Stormwater Tanks
Stormwater Tanks
Stormwater Tanks
stormwater tanks
The concept of storm water detention is to temporarily store excess storm water runoff. This is
to avoid hydraulic overload of the sewer system, which could result in the flooding of roads and
buildings with untreated wastewater or its release directly into the environment, causing pollution. When space is available in the sewer system, the detained water is released at a rate not
exceeding the capacities of the sewer system, and the tank should be cleaned ready for the next
flush.
Climate change is increasingly the cause of extreme weather phenomena around the world, for
example extreme rainfall. This challenges the existing sewer system, not least because an increase in
rain intensity of 40 to 60 % will reduce the return
period of severe flooding events. Stormwater tanks
can store much of this excess rainwater, thereby reducing the hydraulic load on the existing sewers.
Properly sited, such tanks can reduce the need for
expensive renovation of the existing sewer system.
Retention of these extreme peak flows of rainfall
is also a major challenge because of the extent
of paved or impermeable areas in urban areas. In
these situations, water cannot naturally seep into
Dry weather
Spout
Storm
drain
Sewage from
domestic
commercial and
industrial sources
Combined
sewage and
storm water
To WWTP
Combined
sewer
overflow
To WWTP
Dry weather
Spout
Wet weather
Spout
Storm
drain
Storm
drain
BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................................................................................................................................................... 49
To WWTP
To wet
retention pond
Sewage from
domestic
commercial and
industrial sources
To WWTP
Figure 1:
Combined (top) and
separate (bottom)
sewer systems
during dry and wet
weather flow.
Spout
Storm
drain
Flushjets.....................................................................................................................................................................................32
Wet weather
To wet
retention pond
Stormwater tanks
Stormwater tanks
Figure 2:
Combined sewer
systems with
an integrated
stormwater tank
during dry and
wet weather
flow.
Untreated wastewater can also back up in the sewer system and result in backflow into buildings and
basements, for example through toilets and drains
and result in property damage. The concern here is
possible economical losses for private homes, companies and public buildings due to the destruction
of property, of contents and the cost of cleaning.
Spout
Storm
drain
Wet weather
Storm
drain
Stormwater
tank
Inlet
Outlet
In-line detention
Overow
Inlet
Outlet
Overow
Spout
Sewage from
domestic
commercial and
industrial sources
To WWTP
Figure 3:
Off-line detention
Dry weather
Combined
sewage and
storm water
To WWTP
Stormwater
tank
Off-line storage is connected in parallel to the sewer pipe, and as such dry weather flow bypasses the
storage tank, leaving the stormwater tank empty
between storms. Off-line storage is first achieved
when a predetermined flow rate is exceeded and
the flow from the conveyance system is diverted
into the stormwater tank by means of pumping or
gravity. The detained water is stored in the tank until sufficient conveyance or treatment capacity becomes available downstream and the water can be
pumped back.
Inflow from a storm water runoff event entering
the stormwater tank carries organic and inorganic
matter. This can include macro pollutants such as
fine particles, vegetation and litter or micro pollutants such as nutrients, bacteria, heavy metals and
chemicals. The usual definition of all these materials together is total solids (TS), which consists of
a suspended (TSS) and a dissolved (TDS) fraction.
For storm water detention, this incoming material
is left to settle during the detention period. Only a
TS
TSS
TSSsettleable
Diagram showing
the fraction of the
total solids (TS)
that will settle (TSS
settleable) in the
stormwater tank
during retention.
FACTS:
Detaining water for a period of time can also be utilised in applications
other than the temporary storage of storm water in the sewer system:
Wastewater treatment plants: Ensuring efficient treatment of wastewater a constant hydraulic load must be provided throughout the
cleaning processes securing final effluent quality. Inflows of water
exceeding the capacity can then be temporary stored in a detention
tank.
Large blocks of flats and buildings: Discharges to the sewer system
are often subject to limits due to the capacity of the public sewer network. If the hydraulic load is exceeded, detention tanks can be used
for temporary storage.
Discharges from factories: Batch volumes of process water with a certain chemical or physical property must sometimes be stabilised or
equalised before discharge to the sewer system. This is to ensure that
the processes taking place at the receiving wastewater treatment
plant are not disturbed.
Stormwater tanks
Stormwater tanks
Mechanical scrapers keep a clearance from the bottom of the tank, leaving material on the tank floor
which will give rise to the odour problems described
above. This system will therefore not be suitable for
stormwater tanks that are emptied between storm
water events. Compared to the single flush system,
the continuous flush system has the advantage that
it can continue the flushing cycle until all detained
matter has been removed from the tank.
Relatively cheap, flexible and automatic cleaning
with a continuous flush system is obtained by installing Flushjets. This type of equipment is categorised as a continuous flush system that can easily
be adjusted to fit most stormwater tanks. Grundfos
Flushjets are available in two different versions: the
Water/Water ejector (Flushjet WW), and the Water/
Air ejector (Flushjet WA). The Flushjet does not need
an external source of fresh water supplied for cleaning, as it uses the detained water already in the tank
for flushing. This completely circumvents the possible problems of backflow into the potable water
system.
To ensure that the effective and automatic cleaning
of the stormwater tank runs smoothly, it is important that the tank is properly designed, both in regards to equipment, physical design and controls.
To aid the process of creating a durable solution,
this handbook aims to help provide an overview of
some of the important points regarding equipment
used for automatic control, stormwater tank design,
placement of equipment and automatic operation.
Flushjet WA
with longerreaching jet
and mixed
with air
Stormwater tanks
in duty-mode of operation
The variation in stormwater tank design that might
arise due to differences in construction means that
the operation of each stormwater tank must be
considered as a unique case. However, regardless of
whether the tank is renovated or newly constructed, the determining factor for the effective use of
the structure for efficient cleaning is the hydraulics
of the system, as it is the flow of water that cleans
the tank.
The hydraulics of the system require the consideration of filling capacity, mixing, cleaning and emptying as well as the retention time of the storm
water runoff. Equipment installed in the tank can
directly influence the hydraulics, and the selection
of equipment must address these issues.
Grundfos has a strong tradition in using state-ofthe-art simulation tools to improve our products and
has more than 15 years of experience making simulations using computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
to describe flow patterns in for example pumps and
pumping stations. Grundfos has utilised CFD tools
for describing, optimising and visualising the hydraulic processes that takes place during stormwater tank operation with the finite volume method
(Figure 5). Simulations in this guideline have been
made using the general purpose CFD software suite
ANSYS CFX that combines an advanced solver with
powerful pre- and post-processing capabilities.
The best practice for CFD modelling has been applied to generate the simulations shown here. This
involves generating appropriate computation grids
and selecting the relevant physical models.
