Lawson Jazz 1 Libre
Lawson Jazz 1 Libre
Lawson Jazz 1 Libre
Language, Art and Mind: Essays in Appreciation and Analysis in Honor of Paul Ziff,
Edited by Dale Jameson, Kluwer Academic, 1994, pp. 131-142
Archie Shepp, Grachan Moncur III, and Pharaoh Sanders, for example, used elements of
the African-American musical style.6 While the music lacked visual images or lyrics,7
one of two claims were often made about the music. First, one could use the music as a
spring board to discuss the African-American experience. That is,one could play a
recording of Charles Mingus and learn something about the black musical tradition or at
least some of its basic elements. For example, if we listen to Mingus's "Wednesday Night
Prayer Meeting", we could cite the elements of the black musical tradition embodied in
the piece: field hollers, call and response, and a strong bass line. We could even talk
about the socio-logical and historical context out of which the composition arises. For
this composition we could cite the history of the black church and its role in the black
community. We could even discuss the black gospel tradition in all forms of black music.
All of the above, of course, presupposes that the person discussing the composition has
the necessary musical/historical/sociological background to articulate the various musical
and sociological elements. Mingus's music and much of jazz, according to this view,
expressed the black experience.
There is another much more controversial claim made about the music: that just by
listening to the music one can have one's consciousness raised or that one can come to
know something about black culture. Thus one could hear persons claim that if you want
to know about the black experience listen to recordings of the music of Coltrane, Charlie
Parker, or Miles. In an interesting article in Critical Studies in Mass Communication,
Robert Francesconi writes that while there is an absence of lyrical content, the Free Jazz
Movement played a distinctly rhetorical role through its conscious development of
associations between the community and the cultural and musical heritage of the victims
of colonial power around the world.7 Non lyrical jazz communicates cultural awareness
and/or it raises consciousness. The claim is often made that even without lyrics, jazz can
communicate information about the black experience to someone who has little or no
knowledge of the experience. We are never told how the music communicates this
"knowledge" and that is the issue I want to explore in this essay.
COMMUNICATING THE BLACK EXPERIENCE
Two question immediately come to mind: First, what is meant by raising
consciousness and second, what aspect of African-American culture is represented in the
music? It is this second question that will be the focus here.
Can non-lyrical jazz compositions give cultural awareness to the uninitiated listener? But
what do we mean by cultural awareness? It could mean a number of things but let us
consider two possible meanings. First, by listening to the music one gets a greater
appreciation of the culture of African-Americans. Second, the music provides knowledge
and/or information about some aspect of the African-American experience.
Let's consider whether Sonny Rollin's Freedom Suite has this ability. This
composition is important in the history of jazz. It is often cited as one of the earliest tunes
that captured the changing perspective of jazz musicians in the civil rights movement. It
serves our purpose well because it is well known by jazz lovers, but obscure enough that
younger listeners would have a difficult time identifying it. What does this piece
communicate about the African-American experience? Suppose we were to play this
recording for a group of college students who had never heard it. What information
would they get about the black experience just by listening to it? We could provide
background information about the composition and in that way give them some
information about the black experience. but they will not be getting it from the music.
Suppose we slowly give them bits of information about the recording. The first bit of
information we give them is that the leader of the group is Sonny Rollins. Unless they
were jazz fans that information would not direct their attention to some event in the black
experience. They might even ask if Rollins was black.
Next we tell them that this particular session was recorded on the Riverside Record
label. Jazz buffs will no doubt know that in the late 1950s and early 1960s Riverside
Records recorded some of the greatest jazz musicians. Thelonious Monk, Wynton Kelly,
Kenny Dorham, Ernie Henry, Abbey Lincoln, Art Blakey, Cannonball Adderly, and
Johnny Griffin all recorded on Riverside. But would our students know this? If they knew
some jazz history they might know that Riverside was an important jazz label.
Does the composition of the group give them any more information about what the
music is supposed to communicate? The group consists of tenor saxophone, drums and
bass. One inquiring person might want to know why is there no piano and which
instrument does Rollins play. We tell them that Rollins plays tenor saxophone and has
recorded well-known albums: Way out West, The Bridge, and Tenor Madness with
John Coltrane. We could tell them that Rollins had played with Max Roach and Clifford
Brown. We now add that this record was recorded in 1958. They could ruminate about
events that took place in 1958 and then try to guess which event is supposedly depicted
by the music. But how would they know if they had the right event? 1958 was four years
after Brown v. Board of Education and Ghana had became the first independent African
state. The year before (1957) President Eisenhower had sent troops to Little Rock. Rev.
