International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research________________________ ISSN 2277- 3622

Vol.2, No. 3, March (2013)

CELEBRITY ENDORSEMENT IN ADVERTISING; CAN IT LEAD TO

_____________________________________________________________________________________

ABSTRACT
The celebrity endorser is a panacea for all marketing woes. It is today a frequently used approach
in marketing for all brand building exercises. The star appeal however needs to be perfectly
blended intelligently and strategically to reap the benefits and make brands. It serves as an aid to
expedite recall and influence purchase. But, this can also be a nightmare unless accompanied by
a powerful idea, effective and impeccable positioning. (Khatri P). This research attempts to
assess whether celebrity endorsement can translate into brand loyalty, over a period of time. In
this way, one would be able to see whether or not celebrity endorsements can positively
influence the brand, more specifically, does it lead to brand loyalty in the long run? The cause
and effect relationship between celebrity endorsement and brand loyalty is analyzed. The
research would also suggest what the impact on brand loyalty is when brands have used a series
of different endorsers, over a period of time. Has it hampered brand loyalty or did the
consumers attitude towards the brand remain unchanged? It also explores whether there was a
common thread of similarity amidst the various endorsers that promoted the brand. In this way,
corporate giants that are seeking to increase customer loyalty towards their brands would be able
to make smarter decisions regarding the use of a celebrity endorser in their advertisements.
KEYWORDS: Celebrity endorsement, Advertising, Brand loyalty, Branding, Celebrity.
_____________________________________________________________________________________

INTRODUCTION
Celebrities are people who enjoy public recognition by a large share of a certain group of people.
Several attributes like attractiveness, extraordinary lifestyle are characteristics within a social
group wherein they generally differ from the social norm and enjoy a high degree of public
awareness (Schlecht, 2003).
Celebrity Endorsement: A Strategic Promotion Perspective special celebrity events ex. filmfare
star awards, Videocon screen awards etc. In addition they are present in News, Fashion
magazines and tabloids, which provide second source of information on events and private life of
celebrities through mass media channels. Last but not the least celebrities act as spokes people in
advertising to promote products and services. (Kambitsis et.al., 2002, Tom et.al.1992; Schiffman
and Kanuk, 1997). Compared to other endorsers, celebrities achieve a higher degree of attention
and recall. They increase awareness of a companys advertising, create positive feelings towards
73

International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research________________________ ISSN 2277- 3622
Vol.2, No. 3, March (2013)
Online available at www.indianresearchjournals.com

