is responsible for the lack of clues. The handmade VIIb
sherds when found in worn and fragmentary state without any decoration, are indistinguishable from the Early Bronze Age wares and many times even from any worn and fragmentary
coarse cooking wares. Since the proportion of decorated or otherwise diagnostic sherds is
very low even in the best preserved deposits of the citadel, a good dose of luck is necessary to
find them during surface surveys on a tell surface, mixed with remains of other periods.
592
A0.5801.2.
[171]
PROTOGEOMETRIC TROY
CITADEL
H A B I TA T IO N
IN
S Q U A R ES E8-9
Above the Street

Small wall with painted PG sherds ( 35.20-36.00 m)
A small irregular wall fragment has been found running in a south-north direction above the
street next to Room C, over a distance of only one meter (Pl. 74.C, 74.D, 74.E). Little can be
said about its function except that its position would effectively block the street. The wall,
which offers a terminus ante quem for the street, can be at earliest Protogeometric in date.
A single painted Protogeometric sherd, which was found in the substance of the wall, does
not need to date the structure to the Protogeometric period. The related deposits yielded also
Archaic and occasionally even later sherds.
A painted sherd of an early type of Protogeometric amphora comes directly from the wall.593 Two
more painted Protogeometric sherds have been found in the deposits related with the wall, as well as a
Grey ware cup fragment of possible Geometric date and few later sherds. 594Another Prearchaic Grey
Ware fragment came from the stones that might have been the prolongation of the wall.595 To the west
of the wall, the assemblage contained some Post-Bronze Age painted sherds and a number of unidentified shapes and wares. 596 Post-Bronze Age sherds were reported also from the related deposits. 597
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Cup 459. The shape does not fit well to Bronze Age shape spectrum, it could be Geometric.
A. Deep bowls (?) 460, 461. Cups 464, 465.
593
E8.414.2 (Lenz et al. 1998, Cat. No. IB.11).
594
Beh. E8.380. For the PG sherds (possibly from the same vessel) cf. Lenz et al. 1998, Cat. No. IC.6, IC.7.
This deposit contained also few Classical and Early Roman sherds.
595
Beh. E8.265.
596
Beh. E8.318.
597
Beh. E8.338, 340, 343.
[172]
B. Cup or jug 463.

C. Jar 462.
C. Jar 466.
Ruins of Room G
Debris above the upper floor (35.50-36.10 m)
The upper part of Room G was covered by debris of collapsed stones (Pl. 68.B, 68.C, 68.D).
No floor has been found and the area makes an impression of being already in ruins. The
stratification in the profile indicates that a thick erosion layer extended down to the area between the walls. It is the most likely candidate for the presence of later sherds.
The doorway was blocked intentionally with walled up stones (Pl. 68.A, 68.B, 68.D).
Among this fill a fragment of a Mycenaean stirrup jar dated to LH IIIC Late has been
found. 598 This is the only secure excavation unit from the context. Other catalogued sherds
come from the deposits that might have been contaminated by erosion layer.
The assemblage was dominated by handmade wares and contained a few painted Protogeometric
sherds. 599 It is to be stressed that Protogeometric pottery was not the latest material in the deposit,
which yielded also Archaic and in small quantities even Hellenistic and Roman sherds.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Shallow bowl 1142. Cup 1145.

B. Jug or jar 1143. Jug, jar or amphora 1144.
TAN WARE

B. Jug 1148.
PAINTED WARES
B. Protogeometric amphora 1147.
598
Beh. E8.229.1. Penelope Mountjoy dates the piece to LH IIIC Late (Mountjoy 2006, 251, No. 54).
599
Beh. E8.100, 102, 107, 120. Protogeometric sherds were found in E8.107 (Lenz et al. 1998, Cat. No. IA.8)
and E8.120 (Lenz et al. 1998, Cat. No. IB.10)
[173]
C. Jar 1152.
C. Jars 1149, 1150.

A. Cup 1153. Cup or jug 1155.

B. Amphora (?) 1151.
C. Jar (?) 1154.
Ruins of Room H
Upper deposit ( 35.10-35.45 m)
The upper deposit of Room G consisted of earth mixed with fallen stones (Pl. 73.C).
Mostly small and medium sized sherds, with the exception of a larger jar fragment.600 The highest
deposits in the room contained still considerable quantities of Handmade Coarse Wares, but also G2/3
Ware and Wheelmade Coarse Wares. 601
PLAIN WARE
A. Bowl 1158.
A. Cup or jug 1156 with fluted decoration.

B. Amphora 1157.
C. An unusual jar decorated with multiple impressed dots 1159. Large jar with horizontal handles
1160 and probably also 1162.
PAINTED WARES
B. One painted sherd 1161 from a Protogeometric amphora of type IA and possibly one other linear
band painted PG fragment. 602
600
Beh. E8.283, E8.304, E8.324, E8.335.
601
Beh. E8.281, 287, 289.
602
Beh. E8.312.
[174]
Coarse organically tempered clay lump 1163.

AREA
O U TS ID E
G A TE VIU (S Q U A R E A7)
Destruction debris to the west of House 792 and its Annex (25.26-26.24 m)
Stone debris with clear traces of burning encountered to the west of House 792 and its Annex represents most likely a destruction layer that buried several large storage vessels
(Pl. 42.C). Their fragments can be in all likelihood connected with activities taking place in
House 792 and its Annex.
The upper part of the deposit, to the west of the Annex wall (Pl. 42.B), contained nearly all
the sherds from the storage vessels and it also yielded fragments of a Protogeometric
skyphos. 603 The lower part of the deposit (Pl. 42.D) is different; it contained many more Tan
and Brown slip wares, with very few coarse sherds. 604 These are signs of proximity to the
burnt layer on which House 792 and its Annex were built. 605 Although the burnt layer and the
destruction debris clearly represent two different phases, no ordinary surface or other clear
division line was observed between the two. The destruction debris was sloping down towards
the west.
The deposit contained mostly medium-sized sherds. The chart shows a total domination of handmade burnished wares, but it must be stressed that the total majority of handmade burnished sherds
originated from two or three big storage vessels. Whatever statistic will be applied, a significant drop
of Tan Ware in comparison with the underlying layers cannot be overlooked. Especially significant is
the presence of imported Protogeometric pottery, which gives a terminus ante quem for the deposit
and the related buildings. It is somewhat surprising that no decorated Knobbed Ware sherds have been
recovered.
603
Beh. A7.1242.
604
Beh. A7.1245. This part is not taken into consideration for the statistics and for the catalogue. See footnote
319 for closer explanation.

605
Additionally confirmed by several joins with the burnt layer. The joining sherds are much more likely to
have belonged to the burnt layer, since the uppermost surface of the burnt layer was included in the very same
excavation unit where the lower part of the debris was completely removed (Beh. 1245).
[175]
PROTOGEOMETRIC AND TRANSITIONAL WARES
A rim fragment 1164 and a high conical base of a skyphos in non-local fabric 1165 has been found
in the stone debris. 606 The vessels surface is covered with a black semi lustrous firnis, making an
impression of having been painted. The lowermost part of the conical base is left untreated. Three or
four body sherds show thick slip/firnis and probably belong to the same ware category.
A. One small chip of a cup or a bowl and one fragment of a handle.

C. One ring-base 1168, probably from a jar or a krater.
The rest were middle-sized body sherds.
Small and middle sized sherds.

A. One fragment of A73 hemispherical bowl and one fragment of A52 bowl.
B. Fragment of a vertical handle of a juglet 1167.
Most numerous group. Many big sherds.

C. Mostly joining pieces of two big storage jars of C85 type, one grey-brownish 1172 and one reddish 1173. A lug handle from a C86 type barrel jar 1171 points to presence of still other big vessels in
the context. One more vertical handle and one rim fragment. The rest are body sherds, most of them
evidently from 1172 and 1173.
Small group with few sherds.

A. One highly polished and lustrous handle fragment of a cup 1166. One very small handle fragment
of a big belly-handled bowl 1169.
B. Jug fragment 1166. Only a very small part of the rim and handle with upper attachment directly
on the rim was preserved.
C. Jar 1170.
606
The rim was found directly in the excavation unit A7.1242 which is the debris itself. The conical base has
the number of the excavation unit A7.1226 which is the removal of the Wall 793. However, it was noted during
the excavation that it was found under the lowermost course of stones and thus it clearly predates the wall and
belongs to the destruction debris (Tb A7-Ost.2000: p.7). Being in that time the excavator of the area, I remember
this event personally.
[176]
PITHOS WARES
Medium-size body sherds. With one exception (of unknown fabric) all are produced in Red Coarse
Ware. One sherd has a raised flat band, one a horizontal groove 1174 and one an incised horizontal
line. Their thickness was unfortunately not measured.
S Q U A R E D9
Protogeometric terrace wall

A terrace wall was built after the Troy VIIb cells in D9 went out of use (Pl. 9). 607 The terrace wall foundations lay only few centimeters over the division walls of the Troy VIIb2 cells
(Pl. 87.A, 87.D). The cell buildings south wall was already ruined and considerably eroded,
covered with deposits almost 70 cm thick. Considerable quantities of Handmade Lustrous
Ware pottery were laying around on the surface in the time when the terrace wall was constructed. 608 Still more were found in the deposits accumulated at the foot of the terrace wall.
An amphora shoulder fragment with linear decoration is likely of Protogeometric date.
Quite a number of bigger, joining sherds. Many pithos sherds. 609

PAINTED WARES
C. Amphora 1198. Looks like Protogeometric amphora types. 610

A. Cups 1199, 1200, deep bowl or basin with incised decoration 1201.
B. Amphora 1208.
C. A superbly produced highly polished handmade imitation of a krater or amphora (?) 1203 (likely
also 1205), 611 highly polished fragments of bigger Knobbed ware vessels decorated with deep incisions 1202, 1204. Jar (?) with unusual decoration 1206.
607
The terrace wall is designated as Wall 13221 on Pl. 9.
608
See p. 135.
609
Beh. D9.3049, 3065, 3069, 3074.
610
Personal communication of Carolyn Aslan.
[177]
C. Jar 1207.
Stone Tumble
A tight packing fill or a collapse of small stones was uncovered behind the terrace wall and
also to the south of it (Pl. 88.A, 88.B). It was dated to the Early Protogeometric Period by
Carolyn Aslan, due to the presence of painted Protogeometric amphoras of Group I in the
assemblages. 612 The painted Protogeometric amphoras were found in the two uppermost excavation units from the tumble. 613 One of these units seems to have contained slightly later
material. 614
Numerous, but rather fragmented sherds.615 Painted sherds of Protogeometric amphoras are pretty
common in the assemblage, as are also fragments of Handmade Lustrous Ware.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Skyphos 1209, bowl 1211.

B. Jug 1218, jug or amphora 1210.
C. Jug or jar 1215.
D. Stand 1213.
A. Bowls 1216, 1219.

B. Jug 1214.
C. Krater 1217.
611
Sherds from the same krater have been found in D9.1927 and D9.1929 from the fill above the ruins of
Room 3.
612
Aslan 2002, 84.
613
Beh. D9.3053, 3058.
614
Beh. D9.3058. The excavator presupposed that there might have been a step causing the material in the
south of the excavation unit to be later than in the north (Overlay D9, 2000, No.1). The assemblage indeed contains some quartz-tempered wheelmade coarse wares which are otherwise only attested in the layers above, dated
to Late Protogeometric/Early Geometric period Beh. D9.3034, 3046.
615
Beh. D9.3007, 3053, 3056, 3058, 3062.
[178]
PAINTED WARES
C. Amphoras 1220, 1221, 1224, 1225.

C. Cooking pots 1222, 1226 in wheelmade semi-coarse ware.

D. Sieve 1223.
A. Bowl 1237, 1249.

B. Jug 1212.
C. Jars 1238, 1242, 1248, 1253, 1258, 1259. Cooking pot (?) 1239.
D. Tray 1252.
A. Cups 1227, 1229, 1231, 1234, 1251. Deep bowls or kraters 1235, 1236, 1245.
B. Juglet 1228, jug 1232, amphora 1243. Cup or jug 1257.
C. Krater (?) 1230, kraters or amphoras 1233, 1244, 1246, 1247. Cooking pots 1240, 1241. Jar or
amphora 1255.
D. Tray 1254.
UNKNOWN FABRIC
B. Jug (?) 1250.
Burnt layer above the tumble

A distinct burnt layer was encountered above the tumble (Pl. 88.C, 88.D). It was curving up
to the fortification wall and sloped down towards the Protogeometric terrace wall against
whose top it accumulated.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE
The pottery from the burnt layer contained several excellent examples of Knobbed Ware.616 The layers above yielded gradually less and less handmade pottery until they were virtually devoid of it, some
sixty centimeters above the burnt layer, in the Late Protogeometric/Early Geometric period. 617 A rep-
616
Beh. D9.2986.
617
The sequence above the burnt layers was following: Beh. 2967, 2943, 2940, 2936, 2933. Beh. D9.2933 was
the uppermost and although the assemblage was big enough it contained only two sherds potentially produced in
Troy VIIb fashion.
[179]
resentative selection was already published.618 Only substantial examples of handmade pottery will be
catalogued here.
C. Jar 1260, 1261, 1264.

A. Bowls or large cups 1262, 1263. Bowl or jar 1265.
S U R R O U N D IN G S O F T H E N O R TH E A S T B A S TI O N (S Q U A R ES KL4-5)
Several sherds of painted Protogeometric amphoras have been recovered in the rubble layer
above the collapsed Troy VIIb walls (Pl. 83.A-83.F). 619 This stratigraphic event is, however,
attributed to the mid 7th century BCE. 620 No clear Protogeometric layers have been found outside the North-East bastion. A curved wall discovered by Drpfeld (Pl. 86.B, 86.E), also
clearly postdates the remains of Troy VIIb2 and is to be dated to the Geometric or early Archaic period. 621

Several different structures were attributed to the Troy VIIb3 (=Protogeometric) period in
preliminary reports in the 1990s but the overall picture was substantially modified since
then. 622 The stratigraphy, architecture and pottery of the Protogeometric period from the area
of the later Sanctuary is currently being prepared for publication by Basedow and Aslan from
the PBA team. Although the study is not yet completed, it became evident that the opinions
presented in this report diverge from the interpretations offered by the PBA team.
According to complex LBA/EIA stratigraphic relationships that were redefined with the
help of pottery studies, the only architectonic structure recognized here as being built during
the Protogeometric period is the Vertical Stones Feature 1 with its closely related pavement.
The remaining Protogeometric features are concentrated above the ruins of the Terrace House
618
Aslan 2002.
619
Beh. K4.91, K4.169, K4.181, K4.197, L4.122, L4.178, L4.316. Publ. Lenz et al. 1996, IB.7, IB.27, IC.15,
IC.10, II.13, III.10, III.11.

620
Aslan 2008, forthcoming.
621
Aslan 2008, forthcoming.
622
Basedow 2006, Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b.
[180]
and Pithos Storeroom, as various fills and pits. It is striking, how many stone-fill pits are likely to date to Protogeometric times. 623 Their concentration and extent would justify designation
as a stone-pit horizon. This situation is without parallels on the site. Given the later use of
the area as a Sanctuary, and the unusual character of the Vertical Stones feature 1, it would
not be surprising if cult activities played a role already in Protogeometric times.
R U IN S O F TH E T E R R A C E H O U S E
North Room, Deposit over the Ruins ( 25.46-26.08)
The North Room is a Late Bronze Age structure that was covered by burnt debris at the end
of the Troy VIIa phase. 624 No Troy VIIb or Protogeometric architectonic remains have been
found, only a substantial deposit with numerous pottery sherds from these periods (Pl. 7). The
presence of large Late Mycenaean sherds besides the Protogeometric pottery indicates accumulation over a long period of time. The pit published in the preliminary report 625 (Pl. 56.D)
must have been later than the Protogeometric deposit. 626
The pottery of Troy VIIb style occurred in the deposits above the ruins of the North Room and on
the level where the walls just started to appear.627 Side by side lay a considerable number of
Protogeometric and Hellenistic sherds. The presence of Hellenistic sherds must be seen in relation
with the Hellenistic pavements, terrace wall and their substructure lying directly above. Most probably
the deposit was contaminated by Hellenistic leveling of a genuine Early Iron Age layer.
Due to this much later admixture the statistics of the ware groups is only approximate and should be
used with special care.
Anatolian Grey ware dominated among the fine wares. Catalogued are a BS A60 (or some its bigger
variety) carinated bowl 1267 and a small fragment of BS D45 fenestrated stand 1268.
623
In a number of instances the evidence is pretty clear and consists of pottery content and stratigraphy. Some-
times, however, the pits yielded little diagnostic material and they were dated only tentatively on basis of their
relative position in the stratigraphic sequence.
624
Becks et al. 2006b, 43-5.
625
Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b, 77.
626
See its description in the Geometric Phase.
627
Beh. z7.92 was completely above the walls. The walls appeared beginning with Beh. z7.119 the fill seems
to be a genuine Troy VIIa deposit.
[181]
Mostly red varieties of Tan Ware from bowl types BS A49, A71, A73.
MYCENAEAN POTTERY
Most significant piece 1266 belongs to the famous Lion krater whose other remains were scattered
around a surprisingly large area.
PROTOGEOMETRIC POTTERY
The big joining sherds of painted Protogeometric pottery make it clear that they were part of the
original context, not a secondary fill or leveling dump. The concentration of painted Protogeometric
sherds is striking, the mostly complete amphora from Troy 1271 was assembled from pieces found
broken in this area.
TROY VI/VIIA AND TROY VIIB COARSE WARES
The original records do not distinguish between the wheelmade coarse wares of Troy VI/VIIa, Troy
VIIb handmade wares, and the pithoi. The absolute figures for Troy VIIb wares in the chart are reconstructed on basis of surface treatment and production technique.628 However, given the overall character of the assemblage and the better documented proportions among the diagnostic sherds, most of the
undiagnostic pottery classified as Troy VI coarse ware is also likely to be Troy VIIb handmade
coarse ware. 629 The number of pithoi could not be reconstructed.
From the Troy VIIb wares all varieties of surface treatment are represented untreated, burnished
and polished. No decorated examples of Knobbed Ware were recorded, but a sherd from a handmade lustrous ware bowl 1269 might have belonged to that category. Most of the rest were sherds
from cooking or storage vessels, several of them clearly belonging to a single BS C86 example with
oblique fingernails imprints 1270.
South Room, Deposit above the stone collapse with conspicuous small-finds concentration
( 24.74-25.28 m)
Considerable quantities of Troy VIIb pottery have been found over the ruins of the South
Room. Their context is not easy to understand, because despite the limited space, features of
628
Originally all sherds have been classified as Coarse Ware. Remarks about polished or slipped surface and
in case of diagnostic sherds also about the handmade production technique were taken as indications for the a
posteriori re-classification to the Troy VIIb ware groups.
629
I was unable to reexamine all the sherds and from this reason the original figure from primary processing in
1994 is kept.
[182]
different date were clearly present. The whole area is worth closer attention because of the
high numbers of precious small finds retrieved from it. 630
In the preliminary publication, I expressed the opinion that the Troy VIIb pottery originated
from the stone collapse above the ruins and that the small finds could have been deliberately
deposited in the ruins during Troy VIIb phase. 631 The situation seems however more complex
and some revisions must be made.
The stone collapse is dated to the Troy VIIa phase in this report. It is most likely related
with the destruction or later disintegration of the Terrace House building. 632 The stone collapse and the whole north corner of the room were disturbed by a big Troy VIII pit, probably
aimed at robbing the stones (Pl. 55.B, 55.C). 633 Another pit filled with loose stones was cut
into the wall between the South Room and the Pithos Storeroom, destroying it until the floor
level (Pl. 54.B, 54.E). This was dated by the PBA team to Hellenistic or Early Roman
times. 634
The clayish deposit that accumulated above the stone collapse at the level of the uppermost
preserved course of walls (Pl. 55.B) is the only secure context in the South Room, and yielded
Troy VIIb pottery, along with a few Protogeometric sherds. It is argued here that the small
finds are related with this deposit. 635 The deposition of small-finds is likely to have been a
deliberate act that took place inside the ruins of the South Room. It suggests some kind of
ritual activities. No floor or walking levels of the Troy VIIb or PG phase have been recognized.
Interestingly, a good many other small finds were found several centimeters deeper, over the
floor of the South Room and in the Lower pit cut into the floor (Pl. 54.B), securely dated to
Troy VIIa. 636 The two deposits were divided by a burnt destruction layer above the floor of
630
For the list of small finds cf. footnote 241.
631
Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b, 75-6.
632
See p. 59.
633
The pit clearly belongs to PBA phases. In the preliminary publication (see footnote 631), it was referred to
as Late Protogeometric or Archaic, but it can be even later. Here it is only generally dated to Troy VIII. Its position can be seen in Becks et al. 2006b, Abb. 25.
634
Cf. footnote 244.
635
Although numerous smallfinds were found during the removal of the stone collapse underneath (Beh.
A7.675), several indications suggest that most if not all of the finds were on the top of the stones, among the
uppermost stones or in the parts of the room where no stone collapse was found. See the descriptions of the Troy
VIIa deposit for further details (p. 59).
636
Becks et al. 2006b, 40-1, 53-5.
[183]
the South Room. This high concentration of LBA and EIA cult-related finds in one room is
unique for the whole site. Since the Lower pit and the floor belong to the Troy VIIa phase
and the finds from above the stone collapse should be dated to Troy VIIb or Protogeometric
periods, survival of certain practices or continued use of space that was sacred is implied.
Otherwise it would be highly improbable that numerous finds of similar character were by
chance deposited in the very same place in distant phases.
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 110.G)
The pottery assemblage is characterized by the presence of Troy VIIb sherds, of Grey Ware shapes
that are usually considered PG or Geo and of several joins in Tan Ware and Mycenaean Ware to the
deposit lying underneath (the stone collapse). 637 There are small to middle-sized sherds, and several
joins. The presence of PG Group III amphorae would date the whole rather late into the Late
Protogeometric or Geometric period. Immediately above this context a much later pit has been identified and which could have been responsible for these and also for other PBA sherds.
Dominating ware in the assemblage.

A. Fragments of a cup 1280 and of various bowls. The best preserved example belongs to a developed carinated version of a BS A71 skyphos with prolonged handle-tails 1272 and 1275.
B. Fragments of at least three various big jugs or amphoras, one of them 1273 with twisted handle.
Rather big group, mostly sherds in orange and reddish tones of Tan Ware. Some of the examples
classified originally in this category rather belong to Mycenaean plain ware. A number of joins with
the stone collapse context underneath, which seems to have been the primary context for Tan Ware
vessels. Accordingly, the proportion of this ware group in the Protogeometric context above the ruins
can be overestimated.
A. Mostly bowls and deep bowls. Several joining fragments of a BS A93 bowl 1274.
MYCENAEAN WARE
Most of the sherds from this group join to ones from the stone collapse below. Their presence in the
Protogeometric deposit is thus residual. Skyphos 1276, unpainted and produced in a fabric unusual for
Troy, is perhaps exported Mycenaean Plain Ware (?).
637
Beh. A7.638. For the stone collapse (Beh. A7.675) see p. 59.
[184]
One body sherd of late PG Group III type amphora 1277. One disc-base 1278 of probably the same
group.
Body sherd with indication of a handle attachment 1279, and a part of a vertical handle, both from a
big basin.
C. One undecorated handmade cooking pot 1281. One jar too small for nearer classification, with
fingernail imprints on the rim 1285. The rest belonged to typical BS C85-86 jars decorated with raised
bands and finger imprints as 1283.
Few examples produced by hand and with untreated surface (as far as it could have been observed
on the preserved surfaces). The most interesting piece belonged to a cup with handles with horn-like
protrusion 1282.
B. Jug (?) 1284.
Central Room, Big stone pit ( 24.01-24.42 m)

A pit densely filled with stones was cut into the deposits over the Central Room from a level
immediately underneath the Apsidal structure (Pl. 57.E). The stone fill of the pit started from
a higher elevation than that of the Pit with cooking pots (Pl. 57.A, 57.C). 638 The stratigraphic position of the pit thus speaks for a date later than the pit dated in Troy VIIb1 (?) and earlier than the Geometric Cult Building to which the Apsidal structure did belonged. A concentration of painted Protogeometric sherds was uncovered over the stones of the pit. 639 Depending on whether the Protogeometric sherds are interpreted as still belonging to the pit, to the
Apsidal structure or to some intermediary horizon between them, the stratigraphic date of the
pit varies between Troy VIIb1 and PG. Unfortunately, the pottery assemblage is not of much
help in any attempt in attaining better precision. Since typical pottery for any of the
stratigraphically possible dates was missing, the pit was classified into the PG period on the
638
See p. 162.
639
See p. 188.
[185]
basis of compositional similarities (stone fill) with better dated pits from the area. This attribution should be treated with caution.
Catalogue and statistics are omitted, because the excavation units did not distinguish between the
feature and the adjoining strata. The latest pottery from the area included a Mycenaean skyphos in LH
IIIC Early style, 640 one sherd dated as Archaic, 641 and two-three others supposed Troy VIII period
sherds. 642
Central Room, Pit under Orthostate wall ( 23.80-24.65 m)

Another pit cut into the deposits of the former Central Room was discovered under the Geometric Orthostate wall (Pl. 57.C, 57.D). The pit started directly under the Geometric
Orthostate wall, at a comparable level as the Big stone pit, i.e. higher than the Pit with
cooking pots. The dating into the Protogeometric period is based on the interpretation of
stratigraphy the pit under the orthostate wall seems later than the Pit under Apsidal Structure dated provisionally to Troy VIIb1, and it must be earlier than the Orthostate wall, which
belonged to the Geometric Cult Building.
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 110.H)
The pottery assemblage included several middle-sized and a few rather big fragments, with some
joins. Except for typical Late Bronze Age wares (with preponderant Anatolian Grey Ware) it also contained several Troy VIIb body sherds, a PBA plain grey body fragment and a black-glazed bowl fragment. 643 An unusual Anatolian Grey Ware incurved rim with multiple ridges, deep vertical incisions,
triangular fenestration and circular piercing has also been recovered in the area, although it is impossible to decide whether it originally belonged to the pit or to the earlier Troy VI/VIIa strata into which
the pit was cut.644
640
Inv. z7.1248.18 dated by Penelope Mountjoy.
641
Inv. z7.1248.17 dated by Carolyn Aslan.
642
Records from primary processing of Beh. z7.1248. This excavation unit comprised larger area, but the latest
sherds are supposed to have come from the pit.

643
Beh. z7.1303, 1992.
644
z.744.27 + z7.1315.2 + z7.1332.32 and 33 + z7.1992.9. Parts of it were published (without fenestrae) in
Koppenhfer 1997, Abb. 13:1.
[186]
Central Room, Pit to the east of the Orthostate wall ( 24.31-24.76 m)

A conspicuous concentration of inclined stones, clearly indicating a pit was discovered to
the east of the Geometric Orthostate wall, partly covered by several thin stone slabs
(Pl. 57.G). The stratigraphic position of the pit indicates a date later than Troy VIIa and earlier than the Geometric Period.
The pottery from the stone concentration was not separated during the excavation. The presented assemblage must be treated as material from floor and destruction levels of the Troy VIIa building
mixed with later intrusion. Although attribution of these sherds to the pit is only hypothetical, it is very
likely in the light of the fact that this was the latest pottery and no other disturbances were observed
in the given excavation unit. 645
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
All sherds rather fragmented, with the exception of catalogued examples, which contrast strikingly.
A. Cup, likely Early Protogeometric, 646 with ring-base and indication of a vertical handle 1286. It is
actually not clear whether the ware is to be attributed to Grey Ware or better to a secondarily burnt
Brown-slip ware.
A sharply carinated bowl of BS A93 type with deep fast wheel-thrown ridges on the interior 1288.
TAN WARE
Small group. Mostly body sherds in orange shades.

A. Carinated bowl of BS A93 type 1287. A worn fragment of another bowl. It cannot be excluded
that the cup described in the Anatolian Grey Ware section above belongs to this category.
B. Fragments of a rather worn, secondarily burnt flat base of a big closed vessel, most likely big jug
or amphora.
MYCENAEAN WARE
A. Fragment of a painted skyphos 1286 and a fragment of what looks like Mycenaean Plain Ware
kylix 1289 (unless it is not a somewhat unusual pale variety of a local Tan Ware).
COARSE WARES
Mostly wheelmade sherds, very few handmade.
645
Not even in the profiles.
646
Cf. p. 33.
[187]
C. Fragment of an everted rim of a wheelmade cooking pot. Another rim belonged to a handmade
burnished vessel in Gritty fabric decorated with slashes on the rim. The most interesting piece 1290
originates from a big basin with deeply grooved vertical handles.
PITHOI
A large numbers of broken undecorated pithos body sherds, ranging from small to fairly large. Most
of them show traces of secondary burning. Few are worn.
UNKNOWN AND POST BRONZE AGE WARES
A rather big group of various hard-fired body sherds. Pale, reddish, and slipped varieties. Not identified.
Central Room, Scattered painted Protogeometric Sherds ( 24.15-24.54 m)

The sherds have originated from several excavation units. Most of the sherds were found in
a level immediately underneath the apsidal structure of the Geometric cult building or even
adjoining the exterior stones of the apsidal structure. 647 The only concentration of painted
sherds separated directly in the field was found at the south side of the Apsidal structure, at a
level slightly underneath its foundation. 648 It was superposed above the uppermost stones of
the Big stone pit. Since the Apsidal structure seems to have been deepened into earlier strata, 649 the Protogeometric sherds most probably predate it.
Other sherds from a related context included a fragment of a Knobbed Ware cup with channeled decoration. 650
Blocked doorway between the Central Room and South Room ( 24.13-25.00 m)
A Submycenaean or Protogeometric sherd is reported to have been found in the excavation
unit above the door and under the Geometric wall. 651
647
Joining pieces from Beh. z7.126, 567, 569 and 701.
648
Beh. z7.569 ( 24.38-24.54 m); the level range of Apsidal structure in this part was 24.41-24.59 m a.s.l.
649
Its exterior was very irregular. In contrast, the interior was arranged to form a regular face. The stones thus
make impression of being set into an already existing layer package. Otherwise the irregular outer face of the
Apsidal structure
650
z7.571.1 from the excavation unit in which the stones of Apsidal Structure were removed.
651
From Beh. z7.683. The date is based on the personal communication by Penelope Mountjoy. The whole se-
quence included z7.677 (Geometric wall), 679, 683, 685 (above the threshold).
[188]
R U IN S O F P I TH O S S TO R ER O O M
First Protogeometric Pit ( 23.65-24.62/24.87 m)
A pit filled with dark earth, many stones, many bones, shells, burnt clay and many broken
sherds has been found in the disturbed area between the oddly oriented wall and the south
wall of the Pithos Storeroom (Pl. 7, 52.A-52.G). An elongated glass bead 652 and a miniature
stone adze 653 have also been found within its boundaries.
Most likely, the oddly oriented wall was missing in the area of the pit, because it was disturbed by it. The base level of the wall lay at ca. 24.45 m (Pl. 52.A, 52.B). 654
In the earlier publication of the context, I expressed the opinion that the pit was originally a
pithos setting pit. 655 This need not to have been the case and the pit might have been just another one from a series of Protogeometric pits dispersed around the area. The fill indicates a
refuse character of the pit in its last stage.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE LOWER PART ( 23.39-24.62 M) (PL. 110.B)
The pit contained a large assemblage with sherds ranging from small to fairly big fragments. 656 It
was dominated by many broken joining sherds from a big handmade storage vessel. The evidence for
the Protogeometric date of the pit is given by a Protogeometric cup with conical base and by a conical
base of another cup or skyphos. The pit yielded also a number of pithos sherds and a considerable
proportion of earlier wares.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
One nearly complete cup, otherwise only small fragments.

A. One-handled cup of typical Protogeometric shape with a vertical handle and a distinct conical
base 1295. Fragment of another conical base 1293 belonged to a similar cup or skyphos, perhaps to the
same skyphos as rim fragment 1296 and rim with horizontal handle (with elongated tails) 1346.
652
Beh. A7.112.
653
Beh. A7.156.
654
Two middle-sized stones (at ca.24.87) seem to be in line with face of the wall, but they are otherwise
floating. No other stones have been recovered either to the right or to the left of them, and therefore it is more
probable that these two stones belonged to the pit, as the stones immediately below them apparently did. Alternatively the two stones could have been related with Geometric period activities. The wall and the bench of Geometric Cult Building passed directly above the oddly oriented wall in less than a half meter distance from the pit.
655
Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b, 74.
656
Beh. zA7.913, zA7.935, zA7/8.1031, zA7/8.1033, zA7/8.1035, zA7/8.1041, zA7/8.1049.
[189]
TAN WARE
Non-descript fragments.
A. Flat base of a rather thin bowl.

C. Many joining sherds from a big wide-mouthed jar of BS C85 type 1291. Other sherds from the
same vessel 1308, 1300, 1302 and perhaps also 1108, 1109 seem to have been concentrated in the
ruins of the Pithos Storeroom, mostly in the Second Protogeometric pit and its vicinity. 657 This indicate rough contemporaneity of both Protogeometric pits in Pithos Storeroom.
B. Lower part of a jug with rather globular body 1293.

B or C. Rim fragment of an ovoid jar or BS B33 one-handled cooking pot 1298.
B. Fragment of a flat base 1292 most probably belonged to a jug, given its small diameter and steep
belly.
C. Few wheelmade sherds. Not clear whether residual pieces of Troy VI/VIIa or genuine to the deposit. The only recognized shape is a cooking pot with everted rim 1297.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE UPPERMOST PART ( 24.45-24.87 M) (PL. 110.C)
The pottery assemblage from the uppermost deposit of the pit, related with disturbed stones of the
oddly oriented wall, is different from the deeper lying fill of the pit. Instead of the Handmade Coarse
Wares found deeper, it contained almost exclusively wheelmade coarse cooking ware, rather characteristic of Geometric phases. 658 It yielded also a sherd from a fenestrated stand, other fragments of
which have been recovered all over the Geometric horizon near the outside bench of the Geometric
Cult Building.
Sherds of wheelmade cooking ware also have been found in the excavation unit directly above the
oddly oriented wall. 659 Their occurrence in the uppermost part of the pit is likely due to the vicinity to
the Geometric horizon, which lay directly above the oddly oriented wall.
657
The Beh. z7/8.1982 was separated as the pit. Beh. z8.539, z8.640 were limited excavation units excavated
in the area later recognized as the pit. Beh. z7/8.1131 was a larger excavation unit between both pits.
658
Beh. A7.103. Parts of Beh. A7.109 and zA7.902 also belonged to this context.
659
Beh. A7.81. Another unit from the same context and from a comparable elevation should be zA7.1067,
which I was unable to examine.
[190]
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Middle-sized sherds.
A. Remains of what seems to be an advance type of a BS A71 skyphos 1346. One other fragment,
possibly from the same vessel, joined to 1296 (whose bigger part was found in the deeper levels of the
pit). Remarkable is also a body sherd decorated with wavy lines which seem to be produced in polishing technique 1349. Two more bowl fragments are worth mentioning one with a basket handle (BS
A60?) and second from a carinated bowl with a vertical handle with upper attachment at the level of
the lip.
B. Two small rim fragments from jugs with thickened lip.
Mostly body sherds in buff varieties.

