Nutrition Journal

Research

BioMed Central

Open Access

Nutritional status and functional capacity of hospitalized elderly

1

Maria RM Oliveira* , Kelly CP Fogaa and Vnia A Leandro-Merhi

Address: Institte of Biosciences, UNESP - So Paulo State University, Rubio Junior District, Botucatu-SoPaulo, Postal Code 18 618-000, MB 510, Brazil,
2

Health Science Faculty, UNIMEP - Methodist University of Piracicaba, Rodovia do Acar, Km 153, Piracicaba-So Paulo, Postal Code13 400 911, Brazil and

School of Nutrition, PUC-Campinas, So Paulo State, Pontific Catholic University of Campinas, Brazil

Email: Maria RM Oliveira* - [email protected]; Kelly CP Fogaa - [email protected]; Vnia A Leandro-Merhi - [email protected]

* Corresponding author

Published: 17 November 2009

Received: 14 April 2009

Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:54 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-8-54

Accepted: 17 November 2009

This article is available from: http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/54

2009 Oliveira et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2. 0), which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: The nutritional status of the aging individual results from a complex interaction between personal and
environmental factors. A disease influences and is influenced by the nutritional status and the functional capacity of the
individual. We asses the relationship between nutritional status and indicators of functional capacity among recently
hospitalized elderly in a general hospital.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was done with 240 elderly (women, n = 127 and men, n = 113) hospitalized in a hospital
that provides care for the public and private healthcare systems. The nutritional status was classified by the MNA (Mini
Nutritional Assessment) into: malnourished, risk of malnutrition and without malnutrition (adequate). The functional
autonomy indicators were obtained by the self-reported Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL) and Activity of Daily
Living (ADL) questionnaire. The chi-square test was used to compare the proportions and the level of significance was 5%.

Results: Among the assessed elderly, 33.8% were classified as adequate regarding nutritional status; 37.1% were classified as
being at risk of malnutrition and 29.1% were classified as malnourished. All the IADL and ADL variables assessed were
significantly more deteriorated among the malnourished individuals. Among the ADL variables, eating partial (42.9%) or complete
(12.9%) dependence was found in more than half of the malnourished elderly, in 13.4% of those at risk of malnutrition and in 2.5%
of those without malnutrition.

Conclusion: There is an interrelationship between the nutritional status of the elderly and reduced functional capacity.

Introduction

Deterioration of the nutritional status affects and is affected by

disease, especially among the elderly [1]. Nutritional diagnosis
and the identification of factors that contribute to this diagnosis

are, therefore, essential but complex processes. This complexity

is due to the occurrence of many changes, both physiological and patholog-ical,
which may be taken as inherent to the aging or disease process.
However, indirect indicators that likely guarantee proper and
healthy eating, such as economic, social, lifestyle and quality of
life aspects may represent important tools for assessing
nutritional risk [2].

Page 1 of 8

(page number not for citation purposes)

Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:54

The MNA (Mini Nutritional Assessment) [3] has been an

extensively used method to identify risk of malnutrition in the
elderly and in those that may benefit from early intervention. The
MNA is a simple, low cost and non-invasive method that can be
done at bedside [3]. Added MNA scores allow one to screen the
elderly who have an adequate nutritional status, those who are at
risk of mal-nutrition and those who are malnourished. The MNA
consists of anthropometric and global indicators, includ-ing
information on eating patterns and self-perception of health, such
as: reduced food intake; weight loss of >3 kg body weight;
mobility, bed- or chair-bound; psychologi-cal stress;
neuropsychological problems; body mass index; inability to live
independently; taking >3 prescription drugs; having pressure
sores or skin ulcers; number of full meals eaten per day;
consumption of high-protein foods; consumption of fruits &
vegetables; amount of liquids consumed per day; inability to feed
self; difficulty in self-feeding; self-view of nutritional status; selfview of health status; mid-arm circumference <21 cm; and calf
circumfer-ence <31 cm [3]. The tool has been successfully used
to assess the nutritional risk of elderly who live independ-ently,
receive home care services or are institutionalized, and of patients
who are chronically ill, frail, have Alzhe-imer's disease or
cognitive impairment [4]. It has been demonstrated that the
sensitivity of this scale is of 96%, the specificity is of 98% and
3

the prognostic value for mal-nutrition is of 97% . This method

has been broadly used among the geriatric population [5-9] and a
higher preva-lence of malnutrition has been associated with the
elderly most in need of care [10].

