Continuous Footpath Treatments
Continuous Footpath Treatments
Continuous Footpath Treatments
August 2013
Supersedes/Amends
NIL
TDT 2013/
05
INTRODUCTION
Pedestrian prioritisation is desirable in town centres, shopping precincts, and around public
transport hubs and entertainment venues. It may also be desirable in residential areas to
encourage pedestrian activity and reduce real and perceived motor vehicle dominance.
Where vehicle traffic volumes are relatively low, therefore potential conflicts are also
relatively low, regulatory pedestrian prioritisation treatments may not be warranted. In such
locations pedestrian priority may be provided by continuous footpath treatments which are a
continuation of the footpath parallel with the main street, at grade, without colour or texture
change, across side street intersections.
BACKGROUND
Pedestrian priority across roads is usually provided by regulatory crossing treatments such
as pedestrian crossings or marked foot (signalised) crossings.
The normal warrant for a pedestrian crossing is based on the product of the measured
pedestrian flow per hour (P) and the measured vehicle flow per hour (V), where P>30, V>500
and PV>60,000 (RMS Supplement to AS 1742).
The volumes are even higher for a signalised pedestrian crossing (Traffic Signal Design
Section 2).
Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 6A, section 6.3 states that, as a general principle, the
dominant flow should claim priority and maintain a level surface, and recommends
continuous footpaths in conjunction with regulatory crossing treatments.
Austroads also recommends that pavements should be used consistently so it is clear where
priority is intended to be shared or allocated to a particular user (Guide to Traffic
Management Part 7). The Planning Guidelines for Walking and Cycling (DIPNR 2004)
suggest pedestrian priority is enhanced by visual and physical continuity of the footpath.
Distribution List:
Director, Infrastructure Development; Director, Asset Maintenance; Traffic Management and Road Safety staff and Councils.
For further enquiries
www.rms.nsw.gov.au I E [email protected]
RMS 13.372
1 (4 pages)
Under the road rules, a footpath is a road related area. When entering, or crossing, a road
related area from a road, drivers must give way to any pedestrians or other road users on the
road related area.
Therefore, where pedestrian priority is desirable but a regulatory pedestrian crossing is not
warranted, a continuous footpath treatment that is not differentiated in colour and texture
from the adjacent footpath may be a suitable solution.
APPLICATION
A continuous footpath treatment should only be considered where it meets the criteria
outlined below. A sample layout of a continuous footpath treatment is illustrated in Figure 1.
Item
Attribute
Measured vehicle
flow per hour
2 (4 pages)
Item
Attribute
Measured pedestrian
flow per hour
No minimum.
Risk assessment
Direction of traffic
Maximum width of
crossing point
Effective speed of
vehicles traversing
the footpath
Signage
This is the speed of vehicles entering and exiting the side street
once the continuous footpath treatment has been installed. The use
of driveway laybacks and stop or give way signs on exit should help
to achieve this speed.
3 (4 pages)
Item
Attribute
Shared zones
ACTION
This technical direction is effective immediately and must be followed when the relevant road
authority determines the need for a continuous footpath treatment.
UPDATES
To ensure that this Technical Direction remains current and relevant, minor updates may be
made from time to time. This may be done through the Roads & Maritime Services website
using the Traffic & Transport Policies & Guidelines Register which can be found at:
www.rta.nsw.gov.au/trafficinformation/guidelines/documentregister.
The Register should always be checked prior to using this Technical Direction.
REFERENCES
Austroads 2009. Guide to Road Design Part 6A.
Austroads 2009. Guide to Traffic Management Part 7.
Department of Infrastructure Planning and Natural Resources 2004. Planning Guidelines for
Walking and Cycling.
Road Rules 2008.
RMS 2012. Supplement to AS 1742.
Approved by:
Authorised by:
SIGNED
SIGNED
Craig Moran
General Manager
Traffic & Safety Management
Ken Kanofski
Director
Journey Management
4 (4 pages)