Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road: List of Test Forms

Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
List of Test Forms

Form No.
Description of the Form
WORKSHEETS FOR TESTING

1
Material Source
Particle Size Analysis of Fills
Chart for Determining Values of 'K' Used in Particle Size Analysis of Fills
Atterberg Limits
Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 2.5 kg Rammer
Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 4.54 kg Rammer
Field Density Test of Fill Materials by Sand Replacement Method
Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Determination of Unit Weight)
Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Penetration Test and Determination of Swelling)
10
Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Soaked CBR Results)
11
Specific Gravity Test on Soils
12
Determination of Moisture Content of Soil by Oven Drying
13
Calibration of Sand and Sand Cone Apparatus
14
Particle Size Analysis of Aggregates for Subbase
15
16
Particle Size Analysis of Aggregates for Lower Base(Crushed Rock or Boulder or Crushed Over Burnt Bricks)
Particle Size Analysis of Crushed Gravel Aggregates for Lower Base
17
Particle size Analysis of Aggregates for Upper Base
18
Specific Gravity & Water Absorption of Aggregates
19
Abrasion Test on Small Size Coarse Aggregate by Use of Los Angeles Machine
20
Density Correction Chart for Coarse Particles in the Soil Compaction Test
21
Field Density Test for Subbase and Bases by Sand Replacement Method
22
Determination of Total Moisture Content of Aggregate by Drying
23
Materials Finer Than # 200 Sieve by Washing
24
Sieve Analysis of Filler
25
Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Binder Course
26
Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Wearing Course
27
Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulphate
28
Sand Equivalent Test
29
Stripping Test by AASHTO Method: T 182
30
Quantities of Bituminous Prime & Tack Coats
31
Crushed Aggregates of (>2) Fractured Faces (+ 4.75mm, visual)
32
Penetration Test on Bituminous Materials
33
Specific Gravity of Semi-Solid Bituminous Materials
34
Bituminous Extraction & Gradation of Hot Mix
35
Field Density Test of Cored Asphalt Concrete
36
Maximum Specdific Gravity of Bituminous Paving Mixtures
37
Asphalt Concrete Hot Mix Design by Marshall Method
38
Determination of the Presence of Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregate
40
Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes
41
Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete
42
Sieve Analysis of 20mm Coarse Aggregate for Cement Concrete
43
Determination of Flakiness Index
44
Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV) of Coarse Aggregate
45
Clay Lumps and Friable Particles
46
Determination of Slump of Fresh Concrete
47
Normal Consistency and Setting Time of Cement
48
Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar
50
Deflection Test by Benkelman Beam Method
51
Concrete Pouring Record
52
Request for Inspection / Survey / Quality Test
53
MDD vs. Location
54
Sample Record Card
Page 1 of 58

List of Test Forms
Form No.
Description of the Form

SHEETS FOR REPORTING TEST RESULTS
R1
Test Report of Ordinary Fill Material
R2
Test Report of Selected Fill (Improved Subgrade) Material
R3
Test Report of Aggregate Subbase Material
R4
Test Report of Aggregate Lower Base Material
R5
Test Report of Aggregate Upper Base Material
R6
Test Report of Fine Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete
R7
Test Report of Coarse Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete
R8
Test Report of Combined Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete Binder & Wearing Courses
R9
Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Binder Course Mixture
R10
Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Wearing Course Mixture
R11
Test Report of Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete
R12
Test Report of Coarse Aggregate for Cement Concrete
R13
Test Report of Compressive Strength of Concrete
R14
Test Report of Bitumen
R15
Test Report of Portland Cement
WORKSHEETS FOR CALIBRATION

C1
One Monthly Balance Scale Value Check
C2
Six Monthly Balance Repeatability Check
C3
Balance Check Departure from Nominal Value
C4
Balance Check For The Effect of Off-Centre Loading
C5
Clibration of Thermometers
C6
Speedy/Oven Dry Moisture Content Comparison
C7
Batch Plant Calibration Departure from Nominal Value
C8
Batch Plant Calibration Repeatability Check
C9
Calibration of Liquid Limit Apparatus
C10
Calibration of Moulds
C11
Calibration of Tamping Rod
C12
Calibration of Compaction Rammer
C13
Calibration of Sieves of Openings > 2mm
C14
Calibration of Dial Gauges
C15
Calibration of Slump Cones
Page 2 of 58

Page 3 of 58
*
*
*
*
*
2
3
4
5
6
*
*
*
7
8
9
*
*
10
11
*
*
7A
12
13
14
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
15
16
17
18
24
25
*
*
*
26
27
28
19
*
*
*
29
30

Page 4 of 58
WS -
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

MATERIAL SOURCE
Date :
Material Type
Brand Name/ Frog Mark
Source Location
Storage Location
Approx. Quantity
Purpose of Use
Location of Use
Tests Performed
Name of Tests
Lab. Ref.No.
Date
Results
Remarks
Conclusion on Tests:
Manufacturer's Test Certificates:
Remarks:
Sample Collected / Inspected By:
Form No. 1
Revision No. 0
Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
WS - 1
ATTERBERG LIMITS
Lab Ref. No.:
Location:..........................
Date of Sampling............
Material Type: ..
Date of Testing:
LIQUID LIMIT
PLASTIC LIMIT
Determination Number
Container Number
Number of Blows
1
Wt. of Can & Wet Soil (gm)
Wt. of Can & Dry Soil (gm)
Wt. of Water (1-2 = 3) (gm)
Wt. of Can (gm)
Wt. of Dry Soil (2-4=5) (gm)
Moisture Content (3/5)x100%
Results:
Liquid Limit %
Plastic Limit %
Plasticity Index %
Remarks:
Tested By:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-1
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0

