Transformational Leadership
Transformational Leadership
Transformational Leadership
Inspirational Motivation - These leaders embody the term "team spirit". They show enthusiasm
and optimism, providing both meaning and challenge to the work at hand. They create an
atmosphere of commitment to goals and a shared vision.
Intellectual Stimulation - a Transformational Leader encourages creativity and fosters an
atmosphere in which followers feel compelled to think about old problems in a new way. Public
criticism is avoided.
Individualized Consideration - Transformational leaders act as mentors and coaches. Individual
desires and needs are respected. Differences are accepted and two-way communication is
common. These leaders are considered to be good listeners, and along with this comes
personalized interaction. Followers of these leaders move continually toward development of
higher levels of potential.
Who coined the term Transformational Leadership?
The term Transformational Leadership was introduced in 1978 by James MacGregor Burns in his
analysis of political leaders. His conclusions centered around the differences between
management and leadership. He communicated the two basic concepts of "transformational" and
"transactional" leadership.
In 1985, Bernard M. Bass added to Burns' theory on Transformational Leadership, and in the
early 1990's Bass and Bruce Avolio, through empirical study, mapped the most common
leadership approaches of managers and military commanders. They placed Transformational and
Transactional Leadership on a continuum and defined more stages at the passage between the
two leadership approaches. This model is called "The full range of leadership."
How is Transformational Leadership measured?
While researching these concepts, the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) (Bass &
Avolio) was used. The MLQ measures the concepts of transformational and transactional
leadership. The MLQ has undergone various revisions over the years and had achieved a set of
items that are clear, behaviorally based, and so central to the concepts that there are only four
items per concept (scale) and yet the MLQ consistently shows excellent validity and prediction
of organizational performance.
Why is the MLQ the best tool for measuring Transformational Leadership?
The MLQ measures, and the MLQ report makes personal to individuals how they relate
on the key factors that set truly exceptional leaders apart from marginal ones.
Valid across cultures and all types of organizations (see Bass 1997)
Among leadership assessment methods, the MLQ provides the best relationship of
"survey data" to "organizational outcome"