Revenue Regulations No. 12-99: September 6, 1999

(1)
September 6, 1999
REVENUE REGULATIONS NO. 12-99

SUBJECT :
Implementing the Provisions of the National Internal Revenue

Code of 1997 Governing the Rules on Assessment of National
Internal Revenue Taxes, Civil Penalties and Interest and the
Extra-judicial Settlement of a Taxpayer's Criminal Violation
of the Code Through Payment of a Suggested Compromise
Penalty
TO
All Internal Revenue Officers and Others Concerned
SECTION 1.
Scope. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 244
, in
relation to Section 245
of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, these
Regulations are hereby promulgated to implement the provisions of Sections 6
,7
, 204
, 228
, 247
, 248
and 249
on assessment of national
internal revenue taxes, fees and charges and to provide the rules governing the
extra-judicial settlement of a taxpayer's criminal violation of the said Code or any of
its implementing Regulations through payment of a suggested compromise penalty.
SECTION 2.
Copyright 2014
General Principles.
2.1
The surcharge and/or interest herein prescribed shall apply to all

taxes, fees and charges imposed under the Code which shall be
collected at the same time, in the same manner, and as part of the
tax. cdasia
2.2
In case the tax due from the taxpayer is paid on a partial or

installment basis, the interest on the deficiency tax or on the
delinquency tax liability of the taxpayer shall be imposed from due
date of the tax until full payment thereof. The interest shall be
computed based on the diminishing balance of the tax, inclusive of
interests.
CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.
Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014
SECTION 3.
Tax Assessment.
Due Process Requirement in the Issuance of a Deficiency
3.1 Mode of procedures in the issuance of a deficiency tax assessment:

3.1.1
Notice for informal conference. The Revenue Officer who
audited the taxpayer's records shall, among others, state in his report whether or not
the taxpayer agrees with his findings that the taxpayer is liable for deficiency tax or
taxes. If the taxpayer is not amenable, based on the said Officer's submitted report of
investigation, the taxpayer shall be informed, in writing, by the Revenue District
Office or by the Special Investigation Division, as the case may be (in the case
Revenue Regional Offices) or by the Chief of Division concerned (in the case of the
BIR National Office) of the discrepancy or discrepancies in the taxpayer's payment of
his internal revenue taxes, for the purpose of "Informal Conference," in order to
afford the taxpayer with an opportunity to present his side of the case. If the taxpayer
fails to respond within fifteen (15) days from date of receipt of the notice for informal
conference, he shall be considered in default, in which case, the Revenue District
Officer or the Chief of the Special Investigation Division of the Revenue Regional
Office, or the Chief of Division in the National Office, as the case may be, shall
endorse the case with the least possible delay to the Assessment Division of the
Revenue Regional Office or to the Commissioner or his duly authorized
representative, as the case may be, for appropriate review and issuance of a deficiency
tax assessment, if warranted.
3.1.2
Preliminary Assessment Notice (PAN). If after review and
evaluation by the Assessment Division or by the Commissioner or his duly authorized
representative, as the case may be, it is determined that there exists sufficient basis to
assess the taxpayer for any deficiency tax or taxes, the said Office shall issue to the
taxpayer, at least by registered mail, a Preliminary Assessment Notice (PAN) for the
proposed assessment, showing in detail, the facts and the law, rules and regulations,
or jurisprudence on which the proposed assessment is based (see illustration in
ANNEX A hereof). If the taxpayer fails to respond within fifteen (15) days from date
of receipt of the PAN, he shall be considered in default, in which case, a formal letter
of demand and assessment notice shall be caused to be issued by the said Office,
calling for payment of the taxpayer's deficiency tax liability, inclusive of the
applicable penalties. LibLex
3.1.3
Exceptions to Prior Notice of the Assessment. The notice for
informal conference and the preliminary assessment notice shall not be required in
Copyright 2014
any of the following cases, in which case, issuance of the formal assessment notice
for the payment of the taxpayer's deficiency tax liability shall be sufficient:
(i)
When the finding for any deficiency tax is the result of

mathematical error in the computation of the tax appearing on the
face of the tax return filed by the taxpayer; or
(ii)
When a discrepancy has been determined between the tax withheld

and the amount actually remitted by the withholding agent; or
(iii)
When a taxpayer who opted to claim a refund or tax credit of

excess creditable withholding tax for a taxable period was
determined to have carried over and automatically applied the
same amount claimed against the estimated tax liabilities for the
taxable quarter or quarters of the succeeding taxable year; or
(iv)
When the excise tax due on excisable articles has not been paid; or
(v)
When an article locally purchased or imported by an exempt