Martin Luther King, Jr., had been stabbed in the chest by a crazed woman in Harlem.
Would they be able just from listening to the music alone to know more about the black
experience? I don't think so.
Proponents of the "jazz as communication" position could, of course, propose that it
did not express any event of 1958. Could this piece really be about the total history of
African-Americans and not about one particular event? Would more information about
the recording be helpful?
Perhaps the title would help? We now tell them that the composition is titled "The
Freedom Suite." Have they been misled? Does Rollins mean artistic freedom, political
freedom or freedom in the context of the civil rights struggle? Perhaps Rollins' words on
the liner notes will help. He wrote on the liner notes to the Freedom Suite the following
short paragraph:
"America is deeply rooted in Negro culture: its colloquialism, its humor, its music. How
ironic that the Negro, who more than any other people can claim America's culture as his
own, is being persecuted and repressed, that the Negro, who has exemplified the
humanities in his very existence, is being rewarded with inhumanity." Is the music
supposed to express this thought? It might be objected that since Rollins' composition is
about his feelings about the "black experience", we might have difficulty knowing what
he meant. What we need is a piece that draws from some cultural event in the black
experience.
There are, it must be admitted, numerous recordings, that have titles that draw on some
event in the black American experience. John Coltrane's Song of the Underground
Railroad comes immediately to mind. Would our college students know that this
composition drew its title from the underground railroad just by listening to the music?
We have the same problem with Coltrane's recording that we have with the
Freedom Suite. Upon hearing the recording, we still don't know to what aspect of the
black experience our attention should be directed. Once told the title one may be able to
by conjecture hear Elvin Jones' drum work as the driving sound of a train. In order to
make such a claim, one must assume that one does not have direct awareness of music as
much as one has awareness of an event or experience which is brought to mind by the
music serving as the intermediary between one's awareness and the event. Furthermore,
one must assume that an event, say, the "black experience" and the music serving as its
representation "resemble" each other. Thus, one can also make the "black experience" the
intermediary representation of one's awareness of the music, such that one's awareness of
the music is dependent upon how the music is figured or configured by means of the
"black experience".
But what happens if two persons disagree about what the recording represents. Is there
some third person that can tell them how it is that they both missed the message? Those
persons who want to do sociology of music think that there is a clear perspective from
which to view or hear the music. They will tell you that the music expresses the struggle
of blacks in America. Accordingly, you can hear the black experience in the music. Jazz,
on this view, draws on the experiences of blacks, captures these experiences and
represents them in music.
Clearly, all of the following compositions draw on events from the black experience:
Albert Ayler's Drudgery, Max Roach's Driva Man, Charles Mingus' Meditations on
Integration, and Billy Harper's Trying to Make Heaven My Home. But the claim is not
that the composers drew their titles or even their inspiration from events in the black
experience, but that their music alone gives us information about the "black experience".
OPPRESSION AND RACISM IN MUSIC
Let's suppose that what is meant is that the music communicates "the struggle of blacks
against political oppression and racism." That is, any piece of music by a black composer
expresses this struggle. Thus, we should hear this struggle in Curtis Fuller's composition
Alamode recorded by Art Blakey and the Jazz Messengers. We should hear this struggle
in Chico Freeman's For the Peaceful Heart and the Gentle Spirit and Miles Davis'
Milestone. When I listen to these recordings I don't hear the struggle against political
oppression and racism. I hear good music played by Blakey, Freeman, and Davis. Well, it
might be countered that I really don't appreciate these pieces or that I don't know how to
listen to them or what to listen for. My response would be: tell me how to hear "the
struggle against political oppression and racism" in Milestones.
There are different aspects of the "black experience". Can all of the various aspect of
the "black experience" be expressed in each piece? I don't think so. Thus, not every piece
could be expected, e.g., to express oppression. Further, I doubt that these pieces express
racism.
