RESEARCH

A population-based study of thrombolysis for acute stroke

in South Australia
James M Leyden, Woon K Chong, Tim Kleinig, Andrew Lee, John B Field and Jim Jannes

hrombolysis is a highly effective treatment for acute ischaemic stroke, when

administered within 4.5 hours according to strict protocols.1,2 There have been
concerns, however, that the results of clinical
trials for stroke thrombolysis would be difficult to replicate in routine practice. The Safe
Implementation
Thrombolysis
in Stroke
The MedicalofJournal
of Australia
ISSN:
International
Stroke
Thrombolysis
Register
0025-729X 7 February 2011 194 3 111(SITS-ISTR)
was established as a voluntary
115
registry
in over
700 centres
the world
The
Medical
Journal around
of Australia
2011
www.mja.com.au
to address
this concern.3 The SITS-ISTR had
Research
recruited
over 30 000 patients by February
2010, including 704 Australian patients, and
demonstrated clinical outcomes superior to
those seen in clinical trials, including lower
complication rates.4,5
The SITS registry may not reflect outcomes
in the community. Centres registering cases
on the SITS registry may have better outcomes. Although centres participating in the
European Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke Monitoring Study (SITSMOST) were externally audited, there is no
guarantee that centres subsequently participating in the SITS-ISTR report all cases.6
Stroke thrombolysis rates differ greatly
between institutions and, to date, studies of
thrombolysis for acute stroke have not been
population based. The proportion of patients
with acute stroke who receive thrombolysis
has not been accurately estimated.7
We adapted previously developed principles for population-based stroke research8
to identify all cases of acute ischaemic stroke
for which thrombolysis was administered
from October 2007 to September 2009 in
the entire state of South Australia, covering a
population of 1.5 million people. We report
the rates and types of intentional and accidental protocol violations in thrombolysis
administration for stroke, and quantify the
geographic disparity in thrombolytic therapy for stroke in urban and rural SA. We
also examined differences between SITSregistered and unregistered cases.
METHODS
A 2-year study period from 1 October 2007
to 30 September 2009 was chosen to coincide with the opening of an acute stroke unit
(a total of three acute stroke units were
operating during the study period). Multiple

ABSTRACT
Objective: To report the rate of thrombolysis for treating acute stroke in South Australia
from October 2007 to September 2009. We hypothesised that the rate of thrombolytic
therapy would be related to distance from an acute stroke unit.
Design, setting and patients: An observational, population-based, retrospective
review of case notes and imaging, using multiple case-ascertainment methods. Patients
administered a thrombolytic agent by any method for suspected ischaemic stroke in
urban, rural, public and private hospitals in SA (covering a population of 1.5 million
people) were included.
Main outcome measures: Absolute and relative contraindications for thrombolysis
administration in each case, according to the 2007 National Stroke Foundation
guidelines; incidence of haemorrhage; and population thrombolysis rates according to
distance from an acute stroke unit.
Results: A total of 158 cases of thrombolytic therapy for suspected acute ischaemic
stroke were identified in 157 patients. Fifteen patients (10%) had symptomatic
intracranial haemorrhage, of whom eight (5%) died within 3 months. Seven patients had
symptomatic extracranial haemorrhage. Five patients (3%) received thrombolysis
despite absolute contraindications. Patients living closer to stroke units were more likely
to receive thrombolysis.
Conclusions: Rates of symptomatic haemorrhage after thrombolysis were similar to
those in voluntary registries. A large proportion of South Australians are currently
missing out on acute stroke therapy as a result of poor access to acute stroke units in
both urban and rural settings. It is estimated that fewer than 2% of ischaemic stroke
patients are administered thrombolysis in SA.
MJA 2011; 194: 111115

methods of case ascertainment were applied

across urban, rural, public and private hospital systems to identify all cases of acute
stroke for which thrombolysis was administered. SA is geographically isolated from
other states, so no patients with acute stroke
in SA are transferred interstate. Ethics
approval was granted by the ethics committees of the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Royal
Adelaide Hospital and Flinders Medical
Centre.
Case ascertainment
In the urban public health system, case
ascertainment was performed under two
broad headings: searching electronic data
repositories and collating data from other
prospective clinical registries. SAs unique
comprehensive public hospital electronic
data repository was queried. All discharge
summaries over the study period for any
patient with a diagnosis or past history of
stroke were queried for the case-insensitive