There are at least 40 screening and assessment tools for

subjective nutritional status assessments, and some are for the

general population and others for specific populations [11]. The

most broadly used of these population-specific tools is the
Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), devel-oped by Baker et al
in 1982 [3]. The SGA has proven to be one of the most efficient
methods to determine nutri-tional status and make the prognosis
of clinical complica-tions [12]. Different from the MNA, the
SGA was developed to assess hospitalized individuals,
investigating recent weight loss, changes in food consumption,
gas-trointestinal symptoms, loss of functional capacity, dis-easeassociated stress, and depletion, found upon physical examination
[12].

Thus, the SGA focuses mainly on the effect of the disease on

nutritional status. When the same population of eld-erly
individuals is assessed by the SGA and MNA, the SGA detects
already established malnutrition more precisely, while the MNA
detects those who need preventive care [13]. The sensitivities of
the SGA and MNA were 93 and 96% respectively, and the
specificities were 61 and 26% respectively [13]. The Nutritional
Risk Screening (NCR-2002), proposed more recently, has proven
to be an

http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/54

important instrument to assess nutritional risk and pre-dict length

of hospital stay of elderly patients [14]. Thus, the MNA is
considered a very useful instrument for assess-ing long-term
nutritional risk but not as useful for short-term prognoses [15].
Regarding functional autonomy, the MNA considers the mobility
of the elderly, if bedbound or wheelchair-bound or if he or she is
capable of walking but does not leave the home. The MNA does
not assess eating autonomy, that is, if the elderly can prepare his
or her own food, if he or she eats without help, if he or she can
cut the foods and even if he or she can bring the foods to the
mouth.

Functional capacity assessment based on self-reported

performance of daily tasks was first assessed by Katz, 1963 [16].
The multidimensional OARS (Older Americans Research Survey)
[17] questionnaire was validated and has been used in Brazil [18]
for some time now. The ques-tionnaire takes into account the
basic activities of daily liv-ing (ADL) and the instrumental
activities of daily living (IADL). The lack of functional autonomy
to look after oneself and to prepare and eat foods is a factor that
can result in malnutrition and deserves the attention of professionals and family since functional capacity assessment can be
an indicator of nutritional risk which is particularly associated
with food intake [19].

The prognosis of elderly inpatients depends not only on the acute

physiological conditions inherent to the disease but also on a
number of preexisting factors, such as loss of functional
independence, loss of cognitive functions, low body weight [20]
and corrected arm muscle area [21]. Poor eating habits are
predictive of a bad hospitalization prognosis among the elderly
[1], suggesting that there is a relationship of interdependence with
the other factors. Thus, the objective of this work was to assess
the relation-ship between nutritional status and indicators of functional capacity among recently hospitalized elderly in a general
hospital.

Casuistic and Method

A cross-sectional study was done from September to November

2006 with 240 elderly aging more than 60 years, of both genders
(127 womens and 113 mens), hos-pitalized in a hospital in
Piracicaba, SP, Brazil that pro-vides care for the private and
public healthcare systems. This study was submitted and
approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the
institution, according to Resolution n 196/96 of the Brazilian
Ministry of Health. The work only began after the patient or
caregiver was informed of the purpose of the study and agreed to
participate, signing a informed consent form.

