PSQAQP150

ADVANCE QUALITY PLANNING

2
INTRODUCTION
Tell us about yourself
Your name
Your job and how long youve been doing it
Your role in the AQP process
What you would like to know about AQP?
3
OBJECTIVES
1. What is AQP?

2. Why should we do it?

3. How do we do it?

4
FOUNDATION OF AQP: CPCP
Chrysler Product Creation Process
Process Design / AQP (SQ Lead)
IRE
(Approx. timing)
Product Design (Engineering Lead)
Sourcing (Purchasing Lead)
5
FOUNDATION OF AQP: CPCP
6
FOUNDATION OF AQP: CPCP
7
AQP
PSO
A process that will ensure parts that
meet all requirements are delivered on
time to designated manufacturing
facilities.
AQP/PSO Manual 7
th
Edition, page 1
AQP: WHAT IS IT?
8
AQP: WHAT IS IT?
AQP focuses on the design/development of the Suppliers manufacturing process to
ensure that it is capable of producing parts that meet design requirements at the quoted
tooling capacity
Customer requirements /
CPCP timing
AQP Meetings
VP Build
Trial Runs (SRE)
Process Sign-Off
/ PV Testing
PPAP
PVP Build

Corrective Actions
Lessons Learned
Depicting product quality planning as a cycle illustrates the never-ending pursuit of continual improvement that can only be achieved by taking the
experience in one program and applying that acquired knowledge to the next program. APQP & Control Plan Manual, 2
nd
Edition, page 1
9
AQP: WHY DO IT?
Minimize / reduce late changes to the part and process
Reduce / eliminate quality spills at all stages of
production
Reduce / eliminate warranty
Increase customer satisfaction

In short, to eliminate waste and save money!
10
WHAT IS NEEDED: INPUTS
What do we need before we can begin AQP?

Sourced part or module (Supplier must be known)
Source package
CPCP Program Timing
Design Model
Engineering specifications
Engineering Change Notices (CNs), if applicable
Lessons Learned from previous programs
11
AQP: HOW DO WE DO IT?
Milestone
Pre-Volume Production
(PVP)
Volume Readiness Phase
Job 1 Offline
Launch Phase
Commercial Launch
PSO On-Site Visit &
Production
Demonstration Run
PSO Result
Submit final
PSW/PPAP
Complete PPAP requirements
& submit Dimensional
PSW/PPAP
Complete corrective actions;
reschedule On-Site Visit / PDR
as necessary
5 (Z) 1-4 (N)
End & Forever
Requirements
Lessons Learned
A B C
5 + PVT (A)
D
12
Source Evaluation
New Supplier
(Also new management/
organization structure)
New Location
New Process,
Commodity or
Technology
New Product
or Project
Has Not Shipped
Product for More
Than 24 Months
Events
On-Site Source Evaluation
13
Source Evaluation
1. Review list of possible
suppliers.
2. Analyze Fiat and
Chrysler suppliers with
existing ratings or
evaluations.
3. Screen supplier pre-
evaluation data.
4. Determine strategic
suppliers needing
evaluations.
1. Clarify scope of tasks
related to product, site,
technology and supplier
performance data.
2. Prepare decision
making
recommendation and
obtain management
approval for task.
1. Form the cross
functional team.
2. Hold kickoff meeting
and assign roles and
responsibilities.
3. Preliminary
discussion of supplier
pre-evaluation
package.
4. Schedule on-site visit
and confirm trip
details.
1. Perform on-site
evaluation.
2. Inspect facility.
3. Collate and coordinate
analysis results and
scoring.
4. Conduct closing
meeting with supplier
with verbal feedback of
major observations.
5. Resolve/clarify
discrepancies.
1. Finalize summary
report and defined
criteria.
2. Calculate evaluation
pass/fail rating and
identify any risk
factors.
3. Report to approved
managers.
4. Upload information to
GPSIS.
1. Complete gap analysis
form if supplier can be
considered for
business.
2. Assign supplier target
dates on action items.
3. Track progress to gap
close and follow-up
meetings.
4. Notify approved
managers of completed
status.
5. Re-load updated SE
form in GPSIS.
Identification
Task
Clarification
Visit
Preparation
On-Site
Visit
Results
and
Reporting
Closure
SOURCE EVALUATION
Check if Fiat has a PSA
(Potential Supplier Assessment)
If so, use PSA result
Pre-Evaluation form sent to
Supplier for completion
Buyer sends Request form to
SQ Commodity Manager
SQ Commodity Manager
determines the SQE to lead the
Source Evaluation
SQE assembles team
SQE, Engineering are mandatory
Purchasing, Supply recommended
but may delegate