The CFD models give the possibility for studying details in the hydrodynamics of the Flushjet,
which is not possible with traditional experimental
methods. Figure 5 shows examples of flow patterns
which would take weeks to measure manually. The
resulting simulations can with the use of vector
or contour plots in various intersections of the tank
The Grundfos
Flushjet range
Flushjet WW
with greater
flow for
wider tanks
Velocity
Streamline 1
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.500
0.450
0.450
0.400
0.400
0.350
0.350
0.300
0.300
0.250
0.250
0.200
0.200
0.150
0.150
0.100
0.100
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
Figure 5:
CFD simulations
can be used to
describe the hydraulic processes
taking place in the
stormwater tank.
At the top can be
seen an example of
a velocity vector plot
and at the bottom
a contour plot
showing the water
velocity at the
bottom plate.
Stormwater tanks
Stormwater tanks
First flush
In the first minutes of a storm water runoff event, a
batch of water termed the first flush will arrive. The
first flush carries high concentrations of organic
and inorganic matter to the stormwater tank. This
material has accumulated in the sewer system or
on the drained area during periods without rain. Absorbed in this material are different chemicals such
as heavy metals and xenobiotics. These chemicals
originate from the surfaces of roofs, drains, concrete areas and roads in the catchment areas.
Because of the intake of large amounts of organic
and inorganic matter in the first period of a runoff
event, it might be advantageous to divide larger
stormwater tanks into separate sections, which
are then filled successively and controlled by weirs,
valves or other arrangements (Fig. 6). Filling the
sections successively gives two advantages. Firstly,
only the section(s) of the tank that have been filled
must be cleaned and not the whole tank. Secondly,
all major impurities are retained in the first section,
minimising the risk of having suspended material
in the effluent in the event of an overflow.
Retention time
Retention time of the stored water is controlled by
available space in the sewer system, and this determines when water from the tank can be conveyed
back. This can normally be done immediately after
the storm water runoff event and the tank can be
empty within 24-48 hours after the first inflow. During extended periods of detention, unintended issues such as odour problems might arise, resulting
from the combination of wastewater quality, temperature and time.
FACTS:
Gas development problems related to anaerobic digestion of materials in storm water tanks:
Hydrogen sulphide (H2S): H2S has a very characteristic odour and smells strongly like rotten eggs
and flatulence. It is a highly toxic and flammable gas that is detectable in low concentrations (ppm).
H2S deadens the sense of smell in higher concentrations or after prolonged exposure. Respiratory
paralysis and death may occur quickly at concentrations as low as 0.07% by volume in air.
Methane (CH4): CH4 is a colourless and odourless gas at room temperature and atmospheric pressure. CH4 is not toxic but it is highly flammable and may form explosive mixtures with air.
CH4 is a relatively potent greenhouse gas which contributes to global warming because it in the
atmosphere is converted in to carbon dioxide and water.
Figure 7:
Figure 6:
Section
2
Successive
filling of a
stormwater tank
Section
1
Inlet
Section
3
Step 1-2:
Filling of the tank
and settling of detained material
Overflow
Spillway
Non
return valves
Outflow
pump
Due the presence of suspended solids in the detained water, it might be necessary to install
screens or filters in front of the equipment. If these
organic impurities are not removed, they will de-
Cleaning
During the filling period it is desirable to let the organic and inorganic matter settle on the tank floor
so it does not run into the recipient if overflow from
the tank happens (Figure 7).
Stormwater tanks
10
During the subsequent depletion period it is desirable to resuspend the settled material for transport back to the sewer network and further to the
wastewater treatment plant for treatment.
Stormwater tanks
Figure 10:
The dynamic
cleaning effect
where the water
jet oscillates from
side to side can be
visualised using
transient CFD
calculations.
Figure 8:
Step 2 Mixing
and resuspension of
settled matter.
Rectangular tank:
Switching on the Flushjet ensures that the side
walls and the centre area of the tank floor are
kept free from deposits due to the mixing force
provided by the installed equipment. A properly
chosen Flushjet resuspends most of the settled
matter in the tank, with only the corners as an
exception.
During the depletion period the water level is reduced by pumping the detained water back to the
sewer system (see Figure 9). The force required for
mixing the decreasing volume of water in the tank
Circular tank:
Switching on the Flushjet will start building
the inertia of the circular movement which will
clean the stormwater tank. In the direction of
the jet stream the settled matter will be resuspend due to the mixing force provided by the
Flushjet. Furthermore the side walls will also be
scoured as a result of turbulence in the tank.
11
Figure 9:
Figure 11:
Step 4 Cleaning
proximity of the
Flushjet
Rectangular tank:
The excess thrust force during the depletion period is further assisted by an effect of a dynamic
cleaning motion where the water jet oscillates
from side to side, effectively resuspending settled material in the corner of the tank furthest
away from the Flushjet (Figure 10).
Circular tank:
During the depletion period the circulation
speed increases due to the excess power input.
This ensures that all settled material at the tank
periphery will be resuspended and dragged with
the water towards the centre of the tank.
Rectangular tank:
In the cleaning period the length of the jet stream decreases, reaching approximately the centre of the tank where
a standing wave forms. This wave terminates the jet and
spreads out the stream. As the water level decreases in the
tank, the jet length from the Flushjet similarly decreases
until the hydraulic jump disappears and the jet stream
simply protrudes along the tank floor.
The back flow of water is now generated from the centre of
the tank, gathering the solids in the proximity of the Flushjet and flushing them to the sump.
Circular tank:
As the Flushjet becomes unsubmerged the water jet length decreases. This implies that the water delivered from the Flushjet will
be concentrated in the middle of
the tank flushing any remaining
material at the centre into the
sump of the tank.
Stormwater tanks
12
Stormwater tanks
The sump of the stormwater tank can now be completely emptied by the outlet pump. All organic and
inorganic matters are now removed from the tank.
The tank is now thoroughly cleaned and eventual
odour problems are totally eliminated.
Mixing
Figure 12:
Velocity contour
plots showing what
happens at different
Flushjet capacities
all other conditions
are equal. From the
top 25 l/s, 50 l/s and
75 l/s shown in a
plane 0.15 m above
the bottom plate
(left) and in a plane
through the Flushjet
axis (right).
Velocity
Contour 1
The hydrodynamics of the Flushjet makes it possible to both control the mixing and the cleaning of
the tank at the same time. In the depletion period
the detained water must be mixed to resuspend
the settled matter and obtain an efficient cleaning.
The Flushjet is capable of both. When submerged
the Flushjet utilises the flow of water created in
the ejector to act as a powerful mixer, resuspending the matter in the tank due to the thrust force
and high power jet formed. At low water levels the
Flushjet acts as a powerful flushing device, cleaning the tank floor and walls from organic matter, as
explained in the section above.
