(8.3) Distillation Column
(8.3) Distillation Column
(8.3) Distillation Column
85
Vacuum pumps
HYDROCRACKING
86
Several devices are available for producing vacuum at a chemical process plant. Each has its own
advantages and disadvantages , among these ejectors are workhorses. The simples and probably
most widely used vacuum producer is the steam jet ejector.
Ejectors Range:
Ejectors range from single stage up to six stage units, and can be either condensing or noncondensing types. The numbers of ejector stages required are usually determined by the economy
of the ejectors and the level of vacuum required. Vacuum ranges for each stage are as follows.:
1st stage
2nd stage
3rd stage
4th stage
5th stage
6th stage
810mmHgA-30mmHgA
130mmHgA-3mmHgA
25mmHgA-0.8mmHgA
4 mmHgA-75microns Hg A
0.4 mmHgA-10 microns HgA
0.1 mmHgA-3 microns HgA
HYDROCRACKING
87
Fig .
8.1
Fig .
8.2
HYDROCRACKING
88
2. The liquid and vapor streams never reach equilibrium in a packed column. In a tray
column, the steams leaving any stage are assumed to be in the equilibrium.
3. Packed columns can operate over a relatively wide range of vapor flow rates. On the
other hand , plated columns offer wide operating range with respect to the liquid flow
rates.
4. Packed columns cannot work efficiently under stressed condition of temperature and
pressure.
5. Liquid distribution can be a problem in packed columns and cause channeling.
6. For diameters less than about 0.6 m , a plate column cannot be constructed. Therefore a
packed column has to be used.
7. Design information for plate column is more readily available and more reliable.
8. If the system contains solid contents, a plated column is preferred. The solids can
accumulate in the voids of the packing and choke them .
9. For large column heights, weight of the plate column is much smaller as compared to that
of a packed column.
10. For cleaning of packed column, packing must be removed.
In petroleum refining , the distillation columns are plate columns. This selection has
the following aspects.
1. The distillation columns in petroleum refining are complex columns. Actually , they are
fractionators , and multiple products are obtained from a single column as side streams .
the side streams are often steam-stripped to meet the flash point specification and the
overlapping standards of two fractions. The resultant vapor streams are again introduced
in to the column. Hence , a distillation column in a petroleum refinery has a number of
streams going into and out of the system. These inlets and outlets are easy to locate at
discrete points in a tray column, but difficult for a packed column.
2. Because of the multiple inlet and outlet streams, the liquid and vapor flow rated widely
very inside the column. A packed column is not suitable for such a condition.
3. To avoid problems like flooding and entrainment because of the variable liquid and vapor
flow rated , inter stage cooling or heating is often required. Sometimes, pump-arrounds
are also used for this purpose. this provision can only be made in a plate column.
Keeping in mind the above factors, the column selected for the current design is a plate
column.
Tray Selection:
HYDROCRACKING
89
Three basic types of trays are used in plate columns. These are sieve trays, bubble cap
trays, and valve trays. The trays selected for the column are sieve trays. The supporting
factors are.
1. They are light weight and the cheapest available, and easiest to fabricated and install.
2. They have higher capacity and lower pressure drop than other tray types
3. Sufficient design data is available
4. The maintenance cost is lower because of the ease of cleaning.
Fig
-8.3
HYDROCRACKING
90
1. The distillation column itself , as a tray or packed column where the vapor and liquid
streams are brought in contact with each other, and the separation occurs.
2. A reboiler to provide the heat required for vaporization.
3. A condenser to remove the heat from the system and condenses the vapors leaving from
top of the column.
4. A reflux drum to hold the condensed liquid after the separator and provide continuous
liquid reflux to the column.
HYDROCRACKING
91
Fig
8.4
Feed
Fraction
xf
(table- 8.1)
Bottom
Top
Fraction
Fraction
xb
xd
C1,C2
.039
.0001
C3
.042
.0089
I-C4
.048
.032
N-C4
.047
.0238
Gasoline
.313
.439
Napthta (LK)
.326
.058
.455
.186
.942
.0013
HYDROCRACKING
Water
92
.04
C3
i-C4
n-C4
Nature Of Feed:
Feed is entering in column as a saturated liquid at T=1050C and P=305kpa
Components
C1,C2
C3
i-C4
n-C4
Gasoline
Naphtha
U.A.G.O
Xf
Ki
0.039
0.042
0.048
0.047
0.313
0.326
0.186
Table
Ki*Xf
60
13
6
5
1.07
0.111
1.315 E-5
0.115648
0.321437
0.340852
0.208026
0.33628
0.042272
2.42E-06
By bubble point Xf*Ki=1.10; it is verified that feed is entering at saturated liquid. ref: (col V6
page 498.)