Those persons who want to do sociology of music will claim to know what the music
represents or does not represent. These individuals are often thought to be giving the
politically correct perspective from which to listen to the music. One can, of course,
suggest a sociological perspective from which to judge music. One can claim that the
music expresses "the struggle against political oppression and racism" and that's how we
should approach our listening of all black music. It is clear, however, that this is taking a
perspective to the music. It is not hearing it expressed by the music. We still do not get
the perspective just by listening to the music.
ETHNICITY AND RACE IN MUSIC
It may be objected here that while I am correct about the music not expressing an
experience, what one hears is the ethnicity or race of the performer. That is, you can hear
the blackness in the playing (performance of the piece). I find this claim interesting, but
after having listened to Japanese and European musicians play jazz and not knowing the
race or ethnicity of the performer until someone told me, I have given up on trying to
"get" race from the performance. I am not claiming that someone might not be able to
hear "race" in the music. There may be persons who can pick out musicians by race just
by listening to their playing of an instrument. These individuals have the ability to hear
musically race in the way a Japanese chicken sexer can identify the sex of baby chicks by
sight. Most of us, unfortunately, lack this ability.
BLACK AND EUROPEAN STYLES
What is really meant, it might be claimed, is that it is the structure of the music that
expresses the black experience. There is white or European classical music and then there
is black music. Not only are their musical styles different, but black musicians
(particularly free jazz musicians) say something all together different with their music.
Francesconi thinks that the methods in which black musicians used harmony, melody,
nature of the instrumental selection, and rhythm provide a counter to western musical
traditions.8 He, for example, writes about harmony and melody that "through the system
of chords and their tonic relationship, harmony was the dominant characteristic of
European art music from 1650 until the early twentieth century. On the other hand,
African and other non-western music place an emphasis upon the development of melody
uncontrolled by any necessary harmonic system.
This seemingly simple statement of opposites defines the nature of this musical
dialectic."9 He contends that "as black nationalist rhetoric defined the black American
community in terms apart from the white world, free jazz adopted this stance in musical
terms by associating the unfamiliar stylistic elements of their music with non-European
musical practices.10 Yet, he notes that to understand the meaning in instrumental music
"presumes some familiarity with the stylistic conventions of that music on the part of the
listener."11 Thus our students would not know what the music meant if they were not
familiar with the jazz or classical idiom at all.
Perhaps, what is meant is that there are notes that express the black experience. Which
musical notes express the black experience? Is there a note that expresses political
oppression or racism? Rahsaan Roland Kirk plays only the black piano keys on his
recording of his composition Blacknuss. Is there some special relationship between the
black keys and the black experience? We may be able to tell a story about Kirk's view on
the relationship of jazz to the black experience, but we will not hear it just by listening to
his non-lyrical music.
Kirk does, however, tell us at the beginning of Blacknuss that he was only going to
play the black notes. What the artist has to say about a composition can, of course, give
some of us insight into what inspired the artist to compose a certain composition. We are
given this type of information in the liner notes of Art Blakey and the Jazz Messengers
recording The Freedom Rider. Blakey plays an extended drum solo which Nat Hentoff
tells us is meant to "represent" "the defiance of racism and pride in the persistence of "the
movement" to end segregation through mass, direct action". I must admit that I did not
hear all of this in Blakey's drum solo, while I did know that the composition was Blakey's
homage to the Freedom Riders. I do not think that our college students would know
(given the sad state of secondary education) what the piece represents or expresses even
if they were told the title or just heard the recording.
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Two other concerns arise in any discussion of jazz expressing the black experience:
First, jazz, as most music, can be appreciated for itself without any understanding of the
history of the piece or the intention of the composer. For example, one can enjoy A Love
Supreme by John Coltrane and know nothing about the life of John Coltrane. I met a
young alto saxophone player when I was in grad school who had never heard Charlie
Parker play the alto saxophone. I took him to the school's record library and played
Parker's Mood and Ornithology for him. He straight away appreciated Parker's playing.