14
General Navigation
The tabs on this tool are arranged by function.
Tan tabs are general information and Cover Sheet
Green tabs are for the area-specific questions and data input
Dark Blue tabs are for reporting
Light Blue tabs are reference material
Supplier Source Evaluation Toolkit
Instructions for using this tool appear below
Note: Macros must be enabled for this tool to work properly.
SOURCE EVALUATION
Team reviews Pre-Evaluation
information
Team holds on-site review at
the Supplier with the SE tool
Gap analysis completed with
action items and target dates
for unacceptable items
SE result determines if
Supplier can be sourced or not
15
Date:
Zip / Postal Code
DUNS Code
eMail/Nic:
eMail/Nic:
Commodity Code
N
N
N
Total Management
N Expiration Date: Name and Local #
Mailing Executive
Position
Supplier Profile
Small Business Y/N
Woman Owned Y/N
Sheltered Workshop Y/N
Foreign Ownership
Name
Main Contact
Minority Classification
E-mail Address
Country
Percentage
HR/Safety
Union Representation Y/N
Union Information
Number of Employees at facility?
Dedicated to the Product Line
Name
Country
Buyer Name
Plant Manager
Head of Sales
Quality Manager
Supplier Contacts
CEO / President
City, State
[email protected]
Country
Jim Buyer
City, ST 12345
Materials Management
Phone #
Account Rep
Address (Assessed Location) Address
Comm name DC4321 Commodity Name
Author Name email
123456789
Address Address 2
Hourly
Supplier Source Evaluation Toolkit
Sname
City, ST
Sname Supplier Name
After Hours Contact
Traffic Manager
SOURCE EVALUATION
16
Score each question
(or N/A)
0, 15, or 30 pts possible
Click on question
number to go directly to
applicable workbook
section
Summary tab shows results
for each section, plus an
overall percentage score
Overall percentage score
determines if Supplier can
be sourced
SEs for commodities with
safety characteristics
require a higher score
Individual items that are
RED still require corrective
actions!
17 17
SOURCE EVALUATION
18
SCORING
60-80% >80% <60%
70-90% >90% <70%
Green: OK to bid / source business
Yellow: Requires SQ Sr. Manager or Commodity Managers
approval to bid / source business
Red: Cannot bid / source business unless SQ Directors approval
is given
"Safety" components are
any part that contains
characteristics with
Safety shields (<S>)
and/or governmental
safety regulations.
SOURCE EVALUATION
19
INITIAL RISK EVALUATION (IRE)
What is the IRE?
An assessment of the
inherent risks in a new or
modified part
Determines Chrysler
involvement with the AQP
and PSO for the new or
modified part
Required to be completed
within 14 business days of
the part appearing in CQMS
AQP: Supplier
PSO: Supplier
Initial Risk Evaluation
AQP: Supplier
PSO: Chrysler
AQP: Chrysler
PSO: Chrysler
LOW MEDIUM HIGH
20
IRE RISK DRIVERS
Are there issues preventing Production Tools Complete by the
required date?
Expectation: Review the planned Tooling Kickoff (TKO) and Production Tools
Complete (PTC) dates. PTC is required by Verification of Process (VP).
Guidelines: Tooling completion affects numerous AQP deliverables, such as PV
Testing, Process Sign-Off, PPAP, etc. Late tooling should equate to a higher risk level;
completion after Pre Volume Production (PVP) should be an automatic High risk.
Will PPAP be completed by the required date?
Expectation: Review the planned PPAP date. PPAP completion is required by PVP.
Guidelines: Late PPAP may equate to a higher risk level. Late engineering changes
that push PPAP beyond PVP or Job 1 should be re-evaluated to determine if the risk
level of the part should increase. As soon as it is known that PPAP will be after PVP,
follow the "PPAP Submission Delay - Escalation" process in the Book of Knowledge .
Is the design complete?
Expectation: Part design / CAD should be complete and attached as part of the
original Source Package.
Guidelines: If the Supplier submitted an RFQ to an incomplete or non-existent design,
there is increased risk to the program. TKO without a complete design also represents
a High risk to the program.
21
IRE RISK DRIVERS
Has historical design stability (e.g., high CN activity) been
considered?
Expectation: Review Lessons Learned from previous programs (both from the Supplier
and on similarly-designed parts) for CN activity. Were engineering changes minimal and
minor in scope?
Guidelines: A high incidence of CNs on the part, or one or more major part redesigns,
should reflect a higher risk level.
What is the customer impact if the part fails? (Safety, Appearance,
functionality, etc.)
Expectation: Determine the potential customer impact if the part fails. Would it cause
injury, result in vehicle breakdown, or negatively impact customer perception?
Guidelines: Parts with a high degree of customer interface should have correspondingly
higher risk levels. Examples include Safety components, parts that could result in a
"walk-home" condition, or parts in high-visibility areas with Appearance requirements.
What is the level of process technology (e.g., established,
widespread, innovative)?
Expectation: Review the proposed manufacturing process.
Guidelines: Processes that are using technologies new to the Supplier, Chrysler, or the
industry may require a higher risk level.
22
IRE RISK DRIVERS
Is this a new manufacturing location?
Expectation: Manufacturing locations new to Chrysler require a Source Evaluation performed with
an acceptable score. Ensure open issues from Source Evaluation have been closed. If the Supplier
received an unacceptable rating, were the proper overrides obtained?
Guidelines: New Suppliers to Chrysler represent a higher risk to the program. Lack of an acceptable
Source Evaluation for a new Supplier should be an automatic High risk.
Have there been historical quality problems with similar parts?
Expectation: Review the quality history (Nonconformance Tickets, yardholds/PRIs, warranty issues
and field actions) of the part in question (if applicable) or parts with a similar design. Review the
Master PFMEA for this commodity to ensure these issues have been addressed. Have there been
repeat issues?
Guidelines: A high incidence of NCTs, a high c's/1000 rating, or ANY PRIs or field actions on similar
parts represents a higher risk. Repeat issues or lack of corrective actions in the Master PFMEA also
indicate a higher program risk.
What is the Supplier's Supplier Quality Bid List score?
Expectation: The Supplier should be "green" per the Supplier Quality Bid List (SQBL). Their overall
score includes AQP/NCT, 3CPR (Level 1 and Level 2 incidences; reference ), yardholds, Forever
Requirement Violations (reference ), ISO/TS-16949 Certification, and New Business Hold (NBH;
reference ). "Yellow" or "Red" scores on the SQBL require a written override from a SQ Director for
the Supplier to receive business.
Guidelines: A Supplier with a "yellow" or "red" SQBL score indicates potential additional risk to the
program.


23
IRE RISK DRIVERS
What is the Supplier's Warranty history?
Expectation: Review the Supplier's warranty history with the Customer Satisfaction
Team (CST). Are they meeting their targets? Have they had any recent warranty spikes
or field actions?
Guidelines: If the Supplier's warranty has been increasing, or if they have had a field
action recently, it may indicate additional risk.
What is the Supplier's ability to successfully conduct AQP
activities?
Expectation: Assess the Tier 1 Supplier's ability to manage AQP / APQP activities.
Review PSO Element 1, requirements 1.2 through 1.2.4 ("Supply Base Management");
the Tier 1 should have all requirements met. Review if the Supplier location has
required multiple PSO visits in the past before receiving approval.
Guidelines: A lack of sub-tier Supplier management processes indicates high program
risk, as does a history of failing to meet deliverable due dates. Multiple PSO visits in the
past can also indicate poor AQP management.


24
IRE RISK LEVELS
High Risk (H)
Chrysler SQE leads the AQP
Chrysler SQE leads the PSO

Medium Risk (M)
Supplier leads the AQP
Chrysler SQE leads the PSO

Low Risk (L)
Supplier leads the AQP
Supplier leads the PSO
25
DESIGNATING THE IRE IN CQMS
Use the Part Information tab in CQMS
Select Part Risk
Review and acknowledge
the IRE risk drivers!
26
To Enter Initial Risk Evaluation for One or
More Parts:
1. Click the Part Information tab. Then, click
the Part Risk link.
2. Logon to CQMS with your TID and user
password.
3. Enter valid Chrysler Supplier Quality Deck
Code
Note: SQE Deck Code is populated by
default, where applicable. Select Clear to
enter a new value.
4. Check the box for Unassigned Risk
5. To limit the results, enter a value for one or
more Optional filters.
6. Click Find.
7. Click the radio button(s) for the parts where
you want to apply a single Initial Risk value.
8. Select a risk value from the Initial Risk drop
down.
Note: Do not make a separate selection
for Current risk. The initial risk value will
automatically populate to Current risk
when updated.
9. Check the box to Acknowledge Risk Drivers
10.Click Update.