All patients aged 60 or more years and who stayed in the hospital
for one or more days were included in the study. The lower age
limit was chosen according to the second

Page 2 of 8

(page number not for citation purposes)

Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:54

article of the National Policy for the Elderly that classifies

individuals aged 60 years or older as elderly [22].

Data collection was done from 24 to 72 hours after admit-tance

through a single interview with the patient or car-egiver (if the
patient had dementia or some other problem that prevented

communication), thus guaranteeing that nearly all the elderly

admitted in the studied period were included.

The MNA developed by Guigoz et al.[3] was used for the

subjective assessment of the nutritional status. MNA includes
questions regarding weight change, dietary change,
gastrointestinal symptoms that persist for more than two weeks,
functional capacity, physical assessment and disease and its
relationship with nutritional require-ment. A guidance book was
created to calibrate the inter-viewers before the interviews for
data collection to be consistent. In the original MNA version, the
2

Body Mass Index (BMI in weight/height ) is included in the

assess-ment. To allow the assessment of bedridden individuals,

BMI was substituted by arm circumference (AC) with the patient

lying preferably on his or her left side. The agree-ment of this
measurement was determined by the Kappa coefficient (r = 0.89)
considering the classification by BMI and AC as follows:

BMI < 19 for AC P 5

19 BMI < 21 for P 5 < AC P 10

http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/54

The data were analyzed with the elderly divided into groups
according to their nutritional status classified by the MNA. The
answers to the questionnaire were expressed in numbers and
percentages and compared. The proportions were compared by
the chi-square test. When the expected values were below 5, two
categories were combined (some dependence + complete
dependence).

21 BMI < 23 for P 10 < AC < P 85

Results
BMI 23 for AC P 85

Where: the percentile (P) for man is P5 = 25 cm, P10 = 26 cm,

and P85 = 34 cm, and for woman is P5 = 24 cm, P10 = 25 cm,
and P85 = 33 cm [23].

Functional capacity indicators were assessed based on the OARS

questionnaire, adapted for the Brazilian population [18]. The
present work considered in the set the IADL (using a telephone,
walking outside, shopping, meal preparation, housework, selfmedicating, handling money) and the ADL (eating, dressing,
grooming, walk-ing, transferring, bathing, toileting). They were
all consid-ered individually, without worrying about scoring or
classifying the degree of autonomy of each participant.

The following items were also investigated: if the elderly lived by

him or herself; if he or she had a caregiver (hired or family); if he
or she had chronic disease (by verifying the medical record); if he
or she was tube fed and if he or she made use of dietary
supplements.

Among the 240 studied elderly, only 33.8% were classi-fied as

having an adequate nutritional status; 37.1% were classified as
being at risk of malnutrition and 29.1% were classified as
malnourished. Table 1 contains data regard-ing the variables that
correspond to the first MNA phase, showing that all factors were
more prevalent among the malnourished individuals. Among
these factors, a com-promised AC was found in 58.2% of the
individuals, which was roughly the proportion found for the other
fac-tors (Table 1).

Autonomy to answer the questionnaires was inversely

proportional between the elderly classified as malnour-ished and
those at risk of malnutrition or adequately nourished (Table 2).
The individuals classified as mal-nourished presented a higher
prevalence of needing a car-egiver or tube feeding (Table 2). The
use of dietary supplements was lower in these latter two groups
(Table 2). Most (85%) of the studied population had a chronic
disease and this percentage did not differ among the groups
(Table 2). Among the chronic diseases and condi-tions (one or
more conditions in the same individual) of all the assessed
individuals, systemic hypertension ranked first (41.7%), followed
by diabetes mellitus (29.6%), osteoarticular problems (15.1%),
cancer (9.6%), and sequelae of stroke (5.4%). The distribution of
chronic dis-eases and conditions among the malnourished popula2

tion differed from that of the rest of the sample (p < 0.001; =
46.7). The prevalences were as follows: systemic hypertension,
13.7%; diabetes mellitus, 15.7%; osteoar-ticular problems, 3.9%;
cancer, 12.8%; and sequelae of stroke, 15.7%.

