73 Thermal
73 Thermal
73 Thermal
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
7834
ISSN: 2319-8753
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
( )
Where
P= maximum pressure in N/mm
D= cylinder bore/outside diameter of the piston in mm.
t = permissible tensile stress for the material of the piston.
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
7835
ISSN: 2319-8753
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
= .
Where,
K=thermal conductivity of material which is 174.15W/mk
Tc = temperature at centre of piston head in C.
Te = temperature at edges of piston head in C.
(iii). Radial Thickness of Ring (t1)
=
( )
Where,
D = cylinder bore in mm
Pw= pressure of fuel on cylinder wall in N/mm. Its value is limited from 0.025N/mm to 0.042N/mm. For
present material, t is 90Mpa
(iv). Axial Thickness of Ring (t2)
The thickness of the rings may be taken as
t2 = 0.7t1 to t1
Let assume t2 =5mm
Minimum axial thickness (t2)
=
Where nr = number of rings
(v). Width of the top land (b1)
The width of the top land varies from
= .
(vi).Width of other lands (b2)
Width of other ring lands varies from
= .
(vii). Maximum Thickness of Barrel (t3)
= . + + .
Where,
b = Radial depth of piston ring groove
b = t1+0.4
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
7836
ISSN: 2319-8753
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Design1 - Dimensions
Size in mm
Length of the Piston(L)
152
Cylinder bore/outside diameter of the piston(D)
140
Radial thickness of the ring (t1)
5.24
Axial thickness of the ring (t2)
5
Maximum thickness of barell (t3)
14.34
Width of the top land (b1)
10.84
Width of other ring lands (b2)
4
Table1: Design Specification before optimization
Thus, the dimensions for the piston are calculated and these are used for modelling the piston in CATIA V5
R19. In the above procedure the ribs in the piston are not taken into consideration, so as make the piston model
simple in its design. In modelling a piston considering all factors will become tedious process. Thus, a
symmetric model is developed using the above dimensions.
Piston was modelled using CATIA V5 R19 software which is shown in Figure 1.
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
7837
ISSN: 2319-8753
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Aluminium Alloy
70e3 Mpa
0.31
Thermal Conductivity
234 W/mK
co-eff of Thermal Expansion
23e-6 /K
Table2: Properties of materials
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
Zirconium
220e3 Mpa
0.35
7 W/mK
10e-6 /K
7838
ISSN: 2319-8753
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
The meshing of the piston after optimization is done with the same element structure and size i.e., taken before
optimization. The total number elements were 78221 and nodes were 47286 found in meshed model.
S No
1
Design 2 -Dimensions
Length of the Piston(L)
Size in mm
152
140
3.46
3.52
9.08
6
7
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
9.36
3.24
7839
ISSN: 2319-8753
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
7840
ISSN: 2319-8753
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
7841
ISSN: 2319-8753
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
STRESS
Uncoated AL Piston
Coated Zr Piston
76
2851
8368
8366
TOP LAND
Figure 10: Comparison of Uncoated Aluminium Alloy Piston and Coated Aluminium Alloy Piston
The optimized values after optimization using ANSYS are given in the following Table
S. no
Parameter
Before optimisation
After optimisation
Design consideration
5.24 mm
3.46 mm
4 mm
2
3
4
5 mm
14.34 mm
10.84 mm
3.52 mm
9.08 mm
9.36 mm
4 mm
9 mm
10 mm
5
6
4 mm
85.6439 Mpa
3.24 mm
55.6685 Mpa
3 mm
56-86 Mpa
Deflection
0.025884 mm
0.025884 mm
0.051762 mm
Table 4: Results
The length 152 mm and the diameter 140 are assumed to be constant. It is not considerable that the variations in
piston length and diameter of the piston. The radial thickness of the piston has affected more as it is very small
in size and the temperature and heat flow are very high to this size of thickness. Before optimization value is
given as 5.24mm and obtained after optimization is 3.46mm. This is rounded to next highest value i.e., 4mm and
is taken into consideration for design. The axial thickness of the piston ring before optimization is 5mm; it is
changed to 3.52mm after optimization, since the more and more heat and stress applied through groves as it is
very near to the head of the piston. This is rounded to next highest value i.e., 4mm is taken into consideration for
design. The maximum thickness of the barrel before optimization is 14.34mm has much affected in variation of
size after applying pressure and temperature loads and is changed to 9.08mm and rounded to next highest value
i.e., 10mm taken into consideration. The initial value i.e., before optimization is 10.84mm and is changed after
applying pressure which is directly applied on the head i.e., top of the piston as a result the shape of the piston
on top will become just like a bowl. The value after optimization is obtained as 9.36mm and it is rounded to
10mm. This value is considerable for design. The width of the other lands i.e., near piston rings are 4mm in size
and is changed due to pressure and heat applied on rings through groves. The value after optimization is
3.24mm and is rounded to 3mm.
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
7842
ISSN: 2319-8753
International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology
(An ISO 3297: 2007 Certified Organization)
Copyright to IJIRSET
www.ijirset.com
7843