Lucknow Metro
Lucknow Metro
Lucknow Metro
FOR
LUCKNOW METRO RAIL PROJECT (PHASE I)
Prepared By:
October 2013
Prepared By:
October 2013
Description
Page No
SALIENT FEATURES
1-5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
1-20
1-35
1-14
1-124
1-16
ROLLING STOCK
1-13
1-16
1-15
SIGNALLING SYSTEM
1-8
10
1-10
11
1-26
12
1-40
13
COST ESTIMATES
1-13
14
1-28
15
1-12
16
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
1-15
17
CONCLUSIONS
1-3
18
1-6
19
1-23
20
1-4
i - xlviii
SALIENT FEATURES
SALIENT FEATURES
1.
Gauge (Nominal)
1435 mm
2.
Corridors
North South Corridor
(CCS Airport to Munshi Pulia)
East West Corridor
(Lucknow Rly. Station to Vasantkunj)
Total
3.
Elevated
Underground
Total Length
(km)
(km)
(km)
19.438
3.440
22.878
4.548
6.550
11.098
23.986
9.990
33.976
Number of stations
Description
Underground
Elevated
Total
19
22
12
10
24
34
Total
4.
Traffic Forecast
Year
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
2015
2020
2025
2030
Corridor Length
(km)
PHPDT
Daily Passenger
km
Daily
Ridership
Average Trip
Length (km)
7.52
7.58
7.36
7.27
7.07
3.98
4.14
4.27
4.31
1/3
SALIENT FEATURES
Year
Corridor Length
(km)
2041
5.
PHPDT
Daily Passenger
km
Daily
Ridership
Average Trip
Length (km)
36196
2496832
600200
4.16
Train Operation
Capacity Provided for Corridor-I: North South Corridor
Particulars
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
Alambagh Bus Stand to
Mahanagar
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
Alambagh Bus Stand to
Mahanagar
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
Alambagh Bus Stand to
Mahanagar
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
Alambagh Bus Stand to
Mahanagar
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
Alambagh Bus Stand to
Mahanagar
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
Year
Headway
(min)
No. of
Rakes
Rake
Consist
No. of
Coaches
14
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
Max.
PHPDT
Demand
6172
13
6 car
78
13190
14
8451
9658
4.5
18
6 car
108
20976
13498
13159
3.5
23
6 car
138
25890
15644
14995
2.5
30
6 car
180
34955
21246
19581
38
6 car
228
44408
26894
PHPDT
Capacity
Available
6746
(8580*)
13491
(17160)*
6746
(8580*)
10493
(13347*)
20987
(26693)*
10493
(13347*)
13491
(17160*)
26983
(34320)*
13491
(17160*)
18888
(24024*)
37776
(48048)*
18888
(24024*)
23610
47220
(60060*)
23610
(30030*)
2/3
SALIENT FEATURES
Year
Head
way
(min)
No. of
Rakes
Rake
Consist
No. of
Coaches
11
2015
Max.
PHPDT
Demand
8104
6 car
42
22
1831
6.5
14157
2020
6 car
54
13
3638
4.5
2025
6 car
12
21434
72
5765
17
2030
29171
6 car
102
2.5
7522
20
2041
36196
6 car
120
9110
PHPDT
Capacity
Available
8585
(10920*)
4293
(5460)*
14529
(18480*)
7265
(9240)*
20987
(26693*)
10493
(13347)*
31480
(40040*)
15740
(20020)*
37776
(48048*)
18888
(24024*)
6.
7.
Speed
Designed Speed
80 kmph
Scheduled speed
Voltage
25 KV OHE
3/3
SALIENT FEATURES
Year
Corridor
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
Traction
7.27
10.97
13.98
19.46
23.78
Auxiliary
13.96
16.68
18.16
24.09
24.09
Total
21.23
27.64
32.14
43.55
47.86
Traction
3.26
5.08
6.92
10.11
11.69
Auxiliary
20.38
23.47
24.15
27.79
27.79
Total
23.64
28.55
31.07
37.90
39.48
c) Sub Stations
Corridor
Grid sub-station
Location of RSS
of Metro
Authority
Amausi
220/33/25 kV
RSS
Munshi Pulia
220/33/25 kV
RSS
132/33/25 kV
RSS near Vasant
Kunj
132/33/25 KV
RSS Near lucknow
railway station/
near Nawajganj
Corridor 2 East
West Corridor
(Lucknow Railway
Station
to TRT / Hardoi Road Sub
Station,132 kV
Vasantkunj)
d)
8.
SCADA system
Approx. length of
cables
2 to 3 km. 220kV
cabling Double
circuit
6 to 7 km. 220kV
cabling Double
circuit
2 km. 132kV
cabling Double
circuit
2 km. 132kV
cabling Single
circuit
Provided
Rolling Stock
a) 2.90 m wide modern rolling stock with stainless steel body.
b) Axle load
16 T
c) Seating arrangement
Longitudinal
d) Capacity of 6 coach unit
1574 Passengers
e) Class of accommodation
One
9.
Maintenance Facilities
Maintenance Depot for Corridor-1
Maintenance Depot for Corridor-2
Transport Nagar
Vasant Kunj Depot
4/3
SALIENT FEATURES
10.
Type of Signalling
b)
Telecommunication
11.
Fare Collection
Automatic Fare collection system with POM and Smart card etc.
12.
Construction Methodology
Elevated viaduct consisting prestressed concrete Box shaped Girders on Single pier
with pile / Open foundations, and underground section with Tunnel Boring and station
in underground station cut and cover.
13.
Total estimated cost (at May 2013 prices) without taxes & duties
Corridor I
Corridor II
14.
Total
15.
Rs.5494 Crores
Rs.12374Crores
Financial Indices
a)
FIRR
Description
b)
FIRR
8.12%
4.43%
EIRR
The EIRR (without taxes) in economic terms work out to be 19.43 % for the project.
5/3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.1
INTRODUCTION
0.1.1
Background
Economic growth and spatial development are quite often governed by the quality and
quantity of infrastructure provided. While an inadequate transport facilities causes
congestion, delays and hazards result in significant socio economic costs to the society. An
oversupply, apart from being uneconomical, often acts as counter to the long term spatial
development strategies of settlements and regions. Supplying and maintaining an optimal
level of infrastructure is the key to planned development. India is passing a stage where
urbanization is taking place at an increasing rate. With rapid urbanization, there has been a
widening gap between demand and supply of urban infrastructure of which transportation
is an essential component.
Lucknow is popularly known for its cultural and intellectual traditions as well as, its current
status as a nucleus of service industry, education & research. Lucknow is the capital of Uttar
Pradesh & administrative headquarters of Lucknow district & division. With its 2.2 (COI,
2001 Estimates) million inhabitants Lucknow Urban Agglomeration has currently over 3
million population. The master plan has projected a population of about 3.2 million and 4.0
million by years 2011 & 2021 respectively. Being an important cultural and trading centre
Lucknow continues to grow and attract large number of people to the city. The rapid growth
of the city and the associated urban sprawl has accentuated the demand supply mismatch
amidst the constrained transport infrastructure resulting in economic and social
externalities. Lucknow must keep pace with the demographic and economic growth. The
inadequate commuter transportation system in Lucknow is overwhelmed by upsurge of
private automobiles. Private vehicles (motorised 2-wheelers and cars) constitute 90 percent
of total vehicles registered in Lucknow City. The supply of city buses being only 6 per lakh
population is inadequate for a city's size like Lucknow. The benchmark is between 70 to 80
buses per lakh residents in an urban area in India.
i/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
One of the key issues to be tackled is to improvise on a reliable public transport system;
above all, lay emphasis on a mass transportation system which is environmental friendly to
cater to city's growing travelling needs to sustain in the growing economic activities. India
being in the process of economic reforms and that such mass transport systems will involve
heavy investments.
Against this backdrop of increasing number of vehicles on road and concomitant congestion
and air pollution, the Lucknow Development Authority commissioned DMRC to prepare
Detailed Project Report for a Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) for Lucknow City to serve
forecast travel up to the horizon year 2030.
0.1.2
Study Area
The geographic area within the jurisdiction of Lucknow Development Authority (LDA) will
be the Study Area (Figure 1.1) for the current Study.
ii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.2
TRAFFIC DEMAND
Large number of alternate routes for Metro for Lucknow was taken in the traffic analysis
and the Peak Hour and Peak direction traffic (PHPDT) on such routes determined. Based on
PHPDT, two routes; one connecting North to South and East to West were identified. North
South corridor starts at Amusai airport and ends at Munshipulia via Hazaratganj,
Sachivalaya, IT Chouraha etc with a total length of 22.878 km. East- West corridor with its
Length of 11.098kms, starts at Charbagh Railway station and ends at Vasant kunj passing
through City railway station, Balaganj, Musabagh etc.
iii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.2.1
Section Loading
The traffic assignment was carried out with the proposed alignments in place. The
loading on the proposed metro alignments is presented in Table below:-
Year
Corridor Length
(km)
Daily
PHPDT
Passenger
Km
Average
Daily
Trip
Ridership
Length
(km)
13190
3176450
429250
7.52
2020
20976
4963877
644659
7.58
2025
25890
6499272
833240
7.36
2030
34955
8223462
1054290
7.27
2041
44408
10482966
1343970
7.07
22.878
7639
762685
155650
3.8
2020
14157
1240830
243300
4.14
21434
1764243
345930
4.27
2030
29171
2345694
459940
4.31
2041
36196
3061020
600200
4.16
2025
11.098
The total ridership in the proposed North- South corridor in the year 2015 and 2041 will be
4.29 and 13.44 lakhs passengers per day respectively. The daily ridership on the East- West
corridor will be 1.55 lakhs in 2015 and 6.00 lakhs passengers per day in 2041.
The maximum range of PHPDT on the North-South alignment in 2015 will be 13190 and by
2041 the maximum range of PHPDT is projected to be in the order of 41969. The maximum
range of PHPDT on the East-West alignment in 2015 will be 7639 and by 2041 the
maximum range of PHPDT is projected to be in the order of 44408. Station wise boarding,
alighting and sectional load for different horizon years are presented in Annexure 2.2.
iv/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.2.2
The daily station loading (two way boardings) for both the alignments are presented in
Tables below:-
Station Name
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
CCS Airport
1170
1260
1340
1400
1520
Amausi
4700
5020
5370
5610
6070
Transport Nagar
2530
6690
9280
12330
18460
Krishnagar
10340
24050
29780
56570
74850
Singar Nagar
5780
10780
16240
19370
26990
Alambagh
13180
18840
21000
26250
35040
12340
20990
28410
37580
63020
Mawaiya
50990
61889
63180
72600
87180
Durgapuri
25980
35910
56450
59330
88130
10
77650
143030
186620
241260
332350
11
Hussain Ganj
36760
44940
60180
78300
88620
12
Sachivalaya
11370
14800
17510
23410
26710
13
Hazarat Ganj
17380
21440
25170
31600
37070
14
KDSinghBabuStadium
4550
6720
10060
16450
14280
15
Vishwavidyalaya
5540
10580
14340
20810
18710
16
IT College Junction
10210
17500
24830
30870
27480
17
Mahanagar
50420
68100
88720
103210
118720
18
Badshah Nagar
13480
26270
36640
44000
61990
19
Lekhraj Market
21220
32100
41980
56330
71860
10410
16470
21360
27930
37240
20
21
Indira Nagar
15930
21310
29050
38030
53270
22
Munshipulia
27320
35970
45730
51050
54410
v/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
(Note: Numbers are daily Boardings on both directions (Up and Down)
Table 0.3 - Daily Station Loading for East-West Corridor
STATION
NO.
STATION NAME
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
39620
44980
48040
50430
65960
64000
11330
17280
22630
47820
Aminabad
22460
31100
38770
47340
62550
Pandey Ganj
24810
34280
44250
62760
71910
8450
13190
18800
24900
34710
Medical Chauraha
9950
17120
26350
38570
50830
Nawajganj
16950
35000
63260
89770
104090
Thakurganj
8000
17680
36670
44670
63840
Balaganj
6150
19190
28510
51400
59430
10
Sarfarazganj
3970
6970
8430
9720
16140
11
Musabagh
7170
8180
9590
11420
13150
12
Vasant kunj
1720
4280
5980
7140
9270
2,13,250
2,43,300
Total
(Note: Numbers are Daily Boardings on both directions (Up and Down)
2015
6.58
2020
6.64
2025
6.45
2030
6.37
2041
6.17
vi/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.3
0.3.1
The geometric design norms presented have been worked out based on a detailed
evaluation of passenger comfort, safety, experience and internationally accepted practices
used currently operating rapid transit and rail systems. Various alternatives were
considered for most of these parameters but the best-suited ones have been adopted for
the system as a whole.
0.3.2
Alignment Considerations
Super elevation on curves is applied to counter the effect of lateral force felt by
passengers and to prevent passengers from feeling as if they are sliding across the
seat.
- Minimum vertical curve radii are designed with passenger comfort in mind.
0.3.3
General Criteria
0.3.4
SN
Criteria
Dimension
1435 mm
Design Speed
80 kmph
16T
25 v ac (OHE)
Curved Sections
vii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
shall be governed by the design speeds and by the limits for cant but shall not be less than
120m.
The minimum length of a circular curve shall be either V/2 in metres, where V is the design
speed in km/h or 25 m whichever is higher in order to accommodate the full length of a
car/coach.
For dual tracks on curves, the smaller of the two radii shall govern the selection of clearance
requirement and minimum spacing of track centres. The curve parameters are as below:
Table 0.6
CURVE RADIUS IN MID SECTION
(i) Underground sections
Minimum
300 m
Absolute Minimum
200 m
200 m
Absolute minimum
120 m
1000 m
120 mm
100
parabolic curve.
Vertical curves in main lines shall wherever possible be positioned such that coincidence
with both transition curves and canted portions is avoided. Where such coincidence is
unavoidable the largest practicable vertical curve radius shall be employed and the cant
gradient shall be the minimum. In all such cases the resultant geometry shall be verified as
being compatible with safe passage at the design speeds by the proposed rolling stock.
viii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Table 0.7
RADIUS OF VERTICAL CURVES
On main line
desirable
2500 m
Absolute minimum
1500 m
Other Locations
1500 m
0.3.5
20
Track Structure
Track on Metro Systems is subjected to intensive usage with very little time for day-to-day
maintenance. Thus, it is imperative that the track structure selected for Metro Systems
should be long lasting and should require minimum or no maintenance and at the same
time, ensure highest level of safety, reliability and comfort, with minimum noise and
vibrations. The track structure has been proposed keeping the above philosophy in view.
0.3.5.1 General
Two types of track structures are proposed for any Metro. The normal ballasted track is
suitable for At-Grade (surface) portion of Main Lines and in Depot (except inside the
Workshops, inspection lines and washing plant lines. The ballast-less track is recommended
on Viaducts and inside tunnels as the regular cleaning and replacement of ballast at such
location will not be possible. Only in case of the depot normal ballasted track is proposed
for adoption.
From considerations of maintainability, riding comfort and also to contain vibrations and
noise levels, the complete track is proposed to be joint-less and for this purpose even the
turnouts will have to be incorporated in LWR/CWR.
The track will be laid with 1 in 20 canted rails and the wheel profile of Rolling Stock should
be compatible with the rail cant and rail profile.
ix/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
For the Depot lines, the grade of rails should be 880, which can be easily manufactured
indigenously.
0.4
CIVIL ENGINEERING
During the traffic studies carried out for Lucknow City, number of corridors were examined
based on the Peak hour Peak Direction traffic (PHPDT) and the importance of locality to be
served, two corridors have finally been frozen i.e.Corridor-1 from North to South and
Corridor-2 from East to West. Of the two corridors the North-South corridor from Chaudhari
Charan Singh Airport to Munshi Pulia has been recommended for execution in the Phase-I.
Two corridors, i.e. North-South and East-West Corridors have been proposed for Lucknow Metro
is shown as Figure 4.1. Both the North South Corridor and the East-West Corridors are partly
underground and elevated. The elevated alignment is mostly located on the median of the roads.
In the central area near Lucknow Railway Station, Aminabad, Hazratganj the N-S and E-W
corridor will run underground with switch-over ramps for transitions from elevated to
underground on NH-25 (Kanpur Road) and underground to elevated on the Mahatma Gandhi
Road at the end of Hazratganj Market for the N-S corridor, for E-W corridor the ramp has been
proposed at the Hardoi road to transit from underground to elevated. The depots for the East
West corridor has been proposed in Open Land behind Fish Mandi on the Hardoi Road and for
North-South Corridor in open / Agricultural land near Amausi Airport. The break-up of length of
the two corridors (in kilometers) is given below in Table below:Table 0.8 - Proposed MRTS Corriodrs
Corridors
At
Total
Elevated
Ramp
Underground
22.878 km
19.051 km
0.774 km
3.053 km
11.098 km
4.295 km
0.505 km
6.298 km
Grade
North South
(CCS Airport to
Munshi Pulia)
East West
(Lko rly. Station
to Vasantkunj)
x/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
xi/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Diversion of utilities
Excavation between the support walls along with the installation of struts between
the two walls to keep them in position.
xii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.4.4
Utility Diversion
It is suggested that all utilities falling within excavation area are diverted away in advance
to avoid damage to such utilities during the excavation/ construction phase. The cross
utilities, however has to be kept supported. It is suggested that pressure water pipelines
crossing the proposed cut area are provided with valves on both sides of the cut so that
the cut area can be isolated in case of any leakage to the pipeline to avoid flooding of the
cut/damage to the works.
0.4.5
Curvature
The proposed East- west corridor has 55% of the alignment underground and also the
topology of Lucknow is not very undulating, yet to place the stations at proper locations
number of horizontal curves have been proposed. The radius of curves at few locations is
kept as low as 300 m in the underground section to fit the underground stations in such a
way that the property acquisition can be minimised. 22.93 % of the length of the
alignment is on curves. The details of curves on East- West Corridor are given in Table
below:Table 0.9 - Details Of Horizontal Curves Proposed East West Corridor
Length
TS / PC
SC
CS
ST / PT
Radius
Transition
of
(TP1)
(TP2)
(TP3)
(TP4)
(m)
Length (m)
Curve
(m)
Start of Alignment
-113.00
Straight
between
two
curves
(m)
304.494
191.49
216.49
248.80
273.80
1010.000
25
32.305
315.44
589.24
644.24
789.20
844.20
300.000
55
144.958
360.201
1204.40
1259.40
1621.54
1676.54
307.525
55
362.147
417.87
2094.41
2149.41
2358.16
2413.16
305.000
55
208.743
30.321
2443.48
2498.48
2595.59
2650.59
305.000
55
97.108
356.356
3006.94
3061.94
3533.40
3588.40
305.000
55
471.454
308.15
3896.55
3951.55
4446.92
4501.92
310.000
55
495.374
622.869
5124.79
5179.79
5349.33
5404.33
500.000
55
169.542
46.021
5450.35
5505.35
5637.33
5692.33
305.000
55
131.974
323.839
6016.16
6036.16
6041.61
6061.61
3000.000
20
5.445
171.313
xiii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Length
TS / PC
SC
CS
ST / PT
Radius
Transition
of
(TP1)
(TP2)
(TP3)
(TP4)
(m)
Length (m)
Curve
(m)
Straight
between
two
curves
(m)
6232.92
6242.92
6294.42
6304.42
2300.000
10
51.503
30.795
6335.22
6345.22
6428.85
6438.85
3000.000
10
83.635
425.884
6864.74
6919.74
7034.91
7089.91
500.000
55
115.177
257.855
7347.77
7379.13
8000.000
31.359
298.636
7677.76
7687.76
7748.47
7758.46
3000.000
10
60.702
122.853
7881.32
7896.32
7924.50
7939.50
2000.000
15
28.181
151.429
8090.93
8110.93
8184.21
8204.21
1500.000
20
73.285
58.554
8262.77
8282.77
8342.64
8362.64
1400.000
20
59.871
63.665
8426.30
8436.30
8478.29
8488.28
3000.000
10
41.986
381.468
8869.75
8889.75
8985.08
9005.09
1400.000
20
95.332
176.656
9181.74
9211.74
9352.13
9382.13
1200.000
30
140.389
709.336
47.656
846.003
10000.00
10091.47
10985.13
0.4.6
10139.12
End of Alignment
xiv/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
To
Length
Method of
(Km)
Construction
Remarks / Reasons
Underground Section
Distance between track centre
are 4.5 m at start along with
station and scissor is to placed
(-) 0.113
0.257
0.370
0.257
5.718
5.461
5.948
6.185
0.237
6.185
6.676
0.490
Ramp
10.985
4.309
Machine
Elevated Section
6.676
0.4.7
Elevated Box
girder Viaduct
11.098
Station Planning
The proposed metro for lucknow consists of two corridors namely:
1. North-South Corridor: CCS Airport Munshi Pulia
2. East West Corridor: Charbagh/Lucknow Railway Station Vasant Kunj
The length of the proposed N-S corridor is 22.878 km and E-W corridor is 11.098 km.
Along the North-South corridor 22 stations have been planned, 12 stations have been
planned along the East-West corridor. The locations of the stations have been identified
taking into consideration the constraints in land acquisition, congestion issues and
xv/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.4.7.1
The platform level has adequate assembly space for passengers for both normal
operating conditions and a recognized abnormal scenario.
The concourse contains automatic fare collection system in a manner that divides
the concourse into distinct areas. The 'unpaid area' is where passengers gain
access to the system, obtain travel information and purchase tickets. On passing
through the ticket gates, the passenger enters the 'paid area, which includes
access to the platforms.
The arrangement of the concourse is assessed on a station-by-station basis and is
determined by site constraints and passenger access requirements. However, it is
planned in such a way that maximum surveillance can be achieved by the ticket
hall supervisor over ticket machines, automatic fare collection (AFC) gates, stairs
and escalators. Ticket machines and AFC gates are positioned to minimize cross
flows of passengers and provide adequate circulation space.
Sufficient space for queuing and passenger flow has been allowed at the ticketing
gates.
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
xvi/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Tunnel Ventilation fans and ASS in underground stations are provided at platform
level/ concourse level depending on availability of land for locating vent shafts.
The DG set, bore well pump houses and ground tank would be located generally in one
area on ground.
The system is being designed to maximize its attraction to potential passengers and
the following criteria have been observed:
Minimum distance of travel to and from the platform and between platforms for
transfer between lines.
Adequate capacity for passenger movements.
Convenience, including good signage relating to circulation and orientation.
Safety and security, including a high level of protection against accidents.
In order to transfer passengers efficiently from street to platforms and vice versa,
xvii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
station planning has been based on established principles of pedestrian flow and
arranged to minimize unnecessary walking distances and cross-flows between
incoming and outgoing passengers.
-
A list of accommodation required in the non-public area at each station is given below:
Table 0.11
Non Public Area Station Accommodation
Station Control Room
Staff Area
Traction Substation
Cleaners Room
Signaling Room
Security Room
Ticket Office
Staff Toilets
Communication Room
Refuse Store
0.4.8
Geo-Technical Investigations
General Geology & Characteristics - Location
Two corridors and a 3.5 km link line i.e. North-South and East-West have been identified as
potential MRTS in Lucknow in Phase I. The details of the N-S and E-W corridor identified
have already been discussed in the previous sections. Geotechnical investigations have been
carried out along the proposed alignments to determine the strata, depth of foundation and
safe bearing capacity of foundations required for the above proposed Metro corridors.
xviii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Field Work
Subsurface explorations were carried out along the length of the proposed corridors. Bore
holes were done at every 500m at the proposed NS and EW corridors. The summary of field
work conducted is given in Table below:Table 0.12 - Summary Of Field Investigation
NORTH SOUTH CORRIDOR
DEPTH OF
BOREHOLE NO.
DEPTH OF
WATER TABLE
BOREHOLE (m)
BELOW GROUND
SOIL/ROCK
LEVEL (m)
BH-01
30.0
18.60
Only Soil
BH-02
30.0
19.00
Only Soil
BH-03
30.0
20.00
Only Soil
BH-04
30.0
18.00
Only Soil
BH-05
30.0
21.50
Only Soil
BH-06
30.0
25.50
Only Soil
BH-07
30.0
27.00
Only Soil
BH-08
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-09
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-10
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-11
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-12
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-13
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-14
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-15
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-16
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
xix/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DEPTH OF
WATER TABLE
BOREHOLE (m)
BELOW GROUND
SOIL/ROCK
LEVEL (m)
BH-17
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-18
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-19
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-20
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-21
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-22
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-23
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-24
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-25
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-26
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-27
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-28
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-29
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-30
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-31
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-32
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-33
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-34
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-35
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-36
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-37
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-38
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-39
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-40
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-41
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-42
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-43
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-44
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
xx/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DEPTH OF
WATER TABLE
BOREHOLE (m)
BELOW GROUND
SOIL/ROCK
LEVEL (m)
BH-45
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
BH-46
30.0
Not Met
Only Soil
Table 0.13
EAST WEST CORRIDOR
DEPTH OF
BOREHOLE NO.
DEPTH OF
WATER TABLE
BOREHOLE (m)
BELOW GROUND
SOIL/ROCK
LEVEL (m)
BH-01
30.0
23.00
Only Soil
BH-02
30.0
22.00
Only Soil
BH-03
30.0
27.00
Only Soil
BH-04
30.0
26.00
Only Soil
BH-05
30.0
24.00
Only Soil
BH-06
30.0
28.00
Only Soil
BH-07
30.0
29.00
Only Soil
BH-08
30.0
30.00
Only Soil
BH-09
30.0
NIL
Only Soil
BH-10
30.0
NIL
Only Soil
BH-11
30.0
NIL
Only Soil
BH-12
30.0
NIL
Only Soil
BH-13
30.0
26.00
Only Soil
BH-14
30.0
26.00
Only Soil
BH-15
30.0
20.00
Only Soil
BH-16
30.0
20.00
Only Soil
BH-17
30.0
22.00
Only Soil
BH-18
30.0
13.50
Only Soil
BH-19
30.0
13.00
Only Soil
xxi/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DEPTH OF
WATER TABLE
BOREHOLE (m)
BELOW GROUND
SOIL/ROCK
LEVEL (m)
0.4.9
BH-20
30.0
19.00
Only Soil
BH-21
30.0
20.00
Only Soil
BH-22
30.0
27.10
Only Soil
BH-23
30.0
22.00
Only Soil
BH-24
30.0
26.50
Only Soil
BH-25
30.0
26.40
Only Soil
BH-26
30.0
26.50
Only Soil
BH-27
30.0
28.10
Only Soil
BH-28
30.0
13.30
Only Soil
BH-29
30.0
12.40
Only Soil
BH-30
30.0
13.05
Only Soil
BH-31
30.0
17.10
Only Soil
BH-32
30.0
16.50
Only Soil
Land
Land Requirement for following Major Components
Availability of land is one of the major prerequisites for a project in cities like Lucknow. As
the Metro alignment has to be planned on set standards and parameters, it becomes
difficult to follow the road alignment. Apart from alignment the various structures like
stations, parking facilities, traction sub stations, communication towers, etc. require large
plots of land. The land being scare, costly and acquisition being complex process, the
alignment is so planned that land acquisition is required is minimum. Land is mainly
required for:
Entry/Exit
Receiving/Traction Sub-stations.
xxii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Radio Towers.
Property Development.
Depot
Table 0.14 - Summary of Permanent Land Requirement (Ha)
Sr.
No.
1
Description
Stations
Running
Corridor 1
Corridor 2
(N-S Corridor)
(E-W Corridor)
Govt.
Private
Govt.
Private
1.83
2.02
0.81
1.87
1.05
3.68
0.00
0.75
Section
RSS/TSS
1.6
0.00
1.6
0.00
Depots
37.8
0.00
12.33
0.00
Total
42.30
5.70
14.74
2.62
Total Land required permanently for both corridors: 57.04 Ha (Govt.) + 8.32 Ha (Pvt.) =
65.36 Ha.
Table 0.15 - Summary of Temporary Land Requirement (Ha)
Sr.
No.
1
Description
Stations
Running
Section
Construction
Depots
Total
Corridor 1
Corridor 2
(N-S Corridor)
(E-W Corridor)
Govt.
Private
Govt.
Private
2.94
1.73
2.48
2.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.73
0.25
0.23
3.67
1.98
2.71
2.84
Total Land required for temporarily for construction for both corridors: 6.38 Ha (Govt.) + 4.82Ha
(Pvt.) = 11.20 Ha.
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
xxiii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.5
0.5.1
Operation Philosophy
The underlying operation philosophy is to make the MRT System more attractive and economical, the
main features being:
x
Selecting the most optimum frequency of Train services to meet sectional capacity
requirement during peak hours on most of the sections.
Economical & optimum train service frequency not only during peak period, but also
during off-peak period.
x
0.5.2
Salient Features
x Running of services for 19 hours of the day (5 AM to Midnight) with a station dwell time
of 30 seconds,
x Make up time of 5-10% with 8-12% coasting.
x Scheduled speed for these corridors has been assumed as:
A) North- South Corridor:
a) CCS Airport to Munshipulia: 34 kmph
b) Alambagh Bus Stand to Mahanagar: 33 kmph
B) East-West Corridor:
a) Lucknow Railway Station to Vasant Kunj: 32 kmph
b) Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj: 33 kmph
0.5.3
Train Formation
To meet the above projected traffic demand, the possibility of running trains with
composition of 6 Car trains with different headway has been examined.
Composition
DMC
xxiv/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MC
: Motor Car
TC
: Trailer Car
TC/MC
6 Car Train:
0.5.4
Coach requirement has been calculated based on headway during peak hours.
Traffic reserve is taken as one train per section to cater to failure of train on line and
to make up for operational time lost.
IV)
V)
VI)
VII)
xxv/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.6
ROLLING STOCK
The required transport demand forecast is the governing factor for the choice of the Rolling Stock.
The forecasted Peak Hour Peak Direction Traffic calls for an Medium Rail Transit System (MRTS).
Description
Length*
Width
Height
21.64 m
2.9 m
3.9 m
21.34 m
2.9 m
3.9 m
Therefore, for the Medium Rail Vehicles (MRV) with 2.9 m maximum width and longitudinal
seat arrangement, conceptually the crush capacity of 43 seated, 204 standing thus a total of
247 passengers for a Driving trailer car, and 50 seated, 220 standing thus a total of 270 for a
trailer/motor car is envisaged.
xxvi/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
6 Car Train
Normal
Crush
Normal
Crush
Normal
Crush
Seated
43
43
50
50
286
286
Standing
102
204
110
220
644
1288
Total
145
247
160
270
930
1574
0.7
(ii)
(iii)
Elevated station load initially 200KW, which will increase to 500 KW in the year
2041.
(iv)
Underground Station load initially 2000 kW, which will increase to 2500 kW in the
year 2041.
(v)
Depot auxiliary load - initially 1500KW, which will increase to 2500 KW in the year
2041.
Keeping in view of the train operation plan and demand of auxiliary and traction power,
power requirement projected for the year 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030 and 2041 respectively
are summarized in Table below:-
xxvii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
Traction
7.27
10.97
13.98
19.46
23.78
Auxiliary
13.96
16.68
18.16
24.09
24.09
Total
21.23
27.64
32.14
43.55
47.86
Traction
3.26
5.08
6.92
10.11
11.69
Auxiliary
20.38
23.47
24.15
27.79
27.79
Total
23.64
28.55
31.07
37.90
39.48
0.8
0.8.1
Supplying fresh air for the physiological needs of passengers and the authoritys staff;
xxviii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Removing body heat, obnoxious odours and harmful gases like carbon dioxide exhaled
during breathing;
Removing large quantity of heat dissipated by the train equipment like traction motors,
braking units, compressors mounted below the under-frame, lights and fans inside the
coaches, A/c units etc.;
Removing vapour and fumes from the battery and heat emitted by light fittings, water
coolers, Escalators, Fare Gates etc. working in the stations;
Removing heat from air conditioning plant and sub-station and other equipment, if
provided inside the underground station.
This large quantity of heat generated in M.R.T. underground stations cannot be extracted by
simple ventilation. It is therefore, essential to provide mechanical cooling in order to
remove the heat to the maximum possible extent. As the passengers stay in the stations only
for short periods, a fair degree of comfort conditions, just short of discomfort are considered
appropriate. In winter months it may not be necessary to cool the ventilating air as the heat
generated within the station premises would be sufficient to maintain the comfort
requirement.
0.9
SIGNALLING
The signalling system shall provide the means for an efficient train control, ensuring safety
in train movements. It assists in optimization of metro infrastructure investment and
running of an efficient train services on the network.
0.9.1 Standards
The following standards will be adopted with regard to the Signalling system.
xxix/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Table 0.19
Description
Standards
Computer based Interlocking adopted for station having
switches and crossing. All related equipment as far as
Interlocking
Operation of Points
Track Circuit
Signals
at
with
point
crossings
UPS
cost.
(uninterrupted
Train
protection
system
Train
Describer
System
Redundancy for TP/ Redundant Train borne equipment and ATS equipment
Train Describer.
at OCC.
Cables
xxx/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Description
Standards
Train Working under Running on site with line side signal with speed
emergency
Environmental
Conditions
Maintenance
philosophy
0.10
The telecommunication system acts as the communication backbone for Signalling systems
and other systems such as SCADA, AFC etc and provides telecommunication services to meet
operational and administrative requirements of metro network.
0.10.1 Technology
The Technologies proposed to be adopted for telecommunication systems are shown in
Table below:Table 0.20
System
Standards
Transmission
Media
telecommunication network
Telephone
Exchange
x
x
Train
System
xxxi/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
System
x
Centralized
Standards
clock
system
x
Passenger
Announcement
System
Redundancy
(Major System)
Environmental
Conditions
Maintenance
Philosophy
xxxii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed ticketing system shall be same as that to be of Contactless Smart Card type for
multiple journey and Contactless Token for Single Journey. The equipment for the same
shall be provided at each station Counter/Booking office and at convenient locations and
will be connected to a local area network with a computer in the Station Master's room.
0.10.4 Technology
The technology proposed for AFC systems are given in Table below:Table 0.21
Standards
x
Description
a) Contactless smart card for multiple journeys.
Fare media
b) Smart Contactless Token for Single Journeys.
Computer controlled retractable flap type automatic gates at entry and
exit. There will be following types of gates:
Gates
Entry
Exit
Station computer,
Central computer
Ticket Office
Machine
(TOM/EFO)
xxxiii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Standards
x
Ticket Reader
(TR) and portable
ticket decoder.
Description
Ticket reader shall be installed near EFO for passengers to check
information stored in the ticket.
UPS
(uninterrupted
power at stations
as well as for
OCC).
0.11
MAINTENANCE DEPOT
0.11.1 It is proposed to establish one depot- cum- workshop near Transport Nagar for North South
Corridor and one depot- cum- workshop near Vasant kunj for East West Corridor with
following functions:
a) Depot- cum- workshop near Transport Nagar for North South Corridor
(i) Major overhauls of all the trains of N-S corridor.
(ii) All minor schedules and repairs of N-S corridor.
(iii) Lifting for replacement of heavy equipment and testing thereafter of N-S corridor.
(iv) Repair of heavy equipments of N-S corridor.
b) Depot- cum- workshop near Vasant Kunj for East West Corridor
(i) Major overhauls of all the trains of East- West Corridor.
(ii) All minor schedules and repairs of East- West Corridor.
(iii) Lifting for replacement of heavy equipment and testing thereafter of East- West
Corridor.
(iv) Repair of heavy equipments of East- West Corridor.
The Depot planning near Transport Nagar for North South Corridor and near Vasant Kunj
for East West Corridor is based on following assumptions:
(i) Enough space should be available near Transport Nagar for North South Corridor and
near vasant kunj for East West Corridor for establishment of a Depot- Cum- workshop
xxxiv/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
(ii) All inspection, workshop lines and stabling lines are designed to accommodate one
trainset of 6- car.
(iii) All stabling lines are planned in the proposed depot-cum-workshop assuming adequate
space availability. In case of space constraints, if any, stabling facilities may need to be
created at terminal stations or elsewhere to cater to the required stability facilities.
(iv) Provision of transfer line from one corridor to another corridor.
In broad terms, based on the planned Rolling Stock requirements, this chapter covers
conceptual design on following aspects and will work as a guide for detailed design later:
x
0.12
xxxv/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.12.2 Methodology
The EIA study comprises of the following stages.
Table 0.22
Stage 'A'
Stage 'B'
Stage 'C'
0.13
COST ESTIMATES
xxxvi/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Name of Corridor
Distance
Estimated cost
Estimated cost
(KMs)
without taxes
with Central
(Rs/Crore)
22.878
4,992.00
5,590.00
11.098
3,723.00
4,196.00
E-W Corridor
(Charbagh-Vasant
Kunj)
The estimated cost at May-2013 price level includes an amount of Rs.10.83 Crore as onetime charges of security personal towards cost of weapons, barricades, and hand held and
door detector machine etc. However, the recurring cost towards salary and allowances of
security personal have not taken in to account in FIRR calculation.
0.14.1 Investment Cost
For the purpose of calculating the Financial Internal Rate of Return (FIRR), the completion
cost with central taxes have been calculated by taking escalation factor @7.5% PA. It has
been assumed that UP State Government will exempt the local taxes or reimburse the same
and provide the land worth Rs. 545.00 crore (without considering escalation) free of cost or
it shall provide Interest Free SD.
It is assumed that the construction work will start on 01.01.2014 and 01.09.2014
respectively for N-S corridor & E-W corridor and is expected to be completed on 31.03.2018
and 31.03.2019 with Revenue Opening Date (ROD) as 01.04.2018 & 01.04.2019 respectively
for the both the corridors. The total completion costs duly escalated and shown in the table
11.2 have been taken as the initial investment. The cash flow of investments separately is
placed in Table below:
xxxvii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Financial
Year
Corridor-I
Corridor-II
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
Total
179.00
908.00
1169.00
1563.00
1042.00
521.00
208.00
0.00
5590.00
0.00
257.00
660.00
860.00
1210.00
806.00
242.00
161.00
4196.00
Total
Completion Cost
Corridor-I
Corridor-II
179.00
967.00
1331.00
1942.00
1392.00
748.00
321.00
0.00
6880.00
0.00
272.00
754.00
1055.00
1616.00
1157.00
373.00
267.00
5494.00
179.00
1165.00
1829.00
2423.00
2252.00
1327.00
450.00
161.00
9786.00
Total
179.00
1239.00
2085.00
2997.00
3008.00
1905.00
694.00
267.00
12374.00
Description
FIRR
8.12%
4.43%
5.52%
6.49%
9.15%
REVENUE
10% decrease
10% increase
in Fare Box
in Fare Box
revenue
revenue
6.91%
9.22%
20%
decrease in
capital cost
10.39%
20%
increase in
Fare Box
revenue
10.21%
xxxviii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
7.74%
8.50%
Rail based mass transit systems are characterised by heavy capital investments coupled
with long gestation period leading to low financial rates of return although the economic
benefits to the society are immense. Such systems generate externalities, which do not get
captured in monetary terms and, therefore, do not flow back to the system. However,
experience all over the world reveals that both construction and operations of metro are
highly subsidised. Government involvement in the funding of metro systems is a foregone
conclusion. Singapore had a 100% capital contribution from the government, Hong Kong
78% for the first three lines and 66% for the later 2 lines. The Phase-I, Phase-II as well as
Phase-III of Delhi MRTS project, Chennai and Bengaluru metros are also funded with a
mixture of equity and debt (ODA) by GOI & concerned state governments.
0.14.4 Alternative Models of Financing
The financing option shall depend upon selection of the dedicated agency created to
implement the project. The prominent models are: -
xxxix/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
(i)
Special Purpose Vehicle under the State Government Control (Delhi Metro Rail
Corporation (DMRC) /Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation (BMRC)
(ii)
Table 0.26 - Funding pattern under SPV model (with central taxes)
With Taxes & Duties
Particulars
Equity By GOI
Equity By GUP
SD for CT by GUP (50%)
SD for CT by GOI (50%)
SD for Land by GUP (100%)
Contribution of Local Bodies
under Innovative Financing
1.40% JICA Loan /12% Market
Borrowings
Total
Corridor-I
Corridor-II
Total
1003.00
1003.00
373.00
373.00
381.00
786.50
786.50
312.50
312.50
164.00
1789.50
1789.50
685.50
685.50
545.00
% of
contribution
14.46%
14.46%
5.54%
5.54%
4.40%
245.00
105.00
350.00
2.83%
3502.00
6880.00
3027.00
5494.00
6529.00
12374.00
52.77%
100.00%
In addition to the above, State Taxes of Rs.333.00 crore on completion cost basis has to be
either reimbursed or exempted by state government.
BOT Model: - In this model, the private firm will be responsible for financing, designing,
building, operating and maintaining of the entire project. The contribution of Government
of UP will be limited to cost of land only. Such a project become eligible for Viability Gap
Funding (VGF) upto 20% from the Central Government provided the state government also
contribute same or more amount towards the project. The metro being a social sector
project not much private parties are available to bid for such a project. Besides quite
expectedly the private operator may demand assured rate of return in the range of 16% to
18% or a comfort of guaranteed ridership.
The funding pattern assumed under this model excluding the cost of land is placed in Table
below:
xl/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Particulars
VGF by GOI
VGF by GUP
Equity by Concessionaire
Concessionaires debt @12% PA
Total
Land Free by GUP
IDC
Total
% Of contribution
20.00%
50.67%
9.77%
19.56%
100.00
100.00%
VGF by GOI
VGF by GUP
Equity by Concessionaire
Concessionaires debt @12% PA
Total
Land Free by GUP
IDC
Total
% Of contribution
20.00%
13.82%
22.06%
44.12%
100.00
100.00%
In addition to the above, State Taxes of Rs.333.00 crore on completion cost basis has to be
either reimbursed or exempted by state government.
Recommendations:
The FIRR of Lucknow Metro Rail Project with property development is 8.12% including
central taxes. Therefore the corridors are recommended for implementation.
The total fund contribution of GOI & GOUP under various alternatives is given in Table
below:
xli/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Table 0.28
Rs. in crore
Particulars
SPV Model
GOI
2475.00
2365.80
2365.80
GOUP
3020.00
6539.20
2179.20
5495.00
8905.00
4545.00
Total
In addition to the above, State Taxes of Rs.333.00 crore on completion cost basis has to be
either reimbursed or exempted by state government.
The funding pattern assumed under SPV model and BOT model with PD is depicted
in the pie chart i.e., Figure 0.3 and 0.4 as under: -
xlii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
The sources from where economic savings occur are identified first. Although there are
many kinds of primary, secondary and tertiary benefits, only the quantifiable components
can be taken to measure the benefits. These components are quantified by linking with the
number of passengers shifted and the passenger km saved by the trips which are shifted
from road/rail based modes to metro. It may be observed that first four benefit components
given in Table 0.29 are direct benefits due to shifting of trips to metro, but other benefit
components are due to decongestion effect on the road. Benefit components were first
estimated applying market values then were converted into respective Economic values by
using separate economic factors which are also given in table 0.29. Depending upon
methodology of estimation, economic factors are assumed. Overall economic value of benefit
components is 90% of the market value. Similarly economic value of the cost components
are 80% of the market cost.
Benefit Components
Economic
Factors
Construction Cost
80%
Maintenance Cost
80%
100%
xliii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
4
5
0.16
80%
80%
Passengers
100%
Accident Cost
100%
100%
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
On receipt of the Detailed Project Report, following action will be required for
implementing the Lucknow Metro:
x
Approval to the Detailed Project Report to be taken from Uttar Pradesh State
Government (Cabinet approval).
Signing of an MOU between Uttar Pradesh State Government and Government of India
giving all details of the Joint Venture bringing out the financial involvement of each
party, liability for the loans raised, the administrative control in the SPV, policy in
regard to fare structure, operational subsidy, if any, etc.
Lucknow Metro Rail Corporation Ltd, the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) set up for
implementing the project and for its subsequent Operation & Maintenance should be
made functional early.
The Metro Railways (Amendment) Act-2009 can readily be made use of for
implementation of Lucknow Metro by declaring Lucknow City as Metropolitan Area in
terms of clause c of section 243 P of Constitution.
Request
to
GOI
for
notification
for
making
the
Metro
Railways
xliv/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The State Government should formulate the funding plan for executing this project
and get the same approved by the Government of India. The loan portion of the
funding will have to be tied up by State Government in consultation with the
Government of India.
The Government should freeze all developments along the corridors suggested. For
any constructions within 50 m. of the proposed alignment a system of No Objection
Certificate should be introduced so that infructuous expenditure at a later stage is
avoided.
The Metro Railways (Amendment) Act-2009 can readily be made use of for
implementation of Lucknow Metro by declaring Lucknow City as Metropolitan Area.
xlv/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Item of Work
Completion Date
25.07.2013
31.07.2013
15.08.2013
Development (MoUD).
15.09.2013
30.09.2013
01.10.2013
01.01.2014
01.01.2014 -
31.12.2017
10
Revenue Operation
01.01.2018
31.03.2018
01.04.2018
Item of Work
Completion Date
25.07.2013
31.03.2014
30.04.2014
31.05.2014
15.06.2014
15.07.2014
xlvi/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
S. No.
7
8
Item of Work
Completion Date
31.08.2014
01.09.2014 -
31.12.2018
10
Revenue Operation
01.01.2019
31.03.2019
01.04.2019
Both corridors can be divided into sections for the purpose of commercial opening in stages.
0.17
0.17.1 Lucknow has witnessed enormous growth during the last 10 years. The growth is mainly the
result of immigration as the city provided better employment opportunities. Lucknow is the
principal administrative, commercial and distribution center of the State. Lucknow is fast
developing as educational hub of Uttar Pradesh. Rapid urbanization in the recent past has
put the citys travel infrastructure to stress. Being thickly populated area, Lucknows traffic
needs cannot be met by only road-based system.
0.17.2 The existing urban transport system of Lucknow City, which is road-based, has already come
under stress leading to longer travel time, increased air pollution and rise in number of road
accidents. With projected increase in the population of the city, strengthening and
augmenting of transport infrastructure has assumed urgency. For this purpose provision of
rail-based Metro system in the city has been considered.
0.17.3 Studies have brought out that a Medium Metro with carrying capacity of about 25,000 to
50,000 phpdt will be adequate to meet not only the traffic needs for the present but for the
future 30 to 40 years also. A Medium Metro System consisting of two Corridors namely (i)
Amausi to Munshi Pulia Corridor (22.878 km) and (ii) Lucknow Railway Station to Vasant
Kunj Corridor on Hardoi Road (11.098 km) at an estimated completion cost of Rs.
6880.00Crores and Rs.5494.00Crores respectively(with Central taxes & duties) to be
made operational as recommended in implementation chapter.
0.17.4 After examining the various options for execution of Lucknow Metro Project, it has been
recommended that the project should be got executed through a SPV on DMRC funding
pattern.
xlvii/xlviii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
0.17.5 A PSU of the State Government, Lucknow Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (LMRC) for Lucknow
Metro, to be set up under the Companies Act, 1956 should be made functional by posting
Managing Director and Functional Directors.
0.17.6 Delhi Metro Rail Corporation can also be considered straightaway for being appointed as
General Consultant to LMRC which will reduce the construction time by 4 to 6 months.
xlviii/xlviii
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER - 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1.
BACKGROUND
Economic growth and spatial development are quite often governed by the quality and
quantity of infrastructure provided. While an inadequate transport facilities causes
congestion, delays and hazards result in significant socio economic costs to the society.
An oversupply, apart from being uneconomical, often acts as counter to the long term
spatial development strategies of settlements and regions. Supplying and maintaining an
optimal level of infrastructure is the key to planned development. India is passing a
stage where urbanization is taking place at an increasing rate. With rapid urbanization,
there has been a widening gap between demand and supply of urban infrastructure of
which transportation is an essential component.
Lucknow is popularly known for its cultural and intellectual traditions as well as, its
current status as a nucleus of service industry, education & research. Lucknow is the
capital of Uttar Pradesh & administrative headquarters of Lucknow district & division.
With its 2.2 (COI, 2001 Estimates) million inhabitants Lucknow Urban Agglomeration
has currently over 3 million population. The master plan has projected a population of
about 3.2 million and 4.0 million by years 2011 & 2021 respectively. Being an important
cultural and trading centre Lucknow continues to grow and attract large number of
people to the city. The rapid growth of the city and the associated urban sprawl has
accentuated the demand supply mismatch amidst the constrained transport
infrastructure resulting in economic and social externalities. Lucknow must keep pace
with the demographic and economic growth. The inadequate commuter transportation
system in Lucknow is overwhelmed by upsurge of private automobiles. Private vehicles
(motorised 2-wheelers and cars) constitute 90 percent of total vehicles registered in
Lucknow City. The supply of city buses being only 6 per lakh population is inadequate
for a city's size like Lucknow. The benchmark is between 70 to 80 buses per lakh
residents in an urban area in India.
One of the key issues to be tackled is to improvise on a reliable public transport system;
above all, lay emphasis on a mass transportation system which is environmental
friendly to cater to city's growing travelling needs to sustain in the growing economic
activities. India being in the process of economic reforms and that such mass transport
systems will involve heavy investments.
Against this backdrop of increasing number of vehicles on road and concomitant
congestion and air pollution, the Lucknow Development Authority commissioned DMRC
to prepare Detailed Project Report for a Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) for Lucknow
City to serve forecast travel up to the horizon year 2030.
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
1/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
ii)
iii)
Field surveys for identification of major above ground utilities along the
proposed metro corridors requiring diversion / relocation. Details of
underground utilities shall be supplied by state government through the
concerned utilities agencies
iv)
v)
Location of stations and general layout plans for stations and integration area
vi)
EIA study and preparation and preparation of EMP for negative impacts, if any
vii)
viii)
ix)
x)
Implementation schedule
xi)
xii)
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
2/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
xiii)
xiv)
xv)
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
3/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
4/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
5/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Metro rail systems are operational in Delhi & Kolkata and the projects are taken in
various cities like Bangalore, Mumbai, Chennai, Hyderabad, Jaipur, Kolkata.
A summary of metro network developed worldwide is given below in Table 1.1.
Table 1.1 SPREAD OF WORLD METRO RAIL SYSTEMS
City
Adana
Amsterdam
Ankara
Antwerp
Athens
Atlanta
Baku
Baltimore
Bangkok
Barcelona
Beijing
Belo Horizonte
Berlin
Bielefeld
Bilbao
Bochum
Bonn
Boston
Brasilia
Brussels
Bucharest
Budapest
Buenos Aires
Buffalo
Bursa
Busan
Cairo
Caracas
Catania
Changchun
Charleroi
Chengdu
Chennai
Chiba
Chicago
Chongqing
Cleveland
Cologne
Copenhagen
Daegu
Daejeon
Dalian
Delhi
Detroit
Dnepropetrovsk
Dortmund
Country
Turkey
Netherlands
Turkey
Belgium
Greece
USA
Azerbaijan
USA
Thailand
Spain
China
Brazil
Germany
Germany
Spain
Germany
Germany
USA
Brazil
Belgium
Romania
Hungary
Argentina
USA
Turkey
South Korea
Egypt
Venezuela
Italy
China
Belgium
China
India
Japan
USA
China
USA
Germany
Denmark
South Korea
South Korea
China
India
USA
Ukraine
Germany
Continent
Asia
Europe
Asia
Europe
Europe
America
Asia
America
Asia
Europe
Asia
America
Europe
Europe
Europe
Europe
Europe
America
America
Europe
Europe
Europe
America
America
Asia
Asia
Africa
America
Europe
Asia
Europe
Asia
Asia
Asia
America
Asia
America
Europe
Europe
Asia
Asia
Asia
Asia
America
Europe
Europe
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Commencement
18-Mar-09
16-Oct-77
30-Aug-96
25-Mar-75
1954
30-Jun-79
6-Nov-67
21-Nov-83
5-Dec-99
30-Dec-24
1-Oct-69
1-Aug-86
18-Feb-02
21-Sep-71
11-Nov-95
26-May-79
22-Mar-75
1 Sep 1897
31-Mar-01
20-Sep-76
16-Nov-79
2 May 1896
1-Dec-13
18-May-85
19-Aug-02
19-Jul-85
27-Sep-87
27-Mar-83
27-Jun-99
Oct-02
21-Jun-76
27-Sep-10
19-Oct-97
28-Mar-88
6 Jun 1892
18-Jun-05
15-Mar-55
11-Oct-68
19-Oct-02
26-Nov-97
16-Mar-06
1-May-03
24-Dec-02
Jul-87
29-Dec-95
17-May-76
Network
Length
(km)
13.5
32.7
23.1
7.6
52.0
79.2
32.9
24.5
74.9
119.4
337.0
28.1
147.4
5.2
40.6
21.5
9.0
60.5
42.0
32.2
67.7
33.0
48.1
8.4
25.4
95.0
65.5
60.5
3.8
17.0
17.5
18.5
27.0
15.5
166.0
19.5
31.0
45.0
21.0
53.9
22.6
49.0
328.5
4.8
7.1
29.5
Daily
Ridership
(million)
0.233
0.31
0.937
0.0932
0.482
0.0356
0.564
1.1
3.99
1.39
0.238
0.4
0.0438
0.364
0.304
0.814
0.789
0.704
1.92
1.25
0.542
0.0137
0.126
0.301
0.0795
2.3
0.0384
6/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
City
Dubai
Duesseldorf
Duisburg
Edmonton
Essen
Frankfurt
Fukuoka
Gelsenkirchen
Genoa
Glasgow
Guadalajara
Guangzhou
Gwangju
Haifa
Hamburg
Hanover
Helsinki
Hiroshima
Hong Kong
Incheon
Istanbul
Izmir
Jacksonville
Kamakura
Kaohsiung
Kazan
Kharkov
Kiev
Kitakyushu
Kobe
Kolkata
Kryvyi Rih
Kuala Lumpur
Kyoto
Las Vegas
Lausanne
Lille
Lima
Lisbon
London
Los Angeles
Ludwigshafen
Lyon
Madrid
Manila
Maracaibo
Marseille
Mecca
Medellin
Mexico City
Miami
Milan
Country
United
Arab
Emirates
Germany
Germany
Canada
Germany
Germany
Japan
Germany
Italy
United Kingdom
Mexico
China
South Korea
Israel
Germany
Germany
Finland
Japan
China
South Korea
Turkey
Turkey
USA
Japan
Taiwan
Russia
Ukraine
Ukraine
Japan
Japan
India
Ukraine
Malaysia
Japan
USA
Switzerland
France
Peru
Portugal
United Kingdom
USA
Germany
France
Spain
Philippines
Venezuela
France
Saudi Arabia
Colombia
Mexico
USA
Italy
Continent
Asia
Europe
Europe
America
Europe
Europe
Asia
Europe
Europe
Europe
America
Asia
Asia
Asia
Europe
Europe
Europe
Asia
Asia
Asia
Europe
Asia
America
Asia
Asia
Europe
Europe
Europe
Asia
Asia
Asia
Europe
Asia
Asia
America
Europe
Europe
America
Europe
Europe
America
Europe
Europe
Europe
Asia
America
Europe
Asia
America
America
America
Europe
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Commencement
Network
Length
(km)
9-Sep-09
52.1
4-Oct-81
11-Jul-92
22-Apr-78
5-Oct-67
4-Oct-68
26-Jul-81
1-Sep-84
13-Jun-90
14 Dec 1896
1-Sep-89
28-Jun-99
28-Apr-04
1959
1-Mar-12
28-Sep-75
3-Aug-82
20-Aug-94
1-Oct-79
6-Oct-99
16-Sep-00
22-May-00
30-May-89
3-Mar-70
9-Mar-08
27-Aug-05
23-Aug-75
22-Oct-60
9-Jan-85
13-Mar-77
24-Oct-84
26-Dec-86
16-Dec-96
1-Apr-81
15-Jul-04
24-May-91
25-Apr-83
13-Jan-03
29-Dec-59
10 Jan 1863
30-Jan-93
29-May-69
28-Apr-78
17-Oct-19
1-Dec-84
8-Jun-09
26-Nov-77
13-Nov-10
30-Nov-95
5-Sep-69
21-May-84
1-Nov-64
9.6
14.3
20.4
20.2
20.5
29.8
5.5
5.2
10.4
24.0
231.9
20.1
1.8
100.7
18.6
21.0
18.4
188.1
29.5
16.9
11.5
6.9
6.6
42.7
10.9
37.4
63.7
8.8
30.6
22.6
18.0
64.0
31.3
6.2
13.7
45.5
10.0
41.0
408.0
59.3
4.0
30.7
286.3
51.5
6.5
21.8
18.1
28.8
201.7
36.0
79.4
Daily
Ridership
(million)
0.34
0.0411
1.85
0.0466
0.518
0.156
0.0493
3.62
0.2
0.186
0.0822
0.0822
0.0192
0.762
1.76
0.332
0.474
0.299
0.345
0.203
0.488
2.99
0.129
0.499
1.78
0.948
0.159
0.425
3.88
0.0493
0.899
7/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
City
Country
Minsk
Belarus
Monterrey
Mexico
Montreal
Canada
Moscow
Russia
Mulheim
Germany
Mumbai
India
Munich
Germany
Nagoya
Japan
Naha
Japan
Nanjing
China
Naples
Italy
New York
USA
Newark
USA
Newcastle
United Kingdom
Nizhny Novgorod Russia
Novosibirsk
Russia
Nuremberg
Germany
Oporto
Portugal
Osaka
Japan
Oslo
Norway
Palma
de
Spain
Mallorca
Paris
France
Perugia
Italy
Philadelphia
USA
Pittsburgh
USA
Porto Alegre
Brazil
Poznan
Poland
Prague
Czech Republic
Pyongyang
North Korea
Recife
Brazil
Rennes
France
Rio de Janeiro
Brazil
Rome
Italy
Rotterdam
Netherlands
Rouen
France
Saint Louis
USA
Saint Petersburg
Russia
Samara
Russia
San Francisco
USA
San Juan
Puerto Rico
Santiago
Chile
Dominican
Santo Domingo
Republic
Sao Paulo
Brazil
Sapporo
Japan
Seattle
USA
Sendai
Japan
Seoul
South Korea
Seville
Spain
Shanghai
China
Shenyang
China
Shenzhen
China
Europe
America
America
Europe
Europe
Asia
Europe
Asia
Asia
Asia
Europe
America
America
Europe
Europe
Asia
Europe
Europe
Asia
Europe
26-Jun-84
25-Apr-91
14-Oct-66
15-May-35
3-Nov-79
19-Oct-71
15-Nov-57
10-Aug-03
27-Aug-05
28-Mar-93
27-Oct-04
26-May-35
7-Aug-80
20-Nov-85
7-Jan-86
1-Mar-72
7-Dec-02
20-May-33
22-May-66
Network
Length
(km)
30.3
31.5
69.2
302.0
9.0
171.0
94.2
89.0
12.8
84.7
31.8
368.0
2.2
76.5
15.5
16.4
34.6
21.7
137.8
62.0
Europe
25-Apr-07
8.3
Europe
Europe
America
America
America
Europe
Europe
Asia
America
Europe
America
Europe
Europe
Europe
America
Europe
Europe
America
America
America
19-Jul-00
29-Jan-08
4-Mar-07
3-Jul-85
2-Mar-85
1-Mar-97
9-May-74
6-Sep-73
11-Mar-85
16-Mar-02
5-Mar-79
10-Feb-55
10-Feb-68
17-Dec-94
31-Jul-93
15-Nov-55
26-Dec-87
11-Sep-72
6-Jun-05
15-Sep-75
213.0
3.0
62.0
2.9
33.8
6.1
59.1
22.5
39.7
9.0
42.0
39.0
47.0
2.2
73.4
110.2
10.2
166.9
17.2
102.4
2.25
0.0329
0.293
0.0247
1.67
America
30-Jan-09
14.5
0.2
America
Asia
America
Asia
Asia
Europe
Asia
Asia
Asia
14-Sep-74
16-Dec-71
18-Jul-09
15-Jul-87
15-Aug-74
2-Apr-09
10-Apr-95
27-Sep-10
28-Dec-04
69.7
48.0
22.2
14.8
286.9
18.0
423.0
27.8
69.1
1.93
0.573
Continent
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Commencement
Daily
Ridership
(million)
0.718
0.6
6.55
0.962
1.17
0.4
0.0795
4.33
0.104
0.0904
0.192
0.315
2.36
0.214
4.05
0.192
1.6
0.0959
0.063
0.37
0.907
0.238
0.159
5.61
3.56
0.362
8/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
City
Singapore
Sofia
Stockholm
Stuttgart
Sydney
Taipei
Tama
Tashkent
Tbilisi
Tehran
The Hague
Tianjin
Tokyo
Toronto
Toulouse
Turin
Valencia
Valencia
Valparaiso
Vancouver
Vienna
Volgograd
Warsaw
Washington
Wuhan
Wuppertal
Yekaterinburg
Yerevan
Country
Singapore
Bulgaria
Sweden
Germany
Australia
Taiwan
Japan
Uzbekistan
Georgia
Iran
Netherlands
China
Japan
Canada
France
Italy
Venezuela
Spain
Chile
Canada
Austria
Russia
Poland
USA
China
Germany
Russia
Armenia
Continent
Asia
Europe
Europe
Europe
Oceania
Asia
Asia
Asia
Asia
Asia
Europe
Asia
Asia
America
Europe
Europe
America
Europe
America
America
Europe
Europe
Europe
America
Asia
Europe
Asia
Asia
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Commencement
7-Nov-87
28-Jan-98
1-Oct-50
10-Jun-66
1926
28-Mar-96
27-Nov-98
6-Nov-77
11-Jan-66
21-Feb-00
16-Oct-04
28-Mar-04
30-Dec-27
30-Apr-54
26-Jun-93
4-Feb-06
18-Oct-06
3-Oct-88
23-Nov-05
3-Jan-86
25-Feb-78
5-Nov-84
7-Apr-95
27-Mar-76
28-Sep-04
1-Mar-01
26-Apr-91
7-Mar-81
Network
Length
(km)
129.7
18.0
105.7
24.0
22.1
100.8
16.0
36.2
26.3
66.0
27.9
72.0
304.5
71.3
27.5
9.6
6.2
31.8
43.0
69.5
74.6
3.3
22.6
171.2
28.0
13.3
8.5
12.1
Daily
Ridership
(million)
1.81
0.0795
0.841
1.27
0.195
0.252
1.26
0.0411
8.7
0.762
0.115
0.0493
0.203
1.4
0.345
0.611
0.0356
0.126
0.0466
9/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Reach
over
160
Cities
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
10/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
London
Taipei
Delhi
Meddellin
Paris
Kolkata
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
11/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Population Growth
50.00
45.00
40.00
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
10.00
5.00
0.00
45.00 44.40
32.26
31.66
22.46 21.86
16.69 16.19
10.08 9.48
1981
1991
2001
Year
2011
2021
12/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
change significantly in 2011 & 2021, there will be a decrease in the proportion of
primary workers and a relative rise in secondary workers.
