4 A Patrick Cohen Det
4 A Patrick Cohen Det
4 A Patrick Cohen Det
Knowledge and Capabilities (OLKC), in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 26-28 April 2009.
Abstract
Creativity is a major driving force in modern economies, on a global scale, but also on a local
scale. In other words, cities may benefit from a highly creative environment in order to foster
their development. The aim of this contribution is to depict and examine the dynamics of
situated creativity by presenting an anatomy of the creative city based on three different
layers, namely the underground, the middleground and the upperground. In order to illustrate
this point of view, the culture cluster in the creative city of Montreal is analyzed.
Keywords:
Creativity, cities, communities, cluster
1. INTRODUCTION
Throughout history, cultural activity has often been concentrated in specific areas, therefore
providing a particularly creative environment for artists. This phenomenon has led to the
multiplication of creative centers worldwide. From a local point of view, however, not all
territories have equally benefited from a rising creative atmosphere. Indeed, some cities have
gained a growing advantage over other less creative places, as people will tend to cluster in
the urban milieus that offer the best opportunities.
Several reasons may explain these agglomeration phenomena in specific cities or territories
(as shown in the work of Marshall, 1890; Jacobs, 1969; or Porter, 2000). In his well-known
essay, Florida (2002) argues that investment in cultural related facilities and other related
amenities may provide a fertile ground for a creative class of workers to imagine new
products or processes that will ultimately bring economic growth and wealth. Although this
theory has received a significant amount of criticisms, it has opened a large agenda for studies
in situated creativity (for some examples, see Turok, 2004; or Scott, 2006 among others).
Drawing on this stream of research and in order to fully grasp the underlying creative process
inside these creative milieus, we propose to focus on what the creative individuals and
organizations really do rather than on who they are, which is, in our view, the main
shortcoming with the most popular approaches. Our aim is therefore to depict and analyze the
actual dynamics that may lead to the emergence of highly creative ideas and forms in creative
cities.
This perspective requires us to consider the creativity dynamics as a collective process.
Indeed, no matter how talented individuals may be, we argue that creativity can only be fully
expressed in the joint efforts of different social forms that cooperate in a dense network of
collaboration. This collective effort can almost never be achieved virtually (as underlined for
example by Grabher, 2001; Amin and Cohendet, 2005; Bathelt, 2005; or Maskell et al., 2006,
among many others). In fact, in order for new creative ideas to emerge, individuals,
communities and firms must interact frequently with one another through ongoing face-toface exchanges, by regularly getting together in the different cultural and artistic spaces
offered to them by the environment in which they are embedded (as depicted by Storper and
Venables, 2004). For this reason, the creative process is mostly situated and is strongly
dependent on the local services and conveniences that each entity will have access to.
In the following, we first present our theoretical framework. We then illustrate our point of
view drawing on the case of Montreal and its culture cluster, which is recognized as one of
the most creative and diversified area in North America.
they voluntarily cooperate with one another in closely knitted clusters, and share their
knowledge so as to increase their competitiveness (as shown by Maskell, 2001 among others).
In other words, creative forces will become viable only if they are supported by the complex
coupling of heterogeneous entities working together in different layers of a commonly shared
geographical platform.
These different entities include the individual actors in the underground on one hand, from
who the creative impulse originates, and firms from the upperground on the other, that
provide an institutional background for the integration of these new combinations on the
market. The underground brings together the creative, artistic, and cultural activities that are
not immediately linked to the commercial and industrial world. Thus, underground culture
lies outside the corporate logic of standardization. This function is usually assumed by the
upperground. The latter contributes to the creative process by its capacity to finance and unite
the different expressions together, by its capacity to integrate dispersed types of knowledge,
and by its capacity to test new forms of creativity on the market.
Because the underground and the upperground function on entirely different modes, they only
rarely interact together. For this reason, we add, in this contribution, a commonly neglected
dimension to the traditional perspective. Indeed, we suggest that both the underground and the
upperground are linked by communities from the middleground, who act as intermediate
structures allowing for the creative ideas to transit from an informal micro-level to a formal
macro-level, through the accumulation, the combination, the enrichment and the renewal of
distributed bits of knowledge (as portrayed by Lave and Wenger, 1990; Brown and Duguid,
1991; or Amin and Roberts, 2008).