A. Only two diagnostic sherds in the assemblage. Both from bowls one is a flat base, the second a
rim with thickened lip.
PLAIN WARE
A. A rather thick plate with cord impressions on the exterior of the rim 1348.
C. A middle-sized join to the big wide-mouthed jar 1291 was found in this deposit.
Burnished and unburnished varieties. Small to middle-sized fragments. The fabric is rather gritty.
C. Remains of cooking pots with flat bases and vertical handles 1350, 1350.
PITHOI
Several sherds, among them one interesting example with cord impressions on the rim 1353.
POST-BRONZE AGE
D. Small sherd from a fenestrated stand decorated with raised band and oblique incisions 303. Other,
considerably bigger, fragments have been found in the Geometric grey deposit.
Second Protogeometric Pit ( 23.65-24.40 m)

A pit filled with many stones and some broken pottery was discovered during the 1994 excavations in z8. Later it became evident that the pit was cut into the layers of what became to
[191]
be called the Pithos Storeroom. The pit remained for a long time visible only in the profile of
the excavated area (Pl. 48.D, 49.B, 51.A) until a part of it was excavated in 2001 (Pl. 51.B). It
could have been only one from a series of pits in the area (Pl. 51.D). 660
The pit was clearly covered by a clayish deposit and above it by a distinct grey layer interpreted as a Geometric horizon, described in more detail below. 661 It was also partly covered
by a Geometric wall. The grey layer and the wall offer a stratigraphic terminus ante quem for
dating the pit.
The pit fill contained small sherds and also a number of broken pithos fragments.
662
It yielded
handmade sherds in Troy VIIb style, painted fragments of a Protogeometric amphora and a grey ware
skyphos fragment with pronounced handle-tails.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Stem fragment from a kylix 1303 and fragment of what probably was a skyphos with elongated
handle tails 1303.
B. Part of a rim with vertical handle of a BS B25 jug.
Except for one bowl with everted rim only nondescript body sherds.
PLAIN WARE
A. Fragment of a plate or shallow bowl with an unusual decoration of dots produced by a needle or
similar sharp tool.
A. Handle fragment from a cup 1306.

B. Body sherd 1308 from a big wide-mouthed jar whose biggest part was found in the first
Protogeometric pit.
A rather big shoulder fragment 1305 of a painted amphora of Protogeometric Group IB.
660
The pottery from the area is somewhat contaminated by later, mostly Hellenistic sherds. But several inter-
esting fragments
661
See p. 208.
662
Beh. z8.615, z8.634, z7/8.1982.
[192]
N O R TH H O U S E S
Walls of North House A have been partly reused and partly overbuilt by the Vertical Stones
Feature 1. It is not fully clear whether other parts of the North Houses were still visible and
potentially used in the Protogeometric period (Pl. 7).
Vertical Stones Feature 1 ( c. 25.84-26.26 m)
The Vertical Stones Feature 1 (VSF-1) is placed over the east wall of North House A, but it
is set up against its southern wall (Pl. 28.B-28.E). The designation originates from Maureen
Basedow and it reflects the construction technique, a single row of vertically set stone slabs.
In the original BA reports it was interpreted as a Troy VIIb2 wall. 663
The orthostates of the feature are based some 15-20 cm higher than the walls of North
House A (Pl. 8.A, 8.B). The feature seems to have originally continued some 1.5 m to the
northeast of the house and then turned towards the northwest. Its remains were found on both
sides of the Hellenistic foundation wall (Pl. 28.B, 28.E, 30.E). Further continuation is unknown. It might have turned back to the southwest, but the area is disturbed by later activities
(Pl. 30.D). The Vertical Stones Feature 1 is overlain by a Crosswall (Pl. 28.B). 664
The date of the fragmentary Crosswall is not easy to fix, the range being between
Protogeometric and Hellenistic. 665 It was cut by foundations of the Fimbrias building exterior
wall (Pl. 31.B-31.D). 666 The Crosswall might have belonged to a pavement made of pithos
sherds and tiles. This covered the VSF-1 and ran up against the Crosswall and against the
south wall of North House A (Pl. 28.A). It probably continued in the form of a paved stone
surface that was found in a somewhat disturbed state inside the area delimited by the founda-
663
Korfmann 2002, Abb. 10.
664
The date of this wall (designated in field records as 217 and its continuation as 289) and the disposition of
the building to which it belonged are not clear. Possibly the Wall 871 discovered in z7NW, which is built in
similar technique on a comparable level and is perpendicular to the Crosswall, belonged to the same building.
665
It seems to have once abutted the main North House A wall although during the excavation the last centi-
meters between them were filled only with mud.

666
The continuation was designated as wall 289.
[193]
tions of the Fimbria Building (Pl. 30.D). The date of this later pavement stands somewhere
between Archaic and Hellenistic. 667
Due to the very limited space, the Vertical Stones Feature 1 is not fully understood. It seems
to be related with an ashy deposit with burnt material that was directly abutting the orthostates
and which was at the same time passing under the Crosswall (Pl. 8.A, 8.B). 668 The ashy layer
was rather thin. It was encountered also next to the solitary vertical stones 1.5 m to the east of
North House A, underneath the wall of the Fimbria building, which almost surely delimited
Vertical Stones Feature 1 on the east. 669 This part of VSF-1 was, however, considerably disturbed. 670
To the west of the Crosswall, the burnt and ashy deposit was possibly superposed by a
pavement made of flat stones (Pl. 8.A, 8.B). 671 In the preliminary publication it was stated
that a thin layer of burnt material separated the stony surface and the wall from the Troy
VIIb2 deposits below, which contained a considerable amount of Knobbed ware. 672
A good parallel to the orthostate structure was excavated in the citadel area by Blegen in the
1930s. 673 Both, the VSF-1 and the structure found by Blegen, seem to have been closely associated with a house wall. The remains of ashy and burnt deposit indicate use of VSF-1 as a
hearth or altar structure. 674
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE
The orthostates did not have any visible foundation trench. The space between them and the walls of
North House A was filled with rubble and clay packing. Very little and fragmented pottery was found
667
The pottery always included some Hellenistic sherds. But the fact that the pithos and tile pavement partly
served as a substructure for thick marl floor for which the best parallel has been found few meters to the north, in
Archaic Cult Building, leave the Archaic dating worth consideration.
668
Beh. z7.232, 237 (the top of), 250 (this Beh. contained only clay, Httenlehm).
669
Sketch in Tb z7N.1994: 4.
670
As indicated by the missing stones and also by the PBA pottery and tiles found under the level of VSF-1 in
the area to the east of North House A (Beh. z7.243).

671
grey and blackish earth below the pavement Beh. z7.344. This level is however mostly below the
orthostates. Since in other parts the deposit is reported to have been very thin and since many sherds from this
Behlter found joins in Behlter z7.356 laying deeper, they are attributed to the Floor deposit of North House A.
672
Lenz et al. 1998, 194. These VIIb2 deposits are attributed in this report to floor of North House A.
673
Area 786 (Squares HJ/6-7), dated to VIIb1 (Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 105, 352).
674
See more about this interpretation in Basedow and Aslan, forthcoming.
[194]
in the packing. It included Grey Ware, Troy VIIb handmade coarse wares and two small PBA body
sherds (incl. one black glazed chip with slip flaking off). 675
Protogeometric Pavement ( c. 25.92-26.14 m)

A surprising quantity of Protogeometric pottery appeared in a very small area delimited by
the Vertical Stones Feature 1, the Crosswall, southern wall of Fimbrias Building and the Hellenistic wall on the west (Pl. 7, 8.A, 8.B, . 28.C, 28.D). This area was previously referred to as
a surface, possibly a pavement since two bigger flat stones and a few other small ones,
placed in some distance from each other, but being on approximately the same level, have
been found here in the initial stages of excavation. 676
Given the very limited space it is for the moment almost impossible to interpret the context
conclusively. Since the stone surface was not continuous and no other paving stones were
found later on, it is questionable whether the pavement actually deserves its name. The designation is kept here only for the sake of continuity and easier reference.
It was suggested that the pavement belongs to the Crosswall. The elevation in which the
Protogeometric sherds were found makes it, however, more likely that the sherds were related
with the Vertical Stones Feature 1 (Pl. 8.A, 8.B). 677
The pavement was supposed to have continued inside the Fimbria Building. 678 But the only clear pavement, made of closely set flat stones, was uncovered some twenty centimeters
higher (Pl. 30.D) and in absence of diagnostic pieces it was dated only roughly to the Classical Period. 679 The deposits below yielded some later finds, but the majority of the pottery was
already prehistoric and no Early Protogeometric sherds have been found. 680 There are some
675
Beh. z7.259 from the east half of the packing. The west half of the packing was left unexcavated.
676
Lenz et al. 1998, 194. The distance between the two bigger flat stones was mistakenly stated as being 3 m.
The correct distance is c. 1.5 m.

677
They occur higher than the bases but lower than the top parts of VSF-1.
678
Square z6/7.
679
Beh. z6/7.193 according to the primary PBA pottery processing entry.
680
Beh. z6/7.260 (Hellenistic coin), z6/7.261 (Archaic and Classical pottery), z7/8.263 (Archaic), z6/7.266
(Hellenistic?, Archaic). The only Protogeometric sherd was found in Beh. z6/7.268 (Lenz et al. 1998, Cat. No.
II.22). This sherd however belonged to the Group II variety which is considerably later. The excavation unit
encompassed much larger area than the pavement itself, including the space over the Geometric Pit where two
more late types of PG amphoras have been found.
[195]
indications that the area might have been partly destroyed by later activities, which would
explain the presence of later sherds even in the lower deposits (Pl. 30.D). 681
The pottery assemblage does not look like one from a pavement deposit. It contains many big joining sherds, rather indicating a destruction horizon or a deliberate deposition.
It is not excluded that the occurrence of Protogeometric pottery is related with activities exclusively
on the west side of the Crosswall. Twenty one sherds from probably only two painted Protogeometric
amphorae were found on a surface comprising less than 1 m2. 682 This is the highest concentration of
Protogeometric pottery over the entire site.
The Protogeometric sherds were found together with similarly numerous handmade sherds. The surface of the handmade sherds was usually well burnished and suggests attribution of at least some of
them to Knobbed Ware, although no examples with distinct Knobbed Ware decoration have been
found in the assemblage. Some contamination could not be avoided and even the lowest excavation
unit included several Post-Bronze Age sherds, the latest of them were Hellenistic or even Early Roman. 683
Two more Protogeometric sherds have been found inside the Fimbria building, to the west of the
Crosswall continuation, on the same elevation as the sherds from the pavement. 684 The majority of
the excavated deposits on this side however proved to be Archaic, with occasional contaminations of
Hellenistic Period. 685
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
Nondescript sherds.
TAN WARE
Nondescript sherds.
681
This later pavement seems not to have been preserved immediately next to the Hellenistic wall, where the
fill seems to be mixed with small particles of marl and some conspicuously inclined stones.
682
Beh. z7.245 (the excavation unit from the foundation trench of Fimbria Building included parts of sur-
rounding deposits through which it was cut), z7.247 (on the pavement, but it is an extremely small assemblage
and no PG pottery was found there), z7.253 (on the pavement), z7.343 (in the pavement itself).
683
z7.343 information based on the PBA primary pottery processing.
684
Beh. z6/7.319. Published in Lenz et al. 1998, Cat. No. IB.16.
685
Beh. z6/7.301, 321, 322, 324, 331, 333, 559.
[196]
PAINTED PROTOGEOMETRIC POTTERY
C. Many sherds from two different amphoras 1309 and 1310.

A. Bowl 1313.
C. A good many fragments of various undecorated jars. Recognizable shapes are a BS C85 widemouthed jar fragment 1311 and a barrel-shaped jar with ear-like lug placed near the rim 1314. Sherd
1312 seems to have once belonged either to BS C85 or C86 jars.
A. Fragment of a cup 1315.

C. Most probably a BS C85 jar 1316. Its attribution to this wares group is to be taken with care,
since sometimes the burnishing marks are not equally distributed over the surface of the pot and can
thus be missing on some sherds.
PITHOI
One body sherd decorated with deep horizontal and wavy flutes 1317.
V ER T IC A L S TO N ES F E A TU R E 2 ( 26.05-26.40 M )
Another rectangular structure built of upright stones was found inside the southwest corner
of the Fimbrias Building foundations, on a slightly higher elevation than the Vertical Stones
Feature 1. It has been designated as the Vertical Stones Feature 2 (VSF-2) by Maureen
Basedow.
In contrast to the Vertical Stones Feature 1, its second counterpart was built not of one, but
of two closely spaced rows of orthostates. In a style very similar to what was observed for
Troy VIIb house remains in front of Gate VIU.
Vertical Stones Features 1 and 2 are likely to have been related in some way. Perhaps the
VSF-2 replaced the VSF-1.
686
The VSF-2 seems to have delimited some area. Due to the
heavy disturbances caused by later building activity it is not possible to envisage how the
complete structure looked.
686
Both structures will be treated in more detail by Maureen Basedow in the Final Publication of the PBA
team about the Sanctuary (Basedow and Aslan, forthcoming).
[197]
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE
The pottery from the fill of the Vertical Stones Feature 2 contained in its upper part Hellenistic, in its
lower part Troy VIIb handmade burnished ware and handmade lustrous ware body sherds combined
with Protogeometric, Archaic and Hellenistic pottery. 687 The presence of Archaic and Hellenistic
sherds in the assemblage is to be explained by the vicinity of the Hellenistic surface and by the possible contamination through the foundation trenches of Hellenistic walls. Two sherds are catalogued a
Grey ware carinated skyphos with horizontal handle close to the rim 1340 and a shoulder fragment of
a painted Protogeometric amphora 1341.
687
z6/7.302, z6/7.326. Dating of the pottery according to Maureen Basedow: Final Report for Square z6 in
1994.
[198]
REMARKS ON GEOMETRIC TROY

CITADEL
H A B I TA T IO N
IN
S Q U A R ES E8-9
Ruins of Room B
G2/3 PIT
A pit which cut through the western wall of Room B (Pl. 64.B, 64.C) and which itself was
overbuilt by a VIIb3 wall (Pl. 74.A, 74.B) yielded fragments of the best preserved vessel in
G2/3 ware discovered until 1996. 688 The fragments were found scattered over several excavation units, but they constitute a joining part of the vessel. It is improbable that their presence
would be a result of intrusions into an earlier pit. The pit thus offers a terminus ante quem for
the last phase of Room B and at the same time a terminus post quem for the VIIb3 wall.
G2/3 wares dates to the late 8th to the mid 7th century BCE.
VIIb3 Wall (34.71-35.50)
A wall running in a east-west direction which cut though the western wall of Room B and
continued into Room C was believed to have been built shortly after the destruction of the
Troy VIIb2 building (Pl. 74.A, 74.B). It was assigned a Troy VIIb3 date, chronologically defined by the appearance of Protogeometric pottery along with Knobbed Ware. 689 However,
there was Archaic pottery embedded into the wall 690 and even in the pit underneath the
wall. 691 These pieces were initially interpreted in terms of disturbances but they were likely
genuine in the context. The wall does not follow the VIIb urban model and it probably belonged to an Archaic terrace or to a building related with Blegens House 814/Area 815 complex. The VIIb3 wall might be related with the wall over the street (Pl. 74.C, 74.D, 74.E).692
Both walls are perpendicular to each other. Although they do not meet directly, their foundations lay on comparable elevations.
688
Beh. E9.578, 595, 683, 700, 712, 720. See Rose 1996, 99; McMullen Fisher 1996, Cat. No. 14, Fig. 3.
689
Hawkins and Easton 1996, 115; Rose 1996, 99.
690
Beh. E9.617, 632, 656, 677.
691
See above.
692
See p. 172.
[199]
The VIIb3 wall was built in at a distance of a few centimeters up to a meter to the south of
the northern wall of Room B, down the slope. The base of the VIIb3 wall lay some 60-70
cm under the highest preserved course of the northern wall of Room B. There is thus little
doubt that the preserved remains of the VIIb3 wall were only foundations or a terrace wall.
The deposits accumulated between both walls included hanmade coarse and handmade lustrous wares, but also some wheelmade burnished and unburnished coarse wares, an unusual
irregular clay lump resembling a base, but also a few Archaic fragments. 693
Ruins of Room G
Deposits covering the house (35.70-36.10 m)
A substantial quantity of painted Post-Bronze Age sherds has been found in the excavation
units from the topmost levels inside Room G, where the walls started to be revealed (Pl.
68.D). 694 Given their vicinity to Blegens House 814, a Geometric date is most likely. The
pottery has not been processed into necessary level of detail. Part of the deposit likely was
contaminated by the slope erosion and Schliemann dump.
Pit disturbing the southwestern corner
The southwest corner of the room was disturbed by a large pit (Pl. 68.D, 73.C, 73.D). The
assemblage included one sherd from a Protogeometric amphora of Group IB, whereas the
latest pottery was dated as Archaic. 695 The rest of the assemblage consisted of two or three
sherds of G2/3 ware, one knob, fragments with painted bands and a wheelmade coarse ware
jug or amphora base. 696
693
Beh. E9.439, 453, 588, 641.
694
Beh. E8.97, 111.
695
Lenz et al. 1998, Cat. No. IB.23.
696
Beh. E8.254.
[200]

AREA
O U TS ID E
G A TE VIU
Geometric Terrace Wall (26.00-26.50 and 26.80-27.20 m)

A small wall remnant was excavated and removed by the Tbingen team in 2000 directly
underneath Blegens Wall 793 (Pl. 41.A-41.E, 42.A). It consisted of several big and middlesized stones, under the lowermost course of Wall 793, on its southern side. 697 It abutted the
Troy VI Fortification wall whose surface had been considerably worn already in that time. Be
it not for Drpfelds photograph (Pl. 36.A), this earlier predecessor of Wall 793 would not be
recognized as such and it would have been interpreted as a somewhat deeper southern lowermost course of Wall 793. 698
At the beginning of the Tbingen excavation only scattered stones were observed on the
surface (Pl. 37.A, 37.C). There are no records about the wall in Blegens excavation reports
and it is not visible in Blegens photographs.
In all probability, the terrace wall continued over the southwest corner of House 791 which
was found disturbed already in Blegens times. 699 Tbingen excavations uncovered traces of a
wall directly above the disturbed west wall of House 791 (Pl. 36.B-36.D). Originally it was
interpreted as a slightly offset later phase of House 791. 700 The wall was built of irregularly
cut stone blocks on the west side and filled with rubble stones on the east side. This technique
matches remarkably well the wall from Drpfelds photograph whose last remains were removed in 2000, some seven meters to the south. The stratigraphic position is also the same
above the debris of Troy VIIb2 houses. The west wall of House 791 was still visible and the
terrace wall was built directly atop it (Pl. 38.B). In this manner the West wall of House 791
was likely to have been recycled as part of the newly built terrace wall.
697
Including one unusual, big red stone, which might have originally served as a stele (as suggested by
Manfred Korfmann).
698
Identification of a predecessor wall makes much better sense for the deeper lying stones under the south
part of Wall 793. They were not only deeper than the last continuous course of Wall 793, they were also protruding from its face. Since another, even more protruding stone is recognizable on Drpfelds photograph and a
whole row of stones evidently continued to the north as a slightly shifted rounded wall, there is no doubt about
the identification of stones removed in 2000 as the last remains of the curved wall visible in Drpfelds times.
699
700
Korfmann 1998, 40.
[201]
The pressure of accumulated earth seems to have caused problems already at the end of
Troy VIIb times, as indicated by the heavy inclination of House 792 and also the Annex walls
to the west, down the slope (Pl. 40.B). In subsequent times, the area suffered considerably
from erosion, as evidenced by the disturbed southwest corner and the whole west parts of
House 791. 701 The crack between the west wall of House 791 and the partition wall between Rooms 1 and 3 (Pl. 38.B) can be explained in the same manner. 702 The terrace wall
above the ruins of the VIIb buildings may have been the first clear attempt to address the difficulties. Later the much more massive Wall 793 followed. Even this substantial structure was
deformed and partly destroyed by the pressure of accumulated earth (Pl. 36.A).
The first terrace wall in its reconstructed course would be rising up considerably from south
to north. 703 This difference in levels seems to have been dictated by the character of topography and an identical situation can be observed already in the VIIb2 phase. 704 If we conjecturally extend the terrace wall still further to the north, its level there would be very close to
House 850. 705 House 850 was excavated by Blegen and thanks to the reevaluation of the results it is now dated to the Geometric Period. 706 The wall visible on Drpfelds photograph
might have functioned as a retaining wall for a terrace where House 850 stood. This indication, along with the Protogeometric pottery found beneath and behind the wall and Geometric
and Archaic pottery found to the west of it, represents the current evidence for dating the terrace wall to the Geometric Period. Additional indirect support for the passage of some time
between the end of Troy VIIb and the construction of the terrace wall is provided by the fact
that the face of the Troy VI fortification wall was heavily worn in the time of construction of
the terrace wall (Pl. 42.A, 42.B), but very little worn in Troy VIIb times (Pl. 40.E).
701
See footnote 699.
702
The upper parts of the west wall from Troy VIIb2 was disturbed by erosion and later overbuilt by a terrace
wall on the existing substructure.

703
Whereas the wall remnant abutting the Troy VI Fortification Wall is founded on ca. 26.00 m and pre-
served up to 26.60, the wall above House 791 is based at ca. 26.80-27.00 and preserved up to 27.20 m.
704
The difference was more than 1.5 meters. House 792 Annex has no floor identified, but given the bases of
the walls it could have been at ca. 26.70-25.80, in House 792 it might have been at ca.26.20, in the paved
floors of Rooms 1 and 2 of House 791 at a comparable level of ca. 26.03-26.18 and on the stone pavement in
Room 12 of House 791 at 27.30-27.40 m.
705
The terrace wall would need to pass over the walls of House 791, which were preserved in Blegen times up
to 28.15 and under the floor level of House 850, given by Blegen as 28.46.
706
See Basedow 2008, 133 and Basedow and Aslan, forthcoming.
[202]
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE
There are few deposits directly connected with the terrace wall. The uppermost deposit over Room 3
of House 791 lay directly next to the terrace wall, but it turned out to be contaminated by the Roman
Grandstand or by the backfill of Blegens trench (Pl. 37.E, 39.A). 707 The fill over Room 1 of House
791 yielded little material, mostly very fragmented. 708 Luckily along with several nondescript Grey
Ware and handmade sherds, a base of a Protogeometric Amphora of Group I, and a painted body sherd
of another specimen were found. Protogeometric sherds accompanied by Geometric and Archaic
sherds were found also in the deposits to the west of House 791. 709
When the last wall remnant was removed in 2000, a conical base of an imported Protogeometric
skyphos 1164 with a rib at the junction between the body and the foot was found directly underneath
its lowermost stones, 710 giving thus a secure terminus post quem for the wall and the related deposits.
Wall 793 ( 26.44-27.49 m)

Wall 793 was assigned this name by Blegen. It was interpreted as a retaining terrace wall
built of earlier, massive Troy VIIa stone blocks. It was dated to the Troy VIIb2 phase on the
basis of pottery found accumulated behind it. Blegen noticed that a curved wall with a distinct
batter or incline interpreted as a Troy VIII fortification reinforcement is marked in the place
of Wall 793 on Drpfelds plan. Since Wall 793, as found in the 1930s, had no curve and
hardly any batter, Blegen concluded that what he found was a different, earlier wall than
Drpfelds bastion. 711
The comparison of Blegens photographs, 712 unpublished Drpfeld photographs (cf. e.g. Pl.
36.A) and the preserved parts of the Wall 793 at the beginning of the Tbingen excavations
(Pl. 37.C, 41.A-41.E) leaves no doubt that Wall 793 is the same wall as the rounded bastion
on Drpfelds plan. It is only considerably reduced; several upper courses have completely
vanished since Drpfelds time. Already at the beginning of Blegens excavation, the wall
was reduced to approximately one third of its height from the time of its first discovery. The
remaining section was so limited that without access to Drpfelds photographs, it is no won-
707
Classical and Early Hellenistic sherds have been identified by primary processing of Beh. A7.1108.
708
Beh. A7.1115, 1117, 1119.
709
See chapter Deposits to the west of House 791 ( 25.56-27.18 m), p. 130.
710
Cf. footnote 606.
711
712
Blegen et al. 1958, Figs. 154, 155.
[203]
der that was considered a different wall. There is a different wall lying underneath, which was
however unknown to Blegen. 713
Despite this misunderstanding with the attribution of the wall, Blegens interpretation of the
structure as a terrace wall was correct. It was confirmed during the renewed excavation in
2000, at the end of which, Wall 793 was removed. The stones of the wall were carefully arranged to build a faade on the outer, west side of the wall, whereas they were left rough and
irregular on the inner side. No original stratification survived behind the wall by 2000, but it
is clearly to be seen on a cross-section published by Blegen that all strata between Wall 793
and the fortification wall of the citadel (Strata 1-4 and upper part of 5) were running horizontally or were even slightly raised towards Wall 793. 714
Blegens VIIb2 date of the wall depended on the remarkable quantity of Knobbed Ware
(and Coarse Ware), which was found accumulated between it and the Troy VI Fortification
wall. In the upper levels of the deposit the Knobbed and Coarse wares accounted for up to
90% of the total. This figure gradually diminished in the lower levels, where it reached 30%
or less. 715 Even if most or all Coarse Wares are included in this figure, it remains an astonishingly high proportion.
No later sherds have been explicitly mentioned by Blegen, but in the general description of
the context for the introductory purpose of the catalogue it is stated:
The following catalogue comprises the material recovered from Strata 1 to 5, as shown in Figure 365, and
also much of that found in the immediately surrounding area, where intrusions of later periods had caused considerable disturbance. The great bulk of the Knobbed Ware came to light at levels corresponding to those of
Strata 3 and 4, and the upper part of Stratum 5, where abundant carbonized matter and other traces of burning
were observed, no doubt indicating an occupation deposit. 716
From this passage it can be deduced that at least the surrounding area was considerably disturbed by later activities. Nevertheless, Wall 793 must be later than Troy VIIb2, because it
clearly postdates the Protogeometric or Geometric Terrace wall underneath it. Wall 793 was
obviously built as its successor.
713
See Geometric Terrace Wall, p. 201.
714
715
716
[204]
The exact date of Wall 793 is not securely fixed. Hardly any sherds were retrieved from the
wall itself, the latest of these fragmented body chips were tentatively attributed a 6th century
BC date. 717 Due to their minuscule size and some uncertainties connected with their retrieval,
the chips need not be conclusive in dating the wall. 718 Since no stone circles, so common
above the ruins of House 791 and Geometric House 850, 719 were reported to have been found
behind Wall 793, the wall probably stood there before the circles were constructed. This suggests a date earlier than the Late Geometric to Early Archaic period for the construction of the
wall.
The high quantity of Knobbed Ware stressed by Blegen is perplexing; the Geometric levels
usually yield hardly any Knobbed Ware except a few residual pieces. 720 The situation encountered by Blegen could have resulted from debris accumulated in the succeeding phase out of
the falling or leveled material from the citadel. Since several houses of Troy VIIb were lying
immediately above the Fortification wall, their ruins are the likeliest original source of
Knobbed Ware found behind Wall 793.
A corresponding structure to Wall 793, also described by Drpfeld as a rounded Troy VIII
reinforcement of the Troy VI Fortification wall, existed next to the Northeast bastion in
Square K4.
Deposit covering House 791 ( 26.99-27.50 m)
Over House 791 there is a deposit with many Archaic sherds. Due to possible later disturbances and proximity to the Grandstand it needs not be a uniform layer. The latest datable material is from the Hellenistic period, 150-100 BC. 721
S Q U A R E D9
The stratigraphy of Protogeometric, Geometric and Archaic periods in D9 was already published. 722 One of the most striking published results was the attesting of Late Protogeometric
717
Korfmann 2001, 19-20.
718
Roughly datable is only a black-glazed chip. It cannot be reconstructed from which part of the wall it origi-
nated. The northern part of Wall 793 was disturbed by the backfill of an earlier sounding, which was not clear at
the time when Wall 793 was being disassembled.
719
Blegen et al. 1958, Figs. 156-67.
720
Cf. the D9 area in Aslan 2002, 86 and Table 2.
721
Beh. A7.1101. Latest date was provided by the PBA team.
722
Aslan 2002.
[205]
and Early Geometric periods at Troy. The presence of handmade coarse pottery in the deposits of these periods is reconsidered here.
Late Protogeometric/Early Geometric deposits over the tumble
More than 74% of the assemblage was attributed to handmade coarse wares for Late
Protogeometric/Early Geometric phase in the primary publication. 723 This is a surprising
quantity, because according to the same methodology, the number of handmade coarse wares
dropped to almost zero in the following phase. No associated building activity was found for
this phase and the pottery most probably had fallen down from the citadel. Considerable
numbers of sherds could thus have been earlier and residual in this context.
My own study of the coarse pottery also led to the conclusion that handmade coarse wares
continue to occur in this phase. 724 The quantities are substantial and the sherds are not very
worn. One new handmade shape unknown from earlier periods can be considered to be an
innovation of Late Protogeometric/Early Geometric deposits. The wheelmade coarse ware
clearly starts to be more prominent in this phase. It is unburnished and tempered with
semicoarse quartz particles. It is clearly occurring along with the handmade coarse wares. 725
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
A. Skyphos with elongated handle-tails 1318.

C. Cooking pot 1331, jar 1332, jar or jug 1333.

A. Ouzo-cup or miniature cup 1325.

C. Jars 1329, 1330.
D. Tray 1324.
A. Bowls with vertically pierced lug handles at the rim 1319, 1320, 1323.
B. Jugs 1321, 1322.
C. Jar 1326. Amphoras 1327, 1328.
723
Aslan 2002, Table 1, Phase 2 (by mistake labeled as Wheelmade coarse ware Rims).
724
Beh. D9.2963, 2969, 2973, 3034, 3040, 3043, 3046.
725
Beh. D9.3034, 3046.
[206]
Late Geometric House and related deposits

My visual reexamination of the sherds of this level confirmed the conclusions of Carolyn
Aslan. The absolute majority of the coarse wares in this phase was wheelmade and only very
few sherds could be attributed to the Troy VIIb handmade tradition. 726 No shapes or decoration unknown from previous levels are attested and this all speak for the residual character of
the HMCW in this context. The grey ware sherds seem to demonstrate a preference for
hatched triangles, possibly a landmark of geometric taste. 727 Only Grey ware stands and
handmade sherds are catalogued.
ANATOLIAN GREY WARE
D. Stand 1334.
TAN WARE
D. Stand (?) 1335.

C. Closed-shape vessel 1338.

A. Cup 1336.
B. Amphora (?) 1337.
C. Small cooking pot or jug 1339.

The Geometric Phase is actually outside the scope of this report and it will be treated by my
colleagues Maureen Basedow and Carolyn Aslan from the PBA team. Only selected features
are presented here that either yielded handmade pottery in Troy VIIb style or were crucial in
delimiting the stratigraphic sequence with Troy VIIb and Protogeometric features.
726
The reexamined units included: Beh. D9.2933, 2936, 2953 (this is an exception with considerable number
of handmade sherds), 2998, 3005, 3011, 3013, 3015.

727
Beh. D9.2933.9, D9.2933.24.
[207]
G E O M E TR IC
S A N D Y F IL L D IS TU R B IN G TH E N O R TH H O U S E B (24.8725.35 M )
The orthostate wall of North House B and the organic deposit as well were both cut by a pit
P I T W ITH
with sandy fill. This pit represents a terminus ante quem for North House B (Pl. 32.B, 33.A,
33.B). Its fill is catalogued here for the sake of completeness and for documenting the occurrence of Group II and III amphorae with handmade coarse ware pottery. This context will be
treated in more detail by Carolyn Aslan in the final publication of the PBA Sanctuary.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE
Fragments from two late types of Protogeometric amphorae 1344 and 1343, a fragment of a faience
vessel, Anatolian Grey Ware deinos and a fragment of handmade coarse vessel 1343 have been found
in the assemblage. 728
P O S TH O LE IN T H E G E O M E TR IC C U L T B U I LD IN G ( 24.06-24.72 M )
A nice fragment of a small Knobbed ware cup has been found in the fill of a posthole near
the already blocked entrance to the South Room (Pl. 57.F). The post was placed on the central
axis of a building that was erected above the ruins of the Terrace House in the Geometric period. 729
Since no clear Knobbed Ware sherds are usually found in the Geometric deposits, the example from the posthole is likely to be residual. Although it came from a secondary context, it
indicates that activities took place in the neighborhood in Troy VIIb2 times and their remains
were still scattered around on the surface in the Geometric period.
POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE
Not surprisingly only a small assemblage. Except for a small Knobbed Ware cup with channeled
decoration and flattened knob 1342, only five sherds of Grey Ware, two of Brown-slip ware and three
of Handmade Coarse Ware.
G E O M E TR IC H O R IZ O N A B O V E T H E T ER R A C E H O U S E A N D TH E P I T H O S
S TO R ER O O M ( 24.40-24.75 M )
A distinct grey layer was encountered in the area delimited by the Hellenistic terrace wall on
the southwest and the Central Room of the Terrace House in the North. The south wall of the
728
Beh. z6/7.270, 297.
729
Basedow 2006.
[208]
Pithos Storeroom was most probably already robbed out in this time, since the grey layer
seems to have continued above it (Pl. 51.A). 730 The grey layer clearly superposed, by some
thirty to fifty centimeters, the Second Protogeometric Pit in the Pithos Storeroom (Pl. 51.A).
The layer is built partly into and partly upon the wall belonging to the Geometric Cult Building (Pl. 51.C). 731 It continued to the north where it lay over the Big stone pit, at the same
level as the Apsidal structure of the Geometric Cult Building (Pl. 51.D).
The horizon was described as a grey-brown soft earth and grey-brown porous earth. 732
It yielded a fragment of a black-slipped fenestrated stand and a Grey Ware skyphos with pronounced handle tails and originally possessed a conical foot. 733
P IT A B O V E TH E N O R T H R O O M ( 24.42-25.85 M )
The internal Troy VIIa division wall in the North Room was disturbed by a pit (Pl. 56.C).734
The pit was cut from a higher level than the Protogeometric horizon where it appeared as a
conspicuous round concentration of stones (Pl. 56.D). 735 From how much higher, it is not certain since the area was leveled in Hellenistic times. The dating into the Geometric Period
should be understood as a stratigraphicly earliest possible date. The pit can be also later.
The pottery record is not clear. The grayish-brown fill yielded no easily identifiable
finewares. Along with typical Late Bronze Age ceramics 736 also sherds in unknown fabric
with unusual round openings occurred. 737 But since no evident sherds have been found from
730
see also Dia 16892, Pr. z8.1994:1.
731
The grey horizon probably accumulated at the end of Phase II (defined by Basedow and Aslan, forthcom-
ing). The related wall belongs to Basedow and Aslan Phase III.
732
Beh. z7/8.1117, 1123. Tb zA7/8.1996: 176, 179. Beh. z7.619 also belongs to the same deposit.
733
z8.1123.102, z8.1123.1 (anakkale Archaeological Museum, No. 9185). For the whole context and associ-
ated finds see Basedow and Aslan, forthcoming.