The equipment installed in the stormwater tank
must be sized to deliver a large enough water flow
and thus a thrust force to mix the water volume of
the stormwater tank. Choosing a Flushjet with a
too large water flow will not enhance cleaning efficiency but only waste energy in for example the
mixing phase of the cleaning cycle, as illustrated in
Figure 12.
The velocity gradients, as shown on the simulations
below, will give rise to a certain shear stress at the
tank bottom, which at large velocities will be sufficient to keep the bottom plate free from deposits.
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.500
0.450
0.450
0.400
0.400
0.350
0.350
0.300
0.300
0.250
0.250
0.200
0.200
0.150
0.150
0.100
0.100
0.050
0.000
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
[m s^-1]
Velocity
Contour 1
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.500
0.450
0.450
0.400
0.400
0.350
0.350
0.300
0.300
0.250
0.250
0.200
0.200
0.150
0.150
0.100
0.100
0.050
0.050
0.000
0.000
[m s^-1]
[m s^-1]
Velocity
Contour 1
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.500
0.450
0.450
0.400
0.400
0.350
0.350
0.300
0.300
0.250
0.250
0.200
0.200
0.150
0.150
0.100
0.100
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
For a tank having a water level of 4 meters, a Flushjet delivering a water flow of 25 l/s is insufficient to
create a high enough velocity and therefore sufficient mixing in the tank to provide an acceptable
coverage of the tank corners furthest away from the
Flushjet.
Increasing water flow to 75 l/s will result in energy
being wasted at the tank wall and water surface, as
there is a high velocity when the contour colours are
matched to the legend in the figure below. However, a performance of 50 l/s seems to be suitable, as
the water jet of the Flushjet is sufficient to reach all
the way to the backwall with an appropriate velocity to sweep the corners, resuspending the settled
material without wasting energy on the backwall
and water surface.
Even though velocities in the middle part of the
tank seem low compared to a performance of 75
l/s, this has no effect on the cleaning efficiency.
This is due to the fact that this area of the tank is
being cleaned during the end of phase 3 and start
of phase 4, where the water flow of the ejector is
concentrated in this area. Furthermore, at a performance of 50 l/s the water velocity in the area above
the sump is low which favours sedimentation. This
means that materials will collect in the sump where
it will be carried away through the outlet pipe.
If instead of mixing the entire volume it is only necessary to mix a predefined volume of the stored water, a Flushjet with a smaller capacity can be used.
However when choosing this solution it is important to make sure that materials detained in the
Velocity
Streamline 1
Velocity
Streamline 1
0.500
0.500
0.375
0.375
0.250
0.250
0.125
0.125
0.000
0.000
[m s^-1]
FACTS:
A mixer can only be operated when it is submerged and it has a higher thrust-to-power
ratio than the Flushjet. When the water level
drops to a certain level above the mixer, it
might create a vortex which lowers performance and creates unbalanced conditions
around the mixer.
The Flushjet on the other hand can work with
great performance even when it is unsubmerged, as long as the suction pipe provides
enough suction pressure to overcome the
required Net Positive Suction Head (NPSH).
13
[m s^-1]
Figure 13:
Simulation of
the difference in
velocity streamlines,
indicating mixing
capabilities, at different water levels
when using the
same power input
of the Flushjet.
Stormwater tanks
14
Stormwater tanks
h2
Min.water level
Qin
Figure 16:
h h1
Qmin + Qmax
=A 2
2
T
Qmin = 2A
Schematic
representation of
the system defining
how to calculate
pump hydraulics
and emptying time.
h2 h1
Qmax
T
Figure 17:
(Qmin ; Hmin)
(Qmax ; Hmax)
h2
h1
Q
The headloss (H) of these working points can be calculated based on maximum and minimum flow from
the following equations:
H
h1
Min.water level
Max.water level
Max.water level
h2
EXAMPLE:
h2
Min.water level
Figure 15:
The great difference in hydraulic
characteristics
when emptying a
stormwater tank. To
respect the capacity
of the sewer system,
the pump is being
controlled by a
frequency converter.
Max.water level
FACTS:
Figure 14:
The great
difference in
hydraulic characteristics when
emptying a
stormwater tank
is shown here.
h1
Flowmeter
h1
VFD
Min.water level
Capacity of
sewer system
Max.water level
Max.water level
h2
h2
Min.water level
h1
50 Hz
40 Hz
33 Hz
25 Hz
15
The minimum flow should then at least be 0.05 m3/s. The two working points of the pump system can
then be found when knowing:
: 1000 kg/m
g: 9.82 m/s
Working points of a
pump system. Note
that with this notation Hmax < Hmin
16
Stormwater tanks
Stormwater tanks
Physical design
of stormwater tanks
(0.05 ; 10.5)
(0.1 ; 4.5)
8m
2m
Q
Qmax = 2A
17
h2 h1
Qmin
T
2A(h2 h1)
T=
Qmax + Qmin
=xRxI
: Shear stress (N/m2)
: Specific weight of water (N/m3)
R: Hydraulic radius (m)
I: Bottom plate slope (m/m)
Figure 18:
EXAMPLE:
Inlet pipe
Bench
Bottom plate
Spillway
Overflow
pipe
h1: 6 m
h2: 0 m
Qmax: 0.1 m/s
Qmin: 0.05 m/s
Qin: 0 m/s
A: 500 m
The time for emptying will be:
Outflow pipe
Bottom slope
Stormwater tanks
Figure 19:
Bottom displacement forces as a
function of slope
and flow. The simple
spreadsheet model
used to construct
the graph assumes
that the water flowing from the back
wall of the tank and
back to the sump is
equally distributed
over the entire cross
section of the tank.
The model does not
take into account
that parts of the
cross section is taken
up by the water
jet generated from
the Flushjet, which
flows in the opposite
direction.
Figure 20:
The bottom slope
directly influences
the jet length of the
Flushjet, where an
increasing bottom
slope decreases the
effective jet length.
Left: tanks with
slope of 1%. Right:
tanks with slope of
8%. Top: Flushjet
performance of 50
l/s. Bottom: Flushjet
performance 75 l/s.
All other conditions
are equal.
Velocity
Contour 1
The shear stress needed to obtain self cleaning can vary significantly depending on what
kind of material is contained
in the storm water. This is in
regard to size, weight and texture where greasy, and heavy
material consisting of large
particles requires a higher to
obtain self cleaning. In stormwater sewers a of 2-4 N/m2 is
normally considered sufficient
for obtaining self cleaning and
used as dimensioning criteria.
