Political representatives are responsible to citizens for fulfilling election promises, while bureaucrats are responsible for implementing policies. Both must work together for development, as good policy cannot be implemented by a bad administration, and a good administration cannot save a bad policy. There needs to be political intervention, not interference, in bureaucracy. A lack of guidelines on the political-administrative relationship allows for detrimental interference that undermines bureaucratic freedom and creativity. Recent Supreme Court rulings pave the way for a civil services code to better define this relationship.
Political representatives are responsible to citizens for fulfilling election promises, while bureaucrats are responsible for implementing policies. Both must work together for development, as good policy cannot be implemented by a bad administration, and a good administration cannot save a bad policy. There needs to be political intervention, not interference, in bureaucracy. A lack of guidelines on the political-administrative relationship allows for detrimental interference that undermines bureaucratic freedom and creativity. Recent Supreme Court rulings pave the way for a civil services code to better define this relationship.
Political representatives are responsible to citizens for fulfilling election promises, while bureaucrats are responsible for implementing policies. Both must work together for development, as good policy cannot be implemented by a bad administration, and a good administration cannot save a bad policy. There needs to be political intervention, not interference, in bureaucracy. A lack of guidelines on the political-administrative relationship allows for detrimental interference that undermines bureaucratic freedom and creativity. Recent Supreme Court rulings pave the way for a civil services code to better define this relationship.
Political representatives are responsible to citizens for fulfilling election promises, while bureaucrats are responsible for implementing policies. Both must work together for development, as good policy cannot be implemented by a bad administration, and a good administration cannot save a bad policy. There needs to be political intervention, not interference, in bureaucracy. A lack of guidelines on the political-administrative relationship allows for detrimental interference that undermines bureaucratic freedom and creativity. Recent Supreme Court rulings pave the way for a civil services code to better define this relationship.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Political Interference in Bureaucracy Causes, Consequences
and Remedies
The administrative of any democratic country is
analogous to a ship. The owner of the ship is its people, the captain is the representatives chosen by the people elected politicians and the sailors are the ones who help the captain in taking the ship to its destination the bureaucrats. It is by the integrated and coordinated approach of the three that the ship reaches its destination. Here the relation between the captain and the sailor is of primary importance as they are on board and take the prime responsibliy of the ship. Political representatives are directly responsible to the citizens as they are weighed on the parameters of completion of their election promises. They are subjected to close scrutiny and hence are hence in constant pressure of being politically correct and at the same time have to deliver. In contrast the bureaucrats are the permanent executives and are directly responsible to the political heads and indirectly to the people. They have the technical know how and are required to translate the policy formulations into policy implementation. They are expected to operationalise theplan and show results at the ground level. Both the temporary executive and the permantent executive need to work in tandem for the overall development of the citizenry and country at large. As famously quoted A bad administration cannot implement a good policy, a bad policy can not be saved by a good administration. Hence each should offset the shortcomings of the other for producing positive results. Intervention Vs Interference
As noted by the Second Administrative Reform Report
optimum space needs to be provided for the bureaucrats so that innovative solutions can be achieved. A thin line lies between intervention and interference. Political intervention in bureaucracy is essential in a democratic country, not political interference-PM NarendraModi. Due to a lack of comprehensive guidelines regarding the political-administrative relation, this is largely left to discretion and sometimes misused leading to detrimental interference amounting to curbing the bureaucratic freedom of judgement and operation. The political class with stringent time frame of 5 years may resort to hassled implementation. The political power and supremacy may also undermine the possibility of creative operation space for the permanent executive. With no detailed guidelines for grounds of transfer of the public servant, there has been a growing prominence of a transfer industry sucking the enthusiasm and motivation off the bureaucrats.This has inturn led to sycophancy which in turn paves the way for embezzlement of funds and corruption. The Supreme Court has paved the way for a civil services code in its recent judgment .