Popular Resistance To Company Rule: Module - 3
Popular Resistance To Company Rule: Module - 3
Popular Resistance To Company Rule: Module - 3
Modern India
19
Notes
POPULAR RESISTANCE TO
COMPANY RULE
The early years of the English East India companys rule in India witnessed a large
number of uprisings and rebellions. As we have learnt, over a period of 100 years,
starting from 1750s to 1850s, the English East India company adopted various measures
to transform India into a colony Different policies followed by the British in India during
this period were primarily in the interest of the British. A number of land revenue
experiments were made which caused hardship to cultivators. Local administration
failed to provide relief and natural justice to the rural poor. In this lesson we will learn
how the peasantry and tribal people suffered under the colonial administration and why
they resorted to revolts. With a brief narrative of important popular uprisings, we will
analyze the nature and significance of these uprisings. The Revolt of 1857 has a major
significance because, for the first time, it brought together people having different ethnic, religious and class background in a unified movement against the British rule.
OBJECTIVES
After studying the lesson, you will be able to:
discuss the background to the popular revolts which broke out till 1857;
A new set of property relations was introduced and land was made saleable
commodity.
HISTORY
43
MODULE - 3
Modern India
Notes
Commercial crops were encouraged in place of food crops to serve the British
capitalists.
Growing burden of taxation made the cultivators an easy prey to the revenue
collections, merchants and money lenders.
Local industries were suppressed in order to make way for the British manufactured goods.
Tribals lost their traditional rights in land due to the land revenue policy of the
British government.
All these changes dealt a serious blow to the rural society, particularly the cultivators
and tribals. For the peasant, the new changes in agrarian economy and social structure meant more intensive and systematic exploitation.
To recall it again, the colonial rulers were concerned only with the collection of revenues in time which were fixed at high rates. Zamindars and others who were engaged
in collecting the revenue were least concerned about the paying capacity of the cultivators and forcefully collected the taxes. In meeting the increasing demand of taxes, the
peasants were compelled to sell their lands or they were caught in the trap of money
lenders. Justice could not be expected from the local administration because it was
under the influence of the rich. Thus, under the colonial rule, the nexus of the official,
the landlord and the money lender combined together to exploit the peasantry. Bengal
famine of 1770, bear testimony to the devastating effect of the British policy over the
rural society. Alongwith the colonization of the economy, changes introduced by the
British in local administration and society created discontent and resentment among
local population. This discontent at various junctures took the form of rebellion.
How did Indian peasantry met the increasing demand of taxes by Britishers?
2.
Under the colonial rule nexus of which agencies was formed to exploit the
peasantry?
44
HISTORY
MODULE - 3
Modern India
evicted from lands joined the bands of Sanyasis and Fakirs. Though they were
religious mendicants they used to loot the grain stocks of the rich and the treasuries of
the local government. The Sanyasis often distributed their wealth among the poor and
established their own government. However, they could not sustain their struggle for
long in the face of strong repressive measures of the British rulers. Bankim Chanddra
Chatterjee wrote a novel. Anand Math to imortalise the Sanyasi Rebellion.
Notes
Peasants of Rangpur and Dinajpur, two districts of Bengal, were aggrieved by the
tyranny of the revenue contractors. One such revenue contractor, Debi Singh, created a reign of terror by torturing the peasants in order to collect taxes. When the
British officials failed to protect the peasant, the peasants took the law in their own
hands. They attacked the local cutchheries and store houses of the contractors and
government officials. The rebels formed their own government and stopped paying
revenues to the Company agents. This rebellion was in 1783. The rebels were finally
forced to surrender before the Company officials.
In South India, the situation was in no way different. The dispossessed landlords and
displaced cultivators raised the banner of revolt. The poligars of Tamilnadu, Malabar
and coastal Andhra revolted against the colonial rule in the late 18th and the early 19th
century. The revolt of the Mappilas of Malabar was most significant. The Mappilas
of Malabar were the descendants of the Arab settlers and converted Hindus. Majority of them were cultivating tenants, landless labourers, petty traders and fishermen.