This is therefore also seen as a
guide for the bottom plate of a
stormwater tank during final
emptying.
Stormwater tanks
6
5
4
Displacement
3 forces [N/m2]
2
0,040
Visualised by a simple spreadsheet model increasing either the water flow through the Flushjet and
thereby the hydraulic radius or the bottom slope
will result in increasing displacement forces, ensuring that the tank will be self-cleaning.
However, increasing these two parameters infinitely
is not practical or economical in relation to power consumption for example and may induce undesirable
side effects that minimise cleaning efficiency.
The CFD simulations in Figure 20 illustrate how the
effective jet length of the Flushjet is directly influenced by the slope of the bottom plate. From the
flow velocity profile it can be observed that the jet
length in a tank with a bottom plate slope of 1% has
a better reach compared to a slope of 8% at equal
Flushjet performance.
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.50
0.450
0.45
0.400
0.40
0.350
0.35
0.300
0.30
0.250
0.25
0.200
0.20
0.150
0.15
0.100
0.10
0.050
0.000
0.05
0.00
[m s^-1]
[m s^-1]
Velocity
Contour 1
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.50
0.450
0.45
0.400
0.40
0.350
0.35
0.300
0.30
0.250
0.25
0.200
0.20
0.150
0.15
0.100
0.10
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
0,060
0.05
0.00
[m s^-1]
The fact that the effective jet length of the Flushjet is inversely related to the slope of the bottom plate, with regards to having sufficient fall
towards the sump, so water and material will be
transported in this direction.
0,080
Flow [m3/s]
The actual slope of the tank will in practise be determined by several factors which together ensure
that the desired displacement force is met. These
factors are:
19
0
2,50%
1,50% 2,00%
0,50% 1,00%
Slope [m/m]
Benches
To avoid accumulation of solids in for example the
corners of the tank, flow patterns with least possible hydraulic losses should be established to minimise required power consumption of the cleaning
equipment. When water flows over a surface the
velocity will decrease the closer the distance to the
surface is due to the friction losses exhibited by the
texture of the surface (Figure 21).
In corners or where the tank walls and bottom
meet, two surfaces are in close proximity, and this
will decrease the velocity significantly due to the
friction losses from both of these surfaces. The low
velocity in this area will favour sedimentation of
material. Of course, applying excessive power could
well maintain a high velocity; however this cannot
be justified economically. Slanting benches could
be made to minimise the effect of friction losses in
these areas (Figure 22), and increasing power input
ought not to be considered. These benches can either be made in the corner or as benches running
along the entire side of the tank.
Figure 21:
Velocity profile of
a liquid flowing over
a surface.
Distance to wall
18
Velocity
Figure 22:
Benches in a
stormwater tank to
minimise friction
losses at corners and
to mimic natural
flow patterns.
Left: benches running along both
sides of the tank in
the entire longitudinal direction.
Right: bench at the
corner at the wall
furthest away from
the Flushjet.
Stormwater tanks
20
Stormwater tanks
Zoom area
21
Dimensions
Area
Basically, the physical area of a tank, whether new
or old, does not limit the applicability for storm water detention and implementation of a subsequent
hygienic cleaning. However it is not only the specific
tank area that must be taken into account when deciding which equipment to install in the tank, the
length/width ratio is even more important and basically determines which type of Flushjet to install.
In Figure 24 a Flushjet capable of cleaning 78 m2
has been installed in a tank of equal area in two different positions.
In the first position the length/width ratio of the
tank suits the water jet generated from the Flushjet through all phases of stormwater tank operation; from mixing to the final cleaning phase. In the
first case almost all of the energy in the jet stream
will be utilised for mixing and cleaning, and subsequently the jet will be able to spread all the way to
the side walls during final cleaning. In the second
position, where the Flushjet is placed on the longest side, most of the power in the water jet is lost
on the tank wall which means that less power will
be available for mixing and cleaning. Furthermore,
when the water level is at the end of the depletion
period the water jet will not be able to spread all the
way to the corners, leaving settled material at the
side of the tank.
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.450
0.400
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.450
0.400
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
Length/
Width ratio
Ejector type
Flushjet WA
~3
Water/Air
Flushjet WW
~2
Water/Water
Figure 24:
Wall Shear
Velocity
Contour 1
0.50
0.45
0.500
0.40
The length/width ratio of the Flushjet changes depending on the actual bottom slope. At a slope of
around 1 % the Flushjets have the following specific
length/width ratios of their water jets.
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.450
0.400
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.05
0.00
[Pa]
Figure 23:
Shear stress contour plots to show differences in wall shear stress when using benches in a stormwater tank.
Simulations are made at high water level under steady state conditions and an increase in shear stress will be
expected as water level drops during the depletion period.
Simulations show a zoom on one of the corners furthest away from the Flushjet.
From the left: tank without benches; tank with bench in the corner; tank with bench running along the side.
0.000
[m s^-1]
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.450
0.400
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
22
Stormwater tanks
Stormwater tanks
Storage volume
Dimensioning a stormwater tank consists of establishing the storage volume that will ensure a
desired equalisation in the runoff based on a given
maximum overload criterion.
To make this calculation, the system can be simplified by only taking the inflow (Qin) and outflow (Qout)
that corresponds to the storm water runoff flow. For
a combined sewer system, the dry weather flow is
therefore not a part of the calculation.
The continuity equation for a tank during filling or
emptying is described by:
dV
dh
=Ax
Qin Qout =
dt
dt
Where V is the volume, A is the area and h is the water level in the tank. By integration of the continuity
equation the storage volume can be found as:
hmax
t1
V = A x dh = (Qin Q out) dt
hmin
Inlet
Figure 27:
Scumboards
For off-line detention, the inlet structure can be designed as a weir overflow that functions only when
a predetermined flow in the sewer is exceeded (Fig.
27). The overflow can then be guided from the overflow structure to the stormwater tank by gravity or
using pumps.
Figure 25:
flow (Q)
Storage
volume
Qout
Qin
to recipient
During the filling
period, sedimentation of organic
matter is desired due to the risk of overflow, and
turbulence in the tank should therefore be minimised. The only hydraulic disturbance in the tank
during filling will be the inflow jet. Dissipating
the momentum in the inflow jet will decrease the
turbulence, enhancing the settling of material in
the tank. Slowing down the inflow jet can be done
using a weir overflow, a baffle, or other similar arrangements.
Outlet
Inlet
Figure 28:
An example of throttling in an in-line detention,
where the inlet pipe has a bigger diameter than
the outlet pipe. When the capacity of the outlet is
exceeded water will accumulate in the stormwater
tank.