734
This pit was preliminary published by Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b, 77.
735
The stone concentration was excavated as a part of the Beh. z7.96. Although the pottery from the stone
concentration cannot be differentiated from the rest of the excavation unit, it is clear from the field notebook that
the Protogeometric and Late Mycenaean pottery have been retrieved from the area outside of the stone concentration. The Protogeometric and Mycenaean sherds were discovered on 10th August 1993, the stone concentration which stood for several days untouched was removed on 11th August 1993 (PBA Tb z7:1993 by Ponti and
Aslan).
736
According to the Final Report (Tb z7 Nord: 1995), the excavation units reached deeper than the actual bot-
tom of the pit. This explains the high proportion of the LBA pottery in the fill.
737
Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b, Kat.-Nr. 128, 129.
[209]
Archaic, Classical or Hellenistic Periods, times with ubiquitous painted fine wares, the Geometric date seems most likely.
POTTERY FROM UNCERTAIN CONTEXT

A7/8, Thymiaterion Pit ( 23.70-24.76 m)
The blocking wall of the Troy VI street was cut by a deep pit in which a Grey Ware
thymiaterion has been found (Pl. 47.A-47.D). 738 The dating of the thymiaterion pit is not
clear; a general Iron Age date has been suggested in primary publication. 739 But no securely
later pottery than Troy VIIa has been found in the assemblage. 740 Accordingly, the deposition
in Late Bronze Age cannot be excluded from the ceramic point of view.
From the stratigraphic point of view, a terminus post quem is given by the blocking wall.
The blocking wall is part of a long terrace wall of likely Troy VI date. 741 The pit thus needs
to date to Troy VIIa or later. When exactly is stratigraphicly not clear because the level from
which the pit was cut could not be ascertained. The pit was observed from the top of the preserved part of the blocking wall, the deposits further up seem to have been leveled. 742
Despite the pottery assemblage consisting almost exclusively of Late Bronze Age pottery, a
date later than Troy VIIa cannot be completely excluded for the pit. The only known parallel
to the thymiaterion was found in Geometric deposits 743 and the pit fill yielded some unusual
sherds of unknown date.
THE POTTERY ASSEMBLAGE (PL. 109.C)
The Anatolian Grey Ware and Tan Ware make up together half of the assemblage. Two possible but
insecure PBA sherds, one possibly Transitional and nine sherds in unknown fabric (most likely imported) have been recorded. 744 The rest fits well into Troy VI Late or Troy VIIa spectrum. The sherds
are in various fragmentation states the thymiaterion is fairly big and except for missing chips and
738
The identification number of the thymiaterion is A7/8.882.1.
739
Rose 1997, 83, Fig. 10a-b. The registration number of the thymiaterion is A7/8.882.1
740
Whole context has been checked again in summer 2007 by Wendy Rigter, Carolyn Aslan and the author.
741
See p. 50.
742
They contained numerous PBA sherds. Nothing on the field photographs hovewer indicates the start of the
pit higher than the uppermost preserved course of blocking wall.

743
Cf. footnote 745.
744
Beh. A7/8. 882, 950, 965, 975, 986, 1006.
[210]
some cracks, is largely intact. Few other fairly big sherds have been found, but the rest is middle-sized
or small.
GREY WARE
A. Few fragments of deep bowls A71 and a bowl with flattened rim.
C. One base ring fragment of a jar 1357.
D. Except the thymiaterion 1355, also a fragment of a stand 1356 is suggestive of a ritual deposit.
The only close parallel to the thymiaterion was found in front of the Citadel Fortification Wall in
Square D9. 745
TAN WARE
A. Fragments of hemispherical bowls A73 and a vertical handle from a cup 1358.
EARLIER WARES
Mostly beige, orange and red varieties of Plain Ware, but also Red Slip Ware and Red Washed
Wares. One Plain Ware pierced sherd.746
A. A bowl fragment 1359 of BS A49 shape in Plain Ware.
COARSE WARES
With few exceptions rather fragmented. Mostly Gritty and Burnished fabric typical for Troy VI/VIIa
as 1360. Some chips were too small to decide whether they are of the same kind or rather a Handmade
Burnished Ware of Troy VIIb.
TRANSITIONAL (?)
A single flat base in semicoarse wheelmade fabric 1361. Similar types occur in Geometric and Archaic deposits, but usually accompanied by many painted sherds. This not being the case here, a transitional LBA/EIA or still later date is questionable.
UNIDENTIFIED WARES (?)
Two body sherds of identical fabric have been classified by the primary processing as PBA. 747 This
preliminary impression was not confirmed, the sherds better remain at the moment unclassified imports. 748
745
D9.2933:11 published by Aslan 2002, Cat. No. 58.
746
Smallfind No. 96/195.
747
From Beh. A7/8.950. They are produced on fast wheel, they are hard fired, their surface is smoothed and
orange-beige in color. In the fracture the color is gradually changing from orange-beige on the surface through
red and pink to form a distinct grey core. Some chamot and quartz could be identified among the inclusions.
[211]
A7/8, High Pithos ( 24.27-24.98 m)

The lower part of a banded pithos was found to the north of South House on an elevation
much higher than the rest of the pithoi and pithos pits in the street area (50.A, 50.B, 50.C).
The preserved rims (!) of the pithoi in the Pithos Storeroom were only 10 to 40 cm higher
than the base (!) of this pithos. It means that the absolute difference between them must have
been 1-1,5 meters. From this reason the pithos is nicknamed and referred to here as a High
pithos.
The pithos was dated to the Archaic, Classical or Hellenistic Period, on the basis of its
high elevation. 749 Archaic pottery seems to have been present in the fill of the pithos (pale
porous ware) and the assemblages from the deposits into which the pithos was set all contained some Archaic, Classical and even Early Hellenistic material. 750 The high elevation
would fit well for Archaic to Hellenistic periods. Should the pithos be dated to Troy VII it
would presuppose the existence of some kind of higher terrace for which there is currently
little evidence in the field documentation. This all speaks in favor of the already published
date.
On the other hand, since the pithos was cut by later operations, secondary fill could have
found its way inside, analogous to the Big pithos. The surrounding layers all contained later
disturbances. From the pithos setting pit itself, no pottery later than Bronze Age was recorded
by the PBA team. 751 And if the thymiaterion pit should indeed date to the Troy VIIa Period, 752 it would all speak for a considerably higher LBA walking level in this area as was expected so far. The ramp sloping up for approaching the citadel wall might offer a good explanation for raised ground in the vicinity of the High Pithos.753
748
Carolyn Aslan reexamined the sherds and concluded that they do not belong to any of the ware groups typi-
cal for Transitional or later PBA deposits.

749
In quadrat A7/8, to the northwest of the Augustean altar, Mr. Ralf Becks uncovered a banded pithos, the
mouth of which was at approximately the same level as the floor of the Mosaic Building in quadrat z8. The fill
in and around the pithos yielded little pottery and all of it was Bronze Age, but the slender, banded shape of the
pithos coupled with the ground level at its mouth suggest an Archaic, Classical, or Hellenistic date. (Rose 1996,
98).
750
Dates according to the records from the primary processing by the PBA team for Beh. A7/8.718.
751
A7/8.727, 766, 782, 862.
752
Cf. p. 210.
753
Cf. Footnote 181.
[212]
There should thus remain a reservation in respect to the agreed date and an option opened
for future redating to Troy VII times.
Z8, Pit outside the Pithos Storeroom ( 24.21-24.37 m)
A stone concentration, possibly a pit, filled with dark earth, pithos fragments, pottery and
bones was discovered above the street area, in neighborhood of the Second Protogeometric Pit
in Pithos Storeroom (Pl. 51.D). 754 I was not able to examine the assemblage on my own. The
original records do not pinpoint anything special. 755 The ceramic date cannot be offered.
754
Beh. z8.504, 516.
755
There should have existed also PBA records but they are missing.
[213]
POTS AND PEOPLE: IMPLICATIONS

This chapter is dedicated to the social implications of pottery analysis for the Troy VIIb period. It is argued here that profound changes took place at Troy during the Late Bronze
Age/Early Iron Age transition and that these changes can only be explained by the arrival of
new population from Thrace. Yet, at least a part of the original population survived at Troy.
The evidence for a simultaneous presence of two population elements, with different traditions, is robust. This symbiosis opens up a number of interesting sociological questions. Was
there a dominating group, and, if yes, which one was it? Did the two groups live separately in
different districts of the site? Can both ceramic traditions occur in one and the same household? Did any acculturation or assimilation processes take place? The following paragraphs
address these questions by comparing the distribution patterns of traditional and of newly introduced pottery, by looking at mutual influences in shapes and decoration, and by analyzing
the overall quantities of specific pottery types.
CONTINUITY AND CHANGE

A continuity between Troy VIIa and Troy VIIb can be observed, both in terms of wares and
of shapes. The Anatolian Grey Ware and Tan/Brown Slip Wares dominated since Troy VI
Late. During Troy VIIa, they represent nearly 70% of the entire ceramic production used at
the site (Pl. 12.A). During Troy VIIb1, they still make up more than a half of the assemblage
total. Even during Troy VIIb2 and the Protogeometric periods they are nearly 40% present. A
high degree of continuity is evident also in the number of specific pottery shapes that continue
from one subphase into the following one (Pl. 21.A).
Changes to the Troy VIIb pottery assemblages do not occur all at once, but are spread over
all subphases. The examples mentioned above show that both differences in composition of
ware groups and differences in composition of shapes indicate a process of a gradual change.
The traditional pottery is slowly diminishing in quantity and the rate of innovation in traditional shapes is sinking (Pl. 21.A). Nevertheless, if Tan and Grey Ware groups are compared
in detail, a radical change in their mutual proportions is evident. The ratio is virtually inverted, when Anatolian Grey Ware takes over the previous dominant position of Tan/Brown slip
ware. To exemplify the magnitude of this change: the Tan/Brown slip wares drop from 54%
during Troy VIIa to 16% during Troy VIIb1 (Pl. 12.A).
The described changes need not be explained in terms of external factors. A style change
among the sentiments of the local population would suffice. Yet, a set of other factors with
[214]
evident external parallels starts at the beginning of Troy VIIb1. The most apparent is the introduction of a new class of pottery, which is handmade, coarse and usually decorated with
finger imprints. This pottery class, sometimes referred to as Barbarian ware, is the typical
coarse pottery in the Balkans during the Late Bronze Age and Iron Age. The chronological
precedence of the Balkan examples over the Trojan ones is beyond doubt. 756 The pottery decorated with finger imprints became a dominant coarse ware of Troy during the VIIb1 period,
and continued during Troy VIIb2. Remarkably, the proportion of coarse ware grew considerably in comparison with the Troy VIIa period (Pl. 12.A), while the most common wheelmade
coarse ware of Troy VI and VIIa completely disappeared. 757 The Balkanic origin is even more
obvious for the beginning of the Troy VIIb phase. During this period, Handmade Lustrous
Ware appears, with a broad repertoire of new cups, kantharoi, jugs and amphoras decorated
with channeling, incisions, knobs and stamps.
Could the new pottery types be just imported or inspired by foreign fashion? The answer at
Troy is no. The reasons are threefold. First, the very character of the newly introduced vessels does not favour the idea of import. The vessels are unsuitable as transport containers for
anything, since they are fired at low temperatures and break easily. Secondly, the sheer quantity of the handmade pottery classes at Troy is impressive. During Troy VIIb1 they make up
nearly 18%, during Troy VIIb2 more than 40% (Pl. 12.A) and in some excavation areas even
more than half of the total assemblage (e.g. Pl. 97E-G, 100A, 100E). This is in sharp contrast
to the Mycenaean and the Protogeometric pottery which in none of the phases surpass 3-5%
of the total even accounting for their local imitations (Pl. 12.A, 13). 758 Third, the recent scien-
756
Very rarely, examples of handmade coarse ware decorated with finger imprints or blade incisions are found
already in Troy VI and Troy VIIa strata. Yet, most cases are intrusive. Only the example of a funerary urn discovered by Blegen in the Troy VI Late cemetery (Blegen et al. 1953, Fig. 339) is genuine and can point to a
previous infiltration of this production and decoration concept to Troy.
757
The Gritty Ware.
758
The real proportion is difficult to determine precisely. The statistics of all the sherds tend to underestimate
the real presence, because the undecorated body sherds were often unrecognized and counted into Tan/Brown
slip ware category. The statistics using diagnostic sherds, on the other hand, tend to overestimate the real presence of Mycenaean and Protogeometric wares, because all the painted body sherds were treated as diagnostic
sherds, inflating thus their number in comparisons with wares that are never or only rarely decorated. The most
appropriate projection would be somewhere in the middle between proportions reached by counts of diagnostic
sherds and those of all sherds.
[215]
tific analyses of the handmade lustrous ware sherds imply, as opposed to claims in the previous reports, 759 that the clay had a local origin. 760
The exact mechanisms behind the arrival of a new population group are not clear. It is not
even clear, how many migration waves might have taken place during the Troy VIIb
subphases. There is a general agreement about migration from Thrace to Troy VIIb2. Whether
or not an earlier migration took place during the Troy VIIb1 period, is debated. 761 In fact, assuming that the Aeolian colonization took place as early as the Protogeometric period, one
might even speak of three distinctive migrations in a short span of time. 762
From the ceramic point of view, it needs to be stressed that substantial differences exist between the situation in Troy VIIb1 and in Troy VIIb2. The repertoire of shapes introduced in
handmade coarse ware during Troy VIIb1 is very limited. No cups, kantharoi or bowls typical
for the contemporary settlements on the Balkans have been found at Troy. Perhaps the immigrants produced exclusively their rough kitchen pottery in their former style, preferring for all
others purposes the local Trojan traditional wheelmade wares. By any standards, this situation
contrasts with the complete Balkanic assemblage evident in Troy VIIb2.
SYMBIOSIS, ACCULTURATION AND ASSIMILATION

The two handmade classes of pottery at Troy are complementary. The handmade lustrous
ware was used for producing shapes of fine table ware used for eating, drinking and serving
food: cups, kantharoi, bowls, jugs, amphoras. The handmade coarse ware, on the other hand,
served for cooking and storage vessels. Only very rarely were small jugs and cups present in
this pottery class. The situation can be paralleled to some extent to the wheelmade classes of
Trojan pottery, where the Anatolian Grey Ware and the Tan/Brown slip wares vessels functioned as fine table pottery, whereas the cooking pots were produced in wheelmade coarse
ware.
Thus, both assemblages, the local wheelmade traditional one and the handmade Balkanic
one, are functionally complete, as already pointed out by Guzowska. 763 Theoretically they
759
Guzowska et al. 2002.
760
Pintr 2005.
761
See Koppenhfer 1997 summarizing the evidence for migrations; Bloedow 1985 stressing the local devel-
opments; and Hnsel 2008, 73 suggesting a slow infiltration going on since Troy VI.
762
Hertel 2003 and Hertel 2008a. For contrary view see Rose 2008.
763
Guzowska 2002, 239.
[216]
could have been used independently from each other. Yet, the spatial distribution of Troy
VIIb handmade coarse ware and handmade lustrous ware pottery is identical with the traditional wheelmade pottery of the same period. There is no area excavated by either Blegen or
by the Tbingen team, where exclusively one of the assemblages was found. In citadel, and in
the cell buildings outside the citadel wall, and in the west lower town, and in the pits of the
south lower town, the handmade pottery is present along with wheelmade pottery. A single
exception has been found, if we consider the smallest units and try to compare every excavated household and every deposit designated as Troy VIIb. In Room 5 of the KL4/5 cell complex an assemblage practically without handmade wares was found, in which the coarse pottery was represented exclusively in its wheelmade variety. 764 Nonetheless, it is not possible to
speak of social segregation, since only a few meters away the contemporary Room 12 yielded
well preserved vessels in Anatolian Grey Ware. One serious objection, however, needs to be
kept in mind. How could a Troy VIIb1 or a VIIb2 context be recognized as such, if the characteristic handmade sherds were missing? Only a handful of new shapes in Anatolian Grey
Ware or Tan Ware are considered by Blegen to be characteristic of the Troy VIIb1 phase, and
all of them were preserved only in fragments or occurred only in a single instance at the entire
site (Pl. 21.B). Worse still, no such new characteristic types are known for Troy VIIb2 deposits (Pl. 21.A)! It has to be admitted, such contexts would almost surely escape recognition,
were they not embedded into a complete stratigraphic sequence.
The best evidence for symbiosis and acculturation of different population groups seems to
be reflected by mutual influences in the wheelmade and handmade pottery classes. The mutual influences are attested both in shapes and in decoration and they go in both directions;
shapes or decoration motifs typical for wheelmade pottery are found on the handmade classes
and vice versa.
One of the most eloquent examples for shape influences is the deep bowl 1041. It is obviously an imitation of the typical BS A93 wheelmade bowls, produced en masse in Anatolian
Grey Ware and less frequently in Tan ware. The handmade example imitates not only the
shape, but also the ring-base and a single horizontal handle. Several other handmade imitations of wheelmade shapes with ring-bases are attested (228, 442). Even kraters (1203, 694?)
and possibly also typical wheelmade shallow bowls of A49 or A52 type were imitated in
handmade lustrous ware (849). On the other hand, some wheelmade cups imitated their
764
See p. 140.
765
See p. 148.
[217]
handmade prototypes. Nice examples were already listed by Blegen. 766 Rarely, the same phenomenon could be observed also on amphoras (840).
Concerning the decoration, especially the knobs were a favorite feature for imitations on
Anatolian Grey Ware vessels (168, 231, 236, 472, 833, 834). Conversely, the incised multiple
wavy line decoration typical of Anatolian Grey Ware and Tan Ware found some experimental
followers among the producers of handmade pottery (883, 1261, 1338). Even the decoration
of concentric circles typical for painted Protogeometric amphoras finds some striking parallels among the amphoras with knobs surrounded by incised or channeled concentric circles
(1157). 767
It is impossible to decide on the basis of pottery, whether or not assimilation took place with
the passing of time. From the ceramic point of view, it can only be concluded that the
wheelmade tradition of Anatolian Grey Ware survives well into the Archaic period, whereas
the handmade classes of pottery stop being produced during the Protogeometric or at the latest
Geometric period.
766
Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 268:15; 260: 37-1015.
767
See also e.g. Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 280:10; 282: 23, 24.
[218]
SUMMARY
The results presented in the current report are in part new, but partly confirm the conclusions reached by Blegens team. Since Blegens results have been challenged on a number of
occasions in recent years, all confirmations of his results in the current study are explicitly
stated. My research is based solely on the study of ceramic material retrieved during the 19882008 excavations at Troy. Material from earlier excavations has been used only for analogies.
Blegens basic division of Troy VIIb into two phases VIIb1 and VIIb2 has been heavily
questioned in recent years, but my results confirm it. Blegen underestimated the importance
of painted Protogeometric sherds found at Troy, but he was right when stressing the fact that
they never occur in stratified deposits of the Troy VIIb2 settlement. The analysis of the data
from the Tbingen excavation also indicates that the Troy VIIb3 phase introduced in 1994
has little in common with the previous Troy VIIb2 phase. The supposed Troy VIIb3 phase
has more similarities with the following Troy VIII developments and should be better called
Protogeometric.
The pottery typology of Blegen is as yet unsurpassed, and only cosmetic changes and additions were necessary. Only a single important shape unclassified by Blegen was attested: the
amphora/jar with horizontal handles on the belly, produced in Handmade Lustrous Ware.
Blegens classification of wares is also, in most cases, still helpful and valid. Changes were
necessary only in relation to the handmade wares, which are defined as two basic ware groups
in this report the Handmade Coarse Ware (Blegens Coarse Ware was not specific
enough) and Handmade Lustrous Ware (Blegens Knobbed Ware, in fact only rarely decorated with knobs).
The most substantial part of this report is devoted to the pottery in its context. The core of
the analysis has been an independent review of the entire transitional Late Bronze Age and
Early Iron stratigraphy, re-assessing the diverging interpretations and datings of the Bronze
Age and Post-Bronze Age team members. As a result, the attribution of contexts to phases is
based on the combination of stratigraphic and ceramic evidence. The resulting datings are in a
number of instances different from those published in preliminary reports.
The analysis of contexts suggests that the settlement pattern changed dramatically at the beginning of the Troy VIIb1 period. The settlement area seems to be significantly reduced in
scale, and limited exclusively to the citadel. Previously occupied areas in the lower town seem
to have been given up. The Troy VIIb1 pottery gives evidence for both continuity and change.
The traditionally most popular wares, the Anatolian Grey Ware and the Tan Ware, are still in
[219]
use, yet the preferences between them change completely. A new class of coarse pottery,
Handmade Coarse Ware, is introduced to the site. Perhaps the changes should be explained
with a migration from Thrace, but this theory cannot be verified on the basis of pottery alone.
The settlement pattern changes again at the beginning of the Troy VIIb2 period. The site becomes densely populated. Another new class of handmade pottery, Handmade Lustrous Ware,
appears. This new ware can be defined as a fine table ware. Its shapes are limited to cups,
kantharoi, jugs, bowls, kraters and amphoras, and they are frequently decorated with channeling, incisions, and, less frequently, with knobs and stamps. This pottery clearly represents a
different tradition from the Trojan wheelmade wares, but, on the other hand, it is related with
the Handmade Coarse Ware. Both Handmade Lustrous Ware and the Handmade Coarse Ware
are part of the same pottery tradition. They are complementary to each other in terms of
shapes and together they form a complete typological assemblage. The obvious parallels to
the Handmade Lustrous Ware found in the Balkans and the fair quantities of this pottery class
at Troy leave no doubt about the arrival of a new population group from the north at the beginning of the Troy VIIb2 phase. As far as can be judged from the distribution pattern of various classes of pottery at Troy, the new group coexisted with the local population and the
groups were not segregated. Pottery classes typical for both groups have been found in all
excavated areas of the citadel and of the lower town. It seems that acculturation processes
between both groups took place, as indicated by mutual influences between the two different
pottery traditions.
It is not clear how the Troy VIIb2 settlement came to its end. Some houses were destroyed
by fire, incidentally sealing their original contents, while other houses were probably simply
abandoned. At the time when painted Early Protogeometric amphoras begin to be imported to
the site, the Troy VIIb2 houses were already in ruins. The surviving remains of the new phase
are so meager that the population density must have dropped dramatically. Whether or not the
new settlement can be connected with the Aeolian colonization cannot be currently decided
unequivocally. In any case, a certain continuity in pottery terms is documented.
[220]
BIBLIOGRAPHY
AKMAN, MURAT. 1997. Megalithforschung in Thrakien. Istanbuller Mitteilungen 47: 151-70.
ARSLAN, NURETTIN NURTEN SEVIN. 2003. Die einsenzeitlichen Grber von Tenedos.
Istanbuller Mitteilungen 53: 223-50.
ASLAN, CAROLYN CHABOT. 2002. Ilion before Alexander: Protogeometric, Geometric, and
Archaic Pottery from D9. Studia Troica 12: 81-129.
ASLAN, CAROLYN CHABOT. 2008. End or Beginning? The Late Bronze age to Early Iron age
Transition at Troia. in: BACHHUBER, CHRISTOPH R. GARETH ROBERTS (Eds.). Forces of transformation: The end of the Bronze Age in the Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxbow.
ASLAN, CAROLYN CHABOT. forthcoming. New evidence for a destruction in the mid 7th century B.C. at Troia.
BASEDOW, MAUREEN. 2006. What the Blind Man Saw: New Information from the Iron Age
at Troy. in: MATTUSCH, C. C. A. A. DONOHUE A. BRAUER (Eds.). Common Ground: Archaeology, Art, Science, and Humanities. Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of
Classical Archaeology, Boston, August 23-26, 2003. Oxford: Oxbow. 88-92.
BASEDOW, MAUREEN. 2007. Troy without Homer: the Bronze Age-Iron Age Transition in the
Troad. in: MORRIS, SARAH P. ROBERT LAFFINEUR (Eds.). EPOS. Reconsidering Greek Epic
and Aegean Bronze Age Archaeology. Proceedings of the 11th International Aegean Conference Los Angeles, UCLA - The J. Paul Getty Villa, 20-23 April 2006. Lige: Univ. de Lige.
49-58.
BASEDOW, MAUREEN. 2008. The Iron Age Transition at Troy. in: BACHHUBER, CHRISTOPH
R. GARETH ROBERTS (Eds.). Forces of transformation: The end of the Bronze Age in the Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxbow. 129-40.
BASEDOW, MAUREEN CAROLYN CHABOT ASLAN. forthcoming. Troy Final Report on the
Protogeometric, Geometric and Archaic Sanctuary.
BECKS, RALF. 2003. Troia VII: the Transition from the Late Bronze Age to the Early Iron
Age. in: FISCHER, BETTINA HERMANN GENZ E. JEAN K. KROLU (Eds.). Identifying
[221]
Changes: The Transition from Bronze to Iron Ages in Anatolia and its Neighbouring Regions.
Istanbul: Trk Eskia Bilimleri Enstits. 41-53.
BECKS, RALF. 2005. Die nrdliche Burgmauer von Troia VI. Studia Troica 15: 99-120.
BECKS, RALF. 2006. Troia im 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr. (Sptbronzezeit - Frheisenzeit) - Stratigraphie, Architektur, Befunde. PhD thesis, Institut fr Ur- und Frhgeschichte und Archologie des Mittelalters, Eberhard-Karls-Universitt Tbingen, Tbingen.
BECKS, RALF DIANE THUMM-DORAYAN. 2001. Der Untergang der Stadt in der frhen Eisenzeit. Das Ende aus der archologischen Sicht. in: LATACZ, JOACHIM (Ed.). Troia: Traum
und Wirklichkeit. Begleitband zur Ausstellung "Troia - Traum und Wirklichkeit". Stuttgart:
Theiss. 419-24.
BECKS, RALF PAVOL HNILA MAGDA PIENIEK-SIKORA. 2006a. Troia in der frhen Eisenzeit - Troia VIIb1-VIIb3. in: KORFMANN, MANFRED O. (Ed.). Troia - Archologie eines Siedlungshgels und seiner Landschaft. Mainz. 181-8.
BECKS, RALF WENDY RIGTER PAVOL HNILA. 2006b. Das Terrassenhaus im westlichen
Unterstadtviertel von Troia. Studia Troica 16: 27-88.
BLEGEN, CARL W. 1934. Excavations at Troy 1933. American Journal of Archaeology 38:
223-48.
BLEGEN, CARL W. 1937. Excavations at Troy, 1937. American Journal of Archaeology 41
(4): 553-97.
BLEGEN, CARL W. JOHN L. CASKEY MARION RAWSON. 1951. Troy II. The Third, Fourth
and Fifth Settlements. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
BLEGEN, CARL W. JOHN L. CASKEY MARION RAWSON. 1953. Troy III. The Sixth Settlement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
BLEGEN, CARL W. JOHN L. CASKEY MARION RAWSON JEROME SPERLING. 1950. Troy I.
General Introduction. The First and Second Settlements. Princeton: Princeton University
Press.
BLEGEN, CARL W. CEDRIC G. BOULTER JOHN L. CASKEY MARION RAWSON. 1958. Troy
[222]
IV. Settlements VIIa, VIIb, and VIII. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
BLOEDOW, EDMUND F. 1985. Handmade Burnished Ware or 'Barbarian pottery' and Troy
VIIb. La parola del passato XL: 161-99.
BOSSERT, HELMUTH TH. 1942. Altanatolien (Kunst und Handwerk in Kleinasien von den Anfngen bis zum vlligen Aufgehen in der griechischen Kultur). Berlin: Ernst Wasmuth.
CASKEY, JOHN L. 1948. Notes on Trojan Chronology. American Journal of Archaeology 52
(1): 119-22.
CATLING, RICHARD W. V. 1998. Thy Typology of the Protogeometric and Subprotogeometric
Pottery from Troia and its Aegean Context. Studia Troica 8: 151-87.
CZYBORRA, INA. 2001. Die ltere Eisenzeit Trkisch Thrakiens und Sdostbulgariens. Freie
Universitt,
PhD
Diss.,
Available
from
http://www.diss.fu-
berlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000001724.
DEMAKOPOULOU, KATIE (Ed.). 1988. Das Mykenische Hellas. Heimat der Helden Homers.
Athen: Kultusministerium Griechenlands - ICOM Sektion Griechenland - Freie Universitt
Berlin.
DICKINSON, OLIVER. 2006. The Aegean from Bronze Age to Iron Age. Continuity and change
between the twelfth and eight centuries BC. London - New York: Routledge.
DRPFELD, WILHELM. 1893-4. Troja 1893-1894 (unpublished manuscript). Archive of DAI
Berlin, Nachlass Drpfeld K5.
DRPFELD, WILHELM. 1894. Troia 1893. Bericht ber die im Jahre 1893 in Troja veranstalteten Ausgrabungen. Leipzig: F.A.Brockhaus.
DRPFELD, WILHELM. 1894b. Ausgrabung von Troja. 26. April 15. Juli 1894. Tagebuch der
Arbeiten und Architektonischen Funde von Wilhelm Drpfeld (unpublished manuscript). Archive of DAI Berlin, Nachlass Drpfeld K5.
DRPFELD, WILHELM. 1902. Troia und Ilion. Ergebnisse der Ausgrabungen in der vorhistorischen und historischen Schichten von Ilion 1870-1894. Athen: Beck & Barth.
FABI, MARIN. 2002. Ilion Before Alexander: The Archaofaunal Remains from D9. Studia
[223]
Troica 12: 246-74.

FABI, MARIN. 2003. Troia and Fallow Deer. in: WAGNER, GNTHER A. ERNST PERNICKA
HANS-PETER UERPMANN (Eds.). Troia and the Troad. Scientific Approaches. Berlin: Springer.
263-75.
GENZ, HERMANN. 2003. The Early Iron Age in Central Anatolia. in: FISCHER, BETTINA
HERMANN GENZ E. JEAN K. KROLU (Eds.). Identifying Changes: The Transition from
Bronze to Iron Ages in Anatolia and its Neighbouring Regions. Istanbul: Trk Eskia
Bilimleri Enstits. 179-91.
GENZ, HERMANN. 2004. Bykkaya 1. Die Keramik der Eisenzeit. Funde aus den Grabungskampagnen 1993-1998. Boazky-Hattusa. Mainz: Zabern.
GENZ, HERMANN. 2006. Ein neues Metall mach Furore - Die frhe Einsezeit in West- und
Zentralanatolien.
in:
KORFMANN,
MANFRED
O.
(Ed.).
Troia.
Archologie
eines
Siedlungshgels. Mainz: Zabern. 71-80.

GRAVE, PETER LISA KEALHOFER. s.a. Anatolian Iron Age ceramics project. Available from
http://aia.une.edu.au/index.php.
GUZOWSKA, MARTA I. KULEFF ERNST PERNICKA MUHARREM SATR. 2002. On the
Origin of Coarse Wares of Troia VII. in: WAGNER, GNTHER A. ERNST PERNICKA HANSPETER UERPMANN (Eds.). Troia and the Troad. Scientific Approaches. Heidelberg: Springer.
233-49.
HNSEL, ALIX. 2008. Die handgemachte Keramik der VII. Ansiedlung in der Berliner
Sammlung. in: WEMHOFF, MATTHIAS DIETER HERTEL ALIX HNSEL (Eds.). Heinrich
Schliemanns Sammlung Trojanischer Altertmer - Neuvorlage. Berlin: Staatliche Museen zu
Berlin - Preuischer Kulturbesitz. 57-92.
HNSEL, BERNHARD. 1976. Beitrge zur regionalen und chronologischen Gliederung der lteren Hallstattzeit an der Unteren Donau. Bonn: Habelt.
HAWKINS, J. DAVID DONALD F. EASTON. 1996. A Hieroglyphic Seal from Troia. Studia
Troica 6: 111-8.
HERTEL, DIETER. 1991. Schliemanns These vom Fortleben Troias in den 'Dark Ages' im
[224]
Lichte neuer Forschungsergebnisse. Studia Troica 1: 131-44.

HERTEL, DIETER. 2003. Die Mauern von Troia. Mythos und Geschichte im antiken Ilion.
Mnchen: Beck.
HERTEL, DIETER. 2008a. Das frhe Ilion. Die Besiedlung Troias durch die Griechen (1020620/25 v.Chr.). Mnchen: Beck.
HERTEL, DIETER. 2008b. Die frhe griechische Keramik in der Berliner Sammlung. in:
WEMHOFF, MATTHIAS DIETER HERTEL ALIX HNSEL (Eds.). Heinrich Schliemanns Sammlung Trojanischer Altertmer - Neuvorlage. Berlin: Staatliche Museen zu Berlin - Preuischer
Kulturbesitz. 93-173.
HOCHSTETTER, ALIX. 1984. Kastanas. Die handgemachte Keramik. PAS. Berlin: Volker
Spiess.
HOREJS, BARBARA.
2005.
Kochen
am
Schnittpunkt
der
Kulturen
zwischen
Karpathenbecken und gis. in: HOREJS, BARBARA REINHARD JUNG ELKE KAISER BIBA
TERAN (Eds.). Interpretationsraum Bronzezeit. Bernhard Hnsel von seinen Schlern gewidmet. Bonn: Habelt. 71-94.
HOREJS, BARBARA. 2007. Das prhistorische Olynth. Ausgrabungen in der Toumba Agios
Mamas 1994-1996. Die sptbronzezeitliche handgemachte Keramik der Schichten 13 bis 1.
Rahden/Westf.: Verlag Marie Leidorf.
JABLONKA, PETER. 2000. Unterstadt, Quadrat D9. Lower City, Quadrat D9. Studia Troica 10:
30-2.
JABLONKA, PETER. 2001. Unterstadt, Quadrat D9. Lower City, Quadrat D9. Studia Troica 11:
22-7.
JABLONKA, PETER. 2006. Vorbericht zu den Arbeiten in Troia 2005. Studia Troica (16): 126.
JUNG, REINHARD. 2006. Chronologia comparata. Vergleichende Chronologie von Sdgriechenland und Sditalien von ca. 1700/1600 bis 1000 v. u. Z. Verffentlichungen der Mykenischen Kommission. Wien: Verlag der sterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
[225]
KLINKOTT, MANFRED. 2004. Die Wehrmauern von Troia VI - Bauaufnahmen und Auswertung. Studia Troica 14: 33-85.
KNACKE-LOY, ONNO. 1994. Isotopenchemische, chemische und petrographische Untersuchungen zur Herkunftsbestimmung der bronzezeitlichen Keramik von Troia. Heidelberg: Universitt Heidelberg.
KOPPENHFER, DIETRICH. 1997. Troia VII - Versuch einer Zusammenschau einschliesslich
der Ergebnisse des Jahres 1995. Studia Troica 7: 295-353.
KORFMANN, MANFRED. 1992. Troia - Ausgrabungen 1990 und 1991. Studia Troica 2: 1-41.
KORFMANN, MANFRED. 1993. Troia - Ausgrabungen 1992. Studia Troica 3: 1-37.
KORFMANN, MANFRED. 2001. Troia/Wilusa - Ausgrabungen 2000. Studia Troica 11: 1-50.
KORFMANN, MANFRED. 2002. Die Arbeiten in Troia/Wilusa 2001. Studia Troica 12: 3-33.
KORFMANN, MANFRED. 2006. Troia - Archologie eines Siedlungshgels und seiner Landschaft. in: KORFMANN, MANFRED O. (Ed.). Troia - Archologie eines Siedlungshgels und seiner Landschaft. Mainz: Zabern. 1-12.
KOZAL, EKIN. 2006. Anatolien im 2. Jt. v.u.Z. und die Hinterlassenschaften materieller Kultur aus dem Ostmittelmeerraum, insbesondere Zyperns (PhD Dissertation, Universitt Tbingen). Available from URN: urn:nbn:de:bsz:21-opus-24811; URL: http://tobias-lib.ub.unituebingen.de/volltexte/2006/2481/.
KUKUL-CHRYSANTHAK, CHAID. 1992. Protoistorike Thass. Ta nekrotapheia tu oikismu
[226]
Kastri. Athna: Ekd. tu Tameiu Archaiologikon Porn kai Apallotrioseon.