All the IADL and ADL variables assessed were significantly

more compromised among the malnourished elderly (Table 3).
Among the ADL variables, partial (42.9%) or complete (12.9%)
eating dependence is found in more than 50% of the
malnourished elderly against 13.4% of those at risk of
malnourishment and 2.5% of those ade-quately nourished.

This study presents data on the outcome of a study that assessed

the relationship between nutritional status and functional capacity
of hospitalized elderly and there is clearly the need to improve the
knowledge on the mecha-

Discussion

Page 3 of 8

(page number not for citation purposes)

Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:54

http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/54

Table 1: Nutritional screening variables of the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), among recently hospitalized elderly patients (N =
240).

Variable
Anwers

RM

A
Chi-square

(n = 70)
(n = 89)
(n = 81)

n
%
n
%

N
%

Reduced food intake in the last 3 moths

Severe
45
64.2
21
23.6
4
4.9
p < 0.001

Moderate
20
28.6
39
43.8
9
11.1
2

= 118.25

Absent
5
7.2
29
32.6
68
84.0

Weight loss in the last 3 months

More than 3 kg
47
67.2
32
35.9
4
4.9

Does not know

10
14.3
18
20.2
2
2.5
p < 0.005

Between 1 and 3 kg
9
12.8
18
20.2
20
24.7

= 103.34

Absent
4
5.7
21
23.6
55
67.9

Mobility
Bedbound or wheelchair-bound
37
52.8
9
10.2
6
7.4
p < 0.001

Walks only at home

16
22.8
10
11.2

4
4.9
2

= 80.77

Normal
17
24.4
70
78.6
71
87.7

Stress or acute illness in the last months

Yes
42
60.0
32
35.9
10
12.3
p < 0.007

No
28
40.0

57
64.1
71
87.7
2

= 37.53

Has neuropsychological problems, dementia or depression

Severe
18
25.8
9
10.2
1
1.25
p < 0.001

Mild dementia
15
21.4
3
3.4
1
1.3
2

= 52.58

Absent

37
52.8
77
86.5
79
97.5

Arm circumference (AC)

5
39
58.2
14
15.9
2
2.5
p < 0.003
(N = 236)
P5 < AC P10
0
0
13
14.8
9
11.1
2

= 75.50

P10 < AC < P85

25
37.3
45
51.1
49
60.5

AC P85
3
4.5
16
18.2
21
25.9

M = malnourished; RM = Risk of malnutrition; A = Adequate.

nisms of association between these factors (nutritional and

functional states).

In Brazil, deaths associated with malnutrition [24] among the

elderly bring to light the discussion on the need to watch this
population and intervene nutritionally when-ever necessary. In
this study, one third of the population being admitted to the
hospital was classified by the MNA as being malnourished and
the same proportion was clas-sified as being adequately
nourished. This reality rein-forces the need to invest in
assessment and care protocols, especially when dealing with
hospitalized patients, where factors such as poor appetite,
fatigue, pain and early sati-ety can reduce oral food intake
[25]. Correct intervention helps reduce mortality, improve
quality of life and reduce hospitalization costs [25].

This study showed that malnourished individuals are more

dependent on others to communicate and meet other needs and

they are also more likely to require tube feeding (Table 2)

although not forgetting the effect of the disease and the natural
aging process. Furthermore, the distribution of the diseases
differed among the nutritional status classifications. The
malnourished population pre-sented higher proportions of
cancer and sequelae of

stroke. Cancer is a disease that promotes physiological stress,

while stroke mainly compromises functional capac-ity.