1.5.4. Traffic & Transportation Scenario
Lucknow over the last few years has been growing with a spread of around 25 km
radius. The major traffic attracting zones i.e. offices and commercial complexes are
located in the central part of the city thereby congesting the central area. The growth of
city in recent years has resulted in increased transport demand and motorized vehicles.
However transport infrastructure in the city has not grown correspondingly and is
inadequate to accommodate the traffic. The registered vehicles have grown at a rate of
40,000 vehicles per year in the past decade. The roads and parking spaces in the city
have become extremely congested, especially during peak hours. The share of
personalized modes has been increasing continuously due to inadequate supply of
Public Transport along with its inadequate level of service.
At present the public bus transportation in the city operates with a fleet of 104 buses.
The available multiple modes of public transport in the city are taxis, city buses, cycle
rickshaws, auto rickshaws. As per 2021 Master Plan it is estimated that around 13.5 lakh
residents will need public transport daily. Given the number of buses and the
constraints of road network, it seems that it will not be possible to meet the travel
demand through the current fleet of public buses or private taxis and three wheelers.
The major traffic generating areas in Lucknow are Railway Station, Charbagh Bus Stand,
Vidhan Sabha, Secretariat and the commercial areas in the central part of the city. Also
with the absence of proper public transport system, many personalized modes have
emerged in the city. Hence it was decided to plan for suitable mass transportation
system to cater the future demand.
1.5.5. Key Issues of Urban Transport in Lucknow
x Heavily congested narrow roads with mixed traffic conditions and frequent traffic
jams at intersections.
x Very high parking demand due to propagation of personalized vehicles
x Rapid development of the peripheral areas has increased demand for new
connections to central part of the city.
x Public transport system in the city is confined to a small portion of the city and has
poor frequency due to limited availability of fleet size. City also lacks institutional
support for planning, management and operationalisation of safe and reliable pubic
transport
x The condition & width of roads requires attention in terms of widening, remove the
encroachments and construct subways, flyovers and parking places.
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
13/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
The exponential growth in the citys population coupled with faster growth in the
number of motorized vehicles in the city, poses a formidable problem to the citys
planner for providing a transport system for providing quicker, safer, more economical
and pollution free transport system. Thus implementation of robust mass urban public
transport system explore has become essential to cope up with the increasing demand.
This has led to the possibility of the Rail based MRTS for Lucknow city. The rail based
MRT system shall also be in line with Lucknow image of being a modern city with rich
heritage.
Against this background, Government of Uttar Pradesh has commissioned Delhi Metro
Rail Corporation (DMRC) for undertaking Detailed Project Report for MRT system in
Lucknow. Numbers of metro alignments were chosen and traffic was estimated. DMRC
has finally identified 2 corridors based on the existing & projected travel demand,
demographic features, existing and proposed land use pattern in the city. The corridor
identified includes influence areas like Hazaratganj, Alamnagar, Charbagh, Vijaynagar,
Airport etc. The Corridors are:
Corridor 1: North South Corridor (Approx. Length 23kms)
Amausi Transport Nagar Krishna Nagar Singar Nagar Alambagh Alambagh Bus Station
Mawaiya Charbagh Railway Station Lucknow Railway Station KKC Husian Ganj
Sachivalaya Hazrat ganj K.D. Singh Stadium Vishwavidyalaya IT Chauraha Badshahbagh
Mahanagar Badshah Nagar Lekhraj Market Ramsagar Mishra Nagar Indira Nagar
Munshipulia
Corridor 2: East West Corridor (Rajajipuram to Patrakarpuram, Gomti Nagar)
NS: Amausi to Munshi Pulia via Kanpur Road and Faizabad Road (23 km)
ii. EW: Rajaji Puram to Gomtinagar crossing CBD and Hazazrat Ganj (18 km)
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
14/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
iii. Modified NS Corridor from Krishan Nagar to Muhibullahpur along Kanpur Road,
Hazrat Ganj, MG Road, Hasan Ganj RS, crossing Gomti River near Bara Imambara
along Sitapur NH-24 till Muhibullahpur / IET (20.5 km)
iv. Modified EW Corridor from Rajaipuram to Munshi Pulia via CBD, via Hazrat Ganj,
Stadium, Parivartan Chk, IT Charaha along Faizabad Road till Munshi Pulia (18.6 km)
v. Modified EW Corridor from Lucknow Railway Station along Gautam Budha Marg via
Aminabad, Pandey Ganj, City RS, Medical Crossing, Nawajganj and thereafter; along
Hardoi Road up to Vasant Kunj (11.1 km)
Fig 1.3
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
15/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
NS: AMAUSI TO MUNSHI PULIA VIA KANPUR ROAD AND FAIZABAD ROAD
The NS corridor (i) above was selected and considerable feasible and connecting Amausi
with Munshi Pulia. Following issues were studied in detail before finalising / freezing
this corridor.
-
Crossing of alignment across River Gomti underground was also dropped in view
of complex geometry and availability of insufficient lengths for switch over
between elevated to underground.
To streamline these issues an elevated option was considered keeping in view the
cost implications and complexity of construction of underground metro stations.
There were no major obstacles for the alignment between Amausi and Mawaiya
and the alignment was placed central along the Kanpur Road, which has sizeable
ROW.
The challenges posed by the elevated option were more near the existing BG
Railway Line near Mawaiya Junction. In case the alignment has to cross the raillines elevated, the minimum metro rail level shall be 12 m above the broad gauge
rail lines. To encounter this, extra dose bridge was envisaged to cross the railway
lines elevated with span of about 80m.
The issue of ramp positioning near KD Singh Babu Stadium could be avoided with
the elevated option.
The other constraints were on Faziabad Road between Mahangar and Lekhraj
Market. The alignment has to surpass Indra Flyover before Mahanagar Junction
and proposed ROB / Flyover planned across NH-28 crossing the rail lines near
Kukrail Nala. The alignment has been planned double elevated at these locations.
(b) EW: RAJAJI PURAM TO GOMTINAGAR CROSSING CBD AND HAZAZRAT GANJ
Proposed EW corridor (ii above) was envisaged to connect Gomti Nagar with
Rajajipuram via central area, posed feasibility and ridership issues considering the
following:
-
The alignment was proposed to connect the Eastern part of Lucknow i.e. Gomti
Nagar developing rapidly in terms of infrastructure facilities, education, medical
facilities and Rajajipuram, the old established residential settlement in the west.
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
16/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
The alignment was proposed to commence elevated from the Rajajipuram West
near Auto stand. The alignment was to cross congested area of the Central
Lucknow and was envisaged underground immediately after the proposed
Rajajipuram West station.
Crossing Aishbag Road the proposed connection with Hazratganj was aligned via
crossing Subasha Marg, Aminabad, Kaiserbagh Junction reaching Vidhan-Sabha
Marg. The alignment was then planned along the major banks road and
approaching the Hazratganj Junction beneath Sarojni Nagar Road.
The alignment was to cross Gomti River elevated. The switch over ramp had been
proposed in the campus of the Botanical garden along the boundary wall. The
alignment was planned to cross the Gomti River before the Cremation area,
Baikunth Dham. Thereafter, alignment followed the road towards Fun Mall to
reach Ram Manohar Lohiya Park towards Gomti Nagar.
To reach Gomti Nagar, 2 elevated options were considered. Initially, the alignment
was planned along Lohia Park Road turning at City Montessari School to reach
Patrakar Puram. This would involve large scale property acquisition to provide
adequate geometry and avoid the heritage Mutiny Ground.
In the other option after Patrakarpuram the alignment was planned to cross the
under-construction Flyover at a double height and reaching the terminating
station Haneyman Chowk via Jaipuria School of management, Jaipuria School and
Viraat Khand Market. The total length of the corridor was proposed to be 18.8 km
and the underground section shall be about 8.5 km long. A total of 11 metro
stations were planned on this corridor of which 6 stations were underground.
The 4 km section between Botanical Garden and Sangeet Academy along the
Butler Road did not attract significant ridership owing proximity to Butler Road
flanked adjacent to riverbanks and therefore, no major station were planned. The
positioning of elevated bridge across river Gomti was possible only the upstream
side and would pose construction hazards. No other location was possible due
presence of 3 existing bridges at this location.
Since the metro connection to Gomti Nagar is vital, therefore, it was decided that a
proposal for connecting proposed Indranagar metro station near Polytechnic
Junction will be planned with an additional platform to aid possible metro
connection via Wave Mall, Pickup Bhawan, Mashadipur and Patrakarpuram. This
can then expanded in the Gomti Nagar area depending upon the future growth and
potential of public transport demand.
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
17/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
18/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
Corridor
North South
(NS)
Modified East
West (EW)
Route
Major Destinations
Kanpur Road,
Vidhan Sabha Marg,
Ambedkar Marg,
part of MG Road,
University Road,
Faizabad Road &
Himalaya Marg
Gautam Budha
Marg, parts of Ganga
Prasad Marg,
Mirtaki Marg &
Hardoi Road
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Length
(km)
22.878
11.098
19/20
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION
FINAL DETAILED
FFINAL PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
20/20
CHAPTER 2
TRAFFIC DEMAND ANALYSIS
2.0
2.1
TRAVEL CHARACTERISTICS
2.1.1. GENERAL
Large number of alternate routes for Metro for Lucknow was taken in the traffic analysis
and the Peak Hour and Peak direction traffic (PHPDT) on such routes determined. Based on
PHPDT, two routes; one connecting North to South and East to West were identified. North
South corridor starts at Amusai airport and ends at Munshipulia via Hazaratganj,
Sachivalaya, IT Chouraha etc with a total length of 22.878 km. East- West corridor with its
Length of 11.098kms, starts at Charbagh Railway station and ends at Vasant kunj passing
through City railway station, Balaganj, Musabagh etc.
This chapter covers the transport demand projections for the above mentioned corridors
and section and station loadings for the same.
2.1.2. TRANSPORT DEMAND MODELLING
Database
Detailed household surveys and various traffic surveys were carried out during the DPR
study. A travel demand model was developed and the future OD- Matricies based on the
projected population and employment were developed.
The network for the transport demand model including the metro alignments has
been developed from the primary database.
The four stage Transport Demand Model involving Trip Generation, Trip distribution, Modal
Split and Assignment has been adopted for this study.
The basic functions included in the transportation study process are:
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
1/3
x
x
x
x
The details of the planning process as adopted for this study is shown in Figure 2.3.
2.1.3
ZONING
The entire study area has been delineated into 127 zones as shown in Figure 2.4. Among
them 119 are the internal zones and the remaining zones (8 zones) are external zones.
Detailed list of all these zones is given in the Annexure 2.1.
Summary of population projection and employment projections is presented in the Table
2.1.
Table 2.1 Population and Employment projection
Description
2001
2011
2021
2031*
Population(in lakhs)
Employment(in lakhs)
22.45
29.08
44.41
54.61
6.17
9.19
13.50
17.47
VEHICLE GROWTH
The number of registered vehicles in Lucknow was 1010226 till March 2009 with a growth
rate of 7% in the year 2008-2009. The vehicle population for the past five years is presented
in Table 2.2. Private vehicular transport constitutes a very sizeable proportion. Two
wheelers account for more than three- fourths of the total registered vehicles, while cars
constitute 14%.
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
2/3
2.1.5
Buses
Taxi
Tempo Taxi
Auto
Rickshaw
Two
wheelers
Four
wheelers
5303
4780
2392
3553
4602
7381
1544
601745
97317
728617
5541
5018
2782
3831
5080
7475
2228
660332
106874
799161
10%
5893
5783
3197
3914
6283
8233
4762
720158
105447
863670
8%
6066
6738
3576
3842
7083
8216
5008
771846
129316
941691
9%
6242
7657
3776
3741
7399
8447
5015
825088
142861
1010226
7%
Total
Growth
wheelers
Goods
Vehicles
200405
200506
200607
200708
200809
Light Goods
Vehicles
Year
Passenger Vehicles
Heavy Goods
Vehicles
Goods Vehicles
TRIP INFORMATION
The trip information obtained from the survey has been analyzed with respect to
distribution of total trips by mode. The daily trips by various modes are presented in Table
2.3 and Fig. 2.1.
Table 2.3 Distribution of Motorized Trips
Internal
External
Mode
Trips
Trips
Sl. No
Total Trips
Two-wheeler
1342500
43913
1386413
Car
156225
60200
216425
Auto rickshaw
71525
15938
87463
Public Transit
316850
157000
473850
1887100
221640
2164151
Total
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
3/3
Bus trips constitute about 17% of the total trips while Two-wheeler trips are 71 %, Auto
trips 4% and Car trips constitutes 8%.
2.2
2.2.1
MODEL DESCRIPTION
As stated earlier, the standard four stage Model constituting Trip generation, trip
Distribution, Modal split and Assignment is used. Extensive household surveys and
traffic surveys were carried out to develop the four stage model. The horizon year
Origin Destination (O D) Matrices for private and public modes were developed
using the Gravity Model. The parameters obtained from the Model have been used for
the transport demand projections for the proposed alignments.
2.2.2
Directional capacity
4L-2W-UD
3800
4L-2W-D
4500
6L-2W-D
6700
(Note: L: Lanes, 1w- One Way, UD- Undivided, D- Divided, 2W- Two way )
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
4/3
2.2.3
Road way
Class
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
2.2.4
ALPHA
BETA
3.5
3.8
5.2
4.7
5.0
5.5
6.8
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.8
3.3
3.8
TRIP CATEGORIZATION
The passenger transport demand in terms of daily passenger trips has been broadly
categorized as intra-city and inter-city trips. The inter-zonal trips are the most important, so
far as transport system development is concerned. The trips were classified by different
motorized modes including private, hired and public motorized vehicles.
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
5/3
2.2.5
TRIP GENERATION
The first of the sub-models in the study process is that which predicts the number of trips
starting and ending in each zone. The techniques developed attempt to utilize the observed
relationships between travel characteristics and the urban environment and are based on
the assumption that trip making is a function of three basic factors:
x
Land use pattern and development in the study area,
x
Socio-economic characteristics of the trip-making population of the study area, and
x
Nature, extent and capabilities of the transportation system in the study area
Mathematically, trip generation can be expressed as:
Trips Generated = Function (socio-economic, locational etc. variables)
Various techniques for developing the trip generation sub-models are available and
notable among them are:
x
x
Regression Analysis
Category Analysis or Cross Classification Analysis
Where
G
=
A0
ao, a1 aK =
=
X1, x2.
!
!"!!
purpose.
Constant term to be calibrated.
Coefficients to be determined by the regression analysis
Zonal planning input factor (independent) variable)
The significance of the regression equation is tested on the basis of R2 value and the tstatistics value (for each of the coefficients).
Typical inputs for trip generation sub-models are population, employment, vehicle
ownership, household income, residential density, etc. These models are developed using
standard computer programs.
Population is a major influencing factor for trip generation. As it is one of the major
variables in the trip end models used for obtaining the future trip ends, it has an influence in
#!!$$
For the generation of trip generation sub-models, analysis has been carried out at zonal
level utilizing regression analysis technique. The generalized form of the trip generation
equation to be developed is as under: Y=A+BX
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
6/3
Where
Y=Trips produced or attracted
A=Constant term
B=Trip rate to be determined from least square Analysis
X=Independent variable e.g., population, employment, Vehicle ownership
The results of calibration of different models are given in Table 2.6
Table 2.6 Generation for Total Trips
Description
Co-off.
Intercept
0.0343
X Variable
311.65
By using the above table the value of R2 was found to be 0.55, T-value 10.7, F-value114.2 (Assuming Population in zones as the variable).
Table 2.7 Trip attraction for total trips
Description
Co-off.
Intercept
0.104
X Variable
393.92
0.63
2015
0.77
2020
0.91
2025
0.96
2030
1.01
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
7/3
2.2.7
Tij
Jm
Tij
Gi
and
Im
Ai
The calibration includes estimation of parameters of the deterrence function is in the form
of Gamma (Refer Eqn 1). The calibration process for combined trip distribution and mode
choice is explained in flowchart as shown in Figure 2.5.
The cost of travel (C- generallised cost) between the zones has been estimated based on
skims from the Highway and Public Transport assignment. The estimation of generallised
cost for the base year is explained in the following section.
2.2.8
DETERRENCE FUNCTIONS
Calibrated parameters for the Deterrence function by mode is given in Table 2.9
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
8/3
2.2.9
ALPHA
BETA
Two wheeler
3.4
-0.2
52.8
Car
4.2
0.8
12.0
Auto Rickshaw
9.1
1.0
26.8
Public Transport
4.0
0.2
59.4
TRIP ASSIGNMENT
2.2.9.1 Trip assignment is the process of allocating a given set of trip interchanges to a specific
transportation system and is generally used to estimate the volume of travel on various
links of the system to simulate present conditions for validation purposes and to use the
same for horizon years for developing forecast scenarios. The process requires as input, a
complete description of either the proposed or existing transportation system, and a matrix
of inter-zonal trip movements. The output of the process is an estimate of the trips on each
link of the transportation system, although the more sophisticated assignment techniques
also include directional turning movements at intersections.
The purposes of trip assignment are:
1.
To assess the deficiencies of the existing transportation system by assigning
estimated future trips to the existing system Do Nothing Scenario.
2.
To evaluate the effects of limited improvements and extensions to the existing
transportation system by assigning estimated trips to the network which included
these improvements.
3.
To develop system development priorities by assigning estimated future trips for
intermediate years to the transportation system proposed for these years.
4.
To test alternative transportation system proposals by systematic and readily
acceptable procedures.
5.
To provide design hours volumes and turning movements.
2.2.9.2 ASSIGNMENT PROCEDURE ADOPTED
The observed highway and public transport matrices were assigned on the network to
check the validation across the screen lines. The assigned traffic volume has been compared
with the observed traffic counts. The assignment is carried out in two stages with the
assignment of Transit trips following the Highway PCU Assignment. The highway
assignment is the assignment of vehicles on Roads and this is carried out also in stages with
commercial vehicles and buses taken as pre loads. The transit assignment is the assignment
of commuters on a Public Transit network which comprises of buses, metros etc which are
linked on to the zonal system via walk links. This methodology is presented in Figure 2.6.
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
9/3
Commercial
Vehicles
Private
Vehicles&
IPT
2.3
Modes
PCE Values
Two wheeler
0.54
Auto rickshaw
0.43
Car
0.38
Modes
PCU Values
Truck
2.2
MAV
4.0
LCV
1.4
2.3.1 Based on traffic projections, DMRC has identified the under mentioned corridors for Phase-I
of Lucknow Metro :
a) North-South corridor starts at Chaudhary Charan Singh Airport and ends at Munshipulia
via Sachivalaya, Hazaratganj, IT College Junction, Indira Nagar with a total length of
22.878 km having 22 stations (3 underground & 19 elevated).
b) East- West corridor ( length = 11.098 km) starts at Lucknow Railway station and ends at
Vasantkunj passing through Lucknow City Railway Station, Balaganj, Musabagh having
12 stations (7 underground & 5 elevated).
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
10/3
2.3.2
The proposed Phase-I Corridors of Lucknow Metro are shown in Fig 2.2. The proposed
stations on the North-South corridor and East -West corridor Link and the distance between
the stations are given in Tables 2.11 and Table 2.12.
Table 2.11 Inter- Station Distances on the North-South Corridor
S. No
Name of Stations
Inter Station
Distance (in m)
CCS Airport
Amausi
807.23
Transport Nagar
1200.47
Krishna Nagar
1236.50
Singar Nagar
1584.31
Alambagh
1385.60
712.51
Mawaiya
767.51
Durgapuri
1176.93
10
#<># ?Q[$\]
764.49
11
HussainGunj
1371.03
12
Sachiwalaya
934.58
13
HazratGunj
1052.33
14
1124.88
15
Vishwavidyalaya
1480.81
16
IT College Junction
825.83
17
Mahanagar
1092.94
18
Badshah Nagar
673.44
19
Lekhraj Market
976.87
20
718.85
21
Indra Nagar
901.17
22
Munshi Pulia
1560.49
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
11/3
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
12/3
Name of Stations
Inter Station
Distance (in m)
(-)113.00
988.966
1
2
#<>#
?Q^[$\]
Gautam Buddha Marg
Aminabad
964.46
Pandey Gunj
823.67
916.98
Medical Chauraha
949.35
Nawajganj
1189.66
Thakurganj
1342.39
Balaganj
938.70
10 Sarfarazganj
679.91
11 Musabagh
929.67
12 Vasantkunj
853.19
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
Daily
Average
Daily
Passenger
Trip Length
Ridership
Km
(km)
North-South Corridor : CCS Airport to Munshi Pulia
13190
3227960
429250
7.52
20976
4886515
644659
7.58
25890
6132646
833240
7.36
22.878
34955
7664688
1054290
7.27
44408
9501868
1343970
7.07
East-West Corridor : Lucknow Rly Station to Vasant kunj
7639
619487
155650
3.98
14157
1007262
243300
4.14
21434
1477121
345930
4.27
11.098
29171
1982341
459940
4.31
36196
2496832
600200
4.16
Corridor
Length (km)
PHPDT
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
13/3
The total ridership in the proposed North- South corridor in the year 2015 and 2041 will be
4.29 and 13.44 lakhs passengers per day respectively. The daily ridership on the East- West
corridor will be 1.55 lakhs in 2015 and 6.00 lakhs passengers per day in 2041.
The maximum range of PHPDT on the North-South alignment in 2015 will be 13190 and by
2041 the maximum range of PHPDT is projected to be in the order of 41969. The maximum
range of PHPDT on the East-West alignment in 2015 will be 7639 and by 2041 the
maximum range of PHPDT is projected to be in the order of 44408. Station wise boarding,
alighting and sectional load for different horizon years are presented in Annexure 2.2.
2.3.4 STATION LOADING
The daily station loading (two way boardings) for both the alignments are presented in
Table 2.14 to table 2.15
Table 2.14 Daily Station Loading for North-South corridor
Station
no
Station Name
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
CCS Airport
1170
1260
1340
1400
1520
Amausi
4700
5020
5370
5610
6070
Transport Nagar
2530
6690
9280
12330
18460
Krishnagar
10340
24050
29780
56570
74850
Singar Nagar
5780
10780
16240
19370
26990
Alambagh
13180
18840
21000
26250
35040
Alambagh Bus Stn
12340
20990
28410
37580
63020
Mawaiya
50990
61889
63180
72600
87180
Durgapuri
25980
35910
56450
59330
88130
Lucknow Rly. Stn
77650
143030
186620
241260
332350
Hussain Ganj
36760
44940
60180
78300
88620
Sachivalaya
11370
14800
17510
23410
26710
Hazarat Ganj
17380
21440
25170
31600
37070
KDSinghBabuStadium
4550
6720
10060
16450
14280
Vishwavidyalaya
5540
10580
14340
20810
18710
IT College Junction
10210
17500
24830
30870
27480
Mahanagar
50420
68100
88720
103210
118720
Badshah Nagar
13480
26270
36640
44000
61990
Lekhraj Market
21220
32100
41980
56330
71860
Ram Sagar Mishra
10410
16470
21360
27930
37240
20
Nagar
21
Indira Nagar
15930
21310
29050
38030
53270
22
Munshipulia
27320
35970
45730
51050
54410
Total 4,29,250 6,44,659 8,33,240 10,54,290 13,43,970
(Note: Numbers are daily Boardings on both directions (Up and Down)
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
14/3
STATION NAME
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
2015
2020
2025
Mode
Two wheeler
Car
Auto
Shared Auto
Public Transport
Total
Two wheeler
Car
Auto
Shared Auto
Public Transport
Total
Two wheeler
Car
Auto
Shared Auto
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
TRIPS
12850
4497.5
1285
16062.5
29555
64250
28415
7104
4440
17759
31079
88796
34196
22404
5896
18867
20%
7%
2%
25%
46%
100%
32%
8%
5%
20%
35%
100%
29%
19%
5%
16%
15/3
Year
2030
Mode
Public Transport
Total
Two wheeler
Car
Auto
Shared Auto
Public Transport
Total
TRIPS
36554
117917
63631.68
22725.6
4545.12
22725.6
37876
151504
31%
100%
42%
15%
3%
15%
25%
100%
RSI Survey
HHI Survey
Base year
planning
Lucknow
Study area
Network
Screen line
volume count,
cordon count,
speeds, Trip
length
Base year
travel
Generalize
Cost
Calibration (Trips
Distribution and Mode
split Parameters)
Future
Transport
Calibrated Model
Horizon year
planning data
Travel demand
forecast
Ridership forecast
on the proposed
alignments
16/3
2.3.6
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
17/3
Mode wise OD
Matrices from the
Validation
Deterrence Initial F
Function by
Mode
Revised
Synthetic Trip
Matrices by Mode
Calculation of Synthetic
Trip Cost Distribution
Comparison of Synthetic
and Observed Cost
Distribution
Not
Converged
Converged
Synthetic Model Split for
Comparison with Observed
Fitted Smoothened
Deterrence functions to
Empirical factors
18/3
Network attributes
Speed flow parameters
Mode wise ( TW,car,
IPT)matrices from RSI and
HHI
Highway
network
NMT
assignment
CV
Assignment
No
Check
across
Screen
lines,
PT routes,
frequency,
Fare Details
Congested
network
Yes
Highway Assignment
NMT flow
Assignment
Public
transport
network
PT
matrix
Highway Assignment
No
Check Across
Screen lines,
Network
Calibration
Flow15%
No
Check
Across
Screen
lines, Flow
15%
Yes
Yes
Public
Transport
flow
Highway
Flows
Figure 2.6. Trip Assignment
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
19/3
ANNEXURE -2.1
ZONE NUMBERS AND ZONE NAMES
Zone No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Zone name
Ibrahimpur ward
Kharik ward
Raj Vijli pasi ward
Sarojini nagar ward
Shaheed bagath singh ward
Gurugovind singhward
Sharda nagar ward
Tilak nagar ward
Fazulla ganj ward
Nishatganj ward
Vikramaditya ward
Viddya wati devi nagar ward
Murali nagar ward
Janakipuram ward
Lal kuwan ward
Hind nagar ward
Haider ganj ward
Rajeev gandi nagar ward
Jai prakash nagar ward
Churhat ward
Ambedkar nagar ward
Ram mohan rai ward
Babu kunj bihari ward
Ramji lal ward
Rani laxmi bai ward
Knahiya madhavpur ward
Kavi jai sankar prasad ward
Indra priyadarshini nagar
Geeta palli ward
OM nagar ward
Mahatma gandi ward
Jagdish chandrabosh ward
Rafi ahmed kidwai nagar
Maha nagar ward
Guru nanak nagar ward
Balak ganj ward
Shankar purwa ward
Lala lajapathi rai nagar ward
Mallahi tola ward
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
20/3
Zone No
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
Zone name
Lohiya nagar ward
Husainabad ward
Hazaratganj ward
Triveni nagar ward
Begam hazarat mahal ward
Mankameswar mandir ward
Ram tirath ward
Rajendra nagar ward
Daliganj ward
Jai sansthan ward
Banarsi das ward
Bajrangbali mandir ward
Labour colony ward
Keshari khera ward
Peer jalil ward
Mathli sharan gupta ward
Sardar patel nagar ward
Chandganj kalyan ward
Babu jagjeevan nagar ward
Mashakganj ward
Ashok azad ward
Kalvin college ward
Gola ganj ward
Alam nagar ward
Chitragupt nagar ward
Aminabad ward
Bharatendu Harish chand
Yadunath sainiyal ward
Gautam budh ward
Ayodya das ward
Nethajii subhash ward
Sahadatganj ward
Aliganj ward
Ismailganj ward
Aishbag ward
Hardeen rai nagar ward
Molvi ganj ward
Wazir ganj ward
Husainganj ward
Gomati nagar ward
Nazar bagh ward
Shivaji marg ward
Bashirat ganj ward
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
21/3
Zone No
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
Zone name
Moulana kalve avid ward
Daulatganj ward
Motilal nehru nagar ward
Lal bahudur shastri ward
Garhipeer khan ward
Paper mill colony ward
Ganesh ganj ward
Asafabad ward
Yahivaganj ward
Kashmiri mohalla ward
Nirala nagar ward
Bhawani ganj ward
Acharya narendra dev ward
Indra nagar ward
Viveknand pur ward
Chandra bhan gupta ward
Malviya nagar ward
Sewa gram stadium ward
Abdul hameed ward
Seetla devi ward
Kadam rasul ward
Amar ganj ward
Chauk ward
Bazar kali ji ward
Kuwar jyoti ward
Raza bazaar ward
Rajaji puram ward
Kundari kabab ganj ward
Cantonment
Rajeev gandi nagar ward
Rafi ahmed kidwai nagar
Ram mohan rai ward
Kalvin college ward
Hazaratganj ward
Jagdish chandrabosh ward
Hazaratganj ward
Sardar patel nagar ward
FINAL
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
22/3
CCS Airport
Amausi
Transport Nagar
Krishnagar
Singar Nagar
Alambagh
Alambagh Bus Stand
MAWAIYA
Durgapuri
Lucknow Rly. Stn
Hussain Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hazarat Ganj
KDSinghBabuStadium
Vishwavidyalaya
IT College Junction
Mahanagar
Badshah Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Indira Nagar
Munshipulia
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
0
0
158
946
551
1132
932
4557
1748
3820
2472
389
484
263
297
593
738
228
225
253
117
470
Boarding
503
3775
2426
52
44
90
140
226
276
2525
455
513
1220
640
965
863
3302
1389
969
0
0
Alighting
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
21
22
20
Station Name
Station
no
3775
0
4278
1734
2241
3283
4075
8406
9878
11173
13190
13066
12330
11953
11285
11015
8451
7290
6546
840
117
587
Sectional
loading
2
1
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
20
22
21
Station
no
Amausi
CCS Airport
Transport Nagar
Munshipulia
Indira Nagar
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Badshah Nagar
Mahanagar
IT College Junction
Vishwavidyalaya
KDSinghBabuStadium
Hazarat Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hussain Ganj
Lucknow Rly. Stn
Durgapuri
MAWAIYA
Alambagh Bus Stn
Alambagh
Singar Nagar
Krishnagar
Station Name
1037
259
1226
0
0
83
91
288
231
531
617
577
442
769
4237
1146
3821
3055
1874
861
1216
191
883
1897
1120
4304
428
257
192
1254
748
1204
3945
850
542
302
186
27
88
0
0
Alighting
2732
1593
Boarding
23/3
259
0
1296
6831
7860
11876
12073
11799
11374
12051
12357
12792
12500
12204
8925
6172
4484
3650
2522
5017
2732
4325
Sectional
loading
ANNEXURE - 2.2
CCS Airport
Amausi
Transport Nagar
Krishnagar
Singar Nagar
Alambagh
Alambagh Bus Stand
MAWAIYA
Durgapuri
Lucknow Rly. Stn
Hussain Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hazarat Ganj
KDSinghBabuStadium
Vishwavidyalaya
IT College Junction
Mahanagar
Badshah Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Indira Nagar
Munshipulia
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
797
6068
3934
166
0
0
68
53
174
309
393
530
3352
702
912
2259
1030
1670
1240
4222
2177
1303
0
0
Alighting
2267
1014
1587
1578
5457
2408
8059
2890
613
646
334
546
849
867
326
289
669
126
502
Boarding
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
21
22
20
Station Name
Station
no
6068
0
6865
3496
4457
5870
7139
12203
14081
18788
20976
20677
19064
18368
17244
16853
13498
11647
10633
1297
126
628
Sectional
loading
2
1
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
20
22
21
Station
no
Amausi
CCS Airport
Transport Nagar
Munshipulia
Indira Nagar
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Badshah Nagar
Mahanagar
IT College Junction
Vishwavidyalaya
KDSinghBabuStadium
Hazarat Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hussain Ganj
Lucknow Rly. Stn
Durgapuri
MAWAIYA
Alambagh Bus Stn
Alambagh
Singar Nagar
Krishnagar
Station Name
1664
415
1746
0
0
134
183
559
398
1068
877
972
771
1288
5562
2338
3967
4671
2548
1275
2509
328
1481
2921
2301
5943
901
512
338
1498
867
1604
6244
1183
732
521
297
64
138
0
0
Alighting
3597
2131
Boarding
24/3
415
0
2079
9668
11786
17170
17673
17117
16578
17104
17200
17516
18198
17043
13808
9658
7407
6196
3825
6881
3597
5728
Sectional
loading
CCS Airport
Amausi
Transport Nagar
Krishnagar
Singar Nagar
Alambagh
Alambagh Bus Stand
MAWAIYA
Durgapuri
Lucknow Rly. Stn
Hussain Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hazarat Ganj
KDSinghBabuStadium
Vishwavidyalaya
IT College Junction
Mahanagar
Badshah Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Indira Nagar
Munshipulia
1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
998
6454
5087
204
0
0
92
68
381
538
518
653
3903
843
1362
3459
1389
2247
1524
5134
2817
1465
0
0
Alighting
2799
1537
1771
2125
5506
3960
9963
3626
648
768
521
647
1049
1236
521
452
928
134
537
Boarding
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
21
22
20
Station Name
Station
no
6454
0
7452
4306
5775
7165
8752
13740
17047
23107
25890
25176
22485
21617
20017
19542
15644
13348
12335
1599
134
671
Sectional
loading
2
1
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
20
22
21
Station
no
Amausi
CCS
Transport Nagar
Munshipulia
Indira Nagar
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Badshah Nagar
Mahanagar
IT College Junction
Vishwavidyalaya
KDSinghBabuStadium
Hazarat Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hussain Ganj
Lucknow Rly. Stn
Durgapuri
MAWAIYA
Alambagh Bus Stand
Alambagh
Singar Nagar
Krishnagar
Station Name
2357
588
2345
0
0
156
271
644
577
1623
1227
1489
1123
1688
7124
3586
5189
5592
2967
1611
3886
349
1932
3746
3143
7636
1434
787
485
1749
1103
2392
8699
1685
812
716
329
87
179
0
0
Alighting
4573
2905
Boarding
25/3
588
0
2945
12651
15523
22515
23372
22536
21794
22054
22034
22738
24313
22412
18035
13159
10521
8997
5290
9061
4573
7478
Sectional
loading
Amausi
Transport Nagar
Krishnagar
Singar Nagar
Alambagh
MAWAIYA
Durgapuri
Hussain Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hazarat Ganj
KDSinghBabuStadium
Vishwavidyalaya
IT College Junction
Mahanagar
Badshah Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Indira Nagar
Munshipulia
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
8288
2368
6773
258
0
1724
3635
5981
1959
3055
1954
4715
1919
1019
4746
957
682
766
642
85
123
Alighting
555
729
1689
1089
759
676
867
794
4816
14116
4321
6357
2994
2200
1824
5413
1233
561
140
Boarding
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
20
CCS
Station Name
Station
no
8288
10656
17171
18340
21246
25538
26408
28704
29982
33830
34955
31158
21788
18424
12749
10521
8963
7224
1934
701
140
Sectional
loading
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Station
no
CCS
Amausi
Transport Nagar
Krishnagar
Singar Nagar
Alambagh
MAWAIYA
Durgapuri
Hussain Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hazarat Ganj
KDSinghBabuStadium
Vishwavidyalaya
IT College Junction
Mahanagar
Badshah Nagar
Indira Nagar
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Munshipulia
Station Name
657
2630
2424
4541
1988
3537
6331
5564
3952
8308
2437
1658
2844
1688
2513
938
914
443
244
113
425
764
903
1612
10010
3014
1547
2293
969
1322
1998
8632
3671
194
477
2535
5078
Alighting
3803
5105
Boarding
26/3
657
3287
5711
10008
11883
14995
20562
25223
27563
25861
25284
25395
25946
26665
27856
26796
19078
15850
10966
8908
5105
Sectional
loading
Amausi
Transport Nagar
Krishnagar
Singar Nagar
Alambagh
MAWAIYA
Durgapuri
Hussain Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hazarat Ganj
KDSinghBabuStadium
Vishwavidyalaya
IT College Junction
Mahanagar
Badshah Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Indira Nagar
Munshipulia
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
22
10336
3725
7953
377
0
2204
4602
7317
2416
3793
2948
5519
2733
1462
6242
1330
1321
1075
688
91
147
727
822
2306
1371
902
751
1064
818
5179
17254
6620
7503
5249
2893
2348
7113
1846
607
152
Boarding Alighting
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
20
CCS
Station
Station Name
no
10336
14061
21637
23114
26894
31905
32950
35841
38038
42493
44408
40691
29679
24389
18207
14033
11828
9571
2605
759
152
Sectional
loading
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CCS
Amausi
Transport Nagar
Krishnagar
Singar Nagar
Alambagh
MAWAIYA
Durgapuri
Hussain Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hazarat Ganj
KDSinghBabuStadium
Vishwavidyalaya
IT College Junction
Mahanagar
Badshah Nagar
Indira Nagar
Ram Sagar Mishra
Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Munshipulia
Station
Station Name
no
1008
3684
3724
4757
2689
5053
7807
7217
4492
9562
3128
2038
3235
2668
3052
1480
1314
532
372
351
611
1053
1215
2193
15981
3683
1853
2643
677
969
1377
9566
5377
446
609
3347
6459
Alighting
5327
5441
Boarding
27/3
1008
4692
8416
12801
15139
19581
26335
32337
34636
28217
27662
27847
28439
30430
32513
32616
24364
19519
13506
10768
5441
Sectional
loading
Sarfarazganj
Musabagh
Vasant kunj
Station no
10
11
12
Boarding
20
0
21
3962
206
631
305
59
113
99
70
80
156
70
329
0
176
1629
683
638
514
721
273
377
Alighting
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Station
Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Sectional
loading
70
0
206
3962
3992
2994
2616
2037
1636
1014
811
514
2
1
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
Station no
Aminabad
Vasant kunj
Musabagh
Sarfarazganj
Balaganj
Thakurganj
Nawajganj
Medical Chauraha
City Rly. Stn
Pandey Ganj
Station
Name
Boarding
273
7639
970
0
2
10
20
58
223
166
192
446
Alighting
434
0
1615
172
697
376
535
730
1596
882
786
2176
28/3
8104
0
7923
180
907
1291
1831
2537
3984
4741
5372
7203
Sectional
loading
Musabagh
Vasant kunj
11
12
Boarding
22
0
25
4498
311
824
489
96
134
170
165
119
215
129
411
0
276
2167
808
661
697
786
312
391
Alighting
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Sarfarazganj
10
Station no
Station
Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Sectional
loading
129
0
322
4498
4533
3190
2871
2306
1743
1127
980
708
2
1
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
Station no
Aminabad
Vasant kunj
Musabagh
Sarfarazganj
Balaganj
Thakurganj
Nawajganj
Medical Chauraha
City Rly. Stn
Pandey Ganj
Station
Name
Boarding
479
14157
1295
0
3
12
43
125
312
196
282
573
Alighting
822
0
2286
428
796
672
1800
1603
3330
1578
1223
2939
29/3
14157
0
13814
428
1221
1881
3638
5116
8134
9516
10457
12823
Sectional
loading
Sarfarazganj
Musabagh
Vasant kunj
Station no
10
11
12
Boarding
26
0
33
4804
387
890
529
163
184
348
210
163
280
149
457
0
335
2367
1029
735
731
806
406
442
Alighting
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Station
Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Sectional
loading
149
0
403
4804
4856
3379
2879
2307
1760
1302
1106
827
2
1
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
Station no
Aminabad
Vasant kunj
Musabagh
Sarfarazganj
Balaganj
Thakurganj
Nawajganj
Medical Chauraha
City Rly. Stn
Pandey Ganj
Station
Name
Boarding
886
21434
2200
0
5
17
58
159
585
372
324
816
Alighting
1341
0
2987
598
933
810
3504
2641
5978
2451
1717
3896
30/3
21434
0
20979
598
1526
2319
5765
8247
13640
15719
17112
20192
Sectional
loading
Sarfarazganj
Musabagh
Vasant kunj
Station no
10
11
12
Boarding
29
0
37
5043
421
998
664
247
280
413
298
274
362
192
669
0
387
2446
1068
848
846
895
482
509
Alighting
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Station
Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Sectional
loading
192
0
525
5043
5077
3629
3225
2624
2058
1576
1392
1157
2
1
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
Station no
Aminabad
Vasant kunj
Musabagh
Sarfarazganj
Balaganj
Thakurganj
Nawajganj
Medical Chauraha
City Rly. Stn
Pandey Ganj
Station
Name
Boarding
1564
29171
3135
0
8
23
75
234
747
516
561
1256
Alighting
1842
0
3736
714
1113
935
4866
4169
8564
3577
2162
5612
31/3
29171
0
28893
714
1819
2731
7522
11457
19274
22335
23936
28292
Sectional
loading
Sarfarazganj
Musabagh
Vasant kunj
Station no
10
11
12
Boarding
46
0
69
6596
618
1023
720
344
334
466
341
351
571
665
691
0
451
2864
1418
1096
911
1065
614
592
Alighting
FINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
Station
Name
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Sectional
loading
665
0
1190
6596
6763
4922
4224
3472
2895
2296
2023
1812
2
1
12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
Station no
Aminabad
Vasant kunj
Musabagh
Sarfarazganj
Balaganj
Thakurganj
Nawajganj
Medical Chauraha
City Rly. Stn
Pandey Ganj
Station
Name
Boarding
3494
36196
4662
0
34
107
132
479
919
780
806
1503
Alighting
4164
0
5232
927
1269
1545
5642
6043
9943
4749
3127
6471
32/3
36196
0
35526
927
2162
3600
9110
14674
23698
27667
29988
34956
Sectional
loading
Annexure 2.3.
Trip Length Distribution for Metro Trips in Peak Hour
Trip Length Distribution-North South Corridor - 2015
Trip Length (km)
Trips
0-3
7085
3-6
11572
6-9
12863
9-12
9718
12-15
4165
15-18
2039
>18
483
Trip Length Distribution - North South Corridor - 2020
Trip Length (km)
Trips
0-3
8318
3-6
14039
6-9
15237
9-12
10406
12-15
4935
15-18
2561
>18
654
Trip Length Distribution - North South Corridor - 2025
Trip Length (km)
Trips
0-3
12285
3-6
21554
6-9
23278
9-12
14469
12-15
7013
15-18
3718
>18
1007
Trip Length Distribution - North South Corridor - 2030
Trip Length (km)
Trips
0-3
15757
3-6
27589
6-9
29137
9-12
17626
12-15
8728
15-18
5263
>18
1329
33/3
34/3
2015
6.58
2020
6.64
2025
6.45
2030
6.37
2041
6.17
35/3
CHAPTER - 3
PLANNING & DESIGN PARAMETERS
3.0
3.1
3.2.
ALIGNMENT CONSIDERATIONS
-
Super elevation on curves is applied to counter the effect of lateral force felt by
passengers and to prevent passengers from feeling as if they are sliding across the
seat.
Minimum vertical curve radii are designed with passenger comfort in mind.
GENERAL CRITERIA
General criteria used for the design purpose is given below:
SN
1
2
3
4
3.3
DIMENSION
1435 mm
80 kmph
16T
25 kv ac (OHE)
HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT
Horizontal alignment gives the details of curves in horizontal plane as the entire alignment
can not be on straight The alignment on mainline track shall consist of tangent sections
connected to circular curves by spiral transitions.
The maximum operating speed for the mainline shall be 80 km/hr. Wherever, feasible,
maximum speed will be maintained through the curved sections also by providing adequate
cant. On consideration of maximum allowable cant of 110 mm and cant deficiency of 85 mm
1/14
on metro tracks, the safe speed on curves of radii of 350 m or more is 80 km/h. On elevated
section use of curves with desirable minimum radius of 200 m having speed of 60 km/h
shall be adopted. There are however, exceptional situations where due to site constraints;
use of sharper curves is unavoidable. On few locations adoption of curves of 122.1 m radius
(safe speed of 40 km/h) has been necessary. However in underground section desirable
minimum radius of curve shall be 300 m for the ease of working of the tunnel boring
machine (TBM) with absolute minimum radius of 200 m in case the construction is done by
New Austrian Tunnelling Method or by Cut & Cover.
3.3.1
TANGENT SECTIONS
The horizontal alignment shall be on tangent at all station platforms for the entire length of
the platform. The platform length is based on a full train set length, which consists of 6
coaches /cars. To maintain constant distance between platform and vehicle, tangent section
shall also extend beyond each end of platform. The minimum desirable tangent length
beyond each end of a platform is usually based on length of one coach / car. Wherever
straight is not possible at station platform, maximum curve radius of 1000 m is proposed.
3.3.2
CURVED SECTIONS
Circular Curves
Circular curves shall be defined by their radii in meters. Larger radii shall be used whenever
possible to improve the riding quality. The minimum radius of curvature for mainline track
shall be governed by the design speeds and by the limits for cant but shall not be less than
120m.
The minimum length of a circular curve shall be either V/2 in metres, where V is the design
speed in km/h or 25 m whichever is higher in order to accommodate the full length of a
car/coach.
For dual tracks on curves, the smaller of the two radii shall govern the selection of clearance
requirement and minimum spacing of track centres. The curve parameters are as below:
CURVE RADIUS IN MID SECTION
(i) Underground sections
Minimum
Absolute Minimum
(ii) Elevated Section
Minimum
Absolute minimum
Minimum curve radius at stations
Maximum permissible cant (Ca)
Maximum cant deficiency (Cd)
300 m
200 m
200 m
120 m
1000 m
120 mm
100 mm
2/14
Compound Curves
Compound curves will not normally be required between two different radii of the circular
curves where the change of radius of the larger curve does not exceed 15% of the radius of
the smaller curve and provided cant deficiency and/or cant excess criteria are not exceeded
for either circular curve. Where a compound circular curve is employed with a change of
radius greater than 15% of the smaller radius, or where the cant deficiency or cant excess
criteria necessitate a change in cant between the circular curves, a suitable transition curve
shall be interposed between two parts of the curve. The length of such a transition curve
shall be equal to the difference between the required transition lengths at each end of the
curve.
Reverse Curves
The use of reverse curves is discouraged but where necessary, the two curves shall be
separated by a length equal to the sum of the two spiral curve lengths. If restricted by
physical constraints, the cant can vary continuously from one direction to the other.
Transition curves
As far as possible, the alignment follows the existing roads. The existing roads also have
frequent curves and leads to introduction of many horizontal curves in the metro route
alignment. Larger radii shall be used whenever possible to improve rider comfort. However,
it is necessary to provide transition curves at both ends of the circular curves for smooth
transition of the cars /coaches from straight section to canted / super elevated curves
section.
The topology of Lucknow is not very undulating; the terrain type is almost plain. But there
are number of grade separators in the city and bridges across the river Gomti. Thus, it is
necessary to provide vertical curves along the alignment to maintain sufficient clearance
from the existing structures. In case of ballast less track, it is desirable that the vertical
curves and the transition curves of horizontal curves should not overlap. Minimum straight
length between two transition curves shall be either 25m or nil and minimum curve length
between two transition curves shall be 25m.
For safety and comfort of passengers, the transition curves have to be designed with certain
minimum parameters.
3/14
VERTICAL ALIGNMENT
The purpose of this section is to establish criteria for use in all design stages of the vertical
alignment of the tunnel, station and depot area.
3.4.1
ELEVATED SECTIONS
Track supporting structures on Elevated sections are to permit a minimum vertical
clearance of 5.5 m above road level. For meeting this requirement with the Box shaped
pre-stressed concrete girders, rail level will be about 9.8 m above the road level. However,
at stations which are located above central median, the rail level will be 13.5 m above the
road level with concourse at mezzanine. These levels will, however, vary marginally
depending upon where the stations are located.
Similarly, the rail level for the stations on road locations (with concourse on sides on
ground) shall be at least 10.5 m above the road level in the central portion and 9.5 m at
ends.
The track centre on the elevated section is kept as 4.2 m uniform through out the corridor to
standardize the superstructure, except at few locations wherever scissors crossings are
planned; it is kept at 4.5m.
3.4.2
UNDERGROUND SECTIONS
Rail level at midsection in tunnelling portion shall be kept at least 12.0 m below the ground
level. At stations, the desirable depth of rail below ground level shall be at least 13 m, so
that station concourse can be accommodated above the platforms. This requirement has
been kept in view while designing the vertical profile.
Track centre in underground sections are as follows.
4/14
15.05 m
22.00 m
4.50 m
The Interchange station between the North-South and East-West corridor has been
proposed at Lucknow Rly. Station. The Lucknow Station in the North-South corridor will be
elevated and in the East-West corridor will be underground.
3.5
3.5.1
GRADIENTS
STATION TRACKS
Normally the stations shall be on level stretch. Change of grade within length of station
platform plus one car beyond each end of the platform is not permitted. There preferred
grade for station areas is 0.0% (although there must be adequate drainage).
3.5.2
INTER-STATION TRACKS
The grade on the sections between the stations shall not be steeper than 2.0%. However,
there are a few situations, where steeper gradients are unavoidable, such as
a)
Switch over ramp between underground and elevated sections where a grade of up
to 4% is adopted to minimise the length of ramp.
b)
Where the existing road gradient is more than 2% as the elevated section is kept
parallel to the road surface to minimise the rail level (to reduce the pier height).
So the maximum desirable sustained grade shall be 4% or less. The minimum desirable
length of constant profile grade shall be 100 metres. A flat (0.0%) grade is accepted, if
adequate drainage can be provided. However, in practice alternating longitudinal grades of
0.5% with drains at the low point, being the most effective way of assuring proper drainage.
Drainage provisions in tunnel sections shall require the profile to have a desirable minimum
grade of 0.5% and an absolute minimum of 0.25%.
3.5.3
DEPOT TRACKS
In case of depots the desirable grade on stabling tracks is 0.0% but the maximum grade
shall not exceed 0.3%. Adequate track drainage shall be designed to suit the actual grade. All
shop tracks be at0.0% grade. Sidings shall be level or shall fall away from the main line
connection at a gradient not exceeding 0.25%. Train berths shall be level or shall fall
towards the end stops at a gradient not exceeding 0.25%.
5/14
3.6
VERTICAL CURVES
Vertical curves are to be provided when change in gradient exceeds 0.4%. However it is
recommended that all changes in grade shall be connected by a circular curve or by a
parabolic curve.
Vertical curves in main lines shall wherever possible be positioned such that coincidence
with both transition curves and canted portions is avoided. Where such coincidence is
unavoidable the largest practicable vertical curve radius shall be employed and the cant
gradient shall be the minimum. In all such cases the resultant geometry shall be verified as
being compatible with safe passage at the design speeds by the proposed rolling stock.
Minimum radius and length of vertical curves shall be:
RADIUS OF VERTICAL CURVES
On main line
desirable
Absolute minimum
Other Locations
Minimum length of vertical curve
3.7
2500 m
1500 m
1500 m
20 m
DESIGN SPEED
The maximum sectional speed will be 80 kmph. However, the applied cant and the length of
the transition will be decided in relation to normal speeds at various locations as
determined by simulation studies of the alignment. The objective is to minimise the wear on
rails at curved portions. The parameters of cant, permitted speed and min transition lengths
are summarised below:
ACTUAL CANT
PERMITTED SPEED
(m)
120
150
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
(mm)
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
110.00
80.00
65.00
55.00
50.00
(kmph)
40
45
55
70
80
80
80
80
80
6/14
900
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
3.8
45.00
40.00
25.00
20.00
15.00
15.00
10.00
10.00
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
STATION LOCATIONS
Stations have been located so as to serve passenger requirements and enable convenient
integration with other modes of transport. However effort has also been made to plan the
station locations as uniform an inter station distance as feasible. The average spacing of
stations is kept close to one km for better operational plans.
3.9
PERMANENT WAY
3.9.1
CHOICE OF GAUGE
Based on extensive survey of the travel pattern in Lucknow City and discussions with the
officials of the State Government and Lucknow Development Authority, DMRC has finalized
the following corridors as most eligible for introduction of a Metro System in Lucknow City.
The brief details of the corridors are as under:
a) North-South corridor from Amausi to Minshipulia covering a length of 22.878
km with 22 stations out of which three underground and remaining elevated.
c) East-West corridor from Lucknow Railway Station to Vasantkunj covering a
length of 10.985 km with 12 stations (7 underground & 5 elevated).
The corridors will be Standard Gauge (1435 mm) for the following reasons :
(i)
Metro alignments will pass through heavily built-up areas for optimal commuter
utilisation and this imposes severe restrictions on the selection of curves. As in most
of the cities in India no 'right of way' has been reserved for metro systems, the
alignments have to follow the major arterial roads. These roads may often have sharp
curves and right-angle bends. In such a situation adoption of Standard Gauge is
advantageous since, it permits adoption of sharper curves compared to Broad Gauge
to minimise property acquisition along the alignments.
(ii)
In Standard Gauge 1 in 7 and 1 in 9 turn-outs, which occupy lesser length, are feasible
compared to 1 in 8 and 1 in 12 turn-outs required for Broad Gauge. Length of
cross-overs for Standard Gauge is thus lesser than for Broad Gauge. Land
7/14
requirement for depots where a large number of lines connected together in the
shape of ladder is also reduced. Standard Gauge is, therefore, more suited for use in
built up environment where land availability is scarce.
(iii)
For Standard Gauge, optimised state-of-the-art rolling stock designs are available offthe-shelf. This is not so for Broad Gauge where new designs for rolling stock have to
be specially developed which entails extra time and cost.
(iv)
(v)
Once technology for Standard Gauge coaches get absorbed and a manufacturing base
for them is set up in India, there will be considerable export potential for the coaches,
since almost all the countries use Standard Gauge for their metros. This is not so in
case of Broad Gauge.
(vi)
It is some time argued that adoption of Broad Gauge for metros would enable interrunning of metro trains with Indian Railways since the latter uses Broad Gauge. Interrunning is, however, technically and / or operationally not feasible as the two
systems have different:
Signalling Systems,
Headways,
Tariffs,
Loading standards.
Since inter-running is not feasible, choice of gauge for a metro system should be based
solely on technical and economic considerations on which Standard Gauge turns out to be
superior.
3.9.2
TRACK STRUCTURE
Track on Metro Systems is subjected to intensive usage with very little time for day-to-day
maintenance. Thus, it is imperative that the track structure selected for Metro Systems
should be long lasting and should require minimum or no maintenance and at the same
time, ensure highest level of safety, reliability and comfort, with minimum noise and
vibrations. The track structure has been proposed keeping the above philosophy in view.
8/14
General
Two types of track structures are proposed for any Metro. The normal ballasted track is
suitable for At-Grade (surface) portion of Main Lines and in Depot (except inside the
Workshops, inspection lines and washing plant lines. The ballast-less track is recommended
on Viaducts and inside tunnels as the regular cleaning and replacement of ballast at such
location will not be possible. Only in case of the depot normal ballasted track is proposed
for adoption.
From considerations of maintainability, riding comfort and also to contain vibrations and
noise levels, the complete track is proposed to be joint-less and for this purpose even the
turnouts will have to be incorporated in LWR/CWR.
The track will be laid with 1 in 20 canted rails and the wheel profile of Rolling Stock should
be compatible with the rail cant and rail profile.
3.9.3
RAIL SECTION
Keeping in view the proposed axle load and the practices followed abroad, it is proposed to
adopt UIC-60 (60 kg. /m) rail section. Since on main lines, sharp curves and steep gradients
would be present, the grade of rail on main lines should be 1080 Head Hardened as per IRST- 12-96. As these rails are not manufactured in India at present, these are to be imported.
For the Depot lines, the grade of rails should be 880, which can be easily manufactured
indigenously.
3.9.4
3.9.5
Normal Ballast less (as on viaduct) for Washing lines, Stabling and other running lines.
9/14
3.9.6
TURNOUTS
The Scissors cross-overs on Main Lines (1 in 9 type) will be with a minimum track
centre of 4.5 m (shown in Fig.3.4).
The proposed specifications for turnouts are given below: i) The turnouts should have fan-shaped layout throughout the turnout so as to have
same sleepers/base-plates and slide chairs for both LH and RH turnouts.
ii) The switches and crossings should be interchangeable between ballasted and ballast
less turnouts (if required).
The switch rail should be with thick web sections, having forged end near heel of switch
for easy connection with lead rails, behind the heel of switch. The switches should have
anti creep device at heel of switch for minimising the additional LWR forces transmitted
from tongue rail to stock rail.
The crossings should be made of cast manganese steel and with welded leg extensions.
These crossings should be explosive hardened type for main lines and without surface
hardening for Depot lines.
The check rails should be with UIC-33 rail section without being directly connected to
the running rails.
10/14
525
202
Rail level
Slope 2.5%
212.5
1435
175
(Mln)
Fig. 3.1
NOTE:-
Slope 2.5%
11/14
3.24.3
NO
FIG.Fig.
3888
1837.7
R=300m
PT
16615.5
12727.5
16615.5
100
R=300m
16615.5
33331
tg.1/9 (6.3419176)
12/14
4050
2006
14144
9951
9951
24095
GEOMETRY
10094
14144
PT
400m
TURNOUT tg. 1/7 R= 190
m
tg.1/7
13/14
Fig No.3.4
16615.5
33231
16615.5
16615.5
33231
16615.5
40749
73731
40500
AXLE SCHEME
4500
14/14
CHAPTER - 4
CIVIL ENGINEERING
4.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
4.1
ROUTE ALIGNMENT
During the traffic studies carried out for Lucknow City, number of corridors were
examined based on the Peak hour Peak Direction traffic (PHPDT) and the importance
of locality to be served, two corridors have finally been frozen i.e.Corridor-1 from
North to South and Corridor-2 from East to West. Of the two corridors the NorthSouth corridor from Chaudhari Charan Singh Airport to Munshi Pulia has been
recommended for execution in the Phase-I.
Two corridors, i.e. North-South and East-West Corridors have been proposed for
Lucknow Metro is shown as Figure 4.1. Both the North South Corridor and the EastWest Corridors are partly underground and elevated. The elevated alignment is
mostly located on the median of the roads. In the central area near Lucknow Railway
Station, Aminabad, Hazratganj the N-S and E-W corridor will run underground with
switch-over ramps for transitions from elevated to underground on NH-25 (Kanpur
Road) and underground to elevated on the Mahatma Gandhi Road at the end of
Hazratganj Market for the N-S corridor, for E-W corridor the ramp has been proposed
at the Hardoi road to transit from underground to elevated. The depots for the East
West corridor has been proposed in Open Land behind Fish Mandi on the Hardoi Road
and for North-South Corridor in open / Agricultural land near Amausi Airport. The
break-up of length of the two corridors (in kilometers) is given below in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 PROPOSED MRTS CORRIODRS
Total
Elevated
Ramp
Underground
At
Grade
North South
(CCS Airport to
Munshi Pulia)
22.878
km
19.051 km
0.774 km
3.053 km
East West
(Lko rly.