word stems thrombol, tpa, alteplase

and tenecteplase. As all patients who
received thrombolysis for stroke should ideally have subsequent brain imaging, the text
reports of all brain scans in public hospitals
were also queried for the above word stems.
All public hospital encounters, regardless of
diagnosis, were queried for the above word
stems in the procedure field. Pharmacy
records in each public hospital were examined for any vials of thrombolytic drugs
dispensed against a patients name. Two
public hospitals were keeping prospective
registries of stroke thrombolysis from October 2007, and a prospective populationbased study of stroke was being performed
in a subset of the study population (140 000
people) for the final 3 months of the study
period. Data from these were collated.
There were no private hospital centres
with protocols for thrombolytic therapy
operating in SA. However, two private hospitals in Adelaide had emergency departments during the study period and both had

MJA Volume 194 Number 3 7 February 2011

111

RESEARCH

Statistical analysis
Proportions were analysed using the Fisher
exact test for counts with two-tailed P values. Differences in arrival-to-treatment time
and symptom-to-treatment time between
those patients registered with SITS and
those not registered were compared using
the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Computation
was done in the R statistical language.

1 Ascertainment of cases of acute stroke in South Australia for which

thrombolysis was administered, October 2007 to September 2009*
Urban public health system: 155 cases
Electronic data repository: 155 cases
Discharge summaries
8914 admissions; 8201 discharge
summaries available; 2485 acute
ischaemic strokes identied
145 cases

Pharmacy records
Dispensing records for
thrombolytic drugs
28 cases

Safe Implementation of
Thrombolysis in Stroke
registry
72 cases

Hospital encounters
131 064 encounters
(procedure list queried for
thrombolysis keywords)
50 cases

Population-based
stroke study
8 cases

Private hospital system: 4 cases

Emergency departments
4 cases
Private neurologists
4 cases

RESULTS

Rural health system: 4 cases

Thrombolysis for acute
ischaemic stroke
conrmed from case
notes
158 cases in 157 patients

* Only three cases were ascertained by one method alone.

a policy to direct acute stroke patients to

other institutions. To identify any cases of
patients who had received thrombolysis
while in a private hospital emergency
department or while admitted as a private
hospital inpatient for another reason, we
contacted every neurologist covering private
hospital inpatients and hospital coordinators at each private hospital.
Each major regional centre was contacted
to determine whether any patients had
received thrombolysis for stroke. In addition, rural general practitioners, who may
run isolated remote hospitals, were contacted during education sessions provided
by the GP networks.
Case review
Case notes were examined by one of us
(J M L) for time of symptom onset, time of
arrival at hospital, whether the patient had
been transferred from another hospital and
time of thrombolysis administration.
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage
was defined as any recorded haemorrhage
with altered neurological findings (the
National Institute of Neurological Disorders
and Stroke [NINDS] definition 9). The
NINDS definition was the most suitable for
a retrospective audit of case notes and is
likely to overestimate symptomatic haemorrhage compared with other definitions.4 All
imaging was reviewed by one of us (W K C)
112

Prospective registries: 72 cases

Imaging reports
72 082 brain scans (text reports
queried for thrombolysis
keywords)
136 cases

Rural hospitals
3 cases
Rural general practitioners
2 cases

and haemorrhage was classified using the

European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study
(ECASS) grading system.10 Finally, the death
register was examined for ascertained cases.
The accepted protocol for the administration of thrombolysis was that described in
the 2007 National Stroke Foundation guidelines.11 Following the publication of results
from the ECASS-III trial in September 2008,
the allowable time window for administration was extended from 3 hours to 4.5
hours.1 Evidence of exclusion criteria in case
notes was recorded. If the notes mentioned
that the treating medical team was aware of
a particular protocol violation but decided
to administer the medication anyway, the
violation was regarded as intentional. The
reported final diagnosis for the administration of thrombolysis was also recorded.
Population demographics
Statistics regarding the population of SA
were obtained from the Australian Bureau of
Statistics 2006 census. Numbers of admissions of patients with stroke in urban, rural,
public and private hospitals were obtained
from Medicare casemix funding data
between June 2006 and June 2008. The
distance between postcodes for each patient
and the nearest stroke unit was calculated
from longitude and latitude coordinates,
obtained from Google Maps, using the
haversine formula.