brands and are perceived by consumers as more entertaining (Solomon,2002) .Using a celebrity
in advertising is therefore likely to positively affect a customers brand attitude and purchase
intentions.
As advertisers pour crores of rupees every year into celebrity advertising, the question arises; is it
worth all the money and the headaches of coordinating stars and managing their tantrums. Can it
lead to brand loyalty in the long run? Does it actually help each of the brands? Does the
consumer think in categories and slot brands accordingly or is it one big maze of brands and
saliency is dependent on 'recency.' Before exploring whether celebrity advertising can lead to
brand loyalty, let us understand what goes into celebrity advertising. Interestingly, while
celebrity advertising is huge, few agencies actually present celebrity advertising as a solution to
client problems. In the advertising world, celebrity advertising is seen as a substitute for 'absence
of ideas' -- and actually frowned upon. Yet it appears again and again. The reasons are quite
insightful. A client hits upon celebrity as a solution when his agency is unable to present to him a
viable, exciting solution for his communication/marketing problem. He then feels that the
presence of a well-known face is an easy way out. A client looks at a celebrity solution,
sometimes, to follow competition. When attacked with a celebrity, a quick response is to get
another one to combat. The result is often, at best, achieving parity. A third, and often
unfortunate, reason is a client's desire to rub shoulders with the glitterati. And signing a celebrity
is a passport to that. Most frequently, celebrities are given as 'fate accompli' to the agency. And
scripts are written around them.
If celebrity advertising has such implications, one cannot help but wonder if it would yield long
term benefits like building of brand loyalty. Brand loyalty is a topical issue, with several brands
resorting to price cuts across categories. They may attract consumers in the short run: consumers
may stock the brands and consumers new to the brand may try it. But over a period of time, a
brand's value may get diluted in consumers' psyche, and will eventually lose a strong base of
consumers. Hence, lets try and explore whether celebrity advertising could be a solution that
could aid the process of building a loyal base of customers in the long run.
Literature Review
Some properties such as likeability, expertise, trustworthiness and similarity cause a celebrity
endorser to become a source of persuasive information and this creates a sense of certainty which
has been revealed in earlier studies (Suranaa, 2008; Amos et. al., 2008). Also physical
attractiveness of the endorser is considerable in effectiveness of a message (Khatri, 2006). Using
of celebrity endorsers to support products is explained by balance theory principles too.
According to this theory, successful companies establish an emotional relationship both between
the observer and endorser and between endorser and brand (Mowen, 2000). Celebrity
endorsement research has revolved around broadly five themes: celebrity attractiveness
(Debevec and Kernan, 1984; Kahle and Homer, 1985; Caballero, Lumpkin and Madden, 1989);
celebrity meaning transfer (McCracken, 1989; Langmeyer and Walker, 1991; Miciak and
Shanklin, 1994; Erdogan, Baker and Tagg, 2001; Choi, Lee and Kim, 2005); celebrity
credibility (Klebba and Unger, 1982; Patzer, 1983); celebrity impact on brands and
consumers (Ohanian, 1991; Tripp, Jensen and Carlson, 1994; Mathur, Mathur and Rangan,
1997; Shimp and Till, 1998; Erdogan, 1999; Silvera and Austad, 2004); and celebrity product
match-up (Kamins, 1990; Misra and Beatty, 1990; Till and Busler, 1998).
74

International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research________________________ ISSN 2277- 3622
Vol.2, No. 3, March (2013)
Online available at www.indianresearchjournals.com

The realm of the celebritys impact is confined to bestow a distinctive identity and provide an
effective audio visual to the brand; the celebrity does not have the power to improve or debilitate
the efficiency and features of the core product (Kamakura, 1995). The health of a brand can
definitely be improved to some extent by celebrity endorsement. But one has to remember that
endorsement by a celebrity is a means to an end and not an end in itself (Johnson, 1984). An
appropriately used celebrity can prove to be a massively powerful tool that magnifies the effects
of a campaign. But the aura of cautiousness should always be there (Mccracken, 1989). The fact
to be emphasized is that celebrities alone do not guarantee success, as consumers nowadays
understand advertising. They know the nuances of advertising. Customers today realize that
celebrities are paid heavily for endorsements and this makes them cynical about celebrity
endorsements (Bloemer, Lemmink, 1992). A celebrity is used to impart credibility and
aspirational values to a brand, but the celebrity needs to match the product. A good brand
campaign idea and an intrinsic link between the celebrity and the message are an absolute must
for a successful campaign (Erdogan, 1999). Celebrities are no doubt good at generating
attention, recall and positive attitudes towards advertising provided they are supporting a good
idea and there is an explicit fit between them and the brand. On the other hand, they are rendered
useless when it comes to the actual efficiency of the core product, creating positive attitudes to
brands, purchase intentions and actual sales. (Solman, Brown, 2004).Brands have been
leveraging celebrity appeal for a long time. Across categories, whether in products or services,
more and more brands are banking on the mass appeal of celebrities. As soon as a new celebrity
is born, advertisers queue up to them to persuade them to endorse their brand. (Warren, 2007).
There are several reasons for such extensive use of celebrities. The reasons for extensive use of
celebrities are manifold. Firstly, because of their high profile, celebrities may help
advertisements stand out from the surrounding clutter, thus improving their communicative
ability. Secondly, they may also generate extensive public relations leverage for brands.
Celebrity endorsement advertising strategies can, under the right circumstances, indeed justify
the high costs associated with this form of advertising (Alonso, 2006). But it would be
presumptuous to consider celebrity endorsement as a panacea for all barricades. Celebrity
endorsement if used effectively, makes the brand stand out, helps in brand recall and facilitates
instant awareness. To achieve this, the marketer needs to be really disciplined in choice of a
celebrity. Hence the right use of celebrity can escalate the Unique Selling Proposition of a brand
to new heights; but a cursory orientation of a celebrity with a brand may prove to be
claustrophobic for the brand. A celebrity is a means to an end, and not an end in him/her (Mitka,
2008). Brand loyalty has been proclaimed by some to be the ultimate goal of marketing. Brand
loyalty consists of a consumer's commitment to repurchase the brand which can be demonstrated
by repeated buying of a product or service or other positive behaviors such as word of mouth
advocacy. True brand loyalty implies that the consumer is willing, at least on occasion, to put
aside their own desires in the interest of the brand (Banasiewicz, 2005). However, Brand loyalty
is more than simple repurchasing. Customers may repurchase a brand due to situational
constraints, a lack of viable alternatives, or out of convenience. Such loyalty is referred to as
"spurious loyalty". True brand loyalty exists when customers have a high relative attitude
toward the brand which is then exhibited through repurchase behavior. This type of loyalty can
be a great asset to the firm: customers are willing to pay higher prices, they may cost less to
serve, and can bring new customers to the firm (Van den Brink, Odekerken-Schrder, Pauwels,
75