WS - 2
DRY DENSITY vs. MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP USING 4.54 KG RAMMER
Lab Ref. No.:
Description of Material:
Date of Testing:
Blows / Layer: ________
No. of Layers: _______
Mould Dia: __________ mm
Wt. of Rammer: ... kg.
Drop ht.: . mm
Vol. of Mould: _______ x 10-6 m3
Mould Height: ___________ mm
Density Determination
Determination No.
Initial weight
Initial moisture content
Water added
Target moisture content
Weight of mould + wet mat'l
Weight of mould
Weight of wet mat'l
g
%
g
%
g
g
g
Bulk density
g/cm3
Dry density
g/cm3
Determination of Moisture Content

Moisture container No.
Container + wet mat'l
Container + dry mat'l
Water
Container
Dry mat'l
Moisture content
g
g
g
g
g
%
Dry density / moisture content relationship curve
Max. dry density
%
%
Dry density, t/m3
Optimum MC
=
Oversize fraction (+19mm)=
g/cm3
Moisture content, %
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-2
Witnessed by:
Revision No. 0
(Consultant)
WS - 3
FIELD DENSITY TEST OF FILL MATERIALS BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD
TEST INFORMATION :
Chainage:
Lab Ref. No.:
Elevation:
Date Requested:
Layer Thickness:
Request No.:
Width:
Date of Testing:
PREVIOUS LAYER INFORMATION :
Lab Ref. No.:

Elevation:
Location of Test Done:
RESULTS:
FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION
Test Hole Location: Chainage

Offset
Weight of wet sample from hole, mw
Depth of test hole
Weight of sand + cylinder before test, m1
Weight of sand + cylinder after test, m4
Weight of sand in hole + cone, m1 - m4
Weight of sand in cone, m2
Weight of sand in hole, mb = (m1 - m4 - m2)
Bulk density of sand, ga
g/cm3
Ratio, R = mw / mb
Bulk density of sample, gb = R x ga
g/cm3
Dry density, gd =100gb / (100 + W)
g/cm3
MOISTURE CONTENT DETERMINATION
Can No.
Weight of can + wet sample, P
Weight of can + dry sample, Q
Weight of water, R = P - Q
Weight of can, C
Weight of dry sample, Md = Q - C
Water content, W = 100 R / Md
DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION
Maximum dry density (MDD)

OMC (lab value)
MDD Test Reference (Lab Ref. No.)
% Compaction, 100 gd / MDD
Specified compaction
Results
g/cm3
%
%
%
Remarks :
Form No. WS-3
Tested by :
Witnessed by:
(Contractor)
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0

WS - 4
LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (DETERMINATION OF UNIT WEIGHT)
Lab Ref. No.:

Location:
Date of Testing:
MDD:
OMC:
Data for Unit Weight (before soaking) :
Mould No.
No. of layers
No. of blows per layer
Wt. of Wet soil + Mould
(g)
Wt. of Mould
(g)
Wt. of Wet Soil
(g)
Volume of Mould
ml
Wet Unit Weight
g/cm3
Dry Unit Weight
t/m3
Compaction Achieved
Data for Moisture content

Mould No.
Container No.
Wt. of Container + Wet Soil
(g)
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil
(g)
Wt. of Moisture
(g)
Wt. of Container
(g)
Wt. of Dry Soil
(g)
Moisture Content
(%)
Remarks:
Tested by:
Witnessed by:
(Contractor)
(Consultant)
Form No. WS-4
Revision No. 0
WS - 5
LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (PENETRATION TEST AND DETERMINATION OF SWELLING)
Lab Ref. No.:
Date of Testing:
SWELL DATA :
Day &
Month
Time &
Day
Time
Elapsed
(Days)
Mould No.. Ht. mm
Mould No.. Ht. mm
Mould No.. Ht. mm
Gauge
Reading
Swell
(mm)
% Swell
Gauge
Reading
Swell
(mm)
% Swell
Swell
(mm)
% Swell
Gauge
Reading
0
1
2
3
4
SOAKING DATA
Mould No.
Wt. of soil + mould + base- plate
(before soaking)
Wt. of soil + mould + base- plate
(after soaking)
Water absorbed
Wt. of dry soil in mould
% Water absorbed
MOISTURE CONTENT (AFTER SOAKING)
Mould No.
Specimen location
Can No
Wt. of wet soil + Can
Wt. of dry soil + Can
Wt. of Water
Wt. of Can
Wt. of dry soil
Moisture Content %
Av. Moisture Content %
Ring No. __________
PENETRATION TEST DATA

Penetration
Mould No.
Load Dial Div.
Load, kN
Mould No.
Load Dial Div.
Load, kN
Mould No.
Load Dial Div.
Load, kN
0.025 in (0.64mm)
0.050 in (1.27mm)
0.075 in (1.91mm)
0.100 in (2.54mm)
0.150 in (3.81mm)
0.200 in (5.08mm)
0.300 in (7.62mm)
0.400 in (10.16mm)
0.500 in (12.70mm)
Proving Ring Factor :
Tested by :
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-5
Witnessed by:
Revision No. 0
WS - 6
LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (SOAKED CBR RESULTS)
Lab Ref. No.:
Material Type:
Date of testing:
30 Blows/Layer
Load, kN
Load, kN
10 Blows/Layer
Penetration, mm
Penetration, mm
Dry Density vs. Soaked CBR
Load, kN
Soaked CBR %
65 Blows/Layer
Dry Density, g/cm3
Penetration, mm
Result:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-6
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
OF MOISTURE CONTENT OF SOIL BY OVEN DRYING

WS - DETERMINATION
7
Lab Ref. Nos:
Location:
Date of Sampling:
Date of Testing:
Lab Ref. No.

Can No.
Weight of Can + Wet Soil, W 1
Weight of Can + Dry Soil, W 2
Weight of Moisture, W 3 = W 1 - W 2
Weight of Can, W 4
Weight of dry soil, W 5 = W 2 - W 4
Moisture content, 100(W 3 / W 5 )
Average Moisture Content
Lab Ref. No.