MNA has been broadly used [5-9] to classify the nutri-tional

status and has demonstrated adequate sensitivity and
specificity [7]. The elements considered in the screen-ing done
in the first phase of the assessment regard a glo-bal assessment
(reduced food intake, involuntary weight loss, mobility,
cognition and body mass) while in phase 2 the dietary habits
and self-perception of health are inves-tigated [3]. Low body
profile indicators (mass and circum-ferences) are visible
characteristics of protein-calorie malnutrition but good values

do not always reflect ade-quate nutrition. BMI had been

recommended as the best anthropometric indicator of
nutritional status while arm circumference has not been shown
to be a good indicator of nutritional status when used alone
[26]. In the valida-tion study which preceded the current study
we found a good agreement (r = 0.89) between arm
circumference and BMI. This allowed the MNA to be used in
bedridden patients where the study was performed.

Page 4 of 8

(page number not for citation purposes)

The global MNA nature allows the inclusion of important

factors which do not only classify the nutritional status

Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:54

http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/54

Table 2: Variables associated with health and functional autonomy among hospitalized elderly, distributed according to the
nutritional status (N = 240).

Variable
Anwers

RM
A

Chi-square

(n = 70)

(n = 89)
(n = 81)

n
%
n
%
N
%

Interviewed individual
Caregiver
44
62.8
36
40.4
23
28.4
p = 0.009

= 18.55

User
26
37.2
53
59.6
58
71.6

Caregiver present
Yes

48
68.6
31
34.8
15
18.5
p < 0.001

= 40.59

No
22
31.4
58
65.2
66
81.5

Chronic disease
Yes
60
85.7
83
93.2
76
93.8
p = 0.148

= 3.81

No
10
14.3
6
6.8
5
6.2

Tube feeding
Yes
23
32.8
3
3.4
2
2.5
p = 0.004

= 43.9

No
47
67.2
86
96.6
79
97.5

Use of supplement
Yes
15
21.4
9
10.1
8
9.9
p = 0.06

= 5.60

No

55
78.6
80
89.9
73
90.1

D = Malnourished; RM = Risk of malnutrition; A = Adequate.

but also indicate when intervention is necessary to guar-antee

proper care. Inadequate food intake is the cause of malnutrition
while physical and cognitive limitations can prevent adequate
food intake [20]. Cereda et al., 2008 [27], showed that the
poorer functional status was associ-ated with low BMI,
sarcopenia and reduced oral intake and the MNA reliably
identifies at-risk institutionalised elderly needing higher
standards of care, particularly related to eating. Routine
documentation of oral intakes and feeding assistance might be
useful to prevent weight loss, sarcopenia and functional status
deterioration.

The large variability is due to differences in level of

dependence and health status among the elderly. In hos-pital
settings, a low MNA score is associated with an increase in
mortality, prolonged length of stay and greater likelihood of
discharge to nursing homes. Malnutrition is associated with
functional and cognitive impairment and difficulties eating.
The MNA detects risk of malnutrition before severe change in
weight or serum proteins occurs [4].

Functional capacity is interconnected with the quality and

quantity of food consumed. The IADL include shopping

Page 5 of 8

(page number not for citation purposes)

and preparing meals. In the present study, malnourished

individuals were 6 times more dependent on others to shop and
prepare meals than those that were adequately nourished
(Table 3). Being unable to buy and prepare meals not only
interferes with the amount of food ingested but also with the
diversity, which may result in boring and unattractive meals.
Among the ADL, partial or complete dependence of more than
half of the malnour-ished individuals (Table 3) to eat warn us
of the impor-tance to assess the functional capacity while
providing nutritional care, as corroborated by the results of a
study [28] done with 130 Japanese older than 65 years, where
those (48) who totally depended on others to move around
were also the ones with the lowest indicators of nutritional
status (anthropometry, albumin and food intake).

There is an interrelationship between nutritional and functional

statuses. It has already been shown that malnu-trition
compromises the functional status of the individ-ual [29]. At
the same time, functional status impairment increases
vulnerability and may affect food consumption negatively
[19]. Functional capacity assessment tools have

Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:54

http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/54

Table 3: Functional autonomy for the activities of daily living among hospitalized elderly distributed according to the nutritional
status (n = 240).