Station to
Vasantkunj)
11.098
km
4.295 km
0.505 km
6.298 km
Corridors
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
1/69
4.1.1
CORRIDOR 1: NORTH-SOUTH
4.1.1.1
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
2/69
Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport, Amausi, with a terminal station namely
Chaudhary Charan Singh (CCS) near the parking of the new terminal and will serve the
old terminal also via skywalks. The alignment starts from chainage (-)735.00 and the
centreline of the first station i.e CCS station is taken as (-) 614.11 for reckoning of
chainage on Corridor-1, as compared to the previous plan. The chainage increases
form CCS Airport, Amausi to MunshiPulia Station. The Line from Amausi towards
Munshi Pulia is named as Dn Line and from Munshi Pulia to Amausi is named as Up
Line. The alignment will terminate at the Chaudhary Charan Singh Airport Station
with the trait reversed facility on the front via the proposed crossover towards
Munshi Pulia. Only one platform will be used for operations.
The CCS station has been proposed and designed in coordination with the
development master plan of the CCS airports new terminal. From the CCS Station the
alignment runs towards west (towards NH-25) parallel to the road towards airport.
Near the T-Junction the alignment takes sharp right turn with a radius of 122.1 m and
turns toward north of the corridor along the NH-25. At km 193.12 of N.H-25, Amausi
station has been proposed on the center of the road and the alignment runs towards
the north direction along the National Highway-25 (Kanpur Road). The alignment runs
along the central median of the NH-25 with three curves of large radii > 3500 m till the
next station Transport Nagar at chainage 1393.59. This station will very well serve the
RTO office, the literacy house and the police quarters. One important road 6 lane (from
Ramabai Ambedkar Maidan) also joins the alignment at chainage 1025.49 in between
the proposed Amausi and Transport Nagar Metro Station. The Depot has been
proposed on the LHS of the road in the campus of PAC just before the Transport Nagar
Station.
Further also the alignment also runs along NH-25 towards north on median of the
road. There is a ROB (Rail Over Bridge) at chainage 1955.90 (Kanpur-Khaika). The
Metro alignment will cross the ROB with rail level as 18.74 m from ground level and
with a height difference of 11.41 m from the existing rail tracks. The alignment up to
the next station Krishna Nagar, proposed at chainage 2630.09 is on the straight. After
the Krishna Nagar station two large curves of radii 9000 m and 16000 m are provided
to keep the alignment along the median of the road. Office of Home Guards and
Lucknow Polytechnic is situate between chainage 2950.00 and chainage 3235.00 on
RHS of the alignment and Krishna Nagar Police station at chainage 3218.00 on the
LHS.
The next station on the alignment is Singar Nagar at Chainage 4214.40.The station has
been proposed just after the major junction of VIP Road and the connection to Hardoi
Road. The station is proposed at the busy market area and the alignment follows
median of the road. Further, the alignment continues along the centreline of the road
till Alambagh junction. Just before the Alambagh Junction the alignment goes off the
road towards LHS (with a curve radius of 250 m) to avoid very sharp curve and the
Alambagh Station (at chainage 5600.00) has been proposed immediately after
crossing the junction, so that the entry/ exit points can be placed in the open area. The
road on the LHS is the Talkatora Road and goes towards Rajajipuram. The boundary
on the LHS of the road is of the Railways Locomotive Workshop, Alambagh.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
3/69
From the Alambagh station the alignment continues to follow the centreline of the
Kanpur Road (NH-25) in the Alambagh Market area and the next station is proposed
as Alambagh Bus Stand metro station (at Chainage 6312.51).
After the Alambagh Bus stand, the alignment continues to follow the NH 25 and turns
left with 300 m curve radius and the Mawaiya station (at Chainage 7080.02) has been
proposed just before the TN Chowk (at chainage 7224.65). The two roads on TN road
junction go to Cantonment area on RHS and towards Talkatora on LHS.
After the Mawaiya station the alignment crosses over railways area. Few railway
quarters and the thermite wealding trainees hostel at this area will have to be
acquired. From chainage 7476.86 to 7554.08 there are existing railway tracks for the
Charbagh Railway Station, Lucknow Railway Station and towards the yard. Total 12
number of running railway track lines will be crossed with a span length of 88.81 m.
The rail level has been kept at 11 to 12 m above the running railway track levels. After
crossing the railway llines, the alignment crosses over railway land and takes right
with a curve radius of 140.0m to follow the centreline of NH-25 and fit the Durgapuri
station at chainage 8256.95.
The alignment continues to follows the center of the road and the next station i.e.
Lucknow/ Charbagh Railway Station proposed at chainage 9021.44.This station have
been planned in integration with the Charbagh underground station on East-West
corridor. As, the East-West corridor will be take up by the state government after a
revised detailed feasibility study, the elevated station has been proposed and designed
in a manner to integrate the Charbagh Bus stand, NE railway line station of Indian
Railways, the Charbagh railway station. A common entry exit structure has been
proposed for the elevated as well as the underground station. From chainage 8643.19
to chainage 8831.41, Charbagh Bus Depot exists on the LHS of the road. After Lucknow
Railway Station the alignment has to corss through congested areas of Hussainganj
and Hazratganj. Also, the alignment has to cross along the Vidhan Sabha. These
locations being valued aesthetically, considered most congested roads during peak
hours and with a view of security to the Vidhan sabha, the alignment has been
proposed to be undergrounf in these locations. After the Charbagh Station the ramp
has been proposed to switch from elevated to underground at a gradient of -3.98%.
The ramp has been planned along the center of the road and strategically to avoid any
infringement with the railways land. The rail level at the start of the ramp is + 8.0 m
from ground at chainage 9320.49. The switch over point where the rail level is 0.0 is at
chainage 9527.02. The ramp ends at chainage 9730.83 and the rail level at this
chainage is -8.0 m i.e 8.0 m below ground level. The ramp ends at 32m before the KKC
Junction. The track center to center distances have been increased to 32 m after the
ramp to avoid any infringement with the foundations of the minor bridge over Hyder
Canal. After the end of ramp at chainage 9730.83, the construction will done by cut
and cover method till chainage 9838.6. At this chainage the rail level will be at 12 m
below ground level and also the track centers will be more than 12.0 m, to facilitate
the lowering of shaft for the Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM).
The first underground station Hussianganj has been proposed below the road at
chaingae 10392.47. After the Hussainganj Station, the alignment takes sharp right turn
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
4/69
to fit the next underground station Sachiwalaya in front of the Bapu Bhawan at
chainage 11327.04. After the station the alignment takes sharp left turn at a curve
radius of 300m and goes off the road so as to place the next station Hazratganj at
chainage 12379.38 at the center of the road.
After the Hazrajganj station, the alignment has been proposed to be elevated and thus
a switch over ramp has been proposed from the end of the Hazratganj Market till the
parivartan Chowk along the road center and GPO at a gradient of 3.95%. The cut and
cover construction methodology will be used from the Hazratganj Station. To keep the
width of ramp at minimum, the the tracks has been proposed at center to center
distance of 4.2m. From chainage 12256.38 to chainage 12783.38 the construction will
be done by cut and cover alongwith the ramp. Two major structures i.e the Orietal
building and a shopping mall will have to be acquired for construction. The rail level at
the start of ramp at chainage 12783.38 is -8.0m and the rail level at the end of ramp is
+8.0m at chainage 13147.42. Along the ramp, widening of roads upto 5.0 m on both
sides has been proposed. The alignment at chainage 13250.65 achieves sufficient
height from road for vertical clearance of 5.5 m above road at Parivartan Chowk. After
the end of ramp, the alignment takes sharp right turn at curve radius of 120.0 m to fit
in the K D Singh stadium station at chainage 13504.26, partially over road and
partially in the campus of Hotel Clarks Awadh. This station will be accessible for the
traffic from High court, M G Road etc. The alignment has been planned while
maintaining a safe distance from the protected monuments like Sadat Alis Tomb,
Murshid Jadis Tomb, Victoria Memorial etc. After the K D Singh stadium station, the
alignment takes sharp right turn with a curve radius of 122.1 m preceded by a reverse
curve of same radius. The alignment crosses the Gomti River and then follows the
center of the University road till the Vishwavavidylaya station at chainage 14985.07.
The cross-section drawing of the Gomti River has been received from the Irrigation
Department of GoUP. The cross section drawing is attached herewith as Figure 4.12.
This data has been obtained officially from Irrigation Department, Govt. of UP. To
avoid any property acquisition at the IT Junction, the alignment takes sharp right turn
with curve radius of 120.0 and follows the Faizabad road / NH-28. The IT college
station has been proposed at chainage 15810.90 at the center of the road. The Isbela
Thoburn College is located before this station on the LHS and Reserve Police Line area
is on the RHS of the alignment. The alignment follows the centreline of the Faizabad
Road NH-28 up to chainage 15964.80, 140.17 metres before the start of the Flyover
(Indira Flyover Bridge) and shifts on LHS of the Flyover and crosses the railway lines
at chainage 16278. The alignment maintains a safe distance from the flyover.
Acquisition of properties will be needed along the proposed route in this section,
which is comparatively lesser, if the alignment is planned on the RHS of the existing
flyover. At the end of the flyover, near Mahanagar Junction there is an existing flyover
across the proposed alignment. The next station Mahanagar (Chainage 16903.84) has
been proposed after crossing the flyover at the Mahanagar junction and parallel to the
other existing flyover turning towards the Paper Mill. The rail level at the station has
been kept at 17.00m above the ground level for sufficient clearance from the flyover
top. The station centreline is 16.36m from the edge of the flyover on the left hand side
and land and property acquisitions are required in this location also. The alignment
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
5/69
again meets the centreline of the NH-28 (Faizabad Road) at 106.47 m from the end of
the flyover at chainage 17208.76 and continues to follow the curves along the road
centreline and reaches the next proposed station at Badshahnagar (Chainage
17577.28). The alignment then goes off the road on the LHS to cross the Kukrail Nala
at Chainage 17872.21 to chainage 17908.25. The span of the existing minor bridge
over the Kukrail Nala is 70.0 m and to avoid such a large span, the alignment has been
planned along the LHS and crosses the Nala location off the road. The alignment
maintains sufficient distance from the existing ROW. Property acquisitions are
required along the route where the alignment goes off the road and also where the
alignment will meet the road centre. UP Bridge Corporation has proposed a flyover
across the existing Bridge. Therefore, proposed metro corridor will have to cross the
proposed PWD flyover at a safe height with the rail level at 24-25 m above the ground
level. As per the drawing provided by UPPWD, NH Division (attached as Figure 4.13)
the finished level of the flyover at the proposed metro alignment location is 121.337m
(as in drawing provided by UPPWD) and the rail level of metro alignment has been
proposed at 131.786m (reference from SOI Bench mark). The alignment then takes
right turn to again meet the NH-28 (Faizabad Road) at chainage 18161.09 and will
continue to follow the existing road centreline. The next station Lekhraj Market
(Chainage 18554.15) has been proposed at the centre of the road with the entry / exit
points on the service roads of the market.
After the Lekhraj Market, the alignment continues to follow the road centreline and
the next station is proposed at Ram Sagar Mishra Nagar (Chainage 19273.00). There
are no major issues in the station location and sufficient road width, as well as, vacant
land is available to construct the associated facilities with the station. After the station
location HAL (Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.) has its Accessories Manufacturing Division
along the corridor on the RHS and on LHS is Gajipur police station and market. Further
the alignment continues along the Faizabad Road and the Indira Nagar Station
(Chainage 20174.17) has been proposed at a distance of 300.0 m from the HALs main
entrance. There are commercial buildings on both side of the station location. After the
Indira Nagar station the alignment will take a sharp left turn of radius 150.0 m
towards Munshi Pulia alongside the Polytechnic Flyover. At this station, junction
arrangement is has been suggested for integration with proposed MRTS link to Gomti
Nagar area. Two cross-overs one each in the front and rear are proposed at this
station. In addition to this, 2 turnouts for the line coming from Gomti Nagar for
connecting to mainline are also proposed.
After the alignment takes left turn towards Munshi Pulia, it will pass over few Pucca
and few temporary Shops and Buildings and one under construction market complex
and further will follow the left edge of the road along the boundary wall of ST
Automotives, Gyan Mandir Kanya Inter College, Reliance auto work shop and over
Shivam Palace. Then the alignment takes a right turn towards the road centreline at
the end / start of the Polytechnic flyover. The alignment then continues along the
centreline of the road and along Indira Nagar to reach the last station Munshi Pulia
(Chainage 21734.26). The alignment has been extended 408.73 m from the centre line
of the station to maintain a safe & proper reversal distance and will terminate at
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
6/69
chainage 22143.26. Further the road heads towards Kukrail Reserve Forest and very
congested built-up area of Indira Nagar and Munshi Pulia. At this 4-Leg Munshi Pulia
Junction, road on the LHS is the Ring Road that crosses the Indira Nagar, Vikash Nagar,
Tedhi Pulia etc and the road on the RHS goes towards the Indira Nagar Colony.
4.1.1.2
Terminal Stations
South Terminal
The Chaudhary Charan Singh Airport station will be the terminating station on the
South end of the North-South Alignment. There is potential traffic along the NH-25
(Kanpur Road) towards Sarojni Nagar. At present there is no such proposal to extend
the line towards these areas. Any extension proposed will be taken up in subsequent
phases. The Terminal station has been proposed with following objectives:
-
The master plan of AAI has been taken in consideration and the location of the
proposed metro station has been proposed, accordingly.
Being a National Highway, areas further ahead are well served with public
transport that can integrate with the existing metro.
North Terminal
The development is not very prominent beyond Munshi Pulia. Although roads are
being constructed but the majority of buildings along the roads are shops and
markets. Further along the route, there are built-up residential settlements and it is
not feasible technically for further extension. Munshi Pulia Junction being a
commercial centre and integration point for commuters serving the educational
institutions and residential settlements. The station serves the ring road also.
4.1.1.3
Chainage
(m)
Direction
(LHS /
RHS)
590
RHS
1025
1378
1479
1796
2183
2475
3330
3657
3883
4018
RHS
RHS
RHS
RHS
RHS
RHS
RHS
RHS
RHS
RHS
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Name of major
roads across
the alignment
International Air
Cargo
Saheed Path
To RTO Office
To RTO Office
WBM Road
To Hind Nagar
To CMS College
To LDA office
To Aashiyana
To Aashiyana
To Canal Colony
Road
Width
09.17
47.73
14.00
12.00
13.44
10.69
09.18
09.74
11.84
13.19
22.79
7/69
4114
4114
5430
6500
Direction
(LHS /
RHS)
RHS
LHS
LHS
RHS
7225
LHS
7225
7756
RHS
LHS
8470
LHS
8870
9150
9785
LHS
LHS
RHS
10655
LHS
10960
10960
11500
11500
11880
12400
LHS
RHS
LHS
RHS
LHS
RHS
MG Road
12715
LHS
MG Road
MG Road
MG Road
University Road
12840
13100
13250
15172
RHS
RHS
RHS
-
16760
LHS
16760
RHS
17150
LHS
17150
RHS
18430
18788
19288
LHS
LHS
LHS
20244
LHS
20570
20950
LHS
Himalaya Marg
21385
LHS
Himalaya Marg
Himalaya Marg
21900
21900
LHS
RHS
Road
Chainage
(m)
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Name of major
roads across
the alignment
VIP Road
Towards Hardoi Road
To Rajaji Puram
Alambagh Marg
To Aishbagh Rly. Stn./
Talkatora (TN Chowk)
To Cantt. (TN Chowk)
Aishbag RS / Mill Road
G B Marg (To
Aminabad)
Subhash Marg
To Naka Hindola
To SGPGI
Shivaji Marg & Guru
Gobind Singh Marg
To Cantt
To Cantt
To Lalbagh (B.N Road)
To PGI
TN Road
Sahnajab Road
To SBI Local Head
office
Maqbara Road
To K.D.Singh Stadium
Pariwartan Chowk
IT Chauraha
To
Mahanagar
(Flyover)
To
paper
Mills(Flyover)
To Badshah Nagar
(Badshah Nagar
Crossing)
To Badshah Nagar rly
Station (Badshah
Nagar Crossing)
To Indira Nagar
Aditya Mishra Marg
Bhooth Nath Marg
To Indira Nagar
(Arawali Marg)
Polytechnic Chauraha
To Nishat Ganj
Kukrail Picnic Spot
Road
To Sitapur
To Milayam Nagar
Road
Width
27.85
26.15
09.25
09.50
13.15
6.49
14.5
18.48
18.5
21.30
8.08
12.00
16.78
13.75
14.60
21.75
15.50
13.70
13.60
08.80
13.86
4 Legs
4 Legs
24.61
19.84
13.31
09.59
15.85
15.15
10.75
16.50
4-Leg
15.25
15.25
21.77
09.86
8/69
4.1.1.4
Alignment Route
The salient features of NS alignment is described distinctly and briefly with following
sections.
(i) Elevated Section Chainage (-) 735.00 to 9320.49
From chainage (-) 735.00 upto the start of ramp at chainage 9320.49, the alignment is
elevated. Most of the elevated portion of the section follows the road geometry and
centreline, except at the Alambagh Junction. The NH-25 is almost straight at most of
the locations, yet to follow the road centreline 15 nos. of curves have been proposed in
the 10055.49 m long stretch. The vertical alignment has been designed keeping in
view the vertical clearance from the existing ground level is minimum 5.5 m and
specially at rail line at chainage 1955.14 the rail level is 18.59 m above ground level.
The topology is almost flat and thus not much steep gradients have been used in the
alignment design. The gradient at all the station locations is flat.
(ii) Switch over Ramp - Chainage 9320.49 to 9730.83
As the alignment has to pass through very congested areas like Hussainganj and areas
having very prominent structures like the Vidhan Sabha, Hazratganj etc., it has to be
underground, so that the visual aesthetic value of the structures are retained and land
acquisition can be avoided. To transit from elevated to underground the ramp has
been proposed on the center of the NH-25 from chainage 9320.49 to 9730.83 after the
Charbagh Railway Station.
The ramp has been planned at a gradient of 3.98% to minimise the length. A length of
410.34 m will be acquired permanently at the center of the road.
(iii) Underground Section Chainage 9730.83 to 12783.38
Underground Section can further be divided in two sections
a)
b)
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
9/69
The tunnelling will continue till chainage 12256.38 at the start of the Hazratganj
Station. At this point the track centers are at 15.05 m. There are 3 underground
stations proposed in this section. Most of the alignment is on curve to follow the road
center to plan the stations under the road.
(vi) Switch Over Ramp km 12783.38 to km 13147.42
After crossing the prominent locations and congested market areas, the ramp has
been proposed after the hazratganj station on MG Road. Wideing of roads have been
proposed along both sides from UP post Master General office till start of K D Singh
Babu stadium.A gradient of 3.95% has been proposed on the ramp to minimise the
ramp length and to achieve the sufficient clearance from ground level before the
Pariwartan chowk.
(vii) Elevated section km 13147.42 to km 22143.26
From Parivartan Chowk, the K D Singh Babu stadium has been proposed before the
Gomti river. The alignment then follows the university road and takes a sharp right
turn at IT Junction on to the NH-28, Faizabad Road and continues till the Polytechnic
Chauraha and terminates at Munshipulia. The alignment follows the road center a
most of the places except at the Indira flyover and Kokrail nala.The alignment has
been proposed on the LHS of the Indra flyover flyover and also on LHS of the Kukrail
Nala. Both these locations need some property acquisitions. The 8995.84 m alignment
has 20 horizontal curves.
4.1.1.5
Vertical Profile
The topology of Lucknow is not very undulating and the terrain type in most of the
length and sections along the proposed metro routes is plain. The level difference from
lowest point on NH-28 (Faizabad Road) to highest point on NH-25 (Kanpur Road) is
16.0 m. None of the roads are very undulating and have smooth terrain except on
University Road immediately after crossing the Gomti Bridge where the gradient is
2.5%. But the vertical profile of the proposed metro alignment will have vertical
curves as there are ROBs, existing railway tracks and flyovers along the alignment and
also at few locations the alignment had to be planned off the roads in view of
geometric constraints. The gradients observed on this corridor are given in the Table
4.3.
Table 4.3 VERTICAL PROFILE PROPOSED NORTH SOUTH METRO CORRIDOR
Type
Start
Chainage
Start
Elevation
Start
Grade
End
Chainage
0+119.155
End
Elevation
End
Grade
Length
Rise/
Fall
Linear
-0+735
133.22
0.00%
133.225
0.00%
615.845
Level
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
-0+119.155
133.225
0.00%
-0+62.779
133.382
0.56%
56.376
Rise
-0+62.779
133.382
0.56%
0+062.774
134.08
0.56%
125.553
Rise
0+062.774
134.08
0.56%
0+114.558
134.225
0.00%
51.783
Rise
0+114.558
134.225
0.00%
0+271.894
134.225
0.00%
157.336
Level
0+271.894
134.225
0.00%
0+320.838
133.764
-1.88%
48.944
Fall
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
10/69
Type
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Start
Chainage
0+320.838
Start
Elevation
133.764
Start
Grade
-1.88%
End
Chainage
0+402.153
End
Elevation
132.233
End
Grade
-1.88%
81.315
Rise/
Fall
Fall
0+402.153
132.233
-1.88%
0+498.151
131.384
0.11%
95.998
Fall
0+498.151
131.384
0.11%
0+927.813
131.866
0.11%
429.661
Rise
0+927.813
131.866
0.11%
0+995.484
132.17
0.79%
67.671
Rise
0+995.484
132.17
0.79%
1+253.608
134.199
0.79%
258.124
Rise
1+253.608
134.199
0.79%
1+295.490
134.364
0.00%
41.882
Rise
1+295.490
134.364
0.00%
1+481.746
134.364
0.00%
186.256
Level
1+481.746
134.364
0.00%
1+523.502
134.666
1.45%
41.756
Rise
1+523.502
134.666
1.45%
1+882.194
139.863
1.45%
358.693
Rise
1+882.194
139.863
1.45%
2+059.945
139.993
-1.30%
177.751
Rise
2+059.945
139.993
-1.30%
2+463.256
134.741
-1.30%
403.311
Fall
2+463.256
134.741
-1.30%
2+506.964
134.456
0.00%
43.708
Fall
2+506.964
134.456
0.00%
2+730.819
134.456
0.00%
223.855
Level
2+730.819
134.456
0.00%
2+787.179
134.016
-1.56%
56.36
Fall
2+787.179
134.016
-1.56%
2+891.085
132.393
-1.56%
103.906
Fall
2+891.085
132.393
-1.56%
2+946.282
131.981
0.07%
55.197
Fall
2+946.282
131.981
0.07%
3+910.516
132.631
0.07%
964.234
Rise
3+910.516
132.631
0.07%
3+959.574
132.966
1.30%
49.058
Rise
3+959.574
132.966
1.30%
4+100.293
134.796
1.30%
140.72
Rise
4+100.293
134.796
1.30%
4+136.704
135.033
0.00%
36.411
Rise
4+136.704
135.033
0.00%
4+326.263
135.033
0.00%
189.559
Level
4+326.263
135.033
0.00%
4+374.625
134.683
-1.45%
48.362
Fall
4+374.625
134.683
-1.45%
4+577.467
131.746
-1.45%
202.842
Fall
4+577.467
131.746
-1.45%
4+633.432
131.343
0.01%
55.965
Fall
4+633.432
131.343
0.01%
5+108.445
131.373
0.01%
475.013
Rise
5+108.445
131.373
0.01%
5+164.612
131.752
1.35%
56.167
Rise
5+164.612
131.752
1.35%
5+322.220
133.871
1.35%
157.607
Rise
5+322.220
133.871
1.35%
5+371.767
134.204
0.00%
49.548
Rise
5+371.767
134.204
0.00%
5+704.692
134.205
0.00%
332.925
Rise
5+704.692
134.205
0.00%
5+749.558
133.794
-1.83%
44.866
Fall
5+749.558
133.794
-1.83%
5+863.447
131.706
-1.83%
113.889
Fall
5+863.447
131.706
-1.83%
5+910.750
131.181
-0.39%
47.302
Fall
5+910.750
131.181
-0.39%
5+997.969
130.845
-0.39%
87.219
Fall
5+997.969
130.845
-0.39%
6+044.980
130.96
0.88%
47.012
Rise
6+044.980
6+172.503
130.96
132.075
0.88%
0.88%
6+172.503
6+203.311
132.075
132.21
0.88%
0.00%
127.523
30.808
Rise
Rise
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Length
11/69
Type
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Start
Chainage
Start
Elevation
Start
Grade
End
Chainage
End
Elevation
End
Grade
Length
Rise/
Fall
6+203.311
132.21
0.00%
6+451.044
132.21
0.00%
247.732
Level
6+451.044
132.21
0.00%
6+514.621
131.582
-1.98%
63.577
Fall
6+514.621
131.582
-1.98%
6+607.460
129.748
-1.98%
92.839
Fall
6+607.460
129.748
-1.98%
6+644.958
129.359
-0.10%
37.498
Fall
6+644.958
129.359
-0.10%
6+799.882
129.203
-0.10%
154.923
Fall
6+799.882
129.203
-0.10%
6+840.510
129.575
1.93%
40.628
Rise
6+840.510
129.575
1.93%
6+956.923
131.824
1.93%
116.413
Rise
6+956.923
131.824
1.93%
6+995.546
132.197
0.00%
38.623
Rise
6+995.546
132.197
0.00%
7+393.474
132.197
0.00%
397.928
Level
7+393.474
132.197
0.00%
7+490.548
131.385
-1.67%
97.074
Fall
7+490.548
131.385
-1.67%
7+728.800
127.397
-1.67%
238.253
Fall
7+728.800
127.397
-1.67%
7+788.408
127.287
1.31%
59.608
Fall
7+788.408
127.287
1.31%
8+151.059
132.026
1.31%
362.651
Rise
8+151.059
132.026
1.31%
8+177.189
132.197
0.00%
26.13
Rise
8+177.189
132.197
0.00%
8+336.006
132.197
0.00%
158.816
Level
8+336.006
132.197
0.00%
8+377.146
131.837
-1.75%
41.141
Fall
8+377.146
131.837
-1.75%
8+498.917
129.702
-1.75%
121.77
Fall
8+498.917
129.702
-1.75%
8+557.159
129.229
0.13%
58.242
Fall
8+557.159
129.229
0.13%
8+749.731
129.471
0.13%
192.573
Rise
8+749.731
129.471
0.13%
8+810.511
130.111
1.98%
60.78
Rise
8+810.511
130.111
1.98%
8+907.515
132.033
1.98%
97.004
Rise
8+907.515
132.033
1.98%
8+947.138
132.426
0.00%
39.623
Rise
8+947.138
132.426
0.00%
9+092.631
132.426
0.00%
145.493
Level
9+092.631
132.426
0.00%
9+116.451
132.284
-1.19%
23.82
Fall
9+116.451
132.284
-1.19%
9+145.478
131.939
-1.19%
29.026
Fall
9+145.478
131.939
-1.19%
9+168.242
131.538
-2.33%
22.764
Fall
9+168.242
131.538
-2.33%
9+250.510
129.621
-2.33%
82.268
Fall
9+250.510
129.621
-2.33%
9+272.182
128.999
-3.42%
21.672
Fall
9+272.182
128.999
-3.42%
9+309.780
127.715
-3.42%
37.598
Fall
9+309.780
127.715
-3.42%
9+329.780
126.975
-3.98%
20
Fall
9+329.780
126.975
-3.98%
10+041.186
98.634
-3.98%
711.406
Fall
10+041.186
98.634
-3.98%
10+128.823
96.889
0.00%
87.636
Fall
10+128.823
96.889
0.00%
10+434.511
96.89
0.00%
305.688
Rise
10+434.511
96.89
0.00%
10+471.986
96.637
-1.35%
37.476
Fall
10+471.986
96.637
-1.35%
10+612.072
94.748
-1.35%
140.086
Fall
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
12/69
Type
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Start
Chainage
Start
Elevation
Start
Grade
End
Chainage
End
Elevation
End
Grade
Length
Rise/
Fall
10+612.072
94.748
-1.35%
10+657.523
94.42
-0.10%
45.45
Fall
10+657.523
94.42
-0.10%
10+969.191
94.116
-0.10%
311.668
Fall
10+969.191
94.116
-0.10%
10+990.191
94.021
-0.81%
21
Fall
10+990.191
94.021
-0.81%
11+114.682
93.016
-0.81%
124.491
Fall
11+114.682
93.016
-0.81%
11+136.791
92.927
0.00%
22.109
Fall
11+136.791
92.927
0.00%
11+596.672
92.927
0.00%
459.881
Level
11+596.672
92.927
0.00%
11+617.672
92.906
-0.20%
21
Fall
11+617.672
92.906
-0.20%
12+018.256
92.094
-0.20%
400.584
Fall
12+018.256
92.094
-0.20%
12+083.440
92.49
1.42%
65.184
Rise
12+083.440
92.49
1.42%
12+190.193
94.004
1.42%
106.753
Rise
12+190.193
94.004
1.42%
12+218.542
94.205
0.00%
28.35
Rise
12+218.542
94.205
0.00%
12+507.731
94.205
0.00%
289.189
Level
12+507.731
94.205
0.00%
12+590.565
95.84
3.95%
82.834
Rise
12+590.565
95.84
3.95%
13+188.158
119.428
3.95%
597.593
Rise
13+188.158
119.428
3.95%
13+229.056
120.643
2.00%
40.898
Rise
13+229.056
120.643
2.00%
13+328.110
122.621
2.00%
99.054
Rise
13+328.110
122.621
2.00%
13+370.031
123.04
0.00%
41.921
Rise
13+370.031
123.04
0.00%
13+767.972
123.042
0.00%
397.941
Rise
13+767.972
123.042
0.00%
13+813.237
122.642
-1.77%
45.265
Fall
13+813.237
122.642
-1.77%
14+039.395
118.642
-1.77%
226.159
Fall
14+039.395
118.642
-1.77%
14+102.352
118.472
1.23%
62.956
Fall
14+102.352
118.472
1.23%
14+252.906
120.323
1.23%
150.555
Rise
14+252.906
120.323
1.23%
14+272.978
120.474
0.27%
20.072
Rise
14+272.978
120.474
0.27%
14+659.112
121.53
0.27%
386.133
Rise
14+659.112
121.53
0.27%
14+680.112
121.681
1.17%
21
Rise
14+680.112
121.681
1.17%
14+835.961
123.503
1.17%
155.849
Rise
14+835.961
123.503
1.17%
14+867.125
123.685
0.00%
31.164
Rise
14+867.125
123.685
0.00%
15+116.922
123.686
0.00%
249.797
Rise
15+116.922
123.686
0.00%
15+138.891
123.592
-0.85%
21.969
Fall
15+138.891
123.592
-0.85%
15+415.655
121.233
-0.85%
276.764
Fall
15+415.655
121.233
-0.85%
15+465.460
121.3
1.12%
49.805
Rise
15+465.460
121.3
1.12%
15+665.528
123.548
1.12%
200.068
Rise
15+665.528
123.548
1.12%
15+706.377
123.778
0.00%
40.848
Rise
15+706.377
123.778
0.00%
15+928.136
123.778
0.00%
221.759
Level
15+928.136
123.778
0.00%
15+977.966
123.298
-1.93%
49.83
Fall
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
13/69
Type
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Start
Chainage
15+977.966
Start
Elevation
123.298
Start
End
Grade
Chainage
-1.93% 16+102.365
End
Elevation
120.899
End
Grade
-1.93%
124.399
Rise/
Fall
Fall
16+102.365
120.899
-1.93%
16+158.187
120.419
0.21%
55.822
Fall
16+158.187
120.419
0.21%
16+473.156
121.078
0.21%
314.969
Rise
16+473.156
121.078
0.21%
16+555.885
121.987
1.99%
82.729
Rise
16+555.885
121.987
1.99%
16+722.002
125.289
1.99%
166.117
Rise
16+722.002
125.289
1.99%
16+791.505
125.98
0.00%
69.503
Rise
16+791.505
125.98
0.00%
17+050.502
125.98
0.00%
258.997
Level
17+050.502
125.98
0.00%
17+089.469
125.917
-0.33%
38.967
Fall
17+089.469
125.917
-0.33%
17+432.519
124.791
-0.33%
343.049
Fall
17+432.519
124.791
-0.33%
17+465.491
124.736
0.00%
32.973
Fall
17+465.491
124.736
0.00%
17+651.656
124.737
0.00%
186.164
Rise
17+651.656
124.737
0.00%
17+706.254
125.447
2.60%
54.599
Rise
17+706.254
125.447
2.60%
17+950.309
131.794
2.60%
244.055
Rise
17+950.309
131.794
2.60%
18+041.764
132.082
-1.97%
91.455
Rise
18+041.764
132.082
-1.97%
18+365.897
125.688
-1.97%
324.133
Fall
18+365.897
125.688
-1.97%
18+425.592
125.099
0.00%
59.695
Fall
18+425.592
125.099
0.00%
18+688.599
125.099
0.00%
263.007
Level
18+688.599
125.099
0.00%
18+753.212
124.666
-1.34%
64.613
Fall
18+753.212
124.666
-1.34%
18+838.164
123.526
-1.34%
84.952
Fall
18+838.164
123.526
-1.34%
18+913.804
123.289
0.71%
75.639
Fall
18+913.804
123.289
0.71%
18+989.314
123.828
0.71%
75.511
Rise
18+989.314
123.828
0.71%
19+025.563
124.319
2.00%
36.249
Rise
19+025.563
124.319
2.00%
19+131.019
126.423
2.00%
105.456
Rise
19+131.019
126.423
2.00%
19+184.758
126.959
0.00%
53.739
Rise
19+184.758
126.959
0.00%
19+368.624
126.959
0.00%
183.866
Level
19+368.624
126.959
0.00%
19+405.659
126.681
-1.50%
37.036
Fall
19+405.659
126.681
-1.50%
19+524.048
124.903
-1.50%
118.389
Fall
19+524.048
124.903
-1.50%
19+560.954
124.686
0.32%
36.906
Fall
19+560.954
124.686
0.32%
19+792.279
125.434
0.32%
231.324
Rise
19+792.279
125.434
0.32%
19+852.353
126.204
2.24%
60.074
Rise
19+852.353
126.204
2.24%
19+957.326
128.553
2.24%
104.973
Rise
19+957.326
128.553
2.24%
20+002.077
129.054
0.00%
44.751
Rise
20+002.077
129.054
0.00%
20+342.530
129.055
0.00%
340.453
Rise
20+342.530
129.055
0.00%
20+419.653
128.398
-1.70%
77.123
Fall
20+419.653
20+581.088
128.398
125.648
-1.70%
-1.70%
20+581.088
20+615.792
125.648
125.358
-1.70%
0.03%
161.435
34.704
Fall
Fall
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Length
14/69
Type
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
4.1.1.6
Start
Chainage
Start
Elevation
Start
Grade
End
Chainage
End
Elevation
End
Grade
Length
Rise/
Fall
20+615.792
125.358
0.03%
21+380.420
125.601
0.03%
764.628
Rise
21+380.420
125.601
0.03%
21+446.192
126.133
1.59%
65.772
Rise
21+446.192
126.133
1.59%
21+560.821
127.95
1.59%
114.629
Rise
21+560.821
127.95
1.59%
21+629.188
128.492
0.00%
68.366
Rise
21+629.188
128.492
0.00%
21+893.580
128.492
0.00%
264.393
Level
21+893.580
128.492
0.00%
21+937.230
128.144
-1.60%
43.649
Fall
21+937.230
128.144
-1.60%
22+143.260
124.857
-1.60%
206.031
Fall
Curvature
Although the topology of Lucknow is not very undulating and the terrain type is plain,
yet the existing road has frequent horizontal curves to negotiate the densely built up
areas. The proposed alignment also negotiates frequent horizontal curves to follow
the existing road median. At some places there are sharp turns and curves along the
road and this necessitates provision of sharp curves on metro alignment also. The
radius of curves at intersections and at few locations has been planned as less as 122.1
m to reduce property acquisition. 22.74% of the length of the alignment is on curves.
The details of curves planned on the proposed North-South Corridor are presented in
Table 4.4.
Table 4.4 DETAILS OF HORIZONTAL CURVES PROPOSED NORTH SOUTH METRO
P1
(TS/ PC)
CHAINAGE
P2
P3
(SC)
(CS)
Start of Alignment
-452.86
-397.46
-370.38
-181.26
-125.78
5.92
509.93
1132.76
1142.76
1297.00
2716.19
3444.46
5372.38
5427.38
5466.24
5932.33
5952.33
6045.97
6378.80
6433.80
6537.08
7169.65
7224.65
7269.11
7588.15
7643.15
7790.15
7994.68
8049.68
8070.49
8295.68
8300.68
8403.15
9116.58
9144.58
9169.31
9220.91
9248.91
9273.64
9684.27
9739.96
9985.02
10152.55 10208.23 10241.01
P4
(ST/PT)
-735.00
-314.98
61.39
729.22
1307.00
2791.46
4100.09
5521.24
6065.98
6592.08
7324.11
7845.15
8125.49
8408.15
9197.31
9301.64
10040.70
10296.70
RADIUS
(m)
TRANSITION
LENGTH
(m)
157.25
122.10
20000.00
3500.00
9000.00
16500.00
250.00
1400.00
300.00
400.00
145.00
480.00
5000.00
1100.00
1100.00
307.53
307.53
55.40
55.48
10.00
55.00
20.00
55.00
55.00
55.00
55.00
5.00
28.00
28.00
55.69
55.69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
CURVE
LENGTH
(m)
27.08
131.70
0.00
154.24
0.00
0.00
38.86
93.64
103.28
44.45
147.00
20.80
102.47
24.73
24.73
245.06
32.78
STRAIGHT
BETWEEN
TWO
CURVES (m)
282.14
133.72
448.53
403.55
1409.19
653.00
1272.28
411.09
312.83
577.57
264.04
149.53
170.19
708.43
23.60
382.63
111.85
241.63
15/69
CHAINAGE
P2
P3
P1
(TS/ PC)
10538.33
11023.22
11433.67
11702.52
12642.63
12857.80
13250.65
13576.50
13711.85
13960.06
14599.09
14783.83
15067.69
15895.97
16172.53
17112.92
17253.20
17884.58
18041.94
18271.00
18622.43
19850.41
20427.74
20739.85
21006.34
21350.24
4.1.1.7
(SC)
P4
(CS)
(ST/PT)
RADIUS
(m)
TRANSITION
LENGTH
(m)
307.53
307.53
407.53
307.53
660.00
300.00
122.10
122.10
122.10
1500.00
500.00
1800.00
122.10
1000.00
800.00
500.00
450.00
2000.00
300.00
760.00
450.00
13000.00
150.00
800.00
1010.00
55.69
55.69
55.52
55.69
50.00
55.00
55.48
55.48
55.48
20.00
55.00
18.00
55.48
30.00
40.00
55.00
55.00
15.00
55.00
40.00
55.00
55.00
40.00
30.00
CURVE
LENGTH
(m)
309.74
72.68
28.14
461.70
20.82
45.16
64.75
24.37
47.64
295.45
30.22
65.92
116.68
62.31
28.89
30.28
45.37
35.55
31.20
130.92
93.66
133.27
85.23
63.13
STRAIGHT
BETWEEN
TWO
CURVES (m)
63.78
226.39
129.67
367.05
94.35
237.69
150.14
0.02
89.60
303.58
44.52
181.94
600.64
154.25
831.50
0.00
476.01
91.81
87.86
140.51
1024.31
395.00
68.84
101.26
220.77
SN
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Description
Ele/UG/At
grade
Elevated
Ramp
Underground
Underground
Underground
Ramp
Elevated
Chainage (Km)
From
To
-735.00
9320.49
9320.49
9730.83
9730.83
9838.61
9838.61
12256.38
12256.38
12783.38
12783.38
13147.42
13147.42
22143.26
Total Length
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Length (m)
10055.49
410.34
107.78
2417.77
527.00
364.04
8995.84
22878.26
Method of Construction
/ Structure Type
Segmental Box Girder
Ramp
Cut and Cover
TBM
Cut and Cover
Ramp
Segmental Box Girder
16/69
4.1.2
CORRIDOR-2: EAST-WEST
4.1.2.1
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
17/69
After the Aminabad station the alignment continues further under the built-up area
and takes a left turn to fit the next station Pandeyganj (Chainage 2777.12) parallel to
the Ganga Prasad Marg and has been located just before the junction of Nadan Mahal
Road, Subhash Marg and Ganga Prasad Marg under the built-up area as the road width
is not sufficient and congested to accommodate the station. At the junction of the
above three roads there is a rail crossing under the road. The station has been
proposed to be constructed by NATM (New Austrian Tunneling Method) with the
alignment by TBM, so that the acquisition of properties can be minimised. The
alignment further continues and takes a sharp right turn of radius 300.0 m to fit the
Lucknow city metro station (Chainage 3694.10) in the open area just before the
Lucknow City Railway Station. The length of the curve is 462.82m. After Lucknow City
Station, the alignment further runs beneath built up area and it take a left turn before
the next station Medical Chauraha (Chainage 4643.45). The proposed Medical
Chauraha Station is beneath road adjacent to the campus of Madarsa Sultanul Madaris
and extends beyond the junction. This station has been proposed near the Queens
Mary Medical College and Chatrapati Sahuji Medical University.
The alignment further continues underground below the LDA Park and the Play
Ground to reach the Hardoi Road. The next station Nawajganj (Chainage 5833.11) is
proposed on Hardoi Road. The distance between centre of the Up-line and Down-line
tracks has been kept as 15.05 m for the underground portion.
After Nawajganj station the switchover ramp has been proposed at the centre of the
road. This will require some acquisition and widening of the road. The length of the
ramp will be 504.55 m at a rising gradient of 3.50%. Before the start of ramp the
down-line track takes a reverse curve of radius 1000.0m and 1200.00m and the Upline
tracks takes reverse curve of 1100.00m and 1050.00m, so that the distance between
the Up-line and down-line track centres is 4.2m before start of the ramp.
The alignment further follows the centre of the Hardoi Road and the next elevated
station at Thakurganj is proposed at Ch. 7175.50 m. The alignment further continues
and keeps following the centre of the Hardoi Road and reaches the next station
Balaganj (Chainage 8114.19). The Balaganj station has been proposed at the Balaganj
Junction. The four legged Junction is very busy during the peak hours. The road on the
LHS is the Balaganj Compwell Road and on the RHS is the Jal Nigam Road. The next
station proposed is Sarfarazganj with Ch. as 8794.11 m. It is located near Niyaz Duniya
Complex and the NLG Marble Store.
The next station Musabagh (Chainage 9723.78m) has been proposed near the
Musabgh Forest area and before the T-Junction of the 6-lane Road towards NH-25.
Further the alignment continues alongside forest area and follows the straight road to
the next station Vasant Kunj (Chainage 10576.99). The station has been proposed
before the T-Junction of under construction 6-lane road towards Sitapur. Along
Sitapur Road, Lucknow Development Authority has proposed Vasant Kunj Township
on the LHS of the road towards Sitapur. Awas Vikas Parishad has also proposed a
Township Amrapali adjacent to the Vasantkunj Township. On the RHS of the Sitapur
Road, Mandi Parishad has its open land that will be converted to Mandi in future and
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
18/69
also has a portion reserved as graveyard. The alignment will finally terminate straight
on the Hardoi Road at a distance of 407 m from the centre of the terminating station
and will have the dead end at Chainage 10985 m.
The Depot for the corridor has been proposed at a barren land of length 500m and
width 350m that belongs to LDA, behind the Fish Market Mandi.
4.1.2.2
Terminal Stations
East / Central Terminal
The Lucknow metro station will be the terminating station on the Eastern end of the
East-West corridor. The existing Indian Railway Station of Lucknow and Charbagh will
be integrated with the proposed metro corridor effectively. Being located at the
central part of the Lucknow City, this corridor can also be referred as CentralWest
Corridor.
Following are few reasons for justification as the terminating station:
-
The station has been proposed partially in the parking area of the Lucknow
Junction to give access to commuters directly using the sub-urban & long distant
railway system.
This station will integrate and serve central part and also the northern and
southern part by integrating with N-S corridor direct interchange.
West terminal
The Vasant Kunj station will be the terminating station at the western end of the EastWest corridor. A suitable site for the O&M Depot is also available near the station. This
facility avoids the idle running of trains at the beginning/end of services during
Morning and late night. Accordingly, the terminal station is proposed just at the depot
area.
Justification as the terminating station:
-
The depot land is also available at a distance of 350.0 m from the centre of the
terminating station.
Beyond this point the famous Malihabad Mango Gardens are located which will
restrict development. However, the extension of this Corridor on Sitapur Road
may be possible in near future.
Along the side road towards Sitapur, just after the Vasant Kunj station, Lucknow
Development Authority has proposed its Vasantkunj township and Awas Vikas has
proposed its Amrapali Township. Also adjacent to the depot land, low cost housing
flats are being constructed under the Kanshi Ram Yojna. LDAs major City Bus
Stand is under construction beside the Fish Mandi at a walking distance from the
proposed terminating metro station. This will be an ideal integration point for the
passengers commuting from Hardoi and other adjoining areas.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
19/69
4.1.2.3
4.1.2.4
Road
Chainage (m)
Direction
(LHS / RHS)
Road
Width
Underground Section
Gautam Buddha Marg
Gautam Buddha Marg
Gautam Buddha Marg
Gautam Buddha Marg
Gautam Buddha Marg
Gautam Buddha Marg
Gautam Buddha Marg
Gautam Buddha Marg
Gautam Buddha Marg
Gautam Buddha Marg
0.00
190
333
497
502
634
1272
1572
1733
1777
Centre
RHS & LHS
LHS
LHS
RHS
LHS
RHS
Centre
Centre
LHS
22.42
07.00
05.65
20.00
20.00
06.15
14.79
09.30
11.00
09.82
Hardoi Road
5576
RHS
Hardoi Road
Hardoi Road
Elevated Section
Hardoi Road
Hardoi Road
Hardoi Road
5721
6356
LHS
RHS
6495
6712
8158
LHS
RHS
RHS
06.13
06.78
08.51
Hardoi Road
8172
LHS
Hardoi Road
Hardoi Road
9893
10066
LHS
RHS
Napier Road
Girdhari Lal Main Road
Jal Nigam Road
Balaganj Compwell
Road
Towards NH-25
Pdionj Road
15.77
14.24
07.32
19.27
19.13
16.94
Alignment Route
The salient features of EW alignment properly are summarised below:
(i) Underground section km (-)0.113 to km 6.185
Underground section can be further divided into two sections
(a) Underground section by Cut & Cover Method
(b) Underground section by Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM)
(ii) Underground section by Cut & Cover Method
The chainage at the dead end of the alignment is ()113.0 and the distance between
both the track centres is 4.5 m. As scissor crossovers construction can be achieved by
cut and cover method only, it is not possible to place the scissors before the proposed
Lucknow metro station at km 0.000 that is the integrating station of elevated N-S and
underground E-W corridor, being closer to the dead end of the alignment. Thus, front
end reversal has been proposed i.e. the scissor crossover will be provided on the front
end of Lucknow station.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
20/69
After the scissor corssover the tracks diverges from each other. From this station the
alignment runs underground on the Gautam Buddha Marg till the next station Gautam
Buddha Marg (chainage 988.86). At this location the average road width is only 15.0
m. From km -0.113 to km 0.257 the alignment shall be constructed by cut & cover till
the tracks achieve horizontal distance of 12.0m. Again from km 5.948 to km 6.185 the
alignment will be constructed by cut & cover for two tracks to come at a distance of
4.2 m c/c.
(iii) Underground section by Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM)
At km 0.257 the tracks are 12.0 m apart and hence TBM can be lowered at road to
avoid the acquisition of properties. The next station is planned on the Gautam Buddha
Marg named Gautam Buddha Marg Station (at chainage 988.96), where the track
centres is at a distance of 15.05 m to accommodate 12.0m wide platform.
From chainage 0.257 onwards the tracks are > 12.0 m c/c and the construction will
carried out by Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) till chainage 5.717 m i.e. start point of
the last underground station Nawajganj. There are very frequent sharp curves, but at
none of the locations curve radius of less than 300.0 m has been designed.
(iv) Switch Over Ramp km 6.185 to km 6.676 and for alignment to Depot
After the Nawajganj station the switchover ramp has been proposed at the centre of
the road. This will require some acquisition and widening of the road. The length of
the ramp will be 490.31 m at a rising gradient of 3.5%. Before the start of ramp both
the track takes reverse curves so that at the start of the ramp the track centres are
4.2m apart. This will minimise the acquisition. AT the end of the alignment is the
depot on surface. The alignment is then planned and taken to depot.
(v) Elevated section km 6.676 to km 10.985
From km 6.676 at the end of the ramp till km 10.985 (terminating point), the
alignment is elevated. Minimum vertical clearance of 5.5 m from underside of viaduct
to the road / ground surface has been maintained through out the section. The
alignment follows the centre of the Hardoi Road till the dead end near the Fish Mandi.
4.1.2.5
Vertical profile
The topology of Lucknow is not very undulating and the terrain is almost plain along
the alignment route corridor. The maximum and minimum levels are 120.9 m and
114.6 m respectively along the roads. The level difference from lowest point on Kamal
Road near Medical Chauraha to highest point on Subhash Marg is 6.3 m only. The
alignment is following the existing road gradient in the underground and elevated
sections and thus the vertical profile of the proposed metro alignment has a number of
vertical curves. As the Up-line and Down-line tracks will move independently, so there
is a difference in the vertical profile of both the tracks. The gradients in this stretch
are given in the Table 4.7.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
21/69
Start
Chainage
-113.00
Start
Elevation
102.00
Start
Grade
0.00%
End
Chainage
301.56
End
Elevation
102.00
End
Grade
0.00%
301.56
102.00
0.00%
345.59
102.12
345.59
102.12
0.56%
465.53
465.53
102.78
0.56%
520.62
102.98
737.47
Length
Rise/Fall
414.56
LEVEL
0.56%
44.02
RISE
102.78
0.56%
119.94
RISE
520.62
102.98
0.16%
55.09
RISE
0.16%
737.47
103.33
0.16%
216.85
RISE
103.33
0.16%
786.92
103.37
0.00%
49.44
RISE
786.92
103.37
0.00%
1156.96
103.37
0.00%
370.04
LEVEL
1156.96
103.37
0.00%
1183.22
103.13
-1.82%
26.26
FALL
1183.22
103.13
-1.82%
1320.33
100.64
-1.82%
137.11
FALL
1320.33
100.64
-1.82%
1349.11
100.60
1.54%
28.78
FALL
1349.11
100.60
1.54%
1573.06
104.05
1.54%
223.95
RISE
1573.06
104.05
1.54%
1599.06
104.22
-0.28%
26.00
RISE
1599.06
104.22
-0.28%
1786.71
103.69
-0.28%
187.65
FALL
1786.71
103.69
-0.28%
1812.71
103.65
0.00%
26.00
FALL
1812.71
103.65
0.00%
2158.75
103.65
0.00%
346.04
LEVEL
2158.75
103.65
0.00%
2184.75
103.45
-1.58%
26.00
FALL
2184.75
103.45
-1.58%
2555.71
97.60
-1.58%
370.96
FALL
2555.71
97.60
-1.58%
2585.71
97.36
0.00%
30.00
FALL
2585.71
97.36
0.00%
2931.48
97.36
0.00%
345.78
LEVEL
2931.48
97.36
0.00%
2958.48
97.48
0.92%
27.00
RISE
2958.48
97.48
0.92%
3265.77
100.31
0.92%
307.29
RISE
3265.77
100.31
0.92%
3290.77
100.65
1.83%
25.00
RISE
3290.77
100.65
1.83%
3502.85
104.52
1.83%
212.08
RISE
3502.85
104.52
1.83%
3528.85
104.76
0.00%
26.00
RISE
3528.85
104.76
0.00%
3843.64
104.76
0.00%
314.79
LEVEL
3843.64
104.76
0.00%
3869.64
104.67
-0.72%
26.00
FALL
3869.64
104.67
-0.72%
4200.58
102.27
-0.72%
330.94
FALL
4200.58
102.27
-0.72%
4228.58
102.38
1.52%
28.00
RISE
4228.58
102.38
1.52%
4399.87
104.99
1.52%
171.29
RISE
4399.87
104.99
1.52%
4426.87
105.20
0.00%
27.00
RISE
4426.87
105.20
0.00%
4802.50
105.20
0.00%
375.63
LEVEL
4802.50
105.20
0.00%
4859.24
104.67
-1.85%
56.74
FALL
4859.24
104.67
-1.85%
5035.37
101.41
-1.85%
176.14
FALL
5035.37
101.41
-1.85%
5089.79
101.03
0.45%
54.41
FALL
5089.79
101.03
0.45%
5577.13
103.22
0.45%
487.34
RISE
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
22/69
Type
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Start
Chainage
Start
Elevation
Start
Grade
End
Chainage
End
Elevation
End
Grade
Length
Rise/Fall
5577.13
103.22
0.45%
5622.40
103.32
0.00%
45.28
RISE
5622.40
103.32
0.00%
5964.70
103.32
0.00%
342.30
LEVEL
5964.70
103.32
0.00%
6009.17
103.81
2.19%
44.47
RISE
6009.17
103.81
2.19%
6171.68
107.37
2.19%
162.52
RISE
6171.68
107.37
2.19%
6208.31
108.41
3.50%
36.63
RISE
6208.31
108.41
3.50%
6762.38
127.79
3.50%
554.07
RISE
6762.38
127.79
3.50%
6847.99
129.31
0.07%
85.61
RISE
6847.99
129.31
0.07%
6998.67
129.42
0.07%
150.68
RISE
6998.67
129.42
0.07%
7024.62
129.43
0.00%
25.95
RISE
7024.62
129.43
0.00%
7277.16
129.43
0.00%
252.54
LEVEL
7277.16
129.43
0.00%
7322.44
129.03
-1.79%
45.28
FALL
7322.44
129.03
-1.79%
7383.84
127.93
-1.79%
61.40
FALL
7383.84
127.93
-1.79%
7454.12
127.46
0.47%
70.28
FALL
7454.12
127.46
0.47%
7689.56
128.57
0.47%
235.45
RISE
7689.56
128.57
0.47%
7714.56
128.77
1.05%
25.00
RISE
7714.56
128.77
1.05%
7985.43
131.61
1.05%
270.87
RISE
7985.43
131.61
1.05%
8011.72
131.75
0.00%
26.29
RISE
8011.72
131.75
0.00%
8209.55
131.75
0.00%
197.83
LEVEL
8209.55
131.75
0.00%
8254.72
131.45
-1.36%
45.17
FALL
8254.72
131.45
-1.36%
8370.24
129.87
-1.36%
115.53
FALL
8370.24
129.87
-1.36%
8421.34
129.70
0.70%
51.10
FALL
8421.34
129.70
0.70%
8527.13
130.44
0.70%
105.78
RISE
8527.13
130.44
0.70%
8553.13
130.76
1.80%
26.00
RISE
8553.13
130.76
1.80%
8659.45
132.67
1.80%
106.32
RISE
8659.45
132.67
1.80%
8704.88
133.08
0.00%
45.43
RISE
8704.88
133.08
0.00%
8890.99
133.08
0.00%
186.11
LEVEL
8890.99
133.08
0.00%
8933.15
132.73
-1.70%
42.16
FALL
8933.15
132.73
-1.70%
9035.53
130.99
-1.70%
102.38
FALL
9035.53
130.99
-1.70%
9071.52
130.61
-0.43%
35.99
FALL
9071.52
130.61
-0.43%
9453.00
128.96
-0.43%
381.47
FALL
9453.00
128.96
-0.43%
9498.87
129.16
1.29%
45.87
RISE
9498.87
129.16
1.29%
9601.78
130.49
1.29%
102.91
RISE
9601.78
130.49
1.29%
9630.72
130.67
0.00%
28.94
RISE
9630.72
130.67
0.00%
9837.10
130.67
0.00%
206.39
LEVEL
9837.10
130.67
0.00%
9882.91
130.39
-1.24%
45.81
FALL
9882.91
130.39
-1.24%
9973.62
129.27
-1.24%
90.71
FALL
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
23/69
Type
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
Symmetrical
Parabola
Linear
4.1.2.6
Start
Chainage
Start
Elevation
Start
Grade
End
Chainage
End
Elevation
End
Grade
Length
Rise/Fall
9973.62
129.27
-1.24%
10037.58
129.02
0.46%
63.96
FALL
10037.58
129.02
0.46%
10294.51
130.20
0.46%
256.94
RISE
10294.51
130.20
0.46%
10325.12
130.51
1.55%
30.60
RISE
10325.12
130.51
1.55%
10452.15
132.48
1.55%
127.03
RISE
10452.15
132.48
1.55%
10488.50
132.76
0.00%
36.35
RISE
10488.50
132.76
0.00%
10717.36
132.76
0.00%
228.86
LEVEL
10717.36
132.76
0.00%
10754.20
132.50
-1.45%
36.84
FALL
10754.20
132.50
-1.45%
10985.08
129.14
-1.45%
230.88
FALL
Curvature
The proposed East- west corridor has 55% of the alignment underground and also the
topology of Lucknow is not very undulating, yet to place the stations at proper
locations number of horizontal curves have been proposed. The radius of curves at
few locations is kept as low as 300 m in the underground section to fit the
underground stations in such a way that the property acquisition can be minimised.
22.93 % of the length of the alignment is on curves. The details of curves on East- West
Corridor are given in Table 4.8.
Table 4.8 DETAILS OF HORIZONTAL CURVES PROPOSED EAST WEST CORRIDOR
TS / PC
(TP1)
SC
(TP2)
CS
(TP3)
Start of Alignment
191.49
216.49
248.80
589.24
644.24
789.20
1204.40
1259.40 1621.54
2094.41
2149.41 2358.16
2443.48
2498.48 2595.59
3006.94
3061.94 3533.40
3896.55
3951.55 4446.92
5124.79
5179.79 5349.33
5450.35
5505.35 5637.33
6016.16
6036.16 6041.61
6232.92
6242.92 6294.42
6335.22
6345.22 6428.85
6864.74
6919.74 7034.91
7347.77
7677.76
7687.76 7748.47
7881.32
7896.32 7924.50
8090.93
8110.93 8184.21
8262.77
8282.77 8342.64
ST / PT
(TP4)
Radius
(m)
Transition
Length
(m)
-113.00
273.80
844.20
1676.54
2413.16
2650.59
3588.40
4501.92
5404.33
5692.33
6061.61
6304.42
6438.85
7089.91
7379.13
7758.46
7939.50
8204.21
8362.64
1010.000
300.000
307.525
305.000
305.000
305.000
310.000
500.000
305.000
3000.000
2300.000
3000.000
500.000
8000.000
3000.000
2000.000
1500.000
1400.000
25
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
55
20
10
10
55
0
10
15
20
20
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Length
of Curve
(m)
32.305
144.958
362.147
208.743
97.108
471.454
495.374
169.542
131.974
5.445
51.503
83.635
115.177
31.359
60.702
28.181
73.285
59.871
Straight
between
two
curves
(m)
304.494
315.44
360.201
417.87
30.321
356.356
308.15
622.869
46.021
323.839
171.313
30.795
425.884
257.855
298.636
122.853
151.429
58.554
63.665
24/69
4.1.2.7
TS / PC
(TP1)
SC
(TP2)
8426.30
8869.75
9181.74
10091.47
10985.13
8436.30
8889.75
9211.74
-
CS
(TP3)
ST / PT
(TP4)
8478.29 8488.28
8985.08 9005.09
9352.13 9382.13
10139.12
End of Alignment
Radius
(m)
Transition
Length
(m)
Length
of Curve
(m)
3000.000
1400.000
1200.000
10000.000
10
20
30
0
41.986
95.332
140.389
47.656
Straight
between
two
curves
(m)
381.468
176.656
709.336
846.003
Length
(Km)
Method of
Construction
1.
(-)
0.113
0.257
0.370
2.
0.257
5.718
5.461
Tunnel boring
Machine
3.
5.948
6.185
0.237
4.
6.185
6.676
0.490
Ramp
10.985
4.309
Elevated Box
girder Viaduct
Remarks / Reasons
Distance between track
centres are 4.5 m at start
along with station and
scissor is to placed after the
station. After the scissor
crossover the tracks will
diverge to avoid the minor
bridge.
After the track centres are
12.0 m apart, TBM can start.
From Nawajganj station till
start of ramp.