Over the 2-year study period, 158 instances

of thrombolytic therapy for suspected acute
ischaemic stroke in SA were identified in
157 patients; 84 of these patients were male
and 73 were female. The median age of
patients was 76 years (interquartile range,
7179 years), and 43 patients (27%) were
aged over 80 years. One patient was an
Indigenous Australian.
Eighteen of the 157 patients who received
thrombolysis (11%) initially presented to
hospitals that do not have stroke units
five received thrombolysis after transfer to a
hospital with a stroke unit, and 13 (8%)
received thrombolysis in hospitals without
stroke units. More than half of the admissions for stroke in SA recorded by Medicare
from June 2006 to June 2008 were to
hospitals without acute stroke units.
Case ascertainment
The 158 cases of stroke for which thrombolysis was administered were ascertained as
summarised in Box 1. A total of 8914
admissions to urban public hospitals in SA
that related to any patient coded with any
form of stroke or transient ischaemic attack
were identified, for which 8201 discharge
summaries were available (92%). From the
discharge summaries it was determined that
stroke was the principle reason for, or
occurred during, 4106 admissions, and 916
of these admissions were rehabilitation
admissions or interhospital transfers. Of the
remaining 3190 admissions, 2485 hospital
admissions represented acute presentations
with ischaemic stroke. Ischaemic stroke
occurred while the patient was in hospital in
76 of the admissions. Thrombolytic therapy
for stroke was identified in 145 hospital
admissions in 144 patients from discharge
summaries (one patient received thrombolysis twice during the study period).
Of 72 082 brain scans (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging)
performed in Adelaide public hospitals during the study period, 136 instances of
thrombolysis in 135 patients were identi-

MJA Volume 194 Number 3 7 February 2011

RESEARCH

2 Protocol violations according to the 2007 National Stroke Foundation

guidelines11
Intended
by
No. of treating Symptomatic
patients doctors haemorrhage
Absolute contraindications
Stroke symptoms on waking (time of onset unknown)

Yes

International normalised ratio of 1.9 before administration

No

No
No

Reported seizure of unaffected side

Yes

No

Retrospective radiological review showed subacute

ischaemic stroke on contralateral side

No

Yes*

No imaging performed before administration in rural setting

Yes

No

National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score > 22

Yes

No

Large established cerebral infarction on preliminary CT scan

No

No

Recent major surgery

Yes

Yes

53

Yes

10

Relative contraindications

Patient aged over 80 years

CT = computed tomography. * Fatal intracerebral haemorrhage. Both patients had bleeding at surgical site,
and both survived. Seven patients had intracerebral haemorrhages, of whom five died.

fied. Of 131 064 public hospital encounters,

50 cases were identified where thrombolysis
for stroke had been reported as a procedure
during the study period. From pharmacy
dispensing records for thrombolytic drugs,
28 cases were identified (thrombolytic drugs
were frequently dispensed without patient
identifiers).
Seventy-two patients had been recruited
into the SITS registry, all of whom were
also ascertained by other means. Within
the two hospitals participating in the SITS
registry, 15 eligible cases were identified in
patients who had not been enrolled into
the SITS registry. The prospective population-based stroke study detected eight
patients, all of whom were also ascertained
by other means.
Private hospital thrombolysis. Four patients
received thrombolysis in the private sector;
each was identified by both the treating
neurologist and the hospital coordinator.
Medicare recorded 782 private hospital
admissions for stroke from June 2006 to
June 2008.
Patients residing outside Adelaide. Eleven
patients residing outside the urban region of
Adelaide received thrombolysis over the
study period, of whom two received thrombolysis while visiting Adelaide and five were
taken directly to urban hospitals. The population outside Adelaide comprises 26% of
the total South Australian population
(394 000 of 1.5 million) but comprised only
7% of all stroke thrombolysis cases

(P < 0.001). Over the 2-year period from

June 2006 to June 2008, Medicare recorded
997 stroke admissions in hospitals outside
Adelaide, out of a total of 3521 for SA
(28%), suggesting that stroke incidence is at
least as high in these areas as it is in urban
Adelaide.
Case review
Symptom-to-treatment times. Symptom
onset time could not be determined for 10
cases. For the remaining patients, the
median time from symptom onset to hospital
arrival was 55 minutes. In 21 cases, thrombolysis was administered after a stroke that
occurred in hospital. In 11 cases, the hospital arrival time or time of thrombolytic therapy could not be identified from the notes.