LEMOS, IRENE. 2002. The Protogeometric Aegean. The Archaeology of the Late Eleventh and
Tenth Centuries BC. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LENZ, DIRK FLORIAN RUPPENSTEIN MICHAEL BAUMANN RICHARD W. V. CATLING. 1998.
Protogeometric Pottery at Troia. Studia Troica 8: 189-222.
MCMULLEN FISHER, SUSAN. 1996. Troia "G2/3 Ware" revisited. Studia Troica 6: 119-32.
MOMMSEN, H. DIETER HERTEL PENELOPE MOUNTJOY. 2001. Neutron activation analysis
of the pottery from Troy in the Berlin Schliemann collection. Archologischer Anzeiger: 169211.
MOUNTJOY, PENELOPE A. 1997. A Trojan Mycenaean Pictorial Krater. Studia Troica 7: 26974.
MOUNTJOY, PENELOPE A. 1999. Troia VII reconsidered. Studia Troica 6: 295-346.
MOUNTJOY, PENELOPE A. 2005. A Trojan Mycenaean Pictorial Krater Revisited. Studia
Troica 15: 121-6.
MOUNTJOY, PENELOPE A. 2006. Mykenische Keramik in Troia - Ein berblick. in:
KORFMANN, MANFRED O. (Ed.). Troia. Archologie eines Siedlungshgels und seiner Landschaft. Mainz am Rhein: Philipp von Zabern. 241-52.
MOUNTJOY, PENELOPE A. H. MOMMSEN. 2006. Neutron Activation Analysis of Mycenaean
Pottery from Troia (1988-2003 Excavations). Studia Troica 16: 97-123.
NEWTON, MARYANNE KEN A. WARDLE PETER IAN KUNIHOLM. 2003. Dendrochronology
and Radiocarbon determinations from Assiros and the beginning of the Greek Iron Age.
AEMTH (Archeologika Ergo sti Makedonia kai Thrake) 17: 173-90.
ORTON, CLIVE PAUL TYERS ALAN VINCE. 1993. Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge
manuals in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ZDOAN, MEHMET. 1987. Talcabayr. A late bronze age burial mound in Eastern Thrace.
Anatolica 14 (5-25).
[227]
ZDOAN, MEHMET. 1993. The Second Millenium of the Marmara region. The perspective
of a prehistorian on a controversial issue. Istanbuller Mitteilungen 43: 151-63.
PILIDES, DESPINA. 1994. Handmade Burnished Wares of the Late Bronze Age in Cyprus.
Studies in Mediterranean Archaeology 105. Jonsered: Paul strms Frlag.
PINTR, FARKAS. 2005. Provenance study of the Early Iron Age knobbed ware in Troia, NW
Turkey and the Balkans: petrographic and geochemical evidence. Univ. Tbingen, Diss.,
Available from http://w210.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/volltexte/2005/1988/; urn:nbn:de:bsz:21opus-19888.
RIGTER, WENDY DIANE THUMM-DORAYAN. 2004. Ein hohlgeformter Stier aus Troia.
Studia Troica 14: 87-99.
ROSE, CHARLES BRIAN. 1995. The 1994 Post-Bronze Age Excavations at Troia. Studia
Troica 5: 81-105.
ROSE, CHARLES BRIAN. 1996. The 1995 Post-Bronze Age Research and Excavations at Troia.
Studia Troica 6: 97-101.
ROSE, CHARLES BRIAN. 1997. The 1996 Post-Bronze Age Excavations at Troia. Studia
Troica 7: 73-110.
ROSE, CHARLES BRIAN. 2008. Separating fact from fiction in the Aiolian Migration. Hesperia
77: 399-430.
RUTTER, JEREMY. 1975. Ceramic Evidence for Northern Intruders in Southern Greece at the
Beginning of the Late Helladic IIIC Period. American Journal of Archaeology 79: 17-32.
SCHMIDT, HUBERT. 1902. Heinrich Schliemann's Sammlung Trojanischer Altertmer. Berlin:
Georg Reimer.
STOYANOV, TOTKO. 1997. Early Iron Age Tumular Necropolis. Sboryanovo 1. Sofia.
WARDLE, K. A. DIANA WARDLE. 2007. Assiros Toumba. A brief history of the settlement.
in: TODOROVA, HENRIETA MARK STEFANOVICH GEORGI IVANOV (Eds.). The Struma/Strymon
river valley in prehistory. Sofia: Gerda Henkel Stiftung. 451-79.
WARDLE, KEN A. MARYANNE NEWTON PETER IAN KUNIHOLM. 2007. Troy VIIb2 Revisit[228]
ed. The date of the transition from Bronze to Iron Age in the Northern Aegean. in: TODOROVA,
HENRIETA MARK STEFANOVICH GEORGI IVANOV (Eds.). The Struma/Strymon river valley in
prehistory. Sofia: Gerda Henkel Stiftung. 481-97.
ZURBACH, JULIEN. 2003. Schrifthnliche Zeichen und Tpferzeichen in Troia. Studia Troica
13: 113-30.
[229]
Catalogue
Troy VIIa
E9, ROOM B TROY VIIA DESTRUCTION
(Text p. 43)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.1153.73

H. 8 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 26 cm (8% preserved) decorated
with multiple incised wavy and horizontal lines. Wheelmade,
grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Other bigger sherds from likely the same vessel were found in
Beh. E9.1186 which was a fill above the fortification wall, containing also Troy VIIb, VIII and IX sherds.
Stand (?) in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.1178.4
H. 2 cm. Fragment of a pronged object usually attached to
stands. Beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.1137.6
H. 2 cm, Th. 3 mm. Ring base, 48 mm (100% preserved).
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and
polished.
Hemispherical bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.1084.6
H. 6 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 15 cm (50% preserved), rounded
base. Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
slipped and polished.
Carinated bowl in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
E9.1104.41
H. 10 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 18 cm (12% preserved), vertical
handle with oval section (Width: 34 mm). Handmade, grey.
Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Pl.201.
Shallow bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.1153.26
H. 8 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 22 cm (42% preserved). Ring base,
39 mm (80% preserved). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped
and polished, int. slipped and polished.
Tray in Coarse Ware (Baking Pan Ware?). Inv. E9.1104.42
H. 9 cm, Th. 21 mm. Rim rectangular or c. 50 cm (5% preserved). Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.1104.36
H. 6 cm, Th. 11 mm. Flat rim uncertain (< 5% preserved)
with a raised band c. 2 cm below the lip, decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, black. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
Cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.1137.2
handle with oval section (Width: 27 mm). Wheelmade,
brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Pithos in Pithosware. Inv. E9.1203.4
H. 13 cm, Th. 26 mm. Body sherd decorated with imprints of
a cord. Handmade, red. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
H. 3 cm. Ring base, 107 mm (100% preserved).
Wheelmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Storage jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.1091.1
H. 23 cm, Th. 14 mm. Rim 41 cm (22% preserved). Secondarily burnt with heavy fire traces. Handmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Likely the same vessel as 245.
Catalogue
Troy VIIa
E9, ROOM C, TROY VIIA FLOOR AND THE STONE
DEBRIS
(Text p. 44)
14. Carinated A93 bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.1182.6
H. 7 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 19 cm (5% preserved), horizontal
handle with round section (Width: 11 mm). Wheelmade,
grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
15. Shallow bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.320.1
H. 8 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 20 cm (18% preserved).
Wheelmade, orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished.
16. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.1182.10
with multiple incised wavy and horizontal lines on the upper
side of the lip. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. slipped and polished. Joins to 17.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with incised decoration of
multiple horizontal and wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Joins to 16.
18. Bowl (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.320.5
H. 7 cm, Th. 9 mm. Horizontal handle with round section
(Width: 9 mm) decorated with two incised lines in its upper
part. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not
clear.
19. Krater in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.320.2
and polished.
20. Bowl in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. a) E9.320.3 b) E9.320
- unnumbered sherd
H. 9 cm, Th. 15 mm. Rim c. 30 cm (8% preserved). Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
E9, ROOM G, THE DEEPEST EXCAVATED DEPOSITS

(Text p. 46)
68 mm (30% preserved). Wheelmade, orange. Ext. slipped
22. Shallow bowl in Brown-Slip Ware. Inv. E8.367.9
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 20 cm (5% preserved). Wheelmade,
beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
Secondarily burnt.
24. Bowl in Plain Ware. Inv. E8.407.13
brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
26. Hemispherical bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E8.407.6
27. Bowl (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.367.4
H. 4 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd decorated with incised multiple horizontal and wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
28. Jug in Tan Ware. Inv. E8.367.12
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
29. Bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E8.407.3

Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and
polished.
30. Jar in Tan Ware. Inv. E8.367.11
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
31. Cooking pot in Gritty Ware. Inv. E8.407.8
32. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.367.6
H. 2 cm, Th. 10 mm. Flat base, 220 mm (20% preserved).
Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIa
Z7, CENTRAL ROOM, DEPOSIT ABOVE THE PITHOS
IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER
(Text p. 57)
33. Miniature jug with slightly cutaway neck in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z7.2125; Arch. Museum anakkale Inv. 9307
H. 9 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim c. 4 cm (100% preserved), handle
with flat-oval section (Width: 17 mm). Base, 28 mm (100%
preserved). Handmade, dark-brown to grey-brown. Ext. polished, int. of the rim area is burnished, the rest is untreated.
Publ.: Korfmann 2002, Abb. 15:3; Rigter in Becks et al. 2006b,
Kat. Nr. 33. Pl. 204.
34. Bowl on low pedestal (BS A50) in Grey Ware. Inv. z7.2122.28
H. 8 cm, Th. 7 mm. Pedestal with lower part of the belly preserved. Base 100 mm (58% preserved). Wheelmade, grey.
Ext. slipped, int. slipped. Publ.: Rigter in Becks et al. 2006b,
Kat. Nr. 32.
35. Hemispherical bowl (BS A73) in Brown-slip Ware. Inv.
z7.2122.1; Arch. Museum anakkale Inv. 9308
H. 6 cm, Th. 3 mm. Broken into several sherds but otherwise
almost complete. Rim 15 cm (95% preserved). Flat base,
40 mm (100% preserved). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped,
int. slipped. Publ.: Korfmann 2002, Abb. 15:2; Rigter in Becks
et al. 2006b, Kat. Nr. 34.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E8-9, STREET 751 EAST
(Text p. 65)
36. Skyphos is Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.964.1
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 12 cm (15% preserved). Indication
of a handle attachment. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and
polished, int. slipped and polished.
37. Shallow bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.964.18
H. 3 cm, Th. 3 mm. Rim not measurable (<5% preserved)
decorated with a single incised horizontal line. Wheelmade,
38. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.969.12
polished.
39. Jar (?) in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.969.13
H. 3 cm, Th. 3 mm. Small oblong knob or an unusual handle
attachment? Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. untreated.
40. Skyphos in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.964.7
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Shoulder with fragment of a horizontal
41. Jug or amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.969.5
polished.
42. Jug in Brown-slip Ware. Inv. E9.975.6
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 8 cm (10% preserved), vertical handle with round section (Width: 18 mm). Wheelmade, orangebrown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
44. Shallow bowl in Brown-slip Ware. Inv. E9.966.8
45. Bowl or krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.969.4
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Everted rim 25 cm (7% preserved) decorated with multiple incised wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
46. Jug in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.964.4
polished.
H. 12 cm, Th. 10 mm. Vertical handle with oval section
(Width: 27 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. untreated.
48. Jar in Brown-slip Ware. Inv. E9.969.10
H. 2 cm. Ring base, 124 mm (28% preserved). Wheelmade,
beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
49. Bowl or krater in Brown-slip Ware . Inv. E9.975.7
H. 2 cm, Th. 6 mm. Everted rim 20 cm (8% preserved) decorated with incised wavy lines. Wheelmade, brown. Ext.
50. Krater in Brown-slip Ware. Inv. E9.966.9
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple incised wavy lines. Wheelmade, orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.

H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body fragment with incised multiple wavy
lines on the shoulder. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
53. Jar in Brown-slip Ware. Inv. E9.975.12
54. Jar or amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.969.11
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
Joins to E9.1020.31 and E9.121.48. See also 138.
55. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.975.10
H. 5 cm. Rectangular foot with flat-oval section (Width: 37
mm). Grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
56. Deep bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.966.3
57. Deep bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.964.3
Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished. Pl. 89.D.
58. Jar or cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.969.7
H. 3 cm. Vertical handle with oval section (Width: 32 mm).
Likely from a wheelmade vessel, brown. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 14 cm (10% preserved), lug handle
with oval section (Width: 51 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
60. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.964.16
H. 5 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim unclear (<5% preserved), with a
raised band decorated with finger imprints. Handmade,
beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
61. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware (or Organically-tempered
Ware). Inv. E9.964.12
H. 8 cm. Probably a horizontal handle with round section
(Width: 22 mm). Likely from a handmade vessel, beige. Some
organic temper in the fabric. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
H. 2 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 14 cm (8% preserved). Handmade,
brown-black. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E9, STREET 751, BLOCKING SLAB AT THE
ENTRANCE TO ROOM B
(Text p. 66)
63. Stand (?) in Tan Ware (?). Inv. E9.846.18
H. 6 cm. Pronged application likely from the lip of a stand or
big open vessel. Not clear whether from a handmade or
wheelmade vessel, brown with grey stains. Ext. slipped and
polished, int. not preserved. The fracture with thick grey core
and the stained surface are unusual for Tan Ware.
64. Flask in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.846.1
H. 17 cm, Th. 7 mm. Max. c. 50 cm. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. slipped.
65. Deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.846.17
grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
and polished.
68. Jar in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.846.19+ E9.917.2
Wheelmade, orange-beige to grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 89.I.
E8-9, STREET 751 WEST

(Text p. 67)
69. Carinated bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
E8.433.1,2,13,19,21,22,25,70,73,77,80.
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 20 cm (8% preserved). Horizontal
rib in the middle of the shoulder. Incised decoration of double
chevrons and multiple vertical lines below the rib.
polished.
70. Carinated bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.426.21
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 17 cm (15% preserved),.
polished.
72. Kylix in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.433.62
H. 3 cm. Foot fragment. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and
polished, int. not preserved.
polished.
polished.
75. Carinated A93 bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
E8.433.16+38+47
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 20 cm (18% preserved), handle with
round section (Width: 10 mm). Ring base, 60 mm (25% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
76. Cup in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.433.6

polished.
H. 3 cm, Th. 3 mm. Rim 21 cm (8% preserved). Multiple horizontal grooves start some 2 cm below the lip. Wheelmade,
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim with flattened 27 cm (5% preserved) decorated with horizontal grooves. Wheelmade, grey.
Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
79. Jug or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.433.61
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
H. 2 cm, Th. 4 mm. Ring base with sharp profile. Wheelmade,
beige. Ext. untreated, int. slipped.
H. 3 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 28 cm (13% preserved) with
everted lip decorated with a register of incised wavy lines
bordered by horizontal lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
(Continuation)
83. Amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.416.13+17
84. Amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.433.5
polished.
polished.
86. Juglet in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.433.82
H. 10 cm, Th. 4 mm. Shoulder fragment with decoration of incised multiple wavy and horizontal lines. Vertical handle with
oval section (Width: 13 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
and polished, int. untreated.
H. 11 cm, Th. 6 mm. Fragment of shoulder and of a vertical
handle with oval section and middle rib (Width: 25 mm).
polished.
handle with oval section (Width: 37 mm). Wheelmade, grey.
Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
89. Big bowl or basin in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.426.8
polished.
H. 6 cm, Th. 9 mm. Shoulder fragment with a horizontal middle rib and with incised multiple wavy and horizontal lines
decoration underneath the rib. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
92. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.416.34, 36
H. 5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Belly and shoulder fragments. Shoulder
decorated with a register of single vertical lines filled with incised multiple wavy lines in-between. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. untreated.
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment with a tiny knob and
incised wavy line decoration. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Shoulder fragment decorated with multiple bands of incised horizontal and wavy lines. Wheelmade,
H. 6 cm, Th. 12 mm. Large ring base, 192 mm (12% preserved). Wheelmade, orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
96. Stand in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.426.34
H. 8 cm, Th. 4 mm. Animal protome usually broken off the
rim. Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
(Continuation)
Wheelmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Likely
from the same vessel as 98.
H. 6 cm. Vertical handle with flat oval section (Width: 37 mm).
Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved. Likely
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Vertical handle with oval section (Width:
27 mm). Handmade, orange. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
100. Cooking pot in Handmade Burnished Ware ? Inv. E8.426.36
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Likely a conical foot (worn in the contact
zone). Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
grey. Ext. slipped, int. untreated.
with blade-made slashes on the lip. Handmade, grey. Ext.
burnished, int. burnished.
H. 3 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body sherd with a raised band and
oblique, blade-made slashes. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
105. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E8.426.65+60
H. 5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 14 cm (25% preserved) with a
slightly raised horizontal band (without any decoration).
Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
106. Jug in Anatolian Grey Ware (?). Inv. E8.416.2
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Neck fragment, 7 cm (18% preserved).
H. 7 cm, Th. 12 mm. Rim 16 cm (5% preserved). Hornshaped lug handle with oval section (Width: 54 mm). Handmade, orange-beige. Ext. untreated, int. burnished.
110. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.416.38
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd with a small knob and channeled decoration. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E9, HOUSE 761, TROY VIIB1 FLOOR DEPOSITS
(Text p. 69)
handle with round section. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
H. 6 cm, Th. 6 mm. Shoulder fragment with a horizontal handle with round section (Width: 10 mm). Wheelmade, grey.
polished.
H. 7 cm, Th. 3 mm. Shoulder fragment with a horizontal handle with round section (Width: 8 mm).
int. not preserved.
handle with round section. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
119. Carinated deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.971.6
polished. Heavily covered with cess residue. Pl. 95.C.
H. 2 cm, Th. 2 mm. Rim 9 cm (12% preserved), handle attachment indicated on the rim. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Everted rim 22 cm (6% preserved) decorated with horizontal grooves on its upper side. Wheelmade,
polished.
124. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.971.63
H. 6 cm, Th. 9 mm. Shoulder fragment with incised decoration
of multiple wavy and horizontal lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
H. 3 cm. Th. 3 mm. Rim 28 cm (5% preserved). Wheelmade,
126. Flask (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.121.6
H. 7 cm. Th. 7 mm. Belly fragment with three horizontal ribs
in the middle (on maximal diameter). Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
polished.

polished. Heavily covered with cess residue. Pl. 95.B.
polished.
polished.
polished.
H. 2 cm, Th. 3 mm. Sharp-edged ring base, 49 mm (80%
preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
polished.
136. Jug, amphora or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.121.29
H. 3 cm, Th. 9 cm. Disc base, 100 mm (40% preserved).
H. 2 cm, Th. 4 mm. Sharp-edged ring base, 53 mm (100%
138. Jar or amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
E9.121.48+E9.969.11+ E9.1020.31
grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated. See also 54.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E9, HOUSE 761, TROY VIIB1 FLOOR DEPOSITS
(Continuation)
H. 6 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 12 cm (25% preserved). Handle attachment on the lip, with traces of vertical piercing.
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
oval section Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
slipped and polished. From the same pot as 145.
H. 8 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with incised single horizontal
lines alternating with single wavy line grooves. Wheelmade,
grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
Same pot as 143.
146. Stand in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.1020.40
H. 10 cm, Th. 7 mm. Fragment of a stand with a horizontal rib
and with incised zoomorphic decoration depicting a quadruped. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished.
147. Cooking pot in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.971.53
H. 1 cm, Th. 8 mm. Flat base. Handmade, grey. Ext. untreated,
int. untreated. Charred residue on the interior. Pl. 94.K.
148. Cooking pot in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.971.4
black. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 7 cm, Th. 11 mm. Fragment with a circular opening (from a
handle attached by a button) and an edge. Handmade, black.
Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 5 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim c. 26 cm (8% preserved). Raised
band below the rim, decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
152. Storage jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.121.69
H. 9 cm, Th. 23 mm. Body sherd with a raised band decorated
with finger imprints. Handmade, beige.
with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade, black. Ext.
untreated, int. burnished.
with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade, beige. Ext.
with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade, orangebeige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.

H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd decorated with a raised band
and finger imprints. Handmade (?), beige. Ext. untreated, int.
burnished.
with a raised band and vertical slashes. Handmade, beige. Ext.
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Lug handle with horn-like protrusions
(Width: 40 mm). Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Horse-shoe shaped lug handle below the
rim. Handmade, beige-grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
H. 6 cm. Th. 15 mm. Vertical handle with flat oval section with
attachment on the rim. Handmade, beige-grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
H. 6 cm. Horizontal handle with oval section (Width: 21 mm).
Brown. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.
163. Amphora (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.971.64
H. 2 cm, Th. 12 mm. Body sherd decorated with impressed
circles. Handmade, grey. Ext.polished, int. burnished.
164. Amphora in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.971.65
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. From the same vessel as 163.
165. Jug (?)Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.1020.39, E9.121
body sherd
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim sherd decorated with impressed dots.
Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. untreated. Pl. 204.
166. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?). Inv. E9.121.50
H. 2 cm, Th. 4 mm. Anti-splash rim 22 cm (4% preserved).
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished. Survival from
EBA?
167. Jar or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.121.72
H. 6 cm, Th. 18 mm. Body sherd with a slightly elongated
knob. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished, int. polished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E9, HOUSE 761, RUBBISH DEPOSITS
(Text p. 71)
H. 8 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 20 cm (10% preserved). Tiny knob
on the carination. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
handle with round section (Width: 8 mm). Wheelmade, grey.
H 6 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 19 cm (28% preserved).Wheelmade,
172. Kylix in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.894.44
H. 4 cm. Fragment of a foot. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped
H. 5 cm. Vertical handle with angular section (Width: 15 mm).
Black. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim not measurable (<5% preserved).
Upper part of the lip decorated with three horizontal grooves.
polished.
H. 7 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd decorated with a vertical rib
and with incised band filled with multiple wavy lines.
polished.
176. Jug or amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
E9.889.41+E9.894.25
Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
179. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.894.1+18
polished.
180. Amphoriskos or juglet in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.889.17
181. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Semi-Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.889.56
H. 2 cm. Rim 12 cm (10% preserved), vertical handle with
oval section (Width: 26 mm). Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped, int. slipped.
184. Footed bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.889.67
H. 1 cm. Foot with round base plate with 52 mm (62% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.

H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Sharp-profiled ring base, 57 mm (80%
polished.
grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
188. Jug or jar in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.889.82
Wheelmade, reddish. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
polished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E9, HOUSE 761, RUBBISH DEPOSITS
(Continuation)
191. Jar or Cooking pot in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
E9.894.27
192. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Semi-coarse Ware. Inv. E9.889.47
H. 11 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 16 cm (25% preserved), horseshoe like lug handle. Raised band with finger imprints on both
sides of the lug handle. Handmade, black. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated. Pl. 207.
H. 8 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 18 cm (8% preserved). Lip decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished,
int. untreated.
H. 11 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim not measurable (<5% preserved),
lug handle with oval section (Width: 34 mm). Handmade,
beige. Ext. untreated, int. burnished.
H. 4 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim 15 cm (15% preserved). Raised
band c. 1 cm below the rim, decorated with finger imprints.
Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
197. Jar in Wheelmade Semi-coarse Ware. Inv. E9.889.83
H. 7 cm, Th. 16 mm. Body sherd decorated with two raised
band with slashes. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
198. Amphora (?) in Handmade Coarse Ware (?). Inv. E9.894.45
H. 4 cm, Th. 13 mm. Body sherd with a knob. Handmade,
black. Ext. untreated, int. untreated (but the surface is badly
preserved).
E9, HOUSE 761, DEBRIS ON TOP OF THE RUBBISH

DEPOSIT
(Text p. 72)
polished.
polished.
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 13 cm (11% preserved). Handle attachment indicated on the rim. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
orange-beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
polished.

H. 15 cm, Th. 17 mm. Vertical handle with middle rib.
Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved sufficiently.
vertical handle with oval section (Width: 39 mm).
polished.
polished.
polished.
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 89.H.
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Disc base, 81 mm (35% preserved).
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim decorated with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
213. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Semi-coarse Ware (?). Inv.
E9.779.38
H. 3 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim with vertical handle with oval section
(Width: 23 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext.
and finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.
216. Stand in Anatolian Grey Ware (?). Inv. E9.779.35
H. 3 cm. Base, 160 mm (8% preserved). Handmade, grey.
217. Cup (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.790.59
H. 7 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body fragment with incised decoration of
horizontal lines and horizontal bands filled with oblique
slashes. Traces of white incrustation. Handmade, grey. Ext.
polished, int. burnished. Pl. 200.
218. Wide-necked amphora (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E9.790.57
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 22 cm (5% preserved).Handmade,
black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
Pl. 93.D.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E9, ROOM B, TROY VIIB1 FLOOR
(Text p. 73)
Wheelmade, orange. Ext. polished, int. polished.
H. 10 cm, Th. 8 mm. Basket handle with round section and a
tiny knob (Width: 20 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and
polished.
224. Amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.1062.2
brown. Ext. polished, int. untreated. Probably from the same
vessel as 228.
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim with thickened lip c. 18 cm (3% preserved). Handmade, beige. Ext. polished, int. burnished.
lug handle (Width: 40 mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 91.J.
227. Jug in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.1071.6
Brown. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.
H. 2 cm, Th. 6 mm. Imitation of a ring base, 55 mm (50%
preserved). Handmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Probably from the same vessel as 224. Pl. 91.H. Pl. 204.
E9, ROOMS C AND D, FLOOR WITH A HEARTH

(Text p. 75)
H. 7 cm, Th. 3 mm. Body sherd with horizontal handle with
round section (Width: 9 mm) on the carination. Wheelmade,
round section (Width: 10 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
231. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8/9.437.9
H. 2 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherd with a tiny knob and with incised double lines around it. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 26 cm (5% preserved) with thickened lip. Decoration in form of horizontal grooves and incised
multiple wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
polished.

orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
236. Carinated bowl Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.293.1
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body fragment with a tiny knob, with two
horizontal grooves above it and with incised vertical lines.
polished.
H. 4 cm, Th. 3 mm. Body fragment decorated with incised
238. Jug (?) in Wheelmade Semi-Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.287.12
239. Large basin (A67?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.301.1
with grooved wavy line bordered by horizontal lines.
polished.
and polished.
polished.
242. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.287.11+E8/9.437.7
243. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8/9.437.10
H. 7 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd decorated with alternating incised bands of multiple wavy lines alternating with multiple
incised horizontal lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and
polished, int. slipped.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E9, ROOMS C AND D, FLOOR WITH A HEARTH
(Continuation)
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 16 cm (22% preserved). Upper
handle attachment on the rim. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
245. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.303.8
grey. Ext. polished int. polished. Likely the same vessel as 13.
246. Jar or jug in Wheelmade Semi-coarse Ware. Inv. E9.287.15
H. 11 cm, Th. 20 mm.Vertical handle with oval section (Width:
54 mm). Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
247. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.287.1+2+3+6
H. 13 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 25 cm (5% preserved). Shoulder
decorated with incised alternating bands of multiple wavy
lines and multiple horizontal lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
248. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8/9.437.8
Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
E8, ROOM G, STONE COLLAPSE UNDER THE

LOWER FLOOR
(Text p. 76)
249. Cup in Anatolian Grey Ware, Early Variant. Inv. E8.243.2
19 mm). Wheelmade, orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
beige. Ext. untreated, int. slipped and polished.
H. 4 cm, Th. 2 mm. Flat base with incised circle on the exterior. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished.
and polished.
and polished.
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd decorated with incised multiple wavy and horizontal lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped

handle with oval section (Width: 30 mm). Wheelmade, beige.
261. Stand or krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.365.11
H. 5 cm. Fragment of a pronged application which is usually
found attached to the rim. Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and
H. 6 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim 32 cm (5% preserved) with ribs.
and polished.
263. Jar (?) inTan Ware. Inv. E8.365.15
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body fragment decorated with horizontal
grooves. Wheelmade, orange. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
polished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E8, ROOM G, STONE COLLAPSE UNDER THE
LOWER FLOOR
(Continuation)
265. Jar in Gritty Ware. Inv. E8.365.6
H. 4 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim 24 cm (2% preserved). Raised
band decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext.
grey. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
268. Amphora (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.231.2
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with a knob lined by incised
circles with white incrustation. Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped
brown. Ext. polished, int. polished.
Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and
polished.
271. Jug in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E8.231.3
H. 6 cm. Vertical handle with round section (Width: 26 mm).
Brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
E8, ROOM I, DEPOSIT UNDER THE ORTHOSTATE

WALL
(Text p. 77)
273. Hemispherical bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.558.3
polished.
and polished.
decorated with multiple horizontal grooves. Wheelmade,
int. slipped and polished.
H. 18 cm, Th. 10 mm. Fragment of a belly and shoulder.
16 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.

H. 7 cm, Th. 10 mm. Shoulder fragment decorated with a horizontal rib and with multiple incised horizontal and wavy lines
. Wheelmade, orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
E8, ROOM I, DEPOSIT UNDER THE ORTHOSTATE
WALL
(Continuation)
polished.
and polished.
polished.
handle with flat-oval section (Width: 40 mm). Single flat elongated protrusion c. 3 cm below the rim. Handmade, brown.
Ext. burnished, int. burnished. From the same pot as 291.
Pl. 212.
286. Kylix in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.558.4
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Stem fragment. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
288. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.567.7
grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
289. Stemmed bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.567.12
H. 5 cm, Th. 6 mm. Stem fragment. Wheelmade, black. Ext.
with a slightly raised band and finger imprints. Handmade,
brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
291. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.521.12+13
Handmade, brown. Ext. polished, int. polished. From the
same pot as 285.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
A7, BURNT LAYER UNDERNEATH HOUSE 792
(Text p. 78)
292. Bowl in Brown Slip Ware (BS A52). Inv. A7.1254.107
H. 5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim fragment, 23 cm (13% preserved).
and polished.
293. Hemispherical bowl in Brown Slip Ware (BS A73). Inv.
A7.1254.130
and polished.
294. Carinated deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware (BS A72). Inv.
A7.1254.6
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
295. Deep Bowl in Brown Slip Ware (BS A72). Inv. A7.1254.164
Wheelmade, light brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
296. Mug in Brown Slip Ware (BS A87). Inv. A7.1254.173
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim not preserved. Base, c. 70 mm.
Wheelmade, orange-brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
297. Carinated bowl with basket handles in Brown Slip Ware (BS
A60). A7.1254.166
H. 7 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim and shoulder fragment, c. 15 cm
(4% preserved), parallel loop handle with round section
(Width: 12 mm). Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
298. Hemispherical bowl in Brown Slip Ware (BS A77?). Inv.
A7.1254.113+135
and polished.
299. Bowl in Brown Slip Ware (BS A48?). Inv. A7.1254.155
H. 6 cm, Th. 5 mm. Flat base fragment with 44 mm (65%
preserved). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished,
300. Jug in Brown Slip Ware (BS B25). Inv. A7.1254.138
H. 12 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim fragment 14 cm (28% preserved),
attachment of a vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width:
37 mm) and a perforation. Wheelmade, orange-brown. Ext.
301. Bowl in Tan Ware (BS A49 or A52). Inv. A7.1254.152
H. 2 cm, Th. 3 mm. Base-ring with 58 mm (100% preserved). Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
302. Bowl in Brown Slip Ware (BS A). Inv. A7.1254.148
H. 4 cm, Th. 5 mm. Base-ring fragment with 80 mm (20%
preserved). wheelmade, red. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
303. Krater (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware, Early micaceous Variant?
(BS C). Inv. A7.1254.3
H. 3 cm, Th. 8 mm. Base-ring with 120 mm (8% preserved).
304. Krater in Tan Ware (BS C69, 74 or 75). Inv. A7.1254.140
H. 8 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 28 cm (10% preserved). A small part
of a horizontal rib at the lower limit. Wheelmade, orange. Ext.
305. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware (BS C). Inv. A7.1254.26
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body fragment from a shoulder or belly,
decorated with an incised wavy line. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
306. Krater in Tan Ware (BS C69, 74, 75 or 82). Inv. A7.1254.158
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Shoulder fragment decorated with multiple horizontal and wavy incised lines. Wheelmade, orange.
307. Krater (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware (BS C69, 74, 75, or 82). Inv.
A7.1254.170
H. 5 cm, Th. 13 mm.Body fragment with incised decoration of
an unusual shaped motif placed horizontally under a wavy
line. The shaped motif probably continued further as two
horizontal lines. Wheelmade, dark grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
308. Jug in Anatolian Grey Ware (BS B28?). Inv. A7.1254.8
H. 8 cm, Th. 3 mm. Rim fragment 7 cm (10% preserved),
vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width: 16 mm).
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
309. Krater in Tan Ware (BS C69). Inv. A7.1254.167
H. 12 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment with horizontal handle with round section (Width: 20 mm). Horizontal rib to the
left of the handle. Indication of a carination towards the belly.
and polished.
310. Trefoil jug in Anatolian Grey Ware (BS B35). Inv. A7.1254.4
H. 6 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim fragment not ascertainable. A
groove below the rim. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int.
untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
A7, BURNT LAYER UNDERNEATH HOUSE 792
(Continuation)
311. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware (BS C86?). Inv. A7.1254.50
(a) and A7.1245.40 (b)
H. 8 cm, Th. 9 mm. Incurving rim fragment, 29 cm (10%
preserved). A lug handle with a single pronounced finger imprint at its base. Slightly raised horizontal band with two
widely spaced finger imprints on the shoulder. Handmade,
grayish-black. Ext. traces of careless burnishing, int. burnished. Pl. 207.
312. Organically tempered clay structure. Inv. A7.1254.42
H. 6 cm, Th. 3 mm. Slightly curving, 51 cm (2% preserved).
Perhaps a piece of oven or some mudbrick structure? Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
313. Wide-mouthed jar (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware (BS
C85?). Inv. A7.1254.180
H. 5 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim fragment, not ascertainable (only
2% preserved). Oblique slashes on the rim. Handmade,
brown. Traces of a handle attachment in lower part. Ext.
slipped unburnished, int. burnished.
314. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware (BS C85 or 86). Inv.
A7.1254.49
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd from a neck/shoulder transition decorated with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
315. Miniature bowl in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. A7.1254.27
H. 2 cm, Th. 3 mm. Rim 4 cm (55% preserved), rounded
base. Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
316. Jar or cooking pot in Coarse Ware (BS C). Inv. A7.1254.47
H. 3 cm, Th. 9 mm. Fragment of a shoulder and a flaring rim,
12 cm (10% preserved). Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated,
int. untreated.
A7, HOUSE 791, PIT UNDER WEST WALL

(Text p. 81)
317. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware (BS A 92?). Inv. A7.1181.1
H. 6 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim fragment, 12 cm (8% preserved),
horizontal loop handle with round section (Width: 14 mm).
Wheelmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and
polished.
D9, DEPOSIT AT THE FOOT OF TROY VIIB WALL

(Text p. 83)
318. Skyphos A71 in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3101.18+19
319. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3095.9
Small conical knob inside. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and
320. Shallow bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3101.26
grey. Ext. untreated, int. slipped and polished.
321. Krater in Tan Ware. Inv. D9.3101.11
orange-brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
322. Hemispherical bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3095.10
323. Jug in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3101.29

Wheelmade , grey . Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
325. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3095.33
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Fragment of a belly and shoulder decorated with multiple incised horizontal and wavy lines.
polished.
326. Shallow bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. D9.3101.12
orange-brown . Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
327. Bowl with basket handles in Tan Ware. Inv. D9.3101.21
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 12 cm (6% preserved). Horizontal
328. Shallow bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. D9.3095.20
329. Bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. D9.3101.15
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 22 cm (3% preserved), handle attachment on the rim, not clear whether horizontal or vertical.
and polished.
polished.
H. 6 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd decorated with wavy lines.
and polished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Shoulder fragment with a horizontal rib.
Wheelmade, orange-brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
333. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. D9.3095.16
H. 6 cm, Th. 16 mm. Body fragment decorated with a raised
band and finger imprints. Handmade, brown . Ext. untreated,
int. untreated.
334. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. D9.3095.34
below the lip with a raised band and finger imprints.
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
Z7, PIT WITH RESTORED VESSELS
UNDER THE NORTH HOUSE A
(Text p. 87)
335. Deep bowl (BS A71) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z7.360.3
+ z7.363.2 + z7.348 body sherds
H. 14 cm, Th. 4 mm. Except for two small missing chips the
pot is completely restored from original pieces. Rim 17 cm
(100% preserved). Two parallel horizontal handles with round
section (Width: 12 mm). Base-ring with 70 mm (100 % preserved). Wheelmade, grey. The stains visible on the photos
distinguish the joining sherds found later. Those were not
treated by acid solution and are still covered with calcareous
encrustations. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
336. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z7.360.2 + z7.360.10
+ z7.363.5, 9, 10 + z7.283.11
H. 8 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 22 cm (90% preserved). Base ring
60 mm (90% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and
337. Bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. z7.340.1 + z7.348.24
H. 7 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 24 cm (12% preserved). Base ring
80 mm (35% preserved). Wheelmade, beige-brown. Ext.
slipped and burnished, int. slipped and burnished.
338. Closed shape in unknown ware. Inv. z7.363.22
H. 6 cm. Th. 9 mm. Body fragment from a closed vessel, possibly an amphora or a jug. Wheelmade. White-beige inside, in
fracture and also outside. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
smoothed only by the movement on the potters wheel. Fine,
medium hardly fired fabric with a few white and red inclusions.
339. Closed shape in unknown ware. Inv. z7.363.23
H. 5 cm. Th. 8 mm. Body fragment from a closed vessel, possibly an amphora or a jug. Wheelmade. Light beige color outside, orange inside. Ext. smoothed, possibly slipped, int.
smoothed only by the movement on the potters wheel. Fine,
medium hardly fired fabric, with few white inclusions
340. Cup or ladle in Handmade Lustrous (?) Ware. Inv. z7.338.1
H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 10.2 cm (7% preserved). The cup
originally had one vertical handle, which is missing but its attachments survived. Flat base, 65 mm (100% preserved).
Handmade, brown, inside burnt into black. Ext. polished (?),
slightly lustrous, int. polished (?), slightly lustrous. Pl. 199.
341. Juglet (?) in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. z7.337.1
H. 9 cm, Th. 7 mm, Rim 9 cm (7% preserved). Handle broken off, its attachment indicates a vertical handle with oval
section (Width: 20 mm). Flat base, 30 mm (100% preserved). Handmade, grey-brown. Gritty fabric. Ext. unburnished, int. unburnished. Pl. 199.
342. Carinated bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z7.363.18
H. 7.8 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim not measurable (<5% preserved).
No evidence for a handle in the preserved parts. Flat base,
less than 5% preserved, not measurable. Handmade, greybrown, somewhat mottled with black stains. The paste includes some mica. Ext. polished, lustrous, int. polished, lustrous. Pl.201.
343. Jar or cooking pot in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
z7.363.16, possibly also z7.360.7,8,9.
H. 15 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment. Handmade, beigebrown. Fabric similar to 344 but it clearly belonged to a different vessel. Ext. burnished, int. seems to be only smoothed.
Hardly perceptible raised band with finger imprints.
Pl. 207.
344. Barrel shaped jar/cooking pot in Handmade Burnished Ware.