Figure 29:
Outlet
time (t)
Filling period
Emptying period
Figure 26:
Volume (V)
Overflow
volumen
from tank
Designed
volume
of tank
Occurrence (n)
Outlet
Overflow
An example of a
flow split structure
where water at a
flow exceeding the
outlet flow will be
diverted into the
stormwater tank for
temporary storage.
The flow split structure can be designed
with or without
scumboards.
To stormwater
tank
For in-line detention, throttling in response to difference in pipe dimensions between inlet and outlet pipes will ensure that water will backup in the
stormwater tank (Fig. 28). Here, gravity can normally
Inlet
be used to convey water both in and
out of the tank.
In-line detention requires that the backwater level
does not exceed the lowest points in the system it
relieves, if flooding of upstream areas is to be avoided.
When guiding water to the stormwater tank, the
inflow must fulfil what may appear to be conflicting tasks. The inflow should be as fast as possible to
relieve the hydraulic load of the sewer system; and
yet the momentum of the inflow should be limited
to avoid that material in the tank is in suspension.
Inlet
Overflow
weir
Outlet
Outlet
dry weather
23
Screen
Waste
collection
from screen
Sediment
trap
Weir
wall
To stormwater
tank
Inlet
24
Stormwater tanks
Stormwater tanks
Outlet
From the stormwater tank there must be at least
two outlets; a controlled outlet and an emergency
outlet.
When storm water inflow ceases and the emptying
period is initiated, the stored water should be guided back to the sewer system where it is conveyed to
the treatment plant. This must be done in a manner to ensure the sewer system is not overloaded.
Using a controlled outlet provides the opportunity
to control and regulate the emptying of the stored
water in consideration of the actual load and capacity of the sewer system. In advanced control systems, where wastewater flows in citywide systems
are optimised continuously, other parameters such
as the water levels in other storage tanks can decide the outflow pumping operation of the specific
tank. Using pumps for a coordinated control of the
sewer system thereby enables that advanced control strategies can be used to optimise and manage
wastewater flows in the entire system. However the
outflow capacity and pipe dimension should still be
designed and constructed so the outlet structure is
capable of guiding suspended solids out of the tank
without settling and thus blocking the outlet.
Moreover, the use of pumps or motor valves gives
the opportunity to refine cleaning of the tank by reducing the outflow. This reduction should normally
be done in the last period of the cleaning process at
low water level. Setting the actual volume of water
during flow reduction must be done in relation to
the total storage volume. The volume left during
cleaning must be negligible compared to the total
volume in order to cope with any possible stormwater event that can take place during this process.
By a careful control of the outlet, the Flushjet works
as a continuous flush cleaning system that can be
tuned to the actual conditions and demands compared to single flush systems. This gives an opportunity to run an optimal cleaning process where the
exact energy needed to obtain complete cleaning
is matched specifically. This is obtained through a
predefined cleaning time calibrated according to
the actual demands.
Figure 30:
A water brake can dissipate the outflow momentum. The water flow is guided tangentially into the volute of the hydro brake where a
vortex will form. The resulting high peripheral
velocities will create an air-filled core which
will result in increased back pressure that
reduces the discharge flow to the designed
maximum limit.
Figure 31:
Depending on the water quality goal for the receiving water, other arrangements, such as flow regulators to minimise erosion of the recipient or equipment for disinfection, must also be considered at
the emergency outlet.
When the water in the tank reaches a level where it
spills over the overflow weir, a backwater effect in
the tank will occur. This level, h, can be estimated by
the following equation based on the water flow, Q,
and width of the weir, B. The coefficient C is specific
for the dimension and design of the weir and must
be chosen accordingly in some cases it must be determined experimentally.
Q = C x B x h x 2 x g x h
The expected backwater level should be estimated
and it must be taken into account when placing
the overflow arrangements in order not have water
spilling over the sides of the tank. This means that
the tank walls must be higher than the maximum
water level, thus a certain volume of the tank cannot be used for storage. In addition to this backwater level a certain safety margin is also included
when placing the weir, making the storage volume
even less as the difference between weir and edge
of the tank is increased.
Scumboard
Outlet to
recipient
Max. backup
water level
Lost storage
volume
Lost storage
volume
Figure 32:
Sketch showing the
additional storage
volume gained with
a tip-weir installed
at the emergency
outlet in contrary
to having a weir
overflow.
Additional storage
volume during
filling
Start
overflow
Start
overflow
Storage
volume
Spillway
H
(Qdim.Hdim)
25
To recipient
Storage
volume
To recipient
Stormwater tanks
26
Stormwater tanks
Figure 33:
The effect of
having an inlet
water pipe on the
pump is that cleaning can proceed
until the tank is
practically empty so
the entire bottom
plate can be
completely cleaned.
Figure 34:
Sump positioning
in different tank
shapes. Left: wall
placed sump in a
rectangular and
circular tank. Right:
traversing sump in
a rectangular tank
and centre sump in
a circular tank.
Sump
Wall Shear
0.50
0.45
0.40
0.35
0.30
0.25
0.20
0.15
0.10
0.05
0.00
Sump
Sump
Figure 35:
Slanting benches in
a wall placed runoff
channel. Note that
the benches start
below the bottom
plate so the material
in the tank can fall
into the sump and
get flushed away.
To illustrate how the outlet flow influences the selfcleaning ability during final cleaning, simulations
varying this parameter have been made. The simulations show the bottom shear stress in the runoff
channel which is emptied by gravity through an
outlet pipe. However the same would be the case if
a pump has been used for the purpose.
Sump
27
[Pa]
Figure 36:
Bottom shear
stress in the sump
with a slope of 8%
at different outlet
flows.
From left 50 l/s,
200 l/s and 400 l/s.
Stormwater tanks
28
Stormwater tanks
Figure 37:
4%
Difference in maximal
depth, depending on
where the outlet from
the sump is placed.
Difference in
depth of
construction 0.18
4%
Open tanks
Open tanks offer the possibility to easily control
conditions in the tank, offer simple inspection of
the cleaning process in the tank, and a relatively
uncomplicated access to the tank. Ventilation to
remove toxic or explosive gases is implicit in the
design, although dependant on depth. Besides that
there are typically few or no obstructions, such as
pillars to support a cover that will interfere with the
cleaning jets.
Depth of construction
The higher the shear stress that can be obtained
in the runoff channel the more certain one can be
that material will be carried away. However, the
actual slope of the channel will be a compromise
between the possible depth and the economics of
construction, compared to the ability to obtain self
cleaning.
The maximal depth of construction might set the
basis for how the sump should be designed; whether the channel should slant to one of the sides of
the sump or to the middle (Figure 37).
For several tanks placed together or a tank split in
many sections, basically three possibilities of the
outlet location exist, as shown in Figure 38, which
will result in different construction depths.