International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research________________________ ISSN 2277- 3622
Vol.2, No. 3, March (2013)
Online available at www.indianresearchjournals.com

2006). Most important of all, in this context, is usually the 'rate ' of usage, to which the Pareto
80:20 rule applies. Kotler's `heavy users' are likely to be disproportionately important to the
brand. Kotler (2010) has defined the patterns of behavior as follows:
Hard Core Loyals are individuals who buy the same brand all the time
Soft Core Loyals are usually loyal to two or three brands.
Shifting Loyals are those whose loyalty constantly moves from one brand to another.
Switchers are those individuals who have absolutely no loyalty (possibly `deal-prone',
constantly looking for bargains or `vanity prone', looking for something different)
It has been suggested that loyalty includes some degree of pre-dispositional commitment toward
a brand. Brand loyalty is viewed as multidimensional construct. It is determined by several
distinct psychological processes and it entails multivariate measurements. Customers' perceived
value, brand trust, customers' satisfaction, repeat purchase behavior and commitment are found
to be the key influencing factors of brand loyalty (Moschis, Moore, Stanley, 1984). Commitment
and repeat purchase behaviors are considered as necessary conditions for brand loyalty followed
by perceived value, satisfaction and brand trust (Amine, Dec98). Consumers buy 'portfolios of
brands. They switch regularly between brands, often because they simply want a change. Thus,
'brand penetration' or 'brand share' reflects only a statistical chance that the majority of
customers will buy that brand next time as part of a portfolio of brands they favor. It does not
guarantee that they will stay loyal to this (Speck, Schumann, Thompson, 1988). Influencing the
statistical probabilities facing a consumer choosing from a portfolio of preferred brands, which is
required in this context, is a very different role for a brand manager; compared with the - much
simpler - one traditionally described, of recruiting and holding dedicated customers. The concept
also emphasizes the need for managing continuity. So, is loyalty for life possible? (Chaudhuri,
Holbrook, Apr 2001). Erdogan states that celebrity endosers are more effective than noncelebrity endorsers when it comes to generating all desired outcomes.
Reasons for celebrities endorsements
Celebrity Endorsements act as a credible means of money burning. This is because there is a
world of products the value of which a customer obtains from purchasing any given variety. This
could be for reasons of social standing - People want to wear the right clothes, drink the
right beverages and use the right fragrances. Specifically a consumer that observes messages
of two different firms products, one products message containing an endorsement by a
celebrity and the other, does not believe that the celebrity endorsed product will have more
purchases and so will be of a higher value (Clark & Horstman, 2003). Celebrity endorsement is
more likely to be observed for those products having a high price-production cost margin and a
large customer base. In short, celebrity endorsements are more typically for nationally marketed
products then for local or niche market products and for products such as running shoes, soft
drinks and the like for which the price cost margins are apparently large. Promoters of certain
products require co-ordination over multiple customer groups - different age, income, education
groups or groups in different location. With a product of this sort a common set of advertising
messages communicated to all custom is a more effective and coordinates mechanism than
76