Can No.
Weight of Can + Wet Soil, W 1
Weight of Can + Dry Soil, W 2
Weight of Moisture, W 3 = W 1 - W 2
Weight of Can, W 4
Weight of dry soil, W 5 = W 2 - W 4
Moisture content, 100(W 3 / W 5 )
Average Moisture Content
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-7
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WS - 7A
DETERMINATION OF TOTAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF AGGREGATE BY DRYING
Lab Ref. No.:

Location:
Date of Sampling:
Date of Testing:
Representative Area:
Dry Weight:
Mode of Drying (Oven dry / Fry pan):
Sample ID / Lab Ref. No.

Container No.
Weight of wet aggregate + container
Weight of dry aggregate + container
Weight of water in aggregate
Drying started:
h-m
Drying finished:
h-m
Period of drying
h-m
Weight of container
Weight of dry aggregate
Water content
Remarks:
Tested by:
Witnessed by:
(Contractor)
(Consultant)
Form No. 7A
Revision No. 0
WS - 8
CALIBRATION OF SAND AND SAND CONE APPARATUS

Calibration Ref.No.:
Description of Sand:
Date of Calibration:
Dimension of Mould(mm):
Diam. =
Room Temparature: =
Ht. =
Ambient Temp.=
C Relative Humidity =
Volume of Mould
Determination No.:
1
Weight of Empty Mould + Glass Plate
Weight of Mould Filled with Water + Glass Plate
Weight of Water (2-1)
Temparature of Filling Water, C
Temparature Correction
Volume of Mould, cm3
Average Volume of mould, cm3
Sand in Cone with Base Plate

7
Weight of Apparatus + Sand before Pouring,
Weight of Apparatus + Sand after Pouring,
Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate,
10
Average Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate,
g
g
Unit Weight of Sand

11
Weight of Apparatus + Sand before Pouring,
12
Weight of Apparatus + Sand after Pouring,
13
Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate,
14
Weight of Sand in Mould,
15
Unit Weight of Sand,
g/cm3
16
Average Unit Weight of Sand,
g/cm3
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-8
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WS - 9
WORKSHEET FOR PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Lab Ref. No.:
Location:
Date of Sampling:
Date of Testing:
Initial Dry Weight:
Reduction of Test Weights

1
Stages of subdivision
Material passed through test sieve :

Weight before reduction
gm
Mb1 =
Mb2 =
Mb3 =
Weight after reduction
gm
Ma1 =
Ma2 =
Ma3 =
C1 = Mb1 / Ma1 =
C2 = C1.Mb2 / Ma2 =
C3 =
Correction factor
Sieving Test Data

Corrected
Sieve Size, Invidual Weight Correction
mm
Retained, g
Factor
Weight
Cumulative Cumul.
Weight
Percent
Percent
Passing
Retained, g Retained, g Retained
Spec.
Limit
Pan
Total
Remarks:
Tested by:
Contractor
Form No. WS-9
Witnessed by:
Consultant
Revision No. 0
WS - 10
SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND WATER ABSORPTION OF AGGREGATES
Lab Ref. No.:
Stockpile Location:
Date of Sampling:
Date of Test:
Purpose of Use:
Determination No.
1. Weight of oven dry specimen in air
(g)
2. Weight of saturated surface dry specimen in air
(g)
3. Weight of saturated specimen under water
(g)
4. Water Absorbed
B-A
(g)
5. Water Absorption
100(B - A) / A
6. Specific Gravity
a) Oven dry basis (bulk)
A / (B - C)
b) Saturated surface dry (SSD) basis
B / (B - C)
c) Apparent
A / (A - C)
FINE (Coarse Sand/Fine Sand/Filler)

Determination No.
1. Weight of oven dry specimen
(g)
2. Weight of saturated surface dry specimen
(g)
3. Weight of bottle + water
(g)
4. Weight of bottle + saturated specimen + water
(g)
S-A
(g)
100(S - A) / A
5. Water Absobed
6. Water Absorption
7. Specific Gravity
a) Oven-dry basis (bulk)
A / (S + A - C)
b) Saturated surface dry (SSD) basis
S / (S + B - C)
c) Apparent
A / (A + B - C)
Results :
The Average Specific Gravity =
(Bulk / On SSD basis / Apparent)
Water Absorption =
Tested by:
Witnessed by:
(Contractor)
(Consultant)
Form No. WS-10
Revision No. 0
WS - 11
ABRASION TEST ON SMALL SIZE COARSE AGGREGATE BY USE OF LOS ANGELES MACHINE
Lab Ref No.:
Material Source:
Location:
Date of Sampling:
Representative Quantity:
Date of Testing:
Weight in grams after test

Sample
Identification
Test No. No. of Charges
No. of
Revolutions
Weight
Before Test, g
Retained on
1.7mm Sieve
Form No. 11
Total Quantity
Available, g
Loss in
Weight, g
Percent Wear
Mean Wear
%
Specified Values :
Remarks :
Tested By:
(Contractor)
Passing Through
1.7mm Sieve
Subbase
Max.
Road Base
Max.
Asphaltic Concrete Coarse Agg.
Max.
Concrete Aggregates
Max.
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
Form No. 11
Revision No. 0
WS - 3
WORKSHEET FOR FIELD DENSITY TEST BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD
TEST INFORMATION :
Chainage:
Lab Ref. No.:
Material:
Date Requested:
Layer Thickness:
Request No.:
Width:
Date of Testing:
SAND CALIBRATION:
Lab Ref. No.:

Date of Calibration:
Wt. of sand in cone, g
Bulk density of sand, g/cm3
DETERMINATION OF FIELD DENSITY
Test Hole Location:
KM
Offset
Weight of wet sample from hole, mw
Depth of test hole

Weight of sand + cylinder before test, m1
Weight of sand + cylinder after test, m4
Weight of sand in hole + cone, m1 - m4
Weight of sand in cone, m2
Weight of sand in hole, mb = (m1 - m4 - m2)
Bulk density of the material, gb
Dry density, gd=100gb / (100 + W)
mm
g
g
g
g
g
g/cm3
g/cm3
DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT
Can No.
Weight of can + wet sample, P
Weight of can + dry sample, Q
Weight of water, R = P - Q
Weight of can, C
Weight of dry sample, Md = Q - C
Water content, W = 100 R / Md
g
g
g
g
g
%
OVERSIZE FRACTION & DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION
Weight of oversized material