These communities of the middleground play a central role in the situated creativity
dynamics, by achieving a process of progressive codification of knowledge, starting from a
phase where the actors do not know the characteristics of the novelty, do not know each other,
and do not possess the capabilities to communicate, to reach a phase where the novelty is
equipped with sufficient shared understanding and codes to become economically viable (as
depicted by Cowan et al., 2000). In this view, the functioning of these communities is critical
in the sense that they precisely provide the creative city with the local apparatus necessary for
new creative ideas to progressively emerge and reach the market for creative goods and
services, by allowing them to transit from the underground to the upperground.
According to this perspective, the middleground is able to promote creativity in diverse
activities by integrating individuals from distinct backgrounds. It therefore opens both to
exploration and exploitation mechanisms. Firstly, this system allows members to avoid lockin, by ensuring a close connection to diverse styles and traditions. Secondly, by favoring the
creation of a common identity, these collective forms limit the risks related to novelty and
secure the foundations on which each individual expresses his creativity. As a result, the
different communities benefit from the external creativity whenever norms are not fixed, and
benefit from the internal creativity whenever such codes and rules need reinforcement. Again,
for this phenomenon to happen, the middleground must be deeply entrenched in a specific
place, which is in itself a great source of inspiration for its members.
It turns out that each entity forming the anatomy of the creative city plays a specific role in
the creative process and therefore fulfills the task other components cannot achieve. If
talented individuals of the underground are very active in the beginning of the creative
process, they must rely on the communities of the middleground in order to popularize their
creative efforts. In this sense, these communities are essential in the elaboration of a common
grammar on which creative ideas are developed. As new expressions are progressively
reinforced, firms of the upperground replace the two preceding entities. These formal
organizations must rely on the work of the communities, as it is impossible for them to
allocate the sufficient amount of time and money necessary for creative material to blossom
on the market. This suggests that these three social forms are complementary, and, as a result,
can only succeed in promoting creativity if they all act together.
3.1. Background
The cluster strategy was introduced in the Quebec province (and therefore in Montreal) in
1991, based on the idea that, in a competitive world, success could only be reached by
combining efforts on a long term basis, rather than competing individually on the short term.
This decision led to the creation of the metropolitan community of Montreal in 2003, which
helped set up fifteen clusters representing several sectors, all grouped into four major
categories (the competitive clusters, the visibility clusters, the emerging technology clusters,
and the manufacturing clusters). Among the fifteen clusters, four of them are fully structured,
among which the aerospace cluster, the life sciences cluster, the information technologies
cluster, and finally the culture cluster.
Created in 2005, the culture cluster (which is part of the visibility clusters) was originally
established in order to organize the production and distribution of cultural goods and services
in Montreal, as well as to provide Montreal with an international recognition in this domain.
This cluster is decomposed into six sub-clusters that contribute in different ways to the
cultural life inside the city:
Sector
All sectors
2001
1765760
2006
1972455
Variation
11.7%
Culture sector
(In % of total labor)
97755
(5.54)
100385
(5.09)
2.7%
15250
13315
-12.7%
5121
3346
14025
1225
12830
485
-8.5%
-60.4%
21100
23725
12.4%
5413
5414
5418
2455
6895
11750
2850
8675
12200
16.1%
25.8%
3.8%
11590
12360
6.6%
5122
5151
5152
7113
7114
865
5630
2515
2065
515
1045
7620
390
2725
580
20.8%
35.3%
-84.5%
32.0%
12.6%
10390
13380
28.8%
7111
7115
4140
6250
5605
7775
35.4%
24.4%
37360
35605
-4.7%
3231
4512
5111
5191
17870
3410
10955
5125
16395
3810
10940
4460
-8.3%
11.7%
-0.1%
-13.0%
2065
2000
-3.1%
2065
2000
-3.1%
7121
Heritage institutions
Note: This table was obtained using the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). In order
to be as precise as possible, the architectural, engineering and related services category (NAICS 5413), which
comprises many activities that do not belong to the culture sector, was replaced by the occupation categories
C051 and C052.
Number
Movie theaters
Visual arts, design and architecture
23
18.1
Artist centers
Music and popular shows
28
44.4
TV stations
Radio stations
Performing and visual arts
4
25
14.8
16.3
Performance halls
Books and literature
157
28
Libraries
Bookstores
Heritage and museology
11
130
8.8
33.8
63
58
101
14.6
n/a
n/a
Museums
Heritage organizations
Archive centers and services
Montreal offers a wide variety of spaces, both private and public, for artists to implement
and/or put forward their work. These creative spaces are highly concentrated within the city
(often at a walking distance from each other), which significantly facilitates the interaction
among artists from the same but also from very different backgrounds. For example, it is
fairly common for individuals from the visual arts industry to collaborate with individuals in
the music industry, whether it is for a single performance or simply for an album cover or
poster. In fact, Montreal is acknowledged for its blending of different art forms, similarly to
what is observed among its multicultural population. It is also important to note that the city
has received an international recognition for its combination of art and technology, although
we do not deal with this aspect in this contribution given that we focus exclusively on the
culture cluster.
