Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 70 views

    Attorney Addendum Thoughts

    Uploaded by

    Ridalyn Adrenalyn
    The document discusses the relationship between attorneys, courts, and clients. It argues that attorneys are officers of the court first and that their duties to the court supersede their duties to clients. It also discusses the nature of various government agencies and courts as administrative rather than constitutional.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Attorney Addendum Thoughts

    Uploaded by

    Ridalyn Adrenalyn
    70 views3 pages
    The document discusses the relationship between attorneys, courts, and clients. It argues that attorneys are officers of the court first and that their duties to the court supersede their duties to clients. It also discusses the nature of various government agencies and courts as administrative rather than constitutional.

    Original Description:

    read before getting an attorney

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document discusses the relationship between attorneys, courts, and clients. It argues that attorneys are officers of the court first and that their duties to the court supersede their duties to clients. It also discusses the nature of various government agencies and courts as administrative rather than constitutional.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    70 views3 pages

    Attorney Addendum Thoughts

    Uploaded by

    Ridalyn Adrenalyn
    The document discusses the relationship between attorneys, courts, and clients. It argues that attorneys are officers of the court first and that their duties to the court supersede their duties to clients. It also discusses the nature of various government agencies and courts as administrative rather than constitutional.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3
    At a glance
    Powered by AI
    The document discusses the relationship between attorneys, the court system, and the government. It claims attorneys have a duty to the courts over their clients and that courts are administrative rather than judicial.

    The relationship between attorneys, clients, and the court system.

    The author believes attorneys have a primary duty to the courts rather than their clients and that modern court systems are administrative rather than judicial.

    Attorney Addendum Thoughts

    http://freedom-school.com/law/addendum-thoughts.html

    Attorney Addendum Thoughts


    Bigger text (+) | Smaller text (-)
    (as received...)
    [The] fact of the matter, the governor and its agencies falls under the executive branch of government.
    The court system today, including the clerk of courts, are not judicial but administrative pursuant to
    Florida Statutes 120 and 5 U.S.C. the Administrative Procedure Act (federal & state) since they are
    not article III or constitutional courts, they are administrative courts that fall under the executive
    branch and under the Administrative Procedure Acts.
    Secondly, why would anyone in their right mind even hire an attorney? The court and its officers can
    only interact with either a corporation, trust or "ward of the court" (except in a court of record in a
    common law venue which is a superior court) and cannot interact with a live human "people". Under
    Corpus Juris Secundum (CJS), (means body of law)
    Volume 7, Section 4 - Attorney & client: The attorney's first duty is to the courts and the
    public, not to the client, and wherever the duties to his client conflict with those he owes as
    an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to the latter."
    Clients are also called "wards" of the court in regard to their relationship with their attorneys. See the
    lawyer's code of ethics; see 7 CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM at section 4 which reads:
    "7 C.J.S. Section 4. Nature and Duties of Office. An attorney is an officer of the court with
    an obligation to the courts and the public as well as to his clients, and his duty is to
    facilitate the administration of justice. An attorney does not hold an office or public trust, in
    the constitutional or statutory sense of that term, and strictly speaking, he is not an officer
    of the state or of a governmental subdivision thereof. Rather, as held in many decisions,
    he is an officer of the court, before which he has been admitted to practice. An attorney is
    not the court or one of its ministerial officers, or a law enforcement officer. He is, however,
    in a sense an officer of the state, with an obligation to the courts and to the public no less
    significant than his obligation to his clients. Thus, an attorney occupies a "dual position"
    which imposes "dual obligations."
    His first duty is to the courts and the public, not to the client, and wherever the duties his client conflict
    with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former must yield to
    the latter. 1950 the 81st Congress Investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R.
    Association is founded and ran by communists under definition. Thus any elected official that is a
    member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.
    We now know why on the 9th December in 1945 the International Organization Immunities Act
    relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations. In 8 U.S.C. 1481 stated
    that once an oath of office is taken citizenship is relinquished, thus any state employee becomes a
    foreign entity, agency, or state. That means every public office is a foreign state, including all political
    subdivisions. (i.e., every single court is considered a separate foreign entity.) Under 22 U.S.C.
    (Foreign Relations and Intercourse) Chapter 11 identifies all public officials as foreign agents. Federal
    Rules of Civil Procedure (F.R.C.P.) 4j states that the Court jurisdiction and immunity fall under a
    foreign State.
    Any state agency that operates "For Profit" is not dejure but defacto and void of immunity thus
    operating like any other publicly trading corporation as declared by the U.S. supreme Court Clearfield Trust v. U.S., 318 US 363 - 1943.
    The real question is, which state agencies are in charge of the enforcement of law against a clerk of
    court? That is the avenue I wish to pursue, outside of a private civil action and simply not interested in
    being disgruntled in writing a complaint just to be ignored by a state agency which has been par for
    the course when dealing with state agencies, like the fox watching the chicken coup.
    Please advise,
    Darren-James: Michaels
    Private Attorney General 42 U.S.C. 1988
    Qualified Criminal Investigator 18 U.S.C. 1510
    Federal Witness 18 U.S.C. 1512, 13; 1964(a)(b)(c)(d)
    Ordained Minister/Ambassador - Protected Foreign official - 18 U.S.C. 112; 22 U.S.C. 254; 18

    1 of 3

    15-05-15 10:39 AM

    Attorney Addendum Thoughts

    http://freedom-school.com/law/addendum-thoughts.html

    U.S.C 1116 (3)


    Absolute Immunity as a Corporation - 28 U.S.C. 1608
    F.S.I.A. (1976, 1997)
    Secured Foreign Party - 28 U.S.C. 1602-1611
    Florida Notary F.S. 117
    Attorney's License? Ain't No Such Thing!
    ARE LAWYERS AND ATTORNEYS LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW?
    See also,

    Competent Counsel Questionaire


    Lawyers and Attorneys Are Not Licensed To Practice Law
    Bureaucrats Never Have a Case
    NOTICE: Darren-James: Michaels is not affiliated with Freedom School.