To Enter Initial Risk Evaluation for a Single
Part:
1.Logon to CQMS with your TID and user
password.
2.Click Part Information tab. Then, click the
Part Risk link.
3.Type the full Chrysler part number in the Part
Number field.
4.Check the box for Unassigned Risk
5.Click Find.
6.Click the radio button for the Supplier Code
where you want to apply Initial Risk.
7.Select a risk value from the Initial Risk drop
down.
Note: Do not make a separate selection for
Current risk. The initial risk value will
automatically populate to Current risk
when updated.
8.Check the box to Acknowledge Risk Drivers
9.Click Update.
DESIGNATING THE IRE IN CQMS
27
To Change Current Part Risk for a Single Part:
1. Logon to CQMS with your TID and user password.
2. Click Part Information tab. Then, click the Part Risk link.
3. Type the full Chrysler part number in the Part Number field.
4. De-select the check box for Unassigned Risk
5. Click Find.
6. Click the radio button for the Supplier Code where you want to change Current Risk.
Note: Current Risk can only be changed once the Initial Risk has been captured. Do not
select rows where the Current risk value is the same as the new risk value.
7. Select a risk value from the Current Risk drop down.
Note: Do not make a separate selection for Initial risk. The initial risk value cannot be
changed once it is captured. If you attempt to enter a value for Initial risk, you will receive an
error message.
8. Click Update.
To Change Current Part Risk for One or More Parts:
1. Logon to CQMS with your TID and user password.
2. Click the Part Information tab. Then, click the Part Risk link.
3. Enter valid Chrysler Supplier Quality Deck Code
Note: SQE Deck Code is populated by default, where applicable. Select Clear to enter a
new value.
4. De-select the check box for Unassigned Risk
5. To limit the results, enter a value for one or more Optional filters.
DESIGNATING THE IRE IN CQMS
28
QUALITY PLANNING / AQP MEETINGS
What are AQP Meetings?
Regular reviews of the program status
A way to ensure progress of CPCP milestone deliverables
Ensures communication between AQP team members
1. AQP Kick-off Meeting
2. Hold regular AQP
Meetings and track status
with Executive Summary,
Timing Chart
29
WHEN / WHERE ARE AQP MEETINGS HELD?
Required for all programs following the
AQP process
All components with a High IRE
Recommended for Medium and Low IRE
programs, although the Supplier may also
use the APQP process (see the AIAGs
Advanced Product Quality Planning and
Control Plan Manual, 2
nd
Edition)
Regular, frequent schedule
Recommended weekly
No mandatory location
If possible, it is strongly recommend that
some meetings are held at the Tier 1
manufacturing location, critical Tier 2 or
lower Suppliers, and at the Chrysler
manufacturing facility
30
WHOS IN CHARGE?
The Chrysler SQE leads the AQP Meetings for High
IRE programs
The Supplier leads their own AQP/APQP Meetings for
Medium and Low IRE programs

The Chrysler SQE can require
AQP Meetings for any program
on an as needed basis
31
THE AQP KICK-OFF MEETING
Should occur as soon as the part is sourced and given an
IRE in CQMS
Early involvement by Supplier Quality and the Supplier is critical
Should include all AQP Team members
Chrysler Supplier
Quality Engineer
Chrysler Product
Engineer
Supplier Personnel
Core Team

Chrysler SQ
Manager / Vehicle
Lead
Chrysler Buyer
Chrysler Supply
Other Chrysler
Personnel as
needed
Sub-Tier Suppliers
as needed

Extended Team
32
Review the IRE
Gain additional team input
Review issues/risk drivers that gave the highest risk
Establish team roles and responsibilities (including
responsibilities between Tier 1 and Directed/Consigned
Suppliers)
THE AQP KICK-OFF MEETING AGENDA
Directed Tier II
Part PO Tier I
Tool PO Chrysler
AQP/PSO Resp. Chrysler
Release/Logistics Tier I
Receiving Location Tier I
NCT Issued to: Tier I
eCIMS Issued to: Tier II
Consigned Tier II
Part PO Chrysler
Tool PO Chrysler
AQP/PSO Resp. Chrysler
Release/Logistics Chrysler
Receiving Location Tier I
NCT Issued to: Tier II
eCIMS Issued to: Tier II
Standard Tier II
Part PO Tier I
Tool PO Tier I
AQP/PSO Resp. Tier I
Release/Logistics Tier I
Receiving Location Tier I
NCT Issued to: Tier I
eCIMS Issued to: Tier I
33
THE AQP KICK-OFF MEETING AGENDA
Determine AQP meeting frequency
How often, at what location, attendance expectations, etc.
Confirm core AQP Team members
Chrysler SQE
Chrysler Engineer
Supplier Personnel (Quality and Program Management, at a minimum)
Review the source package
Ensure requirements are accurate
Engineering specifications
Prototype build requirements
Review volume assumptions (e.g., shift pattern
agreement with P.O. volumes)
Get an early idea of SRE/PSO cycle time & line speed requirements
Identify potential capacity issues up-front

34
Establish and review program timing / major CPCP
milestones
Prototype (VP, PVP) and Launch (Job 1) build dates and Material
Required Dates (MRD)
Dates for deliverables (including, but not limited to):


THE AQP KICK-OFF MEETING AGENDA
PFMEA Acceptance
Production Tools Complete
Equipment, Fixtures, Facilities, and Gages
Complete
Gage R&R
Supplier Readiness Evaluation (SRE)
Dimensional Capability
Part I/S Draft & Final Complete
Pre-PSO Meeting
PSO On-Site Visit
PSO Complete
IMDS Submitted
PV Testing Start / Complete
PPAP submission
When initial program timing is developed, deliverables for milestones that are
already past due shall be included for completion. These deliverables shall be
distributed into appropriate, future milestones as determined by the AQP Team.
35
THE AQP KICK-OFF MEETING AGENDA
Establish AQP/Process
Sign-Off (PSO)
expectations
Maintenance of AQP forms and
documents
SRE/PDR part run quantities
Extended Run PSO?
Etc.
Confirm manufacturing
location
36
GENERAL AQP MEETINGS
Agenda should include:
Program timing and major milestones
If timing slips, an appropriate Risk Mitigation Plan shall be developed and
implemented to manage the risk
CPCP timing and deliverables for the current and next
milestone
Late deliverables also require an appropriate Recovery Plan
Open issues
Prototype quality issues (NCTs, eCIMS, etc.)
Current or proposed Engineering Changes, IAAs
Sub-tier Supplier status
Etc.
37
Sometimes broken up into two types: High-level
AQP and Working-level AQP

High-level
Agenda based on Milestones / Timing
Focus on process-readiness vs. product design
Team provides brief updates on status

Working-level
Agenda targets specific deliverables
Team members do the work during these meetings (i.e., develop
PFMEA, Part Inspection Standard, Control Plan, etc.)