As exemplified in Figure 37, the rightmost sump
configuration in Figure 38 gives the smallest possible construction depth when using identical slopes
in the sumps.
However, even though it is possible to minimise the
construction depth by placing the outlet centrally
in the sump, other factors might influence this as
well. The factors that should be considered Inlet
are, for
example, pipework, material and equipment needed, placement of the adjacent sewer system as well
as interconnection between other tank sections
when choosing the outlet placement. What Inlet
will be
the best design must be evaluated in each case.
Outlet
Figure 38:
Different
possibilities for
placement of the
outlet from the
stormwater tank.
Covering the tank can, however, have the consequence that maintaining a visual control of conditions in the tank is often difficult. Solving such an
issue requires installing hatch covers. These must
enable viewing into the tank, allow for servicing of
machinery, and provide service access for the entire tank (see also the section about Service Access,
page 30).
Normally a cover also requires supports in the form
of pillars in the tank. These supports create friction
for water circulation during cleaning and make a
thorough cleaning around these structures difficult. Placement of these ought then to be known
in the design phase for the specification of size and
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Closed tanks
Closed or covered tanks offer the possibility for reducing problems due to noise and odour for surrounding areas, avoiding aesthetic inconveniences,
and they can therefore be placed in urban areas
without putting up security fences to keep people
and animals out. Furthermore, they can be designed
so that it blends neutrally into the surroundings by
placing it underground.
Centre sump
During cleaning of a circular tank, the water circulation created will force the water to arrive automatically at the sump due to the outlet flow. In the
middle of the circulating water volume, the velocity will approach zero, which results in suspended
solids effectively settling at the centre of the tank
where the sump is placed.
Inlet
Outlet
However, there are also consequences which can include inconvenience from noise and odours that affect surrounding areas, and the open tank requires
closing off the tank with a security fence, to ensure
that people and animals do not fall into the tank.
On this basis, it could be tempting to create the runoff channel very wide or deep. However, creating a
wide channel will lower the water velocity during
the final emptying of the channel, which can favour
sedimentation in the sump. Making it too deep will
on the other hand increases construction costs. As
a result, the width and depth of the channel is a
compromise between the ability to absorb the flow
arriving from the bottom plate, still being able to
keep an appropriate velocity, and keeping a reasonable construction price.
Inlet
Inlet
Outlet
Outlet
Wall-placed sump
The runoff channel must be designed taking into
consideration the water velocity of the arriving
water. If the velocity of the water running to the
runoff channel is too high and the flow cannot be
absorbed by the channel, a reflection wave might
arise which will flush water back up on the bottom
plate, possibly depositing solids.
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
Outlet
29
Stormwater tanks
30
Stormwater tanks
Obstacles
Service access
Regardless of whether the tank is built with or without a cover, the design ought to include the possibility of access to the tank. This makes it possible for:
ed?
quality
Figure 39:
Velocity contour plot 0.15 m above the tank bottom showing the effect on hydraulic flow patterns when the
tank has pillars at the tank floor to support the cover. Besides altered flow patterns the dynamic cleaning with
the sweeping effect of the water jet is also impeded in this case.
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.450
0.400
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
Consider the amount of sand and suspended solids in the incoming water
Create benches in corners and along the walls to mimic natural hydraulic conditions
Create a smooth bottom surface as this will increase cleaning performance
Avoid obstructions of any kind to minimise dead zones that will favour sedimentation
Design a sump in connection with the outlet
Design the sump, connections and outlet system so it is self cleaning
Let the Flushjets draw in water from the sump to increase flushing time
Consider intensity of outlet, retention and emptying time
Consider duty strategy for tank operation
31
Stormwater tanks
32
Stormwater tanks
FLUSHJets
10 m
10 m
6m
6m
10 m
8m
8m
10 m
10 m
6m
6m
10 m
20 m
20 m
6m
The principles by
which a Flushjet WA
(left) and Flushjet
WW (right) work.
Mixed
water
and air
Mixed
water
Secondary
water flow
Depression zone
Primary water flow
Secondary
water flow
Depression zone
Primary water flow
Thrust
force
Not
sufficient
Jet length
Too long
Thrust
force
Suitable
10 m
For illustration of
10 the
m effective jet length produced by the specific Flushjet, the water jet has been shown to penetrate the
wall even though this would not possible in reality
20 m
6m
6m
10 m
8m
8m
6m
8m
FACTS:
Maximum thrust:
A rule-of-thumb is that with the maximum
thrust force delivered by a Flushjet WA or
WW, a maximum volume of approximately
1,500 m pr. Flushjet can be mixed. However,
it depends on the specific application such as
tank shape, suspended solid concentration,
tank physical design, and so on, and must be
evaluated for each application.
Figure 41:
Suitable
8m
Thrust force
In cases where the thrust force is insufficient for the
application but the jet dimension fits, two methods
can be used to solve this issue.
Either a larger Flushjet with a sufficient thrust force
can be chosen even though the jet length will be
too long for the tank as long as the jet width still fits
the tank. Or installation of one or more mixers to
deliver the remaining thrust force to meet what is
needed in the application can be a possibility. With
the last method the mixers must however be turned
off when the water level decreases and the Flushjet must then be able to produce sufficient thrust
for mixing the water at this point. Consideration
of whether to install additional equipment should
however be done before choosing this solution.
6m
Jet length
There can be situations where the thrust force produced by the Flushjet is sufficient to mix the water
but where the jet stream cannot reach the furthest
end or cover the entire tank floor (see Figure 43), because of the physical layout of the tank. This can be
caused by too steep a slope, an unfavourable ratio
between width/length, or result from the direction
of the slope and position of the sump and outlet.
These situations can be handled by splitting the
tank into different zones or moving the ejector forward to obtain the ideal relation between the performance of a Flushjet and the tank width/length
ratio.
Jet length
Suitable
Thrust
force
Suitable
33
Figure 42:
Considerations of
using Flushjets
alone or in combination with a mixer.
Stormwater tanks
34
Stormwater tanks
35
Recommendation
for installation and
positioning
Figure 43:
How to
overcome
unfavourable
length/width
ratios
Figure 45:
As shown in figure 42 and figure 43, various situations are possible. Sometimes the jet length fits,
sometimes the thrust force. The situations illustrate the intricacy in sizing Flushjets and the considerations that should be made.
Different methods of adjusting both parameters
exist. However, adjusting one of them might affect
the other and vice versa. This must be thoroughly
considered to obtain the most suitable equipment
for the solution.
Figure 44:
CFD simulation
showing how
streamlines and
possible areas for
sedimentation in
the stormwater
tank change due to
different positioning
of the Flushjet.