Switchover ramp from
underground to elevated
Elevated Section
5.
6.676
11.098
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
25/69
4.1.3
4.1.3.1
Ramp on N-S Corridor on Open Land near Amausi Airport (Depot Link)
The ramp has been proposed on the open land in front of the Amausi Airport on RHS
of the Kanpur Road (NH-25) immediately after crossing the ITTUP Institute Tool
Training Center. This land is vacant. Part of the land belongs to State Govt. and part of
land in under the possession of Airport Authority of India. A gradient of 3.85% has
been provided on the ramp, so that sufficient clearance from the AAIs Air Funnel zone
can be achieved. The ramp will start at chainage 526.98 and achieve sufficient height
of 7.5m rail level at chainage 722.15.The length of ramp 195.17 m.
4.1.3.2
4.1.3.3
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
26/69
4.1.3.4
4.1.4
4.2
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATIONS
4.2.1
4.2.1.1
Location
Two corridors and a 3.5 km link line i.e. North-South, East-West and Gomti Nagar Link
have been identified as potential MRTS in Lucknow in Phase I. The details of the N-S
and E-W and Gomti Nagar Link Line corridor identified have already been discussed in
the previous sections. Geotechnical investigations have been carried out along the
proposed alignments to determine the strata, depth of foundation and safe bearing
capacity of foundations required for the above proposed Metro corridors.
4.2.1.2
4.2.2
FIELD WORK
Subsurface explorations were carried out along the length of the proposed corridors.
Bore holes were done at every 500m at the proposed NS and EW corridors. The
summary of field work conducted is given in Table 4.10.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
27/69
BOREHOLE NO.
BH-01
BH-02
BH-03
BH-04
BH-05
BH-06
BH-07
BH-08
BH-09
BH-10
BH-11
BH-12
BH-13
BH-14
BH-15
BH-16
BH-17
BH-18
BH-19
BH-20
BH-21
BH-22
BH-23
BH-24
BH-25
BH-26
BH-27
BH-28
BH-29
BH-30
BH-31
BH-32
BH-33
BH-34
BH-35
BH-36
BH-37
BH-38
BH-39
BH-40
BH-41
BH-42
BH-43
BH-44
BH-45
BH-46
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
SOIL/ROCK
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
28/69
BH-01
BH-02
BH-03
BH-04
BH-05
BH-06
BH-07
BH-08
BH-09
BH-10
BH-11
BH-12
BH-13
BH-14
BH-15
BH-16
BH-17
BH-18
BH-19
BH-20
BH-21
BH-22
BH-23
BH-24
BH-25
BH-26
BH-27
BH-28
BH-29
BH-30
BH-31
BH-32
4.2.3
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
Only Soil
4.2.3.1
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
29/69
Engineering
Parameter
Classification as per IS
1498-1970
TYPE OF SOIL
Layer Type I
Silty Sand/Sandy Silt
low plasticity
Layer Type II
Clayey Silt of low to
medium plasticity
SM/ML-CL
CI
The engineering details (based on field test and laboratory test results) of the sub-soil
strata are available separately in Geotechnical Investigation Report.
4.2.4
RECOMMENDATIONS
Depending on the field and laboratory observations of subsoil strata, test results and
the type of structures proposed at site, the most feasible soil-foundation system is
recommended as normal bored cast in situ R.C.C. piles foundations of 1.0m to 1.2m
diameter for the NS, EW and Gomti Nagar link, at different depths with cut-off level at
2.0m depth below existing Ground level. The safe load carrying capacities of these
piles are given in following Table 4.11.
Table 4.11 DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR FOUNDATION
Cut-off
Length of
Safe load carrying capacity of a pile (T)
level
piles below
In
In lateral
below EGL.
cut-off
In uplift
compression
thrust
(m)
(m)
DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR FOUNDATIONS: NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR
AT LOCATION BH-1
18.0
373.4
100.0
40.2
120
2.0
19.0
405.8
113.7
40.2
19.0
439.7
128.2
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-2
18.0
400.0
108.6
40.2
120
2.0
19.0
430.0
121.1
40.2
20.0
461.3
134.2
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-3
18.0
406.7
114.1
40.2
120
2.0
19.0
438.9
127.6
40.2
20.0
472.5
141.8
40.2
Dia of
piles
(cm)
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
30/69
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
AT LOCATION BH-4
Dia of
piles
(cm)
120
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
20.0
21.0
22.0
223.8
237.5
251.6
78.1
84.5
91.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
390.4
422.1
455.2
101.3
114.5
128.4
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
256.9
274.2
292.5
89.9
97.7
106.0
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
275.7
291.8
308.9
104.5
111.8
119.5
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
240.1
255.8
272.5
84.6
91.6
99.1
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
237.2
253.4
270.6
80.5
87.7
95.4
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
424.8
468.5
515.2
109.2
125.3
143.0
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
248.7
264.7
281.7
87.9
95.0
102.6
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
335.4
350.2
365.9
136.8
143.3
150.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
286.8
303.5
321.4
112.9
120.4
128.4
40.2
40.2
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-5
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-6
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-7
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-8
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-9
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-10
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-11
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-12
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-13
120
2.0
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
31/69
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
AT LOCATION BH-14
Dia of
piles
(cm)
120
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
18.0
19.0
20.0
408.6
448.9
492.3
100.8
115.1
130.9
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
230.0
245.5
262.1
83.9
90.8
98.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
342.2
367.5
393.8
70.7
77.6
85.0
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
418.0
459.5
504.1
108.1
123.1
139.7
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
419.0
461.1
506.2
107.6
122.8
139.5
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
248.1
265.5
284.0
84.9
92.7
101.1
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
230.3
245.9
262.5
79.8
86.8
94.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
260.7
276.8
293.9
97.1
104.2
111.9
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
335.7
373.5
414.2
67.2
80.2
94.6
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
345.5
385.0
427.7
70.0
83.8
99.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-15
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-16
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-17
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-18
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-19
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-20
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-21
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-22
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-23
12
0
2.0
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
32/69
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
AT LOCATION BH-24
Dia of
piles
(cm)
12
0
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
21.0
22.0
23.0
236.1
254.1
273.2
85.8
93.9
102.6
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
419.5
462.4
508.5
108.2
124.0
141.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
265.0
280.3
296.6
103.2
110.0
117.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
363.3
403.8
79.3
93.6
40.2
40.2
20.0
447.5
109.5
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
348.1
387.1
429.2
72.4
86.0
101.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
239.0
255.2
272.5
85.2
92.5
100.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
346.4
385.3
427.2
72.1
85.7
100.8
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
244.1
260.5
278.0
87.5
94.9
102.7
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
429.1
471.4
516.9
114.1
129.5
146.6
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
220.2
235.9
252.7
82.2
89.2
96.8
40.2
40.2
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-25
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-26
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-27
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-28
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-29
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-30
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-31
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-32
12
0
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-33
12
0
2.0
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
33/69
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
AT LOCATION BH-34
Dia of
piles
(cm)
12
0
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
18.0
19.0
20.0
381.2
421.3
464.6
89.4
103.6
119.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
279.2
295.4
312.7
109.6
116.9
124.7
40.2
40.2
40.2
18.0
19.0
20.0
425.0
465.2
508.5
110.3
124.6
140.5
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
287.5
305.1
324.0
112.6
120.6
129.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
292.9
310.1
328.4
112.3
120.1
128.4
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
255.2
271.9
289.7
96.3
103.8
111.9
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
291.2
308.0
325.8
113.5
121.0
129.1
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
282.7
300.2
110.4
118.3
40.2
40.2
23.0
318.9
126.8
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
265.6
283.6
302.8
100.5
108.6
302.8
40.2
40.2
40.2
20.0
21.0
22.0
358.6
375.2
393.0
148.0
155.5
163.6
40.2
40.2
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-35
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-36
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-37
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-38
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-39
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-40
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-41
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-42
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-43
120
2.0
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
34/69
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
AT LOCATION BH-44
Dia of
piles
(cm)
120
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
21.0
22.0
23.0
357.8
373.7
390.6
145.8
152.9
160.5
40.2
40.2
40.2
21.0
22.0
23.0
281.8
298.5
316.4
108.9
116.4
124.5
40.2
40.2
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-45
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-46
21.0
280.6
109.1
40.2
120
2.0
22.0
298.4
117.1
40.2
23.0
317.3
125.7
40.2
DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR FOUNDATIONS: EAST-WEST CORRIDOR and GOMTI
NAGAR
AT LOCATION BH-1
100
2.0
21
208.6
84.8
40.2
22
224.1
92.3
40.2
23
239.9
100.1
40.2
120
2.0
21
259.8
101.7
40.2
22
278.5
110.8
40.2
23
297.5
120.1
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-2
100
2.0
21
253.9
107.5
40.2
22
268.5
114.7
40.2
23
283.3
121.9
40.2
120
2.0
21
314
129
40.2
22
331.6
137.6
40.2
23
349.5
146.3
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-3
100
2.0
21
215.8
88.2
40.2
22
231.2
95.5
40.2
23
247
103.2
40.2
120
2.0
21
268.6
105.8
40.2
22
287.1
114.6
40.2
23
306.3
123.8
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-4
100
2.0
21
229.9
92.1
40.2
22
247.1
100.4
40.2
23
265
109
40.2
120
2.0
21
287
110.5
40.2
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
35/69
Dia of
piles
(cm)
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
AT LOCATION BH-5
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-6
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-7
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-8
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-9
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-10
100
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
22
23
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
307.9
329.5
120.4
130.8
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
213.1
228.5
244.4
265.3
283.9
86.9
94.3
101.9
104.3
113.1
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
23
303.1
122.3
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
337.4
354.7
372.6
416
436.9
458.5
145.8
154.1
162.7
174.9
184.9
195.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
312.2
328.7
345.8
384.4
404.4
425.1
136.2
144
152.3
163.4
172.9
182.7
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
261.7
278.2
295.4
323.8
343.8
364.7
110.8
118.7
127
133
142.5
152.4
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
294.1
311.8
330.2
363.6
385
407.3
125
133.5
142.3
150.1
160.2
170.8
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
300.2
317.9
126.8
135.3
40.2
40.2
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
36/69
Dia of
piles
(cm)
120
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-11
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-12
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-13
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-14
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-15
100
2.0
120
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
23
21
22
23
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
336.3
371.6
393.1
415.3
144.1
152.1
162.3
173
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
234.2
249.5
265.5
290.1
308.7
328
98.5
105.8
113.5
118.2
127
136.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
266
281.2
297
328.2
346.6
365.7
114.6
121.9
129.4
137.5
146.2
155.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
201.9
217.4
233.6
251.5
270.3
82.2
89.6
97.4
98.6
107.5
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
23
289.8
116.8
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
266.3
279.9
294
328.8
345.3
362.3
114.1
120.6
127.4
136.9
144.7
152.9
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
161.7
171.8
182.1
200.8
213
225.4
66.8
71.7
76.8
80.1
86.1
92.1
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-16
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
37/69
100
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
2.0
120
2.0
Dia of
piles
(cm)
AT LOCATION BH-17
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-18
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-19
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-20
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-21
100
2.0
120
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
21
22
23
21
22
23
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
206.2
220.1
234.4
256.8
273.6
290.9
83.8
90.5
97.4
100.6
108.6
116.9
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
180.9
194
207.3
225.7
241.4
257.5
72.6
79
85.6
87.2
94.8
102.7
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
195.4
208
221
243.7
259
274.5
78.5
84.7
91.1
94.2
101.7
109.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
309.5
324.6
340.2
379.9
398.2
417.2
137.2
144.4
152
164.7
173.3
182.3
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
156.2
166.1
176.1
194.2
206
218.1
64.2
69
73.9
77.1
82.8
88.7
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
180
193
206.3
225.1
240.8
71.1
77.5
84
85.3
93.8
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
38/69
Dia of
piles
(cm)
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
AT LOCATION BH-22
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-23
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-24
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-25
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-26
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-27
100
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
23
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
256.7
100.8
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
184.5
195.9
207.6
229.7
243.5
257.6
75
80.5
86.1
90
96.6
103.4
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
212.5
227.3
242.3
264.1
281.8
299.9
87.7
94.9
102.2
105.2
113.9
122.7
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
225
239.7
255
278.6
296.4
315
94.9
101.9
109.3
113.8
122.3
131.1
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
290.6
307.8
325.6
359.2
380
401.5
123.9
132.1
140.7
148.7
158.5
168.8
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
464.6
505
547.1
619.2
669.1
721.2
108.1
125.1
142.9
129.7
150.1
171.5
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
472.4
511.9
553.1
114.5
131.2
148.6
40.2
40.2
40.2
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
39/69
Dia of
piles
(cm)
120
Cut-off
level
below EGL.
(m)
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-28
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-29
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-30
100
2.0
120
2.0
AT LOCATION BH-31
100
2.0
120
2.0
Length of
piles below
cut-off
(m)
21
22
23
In uplift
In lateral
thrust
627.3
676.2
727
137.4
157.4
178.4
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
191.2
203.2
215.4
236.9
251.3
266
80.4
86.2
92.2
96.5
103.5
110.6
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
325.5
350.1
375.4
425.6
455.7
91.1
102.4
113.9
109.3
122.8
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
23
486.5
136.7
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
192.6
204.9
217.5
238.7
253.5
268.7
80.7
86.7
92.8
96.9
104
111.4
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
21
22
23
21
22
23
431.6
466.9
502.9
576.3
619.4
663.4
95.9
112.1
128.7
115.1
134.6
154.5
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
40.2
AT LOCATION BH-32
100
2.0
21
424.4
122.1
40.2
22
453.5
135.6
40.2
23
483.3
149.5
40.2
120
2.0
21
553.2
146.6
40.2
22
588.7
162.8
40.2
23
624.9
179.4
40.2
The ground water level was encountered at the depth varying from 18.0m to 27.0m
below existing ground levels that too in only few boreholes. The measured ground
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
40/69
water table may fluctuate due to variation in climatic conditions and rate of surface
evaporation. However, for design and analyses purposes the ground water may be
considered at the existing water table level.
4.3
STATION PLANNING
4.3.1
GENERAL
The proposed metro for Lucknow consists of two corridors namely:
1. North-South Corridor: CCS Airport Munshi Pulia
2. East West Corridor: Charbagh/Lucknow Railway Station Vasant Kunj
The length of the proposed N-S corridor is 22.878 km and E-W corridor is 11.098 km.
Along the North-South corridor 22 stations have been planned, 12 stations have been
planned along the East-West corridor. The locations of the stations have been
identified taking into consideration the constraints in land acquisition, congestion
issues and integration. Therefore, stations are proposed in such a way so as to attract
maximum demand from the traffic nodal points.
4.3.2
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
41/69
767.51
1176.93
7080.02
8256.95
1124.88
1480.81
825.83
13504.26
14985.07
15810.90
1052.33
712.51
6312.51
12379.38
1385.60
5600.00
934.58
1584.31
4214.40
11327.05
1236.50
2630.09
1371.03
1200.47
1393.59
10392.47
807.23
193.12
764.49
120.89
-614.11
9021.44
NA
Distance from
previous Station
(in m)
-735.00
Chainage
(in m)
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
IT College Junction
Vishwavidyalaya
KD Singh Babu
Stadium
HazratGunj
Sachiwalaya
HussainGunj
Durgapuri
Mawaiya
Alambagh
Singar Nagar
Krishna Nagar
Transport Nagar
Amausi
CCS Airport
Dead End
Name of Station
12.933
12.617
14.700
(-) 15.500
(-) 20.539
(-) 20.903
12.533
14.33
12.703
12.953
12.640
13.490
12.900
12.663
12.516
12.503
Height/Depth
from Adjacent
Ground
123.778
123.686
123.041
94.205
92.927
96.890
132.426
132.197
132.197
132.210
134.205
135.033
134.456
134.364
134.225
133.225
42/69
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Underground,
Straight
Underground,
Straight
Underground,
Straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Elevated, straight
Alignment
Description
Table 4.12 STATION CHARACTERISTICS PROPOSED NORTH SOUTH , Gomti Nagar Link & EAST WEST METRO CORRIDOR
3694.07
4643.42
5833.08
7175.47
Lucknow City
Railway Station
Medical Chauraha
Nawajganj
Thakurganj
1342.39
1189.66
949.35
916.98
823.67
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
2777.09
Pandeyganj
964.46
988.966
988.96
1953.42
113.00
NA
0.00
(-) 113.00
408.60
1560.49
21734.66
22143.26
901.17
976.87
18554.15
20174.17
673.44
17577.28
718.85
1092.94
16903.84
19273.00
Distance from
previous Station
(in m)
Chainage
(in m)
Aminabad
Charbagh/ Lucknow
Railway Station
Gautam Buddha
Marg
Dead End
Dead End
Munshi Pulia
Indra Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Badshah Nagar
Mahanagar
Name of Station
13.169
(-) 13.824
(-) 13.704
(-) 14.160
(-) 19.414
(-) 15.691
(-) 14.600
(-) 17.715
12.843
12.663
12.703
13.500
13.400
17.930
Height/Depth
from Adjacent
Ground
129.436
103.328
105.203
104.767
97.364
103.657
103.375
102.000
128.492
129.055
126.959
125.099
124.737
125.980
43/69
Side Platforms - 2
Side Platforms - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Side Platform - 2
Underground,
Straight
Underground,
Straight
Underground,
Straight
Underground,
Straight
Underground,
Straight
Underground,
Straight
Underground,
Straight
Elevated, Straight
Elevated, Straight
Elevated, Straight
Elevated, Straight
Elevated, Straight
Elevated, Straight
Double Elevated,
Straight, off the road
Alignment
Description
Table 4.12 STATION CHARACTERISTICS PROPOSED NORTH SOUTH , Gomti Nagar Link & EAST WEST METRO CORRIDOR
408.06
10985.00
Dead End
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
938.70
679.91
929.67
853.19
Distance from
previous Station
(in m)
8114.17
8794.08
9723.75
10576.94
Chainage
(in m)
Balaganj
Sarfarazganj
Musabagh
Vasant Kunj
Name of Station
9.938
12.807
12.275
12.857
12.522
Height/Depth
from Adjacent
Ground
129.295
131.757
133.087
130.678
132.767
44/69
Side Platforms - 2
Side Platforms - 2
Side Platforms - 2
Side Platforms - 2
Elevated, Curved
Elevated, Straight
Elevated, Straight
Elevated, Straight
Alignment
Description
Table 4.12 STATION CHARACTERISTICS PROPOSED NORTH SOUTH , Gomti Nagar Link & EAST WEST METRO CORRIDOR
4.3.3
4.3.3.1
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Catchment area
(-) 614.11
NA
133.225
12.503
Located on the center of the road proposed for cirluation of airport
traffic, Near the New Terminal. Integrated with the master plan of
CCS Airport.
Theee entry /exits have been proposed, one at the proposed
parking lot and the other two connecting the old and new terminal
by FOB.
Would mainly cater to Airport passengers, would also serve the
airport employees and residential area of Chillawa.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
45/69
4.3.3.2
Amausi Station
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Entry exit stairs
Catchment area
193.12
828.55
134.225
12.516
Located on the median of Kanpur road and centre line of the station
is adjacent to Life Hospital on northern side.
On northern side both stairs located on open land, one adjacent to
Hardware shop & other to Sahu General Stores. On southern side
located on vacant land adjacent to Sunny Toyota
Would mainly cater to Airport area, would also serve residential
area of Vijaynagar, Sindhu Nagar, part of Indralok Colony and Hind
Nagar
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
46/69
4.3.3.3
Chainage (m)
Inter-station Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Catchment area
1393.59
1200.46
134.364
12.663
Located on the median of Kanpur road and centre line of the
station is adjacent to One Motors India Pvt. Ltd. on the southern
side.
On northern side both stairs located on open land, one adjacent to
LUCAS India Service Ltd. & other to Police Quarters
On southern side located on vacant land adjacent to Sunny Toyota
and other in front of Motor India Pvt. Ltd.
Would mainly cater to Transport Nagar area, RTO office, areas
along Kanpur Road, Hind Nagar, Subhash Nagar, Gopal Nagar,
part of Sindhu Nagar and Indralok Colony
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
47/69
4.3.3.4
Chainage (m)
2630.09
Interstation Distance (m)
1236.50
Rail Level (m)
134.457
Height from Ground (m)
12.900
Location
Located on the median of Kanpur road and centre line of the
station is adjacent to Madan Ply and Glass Centre on the northern
side.
Entry exit stairs
On northern side both stairs located on open land, one adjacent
to Indian Oil Petroleum and other to Tata Tiscon Showroom
On southern side one stair is located adjacent to Rajat Enterprise
& other to India Steel Corporation
Catchment area
Krishna Nagar, Bhehsa / Nahariya area, part of Vijay Nagar,
Vishnulok Colony, Hind Nagar and Ashiana Colony
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
48/69
4.3.3.5
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Entry exit stairs
Catchment area
4214.40
1584.31
135.033
13.490
Located on the median of Kanpur road and centre line of the
station is adjacent to Bank of India on the northern side.
On northern side one stair is located adjacent to Rajpal plaza &
other to Onkar Maruti Suzuki
On southern side one stair is located adjacent to Woodland
shop & other to IDBI bank
Part of Alambagh and Krishna Nagar, Ram Nagar, Singaar
Nagar, areas along Hardoi Road and Sarda Canal
AMAUSI
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
49/69
4.3.3.6
Alambagh Station
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Entry exit stairs
Catchment area
5600.00
1385.60
134.205
12.640
Located on the median of Kanpur road and centre line of the
station is adjacent to Mani Baha market on the northern side.
On northern side stairs are located in park & open area
On southern side stairs are located in open area
Alambagh, Chander Nagar, Gulab Vatika, Ram Prakash Khera
Colony, Alambagh Gurudwara and could extend to Railways
RDSO/Manak Nagar and Rajajipuram area
AMAUSI
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
50/69
4.3.3.7
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Entry exit stairs
Catchment area
6312.51
712.51
132.210
12.953
Located on the median of Kanpur road and centre line of the station is
adjacent to Kumar Hotel on the southern side.
On northern side both stairs are located in an open area
On southern side one stair is located adjacent to Meenu Ranu Auto
Mobile *& other to Pushpa Bajaj Showroom
Lucknow Bus Station, part of Talkatora and nearby commercial areas
along Kanpur Road
AMAUSI
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
51/69
4.3.3.8
Mawaiya Station
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Catchment area
7080.02
767.51
132.197
12.703
Located on the median of Kanpur road and centre line
of the station is adjacent to the Army supply depot
and T N CHowk.
On northern side one stair is located in open land
near Gandhi Inter College and on boundary of Army
Supply Depot.
On southern side stairs are located on open land and
in front of the railway quarters.
Cantonment Area, Alambagh, Railway Colony, part of
Mawaiya, Aishbagh, and could be extended to road
towards Talkatora area.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
52/69
MUNSHIPULIA
AMAUSI
4.3.3.9
Durgapuri Station
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Catchment area
8256.95
1176.93
132.197
14.330
Located on the median of Kanpur road and centre line
of the station is adjacent to Mechanical shed and
platforms of the Indian Railway on northern side.
On northern side one stair is located in temporary
mechanical shed and open land near GRP Police line
quarters
On southern side stairs are located on open land
adjacent to railway quarters and on open land at the
end of platforms
Charbagh Area, Durgapuri, Chander Nagar, Railway
Colony, part of Mawaiya, Pan Dariba, Moti Nagar,
Aishbagh, and could be extended to eastern part of
Talkatora area
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
53/69
MUNSHIPULIA
AMAUSI
Catchment area
9021.44
764.49
132.426
12.533
Located on the median of Station road and centre line of the
station is adjacent to Kyjrati Hotel on the northern side.
On northern side one stair is located adjacent to Railway
Quarters & other to Kyjrati hotel
On southern side both stairs are located in an open area
Charbagh Railway Station, Railway Stadium, part of Pan Dariba,
Arya Nagar, part of Naka Hindola
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
54/69
MUNSHIPULIA
Catchment area
10392.47
1371.03
96.890
(-) 20.903
Located on the median of Station road and centre line of the station is
adjacent to Vidhan Mension on the northern side.
On northern side one stair is located near Bombay sweet shop &
other near Fubag bldg. On southern side stairs are located adjacent to
Furniture shop & Hotel Raj
Dense mixed commercial & residential area on both sides of Shivaji
Marg, Vidhan Sabha Marg, Guru Govind Singh Marg, Lalkuan, Ghasyari
Mandi, part of Naka Hindola and Aminabad
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
55/69
MU
AMAUSI
11327.05
934.58
92.927
(-) 20.539
Located on the median of Vidhan Sabha Marg and centre line of
the station is adjacent to Indian Community Party Office on the
northern side.
All the stairs are located in an open area
Part of Lalbagh, Darulshafa, Ganeshganj, and nearby offices like
LDA, UP Sectariat, PWD, GPO etc
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
56/69
12379.38
1052.33
94.205
(-) 15.5
Located on the median of MG road and centre line of the
station is adjacent to Rasool Manzil Complex on the northern
side.
On northern side one stair is located adjacent to Love lane
bldg. & other near St. Joseph Cathedrad
On southern side stairs are located on footpath
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
57/69
Catchment area
13504.26
1124.88
123.041
14.7
Located on the rear side campus of Hotel Clarks and part on
road towards University at Pariwartan Chowk.
On northern side stairs are located in footpath / open area at
end of K D Singh stadium.
On southern side one stair is located in park & other on park
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
58/69
Catchment area
14985.07
1480.81
123.686
12.617
Located on the median of University road and centre line of the
station is adjacent to Lucknow University on the northern side.
All stairs are located in an open area
Hassanganj, Babuganj, Purana Haidarabad, Lucknow University
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
59/69
area, part of Civil Lines and part of Mukarim Magar and Daliganj
15810.90
825.83
123.778
12.933
Located on the median of university road and centre line of
the station is adjacent to IT Intermediate College on the
northern side.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
60/69
MU
MUNSHIPULIA
16903.84
1092.94
125.980
17.930
Located on the median of Faizabad road and centre line of the
station is adjacent to Karamat Market on the northern side.
On northern side stairs are located adjacent to shopping complex
and temporary shops
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
61/69
Catchment area
On southern side one stair is located near Railway hospital & other
adjacent to Avadh agency
Naya Haidarabad, Nishatganj, Krishnanagar Colony, Mahanagar,
part of Balmiki Nagar, and Fatima Hospital, Railway Hospital,
Mahanagar Boys and Carmel Girls College
MUNSHIPULIA
17577.28
673.44
124.737
13.400
Located on the median of Faizabad road and centre line
of the station is adjacent to Ran Basera complex on the
northern side.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
62/69
Entry/exit stairs
Catchment area
MU
A
18554.15
976.90
125.099
13.500
Located on the median of Faizabad road and centre line of
the station is adjacent to Lekhraj Market on the northern
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
63/69
side.
On northern side both stairs are located in open area
On southern side located in open area, one adjacent to Auto
market shops
Murari Nagar, and commercial areas such as Lekhraj
Market, Sahara Shopping Centre, Meena Market and
surrounding residential areas
Catchment area
MUNSHIPULIA
19273.00
718.85
126.959
12.703
Located on the median of Faizabad road and centre line of the
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
64/69
Catchment area
MU
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
20174.17
901.10
129.055
12.663
65/69
Location
Entry/ exit stairs
Catchment area
AMAUSI
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
21734.66
1560.56
128.492
66/69
Catchment area
12.843
Located on the median of Polytechnic road, center line of the
station is adjacent to Brij Niwas building on northern side
On northern side one stair is located adjacent to S.S Dewan
bldg. & other near Patiksha bldg.
On southern side stairs are located in an open area
Eastern part of Khurram Nagar, Munshipulia, Indira Nagar D
Block, Hanuman Market, Ishwarpuri Colony,and part of
Chinhat locality
MUNSHIPULIA
4.3.4
STATION LOCATIONS ON EW
4.3.4.1
Chainage (m)
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
0.00
67/69
NA
102.000
17.715
Centerline passes through adjacent to the Indian oil motor
sales in the eastern side of the station
At Charbagh Railway Station park on one side and space
adjacent to indian Oil Motor Sales on the other side.
Would mainly cater to Charbagh Railway Station, would also
serve part of Pan Dariba, Arya Nagar, part of Naka Hindola
VASANTKUNJ
4.3.4.2
Chainage (m)
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
988.966
68/69
988.966
103.375
14.600
Centerline passes through adjacent to Bajaj Furniture on
eastern side of station
On acquired properties on western side and Ply House and
shops adjacent to Bajaj Furniture on eastern side of station
Would mainly cater to dense commercial and residential area
along both sides of Gautam Buddha Marg, Rani Ganj, Fatehganj,
Kasai Bara, Husainganj, Naka Hindola, Lalkuan, part of
Aishbagh and part of Arya Nagar
4.3.4.3
Aminabad Station
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
69/69
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Depth from Ground (m)
Location
1953.42
964.46
103.657
15.691
Located beneath the Aminabad Park, centerline lies in front of
Shobhit Complex in north eastern side of station block.
Both entry/exit blocks would be situated at the Aminabad Park
Would cater to commercial hub of the city Aminabad,
Jhandewalan Park, Kaisarbagh, part of Raniganj and Maulvigan
AMINABAD
4.3.4.4
Pandeyganj Station
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
70/69
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Depth from Ground (m)
Location
Entry exit stairs
Catchment area
2777.09
823.67
97.364
19.414
Off the road , underground station is placed in front of
Shyam Kuti in north eastern side of station block
Along the Gangaprasad Marg on acquired porperties
Pandeyganj, Wazirganj, Golaganj, Chikmandi, Maulviganj,
Dubagwan and could extend upto Rakabganj and Rajendra
Nagar
4.3.4.5
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
71/69
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Depth from Ground (m)
Location
Entry exit stairs
Catchment area
3694.07
916.98
104.767
14.160
Off the Subhash Marg, centre line of station lies in front of
city railway station in south east side.
Both the entry/exit blocks on available space along the
railway tracks
Wazirganj, Yahiaganj, part of Rakabganj, Khajuwa area,
Raja Bazar area and extend upto Shahganj and Chowk area
4.3.4.6
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
72/69
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Depth from Ground (m)
Location
4643.42
949.35
105.203
13.704
Located beneath the medical chauraha, centerline lies in
front of Madarsa Sultanul Mardaris building in south
western side of station block.
Southern Stair blocks on the available space on Queen
Mary Hospital and northern stairs on vacant space
CSM Medical University and Hospital area, Patanala, Bara
Imambara, Machchhi Bhawan, and Chowk area
VASANTKUNJ
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
73/69
4.3.4.7
Nawajganj Station
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Depth from Ground (m)
Location
Entry exit stairs
Catchment area
5833.08
1189.66
103.328
13.824
Centerline of underground station passes through the Kapoor
medical store in the south of the station
Southern block at Kali inter college/Kapoor medical store and
northern stairs at Lohiya lawns
Chaupatiyan, Part Of Chowk, Napier Park, Company Bagh,
Husainabad, Sarai Male Khan, and Chota Imambara
VASANTKUNJ
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
74/69
4.3.4.8
Thakurganj Station
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Entry exit stairs
Catchment area
7175.47
1342.39
129.436
13.169
Elevated station located on the median, Centerline passes through
the shops adjacent to Mohit Market in the north of the station
On northern side, Waterpump House premises & open space
adjacent to Sri Ram Market and on southern side, open land
besides Koti Bhawan & Surya Plaza along Pooja hostel lane
Thakurganj, Musahibganj, Daulatganj, Kaffim Nagar, Razabganj,
Lat Purwa, and Ahmadganj
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
75/69
4.3.4.9
Balaganj Station
Chainage (m)
Interstation Distance (m)
Rail Level (m)
Height from Ground (m)
Location
Entry exit stairs
Catchment area
8114.17
938.70
131.757
12.807
Centerline passes through the police station in the south of the
station
open spaces on both sides of the station block are available for
stair blocks
Balaganj, and areas like Rainnagan, Yasinganj, Mauzam Nagar,
Niwati Tola,
VASANTKUNJ
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
76/69
8794.08
679.91
133.087
12.275
Centerline passes through the shops adjacent to Mass Auto
Service in the north of the station
open spaces in front of shops on both sides of the station block
are available for stair blocks
Would cater mainly to Sarfazganj and also to Arihankhera,
Banaura Husainbari, Sardar Nagar etc.
VASANTKUNJ
CHARBAGH RLY. STATION
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
77/69
9723.75
929.67
130.678
12.857
Centerline passes adjacent to the culvert of nala in the north of
the station
open spaces on both sides of the station block is available for
stair blocks
Would cater to Musabagh, Madhopur, Faridpur etc.
VASANTKUNJ
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
78/69
10576.94
853.19
132.767
12.522
Centerline passes through the shops adjacent to Asha Trading
Company in the north of the station
open spaces on both sides of the station block along the State
Highway 25 is available for stair blocks
Would cater to areas like Chhanduiya, Dubagga, and Begaria
VASANTKUNJ
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
79/69
4.3.5
The stations can be divided into public and non-public areas (those areas
where access is restricted). The public areas can be further subdivided into
paid and unpaid areas.
The platform level has adequate assembly space for passengers for both normal
operating conditions and a recognized abnormal scenario.
Sufficient space for queuing and passenger flow has been allowed at the
ticketing gates.
The DG set, bore well pump houses and ground tank would be located generally
in one area on ground.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
80/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
81/69
4.3.6
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
82/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
83/69
front in the middle of the platform through the large double ht space connecting
the two levels.
The USP of the station lies in the spatial quality created out of the structural form.
The entire station passengers area is designed as a column free, double height
space which makes it possible for the passengers to be able to see the entire station
concourse and platform from end to end just as approaching the AFC line. It is this
spatial configuration from where the station will derive its aesthetics value. The
sense of volume (12 m high, 20 m wide and approx 100m long space), visual
legibility (little dependence on signage as the entire station is visible from
entrance) and a sense of orientation are major components of the aesthetics of the
entrances.
Regarding the entrances, it is proposed that the entrance structure is designed as a
light weight providing the basic function of covering the entrance opening from the
basement. Since the entire area is very heavily built up the light weight structures
will be pleasing and welcome. ECS plant room is generally proposed at the
concourse level, outside the station box, ASS at concourse level at the two ends and
the TVF rooms in a track side configuration. Other back of the house areas are
planned at both platform and concourse levels
4.3.8
4.3.9
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
84/69
CONCOURSE
Concourse forms the interface between street and platforms. This is where all the
passenger amenities are provided. The concourse contains automatic fare
collection system in a manner that divides the concourse into distinct paid and
unpaid areas. The 'unpaid area' is where passengers gain access to the system,
obtain travel information and purchase tickets. On passing through the ticket gates,
the passenger enters the 'paid area, which includes access to the platforms. The
concourse is planned in such a way that maximum surveillance can be achieved by
the ticket hall supervisor over ticket machines, automatic fare collection (AFC)
gates, stairs and escalators. Ticket machines and AFC gates are positioned to
minimize cross flows of passengers and provide adequate circulation space.
Sufficient space for queuing and passenger flow has been allowed in front of the
ticketing gates.
4.3.12
TICKETING GATES
Ticketing gates requirement has been calculated taking the gate capacity as 30
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
85/69
persons per minute per gate. Passenger forecast for the horizon year 2041 has
been used to compute the maximum design capacity. At least two ticketing gates
shall be provided at any station even if the design requirement is satisfied with
only one gate. Uniform space has been provided in all stations where gates can be
installed as and when required.
4.3.13
4.3.14
PLATFORMS
A uniform platform width of 5.5-m wide including staircases and escalators in the
central section is proposed for the elevated stations. This platform width has been
checked for holding capacity of the platform for worst-case scenario (disruption
period of 6 min) in the design year 2041. In the underground stations, 12 m wide
island platforms are proposed in all locations except pandey ganja nd charbagh
station on EW corridor.
4.3.15
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
86/69
4.3.16
Additional emergency
stairs in m
Combined Width of
Stairs from Platform to
concourse in m
Ticket Counters
Station
Escalators
Proposed
At Each Station
Conc to Ground Conc to
plat
to Conc
plat
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Chaudhary Charan
Singh Airport
Amausi
Transport Nagar
Krishnagar
Singar Nagar
Alambagh
Alambagh Bus Stn
Mawaiya
Durgapuri
Charbagh / Lucknow
Rly. Stn
Husain Ganj
Sachivalaya
Hazarat Ganj
Stadium
Vishwavidyaly
IT Chauraha
Mahanagar
Badshah Nagar
Lekhraj Market
Ram Sagar Mishra Nagar
Indira Nagar
Munshipulia
152
607
1846
7113
2348
2893
5249
7503
6620
17254
5179
818
1064
751
902
1371
2306
822
727
377
0
0
0
0
0
372
351
611
1053
1215
2193
15981
3683
1853
2643
677
969
1377
9566
5377
6459
3347
5327
5441
4.8
Nil
4
4
9
4
7
12
12
11
2
2
6
3
3
6
7
8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
Nil
Nil
4.8
2.4
2.4
4.8
6.0
6.0
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
17
14
9.6
12
10
9
5
9
5
6
5
14
8
7
7
6
7
7
2
3
2
2
3
10
5
6
3
5
3
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
1.2
2.4
1.2
1.2
1.2
7.2
3.6
4.8
2.4
3.6
0.0
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
87/69
Additional emergency
stairs in m
Combined Width of
Stairs from Platform to
concourse in m
Ticket Counters
Station
Lifts Proposed At
Each Station
Ground to
Conc
Escalators
Proposed
At Each Station
Conc to Ground Conc to
plat
to Conc
plat
1.
2.
3.
Charbagh / Lucknow
Rly. Stn
Gautam Buddha Marg
Aminabad
4.
Pandey Ganj
720
6471
4.8
1.2
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
344
334
466
341
351
69
46
0
3127
4749
9943
6043
5642
1545
1269
927
4
4
9
5
5
2
2
2
4
6
13
7
7
2
2
1
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
1.2
1.2
1.2
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
4.3.17
6596
24
4.8
4.8
618
1023
4164
5232
5
8
3
6
4.8
4.8
1.2
1.8
2
3
1
1
2
3
4
2
2
3
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
TRAFFIC INTEGRATION
The objective of an integrated transport system and traffic movement is to offer
maximum advantage to commuters and society from traffic and planning
consideration. Various modes of transport need to be integrated in a way that each
mode supplements the other. A large proportion of MRTS users will come to and
depart from various stations by public, hired and private modes, for which
integration facilities need to be provided at stations to ensure quick and
convenient transfers.
In order to ensure that entire MRTS function as an integrated network and
provides efficient service to the commuter, the following steps have been
identified:
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
88/69
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Suitable linkages are proposed so that various corridors of MRTS are integrated
within themselves, with existing rail services and with road based modes.
Facilities needed at various stations are planned in conformity with the type of
linkages planned there.
Traffic and transport integration facilities are provided for two different types of
linkages:
4.3.18
Feeder links to provide integration between various MRTS corridors and road
based transport modes i.e. public, hired, and private vehicles.
4.3.19
OPERATIONAL INTEGRATION
Integration at operational level will be required to synchronize the timings of the
MRTS services and the feeder service. For an efficient interchange, walking and
waiting time at these stations will need to be minimized. Introduction of common
ticketing and their availability at convenient locations will be necessary to ensure
forecast patronage of the system. Last but not the least will be the need for an
integrated passenger information system covering all the modes through the
publication of common route guides, time tables and information boards at
terminals and in the train coaches for providing updated information for users of
the system.
4.4
CONSTRUCTION METHODOLOGY
4.4.1
UNDERGROUND CONSTRUCTION
As in the underground section most of the area is either built-up or passing under
Road, it is proposed to tunnel through Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) or New
Austrian Tunneling Method (NATM) in the overburden soil mass. This will reduce
cost substantially and inconvenience to general public during construction. Tunnel
excavation for a major part of this underground section is expected to be carried
out by Tunnel Boring Machines. There is some smaller section along the
underground part of the alignment where Cut & Cover method has been
considered for construction before and after Switch Over Ramp (SOR) and at the
start of the alignment at Lucknow Station. Tunnel boring machines (TBMs) capable
of drilling in soft soil with a finished internal diameter of 5.6 m. can be successfully
employed for boring tunnels through this stratum. The tunnels are proposed with a
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
89/69
Underground Stations
All the seven of the underground stations have been proposed as cut and cover
with top-down method. The diaphragm walls for such station constructions would
be 80 to 100 cm. thick and will function as a permanent side wall of the station. It
is, therefore, necessary to construct the diaphragm walls absolutely watertight and
with the required concrete strength as has been done in the Delhi Metro station
constructions. By resorting to top-down method the surface could be restored
quickly and further excavations and construction of the station will not hamper the
surface activity. The typical dimension of box tunnel section is shown in Fig. 4.2.
4.4.1.2
Diversion of utilities
Excavation between the support walls along with the installation of struts
between the two walls to keep them in position.
The typical section of Cut and Cover construction (Top-Down) method is shown in
Fig.4.3.
4.4.1.3
Utility Diversion
It is suggested that all utilities falling within excavation area are diverted away in
advance to avoid damage to such utilities during the excavation/ construction
phase. The cross utilities, however has to be kept supported. It is suggested that
pressure water pipelines crossing the proposed cut area are provided with valves
on both sides of the cut so that the cut area can be isolated in case of any leakage to
the pipeline to avoid flooding of the cut/damage to the works.
4.4.1.4
Support Walls
Most commonly used support wall is RCC Diaphragm Wall. The advantage of
diaphragm wall is that the same can be used as part of permanent structure. The
modern techniques are now available where water-stop can be inserted at the
joints of two diaphragm wall panels to avoid seepage through the joints. It is also
now possible to ensure the verticality of the diaphragm wall panels to avoid any
infringement problem later on. Typically the diaphragm wall of 80 cm to 1 meter
thickness is sufficient to do the cut and cover construction. The various advantages
of diaphragm wall are as follows.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
90/69
It is rigid type of support system and therefore ensures the maximum safety
against settlement to the adjacent structures.
The other support walls which can be used depending on the site conditions are as
follows:
Sheet Piles: Z/ U sheet piles cane be used as temporary support wall. This can be
advantageous where it is possible to re-use the sheet pile again and again and
therefore, economy can be achieved however the main concern remains, driving of
sheet piles causes vibrations/noise to the adjacent buildings. This may sometimes
lead to damage to the building and most of the time causes inconvenience to the
occupants of the building. Situation becomes more critical if sensitive buildings are
adjacent to the alignment like hospitals, schools, laboratories, etc. Silent pile
driving equipments however are now available and can be used where such
problems are anticipated.
Retaining Casing Piles: This is suitable for situation where the cut and cover is to
be done partly in soil and partly in rocky strata. The top soil retaining structure can
be done with the help of Casing pile which is then grouted with cement slurry. This
is considered suitable in case of shallow level, non-uniform, uneven nature of rock
head surface which render the construction of sheet piles/diaphragm wall
impracticable. These are suitable up to 7-meter depth. The common diameter used
for such casing pile is 2.00-2.50 mm dia.
Soldier Piles and Lagging: Steel piles (H Section or I section) are driven into the
ground at suitable interval (normally 1-1.5 mtr.) centre-to-centre depending on the
section and depth of excavation. The gap between two piles is covered with
suitable lagging of timber planks/shot-creting /steel sheets/GI sheets during the
process of excavation.
Secant Piles: are cast-in-situ bored piles constructed contiguously to each other so
that it forms a rigid continuous wall. This is considered an alternative to diaphragm
wall where due to soil conditions it is not advisable to construct diaphragm wall
from the consideration of settlement during the trenching operation. 800 to 1000
mm dia piles are commonly used. Two alternate soft piles are driven and cast in
such a way that the new pile partly cuts into earlier constructed piles. This new pile
is constructed with suitable reinforcement. With this, alternate soft and hard pile is
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
91/69
constructed. This has got all the advantages of diaphragm wall. However, this wall
can not be used as part of permanent structure and permanent structure has to be
constructed in- side of this temporary wall.
4.4.1.5
Anchors
As an alternative to the struts, soil/rock anchors can be used to keep these support
walls in position. This gives additional advantage as clear space is available
between two support walls and progress of excavation & construction is much
faster as compared to the case where large number of struts is provided which
create hindrance to the movement of equipments and material & thus affects the
progress adversely.
The combination of all the type of retaining walls, struts/anchors may be necessary
for the project to suit the particular site. Based on the above broad principle, the
support walls system for cut and cover shall be chosen for particular locations.
4.4.2
CHOICE OF SUPERSTRUCTURE
The choice of superstructure has to be made keeping in view the ease of
constructability and the maximum standardization of the form-work for a wide
span ranges. Following type of superstructures has been considered:
4.4.2.1
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
92/69
Concreting
Moving the form carrier to the next position and starting a new cycle
The limitation of the method is that the strength of concrete is always on the
critical path of construction and it also influences greatly the structures
deformability, particularly during construction.
Pre Cast Segmental Box Girder
This essentially consists of precast segmental construction with external
prestressing and dries joints and is by far the most preferred technique in fast
track projects. In such construction the prestressing is placed outside the
structural concrete (but inside the box) and protected with high density
polyethylene tubes which are grouted with special wax or cement. The match cast
joints at the interface of two segments are provided with shear keys as in
traditional segmental construction. However, epoxy is dispensed with because
water tight seal at the segment joints is not required in association with external
tendons. The schematic arrangement is shown at Fig. 2.4.
The main advantages of dry-jointed externally prestressed precast segmental
construction can be summarized as follows:-
The elimination of the epoxy from the match-cast joints reduces costs and
increases speed of construction further.
Facility for inspection and monitoring of tendons during the entire service life
of the structure.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
93/69
After studying all the feasible options, Pre-cast segmental box girder using external
unbounded tendon had been adopted because of the advantages mentioned above.
The schematic arrangement for this is shown in Fig. 4.5.
4.4.2.2
Firstly, the piers and the cross heads are constructed in advance of the ALG. For
the construction of every span, formwork units are adjusted, raised and
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
94/69
suspended on the transverse trusses using Maccalloy bars (high tensile bars) in
conjunction with the hollow ram jacks.
-
After the formwork units are in place, fixing of reinforcement, placing of ducts
and concreting will follow.
When the structure achieves a concrete strength of 30 MPa, the stressing of the
tendons will begin.
Upon complete transfer of load to the starting elements and piers, the
formwork units will be dismantled and placed on the working platform. The
entire ALG will then be jacked to the next span. This cycle is then repeated.
The advantage of the span by span method of construction pertains to the prestressing steel requirement. Since the segments are supported by the form
travellers, there are no cantilever stresses during construction, and pre-stress
requirements are akin to those of conventional construction on false work.
The capital investment in the equipment for this type of construction is
considerable. Taking into account total length of approximately 25.4 km of viaduct
and the large number of equal spans, it may be economically justifiable for the
equipment investment by the contractor.
4.4.2.3
Pre-Cast Construction
For the elevated sections It is recommended to have pre-cast segmental
construction for super structure for the viaduct. For stations also the
superstructure is generally of pre-cast members. The pre-cast construction will
have the following advantages:-
Casting of Segments
For viaducts segmental pre-cast construction requires a casting yard. The
construction depot will have facilities for casting beds, curing and stacking areas,
batching plant with storage facilities for aggregates and cement, site testing
laboratories, reinforcement steel yard, fabrication yard, etc. An area of about 2.5
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
95/69
The pier segment will be finalized based on simply supported span of 31.0m
and the same will be also kept for all simply supported standard span.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
96/69
For major crossing having spans greater than 31.0m, special continuous units
normally of 3 span construction or steel girders have been envisaged.
All these continuous units (in case provided at obligatory location) will be
constructed by cast-in-situ balanced cantilever construction technique.
Substructure
The viaduct superstructure will be supported on single cast-in-place RC pier. The
shape of the pier follows the flow of forces. For the standard spans, the pier
gradually widens at the top to support the bearing under the box webs. At this
preliminary design stage, the size of pier is found to be limited to 1.8m to 2.0 m
diameter of circular shape for most of its height so that it occupies the minimum
space at ground level where the alignment often follows the central verge of
existing roads. To prevent the direct collision of vehicle to pier, a Jersey Shaped
crash barrier of 1.0 m height above existing road level has been provided all
around the pier. A gap of 25 mm has also been provided in between the crash
barrier and outer face of pier. The shape of upper part of pier has been so
dimensioned that a required clearance of 5.5 m is always available on road side
beyond vertical plane drawn on outer face of crash barrier. In such a situation, the
minimum height of rail above the existing road is 8.4 m. The longitudinal center to
center spacing of elastomeric/pot bearing over a pier would be about 1.8 m. The
space between the elastomeric bearings will be utilized for placing the lifting jack
required for the replacement of elastomeric bearing. An outward slope of 1:200
will be provided at pier top for the drainage due to spilling of rainwater, if any. The
transverse spacing between bearings would be 3.2 m (to be studied in more
details).The orientation and dimensions of the piers for the continuous units or
steel girder (simply supported span) have to be carefully selected to ensure
minimum occupation at ground level traffic. Since the vertical and horizontal loads
will vary from pier to pier, this will be catered to by selecting the appropriate
structural dimensions.
4.4.2.5
Foundation Recommendation
Substratum consists of top 1 meter as filled up soil followed by sand, silty sand,
silty sand mixed with gravel up to 30 meter depth. Pile foundations have been
recommended for the foundations as per the stratum encountered. Hence, pile
foundations with varying pile depths depending on soil characteristic have to be
provided on a case-by-case basis.
Deck Simple Spans
Salient features of the precast segmental construction method technique as
envisaged for the project under consideration are indicated below:
-
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
97/69
Box girder segments shall be match cast at the casting yard before being
transported to location and erected in position. Post-tensioned cables shall be
threaded in-situ and tensioned from one end. It is emphasized that for precast
segmental construction only one-end pre-stressing shall be used.
The Contractor shall be responsible for the proper handling, lifting, storing,
transporting and erection of all segments so that they may be placed in the
structure without damage. Segments shall be maintained in an upright position
at all times and shall be stored, lifted and/or moved in a manner to prevent
torsion and other undue stress. Members shall be lifted, hoisted or stored with
lifting devices approved on the shop drawings.
The purpose of the epoxy joint, which is about 1mm on each mating surface,
shall be to serve as lubricant during segment positioning, to provide
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
98/69
4.4.2.6
The temporary compressive stress during the curing period shall be applied by
approved external temporary bar pre-stressing (such as Macalloy or Diwidag
bar systems or approved equivalent).
Construction of Stations
It is proposed to construct the elevated stations with elevated concourse over the
road at most of the locations to minimize land acquisition. To keep the rail level
low, it is proposed not to take viaduct through the stations. Thus a separate
structural configuration is required (although this may necessitate the break in the
launching operations at each station location). Sub-structure for the station portion
will also be similar to that of viaduct and will be carried out in the same manner.
However, there will be single viaduct column in the station area, which will be
located on the median and supporting the concourse girders by a cantilever arm so
as to eliminate the columns on right of way. Super-structure will consist of precast
segmental box Girders for supporting the track structure and I Girder / Double T
Girders for supporting the platform and concourse areas. A pre-cast or cast in situ
prestressed cross girder will be required over the middle piers for supporting
platform structure. Box shaped in situ prestressed cantilever cross girders are
planned for supporting the concourse girders and escalators at mezzanine level.
All the members will be pre-cast in a construction depot and launched at site
through cranes.
4.4.2.7
Grade of Concrete
It is proposed to carry out construction work with design mix concrete through
computerized automatic Batching Plants with following grade of concrete for
various members as per design requirement/durability considerations.
i) Piles
M -35
M -35
iii) Piers
M -40
M -45
M -45
M -60
M -30
For all the main structures, permeability test on concrete sample is recommended
to ensure impermeable concrete.
4.4.2.8
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
99/69
It is proposed to use HYSD 415 or TMT steel as reinforcement bars.For prestressing work, low relaxation high tensile steel strands with the configuration 12
T 13 and or 19 K 15 is recommended (confirming to IS:14268).
4.4.2.9
Reservation of land along the corridor, identification and survey for acquisition.
4.5
UTILITY DIVERSIONS
4.5.1
INTRODUCTION
Besides the details of various aspects e.g. transport demand analysis, route
alignment, station locations, system design, viaduct structure, geo-technical
investigations etc. as brought out in previous chapters, there are a number of other
engineering issues, which are required to be considered in sufficient details before
really deciding on taking up any infrastructure project of such magnitude.
Accordingly, following engineering items have been studied and described in this
chapter:
4.5.2
Land acquisition necessary for the project both on permanent basis as well as
temporary, including its break up between Government and private ownership.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
100/69
SN
1.
3
4
Railway
UPPCL Lucknow
GAIL
4.5.3
UTILITY SERVICES
Surface water drains, nallahs, Sewerage and
drainage conduits, sewerage treatment plants,
pumping stations,
Road construction & maintenance of State
highways, Municipals Roads etc.
Telecommunication cables, junction boxes,
telephone posts, O.H. lines, etc.
Traffic signal posts, junction boxes and cable
connections, etc.
Railway crossings, signals, railway bridges, etc.
OH & Under Ground Electric cables and Electric
poles
Gas Pipelines
4.5.4
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
101/69
S.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
S.No.
1
2
3
4
5
Start
Chainage in
(km)
-735.000
0.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
End Chainage
(in Km)
No. of Telephone
poles
No. of telephone
Junction box
0.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
31
30
27
24
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
102/69
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
SN
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
4.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
8.000
9.000
10.000
11.000
12.000
13.000
14.000
15.000
16.000
17.000
18.000
19.000
20.000
21.000
22.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
8.000
9.000
10.000
11.000
12.000
13.000
14.000
15.000
16.000
17.000
18.000
19.000
20.000
21.000
22.000
22.131
29
28
46
16
37
39
40
42
34
20
5
7
34
28
38
26
34
35
11
3
9
5
5
8
17
14
2
1
5
6
-
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
No. of
Transforme
r
2
4
2
4
7
8
2
10
3
1
4
6
7
1
103/69
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
14.000
15.000
16.000
17.000
18.000
19.000
20.000
21.000
22.000
Location @ km
-0+735 0+000
0+000 1+000
1+000 2+000
2+000 3+000
3+000-4+000
3+662.35
4+000-5+000
5+000-6+000
5+355.54
5+392.06
6+000-7+000
7+000+8+000
8+000-9+000
9+000-10+000
9+512.22
10+000-11+000
11+000-12+000
15.000
16.000
17.000
18.000
19.000
20.000
21.000
22.000
22.131
1
4
4
1
10
7
6
2
11+026.26
22.24
11+046.26
21.56
12+000-13+000
12090.94
55
37
29
48
45
39
31
26
15
493.81
20.56
2
3
4
1
16
6
2
2
1
Distance Distance
From C/L From C/L
(L.H.S.)
(R.H.S.)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Crossing @ 3+662.35
0
0
0
0
Crossing @ 5+355.54
Crossing @ 5+392.06
0
0
0
0
0
0
Crossing @ 9+512.22
Crossing @
11+026.26
Crossing @
11+046.26
OFC
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
1.5 -2.0
104/69
Location @ km
13+000-14+000
14+000-15+000
15+000-16+000
Affected
Length
(L.H.S.)
80.65
273.74
16+627.25
20.10
16+647.25
20.55
16+000-17+000
17+000-18+000
18+000-19+000
19+000-20+000
715.15
42.69
20.10
19164.69
20.55
20+000-21+000
21+000-22+000
22+000-22+300
Crossing @
16+627.25
Crossing @
16+647.25
46.61
835.31
19144.69
609.45
-
Distance Distance
From C/L From C/L
(L.H.S.)
(R.H.S.)
OFC
OFC
OFC
OFC
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
Crossing @
19+144.69
Crossing @
19+164.69
OFC
OFC
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
VODAFONE
9+000-10+000
70.78
OFC
9+829.18
20.0
OFC
9+835
20.0
OFC
9+871.74
20.0
OFC
9+883.83
20.0
OFC
10+000-11+000
684.33
882.45
OFC
1.5 2.5
1.5 2.5
1.5 2.5
1.5 2.5
1.5 2.5
1.5 -2.5
10+046.96
20.0
OFC
1.5 -2.5
10+245.18
20.0
OFC
1.5 -2.5
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
8.45
Crossing @ 9+829.18
Crossing
@ 9+835
Crossing
@
10046.96
Crossing
@
10245.18
8.13
Crossing
@
9871.74
Crossing
@
9883.83
105/69
Location @ km
10+251.05
10+315.67
10+384.43
10+398.07
11+000-12+000
12+000-13+000
125010.1
13+000-14+000
13196.45
14+000-15+000
15+000-16+000
16+000-17+000
16852.44
17+000-18+000
17270.24
17+285.33
18+000-19+000
19+000-20+000
19+644.16
19+647.83
19+998
20+000-21+000
20+012.12
20+639.41
20+761.07
20+783.29
21+000-22+000
22+000-23+000
9+000 10+000
10+000
11+000
17+000
18+000
18+000
OFC
1.5 -2.5
OFC
1000
OFC
639.83
757.08
OFC
23.56
OFC
24.12
OFC
22.54
OFC
830.20
762.12
OFC
20.13
OFC
20.17
OFC
20.32
OFC
20.54
OFC
1000
OFC
6.24
OFC
AIRCEL
126.43
110.58
OFC
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
1.5 -2.5
26.65
Distance Distance
From C/L From C/L
(L.H.S.)
(R.H.S.)
Crossing @ 10251.05
Crossing @ 10315.67
Crossing @ 10384.43
Crossing @ 10398.07
8.0
8.0
8.0
Crossing @ 125010.1
8.0
8.0
Crossing @ 13196.45
8.0
8.0
Crossing @ 16852.44
8.0
8.0
Crossing
@
10046.96
Crossing @ 17285.33
8.0
0
8.0
8.0
Crossing @ 19644.16
Crossing @ 19647.83
Crossing @ 19998
8.0
8.0
Crossing @ 20012.12
Crossing @ 20639.41
Crossing @ 20761.07
Crossing @ 20783.29
8.0
8.0
-
2.0 3.0
7.28
8.11
OFC
2.0 3.0
7.25
8.09
31.18
OFC
2.0 3.0
7.00
7.50
999.81
OFC
2.0 3.0
7.65
8.20
998
1000
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
106/69
Location @ km
19+000
19+000
20+000
20+000
21+000
20+055
Affected
Length
(L.H.S.)
Distance Distance
From C/L From C/L
(L.H.S.)
(R.H.S.)
999.97
358.41
OFC
2.0 3.0
7.28
7.45
50.81
45.45
OFC
2.0 3.0
7.28
7.5
OFC
2.0 3.0
20.0
Crossing @20+055
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Distance
From C/L
(R.H.S.)
107/69
8+000 9+000
Affected
Length
(L.H.S.)
642
14+000 15+000
15+000 16+000
574
20+000 21+000
266
21+000 22+000
61
21+061
33
22+000 23+000
23+000 24+000
-0+735 0+000
-0+492
0+000 1+000
1+000 2+000
2+000 3+000
Affected
Length
( R.H.S.)
Description &
Size
8 Dia, High
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
8 Dia, High
594
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
8 Dia, High
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
8 Dia, High
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
8 Dia, High
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
8 Dia, High
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
8 Dia, High
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
8 Dia, High
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
GREEN GAS LIMITED
12 Dia, High
500.22
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
12 Dia, High
23.34
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
12 Dia, High
1000.44
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
12 Dia, High
998.84
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
12 Dia, High
182.16
Pressure Gas
Pipe Line
-
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Depth
(m)
Distanc
e From
C/L
(L.H.S.)
Distance
From C/L
(R.H.S.)
1.5 2.0
4.75
1.5 2.0
5.50
1.5 2.0
5.50
1.5 2.0
3.75
1.5 2.0
3.75
1.5 2.0
Crossing @ 21+061
6.60
1.5 2.0
7.40
1.5 2.0
9.57
1.5 2.0
9.15
1.5 2.0
1.5 2.0
108/69
Table 4.20 DETAILS OF AFFECTED LIGHT AND SIGNAL POLES East West
Corridor
DETAILS OF AFFECTED LIGHT/SIGNAL POLES
No. of
Start Chainage
End Chainage
No. of light
SN
signal
(in km)
(in km)
poles
poles
1
0.000
1.000
39
9
2
1.000
2.000
20
3
2.000
3.000
4
3.000
4.000
13
5
4.000
5.000
19
9
6
5.000
6.000
15
7
6.000
7.000
20
8
7.000
8.000
24
9
8.000
9.000
28
10
9.000
10.000
7
11
10.000
11.000
22
Table 4.21 DETAILS OF AFFECTED TELEPHONE POLES East West Corridor
DETAILS OF AFFECTED TELEPHONE POLES
End
No. of
Start Chainage
No. of telephone
SN
Chainage
Telephone
(in Km)
Junction box
(in Km)
poles
1
0.000
1.000
26
1
2
1.000
2.000
32
6
3
2.000
3.000
5
4
3.000
4.000
2
5
4.000
5.000
10
6
5.000
6.000
11
2
7
6.000
7.000
12
3
8
7.000
8.000
3
9
8.000
9.000
2
1
10
9.000
10.000
1
11
10.000
11.000
4
1
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
109/69
SN
Start Chainage
(in Km)
End
Chainage (in
Km)
No. of
Electric
poles
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
8.000
1.000
2.000
3.000
4.000
5.000
6.000
7.000
8.000
9.000
38
25
14
3
18
37
73
45
38
No. of
Electric
Junction
box
12
7
1
1
2
3
5
13
1
10
11
9.000
10.000
10.000
11.000
34
48
No. of
Transfo
rmer
OFC
OFC
OFC
OFC
OFC
20.0
OFC
359.05
OFC
1000
OFC
1000
OFC
1000
OFC
1000
OFC
1000
OFC
25.65
OFC
VODAFONE
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
1.5 -2.0
6
4
5
5
6
4
7
2
9.57
9.15
Distance
From C/L
(R.H.S.)