For the remaining patients, the median time

from arrival to thrombolysis was 85 minutes,
which was significantly greater (P < 0.001)
than the 60 minutes recommended by the
American Heart Association.12
Protocol violation and misdiagnoses. In five
cases, thrombolytic therapy was administered when absolute contraindications
existed (Box 2). In one of these cases the
patient had a fatal intracerebral haemorrhage after an asymptomatic subacute infarction was missed in the initial radiological
review, and in three the treating physician
was aware of the contraindication. In 53
cases, thrombolytic therapy was administered when at least one relative contraindication existed (Box 2). In all these cases the
patient was aged over 80 years.
In four cases, the diagnosis was not
stroke. One of these diagnoses was Bells
palsy with psychogenic features, one was
hemiplegic migraine, and two cases were
deemed psychogenic presentations.
Haemorrhage after thrombolysis. All haemorrhages occurred within 36 hours of
thrombolysis. Fifteen patients (10%) had
symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage. This
did not differ significantly from the 6.4%
rate recorded in the NINDS trial (P = 0.30).9
Haemorrhage rates apparent on imaging,
defined using the ECASS classification, are
shown in Box 3.
Case fatality. Eight patients with symptomatic haemorrhage died within 3 months
(5%). In five of these patients (3%), the
intracranial haemorrhage was remote to the
site of the stroke. Seven additional patients
had symptomatic extracranial haemorrhage,
of whom one had a myocardial infarct and
died as a consequence. Three months after
thrombolysis, 34 patients (22%) had died
from any cause.

3 Occurance of haemorrhage within 36 hours of thrombolysis based on imaging,

according to the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study grading system10
Classification

No.

Parenchymal haematoma type 2 (PH2): a dense haematoma in >30% of the infarcted

area with substantial space-occupying effect, or any haemorrhagic lesion outside the
infarcted area)

21

Parenchymal haematoma type 1 (PH1): a haematoma in 30% of infarcted area with

some slight space-occupying effect

Haemorrhagic infarction type 2 (HI2): confluent petechiae within the infarcted area but
without space-occupying effect

Haemorrhagic infarction type 1 (HI1): small petechiae along the margins of the infarct
No haemorrhage visible
Imaging not performed or imaging not available

MJA Volume 194 Number 3 7 February 2011

2
116
3

113

RESEARCH

Difference between SITS-registered and

unregistered cases. Seventy-two of the 158
cases were entered in the SITS registry (Box
5). There was no significant difference in
demographics or bleeding complications
between those entered and not entered into
the SITS registry. Cases not entered had
longer arrival-to-treatment times (P < 0.01)
and longer symptom-to-treatment times,
including cases in which the stroke occurred
in hospital (P < 0.001). This analysis
excluded patients treated outside urban
Adelaide.
Proportion of stroke admissions that
involved thrombolysis. During the study
period, 4% (155/4106) of acute hospital
admissions for stroke in urban public hospitals involved administration of thrombolysis. Eight patients received thrombolysis
outside the urban public hospital system.
Medicare estimates from 2006 to 2008 suggest that over 50% of acute stroke admissions in SA occur outside the urban public
hospital system, hence the proportion of
acute strokes in SA for which thrombolysis
is administered is less than 2%. However,
for patients residing within 5 km of an acute
stroke unit, the thrombolysis rate for stroke
was just over 10% (65 patients in 647
strokes).
DISCUSSION
This study was possible due to unique clinical data collection methods and cooperative
hospital relationships. Case ascertainment
was comprehensive and validated against
coexisting registers and a population stroke
study. Although the numbers are small,
there was no difference in haemorrhage rates
between the 72 cases registered in the SITS
trial and the 86 which were not. Patients
registered in the SITS trial received treatment about 30 minutes sooner, excluding
rural cases. With larger numbers, such a
difference in time to treatment could result
in different outcomes, suggesting that outcomes for stroke thrombolysis in the SITS
registry may be better than those in the
broader community.13
114

4 Number of patients who received

thrombolysis for acute stroke per
100 000 population according to
distance from an acute stroke unit*
Number of patients who received thrombolysis
for acute stroke per 100 000 population

Distance from acute stroke unit. For each

postcode, the number of patients who
received thrombolysis per 100 000 population was plotted against the distance from
the nearest acute stroke unit (Box 4), and a
strong inverse relationship was observed
between these variables. There was no relationship between average or median age
and distance from the nearest acute stroke
unit.