Contour plots are
shown 15 cm above
the bottom plate
with the ejector
having equal
performance in
each case.
www.grundfos.com
Rectangular tanks
Velocity
Contour 1
0.500
0.450
0.400
0.350
0.300
0.250
0.200
0.150
0.100
0.050
0.000
[m s^-1]
Flushjet WA
Tank
Dimensions
(3:1)
Floor with a
slope of 1 %
Area
[m2]
Flushjet WW
Tank
Dimensions
(2:1)
10x3
30
8x4
121x4
50
10x5
15x5
75
12.6x6
18x6
100
14x7
21x7
150
17x8.5
24.5x8
200
20x10
27.5x9
250
22.5x11
30x10
300
24.5x12
31.5x10.5
350
26.5x13
Stormwater tanks
36
Stormwater tanks
Positioning
When designing a rectangular tank the
Flushjets can be placed either at one end
or in the middle of the tank depending on
the tank length and sump positioning (Fig.
46). The bottom slope of the tank should
decrease between 1 2 % towards the
sump.
W/2
W/2
W/2
W/2
In longer or wider tanks where one Flushjet does not fulfil the dimensional requirements, the Flushjets can be placed ahead
or besides each other (fig. 47). For wide
tanks partitions between different sections might be installed when Flushjets
are placed next to each other. This divides the tank into more sections that will
fill successive as one section at a time is
filled before overflow into the next section
takes place. This will minimise the need
for cleaning the whole tank every time, if
only a sub-volume of the tank becomes
filled (see Figure 6).
Figure 46:
Principle for
placement of Flushjets in rectangular
stormwater tanks
37
Circular Tanks
with sump placed at the wall
For circular tanks with the sump placed at the wall,
the tank should be treated as a rectangular tank
obeying the length/width ratio of the Flushjets. The
tank floor must as for rectangular tanks have a slope
of 1 2 % towards the outlet/drainage channel.
For diameters larger than one Flushjet can handle,
the tank can be split up into two or more zones. For
example, when using two Flushjets they should be
placed in an angle of around 20 to the centre axis
of the tank. Another example of placement of 3
Flushjets are also shown in Figure 49.
Figure 48:
Principle for placement of Flushjet(s)
in circular stormwater tanks with
sump placed at the
wall
Figure 47:
Principle for
placement of more
than one Flushjet
in wide or long
stormwater tanks
2W
L
W/2
W/2
Grundfos WebCAPS
W
2L
L
W/2
W/2
www.grundfos.com/webcaps
Stormwater tanks
38
Stormwater tanks
Number of
Flushjets*
D<5m
~1-2
5 m > D > 15 m
~2-3
D > 15 m
~3-4
0.4-0.6 x R
0
-6
For circular tanks with a centre sump the Flushjet should be placed at a distance of 0.4-0.6 times
radius from the edge of the tank (Fig. 50). In the
direction of flow, the Flushjet should be placed at
an angle of 30-60 to the centre axis of the tank.
The slope of the bottom should be between 3-4%
from the edge to the centre.
Sump
Layout strategy
When a given tank must be equipped with Flushjets for cleaning, the principle way of thinking is to
divide the tank into equal rectangular sub-volumes/
areas with a length/width ration of either ~1:2 or
~1:3; depending on type of Flushjet to use. The
number of sub-areas that fits into the tank will then
correspond to the number of Flushjets to install
(Fig. 51).
When doing this, it is important to take the bottom slope and sump placement in to account when
splitting the tank into sub-areas. If direction of the
slope and position of the sump have not been decided, the division of the tank into sub-areas can
then aid in deciding this based on best coverage
and cleaning of the tank.
30
Positioning
The jet length for the circular tank is less significant
than in the rectangular tanks due to water inertia
that is created during mixing and cleaning which
will create a circular motion (Fig. 49).
0.4-0.6 x R
40m
40m
37
37
Figure 50:
40m
40m
37
37
Ratio 1:3
Figure 49:
At the left the
principle of water
motion in a
circular tank.
0.4-0.6 x R
Ratio 1:3
Velocity
Vector 1
0.500
0.375
25
30
25
m
12.5
0
-6
0.250
At the right
velocity streamline
plot from a CFD
simulation of a
circular tank with
centre sump
where the arrow
heads indicate flow
direction.
25
0.125
25
m
12.5
0.000
[m s^-1]
Sump
0.4-0.6 x R
39
Ratio 1:2
Ratio 1:2
Figure 51:
Exemplification
of how to divide
the tank area into
sub-compartments
when planning
layout and equipping of stormwater
tanks. In the circular
tank the ejectors
could also be placed
closer to the centre
angled as shown in
Figure 49 to cover
the tank area.
Stormwater tanks
40
Stormwater tanks
41
Risk of airpockets
Figure 52:
Placement of
Flushjet(s) in circular
stormwater tanks
with trap sump.
Risk of airpockets
Pipe installation
Installation of pipes between the pump and ejector can be handled either by placing the pipes above
the floor or moulding them into the floor.
Piping placed on the bottom plate with mechanical
supports must be placed with sufficient clearance to
allow material to pass unhindered underneath; typically this will be at a height so the piping connects
directly to the ejector. However, the supports placed
on the bottom plate will increase the hydraulic
losses and create areas for possible sedimentation.
Furthermore if large impurities get trapped under
the piping this will create an area where material
can build up. On the other hand, as piping is freely
available it is fairly easy to disassemble if the piping
becomes clogged due to large impurities carried to
the tank and thereby restore flow to the ejector.
On the other hand, moulding the pipes in to the
tank floor has the advantages that hydraulic losses and additional areas for sedimentation due to
protruding piping is complete avoided. However
a drawback is the fact that if piping moulded into
the tank floor becomes clogged it can be difficult
to clean and restore flow to the ejector. In circular
tanks, piping placed across the flow direction will, at
low water levels, generate a substantial hindrance.
Figure 53:
What to be aware
of when placing
additional piping
between the pump
and ejector.
DPRequired
H2
DPReduced
Requirerd pump
for the Flushjet
H1
DPNormal
Original pump for
the Flushjet
Q2
Q1
For some applications it could be beneficial to supply multiple ejectors with one single pump. In this
case all ejectors must be connected via a common
manifold. This can be an issue if space is limited in
the sump, if protruding Flushjets in the tank are requested or because of accessibility to equipment.
However this solution will raise the issue of having
one as opposed to many pumps in the installation.
Using a common manifold to feed all Flushjets with
one pump has both pros and cons. As a benefit, the
maintenance cost of the system will decrease as
less mechanical equipment is installed in the tank.