7.40
9.57
-
Crossing @ 4+598.73
110/69
Location@ km
-0+735 0+000
0+000 1+000
1+256.45
1+470.34
1+535.73
1+700.21
1+735.51
1+000 2+000
2+000 3+000
Distance Distance
From C/L From C/L
(L.H.S.)
(R.H.S.)
7.40
Crossing @ 1+256.45
Crossing @ 1+470.34
Crossing @ 1+535.73
Crossing @ 1+700.21
Crossing @ 1+735.51
9.57
9.57
9.15
-
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
111/69
SN
1
2
4.6
4.6.1
No. of Trees
461
158
Availability of land is one of the major prerequisites for a project in cities like
Lucknow. As the Metro alignment has to be planned on set standards and
parameters, it becomes difficult to follow the road alignment. Apart from alignment
the various structures like stations, parking facilities, traction sub stations,
communication towers, etc. require large plots of land. The land being scare, costly
and acquisition being complex process, the alignment is so planned that land
acquisition is required is minimum. Land is mainly required for:
-
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
112/69
brigade.
4.6.3
4.6.4
4.6.5
Plot No.
DETAILS
1
2
3
4
CCS1
CCS2
CCS3
AMA1
AMA2
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
AMA3
AMA4
AMA5
TPN1
TPN2
TPN3
TPN4
TPN5
KRN1
KRN2
KRN3
KRN4
SIN1
SIN2
SIN3
Open land
Open land
Open land
Open land
International tranformer
P(Ltd.)
Shanti sweet Shop
Open land
Open land
Open land
SHOPS
Open land
Open land
SHOPS
SHOPS
SHOPS
Open land
Open land
SHOPS
SHOPS
SHOPS
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
AREA (m2)
Govt
Private
1622.62
1408.56
639.56
226.50
OWNERSHIP
Government
Government
Government
Government
122.65
Private
242.32
Private
Government
Government
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
308.83
144.00
431.57
144.00
439.68
406.18
483.78
131.19
377.16
489.96
427.65
373.22
194.21
188.27
113/69
SN
Plot No.
DETAILS
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
SIN4
SIN5
ALB1
ALB2
ALB3
ALB4
ALBSTA1
ALBSTA2
ALBSTA3
ALBSTA4
ALBSTA5
Dug1
33
Dug2
34
Dug3
35
Dug4
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
Dug5
LKN1
LKN2
LKN3
LKN4
LKN5
HUS1
HUS2
44
HUS3
45
HUS4
46
HUS5
47
48
HUS6
SACH1
49
SACH2
50
SACH3
51
SACH4
52
SACH5
53
SACH6
54
55
56
HAZ1
HAZ2
KD1
57
KD2
58
59
60
KD3
KD4
KD5
SHOPS
SHOPS
Open land
SHOPS
Open land
Open land
Open land
SHOPS
SHOPS
Open land
Open land
Open land
Small Worksop and Open
Land
GRP quarters
Temporary Houses and
Open Land
Open Land
Railway Station Parking
Railway Quarters
Railway Quarters
Railway Station Parking
Railway Quarters
Open land
Open land
JITENDRA MISRA &
ELYSIUM
Open land
NATIONAL PROGREESIVE
SCHOOL
Open land
EYE HOSPITAL PVT
Paking Area of ALL INDIA
RADIO
open Area in ALL INDIA
RADIO Campus
SAHKANTA BHAWAN
Open Area inBapu
Bhawan Campus
Paking Area inBapu
Bhawan Campus
Parking Area
Open Area, Shops
Open Park
Park in Hotel Claark
Campus
Open Land
Temporary Houses
Open Land at Hotel Clarks
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
AREA (m2)
Govt
Private
144.00
331.47
459.10
417.71
600.17
661.98
166.81
262.09
127.97
390.76
716.34
253.35
OWNERSHIP
Private
Private
Government
Private
Government
Government
Private
Private
Private
Government
Government
Government
98.79
284.66
Private
Government
2232.36
Private
33.24
Government
Government
Government
Government
Government
Government
Government
Private
236.75
Private
33.24
Private
280.04
Government
236.20
Government
Private
145.96
178.15
375.17
377.04
374.77
149.09
268.67
349.09
236.24
Government
33.24
Government
33.24
Government
236.21
Government
236.21
Government
405.36
367.05
Government
Private
Government
310.40
Government
219.66
393.56
Government
Government
Private
654.89
3179.87
114/69
SN
Plot No.
61
62
63
VISH1
VISH2
VISH3
64
VISH4
65
66
67
IT1
IT2
IT3
68
IT4
69
MAH1
70
MAH2
71
MAH3
72
MAH4
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
BADS1
BADS2
BADS3
BADS4
LEKH1
LEKH2
LEKH3
LEKH4
RAM1
RAM2
RAM3
RAM4
IND1
IND2
IND3
IND4
MUN1
MUN2
MUN3
MUN4
DETAILS
AREA (m2)
Govt
Private
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
OWNERSHIP
Government
Government
Government
Government
Government
Government
Government
221.52
Private
357.92
Private
Government
244.04
Private
Government
461.01
455.93
499.46
391.21
908.05
168.66
398.07
770.12
387.20
331.77
448.91
313.74
300.55
304.53
312.66
20162.59
Private
Private
Government
Government
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Government
Government
Private
Private
Private
Private
Government
Private
Private
Private
Private
38509.31
115/69
Plot No.
DETAILS
1
2
3
CCST1
CCST2
AMAT1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
AMAT2
AMAT3
AMAT4
TPNT1
TPNT2
TPNT3
KRNT1
KRNT2
KRNT3
SINT1
ALBT1
15
16
17
18
ALBT2
ALBT3
ALBSTAT1
ALBSTAT2
19
20
21
MAWT1
MAWT2
MAWT3
22
23
24
25
MAWT4
DugT1
DugT2
DugT3
26
27
28
29
30
DugT4
LKNT1
LKNT2
LKNT3
LKNT4
31
HUST1
32
SACHT1
33
34
35
HAZT1
KDT1
KDT2
Open land
Open land
Open land
International tranformer
P(Ltd.)
Shanti sweet
Open land
Open land
Open land
Open land
Open land
Open land
shops
shops
Open land
Mani Baha Market &
Temple
Open land
Public Toilet
Open land
Army supply depot
boundary
Temporary Houses
House and College Campus
Army supply depot
boundary
Open Land
Small Workshop
GRP Quarters
Temporary Houses and
Shops
Railway Station Parking
Railway Quarters
Railway Quarters
Railway Station Parking
Vsha Fashion Design
School,
Aggarwal Building
Seventh Boy Adventis Sr
Sec School, Eye Hospital
Pvt ltd.
Jwala Sahortrivedi
buildings,
CATHEDRAL SR. SEC.
SCHOOL
Open Park
Park in Hotel Claark
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
AREA (m2)
Govt
Pvt
3910.30
654.84
855.78
443.84
196.35
188.30
228.23
270.78
222.29
198.41
419.10
96.47
175.66
213.83
205.35
238.07
OWNERSHIP
Government
Government
Government
Government
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Government
186.65
Private
Private
Government
Private
192.50
Government
Government
Private
195.23
205.46
142.77
205.69
303.16
134.84
330.22
Government
Government
Private
Government
587.37
Private
Government
Government
Government
Government
9070.49
Private
184.96
222.34
289.14
228.84
9170.97
Government
8892.47
208.39
337.12
Government
Government
Government
116/69
SN
Plot No.
36
37
KDT3
KDT4
38
39
40
41
42
43
KDT5
VISHT1
VISHT2
VISHT3
ITT1
ITT2
44
45
ITT3
MAHT1
46
MAHT2
47
MAHT3
48
MAHT4
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
MAHT5
BADST1
BADST2
LEKHT1
LEKHT2
LEKHT3
LEKHT4
RAMT1
RAMT2
RAMT3
59
INDT1
60
61
62
INDT2
INDT3
MUNT1
63
64
MUNT2
MUNT3
65
MUNT4
DETAILS
Campus
Open Land
Temporary Houses
Open Land at Hotel Clarks
campus, Houses and Open
land besides River Gomti
Management Girls Hostel
Management Girls Hostel
Reserve Police Line, ATM
Open Land
Reserve Police Line
Fornt Of Bloomfountain
Nirman Appartment
Shed
State Bank Of India,Munna
Trading Company
Deepak Cool Corner,
Saloon Shop, Temporary
shop
Temporary
Houses,Hotel,Pump
House&Tank
Deepak Cool Corner,Saloon
Shop
Open Land
SHOPS
Open Land
Open Land
Open Land
Shops
Open Land
Open Land
Open Land
Mahindra Tower ,Gopal
Plaza
Reliance Tower,Shivalik
Complex &Auto Service
Station
Deep Bhawan
Open Land
TATA BP.SOLAR INDIA
LTD ,HOUSE
PRAKASH PUNCHBATI
BUILDING
S.B Medical Shop &Shops
Maa Vindhyawasini
Traders
SUB TOTAL
TOTAL
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
AREA (m2)
Govt
Pvt
410.05
287.01
OWNERSHIP
Government
Government
805.24
172.25
85.88
158.56
327.13
197.58
170.11
Private
Government
Government
Government
Government
Government
385.73
Government
Private
177.38
Private
170.96
Private
305.63
Private
242.06
204.19
335.18
230.87
179.15
309.67
114.13
224.23
187.15
318.36
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
206.04
Government
195.41
230.71
113.96
Government
Government
Private
126.85
151.37
Private
Private
119.96
17312.92
Private
117/69
29436.08
46749.00
Plot No.
LKN1
LKN2
LKN3
LKN4
LKN5
LKN STAT6
GBM1
GBM2
9
10
11
12
13
GBM3
GBM4
GBM5
GBM6
GBM7
14
GBM8
15
GBM9
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
AMI1
AMI2
AMI3
AMI4
PAN1
PAN2
PAN3
CRS1
CRS2
CRS3
CRS4
MED1
MED2
MED3
MED4
MED5
MED6
NAW1
NAW2
NAW3
NAW4
NAW5
NAW6
DETAILS
EMPOLYMENT
EXCHANGE
RAILWAY
QUARTERS
Under constuction
Fob
Lucknow Railway
station park
Lucknow Railway
station
Open
Shops,
SAKET ELECTICALS
HARGOVIND DAYAL
COMPLEX
HOUSE
HOUSE
HOUSE
HOUSE
KULBHASKER
COMPLEX
SIMLAWALA
PALACE,HOTEL
MANDAKINI
Open
Open
Open
Open
Shops
Shops
Wine shop
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Open
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
AREA (m2)
OWNERSHIP
37.59
Government
417.19
Government
418.97
Government
1134.73
Government
133.62
Government
133.62
Government
73.72
Private
246.64
Private
33.88
628.52
33.87
246.76
37.08
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
288.55
Private
247.22
Private
317.68
263.28
584.88
487.98
2653.17
1866.11
27.95
1319.30
282.00
201.93
352.95
737.50
302.92
1859.58
405.74
755.57
226.41
243.08
95.24
263.75
693.46
79.05
308.83
Government
Government
Government
Government
Private
Private
Private
Government
Government
Government
Government
Government
Government
Private
Private
Government
Government
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
118/69
SN
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
Plot No.
THA1
THA2
THA3
THA4
BAL1
BAL2
BAL3
BAL4
SAF1
SAF2
SAF3
SAF4
MUS1
MUS2
MUS3
MUS4
VAS1
VAS2
VAS3
VAS4
DETAILS
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
TOTAL
AREA (m2)
218.67
168.44
709.52
394.73
587.73
623.19
207.79
253.64
638.95
311.70
296.22
372.80
536.81
449.74
545.40
427.41
390.25
390.74
323.04
471.81
26758.9
OWNERSHIP
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Plot No.
LKNT1
GBMT1
AMINT1
CRST1
MEDT1
NAWT1
THAT1
THAT2
BALT1
BALT2
BALT3
SAFT1
SAFT2
SAFT3
SAFT4
MUST1
MUST2
MUST3
MUST4
VAST1
VAST2
VAST3
VAST4
TOTAL
DETAILS
Cut and Cover
Cut and Cover
Cut and Cover
Cut and Cover
Cut and Cover
Cut and Cover
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
Shops
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
AREA (m2)
7346.77
8414.76
9264.58
10936.29
8219.29
5102.79
230.07
249.71
230.74
268.20
125.04
270.77
255.83
224.20
248.59
215.77
214.89
267.98
213.98
218.37
244.71
169.44
255.65
53188.39
OWNERSHIP
Government
Private
Government
Private
Government
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
Private
119/69
Corridor
Corridor 1 (NorthSouth)
Acquisition Type
Permanent
Temporary
Permanent
Corridor 2 (East- West)
Temporary
Total Permanent
Total Temporary
4.6.6
4.6.7
Location
N-S Corridor, Opposite to
Transport Nagar PAC Campus(
Including staff quarters -0.55 Ha
and PD area 0.93)
E-W Corridor Barren Land on
Hardoi Road behind Fish Mandi
Total
Land Area
(Ha)
Ownership
37.8
Government
12.33
Government
50.13
Location
Transport nagar Depot
Near Mawaiya Junction
Polytechnic Chauraha
Hardoi Road Depot
Total
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Ownership
Government
Government
Government
Government
120/69
4.6.8
SN
Plot
No.
1.
1RS2
2.
1RS3
3.
1RS4
4.
1RS4A
5.
1RS5
6.
1RS6
7.
1RS8
8.
1RS9
9.
1RS10
Between Stations
Area (m2)
Details
from
to
Govt
Private
Corridor 1- North South Corridor
CCS Airport
Amausi
Open land near Amausi
1694.27
Ramratan Sarees, Radhika
Singaar
Medical, Sangeeta Sweet,
Alambagh
517.04
Nagar
SHOPS
near
Lalbagh
Chowk
Railway Training center /
5003.78
Mawaiya
Durgapuri
Quarters near Mawaiya
Kiran X Ray, Shivam
Charbagh
Hussainganj Investment, Jain Hospital,
1942.89
Wine Shop, Workshop
K D Singh
Oriental Building and
Hazratganj
2672.44
Stadium
Shopping Mall
K D Singh
Park, GPO Land before
3847.44
Hazratganj
Stadium
Parivartan Chowk
Vishwavidy
Neeraj Rastogi's House
IT Collage
1129.88
alaya
Campus at IT Chowraha
Nirmal Niwas, Aggarwal
Building, Women's tailor
5484.76
IT Collage
Mahanagar shop, Showcem paint
shop, Temporary Shops,
Harshita Complex
IT Collage
Mahanagar Madanlal
Arora
9245.15
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
Ownership
Government
Private
Government
Government
Government
Private
Private
Private
121/69
SN
Plot
No.
Between Stations
from
to
Area (m2)
Govt
Private
Details
Ownership
General,English
Wine
Shop,Standrad
Auto
Motives,City Montessori
Inter College
10.
1RS10A
Mahanagar
Badshah
Nagar
11.
1RS11
Badshah
nagar
Lekhraj
Market
12.
1RS12
Indira
Nagar
Munshi Pulia
Shops at Mahanagar
2198.26
TOTAL AREA
2RS1
Nawajganj
2RS2
Nawajganj
2RS3
Vasantkunj
4.6.9
5873.59
Private
7783.78
Private
10545.49 36847.79
47393.28
2927.96
Private
2737.78
Private
1850.79
Private
7516.53
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
122/69
Description
Stations
Running
Section
RSS/TSS
Depots
Total
Corridor 1
(N-S Corridor)
Govt.
Private
1.83
2.02
Corridor 2
(E-W Corridor)
Govt.
Private
0.81
1.87
1.05
3.68
0.00
0.75
1.6
37.8
42.30
0.00
0.00
5.70
1.6
12.33
14.74
0.00
0.00
2.62
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
123/69
Total Land required permanently for both corridors: 57.04 Ha (Govt.) + 8.32 Ha
(Pvt.) = 65.36 Ha.
Table 4.36 SUMMARY OF TEMPORARY LAND REQUIREMENT (Ha)
Sr.
No.
1
2
3
Description
Stations
Running
Section
Construction
Depots
Total
Corridor 1
(N-S Corridor)
Govt.
Private
2.94
1.73
Corridor 2
(E-W Corridor)
Govt.
Private
2.48
2.84
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.73
0.25
0.23
3.67
1.98
2.71
2.84
Total Land required for temporarily for construction for both corridors: 6.38 Ha
(Govt.) + 4.82Ha (Pvt.) = 11.20 Ha.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
124/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
125/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
126/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
127/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
128/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
129/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
130/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
131/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
132/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
133/69
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
134/69
CHAPTER 5
TRAIN OPERATION PLAN
5.1
OPERATION PHILOSOPHY
The underlying operation philosophy is to make the MRT System more attractive and
economical, the main features being:
x
Selecting the most optimum frequency of Train services to meet sectional capacity
requirement during peak hours on most of the sections.
Economical & optimum train service frequency not only during peak period, but also
during off-peak period.
x
5.2
STATIONS
List of stations for the Corridors of Lucknow Metro are given below:
NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR
S. No
Name of Stations
Change (in
Inter Station
m)
Distance (in m)
Dead End
-735.00
NA
CCS Airport
-614.11
120.89
Elevated
Amausi
193.12
807.23
Elevated
Transport Nagar
1393.59
1200.47
Elevated
Krishna Nagar
2630.09
1236.50
Elevated
Singar Nagar
4214.40
1584.31
Elevated
Alambagh
5600.00
1385.60
Elevated
6312.51
712.51
Elevated
Mawaiya
7080.02
767.51
Elevated
Durgapuri
8256.95
1176.93
Elevated
Remarks
1/3
NORTH-SOUTH CORRIDOR
S. No
Name of Stations
Change (in
Inter Station
m)
Distance (in m)
9021.44
764.49
Elevated
11 HussainGunj
10392.47
1371.03
Underground
12 Sachiwalaya
11327.05
934.58
Underground
13 HazratGunj
12379.38
1052.33
Underground
13504.26
1124.88
Elevated
15 Vishwavidyalaya
14985.07
1480.81
Elevated
16 IT College Junction
15810.90
825.83
Elevated
17 Mahanagar
16903.84
1092.94
Elevated
18 Badshah Nagar
17577.28
673.44
Elevated
19 Lekhraj Market
18554.15
976.87
Elevated
19273.00
718.85
Elevated
21 Indra Nagar
20174.17
901.17
Elevated
22 Munshi Pulia
21734.66
1560.49
Elevated
22143.26
408.60
Elevated
Inter Station
Remarks
Dead End
Remarks
EAST-WEST CORRIDOR
S. No
Name of Stations
Change (in m)
Distance (in m)
Dead End
Charbagh / Lucknow
(-) 113.00
113
Underground
Railway Station
988.96
988.966
Underground
Aminabad
1953.42
964.46
Underground
Pandeyganj
2777.09
823.67
Underground
3694.07
916.98
Underground
Station
Medical Chauraha
4643.42
949.35
Underground
Nawajganj
5833.08
1189.66
Underground
2/3
EAST-WEST CORRIDOR
S. No
Name of Stations
Change (in m)
Inter Station
Remarks
Distance (in m)
8
Thakurganj
7175.47
1342.39
Elevated
Balaganj
8114.17
938.7
Elevated
10 Sarfarazganj
8794.08
679.91
Elevated
11 Musabagh
9723.75
929.67
Elevated
12 Vasant Kunj
10576.94
853.19
Elevated
10985
408.06
Dead End
5.3
5.3.1
Salient Features
x
Running of services for 19 hours of the day (5 AM to Midnight) with a station dwell
time of 30 seconds,
5.3.2
Traffic Demand
Peak hour peak direction traffic demands (PHPDT) for the Lucknow City North-South
Corridor & East- West Corridor for the year 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030 and 2041 for the
purpose of planning are indicated in Attachment I/A1, B1, C1, D1 & E1 and Attachment
I/A2, B2, C2, D2 & E2 respectively.
3/3
5.3.3
Train formation
To meet the above projected traffic demand, the possibility of running trains with
composition of 6 Car trains with different headway has been examined.
The basic unit of 6-car train comprising of DMC + TC + MC + MC + TC + DMC configuration
is selected for the Lucknow Metro Corridors for the year 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030 & 2041.
Composition
DMC
MC
: Motor Car
TC
: Trailer Car
6 Car Train:
5.3.4
4/3
Train operation plan with train carrying capacity @ 6 persons per square meter of
standee area on North- South Corridor are given below:
i)
Year 2015:
a) CCS Airport to Alambagh Bus Stand Section (Refer Attachment I/A1)
x 14 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 6746 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 8580 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 6172 is in the Section between Alambagh to
Alambagh Bus Stand and demand in the remaining sections is in the range of
259 to 4484 only. The planned capacity of 6746 (8580 under dense loading) is
more than the PHPDT demand in six sections of CCS Airport to Alambagh Bus
Stand section.
b) Alambagh Bus Stand to Mahanagar Section (Refer Attachment I/A1)
x 7 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 13491 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 17160 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 13190 is in the Section between Hussain
Gunj and Sachiwalaya and demand in the remaining sections is in the range of
8925 to 13066 only. The planned capacity of 13491 (17160 under dense
loading) is more than the PHPDT demand in ten sections of Alambagh Bus
Stand to Mahanagar Section.
c) Mahanagar to Munshi Pulia Section (Refer Attachment I/A1)
x 14 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 6746 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 8580 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
5/3
Year 2020:
a)
b)
6/3
With this planned PHPDT capacity, optimum utilization of Rolling Stock will be
achieved and empty running of trains will be considerably reduced. However, the
Rolling Stock is designed for carrying higher density loading @ 8 standee passengers
per square meter and in the sections in which PHPDT capacity exceeds the planned
capacity, overloading during these periods will help in reducing the demand for
increased deployment of Rolling Stock. Traffic demand and train capacity for this
corridor in the year 2020 is tabulated and represented on a chart enclosed as
Attachment I/B1.
iii) Year 2025:
a)
7/3
c)
With this planned PHPDT capacity, optimum utilization of Rolling Stock will be
achieved and empty running of trains will be considerably reduced. However, the
Rolling Stock is designed for carrying higher density loading @ 8 standee passengers
per square meter and in the sections in which PHPDT capacity exceeds the planned
8/3
capacity, overloading during these periods will help in reducing the demand for
increased deployment of Rolling Stock. Traffic demand and train capacity for this
corridor in the year 2025 is tabulated and represented on a chart enclosed as
Attachment I/C1.
iv) Year 2030:
a)
b)
c)
9/3
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 24024 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 21246 is in the Section between Mahanagar
and Badshah Nagar and demand in the remaining sections is in the range of
8288 to 17171 only. The planned capacity of 18888 (24024 under dense
loading) is less than the PHPDT demand in one (zero, with dense loading
capacity) sections out of three sections of Mahanagar to Munshi Pulia.
With this planned PHPDT capacity, optimum utilization of Rolling Stock will be
achieved and empty running of trains will be considerably reduced. However, the
Rolling Stock is designed for carrying higher density loading @ 8 standee passengers
per square meter and in the sections in which PHPDT capacity exceeds the planned
capacity, overloading during these periods will help in reducing the demand for
increased deployment of Rolling Stock. Traffic demand and train capacity for this
corridor in the year 2030 is tabulated and represented on a chart enclosed as
Attachment I/D1.
v)
Year 2041:
a)
b)
10/3
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 60060 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 44408 is in the Section between Hussain
Gunj and Sachiwalaya and demand in the remaining sections is in the range of
26335 to 42493 only. The planned capacity of 47220 (60060 under dense
loading) is more than the PHPDT demand in ten sections of Alambagh Bus
Stand to Mahanagar Section.
c)
With this planned PHPDT capacity, optimum utilization of Rolling Stock will be
achieved and empty running of trains will be considerably reduced. However, the
Rolling Stock is designed for carrying higher density loading @ 8 standee passengers
per square meter and in the sections in which PHPDT capacity exceeds the planned
capacity, overloading during these periods will help in reducing the demand for
increased deployment of Rolling Stock. Traffic demand and train capacity for this
corridor in the year 2041 is tabulated and represented on a chart enclosed as
Attachment I/E1.
5.3.4.2 East- West Corridor:
Train Operation Plan for Lucknow Railway Station to Vasant Kunj has been planned in
such a way that there are two loops of train operation. In one loop, trains run from
Lucknow Railway Station to Vasant Kunj at a given headway and in other loop trains run
11/3
from Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj at the same headway, thus resulting in half
the headway in Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj as compared to Thakurganj to
Vasant Kunj.
For this Train operation Plan, Reversal Facility is required at Thakurganj.
Train operation plan with train carrying capacity @ 6 persons per square meter of
standee area on Corridor-II is given below:
i)
Year 2015:
a) Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj Section (Refer Attachment I/A2)
x 11 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 8585 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 10920 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 8104 is in the Section between Lucknow Rly.
Stn. and Gautam Buddha Marg and demand in the remaining sections is in the
range of 2537 to 7923 only. The planned capacity of 8585 (10920 under dense
loading) is more than the PHPDT demand in seven sections of Lucknow
Railway Station to Thakurganj Section.
b) Thakurganj to Vasant kunj Section (Refer Attachment I/A2)
x 22 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 4293 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 5460 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 1813 is in the Section between Thakurganj
and Balaganj and demand in the remaining sections is in the range of 180 to
1291 only. The planned capacity of 4293 (5460 under dense loading) is more
than the PHPDT demand in four sections of Thakurganj to Vasant kunj Section.
12/3
With this planned PHPDT capacity, optimum utilization of Rolling Stock will be
achieved and empty running of trains will be considerably reduced. However, the
Rolling Stock is designed for carrying higher density loading @ 8 standee passengers
per square meter and in the sections in which PHPDT capacity exceeds the planned
capacity, overloading during these periods will help in reducing the demand for
increased deployment of Rolling Stock. Traffic demand and train capacity for this
corridor in the year 2015 is tabulated and represented on a chart enclosed as
Attachment I/A2.
ii)
Year 2020:
a) Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj Section (Refer Attachment I/B2)
x 6.5 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 14529 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 18480 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 14157 is in the Section between Lucknow
Rly. Stn. and Gautam Buddha Marg and demand in the remaining sections is in
the range of 5116 to 13814 only. The planned capacity of 14529 (18480 under
dense loading) is more than the PHPDT demand in seven sections of Lucknow
Railway Station to Thakurganj Section.
b) Thakurganj to Vasant kunj Section (Refer Attachment I/B2)
x 13 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 7265 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 9240 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 3638 is in the Section between Thakurganj
and Balaganj and demand in the remaining sections is in the range of 428 to
1881 only. The planned capacity of 7265 (9240 under dense loading) is more
than the PHPDT demand in four sections of Thakurganj to Vasant kunj Section.
13/3
With this planned PHPDT capacity, optimum utilization of Rolling Stock will be
achieved and empty running of trains will be considerably reduced. However, the
Rolling Stock is designed for carrying higher density loading @ 8 standee passengers
per square meter and in the sections in which PHPDT capacity exceeds the planned
capacity, overloading during these periods will help in reducing the demand for
increased deployment of Rolling Stock. Traffic demand and train capacity for this
corridor in the year 2020 is tabulated and represented on a chart enclosed as
Attachment I/B2.
iii)
Year 2025:
a) Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj Section (Refer Attachment I/C2)
x 4.5 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 20987 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 26693 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 21434 is in the Section between Lucknow
Rly. Stn. and Gautam Buddha Marg and demand in the remaining sections is in
the range of 8247 to 20979 only. The planned capacity of 20987 (26693 under
dense loading) is more than the PHPDT demand in seven sections of Lucknow
Railway Station to Thakurganj Section.
b) Thakurganj to Vasant kunj Section (Refer Attachment I/C2)
x 9 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 10493 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 13347 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 5765 is in the Section between Thakurganj
and Balaganj and demand in the remaining sections is in the range of 598 to
2319 only. The planned capacity of 10493 (13347 under dense loading) is
more than the PHPDT demand in four sections of Thakurganj to Vasant kunj
Section.
14/3
With this planned PHPDT capacity, optimum utilization of Rolling Stock will be
achieved and empty running of trains will be considerably reduced. However, the
Rolling Stock is designed for carrying higher density loading @ 8 standee passengers
per square meter and in the sections in which PHPDT capacity exceeds the planned
capacity, overloading during these periods will help in reducing the demand for
increased deployment of Rolling Stock. Traffic demand and train capacity for this
corridor in the year 2025 is tabulated and represented on a chart enclosed as
Attachment I/C2.
iv)
Year 2030:
a) Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj Section (Refer Attachment I/D2)
x 3 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 31480 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 40040 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 29171 is in the Section between Lucknow
Rly. Stn. and Gautam Buddha Marg and demand in the remaining sections is in
the range of 11457 to 28893 only. The planned capacity of 31480 (40040
under dense loading) is more than the PHPDT demand in seven sections of
Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj Section.
b) Thakurganj to Vasant kunj Section (Refer Attachment I/D2)
x 6 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 15740 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 20020 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 7522 is in the Section between Thakurganj
and Balaganj and demand in the remaining sections is in the range of 714 to
2731 only. The planned capacity of 15740 (20020 under dense loading) is
15/3
more than the PHPDT demand in four sections of Thakurganj to Vasant kunj
Section.
With this planned PHPDT capacity, optimum utilization of Rolling Stock will be
achieved and empty running of trains will be considerably reduced. However, the
Rolling Stock is designed for carrying higher density loading @ 8 standee passengers
per square meter and in the sections in which PHPDT capacity exceeds the planned
capacity, overloading during these periods will help in reducing the demand for
increased deployment of Rolling Stock. Traffic demand and train capacity for this
corridor in the year 2030 is tabulated and represented on a chart enclosed as
Attachment I/D2.
v)
Year 2041:
a) Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj Section (Refer Attachment I/E2)
x 2.5 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 37776 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 48048 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 36196 is in the Section between Lucknow
Rly. Stn. and Gautam Buddha Marg and demand in the remaining sections is in
the range of 14674 to 35526 only. The planned capacity of 37776 (48048
under dense loading) is more than the PHPDT demand in seven sections of
Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj Section.
b) Thakurganj to Vasant kunj Section (Refer Attachment I/E2)
x 5 min Headway with 6-car train.
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 18888 @ 6 persons per square
meter of standee area
x Available Peak Hour Peak Direction Capacity of 24024 @ 8 persons per square
meter of standee area under dense loading conditions.
x The maximum PHPDT demand of 9110 is in the Section between Thakurganj
and Balaganj and demand in the remaining sections is in the range of 927 to
3600 only. The planned capacity of 18888 (24024 under dense loading) is
16/3
more than the PHPDT demand in four sections of Thakurganj to Vasant kunj
Section.
With this planned PHPDT capacity, optimum utilization of Rolling Stock will be
achieved and empty running of trains will be considerably reduced. However, the
Rolling Stock is designed for carrying higher density loading @ 8 standee passengers
per square meter and in the sections in which PHPDT capacity exceeds the planned
capacity, overloading during these periods will help in reducing the demand for
increased deployment of Rolling Stock. Traffic demand and train capacity for this
corridor in the year 2041 is tabulated and represented on a chart enclosed as
Attachment I/E2.
The above Train Operation Plan is based on calculations on the basis of available
traffic data. In case of any mismatch in the capacity provided and the actual traffic, the
capacity can be moderated suitably by adjusting the Headway.
The PHPDT capacity provided on the all sections in different years of operation is
tabulated below:
17/3
Year
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
Alambagh Bus Stand
to Mahanagar
Headway
(min)
2015
13
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
9
2020
4.5
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
7
2025
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
2030
2.5
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
78
13190
13491
(17160)*
8451
6746
(8580*)
9658
18
23
6 car
6 car
108
138
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
6 car
6746
(8580*)
20976
10493
(13347*)
20987
(26693)*
13498
10493
(13347*)
13159
13491
(17160*)
26983
(34320)*
25890
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
3.5
14
No. of
Coaches
14
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
No. of
Rake
Rakes Consist
2041
30
38
6 car
6 car
180
228
15644
13491
(17160*)
14995
18888
(24024*)
37776
(48048)*
34955
21246
18888
(24024*)
19581
23610
(30030*)
44408
47220
(60060*)
26894
23610
(30030*)
18/3
Lucknow Railway
Station to Thakurganj
Year
Headway
(min)
No. of
Rakes
Rake
Consist
No. of
Coaches
2015
11
6 car
42
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
Lucknow Railway
Station to Thakurganj
2020
Lucknow Railway
Station to Thakurganj
1831
6.5
14157
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
Lucknow Railway
Station to Thakurganj
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
54
3638
21434
4.5
12
6 car
72
2030
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
Lucknow Railway
Station to Thakurganj
6 car
13
2025
5765
29171
3
17
6 car
102
2041
8104
22
9
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
Max. PHPDT
PHPDT Capacity
Demand Available
7522
36196
2.5
20
5
6 car
120
9110
8585
(10920*
)
4293
(5460)*
14529
(18480*
)
7265
(9240)*
20987
(26693*
)
10493
(13347)
*
31480
(40040*
)
15740
(20020)
*
37776
(48048*
)
18888
(24024*
)
19/3
5.3.5
North-South
Corridor
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus
Stand
Alambagh Bus
Stand to
Mahanagar
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
Peak
Hour
h/w
14
min
7 min
14
min
Lean
Hour
h/w
20 to
60
min
10 to
30
min
20 to
60
min
2020
2025
2030
Peak
Hour
h/w
Lean
Hour
h/w
Peak
Hour
h/w
Lean
Hour
h/w
Peak
Hour
h/w
9
min
12 to
40 min
7 min
10 to
30 min
5 min
4.5
min
6 to 20
min
3.5
min
5 to 15
min
2.5
min
9
min
12 to
40 min
7 min
10 to
30 min
5 min
2041
Lean
Hour
h/w
8 to
20
min
4 to
10
min
8 to
20
min
Peak
Hour
h/w
Lean
Hour
h/w
4
min
6 to 20
min
2
min
3 to
10min
4
min
6 to 20
min
No services are proposed between 00.00 hrs to 5.00 hrs, which are reserved for
maintenance of infrastructure and rolling stock.
B) East-West corridor
2015
East-West
Corridor
Peak
Hour
h/w
Lucknow Railway
Station to
Thakurganj
11
min
Thakurganj to
Vasant kunj
22
min
Lean
Hour
h/w
16 to
40
min
32 to
80
min
2020
2025
2030
Peak
Hour
h/w
Lean
Hour
h/w
Peak
Hour
h/w
Lean
Hour
h/w
Peak
Hour
h/w
6.5
min
10 to
30 min
4.5
min
6 to 20
min
3 min
13
min
20 to
60 min
9 min
12 to
40 min
6 min
2041
Lean
Hour
h/w
5 to
15
min
10 to
30
min
Peak
Hour
h/w
Lean
Hour
h/w
2.5
min
4 to 10
min
5
min
8 to
20min
No services are proposed between 00.00 hrs to 5.00 hrs, which are reserved for
maintenance of infrastructure and rolling stock.
5.3.6
20/3
Stand
enclosed as Attachment II. Number of train trips per direction per day for above corridors
are worked out as 50,100 & 50 in the year 2015, 79, 158 & 79 in the year 2020, 100, 200 &
100 in the year 2025, 140, 280 & 140 in the year 2030 and 168, 336 & 168 in the year 2041
respectively. The directional splits for North-South Corridor are presented in Table 2.1
enclosed as Attachment III.
B) East- West Corridor:
The hourly distribution of daily transport capacity is presented in Table 2.1A, 2.1B, 2.2A,
2.2B, 2.3A, 2.3B, 2.4A, 2.4B, 2.5A & 2.5B for years 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030 & 2041 for
Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj section & Thakurganj to Vasant kunj section
respectively and enclosed as Attachment II. Number of train trips per direction per day for
above corridors are worked out as 64 & 32 in the year 2015, 106 & 53 in the year 2020,
158 & 79 in the year 2025, 216 & 108 in the year 2030 and 280 & 140 in the year 2041
respectively. The directional splits for East- West Corridor are presented in Table 2.2
enclosed as Attachment III.
5.3.7
Vehicle Kilometer
Based on above planning, after considering maintenance period and assuming 340 days in
service in a year, Vehicle Kilometers for North South corridor and East- West Corridor is
given in Table 3.1 & 3.2 enclosed as Attachment IV.
5.4
21/3
II)
III)
Coach requirement has been calculated based on headway during peak hours.
Traffic reserve is taken as one train per section to cater to failure of train on line
and to make up for operational time lost.
IV)
V)
VI)
VII)
5.5
COST ESTIMATE
The estimated cost per coach at May 2010 Price level exclusive of taxes and duties may be
assumed as Rs. 9.8 Crores per Coach. Total 78+42 = 120 coaches are required in year 2015
for the two Lines. Hence budget provision of Rs. 1200 Crores is to be kept in the Estimate
for Rolling Stock.
22/3
23/3
24/3
25/3
26/3
27/3
28/3
29/3
30/3
31/3
32/3
33/3
34/3
35/3
36/3
37/3
38/3
39/3
40/3
41/3
42/3
43/3
44/3
45/3
46/3
47/3
48/3
49/3
50/3
51/3
52/3
53/3
54/3
55/3
56/3
57/3
58/3
59/3
60/3
61/3
62/3
63/3
Train Operation Plan for CCS Airport to Munshipulia has been planned in such a way
that there are two loops of train operation. In one loop, trains run from CCS Airport to
Munshipulia at a given headway and in other loop trains run from Alambagh Bus Stand
to Mahanagar at the same headway, thus resulting in half the headway in Alambagh Bus
Stand to Mahanagar as compared to CCS Airport to Alambagh Bus Stand & Mahanagar to
Munshipulia.
For this Train operation Plan, Reversal Facilities are required at Alambagh Bus Stand
and Mahanagar.
Train Operation Plan for Lucknow Railway Station to Vasant Kunj has been planned in
such a way that there are two loops of train operation. In one loop, trains run from
Lucknow Railway Station to Vasant Kunj at a given headway and in other loop trains
run from Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj at the same headway, thus resulting
in half the headway in Lucknow Railway Station to Thakurganj as compared to
Thakurganj to Vasant Kunj.
64/3
3. Number of Stations:
i) North-South Corridor:
a) CCS Airport to Munshipulia : 22
b) Alambagh Bus Stand to Mahanagar: 12
5. Gauge: 1435 mm
6. Traction Power Supply
i) Voltage: 25 KV AC
ii) Current Collection: Overhead Current Collection system
7. Rolling Stock:
i)
Coach Size:
Particular
Length*
Width
Height
21.64m
2.9 m
3.9 m
21.34 m
2.9 m
3.9 m
ii)
65/3
PARTICULAR
SEATED
STANDING
TOTAL
DMC
43
204
247
TC/MC
50
220
270
286
1288
1574
TARE
PASSENGER
GROSS
40
16.055
56.055
TC
40
17.55
57.55
MC
40
17.55
57.55
6-CAR
240
102.31
342.31
6-CAR
Seating: Longitudinal
iii)
Weight:
PARTICULAR
DMC
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
ix)
x)
xi)
Cost per car: Rs.10 Crores exclusive of taxes and duties at May 2010 Price Level.
xii)
66/3
Year
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
Alambagh Bus Stand
to Mahanagar
Headway
(min)
2015
13
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
9
2020
4.5
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
2025
3.5
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
2030
2.5
CCS Airport to
Alambagh Bus Stand
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
13190
13491
(17160)*
8451
6746
(8580*)
9658
18
23
6 car
6 car
108
138
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
78
6746
(8580*)
20976
10493
(13347*)
20987
(26693)*
13498
10493
(13347*)
13159
13491
(17160*)
26983
(34320)*
25890
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
6 car
14
Max.
PHPDT
PHPDT Capacity
Demand Available
6172
14
Mahanagar to
Munshipulia
No. of
Rake
No. of
Rakes Consist Coaches
2041
30
38
6 car
6 car
180
228
15644
13491
(17160*)
14995
18888
(24024*)
37776
(48048)*
34955
21246
18888
(24024*)
19581
23610
(30030*)
44408
47220
(60060*)
26894
23610
(30030*)
67/3
2015
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
Lucknow Railway
Station to Thakurganj
2020
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
6 car
42
6 car
54
13
2025
2030
8104
8585
(10920*)
1831
4293
(5460)*
14157
21434
4.5
12
6 car
72
5765
29171
3
17
6 car
102
2041
Max. PHPDT
PHPDT Capacity
Demand Available
3638
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
Lucknow Railway
Station to Thakurganj
6.5
9
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
Lucknow Railway
Station to Thakurganj
No. of
Coaches
22
Thakurganj to Vasant
kunj
Lucknow Railway
Station to Thakurganj
11
Rake
Consist
7522
36196
2.5
20
5
6 car
120
9110
14529
(18480*)
7265
(9240)*
20987
(26693*)
10493
(13347)*
31480
(40040*)
15740
(20020)*
37776
(48048*)
18888
(24024*)
68/3
CHAPTER - 6
ROLLING STOCK
6.1
INTRODUCTION
The required transport demand forecast is the governing factor for the choice of the
Rolling Stock. The forecasted Peak Hour Peak Direction Traffic calls for an Medium Rail
Transit System (MRTS).
6.2
6.2.1
1/3
6 Car Train
Normal
Crush
Normal
Crush
Normal
Crush
Seated
43
43
50
50
286
286
Standing
102
204
110
220
644
1288
Total
145
247
160
270
930
1574
6.3
WEIGHT
The weights of motorcar and trailer cars have been estimated as in Table 3, referring to
the experiences in Delhi Metro. The average passenger weight has been taken as 65 kg.
DMC
TC
MC
6 Car train
40
40
40
240
(Normal)
9.425
10.4
10.4
60.45
(Crush @6p/sqm)
16.055
17.55
17.55
102.31
(Crush @8p/sqm)
20.475
22.295
22.295
130.22
(Normal)
49.425
50.4
50.4
300.45
(Crush @6p/sqm)
56.055
57.55
57.55
342.31
(Crush @8p/sqm)
60.475
62.295
62.295
370.22
Axle Load
@6
person/sqm
14.014
14.388
14.388
15.577
15.574
TARE (maximum)
Passenger
Gross
Axle Load
@8
person/sqm
15.119
2/3
The axle load @ 6persons/sqm of standing area works out in the range of 14.014T to
14.388T. Heavy rush of passenger, having 8 standees per sq. meter can be experienced
occasionally. It will be advisable to design the coach with sufficient strength so that even
with this overload, the design will not result in over stresses in the coach. Coach and
bogie should, therefore, be designed for 16 T axle load.
6.4
PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS
The recommended performance parameters are:
Maximum Design Speed: 95 kmph
Maximum Operating Speed: 85 kmph
Max. Acceleration: 1.0 m/s2 to 1.1 m/s2 + 5%
Max. Deceleration 1.1 m/s2 (Normal brake)
More than 1.3 m/s2 (Emergency brake)
Accelerating
Decelerating
Coasting
Velocity n
-1.1m/s
2
Time o
6.5
3/3
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
(viii)
(ix)
Energy efficiency
Light weight equipment and coach body
Optimized scheduled speed
Aesthetically pleasing Interior and Exterior
Low Life cycle cost
Flexibility to meet increase in traffic demand
Anti-telescopic
The controlling criteria are reliability, low energy consumption, lightweight and high
efficiency leading to lower annualized cost of service. The coach should have high rate of
acceleration and deceleration.
6.6
SELECTION OF TECHNOLOGY
CAR BODY
In the past carbon high tensile steel was invariably used for car bodies. In-fact almost
all the coaches built by Indian Railways are of this type. These steel bodied coaches need
frequent painting and corrosion repairs, which may have to be carried out up to 4-5
times during the service life of these coaches. It is now a standard practice to adopt
stainless steel or aluminum for carbody.
The car bodies with aluminum require long and complex extruded sections which are
still not manufactured in India. Therefore aluminum car body has not been considered
for use. Stainless steel sections are available in India and therefore stainless steel car
bodies have been specified. No corrosion repair is necessary on stainless steel cars
during their service life.
Stainless steel car body leads to energy saving due to its lightweight. It also results in
cost saving due to easy maintenance and reduction of repair cost from excellent anti
corrosive properties as well as on improvement of riding comfort and safety in case of a
crash or fire.
4/3
6.6.3
BOGIES
Bolster less lightweight fabricated bogies with rubber springs are now universally
adopted in metro cars. These bogies require less maintenance and overhaul interval is
also of the order of 4,20,000km. Use of air spring at secondary stage is considered with
a view to keep the floor level of the cars constant irrespective of passenger loading
unlike those with coil spring. Perturbation from the track are also dampened inside the
car body on account of the secondary air spring along with suitable Vertical Hydraulic
Damper .The primary suspension system improve the curve running performance by
reducing lateral forces through application of conical rubber spring. A smooth curving
performance with better ride index is being ensured by provision of above type of
bogies.
6.6.4
BRAKING SYSTEM
The brake system shall consist of
(i)
An electro-pneumatic (EP) service friction brake
(ii)
A fail safe, pneumatic friction emergency brake
(iii)
A spring applied air-release parking brake
(iv)
An electric regenerative service brake
(v)
Provision of smooth and continuous blending of EP and regenerative braking
The regenerative braking will be the main brake power of the train and will regain the
maximum possible energy and pump it back to the system and thus fully utilize the
advantage of 3 phase technology .The regenerative braking should have air supplement
control to bear the load of trailer car. In addition, speed sensors mounted on each axle,
control the braking force of the axles with anti skid valves, prompting re-adhesion in
case of a skid .The brake actuator shall operate either a tread brake or a wheel disc
brake, preferably a wheel disc brake.
6.6.5
5/3
VVVF control is that regenerative braking can be introduced by lowering the frequency
and the voltage to reverse the power flow and to allow braking to very low speed.
For this corridor, three phase a.c. traction drive that are self-ventilated, highly reliable,
robust construction and back up by slip/slid control have been recommended for
adoption.
The AC catenary voltage is stepped down through a transformer and converted to DC
voltage through converter and supply voltage to DC link, which feeds Inverter operated
with Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) control technology and using Insulated Gate
Bipolar Transistors (IGBT). Thus three-phase variable voltage variable frequency output
drives the traction motors for propulsion.
Recently advanced IGBT has been developed for inverter units. The advanced IGBT
contains an Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) and gate drive circuit and
protection. The advanced IGBT incorporates its own over current protection, short
circuit protection, over temperature protection and low power supply detection. The
IGBT has internal protection from over current, short circuit, over temperature and low
control voltage.
The inverter unit uses optical fiber cable to connect the control unit to the gate
interface. This optical fiber cable transmits the gate signals to drive the advanced IGBT
via the gate interface. This optical fiber cable provides electrical isolation between the
advanced IGBT and the control unit and is impervious to electrical interference. These
are recommended for adoption in Trains of MRTS.
6.6.6 INTERIOR AND GANGWAYS
Passenger capacity of a car is maximized in a Metro System by providing longitudinal
seats for seating and utilizing the remaining space for standing passenger. Therefore all
the equipments are mounted on the under frame for maximum space utilization. The
gangways are designed to give a wider comfortable standing space during peak hours
along with easy and faster passenger movement especially in case of emergency.
6/3
Interior View
6.6.7
PASSENGER DOORS
For swift evacuation of the passenger in short dwell period, four doors of adequate
width, on each side of the coach have been considered. These doors shall be of such
dimensions and location that all the passenger inside the train are able to evacuate
within least possible time without conflicting movement .As the alignment passes
through elevated section above ground, automatic door closing mechanism is envisaged
from consideration of passenger safety. Passenger doors are controlled electrically by a
switch in Driver cab. Electrically controlled door operating mechanism has been
preferred over pneumatically operated door to avoid cases of air leakage and sluggish
operation of doors.
The door shall be of Bi-parting Sliding Type as in the existing coaches of DMRC.
Passenger Doors
7/3
6.6.8
AIRCONDITIONING
With heavy passenger loading of 6 persons/sqm for standee area and doors being
closed from consideration of safety and with windows being sealed type to avoid
transmission of noise, air conditioning of coaches has been considered essential. Each
coach shall be provided with two air conditioning units capable of cooling, heating and
dehumidifying and thus automatically controlling interior temperature throughout the
passenger area at 25C with 65% RH all the times under varying ambient conditions up
to full load. For emergency situations such as power failure or both AC failures etc,
ventilation provision supplied from battery will be made. Provision shall be made to
shut off the fresh air intake and re-circulate the internal air of the coach, during an
emergency condition, such as fire outside the train causing excessive heat and smoke to
be drawn in to the coach.
6.6.9
Driving Cab
An emergency door for easy detrainment of the passenger on the track has been
provided at the center of the front side of the each cabin which has a easy operation
with one handle type master controller.
6.6.10 COMMUNICATION
The driving cab of the cars are provided with continuous communication with base
Operational Control Center and station control for easy monitoring of the individual
train in all sections at all the time .
8/3
Public Address and Passenger Information Display System is provided in the car so that
passengers are continuously advised of the next stoppage station, final destination
station, interchange station, emergency situations if any, and other messages. The
rolling stock is provided with Talk Back Units inside the cars, which permit
conversation between passengers and the drivers in case of any emergency.
6.6.11 NOISE AND VIBRATION
The trains will pass through heavily populated urban area .The noise and vibration for a
metro railway become an important criteria from public acceptance view point. The
source of noise are (i) rail-wheel interaction (ii) noise generated from equipment like
Blower, Compressor, air conditioner, door, Inverter etc. (iii) traction motor in running
train .For elimination and reduction of noise following feature are incorporated: x
x
x
x
x
x
x
The lower vibration level has been achieved by provision of bolster less type bogies
having secondary air spring.
6.6.12 PASSENGER SAFETY FEATURES
(i)
ATP
The rolling stock is provided with Continuous Automatic Train Protection to
ensure absolute safety in the train operation. It is an accepted fact that 60-70%
of the accidents take place on account of human error. Adoption of this system
reduces the possibility of human error.
(II)
FIRE
The rolling stock is provided with fire retarding materials having low fire load,
low heat release rate, low smoke and toxicity inside the cars. The electric cables
used are also normally low smoke zero halogen type which ensures passenger
safety in case of fire.
9/3
(iii)
EMERGENCY DOOR
The rolling stock is provided with emergency doors at both ends of the cab to
ensure well directed evacuation of passengers in case of any emergency
including fire in the train,
(iv)
(v)
GANGWAYS
Broad gangways are provided in between the cars to ensure free passenger movement
between cars in case of any emergency.
Gangways
10/3
Attachment-I
5.4
5.5
6
6.1
6.2
7
Parameter
Gauge (Nominal)
Traction system
Voltage
Method of current collection
Train composition (6 Car)
Coach Body
Coach Dimensions
Height
Width
Length over body (approx)
- Driving Motor Car (DMC)
- Trailer Car (TC)
- Motor Car (MC)
Maximum length of coach over
couplers/buffers:
Locked down Panto height (if applicable)
Floor height
Designed - Passenger Loading
Design of Propulsion equipment
Design of Mechanical systems
Carrying capacity- @ 6 standees/sqm
Details
1435mm
25 KV AC
Overhead Current Collection System
DMC+TC+MC+MC+TC+DMC
Stainless Steel
3.9 m
2.9 m
21.64 m
21.34 m
21.34 m
22 to 22.6 m (depending upon Kinematic Envelop)
4048 mm
1100mm
8 Passenger/ m2
10 Passenger/ m2
Weight (Tonnes)
11/3
S. No.
Parameter
DMC
TC
MC
Axle load(T)(@ 8 persons per sqm of
standee area)
Details
56.055
57.55
57.55
15.57
System should be designed for 16T axleload
10
11
10.1
10.2
12
13
13.1
13.1.1
13.1.2
13.2
13.2.1
13.2.2
13.3
136. m
95 Kmph
85 Kmph
UIC 510-2
LpAFmax 65 dB(A)
LpAFmax 68 dB(A)
LpAeq,30 72 dB(A)
LpAFmax 85 dB(A)
LpAFmax 72 dB(A)
14
Self
15
16
17
18
Type of Bogie
Secondary Suspension springs
Fabricated
Air
19
Brakes
20
Coupler
Auto
12/3
S. No.
Parameter
Details
Semi-permanent couplers
21
Detrainment Door
Front
22
23
24
24.1
24.2
24.3
25
26
27
27.1
Type of Doors
Passenger Seats
Cooling
Transformer
CI & SIV
TM
Control System
Traction Motors
Temperature Rise Limits
Traction Motor
Sliding
Stainless Steel
28
HVAC
29
30
31
32
33
Coasting
34
35
36
Gradient (max)
Insulated Mat on roof
Average Cost per car exclusive of taxes
and duties at Oct 2008 Price level in Rs.
Crores
Maximum Available PHPDT capacity
37
38
Forced
Self/Forced
Self ventilated
Train based Monitor & Control System (TCMS/TIMS)
3 phase VVVF controlled
Temperature Index minus 70 deg C
10 deg C temperature margin for Junction
temperature
IEC specified limit minus 20 deg C
- Cooling, Heating & Humidifier (As required)
- Automatic controlling of interior temperature
throughout the passenger area at 25C with 65% RH
all the times under varying ambient conditions up to
full load.
Required
Required
Lead Acid Maintenance free
LED
8% (Run time with 8% coasting shall be the 'Run Time
in All out mode plus 8%')
- One serviceable fully loaded 6-car train shall be
capable of pushing a fully loaded defective 6-car train
without parking brakes applied on all sections
including section of 3% gradient up to next station.
Thereafter, after pasenger detrainment, the heathy
train shall push the defective train till terminal station.
- A 6-car fully loaded train shall be capable of clearing
the section with the traction motors of one 3-car unit
cut out.
3%
Required
9.8
37,776 @ 2.5 min headway
13/3
CHAPTER - 7
POWER SUPPLY ARRANGEMENTS
7.1
POWER REQUIREMENTS
Electricity is required for operation of Metro system for running of trains, station services
(e.g. lighting, lifts, escalators, signaling telecom, fire fighting etc) and workshops, depots &
other maintenance infrastructure within premises of metro system. The power
requirements of a metro system are determined by peak-hour demands of power for
traction and auxiliary applications. Broad estimation of auxiliary and traction power
demand is made based on the following requirements:(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Elevated station load initially 200KW, which will increase to 500 KW in the year
2041.
(iv)
Underground Station load initially 2000 kW, which will increase to 2500 kW in the
year 2041.
(v)
Depot auxiliary load - initially 1500KW, which will increase to 2500 KW in the year
2041.
Keeping in view of the train operation plan and demand of auxiliary and traction power,
power requirement projected for the year 2015, 2020, 2025, 2030 and 2041 respectively
are summarized in table 7.1 below:Table 7.1 - Power Demand Estimation (MVA)
Year
Corridor
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
7.27
10.97
13.98
19.46
23.78
16.68
18.16
24.09
24.09
27.64
32.14
43.55
47.86
5.08
6.92
10.11
11.69
Traction
Traction
3.26
1/3
Year
Corridor
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
(Lucknow
Railway
Station
to Auxiliary 20.38
Vasantkunj, 11.10 km with 5 elevated
Total
23.64
and 7 U/G stations )
23.47
24.15
27.79
27.79
28.55
31.07
37.90
39.48
Detailed calculations of power demand estimation are attached at Annexure 7.1 & 7.2
7.2
7.3
2/3
shared between the two RSS feeding each corridor, while in case of failure of power supply
from any one of the RSS; other RSS will feed the entire power requirement of the corridor.
Table 7.2 - Sources of Power Supply
Corridor
Grid sub-station
(with Input voltage)
Corridor 1
North
Corridor
South
(CCS Airport
Munshi Pulia)
2 to 3 km. 220kV
cabling
Double
kV circuit
6 to 7 km. 220kV
cabling
Double
kV circuit
2
km.
cabling
circuit
132kV
Double
2
km.
cabling
circuit
132kV
Single
MVVNL have confirmed availability of requisite power at their above sub-stations vide
letter No./75MD/MVVNL/camp, dated:- 01.04.2010 (Annexure 7.2).Ideally the second
source for elevated portion of corridor-2 should get supply near Nawaj Ganj. MVVNL has
indicated their inability to provide power at Aminabad-Nawaj Ganj, therefore either to feed
the section through second source available at that point of time or alternatively power can
be available from TRT.A final decision can be taken in detailed design stage depending upon
the phasing of these corridors.
3/3
Peak Demand
Emergency (MVA)
2015
2041
2015
2041
Traction
4.27
12.78
7.27
23.78
Auxiliary
7.46
12.29
13.96
24.09
11.73
25.07
21.23
47.87
(Amausi
to Traction
Munshi Pulia)
Auxiliary
3.0
11.0
7.27
23.78
6.5
11.8
13.96
24.09
9.5
22.8
21.23
47.87
TOTAL (A + B)
21.23
47.87
Traction
2.13
6.69
3.26
11.69
Auxiliary
10.94
15.15
20.38
27.79
21.84
23.64
39.48
5.0
3.26
11.69
12.64
20.38
27.79
23.64
39.48
Corridor 1
Corridor 2
Total
10.57
17.64
TOTAL (A + B)
23.64
39.48
The 220/132 kV power supply will be stepped down to 25kV single phase for traction
purpose at the RSS of Lucknow Metro and fed to the OHE at viaduct through cable feeders.
For feeding the auxiliary loads, the 220/132 kV power supply received will be stepped
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
4/3
down to 33 kV and will be distributed along the alignment through 33kV Ring main cable
network. These cables will be laid in dedicated ducts along the viaduct / on tunnel walls. If
one RSS trips on fault or input supply failure, train services can be maintained from the
other RSS. However, in case of total grid failure, all trains may come to a halt but station
lighting & other essential services can be catered to by stand-by DG sets. Therefore, while
the proposed scheme is expected to ensure adequate reliability, it would cater to emergency
situations as well.
5/3
6/3
7.5
The proposed 25kV Rigid OHE system in underground section is similar to the one installed
in underground Metro Corridor of Delhi Metro. 25kV Rigid OHE system comprises a hollow
Aluminum Conductor Rail of adequate cross section with 107 sq.mm copper contact wire
held with elastic pinch. The Al conductor rail is supported by an insulator & cantilever
arrangement attached to drop-down supports fixed to tunnel roof. The supports are located
at every 10metre and there is no tension in the conductors and hence, no tensioning
equipment in tunnel. The design of 25kv rigid OHE system shall be in accordance to
electrical clearances & contact wire height as per IEC 60913, which is summarized below:
a) Minimum Contact wire height..4330mm
b) Structure
to
Live
parts
clearances..............................270/170/150mm
(Static/Dynamic/Absolute min dynamic)
c) Vehicle
to
Live
parts
clearances....290/190/150mm
(Static/Dynamic/Absolute min dynamic)
7/3
25 KV ROCS Support
Aluminum Conductor (AAC) of 233 mm2 cross section. From safety considerations,
Hydraulic type Anti-Tensioning Device (ATDs) are proposed on mainlines which does not
require use of balance weight for tensioning 25kV Flexible Overhead Equipment (OHE)
system.
25kV ac flexible OHE system shall comprise 107 sq.mm HD-copper contact wire and 65
sq.mm Cd-copper catenary wire. Return conductor (RC) shall be All Aluminum Conductor
(AAC) of 233 sq.mm cross section. From safety considerations, Hydraulic type AntiTensioning Device (ATDs) are proposed on mainlines which does not require use of balance
weight for tensioning of OHE conductors. Proven catenary fittings are proposed similar to
DMRC system.
7.7
8/3
33kV and 25kV switchgear shall be rated for 1250 A being standard design. 33kV cable ring
network shall be adequately rated to transfer requisite auxiliary power during normal as
well as emergency situations and accordingly 3 number of Single core 300 mm2 FRLSOH
Copper conductor cable XLPE insulated 33kV cable is proposed for ring main network due
to underground section.