Inv. z7.363.20
H. 25 cm, Th. 8 mm, Rim 18 cm (50% preserved), three (out
of originally four) tongue-shaped lug handles preserved
(Width: 28 mm), base is missing. Handmade, prevalently
beige and orange-brown color, mottled with blackish stains.
Inside orange-brown, not mottled. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Undecorated horizontal ledge around the perimeter
of the jar at the height of the lug handles. Pl. 91.M.
Pl. 207.
345. Cup or hemispherical bowl in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv.
z7.360.1
H. 5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim fragment with 11 cm (9% preserved). Handmade, grey-brown. Ext. unburnished, int. unburnished. Pl. 199.
346. Jar or cooking pot (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
z7.399.2
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim fragment with a raised band with finger imprints closely below the rim. Not ascertainable .
Handmade, dark brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
347. Barrel shaped jar/cooking pot in Handmade Burnished Ware.
Inv. z7.360.5+6.
H. 30 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim 20 cm (22% preserved), lug handle (Width: 65 mm), flat base, 123 mm (ca. 20 % preserved). Handmade, variable color, prevalently beige and
brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. On the level of the lug
handle is a raised band decorated with finger imprints. The
pot was secondarily burnt after it was broken (the upper part
is completely blackened, the lower is not). Pl. 207.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb1
Z7, PIT WITH RESTORED VESSELS
UNDER THE NORTH HOUSE A
(Continuation)
348. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. z7.363.21
H. 15 cm, Th. 12 mm. Base, 120 mm (48% preserved).
Handmade, brown and gray-brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Clearly a different vessel than 344. Pl. 91.N.
Pl. 207.
H. 10 cm, Th. 12 mm. Base fragment with 100 mm (88%
preserved). Handmade, beige-brown mottled with blackish
stains. Inside orange-brown. Fabric rather gritty. Ext. burnished, int. smoothed. Clearly from a different vessel than
344 and also than 348. Could belong to the same pot as 343.
Pl. 207.
350. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. z7.348.1,2,3.
preserved). All three depicted sherds join. Handmade, beige
to grayish brown. Ext. burnished, Int. burnished. Clearly from
a different vessel than 344 and also than 348 and 349. There
are few others handmade coarse ware body fragments, some
of them with raised band decorated with finger imprints,
which do not join but might belong to the same vessel.
351. Organically tempered clay lump. Inv. z7.363.8
H. 10 cm, Th. 53 mm. Fragment of an uncertain object (oven?,
pit-lining?, baking-pan?, basin?). Slightly rounded, but cannot be measured. Beige-brown. Ext. and int. both smoothed.
Finished in rim-like manner.
352. Organically tempered clay lump. Inv. z7.363.7
H. 11 cm, Th. 50 mm. Slightly rounded but cannot be
measured. Finished in rim-like manner on two sides (!).
Must be from the same object as 351.
353. Organically tempered clay lump. Inv. z7.348 unnumbered
body sherd.
Size: 14 cm. One side smoothed, the other left untreated and
covered with plentiful impressions of straw or other organic
matter. Not clear whether broken, or original surface. Most
probably belongs to the same object as 351 and 352.
354. Pithos in Coarse Ware. Inv. z7.363.1
H. 9 cm, Th. 26 mm. Fragment of a rather angular rim with
flaring lip. The lip is decorated with impressed loosely spaced,
rather deep dots. Handmade, coarse fabric, reddish-brown.
The paste includes white particles and mica. Ext. smoothed,
int. smoothed.
Z6/7, ORGANIC DEPOSIT

(Text p. 84)
355. Shallow bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. z6.279.22
and polished. Secondarily burnt.
356. Bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. z6.276.1
and polished.
357. Jar in Tan Ware. Inv. z6.276.3
H. 10 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body fragment decorated with a tiny
rounded knob and with horizontal grooves. Wheelmade,
brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
358. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z6.276.7
polished.
359. Jug or jar in Tan Ware. Inv. z6.276.26

360. Jug in Unknown Ware. Inv. z6.276.23
Semicoarse, well fired fabric, reddish core with very thin
brown film on the surface. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.
361. Pyraunos (?) in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. z6.279.15
H. 8 cm, Th. 14 mm. Body sherd with a circular opening.
Wheelmade, red. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
362. Cooking pot (?) in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. z6.276.19
vertical handle with oval section (Width: 19 mm). Handmade,
orange. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
363. Jar or cooking pot in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. z6.276.28
22 mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
H. 8 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim fragment. Handmade, black. Ext.
slipped and burnished, int. slipped and burnished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim with a lug handle (Width: 25 mm). A
raised band decorated with finger imprints. Handmade,
with finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int.
burnished.
and finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int.
burnished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 28 cm (5% preserved) with a raised
undecorated band. Handmade, brown. Ext. well burnished,
int. burnished. Pl. 215.
Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished , int. burnished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E8-9, STREET 751 EAST, TROY VIIB2 DEPOSITS
(Text p. 90)
370. Krater (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.376.18
H. 9 cm. Vertical handle with wavy (Width: 27 mm). Beigegrey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved. Likely from
the same pot as 371 and 438.
H. 7 cm, Th. 3 mm. Vertical handle with wavy section (Width:
29 mm). Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
slipped and polished. Likely from the same pot as 370 and
438.
372. Carinated bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E8.378.7+8
section (Width: 0 mm). base, 0 mm. Wheelmade, brown.
373. Carinated bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E8.308.55
54 mm (50% preserved). Wheelmade, brown with black
stains. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
Secondarily burnt.
374. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.67
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. unclear.
376. Jug or flask in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.45
H. 8 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 6 cm (18% preserved), vertical handle with oval section (Width: 20 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
377. Jug in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.74
H. 8 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body fragment with an attachment for a
vertical handle with round section (Width: 12 mm).
polished.
379. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.376.28+29
with horizontal grooves on the upper side of the lip.
polished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple incised horizontal and wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
382. Kantharos in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E8.297.1+E8.299.1
H. 9 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 9 cm (75% preserved), elbow handle. Belly decorated with knobs and with channeling. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous. Pl.
200.
383. Cup, jug or deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E8/9.396.26
H. 5 cm. Vertical elbow-like handle. Handmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.
384. Cup or juglet in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.308.51
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherd with incised zig-zag on shoulder and with a knob decorated with incisions on the belly.
Handmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
385. Bowl or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.316.15

H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd decorated with oblique channeling. Handmade, reddish. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
386. Krater (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.308.48
H. 2 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 24 cm (5% preserved). Incised
band filled with small oblique vertical lines Handmade, beige.
387. Jar (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.316.4
H. 2 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body fragment decorated with impressed
vertical chevrons. Handmade, grey. Ext. lightly burnished, int.
untreated.
388. Juglet in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.38
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherd with a knob. The belly and the
knob are decorated with channeling. Handmade, grey. Ext.
polished, int. untreated.
H. 4 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 18 cm (18% preserved). Belly decorated with channeling. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished, int.
polished.
390. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.326.31,32, and
E8/9.396.71
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 14 cm (25% preserved). Two incised
horizontal bands filled with oblique vertical slashes. Handmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Pl.201.
391. Krater or amphora (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E8.376.42
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd decorated with impressed circles with dots and enclosed by incised lines. Handmade,
Pl. 92.P.
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd decorated with channeling
and a lower part of an elbow-handle. Handmade, grey. Ext.
393. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.308.31+41
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. unclear.
handle with angular section (Width: 20 mm). Incised decoration of multiple chevrons below the handle attachment.
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated. Pl. 215.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
(Continuation)
395. Krater or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E8.308.52
multiple zig-zags. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
396. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.68
burnished, int. untreated.
397. Amphora (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E8/9.396.10+75
H. 11 cm, Th. 9 mm. Fragments from shoulder and rim. Decoration in forms of vertical and horizontal ribs. Handmade,
398. Jug, krater or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E8.376.27
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body fragment with incised multiple chevrons. Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. unclear.
400. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.41
H. 7 cm, Th. 9 mm. Horse-shoe shaped lug handle decorated
with finger imprints. Handmade, orange. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.
401. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E8.308.10,20, 22
untreated, int. untreated.
H. 16 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 12 cm (15% preserved), decorated with a raised band and finger imprints, indication of a handle attachment on the shoulder. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
with a raised band and finger imprints. Vertical handle with
oval section (Width: 48 mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 212.
404. Amphora (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.11
grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
405. Amphora in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.316.9
H. 4 cm, Th. 15 mm. Body fragment with a vertical handle
with angular section (Width: 46 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext.
slipped and burnished, int. untreated.
406. Amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.64
H. 12 cm, Th. 11 mm. Vertical handle with angular section
(Width: 46 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. impossible to say.
407. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.316.6+7+13
30 mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. not preserved sufficiently.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
(Continuation)
H. 8 cm. Horizontal handle with angular section (Width: 39
mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
409. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.1
H. 7 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 14 cm (8% preserved). Indication of
an lower handle attachment. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished,
int. polished.
grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
412. Cooking pot in Gritty Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.27
Wheelmade, orange. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
413. Jug (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.28
E8-9, STREET 751 WEST, TROY VIIB2 DEPOSITS

(Text p. 90)
polished.
418. Jar in Tan Ware. Inv. E8.354.41
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd with incised decoration of
double vertical and wavy lines. Wheelmade, brown. Ext.
419. Footed krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.354.37
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
420. Bowl in Tan Ware (?). Inv. E8.354.26
Wheelmade, orange. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
421. Cup or juglet in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.354.35
H. 4 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd with channeled decoration.
Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
422. Cup or jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.331.8
H. 4 cm. Elbow handle with round section (Width: 19 mm)
and channeled decoration. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished,
int. not preserved.
423. Cup, jug or krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.354.15
H. 7 cm. Vertical elbow-like handle. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.

E8.358.13
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherds decorated with an incised
band filled with oblique lines and with hanging triangles.
polished.
425. Amphora (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.345.11
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Fragment of a shoulder with decoration in
form of grooved horizontal line in shoulder/neck junction and
with multiple zig-zags on the shoulder. Handmade, grey. Ext.
polished, int. polished.
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body fragment decorated with multiple
incised zig-zags on the exterior and with a vertical rib on the
interior. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished. Same
vessel as 452.
(Width: 41 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished,
H. 5 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd with two parallel ribs, not
clear whether vertical or horizontal. Handmade, grey. Ext.
H. 2 cm. Horse-shoe like lug handle decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. unclear.
430. Cooking pot or jug (?) in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv.
E8.329.5
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 10cm (10% preserved).
431. Bowl in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.363.3
with a small knob on the lip. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
and finger imprints. Handmade, orange. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.
and finger imprints. Handmade, orange. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E8-9, STREET 751 WEST, TROY VIIB2 DEPOSITS
(Continuation)
435. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.329.18 + E8.358.19
H. 16 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 21 cm (38% preserved) with finger
imprints on the lip and with four elongated protruding
tongues modeled by fingers. Handmade, orange-beige with
blackish stains. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
grey. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
Handmade, beige. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
E8-9, STREET 751 STONE COLLAPSE

(Text p. 92)
H. 5 cm. Vertical handle with wavy section (Width: 27 mm).
Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved. Likely from
the same pot as 370 and 371.
polished.
grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. unclear.
441. Jug or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8/9.396.29
Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. unclear.
443. Stand (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.340.16
H. 7 cm. Fragment of a plastic pronged application usually attached on the rim of stands. Grey. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. not preserved.
38 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
45 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
446. Jug (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.276.10
H. 8 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim with vertical handle with round section (Width: 14 mm). Handle decorated with channeling.
Handmade, black. Ext. polished, int. polished.
447. Krater or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.724.9
H. 6 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple incised horizontal lines and with multiple zig-zags (?). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
H. 5 cm. Upper fragment of a vertical elbow-like handle
(Width: 31 mm), decorated with impressed circles. Remains
of deliberate white incrustation. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved.
H. 4 cm. Fragment of a vertical elbow-like handle. Handmade,
beige. Ext. polished, int. impossible to say.
450. Jug in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.724.6

H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 12 cm (5% preserved decorated
with small finger imprints on the lip and with oblique slashes
c. 2 cm below the rim. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int.
burnished.
451. Jug (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.276.4
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherds with incised decoration of
multiple zig-zags or triangles. Handmade, beige. Ext. polished,
int. untreated. Likely from the same pot as 446.
H. 6 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 28 cm (20% preserved). Decoration
in form of three incised horizontal lines below the rim and a
double zig-zag covering the body. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished. The same vessel as 426. Very similar to
Blegen et al. 1958: Fig. 259 (37.1011). Pl.201.
453. Amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Polierte feingemagerte Ware. Inv. E9.636.10
(Width: 41 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E8-9, STREET 751 STONE COLLAPSE
(Continuation)
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. unclear, covered with thick calcareous residue, int. unclear.
H. 3 cm. Body fragment with a horse-shoe shaped lug handle.
Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 5 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd with a subtle knob. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
H. 11 cm. Horizontal handle with oval section (Width: 31
mm). Brown. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
E8-9, STREET 751 - VIIB3 WALL AND RELATED

DEPOSITS
(Text p. 172)
459. Cup in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8/9.380.20
40 mm (20% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and
460. Deep bowl (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.340.29
H. 8 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 13 cm (15% preserved) with thickened lip. Decoration of multiple incised triangles on the
shoulder. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated. Likely from the same pot as 394 and 461.
461. Deep bowl (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.340.4
grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated. Likely from the same pot as
394 and 460.
H. 8 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body fragment with a handle attachment
with round section (Width: 25 mm). Several radially running
ribs below the handle. Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated. Pl. 215.
H. 4 cm. Vertical elbow-like handle. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Vertical handle with round section (Width:
19 mm) and channeled decoration. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
H. 5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body fragment with a handle attachment
and a small part of the rim. Channeled decoration on the belly. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd with a horse-shoe shaped lug
handle. Handmade, beige. Ext. polished, int. polished.
E9, BIG FLAT STONE BLOCKING THE EASTERN

DOORWAY OF ROOM B
(Text p. 92)
Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved sufficiently.
468. Lid (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.839.6

H. 5 cm. Probably a poppy-head shaped lid finial with incised
decoration (Width: 16 mm). Grey. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. not preserved.
H. 6 cm. Vertical elbow-like handle (Width: 25 mm). Grey. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
470. Jar in Wheelmade Semi-Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.808.32
with a raised band. Wheelmade (?), brown. Ext. untreated,
int. untreated. Pl. 210.
H. 6 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim 22 cm (5% preserved), horse-shoe
like handle. Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Pl. 208.
472. Krater (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.839.9+E9.846.4
H. 15 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 22 cm (10% preserved). Shoulders
decorated with conical knobs. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E9, HOUSE 761, VIIB2 FLOOR DEPOSITS (?) FIRST
PROBABLE SURFACE
(Text p. 94)
E9, HOUSE 761, VIIB2 FLOOR DEPOSITS (?) THIRD

PROBABLE SURFACE
(Text p. 96)
473. Juglet or alabastron in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.574.2

474. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.574.1, E9.554.3
475. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.574.6, E9.554.9
Pl.201.
38 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.

grey. Ext. polished, int. polished. Pl. 215.
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
E9, HOUSE 761, VIIB2 FLOOR DEPOSITS (?)

SECOND PROBABLE SURFACE
(Text p. 96)
polished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 3 mm. Body sherd with a horizontal handle with
round section (Width: 10 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
polished.
480. Krater or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.761.1
decorated with a horizontal rib and with alternating multiple
incised wavy and horizontal lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
481. Jug or amphora Plain Ware. Inv. E9.761.13
H. 4 cm. Vertical handle with middle rib (Width: 35 mm).
Beige. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.
482. Jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.761.18
grey. Ext. polished, int. burnished.
polished.
with multiple incised horizontal lines. Wheelmade, beige. Ext.
485. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware (?). Inv. E9.773.6
33 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 89.G.
decorated with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade,
grey. Ext. lightly burnished, int. untreated.
E9, HOUSE 761, DEPOSITS COVERING THE HOUSE

(Text p. 97)
490. Deep bowl (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.602.3
polished.
491. Jug in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.620.2, 3
polished.
polished.
H. 8 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 20 cm (2% preserved). Indication of
a handle attachment on the shoulder. Handmade, beige. Ext.
H. 7 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 20 cm (10% preserved), horseshoe like lug handle. The rim and the lug handle decorated
with finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. not clear, int.
burnished.
H. 10 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 30 cm (12% preserved), horseshoe like lug handle. Handmade, whitish-grey. Ext. not clear
(heavily covered with a calcareous residue), int. not clear.
67 mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
untreated.
with oval section (Width: 32 mm). Two horizontal bands, one
undecorated on the level of the lug handle, the other placed
below the lug handle and decorated with finger imprints.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E9, ROOM B, STONE DEBRIS AND FLAT STONES
DEPOSIT
(Text p. 98)
498. Skyphos in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.983.2+5
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 12 cm (5% preserved), decorated
with horizontal grooves. Horizontal handle with round section
499. Juglet B29 in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.957.10+15
H. 3 cm, Th. 3 mm. Rim 5 cm (12% preserved), attachments
for a vertical handle with round section (Width: 10 mm).
500. Jar C68 (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.957.1
H. 14 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body fragment with a horizontal handle
with round section (Width: 18 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
H. 18 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim c. 14 cm (5% preserved), vertical
handle with oval section with middle rib (Width: 34 mm).
Wheelmade, grey-brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
503. Deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.1007.15
with deep horizontal grooves below the rim and with incised
multiple wavy and horizontal lines further down.
polished. Same pot as 540 and 628.
and polished.
505. Bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.953.10+E9.957.2
506. Unknown shape in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.919.8
H. 8 cm. Massive mushroom-shaped object with incised concentric circles on its top. Perhaps from a lid or from an attachment broken off from a rim of bigger vessel. Grey. Ext.
H. 5 cm. Mushroom-shaped finial from what was originally
most likely a pronged object placed on the mouth of a stand.
Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
508. Bowl (A77?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.953.17
509. Shallow bowl in Plain Ware. Inv. E9.1027.2
and polished.
512. Shallow bowl in Plain Ware. Inv. E9.1027.1

and polished.
polished.
516. Cup in Brown-Slip Ware. Inv. E9.1027.6
handle with angular section (Width: 14 mm). Wheelmade,
orange-brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
orange. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Wheelmade, orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
520. Alabastron or juglet in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.1007.12
polished.
H. 8 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body fragment with vertical handle with
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E9, ROOM B, STONE DEBRIS AND FLAT STONES
DEPOSIT
(Continuation)
522. Cooking tray in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.1017.6
H. 6 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 26 cm (15% preserved), basket
handle with oval section (Width: 14 mm). Wheelmade,
brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 215.
523. Cup in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.979.4+E9.989.3
H. 6 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 9 cm (78% preserved), vertical handle with angular section (Width: 15 mm). Rounded base
(100% preserved) with a circular opening. Handmade, grey.
Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 200.
524. Cooking pot or jar in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv.
E9.953.2+E9.957.7, E9.979.3
525. Amphora in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.987.5
beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 91.D.
brown. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
527. Juglet in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.1007.6
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 9 cm (10% preserved), vertical handle with oval section (Width: 12 mm). Handmade, grey.
Ext.burnished, int. untreated.
with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade, brown.
Ext. burnished, int. untreated. Pl. 91.B.
Handmade, brown. Ext. polished, int. untreated, very rough.
Pl. 93.E.
530. Jar (or rather a pyraunos or a stand?) in Handmade Burnished
Ware. Inv. E9.953.9
like lug handle (Width: 41 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
531. Deep bowl in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.1027.5
grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Pl.201.
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with shoulder/rim transition.
Wheelmade, black. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Handmade, orange. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
handle with oval section (Width: 38 mm). Handmade, beige.
Ext. burnished, int. untreated. Pl. 211.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E9, ROOM B, LOWER VIIB2 FLOORS
(Text p. 99)
535. Jug in Nubbly Ware (Troy II-V). Inv. E9.766.27
H. 3 cm. Vertical handle with saddle-like section (Width: 37
mm). Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved. Residual.
536. Spouted jar or sauceboat (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?).
Inv. E9.766.59
H. 5 cm, Th. 3 mm. Highly unusual rim with spout or a
sauciere-like curving part. Decoration in form of impressed
circles and two V-shaped grooves, all of them with traces of
white paste fill. Handmade (?), grey. Ext. polished, int. polished. The fabric shows similarities to Anatolian Grey Ware.
H. 6 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd decorated with a horizontal rib
and with multiple incised horizontal and wavy lines.
polished.
538. Stirrup jar (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.915.11
H. 5 cm. Mushroom-shaped object or a lid button with incised
chevrons on the stem and with a cavity on the cap. The cavity
is bordered by a band with radially placed short incised lines
and a wavy line. Uppermost part worn. Grey. Ext. slipped and
539. Basin (A54?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.917.8
decorated with grooves and with incised multiple wavy lines.
polished. Likely from the same pot as 503 and 628.
543. Deinos in unidentified ware. Inv. E9.915.6
Unusual shape and fabric, could be residual from Troy VI Early
(secondarily burnt Red-Coated Ware?).
544. Deep bowl (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.884.12
with a single incised horizontal line immediately below the lip.
Below the horizontal line is a tiny knob on both sides of which
are multiple incised wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
and polished. Smudged on the interior.
548. Juglet in Plain Ware. Inv. E9.915.10
H. 9 cm. Thin vertical handle with oval section (Width: 8 mm).
Beige. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.

H. 7 cm. Rim not measurable reliably (deformed in the area
of handle attachment). Vertical handle with oval section
(Width: 31 mm). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
beige. Ext. untreated (!), int. slipped and polished.
Wheelmade, beige-orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
552. Jar or jug in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.897.3
polished.
554. Jar (C45?) in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.857.25
H. 8 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment with a horizontal handle with round section (Width: 21 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext.
polished.
untreated.
polished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E9, ROOM B, LOWER VIIB2 FLOORS
(Continuation)
559. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.915.1+E9.917.1
H. 11 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 17 cm (35% preserved). Lip decorated with finger imprints. A number of elongated vertical
tongues produced by pressing with fingers. Handmade,
brown. Ext. slipped untreated, int. slipped and burnished.
From the same vessel as 560. Pl. 215.
brown. Ext. slipped untreated, int. slipped and polished. From
the same vessel as 559.
with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade, brown.
Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with a vertical raised band
decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, beige. Ext. lightly
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 18 cm (22% preserved). Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 209.
H. 9 cm, Th. 12 mm. Rim c. 25 cm (<5% preserved). Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
Decoration in form of a raised band with finger imprints.
H. 7 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 26 cm (10% preserved), horn-like
lug handle with angular section (Width: 28 mm). Handmade,
brown. Ext. untreated, int. burnished. Pl. 208.
568. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.907.1.
H. 13 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 13 cm (48% preserved), flat base,
80 mm (22% preserved). Handmade, brown. Ext. polished,
int. untreated. Deposited in the anakkale Archaeological
Museum, No. 9052(?).
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim not measurable securely (<5% preserved and deformed by the handle attachment), vertical
brown. Ext. slipped, int. slipped.
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body shed decorated with a band filled
with oblique slashes. Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int.
burnished.
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim and vertical handle with oval section
(Width: 26 mm). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 89.J.
H. 4 cm. Vertical elbow-like handle with oval section (Width:
19 mm). Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
573. Jug in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E9.766.54, E9.766.53
Handmade, brown. A belly fragment and a horizontal handle
from the same pot. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.

Handmade, black. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
576. Jar in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.917.2
grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Joins to 68.
577. Cooking pot (?) in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.887.11
Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 9 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd decorated with a conical knob.
Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
Pl. 199.
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherd decorated with an oblong
knob. Handmade, beige. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E9, ROOM B, UPPER VIIB2 FLOORS
(Text p. 101)
with subtle finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 8 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd with radially running raised
bands decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext.
Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and burnished, int. slipped and
burnished.
Pl. 93.A.
burnished, int. slipped and polished.
587. Cup or jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware . Inv. E9.754.18
H. 5 cm. Vertical elbow-like handle (Width: 40 mm). Grey. Ext.
H. 3 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple incised horizontal lines. Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
H. 3 cm. Vertical elbow-like handle. Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
590. Juglet in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.991.1
brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 90.A.
E9, ROOM B, DEPRESSION IN THE MIDDLE

(Text p. 103)
591. Basin A67 in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.998.1
polished.
593. Jug or amphora in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.1004.2
polished.
H. 4 cm, Th. 3 mm. A pedestal base, 160 mm (30% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
Wheelmade, orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
polished.
597. Bowl in Brown-slip Ware. Inv. E9.1011.10

and polished.
Likely from the same pot as 520.
599. Skyphos A72 in Brown-Slip Ware. Inv. E9.1011.1
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim fragment, 18 cm (<5% preserved).
and polished.
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim c. 20 cm (5% preserved). Decorated
H. 6 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd with a vertical raised band
decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. burnished. Likely from the same vessel as 562
and 583. Pl. 91.E.
Brown. Ext. polished, int.polished.
Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. untreated. Pl. 91.G.
H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Fragment of a belly and shoulder with an
attachment for a vertical handle with oval section (Width: 50
mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished.
605. Cup or jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. E9.998.4
H. 2 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherds decorated with fluting.
Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and
polished.
H. 8 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 23 cm (10% preserved). Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Pl. 202.
607. Cooking pot or jug in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.1004.4
H. 8 cm. Handle (most probably vertical) with round section
(Width: 19 mm). Grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E9, ROOM B, DESTRUCTION VIIB2
(Text p. 102)
608. Carinated basin in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.705.1
609. Unknown shape in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.705.2
H. 3 cm. Fragment of a twisted handle with round section
decorated with multiple incised lines alternating with wavy
lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
611. Goblet (?) in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.680.10
H. 5 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim fragment. Handmade, grey. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Pl. 93.B.
613. Jug or krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.680.4
H. 4 cm. Vertical handle with wavy section (Width: 26 mm).
and polished.
616. Jug, amphora or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E9.680.2
H. 9 cm, Th. 6 mm. Completely preserved profile. Rim 9 cm
(50% preserved). Attachments for a vertical elbow-like handle. Rounded base. Belly decorated with channeling, with alternating direction. Handmade, beige and grey. Ext. polished,
int. polished. Pl. 200.
H. 5 cm. Vertical elbow-like handle with round section
(Width: 18 mm). Brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not
preserved.
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body fragment decorated with a knob.
polished.
H. 6 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body fragment with an attachment for a
handle. The area of the attachment was roughened by incision during the production process. Handmade, brown. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. untreated. Pl. 95.E.
622. Cooking pot or Jug (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
E9.680.21
grey. Fabric rather gritty. Ext. slightly burnished, int. untreated. Pl. 91.A.
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd decorated with a knob and
with fluting. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.

H. 12 cm, Th. 10 mm. Horizontal handle with oval section
(Width: 36 mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
626. Pithos in Coarse Ware. Inv. E9.732.4
H. 6 cm, Th. 35 mm. Body sherd decorated with broad horizontal and wavy grooves produced by fingers. Handmade,
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E9, ROOMS C AND D, UPPER DEPOSITS
(Text p. 104)
H. 12 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim with a hollowed lip 10 cm (25%
preserved), handle with oval section (Width: 23 mm).
with horizontal grooves under the rim and with incised wavy
lines further below. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Same pot as 503 and 540.
slipped and polished. Covered by cess residue.
632. Jug, jar or amphora in Tan Ware. Inv. E9.259.3
polished.
polished.
polished.
orange. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
and polished.
beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
641. Jar or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.261.1
H. 9 cm. Rim and shoulder fragment. Handmade, grey. Ext.
642. Bowl or jug in Plain Ware. Inv. E9.275.11
grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 210.
and finger imprints. Handmade, dark brown. Ext. burnished,
int. untreated.