A drawback is that flexibility of system adjustment
decreases, as branch pipes are welded in a fixed position to the manifold, so if tank drawings do not
correspond to the actual conditions it can be hard
to adjust the system. This drawback can to some
extent be overcome as described above by using adjustable flanges or other initiatives for final adjustment of the equipment at commissioning.
However using one pump per ejector will give complete freedom for final adjustment during commissioning if this should be necessary. Although several pumps increase maintenance costs, the safety
of having more pumps is an advantage in case of
pump breakdown. However, as the pump on the
ejector manifold can be mounted either on an auto
coupling or dry-installed, this safety issue is a matter of estimate.
Design of manifold
Figure 54:
How to design a
manifold without
the risk for getting
airpockets.
Figure 55:
Different layouts
where one pump
feeds several ejectors. In the left examples the ejectors
must have equal
performance. In the
examples at the
right, the ejectors
must have different
performance.
42
Stormwater tanks
Stormwater tanks
Q = 50 l/s
H = 4.1 mWC
C
B
20 m
10 m
1
2
DN100
A
3m
5m
2: 90 bend ( = 0.5)
1m
DN200
3: T-piece ( = 3)
43
As the flow is being split into two in the T-piece the pump flow must equal 2 x 50 l/s = 100 l/s. To find
the head of the pump suitable for the system the pipe losses must be calculated and added to the
head of the ejector. For these calculations the following equations have been used:
Hsingle losses =
2
2g
L x 2
Hpipe = f x
Rh 2g
=
Q 4
x d2
x
Calculation of the headlosses is split into three sections. The headlosses of pipework and single losses for
each section have been calculated using WebCAPS (www.grundfos.com).
Section A) from the pump to T-piece where the flow is 100 l/s in a DN200 pipe:
H = 1.57 m
Section B) after the T-piece to eccentric reducer where the flow is 50 l/s in a DN200 pipe:
H = 0.331 m
Section C) after the eccentric reducer to ejector where the flow is 50 l/s in a DN100 pipe:
H = 1.53 m
Figure 56:
If the chosen pipe configuration gives unacceptable headlosses, other dimensions could be used and the
calculation must be repeated.
The total head of the pump for the system can then be found by adding the losses of the three sections together with the head of the ejector itself.
Htotal = 1.57 m + 0.331 m + 1.53 m + 4.1 m = 7.53 m
The hydraulic characteristic of the pump must hence be:
Q = 100 l/s, H = 7.53 m
Inflow
Outflow
Sketch of a
channel tank
for storm water
detention
Stormwater tanks
44
Stormwater tanks
Level
Overflow level
Figure 57:
Control scheme for
Flushjets. Blue arrows indicate slope/
trend/gradient of
the water level in
the tank. The text in
the circles indicate
specific duty mode
of the Flushjet based
on variations in
water levels.
Duty at increasing
water level
Duty at steady
water level
Duty at decreasing
water level
Off
Off
Off
Off
On
Off
On
Off
On
Off
On
Critical duty
level
Noncritical
duty level
Tank empty
ous flush, dragging all material to the sump for conveyance to the sewer system. This time period should
be set according to actual experiences based on conditions in the tank.
Between operation
Because of the impact of the environment on the installed equipment, it can be an advantage to install as
part of the control system function tests and test runs
of pumps, sensors, and so on, to ensure full function.
Not everything can be integrated into the controls, and
it can therefore be necessary occasionally to visually
check the tank for foreign items as well as checking
overflow grates and the functionality of ventilation, to
ensure the required level of operation of the tank.
45
46
Stormwater tanks
Stormwater tanks
Product:
Flushjet WA/WW
Product:
SL, SLV
Product:
S-range
Product:
Controls and Monitoring
Dedicated Controls:
User friendly display, plug
and play commissioning
and all the right functions.
Supplied as modules or
ready-made panels.
Applications are typically
sewage network pumping
stations controlling up
to six pumps.
MP204:
Electronic motor protection.
Pump principle:
Submersible semi-open, single channel or Super
Vortex wastewater pumps.
With or with out built-in controller.
Flow, Q: Max. 87,5 l/s
Head, H: Max. 44 m
Liquid temp.: Max. 40C
Discharge diam.: DN 65 to DN 150 / 2 to 6
Product types:
SV, S1, S2, S3, S4
CUE:
Frequency converters for three-phase pumps.
Adjustment of the pump performance to the
demand.
Product:
AFG/AMD/AMG
Product:
SEV, SE1
Product:
KPL/KWM
Product:
Remote Management
Product types:
AFG, AMD, AMG
Product types:
KPL/KWM
Pump principle:
Horizontal gear driven flowmakers.
Direct and gear driven mixers.
Axial thrust:
AFG 998-6632 N
Pump principle:
Submersible or dry installed single channel or
Super Vortex wastewater pumps. Stainless steel
versions available.
Controls and protection systems available
Head, H: Max. 45 m
Head, H: Max. 20 m
47
48
Stormwater tanks
Stormwater tanks
bibliography
Grundfos WebCAPS
Go to the Grundfos online WebCAPS,
Computer Aided Product Selection program,
toaccess more than 180,000 Grundfos products
complete with data and CAD drawings.
Solids in sewers characteristics, effects and control of sewer solids and associated pollutants (2004);
Scientific and Technical Report No. 14; edited by R. M. Ashley et al; ISBN: 1 900222 91 4; IWA Publishing
Urban and Highway Stormwater Pollution, Concepts and Engineering (2010); Thorkild Hvitved-Jacobsen ,
Jes Vollertsen and Asbjrn Haaning Nielsen, ISBN: 978-1-4398-2685-0, CRC Press 2010
Stormwater collection systems design handbook (2001); editor in chief Mays, Lary W.; ISBN 0-07-135471-9;
McGraw-Hill
Danish literature:
Aflbsteknik (2002); Linde et al; ISBN 87-502-0827-6; Polyteknisk Forlag
Lrebog i Hydraulik (2003); Brorson, M and Larsen, T; ISBN 87-7307-691-0; Aalborg Universitetsforlag
Pumpe stbi (2000); Ingeniren Bger; Publisher Flening, Sren; ISBN 87-571-2296-2; Ingeniren
Vejledning nr. 71, Regnbetingede udledninger - katalog over teknologier til reduktion af effekter i miljet
(2006); DANVAs Arbejdsgruppe Om Regnbetingede Udledninger, ISBN 87-90455-61-4; DANVA
www.grundfos.com/webcaps
49
50
51
www.grundfos.com
The name Grundfos, the Grundfos logo, and the payoff BeThinkInnovate are registered trademarks
owned by Grundfos Holding A/S or Grundfos A/S, Denmark. All rights reserved worldwide.
98140144/0112/Water Utility/9824-D&I