Adequate no. of cables are required for transfer of traction power from Metros RSS to 25kV
OHE. Single-phase XLPE insulated cables with 240mm2 copper conductors are proposed for
traction power. Based on current requirements, 2 cables are required for each of the two
circuits to feed power to OHE.
The above capacities of transformers, switchgear, cables etc. have been worked out based
on the conceptual design. Therefore, these may be required to be revised for better
accuracy during design stage of project implementation.
7.8
Essential lighting
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
Lift operation
(v)
(vi)
Silent type DG sets with low noise levels are proposed, which do not require a separate
room for installation.
7.9
9/3
7.11
(i)
Modern rolling stock with 3-phase VVVF drive and lightweight stainless steel
coaches has been proposed, which has the benefits of low specific energy
consumption and almost unity power factor.
(ii)
Rolling stock has regeneration features and it is expected that 30% of total traction
energy will be regenerated and fed back to 25kV ac OHE to be consumed by nearby
trains.
(iii)
(iv)
Machine-room less type lifts with gearless drive have been proposed with 3-phase
VVVF drive. These lifts are highly energy efficient.
(v)
The proposed heavy-duty public services escalators will be provided with 3-phase
VVVF drive, which is energy efficient & improves the power factor. Further, the
escalators will be provided with infrared sensors to automatically reduce the speed
(to idling speed) when not being used by passengers.
(vi)
The latest state of art and energy efficient electrical equipment (e.g. transformers,
motors, light fittings etc) has been incorporated in the system design.
(vii)
10/3
139.55 Million Units by year 2041 for Corridor 1 and about 58 million units in initial years
(2015), which will increase to 105.5 Million Units by year 2041 for Corridor 2. In addition
to ensuring optimum energy consumption, it is also necessary that the electric power tariff
be kept at a minimum in order to contain the O& M costs. Therefore, the power tariff for this
Corridor should be at effective rate of purchase price (at 220/132 kV voltage level) plus
nominal administrative charges i.e. on a no profit no loss basis. This is expected to be in the
range of Rs. 3.00 per unit. It is proposed that Government of Uttar Pradesh take necessary
steps to fix power tariff for Lucknow Metro at No Profit No Loss basis. Financial analysis
has been carried out based on this tariff for the purpose of finalizing the DPR. Similar
approach is being pursued for Delhi Metro.
11/3
12/3
13/3
14/3
15/3
16/3
CHAPTER 8
VENTILATION AND AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM
8.1
INTRODUCTION
This chapter covers the Ventilation and Air-conditioning (VAC) system requirements for
the underground sections of the proposed Lucknow Metro alignment. It includes the
following:
8.2
ALIGNMENT
The proposed alignment has two corridor of underground section i.e. Corridor -1 is
having three underground stations with 3.44km length of underground running section
and Corridor-2 is having seven underground stations with 5.9 km length of underground
running section .
The MRTS alignment passes through the heart of the city. The underground section of
North-south corridor starts from HussainGunj and passes through Sachiwalaya and
HazaratGunj and East-West corridor starts from Lucknow Railway Station/ Charbagh
and passes through Gautam Buddha Marg, Aminabad, Pandeyganj, Lucknow City
Railway Station, Medical Chauraha and Nawajganj Metro Stations. The inter-station
distances vary from 823 meters to 1371 meters.
8.3
Supplying fresh air for the physiological needs of passengers and the authoritys
staff;
1/3
Removing body heat, obnoxious odours and harmful gases like carbon dioxide
exhaled during breathing;
Removing large quantity of heat dissipated by the train equipment like traction
motors, braking units, compressors mounted below the under-frame, lights and fans
inside the coaches, A/c units etc.;
Removing vapour and fumes from the battery and heat emitted by light fittings,
water coolers, Escalators, Fare Gates etc. working in the stations;
Removing heat from air conditioning plant and sub-station and other equipment, if
provided inside the underground station.
8.5
2/3
8.6
8.7
This is based upon ASHRAE recommended design conditions for 1% criteria, as under
1% Criteria
Summer :
Monsoon:
3/3
(3)
(4)
27 deg. C at 55 % RH
Concourse
28 deg. C at 60% RH
Max. DB 40 deg. C
Congested conditions --
Max. DB 45 deg. C
10 % or 18 cmh / person
8.9
4/3
8.10
8.11
5/3
evacuation. The stations will be designed to accommodate the full smoke exhaust
volumes and thus prevent the reservoir from completely filling with smoke. To provide
an additional barrier against smoke migration, the overall smoke management system
would be designed to provide a draught of fresh air through entrances and escape
routes, to assist in protecting those routes from smoke.
8.12
These air conditioning systems mix return air with a desired quantity of outside air. The
outside air requirement is based on occupancy, with a minimum of 5 liters per second
per person or 10% of circulated air volume, whichever is the greater. The provision of
free cooling by a simple two-position economizer control system will be included, with
the use of enthalpy sensors to determine the benefits of using return air or outside air.
This will signal the control system to operate dampers between minimum and full fresh
air, so as to minimize the enthalpy reduction needed to be achieved by the cooling coil.
This mixture of outside and return air is then filtered by means of suitable filters and
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
6/3
then cooled by a cooling coil before being distributed as supply air via high level
insulated ductwork to diffusers, discharging the air into the serviced space in a
controlled way to minimize draughts. Return air to the platform areas is extracted via
the track way exhaust system and either returned to the AHUS or exhausted as
required.
UVC Emitters can also be installed in the AHUs for the reduction of mould and fungus
growth on the coil and keeps the surface clean, eliminating need for coil cleaning
programme and improve the overall coil efficiency.
Following are the advantages of UVC emitter :
(a) UVC emitter kills or inactive surface and air borne microorganism that contribute to
poor indoor air quality or spread of infectious diseases.
(b) UVC emitter doesnt allow bio film to form on cooling coil surface and lowers HVAC
costs by resorting heat transfer and net cooling capacity.
(c) Increase in air flow resulted better air conditioning in the public area hence reduced
requirement of additional cooling through AC plant.
Water-cooled chiller units with screw/centrifugal compressors are recommended to be
provided at each station. These units can be installed in a chiller plant room at surface
level. Based on the initial concept design, the estimated capacity for a typical station
would be around 900 TR, hence three units of 300TR (including one stand-bye) may be
required for full system capacity (i.e. design PHPDT traffic requirement). During the
detail design stage this estimated capacity might get marginally changed for individual
station depending on the heat loads calculated through SES analysis.
7/3
8.14
8.15
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
8/3
From the experience of DMRC, it can be concluded that with open shaft system the
piston effects can be sufficient to maintain acceptable conditions inside the tunnel, as
long as the ambient DB temperature remains below 330 C. When the outside
temperature is higher than 330 C the tunnel shafts should be closed to prevent any
further exchange of air with atmosphere.
Under the normal train running the train heat generated inside the tunnel sections
would be removed by the train piston action. It is envisaged that for the design outside
conditions, it may not be necessary to provide forced ventilation using Tunnel
Ventilations Fans for normal operating conditions. Two tunnel ventilation shafts would
be provided at the end of the stations. These end-shafts at the stations also serve as
Blast Relief Shafts i.e. the piston pressure is relieved to the atmosphere before the train
reaches the station. All these shafts are connected to the tunnels through dampers. The
dampers are kept open when the exchange of air with the atmosphere is permitted
(Open Mode). For the Closed Mode system the shaft dampers can be in closed mode and
the displaced air is dumped in the adjacent tunnel.
Generally each tunnel ventilation shaft is connected to a fan room in which there are two
reversible tunnel ventilation fans (TVF) are installed with isolation dampers. These
dampers are closed when the fan is not in operation. There is a bypass duct around the
fan room, which acts as a pressure relief shaft when open during normal conditions, and
enables the flow of air to bypass the TV fans, allowing air exchange between tunnel with
flows generated by train movements. Dampers are also used to close the connections to
tunnels and nozzles under different operating conditions. The details for the shaft sizes,
airflow exchange with the atmosphere, fan capacities can be estimated in a more
accurate manner with the help of Computer Simulations during the detailed design
stage.
9/3
8.16
Provide a tenable environment along the path of egress from a fire incident in
enclosed stations and enclosed train ways.
(b)
Produce airflow rates sufficient to prevent back layering of smoke in the path of
egress within enclosed trainways.
(c)
(d)
There are various operating modes (scenarios) for the Tunnel Ventilation system. These
are described as under:
8.16.1 Normal Conditions
Normal condition is when the trains are operating to timetable throughout the system,
at prescribed headways and dwell times, within given tolerances. The primary source of
ventilation during normal conditions is generated by the movement of trains operating
within the system and, in some cases, the trackway exhaust system.
During summer and the monsoon seasons, the system will be functioning essentially
with the station air conditioning operating. The vent shafts to the surface will enable the
tunnel heat to be removed due to train movements. The platform air captured by the
trackway exhaust system shall be cooled and recirculated in the station. For less severe
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
10/3
(i.e. cool) environmental conditions (or in the event of an AC system failure), station air
conditioning will not be used and ventilation shafts will be open to atmosphere (open
system) with the trackway exhaust system operating. For cold conditions, the closed
system or open system mode may be used, but without any station air conditioning.
System heating is achieved by the train heat released into the premises.
8.16.2 Congested Conditions
Congested conditions occur when delays cause disruption to the movement of trains. It
is possible that the delays may result in the idling of a train in a tunnel section. Without
forced ventilation, excessive tunnel temperatures may result reduced performance of
coach air conditioners that may lead to passenger discomfort.
During congested operations, the tunnel ventilation system is operated to maintain a
specific temperature in the vicinity of the car air conditioner condenser coils (i.e.
allowing for thermal stratification). The open system congested ventilation shall be via
a push-pull effect where tunnel vent fans behind the train are operated in supply and
tunnel vent fans ahead of the trains are operated in exhaust mode. Nozzles or booster
(jet) fans will be used to direct air into the desired tunnel, if required.
8.16.3 Emergency Conditions
Emergency conditions are when smoke is generated in the tunnel or station trackway. In
emergency conditions, the tunnel ventilation system would be set to operate to control
the movement of smoke and provide a smoke-free path for evacuation of the passengers
and for the fire fighting purposes. The ventilation system is operated in a push-pull
supply and exhaust mode with jet fans or nozzles driving tunnel flows such that the
smoke is forced to move in one direction, enabling evacuation to take place in the
opposite direction depending upon the location of Fire on the train.
8.16.4 Pressure Transients
The movement of trains within the underground system induces unsteady air motion in
the tunnels and stations. Together with changes in cross section, this motion of air
results in changes in air pressure within trains and for wayside locations. These changes
in pressure or pressure transients can be a source of passenger discomfort and can also
be harmful to the wayside equipment and structures. Two types of transient
phenomenon are generally to be examined:
a) Portal Entry and Exit Pressure Transients As a train enters a portal, passengers
will experience a rise in pressure from when the nose enters until the tail enters.
After the tail enters the pressure drops. Similarly, as the nose exits a portal,
pressure changes are experienced in the train. There is two portal location in North
south corridor between Charbagh/LKO Rly Station to HussainGunj and HazratGunj
to KD Singh Babu Stadium and one portal location in East-West corridor between
Nawajganj to Thakurganj.
11/3
b) Wayside Pressure Transients As trains travel through the system they will pass
structures, equipment and patrons on platforms. Equipment would include cross
passage doors, lights, dampers, walkways etc. Pressures are positive for the
approaching train and negative for retreating trains. Most rapid changes occur with the
passage of the train nose and tail. The repetitive nature of these pressures may need to
be considered when considering fatigue in the design of equipment.
The detailed analysis to assess the effect of pressure transients will be done during the
design stage. For the portal entry/exits the effect of higher train speed may pose
discomfort to the passengers. Although, based on the recent studies, it is assumed that a
design train speed of 80 kmph would not be of major concern. The estimation of Wayside transients during design stage would be necessary to select design mechanical
strength of the trackside fixtures, e.g. false ceilings, light fittings etc at the platform
levels.
8.17
12/3
CHAPTER 9
SIGNALLING SYSTEM
9.1
INTRODUCTION
The signalling system shall provide the means for an efficient train control, ensuring
safety in train movements. It assists in optimization of metro infrastructure investment
and running of an efficient train services on the network.
9.2
Provide high level of safety with trains running at close headway ensuring
continuous safe train separation.
Provides safety and enforces speed limit on section having permanent and
temporary speed restrictions.
Improve capacity with safer and smoother operations. Driver will have continuous
display of Target Speed / Distance to Go status in his cab enabling him to optimize
the speed potential of the track section. It provides signal / speed status in the cab
even in bad weather.
Increased productivity of rolling stock by increasing line capacity and train speeds,
and enabling train to arrive at its destination sooner. Hence more trips will be
possible with the same number of rolling stock.
1/3
Signalling & Train Control system on the line shall be designed to meet the
required headway during peak hours.
9.3
Cab Signalling
Track Related Speed Profile generation based on line data and train data
continuously along the track
2/3
The cab borne equipment will be of modular sub-assemblies for each function for easy
maintenance and replacement. The ATP assemblies will be fitted in the vehicle
integrated with other equipment of the rolling stock.
(ii) Automatic Train Operation (ATO)
This system will operate the trains automatically from station to station while
remaining within the safety envelope of ATP & open the train doors. Driver will close
the train doors and press a button when ready to depart. In conjunction with ATP/
ATS, ATO can control dwell time at stations and train running in accordance with
headway/ timetable.
b.
Interlocking System:
(i) Computer Based Interlocking (CBI)
At all stations with points and crossings, Computer Based Interlocking (CBI) will be
provided for operation of points and crossings and setting of routes.
3/3
The setting of the route and clearing of the signals will be done by workstation, which
can be either locally (at station) operated or operated remotely from the OCC.
This sub-system is used for controlling vehicle movements into or out of stations
automatically from a workstation. All stations having points and crossings will be
provided with workstations for local control. Track occupancy, point position, etc. will
be clearly indicated on the workstation. It will be possible to operate the workstation
locally, if the central control hands over the operation to the local station. The
interlocking system design will be on the basis of fail-safe principle.
The equipment will withstand tough environmental conditions encountered in a Mass
Transit System. Control functions in external circuits will be proved both in the positive
and negative wires. Suitable IS, IRS, BS standards or equivalent international standards
will be followed in case wiring, installation, earthing, cabling, power supply and for
material used in track circuits, relays, point operating machines, power supply etc.
(ii) Track Circuits
Audio Frequency Track Circuit will be used for vehicle detection and for transmission of
data from track to train.
(iii) Point Machines
Non-Trailable Electrical Point Machine capable of operating with either 110V DC or 3phase 380V AC will be used on main line. The depot point machine will preferably be
trailable type.
c.
d.
4/3
9.4 STANDARDS
The following standards will be adopted with regard to the Signalling system.
Description
Standards
Redundancy for
Train Describer.
Cables
5/3
Description
Standards
Conditions
9.5
Maintenance philosophy
9.6
6/3
7/3
8/3
CHAPTER - 10
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND
AUTOMATIC FARE COLLECTION SYSTEM
10.1
INTRODUCTION
The telecommunication system acts as the communication backbone for Signalling
systems and other systems such as SCADA, AFC etc and provides telecommunication
services to meet operational and administrative requirements of metro network.
10.2
OVERVIEW
The telecommunication facilities proposed are helpful in meeting the requirements for
1.
2.
3.
4.
1/3
10.3
The main bearer of the bulk of the telecommunication network is proposed with optical
fibre cable system. Considering the channel requirement and keeping in view the future
expansion requirements a minimum 48 Fibre optical fiber cable is proposed to be laid in
ring configuration with path diversity.
SDH (minimum STM-4) based system shall be adopted with SDH nodes at every station
and OCC . Access 2MB multiplexing system will be adopted for the lower level at each
node, equipped for channel cards depending on the requirement of channels in the
network. Further small routers and switches shall be provided for LAN network at
stations. Alternatively a totally IP Based High Capacity, highly reliable and fault
tolerant, MPLS Ethernet Network can be provided in lieu of SDH/MUX.
ii)
Telephone Exchange
For an optimized cost effective solution Small exchanges of 30 port each shall be
planned at each station and a 60 Port Exchange at the Terminal Stations shall be
provided. The exchanges at OCC/Depot shall be of larger sizes as per the actual number
of users. The Exchanges will serve the subscribers at all the stations and OCC. The
exchanges will be interconnected at the channel level on optical backbone. The
exchanges shall be software partitioned for EPABX and Direct Line Communication from
which the phones shall be extended to the stations. Alternatively only for nonoperational (other than Direct Line Communication) a separate IP Based Phone System
can be implemented.
iii)
2/3
through the central control, besides intimating the approaching trains about any
emergency like accident, fire, line blocked etc., thus improving safety performance.
To provide adequate coverage, based on the RF site survey to be carried out during
detailed Design stage, base stations for the system will be located at sites conveniently
selected after detailed survey. Tentatively minimum 1 site every third station with 35
meter tower with Base Station shall be required along the route, on the N-S Corridor.
For the Elevated part of East West Corridor, atleast 2 BTS stations will be required,
with 35 m towers each. For the Underground Section, atleast one Base Station each
shall be required at Gautam Budh Nagar, Lucknow City Railway Station and Nawajgang
feeding through Bi-directional Amplifiers and Leaky Coaxial Cables, the adjacent
stations/tunnels/ramp.
In addition to the TETRA Radio Coverage for the internal use of the Metro, the city is
also likely to have Mobile Coverage from Private Operators.
In the elevated sections it is expected that coverage shall be available from the adjoining
sites of the Mobile Operators. However, in the underground stations / tunnels, coverage
needs to be specially extended by the Mobile Operators. To enable the Mobile Operators
to do so, the Metro Authority will have to have an agreement with a group of Mobile
Operators according to which Metro shall provide an Air-conditioned room (approx. 20
sq. m) at each underground station to the Mobile Operator Group. The Mobile
Operators shall install all their repeater equipment in this room and then extend the
coverage inside the tunnel by laying their own LCX cable in each tunnel and through
antennas strategically placed in the concourse area. Further, for City Emergency
Services like Police and Fire, the mobile operators shall also design their LCX network to
support the police wireless coverage in the tunnels /station area. The detailed
Agreement covering both the Mobile / Emergency Service Radio Coverage shall have to
be finalised by the Metro Authority with the respective parties, at the time of
implementation.
iv)
The system shall be capable of announcements from the local station as well as from
OCC. Announcements from Station level will have over-riding priority in case of
emergency announcements. The System shall be linked to Signalling System for
automatic train actuated announcements.
v)
These shall be located at convenient locations at all stations to provide bilingual visual
indication of the status of the running trains and will typically indicate information such
3/3
This will ensure an accurate display of time through a synchronization system of slave
clocks driven from a Master Clock fed from a GPS equipment at the operation control
center. The Master Clock signal shall also be required for synchronization of FOTS,
Exchanges, Radio, Signaling, etc. The System will ensure identical display of time at all
locations. Clocks are to be provided at platforms, concourse, Station Master's Room,
Depots and other service establishments etc.
vii)
The CCTV system shall provide video surveillance and recording function for the
operations to monitor each station. The monitoring shall be possible both locally at
each station and remotely from the OCC.
The CCTV system backbone shall be based on IP technology and shall consist of a mix of
Fixed Cameras and Pan/Tilt/Zoom (PTZ) Cameras. Cameras shall be located at areas
where monitoring for security, safety and crowd control purpose is necessary
viii)
For efficient and cost effective maintenance of the entire communication network, it is
proposed to provide a network management system (NMS), which will help in
diagnosing faults immediately from a central location and attending the same with least
possible delay, thus increasing the operational efficiency and reduction in manpower
requirement for maintenance. The proposed NMS system will be covering radio
communication, Optical Fiber Transmission, Telephone Exchange and summary alarms
of PA/PIDS, CCTV and Clock System.
ix)
Technology
TABLE 10.1
System
Standards
Transmission
Media
4/3
System
Standards
x
x
x
x
Telephone
Exchange
Maintenance
Philosophy
x)
5/3
xi)
10.4
10.4.1 INTRODUCTION
Metro Rail Systems handle large number of passengers. Ticket issue and fare collection
play a vital role in the efficient and proper operation of the system. To achieve this
objective, ticketing system shall be simple, easy to use/operate and maintain, easy on
accounting facilities, capable of issuing single/multiple journey tickets, amenable for
quick fare changes and require overall lesser manpower. In view of above, computer
based automatic fare collection system is proposed.
For Multiple Journey, the Store Value Contactless Smart Card shall be utilized and for
the Single Journey, Smart Contactless Token shall be utilised.
AFC system proves to be cheaper than semi-automatic (manual system) in long run due
to reduced manpower cost for ticketing staff, reduced maintenance in comparison to
paper ticket machines, overall less cost of recyclable tickets (Smart Card/Token) in
comparison to paper tickets and prevention of leakage of revenue. Relative advantages
of automatic fare collection system over manual system are as follows:
A)
6/3
C)
D)
10.4.2 Technology
The technology proposed for AFC systems are given in Table 10.2.
7/3
TABLE 10.2
Standards
x
Fare media
Gates
Station computer,
Central computer
and AFC Net work
Ticket Office
Machine
(TOM/EFO)
Ticket Reader
(TR) and portable
ticket decoder.
UPS
(uninterrupted
power at stations
as well as for
OCC).
Description
a) Contactless smart card for multiple journeys.
b) Smart Contactless Token for Single Journeys.
Computer controlled retractable flap type automatic gates at entry and
exit. There will be following types of gates:
x Entry
x Exit
x Reversible (if required as per final station layout) can be set to
entry or exit
x
Reversible Handicapped Gate -gate for disabled people.
All the fare collection equipment shall be connected in a local area
network with a station server controlling the activities of all the
machines. These station servers will be linked to the central computer
situated in the operational control centre through the optic fibre
communication channels. The centralised control of the system shall
provide real time data of earnings, passenger flow analysis, blacklisting
of specified cards etc.
Manned Ticket office machine shall be installed in the stations for
selling tickets to the passengers. Also POMs shall be provided for
Automatic Ticket Vending.
Ticket reader shall be installed near EFO for passengers to check
information stored in the ticket.
8/3
Entry/Exit Gates
9/3
10/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
CHAPTER 11
DEPOT
11.1
Name of Corridor
North-South Corridor
CCS Airport -Munshi Pulia
East-West Corridor
Lucknow Railway StationVasant Kunj
Gauge(mm)
Route Length(km)
1435
22.349
1435
11.304
b) Depot- cum- workshop near Vasant Kunj for East West Corridor
(i) Major overhauls of all the trains of East- West Corridor except wheel pressing/
boring etc
(ii) All minor schedules and repairs of East- West Corridor.
(iii) Lifting for replacement of heavy equipment and testing thereafter of East- West
Corridor.
(iv) Repair of heavy equipments of East- West Corridor.
The Depot planning near Transport Nagar for North South Corridor and near Vasant Kunj
for East West Corridor is based on following assumptions:
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
1/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
(i) Enough space should be available near Transport Nagar for North South Corridor and
near vasant kunj for East West Corridor for establishment of a Depot- Cum- workshop
(ii) All inspection, workshop lines and stabling lines are designed to accommodate one
trainset of 6- car.
(iii) All stabling lines are planned in the proposed depot-cum-workshop assuming adequate
space availability. In case of space constraint, if any, stabling facilities may need to be
created at terminal stations or elsewhere to cater to the required stability facilities.
Provision of transfer line from one corridor to another corridor (which has not been
planned at this stage), may be kept for future.
In broad terms, based on the planned Rolling Stock requirements, this chapter covers
conceptual design on following aspects and will work as a guide for detailed design later:
x
x
x
x
x
11.3
11.4
2/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
Type of
Schedule
Daily
Interval
Daily
A Service 5,000
Km
Check
(approx.
15
days)
B Service 15,000
Km
Check
(approx.
45
days)
Intermediat 420,000 Km,
e Overhaul (3 and half
Years approx.)
(IOH)
Periodical
Overhaul
(POH)
840,000 Km,
(7 Years
approx.)
Heavy
Repairs
Work Content
Check on the train condition and function at
every daily service completion. Interval
cleaning/mopping of floor and walls with
vacuum cleaner.
Detailed inspection and testing of sub systems, under frame, replacement/topping
up of oils & lubricants.
Detailed Inspection of A type tasks plus
items at multiples of 15,000 Km (B type
tasks)
Check and testing of all sub-assemblies
(Electrical + Mechanical).
Overhaul of
pneumatic valves, Compressor. Condition
based maintenance of sub-systems to bring
them to original condition. Replacement of
parts and rectification, trial run.
Dismantling of all sub-assemblies, bogies
suspension system, traction motor, gear,
control equipment, air-conditioning units etc.
Overhauling to bring them to original
condition. Checking repair and replacement
as necessary. Inspection and trial.
Locations
Stabling Lines
Inspection
Bays
Inspection
Bays
Workshop
Workshop
The above Schedule may need slight revision based on the actual earned kilometers per
train and the specific maintenance requirements of Rolling Stock finally procured.
11.4.2 Washing Needs of Rolling Stock
Cleanliness of the trains is essential. Following schedules are recommended for Indian
environment:
3/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S.N.
1.
2.
Kind Inspection
Maint.
Cycle
Outside
cleaning
(wet 3 Days
washing
on
automatic
washing plant)
Outside heavy Cleaning (wet 30 days
washing
on
automatic
washing plant and Front
Face, Vestibule/Buffer area.
Floor, walls inside/outside of
cars and roof. Manually)
Time
Maintenance Place
10 mins.
Single
Pass
through
Automatic washing plant
of Depot
2 3 hrs.
(Automatic washing plant
& cleaning & washing
shed)
No. of Rakes
No. of coaches
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
13
18
23
30
38
78
108
138
180
228
No. of Rakes
No. of coaches
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
7
9
12
17
20
42
54
72
102
120
4/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
2015
259
2020
2025
2030
2041
295
293
314
298
2015
2020
2025
2030
2041
259
334
373
360
397
(iii) Requirement of Stabling Lines (SBL), Inspection Lines (IBL) and Workshop Lines
(WSL) in the Depot -cum Workshop:
a) Requirement of Stabling Lines (SBL), Inspection Lines (IBL) and Workshop Lines
(WSL) in the Depot -cum Workshop at Transport Nagar for North South Corridor.
Year
2015
No. of
Trains
13
2020
18
2025
23
2030
30
2041
38
SBLs
11 lines x one
train of 6-car
16 lines x one
train of 6-car
21 lines x one
train of 6-car
28 lines x one
train of 6-car
36 lines x one
train of 6-car
IBLs
WSLs
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
All lines shall be suitable for placement of one train of 6-car trains on each line.
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
5/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
b) Requirement of Stabling Lines (SBL), Inspection Lines (IBL) and Workshop Lines
(WSL) in the Depot -cum Workshop at Vasant Kunj for East- West Corridor.
Year
2015
No.
of
SBLs
Trains
7
6 lines x one
train of 6-car
2020
2025
12
2030
17
2041
20
7 lines x one
train of 6-car
10 lines x one
train of 6-car
15 lines x one
train of 6-car
18 lines x one
train of 6-car
WSLs
IBLs
One bay of two IBL
for present with
further provision to
add one IBL. Each
line will have
capacity to
accommodate 6 car
trains.
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
-do-
All lines shall be suitable for placement of one train of 6-car trains on each line.
11.5 REQUIREMENT OF MAINTENANCE / INSPECTION LINES FOR DEPOT-CUM-WORKSHOP
(a) Requirement of maintenance / Inspection lines in the depot-cum-workshop for N-S
Corridor at Transport Nagar:
Schedule
i)
Maintenance Requirement
Lines Needed
(No. of Cars)
Year 2015 - Maximum no. of rake holding is 13 TS (13 X 6 Cars = 78 Cars)
13 X 6 Cars = 78 Cars
13 X 6 Cars = 78 Cars
Requirement
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
6/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
Schedule
ii)
Maintenance Requirement
(No. of Cars)
Lines Needed
B Checks (15000
km) 45 days
iii)
23 X 6 Cars = 138
iv)
23 X 6 Cars = 138
v)
7/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
Schedule
B Checks (15000
km) 45 days
Unscheduled line &
adjustment lines
Maintenance Requirement
(No. of Cars)
38 X 6 Cars = 228 Cars
For minor repairs, testing and
after IOH/POH adjustments
Requirement
Lines Needed
1 Line x one train of 6 cars (with Sunken
Floor)
1 Line x one train of 6 cars (with Sunken
Floor)
One bay of 4 lines each with one train of
6-cars
All lines shall be suitable for placement of one train of 6-car trains on each line.
(b)
Schedule
i)
Maintenance
Lines Needed
Requirement (No. of
Cars)
Year 2015 - Maximum no. of rake holding is 7 TS (7 X 6 Cars = 42 Cars)
7 X 6 Cars = 42 Cars
B Checks (15000
km) 45 days and
Unscheduled line &
adjustment lines
Requirement
7 X 6 Cars = 42 Cars,
and for minor repairs,
testing and after
IOH/POH adjustments
ii)
9 X 6 Cars = 54 Cars
B Checks (15000
km) 45 days and
Unscheduled line &
adjustment lines
Requirement
8/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
iii)
B Checks (15000
km) 45 days and
Unscheduled line &
adjustment lines
Requirement
iv)
B Checks (15000
km) 45 days and
Unscheduled line &
adjustment lines
Requirement
17 X 6 Cars=102 Cars,
and for minor repairs,
testing and after
IOH/POH adjustments
v)
B Checks (15000
km) 45 days
Requirement
9/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
11.6 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS AT DEPOTS FOR NORTH SOUTH CORRIDOR AND FOR
EAST WEST CORRIDOR:
Facilities for carrying out inspection activitities shall be provided in the inspection bay for
following Systems / Equipments of a train:
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Electronics; PA/PIS
Mechanical components, couplers etc
Batteries
Air conditioner
Brake modules
Bogie
Traction Motor
Vehicle doors, windows and internal fittings
Power system including converter, circuit breaker etc.
These activities shall be grouped into A checks and B checks. The minor scheduled
inspections (A checks) shall be carried out during the day off peak and night. Since B
checks take longer time, these cannot be completed in the off peak times. Certain
inspection lines will be nominated for A checks. For B checks, separate line will be
nominated where the rakes may be kept for long time.
One dedicated line in the shed will be used for minor repairs and for adjustment and
testing after the IOH and POH. There shall be a spare line in inspection bay for this
purpose.
11.7 DESIGN OF STABLING, INSPECTION AND WORKSHOP LINES
As per advised dimensions of the Rolling Stock, the length of 6-Car train would be Approx.
135.6 mts. (say 136 mts). For the design of the inspection/stabling/workshop lines in the
depots and at terminal stations, the following lengths have been taken in consideration:
11.7.1 Stabling lines at depot near Transport Nagar for North South Corridor and near
vasant kunj for East West Corridor:
For the design of the stabling lines in the depot and terminal stations or elsewhere (as may
be required), following approximates lengths have been taken in consideration:
(i) Length of one 6- car train= 136 m
(ii) Free length at outer ends of one train of 6- cars ( for cross pathway, Signal and Friction
buffers)= 10m each side
(iii)Total length of Stabling lines = (i)+(ii)+(i)= 10+ 136 + 10 = 156
10/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
Looking to the car width of 2900mm on SG, 5m Track Centre is proposed for all the
stabling lines. Thus, space between stabling shall be sufficient to include 1 mt. wide
pathway to be constructed between tracks to provide access for internal train cleaning and
undercarriage inspection with provision of following facilities:
a) Each Stabling line to have water connection facility so that local cleaning, if required, is
facilitated.
b) Platforms at suitable points at each end of stabling lines to enable train operators to
board or de- board conveniently.
11.7.2 Inspection Bay at depot-cum-workshop at Transport Nagar for N- S Corridor and
depot-cum- workshop at vasant kunj for East- west corridor:
A) Inspection Bay at depot-cum-workshop at Transport Nagar for N- S Corridor:
The length of Inspection shed is computed as below:
(i) Length of a 6-car train= 136 m.
(ii) Cross- path at each end= 10 m
(iii)Length of Inspection line= (i)+(ii)+ (i) = 10+ 136 + 10= 156 m
The width of the Inspection bay in computed as below:
(i) Centre to- centre spacing between the three lines= 7.5 m
(ii) Centre line of outer lines to column of Shed= 3.25 m
(iii)Width of a 4 line Inspection Bay= (ii)+(i)+(i)+(i)+(ii)= 3.25+ 7.5+ 7.5+ 7.5+3.25= 29 m
a)
b)
Roof Inspection platforms and walkways for roof inspection supported on the
columns shall be provided. There would be lighting below the rail level to facilitate the
under frame inspection. Ramps of 1:8 slopes, 3 meter wide should be provided with
sunken floor system for movement of material for the cars. Further, 10m cross
pathways are left at each end for movement of material by fork lifter/Leister/Hand
trolley. 415V 3 phase 50 Hz, 230V 1 phase 50 Hz AC supply and Pneumatic supply
shall also be made available on each inspection shed columns. Air-circulators shall be
provided on each column. The inspection bay shall be provided with EOT crane of 1.5
T to facilitate lifting of equipment.
11/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
Roof and walls shall be of such design that optimum natural air ventilation occurs all
the time and sufficient natural light is also available. Each Inspection bay will also
have arrangement close by for cleaning of HVAC filter under high pressure water jet.
B) Inspection Bay at depot-cum-workshop at vasant kunj for E- W Corridor:
The length of Inspection shed is computed as below:
(i) Length of a 6-car train= 136 m.
(ii) Cross- path at each end= 10 m
(iii)Length of Inspection line= (i)+(ii)+ (i) = 10+ 136 + 10= 156 m
The width of the Inspection bay in computed as below:
(i) Centre to- centre spacing between the three lines= 7.5 m
(ii) Centre line of outer lines to column of Shed= 3 m
(iii)Width of a three line Inspection Bay= (ii)+(i)+(i)+(ii)= 3+7.5+7.5+ 3= 21 m
a) There shall be one inspection bay of 156 m X 21 m size with provision of
accommodating three inspection lines (two IBL for present with further provision to
add one IBL) each having sunken floor and overhead roof inspection platforms at
each of the depot. The floor will be sunken by 1100mm. The track spacing between
the adjacent IBLs shall be 7.5 m.
b) Roof Inspection platforms and walkways for roof inspection supported on the
columns shall be provided. There would be lighting below the rail level to facilitate
the under frame inspection. Ramps of 1:8 slopes, 3 meter wide should be provided
with sunken floor system for movement of material for the cars. Further, 10m cross
pathways are left at each end for movement of material by fork lifter/Leister/Hand
trolley. 415V 3 phase 50 Hz, 230V 1 phase 50 Hz AC supply and Pneumatic supply
shall also be made available on each inspection shed columns. Air-circulators shall
be provided on each column. The inspection bay shall be provided with EOT crane
of 1.5 T to facilitate lifting of equipment.
Roof and walls shall be of such design that optimum natural air ventilation occurs all
the time and sufficient natural light is also available. Each Inspection bay will also
have arrangement close by for cleaning of HVAC filter under high pressure water jet.
11.7.3 Workshop shed depots near Transport Nagar for North South Corridor and near
vasant kunj for East West Corridor :
(a) There shall be one bay comprising of two lines each with capacity to accommodate one
train of 6-cars on each line and space earmarked for future extension of one bay of two
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
12/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
lines for North- South Corridor in Transport Nagar depot- cum- workshop (as detailed
in 11.5 (iii) (a) above) and one bay comprising of two lines for East-West Corridor in
vasant kunj depot- cum- workshop (as detailed in 11.5 (iii) (b) above). Size of the
workshop bay of two lines is proposed to be 156m x 21m. The unscheduled lifting and
heavy repair line shall be fitted with jack system capable to lift the 6-Car unit
simultaneously for quick change of bogie, thereby saving down time of Rolling Stock.
The arrangement of jack system shall be such that lifting of any coach in train formation
for replacement of bogie/equipments is also individually possible. These lines are to be
provided with pits at regular intervals for inspection of undercarriage with turn tables.
Each workshop bay shall be equipped with two trains 15T and 3T overhead cranes, each
spanning the entire length of the workshop bay.
(b) There shall be provided space for repairs of HVAC, Door, and Traction motor etc.
repairs. Distinct spaces shall be earmarked for dismantling/repairs/ assembling and
testing of each of these equipments. Related machinery for Overhauling / Repairs &
testing activities of every equipment are also to be housed in the space earmarked.
(c) There shall be washing and cleaning equipments on the workshop floor. Bogie test
stand shall be provided in the workshop. Other heavy machinery shall also be suitably
installed on the workshop floor. Air-circulators, lights, Powers supply points and
compressed air supply line shall be provided on each workshop column.
(d) Workshop lines shall be inter-linked through turn tables, each suitable for movement of
a train in AWo (unloaded) condition and shall also be capable to rotate with a fully
loaded bogie on it. Repair of heavy equipments such as air conditioners shall be so
located so that it does not affect the movement inside workshop.
(e) There shall be walkways on columns for roof inspections, along the workshop lines.
These walkways shall not infringe with cars being lifted/ lowered by means of mobile
jacks. Suitable space between the nearest exterior of a car and farthest edge of the
walkway has to be ensured to avoid conflict in lifting and lowering of cars.
(f) The small component, bogie painting and battery maintenance cells will be located in
the workshop with arrangement that fumes are extracted by suitable exhaust systems.
(g) Workshop will have service building with array of rooms along its length. Total size is
proposed to be 156 x 8m. These can be made by column and beam structure and
architecture made of brick works. These shall cater for overhauling sections, offices,
costly store item, locker rooms, toilets etc. Two trains opposite sides widthwise shall be
open to facilitate natural air circulation and cross ventilation besides the egress &
ingress for coaches. The sidewalls shall also have sufficient width of louvers for
providing adequate ventilation.
13/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
(h) There shall be space for bogie/ axle repair shop with necessary infrastructure for
disassembly, overhead, assembly and testing of mechanical components of bogies/ axle.
The repair shop shall be easily approachable from with the workshop for transportation
of components.
Following equipment repair/overhaul facilities are planned in the workshop and
wheel repairs shop at the workshops depots near Transport Nagar for North South
Corridor and near vasant kunj for East West Corridor:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
Body furnishing
Bogie
Wheels
Traction Motors
Axle Box and Axle Bearing
Pantographs
Transformer, converter/inverter, circuit breaker
Battery
Air Compressor
Air-conditioner
Brake Equipment
Door actuators
Control and measuring equipments
Pneumatic equipment
Dampers and Springs
Couplers/Gangways
Coach Painting (Applicable only for Aluminum coaches, if any)
14/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
II.
III.
15/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
IV.
V.
Test Track
A test track of 1000 mts. in length covered & fenced should be provided beside
workshop in the depot. It shall be equipped with signaling equipments (ATP/ATO).
It shall be used for the commissioning of the new trains, their trials and testing of
the trains after the IOH and POH. Entry into the test track shall be planned for a 3car train. In compliance to safety norms, the boundary of the track shall be
completely fenced to prevent unauthorized trespassing across or along the track.
VI.
VII.
Power Supply
Auxiliary substations are planned for catering to the power supply requirement of
the whole depot and workshop. Details of connected load feeder shall be worked
out. Taking diversity factor of 0.5 the maximum demands shall be computed. Two
trains Auxiliary substations are proposed, as the demand by machines in Workshop
area would be very large. The standby power supply is proposed through DG set
with AMF panel. The capacity of DG set will be adequate to supply all essential loads
without over loading.
VIII.
IX.
16/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
the drainage system. Rainwater harvesting would be given due emphases to charge
the underground reserves.
X.
Ancillary Workshop
This workshop will have a line at floor level with provision of pits. Arrangement for
repairs of Shunters, Rail Road Vehicles and other ancillary vehicles will be provided.
These vehicles will also be housed here itself. Heavy lifting works can be carried out
in main workshop.
Ancillary workshop will be used for storing OHE/rigid OHE parts and their
maintenance/ repair for restoration of 25 kV feed system.
XI.
Watch Towers
There shall be provision of adequate number of watchtowers for the vigilance of
depot boundary.
XII.
Administrative Building
An administrative building close to the main entrance is planned. It can be suitably
sized and architecturally designed at the detailed design stage. A time and security
office is also provided close to main entrance. It shall be equipped with suitable
Access control system for all the staff working in the complex.
XIII.
Parking Facilities
a) Ample parking space shall be provided for the two trains wheelers and four
wheelers at the following points.
i) Close to the depot entry.
ii) Close to the stabling lines.
iii) Close to the Workshop/IBL.
b) Space for parking of road and re-railing equipments
Enough space for parking of road vehicle/ trailers/ trucks etc. Enough space
will also have to be earmarked adjacent to workshops. Similarly, provision of
space for parking of re-railing equipments will have to be made close to the
main exit gate of the Depot.
XIV.
XV.
17/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
b)
placement of cars for re- profiling of wheels within the depot along with space
for depot of scrap.
Requirement of buildings and major plants and machinery, is given in Para
11.12.1(a), 11.12.1 (b), Para 11.12.2 (a) & 11.12.2(b).
11.10.1 Following Safety features should be incorporated in the design of the Maintenance
Depot-cum-Workshop near Transport Nagar for North South Corridor and near
Vasant Kunj for East West Corridor:
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)
g)
h)
i)
j)
k)
11.11
11.11.1
1.5 EOT cranes in the inspection bay should be interlocked with 25 kV ac OHE
in such a way that, the cranes become operational only when the OHE is
isolated and grounded.
Red flasher lights should be installed along the inspection lines at conspicuous
location to indicate the OHE is Live.
Multi level wheel and TM stacking arrangement should be an inbuilt feature at
the end of Workshop Lines.
Pillars in the inspection bay & workshop should have provision for power
sockets.
Placement of rakes from inspection/workshop lines on to washing lines for
interior cleaning on their own power should be possible. Linking of OHE and
its isolation at the cleaning area should be provided. Necessary requirements of
safety should be kept in view.
The roof inspection platform should have open-able doors to facilitate staff to
go up the roof for cleaning of roof. Suitable safety interlock should be provided
to ensure maintenance staff are enabled to climb on the roof inspection
platform only after the OHE is isolated.
Control Centre, PPIO & store depot must be close to Workshop.
Width of the doors of the sections wherein repairs of equipments are done
should be at least 2 meters wide to allow free passage of equipment through
them.
Provision of water hydrants should be done in workshops & stabling yards also.
Compressed air points along with water taps should be available in interior of
buildings for cleaning.
Ventilation arrangement inside the inspection shed and workshop should be
ensured. Arrangement for natural cross ventilation from one side to another of
inspection & workshop bays to be incorporated along with optimum
availability of natural light at floor level.
18/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S.No
1.
Name of Building
Size
Remarks
Inspection Shed
156m x 29m
Workshop Shed
156m x 21m
Associated Sections
156m x 8m
2.
3.
4.
x
30m Stabling and routine maintenance of shunting
Traction
repair 80m
double engine etc. & Traction maintenance depot.
depot and E &M (partly
storey)
repair shop
For maintenance of lifts/escalators and other
i.
19/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S.No
Name of Building
Size
Remarks
General service works.
5.
i.
ii.
6.
7.
8.
9.
i.
10.
11.
Watch
Nos.)
12.
13.
14.
Pump house Bore 7.3mx5.4m (200 Submersible type pump planned with 200 mm
well
mm bore)
diameter bore well.
15.
Dangerous
Store
16.
a)Traction
a)120m x 80m
25/33kV/66kV sub
Tower
5m x 3m
(4 3.6m x2.5 m
1,00,000
Capacity
20/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S.No
Name of Building
station
Size
Remarks
b) 15m x30m
b) Feeding Post
17.
Garbage dumping
18.
19.
20.
21.
Waste
Water 12m x 6m
Treatment Plant
22.
Canteen
200 sqm.
23.
Toilets
-Gents
-Ladies
10m x 7m
10m x 7m
11.12.1
10m x 8m
(b) List of Buildings at Depot- Cum- Workshop near vasant kunj for East West
Corridor:
S.No
Name of Building
Size
Remarks
1.
Inspection Shed
156m x 21m
Workshop Shed
156m x 21m
21/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S.No
Name of Building
Size
Remarks
train of 6 cars on each line]
Associated Sections
156m x 8m
2.
3.
4.
Traction
repair 80m
x
30m Stabling and routine maintenance of shunting
depot and E &M (partly
double engine etc. & Traction maintenance depot.
repair shop
storey)
For maintenance of lifts/escalators and other
General service works.
5.
iii.
iv.
6.
7.
i.
22/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S.No
Name of Building
Size
Remarks
Interior Cleaning
8.
9.
iv.
10.
11.
Watch
Nos.)
12.
13.
14.
Pump house Bore 7.3mx5.4m (200 Submersible type pump planned with 200 mm
well
mm bore)
diameter bore well.
15.
Dangerous
Store
16.
a)Traction
a)120m x 80m
25/33kV/66kV sub
b) 15m x30m
station
Tower
5m x 3m
(4 3.6m x2.5 m
1,00,000
Capacity
b) Feeding Post
17.
Garbage dumping
18.
19.
23/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S.No
Name of Building
Size
Remarks
10m x 8m
Office
20.
21.
Waste
Water 12m x 6m
Treatment Plant
22.
Canteen
200 sqm.
23.
Toilets
-Gents
-Ladies
10m x 7m
10m x 7m
11.12.2
S. No. Equipment
Qty.
Unit
1.
Under floor Pit wheel lathe, Chip crusher and conveyor for 1
lathe on pit, Electric tractor for movement over under floor
wheel lathe
No.
2.
Set
3.
No.
4.
Set
5.
No.
6.
No.
7.
No.
8.
No.
24/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S. No. Equipment
Qty.
Unit
9.
No.
10.
Set
11.
No.
12.
No.
No.
13.
No.
14.
No.
15.
Carbody stands
24
No.
16.
No.
17.
No.
18.
No.
19.
No.
20.
No.
21.
L.s.
22.
23.
Induction heater
No.
24.
No.
25.
No.
26.
Set
27.
Set
28.
Set
29.
Tool Kits
Set
Set
25/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S. No. Equipment
Qty.
Unit
30.
12
No.
31.
No.
32.
Pallet trucks
No.
33.
RRV
34.
35.
36.
No.
37.
No.
38.
No.
39.
Special jigs and fixtures and test benches for Rolling Stock
set
40.
No.
41.
Set
42.
Test benches
Set
43.
44.
45.
46.
Bearing puller
11.12.2
Set
Set
(b)List of Plants & Equipments at Depot-cum-Workshop near vasant kunj for East
West Corridor:
S. No.
Equipment
1.
Under floor Pit wheel lathe, Chip crusher and conveyor for 1
lathe on pit, Electric tractor for movement over under floor
wheel lathe
Qty.
Unit
No.
26/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S. No.
Equipment
2.
Set
3.
No.
4.
Set
5.
No.
6.
No.
7.
No.
8.
No.
9.
No.
10.
Set
11.
No.
12.
No.
No.
13.
No.
14.
No.
15.
Carbody stands
24
No.
16.
No.
17.
No.
18.
No.
19.
No.
20.
No.
21.
22.
Set
Qty.
Unit
L.s.
27/3
CHAPTER 11 DEPOT
S. No.
Equipment
Qty.
Unit
23.
Induction heater
No.
24.
No.
25.
No.
26.
Set
27.
28.
Set
29.
Tool Kits
Set
30.
12
No.
31.
No.
32.
Pallet trucks
No.
33.
RRV
34.
35.
36.
No.
37.
Special jigs and fixtures and test benches for Rolling Stock
set
38.
No.
39.
Set
40.
Test benches
Set
41.
42.
43.
44.
Bearing puller
Set
Set
Set
28/3
CHAPTER 12
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT
12.1
BACKGROUND
Lucknow is the capital city of Uttar Pradesh, the most populous state of India.
Lucknow had a population of 22.45 lakh in 2001 and 29.08 lakh in 2011. The Lucknow
Metro is being proposed to strengthen public transport system in the city.
Any environment has a limited carrying capacity and it can only sustain negative
impact up to a level without further degradation. But sensitive systems are not so
resilient to cope up with changes in physical and natural environment, thus leading to
negative impact and socio-economic losses. The railway development projects, like
any other projects, have certain adverse, as well as, beneficial impacts on biophysical
and social environment. Though railway projects do not come under the preview of
environmental clearance from Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of
India, the Environmental Impact Assessment provides tools for decision-making, as
well as, it also help in ensuring the sustainable development with least environmental
damage by providing proper Environmental Management Plan.
12.2
OBJECTIVE
The objective of EIA study is to assess the following components.
i.
ii.
iii.
To identify suitable Mitigation measures for all the potential impacts envisaged
due to the proposed project
iv.
v.
vi.
1/42
12.2.1
METHODOLOGY
The EIA study comprises of the following stages.
Stage 'A'
Stage 'B'
Stage 'C'
12.3
BASELINE DATA
The baseline environmental conditions are reviewed through literature survey and
field studies/monitoring. Information on the location of citys national parks, wildlife
sanctuaries and ecologically sensitive areas like tropical forests, important lakes,
biosphere reserves, ecological resources around the site have been collected.
Following are the major components of field study:
PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
Physical presence of environmental components such as land use pattern, water
resources, drainage condition, historical and archaeological sites, polluting industries,
sensitive areas, plantations, etc were marked. Strip map database is prepared by
precisely locating the details along the corridor of impact to characterise the
environmental sensitivity of the feature for the EIA.
2/42
WATER QUALITY
Water Quality for both surface and ground water has been measured at 2 locations for
each project corridor. The selection of the sampling site was made after site study
following the standard sampling methods as prescribed by the Central Pollution
Control Board.
The Ground water quality was measured at 2 locations along each project corridor.
Ground water quality was monitored following standard methods and for the
parameters given in IS:10500 for drinking water standard.
12.3.7
SOIL CHARACTERISTICS
The physio-chemical characteristics of soil along the proposed alignment were
measured by collection of composite samples from each sampling site following the
prescribed sampling and testing methodology.
12.3.8
12.3.9
3/42
12.4
12.4.1
Geographical Position
Total Vehicle Population
in Lucknow city as on March 2009
Growth of Vehicle over 2008-09
Share of cars and two-wheeler
At present the available multiple modes of public transport in the city are taxis, city
buses, cycle rickshaws and auto rickshaws and CNG buses. CNG has been introduced
recently as an auto fuel to keep the air pollution in control. The city bus service is run
4/42
Number
Type of vehicles
Nagar Bus
CNG Bus
Tempo Taxi
Diesel
CNG
Battery
Auto Rickshaw
Diesel
CNG
110
43
1776
578
1153
45
2129
26
2103
12.4.2
12.4.3
Year
2015
NS Corridor
4.29
EW Corridor
1.56
2020
6.45
2.43
2025
8.33
3.46
2030
10.54
4.60
2041
13.44
6.0
5.85
8.88
11.79
15.14
19.44
PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposed Lucknow Metro track will comprise of two corridors
North-South corridor from CCS airport to Munshipulia
East-West corridor from Lucknow Railway Station to Vasant Kunj
12.4.4
CONSTRUCTION METHODS
The foundation shall consist of a set of four piles and pile cap over it. The
superstructure will be constructed by pre-caste segmental box girder.
The locations where the track centres are at a distance of less than 12.0 m, the
construction shall be done by cut and cover. In the process the structures above the
location are dismantled and after the construction work is over, those dismantled
5/42
structures are again rebuilt. The locations where the track centres are at a distance of
more than 12.0 m, the construction is done by Tunnel Boring Machine. The locations
where scissors crossovers and turnouts are proposed shall be constructed by cut and
cover.
All underground stations have been proposed to be constructed by cut and cover along
the road section. The station locations where it is densely built-up, the Stations will be
constructed by New Austrian Tunnelling Method (NATM). Construction material shall
be stored at temporary construction depots (approx. area 2500 m2) proposed at each
every approx. 5 km section along the corridor and shall be transported to site through
trucks / dumpers.
Water shall be required for Flushing of piles during excavation, concreting, curing etc.
Quantity of water required equals about 3.5 Million m3. The source for water supply
shall be ground water or from Gomti River whichever is nearer. No storage of water
has been planned.
Servicing centres for equipments shall be constructed at the construction depots. The
residence of the construction workers shall be constructed in the temporary
construction depots, metro depots and at site where-ever space is available. No. of
workers will be approximately 5,324.
12.5
BACKGROUND ENVIRONMENT
12.5.1. SITE
The project site is located in the urban area of the Lucknow city. The two corridors
proposed cross the city east-west and north-south along. The proposed metro railway
track will be mostly elevated over the median of the roads and about 41 percent of it
will remain underground. The river Gomti passes through the city west to east and
then turns to south forming eastern boundary of the city. The city is mostly plain land
at an average altitude of 128 m.
12.5.2
SEISMICITY
The earthquake zoning map of India divides India into 4 seismic zones (Zone 2, 3, 4
and 5). According to the present zoning map, Zone 5 expects the highest level of
seismicity whereas Zone 2 is associated with the lowest level of seismicity. The city of
Lucknow falls in Zone 3 (Figure 12.1). This zone is classified as Moderate Damage Risk
Zone which is liable to MSK VII. The IS code assigns zone factor of 0.16 for Zone 3. MSK
scale describes the impact as Felt by most indoors and by many outdoors. A few
persons lose their balance. Many people are frightened and run outdoors. Small objects
may fall and furniture may be shifted. Dishes and glassware may break. Farm animals
may be frightened. Visible damage to masonry structures -cracks in plaster. Isolated
cracks on the ground. Comparing with Modified Mercalli intensity scale, Zone 3 can
have earthquake of 5 to 5.9 Richter magnitudes near the epicentre of the earthquake.
6/42
12.5.3
CLIMATE
Lucknow has a warm humid subtropical climate with cool, dry winters from December
to February and dry, hot summers from April to June. The rainy season is from midJune to mid-September, when Lucknow gets an average rainfall of 1010 mm mostly
from the south-west monsoon winds. In winter the maximum temperature is around
21 degrees Celsius and the minimum is in the 3 to 4 degrees Celsius range. Fog is quite
common from late December to late January. Summers can be quite hot with
temperatures rising to the 40 to 45 degree Celsius range, the average highs being in
the high 30's.
7/42
12.5.4
AIR QUALITY
Ambient air quality of Lucknow city for this project was monitored at total eight (8)
sites along the East-West and North-South corridor (Table 12.4, Figure 12.2).
Monitoring was carried out for two (2) weeks, twice a week at each site in the month
of May 2010. Main air pollutants monitored were
Particulate matter of 10 micron and below
Particulate matter of 2.5 micron and below
Sulphur dioxide
Nitrogen dioxide
Carbon monoxide
The results show that desirable limits for particulate matters (10.5 micron and 2.5
micron) were crossed at number of places but the average values nearly all remained
within limits. Sulphur dioxide levels remained very low, highest value being 8.7 g/m3
only. Nitrogen oxide levels were optimum near the 50% level of the permissible limit.
The National Ambient Air Quality Standards are compiled in Table 12.5.
8/42
TABLE 12.4 - AMBIENT AIR QUALITY MONITORING ON MRTS CORRIODRS MAY 2010
Parameter (Location)
MAX
MIN
PM 10 (g/m3) micro gram per cubic metre
NS-1
78
44
NS-2
147
70
NS-3
113
65
NS-4
84
41
EW-1
131
58
EW-2
118
93
EW-3
98
51
EW-4
131
58
PM 2.5 (g/m3)
NS-1
38
25
NS-2
67
38
NS-3
48
33
NS-4
37
24
EW-1
88
34
EW-2
53
37
EW-3
83
28
EW-4
63
36
SO 2 (g/m3)
NS-1
6.1
4.7
NS-2
8.7
7.4
NS-3
7.6
6.3
NS-4
7.2
5.8
EW-1
6.9
5.4
EW-2
6.3
5.4
EW-3
5.8
4.7
EW-4
6.9
5.4
NO 2 (g/m3)
NS-1
46.4
36.4
NS-2
52.7
49.4
NS-3
52.4
42.0
NS-4
43.9
36.6
EW-1
46.2
37.1
EW-2
41.2
36.4
EW-3
40.6
35.8
EW-4
46.2
37.1
NS North-South Corridor;
AVG
62.1
116.0
95.0
61.0
106.7
106.5
77.4
106.7
31.8
55.0
41.0
30.0
56.3
46.3
39.8
51.0
5.5
7.9
6.9
6.3
6.4
5.7
5.2
6.4
41.6
51.2
46.8
40.1
41.9
39.2
37.7
41.9
EW East-West Corridor
Locations Codes
NS-1= Krishna Nagar,
NS-2= Vidhan Bhawan Road, Hussaingunj,
NS-3= Police Line, Near Lucknow University,
NS-4 = Block-B, Indira Nagar,
EW-1= Near Charbag Railway Station,
EW-2= Medical Collage Chowraha,
EW-3=, Haribazar Balaganj
EW-4= Near Sabjimandi, Dubaga
9/42
Pollutants
Time-weighted
average
24 hours
24 hours
Residential,
Rural &
other Areas
80 g/m3
80 g/m3
Ecologically
Sensitive Areas
Notified by GOI
80 g/m3
80 g/m3
SulphurDioxide (SO 2 )
Oxides of Nitrogen as
(NOx)
Respirable Particulate Matter
(RPM) (size less than 10
microns)
PM 2.5 microns
24 hours
100 g/m3
100 g/m3
24 hours**
60 g/m3
60 g/m3
10/42
Parameter
Unit
0C
mg/1
mg/1
mg/l
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
Gomti river
Gomti river
middle point Entrance point
8.28
7.55
32
32
<1.4
<1.4
305
294
17.2
31.4
0.56
0.80
25.5
29.7
14.52
14.0
0.53
0.60
<0.005
<0.005
<0.1
<0.1
11.04
7.36
mg/1
3.4
<2.0
mg/1
MPN/100
ml
4.1
4.08
1600
1600
Unit
Drinking
Indira Charbagh
Krishna
Dubgga
Water Standard
Nagar N-S
E-W
Nagar N-S
E-W Corridor
Corridor Corridor
Corridor Desirable Permissible
7.47
7.64
7.84
7.64
6.5
8.5
mg/1
399.36
245.76
280.32
276.48
300
600
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
460
253.44
0.25
103.66
18.8
0.15
<0.01
<0.005
<0.1
495
330.24
1.06
45.89
22.6
0.12
<0.01
<0.005
<0.1
518
291.84
0.30
40.78
13.1
0.25
<0.01
<0.005
<0.1
434
372.48
0.19
30.59
4.0
0.20
<0.01
<0.005
<0.1
500
200
0.3
250
45
0.05
0.05
0.05
2000
600
1.0
-
11/42
TABLE 12.8 - PRIMARY WATER QUALITY CRITERIA AS LAID DOWN BY THE CENTRAL
POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
SN
1
2
3
3
4
5
6
7
Water quality
characteristics
Dissolved oxygen (DO) mg/1 Min
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
mg/1 Max
Total
coliforms
organism**MPN/100ml,Max
PH value
Free ammonia (as N)mg/1,Max
Electrical
conductivity,
micromhos/cm Max
Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) Max
Boron, mg/1 max
A
6
B
5
E
-
50
500
5,000
6.5-8.5
-
6.5-8.5
-
6.9
-
6.5-8.5
1.2
6.5-8.5
-
2,250
26
2
Class A Drinking Water Source without Conventional Treatment but after Disinfection
Class B Outdoor Bathing
Class C Drinking Water Source with Conventional Treatment Followed by Disinfection
Class D Fish Culture and Wild Life Propagation
Class E Irrigation, Industrial Cooling or Controlled Waste Disposal
Ref: Central Pollution Control Board (Ministry of Environment & Forest, Govt. of India) Environmental Standards (water quality
criteria)
Parameters
Dissolved oxygen (DO) mg/1, min
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) mg/1 Max
pH
Criteria
5
3 or less
500 (desirable), 2500 (Maximum
permissible)
100 (desirable), 500 (Maximum
permissible)
6.5 8.5
Ref: Central Pollution Control Board (Ministry of Environment & Forest, Govt. of India) Environmental Standards (water quality
criteria)
12.5.6
NOISE
Ambient Noise level was monitored at four (4) places on each corridor for one full day
during May 2010 (Table 12.10). Locations were selected to represent commercial,
residential and silence zones. Noise levels have been presented as day time and night
time averages and also as different percentile results to provide an overall noise
scenario. The results are compiled and presented in Table 12.11. The results show the
city is like any typical Indian urban scenario, noise levels crossing the desirable limits
& the ambient noise standards are given in Table12.12.
