Continuous Footpath Treatments

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4
At a glance
Powered by AI
The key takeaways are that continuous footpath treatments are used to prioritize pedestrians in areas with low vehicle volumes as an alternative to regulatory crossings, providing pedestrian priority through a consistent footpath design across intersections.

A continuous footpath treatment is where the footpath continues across side street intersections at grade, without changes in colour or texture, to provide pedestrian priority. It is used as an alternative to regulatory crossings in locations with low vehicle volumes where pedestrian priority is desirable.

For a location to be suitable for a continuous footpath treatment, the measured vehicle flow must typically be no more than 45 vehicles per hour, there should be few heavy vehicles, maximum width of the crossing point must be no wider than 7m, and the effective speed of vehicles traversing the footpath must be 10km/h or less.

Technical Direction

For traffic, transport & safety practitioners


OPERATIONAL POLICY GUIDELINES ADVICE
Published

August 2013

Supersedes/Amends

Continuous footpath treatments

NIL

TDT 2013/

05
INTRODUCTION
Pedestrian prioritisation is desirable in town centres, shopping precincts, and around public
transport hubs and entertainment venues. It may also be desirable in residential areas to
encourage pedestrian activity and reduce real and perceived motor vehicle dominance.
Where vehicle traffic volumes are relatively low, therefore potential conflicts are also
relatively low, regulatory pedestrian prioritisation treatments may not be warranted. In such
locations pedestrian priority may be provided by continuous footpath treatments which are a
continuation of the footpath parallel with the main street, at grade, without colour or texture
change, across side street intersections.

BACKGROUND
Pedestrian priority across roads is usually provided by regulatory crossing treatments such
as pedestrian crossings or marked foot (signalised) crossings.
The normal warrant for a pedestrian crossing is based on the product of the measured
pedestrian flow per hour (P) and the measured vehicle flow per hour (V), where P>30, V>500
and PV>60,000 (RMS Supplement to AS 1742).
The volumes are even higher for a signalised pedestrian crossing (Traffic Signal Design
Section 2).
Austroads Guide to Road Design Part 6A, section 6.3 states that, as a general principle, the
dominant flow should claim priority and maintain a level surface, and recommends
continuous footpaths in conjunction with regulatory crossing treatments.
Austroads also recommends that pavements should be used consistently so it is clear where
priority is intended to be shared or allocated to a particular user (Guide to Traffic
Management Part 7). The Planning Guidelines for Walking and Cycling (DIPNR 2004)
suggest pedestrian priority is enhanced by visual and physical continuity of the footpath.

Distribution List:
Director, Infrastructure Development; Director, Asset Maintenance; Traffic Management and Road Safety staff and Councils.
For further enquiries
www.rms.nsw.gov.au I E [email protected]
RMS 13.372

UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

1 (4 pages)

Under the road rules, a footpath is a road related area. When entering, or crossing, a road
related area from a road, drivers must give way to any pedestrians or other road users on the
road related area.
Therefore, where pedestrian priority is desirable but a regulatory pedestrian crossing is not
warranted, a continuous footpath treatment that is not differentiated in colour and texture
from the adjacent footpath may be a suitable solution.

APPLICATION
A continuous footpath treatment should only be considered where it meets the criteria
outlined below. A sample layout of a continuous footpath treatment is illustrated in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Example of a continuous footpath treatment layout.

Item

Attribute

Measured vehicle
flow per hour

Typically no more than 45 vehicles per hour moving through the


intersection to be treated. There should be few, if any, heavy
vehicles frequenting the intersection.
Measured vehicle flows apply for three periods of one hour in any
day. This measure should capture the busiest traffic flows that occur
at that location.

Continuous Footpath Treatments I August 2013


UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

2 (4 pages)

Item

Attribute

Measured pedestrian
flow per hour

No minimum.

Risk assessment

If a continuous footpath treatment is being considered, the location


will already have been identified as one where it is appropriate to
provide pedestrian priority.

Continuous footpath treatments may be implemented to encourage


pedestrian activity or to reduce the car-dominant appearance of an
area. Baseline measured pedestrian flows will be irrelevant in these
instances.

A risk assessment, ie identification of types of people using the path,


types of vehicles, sight lines, etc, will help to inform the facilitys
design to ensure the treatment is safe and effective.
Type of intersection

A continuous footpath treatment can be used on any type of


intersection other than a signalised intersection.
However, careful consideration may be needed if implementing the
treatment at four way intersections as the gap required by vehicles
crossing the main street will be increased because they have to slow
down to traverse the continuous footpath treatment.

Direction of traffic

Ideally, traffic would be one way into the side street.


However, this is not mandatory as it may place undue restrictions on
the implementation of continuous footpath treatments and/or unduly
complicate traffic flow in the area.
Consideration needs to be given to the movement of traffic on the
main street. Depending on the specific location, it may be
appropriate to limit turning movements on the side street to left in/left
out to minimise impacts on main traffic flow.

Maximum width of
crossing point

The driveway laybacks must be no wider than 7m.


This will constrain the available space while still allowing width for
two motor vehicles to pass each other if required.
Where the side street is significantly wider than 7m, additional
treatments may be required to constrain the intersection so drivers
do not think they have the full width of the street in which to
manoeuvre, for example bollards or appropriate street plantings.

Effective speed of
vehicles traversing
the footpath

10 kilometres per hour or less.

Signage

Stop, give way or a pedestrian warning signage should be provided


on the side street if vehicles are exiting the side street over the
continuous footpath treatment.

This is the speed of vehicles entering and exiting the side street
once the continuous footpath treatment has been installed. The use
of driveway laybacks and stop or give way signs on exit should help
to achieve this speed.

Continuous Footpath Treatments I August 2013


UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

3 (4 pages)

Item

Attribute

Shared zones

A continuous footpath treatment may be used as part of the


threshold treatment for a shared zone.
In these cases, the maximum width requirement for the intersection
is waived as the 10 kilometre per hour speed limit and other
measures will help to calm the traffic and minimise conflict.

ACTION
This technical direction is effective immediately and must be followed when the relevant road
authority determines the need for a continuous footpath treatment.

UPDATES
To ensure that this Technical Direction remains current and relevant, minor updates may be
made from time to time. This may be done through the Roads & Maritime Services website
using the Traffic & Transport Policies & Guidelines Register which can be found at:
www.rta.nsw.gov.au/trafficinformation/guidelines/documentregister.
The Register should always be checked prior to using this Technical Direction.

REFERENCES
Austroads 2009. Guide to Road Design Part 6A.
Austroads 2009. Guide to Traffic Management Part 7.
Department of Infrastructure Planning and Natural Resources 2004. Planning Guidelines for
Walking and Cycling.
Road Rules 2008.
RMS 2012. Supplement to AS 1742.

Approved by:

Authorised by:

SIGNED

SIGNED

Craig Moran
General Manager
Traffic & Safety Management

Ken Kanofski
Director
Journey Management

Continuous Footpath Treatments I August 2013


UNCONTROLLED WHEN PRINTED

4 (4 pages)

You might also like