International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research________________________ ISSN 2277- 3622
Vol.2, No. 3, March (2013)
Online available at www.indianresearchjournals.com

messages targeted at separate customer groups with common messages. Since, the celebrity is
recognizable globally; it is a low cost way to achieve cross group coordination (Clark &
Horstman, 2003)
Endorsement: Risk vs. Returns
The basic assumption underlying celebrity endorsement is that the value associated with the
celebrity is transferred to the brand and therefore helps in creating an image that can be easily
referred to by the consumers. Consequently by association the brand can very quickly establish
the creditability and get immediate recognition thereby lead to an improvement in sales.
However, there are many risks associated with such endorsers. The brand could slide down just
as quickly as it moved up the consumers mind. There are many cases of brands failing in the
market place despite famous celebrities endorsing them.
Risks
a) Celebrity overshadows the brand: Mostly happen in certain cases where the celebrity
values and brand values are not closely linked. There are chances that the celebrity is
remembered more than a brand. Cyber media research study reveals that 80% of the
respondents approached for research remembered the celebrity but could not recall the
brand being endorsed.
b) Necessary Evil: Marketers have felt that once the brand is associated with the celebrity it
becomes difficult to promote it without the star. There arises a difficulty in trying to
separate the role of message and the role of the celebrity in selling the brand. The
celebrity activity becomes an addiction and the task to find substitute becomes more and
more difficult.
c) Celebrity creditability a question mark for the competent customer: Todays
marketing endorsement has to deal with a competitive and knowledgeable customer who
has begun to voice his opinion about their perception regarding the endorsement of a
brand. The celebrity is said to befool the public as he is paid to sell and communicate
good things about the brand. Hence the question of creditability of the celebrity being
chosen to protect the brand is becoming increasingly pertinent.
d) Conflicting Image: A difference between the image of the credibility and the product
can lead to serious damages to both. Unless there are synergies between celebrities own
image and that of product category the strategy of endorsement is rendered futile.
e) Multiple Endorsements: The poly endorsement has lead to a celebrity clutter.
Celebrities endorsing multiple products and multi brands in a category have left the
customer confused and have lead to dilution in the celebrities value.
f) Influence of Celebrity scandals and moral violation of brands: A number of
entertainers and athletes have been involved in activities that could embarrass the
77

International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research________________________ ISSN 2277- 3622
Vol.2, No. 3, March (2013)
Online available at www.indianresearchjournals.com

companies whose products the endorsed. When the endorser has had a debacle it actually
leads to a greater fall in the image for the brand.
Returns
a) Build Awareness: A new brand can benefit greatly if a celebrity endorses it. It can attract
the customers attention and inquisitiveness to see what product is being endorsed.
Research has shown consumers have a higher level of message recall for products that are
endorsed by celebrities.
b) Connects Emotionally: Some celebrities like Shahrukh Khan, Amitabh Bachan
command great adoration among people. Such celebrities can positively influence their
fans etc. to a great extent and hence tend to even connect with the brand emotionally
because of their star endorsing it.
c) Quick Connect: The communication process tends to hasten up due to the mere presence
of a celebrity. This is because the star carrying the message tends to click with the
customer more. Because of likeability, attractiveness and creditability of the celebrity it
thereby helps the company to effectively and quickly pass on the message to the target
customers.
d) Means of Brand differention: The use of a celebrity is a source of brand differentiation.
In a product category where brands are suing a celebrity the first brand that picks one
up could use it differently itself in the market.
e) Source of Imitation and hence inducing increased product usage: Celebrities actually
tend to become models or idols for the target audience who start using the product just
because the celebrity name is attached with it. For instance, Lux has been used by many
as it is a beauty soap recommended by the beauty queen, Aishwarya Rai.
f) The use of Better Brand Image: Celebrities could also bring in positive image among
the masses for brand. The credibility and authenticity attached with Amitabh Bachchan
has inculcated trust for ICICI, Nerolac Paints and several others.
Conclusion
An assessment of current market situation has indicated that celebrity endorsements and
advertising strategies if correctly blended in terms of matching the strengths of the brands with
the celebritys quality indeed justifies the high cost associated with this form of advertising.
However, advertising needs to be aware of the complex processing underlying celebrity
endorsement by gaining clarity on described concepts of celebrity source, credibility and
attractiveness, match-up hypothesis, multiple product endorsement etc. Marketer has to decide
how far the benefits outweigh the risks associated. Advertisers agree that celebrity endorsement
does not itself guarantee sales. It can create a buzz and make a consumer feel better about the
product, which in turn has to come to expectation of customers as a real star by delivering the
promise. In fact much research needs to be done on customer testimonials, which tend to induce
better creditability and helps in carving the competent, rational, knowledgeable customer of
78