% oversize (dry basis)
Optimum Moisture Content (lab value)
Maximum Dry Density (lab value)
MDD Test Reference (Lab Ref. No.)
% Compaction, 100 gd / MDD
Specified compaction
Results
g
%
%
g/cm3
%
%
Remarks
Tested by :
Witnessed by:
(Contractor)
(Consultant)
Form No. WS-3
Revision No. 0
WS - 12
WORKSHEET FOR MATERIALS FINER THAN 0.075MM SIEVE BY WASHING
Lab Ref. No.:
Stock Pile Location:
Date of Sampling:
Material:
Date of Testing:
Determination No. / Sample Ref.
Initial Oven Dry Weight of Specimen, W 1 gm

Final Oven Dry Weight after Washing on # 200 Sieve,
W 2 gm
Material Passed Through # 200 Sieve (W 1 - W 2) gm
% Passing = 100(W 1 - W 2) / W 1
Average % Passing
Specification
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-12
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WS - 13
WORKSHEET FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FILLER

Lab Ref. No.:
Source:
Date of Sampling:
Description:
Date of Testing:
Original Weight:
Oven Dry Weight:
Sieving Test Data

Sieve Size, Invidual Weight
mm
Retained, g
Cumulative
Cumulative
Weight
Percent
Retained, g
Retained
Percent Passing
Specification
Limit
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
Pan
Total
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-13
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR BINDER COURSE
Lab Ref. No.:
Location:
Date of Sampling:
Date of Testing:
Initial Oven Dry Weight:

1

gm
Mb1 =
Mb2 =
Mb3 =
gm
Ma1 =
Ma2 =
Ma3 =
C1 = Mb1 / Ma1 =
C2 = C1.Mb2 / Ma2 =
C3 =
Correction factor
Sieving Test Data

Sieve Size,
mm
Invidual Weight
Retained, g
Correction
Factor
Corrected
Cumulative
Cumul.
Weight
Weight
Percent
Retained, g
Retained, g
Retained
Spec.
Limit
Percent
Passing
28
100
20
80 ~ 100
14
60 ~ 80
10
48 ~ 70
4.75
36 ~ 56
2.36
28 ~ 44
1.18
20 ~ 34
0.600
15 ~ 27
0.300
10 ~ 20
0.150
5 ~ 13
0.075
2~6
Pan
Total
Remarks:
Tested by:
Form No. 25
Revision No. 0
ANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD

ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR BINDER COURSE
Mb3 =
Ma3 =
C3 =
Spec.
Limit
100
80 ~ 100
60 ~ 80
48 ~ 70
36 ~ 56
28 ~ 44
20 ~ 34
15 ~ 27
10 ~ 20
5 ~ 13
2~6
Form No. 25
Revision No. 0

PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR WEARING COURSE
Lab Ref. No.:

Location:
Date of Sampling:
Date of Testing:
Initial Oven Dry Weight:

1

gm
Mb1 =
Mb2 =
Mb3 =
gm
Ma1 =
Ma2 =
Ma3 =
C1 = Mb1 / Ma1 =
C2 = C1.Mb2 / Ma2 =
C3 =
Correction factor
Sieving Test Data

Sieve Size,
mm
Invidual Weight
Retained, g
Correction
Factor
Corrected
Cumulative
Cumul.
Weight
Weight
Percent
Retained, g
Retained, g
Retained
Spec.
Limit
Percent
Passing
20
100
14
90 ~ 100
10
70 ~ 85
4.75
52 ~ 72
2.36
40 ~ 62
1.18
30 ~ 50
0.600
20 ~ 40
0.300
14 ~ 30
0.150
8 ~ 20
0.075
6 ~ 10
Pan
Total
Remarks:
Tested by:
Form No. 26
Revision No. 0
ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR WEARING COURSE
Mb3 =
Ma3 =
C3 =
Spec.
Limit
100
90 ~ 100
70 ~ 85
52 ~ 72
40 ~ 62
30 ~ 50
20 ~ 40
14 ~ 30
8 ~ 20
6 ~ 10
Form No. 26
Revision No. 0
WS - 14
WORKSHEET FOR SOUNDNESS TEST OF AGGREGATES BY USE OF SODIUM SULPHATE

(5-CYCLES)
Lab Ref. No.:
Source:
Date Sampled:
Description:
Date of Testing:
Sieve Size
Passing
Retained on
(A)
(B)
Grading
Weight of
Original
Test
Sample % Fraction
Retained
Before
Test
(gram)
(C)
Weight of
Test
Fraction
After Test
(gram)
(D)
Loss in
Weight
After Test
(gram)
(E) Actual
(F)
Loss After Corrected
Test %
Avg.
Weight
Loss %
Fine Aggregate
150 micron
300 micron
150 micron
600 micron
300 micron
100
1.18mm
600 micron
100
2.36mm
1.18mm
100
4.75mm
2.36mm
100
9.5mm
4.75mm
100
9.5mm
4.75mm
300
19mm
9.5mm
1000
37.5mm
19mm
1500
75mm
37.5mm
3000
Coarse Aggregate
Total
Total
Notes :
D=B-C
9.5 to 19mm consists of 33% of 9.5 ~ 13.2mm and 67% of 13.2 ~ 19mm.
E = D / B x100
19 to 37.5mm consists of 33% of 19 ~ 26.5mm and 67% of 26.5 ~ 37.5mm
F = A x E/100
37.5 to 75mm consists of 50% of 37.5 ~ 50mm and 50% of 50 ~ 75mm
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-14
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
SAND EQUIVALENT TEST
Lab Ref. No.:

Location:
Date of Sampling:
Date of Testing:
Test Data
Trial Nos.
Clay Reading
Sand Reading
Sand Equivalent, %
Average Sand Equivalent, %
Remarks:
Tested by:
Form No. 28
Revision No. 0
WS - 15
WORKSHEET FOR STRIPPING TEST BY AASHTO METHOD: T 182