Table 3: Main festivals in Montreal
Sector
Main festivals
Creative spaces are often formal meeting points, but they can also be organized artificially, as
this would be the case whenever a specific event takes place in the city. As a matter of fact,
Montreal is well-known for its numerous festivals, which all offer an ideal platform for artists
to present their own work and interact with members of their own community. In many
situations, these festivals reward the most promising artists through an elaborate prize system,
which undoubtedly contributes to establish ones reputation in his milieu. These festivals are
not only destined to one specific sector, however, as they provide an opportunity for artists to
also meet with other creative individuals, communities and firms, interested in their activities.
In this sense, the festivals provide a temporary space for creative individuals to cluster in one
specific place and to eventually receive a wider recognition on the local and global scene.
http://www.kino00.com/
http://www.distroboto.archivemontreal.org/
3
http://www.alien8recordings.com/
4
http://www.cstrecords.com/
2
actively participate in the production, promotion and distribution of a wide variety of local
performers from the underground. These labels have established their reputation by an intense
collaboration with local venues, such as the Sala Rossa or the Divan Orange, offering the
possibility for many small bands to perform. The multiplication of such venues in the MileEnd quarters in particular, situated in the Plateau neighborhood, has contributed to develop a
broad network of artists and fans that frequently get together, thus creating an important
middleground community in support of the local scene. These locally sustained collaborative
projects have enabled some artists to distribute their works internationally. In spite of this, a
majority of them still sell most of their records within Montreal, therefore nourishing the local
creative environment.
In the performing arts sector, the circus arts, with the famous Cirque du Soleil6 as its main
representative, play a major role in Montreal, and have progressively helped the city become a
world leader in this domain. In 1997, Cirque du Soleil officially grouped its activities in the
Saint-Michel neighborhood, following the implementation of an urban development program,
which also included the creation of the Ecole nationale de cirque de Montreal and the Tohu, a
performance hall, destined to offer an institutional setting for new emerging circuses, as well
as for young artists graduating from the nearby school, to present their creations. This project
has played an active part in codifying the different rules associated to modern circus and has
offered an ideal platform for several other circuses, such as 7 Fingers7 or Cirque Eloize8, to
come forward and reach a worldwide market, by attracting several underground artists
towards the communities of the middleground. In this sense, the upperground, incarnated by
Cirque du Soleil, has nourished the middleground, and has given the opportunity for renewed
creative ideas and conceptions to emerge.
The book and literature sector, finally, enables many emerging writers to disseminate their
work, in the same way as this is achieved in the visual arts or in the music sector. Indeed,
along with the usual streams of diffusion from the upperground, such as the Renaud Bray
stores that frequently promote local writers, the city comprises many independent bookstores
and/or libraries, which serve as channels of diffusion for many underground authors. The
Bibliograph/e project, for example, which is a library of more than five hundred zines and
artist books, helps create a link between the bookmakers and the public. This library, which is
situated as part of Caf Toc Toc in the Mile End neighborhood frequently organizes
workshops on storytelling and drawing, and has hosted many public readings for the local
community. In turn, these workshops have led to the creation of a book, grouping some of the
drawings made during one of these workshops, which is now sold for fundraising. This
initiative allows the hosts to create and maintain the library, but also provides a certain
amount of visibility for the public.
All these projects share in common a collective desire to put forth the local culture, which is
represented by a myriad of connected artists. In other words, in all these cases, the
collaborative efforts provided by the communities of the middleground contribute to support
the local culture and offer the foundations on which different artists can navigate between the
underground and the upperground, whether it is through a top-down or through a bottom-up
mechanism. For these reasons, the local middleground should be viewed as a major actor in
5
http://www.bangorrecords.com/
http://www.cirquedusoleil.com/
7
http:// www.les7doigtsdelamain.com/
8
http://www.cirque-eloize.com/
6
the dynamics of the creative process in Montreal, and has widely contributed to build up the
culture cluster. What appears to be even more important in all the examples above is the fact
that the middleground proposes an implicit assessment and validation mechanism, which
allows emerging artists to disseminate their work, interact and eventually collaborate with one
another. In this sense, the middleground communities not only preserve the development of
local culture, they also nourish both the underground and the upperground with new creative
ideas.
REFERENCES