Angulo de Dilatancia de Rocas

Post-failure behaviour
183
70
60
Stress
50
Elastic-brittle
40
30
20
10
0
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
Strain
(a) Very good quality hard rock mass

15
Stress
10
Strain softening
5
0
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
Strain
(b) Average quality rock mass

2.0
Elastic-plastic
Stress
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.000
0.001
0.002
0.003
Strain
(c) Very poor quality soft rock mass

Figure 11.10: Suggested post failure characteristics for different quality rock masses.
Chapter 11: Rock mass properties
184
Table 11.7: Typical properties for a very good quality hard rock mass
Intact rock strength
Hoek-Brown constant
Geological Strength Index
Friction angle
Cohesive strength
Rock mass compressive strength
Rock mass tensile strength
Deformation modulus
Poissons ratio
Dilation angle
Post-peak characteristics
Friction angle
Cohesive strength
Deformation modulus
11.8.2
ci
mi
GSI
c
cm
tm
Em
150 MPa
25
75
46
13 MPa
64.8 MPa
-0.9 MPa
42000 MPa
0.2
/4 = 11.5
f
cf
Efm
38
0
10000 MPa
Average quality rock mass
In the case of an average quality rock mass it is reasonable to assume that the postfailure characteristics can be estimated by reducing the GSI value from the in situ
value to a lower value which characterises the broken rock mass.
The reduction of the rock mass strength from the in situ to the broken state
corresponds to the strain softening behaviour illustrated in Figure 11.10(b). In this
figure it has been assumed that post failure deformation occurs at a constant stress
level, defined by the compressive strength of the broken rock mass. The validity of
this assumption is unknown.
Typical properties for this average quality rock mass may be as follows:
Table 10.8: Typical properties for an average rock mass.
Hoek-Brown constant
Friction angle
Cohesive strength
Deformation modulus
Poissons ratio
Dilation angle
Broken rock mass strength
Deformation modulus
11.8.3
ci
mi
GSI
c
cm
tm
Em
80 MPa
12
50
33
3.5 MPa
13 MPa
-0.15
9000 MPa
0.25
/8 = 4
fcm
Efm
8 MPa
5000 MPa
Very poor quality rock mass
Analysis of the progressive failure of very poor quality rock masses surrounding
tunnels suggests that the post-failure characteristics of the rock are adequately
represented by assuming that it behaves perfectly plastically. This means that it
Reliability of rock mass strength estimates
185
continues to deform at a constant stress level and that no volume change is associated
with this ongoing failure. This type of behaviour is illustrated in Figure 10.10(c).
Typical properties for this very poor quality rock mass may be as follows:
Table 11.9: Typical properties for a very poor quality rock mass
Hoek-Brown constant
Friction angle
Cohesive strength
Deformation modulus
Poissons ratio
Dilation angle
Broken rock mass strength
Deformation modulus
ci
mi
GSI
c
cm
tm
Em
20 MPa
8
30
24
0.55 MPa
1.7 MPa
-0.01 MPa
1400 MPa
0.3
zero
fcm
Efm
1.7 MPa
1400 MPa
11.9 Reliability of rock mass strength estimates

The techniques described in the preceding sections of this chapter can be used to
estimate the strength and deformation characteristics of isotropic jointed rock masses.
When applying this procedure to rock engineering design problems, most users
consider only the average or mean properties. In fact, all of these properties exhibit
a distribution about the mean, even under the most ideal conditions, and these
distributions can have a significant impact upon the design calculations.
In the text that follows, a slope stability calculation and a tunnel support design
calculation are carried out in order to evaluate influence of these distributions. In each
case the strength and deformation characteristics of the rock mass are estimated by
means of the Hoek-Brown procedure, assuming that the three input parameters are
defined by normal distributions.
11.9.1
Input parameters
Figure 11.11 has been used to estimate the value of the value of GSI from field
observations of blockiness and discontinuity surface conditions. Included in this
figure is a crosshatched circle representing the 90% confidence limits of a GSI value
of 25 5 (equivalent to a standard deviation of approximately 2.5). This represents
the range of values that an experienced geologist would assign to a rock mass
described as BLOCKY/DISTURBED or DISINTEGRATED and POOR. Typically,
rocks such as flysch, schist and some phyllites may fall within this range of rock mass
descriptions.
186
Chapter 11: Rock mass properties
Figure 11.11: Estimate of Geological Strength Index GSI based on geological descriptions.

Angulo de Dilatancia de Rocas

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Angulo de Dilatancia de Rocas

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Angulo de Dilatancia de Rocas

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Post-failure behaviour

(a) Very good quality hard rock mass

(b) Average quality rock mass

(c) Very poor quality soft rock mass

Chapter 11: Rock mass properties

Average quality rock mass

Very poor quality rock mass

Reliability of rock mass strength estimates

11.9 Reliability of rock mass strength estimates

Chapter 11: Rock mass properties

You might also like