person, such as, but not limited to, vehicles, capital equipment,
machineries and spare parts, has been sold, traded or transferred to
non-exempt persons.
3.1.4
Formal Letter of Demand and Assessment Notice. The formal
letter of demand and assessment notice shall be issued by the Commissioner or his
duly authorized representative. The letter of demand calling for payment of the
taxpayer's deficiency tax or taxes shall state the facts, the law, rules and regulations,
or jurisprudence on which the assessment is based, otherwise, the formal letter of
demand and assessment notice shall be void (see illustration in ANNEX B hereof).
The same shall be sent to the taxpayer only by registered mail or by personal delivery.
If sent by personal delivery, the taxpayer or his duly authorized representative shall
acknowledge receipt thereof in the duplicate copy of the letter of demand, showing
the following: (a) His name; (b) signature; (c) designation and authority to act for and
in behalf of the taxpayer, if acknowledged received by a person other than the
taxpayer himself; and (d) date of receipt thereof.
3.1.5
Disputed Assessment. The taxpayer or his duly authorized
representative may protest administratively against the aforesaid formal letter of
demand and assessment notice within thirty (30) days from date of receipt thereof. If
there are several issues involved in the formal letter of demand and assessment notice
but the taxpayer only disputes or protests against the validity of some of the issues
Copyright 2014
raised, the taxpayer shall be required to pay the deficiency tax or taxes attributable to
the undisputed issues, in which case, a collection letter shall be issued to the taxpayer
calling for payment of the said deficiency tax, inclusive of the applicable surcharge
and/or interest. No action shall be taken on the taxpayer's disputed issues until the
taxpayer has paid the deficiency tax or taxes attributable to the said undisputed issues.
The prescriptive period for assessment or collection of the tax or taxes attributable to
the disputed issues shall be suspended. llcd
The taxpayer shall state the facts, the applicable law, rules and regulations, or
jurisprudence on which his protest is based, otherwise, his protest shall be considered
void and without force and effect. If there are several issues involved in the disputed
assessment and the taxpayer fails to state the facts, the applicable law, rules and
regulations, or jurisprudence in support of his protest against some of the several
issues on which the assessment is based, the same shall be considered undisputed
issue or issues, in which case, the taxpayer shall be required to pay the corresponding
deficiency tax or taxes attributable thereto.
The taxpayer shall submit the required documents in support of his protest
within sixty (60) days from date of filing of his letter of protest, otherwise, the
assessment shall become final, executory and demandable. The phrase "submit the
required documents" includes submission or presentation of the pertinent documents
for scrutiny and evaluation by the Revenue Officer conducting the audit. The said
Revenue Officer shall state this fact in his report of investigation.
If the taxpayer fails to file a valid protest against the formal letter of demand
and assessment notice within thirty (30) days from date of receipt thereof, the
assessment shall become final, executory and demandable.
If the protest is denied, in whole or in part, by the Commissioner, the taxpayer
may appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals within thirty (30) days from date of receipt of
the said decision, otherwise, the assessment shall become final, executory and
demandable.
In general, if the protest is denied, in whole or in part, by the Commissioner or
his duly authorized representative, the taxpayer may appeal to the Court of Tax
Appeals within thirty (30) days from date of receipt of the said decision, otherwise,
the assessment shall become final, executory and demandable: Provided, however,
that if the taxpayer elevates his protest to the Commissioner within thirty (30) days
from date of receipt of the final decision of the Commissioner's duly authorized
representative, the latter's decision shall not be considered final, executory and
Copyright 2014
demandable, in which case, the protest shall be decided by the Commissioner.

If the Commissioner or his duly authorized representative fails to act on the
taxpayer's protest within one hundred eighty (180) days from date of submission, by
the taxpayer, of the required documents in support of his protest, the taxpayer may
appeal to the Court of Tax Appeals within thirty (30) days from the lapse of the said
180-day period, otherwise, the assessment shall become final, executory and
demandable.
3.1.6
Administrative Decision on a Disputed Assessment. The
decision of the Commissioner or his duly authorized representative shall (a) state the
facts, the applicable law, rules and regulations, or jurisprudence on which such
decision is based, otherwise, the decision shall be void (see illustration in ANNEX C
hereof), in which case, the same shall not be considered a decision on a disputed
assessment; and (b) that the same is his final decision.
3.1.7
Constructive Service. If the notice to the taxpayer herein
required is served by registered mail, and no response is received from the taxpayer
within the prescribed period from date of the posting thereof in the mail, the same
shall be considered actually or constructively received by the taxpayer. If the same is
personally served on the taxpayer or his duly authorized representative who, however,
refused to acknowledge receipt thereof, the same shall be constructively served on the
taxpayer. Constructive service thereof shall be considered effected by leaving the
same in the premises of the taxpayer and this fact of constructive service is attested to,
witnessed and signed by at least two (2) revenue officers other than the revenue
officer who constructively served the same. The revenue officer who constructively
served the same shall make a written report of this matter which shall form part of the
docket of this case (see illustration in ANNEX D hereof).
SECTION 4.
Civil Penalties.
4.1 Twenty-Five Percent (25%) Surcharge. There shall be imposed, in

addition to the basic tax required to be paid, a penalty equivalent to twenty-five
percent (25%) thereof, in any the following cases:
4.1.1 Failure to file any return and pay the tax due thereon as required
under the provisions of this Code or rules and regulations on the
date prescribed; or
4.1.2 Unless otherwise authorized by the Commissioner, filing a return
with an internal revenue officer other than those with whom the
Copyright 2014
return is required to be filed; or