P=13 kpa
HYDROCRACKING
Components
C1,C2
C3
i-C4
n-C4
Gasoline
Naphtha
U.A.G.O
Water
93
Xd
Ki
Ki/Xd
.0001
.0089
.032
.0238
.439
.455
.0013
.04
147.5
32
18
17
22.1923
2.2077
0.0014
1.62E-05
9.59E-04
3.92E-03
3.04E-03
1.75E-02
2.06E-01
8.25E-01
0.25E-02
15
Table
Hence by dew point calculation (Ki/Xd)=1.2 app . it is verified the top temperature
Xw
0.058
0.942
Ki
Xw*Ki
13.025
0.094866667
Table8.4
0.8597041
0.0893334
ln[(xLK/xHK)D/(xLK /xHK)B]
ln (LK/HK) average
Lk / Hk avg Lk / Hk D Lk / Hk B 0.5
Lk / Hk
Lk / Hk
so
1 .5
5.3
Nmin +1=8.77/1.12
Nmin = 7
HYDROCRACKING
94
By
trial,
(root of equation)
Using
0.75 1 R Rmin
N 1
R
Nmin = 6
N N min
Rmin = 0.3
R(actual)= 0.5
0.566
HYDROCRACKING
95
Eo 51 32.5 log avg . avg
Eo = 54.0%
Then,
No. of actual trays = 15/0.54 = 28
Total # of actual trays=28+1=29
HYDROCRACKING
96
XLk(f)=.38
B=345.5kmol/hr
XLk(B)=.058
D=1209kmol/hr
XHk(B)=.0013
XHk(f)=.184
From which,
Number of Plates above the feed tray=Nr = ND = 10
Number of Plates below the feed tray=Ns = NB = 19
So feed is entering at plate 11 from top
Bottom conditions
Lw=Ln+F=2382kmole/hr
Vw=Lw-W=2036.35kmole/hr
Lm=Lw=284562kg/hr
Vm=Vw=196805kg/hr
T=200C=473K ,P=30kps
v(bottom)=5.68kg/m3
L(bottom)=756.6kg/m3
M.W=119kg/kmole
Table 8.5
L
n
Vn
v
L
0.5
HYDROCRACKING
97
Lm=Ln=284562kg/hr
Vm=Vn=196805kg/hr
v=5.68kg/m3
L=756.5kg/m3
FLV = Liquid Vapor Factor = 1.25
Assumed tray spacing = 35 inch (0.91 m)
Net vapor velocity at flooding.
Vm
V 3600
HYDROCRACKING
98
Qv=196805/(5.68*3600)= 9.6m3/s
Now, net area = Qv/vn = 17m2
Assume that down comer occupies 15% of cross sectional Area (Ac) of column thus:
Ac = An + Ad
Where, Ad = down comer area
Ac = An + 0.15(Ac)
Ac = An / 0.85
Ac=20 m2
So Diameter of Column Is
Ac =(/4)D2
Dc =
4 Ac
Dc = 5meter = 16ft
(based upon bottom conditions)
in the similar way we calculate the top diameter which come out to be 4.43m.so we will
decrease the perforated area for uniform diameter of 5m
HYDROCRACKING
99
(5mm-25mm)
Plate thickness = 5 mm
Check Weeping:
where uh = minimum vapour velocity through the holes(based on the hole area), m/s,
dh = hole diameter, mm,
K2 = a constant, dependent on the depth of clear liquid on the plate
The vapor velocity at weeping point is the minimum velocity for the stable operation.
In order to have K2 value from fig11.30 Coulson & Richardson 6th volume 4th edition we
have to 1st find how(depth of the crest of liquid over the weir)
where how is calculated by following formula:
how=750{[Lm/lw*l]2/3}
Maximum liquid rate Lm= 284562/3600=79 kg/sec
Minimum Liquid Rate At 80% turn down ratio
HYDROCRACKING
100
= 63.2Kg/sec
Iw=4m
l=756kg/m3
At Maximum rate ( how)= 63 mm Liquid
At Minimum rate (how) = 54.6 mm Liquid
hw + how = 25 + 54.6 = 79 mm Liquid
from fig 11.30, Coulson and Richardson Vol.6
K2 = 28
So, putting the value for Umin we will have.
U (min) = 3.5 m/sec
Now maximum volumetric flow rate (vapors) Base = 9.6 m3/sec
Ah=1.4m2
At 80% turn down ratio
Actual minimum vapor velocity
Fig
8.5
HYDROCRACKING
101
Co = 0.84
hd = 25 mm Liquid
L =756kg/m3
so hr = 16.5 mm Liquid
Fig
-8.6
HYDROCRACKING
102
that is
HYDROCRACKING
103
hbc=0.404m
l=756kg/m3
Lmax=79kg/sec
tr = 12 sec
It should be > 3 sec. so, result is satisfactory
Check Entrainment:
(un) actual velocity (based on net area) = (max volumetric flow rate at base Vm / net area An)
un=9.6/17=0.565m/sec
(un) actual velocity = 0.565 m/sec
Velocity at flooding condition Uf = 0.706 m/sec
So Percent flooding =un/ uf = 0.80 = 80%
Liquid flow factor FLV = 1.25
From fig. 11.29 Coulson & Richardson 6th volume 3rd edition
fractional entrainment can be found out.
Fractional entrainment () factor = 0.0025
Well below the upper limit of () which is 0.1. Below this the effect of entrainment on
efficiency is small.
No. Of holes.
Area of 1 Hole=ah = (/4) Dhole2
= 0.00002 m2
Area of N Holes =Ah= 1.4 m2
So,
Number OF Holes=Ah/ah = 7000
HYDROCRACKING
104
Fig 8.7
HYDROCRACKING
105
Specification sheet
Identification:
Item
No. required:
Tray type:
Function:
separation of gasoline and
Operation:
Table 8.6
No. of tray= 29
Pressure = 15Kpa
Weir height = 25 mm
Height of column = 29 m
Weir length = 4 m
Diameter of column=5m
Active area = 14 m2
Tray thickness = 5 mm
Entrainment = 0.025 %