Variables
Answers
M (n = 70)
RM (n = 89)
A (n = 81)
Chi-square

Instrumental Activity of daily living (IADL)

n
%
n
%
n
%

Phone use
Independence
20

28.6
62
69.7
66
81.5
p < 0.003

Some dependence
17
24.3
20
22.5
10
12.3
2

= 64.40

Complete dependence
33
47.1
7
7.9
5
6.2

Walking outside

Independence
23
32.9
53
59.6
55
67.9
p < 0.001

Some dependence
17
24.3
34
38.2
22
27.2
2

= 41.27

Complete dependence
30
42.9
2
2.2
4
4.9

Shopping
Independence
14
20
49
55.1
55
67.9
p < 0.001

Some dependence
17
24.3
29
32.6
19
23.5
2

= 61.26

Complete dependence
39
55.7
11
12.4
7
8.6

Meal preparation
Independence
17
24.3
44
49.4
60
74.1
p < 0.005

Some dependence
9
12.9
26
29.2
14
17.3
2

= 63.56

Complete dependence
44
62.8
19
21.3
7
8.6

Housework
Independence
14
20
41
46.1
46
56.8
p < 0.003

Some dependence
10
14.3
23
25.8
24
29.6
2

= 45.2

Complete dependence
46
65.7
25
28.1
11
13.6

Self-medicating
Independence
21
30
63
70.8
67
82.7
p < 0.008

Some dependence
20
28.6
19
21.3
10
12.3
2

= 57.7

Complete dependence
29
41.4
7
7.9
4
4.9

Handling money
Independence
14
20
51
57.3
58
71.6
p < 0.002

Some dependence
16
22.8
26
29.2
17
21
2

= 65.33

Complete dependence
40
57.2
12
13.5
6

7.4

Activity of daily living (ADL)

Eating
Independence
31
44.3
77
86.5
79
97.5
p < 0.001

Some dependence
30
42.9

10
11.2
2
2.5
2

= 67.94

Complete dependence
9
12.9
2
2.2
0
0

Dressing
Independence
28
40
80
89.9
77
95.1
p < 0.002

Some dependence

12
17.1
8
9
3
3.7
2

= 88.95

Complete dependence
30
42.9
1
1.1
1
1.2

Grooming
Independence
28
40
79
88.8
79
97.5
p < 0.001

Some dependence
8
11.4
8
9
1
1.2
2

= 94.49

Complete dependence
34
48.6
2
2.2
1
1.2

Walking
Independence
22
31.4
71
79.8
71

87.7
p < 0.002

Some dependence
17
24.3
15
16.9
9
11.1
2

= 83.81

Complete dependence
31
44.3
3
3.4
1
1.2

Transferring
Independence
21
30
73

82
74
91.4
p < 0.005

Some dependence
15
21.4
14
15.7
6
7.4
2

= 74.89

Complete dependence
34
48.6
2
2.2
1
1.2

Bathing
Independence
21

30
73
82
74
91.4
p < 0.005

Some dependence
15
21.4
14
15.7
6
7.4
2

= 74.89

Complete dependence
34
48.6
2
2.2
1
1.2

Toileting

Independence
22
31.4
72
80.9
75
92.6
p < 0.007

Some dependence
16
22.9
15
16.9
6
7.4
2

= 55.79

Complete dependence
32
45.7
2
2.2
0
0

D = Malnourished; RM = Risk of malnourishment; A = Adequate

Page 6 of 8

(page number not for citation purposes)

Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:54

necessary to pay special attention to functional capacity when

planning nutri-tional care for this group, especially when they
are debili-tated by disease.

been included in studies that seek to assess nutritional risk

[30].