GENERAL AQP MEETINGS
38
AQP MEETING FORMS AND DOCUMENTS
AQP Timing Chart
Supplier must maintain and update for each AQP meeting
Tracks progress towards completion of all PSO elements, plus key
Supplier Quality deliverables and AQP tasks (IRE, PPAP, etc.)
Details item status and customer responsible lead
Required for all programs following AQP (and all Fiat parts managed
by Chrysler)
SUPPLIER:
SUPPLIER CODE: MY/VEHICLE FAMILY:
PART NUMBER(S):
REVISION:
PART NAME(S): REVISION DATE:
AQP MEETING DATE:
PART RISK (H/M/L): AQP MEETING LOCATION:
VP
PVP
Job 1
BEGIN
PLAN ACT PLAN ACT
SQE -
SQE 1
SQE -
ENG -
SQE -
SQE -
SQE -
SQE -
Confirm composition and commitment of Core
AQP Team Members
C
U
S
T
O
M
E
R

L
E
A
D
PSO
Element
END
Build
Name
MRD Build Date
Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date
SUPPLIER
RESPONSIBLE
# of
Veh
AQP ACTIVITIES
eCIMS / Lessons Learned Reviewed
If status is 1, 2, or 3 (Red
or Yellow), you must
provide a Risk Mitigation
Plan
Enter 1-5
Advance Quality Planning
Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date
ADVANCE QUALITY PLANNING (AQP)
TIMING CHART
Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date STATUS
# of
Days
YEAR
Month-Date
#NUM!
FIAT PROGRAM
REVIEW STATUS
#NUM!
CHRYSLER AQP
STATUS
RISK MITIGTION PLAN
YEAR
Month-Date
Initial Risk Evaluation (IRE)
Source Package Review
KEY MATERIAL/BUILD DATES
Verify deliverables timing to CPCP timing
Prior PSO Review (similar products)
Volume, ramp-up curve, and product mix verified
and capable - CPV, P.O, SP
Program &
Style
Approval
EF EF EF
Step 2
Style
Freeze
Step 3
Tooling
Kickoff
EF
Verification of
Process
VP
EF
Pre Volume
Production
PVP
EF
Job 1
Offline
EF
Commercial
Launch
EF
Step 5 Prod.
Designs
Complete
0
0
0
VP
PVP
Job 1
BEGIN
PLAN ACT PLAN ACT
SQE -
SQE 1
SQE -
ENG -
SQE -
SQE -
SQE -
SQE -
SQE -
PTS -
ENG -
ENG -
ENG -
SQE -
ENG -
ENG 3
ENG 4
SQE -
Review CNs and IAAs (including associated Risk)
TAG Review (Chrysler-purchased tooling only)
Confirm composition and commitment of Core
AQP Team Members
Part Development Plan Complete
Status of Open Issues from Technical Review Risk
Assessment (FIAT parts only)
Supplier Quality Risk Assessment (SQRA)
C
U
S
T
O
M
E
R

L
E
A
D
PSO
Element
END
Build
Name
MRD Build Date
Production Tooling Complete (PTC)
SUPPLIER
RESPONSIBLE
# of
Veh
AQP ACTIVITIES
eCIMS / Lessons Learned Reviewed
Advance Quality Planning
Design FMEA
Test Sample Sizes and Frequencies
# of
Days
Design Review - Customer Perception targets
Initial Risk Evaluation (IRE)
Source Package Review
Confirm Supplier PPAP Self-Certification status
KEY MATERIAL/BUILD DATES
Verify deliverables timing to CPCP timing
Prior PSO Review (similar products)
Volume, ramp-up curve, and product mix verified
and capable - CPV, P.O, SP
39
AQP TIMING CHART
1. Item or activity title
Key AQP tasks and SQ
deliverables (IRE, Production
Tools Complete, IMDS, PPAP)
All PSO Elements

2. Tracks Supplier
responsibility for each item,
with begin/end dates

3. Key build/MRD dates

4. Details Chrysler lead for
each item

1
2
3
4
If status is 1, 2, or 3 (Red
or Yellow), you must
provide a Risk Mitigation
Plan
Enter 1-5
STATUS RISK MITIGTION PLAN
Commercial
40
AQP TIMING CHART
5
6
5. Indicate the status of the task.
