Yet he knew nothing about Parker's life or the impact of Parker on the history of jazz. His
appreciation of the music was presentational rather than representational. That is, he had
access to the music directly not as an intermediary. This signifies an aural awareness and
appreciation of the music on its own terms alone. Charlie Parker's playing on alto sax is
just excellent playing. Second, what does the role of improvising in jazz play in
communicating the black experience through music? Improvising is often cited as the
heart of jazz. Improvising is performing according to spontaneous fancy, not from
memory or from written copy, though often a performer improvises 'on' (i.e. round about)
a given tune. Since in theory, no improvised piece should sound the same each time it is
played, one wonders if it would "express" or "represent" the same act, event, experience
or evoke the same emotional response at these different performances. Are we to
conclude that the different versions of Coltrane's My Favorite Things give different
information about the "black experience"?
THE INFORMATION IN MONK'S MUSIC
I find Thelonious Monk's music very expressive. When I listen to Monk's music I often
smile or chuckle. Listen, for example, to Monk's choppy version of Smokes Gets In
Your Eyes or his own compositions like Misterioso or Rootie Tootie. When I hear these
compositions, I think of a man willing to break what some people thought were the
musical rules. Monk was a man who took chances with his music. Monk was also
criticized for playing the same tunes for 40 years. Monk died in 1982. He had played in
the early 40s with Dizzy, Bird and Kenny Clarke at the formation of bebop. At his death,
he was still playing his compositions that were written in the forties. He did play the
same tunes over and over again. So what! Monk had style. When Monk died I took a tape
player and some recordings of Monk's music to my philosophy class and talked about his
importance to the development of modern music. I even took piano lessons so I could
play Straight, No Chaser and normally when I am at work in my office there is some
tune of Monk's playing. I like Monk's music and I like the feelings his music evokes in
me. I think that Monk's music is expressive. I find Monk's playing humorous. His music
evokes a humorous response from me. It causes me to smile. And this response to the
expressiveness of his music has nothing to do with my knowledge about Monk's life.
When I think of his life I am disheartened and become sad. His music is not his life.
People often claim that we can't separate the two, but that is not true. It is true that the
background information we have about an individual's life can affect the response we will
have toward his or her music and the effect the music will have on us. Sometimes so
much background information and faulty sociological assumptions are given, which it is
claimed is needed to understand the social significance of the music, that the beauty of
the music as music is destroyed.
In the case of Monk's music, I have background information that enables me to
understand Monk's playing in a certain way. I know about his so-called eccentric
behavior. I know about his sense of humor in his social dealing and, having read
literature on his compositions, I know what skill went into writing them. Thus, my claim
that Monk's music evokes a certain response from me could be understood by
understanding my relationship to Monk's music. But I enjoyed listening to Monk's music
well before I had any knowledge of his life and musical abilities. I liked the way his
music sounded and that was it. I did not learn about the black experience by listening to
Monk's music. Nor was I driven to learn about the "black experience' by listening to his
music.
There is no rhetorical information about the "black experience" in Monk's music. His
musical compositions are just that, musical compositions. His musical compositions are
not literary texts. One does not read them in the manner one reads a book and as such
they don't communicate any information. Writers on the black experience may want to
view the music as a communicational system, but this is misguided. To talk about the
music expressing some truth or communicating some information is to talk
metaphorically. These metaphors have never been fleshed out.. Let's cite one more
example: John Coltrane's "Alabama" on his Live at Birdland album. The liner notes
read:
If you have heard Slow Dance or After the Rain. then you might be prepared for the kind
of feeling that Alabama carries: I didn't t realize until now what a beautiful word
Alabama is. That is one function of an, to reveal beauty, common or uncommon,
uncommonly. And that's what Trane does. Bob Theiele asked Trane if the title "had any
significance to today 's problems." I suppose he meant literally. Coltrane answered, "it
represents, musically, something that I saw down there translated into music from inside
me." Which is to say, listen. And what we're given is a slow delicate introspective
sadness, almost hopelessness, except for Elvin [Jones], rising in the background like
something out of nature . . . a fattening thunder, storm clouds or jungle war clouds. The
whole is a fnghtening emotional portrait of some place, in these musicians' feelings. If
that "real" Alabama was the catalyst, more power to it, and it may be this beautiful, even
in its destruction. 12
If we put the piece in a historical context, we will remember that the recording was
made after a church bombing in Alabama left four young black girls dead. The culprits
have never been brought to justice. Coltrane was saddened by what happened in
Alabama.