H. 5 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body sherd decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and burnished, int. untreated.
H. 4 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 22 cm (12% preserved). Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. burnished.
647. Juglet in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E9.160.6
decorated with triple incised wavy lines. Belly decorated with
a subtle knob and with channeling. Handmade, brown. Ext.
polished, int. burnished. Pl. 200.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E8, ROOM G, LOWER FLOOR
(Text p. 105)
648. Hemispherical bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.225.2
polished.
650. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware, Early Variant. Inv. E8.225.15
651. Shallow bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware, Early Variant. Inv.
E8.225.6
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd decorated with incised horizontal lines and with a subtle knob. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
H. 3 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd decorated with a horizontal rib
and with multiple incised wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
H. 5 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd decorated with a subtle knob
and with two horizontal ribs. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
polished.
H. 4 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd with a small circular flattened
knob and two raised horizontal bands. Wheelmade, orange.
H. 14 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 9 cm (10% preserved). Small
knobs on the belly. Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
658. Cup/bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.212.1
elbow-like handle with oval section (Width: 24 mm). Decorated with three knobs and with channeling. Small umbo on
the bottom. Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
burnished.
H. 18 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 14 cm (25% preserved). Attachments for a vertical handle attached by means of a button.
Belly decorated with channeling. Handmade, black. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. polished. Pl. 92.K, 92.N. Pl. 199.
H. 8 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 18 cm (12% preserved), horseshoe
shaped lug handle (Width: 34 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext.
burnished, int. untreated. Pl. 209.
661. Cooking pot in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.215.12,13,
E8.219.1, E8.223.1
H. 15 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 18 cm (40% preserved), handle
with oval section (Width: 27 mm). Flat base, 58 mm (100%
preserved). Wheelmade, grey-brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Heavily secondarily burnt.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 13 cm (16% preserved) with elongated tongue-like protrusion. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.

with finger imprints on the lip. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 12 cm (12% preserved). Small irregular knob on the shoulder. Handmade, orange. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
665. Cooking pot in Gritty Ware. Inv. E8.225.40
666. Unknown shape in Coarse Ware. Inv. E8.220 unnumbered
body sherd.
H. 6 cm. Unusual sherd with rough surface. Possibly not a
vessel, but rather a structural element (part of an oven?). At
least one opening. Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E8, ROOM G, FILL BETWEEN THE LOWER AND THE
UPPER FLOOR
(Text p. 107)
H. 4 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd decorated with a horizontal
rib and with incised multiple wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey.
H. 3 cm. Vertical handle or protome in form of an animal
head (Width: 15 mm). Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
red. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
670. Jar in Brown-Slip Ware. Inv. E8.148.4
Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd decorated with a subtle knob
and with channeling. Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. polished.
H. 3 cm. Vertical handle with oval section (Width: 28 mm)
decorated with incised lines. Grey. Ext. untreated, int. not
preserved.
673. Jug or deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.148.18
decorated with incised lines and dots. Grey. Ext. slipped and
polished, int. not preserved. Pl. 202.
H. 10 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim with vertical elbow-like handle with
oval section (Width: 30 mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped
676. Krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.148.2
decorated with channeling and with a subtle knob. Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Pl. 202.
brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. polished.
H. 8 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with handle attachment. The
shoulder is decorated by a thin raised band with oblique imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
679. Bowl (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.161.3
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 16 cm (10% preserved), the lip is
thickened and incurved inside, its top is flattened and decorated with a subtle vertical knob. Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. untreated. Parallel: Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 285:18
(From House 761)
680. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.148.25+26
681. Amphora or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.148.3
H. 11 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim 25 cm (18% preserved). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Pl. 209.
E8, ROOM G, UPPER FLOOR

(Text p. 108)
682. Jar or krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.116.26, 27
H. 6 cm. Body sherds decorated with multiple incised wavy
and horizontal lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished , int. not recorded.
H. 8 cm, Th. 10 mm. Neck fragment with vertical handle with
684. Jar (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.116.15
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd decorated with a conical
knob. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 5 cm. Vertical twisted handle with round section (Width:
28 mm). Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
Pl. 203.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E8, ROOM G, UPPER FLOOR
(Continuation)
686. Amphora or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.116.4+11
Pl. 92.I.
H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Vertical elbow-like handle decorated with
with V-shaped lines. Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Parallel: Blegen et al. 1958,
Fig. 259: 37.1009 (from the neighboring House 768). Pl.
200.
688. Large bowl or jug in (?) Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E8.116.12
decorated with channeling. Brown. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. not preserved. Pl. 203.
689. Jar or jug in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.116.13
Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. untreated. Pl. 215.
690. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.123.3+8+9+12+15,
E8.148.1
H. 8 cm, Th. 12 mm. Rim 55 cm (30% preserved). Also
fragment of a shoulder with a handle attachment. Shoulder
decorated with triple incised horizontal lines. Handmade,
E8, ROOM H, FLOOR AND THE LOWER DEPOSIT

(Text p. 109)
692. Deep bowl or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.424.1
decorated with a subtle triangular knob. Handmade, grey.
Ext. polished, int. burnished. Likely from the same vessel as
693. Pl. 202.
693. Deep bowl or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.424.2
38 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. burnished. Likely
694. Jar (or krater?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.371.12
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim with a lip 30 cm (10% preserved).
Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
697. Biconical jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E8.371.24
H. 42 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 19 cm (75% preserved), two lug
handles with oval section. Decoration of a horizontal raised
band with finger imprints on both sides of lug handles. Flat
base, 120 mm (100% preserved). Handmade, brown. Ext.
untreated, int. burnished. Pl. 209.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E8, ROOM I, LOWER ORTHOSTATE WALL
(Text p. 110)
698. Kantharos in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.524.1
H. 5 cm, Th. 12 mm. Rim 7 cm (100% preserved). Lower
parts of two vertical handles. Base, 30 mm (100% preserved). Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
slipped and polished. Pl. 199.
699. Bowl in Brown-Slip Ware. Inv. E8.459.8
polished.
handle with round section (Width: 20 mm) on the carination.
polished. Worn.
brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
E8, ROOM I, UPPER ORTHOSTATE WALL AND THE

STONE DEBRIS
(Text p. 111)
703. Jug in Brown-Slip Ware. Inv. E8.457.29
Wheelmade, red. Ext. polished lustrous, int. untreated.
H. 2 cm, Th. 6 mm. Raised ring base, 110 mm (22% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
706. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware, Early Variant. Inv. E8.449.3+8 +
E8.457.6
strap handle with middle rib (Width: 36 mm). Wheelmade,
polished.
polished.
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with three parallel horizontal
incised lines. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E8, ROOM I, UPPER ORTHOSTATE WALL AND THE
STONE DEBRIS
(Continuation)
710. Jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.137.7 + E8.449.6
H. 6 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 9 cm (40% preserved). Belly decorated with oblique channeling, neck decorated with a slightly
raised band with impressed dots. Handmade, black. Ext.
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Flat base. Belly decorated with channeling.
Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherd decorated with channeling.
Flat base. Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
713. Jug or jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.165.5
handle with oval section (Width: 31 mm). Handmade, black.
H. 10 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 9 cm (48% preserved). Belly decorated with channeling. Handle missing. Flat base, 42 mm
(100% preserved). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. polished. Pl. 199.
H. 4 cm. Vertical handle with rectangular section (Width: 41
mm). Black. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 12 cm (20% preserved). Incised
band filled with oblique lines on the neck, below the rim.
Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and
polished.
718. Jug or amphora in Handmade Burnished (or Lustrous?) Ware.
Inv. E8.449.10+11
H. 7 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder and neck fragment. Lower attachment of an handle. Handmade, black. Ext. burnished, int.
heavily worn.
719. Piriform jar (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware (?). Inv. E8.141.1
H. 9 cm, Th. 19 mm. Base 92 cm (100% preserved). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished (worn in contact zone),
int. untreated.
720. Cup in Gritty Ware. Inv. E8.457.11
Wheelmade, orange. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
721. Pithos in Pithos Ware. Inv. E8.449.15
H. 6 cm. Body sherd decorated with multiple deep curved
grooves produced by fingers. Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
E8, ROOM I, DEPOSITS COVERING THE ROOM
(Text p. 112)
H. 14 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body fragment with a vertical handle
with oval section (Width: 39 mm). Shoulder decorated with
multiple incised wavy lines and with a horizontal rib in the
middle. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
H. 15 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 17 cm (30% preserved). Neck decorated with incised horizontal band filled with oblique incisions. Wheelmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
724. Amphora or deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E8.137.30
H. 8 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment decorated with three
horizontal grooves. Handle attachment indicated. Handmade,
grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. polished.
H. 13 cm, Th. 6 mm. Shoulder fragment with attachments for
a vertical handle with oval section (Width: 39 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. polished.
H. 10 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 13 cm (15% preserved). Subtle
rounded knob on the maximal belly diameter. Handmade,
Pl. 200.
727. Deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E8.137.1+E8.165.2
with oval section. Subtle oblong knob on the belly. Incised
horizontal band filled with oblique lines below the rim, another one on the shoulder. The belly decorated with incised
triple zig-zags. Handmade, brown to black. Ext. slipped and
polished, int. slipped and polished. Pl. 203.
H. 13 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 31 cm (12% preserved). Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
729. Jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.137.21+22
Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. polished.
polished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
K4, WELL DEPOSITS UNDER THE LEVEL REACHED
BY DRPFELD (16.90-17.50/70 M A.S.L.)
(Text p. 118)
732. Closed-shaped vessel in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.938.19
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Ring-base, 85 mm (50% preserved).
Wheelmade, light-grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
733. Jug in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.938.21
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 10 cm (10% preserved),
734. Piriform jar (C41) in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.952.1
Wheelmade, orange. Covered with cess-residue. Ext. slipped
735. Closed-shape vessel in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.761.2
and K4.934.30
H. 4 cm, Th. 3 mm. Ring-Base, 90 mm (30% preserved).
736. Closed-shape vessel in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.938.20
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
737. Jug with trefoil-mouth (B35) in Unknown Ware. Inv. K4.938.35
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 6 cm (18% preserved). Probably
wheelmade, tan fabric (with remains of a brown slip). Ext.
slipped, int. slipped.
738. Barrel-shaped jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. K4.952.4
brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 91.I. Pl. 209.
739. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?). Inv. K4.938.6
H. 7 cm, Th. 12 mm. Rim 30 cm (7% preserved), Handmade,
beige. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous. Pl. 208.
740. Small jug (or cup?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
K4.938.16
Handmade, grey. Ext. lightly burnished, int. untreated. Inside
rather rough which is unusual for a cup. Pl. 204.
741. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. K4.938.13
H. 4 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd with a gently protruding lug
handle. Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 5 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd decorated with oblique finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
H. 7 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd with a pronounced raised
band (square in section) decorated with fingertip imprints.
Handmade, beige with orange stains. Ext. untreated, int. burnished. Possibly from the same vessel as 780.
744. Jar in Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.938.8
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with a distinct raised angular
band (rectangular in section) decorated with deep and broad
fingertip imprints. Wheelmade (?), brown. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated. Pl. 208.
745. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.938.10
H. 5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 10 cm (7% preserved), Lower handle attachment indicated. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished. Pl. 199.
746. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.938.5
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with a slight S-shaped profile
and with attachment of a vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width: 53 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous,
int. burnished.
747. Jar (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.938.7
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Unusual slightly raised oval knob or lug
handle (Width: 43 mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lus-
trous, int. impossible to decide because the surface badly deteriorated.

H. 5 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body fragment with an oblong knob.
Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
K4, SECOND WATER-BEARING LAYER AND THE
LEVEL REACHED BY DRPFELD (17.50/70-18.40
M A.S.L.)
(Text p. 120)
749. Cup in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.934.29
H. 2 cm, Th. 3 mm. Rim 18 cm (5% preserved), vertical handle (section and width were impossible to determine).
750. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.934.31
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Ring-base fragment with 65 mm (13%
preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
751. Carinated A93 one-handled bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
K4.930.16
752. Carinated bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.736.10+11+12
H. 8 cm, Th. mm. Rim 9 cm (13% preserved), vertical handle
with oval section (Width: 24 mm). The handle was pierced before firing near both its upper and lower attachment. The upper piercing goes through the handle, the lower piercing finished with a bulge on the interior. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
H. 9 cm, Th. mm. Vertical handle with oval section (Width: 31
mm), decorated with incision marks made after the firing.
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
755. Jug (B 25) in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.934.25
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. polished, int. polished.
756. Spouted-bowl in Unknown Ware. Inv. K4.930.1
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 22 cm (7% preserved), with a
bridge-spout. Wheelmade, beige. Fabric includes numerous
fine, rounded, white and black mineral particles. Some mica.
Break compact. Ext. smoothed, int. smoothed. Pl. 94.H.
757. Jug or jar (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.736.33
H. 13 cm, Th. 8 mm. Lower part of body with traces of removal by means of a string (?). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
758. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.736.2
of multiple incised parallel and wavy lines on the shoulder
and a register of multiple wavy lines framed by horizontal
lines on the upper side of the lip. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
759. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.930.17
H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Fragment of shoulder decorated with two
registers of multiple wavy lines divided by multiple horizontal
lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
H. 6 cm, Th. 12 mm. Body sherd decorated with incised horizontal and wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int.
polished.
762. Krater (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. I Inv. K4.934.32

H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Shoulder fragment with a horizontal handle with round section (Width: 16 mm). Wheelmade, grey.
Ext. polished, int. untreated.
764. Flask in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.736.28
H. 6 cm, Th. 9 mm. Heavily worn body fragment with a thick
rib on the exterior. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. badly
preserved, most probably untreated.
765. Jar or cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. Inv.
K4.930.4
766. Jar or cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.934.26
767. Jar (?) in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.934.4
H. 5 cm, Th. 12 mm. Body sherd with a lug handle with oval
section. Wheelmade, beige/grey. Semi coarse fabric with
white inclusions. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
768. Jar in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.736.22
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
K4, SECOND WATER-BEARING LAYER AND THE
LEVEL REACHED BY DRPFELD (17.50/70-18.40
M A.S.L.)
(Continuation)
769. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.930.5+6+9+12
H. 11 cm, Th. 6 mm. Elbow handle (Width: 22 mm) decorated
with fluting on its upper part. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished,
int. polished.
770. Bowl or big cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.736.25
H. 7 cm, Th. 10 mm. Identical decoration to 769, likely from
the same vessel. Broken area indicates the missing attachment of a vertical handle. Handmade, brown with black
stains. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
771. Basin or jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.736.16
H. 6 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body fragment with a handle attachment. Handle with angular section (Width: 28 mm). A pronounced finger imprint on the outer side of the handle attachment. Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
772. Deep bowl (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.736.26
42 mm). Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not
preserved.
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body fragment with vertical fluting on the
belly and incised register with arrows on the shoulder. (dm at
the belly level 25-30 cm). Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
774. Jar or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.934.14
H. 6 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body sherd with a slightly protruding
knob enclosed by an incised hatched band. Handmade,
brown. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. covered by a
thick burnt matter residue. Pl. 94.I, 94.J.
776. Jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.934.11
grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished.
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 25 cm (3% preserved). The lip is
decorated with fingertip imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
778. Jar (C 86 ?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. K4.934.7
H. 5 cm, Th. 14 mm. Rim 20 cm (6% preserved). The shoulder is decorated with a slightly protruding horizontal ledge
with fingertip imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int.
burnished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 20 cm (7% preserved). A raised
band, placed 1 cm below the rim, decorated with oblique
slashes in lozenge-shape (produced by a blade or a similar
sharp instrument). Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 209.
780. Jar (C 86) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. K4.934.1
H. 4 cm. Lug handle (Width: 51 mm). Handmade, beige. Ext.
burnished, int. not preserved. Possibly from the same vessel
as 743.
K4, FIRST WATER-BEARING LAYER (18.40-19.90

M A.S.L.)
(Text p.122)
781. Jug or amphora in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.702.52
polished.
H. 2 cm, Th. 6 mm. Somewhat flattened rim, 28 cm (4%
preserved), decorated with incised multiple wavy lines on the
interior. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
783. Skyphos (A71) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.711.7
round section (Width: 8 mm). No rim preserved, but its approximate can be reconstructed as c. 16 cm. Wheelmade,
light grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
784. Skyphos (A71) Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.711.9
H. 6 cm, Th. 3 mm. Body sherd with a very small rim portion
preserved and with a horizontal handle with round section
(Width: 8 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
785. Amphora (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.921.29
H. 7 cm, Th. 8 mm. Two joining sherds, one of them heavily
covered with cess residue. A non-joining rim sherd from the
same vessel is not depicted (K4.926.4). Rim 14 cm (32%
preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
786. Neck-handled amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
K4.711.41
Ext. polished, int. untreated. Perhaps from the same vessel as
835.
handle with flat-oval section (Width: 34 mm). Wheelmade,
788. Jug or jar (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.702.4
H. 6 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd decorated with horizontal
broad raised band with a groove. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
789. Amphoriskos in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.711.5 + K4.736.5
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
M A.S.L.)
(Continuation)
H. 9 cm. Body sherd with a fragment of horizontal handle
with round section (Width: 27 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
791. Jar or jug in Anatolian Grey Ware, Early Variant. Inv. K4.702.2
H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Ringbase, 65 mm (100% preserved).
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped, int. untreated.
795. Jug or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.926.9
decorated with multiple incised horizontal and wavy lines.
The upper side of the lip is decorated with grooves.
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. treatment cannot be determined.
797. Jar or cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.921.23
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim ? cm (only 3% preserved) decorated
with incised wavy line. Wheelmade, orange. Ext. wash (?), int.
wash (?).Pl. 90.G.
798. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.926.28
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Everted rim 21 cm (7% preserved).
799. Strainer in Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.702.55
H. 2 cm, Th. 25 mm. Body sherd perforated with a number of
holes. Not clear, whether handmade or wheelmade, beige
color. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
800. Jug or Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.926.2
801. Jug or jar in Unknown Ware. Inv. K4.711.45
Wheelmade, white-beige to light greenish. Hard firing. Ext.
untreated, int. untreated. Could be Cypriot (information provided by Prof. Dr. Michal Artzy on the occasion of her visit to
Troy).
802. Jar (?) in Brown Ware. Inv. K4.702.14
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 cm. Sherd decorated with a herringbone pattern. Not clear, whether in horizontal or vertical position.
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. burnished. Likely a residual piece from Troy I period. Parallels: Blegen 1950, Fig. 244:21.
H. 2 cm, Th. 5 mm. Flat base with a slight umboprotrusion in
the middle with 170 mm. Handmade, black. Ext. polished,
int. polished.
H. 2 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 28 cm (7% preserved). The lip is
decorated with cut facets. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
805. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?). Inv. K4.702.56
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Base and body fragment with a lower attachment of a vertical handle with an oval section (Width: 19
mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. not preserved sufficiently, int.

burnished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 23 cm (3% preserved). Stamped
(false-cord) decoration on its exterior and with concentric circles connected with tangents on its lip. Handmade, grey. Ext.
polished lustrous, int. burnished. Pl. 199.
H. 3 cm. Vertical (originally likely elbow-like) handle with
channeled decoration in vertical direction (Width: 37 mm).
Handmade, beige and black. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
808. Cup in Handmade Lustrous (?) Ware. Inv. K4.702.49
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherd with a small knob. Handmade,
beige and grey. Ext. burnished, int. polished.
809. Jug (?) in Handmade Burnished ware. Inv. K4.711.25
H. 6 cm. Vertical handle with a saddle-like section in the upper part and round section in the lower part (Width: 35 mm).
Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. not preserved.
810. Deep bowl (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.711.26
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Vertical handle with flat-oval section
(Width: 41 mm) decorated with incised vertical lines. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished.
811. Jar or bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.711.22
H. 7 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd with a slightly protruding
knob, both the body and the knob decorated with fluting.
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. burnished. Pl. 93.L.
Pl. 199.
812. Bowl or big cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.926.14
H. 8 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd. The belly decorated with vertical channeling. A single horizontal flute divides the belly
channeling from undecorated shoulder. Handmade, grey. Ext.
polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body fragment decorated with a low, oblong knob and oblique channeling from both sides of the
knob. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished.
814. Cup or bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.926.16
H. 6 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple vertical flutes at the shoulder. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
815. Juglet in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.702.26
Handmade, black. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
M A.S.L.)
(Continuation)
816. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.711.24
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Horizontal handle with angular section
(Width: 37 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Lower side of the handle more burnished, upper side
without burnishing.
817. Jar or big basin with horizontal handles in Handmade Lustrous
Ware. Inv. K4.711.30
H. 9 cm, Th. 9 mm. Fragment of a shoulder with a horizontal
handle, section not ascertainable (Width: 37 mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
818. Jar or Basin in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.926.13
H. 8 cm. Horizontal handle with flat-oval section (Width: 45
mm). Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. not preserved.
819. Amphora BS C84 in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.702.48
H. 10 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd with a vertical handle with
flat-oval section (Width: 75 mm). Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. unclear.
H. 9 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim 15 cm (15% preserved). Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. not preserved sufficiently.
H. 10 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd with a massive crescentshaped raised band decorated with deep finger imprints.
Handmade, beige/orange. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
with a raised band with finger imprints directly under the lip.
Handmade, red-brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
band and pronounced finger imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext.
H. 10 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd with a lug handle (Width: 45
mm). Horizontal raised band on both sides of the lug, vertical
raised band under the lug. The bands and the lug are all decorated with finger imprints. Ext. untreated, int. burnished.
with oblique slashes made by a blade. Handmade, grey. Ext.
and round finger-nail imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
and finger imprints. Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated (?), int.
burnished.
828. Jug in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.926.27
H. 4 cm. Lug handle with an oval section (Width: 34 mm).
Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.
829. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.702.36
H. 6 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body sherd with a horn-shaped lug
(Width: 42 mm). Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
decorated with a raised band and oblique finger imprints.
Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. burnished.

H. 4 cm, Th. 13 mm. Horn-shaped lug handle (Width: 50 mm).
Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with a oblong vertical knob on
the belly. Handmade, beige-brown. Ext. untreated, int. burnished. The individual number written on the sherd says 59
by mistake.
K4, UPPER PART OF THE ROCK-CUT SHAFT

(19.90-24.17 M A.S.L.), SOUNDING A2
(Text p. 124)
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Carinated body sherd decorated with incised horizontal lines on the belly and with a small knob on
the carination. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
834. Closed shape vessel in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.687.53
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherds decorated with small knobs.
835. Amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.696.31
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated. Probably
H. 10 cm, Th. 7 mm. Slightly facetted rim, 28 cm (11% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
837. Stand (D45?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. K4.696.27
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim thickened on the exterior, c. 30 cm
(3% preserved), decorated with a groove on exterior and incised double wavy line on the top. Remains of a double curving line (or wavy lines?) under the lip on exterior.
838. Jar or alabastron in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.696.32
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Shoulder fragment with a pierced horizontal lug handle. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
839. Pilgrim flask (?) Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.696.33
H. 5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 5 cm (100% preserved) and neck
with a handle attachment closely to the rim. The handle broken off. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
(19.90-24.17 M A.S.L.), SOUNDING A2
(Text p. 124)
840. Amphora BS C84 in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.677.39
H. 16 cm, Th. 8 mm. Belly fragment with a vertical handle
int. untreated. Some body sherds from the same pot were
present in the same excavation unit.
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished. .
847. Jug in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.696.59
H. 8 cm, Th. 8 mm. Belly and shoulder fragment with a vertical handle with oval section (Width: 28 mm). Lower attachment of the handle is on the widest point of the vessel.
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Perhaps
from the same pot as 871.
849. Bowl with everted rim in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
K4.687.22
H. 2 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 23 mm (5% preserved). Handmade,
light-brown with dark-grey stains. Ext. polished, int. polished.
Pl. 93.J.
H. 4 cm. Fragment of a handle decorated with fluting that imitates twisting. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
851. Jar or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.696.72
H. 7 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body fragment with a slight knob. Handmade, brown-grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. too unclear to
decide.
H. 5 cm. Elbow-like handle tip (Width: 44 mm) with incised
decoration of two hatched registers on sides and circle with a
dot in the middle. Handmade, black. Ext. polished, int. not
preserved. Pl. 202.
H. 6 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim c. 15 cm (only 2% preserved). The
belly is decorated with oblique channeling. Handmade, grey.
Ext. polished, int. polished.
H. 2 cm, Th. 5 mm. Upper fragment of likely an elbow handle
decorated with vertical fluting. Handmade, grey.
855. Large vessel in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.677.33
H. 8 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body sherd with a triangular knob.
Handmade, grey. Ext. well polished, int. burnished.
856. Jar or amphora? in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.696.70

H. 3 cm, Th. 8 cm. Body sherd with a knob. The surface of the
sherd (including the knob) is decorated with stamped decoration in false-cord technique (concentric circles or spiral
around the knob, multiple triangles on the belly). Handmade,
black. Ext. polished, int. burnished. Pl. 93.K, Pl. 199.
H. 7 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple zigzag
lines stamped in false-cord technique. Handmade, beige and
brown. Ext. polished, int. burnished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body fragment with two horizontal lines
produced in stamped decoration in false-cord technique.
Handmade, brown. Ext. polished, int. polished.
859. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. K4.696.11 and unnumbered body sherds
H. 6-12 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 14 cm (11% preserved). Raised
band close under the lip, decorated with oblique finger imprints. Oblong knobs on the shoulder. Handmade, dark grey.
Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 91.F.
860. Jar (C85) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.696.48
H. 8 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 15 cm (25% preserved). Vertical
handle on the shoulder. Handmade, black. Ext. polished, int.
not clear. Pl. 212.
with a raised band and shallow finger imprints close under
the lip. Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
862. Jar in Organically tempered ware. Inv. K4.696.63
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. burnished. Likely a residual piece from Troy II-V.
863. Jar in Brown Ware. Inv. K4.687.4
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple rows
of small oval imprints. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int.
burnished. Likely a residual piece from Troy I period. Parallels:
Blegen 1950, Fig. 244:28.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
(19.90-24.17 M A.S.L.), SOUNDING A2
(Continuation)
864. Pithos in Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.687.68
H. 12 cm, Th. 24 mm. Sherd with everted rim decorated on
shoulder with multiple wavy lines grooved with fingers.
Handmade, beige/orange. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
865. Pithos in Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.687.67
H. 13 cm, Th. 27 mm. Body sherd from likely the same pot as
864.

(19.90-24.17 M A.S.L.), SOUNDING B
(Text p. 125)
866. Kylix or bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.908.10
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Circular stand-foot with 105 mm (27%
preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
Pl. 89.A.
polished.
868. Bowl (A60 or A69) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.906.9
H. 8 cm. Vertical handle with U-shaped section (Width: 27
mm). Likely from a wheelmade vessel, grey. Ext. polished, int.
not preserved.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Attachment of a likely vertical handle with
oval section (Width: 47 mm). Pierced vertically and horizontally before firing. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
Ext. untreated, int. burnished. Pl. 90.F.
872. Cooking pot (?) in Wheelmade Cooking Ware. Inv. K4.906.6
H. 4 cm. Body sherd with a vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width: 31 mm). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.
H. 5 cm. Fragment of an elbow-like handle with rounded triangular section (Width: 28 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved.
H. 3 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim with flattened lip 22 cm (5% preserved). Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished
lustrous. The engobe is detached near the lip, almost surely
an indication of a handle attachment.
875. Amphora or Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.904.1
black. Ext. polished, int. polished.
876. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. Inv. K4.912.10
(Width: 41 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
H. 4 cm. Vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width: 43 mm)
decorated with fluting. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved.

with oblique blade slashes on the lip and a raised band with
round finger imprints closely under the lip. Handmade, beige.
Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
879. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.912.6+7+8
H. 8 cm, Th. 12 mm. Shoulder fragment decorated with multiple incised horizontal lines. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished,
int. burnished.
880. Cup or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.908.18
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with an oblong knob. Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not clear.
881. Jug, jar or cooking pot in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
K4.906.3+4
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 28 cm (2% preserved). Below the
rim a vertical oblong knob or lug. Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
K4, FRAMING WALL AND THE HOLLOW VAULT

(24.17-24.41 M)
(Text p. 126)
883. Closed-shape vessel in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?). Inv.
K4.674.47
H. 6 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body fragment with decoration of two
bands of multiple incised horizontal lines and between them
multiple wavy lines. Not clear whether handmade or
wheelmade, black. Rather coarse fabric. Ext. polished (over
the decoration), int. untreated. Pl. 93.I.
884. Deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.674.2
H. 8 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body fragment with a broken handle with
rounded triangular section (Width: 13 mm). The shoulder is
slightly offset on both sides of the handle. Decoration of multiple triangles or zigzags under the handle. Handmade, beige
and black. Ext. well polished, int. well polished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim fragment with 18 cm (6. % preserved) decorated with blade slashes on the lip and with a
raised band and finger imprints under the rim. Handmade,
orange-beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
H. c. 5 cm, Th. 10mm. Horizontal handle with rectangular section (Width: 45 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Fragment of a cup with channeled vertical
decoration. Rim 8 cm (35% preserved). Handle with round
section (Width: 15 mm). Handmade, beige-brown with blackish stains. Ext. well polished, int. burnished.
888. Amphora of Protogeometric Group IA (?). Inv. K4.674.23
H. 5 cm. Vertical handle with flat oval section (Width: 19 mm),
pierced and decorated with two bands of blackish paint.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
A7, HOUSE 792 ANNEX
(Text p. 131)
D9, FILL OF ROOM 3

(Text p. 133)
889. Jug in Tan Ware (BS B25 or 26). Inv. A7.1251.1

Wheelmade, orange. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
890. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware (no BS shape). Inv.
A7.1251.12
H. 6 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim and shoulder fragment, 16 cm (12%
preserved). Notches on the rim and crescent-shaped fingernail imprints on the shoulder. Handmade, coarse fabric, black.
Ext. burnished, int. untreated. Pl. 209.
891. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. A7.1251.10
H. 3 cm, Th. 12 mm. Fragment of a vertical handle with flatoval section (Width: 34 mm). Handmade, coarse fabric, grey.
Ext. lustrous, int. not preserved.
900. Bowl or krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.1931.2a (No. 2

given twice)
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Pierced ring base, 76 mm (100% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
901. Bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. D9.1931.1a (No. 1 given twice)
H. 6 cm, Th. 2 mm. Rim with basket handle with round section (Width: 9 mm). Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
902. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. D9.1931.2b (No. 2
given twice)
brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
903. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. D9.1931.1b (No. 1
given twice)
904. Jar in Handmade Burnished (?) Ware. Inv. D9.1931.4
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with radially running raised
bands decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext.
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim with a raised band on the lip, decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated,
int. untreated.
D9, FILL OF ROOM 1

(Text p. 133)
892. Mug or jug in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.1330.1
H. 6 cm, Th. 4 mm. Cylindrical part with 70 cm (25% preserved) decorated with multiple incised horizontal and wavy
lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
polished.
894. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.1330.7
Rim 8 cm (10% preserved). Lower attachment of a, vertical
handle preserved. Handmade, brown-black . Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished. Pl. 92.C.
D9, FILL OF ROOM 2

(Text p. 133)
H. 4 cm. Rim 8 cm (14% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
with incised double wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped
with pronounced finger imprints. Handmade, red. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
899. Jar in Gritty Ware. Inv. D9.1353.3
H. 6 cm, Th. 12 mm. Rim with thickened lip ( too small to be
measured accurately). Wheelmade (?), grey. Ext. untreated,
int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
D9, DEPOSITS TO THE SOUTH OF THE CELLS
(Text p. 134)
906. Shallow bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3098.29
grey . Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
907. Deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3098.5
908. Jug or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3098.16
H. 6 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 13 cm (15% preserved) with
outflaring lip decorated with multiple incised wavy lines.
polished.
911. Closed-shape vessel in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3092.1
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd decorated with two horizontal
raised bands with oblique slashes. The slashes were made by
a blade in a wheat-spike manner. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
913. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3098.20
914. Jar (?) Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3098.13
H. 10 cm. Ring base, 170 mm (12% preserved).
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. cannot be
decided unequivocally.
915. Bowl or krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3098.10
Wheelmade, light grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished.
916. Jug or amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3098.26
H. 10 cm, Th. 10 mm. Twisted vertical handle (Width: 34 mm).
polished.
H. 11 cm, Th. 43 mm. Twisted vertical handle pierced near its
lower attachment (Width: 32 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. impossible to say.
grey . Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
920. Jug or cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv.
D9.3092.33
H. 6 cm, Th. mm. Vertical handle with oval section and small
rib on interior (Width: 42 mm). Brown, with silver mica. Ext.
slipped, int. not preserved.
H. 6 cm, Th. 5 mm. Belly fragment decorated with a knob and
with channeling. Handmade, black. Ext. polished, int. polished.

H. 4 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 8 cm (11% preserved). Belly decorated with channeling. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished. Pl. 199.
923. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3098.48
with incised register filled with oblique slashes. Handmade,
black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
924. Cup or juglet in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3098.22
Handmade, brown . Ext. polished, int. burnished.
D9.3092.8
H. 6 cm, Th. 12 mm. Body fragment with a knob. Handmade,
black . Ext. polished, int. polished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
D9, DEPOSITS TO THE SOUTH OF THE CELLS
(Continuation)
H. 7 cm. Elbow-like handle with round section (Width: 22
mm) decorated with gentle spiraliform channeling in the lower part and multiple V-shaped grooves in the upper part.
Handmade, brown . Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
927. Cup or jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3098.24
H. 7 cm, Th. mm. Elbow-like handle with round section
(Width: 25 mm). Handmade, brown . Ext. polished lustrous,
int. not preserved.
928. Cup or juglet in Handmade Burnished (?) Ware. Inv.
D9.3092.49
H. 6 cm. Vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width: 28
mm). Handmade, brown-black. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
H. 6 cm. Elbow-like handle with round section (Width: 21
mm) decorated with pronounced channeling (imitation of
twisting?) in the lower part and with V-shaped grooves in the
upper part. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not
preserved. Pl. 199.
H. 8 cm, Th. 9 mm. Elbow-like handle with flat-oval section
(Width: 39 mm) decorated with incised V-shaped lines in the
upper part. Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not
preserved.
931. Krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3092.12
40 mm) decorated with channeling. Handmade, brown . Ext.
932. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3098.84
mm). Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved. Pl. 199.
933. Krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3092.30
(Width: 40 mm). Handmade, black. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
934. Cup or jug in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. D9.3098.47
H. 5 cm. Vertical handle with oval section (Width: 24 mm) and
a button for attachment into the vessel body. Handmade,
beige- grey. Ext. untreated, int. could not be decided unequivocally.
935. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. Inv. D9.3092.7
H. 7 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim (3% preserved) decorated with
oblique slashes (blade-made) on the lip. Handmade, beige .
Ext. polished, int. polished.
decorated with a raised band and finger imprints. Handmade,
beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
H. 6 cm. Horn-like lug handle (Width: 43 mm). Handmade,
beige. Ext. burnished , int. not preserved.
H. 5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Shoulder fragment with a raised band and
blade-made slashes. Handmade, black. Ext. burnished, int.
burnished.
H. 7 cm, Th. 11 mm. Lug handle with oval section and with a
deep notch in the middle (Width: 32 mm). Handmade, . Ext.