Competing interests

The MNA is a screening and assessment tool with a relia-ble

scale and clearly defined thresholds, usable by health care
professionals. It should be included in the geriatric assessment
and is proposed in the minimum data set for nutritional

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

interventions . This study reinforces the importance of the

MNA as an instrument to assess the nutritional status of the
elderly since it represents a global assessment instrument. It
also warns us of the need to pay special attention to functional
capacity indicators and food intake among the elderly when
planning care for this group, especially when they are
debilitated by disease.

Conclusion

A relationship of interdependence between nutritional status

and functional status was observed among the stud-ied elderly.
Deterioration of the nutritional status was associated with
reduced food consumption, recent weight loss, diseaseassociated stress, degree of self-sufficiency, and functional
capacity. The IADL and ADL showed that malnourished
elderly were more impaired regarding the activities of daily
living, which emphasizes the impor-tance of nutrition.
Malnutrition prevalence among the elderly admitted to the
hospital was high, probably because of their vulnerability
before the disease. Nutri-tional status deterioration is
accompanied by reduced functional capacity. Thus, it is

MR carried out the statistical analysis, writing of the article

and critically reviewed the article. KC participated in the
protocol design and reviewed the manuscript. VA was involved
in the protocol and study design, analysis and writing of the
article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Sponsored by: Research Support Fund of the Methodist University

of Pirac-icaba-SP-Brazil (Unimep).

References

Kagansky N, Berner Y, Koren-Morag N, Perelman L, Knobler H, Levy S:

Poor nutritional habits are predictors of poor outcome in very old
hospitalized patients. Am J Clin Nutr 2005, 82:784-91.

Gariballa S, Forster S: Associations between underlying disease and

nutritional status following disease and nutritional status following
acute illness in older people. Clin Nutrition 2007,

http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/54

26(4):466-473.

Guigoz Y, Garry JP: Mini nutritional assessment: A practical

assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly
patients. Facts Res Gerontol 1994:15-59.
Guigoz Y: The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) review of the
literature-What does it tell us? J Nutr Health Aging 2006,

10(6):466-85.
Bauer JM, Sieber CC: Significance and diagnosis of malnutrition in the
elderly. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich 2007, 101(9):605-9.
Cuyac Lantigua M, Santana Porbn S: The Mini Nutritional Assess-ment of
the elderly in the practice of a hospital geriatrics service: inception,
validation and operational characteristics.

Arch Latinoam Nutr 2007, 54(3):255-65.

Ferreira LS, Nascimento LF, Marucci MF: Use of the mini nutritional assessment tool in elderly people from long-term
institutions of southeast of Brazil. J Nutr Health Aging 2008,
12(3):213-7.

Gonzlez Hernndez A, Cuy Lantigua M, Gonzlez Escudero H, Snchez

Gutirrez R, Cortina Martnez R, Barreto Peni J, Santana Porbn S, Rojas
Prez A: Nutritional status of Cuban elders in three different geriatric
scenarios: community, geriatrics service, nursery home. Arch Latinoam
Nutr 2007, 57(3):266-72.

Tsai AC, Ho CS, Chang MC: Assessing the Prevalence of

Malnu- trition with the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) in a
Nationally Representative Sample of Elderly Taiwanese. J Nutr
Health Aging 2008, 12(4):239-43.

Izawa S, Kuzuya M, Okada K, Enoki H, Koike T, Kanda S, Iguchi A:

The nutritional status of frail elderly with care needs accord- ing to
the mini-nutritional assessment. Clinical Nutrition 2006,

25(6):962-967.
Jones JM: The methodology of nutritional screening and
assessment tools. J Hum Nutr Dietet 2002, 15:59-71.
Makhija S, Baker J: The Subjective Global Assessment: A
Review of Its Use in Clinical Practice. Nutr Clin Pract 2008,
23(4):405-9.

Christensson L, Unosson M, Ek AC: Evaluation of nutritional

assessment techniques in elderly people newly admitted to
municipal care. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002, 56(9):810-8.