The British conquest of Malabar in the last decade of the 18th century, and the introduction of the British land revenue administration in Malabar enraged the Mappilas.
Over assessment, illegal taxes, eviction from land and the change in land ownership
right caused growing discontentment among them. Thus, they rose in revolt against
the British and the landlords. The religious leaders helped in strengthening the solidarity of Mappilas and in developing anti-British consciousness. These Mappilas were
suppressed by the colonial rulers.
In Northern India the Jats of Western U.P. and Haryana revolted in 1824. In Western
India Maharashtra was a common centre of uprising and Gujarat also witnessed the
revolt of the Kolis. We can add more to the list of peasant rebellions. But let us look
at tribal uprisings.
(ii) Tribal Uprisings
The establishment of colonial rule also affected the tribal people. Living outside the
boundary of the mainstream population the tribals lived in their own world being
governed by their own traditions and customs. The colonial government extended
their authority to the tribal lands and the tribals were subjected to various extortions.
The tribals resented the entry of the colonial administration into their land. Take the
example of the Bhils of Khandesh and the Kols of Singhbhum (Bihar) who enjoyed
independent power under their chiefs. But the British occupation of their territories
and the entry of merchants, money-lenders and the British administration in these
tribal lands curbed the authority of the tribal chiefs. This led the tribal leaders to revolt
against the British rule and their target of attack were all the outsiders in the tribal
territories. The insurrections were suppressed by the British.
Similarly, the Santhals had been living in a large tract of land in the border of Bengal,
Bihar and Orissa. Their livelihood depended upon the flora and fauna of the jungle.
With the introduction of the British rule they were used to clear jungle lands and once
they started cultivation on these lands, they were forcibly evicted. Thus, penetration
HISTORY
45
MODULE - 3
Modern India
Notes
of landlords, merchants and money-lenders into their lands brought misery and oppression for the simple living Santhals. The oppression forced the Santhals to take up
arms, and they found their leaders in two brothers, Sidhu and Kanu. It was believed
that Sidhu and Kanu had blessings from the gods to bring an end to their miseries.
They decided to get hold of their lands and to set up their own government. The
rebellious Santhals were supported by the local poors like the Gowallahas. Telis,
Lohars and others. The rebellious Santhals ultimately failed in the face of the ruthless
suppression by the British.
Actions of the rebels prove that they were clear about their interest and about
their enemies. Some features of the peasant and tribal protest movements demonstrate a certain level of political and social consciousness among them.
In many instances local issues might have triggered off the rebellion. But in the
course of the development of the movement, its objective was broadened. Immediate context of a movement may be the oppression of local landlords, once
the movement started, it ended up as protest against the British Raj.
Religious belief, Ethnic ties and traditions played a positive role in mobilizing the
peasants and strengthening their solidarity. Very often their notions of their own
good old past inspired rebels to recover their lost past. Past basically meant to
the rebels to get relief from exploitation and oppression.
Attempt was made by the ruling class to define the rebellions as a problem of
law and order and act of crime. This is complete denial of the peasants
understanding of their grievances and their right to protest. It is necessary to
understand the domain of peasant and tribal action in its own terms.
However, the rebels did not have a future plan beyond the restoration of the old
order. In spite of their limited objective and narrow world view the rebels definitely exposed the unpopular character of the colonial rule.
2.
46
HISTORY
MODULE - 3
Modern India
Notes
Besides the economic grievances, at the social level there was a strong reaction in
the local society against the British intervention in their age-old customs and traditions. Being guided by the philosophy of racial superiority a section of the British
officials was engaged in modernizing and civilizing India. People were apprehensive
of the social legislation introduced by the British. Particularly the abolition of Sati and
the widow remarriage act had a negative effect on the common people. These changes
were viewed as intervention in the local tradition and culture. Added to this was the
fear of conversion to Christianity. All these alienated the people from the British Raj.
The sepoys had their own reasons for resentment. The sepoys were unhappy for low
pay and racial discrimination in matters of promotion, pension and terms of service.