6. Brief description of the risk mitigation
plan (or reference to a more detailed
action plan)
Score Chrysler Definition
1
Not present / not started and:
Very late to required milestone and will cause other required
deliverables to be late to their required milestone/vehicle launch
Risk Mitigation Plan does not exist
Extremely High Risk to milestone/vehicle launch (certain to cause
delay in milestone/vehicle launch)
2
Incomplete and:
Late to required milestone and may cause other deliverables to be
late to their required milestone/vehicle launch
Risk Mitigation Plan exists but is not acceptable or requires
unrealistic timing to meet milestone
High Risk to milestone/vehicle launch (may cause delay in
milestone/vehicle launch)
3
Incomplete and:
Late to required milestone
Risk Mitigation Plan exists and is acceptable
Low Risk to milestone/vehicle launch
4
Incomplete and:
Progressing according to required milestone timing
No Risk to milestone/vehicle launch
5 Complete and approved
41
AQP TIMING CHART
7. Use this section to track progress of each item towards completion
Shows suggested AQP start and finish CPCP milestones (solid black line)
Shows current progress (gold dotted line; manually adjusted)
Use solid red line to show current date (manually adjusted)
Details required deliverable dates (black diamonds)
Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date
YEAR
Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date Month-Date
YEAR
Month-Date
High risk; PO + 8 wks
All Other
Program &
Style
Approval
EF EF EF
Step 2
Style
Freeze
Step 3
Tooling
Kickoff
EF
Verification of
Process
VP
EF
Pre Volume
Production
PVP EF
Job 1
Offline
EF
Commercial
Launch
EF
Step 5 Prod.
Designs
Complete
7
10 AQP Activities [Specific] Follow the instructions listed below: Used in FIAT
Program Review?
Initial Risk Evaluation (IRE) The SQE performs the Initial Risk Evaluation and determines the part risk to be High, Medium, or Low. No
Advance Quality Planning PSO Element 1. Includes overall program timing, Supply Base Management, Problem Solving, and most
supporting processes. Verify timing for tooling, fixtures, gages, testing requirements, and sub-components.
Regularly review and update timing plans, as needed. Review risk assessments for sub-components. Ensure
the Tier 1 Supplier has a process for tracking Sub-Tier Supplier quality and delivery, and that poor-performing
suppliers have been replaced or are receiving commensurate additional attention during the development
phase. Review the Tier 1 Supplier's plan for PSO on sub-components, and verify back-up plans exist for Sub-
Tier Suppliers with a high risk for supply issues.
Yes
Confirm composition and commitment of Core AQP
Team Members
Verify the core AQP Team members: Supplier Quality, Engineering, Plant Quality Center (for Part I/S), and key
Suppler team members (Quality, Program Management/Engineering). Identify non-core AQP Team members
that may need to provide input, such as Purchasing, Logistics/Supply, Supplier Sales Representative, etc.
Complete, and keep up-to-date, a contact list with all AQP Team members, their phone numbers, and email
addresses.
Yes
Source Package Review At the AQP Kick-Off Meeting, review the completed Source Package, noting key information and program
deliverables. Ensure engineering specifications and Quality and Supply requirements are understood by the
Supplier.
No
Volume, ramp-up curve, and product mix verified and
capable - CPV, P.O, SP
Review program volume requirements, planned product mix, and planned launch ramp-up curve. Ensure the
Supplier understands the requirements. Support the Buyer in timely Purchase Order issuance, and ensure the
quoted Daily Tooling Capacity is sufficient to meet Chrysler's needs.
Yes
eCIMS / Lessons Learned Reviewed Review quality spills from previous and similar products/processes. Use the eCIMS system, NCT system, and
completed 8-steps. Ensure issues are accounted for when developing Design and Process FMEAs. Verify that
issues resulting in past yardholds, PRIs, or Field Actions are adequately error-proofed or completely designed
out of the part in the new process.
Yes
Prior PSO Review (similar products) Review Process Sign-Off (or PCPA, for Fiat parts) results from previous programs, both on similar product and
from the same Supplier. Account for issues that may have resulted in lack of PSO approval so that do not
reoccur, and make sure all open issues have been closed.
Yes
Verify deliverables timing to CPCP timing Ensure the AQP Team has the most current CPCP timing, including all milestones. Verify that Supplier
promise dates for all deliverables are consistent with CPCP timing and are not late. Reference the "Supplier
Quality Deliverables Timing" form on the AQP/PSO website.
Yes
Status of Open Issues from Technical Review Risk
Assessment (FIAT parts only)
Applicable for FIAT parts only. Review the status of open issues created from the Risk Assessment during the
Technical Review (part of the FIAT Sourcing process). Verify progress and ensure it is consistent with what
was planned.
Yes
Supplier Quality Risk Assessment (SQRA) Review the status and issues from the Supplier Quality Risk Assessment (SQRA) with the Product Team
SQE. Ensure the AQP Executive Summary form is kept updated after each AQP Meeting with potential launch
risks and Risk Mitigation plans.
No
Part Number, Description, and Change Level PSO Element 2. Verify that the Supplier has the latest Technical Documentation, including the design model,
GD&T, access to the latest Chrysler Engineering Standards, access to color/gloss/graining masters, etc.
Review GD&T to ensure datums are adequately defined and special characteristics are identified. Verify CNs
allow sufficient time for tool modifications, testing, etc.; propose V2 timing for CNs that may create a risk to
launch. Note: Planning to run the PSO at an unapproved revision level (i.e., a future CN) results in a maximum
score of "3" for this item.
Yes
AQP TIMING CHART
42
Sample of task directions:
AQP TIMING CHART
43
Scoring Examples:
Task

Production Tooling
Complete (PTC)





Process FMEA
Issue

Late design release means the Supplier will not have
production tools ready by VP. They plan to build parts with
prototype tooling, using production intent materials and
gages. Tools will be available in time to provide parts for
PSO and the Pre-series build. (Suggested score = 3)


In a review of the PFMEA, the SQE discovers that the
Supplier has not implemented error/mistake-proofing on
several safety-related items. In addition, an overall audit
using the Supplier PFMEA Audit form returns a red
result. (Suggested score = 1 or 2, depending on when this
is discovered)
44
AQP MEETING FORMS AND DOCUMENTS
AQP Open Issues
Open Issues must be created and maintained throughout the program
SQE has responsibility to maintain, but can delegate to the Supplier
Key Points:
1. ONE Individual as responsible for an item
2. Dates: when the issue was opened, target for completion, and actual
completion or closed
3. Priority or risk level (recommended)
4. Updates and comments
AQP Open Issues are considered quality records
Kept for life of the program, plus one year
Who retains them? (SQE)

45
PART INSPECTION STANDARD (PART I/S)
Provides clear communication
and agreement between the
Chrysler Manufacturing Plant,
Engineering, Supplier Quality
and the Supplier in regards to:
Characteristics on the design model
which the Chrysler Manufacturing
Plant considers to be most important
The measurement method, sample
size, and frequency with which the
Supplier checks those characteristics
DRAWING/SKETCH
SUPPLIER CHRYSLER
DATE REVISION / DESCRIPTION
FINAL
PART NO: PART NAME/DESC:
SUPPLIER NAME: MANUFACTURING LOCATION: SUPPLIER CODE:
PART INSPECTION STANDARD
VEHICLE MY / FAMILY: DATE:
DRAFT
ENG QLTY MGR
REV.
# ENG PLANT QC SQE
INITIAL SIGN-OFF / APPROVAL
DATE TITLE SIGNATURE NAME
Engineer - Chrysler
Plant QC Eng. - Chrysler
SQE - Chrysler
DRAWING NO. / REVISION LEVEL:
Engineering - Supplier
Quality Mgr. - Supplier
46
PART I/S
SUPPLIER CODE: SUPPLIER NAME: MANUFACTURING LOCATION:
FINAL
PART INSPECTION STANDARD
VEHICLE MY / FAMILY: DATE:
DRAFT
PART NO: PART NAME/DESC:
INITIAL SIGN-OFF / APPROVAL
TITLE DATE NAME SIGNATURE
Plant QC Eng. - Chrysler
SQE - Chrysler
Engineer - Chrysler
Quality Mgr. - Supplier
Engineering - Supplier
ITEM
#
REMARKS / INSPECTION METHOD FREQ.
SAMPLE
SIZE
MEAS.
METHOD
SPECIFICATION /
TOLERANCE
CHARACTERISTIC /
INSPECTION POINT
DRAWING NO. / REVISION LEVEL:
Provides the Chrysler
Manufacturing Plant a tool to
more quickly identify a
problem and responsibility
when a quality issue occurs

