NMR Logging Tool
NMR Logging Tool
NMR Logging Tool
Page 1 of 8
http://www.petrolog.net/webhelp/Logging_Tools/tool_nmr/nmr.html
10/5/2011
nmr
Page 2 of 8
http://www.petrolog.net/webhelp/Logging_Tools/tool_nmr/nmr.html
10/5/2011
nmr
Page 3 of 8
Depth of Investigation
Vertical Resolution
MRIL (Halliburton)
approx. 5ft but dependent upon sampling rate and logging speed
CMR (Schlumberger)
0.5-1.25 inches
approx. 6 inches but dependent upon sampling rate and logging speed
3.3 Specifications
http://www.petrolog.net/webhelp/Logging_Tools/tool_nmr/nmr.html
10/5/2011
nmr
Page 4 of 8
Halliburton MRIL
Schlumberger CMR
Pros
Cons
4.0 CALIBRATION
The NMR tool requires a monthly calibration using a calibration tank. Before and after survey calibration checks are also
required.
5.0 LIMITATIONS AND PRESENTATION
5.1 Limitations
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance tools where initially used to measure bound fluid volumes. The T2 decay times for clay bound fluids is in the
vicinity of 3msec and 10msec for capillary bound fluids. This requires a very small polarisation time. Logging speeds therefore are not
restricted. Free fluids however have a far greater T2 decay time and require a far greater polarisation time. This restricts the logging
speed considerably to less than 10ft/min. Stationary readings are often required over very porous, large porosity zones.
The Halliburton MRIL tool has a larger permanent magnet than Schlumberger's CMR allowing it polarise formation fluids faster. The
larger magnet however is approximately 7 feet in length compared to the CMR at approximately 2feet. The CMR therefore has a superior
vertical resolution. The MRIL is a centred tool and the depth of investigation is reduced as the hole size increases. The CMR is an
eccenterred tool and is not as badly affected by hole size.
5.2 Presentation
http://www.petrolog.net/webhelp/Logging_Tools/tool_nmr/nmr.html
10/5/2011
nmr
Page 5 of 8
http://www.petrolog.net/webhelp/Logging_Tools/tool_nmr/nmr.html
10/5/2011
nmr
Page 6 of 8
7.2 Corrections
No environmental corrections are applied to the NMR tool.
7.3 Interpretation
http://www.petrolog.net/webhelp/Logging_Tools/tool_nmr/nmr.html
10/5/2011
nmr
Page 7 of 8
http://www.petrolog.net/webhelp/Logging_Tools/tool_nmr/nmr.html
10/5/2011
nmr
Page 8 of 8
Hydrocarbon Saturation:
Shc = (Vol. oil and gas)
(MCBW+MBVI+MBVM)
The bottom part of Figure 13 shows how a long wait time TW will increase the volume of oil and gas determined from the NMR.
Also a long TE will move the free water volume to the left.
The correct TW and TE values are clearly critical to distinguishing the different fluids in the formation. Zones of interest should
have multiple passes to confidently establish what values should be used.
Caution: The volume of hydrocarbon using the above mentioned method is highly dependant on the residual hydrocarbon.
Since the tool measures in the invaded zone, this method is less effective where Swirr is high and hydrocarbons have been
flushed out.
8.0 ADDITIONAL READING
General Literature:
Formation evaluation chart books.
Open hole Log Analysis texts.
Formation Evaluation texts.
http://www.petrolog.net/webhelp/Logging_Tools/tool_nmr/nmr.html
10/5/2011