Genesis II Xu
Genesis II Xu
Genesis II Xu
UNI: sx2125
Genesis XII-XXXVI: The Patriarchal Cycle
Some have argued that, in Book XIX, Penelope recognizes Odysseus. What evidence
supports this theory? What evidence contradicts it? How would the Odyssey be different
if it were absolutely clear one way or the other? (How does Homer use the ambiguity?).
In line 71 to 88, Odysseus speaks to Melanthos who has verbally insulted him, stating,
So, woman, you should now beware Beware of your mistress Or Odysseus may come back.
There is still time for hope there here is Telemachos, his son and in his palace none of the
women will be sinful and escape (Homer 284). When Odysseus is speaking here, he is disguised
as an old beggar. Yet, his statement is not only harsh like that of a master, but also clever
Odysseuss speech includes a triple threat toward Melanthos which states that her mistress, elder
master, as well as her young master will all disapprove her wrongdoing. Odysseuss speech also
hints Odysseuss own nostos. If indeed Penelope recognizes Odysseus, her realization may
begin here. Immediately after this speech, circumspect Penelope heard him. (Homer 284).
Notice that the epithet for Penelope is circumspect, which emphasizes Penelopes wit and
insinuates that Penelope may have noticed something about beggar Odysseuss identity. Indeed,
Penelopes immediate actions are to insult Melantos and converse with Odysseus. In her speech
with Odysseus, Penelope seems to intentionally highlight her loyalty, delineating her weaving
story as well as stating, I pay no attention to strangers, nor to supplicants but always I waste
away at the inward heart, waiting for Odysseus (Homer 285). Penelope also attempts to find out
the beggar Odysseuss identity, both by inquiry and via testing. Penelope asks about Odysseuss
clothing, and when she constantly weeps about Odysseus, she perhaps hopes to see the
beggars reaction, hoping to gain information concerning his identity. Finally, Penelope addresses
the beggar as a friend. Although guests in the house should be treated with respect, it is quite
unnecessary for Penelope, who has been cold toward the guest suitors, to be so excessively kind
to his one particular beggar.
All the evidence should display that Penelope recognizes Odysseus. Yet Book XIX also
demonstrates that the recognition is ambiguous and incomplete. When the beggar Odysseus
informs Penelope of Odysseuss nostos, Penelope responds, here is the way I think in my
mind, and the way it will happen. Odysseus will never come home again (Homer 290). Why
would Penelope state that Odysseus will not return if she recognizes the beggar as Odysseus?
Here, Penelopes response contradicts her predicted response if she indeed recognizes the
beggar as Odysseus completely.
Why does Homer include such contrasting ideas? Perhaps there is purpose in the
ambiguity. If Penelope does not recognize anything special about the beggar, Penelope may
come across as imprudent, which contrasts with her characterization as the circumspect
Penelope. Also, in the end when Odysseus finally reveals himself, Penelope may not be able to
respond so logically and calmly (Penelope even tested Odysseuss loyalty) had she not prepared
herself in some way beforehand.
However, if Penelope figures out about Odysseuss identity completely, the climax of
Odysseuss homecoming may not be so emotional and stressed, and it would not make sense for
Penelope to sit so tranquilly while Odysseus and Telemachos are with the suitors in the final
Books. In short, the ambiguity serves to better concur with Penelopes character as well as the
storyline of the Odyssey.