Lab Ref. No.:
Location:
Weight of Aggregate:
Size:
Weight of Asphalt:
Type:
Visual Quality of Mix:
Date of Testing:
Visual estimation after 16 -18 hours of immersion in

water
% Area Coated
Above 95 %
Below 95 %
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-15
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WS - 16
WORKSHEET FOR QUANTITIES OF BITUMINOUS PRIME & TACK COATS
Lab Ref. No.:

Area (KM):
Date of Testing:
Station Number
Tray Number
Weight of Tray + Bituminous Material
(g)
Weight of Tray
(g)
Weight of Bituminous Material
(g)
Area of Tray
Quantity of Bituminous Material
Unit weight of Bituminous Material at 0C
(m2)
(g/m2)
(g/l)
Spraying Rate
(l/m2)
Average Spraying Rate
(l/m2)
Temperature at Application
Temperature Correction Factor

Corrected Average Rate of Application
(l/m2)
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-16
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WS - 17
WORKSHEET FOR CRUSHED AGGREGATE OF (>or =2) FRACTURED FACES (+ 4.75MM, VISUAL)
Material:
Lab Ref. No.:
Source:
Date of Sampling:
Stockpile:
Date of Testing:
Description:
Test No.
a)Total Weight of + 4.75 mm Material
b) Weight of (2) Fractured Faces Material (g)
c) Percentage of (2) Fractured Faces Material
100(B / A)
d) Average (2) Fractured Faces Material
e) Specification Limit
Remarks
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-17
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WS - 18
WORKSHEET FOR PENETRATION TEST ON BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
Lab Ref. No.:
Location(KM):
Date of Sampling:
Origin:
Date of Testing:
Specimen No. 1
REMARKS
Description of the Test Specimen:
Container No.
Initial Dial Reading
Final Dial Reading
Penetration, mm
Average Penetration
Specimen No. 2
REMARKS
Container No.
Final Dial Reading
Penetration, mm
Average Penetration
Specimen No. 3
REMARKS
Container No.
Final Dial Reading
Penetration, mm
Average Penetration
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-18
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WORKSHEET FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF SEMI SOLID BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
Lab. Ref:
Location:
Date of Sampling:
Origin:
Date of Testing:
Determination No.
Temperature of water during test
Weight of clean dry pycnometer & stopper (nearest 1 mg)
Weight of pycnometer, stopper plus water (nearest 1 mg)
Weight of pycnometer, stopper plus sample (nearest 1 mg)
Weight of pycnometer, stopper, sample plus water (nearest 1 mg)D
Weight of sample
C-A g
Volume of pycnometer
B-A g
Specific Gravity
(C - A) / [(B - A) - (D - C)]
Average Specific Gravity

Temperature correction
Corrected Specific Gravity ( at 25C)
Note
A pycnometer calibrated at one temperature cannot be used at a different temperature without recalibration at that temperature
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No.
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WS - 19
WORKSHEET FOR BITUMEN EXTRACTION & GRADATION OF HOT MIX

Lab Ref. No:
Sample:
Date Sampled:
Chainage:
Date of Testing:
Material:
(A) BITUMEN EXTRACTION
DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
VALUE
1. Weight of pan + Sample
7. Weight of filter paper after test
2. Weight of pan
8. Weight of dust accumulated in

filter paper (7 - 6)
3. Weight of Mix. + Sample (1 - 2)
9. Weight of total extracted Agg. (5

+ 8)
4. Weight of pan + Extracted Agg.
10. Weight of bitumen (3 - 9)
5. Weight of extracted Agg. (4 - 2)
11. Percent of bitumen by weight of

Mix. 100(10) / (3)
6. Wt. of filter paper before test
12. Specified percent of bitumen
VALUE
(B) GRADATION OF EXTRACTED AGGREGATE
Standard Sieve
size (mm)
Weight Retained
(gram)
Cumulative
Weight Retained
Cumulative
Percentage
Retained
% Passing
Specification Limit
25
19
12.5
9.5
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
Pan
Remarks:
Tested by :
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-19
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0

WORKSHEET FOR FIELD DENSITY TEST OF CORED ASPHALT CONCRETE
Lab Ref. Nos.:

Material:
Date Sampled :
Description:
Date Tested :
Field Cored Sample
Specimen
No.
Specimen
Idn.
Station
Thickness
Wt. in Air
Wt. in water
Volume
Density
Bulk
Density
(Lab)
mm
ml
g/ml
g/ml
% Compaction
Test Performed by:
Form No. 35
Revision No. 0
T FOR FIELD DENSITY TEST OF CORED ASPHALT CONCRETE
Remarks
Form No. 35
Revision No. 0
WS - 29
MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES
Lab Ref. No.:

Sample Location:
Date sampled :
Type of Materials:
Date tested :
Percentage of Bitumen in the Mixture:
Determination No.
Mass of Dry Sample in Air
Mass of Jar + Lid + Water
Mass of Jar + Lid + Sample + Water
Temparature of Water
K factor :
Corrected Mass of Jar + Lid + Water to Fill at 25C:
D = B.K
Corrected Mass of Jar + Lid + Sample + Water

to Fill at 25C:
E = C.K
Maximum Specific Gravity
F = A / (A + D - E)
( Gmm)
Average Maximum Specific Gravity
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-29
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0