Gives the AQP team an
opportunity to identify
potential problems/conflicts
between individual part
requirements and Chrysler
Build Objectives before the
prototype build phase.
47
PART I/S TEAM
Team Members (minimum):
Chrysler:

Supplier Quality
Engineer
Engineer
Plant Quality Center
Engineer

Supplier:

Quality Manager
Engineering / Program
Manager

Additional team members may be added, as needed. Examples
include the Chrysler Dimensional Engineer, Design Office, TAG
representative, etc.
48
PART I/S RASIC
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
r
S
u
p
p
l
i
e
r

Q
u
a
l
i
t
y
S
y
s
t
e
m

&

C
o
m
p
o
n
e
n
t

E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
M
a
n
u
f
a
c
t
u
r
i
n
g

Q
u
a
l
i
t
y

(
P
l
a
n
t
)
V
e
h
i
c
l
e

E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
i
n
g
D
e
s
i
g
n

O
f
f
i
c
e
Selection of Parts C CS C RA C
Confirm Assembly vs Part Datum Scheme Alignment
1
R/S C C/R A
Selection of Critical Dimensions
1
R/S C C/R A
Sample Size and Frequency determination R A C C
Measurement Method of Critical Dimensions R S A C
Selection of Appearance Specs/Characteristics
1
R/S C C/R A C S
Boundary Sample Creation and Review/Sign-off R S C A S S
Selection of Functional Specs/Characteristics
1
R/S C C/R A
Completion of Part I/S form R S CA
Retention of Completed Part I/S RA I I I I I
Responsible - Those who do the work to achieve the task. There is typically one role with a participation type of Responsible
Accountable - Final Approving Authority
Support - Resources allocated to Responsible
Informed - Those who are kept up-to-date on progress, often only on completion of the task or deliverable; and with whom there is just one way
Consulted -Those whose opinions are sought; and with whom there is two-way communication
NOTES
1: Dependant upon which party is design-responsible
49
HOW IS THE PART I/S DONE?
Chrysler Product Creation Process (CPCP)
FINAL DRAFT CREATION
PART INSPECTION STANDARD
IRE FPSC
PSO &
PPAP
50
Part I/S Creation Phase
HOW IS THE PART I/S DONE?
Scope of the program is defined (parts identified, critical
characteristics identified, etc.)
Document is created
Identify Parts
& Provide
Information
Team Review
Revise &
Sign
Create
Part I/S
51
Use of the Part I/S Draft to check parts for the VP and
PVP pilot builds
Follows the same basic flow for each build:
Part I/S Draft Phase
Implement &
Collect Data
Team Review
Revise &
Resubmit
Build
Event
HOW IS THE PART I/S DONE?
52
Part I/S is finalized for Job 1 and continuing volume
production
The Part I/S remains a living document and can be
revised as needed
Part I/S Final Phase
The Part I/S does not replace either the Control Plan or FPSC
at any program stage.
HOW IS THE PART I/S DONE?
53
PART I/S AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
The Part I/S should be developed alongside other quality
documents, especially the PFMEA, Control Plan, and
FPSC plan
The Part I/S does NOT replace or supersede any other quality
documents!
Characteristics included on the Part I/S should also be included on the
Control Plan for the part
The Part I/S should be updated at the same time as
other quality documents (e.g., for CNs, FRs, etc.)
PART I/S AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
54

FPSC: Safe Launch; checks/inspections over and above
Control Plan

Control Plan: Controls (w/ frequency, sample size) for
entire process

Part I/S: Ties controls for the final product characteristics
with visual representation (GD&T) and allows for
measurement scheme agreement with the Chrysler
Manufacturing Plant



PART I/S AND OTHER DOCUMENTS
Question: If were instituting 100% inspection for VP (or
other pilot build), with a gradual lessening of frequency as
we move into production, should the Part I/S reflect this?
No. The Part I/S is a tool to communicate how the Supplier will check
parts in production. As such, it should reflect the production control
plan inspection frequencies and sample sizes. If the team is requiring
100% inspection for a pilot build, this should be reflected on the FPSC
plan, NOT Part I/S. Per the RASIC on slide 8, SQ has the final
approving authority on sample sizes and frequencies.

55
PART I/S FLAG IN CQMS
56
PFMEA ACCEPTANCE
57
Part Inspection
Standard (Part I/S)
PFMEA Acceptance
What is significant PFMEA Acceptance?
An audit or assessment of the Suppliers Process FMEA
Applicable for any part that also requires a Part I/S
All parts with a High IRE and those parts selected by the Assembly Plant
Required to be completed 14 weeks prior to VP
PFMEA ACCEPTANCE
58
Supplier Quality Engineer (SQE) Supplier 3rd Party
Audit Result?
Identify Significant PFMEA
Acceptance parts (Notify
Supplier)
End
3rd Party Review
required?
ReviewPFMEA using "Supplier
PFMEA Audit Summary" form
ReviewPFMEA using "Supplier
PFMEA Audit Summary" form
Forward PFMEA
to SQE
Forward PFMEA
to 3P (copy SQE)
YES
Audit Result?
Make corrections to PFMEA (work with Chrysler SQE)
Enter Actual Date in CQMS GREEN
NO
Make corrections to PFMEA (work with 3P)
RED
RED
YELLOW
YELLOW
Dispute Process
If Supplier and/or SQE disagrees with 3P assessment:
1. Submit PFMEA to Sr. Manager - SQ Operations
2. Sr. Manager - SQ Operations reviews PFMEA
3. If result matches 3P, 3P assessment stands and process is
followed as normal
4. If result differs, Audit Result changes and process follows
the new result flow for 3P
Audit Result?
GREEN
RED
YELLOW
GREEN
SQE determines if audit
will be done by
themselves or 3
rd
Party
Auditor uses the
Supplier PFMEA Audit
Summary form
If not green, Supplier
makes corrections and
resubmits per the
flowchart
PFMEA ACCEPTANCE
Criteria for using a 3
rd
Party Auditor include (but is not
limited to):
Suppliers who are "Red" in the Quality Bid List system
Suppliers who are on New Business Hold
Suppliers on the Top Problem Supplier Locations list
Parts from Suppliers that have been involved with / responsible for
recent yardholds, Product Related Issues (PRIs), or Field Actions