20

0 to <5 km
5 to <10 km
10 to <15 km

15

15 to <20 km
20 to <50 km
50 km

10

0
0 5 10 15 20
50
Distance from an acute stroke unit (km)

* The dashed line represents locally weighted

regression applied to individual postcode data.

The rate of symptomatic intracranial

haemorrhage was not significantly different
from the rate reported for the NINDS study
(10% v 6.4%). A third of patients received
thrombolysis despite contraindications
defined by the National Stroke Foundation
guidelines.11 In a Finnish study of more
than 1000 stroke patients who were treated
with thrombolysis, half were treated outside
guidelines suggesting that most contraindications may be unnecessary, or at least
relative contraindications.14 Haemorrhage
rates apparent on imaging were similar to
those reported from previous studies.10

In a 2007 prospective hospital-based

study of 259 stroke patients admitted to a
tertiary hospital in Adelaide, it was estimated that 16% of stroke patients were
potentially eligible for thrombolysis and
arrived within the treatment time for thrombolysis.15 A much larger proportion would
have been eligible had they arrived sooner.
Currently, many stroke patients who would
benefit from thrombolysis do not receive it.
Similar data have been reported throughout
the Western world. In the United States, it is
estimated from Medicare data alone that
fewer than 3% of stroke patients admitted to
hospital receive thrombolysis.16 In the
United Kingdom, a national audit showed
that 1.4% of stroke patients were treated
with thrombolysis, but some individual centres achieved much higher thrombolysis
rates.7
Distance is an obstacle to thrombolysis for
stroke in SA, even within metropolitan
Adelaide. In our study, residing more than
five kilometres from an acute stroke unit
diminished the chance of receiving thrombolytic therapy this distance is only a
matter of minutes by car in Adelaide. At a
distance of more than about five kilometres
from an acute stroke unit, a patient is much
more likely to be taken to a closer alternative
hospital. Despite over half of stroke admissions occurring at hospitals without stroke
units, transferred patients represented only
3% of those who received thrombolysis.
Also, although age is a strong risk factor for
stroke,17 there was no relationship between
age and distance from acute stroke unit.
The barriers to thrombolysis for stroke in
rural areas, including lack of rapid imaging

5 Comparison of SITS-registered and unregistered cases

Registered
(n = 72)

Unregistered
(n = 86)

72

72

Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage

Symptomatic extracranial haemorrhage

Death from intracranial haemorrhage

Diagnosis other than stroke

Thrombolysis protocol violation absolute

contraindication*

Thrombolysis protocol violation relative

contraindication*

27

26

Average age (years)

Median symptom-to-arrival time (min)

53

56

Median arrival-to-treatment time (min)

74

95

131

165

Median symptom-to-treatment time (min)

SITS = Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke. * One or more contraindications according to the 2007

National Stroke Foundation guidelines.11 P < 0.01. P < 0.001.

MJA Volume 194 Number 3 7 February 2011

RESEARCH

and medical expertise, are formidable; yet a

small number of stroke patients do receive
thrombolysis in the rural health system. Rural
doctors come under pressure to provide treatment options to their patients. As unsupported administration of thrombolysis for
stroke is not recommended in Australian
guidelines,18 Australia must develop networks
that link rural doctors with stroke physicians.
The shortfalls in stroke service delivery in
SA are currently being addressed by the
Stroke Clinical Network, established by SA
Health in 2009. Offering thrombolysis to all
eligible patients is a main objective. Strategies include paramedic stroke identification,
patient redirection to stroke units, acute
stroke management protocols, and rural
stroke service networks. Unified hospital
coding of thrombolysis is being implemented to monitor the success of these
strategies.
Our results show that a large proportion
of patients in SA are missing out on acute
stroke therapy as a result of poor access to
acute stroke units in urban and rural settings. Australia must face the challenge of
delivering stroke thrombolysis safely and
frequently.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Lizzie Dodd, Stroke Nurse, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, for help in reviewing SITS cases;
Grant Emmerson, Manager, Analysis and Reporting, Information Communication and Technology
Delivery Services, SA Health, for help in developing searches within public hospital data repositories; and Clarabelle Pham and Jonathan Karnon,
Risk Adjusted Cost-Effectiveness (RAC-E) team,
University of Adelaide, for providing Medicare
data.