International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research________________________ ISSN 2277- 3622
Vol.2, No. 3, March (2013)
Online available at www.indianresearchjournals.com

today who is said to be the real hero.We have seen that brands like Pepsi, Coke, Pantene, Head
and Shoulders, Nike and LOreal have a strong base of loyal customers. It is evident that all
these brands have used celebrity endorsers. Celebrity endorsement when in sync with the
customers tastes can, therefore, indeed lead to brand loyalty.
References
Agrawal, Jagdish; Kamakura, Wagner A. (1995).The Economic Worth of Celebrity Endorsers:
An event study analysis. Journal of Marketing. Vol. 59, (3).
Alonso, Anne. (2006). Star Power: Celebrity Endorsements Impact Stigma and Treatment
Seeking, Vol. 23 Issue 3
Amine Abdelmajid. (1998). Consumers' true brand loyalty: the central role of commitment,
Journal of Strategic Marketing, Vol. 6 Issue 4
Banasiewicz, Andrew. (2005). Loyalty program planning and analytics, Journal of Consumer
Marketing, Vol. 22 Issue 6
Bloemer, Jos M. M.; Lemmink, Jos G. A. M. (1992). The Importance of Customer Satisfaction
in Explaining Brand and Dealer Loyalty, Journal of Marketing Management, , Vol. 8 Issue 4
Chaudhuri, Arjun; Holbrook, Morris B. (2001). The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and
Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65,
2.
Erdogan, B. Zafer (1999).Celebrity Endorsement: A Literature Review, Journal of Marketing
Management, Vol. 15 Issue 4
Johnson, Tod. (1984). The Myth of Declining Brand Loyalty. Journal of Advertising Research, ,
Vol. 24 Issue 1
Mccracken, Grant. (1989). Who Is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the
Endorsement Process, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 16 Issue 3
Mitka, Mike. (2008). Celebrity Endorsements, JAMA: Journal of the American Medical
Association Vol. 299 Issue 6,
Moschis, Goerge P., Moore, Roy L.; Stanley, Thomas J. (1984). An Exploratory Study of Brand
Loyalty Development, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 11 Issue 1
Solman, Gregory; Brown, Sandy.(2004). Celebrity Endorsements: Decisive or Divisive?, Vol. 45
Issue 7
Speck, Paul Surgi; Schumann, David W.; Thompson, Craig.(1988). Celebrity Endorsements Scripts, Schema and Roles: Theoretical Framework and Preliminary Tests, Advances in
Consumer Research. Vol. 15 Issue 1
Van den Brink, Douwe; Odekerken-Schrder, Gaby; Pauwels, Pieter.(2006). The effect of
strategic and tactical cause-related marketing on consumers' brand loyalty, Journal of Consumer
Marketing, Vol. 23 Issue 1
Warren, Matthew. (2007). Do celebrity endorsements still work? Campaign (UK), Issue 44.
79