4.1.3 Failure to pay the deficiency tax within the time prescribed for its
payment in the notice of assessment; or
4.1.4 Failure to pay the full or part of the amount of tax shown on any
return required to be filed under the provisions of this Code or
rules and regulations, or the full amount of tax due for which no
return is required to be filed, on or before the date prescribed for
its payment.
4.2 Fifty Percent (50%) Surcharge:
4.2.1 In case of willful neglect to file the return within the period
prescribed by the Code, or in case a false or fraudulent return is
willfully made, the penalty to be imposed shall be fifty percent
(50%) of the tax or of the deficiency tax, in case any payment has
been made on the basis of such return before the discovery of the
falsity or fraud: Provided, That a substantial underdeclaration of
taxable sales, receipts or income, or a substantial overstatement of
deductions, as determined by the Commissioner or his duly
authorized representative, shall constitute prima facie evidence of
a false or fraudulent return: Provided, further, That failure to
report sales, receipts or income in an amount exceeding thirty
percent (30%) of that declared per return, and a claim of
deductions in an amount exceeding thirty percent (30%) of actual
deductions, shall render the taxpayer liable for substantial
underdeclaration of sales, receipts or income or for overstatement
of deductions, as mentioned herein: Provided, further, that the term
"willful neglect to file the return within the period prescribed by
the Code" shall not apply in case the taxpayer, without notice from
the Commissioner or his authorized representative, voluntarily
files the said return, in which case, only 25% surcharge shall be
imposed for late filing and late payment of the tax in lieu of the
above 50% surcharge. Conversely, the 50% surcharge shall be
imposed in case the taxpayer files the return only after prior notice
in writing from the Commissioner or his duly authorized
representative.
4.2.2 Section 6 (A) of the Code provides that any tax return filed by a
Copyright 2014
taxpayer "may be modified, changed or amended" by the taxpayer

"within three (3) years from date of such filing" provided,
however, that "no notice for audit or investigation of such return,
statement or declaration has, in the meantime, been actually
served upon the taxpayer." Thus, if upon investigation, it is
determined that the taxpayer's originally filed tax return is false or
fraudulent, such taxpayer shall remain liable to the 50% civil
penalty regardless that the taxpayer has filed his amended tax
return, if the said amended tax return, however, has been filed only
after issuance of the Letter of Authority for the investigation of the
taxpayer's tax return or such amendment has been made in the
course of the said investigation.
cda
SECTION 5.
Mode of Procedures in Computing for the Tax and/or
Applicable Surcharge. Shown hereunder are illustrative cases for the computation
and assessment of the tax, inclusive of surcharge (if applicable) and interest:
5.1 Late filing and late payment of the tax. Illustration: Income tax
return for the calendar year 1998 was due for filing on April 15, 1999 but the
taxpayer voluntarily filed his tax return, without notice from the BIR, only on
June 30, 1999. The tax due per return amounts to P100,000. In this case, the
taxpayer shall be liable for delinquency penalties consisting of 25% surcharge,
plus 20% interest per annum, computed from due date of the tax until date of
payment, computed as follows:
Calendar Year 1998
Income tax due per return
Add: 25% surcharge for late filing and late
payment (P100,000.00 times 25%)
20% int. p.a. from 4-15-99 to 6-30-99
(P100,000.00 times .0415524)
P100,000.00
P25,000.00
P4,155.24
Total amount due (excluding suggested compromise for

late filing and late payment of the tax)
P29,155.24
P129,155.24
=========
Only one 25% surcharge shall be imposed for late filing of the return and late
payment of the tax.
Copyright 2014
5.2 The tax return is filed on time but filed through an internal revenue
officer other than with whom the return is required to be filed. Illustration:
The taxpayer's 1998 income tax return is required to be filed through the
authorized agent bank under the jurisdiction of RDO East Makati. But, without
prior authorization from the BIR, the taxpayer filed his tax return and paid the
tax through the authorized agent bank under the jurisdiction of RDO Davao
City. Tax due and paid per return is P100,000.00.
Calendar Year 1998
Add: 25% surcharge
P100,000.00
P25,000.00
P125,000.00
P100,000.00
Total amount due

