Cold Formed Steel Design.
Cold Formed Steel Design.
Cold Formed Steel Design.
131
E-mail: [email protected]
Received Apr. 19, 2010; Revision accepted June 8, 2010; Crosschecked Jan. 7, 2011
Abstract: A numerical investigation of thin-walled complex section steel columns with intermediate stiffeners was performed
using finite element analysis. An accurate and reliable finite element model was developed and verified against test results. Verification indicates that the model could predict the ultimate strengths and failure modes of the tested columns with reasonable
accuracy. Therefore, the developed model was used for the parametric study. In addition, the effect of geometric imperfection on
column ultimate strength and the effect of boundary conditions on the elastic distortional buckling of complex section columns
were investigated. An equation for the elastic distortional buckling load of fixed-ended columns having different column lengths
was proposed. The elastic distortional buckling load obtained from the proposed equation was used in the direct strength method to
calculate the column ultimate strength. Generally, it is shown that the proposed design equation conservatively predicted the
ultimate strengths of complex section columns with different column lengths.
Key words: Complex section column, Distortional buckling, Finite element method (FEM), Intermediate stiffener
doi:10.1631/jzus.A1000185
Document code: A
CLC number: TU391
1 Introduction
Thin-walled cold-formed steel sections have
been used increasingly in recent years. There are
some advantages in using cold-formed steel as a
structural material, such as high strength-to-weight
ratio and ease of production. However, one disadvantage is that large width-to-thickness ratio sections
can suffer a loss of strength in a localized region when
2D plate buckling occurs, known as local buckling
(Yu, 2000). Previous research indicated that stiffeners
have significant effects on local buckling stress (Yan
and Young, 2002; Young and Yan, 2004b). Therefore,
a new section with intermediate stiffeners in the web
Corresponding author
Project supported by the Department of Education of Zhejiang
Province (No. Y200804537), the Zhejiang University Zijin Project,
and the Zhejiang College of Construction (No. 200914), China
Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011
was proposed (Young and Chen, 2008). An experimental investigation was carried out on the complex
section steel column with intermediate stiffeners. The
details of the test program are presented in Chen et al.
(2010). In this study, a numerical parametric study is
conducted to further investigate the behavior and
ultimate strengths of complex section columns with
intermediate stiffeners. The finite element program
ABAQUS (2004) has been widely used to investigate
the behavior of cold-formed steel columns (Kaitila,
2002; Young, 2004; Young and Yan, 2004a; Chen and
Young, 2007; Young and Ellobody, 2007). Therefore,
the finite element program ABAQUS was used to
simulate the complex section columns in this study.
The direct strength method (DSM), specified in
the supplement to the North American Specification
(AISI, 2004), proposed by Schafer and Pekz (1998),
is based on the same underlying empirical assumption
as the effective width method: ultimate strength is a
function of the elastic buckling and the yielding of the
132
Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138
Bf
Bf
Bl
ri
w3
Bw
(b)
f1
Bl
f1
f2
Specimen
S1L400A
S1L400B
S2L400A
S2L400B
S3L400A
S3L400B
S4L400A
S4L400B
f3
f3
Bf
f2
f5
f4
w3
w1
w2 w4
f5
Length
(mm)
L
401.0
400.0
400.0
399.8
400.5
400.0
399.5
400.8
w5
Bw
(a)
f4
2 Test program
w2 w4
w1
Bf
material (Schafer, 2002). Recent research on the application of the DSM on cold-formed steel structures
has also been reported (Sputo and Tovar, 2005; Tovar
and Sputo, 2005; Yu and Schafer, 2007; Kwon et al.,
2009; Dawe et al., 2010). However, the DSM emphasizes the use of finite strip analysis for the determination of elastic buckling. Finite strip analysis is a
general tool that provides accurate elastic buckling
solutions with a minimum of effort and time. Finite
strip analysis, as implemented in conventional programs, does have limitations: it provides a solution
for member ends which are pinned only (AISI, 2006).
Previous research has indicated that distortional
buckling can be influenced by additional restraint
provided at the ends, but no direct way exists to capture this effect in a traditional finite strip analysis
(AISI, 2006). The buckling mode of the proposed
complex section is general distortional buckling;
therefore, the effect of boundary conditions on the
distortional buckling of complex section fixed-ended
columns was investigated.
The purpose of this study is firstly to develop an
accurate finite element model to investigate the behavior of complex section columns with intermediate
stiffeners. Secondly, a comparison of the ultimate
column strengths from the finite element analysis
(FEA) and DSM predictions were made. A design
method for the elastic distortional buckling of fixedended complex section columns is also proposed.
