The Basic Principles of Sieve Analysis: Fig. 1: Particle Size Determination Methods
The Basic Principles of Sieve Analysis: Fig. 1: Particle Size Determination Methods
The Basic Principles of Sieve Analysis: Fig. 1: Particle Size Determination Methods
Introduction
Many natural and manufactured materials occur in a disperse form, which means that
they consist of differently shaped and sized particles. The particle size distribution, i.e.
the number of particles of different sizes, is responsible for important physical and
chemical properties such as:
This list could be continued at great length. The examples clearly show how important it
is to have a knowledge of the particle distribution, particularly within the context of
quality assurance in the production of bulk goods. If the particle distribution changes
during the manufacturing process then the quality of the finished product will also
change. Only a continuous monitoring of the particle size distribution can guarantee a
constant product quality.
Particle size determination methods
There are different methods for determining the particle distribution. The choice of a
particular method depends primarily on the dispersion status, i.e. on the degree of
fineness of the sample.
1x1Siebanalysen_040226_final_E.doc
Page 2 of 7
1x1Siebanalysen_040226_final_E.doc
In addition, in the fine particle size range and for obtaining single fractions, ultrasonic
and air-jet sieving are used for special applications.
2. Single sieve and sieve set sieving
The use of a single sieve, frequently also known as sieve cut, is only used to determine
the percentage of undersize and oversize particles. Particle size distribution in the normal
sense is not carried out. In a single sieving process, only a single sieve with a defined
mesh is subjected to the sieving movement together with a collector pan. It is normally
used only for orientation purposes.
Sieve set sieving is the process in which a set of several sieves is used together with a
collector pan. The tests sieves are arranged in a stack with the largest mesh openings at
the top of the stack. The sample is placed on the top sieve.
Page 3 of 7
1x1Siebanalysen_040226_final_E.doc
1x1Siebanalysen_040226_final_E.doc
If this basic information does not exist then the sieving time and amplitude or speed
must be determined experimentally. This is done by first selecting a relatively short
sieving time (e.g. 5 min) and carrying out sieving at various amplitudes or speeds to
determine at which values the largest amount of sample passes through the sieves
(optimal sieving quality). An initial approximate value for the amplitude can be obtained
by observing the sample movements. These should not be too weak (the sample will not
be adequately loosened up) and not too strong (the particles float and have no chance
of passing through the mesh).
In the next step sieving is carried out with different sieving times at the amplitude or
speed determined above. When the weight of the material passing through the sieve in
one minute changes by less than 0.1% of the sample amount (DIN 66 165) the optimal
sieving time has been achieved.
Fig. 5: Manual and digital setting of the amplitude and the effect on the
sieving results
Sieving aids
Sieving aids are used for very fine samples that tend to adhere together. They are used
to make the sample sievable. A differentiation is made between mechanical sieving aids
(e.g. rubber cubes, brushes, balls, chains) for eliminating molecular adhesive forces, and
additives (e.g. talcum, Aerosil) for greasy, sticky and oil-containing products. Antistatic
sprays reduce electrostatic charges, surfactants reduce the surface tension in wet
sieving.
Page 5 of 7
1x1Siebanalysen_040226_final_E.doc
Error-free evaluation
Evaluation takes place when the sieving process has finished. The sample residues in
each test sieve are determined by weighing and assigned as a percentage of the sum of
the individual fractions. The difference between the original sample weight and the sum
of the individual fractions is the sieving loss. If this is greater than 1% then, according to
DIN 66 165, the sieving process must be repeated.
The results of the evaluation can be shown graphically and in tabular form. As can be
seen from Figure 5, the fractions (p3) are normally shown as a histogram (bar graph) and
the cumulative frequency curve (Q3) from the percentage mass fractions is plotted
against the nominal sieve mesh (x). In this example 19% of the sieved material has a
particle size between 0.063 mm and 0.125 mm. From the cumulative frequency curve,
for example, it can be seen that 67% of the material is smaller than 0.250 mm.
Size class
<
0.045 0.063 0.125 0.250 0.500 1.000 2.000 > 4.000
[mm]
0.045
0.063
0.125
0.250
0.500
1.000
2.000
4.000
p3 [%]
3.0
10.0
19.0
35.0
16.0
10.0
5.0
2.0
0.0
Q3 [%]
3.0
13.0
32.0
67.0
83.0
93.0
98.0
100.0
100.0
x50 = 0.189 mm
Fig. 7:
Fractions p3 (left-hand y-axis) and cumulative frequency curve Q3 (right-hand Y-axis)
Frequently used characteristic features can be calculated from the result, for example the
x50 value, which defines the median particle diameter of the sieved particle fraction; in
the example shown above it indicates that 50% of the sample is larger or smaller than
x=0.189 mm.
PC-supported programs for evaluating sieve analyses work very quickly and reliably,
eliminate calculation and graphics errors and meet the requirements of modern quality
management systems (DIN EN ISO 9000ff). In contrast, manual evaluation is very timeconsuming and also the risk of operator and random errors is large.
Professional evaluations are offered, for example, by the EasySieve 2.0 software from
Retsch. It communicates with the sieve shaker and the balance and gives the user easily
understood instructions for each particular working step. The calculated sieve analysis
result is available directly after the end of the sieving process. The result is presented in
well-laid-out, standardized measurement protocol.
Page 6 of 7
1x1Siebanalysen_040226_final_E.doc
Final remarks
Analytical sieving is used in the R&D sector, for quality control of raw materials,
intermediate and finished products as well as for production monitoring. Despite new
developments in the field of optical particle measuring instruments it remains a proven,
reliable and inexpensive method for determining the particle size. However, the result of
a sieve analysis is only meaningful and reproducible when the preconditions described
above are fulfilled. Modern sieve shakers with digital settings, such as the AS-control
series from Retsch, supported by a powerful evaluation software, permit exact sieving
results that are reproducible throughout the whole world.
Page 7 of 7
1x1Siebanalysen_040226_final_E.doc
Annex
Short glossary of sieve analysis
Test sieving
Test sieving is a sieve analysis for determining whether the distribution of the particle
sizes in a sample fulfills certain requirements.
Sieve passage
The sieve passage is the fine material that passes through the sieve during a sieve
analysis.
Sieve residue
The sieve residue is the coarse material that remains on the sieve after a sieve analysis.
Sieving loss
The sieving loss is the difference in weight between the original sample and the sum of
the recovered fractions. According to DIN 66 165 part 1 it should not exceed 1% of the
original sample weight.
Relative open sieve area
The relative open sieve area is the sum of all the open mesh areas of the sieve relative to
the total area of the sieve.
Available open sieve area
The available open sieve area is the sum of the open mesh areas of the sieve that have
not been blocked.
Cut sharpness
The cut sharpness characterizes the quality of the sieving into individual fractions.
Equivalent diameter
In sieving the equivalent diameter of a particle is the diameter of a sphere with the same
mass or volume.
Undersize
Mass fraction below a defined cut point.
Oversize
Mass fraction above a defined cut point
Page 8 of 7
1x1Siebanalysen_040226_final_E.doc