H. 5 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body fragment decorated with finger
imprints. Handmade, dark-brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
K4, FILL OF ROOMS 1 AND 2
(Text p. 137)
941. Shallow bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.537.5
Wheelmade, brown. Ext. polished, int. polished.
943. Deep bowl in Plain Ware. Inv. K4.537.7
944. Closed shape vessel in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.539.3
H. 4 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple incised horizontal and wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
945. Carinated bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.537.3
orange. Ext. polished, int. polished.
946. Bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.547.2
947. Jug or amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.547.15
polished.
948. Bowl in Brown Slip Ware. Inv. K4.547.17
and polished. The sherd is marked as K4.549.17 by mistake.
949. Cup or jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?). Inv. K4.547.9
H. 4 cm. Vertical handle fragment with deep grooves (Width:
35 mm). Brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
Pl. 199.
950. Jug (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. K4.547.8
black. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
951. Juglet in unknown fine ware (secondarily burnt Tan Ware?).
Inv. K4.537.8
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. polished, int. untreated. Pl. 94.F.
952. Storage vessel in unknown fine ware with beige slip. Inv.
K4.547.10
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with a vertical handle with
flat-oval section (Width: 47 mm) on the carination.
Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped, int. untreated. Could be Canaanite or Cypriot krater (information provided by Prof. Dr.
Michal Artzy on the occasion of her visit to Troy). Pl. 94.H.
K4, FILL OF ROOM 4

(Text p. 139)
953. Bowl (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.509.3
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Raised ring base, 120 mm (10% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Raised ring base, 60 mm (80% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
955. Hemispherical (?) bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.517.2
957. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.517 unnumbered sherd

H. 4 cm. Fragment of a basket handle originally placed on the
rim. Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
959. Bowl or krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.517.11+12
961. Jar in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.517.4
H. 3 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple incised horizontal and wavy lines. Wheelmade, beige. Ext.
H. 5 cm, Th. 6 mm. Fragment of shoulder with decoration of
multiple incised horizontal and wavy lines placed above the
carination. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
963. Krater in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.517.3
964. Jug, jar or amphora in Unidentified Fine Ware. Inv. K4.509.7
Beige. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved. The pale orange,
very hard-fired fabric is unusual, might be imported.
H. 5 cm. Rectangular foot. Handmade, red. Ext. untreated, int.
not preserved.
966. Jar in Wheelmade Coarse Burnished Ware. Inv. K4.484.4
H. 5 cm. Body fragment decorated with a raised plastic band.
Not clear whether wheelmade or handmade, red-brown. Ext.
burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 90.E.
967. Closed-shaped vessel in Plain Ware. Inv. K4.509.4
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Fragment of a flat base with a small bulge
in center. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int.untreated.
968. Cup in an unknown, most probably imported ware. Inv.
K4.494.8
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim with 110 mm (8% preserved).
Wheelmade, reddish surface, reddish fabric with small darkbrown tempering particles. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
969. Likely a closed-shape vessel in an unknown ware. Inv.
K4.517.13
H. 3 cm. Body sherd separated only because of its unique fabric. Average firing, compact fracture, many small white sub
angular inclusions, fine flat horizontal pores. The sherd is
strikingly light-weight. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int.
could not be determined. Pl. 94.E.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
K4, FILL OF ROOM 5
(Text p. 140)
with multiple incised wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
971. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. KL4.1226.3
H. 4 cm. Fragment of a raised ring base. Wheelmade, grey.
Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
973. Deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. KL4.1226.4
H. 4 cm. Rim. Wheelmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished,
975. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. KL4.1226.2
H. 4 cm. Everted rim. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and burnished, int. slipped and burnished.
977. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?). Inv. K4.486.2
H. 2 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 26 cm (4% preserved). Not clear
whether wheelmade or handmade, brown. Surface and fabric
look similar to Early Bronze Age fine wares. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
979. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.472.22 +
K4.470.14 + K4.480 body sherds
round section (Width: 17 mm). Wheelmade, brown-black.
Semi coarse fabric, surface mostly blackened, inside also
mottled, possibly secondarily fired. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 90.C. Pl. 206.
980. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. KL4.1226.14
H. 2 cm. Rim fragment with an attachment of vertical handle,
similar to the previous one. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
H. 3 cm. Rim fragment with an attachment of a vertical handle, similar to 979. Wheelmade, brown-black. Ext. untreated,
int. untreated.
KL4.1229.2
H. 10 cm. Vertical handle with a round section. (Width: 17
mm). Beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
KL4.1226.13
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Low ring base, 100 mm (80% preserved). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Pl. 90.D. Pl. 206.
unnumbered unjoining body sherd from the same pot
H. 5 cm. Disc-base 80 mm. Wheelmade, brown, with traces
of black smudging on the inner side. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
986. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. KL4.1226.9

H. 6 cm. Rim. Handmade, orange beige to grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
987. Bowl in Cypriot White Slip II Ware. Inv. K4.425.1
H. 2 cm. Body sherd with typical creamy slip and red-brown
painted decoration. Handmade, beige. Publ.: Kozal 2006: Kat.
Nr. 136. (the illustration of the sherd is not a photo but a
drawing).
988. Amphora in imported Canaanite Ware. Inv. K4.472.16
H. 5 cm. Vertical handle with oval section (Width: 24 mm) and
signs incised before firing. Beige color. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Publ.: Zurbach 2003: 121, Abb.26, Cat. No.30. (the illustration of the sherd is not a photo but a drawing).
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
K4, FILL OF ROOM 6
(Text p. 142)
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd decorated with multiple horizontal grooves. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
990. Deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.406.5
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Raised ring base, 95 mm (13% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
992. Skyphos in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.421.5
beige. Ext. polished, int. polished.
993. Cup (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. K4.406.9
with two vertical rounded ribs. Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. burnished.
994. Carinated bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.406.1
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body fragment with a decoration of multiple horizontal grooves above the carination. Wheelmade,
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim not ascertained (only 1-2 % preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
996. Jug or jar in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.421.11
beige. Ext. burnished, int. untreated.
H. 2 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd with incised multiple horizontal and wavy line decoration. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished,
int. untreated.
H. 9 cm. Body fragment. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. untreated. Pl. 93.C.
K4,L4, FILL OF ROOM 7

(Text p. 143)
H. 10 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 30 cm (4% preserved) with a basket handle with round section (Width: 18 mm). Wheelmade,
1001. Carinated deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.415.14
H. 6 cm. Rim 30 cm (5% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
black. Ext. polished, int. polished.
1003. Shallow bowl in Brown-slip Ware. Inv. Inv. K4.415.6
1005. Cup in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.415.5
H. 4 cm. Vertical handle with triangular section (Width: 13
mm). Grey. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.
1006. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. L4.464.9
H. 7 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim not measurable (<5% and deformed by the handle attachment). Vertical handle with oval
section (Width: 20 mm). Shoulder decorated with a raised

band and finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished,
int. lightly burnished.
K4, FLOOR OF ROOM 8

(Text p. 144)
1007. Hemispherical bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.460.1
polished.
polished.
H. 6 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 12 cm (40% preserved). Loop handle with triangular section (Width: 14 mm). Flat base, 35
mm. Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
slipped and polished. Pl. 93.F. Pl. 199.
1010. Amphora or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.460.4
H. 7 cm, Th. 6 mm. Shoulder fragment with an oval vertical
knob. Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
K4, FILL OF ROOM 8

(Text p. 144)
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Raised ring base, 13 mm (13% preserved). Wheelmade, orange. Worn on resting surface. Ext.
1012. Hemispherical bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.362.3
1013. Amphora or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.362.1 +
K4.344.1
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
K4, FILL OF ROOM 9
(Text p. 145)
K4, FILL OF ROOM 11

(Text p. 146)
1014. Jar in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.464.15

grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 206.
section (Width: 0 mm). base, 0 mm (0% preserved).
polished.
1017. Hemispherical bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.464.12
1030. Amphora or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.511.2

inside and outside with incised multiple horizontal lines. Vertical handle with rectangular section (Width: c. 37 mm).
Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous. Pl. 93.H. Pl. 199.
1031. Hemispherical bowl in Brown slip Ware. Inv. K4.440.2
1033. Kylix or bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.528.2
H. 3 cm, Th. 3 mm. Raise ring base, 100 mm (12% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd decorated with incised double
wavy and horizontal lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished,
int. untreated.
1035. Jar in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.528.4
H. 4 cm, Th. 3 mm. Ring base with sharply cut profile, 60
mm (20% preserved). Wheelmade, beige. Ext. polished, int.
polished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim fragment decorated with a slightly
oblique raised band and finger imprints. Handmade, beige.
Ext. untreated, int. burnished.
1038. Cup in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. K4.528.5
H. 5 cm, Th. c. 10 mm. Rim 12 cm (12% preserved), vertical
handle with flat-oval section (Width: 18 mm). Handmade,
beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 91.C.
L4, FILL OF ROOM 10

(Text p. 145)
1019. Shallow bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. L4.447.5
1020. Shallow bowl in Plain Ware. Inv. L4.447.8
1021. Krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. L4.407.1
1022. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. L4.447.11
1023. Bowl or krater in Tan Ware. Inv. L4.447.9
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Shoulder fragment with a horizontal handle with round section (Width: 13 mm). Wheelmade, beigeorange. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
1024. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. L4.407.5
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd decorated with two incised
horizontal lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
1025. Shallow bowl in Plain Ware. Inv. L4.447.7
beige. Ext. plain, int. plain.
1026. Stand in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. L4.447.1
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Ribbed pedestal base, 290 mm (8% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
1027. Cooking pot in Gritty Ware. Inv. L4.407.19
black. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
1028. Jar in Burnished Ware. Inv. L4.407.18
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 30 cm (4% preserved). Not clear
whether wheelmade or handmade, brown. Ext. burnished,
int. burnished.
1029. Jug in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. L4.447.2
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
KL4, FLOOR OF ROOM 12
(Text p. 147)
H. 7 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 9 cm (60% preserved). Part of the
rim is missing, the rest is compact, only two tiny cracks visible.
Handle with round section (Width: 9 mm). Ring base, 34
mm (100% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int.
polished. Laboratory No. L96-560.
H. 12 cm, Th. 4 mm. Fragments of belly, shoulder and neck.
1041. Deep bowl (BS A93) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
L4.495.1
with round section (Width: 10 mm). Ring base, 55 mm
(100% preserved). Imitation of a wheelmade shape. Handmade, beige-grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous. Laboratory No. L96-561. Pl. 93.O, 94.A. Pl.201.
1042. Wide-mouthed jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
L4.489.1
H. 31 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 18 cm (100% preserved), handles
with irregular rounded section (Width: 24 mm). Flat base,
90 mm (100% preserved). Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished,
int. burnished lightly only on the top, the remaining part left
untreated. Decoration combines small knobs and two vertical
raised bands with finger imprints placed on the opposite sides
of the vessel, between the handles. Two knobs are placed
under each handle, two flank each side of the vertical band
and a single knob is placed in each of the four areas between
vertical bands and handles. Deposited in the anakkale Archaeological Museum, No. 8594. Pl. 91.K. Pl. 211.
1043. Unknown shape in Plain Ware. Inv. K4.594.4
H. 3 cm, Th. 10 mm. Unusual rounded sherd of showing traces of cutting with a thread (when the clay was still wet). Looks
like a detached appliqu, but the shape and the purpose remain unexplained.
1044. Amphora or krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
L4.493.1
H. 12 cm, Th. 4 mm. Fragments of belly and shoulder. Handle
with rectangular section (Width: 37 mm). Wheelmade,
Pl. 93.N. Pl. 202.
H. 15 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim preserved only from a small part,
vertical handle with oval section (Width: 20 mm). Rounded
base. Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
slipped and polished. Pl. 204.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
KL4, UNDER THE FLOOR OF ROOM 12
(Text p. 147)
L4, FILL OF ROOM 13

(Text p. 149)
1046. Krater (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.603.1

of incised multiple wavy lines on the rim. Wheelmade, grey.
1047. Shallow bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.605.1
polished.
polished.
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment decorated with incised
multiple wavy and horizontal lines. Indication of a handle attachment. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
untreated.
1050. Bowl in Plain Ware. Inv. K4.605.12
1051. Jug or jar in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.605.11
1062. Shallow bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. L4.436.3

1063. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. L4.436.1
mm). Grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. untreated.
1064. Jar or Amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. L4.470.3
H. 10 cm, Th. 5 mm. Ring base with irregular 130-140 mm
(60% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. untreated.
1065. Pithos in Coarse Ware. Inv. L4.470.4
H. 13 cm, Th. 47 mm. Shoulder fragment decorated with triple wavy and horizontal lines grooved with fingers. Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
1066. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. L4.472.1
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 8 cm (50% preserved). Flattened
base. Decorated with two oppositely placed small knobs and
with channeling (inclination differs on each side of the vessel).
Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished. Pl.
199.
KL4, FILL OF ROOM 12

(Text p. 147)
1052. Skyphos in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.462.9
H. 5 cm, Th. 3 mm. Rim 13 cm (20% preserved). Attachment of a vertical handle on the lip. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
H. 2 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherd decorated with incised multiple horizontal lines and wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
1057. Bowl with a ledge in Tan Ware. Inv. K4.462.5
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 30 cm (5% preserved). Ledge under
the rim is decorated on its upper side with incised wavy lines.
decorated with multiple horizontal ribs. Wheelmade, grey.
Ext. polished, int. untreated.
Wheelmade, beige-orange. Ext. polished, int. polished.
mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. not preserved.
1061. Amphora in Protogeometric Group II (?) Ware. Inv. K4.513.11
H. 4 cm. Vertical handle with a central rib (Width not measurable). Brown, semi-coarse. The attribution to the ware group
is tentative. Alternatively it might belong to some currently
undefined group. Ext. untreated, int. not preserved.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
K4, DEPOSITS COVERING ROOMS 1, 2 AND 3
(Text p. 152)
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with incised multiple wavy and
horizontal lines decoration and a small rounded knob.
polished.
1068. Krateroid shape or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware.
Inv. K4.526.14
H. 2 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd decorated with oblique channeling and with horizontal lines stamped in false-rope manner. Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished.
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Thickened rim, 10 cm (8% preserved)
decorated with finger imprints on the upper side of the lip.
KL4, STONE DEBRIS ABOVE TROY VIIB CELLS

(Text p. 144)
1070. Amphora or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. K4.279.2 (joins
to K4.496.1 and K4.454.4)
Pl. 206.
K4.282.1 + K4.456.7 + K4.528.7
round section (Width: 17 mm). Ring base, 80 mm (47% preserved). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Pl. 90.B. Pl. 206.
H. 1 cm, Th. 3 mm. Sharp-profile ring base, 58 mm (55%
preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. burnished.
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment with a horizontal rib
and incised multiple horizontal and wavy lines underneath.
polished.
1074. Krateroid vessel in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.462.2,6
+ K4.507.8, 12, 18
H. 20 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim not measurable (3% preserved).
Vertical handle with rectangular/slightly oval section (Width:
33 mm). Base, 80 mm (30% preserved). Handmade, grey.
Fabric tempered also with small pieces of crushed shell Ext.
polished lustrous, int. burnished. Pl. 93.G.
1076. Bowl in Cypriot White Slip II Ware. Inv. K4.282.2
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim with not measurable. Grid decoration in red-brown paint. Handmade, beige. Ext. slipped, int.
slipped. Publ.: Kozal 2006: Kat. Nr. 131.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
Z7, NORTH HOUSE A FLOOR DEPOSIT
(Text p. 154)
1077. Carinated bowl (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z7.344.1
(a), z7.356 unnumbered body sherds (b)
H. 2-6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Several body fragments with incised
decoration (multiple zig-zags). Handmade, black. Ext. slipped
and polished, slightly lustrous, int. slipped, burnished.
1078. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z7.356.2
H. 5 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim fragment with 12 cm (7% preserved). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, slightly
lustrous, int. slipped and polished. Pl.201.
1079. Amphora of Protogeometric Group IA (?), Inv. z7.356 unnumbered body sherd
H. 3.6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Beige unslipped surface, dark brown
heavily worn paint.
Z6/7, NORTH HOUSE B FLOOR DEPOSIT

(Text p. 156)
1080. Cup (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z6.529.1
H. 5 cm. Fragment of a vertical handle with flat-oval section
(Width: 33 mm) with a conical knob. No attachments preserved. The upper surface of the handle is decorated with triple incised parallel lines on each side. The knob is decorated
with double incised zig-zag lines forming a star. Grey-beige
color with a secondarily burnt black stain on the knob and
next to the knob. Ext. burnished, int. not preserved.
Pl. 216.
coarse fabric, grey-brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
Decorated with inclined finger (?) imprints on a slightly raised
band with semicircular section. Pl. 216.
1082. Pot in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. z6.532.12
H. 11 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim and shoulder fragment ( ca. ) with
attachments for a vertical handle with oval section. Handmade, grey- black. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 216.
1083. Deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z6.517.3
polished.
1084. Krater (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z6.517.4
coarse fabric, grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 216.
1085. Deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z6.532.3
polished.
1086. Protogeometric amphora of Group IB. Inv. z6.517.7
H. 2 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body fragment. Wheelmade, beige. Reddish paint. Small white and red grit visible on the surface. Ext.
1087. Closed shape vessel in Tan Ware. Inv. z6.517.1
H. 3 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body fragment decorated with two parallel grooved lines. Wheelmade, orange-beige. Ext. slipped and
1088. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?). Inv. z6.532.14
H. 2 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim fragment 22 cm (8% preserved).
Handmade, fine fabric, grey-black. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. slipped and polished. Pl. 216.
1089. Cup or bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z6.532.2
1090. Jug or Amphora in Tan Ware. Inv. z6.532.4

H. 9 cm. Vertical handle fragment with flat-oval section
(Width: 43 mm). Light brown, burnished.
Z6/7, DISTURBED DEPOSITS TO THE EAST OF

NORTH HOUSE B
(Text p. 161)
1091. Amphora (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z6.506.10
H. 4 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body fragment. Handmade, brown. Ext.
polished lustrous, int. burnished. Stamped decoration in form
of false cord, imprints of concentric circles, incised tangents
(?).Pl. 94.B. Pl. 216.
Z6/7, ROUNDISH PIT CUT INTO THE ORGANIC

DEPOSIT
(Text p. 86)
1092. Amphora (?) in Unknown fabric. Inv. z6.582 unnumbered
body sherd
H. Wheelmade, orange-beige. Remains of two horizontal
bands in red color. Ext. smoothed, int. smoothed. Not clear
whether Mycenaean or Post-Bronze Age.
1093. Pot in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z6.582.5
polished. Pl. 216.
1094. Pot or jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. z6.582.7
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Fragment of a flat base, 80 mm. Handmade, brown.
Z7, PIT UNDER THE VERTICAL STONES FEATURE 1

(Text p. 161)
1095. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z7.320.1
black. Ext. slipped and polished, lustrous, int. slipped and
burnished, not lustrous. Pl. 199.
1096. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z7.320.3
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Ring base fragment with 100 mm (20%
Z7/8, PORCH AREA

(Text p. 162)
1097. Barrel-shaped jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
z7.2153.16
H. 7 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 18 cm (8% preserved). Decorated
with a plain raised band (triangular in section). Handmade,
grey-brown. Ext. burnished, Int. burnished.
1098. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z7.2253.1
H. 2 cm, Th. 7 mm. Base, 40 mm (40% preserved). The missing part of the slip indicates former existence of a vertical
handle. Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, Int.
burnished. Pl. 216.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
Z7, PIT WITH COOKING POTS IN THE CENTRAL
ROOM OF TERRACE HOUSE
(Text p. The pottery assemblage163)
1099. Barrel-shaped jar (BS C86) in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv.
z7.1232.10
H. 20 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 30 cm (15% preserved). Lug handle (Width: 43 mm). Decorated with finger imprints on the
rim and on the shoulder, at the level of the lug handle.
Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 208.
1100. Barrel shaped jar (BS C86) in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv.
z7.701.2, 3 + z7.561.6. Unjoining sherds from most likely the
same pot were found in z7.766, z7.1995.8.
H. 11 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim ca. 32 cm (10% preserved). Remains of undecorated (?) raised band and oval lug handle.
Handmade, brown to grey-brown. Ext. untreated, Int. untreated. Pl. 208.
z7.701.5, 6, 13 + joining body sherds from z7.766
H. 29 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim ca. 20 cm (only 2% preserved).
Restoration of the rim is not fully secure because the surface
and the breaks of the crucial sherds were deteriorated. Vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width: 34 mm). Flat base,
90 mm (51% preserved). Handmade, color varies from light
brown to grey. Ext. burnished (or polished?), Int. burnished.
Pl. 91.Q. Pl. 211.
1102. One-handled (?) jar (BS B33) in Handmade Burnished Ware.
Inv. z7.701.1, 11, 12 + z7.766.4
H. 17 cm, Th. 8 mm. Lightly flaring rim with 13 cm (48%
preserved). Vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width:
26mm). Flat base, 70 mm (40% preserved). Handmade,
color varies from light brown and orange-brown to greybrown. Ext. burnished, Int. burnished. Pl. 91.P. Pl. 206.
1103. Jug (BS B25) in Brown Slip Ware. Inv. z7.701.19
H. 16, Th. 6 mm. Rim 11 cm (80% preserved). Vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width: 28 mm). Wheelmade, buff.
Parts are secondarily burnt, grey. Ext. slipped and polished
(the slip seems to be applied by a brush or sponge), Int. untreated. Pl. 90.C.
Inv. z7.701.4, 7 + joining body sherds from z7.766 and z7.1232
handle with flat-oval section (Width: 35 mm). Handmade,
orangebrown to brown. Secondarily burnt. Ext. burnished,
Int. burnished. Pl. 206.
1105. Amphora (BS C84) or large jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware.
Inv. z7.701.9 + z7.766.5 + joining body sherds from z7.1232
H. 26 cm, Th. 12 mm. Shoulder and belly fragments. Raised
band at the junction, decorated with oblique slashes and one
small, slightly protruding knob. Handmade, color varies from
lightbrown to grey. Ext. slipped and polished, Int. burnished.
Pl. 94.D. Pl. 199.
Inv. z7.701.8 + z7.766.1, 3 + joining body sherds from z7.1232
handle with oval section (Width: 28 mm). Flat base, 75 mm
(95% preserved). Handmade, brown to grey-brown. Ext. burnished (or polished?), Int. burnished. Pl. 91.O. Pl. 206.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
Z8, UNCERTAIN CONTEXT ABOVE THE STREET
(Text p. 165)
1107. Stand (BS D45) in Anatolian Grey Ware, Early micaceous
variant. Inv. z8.1230 (from Beh. z8.1227)
H. 7 cm, Th. 12 mm. Base fragment with incised decoration of
small circles (with dots in the middle) interconnected with
tangents. The sherd was evidently broken and repaired in antiquity as evidenced by preserved remains of two lead
clamps. Wheelmade, black-grey. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. slipped and polished. Pl. 216.
Z/A7/8, PITHOS STOREROOM

(Text p. 189)
1108. Jug in Anatolian Ware. Inv. z7/8.1131.1
H. 9 cm, Th. 4 mm. Ring base with 86 mm (15% preserved).
1109. Two-handled wide-mouthed jar in Handmade Lustrous
Ware. Inv. z7/8.1131.3
H. 15 cm, Th. 14 mm. Rim dm not measurable. Vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width: 42 mm). Handmade, grey.
A8, SOUTH HOUSE - BURNT STRUCTURE OVER THE

NORTHEAST WALL
(Text p. 54)
1110. Trefoil jug in Anatolian Grey Ware (BS B35). Inv. A8.818.4
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim fragment, not measurable.
polished.
1111. Jar in Gritty Ware (?) (BS C). Inv. A8.818.5
H. 5 cm, Th. 12 mm. Shoulder fragment decorated with a
small knob. Handmade, red. Ext. untreated, int. with traces of
burnishing. Pl. 215.
1112. Jar in Gritty Ware (BS C). Inv. A8.818.2
H. 8 cm, Th. 10 mm. Lug handle with a pronounced finger imprint. Wheelmade, orange-brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 208.
1113. Cooking pot in Gritty Ware (BS C). Inv. A8.818.3
H. 5 cm, Th. 11 mm. Base fragment with 86 mm (15% preserved). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
KL16/17, SOUTH LOWER TOWN, PIT WITH CLAY
REED IMPRESSIONS
(Text p. 168)
1114. Skyphos (BS A71?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
KL16/17.522.15
1115. Carinated cup with everted rim in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
KL16/17.522.21
1116. Carinated A93 bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
KL16/17.522.17
handle with round section (Width: 9 mm). Base not preserved. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
1117. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. KL16/17.522.24
1118. Bowl or krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
KL16/17.522.22+23
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Fragment of a ring-base with the ring
broken off. ca. 75 mm (45% preserved). Wheelmade, grey.
Ext. polished, int. polished. Pl. 95.F.
1119. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. KL16/17.522.16
1120. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware, Early Variant. Inv.
KL16/17.522.25
horizontal wavy lines. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int.
untreated.
1121. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv.
KL16/17.522.12
H. 3 cm, Th. 8 mm. Slightly everted rim 17 cm (6% preserved). Wheelmade, brown. Paste tempered with golden
mica, with small whitish, transparent, pinkish and yellowish
stones and with red chamot. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Pl. 90.H.
1122. Deep bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. KL16/17.522.9
Wheelmade, orange-tan. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
1123. Bowl (BS A49?) in Tan Ware. Inv. KL16/17.522.10
1124. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?). Inv. KL16/17.522.32
H. 5 cm. Vertical handle with round section (Width: 27 mm)
decorated with subtle diagonal channeling. Handmade, grey.
Ext. burnished, int. not preserved.
1125. Cup or jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. KL16/17.522.14
mm). Production technique of the whole pot unknown, grey
color. Ext. polished and lustrous, int. not preserved.
1126. Jar or jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. KL16/17.522.41
H. 3 cm. Th. unknown. Fragment of a vertical handle with flat
oval section (Width: 39 mm). Handmade, grey-black. Ext. polished and lustrous, int. not preserved.
1127. Jug (B 43?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. KL16/17.522.19
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim with flat thickened lip 11 cm (7%
preserved). Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
1128. Amphora (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.

KL16/17.522.11 (a) and unnumbered body sherds (b-c).
H. 11 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 26 cm (8% preserved) and
nonjoining fragments from neck, shoulder and belly. Indication of a handle attachment on the shoulder. Handmade,
grey. Fairly well fired. Tempering consists of small and occasionally also bigger white angular stones. Ext. polished lustrous, int. well polished near the rim, only lightly burnished on
the belly. Probably from the same pot as 1130.
1129. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. KL16/17.522.28
H. 8 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body fragment with a raised band decorated with finger imprints. Handmade, grey-brown with
blackish stain. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
1130. Belly-handled amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
KL16/17.522.36
H. 11 cm, Th. 11 mm. Flat vertical handle with angular section
(Width: 44 mm). Ext. lustrous, int. not preserved sufficiently
for a substantiated judgment. Probably from the same pot as
1127.
1131. Jug or jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. KL16/17.522.31
with fingernail imprints. Handmade, black. Ext. well burnished, lustrous, int. burnished. Pl. 209.
1132. Jar in Island Ware of Middle Bronze Age. Inv.
KL16/17.522.4
Wheelmade, tan. Decorated with horizontal grooves on the
shoulder and on the rim. Ext. slipped and slightly burnished,
int. not preserved sufficiently for a substantiated judgment.
Ware attribution was provided by Peter Pavk.
Catalogue
Troy VIIb2
KL16/17, THE SOUTH PIT
(Text p. 169)
1133. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. KL16/17.1087.1
H. 7 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 7 cm (37% preserved), vertical handle with round section (Width: 15 mm). The belly is decorated
with channeling. No traces of knobs in the preserved part.
Handmade, grey-brown. Fabric gritty. Ext. polished lustrous,
int. burnished near rim, untreated on the bottom. Pl. 93.M.
Pl. 199.
1134. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. KL16/17.1087.2
handle with flat oval section slightly protruding over the rim
(Width: 42 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. lustrous, int. lustrous.
KL16/17, THE WEST PIT

(Text p. 170)
1135. Bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. KL16/17.713.2
beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not clear.
1136. Deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. KL16/17.713.6
H. 18 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 13 cm (23% preserved). Flat undecorated horizontal ledge in the middle of the neck, flat
elongated triangular knob on the belly. No handle or its attachment preserved but perhaps could be from the same
vessel as 1138. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
burnished. Pl. 202.
1137. Wide-mouthed jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
KL16/17. 519.2
H. 3 cm. Th. 12 mm. Body fragment with a triangular knob.
From a considerably bigger vessel than the previous example.
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. polished.
1138. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. KL16/17.713.5
H. 6 cm. Vertical handle overreaching the rim, with flat-oval
section (Width: 30 mm). Probably handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved. Perhaps from the same
vessel as 1137.
1139. Large bowl or basin in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
KL16/17.713.4
mm). Probably handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
not preserved.
LOWER TOWN, EVIDENCE FROM THE SURVEY

(Text p. 170)
H. 3 cm. Elbow handle (Width: 15 mm). Handmade, brown.
Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
1141. Jar in Coarse Ware. Inv. A0.5801.2
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim with a raised band decorated with
finger imprints c. 2 cm under the lip. Looks wheelmade (!),
Catalogue
Protogeometric
E8, RUINS OF ROOM G, DEPOSIT ABOVE THE
UPPER FLOOR
(Text p. 173)
polished.
1144. Jug, jar or amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. E8.102.3
1147. Amphora in Protogeometric Group IA. Inv. E8.107.1
H. 9 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd decorated with painted concentric circles. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped, int. untreated.
Publ.: Lenz et al. 1998: Cat. No. IA.8.
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim fragment. Wheelmade, beige. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. not recorded.
1149. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. E8.102 sherd without individual number
H. 5 cm. Body sherd with a raised band decorated with finger
imprints. Handmade, beige. Ext. not clear, int. not clear.
1152. Jar in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. E8.102.8
1153. Cup in Handmade Lustrous (?) Ware. Inv. E8.120.13
H. 4 cm. Vertical elbow-like handle with oval section (Width:
15 mm). Grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
1154. Jar (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.120.2
decorated with incised line attached to an incised or impressed circle. Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. slipped and polished. Pl. 92.J.
Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
E8, RUINS OF ROOM H, UPPER DEPOSIT

(Text. p. 174)
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherd decorated with a oblong knob
and with channeling. Handmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Pl. 199.
H. 7 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd decorated with a knob (or
handle fragment) decorated with channeling (Width: 26 mm).
polished. Pl. 199.

H. 4 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim 30 cm (5% preserved). Remains of
red paint on the lip. Wheelmade, orange. Fabric fine, wellfired, with golden mica. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Pl. 210.
H. 4 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body sherd decorated with impressed
dots. Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished.
angular section (Width: 35 mm). Attachments of the handle
flattened with finger imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. slipped
and polished, int. slipped and polished. Pl. 92.O. Pl. 199.
1161. Amphora in Protogeometric Group IA. Inv. E8.324.3
H. 5 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body sherd decorated with painted concentric circles. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Publ.: Lenz et al. 1998: Cat. No. 1A.5
1162. Jar in Handmade Lustrous (?) Ware. Inv. E8.335.3
H. 7 cm, Th. 11 mm. Body sherd with a flattened protrusion,
probably from a handle attachment. Handmade, grey. Ext.
1163. Unknown object in Organically-tempered Coarse Ware. Inv.
E8.283.28
H. 12 cm, Th. 32 mm. Rim with a channel on the lip. Either a
big vessel or part of a structure (hearth?). Handmade, beige.
Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Catalogue
Protogeometric
A7, DESTRUCTION DEBRIS TO THE WEST OF
HOUSE 792 AND ITS ANNEX
(Text p. 175)
1164. Skyphos in imported Black-firnis Ware. Inv. A7.1242.15
Wheelmade, very fine fabric, solid black semi lustrous firnis.
Fracture beige/grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished. Pronounced wheel-throwing marks discernible
on interior.
1165. Skyphos in imported Black-firnis Ware. Inv. A7.1226.4+16
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Conical base of a skyphos, 60 mm (75%
preserved). A ridge on the junction between the body and the
conical base. The lowermost part of the base is left unpainted. The transition is very irregular due to the careless application of the black firnis. Almost surely from the same vessel
as 1164.
1166. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware (BS A105-7). Inv.
A7.1242.17
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Fragment of a vertical handle with flat
oval section and a hardly discernible middle rib (Width: 29
mm). Handmade, black. Ext. slipped, polished, lustrous, int.
not preserved. Pl. 92.B.
1167. Juglet in Tan Ware. Inv. A7.1242.16
H. 6 cm, Th. 12 mm. Thin vertical handle with oval section
(Width: 17 mm). Beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
1168. Jar or krater in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. A7.1242.10
H. 3 cm, Th. 8 mm. Base-ring with 120 mm (45% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. polished, int. not clear.
1169. Bowl in Handmade Burnished or Lustrous Ware (no BS
shape). Inv. A7.1242.7
H. 4 cm, Th. 26 mm. Fragment of a massive horizontal handle
with oval section (Width: 34 mm). Handmade, beige. Ext.
burnished, slightly lustrous (?), int. not clear.
1170. Jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware (BS B45). Inv. A7.1242.5
handle with circular section, but on the upper side has a
somewhat flattened section (Width: 34 mm). Handmade,
brown. Ext. lustrous, int. untreated.
1171. Barrel jar in Handmade Burnished Ware (BS C86). Inv.
A7.1242.6
H. 8 cm, Th. 18 mm. Lug handle with oval section (Width: 40
mm). Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
1172. Wide-mouthed jar in Handmade Burnished Ware (BS C85).
Inv. A7.1242.8+9+18 (a), A7.1242.2+3 (b)
H. 14 cm, Th. 13 mm. Rim fragment, 30 cm (16% preserved). Vertical handle with oval section (Width: 37 mm).
Base fragments obviously from the same vessel, with 115
mm (60% preserved). Handmade, coarse fabric, beige. Ext.
burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 90.I. Pl. 213.
1173. Wide-mouthed jar in Handmade Burnished Ware (BS C85).
Inv. A7.1242.23 (a), A7.1242.21 (b), A7.1242.22 (c)
H. 30 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 30 cm (40% preserved). Two vertical handles with rather angular section (Width: 42mm). Base
does not join but is doubtless from the same pot. It is irregular, slightly oval, ca. 120 mm (85% preserved). Handmade,
coarse fabric, orange with red and dark brown stains. Ext.
burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 214.
1174. Pithos in Red Coarse Ware (BS C39). Inv. A7.1242 unnumbered body sherd
H. 9 cm. Body fragment of a pithos decorated with a horizontal groove made by a finger.
Catalogue
Protogeometric
D9, DEPOSITS ABOVE THE TROY VIIB2 CELL
ROOMS
(Text p. 135)
1175. Jug or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware (?). Inv. D9.3076.2
Wheelmade, black. Ext. thick black slip and polished, int. untreated.
1176. Cup or kylix in Anatolian Grey Ware (?).D9.3076.1
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Ripped foot base. Wheelmade, dark-grey,
semi-lustrous. Ext. thick dark grey slip, polished, int. slipped
and polished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Rim (2% preserved). Wheelmade, grey.
1178. Jug or amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware (?). Inv. D9.3076.3
H. 6 cm, Th. 9 mm. Neck fragment with series of horizontal
grooves. Wheelmade, dark-grey. Fabric similar to 1175 and
1176. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
polished.
1180. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3084.8
H. 10 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment decorated with multiple incised horizontal and wavy lines. Handle attachment indicated. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
1181. Jug or jar in Tan Ware (?). Inv. D9.3084.2
H. 8 cm, Th. 7 mm. Ring base, 80mm (55% preserved).
1182. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3086.74, 75
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 11 cm (13% preserved). Slightly
thickened lip decorated with incised zig-zags. Belly decorated
by channeling. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
polished lustrous. Pl. 215.
H. 4 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd with channeled decoration.
Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
1184. Cup or krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3076.4
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd with a knob decorated by
channeling. Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous. Pl. 199.
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with an opening for attaching
a handle by means of a protruding button. Handmade, grey.
Ext. untreated, int. polished lustrous.
1186. Bowl or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.3086.61
H. 2 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim c. 30 cm (2% preserved) decorated
with small stamped concentric circles interconnected with
stamped tangents in false-cord technique. Handmade,
brown. Ext. not clear, int. polished lustrous. Pl. 215.
1187. Stand (?) with animal-head protome in Anatolian Grey Ware.
Inv. D9.3086.27
H. 10 cm. Animal (horse?) head protome decorated with
notches and small plastic protuberance. Originally placed on
the rim. Grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not preserved.
1188. Bowl (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. Inv. D9.3086.78
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with two horizontal lines in
false-cord stamping technique. Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished.
1189. Bowl, krater o r amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.

D9.3084.12
polished.
H. 5 cm, Th. 10 mm. Attachment of a horizontal handle with
angular section (Width: 27 mm) decorated with a finger imprint. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished
lustrous.
Handmade, black. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
H. 9 cm, Th. 3 mm. Rim with slightly thickened lip decorated
with gentle finger imprints. Handmade, beige. Ext. polished,
int. untreated.
H. 9 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim 10 cm (15% preserved). Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
band and finger imprints. Handmade, grey-brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
H. 3,5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd decorated with a slightly
raised band and blade-made slashes. Handmade, grey. Ext.
like handle. Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. burnished.
H. 6 cm. Lug handle in horn-like shape (Width: 55 mm).
Handmade, beige. Ext. polished, int. not preserved.
Catalogue
Protogeometric
D9, DEPOSITS AT THE FOOT OF THE
PROTOGEOMETRIC TERRACE WALL
(Text p. 177)
1198. Amphora in Protogeometric Group I. Inv. D9.3065.20
H. 14 cm. Shoulder and belly fragment with two horizontal
painted bands. Wheelmade, beige, paint red to brown.
H. 3 cm. Elbow handle. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved.
H. 3 cm, Th. 7 mm. Fragment of a belly and handle with flatoval section (Width: 22 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
1201. Deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3065.1
H. 10 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 19 cm. Body decorated with multiple V-shaped grooves. Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous. Pl.201.
1202. Krater or deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.3074.1
H. 5 cm, Th. 13 mm. Body fragment decorated with multiple
incised horizontal lines and with multiple zig-zag or -shaped
motive. Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished. Pl. 203.
1203. Krater or Amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.3065.2
H. 10 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 31 cm (15% preserved). Handmade, black . Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
Perhaps from the same pot as horizontal handle 1247 and flat
base 1205.. Pl. 92.H. Pl. 203.
1204. Bowl or amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.3065.3
H. 5 cm, Th. 12 mm. Body sherds decorated with multiple incised zig-zag or V-shaped motive an with impressed dots.
Handmade, black . Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
1205. Carinated krater or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.3065.5
H. 3 cm, Th. 10 mm. Flat base with 12 mm (30% preserved).
Handmade, black . Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished. Fabric the same as 1203 and 1247.
1206. Jar (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3065.14
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body fragment with a vertical raised band,
possibly joining with a horizontal band in T-form manner.
Perhaps originally with a handle or a plastic application, now
broken off. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
burnished.
1207. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Handmade Burnished
Ware. Inv. D9.3065.8
H. 5 cm. Body sherd with a slightly raised band decorated
with oblique blade-made slashes. Handmade, brown-grey.
1208. Amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3065.7
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Handle with oval section (Width: 24
mm). Handmade, beige . Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished.
Catalogue
Protogeometric
D9, STONE TUMBLE
(Text p. 178)
1209. Skyphos in Anatolian Grey Ware (?) Inv. D9.3053.1
Wheelmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished (the slip looks
like predecessor of PBA firnis), int. slipped and polished.
Publ.: Aslan 2002: Cat. No. 8.
1210. Jug, jar or amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3058.16
Wheelmade, grey . Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
1212. Jug in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. D9.3056.15
1213. Stand in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.3053.2
H. 2 cm, Th. 7 mm. Ripped base, 150 mm (10% preserved).
polished. Likely same pot as 1334.
1214. Jug in Brown Slip Ware (?). Inv. D9.3056.18
H. 4 cm. Neck fragment. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. streaky wash
slip, int. untreated, greenish. Perhaps a misfired Brown-slip
Ware.
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. not clear.
1216. Hemispherical bowl in Polished Plain Ware (or inferior quality Tan Ware). Inv. D9.3058.19+49
H. 5 cm. Shoulder fragment decorated with multiple incised
wavy lines. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
H. 4 cm, Th. 8 mm. Ring base with 80 mm (17% preserved).
H. 2,5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 23 cm (10% preserved), small,
pierced horizontal lug handle on the rim. Wheelmade, beige.
1220. Amphora in Protogeometric Group IB. Inv. D9.3053.10
H. 12 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body fragment with painted bands and
concentric semicircles. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated. Publ.: Aslan 2002: Cat. No. 1.
1221. Amphora in Protogeometric Group IB. Inv. D9.3053.13
H. 10 cm, Th. 10 mm. Shoulder fragment with painted band,
concentric circles and vertical wavy lines. Wheelmade, beige.
Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Publ.: Aslan 2002: Cat. No. 2.
1222. Cooking pot in Wheelmade Semicoarse Ware. Inv.
D9.3058.21
1223. Sieve in Coarse, organically tempered Ware. Inv. Inv.
D9.3062.5
H. 2,5 cm, Th. 25 mm. Flat body sherd with small round
pierced openings. Handmade, grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
1224. Amphora in Protogeometric Group IA . Inv. D9.3058.3
H. 4 cm. Handle with middle rib section (Width: 34 mm) with
traces of a dark-brown paint.Wheelmade, beige-orange . Ext.
untreated , int. untreated.
1225. Amphora in Protogeometric fabric, group unspecified. Inv.

