Mercado Vs Manzano

DUAL CITIZENSHIP AS GROUND FOR DISQUALIFICATION FROM OFFICE; FILING OF
CERTIFICATE OF CANDIDACY AS EFFECTIVE RENUNCIATION OF AMERICAN

CITIZENSHIP
Mercado vs. Manzano, G.R. No. 135083, May 26, 1999
FACTS:
Mercado and Manzano are both running for vice-mayor of Makati City. Manzano got
the highest number of votes but his proclamation was suspended in view of a
pending petition for his disqualification on the ground that he is an American citizen.
Manzano is born in 1955 of Filipino father and mother. However, since he is born in
the US, he is considered as an American under the jus soli doctrine. Upon his return
to the Philippines, he is registered as a foreigner with the Bureau of Immigration.
ISSUE: Whether or not Manzano is disqualified on ground that he is an
alien
HELD:
Manzano is a dual citizen, but his being such does not disqualify him from running
for public office. Under the LGC, what is prohibited is dual allegiance and not dual
citizenship. The two terms are different.
Dual allegiance refers to a situation in which a person simultaneously owes, by
some positive act, loyalty to two or more states. Dual citizenship arises when, as a
result of the concurrent application of the different laws of two or more states, a
person is simultaneously considered a national by the said states.
Moreover, Manzano is considered to have renounced his American citizenship by
filing his certificate of candidacy.
NOTE: This case doctrine has no more application after the effectivity of RA 9225 on
August 29, 2003.
E.Loss and Reacquisition of Philippine Citizenship

HOW PHILIPPINE CITIZENSHIP IS LOST:
1. By naturalization in a foreign country (prior to RA 9225)
2. By express renunciation of citizenship
3. By subscribing to an oath of allegiance to support the constitution or laws of
a foreign country
4. By accepting commission in the military, naval or air service of a foreign
country
5. By cancellation of the certificate of naturalization
6. By having been declared by competent authority a deserter of the Philippine
armed forces in time of war, unless subsequently a plenary pardon or
amnesty has been granted
CASAN MACODE MAQUILING,Rommel Arnado is a natural born Filipino citizen.

However, as a consequence of his subsequentnaturalization as a citizen of the
United States of America, he lost his Filipino citizenship.Arnado applied for
repatriation under Republic Act (R.A.) No. 9225 before the ConsulateGeneral of the
Philippines in San Franciso, USA and took the Oath of Allegiance to the Republicof
the Philippines on 10 July 2008. On the same day an Order of Approval of his
CitizenshipRetention and Re-acquisition was issued in his favor. On 3 April 2009
Arnado again took hisOath of Allegiance to the Republic and executed an Affidavit of
Renunciation of his foreigncitizenship.On 28 April 2010, respondent Linog C. Balua
(Balua), another mayoralty candidate, filed a petition to disqualify Arnado and/or to
cancel his certificate of candidacy for municipal mayor of Kauswagan, Lanao del
Norte in connection with the 10 May 2010 local and national elections.Respondent
Balua contended that Arnado is not a resident of Kauswagan, Lanao del Norte
andthat he is a foreigner, attaching thereto a certification issued by the Bureau of
Immigration dated
23 April 2010 indicating the nationality of Arnado as USA
American. The COMELEC F
irstDivision ruled that the petition for disqualification be granted because he is still
using his US passport after his renunciation of his US citizenship which negates his
Affidavit of Renunciation.Arnado filed a Motion for Reconsideration before the

COMELEC En Banc. Petitioner CasanMacode Maquiling (Maquiling), another
candidate for mayor of Kauswagan, and who garneredthe second highest number of
votes in the 2010 elections, intervened in the case and filed beforethe COMELEC En
Banc a Motion for Rec
onsideration together with an Opposition to Arnados
Amended Motion for Reconsideration.The COMELEC En Banc granted the Motion for
Reconsideration of Arnado on the ground that
the use of a US passport. does not operate to revert back his status as a d
ual citizen prior tohis renunciation as there is no law saying such. More succinctly,
the use of a US passport does
not operate to unrenounce what he has earlier on renounced. Maquiling files a
petition before
the Supreme Court to assail the decision of the COMELEC En Banc.ISSUE: Whether
or not the use of a foreign passport after renouncing foreign citizenship affects
ones qualifications to run for public office.
Maquiling v. COMELEC ( Sereno, April 16, 2013) Facts:
Respondent Arnado is a natural born Filipino citizen.

3
However, as a consequence of his subsequent naturalization as a citizen of the
United States of America, he lost his Filipino citizenship. Arnado applied for
repatriation under Republic Act (R.A.) No. 9225 before the Consulate General of the
Philippines in San Franciso, USA and took the Oath of Allegiance to the Republic of
the Philippines on 10 July 2008.
4
On the same day an Order of Approval of his Citizenship Retention and Reacquisition was issued in his favor.
5

On 3 April 2009 Arnado again took his Oath of Allegiance to the Republic and
executed an Affidavit of Renunciation of his foreign citizenship, which states:
On 30 November 2009, Arnado filed his Certificate of Candidacy for Mayor of