Bw
w5
Bw
(c)
(d)
149.5
1.99
14.8
149.5
149.6
1.98
15.0
150.0
151.0 40
2.00
14.9
150.0
151.0 40
2.00
15.0
149.3 40 22 40 22 40 151.1
1.98
14.8
149.5 40 22 40 22 40 151.3
2.00
150.2 40 22 40 22 40 151.4 40
2.00
150.2 40 22 40 22 40 152.6 40
Web
(mm)
w2 w3
22 40
22 40
22 40
22 40
w4
22
22
22
22
w5
40
40
40
40
133
Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138
(a)
4 Test verification
The FEA results were verified against the test
results. As shown in Table 3, the FEA results (PFEA)
agree with test results (PEXP) well. The PFEA are
slightly higher than PEXP, except for the specimens
S3L400A and S3L400B. The mean value of the
PEXP/PFEA ratio is 0.98 with the corresponding coef-
(b)
134
Load (kN)
Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138
400
250
300
200
200
150
IMP (mm)
0.0025
0.025
0.25
1.0
2.0
100
FEA
100
(a)
TEST
0
0.0
50
0.5
1.0
Displacment (mm)
1.5
0
300
(b)
250
200
5 Parametric study
150
5.1 General
100
IMP (mm)
0.0025
0.025
2.0
0
450
350
300
200
0
450
0.025
150
IMP (mm)
0.0025
250
100
(c)
400
1.0
50
Load (kN)
0.25
0.25
1.0
50
2.0
(d)
400
350
300
IMP (mm)
0.0025
250
200
0.025
150
0.25
100
1.0
50
2.0
0
0.0
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
Displacement (mm)
1.5
199.7
201.8
S3L400A
744.8
766.3
S4L400A
352.7
365.4
Pcrd-in and Pcrd-out are the elastic distortional buckling loads of the lip
inward deformation and outward deformation, respectively
135
Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138
83.8
92.0
135.1
137.4
Pcrd-FEA
0.6
= 1 + 1.5 ,
Pcrd-FSM
from Eq. (1) are generally non-conservative. Therefore, a modified equation was proposed:
Pcrd-FEA
0.3
= 1 + 1.5 ,
Pcrd-FSM
(2)
Pcrd-FEA/Pcrd-FSM
Section 1
Section 2
Section 3
Section 4
Eq. (1)
Eq. (2)
Section 1-FEA
Section 3-FEA
Section 1-DSM
Section 3-DSM
350
300
Load (kN)
250
Section 2-FEA
Section 4-FEA
Section 2-DSM
Section 4-DSM
Section 4-DSM
200
150
100
Section 1-DSM
Section 2-DSM
Section 3-DSM
50
0
0
400
800
1200
1600
(1)
6 Design rules
6.1 General
136
Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138
Pne = 0.877
2 Py , c > 1.5,
c
(3)
(4)
l 0.776,
Pne ,
0.4
0.4
(5)
Pnl =
Pcrl Pcrl
1 0.15 P P Pne , l > 0.776,
ne ne
Py ,
Pnd =
Pcrd
1 0.25 P
where
Py=fyAg,
d 0.561,
0.6
P
crd
Py
0.6
Py , d > 0.561,
Pcre=2EA/(le/r)2,
(6)
c = Py /Pcre ,
axial strength for flexural, torsional, or flexuraltorsional buckling, and Pnl and Pnd are the nominal
axial strengths for local buckling and distortional
buckling, respectively. Py is the nominal section yield
strength. fy is the material yield strength, which is the
static 0.2% proof stress (0.2). Pcrl and Pcrd are the
critical elastic buckling loads for the local columns
and distortional columns, respectively. c, d, and l
are the slendernesses of the overall buckling, distortional buckling, and local buckling, respectively. A is
the cross section area, Ag is the full cross section area,
E is the elastic modulus, and r is the radius of gyration
of gross cross section about the minor y-axis of
buckling.
The ultimate strengths predicted by the DSM
with Pcrl and Pcrd calculated using the FSM (Papangelis and Hancock, 1995) were compared with the
FEA parametric study results (Fig. 6). Since the ultimate strengths calculated by Eq. (6) have no relationship with the column length, the design curves are
all horizontal straight lines. It is shown that the ultimate strengths predicted by the DSM are very conservative for column sections 2, 3, and 4. The current
DSM was developed based on open sections rather
than complex sections. Hence, the predictions of the
DSM on the complex sections may differ from those
of simple channel sections.
The ultimate strengths (PDSM-M) predicted using
the DSM with Pcrd calculated by Eq. (2) were compared with the FEA parametric study results in Table 6.