12/42
Type of
Area
Commercial
Silence Zone
Residential
Commercial
Location
Near Charbag
Railway Station
Near Medical
College
Chowraha
Near Haribazar
Balaganj
Near Sabjimandi
Dubaga
Leq
dB(A)
Day
Leq
dB(A)
Night
Lmax
Lmin
L90
L10
71.4
50.4
77.0
46.9
73.5
47.5
62.4
44.4
67.2
42.3
65.3
43.1
58.2
43.6
65.7
39.1
59.3
40.1
64.6
46.6
70.6
39.8
66.9
44.3
Type of Area
Residential
Commercial
Silence Zone
Residential
Location
NearKrishna
Nagar
Near Vidhan
Bhawan Road
Hussaingunj
Near Police Line,
Lucknow
University
Near Block-B,
Indira Nagar
Leq
dB(A)
Day
Leq
dB(A)
Night
Lmax
Lmin
L90
L10
64.3
47.7
72.6
40.3
64.7
46.3
68.6
53.9
72.4
41.3
71.5
47.8
64.5
48.3
69.2
42.4
67.3
45.6
57.8
48.2
65.6
40.5
58.6
42.0
Category of Zones
A
B
C
D
Industrial
Commercial
Residential and rural
Silence Zone **
12.5.7
SOIL
Soil samples at 30 cm depth were collected from four locations (Table 12.13) and
were analysed for texture and fertilizing properties. The results conclude that top soil
is silt clay and favourable for agriculture.
13/42
Serial
No.
1
2
3
4
5
12.5.8
Parameter
pH (1:5) at
300C
Texture
Nitrogen as N
in mg/kg
Phosphorus as
P in mg/kg
Potassium as K
in mg/kg
Indira
Nagar
NorthSouth
Corridor
Krishna
Nagar
NorthSouth
Corridor
Charbag,
East -West
Corridor
8.10
7.82
8.12
7.78
Silty Clay
Silty Clay
Silty Clay
Silty Clay
51.08
61.82
102.14
59.14
2.40
1.84
1.22
1.65
203.84
123.80
170.06
231.34
Sabjimandi
(Dubagga)
East-West
Corridor
ECOLOGY
The forest area is negligible in Lucknow district. Shisham, Dhak, Mahua, Babul, Neem,
Peepal, Ashok, Khajur, Mango and Gular trees are grown here. In fact different varieties
of mangoes specially Dashari are grown in Malihabad block of the district and exported
to other countries too. The main crops are wheat, paddy, sugarcane, mustard, potatoes,
and vegetables such as cauliflower, cabbage, tomato, brinjals are grown here. Similarly
sunflowers, roses, and marigold are cultivated on quite a large area of the land. Apart
from this, many medicinal and herbal plants are also grown here.
In the project area the trees planted along the project corridor will be directly
impacted. A survey was conducted to find the quantum of impact on the trees along
the corridors.
The major finding of the survey (Table 12.14, 12.15 & 12.16)) is that 158 trees will
be impacted in E-W corridor out of which 77 trees can be called big trees. In the N-S
corridor number of trees that may be impacted is 461 out of which 189 are big trees. In
the Gomti Nagar Link number of trees that may be impacted is 437, out of which 47 are
big trees. Major species to be impacted are Eucalyptus, Chilbil, Simul, Sisam etc.
TABLE 12.14 - TREES WITHIN 10 M ON EITHER SIDE OF CENTRE LINE OF E-W CORRIDOR
Tree Local Name
Gular
Gulmohar
Rubber
Sajina
Pakur
Simul
Unknown
Debdar
Jamun
Sagwan
Neem
Khejur
Total
1
1
1
1
3
4
4
5
7
8
11
12
14/42
Total
15
15
29
41
158
TABLE 12.15 - TREES WITHIN 10 M ON EITHER SIDE OF CENTRE LINE OF N-S CORRIDOR
Tree Local Name
Jamrul
Mango
Sagun
Babul
Kadam
Khejur
Singri
Gular
Chatim
Unidentified
Sajina
Bat
Sagwan
Aam
Balamkhira
Chilbil
Imli
Pakur
Gulmohar
Pinni
Debdar
Dhaicha
Neem
Sisam
Simul
Eucalyptus
Total
Total
1
1
1
2
2
4
4
5
6
6
7
8
8
9
10
11
12
14
17
19
23
23
23
33
42
170
461
Total
390
47
437
15/42
12.5.9
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES
Lucknow claims its historical root to mythological character Laxman of the epic
Ramayana. In recent history Lucknow became capital of Oudh state under Mughal
Empire in middle of the 18th Century and a number of magnificent royal buildings,
mausoleums, mosques were built by the Muslim rulers of Lucknow. A number of such
buildings have been declared Protected Site by Archaeological Department.
Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Site and Remains Act 1958 (amended 2010)
defines ancient monument, archaeological site and remains which are not less than
one hundred years old and has historical, archaeological and artistic interest. Under
this act a number of such monuments and sites of national importance have been
declared as protected. The limits of prohibited area and regulated area around the
monuments and archaeological sites and remains have been specified under the Act as
100 m and 200 m respectively. No permission for construction of any public projects
or any other nature shall be granted in the prohibited area of 100 m. Construction can
be done within the regulated area (in between 100 m and 200 m) after approval from
National Monument Authority.
8 nos of archaeological sites on N-S corridor and 1 no. on E-W corridor need to be
considered for this purpose (Table 12.17 & 12.18). Two monuments on N-S corridor
(i) Alambagh Gate which is under the State Archaeology and (ii) the old gate and
boundary of Amzad Ali Shahs Mausoleum fall within the prohibited area of 100 m
from the centre line of the project corridor. The actual monument building is 160 m
away from the proposed alignment. Total Nine (7) sites fall within regulated zone.
TABLE 12.17-PROTECTED AND REGULATED ARCHAEOLOGICAL
SITES ON N-S CORRIDOR
SN
Name of Protected
monument /Site
Alambagh Gate
Alambagh Cemetry
4
5
6
Location
N 2648'50.01
E 8054'11.06
N 264882.5
E80 5430.3
Sapper's Tomb
Tomb of Mushir
Zadi
Tomb of Saadat Ali
Khan
NA
N26 5124.8
E80 5607.4
N26 5126.8
E80 5602.7
N26 5138.1
E80 5603.6
Victoria Memorial
Cementry
Faizabad Road
on
NA
Dist. from
Centreline (m)
Chainage
(km)
32
5.620
202
5.620
15m (from
exterior old
gate), 160m
from main
structure
within 200
12.523
13.180
115
13.193
115
13.193
102
13.428
Bet. 100-200
19.240
16/42
Name of Site
Jama Masjid
Location
N26 52366
E80 54036
Distance
from CL
(m)
150
Chainage
(km)
6.370
Name
Life Hospital
Hospital
Nursery School (Ringing Bell)
State Govt. Hospital
Bhatnagar Nursing Home
Lucknow Polytechnique College
Lal Hospital
Mehra hospital
Suraj Singh Hospital
Awadh Hospital
Govt. Primary School
Ajanta Hospital
City Hospital & Trauma Centre
Gandhi Inter College
Dindayal Memorial Park
KKC College
National Progressive School
City Montessori School
Vidhan Sabha
Sarojini Naidu Park
KD Babu Singh Stadium
Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Park
Lucknow University
Colvin Taluqdars College
IT College
Approx.
dist from
CL (m)
27
31
10
21
16
28
19
21
31
17
20
22
22
18
16
25
16
15
16
17
18
15
16
13
25
Direction from CL
(R/L)
L
R
L
L
R
R
L
R
R
L
R
R
L
L
R
R
L
R
R
R
R
R
L
R
L
17/42
Chainage
(km)
15.590 Km
16.300 Km
16.440 Km
17.020 Km
17.200 Km
17.950 Km
19.640 Km
20.000 Km
20.600 Km
20.720 Km
21.200 Km
Name
Vikram Mehta Hospital
Fatima Hospital
Karamant Girls' Muslim College
City Montessori Inter College
Mahanagar Girls' College
Indira Nagar Public College
Beniprasad Memorial Park
Red Hill School
Lucknow Polytechnica
Gyan Mandir Kanya Intermediate College
S.B. Inter College
Approx.
dist from
CL (m)
25
21
25
18
18
17
15
16
65
3
16
Direction from CL
(R/L)
L
L
L
L
L
R
L
L
R
L
R
Type of Structure
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Bodh Vihar
Satsang Bhawan
Gurudwara
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Temple
Distance from
CL (R/L)
L
L
L
L
L
R
L
R
R
R
L
L
L
R
R
L
L
R
L
R
R
L
L
L
L
R
R
R
L
R
R
L
18/42
Chainage (Km)
10.765Km
10.900 Km
10.900 Km
11.421 Km
11.496 Km
12.733Km
14.222 Km
14.347Km
14.675 Km
14.750 Km
16.550 Km
17.550 Km
17.550 Km
17.925 Km
18.050 Km
18.375 Km
18.475 Km
18.525 Km
18.700 Km
18.800 Km
18.875 Km
20.900 Km
20.925 Km
Type of Structure
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Distance from
CL (R/L)
R
L
R
R
R
R
L
L
L
R
L
R
R
L
L
L
L
L
R
R
R
L
R
Name
Gurunanak Girl's College
Kamaladevi Hospital
Vidyant Hindu College
Amar Convent School
Sahuji Maharaja Medical University
Queen Mary Hospital
Kalicharan Inter College
CMS School
MG Montessori School
Kamakhya College
Saraswati Sishu Vidya mandir
Brajraj Hospital
Mother & Child Care Centre
St. Joseph Inter College
New Ideals Montessori School
Glorious Public School
Ramsa Hospital
Approx.
Distance From
CL (m)
18
15
14
20
35
30
25
17
17
16
17
17
20
18
13
23
30
Direction from
CL(R/L)
L
L
R
L
R
R
L
R
L
R
R
R
R
R
L
L
L
19/42
20/42
Type
0.075 Km
0.325 Km
1.325 Km
1.400 Km
2.050 Km
2.100 Km
2.900 Km
2.950 Km
4.800 Km
5.600 Km
5.850 Km
6.600 Km
6.600 Km
6.650 Km
6.750 Km
6.800 Km
6.900 Km
7.850 Km
7.925 Km
8.150 Km
8.525 Km
8.700 Km
8.750 Km
9.200 Km
9.350 Km
9.625 Km
9.950 Km
10.250 Km
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Temple
Mosque
Mosque
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Temple
Temple
Mosque
Temple
2 Temples
Temple
Temple
Approx. Distance
From CL (m)
20
20
19
14
35
30
6
5
0
4
17
18
25
17
18
25
15
13
16
9
12
20
17
7
30
16
16
23
Direction from
CL(R/L)
L
R
R
L
L
R
R
L
M
L
L
R
L
R
R
L
L
L
R
L
L
L
R
L
L
L
R
L
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
12.6.1 INTRODUCTION
This section identifies and assesses the probable impacts on different environmental
parameters due to planning, construction and the operation of the proposed
development. After studying the existing baseline environmental scenario, initial field
surveys, reviewing the process and related statutory norms, the major impacts have
been identified and assessed during the design, construction and the operation phases.
Metro construction related impacts occur at three stages of the project:
x Planning and Design
x Construction
x Operation
21/42
Planning and Design includes planning of the metro railway corridor alignment,
underground and elevated sections, construction details, materials of construction etc.
which ultimately decides the impact during later phases. Most of the impacts are
during construction and operation phase. While some of the construction phase
impacts are temporary, some also are permanent. Operation phase impacts are
continuous in nature. To identify these impacts broadly on physical, ecological and
social environment Impact Identification Matrix are developed.
Other important criteria for identification of impact are identification of the impact
zone. For present screening studies, a Corridor of Impact (COI) of 30 m width from the
central alignment has been considered.
Environmental parameters are broadly classified into three groups.
x Physical Environment
x
Biological Environment
Human Environment
Physical environment includes:
Water Resources, Water Quality, Air Quality, Noise and Land environment
Project
Activity
Env.
Component
Air
Noise
Water
Resources &
water quality
Land
Trees
Cultural &
Religious
facility
Sensitive
Places
Realignment
of Utility
Lines
Earth
moving
Removing
trees &
vegetation
Construction
work
Sanitation &
disposal of
water from
tunnel
Vehicle &
machine
operation &
maintenance
Vehicle
operation
Dust
Pollutio
n
Reduced
buffering of
air and noise
pollution
Odour
Air pollution
Noise, air
pollution
and dust
Contamination
of water line,
Impact
disturbance in due to Soil
sewerage and
Erosion
drainage line
Dumping
of earth
Impact on
trees
Damage
to
structure
Noise,
dust, air
pollution
Impact on Water
use,
Contamination Contamination of
Contamination
of local water
local water
by fuel &
sources
sources
lubricants,
Contamination
Solid Waste
from wastes
Loss of trees
& vegetation
Loss of sacred
trees
Disturbance to
religious
functions
Noise, dust, air
pollution
22/42
12.6.2
SN
Plot No.
Depot
1RST1
1RST2
1RST3
1RST5
1
2
2RST1
Depot
Details
N-S CORRIDOR
PAC
Campus
Land
opposite
Transport Nagar
Open Land on RHS of NH-25
opposite to Literacy House
At Sarojini naidu Park beside
K.D.Singh Babu stadium on RHS of
the MG Road
Open Ground in the campus of
Reserve Police Line
Open Land on RHS of Himalaya
Marg beside the Polytechnic Flyover
and adjacent to the Polytechnic
Campus.
E-W CORRIDOR
Playground of Girls college
Open Land Behind Fish mandi
Area (m )
Ownership
378000.00
Government
2512.37
Private
2742.80
Government
2499.99
Government
2015.65
Government
2500.00
123300.00
Government
Government
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
23/42
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
24/42
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
25/42
80
72 - 84
83 - 94
81 - 98
75 - 87
80
72 - 93
72 - 84
83 - 94
81 - 98
80 - 93
75 - 77
71 - 82
74 - 88
81 - 84
76
74 - 87
81 - 98
80
83 - 94
72 - 84
83 - 94
86 - 88
80 -93
73 - 75
86 - 88
83 - 94
74 - 77
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
80
72 - 93
83 - 94
72 - 84
83 - 94
86 - 88
26/42
From the above table it is evident that the operation of construction machinery e.g.
hot-mixer, bulldozer, loader, backhoes, concrete mixer, etc will lead to rise in noise
level to the range between 80-95 dB (A). Vehicles carrying construction materials will
also act as the noise sources. The magnitude of impact from noise will depend upon
types of equipment to be used, construction methods and also on work scheduling.
However, the noise pollution generated due to different construction activities is a
temporary affair. Each type of activity can generate different type and level of noise
that continue for a short period during the operations of those activities.
The impact of noise depends on the location of the receptor and source. The noise
level generated from a source decreases with distance as per the following empirical
formula (inverse square law).
SPL2 = SPL1 - 20Log 10 (r 2 /r 1 )
Where, SPL1 and SPL2 are the sound pressure levels at distance r 1 and r 2 respectively.
Considering the stationary construction equipment as a point source generating 90 dB
(A) at a reference distance of 2 m, computed distance require to meet the permissible
limits during day time for different land use categories are given below in Table
12.26.
TABLE 12.26 - MINIMUM DISTANCE OF OPERATION FROM STATIONARY
SOURCE REQUIRED FOR MEETING STANDARDS
Category
Silence zone
Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Distance required
(m)
200
113
36
11
Ref: Central Pollution Control Board (Ministry of Environment and Forests) Guidelines
From the above table it may be noted that residence within 113 m from the road will
be exposed to a noise higher than the permissible limit. The impacts will be significant
on construction workers, working close to the machinery.
12.6.3.6 Utilities
Many types of utilities serving local and regional needs are falling under COI will need
to be relocated from their present position due to the proposed widening alignment.
These services are mainly lamp posts, electric poles, transformers, telephone poles, gas
lines and optical fibre cables. The magnitudes of impact in each corridor on these
services are presented below in Table 12.27. Such types of impacts are inevitable.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
27/42
Item
NORTH-SOUTH
EAST-WEST
690
661
75
661
75
740
115
98
13478.65
362
207
18
108
14
373
45
45
2748.57
No. of Trees
Light Poles
Signal Poles
Telephone Poles
Telephone Junction box
Electric Poles
Electric Junction box
Transformer
Gas Pipeline Affected Length (m)
Ref: Field Survey and proposed design
12.6.3.7 Trees
The project corridors have trees and plantations on sides or in some stretches on the
middle of the project corridor. Construction and maintenance activities can cause
severe impact on these trees and plantations by removing them. This will cause also
induced impact on local fauna and ecology. The loss of trees is also important for road
users as these trees provide shade to the road users. The impact will depend on the
number, density, and types of species of trees on each road.
The major finding of the survey is that 158 trees can be impacted in E-W corridor out
of which 77 trees can be called big trees. In the N-S corridor number of trees that may
be impacted is 461 out of which 189 are big trees. Major species to be impacted are
Eucalyptus, Chilbil, Simul, Sisam etc.
Compensatory plantation near the project area needs to be carried out as detailed out
in mitigation measures. With the proposed mitigation measures, there can be more
trees planted as compared to existing one.
12.6.3.8 Archaeological Sites
There are Nine (9) archaeological sites near the project corridors falling within the
prohibited or regulated zone. The construction works can have adverse impact on
these sites because of vibration, air pollution and other pollutants. But necessary
precautionary measures will be taken during the construction activities, so as to
mitigate any adverse effect.
12.6.4
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
28/42
12.6.4.1 Noise
The noise will impact the people outside on the elevated part of the corridor.
12.6.4.2 Air Quality
It is expected that air quality of the city will improve and people will depend on Metro
service and there will be less increase in numbers of car and buses. As Metro operation
will not locally emit any air pollution, ambient air quality will be better in future.
12.6.4.3 Refuse from Stations
The station will generate solid waste from different uses of the passengers. All wastes
from stations need to be disposed properly to avoid any local pollution
12.6.4.4 Traffic problem near the Stations
There will be increased traffic near the stations. All stations also will not have parking
spaces. If this traffic is not managed properly it can cause both noise and air pollution
locally. This should be considered for long term planning.
12.7
12.7.1
12.7.2
DESIGN PHASE
Design of the project will also be based on social and environmental criteria. Important
environmental components e.g. water supply, sewage disposal, drainage, trees,
sensitive locations etc, and social components e,g, school, hospitals, places of worship,
residential areas, commercial place etc. have been preliminarily identified on project
corridors. While finalising alignments and deciding on corridor of impact, these data
has been considered to minimize the impact on environment (Table 12.28).
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
29/42
Planning shall also be done for the realignment of the underground public utility lines
e.g. water supply, sewage and storm water disposal, electricity, gas, telephone lines etc
at planning stage. This will be done in consultation with the relevant authorities.
TABLE 12.28 - DESIGN PHASE MEASURES
Impacts
Land Acquisition
Removal of Trees
Impact
on
public
utilities
Impact
on
Archaeological
and
Cultural Sites
Access Restriction
Environmental
Specifications
Contractors
12.7.3
for
Mitigation Measures
Alignment design to minimize the land acquisition
Alignment design to reduce the number of trees to be cut.
Compensatory plantation to be planned.
Alignment design to consider. In case of removal alternate
arrangement to be done before.
Alignment design to consider minimum impact
CONSTRUCTION PHASE
Gaseous
Pollution
Mitigation Measures
Water will be sprayed during construction phase if required, in
earth handling sites and other excavation areas for suppression of
dust.
Dust emission from piles of excavated material should also be
controlled by spraying water on the piles or should be kept
covered by tarpaulin sheets.
Special care should be taken when working near the educational
and medical institutions.
Vehicles and machineries will be regularly maintained to conform
to the emission standards stipulated under Environment
(Protection), Rules 1986.
The workers should be provided with masks in dusty condition and
it will be responsibility of the supervising officers that the workers
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
30/42
Impacts
Noise
Mitigation Measures
x
Mitigation Measures
Realignment
will
be
done in consultation with the
x
authorities responsible for the maintenance of these utilities.
The personnel from those organizations should be involved
during this activity.
If there is any requirement for closure or stoppage of access
to public water taps on the roadside, alternative
arrangements for the users will be made accordingly.
x Excavated earth and other construction materials should be
stored away to prevent washing away.
x Proper permission from relevant authorities to be obtained.
x All practical measures will be taken to prevent any
uncontrolled effluent discharge from construction workers
camps and storages to water sources. The camp site will be
provided with proper drainage connected with local drain.
x Vehicle maintenance will be carried out in a confined area,
away from water sources, and it will be ensured that used oil
or lubricants are not disposed to watercourses.
Construction camp will be organised in a planned manner.
Workers shall be provided proper sanitation facilities
including toilets. Solid wastes from camps will be disposed
only in the waste bins provided by the Municipal
corporation.
Camps will have water supply facilities like tube wells or
from separate municipal supply so that local water sources
are not affected.
Contractor and Supervising Engineer will be responsible for
sanitation condition of the camp.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
31/42
The ground water table generally lies below 30 m. So problems of water flow
associated with tunnelling should not be a major issue. In cut and cover type
construction continuous pumping is an economical alternative. A suitable piezometer
shall be installed to monitor the water table constantly and to see how much lowering
has been effectively done. The dewatering should not be stopped unless it is ensured
from design calculations that the load of the constructed box component has reached a
stage where it will be able to counter act the hydrostatic pressure from below.
Water from the excavated site should be pumped out to a sump and then disposed
after providing some settling time for particulates. To prevent loss of fines, inverted
filter may have to be used.
The construction of diaphragm walls of concrete along the side of channels, before the
commencement of excavation will be required. The concrete walls are taken down to
rest on bed rock or impervious strata or, in their absence, deep enough below the
bottom of excavation, to serve as an effective cut off for the inflow of ground water into
the proposed excavation. The trenches are kept continuously filled with a thiotropic
material like Bentonite slurry, which has the effect of stabilising the trench and
preventing any subsidence.
During operation phase, seepage water has to be drained along the side of walls
(retaining). The pumped water from sump will be put into storm water drain that is
suitable for taking up this flow. These storm water drains finally join natural existing
streams/nallah.
12.7.3.4 Excavated soil disposal
About 2.1 Million cubic meter of earth will be excavated for the project work. As the
construction work will be done in a city, space for construction requirements will not
be much available. Therefore an elaborate planning should be done to regularly
dispose the excavated soil by trucks. The excavated earth at construction site should
be stored and covered with tarpaulins to prevent erosion of soil and clogging of local
drainage.
It should be seen that there is no spillage from the trucks and these trucks should be
regularly washed and cleaned. All the usable excavated materials shall be re-used as fill
materials. The movement of vehicles and equipments will be restricted to only
designated route.
Designated storage site shall be used for fill materials and adequate stockpiling to
prevent erosion and runoff related problem.
12.7.3.5 Utility Restoration
The utilities likely to be affected are mainly water supply and sewer pipe, storm water
drains, telephone, cables, over head transmission lines, electric poles, traffic signals
etc. These utilities have been identified at design phase. At the beginning of the
construction work, it should be ensured that temporary or permanent substitutions for
these utilities have been arranged. The related government departments and private
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
32/42
agencies should be consulted otherwise the project schedule may hamper significantly
and people will have to face much adverse impact.
12.7.3.6 Trees
Some trees have to be removed during construction activities. Field survey has found
about 619 trees may be cut for the project. Mitigation measures to reduce the impact
and trees suggested for plantation are suggested below in Table 12.31 and Table
12.32 respectively:
TABLE 12.31 - IMPACT AND MITIGATION MEASURES FOR TREES
Impacts
Loss of trees
Loss of Sacred
Trees
Mitigation Measures
Tree felling will be restricted to requirement of construction
activities and reduction of accident possibilities.
Five times the number of trees cut will be planted. So about 3100
trees are to be planted. Besides there will be more plantation on
road sides. Plantation will be done as near as the old site, most
preferably just beyond the existing position within Right of Way
(ROW). To compensate the felling of trees and improve
environmental quality trees may be planted in nearby areas beyond
the project site. If space is not available, forest department will be
approached to plant in degraded forest land.
The species will be selected depending on site, plantation design and
in consultation with local community.
In case of any sacred tree associated with community tradition,
it will be preserved.
Roads Wide to
moderately
wide
roads with overhead
interference
Desirable Species
Characteristics
Evergreen ornamental tall
trees with spreading crown
along the periphery, planting
medium height trees in
groves, ornamental climbers
and creepers on topiaries,
provision for small lawn for
green ambience
Recommended Plants
Trees;
Samanea
saman,
Pterospermum
acerifolium,
Swietenia spp, Delonix regia,
Jacaranda ovalifolia, Millingtonia
hortensis, Fiscus spp, Schleichera
oleosa
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
33/42
12.7.3.9
For smooth traffic flow between Hussain Ganj till Hazrat Ganj traffic shall be
diverted onto following routes: From Hussain Ganj will diverted to Dr. RK Tandon
Rd. and join University road further; From sachivalaya traffic shall be diverted
onto Ashok Marg to avoid Hazratganj stretch.
Traffic movement between Lucknow Rly. Station till Gautam Buddha marg will be
blocked due to constrained ROW cut & cover construction of stations. The traffic
from Charbagh shall be diverted onto Aminabad Road & Subhash marg. Aminabad
road further joins University road and will carry the traffic moving towards
Vishwavidhyalaya & beyond.
Traffic movement between Medical Chauraha till Nawazganj will be blocked due to
cut & cover construction method. Traffic shall be diverted onto Nabiullah road
and joins Thakurganj further.
Environmental Enhancement
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
34/42
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
35/42
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
36/42
First Aid
At every workplace, a readily available first aid unit including an adequate supply of
sterilised dressing material and appliances will be provided as per the Factory Rules.
Potable Water
In every workplace at suitable and easily accessible places a sufficient supply of cold
potable water (as per IS) will be provided and maintained. If the drinking water is
obtained from an intermittent public water supply then, storage tanks will be
provided.
Hygiene
-
The Contractor during the progress of work will provide, erect and maintain
necessary (temporary) living accommodation and ancillary facilities for labour
to standards and scales approved by the resident engineer.
There shall be provided within the precincts of every workplace, latrines and
urinals in an accessible place, and the accommodation, separately for each for
these, as per standards set by the Building and other Construction Workers
(regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1996. If women are
employed, separate latrines and urinals, screened from those for men and
marked in the vernacular shall be provided. There shall be adequate supply of
water, close to latrines and urinals.
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
37/42
12.7.4
OPERATION PHASE
Environmental issues change during operation phase and its mitigation plan also has
to be looked for a longer period of time.
12.7.4.1
Noise
The noise will impact the people outside on the elevated part of the corridor. Mostly
upper stories of the buildings close to the corridor may face additional noise level. In
case the elevated track goes too close to any sensitive building, noise barrier may be
constructed there.
12.7.4.2
12.7.4.3
12.8
12.8.1
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
38/42
12.8.3
MONITORING
39/42
Organisational Charts
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
40/42
Operational Procedure
Monitoring Records
Emergency plans
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
41/42
12.9
FINAL DETAILED
PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FFINAL
42/42
CHAPTER - 13
COST ESTIMATES
13.1
INTRODUCTION
Detailed cost estimates for North-South Corridor (Chaudhary Charan Singh Airport Munshipulia), Gomti Nagar Link and East-West Corridor (Charbagh/Lucknow Railway
Station Vasantkunj) have been prepared covering civil, electrical, signalling and
telecommunications works, rolling stock, environmental protection, rehabilitation, etc.
considering 25 kV ac Overhead Traction System at May 2013 price level.
While preparing the capital cost estimates, various items have generally been grouped
under three major heads on the basis of (i) route km length of alignment, (ii) number of
units of that item, and (iii) item being an independent entity. All items related with
alignment, whether elevated or at-grade or underground construction, permanent way,
traction, signalling & telecommunication, whether in main lines or in maintenance
depot, have been estimated at rate per route km basis. Cost of station structures, other
electrical services at these stations including Lifts & Escalators and Automatic Fare
Collection (AFC) installations at all stations have been assessed in terms of each station
as a unit. Similarly rolling stock costs have been estimated in terms of number of units
required. In remaining items, viz. land, utility diversions, rehabilitation, etc. the costs
have been assessed on the basis of each item, taken as an independent entity.
In order to arrive at realistic cost of various items, costs have been assessed on the basis
of recently awarded rates of Phase III Delhi Metro Project and a suitable escalation
factor has been applied to bring these costs to May 2013 price level. Land rates have not
been changed and are same as these were in April 2011 DPR. The details of taxes and
duties are worked out separately.
13.2
1/3
S. No.
1.0
1.1
a
b
1.2
a
b
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
R. Km.
29.057
1.000
Subtotal (2)
3.0
3.1
a
b
3.2
a
b
c
d
e
Station Buildings
Underground Station(240 m
length) incl. EM works, lifts,
escalators, VAC etc.
Underground Station- Civil works
Underground Station- EM works
etc.
Elevated stations(including
finishes)
Type (A) way side- civil works
Type (A) way side- EM works etc
Type (B) Way side with
signalling-civil works
Type (B) Way side with
signalling-EM works etc
Type (C), Terminal station -civil
29.06
873.49
Each
Each
109.143
327.43
Each
57.370
172.11
Each
Each
22.894
6.500
12
12
274.73
78.00
Each
24.655
123.28
Each
6.500
32.50
Each
25.540
51.08
Each
2/3
S. No.
f
3.3
Item
works
Type (c), Terminal station -EM
works
OCC bldg.
Unit
Rate
Qty.
Each
6.500
Amount (Rs. in
Cr.)
Without taxes
13.00
LS
LS
40.00
LS
10.00
4.0
a
b
5.0
5.1
5.2
6.0
6.1
6.1
7.0
7.1
7.2
8.0
9.0
10.0
Subtotal (3)
Depot
Civil works
EM works etc ( Without
workshop)
Subtotal (4)
P-Way
Ballastless track for elevated &
underground Section
(22.878+1.000)
Ballasted track for at grade
alignment (in depot)
Subtotal (5)
Traction & power supply incl.
OHE, ASS etc. Excl. lifts &
Escalators
UG Section
Elevated & at grade section
(19.438+1.000)
Subtotal (6)
Signalling and Telecom.
Sig. & Telecom.
Automatic fare collection
a) Underground stations
b) Elevated stations
Subtotal (7)
R & R incl. Hutments etc.
Subtotal (8)
Misc. Utilities, roadworks,
other civil works such as
median stn. signages
Environmental protection
Civil works (3.53 cr/km)
+
EM works (2.93 cr/km)
Subtotal (9)
Rolling Stock
1122.12
LS
LS
70.00
LS
105.00
175.00
R. Km.
7.260
23.878
173.35
R. Km.
7.260
5.000
36.30
209.65
R.Km.
14.230
3.440
48.95
R.Km.
9.560
20.438
195.39
244.34
R. Km.
Stn.
Each
Each
14.540
23.878
347.19
5.000
5.000
3
19
R. Km.
3.120
22.878
15.00
95.00
457.19
71.38
71.38
R. Km.
6.460
22.878
147.79
Each
9.800
78
147.79
764.40
R. Km.
3/3
S. No.
11.0
a
b
12.0
a
b
13.0
14.0
15.0
16.0
17.0
18.0
Item
Subtotal (10)
Capital expenditure on security
Civil works
EM works etc
Subtotal (11)
Staff quarter for O & M
Civil works
EM works etc
Sub Total (12)
Capital expenditure on MultiModal Traffic Integration @
2% of total cost excluding land
Sub Total (13)
Total of all items except Land
General Charges incl. Design
charges @ 7 % on all items
except land
Total of all items including G.
Charges except land
Continegencies @ 3 %
Gross Total
Rate
Qty.
LS
R.Km.
R.Km.
0.235
0.056
22.878
22.878
5.38
1.28
6.66
R.Km.
R.Km.
1.042
0.258
22.878
22.878
23.84
5.90
29.73
82.04
82.04
4183.79
292.87
4476.66
Amount (Rs. in
Cr.)
Without taxes
764.40
Unit
=
=
134.30
4610.96
4611
4992
4/3
1.0
1.1
a
b
1.2
a
b
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
Qty.
Amount (Rs. in
Cr.)
Without taxes
Item
Unit
Rate
Government
Private
ha
ha
5.000
25.000
14.740
2.620
73.70
65.50
Government
Private
Subtotal (1)
Alignment and Formation
Underground section by T.B.M
excluding station length (240m
each)
Underground section by Cut &
Cover excluding station length
(240m each)
Elevated section including station
length
ha
ha
1.200
6.000
2.710
2.840
3.25
17.04
159.49
R. Km.
105.710
4.022
425.17
R. Km.
97.970
0.848
83.08
R. Km.
29.057
4.548
132.15
Entry to depot
R. Km.
29.057
0.350
10.17
Land
Permanent
Temporary
Subtotal (2)
650.57
3.0
Station Buildings
3.1
Each
Each
109.143
764.00
Each
57.370
401.59
Each
Each
Each
22.894
6.500
2
2
45.79
13.00
Each
24.655
49.31
Each
6.500
13.00
Each
25.540
25.54
3.2
a
b
c
d
e
5/3
S. No.
f
4.0
a
b
5.0
5.1
5.2
6.0
6.1
6.1
7.0
7.1
7.2
8.0
9.0
10.0
11.0
a
b
12.0
a
b
Item
works
Type (c), Terminal station -EM
works
Subtotal (3)
Depot
Civil works
EM works etc ( Without workshop)
Subtotal (4)
P-Way
Ballastless track for elevated &
underground Section
(11.098+0.350)
Ballasted track for at grade
alignment (in depot)
Subtotal (5)
Traction & power supply incl.
OHE, ASS etc. Excl. lifts &
Escalators
UG Section
Elevated & at grade section
(4.548+0.350)
Subtotal (6)
Signaling and Telecom.
Sig. & Telecom.
Automatic fare collection
a) Underground stations
b) Elevated stations
Subtotal (7)
R & R incl. Hutments etc.
Subtotal (8)
Misc. Utilities, roadworks, other
civil works such as median stn.
signages Environmental
protection
Civil works (3.53 cr/km)
+
EM works (2.93 cr/km)
Subtotal (9)
Rolling Stock
Subtotal (10)
Capital expenditure on security
Civil works
EM works etc
Subtotal (11)
Staff quarter for O & M
Civil works
EM works etc
Sub Total (12)
Unit
Rate
Qty.
Amount (Rs. in
Cr.)
Each
6.500
6.50
1318.73
LS
LS
LS
70.00
105.00
175.00
R. Km.
7.260
11.448
83.11
R. Km.
7.260
5.000
36.30
119.41
R.Km.
14.230
6.550
93.21
R.Km.
9.560
4.898
46.82
140.03
R. Km.
Stn.
Each
Each
14.540
11.448
166.45
5.000
5.000
7
5
R. Km.
3.120
11.098
35.00
25.00
226.45
34.63
34.63
6.460
11.098
71.69
42
71.69
411.60
411.60
R. Km.
R. Km.
Each
9.800
R. Km.
R. Km.
0.235
0.056
11.098
11.098
2.61
0.62
3.23
R. Km.
R. Km.
1.042
0.258
11.098
11.098
11.56
2.86
14.42
6/3
S. No.
Item
Unit
Rate
Qty.
13.0
14.0
15.0
63.32
63.32
3229.08
226.04
16.0
17.0
18.0
3455.12
13.4
Amount (Rs. in
Cr.)
=
=
103.65
3558.77
3559
3723
LAND
i)
Land requirements have been kept to the barest minimum & worked out on area
basis. For underground and elevated alignment, no land is proposed to be
acquired permanently, except small areas for locating entry/exit structures, traffic
integration, etc. at stations, and wherever the alignment is off the road.
ii)
Total land permanently required for the project is 65.36 Ha out of which only 8.32
Ha is private land and major part of it i.e. 57.04 Ha is government land which
includes 49.13 Ha land for depots at Transport Nagar and at Fish Mandi on Hardoi
road.
iii)
iv)
Total land requirements permanently for North-South Corridor have been worked
out to 48.00 Ha, out of which 42.30 Ha is Govt. land and 5.70Ha is private land.
v)
Similarly, for East-West Corridor, total permanent land required is 17.36 Ha, out
of which 14.74 Ha is government and 2.62 Ha is private land.
vi)
7/3
FORMATION / ALIGNMENT
i) Underground section: The basis of rate is recently awarded rates of Phase III
Delhi Metro Project and a suitable escalation factor has been applied to bring
these costs to May 2013 price level. Costs are worked considering underground
alignment to be done by Tunnel Boring Machines and cut & cover method, except
240 m lengths for each station, which is proposed to be done along with station
work. Only one station is proposed to be constructed by cut & cover method.
ii) Elevated Section: The basis of rate is recently awarded rates of Phase III Delhi
Metro Project and a suitable escalation factor has been applied to bring these costs
to May 2013 price level. Cost of viaduct length for station has been included in
elevated section.
13.6
STATION BUILDINGS
i) Underground Stations: Rates for underground stations are based on recently
awarded rates of Phase III Delhi Metro Project and a suitable escalation factor has
been applied to bring these costs to May 2013 price level. This work cover U.G.
alignment as well as other civil electrical works like ventilation, air-conditioning,
lifts & escalators but does not cover P-way, O.H.E, signaling and interlocking works,
AFC installations.
ii) Elevated Stations: The basis of rate is recently awarded rates of Phase III Delhi
Metro Project and a suitable escalation factor has been applied to bring these costs
to May 2013 price level. The cost includes the general services at the stations but
excludes the cost of viaduct, lifts & escalators, which have been considered
separately under, respective items.
13.7
PERMANENT WAY
For elevated and underground sections, ballast-less track and for at-grade section and
Depot ballasted track has been planned. The basis of rate is recently awarded rates of
Phase III Delhi Metro Project and a suitable escalation factor has been applied to bring
these costs to May 2013 price level.
13.8
DEPOT
Separate Car Maintenance Depot-cum-Workshop for North-South Corridor and EastWest Corridor has been proposed at Transport Nagar and at Fish mandi on Hardoi road
8/3
respectively. The two depots are planned at ground level. Costs have been worked out
for various items of building, elevated structures, tracks, boundary wall & plants
machinery etc.
13.9
UTILITY DIVERSIONS
The costs of utility diversions involved in the stretch have been considered separately
and provided for in the estimate. In addition to sewer/drainage/water pipelines other
important utilities works considered are road diversions, road restoration etc. Cost
provision has been made on route km basis based on experience of Delhi Metro.
OHE
Receiving-cum-Traction Sub-stations including cables.
ASS for elevated and at-grade stations.
Service connection charges for Receiving Sub-stations.
SCADA augmentation.
Miscellaneous items e.g. illumination, lifting T&P, etc.
The basis of rate is recently awarded rates of Phase III Delhi Metro Project and a
suitable escalation factor has been applied to bring these costs to May 2013 price level.
13.13 ELECTRICAL SERVICES AT STATIONS
These are included in estimated costs of stations. Cost of escalators for elevated stations
have not been included in station costs, and therefore, are provided under electrical
estimates & shown separately.
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
9/3
Availability and review of existing public and IPT facilities, in terms of motorized
and non-motorised mode with main consideration of the streets/roads adjoining
literally to the stations and also to examine adequacy of availability of
pedestrians/cycle paths in the influenced zone.
ii)
10/3
iii)
iv)
Proposal for better integration of Metro station with other mode of transport,
such as relocation of existing bus stop, introduction of new bus stop, bus base
etc.
v)
The detailed study and requirement for providing first mil as well as last mile
connectivity to the Metro users will be carried out separately and the same should be in
place before the commercial operation of the Metro services for the benefit of the users
as well as for better ridership and the financial viability of the project.
Since, it is envisaged that detailed study for provision of feeder buses, public bike
sharing and pedestrianisation in the influence zone of metro stations will be done and
put in place by the time commercial operation of the Metro services, a lump-sum cost of
2% of project cost(excluding taxes and land cost) is considered sufficient and included
in the project cost of proposed Metro Rail System. If at any stage more feeder services
etc.will be required, same can be augmented by concerned City and other Authorities.
11/3
S. No.
Description
1
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Total
cost
without
Taxes &
duties
(Cr.)
excise
duty
(Cr.)
19.17
16.93
sale
tax
(Cr.)
Total
taxes &
duties
(Cr.)
works tax
(Cr.)
VAT(Cr.)
4.81
4.81
9.62
45.73
51.38
14.60
14.60
29.19
80.57
279.62
593.87
327.43
22.45
19.83
5.63
5.63
11.27
53.55
172.11
449.08
123.50
40.00
10.00
19.67
0.46
9.04
38.85
10.38
3.46
0.84
2.57
11.04
2.95
0.98
0.24
2.57
11.04
2.95
0.98
0.24
5.14
22.08
5.90
1.97
0.48
33.84
60.93
21.92
5.43
1.78
70.00
105.00
209.65
4.80
4.80
38.33
4.24
8.83
4.41
1.20
2.51
1.25
1.20
2.51
1.25
2.41
5.01
2.50
11.45
18.64
45.24
244.34
22.34
15.40
4.38
4.38
8.75
46.49
347.19
110.00
71.38
63.47
18.85
8.58
3.40
2.44
0.97
2.44
0.97
4.46
4.88
1.93
4.46
76.93
24.18
4.46
153.73
14.91
6.04
7.37
4.24
1.71
2.09
4.24
1.71
2.09
8.47
3.43
4.19
23.39
9.47
165.28
5.38
1.28
0.47
0.16
0.17
0.06
0.17
0.06
0.34
0.12
0.80
0.27
23.84
5.90
4183.79
2.06
0.73
223.90
0.08
0.26
63.60
0.08
0.26
68.07
0.16
0.53
131.67
2.23
1.26
729.27
172.37
57.46
764.40
5.64
373.71
SAY
Revised October 2013
729
12/3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
=
=
=
=
=
Total cost
without
Taxes &
duties
(Cr.)
508.24
22.8531
12.36 %
6.25 %
6.25 %
12.5 %
%
= 12.5%/2
= 12.5%/2
34.84
142.32
excise
duty
(Cr.)
sale tax
(Cr.)
works
tax (Cr.)
VAT
(Cr.)
Total
taxes &
duties
(Cr.)
30.78
8.74
8.74
17.49
83.11
12.31
3.50
3.50
7.00
19.31
764.00
52.38
46.27
13.14
13.14
26.29
124.94
401.59
45.89
21.10
5.99
5.99
11.99
78.97
0.00
10.44
2.73
0.00
0.00
2.97
0.78
0.00
0.00
2.97
0.78
0.00
0.00
5.93
1.55
0.00
0.00
16.37
5.77
0.00
0.00
70.00
105.00
119.41
4.80
4.80
21.83
4.24
8.83
2.51
1.20
2.51
0.71
1.20
2.51
0.71
2.41
5.01
1.43
11.45
18.64
25.77
140.03
12.80
8.83
2.51
2.51
5.02
26.64
166.45
60.00
0.00
34.63
30.43
10.28
4.11
1.85
1.17
0.53
1.17
0.53
2.34
1.05
36.88
13.19
2.16
2.16
2.16
120.64
32.50
0.00
0.00
101.26
33.75
411.60
1.49
8.76
3.55
3.97
2.49
1.01
1.13
2.49
1.01
1.13
4.98
2.01
2.25
13.74
5.56
89.00
2.61
0.62
0.23
0.08
0.08
0.03
0.08
0.03
0.16
0.06
0.39
0.13
11.56
2.86
3229.08
1.00
0.35
170.27
0.04
0.13
48.37
0.04
0.13
50.54
SAY
0.08
0.26
98.91
1.08
0.61
571.50
572
82.78
302.32
13/3
Chapter - 14
FINANCING OPTIONS, FARE STRUCTURE
AND FINANCIAL VIABILITY
14.1 INTRODUCTION
The Lucknow Metro Project is proposed to be constructed with an estimated cost of Rs
9786.00 Crore with central taxes and land cost. The length of the metro system and
estimated cost at May-2013 price level without central taxes and with central taxes is
placed in table 14.1 as under:
Table 14.1 Cost Details
Sr. No.
Name of Corridor
Distance
(KMs)
Estimated cost
without taxes
(Rs/Crore)
Estimated cost
with Central
taxes & land cost
(Rs/Crore)
22.878
4,992.00
5,590.00
11.098
3,723.00
4,196.00
The estimated cost at May-2013 price level includes an amount of Rs.10.83 Crore as onetime charges of security personal towards cost of weapons, barricades, and hand held
and door detector machine etc.
14.2
COSTS
1/3
It is assumed that the construction work will start on 01.01.2014 and 01.09.2014
respectively for N-S corridor & E-W corridor and is expected to be completed on
31.03.2018 and 31.03.2019 with Revenue Opening Date (ROD) as 01.04.2018 &
01.04.2019 respectively for the both the corridors. The total completion costs duly
escalated and shown in the table 14.2 have been taken as the initial investment. The cash
flow of investments separately is placed in Table 14.2 as below.
Completion Cost
Financial
Year
Corridor-I
Corridor-II
Total
Corridor-I
Corridor-II
Total
2013-14
2014-15
2015-16
2016-17
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
Total
179.00
908.00
1169.00
1563.00
1042.00
521.00
208.00
0.00
5590.00
0.00
257.00
660.00
860.00
1210.00
806.00
242.00
161.00
4196.00
179.00
1165.00
1829.00
2423.00
2252.00
1327.00
450.00
161.00
9786.00
179.00
967.00
1331.00
1942.00
1392.00
748.00
321.00
0.00
6880.00
0.00
272.00
754.00
1055.00
1616.00
1157.00
373.00
267.00
5494.00
179.00
1239.00
2085.00
2997.00
3008.00
1905.00
694.00
267.00
12374.00
Although the construction is expected to get over by 31st March 2019, the cash flow spill
over up to March 2021 on account of payment normally required to be made to the
various contractors up to that period necessitated by contractual clauses.
The cost of Land of Rs. 545.00 crore (without considering escalation) included in the
above completion cost will be provided free of cost by the UP Government. However,
Cost of 60 hectare land to be provided by UP government has not been included in above.
2/3
(Rs/Crore)
Financial
Year
2020-21
2025-26
2030-31
2041-42
No. of Cars
Corridor-I
30
30
42
48
Amount
Corridor-II
12
18
30
18
Corridor-I
528.00
674.00
1205.00
2355.00
Corridor-II
211.00
405.00
861.00
883.00
Staff costs
(ii)
YEAR
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Staff
Maintenance
Expenses
Energy
Total
43.84
47.79
52.09
56.77
61.88
67.45
73.52
80.14
87.35
33.32
35.81
38.50
41.39
44.49
47.83
51.42
55.27
59.42
37.60
40.42
58.72
63.12
67.86
72.95
78.42
99.04
106.47
114.75
124.02
149.31
161.29
174.23
188.23
203.36
234.46
253.24
3/3
YEAR
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
Staff
Maintenance
Expenses
Energy
Total
95.22
103.79
113.13
123.31
134.40
146.50
159.69
174.06
189.72
206.80
225.41
245.70
267.81
291.91
318.19
346.82
63.87
68.66
73.81
79.35
85.30
91.70
98.58
105.97
113.92
122.46
131.65
141.52
152.13
163.54
175.81
189.00
114.46
123.04
132.27
193.67
208.19
223.81
240.59
258.63
278.03
298.88
321.30
345.40
371.30
441.17
474.25
509.82
273.55
295.49
319.21
396.32
427.90
462.01
498.85
538.66
581.67
628.15
678.36
732.62
791.25
896.62
968.25
1045.64
YEAR
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
Staff
Maintenance
Expenses
Energy
Total
21.69
23.64
25.77
28.09
30.62
33.37
36.38
39.65
43.22
47.11
51.35
55.97
61.01
66.50
72.48
79.01
86.12
93.87
102.31
111.52
121.56
132.50
144.43
157.42
19.38
20.83
22.39
24.07
25.88
27.82
29.90
32.15
34.56
37.15
39.94
42.93
46.15
49.61
53.33
57.33
61.63
66.25
71.22
76.57
82.31
88.48
95.12
102.25
38.55
50.68
54.48
58.56
62.95
67.68
81.29
87.39
93.94
100.99
108.56
140.77
151.33
162.68
174.88
188.00
202.10
217.25
233.55
251.06
269.89
290.13
338.70
364.10
79.61
95.15
102.64
110.72
119.45
128.87
147.57
159.18
171.72
185.24
199.84
239.67
258.49
278.79
300.69
324.33
349.84
377.37
407.08
439.15
473.76
511.11
578.24
623.78
4/3
YEAR
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
Staff
Maintenance
Expenses
Energy
Total
43.84
69.48
75.73
82.54
89.97
98.07
106.90
116.52
127.00
138.43
150.89
164.47
179.28
195.41
213.00
232.17
253.06
275.84
300.66
327.72
357.22
389.37
424.41
462.61
504.25
33.32
55.19
59.33
63.78
68.56
73.71
79.23
85.18
91.56
98.43
105.81
113.75
122.28
131.45
141.31
151.91
163.30
175.55
188.72
202.87
218.09
234.44
252.02
270.93
291.25
37.60
78.96
109.39
117.60
126.42
135.90
146.09
180.33
193.86
208.40
224.03
240.83
334.44
359.52
386.48
415.47
446.63
480.13
516.14
554.85
596.46
641.20
731.30
812.95
873.93
114.75
203.63
244.45
263.92
284.96
307.68
332.22
382.03
412.43
445.26
480.74
519.05
635.99
686.38
740.79
799.55
863.00
931.52
1005.52
1085.44
1171.77
1265.01
1407.74
1546.49
1669.42
14.2.4 Depreciation
Although depreciation does not enter the FIRR calculation (not being a cash outflow)
unless a specific depreciation reserve fund has been provided, in the present calculation,
depreciation calculations are placed for purpose of record.
5/3
14.3 Revenues
The Revenue of Lucknow Metro mainly consists of fare box collection and other incomes
from property development, advertisement, parking etc.
14.3.1 Fare box
The Fare box collection is the product of projected ridership per day and applicable fare
structure based on trip distribution at different distance zones.
14.3.2 Traffic
The projected ridership figures years are as indicated in table 14.5 as below: Table 14.5 - Projected Ridership
Financial Year
2018-19
2019-20
2020-21
2025-26
2030-31
2041-42
Corridor-I
Corridor-II
4.97
5.22
6.45
8.33
10.54
13.55
1.80
2.43
3.46
4.60
6.00
The growth rate for traffic is assumed at 5% Per Annum upto 2029-30 and thereafter @
2.40% per annum.
14.3.3 Trip Distribution
The trip distribution has been worked out by considering average lead of 6.44 KM and,
which is placed in Table 11.6 below: Table 14.6 - Trip Distribution
Distance in km
Percent distribution
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-9
9-12
12-15
15-18
18-21
21-24
>24
Total
14.00%
20.00%
23.00%
21.00%
10.00%
5.00%
3.00%
2.00%
1.00%
1.00%
100.00%
6/3
Fare (Rs)
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-9
9-12
12-15
15-18
18-21
21-24
>24
12
15
18
23
25
28
29
32
34
35
7/3
Year
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
Total
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
Upfront
Rental
Income
Maintenance
Expenditure
1200
1260
1323
1389
1458
6630
5363
5399
208
328
689
724
760
798
838
880
924
970
1018
1069
1123
1179
1238
1300
1365
1433
1504
1580
1659
1742
1829
536
540
21
33
69
72
76
80
84
88
92
97
102
107
112
118
124
130
136
143
150
158
166
174
183
35916
3591
Loan
IDC
868
928
991
1057
1126
52
114
135
153
166
Loan
repayment
559
559
559
559
559
559
559
559
559
559
4970
620
5590
Bal
Loan
Amount
920
1962
3088
4298
5590
5031
4472
3913
3354
2795
2236
1677
1118
559
0
Interest
on Loan
@12%
671
604
537
470
402
335
268
201
134
67
3689
Return
@14%
to the
develo
per
-332
-332
-332
-332
-332
232
244
256
269
282
296
311
327
343
360
378
397
417
438
460
483
507
532
559
587
616
647
679
713
749
Residual
rental
income
to SPV
9422
11968
3365
3452
-1165
-1003
-623
-538
-454
-369
-282
-194
454
476
499
524
551
578
607
638
670
703
738
775
814
855
897
8/3
Outflow
Year
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
- 2014
- 2015
- 2016
- 2017
- 2018
- 2019
- 2020
- 2021
- 2022
- 2023
- 2024
- 2025
- 2026
- 2027
- 2028
- 2029
- 2030
- 2031
- 2032
- 2033
- 2034
- 2035
- 2036
- 2037
- 2038
- 2039
- 2040
- 2041
- 2042
- 2043
Total
Cash
Inflow
Flow
Completi
Additiona
Running
Replacem
Total
Fare Box
PD &
Total
on Cost
l Cost
Expenses
ent costs
Costs
Revenue
ADVT
Revenue
179
967
1331
1942
1392
748
321
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6880
0
0
528
0
0
0
0
674
0
0
0
0
1205
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2355
0
4762
115
124
149
161
174
188
203
234
253
274
295
319
396
428
462
499
539
582
628
678
733
791
897
968
1046
11136
993
774
0
0
0
1767
179
967
1331
1942
1392
863
445
677
161
174
188
203
908
253
274
295
319
1601
428
462
499
539
582
628
678
1726
1565
897
3323
1046
24545
333
350
480
503
586
615
711
755
868
911
1052
1104
1272
1302
1468
1503
1703
1743
1963
2010
2268
2323
2618
2633
2969
34043
33
35
48
50
59
62
71
76
87
91
105
110
127
130
147
150
170
174
196
201
227
232
262
263
297
3403
0
0
0
0
0
366
385
528
553
645
677
782
831
955
1002
1157
1214
1399
1432
1615
1653
1873
1917
2159
2211
2495
2555
2880
2896
3266
37446
IRR
-179
-967
-1331
-1942
-1392
-497
-60
-149
392
471
489
579
-77
702
728
862
895
-202
1004
1153
1154
1334
1335
1531
1533
769
990
1983
-427
2220
6.69%
9/3
Year
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
- 2015
- 2016
- 2017
- 2018
- 2019
- 2020
- 2021
- 2022
- 2023
- 2024
- 2025
- 2026
- 2027
- 2028
- 2029
- 2030
- 2031
- 2032
- 2033
- 2034
- 2035
- 2036
- 2037
- 2038
- 2039
- 2040
- 2041
- 2042
- 2043
- 2044
Total
Outflow
Completi
on Cost
272
754
1055
1616
1157
373
267
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5494
Additiona
l Cost
0
211
0
0
0
0
405
0
0
0
0
861
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
883
0
0
2360
Running
Expenses
80
95
103
111
119
129
148
159
172
185
200
240
258
279
301
324
350
377
407
439
474
511
578
624
673
7336
Inflow
Replacem
ent costs
516
818
0
0
0
1334
Total
Costs
272
754
1055
1616
1157
453
573
103
111
119
129
553
159
172
185
200
1101
258
279
301
324
350
377
407
439
990
1329
1461
624
673
16524
Fare Box
Revenue
121
181
190
221
232
268
314
360
378
437
458
555
568
640
656
742
760
856
877
989
1013
1142
1176
1326
1357
15817
PD &
ADVT
12
18
19
22
23
27
31
36
38
44
46
56
57
64
66
74
76
86
88
99
101
114
118
133
136
1584
Total
Revenue
0
0
0
0
0
133
199
209
243
255
295
345
396
416
481
504
611
625
704
722
816
836
942
965
1088
1114
1256
1294
1459
1493
17401
Cash
Flow
IRR
-272
-754
-1055
-1616
-1157
-320
-374
106
132
136
166
-208
237
244
296
304
-490
367
425
421
492
486
565
558
649
124
-73
-167
835
820
0.81%
10/3
Table 14.9.3 FIRR with Central Taxes (Combined without Property Development)
Figs in cr. (Rs.)
Year
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
- 2014
- 2015
- 2016
- 2017
- 2018
- 2019
- 2020
- 2021
- 2022
- 2023
- 2024
- 2025
- 2026
- 2027
- 2028
- 2029
- 2030
- 2031
- 2032
- 2033
- 2034
- 2035
- 2036
- 2037
- 2038
- 2039
- 2040
- 2041
- 2042
- 2043
Total
Outflow
Completi
on Cost
179
1239
2085
2997
3008
1905
694
267
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12374
Additiona
l Cost
0
0
739
0
0
0
0
1079
0
0
0
0
2066
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3238
0
7122
Running
Expenses
115
204
244
264
285
308
332
382
412
445
481
519
636
686
741
800
863
932
1006
1085
1172
1265
1408
1546
1669
17800
Inflow
Replacem
ent costs
993
1290
818
0
0
3101
Total
Costs
179
1239
2085
2997
3008
2020
898
1250
264
285
308
332
1461
412
445
481
519
2702
686
741
800
863
932
1006
1085
2165
2555
2226
4784
1669
40397
Fare Box
Revenue
333
471
660
693
807
848
979
1069
1229
1290
1489
1563
1827
1870
2108
2159
2445
2504
2819
2887
3258
3337
3760
3809
4294
48508
PD &
ADVT
33
47
66
69
81
85
98
107
123
129
149
156
183
187
211
216
245
250
282
289
326
334
376
381
429
4852
Total
Revenue
0
0
0
0
0
366
518
726
762
888
933
1077
1176
1352
1419
1638
1719
2010
2057
2319
2375
2690
2754
3101
3176
3584
3671
4136
4190
4723
53360
Cash
Flow
IRR
-179
-1239
-2085
-2997
-3008
-1654
-380
-524
498
603
625
745
-285
940
974
1157
1200
-692
1371
1578
1575
1827
1822
2095
2091
1419
1116
1910
-594
3054
4.43%
11/3
Table 14.9.4 FIRR with Central Taxes (Combined with Property Development)
Figs in cr. (Rs.)
Outflow
Year
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
- 2014
- 2015
- 2016
- 2017
- 2018
- 2019
- 2020
- 2021
- 2022
- 2023
- 2024
- 2025
- 2026
- 2027
- 2028
- 2029
- 2030
- 2031
- 2032
- 2033
- 2034
- 2035
- 2036
- 2037
- 2038
- 2039
- 2040
- 2041
- 2042
- 2043
Total
Completi
on Cost
179
1239
2085
2997
3008
1905
694
267
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12374
Additiona
l Cost
739
0
0
0
0
1079
0
0
0
0
2066
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3238
0
7122
Running
Expenses
115
204
244
264
285
308
332
382
412
445
481
519
636
686
741
800
863
932
1006
1085
1172
1265
1408
1546
1669
17800
Inflow
Replacem
ent costs
993
1290
818
0
0
3101
Total
Costs
179
1239
2085
2997
3008
2020
898
1250
264
285
308
332
1461
412
445
481
519
2702
686
741
800
863
932
1006
1085
2165
2555
2226
4784
1669
40397
Fare Box
Revenue
333
471
660
693
807
848
979
1069
1229
1290
1489
1563
1827
1870
2108
2159
2445
2504
2819
2887
3258
3337
3760
3809
4294
48508
PD &
ADVT
33
47
66
69
81
85
98
107
123
129
149
156
183
187
211
216
245
250
282
289
326
334
376
381
429
4852
Additional PD
Income
3365
3452
-1165
-1003
-623
-538
-454
-369
-282
-194
454
476
499
524
551
578
607
638
670
703
738
775
814
855
897
11968
Total
Revenue
0
0
0
0
0
3731
3970
-439
-241
265
395
623
807
1070
1225
2092
2195
2509
2581
2870
2953
3297
3392
3771
3879
4322
4446
4950
5045
5620
65328
12/3
Cash
Flow
IRR
-179
-1239
-2085
-2997
-3008
1711
3072
-1689
-505
-20
87
291
-654
658
780
1611
1676
-193
1895
2129
2153
2434
2460
2765
2794
2157
1891
2724
261
3951
8.12%
5.52%
20%
decrease
in capital
cost
10.39%
6.49%
9.15%
REVENUE
10%
10% increase
decrease in
in Fare Box
Fare Box
revenue
revenue
20%
increase
in Fare
Box
revenue
10.21%
6.91%
9.22%
O&M COSTS
7.74%
8.50%
These sensitivities have been carried out independently for each factor.
14.5 FINANCING OPTIONS
Objectives of Funding: The objective of funding metro systems is not necessarily
enabling the availability of funds for construction but coupled with the objective of
financial closure are other concerns, which are of no less importance: x
Rail based mass transit systems are characterised by heavy capital investments coupled
with long gestation period leading to low financial rates of return although the economic
benefits to the society are immense. Such systems generate externalities, which do not
get captured in monetary terms and, therefore, do not flow back to the system. However,
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
13/3
experience all over the world reveals that both construction and operations of metro are
highly subsidised.
foregone conclusion. Singapore had a 100% capital contribution from the government,
Hong Kong 78% for the first three lines and 66% for the later 2 lines. The Phase-I,
Phase-II as well as Phase-III of Delhi MRTS project, Chennai and Bengaluru metros are
also funded with a mixture of equity and debt (ODA) by GOI & concerned state
governments.