The SQE makes the final decision for whether or not a Supplier must
use a 3
rd
Party auditor for this process


59
PFMEA ACCEPTANCE
60
Dispute Process

If the Supplier and/or SQE disagrees with the 3
rd
Party assessment:
1. Submit the PFMEA to the Sr. Manager - SQ Operations
2. The Sr. Manager - SQ Operations reviews the PFMEA with Supplier
PFMEA Audit Summary form
3. If the result matches the 3
rd
Party, the assessment stands and process
is followed as normal
4. If the result differs, the Audit Result is changed and the process
follows the process flow for the new result
PFMEA ACCEPTANCE
61
Supplier Process FMEA: Audit Summary (based on Fourth Edition FMEA Manual)
MY/Program
Name of Component(s), Sub-System(s) or System(s):
Part Number(s):
Responsible Supplier:
Responsible Chrysler Supplier Quality Engineer:
Name of Auditor:
Date Reviewed:
Date of PFMEA audited (Later of Original or Rev. Level):
Rating Detail Criteria
Header: "Yes" if all answers in section 1 are "Yes."
Non-Header sections (2 through 13): Count # of sections 2-13 "No" and # "E/I."
Header "Yes" overall and no more than
three sections "E/I" overall = "Green"
Neither "Green" nor "Red" criteria met =
"Yellow"
Six or more non-Header sections "No"
overall = "Red"
1 Header Yes E/I No N/A Auditor Comments
1a Name of Vehicle(s)/Program(s) included? - -
1b Model Year of Program(s) included? - -
1c Name of Supplier included? - -
1d Part Number and Description included? - -
1e Core Team includes (at a minimum): Chrysler: Supplier Quality Engineer and
design-responsible Engineer. Supplier: Quality Engineer and Plant Mfg.
Engineer? Names and titles or area of responsibility are included? Note: Phone
#'s recommended, but not mandatory for this audit.
- -
1f Key Date shown is PPDC date or P.O. issuance + 60 days, whichever is later (for
new vehicle programs), or does not exceed PPAP date (for programs already in
production )? Note: Contact Chrysler SQE, if required.
- -
1g FMEA Date (Orig.) is shown? - -
1h FMEA "(Rev.)" date within past 60 days? Note: "N/A" if "(Orig.)" date is within 60
days.
- -
Additonal Comments (not to impact audit results): - - - -
If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." - -
Result
"No"___ "E/I"___
Overall Rating (place an "X" in the appropriate box)
Note 1: "E/I" = only minor "E"xceptions or requirement "I"nconsistently applied (approx. 25% or less) and correction still required.
Note 2: Do not allow a "No" answer to one question (e.g., Detection ranking too low) result in a "No" answer to another related question (e.g.,
lack of "Recommended Actions" or "Action Results"). Evaluate each question based only on their own merits.
Note: If PFMEA is done by process vs. part, a separate header sheet listing the various programs, parts, etc. for each element in Section 1 is acceptable.
If you dont know if
something has been done,
answer , No then follow up
later.

Ask how? and when? vs.
yes/no questions when
assessing certain questions,
(i.e., Did the Design-
responsible Engineer provide
input on Effects?).

Be sure to read and
understand the Notes to
help ensure consistency.

Additional Comments on the PFMEA
PFMEAs shall incorporate lessons learned from past programs or
similar parts, internal and external nonconformance data related to
the parts, and customer (Chrysler) inputs, as outlined in the Supplier
PFMEA Audit Summary.
For the parts requiring PFMEA Acceptance in the Chrysler Quality
Management System (CQMS), the SQE and Supplier shall jointly
audit the PFMEA no later than (14) weeks prior to VP SOF. In
addition, the result of the PFMEA audit shall be "Green" before the
Actual Date is entered in CQMS.
All PFMEAs, regardless of the risk level, shall be rated "Green" per
the "Supplier PFMEA Audit Summary" form as part of PSO
requirements.

Please refer the PFMEA Acceptance process standard in the
Book of Knowledge for more details.


62
The responsible SQE is expected to provide following support:
Ensure the Supplier provides the PFMEA and supporting documents within
2 weeks of email notification. Do not rework the documents beforehand.
If the 3rd party audit obtains a "Red result, the Supplier is required to
contract one of the 3rd Party Auditors and start coaching and audits within
(2) weeks. The Supplier works with the 3rd Party Auditor until a "Green"
result is achieved.
The supplier may be issued a Forever Requirement Violation (FRV) as Failure to
follow/respond to Chrysler requirements or requests if they refuse to seek coaching within
(2) weeks of receiving a Red audit result.
If the supplier needs to dispute the audit result, the Supplier and/or SQE
shall submit the PFMEA audit form as originally completed by the auditor
and an explanation for the dispute to the PFMEA Auditor Facilitator, Stanley
Zhou ([email protected]).

Please refer to the PFMEA 3rd Party Audits and Coaching process
standard in the Book of Knowledge for more details.
3
rd
Party PFMEA Audits
64
FIRST PRODUCTION SHIPMENT CERTIFICATION
What is FPSC?
Safe Launch activities
Audit / inspection above
and beyond standard
process controls
Records retained by the
Supplier; may be
requested by Chrysler
personnel at any time
65
FPSC BASICS
FPSC includes all Special Characteristics
Product characteristics or manufacturing process parameters which can
affect safety or compliance with regulations, fit, function, performance or
subsequent processing of a product




Also includes any additional characteristics selected by the AQP and/or PSO
Team (Chrysler or Supplier)

Key <D> characteristics
Safety <S> characteristics
Emissions <E> characteristics
Torque requirements
SPC points
Others deemed critical by the
Supplier or Chrysler
S
66
FPSC BY PROGRAM
NEW PROGRAMS

Begins with first shipment for VP
build
Duration is until Job 1 + 90 days
has passed (minimum)
Plan, results for VP, and
effectiveness of the FPSC
reviewed during the Pre-PSO
Meeting
MODIFIED PROGRAMS / FR
CHANGES / RESOURCING

Begins with first shipment to a
Chrysler (or Chrysler-designated)
facility
Duration is until 1
st
shipment + 90
days has passed (minimum)
Plan reviewed during PSO

The Chrysler AQP Team is final approver of the FPSC
duration. Deviations from the minimum are to be
approved in writing by the Chrysler AQP Team.
67
OTHER FPSC INFORMATION
The Supplier is responsible for ensuring that FPSC (or
equivalent) activities are implemented through the Supply
Chain (Tier 2 and lower). The duration of FPSC (or
equivalent) at sub-tier suppliers shall match that of the Tier
1 Supplier's FPSC.