Table 6 Comparison of the column strengths of the sections from the FEA with the DSM predictions
Length
(mm)
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
Mean
COV
PFEA
(kN)
176.0
170.4
165.0
160.8
159.3
156.7
151.2
144.7
143.8
141.1
138.4
Section 1
PDSM-M
Ratio
(kN)
195.7
0.90
183.1
0.93
173.5
0.95
166.9
0.96
162.0
0.98
158.4
0.99
155.6
0.97
147.9
0.98
144.5
1.00
142.7
0.99
141.6
0.98
0.97
0.030
PFEA
(kN)
252.0
236.6
226.7
218.4
212.5
205.4
197.7
184.7
180.7
178.5
176.1
Section 2
PDSM-M
Ratio
(kN)
210.5
1.20
195.0
1.21
184.8
1.23
177.7
1.23
172.6
1.23
168.7
1.22
165.7
1.19
157.4
1.17
153.7
1.18
151.8
1.18
150.6
1.17
1.20
0.020
PFEA
(kN)
340.0
328.0
318.1
316.0
309.7
294.7
279.7
252.0
241.0
231.3
184.7
Section 3
PDSM-M
Ratio
(kN)
264.5
1.29
260.3
1.26
244.8
1.30
233.7
1.35
225.5
1.37
219.2
1.34
214.2
1.31
200.1
1.26
193.8
1.24
190.4
1.21
188.3
0.98
1.27
0.084
PFEA
(kN)
347.0
328.7
315.0
302.7
292.4
283.6
276.2
252.5
246.3
232.5
205.3
Section 4
PDSM-M
Ratio
(kN)
267.8
1.30
247.9
1.33
234.3
1.34
224.7
1.35
217.5
1.34
212.1
1.34
207.8
1.33
195.9
1.29
190.6
1.29
187.7
1.24
185.9
1.10
1.30
0.055
Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138
137
Chen, J., Yong, H., Jin, W.L., 2010. Stub column tests of
thin-walled complex section with intermediate stiffeners.
Thin-Walled Structures, 48(6):423-429. [doi:10.1016/j.
tws.2010.01.008]
Dawe, J.L., Liu, L., Li, J.Y., 2010. Strength and behavior of
cold-formed steel offset trusses. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(4):556-565. [doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.
2009.10.015]
7 Conclusions
Numerical investigations and design of fixedended complex section columns using the FEA have
been presented. A finite element model, including
geometric and material nonlinearities, has been developed and verified against experimental results.
The FEA predictions were generally in good agreement with the experimental ultimate strengths and
failure modes of the test columns. The columns underwent distortional buckling. An extensive parametric study of initial geometric imperfection, buckling
deformation shape, boundary condition, and column
length effects on elastic distortional buckling load has
been performed using the developed finite element
model. It is shown that for more complex sections, the
effect of initial local geometry imperfection is
smaller. The buckling deformation shape has no significant effect on the buckling load. It is also shown
that the elastic distortional buckling load of a column
obtained from the FEA approached that obtained from
the FSM when the column lengths increases. A
comparison of the column strengths obtained from the
FEA and the design column strengths calculated using
the DSM has also been presented. Results showed
that the design column strengths calculated using the
critical elastic distortional buckling load obtained
from the proposed equation were generally conservative for fixed-ended complex section columns.
References
ABAQUS, 2004. Analysis Users Manual. Version 6.5.
ABAQUS, Inc.
AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute), 2004. Supplement to
the North American Specification for Design of
Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members. AISI, Washington, DC.
AISI (American Iron and Steel Institute), 2006. Direct Strength
138
Huang et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A (Appl Phys & Eng) 2011 12(2):131-138
These journals are among the best of Chinas University Journals. Heres why:
JZUS (A/B/C) have developed rapidly in specialized scientific and technological areas.
JZUS-A (Applied Physics & Engineering) split from JZUS and launched in 2005
JZUS-B (Biomedicine & Biotechnology) split from JZUS and launched in 2005
JZUS-C (Computers & Electronics) split from JZUS-A and launched in 2010
We are the first in China to completely put into practice the international peer review system in
order to ensure the journals high quality (more than 7600 referees from over 60 countries,
http://www.zju.edu.cn/jzus/reviewer.php)
We are the first in China to pay increased attention to Research Ethics Approval of submitted
papers, and the first to join CrossCheck to fight against plagiarism
Since the start of an international cooperation with Springer in 2006, through SpringerLink,
JZUSs usage rate (download) is among the tops of all of Springers 82 co-published Chinese
journals
JZUSs citation frequency has increased rapidly since 2004, on account of DOI and Online
First implementation (average of more than 60 citations a month for each of JZUS-A &
JZUS-B in 2009)
JZUS-B is the first university journal to receive a grant from the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (20092010)