Less: Amount paid
Amount still due
P25,000.00
=========
5.3 Late filing and late payment due to taxpayer's willful neglect.
Illustration: The taxpayer did not file his income tax return for the calendar
year 1997 which was due for filing on April 15, 1998. He was notified by the
BIR of his failure to file the tax return, for which reason, he filed his tax return
and paid the tax, only after the said notice, on June 30, 1999. The tax due per
return is P100,000.00.
Calendar Year 1997
Add: 50% surcharge for willful neglect to
file the return and late payment of the tax
(P100,000 times 50%)
P50,000.00
20% int. p.a. fr. 4-15-98 to 6-30-99
(P100,000.00 times .2415524)
P24,155.24
Total amount due (excluding suggested compromise

for late filing and late payment of the tax)
Copyright 2014
P100,000.00
P74,155.24
P174,155.24
=========
5.4 Penalty or penalties for deficiency tax. As a rule, no surcharge

is imposed on deficiency tax and on the basic tax. However, if the amount due
inclusive of penalties is not paid on or before the due date stated on the
demand letter, the corresponding surcharge shall be imposed.
Illustration No. 1: Taxpayer filed on time his income tax return for
calendar year 1997 and paid P100,000.00 on April 15, 1998. Upon pre-audit of
his return, it was disclosed that he erroneously computed the tax due. The
correct amount of tax due is P120,000.00. The taxpayer is assessed for
deficiency income tax in a letter of demand and assessment notice issued on
June 30, 1999.
Calendar Year 1997
Tax due per pre-audit
Less: Amount assessed and paid per tax return filed
Deficiency income tax
Add: 20% int. p.a. from 4-15-98 to 6-30-99
(P20,000.00 times .2415524)
Amount still due
P120,000.00
P100,000.00
P20,000.00
P4,831.05
P24,831.05
=========
Illustration No. 2: ABC CORPORATION filed its income tax return for
calendar year 1997 and paid on time its income tax shown thereunder,
amounting to P100,000. Said taxpayer was investigated. Upon verification of
its accounting records, it was disclosed that its deduction, from gross income,
of representation expenses in the amount of P200,000.00 did not meet all the
statutory requisites for deductibility. The corporation was duly notified of the
said discrepancy through a Preliminary Assessment Notice. Based on the 35%
income tax rate on corporations applicable in the year 1997, the income tax
due after investigation amounts to P170,000.00. After deduction of income tax
paid per return filed, the basic deficiency income tax amounts to P70,000,
excluding penalties. Failing to protest on time against the preliminary
assessment notice, a formal letter of demand and assessment notice was issued
on May 31, 1999, requiring payment of the assessment not later than June 30,
1999.
Copyright 2014
Calendar Year 1997

Income tax due per investigation
Less: Income tax paid per return
P170,000.00
P100,000.00

P70,000.00
Add: 20% int. p.a. fr. 4-15-98 to 6-30-99 (P70,000 times .2415524) P16,908.67
Total amount still due

P86,908.67
=========
Illustration No. 3: XYZ CORPORATION filed its income tax return for
calendar year 1997 with a net taxable income of P500,000.00. At the
applicable income tax rate of 35% for the year 1997, its income tax amounted
to P175,000.00. However, upon investigation, it was disclosed that its income
tax return was false or fraudulent because it did not report a taxable income
amounting to another P500,000.00. On its net income of P1,000,000.00, per
investigation, the income tax due is P350,000.00. Deducting its payment per
return filed, the deficiency, excluding penalties, amounted to P175,000.00. It
was duly informed of this finding through a Preliminary Assessment Notice.
Failing to protest on time against the preliminary assessment notice, a formal
letter of demand and assessment notice was issued on May 31, 1999 calling for
payment of the deficiency income tax on or before June 30, 1999.
In this case, said corporation is liable for the civil penalties of 50%
surcharge for having filed a false or fraudulent return, plus 20% interest per
annum on the deficiency, computed as follows:
Calendar Year 1997
Income tax due per investigation
Add: 50% surcharge for filing a fraudulent or false
return (P175,000.00 times 50%)
P87,500.00
20% int. p.a. fr. 4-15-98 to 6-30-99
(P175,000.00 times .2415524)
P42,271.67
Total amount due