ASPHALT CONCRETE HOT MIX DESIGN BY MARSHALL METHOD
Lab Ref. No.:
Date of sampling :
Asphalt
Specime Content
n No. by Wt. of
Mix
%
Date of Testing :
Wt. of Specimen
In Air
In Water
gm
gm
Height of Bulk
Sample Volume
mm
cc
Bulk
Density
Maximum
Theoritical
Density
gm/cc
gm/cc
c-d
c/f
ASTM
D -2041
Volume % Total
Asphalt
bxg
Gasp
Aggregate
(100-b)xg
Gagg
Voids %
Voids
Stability
V.M.A
VFA
Total Mix.
100-i - j
100-j
i x 100
j
100(h-g)
h
Dial
Gauge
Reading
Reading
in kN
ox factor
Correl
Ratio.
Flow
Marshall
Quotient.
mm
kN/mm
Adjusted
from
Table
pxq
r/s
1
2
3
Av.
1
2
3
Av.
1
2
3
Av.
Specified Values :
Specific Gravity of Bitumen (Gasp) =
Bulk Specific Gravity of Aggregate ( Gagg) =
Tested By:
(Contractor)
Minimum Stability ( kN at 60 C)
7.0
( Binder & Wearing Courses)
Minimum Flow ( mm)
2.0
3-5
70 - 85
1.8 - 5.0
1.0 - 4.0
0.6 - 1.2

( Binder Course)
( Wearing Course)
( Wearing Course)
Air Voids in Total Mix (%)

Voids in Mineral Aggregate Filled with Bitumen (%)
Marshall Quotient ( kN / mm)
Marshall Quotient ( kN / mm)
Filler to Binder Ratio
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Form No.
Revision No. 0
Form No.
Revision No. 0
DETERMINATION OF THE PRESENCE OF ORGANIC IMPURITIES IN FINE AGGREGATE
Lab. Ref. No.:

Material
Description
Location
Test mass
Date of testing
Time of addition of NaOH to sample :
Use SECTION A OR SECTION B

Section A
Prepared liquid colour standard method
Time of preparation of colour standard
Time of comparison of colour
Observation
The colour of the supernatant liquid above the test sample was found to be:
lighter than
the same as
darker than
the standard colour

Section B
Glass colour standard method
Time of comparison of colour
Observation
The colour of the supernatant liquid above the test sample was similar to:
Gardner Colour Standard No.
11
14
16
Inference
The fine aggregate does/does not contain organic impurities
Remarks:
Form No. 38
Revision No. 0

DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CYLINDERS
Lab Ref. No.:
Pouring No.:
Date of Pouring:
Concrete Grade:
Structure:
Location:
No. of Cylinders:
Age of concrete
hr/day
Cylinder No.
Time of testing
h-min
Variation in age from the target
hr
Specimen condition: moist or dry

Diameter at mid height of the specimen
1)
mm
2)
mm
Average diameter at mid height
mm
Cross sectional area (rounded to 10 mm 2)
mm2
Diameter at top
mm
Diameter at bottom
mm
Height of the specimen
mm
Whether the specimen was capped with sulphur compound

Whether the specimen was properly placed on the platen
Pace rate (should be 2.6 ~ 6.2 kN / sec )
kN / sec
Whether attempt was made to keep the pace rate constant at failure
Failure type(cone/ cone and split/ cone and shear/ shear/ columnar)
Maximum load on dial gauge
kN
Compressive strength (upto 2nd place of decimal)

Compressive strength (rounded to 0.05 Mpa)
MPa
Average compressive strength (test result, rounded to 0.05 MPa)
MPa
Remarks:
Tested by:
Form No. 39
Revision No. 0
WS - 24
DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CUBES
Lab. Ref. No.:
Cube No.
Date of casting
Date of testing
Age
day
Time of testing
h-m
Variation in age from the target

Received specimen immersed in laboratory for 5 min. before testing
Whether the specimen was wet during testing
Whether "go / no go" gauge was used for checking dimensions
Whether the test gauge fitted with the specimen
Height of specimen:
top face :
Height of specimen:
bottom face
1)
mm
2)
mm
1)
mm
2)
mm
Average height of specimen
mm
Width of specimen:
top face :
Width of specimen:
bottom face
Average width of specimen
1)
mm
2)
mm
1)
mm
2)
mm
mm
mm 2
Area of specimen (rounded to 10mm )

Machine platens were cleaned before crushing specimen
Whether surfaces of the cube were cleaned before crushing
Whether centering of the cube was made before application of load
Pace rate (should be 4.5 to 9.0 kN / sec.)
kN / sec
Whether attempt was made to keep the pace rate constant at failure
Maximum load on dial gauge
kN
Compressive strength (upto 2nd place of decimal)
N / mm 2
Cube strength (rounded to 0.5 N/mm2)
N / mm 2
Normal or abnormal failure

N / mm 2
Test result
Remarks:
Tested by:
Witnessed by:
(Contractor)
(Consultant)
Form No. WS-24
Revision No.:
SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE
Lab Ref. No.:

Date Requested:
Oven Dry Weight:
Date of sampling:
Date of Testing :
Dry Sieving / Wet sieving
Sieving Test Data
Sieve Size, mm
Weight
Retained
Cumulative
Weight Retained
9.5
Cumulative %
Retained
% Passing
Spec. Limit
100
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
Pan
Remarks :
Tested By :
Form No. 41
Revision No. 0
I - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
E ANALYSIS OF FINE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE
Form No. 41
Revision No. 0
SIEVE ANALYSIS OF 20 MM COARSE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE
Lab Ref. No.:

Date Requested:
Oven Dry Weight:
Date of sampling:
Date of Testing :
Sieving Test Data

Sieve Size,
mm
Weight
Retained
Dry Sieving / Wet sieving

Cumulative
Weight
Retained
Cumulative
% Retained
% Passing
AASHTO Limits AASHTO Limits

(Size No.67)
(Size No.68)
25
100
100
19
90 ~ 100
90 ~ 100
9.5
20 ~ 55
30 ~ 65
4.75
0 ~ 10
5 ~ 25
2.36
0~5
0 ~ 10
1.18
0~5
0.075
Pan
Remarks :
Tested By :
Form No. 42
Revision No. 0
DETERMINATION OF FLAKINESS INDEX
WS - 25
Lab Ref. No:

Date Requested:
Representative Quantity:
Date of Sampling:
Type of Material:
Date of Testing:
INFORMATION ON SIEVE ANALYSIS

