Electrical Network Power Quality Report
Electrical Network Power Quality Report
Electrical Network Power Quality Report
1
1.1
1.2
MEASUREMENTS RESULTS
1.2.1 Measurements Analyze
Recordings are presented in manufacturer report for voltage, current, apparent, reactive and
reactive power, power factor and harmonics.
The 1000 kVA main transformer was finding to have, for short periods of time an overload state
for 1018kVA ( 101.8% from the nominal power). Even the equipment has the capability to sustain
the overload, it generates a winding temperature increase with more concerns within harmonic
presence.
Temperature increase is one of the prime factors that affect a transformer's life.
Power quality monitoring has revealed three mains issues:
a) Power factor issues and energy consumption in terms of components (apparent, active and
reactive)
b) Harmonic pollution.
c) Voltage disturbances.
THDi (total harmonic distortion for current) gives indication about the harmonic pollution, but not
always the best criteria. The loading level (power withdrawn from the main transformer in our case)
has a crucial signification for the system. A 50% loaded system with 75% THD will have much less
harmful (or not at all) as a 100% loaded transformer with 10% harmonic current distortion. The
negative effects of the harmonics rise exponentially with transformer loading.
A better indication of the states of entire electrical system (and in our case also of the 1MVA main
transformer) is the total demand distortion (TDD factor). It express harmonics in terms of load
current and in our case is over the limit, so mitigation will bring a major correction.
Calculated values are between 5 and 7% for some portion of the recordings, so over the 5% we
can see on the TDD column of table 10.3 of 519 IEEE standard.
A higher level was recorded for the 5th harmonic.
The measurements are relevant for the Point of Common Coupling (PCC) at the main bus, were
the recording was done.
If after the overload release of the power transformer, heating or other power quality persist, some
investigation should be done to identify and eliminate the harmonic generation hotspots.
Even rare, the damages could be significant, particularly in a pharmaceutical company where high
cost equipment should be protected.
1.3
MANUFACTURER PROPOSAL
1.3.1 Detuned automatic capacitor bank
Chapter D of Schneider report issue the recommendations based on the power quality data records
with the goal of improving the performance, reliability and efficiency of the electrical distribution.
The first recommendation, for installing a de-tuned capacitor bank could be an optimal choice for
reducing the electricity bill and decreasing the load of the transformer.
A detuned automatic capacitor will mainly improve the power factor, but bring also some small
amelioration to harmonic contents.
It is a cost effective solution, but in case of further power quality issues, supplementary harmonic
mitigations could be necessary.
1.3.2 Surge Protection Devices (SPD)
The second recommendation is regarding the protection of equipment and electrical network
against the transients, by placing a surge protection device (SPD) at the incoming 600V bus, at the
PCC were the measurements were done.
As transients could come from internal network too, it is a good practice to install SPD on the
electrical panels servicing the most sensitive loads. It is worth, especially for expensive process
equipment. The average price is 5k$ per unit and could be installed near the panels supplying
power to process equipment.
2
2.1
2.2
HARMONIC MITIGATIONS
Data recordings show harmonics content sometimes exceeding the recommendations values, but
not significant concerns were found out. Elimination will certainly improve electrical distribution,
motors and transformers will be less stressed and live expectancy will be increased.
In certain conditions it could ameliorate the power factor too.
A detuned reactor will eliminate harmonics at the point of common coupling (PCC), but some
disturbances could still exist in the downward electrical distribution network. A detailed load analyze
to identify nonlinear loads concentration could impose local harmonic mitigations, as harmonics
could still overheat the motors and transformers from the generation point to the PCC.
If disturbances will occur after decreasing main transformer overload (what is the first
recommendation), the limitation of the harmonic currents could be a point to consider.
Harmonic pollution could be eliminated by different methods and at different levels. For an optimal
choice to be done, a detailed analyze of loads distribution and configuration is necessary.
A verification of the grounding and binding, as well as neutral connections could bring out power
quality problems and correcting them will ameliorate the electrical distribution (most cases for the
3d order harmonics).
For the harmonic mitigations, if additional equipment should be considered, load configuration
could influence also the choice of harmonic mitigation techniques.
The individual loads characteristics could make as power factor could be improved after with
harmonics mitigation equipment is installed.
The less expensive is by installation passive equipment, as line reactors and isolation transformer
where non-linear loads are concentrating. They could offer a good cost effective option for
harmonics reduction near the load generating them.
As a rule of thumb, 100$ per HP power nonlinear load should be considered, detailed load
configuration will be necessary.
If the nonlinear load is scattered on site, harmonic filtering equipment could be installed at the point
th
th
of entrance (PCC). It will remove most dangerous order harmonics (5 and 7 ) but will not remove
all the high orders(those do not have a serious negative impact on the network). For a budget
estimation the value could be 35k$.
The most evaluated technique eliminating a higher spectrum is by active harmonic filtering. It could
be necessary if nonlinear loads have fast variations, as high power motors driven by VFD with
frequent starting. However the cost is elevate, for site conditions minimum 100k$ should be
considered as a budget cost estimate, if the case.
BUDGET OPTIONS
The main transformer is overloaded and the first and most economical option is to install the fans on the
transformer. With an investment less than 5k$, the new capacity will be 1.33 MVA and overheat will be
eliminate.
Detuned capacitor bank will allow to adjust the capacitor value (and the energy consumption) based on
the momentary states of electrical distribution network. This option involve around 30k$ and will bring a
payback from electricity bill. With an average of 6k$ savings by year, the investment is covered in 5 years.
This option will bring out also a light improvement in harmonic content.
Another option is to install dedicated harmonic mitigations equipment. The equipment could be with
passive filters to eliminate the most important harmonics (investments around 35k$) or active filters
(invest 100k$) for a complete monitoring of the harmonics in the network and total power quality
improvements.
Option
Harmonics
mitigation
Estimate
value
<5000
30,000
25,000
35,000
100,000
Active filter
Comments
CONCLUSIONS
The site conditions impose urgent countermeasures against high loading of the main 1MVA
transformer, as is sometimes over its limits. This goal could be achieved with a minimum financial
effort by installing fans to increase the capacity. However, it is recommended the power factor to be
improved, solving most of the problems.
Harmonic content is also lightly over recommended limits and should be improved too, but their
elimination is not a very critical issue.
Harmonic filtering will certainly improve power quality and optimal use of the equipment, but in
financial issues cases, a power factor capacitor installation could be more concretely sensed on a
short term.
After the transformer will be brought at normal work conditions, if power quality issues still persist,
harmonic mitigations should be done.