Kauswagan, Lanao del Norte, On 28 April 2010, respondent Linog C. Balua (Balua),
another mayoralty candidate, filed a petition to disqualify Arnado and/or to cancel
his certificate of candidacy for municipal mayor of Kauswagan, Lanao del Norte in
connection with the 10 May 2010 local and national elections.
9
Respondent Balua contended that Arnado is not a resident of Kauswagan, Lanao del
Norte and that he is a foreigner, attaching thereto a certification issued by the
Bureau of Immigration dated 23 April 2010 indicating the nationality of Arnado as
"USA-American."
10
To further bolster his claim of Arnados US citizenship, Balua presented in his
Memorandum a computer-generated travel record
11
dated 03 December 2009 indicating that Arnado has been using his US Passport
No. 057782700 in entering and departing the Philippines.
On 30 April 2010, the COMELEC (First Division) issued an Order

13
requiring the respondent to personally file his answer and memorandum within
three (3) days from receipt thereof.
After Arnado failed to answer the petition, Balua moved to declare him in default
and to present evidence ex-parte.
Neither motion was acted upon, having been overtaken by the 2010 elections
where Arnado garnered the highest number of votes and was subsequently
proclaimed as the winning candidate for Mayor of Kauswagan, Lanao del Norte.
It was only after his proclamation that Arnado filed his verified answer,
THE RULING OF THE COMELEC FIRST DIVISION:
Instead of treating the Petition as an action for the cancellation of a certificate of

candidacy based on misrepresentation,
15
the COMELEC First Division considered it as one for disqualification. The First
Division disagreed with Arnados claim that he is a Filipino citizen.
18
The Court ruled that Arnados act of consistently using his US passport after
renouncing his US citizenship on 03 April 2009 effectively negated his Affidavit of
Renunciation.
Petitioner Casan Macode Maquiling (Maquiling), another candidate for mayor of

Kauswagan, and who garnered the second highest number of votes in the 2010
elections, intervened in the case and filed before the COMELEC En Banc a Motion for
Reconsideration together with an Opposition to Arnados Amended Motion for
Reconsideration. Maquiling argued that while the First Division correctly disqualified
Arnado, the order of succession under Section 44 of the Local Government Code is
not applicable in this case. Consequently, he claimed that the cancellation of
Arnados candidacy and the nullification of his proclamation, Maquiling, as the
legitimate candidate who obtained the highest number of lawful votes, should be
proclaimed as the winner.
RULING OF THE COMELEC EN BANC:
ruled in favor of arnado
Maquiling filed the instant petition questioning the propriety of declaring Arnado
qualified to run for public office despite his continued use of a US passport, There
are three questions posed by the parties before this Court which will be addressed
seriatim as the subsequent questions hinge on the result of the first. Issues: 1.
whether or not intervention is allowed in a disqualification case. 2. whether or not

the use of a foreign passport after renouncing foreign citizenship amounts to
undoing a renunciation earlier made. 3. whether or not the rule on succession in the
Local Government Code is applicable to this case.
SC:
1.
Intervention of a rival candidate in a disqualification case is proper when there has
not yet been any proclamation of the winner.
2.
The use of foreign passport after renouncing ones foreign citizenship is a positive
and voluntary act of representation as to ones nationality and citizenship; it does
not divest Filipino citizenship regained by repatriation but it recants the Oath of
Renunciation required to qualify one to run for an elective position.
Between 03 April 2009, the date he renounced his foreign citizenship, and 30
November 2009, the date he filed his COC, he used his US passport four times,
actions that run counter to the affidavit of renunciation he had earlier executed. By
using his foreign passport, Arnado positively and voluntarily represented himself as
an American,
Arnados category of dual citizenship is that by which foreign citizenship is acquired

through a positive act of applying for naturalization. This is distinct from those
considered dual citizens by virtue of birth, who are not required by law to take the
oath of renunciation as the mere filing of the certificate of candidacy already carries
with it an implied renunciation of foreign citizenship.
39
Dual citizens by naturalization, on the other hand, are required to take not only the
Oath of Allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines but also to personally renounce
foreign citizenship in order to qualify as a candidate for public office.
By the time he filed his certificate of candidacy on 30 November 2009, Arnado was
a dual citizen enjoying the rights and privileges of Filipino and American citizenship.
He was qualified to vote, but by the express disqualification under Section 40(d) of
the Local Government Code,
40
he was not qualified to run for a local electiv

Mercado Vs Manzano

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mercado Vs Manzano

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Mercado Vs Manzano

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DUAL CITIZENSHIP AS GROUND FOR DISQUALIFICATION FROM OFFICE; FILING OF

CERTIFICATE OF CANDIDACY AS EFFECTIVE RENUNCIATION OF AMERICAN

Mercado vs. Manzano, G.R. No. 135083, May 26, 1999

E.Loss and Reacquisition of Philippine Citizenship

CASAN MACODE MAQUILING,Rommel Arnado is a natural born Filipino citizen.

Affidavit of Renunciation.Arnado filed a Motion for Reconsideration before the

Maquiling v. COMELEC ( Sereno, April 16, 2013) Facts:

Respondent Arnado is a natural born Filipino citizen.

On 30 November 2009, Arnado filed his Certificate of Candidacy for Mayor of

On 30 April 2010, the COMELEC (First Division) issued an Order

Instead of treating the Petition as an action for the cancellation of a certificate of

Petitioner Casan Macode Maquiling (Maquiling), another candidate for mayor of

whether or not intervention is allowed in a disqualification case. 2. whether or not

Arnados category of dual citizenship is that by which foreign citizenship is acquired

You might also like