14.5.1 Alternative Models Of Financing
The financing option shall depend upon selection of the dedicated agency created to
implement the project. The prominent models are: (i)
Special Purpose Vehicle under the State Government Control (Delhi Metro Rail
Corporation (DMRC) /Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation (BMRC)
(ii)
SPV Model: The corridor is a standalone one and therefore forming a separate SPV may
be in the name of Lucknow Metro Rail Corporation may be desirable. The funding
pattern under this model (SPV) is placed in table 14.11 as under: -
Table 14.11 - Funding pattern under SPV model (with central taxes)
Corridor-I
Corridor-II
Total
1003.00
1003.00
373.00
373.00
381.00
786.50
786.50
312.50
312.50
164.00
1789.50
1789.50
685.50
685.50
545.00
% of
contribution
14.46%
14.46%
5.54%
5.54%
4.40%
245.00
105.00
350.00
2.83%
3502.00
6880.00
3027.00
5494.00
6529.00
12374.00
52.77%
100.00%
In addition to the above, State Taxes of Rs.333.00 crore on completion cost basis has to
be either reimbursed or exempted by state government.
BOT Model: In this model, the private firm will be responsible for financing,
designing, building, operating and maintaining of the entire project. The
contribution of Government of UP will be limited to cost of land only. Such a
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
14/3
project become eligible for Viability Gap Funding (VGF) upto 20% from the
Central Government provided the state government also contribute same or more
amount towards the project. The metro being a social sector project not much
private parties are available to bid for such a project. Besides quite expectedly
the private operator may demand assured rate of return in the range of 16% to
18% or a comfort of guaranteed ridership.
The funding pattern assumed under this model excluding the cost of land is
placed in table 14.12.1 & 14.12.2 tabulated as under: Table 14.12.1 Funding pattern under BOT Combined (16% EIRR) (With central taxes and without land cost and without Property Development)
Particulars
VGF by GOI
VGF by GUP
Equity by Concessionaire
Concessionaires debt @12% PA
Total
Land Free by GUP
IDC
Total
% Of contribution
20.00%
50.67%
9.77%
19.56%
100.00
100.00%
Particulars
VGF by GOI
VGF by GUP
Equity by Concessionaire
Concessionaires debt @12% PA
Total
Land Free by GUP
IDC
Total
% Of contribution
20.00%
13.82%
22.06%
44.12%
100.00
100.00%
In addition to the above, State Taxes of Rs.333.00 crore on completion cost basis has to
be either reimbursed or exempted by state government.
15/3
14.6
RECOMMENDATIONS
The combined FIRR of subject metro with taxes is 8.12% with additional property
development of 60 hectares. The pre-tax Equity IRR to the BOT operator is 16% with a
total VGF of only Rs.4545 crore excluding the cost of 60 ha. Land required for PD if the
additional PD income is considered. Since the UP government is providing huge land
bank for PD, it is advisable to take up the job on DMRC model. Accordingly, the corridors
are recommended for implementation.
The total fund contribution of GOI & GOUP under various alternatives is tabulated in table
14.13.
Table 14.13
Rs. In crore
Particulars
SPV Model
Total
2475.00
3020.00
5495.00
2365.80
6539.20
8905.00
GOI
GOUP
In addition to the above, State Taxes of Rs.333.00 crore on completion cost basis has to
be either reimbursed or exempted by state government.
N-S Corridor
E-W Corridor
Combined
Option
Table No.
14.14
14.15
14.16
14.17
14.18
14.19
14.20
14.21
14.22
14.23
14.24
16/3
The funding pattern assumed under SPV model & BOT model with PD is depicted in the
pie chart i.e., Figure 14.2.1 & 14.2.2 as under: -
17/3
18/3
19/3
20/3
21/3
22/3
23/3
24/3
25/3
26/3
27/3
28/3
CHAPTER - 15
ECONOMIC APPRAISAL
15.1
INTRODUCTION
Economic benefits are social and environmental benefits which are quantified and then
converted into money cost and discounted against the cost of construction and maintenance
for deriving Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR). When actual revenue earned from
fare collection, advertisement and property development are discounted against
construction and maintenance cost, interest (to be paid) and depreciation cost, Financial
Internal rate of Return (FIRR) is obtained. Therefore, EIRR is viewed from socio-economic
angle while FIRR is an indicator of financial profitability and viability of any project
The sources from where economic savings occur are identified first. Although there are
many kinds of primary, secondary and tertiary benefits, only the quantifiable components
can be taken to measure the benefits. These components are quantified by linking with the
number of passengers shifted and the passenger km saved by the trips which are shifted
from road/rail based modes to metro. It may be observed that first four benefit components
given in Table 15.1 are direct benefits due to shifting of trips to metro, but other benefit
components are due to decongestion effect on the road. Benefit components were first
estimated applying market values then were converted into respective Economic values by
using separate economic factors which are also given in table 15.1. Depending upon
methodology of estimation, economic factors are assumed. Overall economic value of benefit
1/3
components is 90% of the market value. Similarly economic value of the cost components
are 80% of the market cost.
Table 15.1 - Benefit Components due to Metro
S. No.
Factors
Construction Cost
80%
Maintenance Cost
80%
100%
80%
15.2
Economic
Benefit Components
80%
100%
Accident Cost
100%
100%
S. No.
Values
1
2
3
51.68%
Important variables
Time Cost derived from passengers monthly income level.
Fuel Cost (value of Petrol, Diesel and CNG).
Vehicle Operating Cost (Derived from Life Cycle Cost of
different passenger vehicles per km)
Emission (gm/km as per CPCB and UK Norms) Emission
Saving Cost (adopted for Indian conditions in Rs/ton).
Accident Rate (No of fatal and all accidents per one Cr.KM).
Accident costs are derived from published papers at current
rate.
Passenger km Vehicle km conversion factor and mode share
percent values (derived from traffic volume count and modal
split within study area as reported in chapter 2)
Fuel Consumption of vehicles at a given speed is derived
Infra Structure Maintenance Cost is derived from published
values on annual expenditure on roads and traffic and annual
vehicle km
2/3
S. No.
Values
11.12 min
10
20 kmph
Important variables
Weighted Average of all mode travel time saved for average
trip length km journey after Shifting (Derived)
Present Public Transport Journey Speed (Speed & Delay
Study)
4 Wh
2 Wh
2 Wh
3 Wh
Mini
(Large)
(Small)
(MC)
(SC)
(Auto)
Bus
3.94
3.31
2.01
0.57
0.72
2.25
2.75
Capital Cost
2.40
2.67
1.20
0.18
0.16
0.72
1.72
Total VOC
6.98
6.58
3.54
0.82
0.96
3.27
4.92
Per Vehicle KM
Bus
Maintenance Cost
CO
HC
NOX
PM
CO
CO2
BUS
3.72
0.16
6.53
0.24
3.72
787.72
2W-2 STROKE
1.4
1.32
0.08
0.05
1.4
24.99
2W-4 STROKE
1.4
0.7
0.3
0.05
1.4
28.58
MINI BUS
2.48
0.83
8.26
0.58
2.48
358.98
4W-SMALL
1.39
0.15
0.12
0.02
1.39
139.51
4W-LARGE
0.58
0.05
0.45
0.05
0.58
156.55
TATA MAGIC
1.24
0.17
0.58
0.17
1.24
160
3W
2.45
0.75
0.12
0.08
2.45
77.89
Cost
500
Accident Cost in Rs
Vehicle KM
Average of all types.
2.0
588911
Fatal Accident.
0.2
1692648
3/3
Traffic parameter values used for economic analysis are given in Table 15.6.
2021
2026
2031
2036
2041
584900
887951
1179170
1514230
1729200
33.976
33.976
33.976
33.976
33.976
6.58
6.64
6.45
6.37
6.27
3849449
5896997
7609517
9652649
10846554
113299
173564
223967
284102
319242
Trips/day
Lucknow
METRO
Line Length (km)
Average Trip
length (km)
Passenger km
Passenger
km/km
15.3
4/3
Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
Year
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
Passengers in
in Cr. Rs.
396.41
379.11
354.58
324.73
304.37
285.34
276.17
257.29
239.75
223.46
208.32
189.16
171.77
46.81
Metro
Passengers
475.45
429.85
380.00
328.88
291.25
257.93
235.78
207.42
182.48
160.53
141.23
121.00
103.64
26.63
Cr. Rs.
Cost Saved by
Operating
Cost Saved
by Metro
Vehicle
Annual Fuel
Annual
167.79
151.70
134.11
116.06
102.79
91.03
83.21
73.20
64.40
56.65
49.84
42.70
44.51
13.48
Cr. Rs.
Cost in
Saving
Emission
58.59
53.23
47.26
41.95
37.24
33.06
30.30
26.81
23.72
20.99
18.57
16.00
13.68
3.51
Cr. Rs.
Cost in
Accident
1708.13
1544.62
1396.77
1263.07
1142.17
1032.84
927.73
833.32
748.51
672.34
603.91
528.13
461.85
121.17
in Cr. Rs.
Passengers
Metro
Saved by
Time Cost
Annual
9.28
8.74
8.05
7.25
6.68
6.15
5.85
5.34
4.88
4.45
4.06
3.60
3.19
0.85
5/3
in Cr. Rs.
Passengers
Road
Saved by
Fuel Cost
Annual
365.11
329.11
290.08
247.79
218.95
193.48
176.47
154.90
135.97
119.35
104.77
89.56
76.54
19.63
in Cr. Rs.
Passengers
Road
Saved by
Time Cost
Annual
89.20
85.44
80.02
73.37
68.83
64.58
62.54
58.29
54.32
50.63
47.19
42.83
38.87
10.58
Rs.
Cost in Cr.
Maintenance
Structure
Annual Infra
3269.96
2981.80
2690.85
2403.10
2172.29
1964.42
1798.05
1616.57
1454.03
1308.41
1177.90
1032.97
914.06
242.65
Cr. Rs.
Discount in
without
Benefits
Total
Year
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
Year
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
Passengers in
in Cr. Rs.
905.71
840.17
779.37
722.97
670.66
622.13
577.11
535.35
496.61
460.67
427.34
Metro
Passengers
2046.81
1792.44
1569.68
1374.60
1203.77
1054.16
923.15
808.43
707.96
619.97
542.92
Cr. Rs.
Cost Saved by
Operating
Cost Saved
by Metro
Vehicle
Annual Fuel
Annual
562.61
504.01
451.52
404.49
362.36
324.62
290.81
260.52
233.38
209.08
187.30
Cr. Rs.
Cost in
Saving
Emission
240.87
211.82
186.28
163.81
144.06
126.68
111.40
97.97
86.15
75.76
66.63
Cr. Rs.
Cost in
Accident
5993.57
5347.18
4770.51
4256.02
3797.03
3387.53
3022.20
2696.26
2405.48
2146.06
1914.61
in Cr. Rs.
Passengers
Metro
Saved by
Time Cost
Annual
26.66
24.22
22.00
19.99
18.16
16.50
14.99
13.62
12.37
11.24
10.21
6/3
in Cr. Rs.
Passengers
Road
Saved by
Fuel Cost
Annual
1625.58
1419.21
1239.03
1081.73
944.40
824.51
719.83
628.45
548.67
479.01
418.20
in Cr. Rs.
Passengers
Road
Saved by
Time Cost
Annual
203.55
188.84
175.20
162.54
150.80
139.90
129.79
120.41
111.71
103.64
96.15
Rs.
Cost in Cr.
Maintenance
Structure
Annual Infra
11605.37
10327.90
9193.59
8186.17
7291.23
6496.03
5789.29
5161.00
4602.33
4105.43
3663.36
Cr. Rs.
Discount in
without
Benefits
Total
between 2018-2043 in
Percent
Cr.Rs.
TIME COST-METRO
53357
48.40%
FUEL COST-METRO
13683
12.41%
VOC
20155
18.28%
EMISSION
5052
4.58%
ACCIDENT
1955
1.77%
TIME COST-ROAD
12552
11.39%
FUEL COST-ROAD
341
0.31%
INFRASTRUCTURE
3082
2.80%
0.31%
2.80%
11.39%
1.77%
4.58%
48.40%
18.28%
12.41%
TIME COST-METRO
FUEL COST-METRO
VOC
EMISSION
ACCIDENT
TIME COST-ROAD
FUEL COST-ROAD
INFRASTRUCTURE
7/3
Components of Benefit (between the years 2018-2043) are shown in figure 15.1 which
shows that benefits are mainly coming from saving of travel time (60%), VOC (18%) and
fuel cost (13%) by shifted metro passengers and relieved road passengers. Environmental
benefit from emission reduction, accident reduction and road maintenance cost (together)
is 9%.
In this area, personalised modes (car, three and two wheelers) are dominant which have
made vehicle by passenger ratio very high (51%). Average passenger wise modal split (with
motorized vehicle class) obtained from the house hold survey shows that 77% trips are
made by private modes and 8% are by IPT. Trips carried by Bus is about 15% as may be
seen in table 15.8. Obviously presence of dependable mass transport system is not there.
15.4
Vehicles
% PASS
% Vehicle
BUS
14.53%
0.80%
MINI BUS
3.63%
0.42%
CAR
1.54%
1.02%
TAXI
0.17%
0.10%
2 WH
75.85%
94.09%
AUTO
4.27%
3.56%
8/3
Year
Year
Start
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
Ending
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
Capital
Cost
Cr. Rs.
178
952
1308
1904
1365
734
316
528
0
0
0
0
674
0
0
0
0
1205
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
993
774
0
2355
0
Recurring
Cost
Cr. Rs
0
0
0
0
0
115
124
149
161
174
188
203
234
253
274
295
319
396
428
462
499
539
582
628
678
733
791
897
968
1046
9/3
15.5
(12%)
19538
5593
101449
10757
5.19
1.92
81911
4611
15.6
WITH DISCOUNT
WITHOUT DISCOUNT
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Sensitivity and B/C ratios both with and without discount was carried out and the output is
given in the table 15.12. 2043-44 is taken for the year of comparison.
Table 15.12 - Sensitivity of EIRR
SENSITIVITY
WITHOUT DISCOUNT
WITH DISCOUNT
TRAFFIC
COST
EIRR
B/C
COST
EIRR
B/C
COST
0%
0%
19.43%
5.19
19538
6.64%
1.92
5593
-10%
0%
18.78%
4.92
19538
6.06%
1.82
5593
-20%
0%
18.11%
4.65
19538
5.45%
1.72
5593
0%
10%
18.27%
4.72
21491
5.60%
1.75
6152
0%
20%
17.25%
4.33
23445
4.68%
1.60
6712
-10%
10%
17.64%
4.48
21491
5.04%
1.66
6152
-20%
20%
15.99%
3.88
23445
3.56%
1.44
6712
10/3
15.7
QUANTIFIED BENEFITS.
Benefits which are shown in previous tables are money value of the benefits. These benefits
are estimated (in terms of quantity) first and then converted into money value. For brevity,
only 5 year estimates are shown in table 15.13 (Reduction of Vehicle gas Emission).
Table 15.13 - Environmental Benefits Quantified
Tons/Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
CO
1498.35
1634.55
1736.38
1844.60
1959.59
HC
1011.42
1103.36
1172.10
1245.14
1322.76
NOX
281.71
307.32
326.46
346.81
368.43
PM
56.37
61.49
65.33
69.40
73.72
SO2
3.75
4.10
4.35
4.62
4.91
CO2
38579
42085
44707
47493
50454
41430
45196
48012
51004
54184
Quantified Travel Benefits are shown in Table 15.14, it may be seen that In 2020, Time
saving will be 6.07 Crore (10 million) hours, fuel saving 37.17 thousand tons. Amount of
travel in terms of road passenger km reduced due to shifting to Metro Rail is equivalent to
reduction of 74357 vehicle (distributed as per modal split given in table 15.8) from the
road. More than 22 fatal accidents and 180 other accidents may be avoided. Hence it is
expected that there will be some improvement of the overall ambience of the city.
Table 15.14 - Travel Benefits Quantified
Quantified Benefits in Horizon Years
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
5.57
6.07
6.43
6.82
7.23
33.72
37.17
39.91
42.86
46.04
68161
74357
78990
83912
89144
38.58
42.09
44.71
47.49
50.45
2.85
3.11
3.30
3.51
3.73
20.73
22.48
23.75
25.08
26.49
186.56
202.35
213.72
225.74
238.45
28.190
30.753
32.669
34.705
36.868
11/3
15.8
12/3
CHAPTER 16
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
16.1
Approval to the Detailed Project Report to be taken from Uttar Pradesh State
Government (Cabinet approval).
Signing of an MOU between Uttar Pradesh State Government and Government of India
giving all details of the Joint Venture bringing out the financial involvement of each
party, liability for the loans raised, the administrative control in the SPV, policy in
regard to fare structure, operational subsidy, if any, etc.
Lucknow Metro Rail Corporation Ltd, the Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) set up for
implementing the project and for its subsequent Operation & Maintenance should be
made functional early.
The Metro Railways (Amendment) Act-2009 can readily be made use of for
implementation of Lucknow Metro by declaring Lucknow City as Metropolitan Area
in terms of clause c of section 243 P of Constitution.
The State Government should formulate the funding plan for executing this project
and get the same approved by the Government of India. The loan portion of the
funding will have to be tied up by State Government in consultation with the
Government of India.
the
Metro
Railways
1/3
16.2
The Government should freeze all developments along the corridors suggested. For
any constructions within 50 m. of the proposed alignment a system of No Objection
Certificate should be introduced so that infructuous expenditure at a later stage is
avoided.
The Metro Railways (Amendment) Act-2009 can readily be made use of for
implementation of Lucknow Metro by declaring Lucknow City as Metropolitan Area.
INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
To enable Lucknow Metro project to be implemented without any loss of time and cost
over-run, effective institutional arrangements would need to be set up. Details of these
arrangements are explained below:
2/3
implementation schedule is given below. The proposed date of commissioning of the both
corridor with suggested dates of important milestones is given in Table 16.1 and 16.2
respectively.
Table 16.1 - Implementation Schedule through DMRC model
Phase 1A North south Corridor
S. No.
Item of Work
Completion Date
25.07.2013
31.07.2013
15.08.2013
15.09.2013
30.09.2013
01.10.2013
01.01.2014
01.01.2014 31.12.2017
01.01.2018
31.03.2018
10
Revenue Operation
01.04.2018
Item of Work
25.07.2013
31.03.2014
30.04.2014
31.05.2014
15.06.2014
15.07.2014
Completion Date
3/3
S. No.
Item of Work
Completion Date
31.08.2014
01.09.2014 31.12.2018
01.01.2019 31.03.2019
10
Revenue Operation
01.04.2019
Both corridors can be divided into sections for the purpose of commercial opening in stages.
16.3
4/3
Metro projects cannot be executed the way Government agencies execute projects in this
country. Timely completion is very important to safeguard the financial viability. Competent
and skilled technical personal to man such an organization are difficult to mobilize. In fact
such experienced persons are not readily available in the country. Being a rail based project,
for most of the systems such as rolling stock, signaling, telecommunication, traction power
supply, etc., persons with railway background would be necessary. As systems &
construction technology used in metro are much more advanced and sophisticated than the
one used in Railways as these have to suit dense urban areas, Metro experience will enable
faster & smoother execution and thus is desirable & therefore should be preferred.
Since LMRC will not have the required expertise and experienced manpower to check and
monitor the General Consultants it may be necessary to engage Prime Consultants from the
very start of GCs assignment who will do this job on behalf of LMRC. Delhi Metro Rail
Corporation can be considered for being appointed as Prime Consultant to LMRC.
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation can also be considered straightaway for being appointed as
General Consultant to LMRC which will reduce the construction time by 4 to 6 months.
16.4
CONTRACTS
(b)
Corridor
Length of
Elevated
Elevated
Stations
Section
(Nos.)
(km)
Proposed
Contracts
Viaduct
Station
19.438
19
3 Nos
4 Nos.
1 No.
1 No.
5/3
(c)
Proposed Contracts
Corridor
Length
(km)
Station
(Nos.)
Underground section
including stations
3.44
2 Nos
2 Nos
Architectural finishes, fire fighting arrangements and general electrification, will form part
of civil contracts.
16.4.2 System Contracts
x
Vasant Kunj
The number of contracts for supply of Depot Equipment may be decided as and when the
work is in progress.
16.5
6/3
EMPOWERED COMMITTEE
At the Central Government level an Empowered Committee, under the chairmanship of
Cabinet Secretary, is presently functioning for Delhi Metro project. Other members of this
Committee are Secretaries of Planning Commission, Ministry of Home Affairs, Ministry of
Urban Development, Ministry of Surface Transport, Ministry of Environment and Forests,
Department of Expenditure, Chief Secretary of Delhi Government and a representative from
the PMO. The Empowered Committee meets regularly and takes decisions on matters
connected with inter-departmental coordination and overall planning, financing and
implementation of the Delhi Metro project. It is suggested that the role of this Empowered
Committee should be enlarged to include Lucknow Metro project also and the Chief
Secretary, Uttar Pradesh should be inducted as a member of this Committee.
16.7
16.8
7/3
Implementation of proposed Lucknow Metro can now be done under The Metro Railways
(Amendment) Act 2009. The copies of the Gazette notification and the amendment are put
up enclosure to this chapter.
16.9
Tax on electricity required for operation and maintenance of the metro system.
Municipal Taxes.
As per the present policy 50% of the Central Taxes will be paid by GOI as subordinate Debt
and balance 50% will be paid by the concerned State Government. Uttar Pradesh State
Government may pursue the Central government to extend the same benefit to Lucknow
Metro.
16.10 POSTING OF OSD
Since sanction of Lucknow Metro and selection of full time Directors may take some time, it
is recommended that Uttar Pradesh State Government should urgently post an Officer on
Special Duty (OSD) with adequate powers to process and pursue sanction for this project
and to take preliminary steps required for its implementation.
16.11 NEED FOR DEDICATED FUND FOR METRO PROJECTS
We also strongly recommend that the State Government start building up funds for the
project through dedicated levies as has been done by other State Governments notably
Karnataka.
To enable the State Governments to provide their share of equity in the Special Purpose
Vehicles set up for such projects, it would be necessary to constitute a Special Metro Fund at
8/3
the State Government level. The State Government should resort to imposition of dedicated
levies for raising resources for these Funds. Areas where such dedicated levies are possible
are given below:
x
A onetime Green Tax (Rs. 5000 to Rs. 10000 for four wheelers and Rs. 2000 for two
wheelers) on existing vehicles registered in the City.
Metro Tax @ 2% on pay rolls of all establishments having more than 100 employees.
Such cess is in existence in a number of Western countries for raising resources for
metro rail. The employers benefit a good deal by good Metro System.
Surcharge @ 10% on luxury tax on the earning of all Star Hotels. At present level, the
luxury tax is 10%. The surcharge will raise the level to only 11%. Chinese cities have
adopted this scheme.
Densification ofCorridor by way of selling of Floor Area Ratio (FAR) along the proposed
metro corridors.
9/3
10/3
11/3
12/3
13/3
14/3
CHAPTER 17
Lucknow has witnessed enormous growth during the last 10 years. The growth is
mainly the result of immigration as the city provided better employment opportunities.
Lucknow is the principal administrative, commercial and distribution center of the
State. Lucknow is fast developing as educational hub of Uttar Pradesh. Rapid
urbanization in the recent past has put the citys travel infrastructure to stress. Being
thickly populated area, Lucknows traffic needs cannot be met by only road-based
system.
The existing urban transport system of Lucknow City, which is road-based, has already
come under stress leading to longer travel time, increased air pollution and rise in
number of road accidents. With projected increase in the population of the city,
strengthening and augmenting of transport infrastructure has assumed urgency. For
this purpose provision of rail-based Metro system in the city has been considered.
Studies have brought out that a Medium Metro with carrying capacity of about 25,000 to
50,000 phpdt will be adequate to meet not only the traffic needs for the present but for
the future 30 to 40 years also. A Medium Metro System consisting of two Corridors
namely (i) Amausi to Munshi Pulia Corridor (22.878 km) and (ii) Lucknow Railway
Station to Vasant Kunj Corridor on Hardoi Road (11.098 km) at an estimated completion
cost of Rs. 6880.00Crores and Rs.5494.00Crores respectively(with Central taxes &
duties) to be made operational as recommended in implementation chapter.
17.2
A detailed Environmental Impact Assessment Study has been carried out for the project.
As a part of this Study, comprehensive environmental baseline data was collected, and
both positive and negative impacts of the project were assessed in detail. The project
has many positive environmental impacts like reduction in traffic congestion, saving in
travel time, reduction in air and noise pollution, lesser fuel consumption, lesser road
accidents etc, with a few negative impacts (especially during implementation phase of
the project) for which Environmental Management Plan has been suggested.
1/3
17.3
After examining the various options for execution of Lucknow Metro Project, it has been
recommended that the project should be got executed through a SPV on DMRC funding
pattern
17.4
The fare structure has been estimated based on Delhi Metro fares decided by Fare
Fixation Committee in 2009. Subsequently, for the purpose of assessing returns from
the project, the fares have been revised every second year with an escalation of 10%
every two years.
17.5
As in the case of Delhi Metro, the State Government should exempt/ reimburse the Uttar
Pradesh Value Added Tax (VAT) to Lucknow Metro. It should also exempt the following:
x
Tax on electricity required for operation and maintenance of the metro system.
Municipal Taxes.
17.6
As per the present policy 50% of the Central Taxes will be paid by GOI as subordinate
Debt and balance 50% will be paid by the concerned State Government. Uttar Pradesh
State Government may pursue the Central Government to extend the same benefit to
Lucknow Metro.
15.7
While the Financial Internal Rate of Return (FIRR) for the project has been assessed as
8.12% with central taxes with property development and the Economic Internal Rate of
Return (EIRR) works out 19.43%.
17.8
To avoid delays in processing the clearance for the Project, Government of Uttar
A PSU of the State Government, Lucknow Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. (LMRC) for
Lucknow Metro, to be set up under the Companies Act, 1956 should be made functional
by posting Managing Director and Functional Directors.
17.10 Since sanction of Lucknow Metro & making LMRC fully functional may take some time, it
is recommended that the State Government should urgently post an Officer on Special
Duty (OSD) with adequate powers to process and pursue sanction for this project and to
initiate preliminary steps required for its implementation.
2/3
17.11 Meanwhile the State Government should freeze all future developments along the
proposed route of Lucknow Metro to avoid in-fructuous expenditure.
17.12 As it may take some time to make Lucknow Metro Rail Corporation fully functional and
initially LMRC may lack in expertise, it will be necessary to engage Interim Consultants
who will do this job on behalf of LMRC in preparation of land plans, transferring the
alignment from drawing to the ground, fixing the contracts for some of the selected
elevated packages and depots and also to help LMRC in finalization of General
Consultants.
17.13 To keep a check on the work of General Consultants and to ensure that the Metro is
being constructed to meet the appropriate specifications and safety standards, LMRC
will also need to engage the services of Prime Consultants from the very start of GCs
assignment who will do this job on behalf of LMRC. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation can be
considered for being appointment as prime consultant to LMRC of the project.
17.14 Delhi Metro Rail Corporation can also be considered straightaway for being appointed as
General Consultant to LMRC which will reduce the construction time by 4 to 6 months.
3/3
Chapter -18
Disaster Management Measures
18.1
Introduction
18.2
18.3
Objectives
18.4
18.5
18.6
18.7
CHAPTER- 18
DISASTER MANAGEMENT MEASURES
18.1 INTRODUCTION
Disaster is a crisis that results in massive damage to life and property, uproots the physical
and psychological fabric of the affected communities and outstrips the capacity of the local
community to cope with the situation. Disasters are those situations which cause acute
distress to passengers, employees and outsiders and may even be caused by external
factors. As per the disaster management act, 2005 "disaster" means a catastrophe, mishap,
calamity or grave occurrence in any area, arising from natural or manmade causes, or by
accident or negligence which results in substantial loss of life or human suffering or damage
to, and destruction of, property, or damage to, or degradation of, environment, and is of such a
nature or magnitude as to be beyond the coping capacity of the community of the affected
area. As per world health organisation (who):
Any occurrence that causes damage, economic disruption, loss of human life and
deterioration of health and services on a scale sufficient to warrant an extra ordinary response
from outside the affected community or area.
A disaster is a tragic event, be it natural or manmade, which brings sudden and immense
agony to humanity and disrupts normal life. It causes large scale human suffering due to
loss of life, loss of livelihood, damages to property and persons and also brings untold
hardships. It may also cause destruction to infrastructure, buildings, communication
channels essential services, etc.
18.2 NEED FOR DISASTER MANAGEMENT MEASURES
The effect of any disaster spread over in operational area of Lucknow Metro is likely to be
substantial as LMRC will deal with thousands of passengers daily in underground tunnels,
viaducts and stations. Disaster brings about sudden and immense misery to humanity and
disrupts normal human life in its established social and economic patterns. It has the
potential to cause large scale human suffering due to loss of life, loss of livelihood, damage
to property, injury and hardship. It may also cause destruction or damage to infrastructure,
buildings and communication channels of Metro. Therefore there is an urgent need to
provide for an efficient disaster management plan.
1/3
18.3
OBJECTIVES:
The main objectives of this Disaster Management Measures are as follows:
x
x
x
x
x
x
18.4
Terrorist attack
Bomb threat/ Bomb blast
Hostage
Release of Chemical or biological gas in trains, stations or tunnels
Fire in metro buildings, underground/ elevated infrastructures, power stations,
train depots etc.
6. Train accident and train collision/derailment of a passenger carrying train
7. Sabotage
8. Stampede
b. Natural Disaster
1. Earthquakes
2. Floods
2/3
18.5
A.
Establishment of National Disaster Management Authority:(1) With effect from such date as the Central Government may, by notification in the
Official Gazette appoint in this behalf, there shall be established for the purposes of
this Act (The Disaster Management Act, 2005), an authority to be known as the
National Disaster Management Authority.
(2) The National Authority shall consist of the Chairperson and such number of other
members, not exceeding nine, as may be prescribed by the Central Government and,
unless the rules otherwise provide, the National Authority shall consist of the
following:(a) The Prime Minister of India, who shall be the Chairperson of the National
Authority, ex officio;
(b) Other members, not exceeding nine, to be nominated by the Chairperson of the
National Authority.
(3) The Chairperson of the National Authority may designate one of the members
nominated under clause (b) of sub-section (2) to be the Vice- Chairperson of the
National Authority.
(4) The term of office and conditions of service of members of the National Authority
shall be such as may be prescribed.
B.
Establishment of State Disaster Management Authority:(1) Every State Government shall, as soon as may be after the issue of the notification
under sub-section (1) of section 3, by notification in the Official Gazette, establish a
State Disaster Management Authority for the State with such name as may be
specified in the notification of the State Government.
(2) A State Authority shall consist of the Chairperson and such number of other
members, not exceeding nine, as may be prescribed by the State Government and,
unless the rules otherwise provide, the State Authority shall consist of the following
members, namely:-
3/3
(a) The Chief Minister of the State, who shall be Chairperson, ex officio;
(b) Other members, not exceeding eight, to be nominated by the Chairperson of the
State Authority;
(c) The Chairperson of the State Executive Committee, ex officio.
(3) The Chairperson of the State Authority may designate one of the members
nominated under clause (b) of sub-section (2) to be the Vice- Chairperson of the
State Authority.
(4) The Chairperson of the State Executive Committee shall be the Chief Executive
Officer of the State Authority, the Chief Minister shall be the Chairperson of the
Authority established under this section.
(5) The term of office and conditions of service of members of the State Authority shall
be such as may be prescribed.
C.
The mechanism to deal with natural as well as manmade crisis already exists and that it has
a four tier structure as stated below:(1) National Crisis Management Committee (NCMC) under the chairmanship of Cabinet
Secretary
(2) Crisis Management Group (CMG) under the chairmanship of Union Home Secretary.
(3) State Level Committee under the chairmanship of Chief Secretary.
(4) District Level Committee under the Chairmanship of District Magistrate.
All agencies of the Government at the National, State and district levels will function in
accordance with the guidelines and directions given by these committees.
D.
Every office of the Government of India and of the State Government at the district level and
the local authorities shall, subject to the supervision of the District Authority:-
(a) Prepare a disaster management plan setting out the following, namely:(i) Provisions for prevention and mitigation measures as provided for in the District
Plan and as is assigned to the department or agency concerned;
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
4/3
ii)
Smoke management
iii)
iv)
v)
vi)
vii)
viii)
Lighting system
ix)
x)
Tunnel lighting
xi)
xii)
Seepage system
xiii)
xiv)
Sewage system
xv)
The above list is suggestive not exhaustive actual provisioning has to be done based on site
conditions and other external and internal factors.
5/3
18.7
Fire Drill
Rescue of a disabled train
Detrainment of passengers between stations
Passenger evacuation from station
Drill for use of rescue & relief train
Hot line telephone communication with state disaster management authority.
6/3
Chapter -19
Disabled Friendly Features
19.1
19.2
19.3
19.4
19.5
19.6
19.7
19.8
19.9
19.10
19.11
19.12
19.13
19.14
19.15
19.16
19.17
19.18
19.19
19.20
19.21
Introduction
Content
Rail Transport
Information Signs And Announcements
Metro Railway Stations
Information Systems
General And Accessible Toilets
Drinking Water Units
Visual Contrasts
Emergency Egress/Evacuation
Alerting Systems
Written Evacuation Procedure
Emergency Evacuation Route
Way Guidance System
Fire Resistant Doors
Street Design
Traffic Signals
Subway And Foot Over Bridge
Alighting And Boarding Areas
Approach
Car Park
Chapter 19
DISABLED FRIENDLY FEATURES
19.1
INTRODUCTION
The objective of making this chapter is to create a user-friendly mass transport system in
India which can ensure accessibility to persons with disabilities, people travelling with
small children or are carrying luggage, as well as people with temporary mobility problems
(e.g. a leg in plaster) and the elderly persons.
The design standards for universal access to Public Transport Infrastructure including
related facilities and services, information, etc. would benefit people using public transport.
The access standards given here are extracted from Indian Roads Congress Code, IRC 103:
2012, Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities; Model Building Bye-Laws, 2011 and National
Building Code, 2005. Central Public Works Departments (CPWD) Space Standards for
Barrier Free Built Environment for Disabled and Elderly Persons, 1998 and 2013 edition
(under revision by MoUD), and international best practices / standards. Further, it has also
been attempted to provide guidelines/ standards for alighting and boarding area, approach
to station, car parking area, drop-off and pick-up areas, taxi/auto rickshaw stand, bus
stand/stop, footpath (sidewalk), kerb ramp, road intersection, median/pedestrian refuge,
traffic signals, subway and foot over bridge etc. to achieve a seamless development around
metro stations.
19.2
CONTENT
1. Rail Transport
2. Metro Rail Station
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Way finding
Signage
Automated Kiosks
Public Dealing Counters
Audio-visual Displays
Public Telephones
Rest Areas/Seating
Tactile Paving - Guiding & Warning
1/23
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Doors
Steps & Stairs
Handrails
Ramps
Lifts/Elevators
Platform/Stair Lift
General and Accessible toilets
Drinking Water Units
Visual Contrasts
Emergency Egress/Evacuation
3. Street Design
x
x
x
x
x
x
Footpath (Sidewalk)
Kerb Ramp
Road Intersection
Median/Pedestrian Refuge
Traffic Signals
Subway and Foot Over Bridge
19.3
Approach
Car Park
Drop-off and Pick-up Areas
Taxi/Auto Rickshaw Stand
Bus Stand/Stop
RAIL TRANSPORT
1. General
Whether over-ground or underground, rail travels is a highly effective mode of
transport.
Every train should contain fully accessible carriages.
Staff should be trained in methods of assistance and be at hand on request.
Stations for all rail travel should be fully accessible with extra wide turnstiles where
possible alongside wheelchair accessible doorways
Staff should be on hand to assist persons with disabilities and elderly to enter or exit
through convenient gates.
All new railway stations should be designed to be fully accessible.
2/23
For persons with hearing impairments, an electronic sign board (digital display) should
be displayed on each platform at conspicuous location for all announcements made by
the railways.
For persons with visual impairments audio system announcing the station names and
door location should be available.
3/23
19.5
Approach route should not have level differences. If the station is not on the same
level as the walkway or pathway, it should a ramp.
Walkway surfaces should be non-slip.
Approach walkway should have tactile pavements for persons with visual
impairments.
Should have clear floor space of at least 900 mm x 1200 mm in front of the counters;
There should be at least one low counter at a height of 750 mm to 800 mm from the
floor with clear knee space of 750 mm high by 900 mm wide by 480 mm deep.
At least one of the counters should have an induction loop unit to aid people with
hearing impairments; and
The counters should have pictographic maps indicating all the services offered at the
counter and at least one of the counter staff should be sign language literate.
4. TOILET FACILITIES
5. PLATFORMS
The Platforms should:
Have a row of warning paver installed 600mm before the track edge (photo 6);
Have non-slip and level flooring;
Have seating areas for people with ambulatory disabilities;
Be well illuminated lux level 35 to 40;
There should be no gap or difference in level between the train entry door and the
platform.
4/23
6. WAY FINDING
7. SIGNAGE
Signs must be clear, concise, and consistent. All travelers need clear information about the
purpose and layout of terminals to maintain a sense of direction and independent use of all
facilities. Using internationally and nationally established symbols and pictograms with
clear lettering and Braille ensures universal accessibility cutting across regional/cultural
and language barriers. A cohesive information and signage system can provide visual (e.g.
signs, notice boards), audible (e.g. public address and security systems, induction loops,
telephones, and infrared devices), and/ or tactile information (e.g. signs with embossed
lettering or Braille).
8. SIGN DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
5/23
Letters should be simple such as Arial, Helvetica medium, and san serif or similar
and numbers should be Arabic.
The colour of the text should be in a colour that contrasts with the sign board.
The sign board should also contrast with the wall on which it is mounted.
The surface of the sign should not be reflective.
Some signs such as those adjacent to or on a toilet door may be embossed so that
they can be read by touch.
Illuminated signs should not use red text on a dark background.
Signs should be supplemented by Braille where possible.
9. AUTOMATED KIOSKS
Ticketing, Information, Check-in, Help desk, Restaurants, Shops, etc. should have
public dealing counters.
Information or help desks should be close to the terminal entrance, and highly
visible upon entering the terminal. In addition, they should be clearly identified and
accessible to both those who use wheelchairs and those who stand.
6/23
It should provide information in accessible formats, viz. Braille leaflets for persons
with vision impairments.
Ideally, these desks should have a map of the facility that desk attendants can view
with passengers, when providing directions.
Staff manning the counters should know sign language.
Information desk acoustics should be carefully planned and controlled as a high
level of background noise is confusing and disorienting to persons with hearing
impairment.
Lighting should be positioned to illuminate the receptionist/person manning the
counter and the desk top without creating glare.
Lighting should not create shadows over the receptionist staff, obscuring facial
detail and making lip reading difficult.
There should be a hearing enhancement system such as a loop induction unit, the
availability of which is clearly indicated with a symbol.
One of the counters should not be more than 800mm from the floor, with a
minimum clear knee space of 650mm high and 280mm- 300mm deep .
Terminal maps should be placed so that they are readily visible to persons who are
standing and persons who use wheelchairs. They should also be accessible to
persons with a visual disability (i.e. tactile maps). Other alternatives include
electronic navigation systems or audio maps.
Enable captioning at all times on all televisions and other audiovisual displays that
are capable of displaying captions and that are located in any portion of the
terminal.
The captioning must be in high contrast for all information concerning travel safety,
ticketing, check-in, delays or cancellations, schedule changes, boarding information,
connections, checking baggage, individuals being paged by bus railway or airlines,
vehicle changes that affect the travel of persons with disabilities, and emergencies
(e.g., fire, bomb threat).
Seating area / benches should be provided along the circulation path at regular
intervals so that passengers do not need to walk more than 50 to 60 metres before
being able to sit and rest.
Where seating is provided, designated seating for passengers with disabilities is to
be provided at boarding gates and departure areas within viewing distance of
communication boards and/or personnel and identified by the symbol of access.
Public transit operators should provide seating in passenger service areas where
there may be long waiting lines or times, including at ticket sales counters, check-in
7/23
counters, secured screening and during inter-country travel in customs areas and
baggage retrieval areas.
Designated seating should be provided for at boarding gates and departure areas
within viewing distance of communication boards, and within hearing range of
audio announcements as well. Such seating areas should be identified by the symbol
of accessibility and shelter should be provided where this seating is outdoors.
In outdoor settings, seating should be provided along with the planned hawker
spaces.
At waiting lounges for persons with disabilities chairs should have armrests and
backrest.
Indicate an approaching potential hazard or a change in direction of the walkway, and serve
as a warning of the approaching danger to persons with visual impairments, preparing
them to tread cautiously and expect obstacles along the travel path, traffic intersections,
doorways, stairs, etc. They are used to screen off obstacles, drop-offs or other hazards, to
discourage movement in an incorrect direction, and to warn of a corner or junction. Two
rows of tactile warning paver should be installed across the entire width of the designated
accessible passenger pathway at appropriate places such as before intersections, terminal
entrances, obstacles such as signage, and each time the walkway changes direction.
14. PLACES TO INSTALL WARNING PAVER
8/23
15. DOORS
Whatever the type of entrance door, it must be wide enough to accommodate
passenger traffic comfortably.
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
9/23
Glazed doors and fixed glazed areas should be made visible by use of a clear, colour and
tone contrasted warning or decorative feature that is effective from both inside and
outside and under any lighting conditions, e.g. a logo, of minimum dimensions 150mm
by 150mm (though not necessarily square), set at eye level.
Steps should be uniform with the tread not less than 300mm and the risers 150mm.
The risers should not be open.
The steps should have an unobstructed width of 1200mm minimum.
All steps should be fitted with a permanent colour and tone contrasting at the step
edge, extending the full width of the step, reaching a minimum depth of 50mm on both
tread and riser.
Have continuous handrails on both sides including the wall (if any) at two levels
Warning paver to be placed 300mm at the beginning and at the end of all stairs.
Nosing to be avoided.
The staircase should be adequately and uniformly illuminated during day and night
10/23
(when in use). The level of illumination should preferably fall between 100-150 lux.
The rise of a flight between landings must be no more than 1200mm.
There should be no more than 12 risers in one flight run.
The stair covering and nosing should be slip-resistant, non-reflective, firmly-fixed and
easy to maintain.
Soffit (underside /open area under the stairs) of the stairs should be enclosed or
protected.
17. HANDRAILS
Handrails should be circular in section with a diameter of 38-45mm and formed from
materials which provide good grip such as timber, nylon or powder coating, matt finish
metal finishes.
The handrail should contrast in colour (preferably yellow/orange) with surrounding
surfaces.
At least 50mm clear of the surface to which they are attached and should be supported
on brackets which do not obstruct continuous hand contact with the handrail.
The handrail should be positioned at two levels- 760mm and 900mm above the pitchline of a flight of stairs.
Handrail at foot of the flight of stairs should extend 300mm beyond the stairs in the line
of travel and returning to the wall or floor or rounded off, with a positive end that does
not project into the route of travel.
18. RAMPS
11/23
150 mm
300 mm
300 mm
750 mm
750 mm
3000mm
3000 mm
Minimum
gradient
of Ramp
1:12
Ramp Width
1200 mm
Handrail on
both
sides
1:12
1500 mm
1:15
1800 mm
1:20
1800 mm
Comments
19. LIFTS/ELEVATORS
A carefully designed lift makes a huge contribution to the accessibility of a multi-storied
terminal building for persons with disabilities.
Lift locations should be clearly signposted from the main pedestrian route and
recognizable through design and location.
The colour and tone of the lift doors should contrast with the surrounding wall finish to
assist in their location. Lift doors with metallic finishes such as steel grey and silver
should be avoided as they are difficult to identify by persons with low vision.
The lift lobby shall be of an inside measurement of 1800mm X 2000mm or more. A
clear landing area in front of the lift doors of minimum dimensions 1500mm x 1500mm
should be provided.
By making the landing area distinguishable by floor surface and contrast, it will aid
location and recognition of core areas. This could comprise a change in floor finish from
thin carpet to vinyl/PVC, or cement/mosaic floor to carpet.
Changes in floor finish must be flushed. There should be no level difference between lift
door and the floor surface at each level; the gap if unavoidable should not be more than
12mm.
The floor level/location should be indicated on the wall adjacent to or just above the
call buttons, and opposite the lift doors where possible.
Provisions of at least one lift shall be made for people using wheelchairs with the
following car dimensions:
o Clear internal depth -1500 mm minimum
o Clear internal width - 1500 mm minimum
o Entrance door width - 900 mm minimum
12/23
The lift call button should be wall-mounted adjacent to the lift and should contrast with
wall finish, either by using a contrasting panel, or a contrasting border around the
button panel.
The call buttons should be located within the range 800-1000mm above floor finish.
Buttons should not be touch sensitive, but should require a light positive pressure and
should ideally be large enough to be operable by the palm of the hand if required.
The control buttons inside the lift should be positioned on the side wall rather than
front wall to allow access from the back and front of the lift car, by mobility aid users
like wheelchair users.
The control buttons should contrast with their surroundings and illuminate when
pressed and should incorporate highly visible tactile embossed (NOT engraved)
characters and in Braille.
Time of closing of an automatic door should be more than 5 seconds and the closing
speed should not exceed 25 meters per second. There should be a provision of censor
enabled closing.
In larger lifts, controls should be positioned on both side walls, at least 400mm from
front wall and between 800-1000mm above floor level.
19.6
Internal walls should have a non-reflective, matt finish in a colour and tone contrasting
with the floor, which should also have a matt, non-slip finish.
Use of reflective materials such as metal (stainless steel for example) can be
problematic in creating sufficient contrast with control buttons, emergency telephone
cabinet, etc. for persons with low vision and the use of such materials should be
avoided wherever possible.
A mirror (750mm above floor level) on the rear wall can be useful to persons using
wheelchairs and other mobility aids should they need to reverse safely out of the lift car
or view the floor numbers.
Internal lighting should provide a level of illumination of minimum 100 lux
(approximately 50-75 lux at floor level), uniformly distributed, avoiding the use of
spotlights or down lighters.
A grab bar should be provided along both sides and the back wall, 900mm above floor
level.
Handrails should be of tubular or oval cross section, in order to be easily gripped and
capable of providing support.
Handrails should be positioned so that there is a clear space behind the handrail to
allow it to be grasped i.e. knuckle space should be 50mm.
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Lifts should have both visual and audible floor level indicators
13/23
19.7
Audible systems are also usually capable of incorporating additional messages, such as
door closing, or, in the case of an emergency, reassurance (with manual over-ride
allowing communication with lift occupants).
Announcement system should be of 50 decibel.
The display could be digital or segmented LED, or an appropriate alternative. A yellow
or light green on black display is preferred to a red on black display as it is easier to
read.
2. ACCESSIBLE TOILETS
Should have the international symbol of accessibility displayed outside for wheelchair
access.
The toilet door should be an outward opening door or two way opening or a sliding
type and should provide a clear opening width of at least 900mm.
It should have a horizontal pull-bar, at least 600mm long, on the inside of the door,
located so that it is 130mm from the hinged side of the door and at a height of 1000mm.
3. WC COMPARTMENT DIMENSIONS
The dimensions of a unisex toilet are critical in ensuring access. The compartment
should be at least 2200mm and 2000mm. This will allow use by both manual and
motorized wheelchair users.
Layout of the fixtures in the toilet should be such that a clearing maneuvering space of
1500mm x 1500mm in front of the WC and washbasin.
14/23
Top of the WC seat should be 450-480mm above finished floor level, preferably be of
wall hung or corbel type as it provides additional space at the toe level.
An unobstructed space 900mm wide should be provided to one side of the WC for
transfer, together with a clear space 1200mm deep in front of the WC.
WC should be centred 500mm away from the side wall, with the front edge of the pan
750mm away from the back wall. Have a back support. The WC with a back support
should not incorporate a lid, since this can hinder transfer.
L-shape grab bar at the adjacent wall and on the transfer side (open side) swing up
grab bar shall be provided.
The cistern should have a lever flush mechanism, located on the transfer side and not
on the wall side and not more than 1000mm from the floor.
5. GRAB BARS
Grab bars should be manufactured from a material which contrasts with the wall finish
(or use dark tiles behind light colored rails), be warm to touch and provide good grip.
It is essential that all grab rails are adequately fixed, since considerable pressure will be
placed on the rail during maneuvering. Grab bars should sustain weight of 200kgs
minimum.
A hinged type moveable grab bar should be installed adjacent to the WC on the transfer
side. This rail can incorporate a toilet tissue holder. A distance of 320mm from the
centre line of the WC between heights of 200-250mm from the top of the WC seat. It
should extend 100-150mm beyond the front of the WC.
A fixed wall-mounted L- shape grab bar (600mm long horizontal and 700mm long
vertical) on the wall side should be provided. It should be placed at a height of 200250mm above the WC seat level.
6. WASHBASINS
15/23
Contrast between fittings and fixtures and wall or floor finishes will assist in their
location. For example, using contrasting fittings, or dark tiles behind white hand
washbasins and urinals, contrasting soap dispensers and toilet roll holders. Contrast
between critical surfaces, e.g. floors, walls and ceilings helps to define the dimensions of
the room.
Towel rails, rings and handrails should be securely fixed to the walls and positioned at
800-1000mm from the floor.
The mirror should be tilted at an angle of 300 for better visibility by wheelchair users.
It should have lower edge at 1000mm above floor finish and top edge around 1800mm
above floor finish.
Hooks should be available at both lower-1200mm and standard heights- 1400mm,
projecting not more than 40mm from the wall.
Where possible, be equipped with a shelf of dimensions 400mm x 200mm fixed at a
height of between 900mm and 1000mm from the floor.
Light fittings should illuminate the user's face without being visible in the mirror. For
this reason, most units which have an integral light are unsatisfactory.
Large, easy to operate switches are recommended, contrasting with background to
assist location, at a maximum height of 1000mm above floor finish.
All toilet facilities should incorporate visual fire alarms.
Alarms must be located so that assistance can be summoned both when on the toilet
pan i.e. at 900mm height and lying on the floor i.e. at 300mm, from floor surface.
Alarms should be located close to the side wall nearest the toilet pan, 750mm away
from rear wall and at 900mm and 200mm above floor finish
All unisex accessible toilets to have access symbol in contrast colours. A distinct audio
sound (beeper/clapper) may be installed above the entrance door for identification of
the toilets.
9. ACCESSIBLE URINAL
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
16/23
19.8
19.9
At least one of the urinals should have grab bars to support ambulant persons with
disabilities (for example, people using mobility aids like crutches).
A stall-type urinal is recommended.
Urinals shall be stall-type or wall-hung, with an elongated rim at a maximum of 430mm
above the finish floor. This is usable by children, short stature persons and wheelchair
users.
Urinal shields (that do not extend beyond the front edge of the urinal rim) should be
provided with 735mm clearance between them.
Grab bars to be installed on each side, and in the front, of the urinal.
The front bar is to provide chest support; the sidebars are for the user to hold on to
while standing.
Drinking water fountains or water coolers shall have up front spouts and control .
Drinking water fountains or water coolers shall be hand-operated or hand and footoperated.
Conventional floor mounted water coolers may be convenient to individuals in
wheelchairs if a small fountain is mounted on the side of the cooler 800mm above the
floor.
Fully recessed drinking water fountains are not recommended.
Leg and knee space to be provided with basin to avoid spilling of water . This allows
both front and parallel access to taps for persons using mobility aids like wheel chair,
crutches etc.
VISUAL CONTRASTS
17/23
Placement (accessibility) and visibility of such devices is very important. The following
is to be considered for the installation of such alarm devices; fire alarm boxes,
emergency call buttons and lit panels should be installed between heights of 800mm
and 1000mm from the furnished floor surface. These should be adequately contrasted
from the background wall and should be labelled with raised letters and should also be
in Braille.
In emergency situations, it is critical that people are quickly alerted to the situation at
hand, for persons with disability the following needs to be considered.
Consider having audible alarms with voice instructions that can help guide them to the
nearest emergency exit. As an alternative to the pre-recorded messages, these alarms
may be connected to the central control room for on-the-spot broadcasts.
Flashing beacons
Vibrating pillows and vibrating beds.
Pagers or mobile phones that give out a vibrating alarm along with a flashing light
(these may be issued to persons with vision or hearing impairments at the time of
check-in or boarding the vehicle.)
18/23
Designate routes that are at least 1200mm wide, to ensure that a person using a
wheelchair and a non disabled person are able to pass each other along the route. The
route should be free of any steps or sudden changes in level and should be kept free
from obstacles such as furniture, coolers, AC units and flower pots.
Use Exit signage along the route. Orientation and direction signs should be installed
frequently along the evacuation route and these should preferably be internally
illuminated. The exit door signage should also be internally illuminated.
A way guidance lighting system consisting of low mounted LED strips to outline the
exit route (with frequent illuminated direction indicators along the route) should be
installed along the entire length of the evacuation route. Way guidance systems allow
persons with vision impairments to walk significantly faster than traditional overhead
emergency lighting. Moreover, emergency exit lights in green color and directional
signals mounted near the floor have been found to be useful for all people in cases
where a lot of smoke is present.
Luminance on the floor should be 1lux minimum provided on along the centre line of
the route and on stairs.
Install clear illuminated sign above exit and also directional signage along the route.
The directional exit signs with arrows indicating the way to the escape route should be
provided at a height of 500mm from the floor level on the wall and should be internally
illuminated by electric light connected to corridor circuits.
Fire resistant doors and doors used along the emergency evacuation route are
generally heavy and the force required to open these is much higher than 25 Newtons,
making it difficult for people with disability to negotiate these doors independently.
There are, however, magnetic and other types of door holders available that can be
connected to fire alarms so that they will hold the doors open normally but will release
the doors when the fire alarm is activated.
19/23
Footpath should:
Have kerb ramps where ever a person is expected to walk into or off the pathway; and
Have tactile warning paver installed next to all entry and exit points from the footpath.
Kerb should be dropped, to be flush with walk way, at a gradient no greater than 1:10
on both sides of necessary and convenient crossing points. Width should not be less
than 1200mm. If width (X) is less than 1200mm, then slope of the flared side shall not
exceed 1:12.
Floor tactile paving- Guiding & Warning paver shall be provided to guide persons with
vision impairment so that a person with vision impairment does not accidentally walk
onto the road.
Finishes shall have non-slip surface with a texture traversable by a wheel chair.
20/23
Passenger walkways, including crossings to the bus stops, taxi stands, terminal /
station building, etc. should be accessible to persons with disabilities.
Uneven surfaces should be repaired and anything that encroaches on corridors or paths
of travel should be removed to avoid creating new barriers. Any obstructions or areas
requiring maintenance should be white cane detectable2.
21/23
Access path from plot entry and surface parking to terminal entrance shall have even
surface without any steps.
Slope, if any, shall not have gradient greater than 5%. The walkway should not have a
gradient exceeding 1:20. It also refers to cross slope.
Texture change in walk ways adjacent to seating by means of tactile warning paver
should be provided for persons with vision impairment.
Avoid gratings in walks.
(B) SYMBOL
International Symbol of Accessibility should be clearly marked on the accessible parking lot
for drivers/riders with disabilities only.
A square with dimensions of at least 1000 mm but not exceeding 1500 mm in length;
Be located at the centre of the lot; and
The colour of the symbol should be white on a blue background.
The car park entrance should have a height clearance of at least 2400 mm.
LOCATION
Accessible parking lots that serve a building should be located nearest to an accessible
entrance and / or lift lobby within 30 meters. In case the access is through lift, the
parking shall be located within 30 meters.
The accessible route of 1200 mm width is required for wheelchair users to pass behind
vehicle that may be backing out.
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
22/23
Designated drop-off and pick-up spaces, to be clearly marked with international symbol
of accessibility.
Kerbs wherever provided, should have kerb ramps.
23/23
Chapter -20
Security Measures
20.0
Introduction
20.1
Necessity Of Security
20.2
20.3
Phases Of Security
20.4
20.5
CHAPTER -20
SECURITY MEASURES FOR A METRO SYSTEM
20.0 INTRODUCTION
Metro is emerging as the most favoured mode of urban transportation system. The
inherent characteristics of metro system make it an ideal target for terrorists and
miscreants. Metro systems are typically open and dynamic systems which carry thousands
of commuters. Moreover the high cost of infrastructure, its economic impotence, being the
life line of city high news value, fear & panic and man casual ties poses greater threat to its
security. Security is a relatively new challenge in the context of public transport. It
addresses problems caused intentionally. Security differs from safety which addresses
problems caused accidentally. Security problems or threats are caused by people whose
actions aim to undermine or disturb the public transport system and/or to harm
passengers or staff. These threats range from daily operational security problems such as
disorder, vandalism and assault to the terrorist threat.
20.1 NECESSSITY OF SECURITY
It is well known that public transportation is increasingly important for urban areas to
prosper in the face of challenges such as reducing congestion and pollution. Therefore,
security places an important role in helping public transport system to become the mode of
choice. Therefore, excellence in security is a prerequisite for Metro system for increasing
its market share. Metro railway administration must ensure that security model must keep
pace rapid expansion of the metro and changing security scenario.
20.2 THREE PILLARS OF SECURITY
Security means protection of physical. Human and intellectual assets either from criminal
interference, removal of destruction by terrorists or criminals or incidental to
technological failures or natural hazardous events. There are three important pillars of
security as mentioned under:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
1/4
Staff engaging with the passengers create a sense of re-assurance which can not fully be
achieved by technology. For human factor to be more effective staff has to be qualified,
trained, well equipped and motivated. They should bs trained, drilled and tested. The
security risk assessment is the first step for understanding the needs and prioritizing
resources. The organization of security should be clear and consistent. Security incidents,
especially major ones, often happen without warning. Emergency and contingency plans
must be developed communicated and drilled in advance.
There are number of technologies which can be used to enhance security e.g. surveillance
systems. The objectives of the security systems are to differ i.e., making planning or
execution of on attack too difficult, detect the planned evidence before it occurs deny the
access after in plan of attack has been made and to mitigate i.e. lessen the impact severity as
the attack by appropriate digits.
20.3 PHASES OF SECURITY
There are three phases of security as under:
Prevention
These are the measures which can prevent a security incidence from taking place. These can
be identified by conducting a risk assessment and gathering intelligence. Prevention begins
with the daily operational security -problems. Uncared for dirty, damaged property is a
breeding ground for more serious crime.
Preparedness
Plans must be prepared to respond to incidents, mitigate the impact. Train staff accordingly
and carry out exercises. The results of the risk assessment give a basis for such plans.
Recovery
Transport system must have laid down procedures/instructions for the quick recovery of
normal service after an incident. Recovery is important for the financial health of the
operation, but it also sends a clear message to public, it reassures passengers and gives
them confidence to continue using the system. Communication is key to the quick
restoration after such incidents. Restoration should ^also include an evaluation process for
the lessons learnt.
2/4
20.4
20.5
9. Mobile phones, land lines and EPBX phone connections for senior security officers and
control room etc.
10. Dog Squads (Sniffer Dog), at least one dog for 4 metro stations which is at par with current
arrangement of Lucknow Metro. Cost of one trained sniffer dog is Rs 1.25 Lacs
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
FINAL DETAILED PROJECT REPORT FOR LUCKNOW METRO
3/4
approximately. Dog Kennels alongwith provision for dog handlers and MI room will also be
provided by metro train depot administration including land at suitable places line wise.
11. Bullet proof Morcha one per security check point (i.e. AFC array) and entry gate of metro
train depot administration metro station.
12. Bullet proof jackets and helmets for QRTs and riot control equipments including space at
nominated stations. One QRT Team looks after 5-6 metro stations as per present
arrangement. One QRT consist of 5 personnel and perform duty in three shifts.
13. Furniture to security agency for each security room, and checking point at every entry
point at stations. Scale is one office table with three chairs for security room and office of
GO and one steel top table with two chairs for checking point.
14. Ladies frisking booth
Wooden Ramp
15. Wall mounted/ pedestal fan at security check point, ladies frisking booth and bullet proof
morcha, as per requirement.
16. Physical barriers for anti scaling at Ramp area, low height of via duct by providing iron grill
of appropriate height & design/concertina wire.
17. Adequate number of ropes. Queue managers, cordoning tapes, dragon search lights for
contingency.
18. Iron grill at station entrance staircases, proper segregation of paid and unpaid by
providing appropriate design grills etc.
19. Proper design of emergency staircase and Fireman entry to prevent unauthorized entry.
4/4