COMPETING INTERESTS
None identified.

AUTHOR DETAILS

8 Sudlow CL, Warlow CP. Comparing stroke incidence worldwide: what makes studies comparable? Stroke 1996; 27: 550-558.
9 The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group.
T issue plasminogen activator for acute
ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 15811587.
10 Fiorelli M, Bastianello S, von Kummer R, et al.
Hemorrhagic transformation within 36 hours of
a cerebral infarct: relationships with early clinical deterioration and 3-month outcome in the
European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study I
(ECASS I) cohort. Stroke 1999; 30: 2280-2284.
11 National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines
for acute stroke management. Melbourne: NSF,
2007.
12 Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, Smith EE, et al. Characteristics, performance measures, and in-hospital outcomes of the first one million stroke
and transient ischemic attack admissions in Get
With The Guidelines-Stroke. Circ Cardiovasc
Qual Outcomes 2010; 3: 291-302.
13 Lees KR, Bluhmki E, von Kummer R, et al. Time
to treatment with intravenous alteplase and
outcome in stroke: an updated pooled analysis
of ECASS, ATLANTIS, NINDS, and EPITHET
trials. Lancet 2010; 375: 1695-1703.
14 Meretoja A, Putaala J, Tatlisumak T, et al. Offlabel thrombolysis is not associated with poor
outcome in patients with stroke. Stroke 2010;
41: 1450-1458.
15 Kleinig TJ, Kimber TE, Thompson PD. Stroke
prevention and stroke thrombolysis: quantifying the potential benefits of best practice therapies. Med J Aust 2009; 190: 678-682.
16 Kleindorfer D, Xu Y, Moomaw CJ, et al. US
geographic distribution of rt-PA utilization by
hospital for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2009;
40: 3580-3584.
17 Feigin VL, Lawes CM, Bennett DA, Anderson
CS. Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence,
and case-fatality in the late 20th century. Lancet
Neurol 2003; 2: 43-53.
18 Ad Hoc Committee representing the National
Stroke Foundation and the Stroke Society of
Australasia. The implementation of intravenous
tissue plasminogen activator in acute ischaemic
stroke a scientific position statement from
the National Stroke Foundation and the Stroke
Society of Australasia. Intern Med J 2009; 39:
317-324.

James M Leyden, MB BS, FRACP, Neurologist

Woon K Chong, MB BS, FRANZCR,
Neuroradiologist 1
Tim Kleinig, MB BS(Hons), FRACP, PhD,
Neurologist2
Andrew Lee, MB BS, MPH, FRACP, Director of
Stroke Medicine3
John B Field, PhD, AStat, Statistical Consultant4
Jim Jannes, BM BS, FRACP, PhD, Head, Stroke
Unit1
1 Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
2 Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA.
3 Comprehensive Stroke Centre, Flinders
Medical Centre, Adelaide, SA.
4 Faculty of Health Sciences, University of
Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.
Correspondence:
[email protected]

REFERENCES
1 Hacke W, Donnan G, Fieschi C, et al. Association of outcome with early stroke treatment:
pooled analysis of ATLANTIS, ECASS, and
NINDS rt-PA stroke trials. Lancet 2004; 363:
768-774.
2 Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, et al. Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute
ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 13171329.
3 Kaste M, Thomassen L, Grond M, et al. Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus
statement of the 3rd Karolinska Stroke Update,
October 3031, 2000. Stroke 2001; 32: 27172718.
4 Wardlaw JM, Murray V, Berge E, Del Zoppo GJ.
Thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (4):
CD000213.
5 Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A, et al.
Thrombolysis with alteplase 3-4.5 h after acute
ischaemic stroke (SITS-ISTR): an observational
study. Lancet 2008; 372: 1303-1309.
6 Leung TW, Wong KS. Thrombolysis with
alteplase for acute ischemic stroke: safe and
effective outside the 3-hour time window? Nat
Clin Pract Neurol 2009; 5: 70-71.
7 Sudlow C, Warlow C. Getting the priorities right
for stroke care. BMJ 2009; 338: b2083.

(Received 14 Jul 2010, accepted 12 Oct 2010)

MJA Volume 194 Number 3 7 February 2011

115