Copyright 2014
P350,000.00
P175,000.00
P175,000.00
P129,771.67
P304,771.67
10
=========
5.5 Late payment of a deficiency tax assessed. In general, the

deficiency tax assessed shall be paid by the taxpayer within the time prescribed
in the notice and demand, otherwise, such taxpayer shall be liable for the civil
penalties incident to late payment.
Illustration: Based on the above Illustration No. 3, Scenario 4, assuming
that the calendar year 1997 deficiency income tax assessment against XYZ
CORPORATION, in the amount of P304,771.67, is not paid by June 30, 1999,
the deadline for payment of the assessment, and assuming further that this
assessment has already become final and collectible. In this case, such
corporation shall be considered late in payment of the said assessment.
Assuming, further, that the corporation pays its tax assessment only by July 31,
1999, the civil penalties for late payment shall be computed as follows:
Calendar Year 1997
Total deficiency income tax assessed on May 31, 1999
Add: 25% surcharge for late payment
(P304,771.67 times 25%)
P76,192.92
20% interest p.a. from 7-1-99 to
7-31-99 (P304,771.67
times .0166667)
P5,079.54
Total amount due (excluding suggested compromise

penalty for late payment)
P304,771.67
P81,272.46
P386,044.13
=========
5.6 Computation of 20% interest per annum in case of partial or

installment payment of a tax liability. Illustration No. 1: In case extended
payment of the tax is duly authorized. DEF CORPORATION, due to
financial incapacity, requested that it be allowed to pay its income tax liability
per return for calendar year 1998, in the amount of P1,000,000.00, in four (4)
monthly installments, starting April 15, 1999. Its request has been duly
approved pursuant to Sec. 53 of the Tax Code.
In this case, no 25% surcharge shall be imposed for late payment of the
tax since its deadline for payment has been duly extended. However, 20%
interest per annum for the extended payment shall be imposed, computed
Copyright 2014
11
based on the diminishing balance of the "unpaid amount", pursuant to the

provisions of Section 249 (D) of the Code.
No 25% surcharge on extended payment shall be imposed provided,
however, that the taxpayer's request for extension of the period within which to
pay is made on or before the deadline prescribed for payment of the tax due.
Conversely, if such request is made after the deadline prescribed for payment,
the taxpayer shall already be treated late in payment, in which case, the 25%
surcharge shall be imposed, even if payment of the delinquency be allowed in
partial amortization.
Example:
Calendar Year 1998
Less: 1st installment of the tax on or before 4-15-99
Balance as of 4-15-99
Add: 20% int. p.a. from 4-15-99 to 5-15-99
(P750,000.00 times .0166667)
Amount due on 5-15-99
Less: 2nd installment on 5-15-99 (P250,000.00 plus
P12,500.03 interest)
Add: 20% int. p.a. from 5-15-99 to 6-15-99
(P500,000.00 times .0166667)
Amount due on 6-15-99
Less: 3rd installment on 6-15-99 (P250,000.00 plus
P8,333.35 interest)
Add: 20% int. p.a. from 6-15-99 to 7-15-99
(P250,000.00 times .0166667)
4th and final installment on 7-15-99
Copyright 2014
P1,000,000.00
P250,000.00
P750,000.00
P12,500.03
P762,500.03
P262,500.03
P500,000.00
P8,333.35
P508,333.35
P258,333.35
P250,000.00
P4,166.68
P254,166.68
===========
12
Illustration No. 2: Computation of tax delinquency in case of partial

payment of the tax due without prior BIR authorization for extended payment.
Example: GHI CORPORATION did not file its final adjustment income
tax return for the calendar year 1998 which was due on April 15, 1999. The
BIR informed the corporation of its failure to file its said tax return and
required that it file the same, inclusive of the 25% surcharge and 20% interest
per annum penalties incident to the said omission. On May 15, 1999 it advised
that its income tax due for the said year amounts to P1,000,000.00 but,
however, due to its adverse financial condition at the moment, it will be unable
to pay the entire amount, inclusive of the delinquency penalties. Hence, on
May 15, 1999, it made a partial payment of P400,000.00. Assuming that the
BIR demanded payment of the unpaid balance of its tax obligation payable by
June 15, 1999, the unpaid balance of the corporation's delinquent income tax
shall be computed as follows:
Calendar Year 1998
Add: 25% surcharge for late filing and
late payment
20% interest per annum from 4-15-99
to 5-15-99 (P1,000,000.00
times .0166667)
P1,000,000.00
P250,000.00
P16,666.70
Amount due as of 5-15-99

