Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 393 views

    10 Sumacad Et Al. vs. Province of Samar and PNB

    Uploaded by

    r
    1) The plaintiffs sued the Province of Samar and Philippine National Bank (PNB) over a check worth P25,000 issued by the Province of Samar in 1942 but not paid upon presentation. 2) In 1950, PNB requested a photocopy of the check from the Bureau of Posts and required certification from provincial authorities, even though the check was never directly presented to PNB. 3) The court ruled PNB was secondarily liable because by requesting documentation related to the check, it impliedly accepted the check and assumed an obligation to retain sufficient funds for payment, though the Province remained primarily responsible as the drawer.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    10 Sumacad Et Al. vs. Province of Samar and PNB

    Uploaded by

    r
    393 views2 pages
    1) The plaintiffs sued the Province of Samar and Philippine National Bank (PNB) over a check worth P25,000 issued by the Province of Samar in 1942 but not paid upon presentation. 2) In 1950, PNB requested a photocopy of the check from the Bureau of Posts and required certification from provincial authorities, even though the check was never directly presented to PNB. 3) The court ruled PNB was secondarily liable because by requesting documentation related to the check, it impliedly accepted the check and assumed an obligation to retain sufficient funds for payment, though the Province remained primarily responsible as the drawer.

    Original Description:

    `

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) The plaintiffs sued the Province of Samar and Philippine National Bank (PNB) over a check worth P25,000 issued by the Province of Samar in 1942 but not paid upon presentation. 2) In 1950, PNB requested a photocopy of the check from the Bureau of Posts and required certification from provincial authorities, even though the check was never directly presented to PNB. 3) The court ruled PNB was secondarily liable because by requesting documentation related to the check, it impliedly accepted the check and assumed an obligation to retain sufficient funds for payment, though the Province remained primarily responsible as the drawer.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    393 views2 pages

    10 Sumacad Et Al. vs. Province of Samar and PNB

    Uploaded by

    r
    1) The plaintiffs sued the Province of Samar and Philippine National Bank (PNB) over a check worth P25,000 issued by the Province of Samar in 1942 but not paid upon presentation. 2) In 1950, PNB requested a photocopy of the check from the Bureau of Posts and required certification from provincial authorities, even though the check was never directly presented to PNB. 3) The court ruled PNB was secondarily liable because by requesting documentation related to the check, it impliedly accepted the check and assumed an obligation to retain sufficient funds for payment, though the Province remained primarily responsible as the drawer.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    SUMACAD et al. vs.

    PROVINCE OF SAMAR and PNB


    G.R. No. L-8155; Oct. 23, 1956; Paras.
    Digest by Ian.
    Doctrine: There was implied acceptance and the drawee bank voluntarily assumed the
    obligation of holding so much of the deposit of the province of Samar as would be sufficient to
    cover the amount of the check when it requested to be furnished a photostatic copy of the check
    and required the holder to secure the necessary certification from the provincial treasurer and
    auditor per circular of the Department of Finance.
    Facts: Check worth P25, 000.
    Drawer: Province of Samar
    Drawee: Philippine National Bank
    Payee: Paulino Santos (postmaster of Borongan)
    Indorsee/-er: James Mcguire
    Indorsees/ Holders: Plaintiffs Violet Mcguire Sumacad et al.
    1. In May 1942, the check was issued by the drawer. After the liberation in 1946, indorser
    Mcguire presented the check to the Municipal treasurer of Borongan for payment but but
    the latter (who merely noted it) was not able or did not choose to pay the same.
    2. McGuire wrote letters to the Bureau of Posts dated May 28 and August 5, 1948, and March
    30, 1950 seeking payment of the check, which were in turn referred by the Director of the
    Bureau of Posts to the PNB on April 21, 1950.
    3. On April 25, 1950, the PNB requested the Bureau of Posts to furnish it with
    photostatic copies of the check which were duly received by the bank on May
    12, 1950. As of this date the province of Samar still had a deposit of P84,287.47
    with the drawee .
    4. On May 14, 1950, the drawee requested James McGuire to present the check to
    the provincial treasurer and the provincial auditor for certification in accordance
    with the circular issued by the Secretary of Finance of July 3, 1947. Before the
    check could be certified by the authorities concerned as being in order and entitled to
    priority of payment, the province of Samar, on September 4, 1951, withdraw the
    amount of P83,504.07, leaving a balance of only P743.43.
    5. In the meantime, James McGuire transferred his rights to the check to the
    herein Plaintiffs who, unable to cash it, filed in the Court of First Instance of Samar on July
    27, 1953, the present complaint against the province of Samar and the Philippine National
    Bank.
    6. Trial Court- ruled in favor of plaintiffs. Only PNB appealed.
    7. Defense of PNB:
    a. It did not issue the check and was merely called upon to pay the same upon being
    presented for encashment if and when funds for the purpose were available; chan
    roblesvirtualawlibra
    b. rIt could not have paid said check because it was never presented to it with the
    required certification under the circular of the Secretary of Finance of July 3, 1947;
    c. That the relation between the Appellant bank and the province of Samar was that of
    debtor and creditor, the debtor being without power to inquire into the obligation of
    his creditor unless it had an interest in the same; ch
    d. That there is nothing in the records to show that the holder of the check ever
    requested the Appellant bank to withhold the amount of the check or ever filed,
    before the exhaustion of the deposit of the province of Samar, any order from the
    courts or proper authorities to withhold the amount covered by the check;
    e. That in any event, the Appellant bank cannot be held solidarily liable, the province
    of Samar being the drawee of the check and therefore primarily liable to pay the
    same.
    Issue: WON PNB may be held liable under the check.

    Held: Yes. There was implied acceptance on the part of drawee. Nevertheless, it was merely
    subsidiarily liable, the drawer being primarily liable. Decision affirmed.
    Ratio: In view of the fact that as early as May 12, 1950, upon its own request, it was furnished
    with photo static copies of the check in question; and on May 14, 1950, it went to the trouble of
    requiring James McGuire to present the check to the provincial treasurer and provincial auditor
    for necessary certification, it voluntarily assumed the obligation of holding so much of the
    deposit of the province of Samar as would be sufficient to cover the amount of the check, or
    before allowing the withdrawal that exhausted said deposit, of making the necessary inquiry on
    the matter. In our opinion, an implied acceptance of the check by the Appellant bank was
    thereby created. The request by the Appellant bank from the Bureau of Posts for photo static
    copies of the check and the subsequent requirement by it for its presentation by James McGuire
    to the provincial treasurer and the provincial auditor for certification, would be an empty gesture
    if the Appellant did not thereby mean to assume the obligation of paying the check and holding
    sufficient deposit of the drawer for the purpose. Even so, Appellants resulting obligation is
    merely subsidiary, the province of Samar being primarily liable to pay the check.
    Padilla, dissenting: The only party liable for the payment of the check is the Province, the drawer.
    The drawee cannot be held subsidiarily liable because the check was not presented to it for
    payment hence it follows that it was not able to refuse payment. The requests for the photostatic
    copies as well as the certifications did not create an obligation on the part of the drawee to pay
    the amount of the check. The fact the PNB actually requested for these shows that the original
    check had not been presented to the drawee.

    You might also like