Sieve Size, mm
Passing Retained
63
50
50
37.5
37.5
28
28
20
20
14
14
10
10
6.3
Wt.Retained
g
TEST ON FLAKINESS
% Retained
Test
Weight Passing
Flaky Particles
Specified Max.
Weight, g
(Gauge), g
Flakiness Index
Total
Note 1. It retained % of any fraction is equal to or less than 5, then the fraction is not considered for test.
Note 2. If any fraction does not satisfy the test quantity then achieve the required quantity and calculate the flakiness index based on
weighted average of the material retained
Flakiness Index =
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-25
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0

AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE (ACV) OF COARSE AGGREGATE
Lab Ref. No.:
Location:
Date of Sampling:
Date of Testing:
Representative Area:
Dry Weight:
Preparation of Test Specimen

Size fraction
mm-mm
Quantity of sample
kg
Test sieves used for separating test portion
mm
Quantity of test portion
kg
Period of drying the sample
h-m
Specimen compacted in the cylinder
Y/N
No. of layers
No. of strokes/layer
Drop height for compaction
mm
Test Data
Determination No.
Initial mass of compacted specimen
h-m-s
Loading finished
h-m-s
Period of application of force
m-s
Maximum force applied
kN
M1
Sieve used for separating fines
Loading started
Mass of crushed specimen
g
mm
Mass retained on the separating sieve
M3
Mass passed through the separating sieve
M2
Sum* M2 + M3
Fines, 100(M2 / M1)
ACV**
*
**
if the sum differs from M1 by more than 10g, discard the result and test other specimens
The ACV value to be reported is the mean of two results unless any single result differs by more than 0.07 times the mean
in which case the test shall be repeated on two further specimens.
Test Result:
Form No. 44
Revision No. 0

CLAY LUMPS AND FRIABLE PARTICLES
(For Coarse Aggregate / A Mixture of Fine and Coarse Aggregates)
Lab Ref No.:

Type of Material :
Purpose of Use:
Date of Sampling:
Representative Quantity :
Location:
Date of Testing:
Designated
Grading of
Mass of Test
Designated
Mass Retained on
Weighted %
Maximum
Fractional
Original
Fraction before
Sieve Size,
Designated Sieve
Passing, P
Loss
Specified
Sample, %, G
Wash, g, W
mm
after Wash, g, R
(P x G) / 100
% Loss
Sieve Size, mm
Fraction
Passing
Retained
Wt, g (min)
1)
37.5
19
3000
4.75
2)
19
9.5
2000
4.75
3)
9.5
4.75
1000
2.36
4)
4.75
1.18
25
0.850
Total
Note.
Include fraction 4) for a material which is a mixture of fine and coarse aggregates otherwise ignore
Tested by :
(Contractor)
Form No.
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WS - 26
DETERMINATION OF SLUMP OF FRESH CONCRETE

Lab. Ref. No.:
Pouring No.:
Method of sampling: Standard/Alternate
Date and Time of sampling:
Batch identification
Nos. of specimens taken
Place of sampling
Place of test
Concrete type
Source of concrete
Time elapsed from sampling to commencement of test

Period from the start of filling to removal of cone
Time to lift the slump cone
Graphical Representation
Slump =
Form :
mm
true / shear / collapse
Thermometer No.:
Thermometer Type:
Temperature =
Remarks:
Tested by:
Witnessed by:
(Contractor)
(Consultant)
Form No. WS-26
Revision No. 0
WS - 27
NORMAL CONSISTENCY AND SETTING TIME OF CEMENT

Date of Sampling:
Lab Ref. No.:
Storage Location:
Sample Idn.:
Date of Testing:
Date of Consignment:
Description of Sample:
Test for Normal Cosistency

Wt.of
Cement
Test No.
Wt.of Water
% Water
Observed Pen.,
mm
Observed:
Required Penetration, mm
10 1 in 30 sec
Temparature:
Relative Humidity
50
150
Normal Consistency :
Test for Initial Setting Time
Clock Hrs.
Scale
Elapsed
Reading, mm Time, min
Clock Hrs.
Scale
Reading, mm
50
Penetration, mm
Elapsed
Time, min
40
El. Time
Pen.,mm
10
20
40
50
60
20 70
80
90
100
10130
###0
260
290
300
50
45
43
42
41
38
35
32
30
28
26
22
18
15
30 30 444
100
200
Elapsed time, min
Test for Final Setting Time

Elapsed
Time, min
Clock Hrs.
Notes on Observation
Observation
Initial Setting Time:
When penetration of the needle is 25 mm.

Final Setting Time:
When the needle does not sink visibly into the cement paste.
Test Results:
Initial Setting Time:

Final Setting Time:
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-27
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0
WS - 28
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF HYDRAULIC CEMENT MORTAR
Structure Location:
Date of Sampling:
Storage Location:
Sample Idn.:
Date of Consignment:
Description of Sample:
Other Ref.:
Date of Adding Water:
Mortar
Cube no.
Testing
Date
Age, days
Dimensions,
mm
Area,
mm2
Test
Load,
kN
Lab Ref. No.:
Comp.
Strength,
MPa
Average
Specified
Comp.
Compressive
Strength,
Strength, MPa
MPa
Remarks
Remarks:
Tested by:
(Contractor)
Form No. WS-28
Witnessed by:
(Consultant)
Revision No. 0

DEFLECTION TEST BY BENKELMAN BEAM METHOD
Lab Ref. No:
Station:
Temperature: ... C
Date of Testing:
FIELD TEST DATA
Chainage
Initial of First
Reading
0.5m 2nd
1.0m 3rd
Final
Reading
Rebound
Deflection
Remarks
Tested by:
Form No. 50
Revision No. 0