Less: Partial payment on 5-15-99
Add: 20% interest per annum from 5-15-99
to 6-15-99 (P866,666.70 times .0166667)
Amount still due (exclusive of the suggested compromise
penalty for late filing and late payment
P266,666.70
P1,266,666.70
P400,000.00
P866,666.70
P14,444.47
P811,111.17
=========
If the said taxpayer fails to pay the amount of P811,111.17 by June 15,
1999, no further 25% surcharge for late payment of the tax shall be imposed.
Instead, only the 20% interest per annum shall be imposed against the taxpayer
Copyright 2014
13
against the taxpayer, computed from due date thereof (i.e., June 15, 1999) until
paid. If said taxpayer pays the same on partial payment basis, the 20% interest
per annum shall be computed on the diminishing balance thereof, pursuant to
the procedures in the preceding Illustration No. 1, Section 6.6 hereof.
SECTION 6.
Suggested Compromise Penalty in Extra-judicial Settlement
of a Taxpayer's Criminal Violation. Section 204 of the Tax Code of 1997 provides
that "All criminal violations may be compromised except: (a) those already filed in
court, or (b) those involving fraud." This means that, in general, the taxpayer's
criminal liability arising from his violation of the pertinent provision of the Code may
be settled extra-judicially instead of the BIR instituting against the taxpayer a criminal
action in Court. A compromise in extra-judicial settlement of the taxpayer's criminal
liability for his violation is consensual in character, hence, may not be imposed on the
taxpayer without his consent. Hence, the BIR may only suggest settlement of the
taxpayer's liability through a compromise.
The extra-judicial settlement of the taxpayer's criminal liability and the amount
of the suggested compromise penalty shall conform with the schedule of compromise
penalties provided under Revenue Memorandum Order No. 1-90 or as hereafter
revised.
SECTION 7.
Repealing Clause. Any revenue issuance which is
inconsistent herewith shall be considered repealed, amended, or modified
accordingly.
SECTION 8.
Copyright 2014
Effectivity.
8.1
General Rule. In general, the provisions of these Regulations

shall be effective beginning January 1, 1998 pursuant to the
provisions of Section 8 of R.A. No. 8424, otherwise known as the
National Internal Revenue Code of 1997.
8.2
Computation of Surcharge and Interest on Deficiency Tax

Assessment. Any deficiency tax assessment issued beginning
January 1, 1998 shall be governed by the rules prescribed in these
Regulations. cda
8.3
Other Provisions. Any provision of these Regulations not

otherwise specifically provided in the National Internal Revenue
Code of 1997 shall take effect fifteen (15) days after publication in
14
any newspaper of general circulation.
(SGD.) EDGARDO B. ESPIRITU

Secretary of Finance
Recommending Approval:
(SGD.) BEETHOVEN L. RUALO
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
ANNEX A
Preliminary Assessment Notice
ABC Corporation
123 Makati Avenue
Makati City
TIN: 000-000-000-000
Gentlemen :
Please be informed that after investigation there has been found due from you
deficiency income tax for calendar year 1997, as shown hereunder:
Assessment No. _______
Taxable income per return
Add: Discrepancies per investigation
1. Undeclared rental income
2. Non-deductible interest expenses
3. Undocumented representation expenses
4. Non-deductible bad debt expense
P1,000,000.00
P200,000.00
300,000.00
150,000.00
250,000.00
Taxable income per investigation
P1,900,000.00
P665,000.00
350,000.00
Income tax due thereon (35%)

Copyright 2014
900,000.00
15
Balance
Add: 50% surcharge for filing of fraudulent return
20% interest per annum from 4-15-96 to 3-15-98
P315,000.00
P157,500.00
63,000.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
220,500.00*
P535,500.00*
*Please note that the interest and the total amount due will have to be adjusted if paid beyond 3-15-98
The complete details covering the aforementioned discrepancies established during

the investigation of this case are shown in the accompanying ANNEX A-1 of this letter of
demand. cdasia
The 50% surcharge has been imposed pursuant to the provisions of Section 248(B) of
the National Internal Revenue Code, as amended by R.A. No. 8424, which took effect on
January 1, 1998, in view of your failure to report for income tax purposes your
aforementioned rental income. Such omission renders your income tax return filed for the
taxable calendar year 1997 as a false or fraudulent return.
The 20% interest per annum has been imposed pursuant to the provisions of Section
249(B) of the said Code.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 228 of the National Internal Revenue Code of
1997 and its implementing Revenue Regulations, you are hereby given the opportunity to
present in writing your side of the case within fifteen (15) days from receipt hereof. If we fail
to hear from you within the said period, you shall be considered in default, in which case, a
formal letter of demand and assessment notice shall be issued by this Office calling for
payment of your aforesaid deficiency income tax, inclusive of the aforementioned civil
penalty and interest.
We hope that you will give this matter your preferential attention.
Very truly yours,
ANNEX A-1
ABC CORPORATION
123 Makati Avenue
Makati City
TIN: 000-000-000-000
DETAILS OF DISCREPANCIES
Copyright 2014
16
Assessment No. ________

