WET OperatorEssentials - Trickling Filters - Aug - 13
WET OperatorEssentials - Trickling Filters - Aug - 13
WET OperatorEssentials - Trickling Filters - Aug - 13
Principle
Practical considerations
History
System
components
Media types
Advantages
Disadvantages
Rock
Vertical flow
Cross flow
Longest-lasting
Least likely to
plug
Redistributes
wastewater
Use of local
materials possible
Best ventilation
Higher hydraulic
retention time
Poor ventilation
Higher in cost
High flushing
rate necessary to
minimize nuisance
organisms
Redistributes
wastewater
only at module
interface
Increase in
density may result
in reduced oxygen
transfer and
increased biofilm
thickness
68
Knowledge
Principle
Practical considerations
How it works
Rotational
speed/flushing
intensity
Filter type
Organic loading
(lb BOD per
1000 ft3 per day)
Percent soluble
CBOD/ammonia
nitrogen removal
Media
suitability
Roughing filters
100220
50% to 75%
Vertical flow,
mixed flow
Carbon oxidizing
filters
2060
Up to 90%
Vertical flow,
cross flow
Combined BOD
and nitrification
filters
520
Cross flow,
standard
or medium
density
Nitrification filters
< 20 mg/L or
filter will fail
< 3 mg/L
ammonia
Cross flow,
medium or
high density
l WE&T
69
Knowledge Principle
Practical considerations
Macro fauna
Many problems associated with macro fauna can be controlled by increasing flushing
intensity. Snail-control mechanisms include filter flooding either alone or with the
addition of sodium hydroxide to raise pH or maintaining high concentrations of
ammonia, which is toxic to snails.
Some facilities have developed snail traps to contain and remove snails from trickling filter
effluent lines and aeration tanks.
Recirculation provides the ability to maintain a consistent flow to the trickling filter during
diurnal flow variations, provides for consistent rotation speeds for hydraulically driven
distributor arms, and maintains proper wetting rates.
Low wetting rates can result in nonuniform application of wastewater and unwetted areas
that can attract snails and filter flies. Biofilm that is not wetted continuously and supplied
with food from the wastewater becomes ineffective. The typical suggested hydraulic
wetting rate range for BOD removal systems is 30 to 40 L/minm2 (0.75 to 1.0 gal/
minft2). For nitrification systems, the range is 30 to 80 L/minm2 (0.75 to 2.0 gal/minft2).
For speed-controlled distributors, the introduction of regular flushing of the trickling filter
and improved wetting through high instantaneous dosing rates make past criteria for
hydraulic wetting and recirculation of secondary or little concern. Operators should track
the past criteria but may find better operation by establishing a good dosing program.
Greg Farmer is a process specialist at the Littleton/Englewood (Colo.) Wastewater Treatment Plant.
InfIlco
Infilco Degremont, Inc. 8007 Discovery Drive, Richmond, Virginia 23229 (800) 446-1150
www.degremont-technologies.com
HeaDworkS | BiologiCal | SeParaTionS | MeMBraneS | oxiDaTion DiSinfeCTion | Biosolids | inDUSTrial SySTeMS
70