Soldiers who were basically hailing from the peasant families were also unhappy with
the new land settlements introduced by the British. It is true that the sepoys were
agitated for various reasons but an immediate provocation was their suspicion that they
would be forced to renounce their cultural ethos of centuries old society. Just before the
Revolt of 1857, there was a rumor of bone dust in the Atta (flour) ration. The cartridges
of the Enfield rifles, which had to be bitten off before loading, were reportedly greased
with pork and beef fat. This was perceived as an attack on the religious belief of the
soldiers-both the Hindus and the Muslims. Sentiment of the sepoys was well reflected
in a proclamation issued at Delhi,- It is well known that in these days all the English
have entertained these evil designs-first, to destroy the religion of the whole Hindustani
Army and then to make the people by compulsion Christians. Therefore, we, solely on
account of our religion, have combined with the people, and have not spared alive one
infidel, and have re-established the Delhi dynasty on these terms.
Courses of the Revolt
Initial disturbances started in March, 1857 when at Barrackpore, near Calcutta, Mangal
Pandey, a sepoy, asked other sepoys to rise against the British military officers and he
killed the British Adjutant, Mangal Pandey was later arrested and hanged to death.
After that in May, 1857 at Meerut the regiments of Indian sepoys shot down the
HISTORY
47
MODULE - 3
Modern India
Notes
48
British officers, broke open the prisons, released their comrades and crossed over to
Delhi to appeal Bahadur Shah II, the pensioner Mughal emperor, to become their
leader. Rumour spread about the fall of the British rule and soon the rebellion spread
to other parts of north and central India. In Awadh, the sepoys proclaimed that sepoy
Raj had arrived. Dissatisfaction and disillusion against the British Raj brought many
local chiefs, peasants, artisans, civil servants, and religious medicants together in this
revolt. In Awadh, the revolt spread to Lucknow, Kanpur, Allahabad, Benaras,
Rohilkhand, Bundelkhand, Gwalior, Jhansi and Bihar. The revolt in these areas had
massive response among the civil population. Some important leaders of the rebellion
were Rani Laxmi Bai, Tantia Tope, Begum Hazrat Mahal, Nana Saheb, Kunwar
Singh of Arrah.
HISTORY
MODULE - 3
Modern India
Notes
2)
there was a lack of communication and centralized leadership among the rebels,
the British had sufficient resources and also better arms and equipments,
the rebels did not have clear political agenda for future except their distrust on
the foreign rule.
the rebels, in spite of the popular character of the movement had failed to enlist
the support of merchants, intelligentsia and many local princes that rather supported the British.
HISTORY
49
MODULE - 3
Modern India
Notes
The British though managed to suppress the revolt but realized the extent of peoples
resentment. The events of 1857 compelled the British to reexamine their policy
towards India, after the revolt; therefore, they adopted a strategy to check the future
incidents of such a revolt. In order to win back the confidence of local princes, the
British made a declaration that they would no longer expand their existing territorial
possessions. Special awards were given to the loyal princes. In the recruitment of
army, community, caste, tribal and regional loyalties were encouraged in order to
check the solidarity among soldiers. the British took recourse to the policy of divide
and rule by tactfully utilizing caste, religious and regional identities of Indian people.
Another important consequence of the Revolt of 1857 was the declaration of Royal
Proclamation in 1858. By this proclamation Indias administration was taken over
directly by the British Crown abolishing East India Companys rule.
Finally, though the rebels failed, their heroic struggle against the British Raj left a deep
impression in peoples mind. The spirit of Indian nationalism which was at a formative
stage in the second half of the 19th century was greatly influenced by this Revolt.
2)
TERMINAL QUESTIONS
50
1.
2.
HISTORY
MODULE - 3
Modern India
3.
Notes
19.1
1)
2)
19.2
1)
2)
19.3
1)
2)
Rani Laxmi Bai, Tantia Tope, Begum Hazrat Mahal, Nana Saheb, Kunwar Singh
of Arrah.
19.4
1)
2)
2.
3.
HISTORY
51