    (This page was last modified on: 05/02/2015 14:47:27)

    Specialty Areas

    All the powers in the universe seem to favor the person who has confidence.
    ShareThis

    More & Other Information - Resource Pages


    Admiralty related items

    Belligerent Claimant

    Bonds

    Attention Signing the Constitution Away

    Citizenship / nationality related items

    Education

    Graphics

    History

    Jerry Kirk

    Aware

    Jurisdiction

    Law related items

    Lewis Mohr

    Luis Ewing

    Money

    Oath related items

    Reading Material

    Reading Room

    Stuff

    Tax matters

    Travel related

    Truth
    Video

    NOTICE: The information on this page was brought to you by people


    who paid this website forward so that someone such as you might also
    profit by having access to it. If you care to do so also please feel
    encouraged to KEEP THIS SITE GOING by making a donation today.
    Thank you.

    Freedom School is not affiliated with the links on this page - unless otherwise stated.
    Freedom School information served for educational purposes only, no liability assumed for use.

    2 of 3

    15-05-15 10:39 AM

    Attorney Addendum Thoughts

    http://freedom-school.com/law/addendum-thoughts.html

    The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice.
    Freedom School does not consent to unlawful action.
    Freedom School advocates and encourages one and all to adhere to, support and defend all law which is particularly applicable.
    Information is intended for those men and women who are not "US CITIZENS" or "TAXPAYERS" - continued use, reference or citing indicates voluntary and
    informed compliance.
    Freedom School is a free speech site and operation as there is no charge for things presented
    this site relys on this memorandum and others in support of this philosophy and operation.
    The noteworthy failure of the government or any alleged agency thereof to at any time rebut anything appearing on this website constitutes a legal admission
    of the fidelity and accuracy of the materials presented, which are offered in good faith and prepared as such by Freedom School and third parties affiliated or
    otherwise. THIS IS AN ELECTRONIC AGREEMENT AND IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT, EQUIVALENT TO A SIGNED, WRITTEN CONTRACT
    BETWEEN PARTIES - If the government, or any one else, wants to assert that any of the religious and/or political statements that are not factual appearing
    on this website are in error, then they as the moving party have the burden of proof, and they must responsively meet that burden of proof under the
    Administrative Procedures Act 5 U.S.C. 556(d) and under the due process clauses found in the Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Amendments to the national
    Constitution BEFORE there will be response to any summons, questions, or unsubstantiated and slanderous accusations. Attempts at calling presented
    claims "frivolous" without specifically rebutting the particular claim, or claims, deemed "frivolous" will be in deed be "frivolous" and prima facie evidence that
    shall be used accordingly. Hey guys, if anything on this site is found to be in error a good faith effort will be made to correct it in timely fashion upon
    notification.

    Freedom-School.com site, the DVD, or work computers DMCA Policy


    the Freedom-School.com site, the DVD, and/or work computers, make effort to be in compliance with 17 U.S.C. 512 and the Digital
    Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA"). It is our policy to respond to any infringement notices and take appropriate actions under the Digital
    Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") and other applicable intellectual property laws.
    If your copyrighted material has been posted on the Freedom-School.com site, the DVD, or work computers, in other than fair use capacity
    or if links to your copyrighted material are returned through our search engine and you want the material removed, you must provide a
    written communication that details the information listed in the following section. Please be aware that you will be liable for damages
    (including costs and attorneys fees) if you misrepresent information listed on the site that is allegedly infringing on your alleged copyrights.
    We suggest that you may want to first contact competent legal assistance on this matter.
    The following elements must be included in your copyright infringement claim:
    * Provide evidence of the authorized person to act on behalf of the fully disclosed alleged owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly
    infringed. Please notice that we generally do not deal with third parties.
    * Provide sufficient contact information so that we may contact you. You must also include a valid email address.
    * You must identify in sufficient detail the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed and including at least one search term under
    which the material appears in Freedom-School.com search results.
    * A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the
    copyright owner, its agent, or the law.
    * A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act
    on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.
    * Must be signed by the authorized person to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly being infringed. (Proper
    ratification of commencement.)

    Send the infringement notice via email to the postmaster at Freedom-School.com


    Please allow 1-3 business days for an email response. Note that emailing your complaint to other parties such as our Internet Service
    Provider (ISP) or server host(s) will not expedite your request and may result in a delayed response due the complaint not being properly
    being filed.

    Presentation Copyright 2007, 2015


    All Rights Reserved

    HOME

    3 of 3

    15-05-15 10:39 AM

    You might also like