The liner notes were written by Amiri Baraka (Leroi Jones). Baraka thinks Alabama
will evoke the emotion of sadness. That Baraka thinks that this composition has the
potential to evoke the emotional response of sadness tells us more about Baraka than it
does about what the music is thought to impart about the black experience. It is not
surprising then that "Alabama" would evoke the emotion of sadness from Baraka. He
knows the history of the piece and relates it to what happened in Alabama. Would our
college students feel sadness and think about what happened in Alabama when they hear
this composition? In some listeners it may evoke a response of sadness, in other listeners
it may not. Without some background information it is unclear that their attention would
be directed towards the state of Alabama or some negative aspect of African-American
history. Without the relevant background information, it is unclear that our college
students would have a greater appreciation of the culture of African Americans or have
information about some aspect of the African-American Experience.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Finally, nothing said here should be taken to imply or should be inferred to imply that
black music is not important in the lives of black people. Nothing said here negates the
fact that black music has been one of America's many cultural gifts to the world. Neither
does it follow that because non lyrical music does not convey information, it has no value
as an element in the black experience. Non lyrical jazz pieces, even if they do not give
direct information about the black experience, still perform an important function in the
lives of blacks. Indeed, jazz had tremendous impact on the evolution of the music of the
world. In the end, black music can be enjoyed solely for its musical qualities alone and
need not be the messenger of the black experience. This important fact should always be
remembered by those persons who attempt to do both sociology of music and
aesthetics.13
Dr. Bill E. Lawson
Department of Philosophy
University of Memphis
Memphis TN 38152
2006
.
SELECTED DISCOGRAPHY
Ayler, Albert. Reevaluations: The Impulse Years, Impulse-AS 9257-2
Blakey, Art. The Freedom Rider, Blue Note-84156.
Coltrane, John. A Love Supreme, MCA Impulse MCAD 5660.
Coltrane, John. Live at Birdland, Impulse AS 50.
Coltrane, John. The African Brass Sessions, Vol. 2, Impulse AS 9273.
Davis, Miles. Milestones. . . Miles Davis, Columbia-PC 9428.
Freeman, Chico. Peaceful Heart, Gentle Spirit, Contemporary- 1405.
Harper, Billy. Trying to Make Heaven My Home, MPS-ULS 6005-P.
Kirk, Rahsaan Roland. Blacknuss, Atlantic, SD 1601.
Mingus, Charles. Music Written for Monterey, 1965 Not heard..., Iwl 0013. lwl 0014
mono.
Monk, Thelonious. The Complete Blue Note Recording of Thelonious Monk, Mosaic
1187.
Parker, Charlie. The Complete Savoy Studio Sessions, Savoy SSjS500.
Roach, Max. We Insist: Freedom Now, Amigo Amiq 810.
Rollins, Sonny. The Freedom Suite, Riverside RLP-258.
NOTES
1. Alphonso Pinkney, Red, Black, and Green: Black Nationalism in the United States
(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), p. 76.
2. Ibid., pp. 76- 80.
3. Ibid., chapter 7.
4. The Black Panther Party denounced cultural nationalists, calling them "pork-chop'
nationalists. Ibid., p. 123.
5. Kofsky, Frank. "Black Nationalism in Jazz" in The Journal of Ethnic Studies 10(2),
pp. 1-27.
6. Kofsky, Frank. Black Nationalism and the Revolution in Music (New York:
Pathfinder
Press, 1970).
7. Robert Francesconi, "Free Jazz and Black Nationalism: A Rhetoric of Musical Style",
in
Critical Studies in Mass Communication 3(1986), pp. 36 49.
8. Ibid.,, p. 40.
9. Ibid., p. 41.
10. Ibid., p.40.
11. Ibid., p, 40,
12. John Coltrane Live at Birdland Impulse AS 50.
13. An earlier version of this paper was read at the Oxford Centre for African Studies,
Oxford,
England, August, 1990. The author gratefully acknowledges the helpful comments and
suggestions
of Houston A. Baker, Jr., Charlotte Baker, Frank Kirkland, William Lance Lawson,
Marilyn
Whittington, and Paul Ziff, who allowed me access to materials at the Chapel Hill
Center For
Philosophic Linguistic Research.