1. Undeclared rental income (P200,000.00). Verification disclosed that you
derived this rental income from the lease of your building to XYZ CORPORATION during
the tax year 1997 but the same, without any legal justification, was neither recorded in your
books of accounts nor declared in your income tax return, thereby resulting to the
understatement of your reported taxable income for the said tax year.
2. Non-deductible interest expense (P300,000.00). Verification disclosed that
this interest expense, claimed as deduction from your gross income for the tax year 1997,
was actually incurred in connection with your loan from Mr. JUAN CASTRO. It was,
however, further disclosed that Mr. Castro owns and controls 60% of your outstanding
capital stock. Hence, this interest expense is not a valid deduction from your gross income,
pursuant to Section 34(B)(2), in relation to Section 36(B)(2) of the National Internal
Revenue Code which provides that no deduction shall be allowed in respect of interest
expense incurred between an individual and a corporation more than fifty percent (50%) in
value of the outstanding stock of which is owned, directly or indirectly, by or for such
individual. LexLib
3. Undocumented representation expenses (P50,000.00). Verification disclosed
that this item of deduction from your gross income for the tax year 1997 is in fact
unsubstantiated with any documentary evidence, hence, disallowed in audit.
4. Non-deductible bad debt expense (P250,000.00). Verification disclosed that
this item of deduction from your gross income for the tax year 1997 was, in fact, a mere
provision for estimated uncollectible accounts from your customers as of the end of the said
year. Under Section 34(E) of the said Code, a mere provision for estimated uncollectible
accounts is not allowable deduction from gross income. In general, for bad debts to be
deductible, the following statutory requisites must have been complied with:
4.1 That, the debts due from your debtor or debtors must have been
ascertained actually worthless as of the end of the taxable year; and
4.2 That, the same have been actually charged or written-off in your
books of accounts as of the end of the said taxable year.
4.3 That, the said accounts receivable have actually been charged off
or written-off the books of accounts as of the end of the taxable year.
The records of this case disclosed that you have not introduced any evidence to
overthrow the validity of our said findings.
It is requested that your aforesaid deficiency income tax liability be paid immediately
Copyright 2014
17
upon receipt hereof, inclusive of penalties incident to delinquency. This is our final decision.
If you disagree, you may appeal this final decision with the Court of Tax Appeals within
thirty (30) days from date of receipt hereof, otherwise our said deficiency income tax
Very truly yours,
ANNEX B
FORMAL LETTER OF DEMAND
ABC Corporation
123 Makati Avenue
Makati City
TIN: 000-000-000-000
Gentlemen :
Please be informed that after investigation there has been found due from you
deficiency income tax for calendar year 1997, as shown hereunder:
Assessment No. _______
Taxable income per return
Add: Discrepancies per investigation
1. Undeclared rental income
2. Non-deductible interest expenses
3. Undocumented representation expenses
4. Non-deductible bad debt expense
P1,000,000.00
P200,000.00
300,000.00
150,000.00
250,000.00
Taxable income per investigation
P1,900,000.00
P665,000.00
350,000.00
P315,000.00
Income tax due thereon (35%)

Balance
Add: 50% surcharge for filing of fraudulent return
20% interest per annum from 4-15-96 to 3-15-98
P157,500.00
63,000.00
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE

Copyright 2014
900,000.00
220,500.00*
P535,500.00*
18
*Please note that the interest and the total amount due will have to be adjusted if paid beyond 3-15-98
The complete details covering the aforementioned discrepancies established during

the investigation of this case are shown in the accompanying SCHEDULE 1 of this letter of
demand.
The 50% surcharge has been imposed pursuant to the provisions of Section 248(B) of
the National Internal Revenue Code, as amended by R.A. No. 8424, which took effect on
January 1, 1998, in view of your failure to report for income tax purposes your
aforementioned rental income. Such omission renders your income tax return filed for the
taxable calendar year 1997 as a false or fraudulent return. cdll
The 20% interest per annum has been imposed pursuant to the provisions of Section
249(B) of the said Code.
In view thereof, you are requested to pay your aforesaid deficiency income tax
liability through the duly authorized agent bank in which you are enrolled within the time
shown in the enclosed assessment notice.
Very truly yours,
ANNEX C
ABC Corporation
123 Makati Avenue
Makati City
TIN: 000-000-000-000
FINAL DECISION ON DISPUTED ASSESSMENT
Gentlemen :
Referring to your letter dated May 15, 1999, please be informed that your protest
against our calendar year 1997 deficiency income tax assessment in the amount of
P535,500.00, the subject matter of our covering letter of demand dated March 15, 1999, is
hereby denied for lack of factual and legal basis. The aforesaid assessment is premised on the
following:
1.
Copyright 2014
Undeclared rental income (P200,000.00). Verification disclosed that

you derived income from the lease of your building to XYZ Corporation
during the year 1997 but this was not recorded in your books of accounts
19
and also not reported in your income tax return.