D9.3058.2
H. 2 cm. Handle with middle-rib section (Width: 54 mm), decorated with bands in black paint. Wheelmade, white-beige.
Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Publ.: Aslan 2002: Cat. No. 3.
1226. Cooking ware in Wheelmade Semicoarse Ware. Inv.
D9.3058.20, 22
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Two sherds likely from the same pot.
Fragment of a handle and a body sherd with lower attachment for a vertical strap handle. Wheelmade, grey. Fabric
with numerous small quartz inclusions. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.
H. 2,5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd with a lower attachment for
a vertical handle with oval section (Width: 24 mm). Decorated
with channeling. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
burnished.
1228. Juglet in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3058.9
H. 5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Fragment of belly and base, 37 mm
(100% preserved). Decorated with incised, white-incrusted, Vshaped lines and with three knobs. Handmade, black. Ext.
polished lustrous, int. untreated, very uneven. Pl. 200.
H. 4 cm. Body fragment decorated with a knob. Handmade,
grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. unclear.
1230. Krater (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3053.33
H. 3 cm. Elongated knob with circular section. Handmade,
grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved.
H. 4 cm, Th. 6 mm. Body sherd with incised decoration of horizontal line in the shoulder and V-shaped lines on the belly.
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
1232. Jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3053.23
H. 10 cm. Elbow-like handle with circular section (Width: 22
mm) in lower part and flattened oval section (Width: 31 mm)
in upper part. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
not preserved. Pl. 203.
D9.3053.26
H. 4 cm, Th. 12 mm. Body sherd with a knob. Handmade,
brown. Fabric gritty, semicoarse. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
untreated. Pl. 92.G.
H. 5 cm. Round vertical handle with middle rib (Width: 26
mm). Grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved.
1235. Deep bowl or krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.3062.1
dark-grey . Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished. Pl. 200.
1236. Deep bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3056.19
H. 6 cm. Body sherd with a carination. Handmade,
brown/black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
Catalogue
Protogeometric
D9, STONE TUMBLE
(Continuation)
1237. Hemispherical bowl in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
D9.3053.42
grey. Gritty semicoarse fabric. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
Pl. 90.N.
1238. Jar in Handmade Burnished (?) Ware. Inv. D9.3056.4
with oval section (Width: 40 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous. Pl. 210.
D9.3053.32
black . Ext. untreated, int. burnished.
1240. Cooking pot in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3053.34
H. 8 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim 12 cm (10% preserved). Indication
of an upper attachment for a horizontal handle on the rim,
lower attachment on the shoulder. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished. Pl. 215.
1241. Cooking pot in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3053.28
black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished.
H. 10 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 19 cm (17% preserved). Handle
with oval section (Width: 25 mm). Handmade, beige. Ext.
1243. Amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3062.9
H. 7 cm. Body fragment with a vertical handle with flat-oval
section (Width: 43 mm). Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished.
D9.3007.11
H. 4,5 cm. Body sherd with incised zig-zag or V-shaped lines.
Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished.
Likely from the same vessel as the next example. Pl. 203.
D9.3007.12.
H. 6,5 cm. Body sherd with an incised horizontal register filled
with vertical chevrons. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished
lustrous, int. burnished. Likely from the same vessel as the
previous example.
D9.3058.40
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with an incised decoration
horizontal line and multiple zig-zag or V-shaped lines.
Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished
lustrous.
1247. Jar or krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3054.24
mm). Black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved. Same
fabric as 1203.
H. 4,5 cm, Th. 9 mm. Horizontal handle with angular section
(Width: 22 mm). Handmade, grey-brown. Ext. burnished, int.
burnished. Pl. 199.
1249. Bowl in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. D9.3058.33
brown. Ext. burnished, int. polished lustrous.
1250. Jug (?) in Unknown Ware. Inv. D9.3053.40
H. 4,5 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body sherd with a lower part of an
horizontal handle with angular section (Width: c. 25 mm).
Handmade, brown. Fine fabric with ample tiny silver mica
particles, shaved, angular surface. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.

H. 2,5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with incised V-shaped
decoration. Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
burnished.
1252. Tray (?) in Handmade Coarse Ware . Inv. D9.3053.75
H. 1,5 cm, Th. 15 mm. Looks like a rounded tray with wavy
surface or a base detached from the rest of the vessel (?),
110 mm (25% preserved). Probably handmade, beige. Ext.
not preserved sufficiently, int. untreated. Pl. 90.O.
H. 3 cm. Th. 30 mm. Flat base, 150 mm (22% preserved).
Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Cooking
residue in the interior.
1254. Tray or cooking pan in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.3056.3
H. 2,5 cm, Th. 13 mm. Flat circular base with elevated rim,
250 mm (11% preserved). Handmade (?), brown . Ext. polished, int. polished
H. 6,5 cm, Th. 13 mm. Rim 24 cm (8% preserved).
Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished
lustrous.
1256. Pithos in Coarse Ware. Inv. D9.3053.37
H. 15 cm, Th. 25 mm. Rim with thickened banded lip 24 cm
(15% preserved). Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.
1257. Cup or jug in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3056.11
H. 5 cm. Vertical facetted handle with polygonal section
(Width: 22 mm) Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
not preserved.
1258. Jar (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. D9.3056.2
H. 4 cm, Th. 16 mm. Body sherd with an unusual, offset
handle attachment at the body oval shaped section (Width:
65 mm), afterwards rounded section (Width: 39 mm).
Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. polished lustrous.
Handmade, beige. Ext. burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 210.
Catalogue
Protogeometric
D9, BURNT LAYER ABOVE THE TUMBLE
(Text p. 179)
1260. Jar (?) in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. D9.2986.7
H. 8 cm, Th. 9 mm. Body sherd decorated with finger imprints
(without raised band). Handmade, grey. Ext. slighlty
burnished, int. slightly burnished. Perhaps from the same
vessel as 1264.
1261. Closed-shape vessel in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
D9.2986.9
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with decoration of multiple
incised zig-zag and wavy lines. Handmade, brown. Ext.
burnished, int. burnished. Likely from the same vessel as
1338. Pl. 90.M.
H. 7 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 19 cm (3% preserved). Belly
decorated with double V-shaped grooves and with a knob.
Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished
lustrous. Pl. 92.E.
H. 7 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 14cm (5% preserved). The belly
decorated with channeling. Attachments for a vertical (likely
elbow-like) handle. Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous,
int. polished lustrous. Pl. 92.F.
H. 7 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 19cm (20% preserved). Handmade,
redbrown to grey. Ext. slightly burnished, int. slightly
burnished. Perhaps from the same pot as 1260.
1265. Bowl (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.2986.11
H. 4 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 20cm (5% preserved). Small
protruding knob or lug attached to on rim. Handmade, black.
Ext. polished, int. burnished.
Z7, NORTH ROOM OF THE TERRACE HOUSE,

DEPOSIT OVER THE RUINS
(Text p. 181)
1266. Krater in Mycenaean Ware. Inv. z7.96.3.1 (other fragments
from same vessel have been found in A7.123, 630, 736, 752,
768, 769, 785; z6/7.267, 276, 297; z7.111, 119, 454, 505, 715,
1121, 1210, 1300, 1610 Mountjoy 2005)
H. 7 cm, Th. 8-10 mm. Rim ( 43 cm) and handle with flatoval section (Width: 53 mm) of a locally made Mycenaean
krater. Dated to LH IIIB2-LH IIIC Early. Published: Mountjoy
1997, Mountjoy 2005.
1267. Carinated Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z7.96.20
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, Int. slipped and
polished.
1268. Fenestrated stand (BS D45) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
z7.96.21
H. 7 cm, Th. 11 mm. Part of the lower pedestal with indications of two openings. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, Int. untreated.
1269. Bowl (BS A101) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z7.92.3
H. 4 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim fragment with 18 cm (5% preserved). Handmade, grey. Ext. polished, Int. polished. Published: Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b, Kat. Nr. 125. Pl.201.
1270. Barrel-shaped jar (BS C86) in Handmade Burnished Ware.
Inv. z7.96.49
H. 16 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment with a lug handle.
Decorated with fingernail imprints in horizontal and vertical
lines to the left and to the right from the lug handle. Handmade, brown to grey. Ext. untreated, Int. burnished
(?). Pl. 210.
1271. Protogeometric neck-handled amphora of Group IB. Inv.

z7.96.2
H. 49 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim ( 16 cm), strap handle (Width: 48
mm), disc base ( 131 mm). Published: Lenz et al. 1998, Kat.
Nr. IB.1.
Catalogue
Protogeometric
ZA7, SOUTH ROOM, DEPOSIT ABOVE THE STONE
COLLAPSE WITH CONSPICUOUS SMALL-FIND
CONCENTRATION
(Text p. 182)
1272. Skyphos (developed version of A71) in Anatolian Grey Ware
(?). Inv. A7.638.18
handle with round section and elongated handle tails (Width:
10 mm). Perhaps the base 1275 belonged to the same vessel.
Wheelmade, dark-grey. The slip is thin, wheel-throwing
marks of the surface show through it (perhaps a predecessor
of black glaze?). Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and
polished.
1273. Jug or jar in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. A7.638.11
H. 2.5 cm. Fragment of a twisted handle (Width: 38 mm). Ext.
slipped and polished, Int. not preserved.
1274. Carinated one-handled bowl (BS A93) in Tan Ware. Inv.
A7.638.21, 28, 29 + A7.675.1
handle with round section (Width: 12 mm). Wheelmade, buff.
Ext. slipped and burnished, Int. slipped and burnished. Published: Hnila in Becks et al. 2006. Kat. Nr. 112.
1275. Skyphos or bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware (?). Inv. A7.638.14
H. 2 cm, Th. 4 mm. Low ring-base, 70 mm (25% preserved).
Wheelmade, dark-grey. Very similar fabric to 1272, perhaps
the same vessel. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and
polished.
1276. Skyphos (BS A71) in Mycenaean Plain Ware (?). Inv.
A7.638.22, 23, 30 + A7.675.3 ant not joining A7.638.24,
A7.675.9
Published: Hnila in Becks et al. 2006b, 114.
1277. Amphora of Protogeometric Group III. Inv. A7.638.2
H. 2 cm, Th. 5 mm. Shoulder fragment. Wheelmade. Published: Lenz et al. 1998, Cat. No. III.8.
1278. Amphora of Protogeometric Group III (?). Inv. A7.638.41
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Base fragment with 110 mm (22% preserved). Wheelmade, brown. Surface not very well preserved,
thus the attribution to fabric is not completely certain. Ext.
unclear (slight traces of burnishing?), int. untreated.
1279. Amphora in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. A7.638.8
H. 8 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body fragment with an offset handle attachment. Handmade, brown. Ext. lustrous, int. lustrous.
1280. Cup in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. A7.638.34
and polished.
1281. Cooking pot in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. A7.638.38
H. 11 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 12 cm (30% preserved). Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. untreated. Pl. 90.K.
Pl. 215.
1282. Cup in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. A7.638.6
decorated with plastic horn-like protrusions. Handmade,
brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 90.J.
1283. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. A7.638.4
H. 6 cm, Th. 13 mm. Rim fragment (too irregular to be securely oriented). Raised band under the rim decorated with
fingert imprints. Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
1284. Jug (?) in Wheelmade Coarse Ware. Inv. A7.638.39

brown. Ext. untreated, int. untreated..
1285. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. A7.638.5
H. 4 cm, Th. 9 mm. Rim fragment, not measurable (<5%
preserved) decorated with fingernail imprints on the mouth.
Handmade, brown. Ext. untreated (?), int. burnished.
Catalogue
Protogeometric
Z7, CENTRAL ROOM OF THE TERRACE HOUSE, PIT
TO THE EAST OF ORTHOSTATE WALL
(Text. p. 187)
1286. One-handled cup with ring-base in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv.
z7.649.20
H. 9 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 10 cm (50% preserved). Base, 50
mm (40% preserved). Handle attachment of a vertical handle
preserved (Width: 17 mm), handle itself lost (it must have
been close to the belly, since the part under the handle was
left untreated). Wheelmade, brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Traces of burning residue inside, and secondary burning outside (on the base).
1287. Carinated bowl in Tan Ware. Inv. z7.649.12
polished.
1288. Carinated bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z7.649.3, 9
grey-brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
1289. Cup or kylix in Mycenaean Plain Ware (?). Inv. z7.649.15
1290. Big basin (D 37?) in Burnished Ware. Inv. z7.649.21
H. 9 cm, Th. 12 mm. Horizontal handle with broad and deep
groove, U-shaped section (Width: 37 mm), finger imprints at
the handle attachments. Probably wheelmade (not fully
clear), orange-brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
Z/A7/8, FIRST PROTOGEOMETRIC PIT

IN PITHOS STOREROOM, LOWER PART
(Text p. 189)
Ware. Inv. zA7.913.38, 13+39+zA7.902.13
Portions of rims, shoulder, belly and two handles. One handle
completely preserved, with rectangular cross-section. See also 1108, 1109, 1300 and 1302. Pl. 213.
1292. Cup or juglet in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. A7.153.2
H. 2 cm, Th. 10 mm. Base fragment with 52 mm (38% preserved). Handmade, beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
1293. Jug in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. zA7.913.35
Fragment of base and somewhat flattened globular belly. Ext.
poorly burnished, covered by sinter, Int. very rough.
1294. Skyphos in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. A7.153.3
H. 4 cm, Th. 2 mm. Fragment of a conical base, 58 mm (80%
unknown. Perhaps from the same vessel as 1296 and 1346.
1295. Cup in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. A7.157 (PBA Inv. P424)
H. 10 cm, Th. 2 mm. Handle, parts of rim and chips from the
base missing, otherwise nearly completely preserved. Rim
10 cm, handle with flat-oval section. Base, 48 mm (95%
preserved). Published: Catling 1998, 178-9, Fig. 14.
1296.Skyphos in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. zA7.902.9 + zA7.913.4
H. 4 cm, Th. 3 mm. Rim 16 cm (20% preserved), slight carination between belly and shoulder. Wheelmade, grey. Ext.
slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished. Likely from
the same vessel as 1346 and maybe also as 1293.
1297. Jar or cooking pot with everted rim in Wheelmade
Semicoarse Ware. Inv. zA7.913.29
Fragment of a rim.
1298. Ovoid jar or one-handled cooking pot in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. zA7.913.30
Traces of organic tempering. Pl. 210.
1299. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. zA7.913.31
Flat base. Semicoarse fabric, lightly lustrous. Handmade, greybrown. Ext. polished, Int. polished.
Z8, PITHOS STOREROOM

(Text p. 189)
Ware. Inv. z8.539.2
Almost surely from the same vessel as 1291. H. 14 cm, Th. 9
mm.
1301. Skyphos in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z8.539.11
H. 4 cm. Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
Ware. Inv. z8.640.4
Almost surely from the same vessel as 1291. Belly and shoulder fragment. Belly decorated with a flat oblong vertical knob.
Pl. 94.C.
Catalogue
Protogeometric
Z7/8, SECOND PROTOGEOMETRIC PIT
IN PITHOS STOREROOM
(Text p. 191)
1303. Kylix in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z7/8.1982.1
H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Foot stem fragment. Wheelmade, grey.
1304. Skyphos in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z8.634 - unnumbered
body sherd
H. 3 cm. Body fragment with pronounced tails of a horizontal
handle. Wheelmade, grey-black. Ext. slipped and polished,
1305. Protogeometric amphora of Group IB. Inv. z7.1982:1 (PBA
numbering system)
H. 16 cm. Shoulder fragment. Wheelmade, beige. Ext. slipped,
int. untreated.
1306. Cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware (?). Inv. z7/8.1982.7
H. 6 cm, Th. mm. Handle fragment with round section (Width:
24 mm), decorated with channeling which possibly imitates
twisting. Ext. untreated (?), originally probably polished.
1307. Plate in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. z7/8.1982.4
H. 9 cm, Th. 13 mm. Body fragment decorated with small
deep oblique stabs. Handmade, light-red. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated. Pl. 210.
1308. Jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z7/8.1982.unnumbered
body sherd
H. 11 cm. From the same vessel as 1291.
Z7, VERTICAL STONES FEATURE 1 AND THE

PROTOGEOMETRIC PAVEMENT
(Text p. 195)
1309. Protogeometric amphora of Group IA (P483). Inv. z7.253.1-3
+ z7.343.1, 3, 4 (a); z7.245.12, 15 (b) and z7.253.5 (c)
H. 9 cm, Th. 7-8 mm. Fragments of shoulder, neck, belly and
handle with typical PG decoration. Various other decorated
and undecorated fragments from the same vessel were
found in the three mentioned Behlters. For complete list and
descriptions cf. Lenz et al. 1998: Cat. No. IA.1.
H. 9 cm. Handle (Width 44 mm) with two grooves and painted stripes. Finger imprint at the base. For more details cf.
Lenz et al. 1998: Cat. No. IB.21. Possibly from the same vessel
as z7.96.2 (P459).
H. 9 cm, Th. 7 mm. Fragment of shoulder and vertical handle
with oval section (Width: 34 mm). Top of the handle originally
attached to the rim. Handmade, brown, mottled. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
1312. Jar in Handmade Burnished Ware (?). Inv. z7.343.5
H. 8 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim fragment, too small for ascertaining
. Handmade, grey-brown. Ext. untreated or perhaps poorly
1313. Bowl in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. z7.245.2
H. 4-6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim fragments. Handmade, light
brown. Ext. and int. burnished. Pl.201.
H. 2 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim fragment. not measurable. Horseshoe lug handle below the rim. Handmade, brown and black,
mottled. Ext. and int. burnished.
1315. Cup in Handmade Coarse Ware (?). Inv. z7.245.4
H. 6 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 9 cm (18% preserved). Most probably handmade or slow wheel thrown, orange-beige. Ext. and
int. untreated. Pl. 200.
1316. Jar in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. z7.247.2

H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim fragment, 12 cm (12% preserved),
Handmade, light-brown. Ext. and int. untreated. Pl. 210.
1317. Pithos in Red Coarse Ware. Inv. z7.343 unnumbered sherd.
H. 3 cm. Shoulder fragment decorated with deep horizontal
flute and a rest of fluted wavy line. Coarse fabric, mineral inclusions, handmade, orange-beige. Ext. and int. smoothed.
Catalogue
Geometric
D9, LATE PROTOGEOMETRIC/EARLY GEOMETRIC
DEPOSITS
(Text p. 206)
1318. Skyphos in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.2963 - unnumbered
body sherd
H. 3 cm. Fragment of a shoulder with attachment for
a horizontal handle with prolonged handle-tail. Wheelmade,
black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
H. 1,5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body fragment with a vertically pierced
lug (Width: 25 mm). Handmade, grey-brown. Ext. polished
lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
H. 3 cm, Th. 6 mm. Rim 15cm (4% preserved). Small,
vertically pierced lug handle attached just below the rim
(Width: 32 mm). Handmade, beige. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
polished lustrous.
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim from probably a cutaway neck,
15cm (5% preserved). Decoration of multiple incised zig-zag
above a line of impressed dots and multiple horizontal incised
lines. Handmade, brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished
lustrous. Probably from the same vessel as 1322
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Neck fragment of a jug decorated with
multiple incised zig-zag placed above multiple horizontal
lines. Likely from the same vessel as 1321.
1323. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.2963
unnumbered sherd.
H. 5 cm. Fragment with a vertically pierced lug handle just
below the rim. Handmade, black. Ext. polished lustrous, int.
polished lustrous.
1324. Tray in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. D9.2973.44
H. 2,5 cm. Circular shape with vertical rim ( c. 25 cm).
Handmade, brown-grey. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
1325. Ouzo-cup or miniature vessel in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv.
D9.2973.72
beige. Ext untreated, int. untreated.
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 32 cm (5% preserved) with a conical
lug handle (Width: 27 mm). Handmade, beige-brown. Ext.
1327. Amphora (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. D9.3043.3
H. 4 cm. Th. 7 mm. Body sherd with a knob. Handmade,
beige-grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. burnished.
1328. Amphora or krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.2973.51
H. 5 cm. Th. 9 mm. Body sherd with a knob. Handmade,
brown. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
H. 3 cm. Th. 7 mm. Rim with blade-made slashes ( not
measurable). Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int.
burnished.
H. 3 cm. Lug handle with horn-like protrusions (Width: 42
mm). Handmade, brown. Ext. burnished, int. not preserved.
1331. Cooking pot in Wheelmade semi-coarse Ware. Inv. D9.2969.2
handle with oval section , flat base, 70 mm. Wheelmade,
grey. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Pl. 89.E.
1332. Jar in Wheelmade semi-coarse Ware. Inv. D9.3046.6
Wheelmade, brown and beige. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
Pl. 89.F.
1333. Jar or jug in Wheelmade semi-coarse Ware. Inv. D9.3034.15

H. 4 cm. Body sherd with a vertical handle with saddle-like
section (Width: 26 mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. untreated,
int. untreated.
D9, LATE GEOMETRIC HOUSE

(Text p. 207)
1334. Stand in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. D9.2933.11
H. 4 cm. Raised base with plastic ridges, 24 cm.
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped,int.slipped. Publ.: Aslan 2002:
Cat. No. 58. Probably from the same pot as 1213.
1335. Jar or krater in Tan Ware. Inv. D9.2943.5
H. 4 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim with a ledge. Unusual
shape.Wheelmade, tan. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped
and polished.
H. 2 cm. Upper part of an elbow handle decorated with
incised concentric circles interconnected with tangents.
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. not preserved.
Pl. 92.D.
1337. Amhora or krater in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.2943.30
H. 4,5 cm. Body sherd decorated with two horizontal lines
stamped in false-cord technique. Handmade, brown. Ext.
1338. Closed-shape vessel in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv.
D9.2933.15
H. 5 cm, Th. 8 mm. Body sherd with decoration of multiple
incised zig-zag and wavy lines around a small knob.
Handmade, beige-brown. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
Likely from the same vesse as 1261. Pl. 90.L.
1339. Small cooking pot (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
D9.2943.45
H. 7,5 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim 9 cm (20% preserved).
Handmade, grey. Ext. polished lustrous, int. polished lustrous.
Catalogue
Geometric
Z6/7, VERTICAL STONES FEATURE 2
(Text p. 197)
1340. Carinated deep bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. z6.326.1
H. 7 cm, Th. 4 mm. Belly, shoulder, rim and handle fragment.
Rim 16 cm. Parallel handle with round section (Width: 10
mm). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. and int. slipped and polished.
Deep wheel-throwing ridging on the interior.
H. 7 cm. Shoulder fragment, worn. Pale light brown surface,
reddish paint. Remains of a horizontal band and a circle segment.
Z7, POSTHOLE IN THE GEOMETRIC CULT BUILDING

(Text p. 208)
1342. Cup (BS A106?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. z7.655.1
H. 3 cm, Th. 4 mm. Belly and shoulder fragment with a knob
and grooved decoration. Handmade, mottled from orangebrown to brown and grey. Ext. polished, Int. burnished (?).
Pl. 216.
Z6/7, GEOMETRIC PIT

(Text p. 208)
1343. Amphora of Protogeometric Group II. Inv. z6.297.1
H. 16 cm, Th. 7 mm. Shoulder, neck and handle fragment.
Published and catalogued in Lenz et al. 1998: Cat. No. II.27.
1344. Amphora of Protogeometric Group III. Inv. z6.297.2
H. 17 cm, Th. 8 mm. Shoulder fragment. Published and catalogued in Lenz et al. 1998: Cat. No. III.1
1345. Pot in Handmade Burnished Ware. Inv. z6.297.7
H. 7 cm, Th. 7 mm. Rim fragment 20 cm, with a vertical
handle (Width: 31 mm). Handmade, brown. The fabric is rather similar to Troy II-V Nubbly Ware, but to Stephan Blum,
the specialist on Troy V pottery, the sherd looks different, because the surface is too even for a typical Nubbly Ware. Ext.
burnished, int. burnished. Pl. 91.L. Pl. 216.
Z/A7/8, GEOMETRIC HORIZON ABOVE THE RUINS

OF THE PITHOS STOREROOM
(Text p. 190)
1346. Stand in black slip fine fabric. Inv. zA7.902.16.
H. 6 cm, Th. 10 mm. Body fragment with a rib decorated with
oblique incisions. Wheelmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, Int. untreated.
1347. Amphora in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. zA7.902.8
section (Width: 0 mm). Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped and polished.
1348. Plate in plain semicoarse fabric. Inv. A7.109.1
Wheelmade, red-brown. Semicoarse fabric with few white inclusions. Ext. untreated, int. untreated. Shallow imprints of a
thick cord on exterior.
1349. Bowl (?) in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. zA7.902.11
H. 3 cm, Th. 5 mm. Body fragment decorated with wavy lines
produced by polishing (or less likely by dark grey paint?).
Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped, int. slipped and polished.
1350. Bowl in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. zA7.902.12
vertical handle with flat-oval section (Width: 22 mm).

polished.
1351. Cup in Handmade Coarse Ware. Inv. zA7.902.17
16 mm). Handmade, black. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
1352. Cooking pot in Gritty Ware. Inv. A7.103.2,4,5
(a) H. 11 cm. Vertical handle with oval section (Width: 34
mm).(b) H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Flat base, 85 mm (48% preserved). Wheelmade, color varies from brown to grey. Ext.
untreated, Int. untreated.
1353. Pithos in Coarse Ware. Inv. A7.103.6
H. 12 cm, Th. 60 mm. Rim with decoration of oblique fingernail (?) imprints on its exterior. Handmade, orange-beige,
heavily encrusted. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
1354. Cooking pot in Burnished Ware. Inv. zA7.902.6 (a) and
zA7.902-unnumbered
(a) H. 8 cm, Th. 5 mm. Vertical handle with flat-oval section
(Width: 28 mm). (b) Flat base. Wheelmade (?), color varies
from red-brown to dark grey. Gritty fabric. Ext. untreated, int.
untreated.
Catalogue
Uncertain context
A7/8, THYMIATERION PIT
(Text p. 210)
1355. Thymiaterion in Anatolian Grey Ware. Inv. A7/8.882.1
H. 23 cm, Th. 10 mm. Small parts of rim and base broken off,
otherwise largely intact. A hole through the body was made
before firing. Rim 11cm (70% preserved), base, 170 mm
(90% preserved). Wheelmade, light-grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated. Pl. 216.
1356. Stand in Anatolian Grey Ware (BS D45). Inv. A7/8.882.2
Wheelmade, dark-grey/black. Ext. slipped and polished, int.
1357. Jar in Anatolian Grey Ware (BS C). Inv. A7/8.882.10
H. 6 cm, Th. 8 mm. Base fragment with 65 mm (48% preserved). Wheelmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, int. untreated.
1358. Cup in Tan Ware (BS A80, 81 or 83?). Inv. A7.975.2
H. 2 cm, Th. 6 mm. Fragment of a vertical handle attached on
the rim, with flat-oval section (Width: 15 mm). Buff color. Ext.
1359. Bowl in Plain Ware (BS A49). Inv. A7.975.1
H. 6 cm, Th. 6 mm. Fragment with complete profile. Rim 25
cm (8% preserved), base, 75mm (30% preserved).
Wheelmade, buff. Ext. untreated, int. untreated.
1360. Jar or Cooking pot with everted rim in Burnished Ware. (BS C)
Inv. A7.882.7
Wheelmade, black. Ext. burnished, int. burnished.
1361. Cooking pot in Semicoarse Ware (BS C). Inv. A7.950.6
H. 2 cm, Th. 7 mm. Base fragment with 80 mm (12% preserved). Wheelmade, beige. Ext. smoothed, int. smoothed.
SHERDS FROM UNCERTAIN OR MUCH LATER

CONTEXTS
(Text p. 210)
1362. Amphora or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv.
E9.1167.15+1174.28+E9.1186.9
H. 18 cm, Th. 11 mm. Rim 34 mm (20% preserved). Shoulder decorated with a conical knob, neck/shoulder transition
decorated with a raised band with oblique slashes. Handmade, reddish-brown. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped.
Context: Troy VIII/IX deposits in the disturbed part of Room B,
above the Citadel wall of Troy VI.
H. 9 cm, Th. 4 mm. Approximately 1/4 of the pot preserved
intact. Surface covered with slight cess-residue. Rim 6 cm
(25% preserved), vertical handle with oval section in upper
part, round in lower part (Width: 14 mm). Very gentle knob
on the belly. Handmade, grey-brown. Ext. polished, Int. burnished. Context: Troy VIII/IX deposits from above the ruins of
Terrace House. Pl. 92.A.
H. 8 cm, Th. 5 mm. Fragment of rim, shoulder and belly. Decorated with plastic oblong knob and oblique channeling on
the belly, and horizontal grooves on the shoulder. Handmade,
buff. Ext. polished, Int. polished. Context: Troy VIII/IX deposits
from above the ruins of Terrace House.
1365. Bowl in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. A7.167.15
H. 11 cm, Th. 8 mm. Rim 24 cm (10% preserved). Oblong
knob on the belly. Handmade, grey to black with small
brownish stain. Ext. polished, Int. polished. Context: Troy
VIII/IX deposits from above the ruins of Terrace House
1366. Kantharoid (?) cup in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.189.9

H. 4 cm, Th. 4 mm. Rim 12 mm (10% preserved). Decoration of two hatched triangles (?) produced in Furchenstich
technique. Handmade, grey-brown. Ext. slipped and polished,
int. slipped and polished. Context: Mixed deposits above the
Street 751, to the south of the curving Troy VI wall, likely a fill
accumulated after Drpfelds excavations.
1367. Cup or jug (?) in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. E8.7.1
H. 2 cm. Body sherd decorated with multiple incised triangles
or zig-zags and above them a horizontal line of impressed
dots. Handmade, grey. Ext. slipped and polished, not recorded. Context: Fill accumulated after Drpfelds excavations in
the area above Room H, I and the Street 751
1368. Deep bowl or jar in Handmade Lustrous Ware. Inv. K4.91.11
H. 5 cm, Th. 4 mm. Body sherd with a horizontal handle decorated with impressed double lines in false-cord technique.
Handmade, black. Ext. slipped and polished, int. slipped. Context: Geometric/Archaic rubble layer above the Troy VIIa
Mudbrick structure at the North-East Bastion.
H. 11 cm, Th. 10 mm. Rim 18 mm (8% preserved). Lug handle. Lip decorated with finger imprints. Shoulder decorated
with a raised band with finger imprints. The raised band on
shoulder runs horizontally up to the lug handle, then it turns
90 down and continues vertically. Handmade, brown. Ext.
burnished, int. burnished. Context: Disturbed area above the
Citadel wall to the south of Room E. Pl.201.
Catalogue

Troy VIIB Chronology

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Troy VIIB Chronology

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Troy VIIB Chronology

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats



  

POTTERY OF TROY VIIB

VOLUME 1 (TEXT & CATALOGUE)

PREFACE TO THE ONLINE PUBLICATION

Berlin, 15th May 2012

ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS

AREAS EXCAVATED BY THE TBINGEN AND THE CINCINNATI TEAMS (1988-2008)

CHRONOLOGY AND CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TROY VIIB PERIOD 13

DISCUSSION ON SUBDIVISIONS OF TROY VII

Area outside Gate VIU

WEST LOWER TOWN

OUTER PERIMETER OF THE CITADEL WALL

OUTER PERIMETER OF THE CITADEL WALL

POTS AND PEOPLE: IMPLICATIONS

CONTINUITY AND CHANGE

SYMBIOSIS, ACCULTURATION AND ASSIMILATION

WARE GROUPS CHARTS

Different times of the day, with or without artificial lamp reflectors.

ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS

reference to a detailed photograph

reference to a shape profile code number

reference to a Catalogue number

Behter, designation of an excavation unit in the Tbingen Troy project

Slide from the Tbingen Troy project archive

Digital image from the Tbingen Troy project archive

Early Iron Age

Late Bronze Age

Field notebook of the Tbingen Troy project archive

Blegen et al. 1958, 139-48.

Rutter 1975 who prefers a designation Handmade Burnished Ware.

Wardle and Wardle 2007.

from the surveys was published in Czyborra 2001.

See discussion in Mountjoy 1999.

Blegen et al. 1958, 147.

Rose 1995, 91.

Rose 1995, 91.

Korfmann 1994, 19-20.

Jablonka 2000, 30.

Jablonka 2000, Jablonka 2001.

Basedow 2006; Basedow 2007; Basedow 2008.

see Rose 2008 for the contrary.

AREAS EXCAVATED BY THE TBINGEN AND THE CINCINNATI

OUTER PERIMETER OF THE CITADEL WALL

For the summary of evidence see Becks 2005.

Blegen et al. 1958, Fig. 366.

Blegen et al. 1958, 238-41.

WEST LOWER TOWN

Korfmann 1994, 19.

Blegen et al. 1958, 130.

Chapters devoted to Outer perimeter of the citadel wall.

SOUTH LOWER TOWN

THE POTTERY PROCESSING WORKFLOW

Orton et al. 1993.

tion numbers to the diagnostic sherds.

See pp. 1-4.

STATISTICS AND THEIR CHALLENGES

Surface treatment, some decoration elements.