Page .. of
Concrete Pouring Record

Supplementary Sheet(s): Yes / No
Contract No.: __________
Structure: _______________________
Concrete Class: __________
Pumping Stages(Nos.):
Trial Mix Ref.: ___________
Slump Range: ___________________
Pouring No. _____________
Batch Plant No.: _______
Sl.
No.
Date
Truck /
Batching
Batch No.
Time
Batch Counted by :
Discharge
Time
Time
Started
Finished
Delivery
Slump
Visual
Concrete
Slip No.
Test Value
slump
Temp, C
mm
check
_____
Target volume: ___________ m3
Checked by
Weather Condition: _____________
Date
Cylinders / Cubes
Mould Ref.
7 day
28 day
Prepared
7 day
28 day
by
Specimen No.
Specimen No.
Lab Ref. No.
Quantity
m3
Thermometer
No.
1) __________________
Reviewed by: ___________________
_____________________
Date
2) __________________
Form No. 51
Engineer
Attended
Revision No. 0
ENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
ete Pouring Record
Page .. of
Action
Taken by
Contractor
Form No. 51
Revision No. 0
REQUEST FOR ISPECTION / SURVEY / QUALITY TEST

TO:
Resident Engineer
JOC-BCL
Request for checking and / or

inspection as per Clause 37 and 38
Consultants
of the Condition of Contract
Ref. No.
DESCRIPTION OF WORKS:
LOCATION:
Estimated time that the work will be ready .. AM/PM
Date: ..
Following Operation:
_______________
Signed
Time: ...
For the Contractor
Date: ...
Received
Time: ...
_______________
For Consultants
Date: ...
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
RE
Date: ...
Time: ...
Bridge Engineer .
Date: ...
Time: ...
Survey Engineer
Date: ...
Time: ...
Materials Engineer
Date: ...
Time: ...
APPROVAL TO PROCEED
Approval is / is not given to proceed as requested.
Remarks:
______________
Signed:
Time: ...
For Consultants
Date: ...
Form No. 52
Revision No. 0

MDD vs. LOCATION
Lab Ref. Nos.:
Station
Lab Ref. No. Cut / Fill
Depth, m
Description of
Material
Compaction,
4.54kg Rammer
MDD, t/m3
Prepared by: __________________
Reviewed by: ___________________
Date: ____________________
Date: _______________________
Form No. 53
Revision No. 0
OMC, %
AD
Compaction,
4.54kg Rammer
OMC, %
Form No. 53
Revision No. 0
WS - 30
DETERMINATION OF WATER ABSORPTION OF STONE

Lab Ref. Nos:
Sampling Location:
Km 24 + 500
Date of Sampling: 09 August, 2014
Purpose of Use:
Construction of
Date of Testing:
Masonry Wall
Engineer's Test/Joint Test:
Specimen No.
Marking
Engineer's
No
No
No
No
Stained brown
surface
Description
11 August, 2014
Stained brown
surface
Deep grey
Gray
Weight after oven drying
4373
6339
8045
9238
Period of drying
hr
24
24
24
24
Weight of SSD specimen
4402
6354
8061
9269
Period of soaking under water
hr
24
24
24
24
Weight of absorbed water
29
15
16
31
Water Absorption
0.66
0.24
0.20
0.34
No.
No.
No.
Specimen No.
Marking
Stained brown
surface
Description
Grey
Grey
Weight after oven drying
5779
6380
6567
Period of drying
hr
24
24
24
Weight of SSD specimen
5818
6388
6581
Period of soaking under water
hr
24
24
24
Weight of absorbed water
39
14
Water Absorption
0.67
0.13
0.21
Form No. WS-30
Revision No. 0
CONSULTANTS
CONTRACTOR
SAMPLE RECORD CARD
Sample ID..........................................................
Contract No.:
Location:..............................................
Date: ....................................................
Sampled by: .
Material Type: .................................................
Lab Ref.
No.
Form No. 54
Description of Sample
Source
Rep. Qty
Revision No. 0
Quantity/No.
Tests Required
Remarks

Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road: List of Test Forms

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road: List of Test Forms

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road: List of Test Forms

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road

List of Test Forms

Description of the Form

WORKSHEETS FOR TESTING

Particle Size Analysis of Fills

Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 2.5 kg Rammer

Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 4.54 kg Rammer

Field Density Test of Fill Materials by Sand Replacement Method

Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Determination of Unit Weight)

Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Penetration Test and Determination of Swelling)

Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Soaked CBR Results)

Specific Gravity Test on Soils

Determination of Moisture Content of Soil by Oven Drying

Calibration of Sand and Sand Cone Apparatus

Particle Size Analysis of Aggregates for Subbase

Particle size Analysis of Aggregates for Upper Base

Specific Gravity & Water Absorption of Aggregates

Determination of Total Moisture Content of Aggregate by Drying

Materials Finer Than # 200 Sieve by Washing

Sieve Analysis of Filler

Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Binder Course

Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Wearing Course

Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulphate

Sand Equivalent Test

Stripping Test by AASHTO Method: T 182

Quantities of Bituminous Prime & Tack Coats

Crushed Aggregates of (>2) Fractured Faces (+ 4.75mm, visual)

Penetration Test on Bituminous Materials

Specific Gravity of Semi-Solid Bituminous Materials

Bituminous Extraction & Gradation of Hot Mix

Field Density Test of Cored Asphalt Concrete

Maximum Specdific Gravity of Bituminous Paving Mixtures

Asphalt Concrete Hot Mix Design by Marshall Method

Determination of the Presence of Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregate

Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes

Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete

Sieve Analysis of 20mm Coarse Aggregate for Cement Concrete

Determination of Flakiness Index

Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV) of Coarse Aggregate

Clay Lumps and Friable Particles

Determination of Slump of Fresh Concrete

Normal Consistency and Setting Time of Cement

Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar

Deflection Test by Benkelman Beam Method

Concrete Pouring Record

Request for Inspection / Survey / Quality Test

MDD vs. Location

Sample Record Card

Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road

Description of the Form

Test Report of Ordinary Fill Material

Test Report of Selected Fill (Improved Subgrade) Material

Test Report of Aggregate Subbase Material

Test Report of Aggregate Lower Base Material

Test Report of Aggregate Upper Base Material

Test Report of Fine Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete

Test Report of Coarse Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete

Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Binder Course Mixture

Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Wearing Course Mixture