2.
Non-deductible interest expense deduction (P300,000.00).

Verification disclosed that this interest expenses was incurred in
connection with your loan from MR. JUAN CASTRO. It was also
disclosed that Mr. Castro owns 60% of the outstanding stock of ABC
Corporation. Hence the said interest expense is non-deductible in
computing ABC Corporation's taxable income pursuant to Section
34(B)(2)(a), in relation to Section 36(B)(2) of the NIRC, that interest
paid on a loan transaction between an individual and a corporation more
than fifty percent (50%) in value of the outstanding stock of which is
owned, directly or indirectly, by or for such individual shall be
deductible from gross income for income tax purposes. cdasia
3.
Undocumented representation expenses (P150,000.00). Verification

disclosed that the veracity of this item of deduction has not been
established, hence, disallowed as a deduction from gross income.
4.
Non-deductible bad debt expense (P250,000.00). Verification

disclosed that this was a mere provision for estimated collectible
accounts as of the end of the year 1997. Under Section 34(E), NIRC, a
mere provision for estimated uncollectible accounts is not deductible
from gross income. To be deductible, two requisites must be met:
4.1
That, the debts due from your debtor/s (accounts receivable)

have been ascertained actually worthless as of the end of the
taxable year; and
4.2
That, the said accounts receivable have actually been charged off
or written-off the books of accounts as of the end of the taxable
year.
The records of this case disclosed that you have not introduced any evidence to
overthrow the validity of our said findings. dctai
It is requested that your aforesaid deficiency income tax liability be paid immediately
upon receipt hereof, inclusive of penalties incident to delinquency. This is our final decision.
If you disagree, you may appeal this final decision with the Court of Tax Appeals within
thirty (30) days from date of receipt hereof, otherwise our said deficiency income tax
Very truly yours,
Copyright 2014
20
ANNEX D
CONSTRUCTIVE SERVICE OF NOTICE/S
MEMORANDUM FOR:
The Commissioner/Regional Director
Thru Channel
SUBJECT
:
Name of Taxpayer:
Address:
T.I.N.:
Kind of Taxes:
Amount:
__________________
__________________
__________________
__________________
P_________________
This is to report that I/We personally served on the subject taxpayer at the above
given address on ______________, 1999, the formal letter of demand and assessment notice,
dated _______________, 1999, calling for payment of his/its above stated tax liability.
However, the taxpayer refused to acknowledge receipt thereof. I/We also tried to serve the
same on ___________________________________, the taxpayer's duly authorized
representative, but the latter likewise refused to acknowledge receipt thereof.
Due to the foregoing, the said formal letter of demand and assessment notice were
constructively delivered by leaving the same conspicuously at the taxpayer's residence/place
of business at _____________________, on ____________, 1999.
_______________________
Revenue Officer
_________________________
Name and Signature of Witness
_________________________
Name and Signature of Witness
_________________________
Designation
_________________________
Designation
Copyright 2014
21
Copyright 2014
22
Endnotes
1 (Popup - Popup)
Annex A
Annex A-1
Annex B
Annex C
Annex D
Copyright 2014
23

Revenue Regulations No. 12-99: September 6, 1999

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Revenue Regulations No. 12-99: September 6, 1999

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Revenue Regulations No. 12-99: September 6, 1999

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

(1)

REVENUE REGULATIONS NO. 12-99

Implementing the Provisions of the National Internal Revenue

All Internal Revenue Officers and Others Concerned

The surcharge and/or interest herein prescribed shall apply to all

In case the tax due from the taxpayer is paid on a partial or

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

Due Process Requirement in the Issuance of a Deficiency

3.1 Mode of procedures in the issuance of a deficiency tax assessment:

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

When the finding for any deficiency tax is the result of

When a discrepancy has been determined between the tax withheld

When a taxpayer who opted to claim a refund or tax credit of

When an article locally purchased or imported by an exempt

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

demandable, in which case, the protest shall be decided by the Commissioner.

4.1 Twenty-Five Percent (25%) Surcharge. There shall be imposed, in

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

return is required to be filed; or

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

taxpayer "may be modified, changed or amended" by the taxpayer

Total amount due (excluding suggested compromise for

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

Total amount due

Total amount due (excluding suggested compromise

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

5.4 Penalty or penalties for deficiency tax. As a rule, no surcharge

Amount still due

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

Calendar Year 1997

Deficiency income tax

Total amount still due

Total amount due

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

5.5 Late payment of a deficiency tax assessed. In general, the

Total amount due (excluding suggested compromise

5.6 Computation of 20% interest per annum in case of partial or

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

based on the diminishing balance of the "unpaid amount", pursuant to the

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

Illustration No. 2: Computation of tax delinquency in case of partial

Amount due as of 5-15-99

CD Technologies Asia, Inc. and Accesslaw, Inc.

Philippine Taxation Encyclopedia First Release 2014

General Rule. In general, the provisions of these Regulations