Martins CP, Correia JR, do Amaral TF: Undernutrition risk

screening and length of stay of hospitalized elderly. J Nutr
Elder 2005, 25(2):5-21.

Bo M, Massaia M, Raspo S, Bosco F, Cena P, Molaschi M, Fabris F: Preventive factors of in-hospital mortality in older patients admitted to a
medical intensive care unit. J Am Geriatr Soc

2003, 51:529-33.
Neumann SA, Miller MD, Daniels L, Crotty M: Nutritional status
and clinical outcomes of older patients in rehabilitation. J Hum
Nutr Dietet 2005, 18:129-36.

Langkamp-Henken B: Usefulness of the MNA in the long-term

and acute-care settings within the United States. J Nutr Health
Aging 2006, 10(6):502-9.
Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jacson BA, Jaffe MW: Studies of
illness in the aged. JAMA 1963, 185(12):914-9.

BRASIL: Lei n. 8.842, de 4 de janeiro de 1994. Dispe sobre a

poltica nacional do idoso, cria o Conselho Nacional do Idoso e
d outras providncias. [ http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/
leis/L8842.htm].

Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA: The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment
questionnaire. J Gerontol 1981, 36:428-34.
Frisancho AR: Anthropometric Standards for the Assessment of
Growth and Nutrition Status. The University of Michigan Press.
Ann Arbor, Michigan USA; 1990.
Ramos LR: Growing old in So Paulo, Brazil: assessment of health
status and family support of the elderly of different socio-economic
stratus living in the community. In PhD Thesis
Otero UB, Rozenfield S, Gadelha MJ, Carvalho MS: Mortalidade por
desnutrio em idosos, regio Sudeste do Brasil, 1980-1997.

University of London. London UK; 1987.

Rev Sade Publica 2002, 36(2):141-8.

Schroll M: Aging, food patterns and disability. Forum Nutr 2003,

Daniels L: Good nutrition for good surgery: clinical and quality

of life outcomes. Aust Prescriber 2003, 26:136-140.

56:256-8.

Page 7 of 8

(page number not for citation purposes)

Burden ST, Stoppard E, Shaffer J, Makin A, Toods C: Can we use mid

upper arm anthropometry to detect malnutrition in

Nutrition Journal 2009, 8:54

http://www.nutritionj.com/content/8/1/54

medical inpatients? A validation study. J Hum Nutr Diet 2005,

18(4):287-94.
Cereda E, Valzolgher L, Pedro C: Mini nutritional assessment is a good predictor of functional status in institutionalised eld- erly at risk of
malnutrition. Clinical Nutrition 2008, 27(5):700-705.

Tajima O, Nagura E, Ishikawa-Takata K, Furumoto S, Ohta T: Nutri-tional assessment of elderly Japanese nursin home residents os
differing mobility using anthropometric measurements, biochemical indicator and food intake. Geriatrics and Gerontology
International 2004, 4:93-99.

Chevalier S, Saoud F, Gray-donald K, Morais JA: The physical func- tional capacity of frail elderly persons undergoing ambula- tory
rehabilitation is related to their nutritional status. J Nutr Health Aging 2008, 12(10):721-6.

Ruiz-Lpez MD, Artacho R, Oliva P, Moreno-Torres R, Balaos J, de Tereza C, Lpez MC: Nutritional risk in Institutionalized older women
determined by the Mini Nutritional Assessment test: What are the main factors? Nutrition 2003, 19:767-71.

Publish with BioMed Central and every scientist can read your work free of charge

"BioMed Central will be the most significant development for disseminating the results of biomedical research in our lifetime."

Sir Paul Nurse, Cancer Research UK

Your research papers will be:

available free of charge to the entire biomedical community

peer reviewed and published immediately upon acceptance

cited in PubMed and archived on PubMed Central

yours you keep the copyright

Submit your manuscript here:

BioMedcentral
http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/publishing_adv.asp

Page 8 of 8

(page number not for citation purposes)