FPSC is not a replacement for the Part I/S or Control Plan,
nor is the Part I/S or Control Plan a replacement for FPSC.
FPSC is intended to be an additional level of inspections or
audits to protect the Chrysler (or Chrysler-designated)
manufacturing facility during the pilot and launch phases.

PART QUALIFICATION PROCESS
68
Plant validation of BIW/QAF
(Interior & Exterior Quality
Assurance Fixtures)
components (internal and
external suppliers) to fulfill the
customer requirements,
Quality standards, Build
Objectives (EBO) and Design
intent. Validation includes
Dimensional control.
Plant Metrology Center lead;
SQE supports the plant by
ensuring Supplier submits
parts and data when required
and corrective actions are
completed
75% of Tolerance
75%-100%
of Tolerance
Over 100%
of Tolerance
PART QUALIFICATION PROCESS
69
Supplier
submits part
data from 5
parts and
transfer to
Plant
Mark up two
parts with
measured
data to bring
to plant
Meet with
Plant to review
parts and data
Supplier
Creates new
PDCA if
required
Supplier
incorporates
Changes in
Manufacturing
Process if req.
If part has Red data
supplier should submit
PDCA and sub-tier data
Supplier (Internal & External)
Requirements for Part Submission
(preferred two Weeks prior to
MRD) for each build phase
Plan Do Check Act (PDCA)/Quick
Kaizen required for any red
points
More loops should be repeated as
corrective action timing permits
Parts and Data need to be
characterized :
Part made from Soft Tool /
Hard Tool
Tools are on Home Line /
Temp Line
Special Means were /were
not
Gage R&R
Roadmap of Part
PART QUALIFICATION PROCESS
70
Vehicle Development Phase
Mass
Production
Continuous Loops
Additional loops will be required within each build
phase (S1A, S1B etc.) according to:
Part achievement of Dimensional Compliance
Engineering changes
Part availability (Pilot Build Phase)
Measurement schedule
Process changes (e.g. soft to hard tools)
Must have knowledge of part production process
hard tools/soft tools , maturity of supplier process

Parts shall be dimensionally correct for S1 / VP
Parts shall meet PP/PPK per Appendix B of the AQP/PSO
Manual at S2 / PVP (min 30 pc sample)
Parts shall meet CP/CPK of 1.33 at V1 and later (min 30 pc
Sample)
NOTE: Supplier should build in small batches for each burst build in the pilot phase to accommodate continuous
improvement plans
NOTE: Submission due date - preferred 2 weeks prior to MRD First submission for each Pilot Phase must be complete before A Phase
framing
NOTE: Request 2 additional parts for each pilot phase to accommodate submission requirement
NOTE: Supplier Must submit for each of the 3 Pilot Phase (if applicable)
S1/VP S2/PVP V1
S1A - Framing S2A - Framing Loop 1
PART QUALIFICATION PROCESS
71
PART AVG. WEIGHT SUBMISSIONDATE:
SUBMISSION: BUILD: PHASE:
FIRST PRODUCTIONSHIPMENT CERTIFICATION(FPSC) S1 / VP Phase A
PART QUALIFICATION S2 / PVP Phase B
PART INSPECTIONSTANDARD(PART I/S) V1 / Job 1 Other
INITIAL PROCESS STUDY Post-V1 / Post-Job 1
OTHER
PROCESS:
TOOLING ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEANS
COMMENTS:
Chrysler SQE/ASME Phone ( )
Chrysler Plant QE Phone ( )
Chrysler Engineer Phone ( )
Plant Mgr. (Supplier) Phone ( )
Quality Mgr. (Supplier) Phone ( )
Data Prepared by: Phone ( )
Special Means Not Required Date: Home Line Complete Date: Production Tooling Complete Date:
Email
Email
Email
Email
Email
Email
Characteristic Char #
PROTOTYPE PRODUCTION TEMP LINE HOMELINE
PART NUMBER
SUPPLIERCODE
SUPPLIERNAME
Meisterbock R/Y/G CP
3
CPK
3 Gage R&R
Acc?
ACC/REJ
Free
State Fit
QAF
Variable /
Attribute
Dim.
Correct?
1 PP
2
PPK
2
YES NO
MEASUREMENT RESULTS SUMMARY
Specification /
Tolerance
Classif.
MFG. LOCATION PART DESCRIPTION
MY/VEHICLE
3
Parts shall meet CP/CPK of 1.33 at V1 and later
2
Parts shall meet PP/PPK per Appendix B of the AQP/PSOManual at S2 / PVP
NOTES:
1
Parts shall be dimensionally correct f or S1 / VP
Supplier Completes Part Data Submission form-
Requirement of Submission prior to MRD
Metrology Center will notify supplier of Disposition
Green = Dimensionally Correct (< 75% of Tolerance)
Yellow Dimensionally Correct (>75% and < 100% of
Tolerance)
Red = Dimensionally incorrect - Quick Kaizen/PDCA
needed with data submission
Metrology Center will notify supplier of Part Validation
Meeting
Green Part = Metrology Center will notify supplier of next
build phase submission and give approval for next batch
build
Red Part = Suppliers corrective action will determine next
submission (PDCA needed documenting plan)
PART QUALIFICATION PROCESS
72
Supplier Submits GD&T or PIS (Part
Inspection Standard - if available) -
Requirement of Submission
Part I/S is used only if the part is required to have one based on Part I/S criteria
Part I/S is NOT automatically required for parts undergoing the Part Qualification
Process!
PART QUALIFICATION PROCESS
73
PART QUALIFICATION PROCESS
74
Dimensional Compliance Team:
-Product Release Engineer
-Have the released model/GD&T up to date
-Ensure CN is complete to document dimensional revisions
-Supplier Quality Engineer (SQE) External Suppliers
-Assist Metrology Center Rep by communicating requirements to the supply base
-Assist supplier with Quick Kaizen/PDCA
-Advance Stamping Manufacturing Engineer (ASME) Internal Suppliers
-Assist Metrology Center Rep by communicating requirements to the supply base
-Assist supplier with Quick Kaizen/PDCA
-Metrology Center Representative
-Maintains Master Part Approval Schedule
-Schedules part disposition Team Meetings
-Schedules part submissions
-Supplier Representative (Internal & External)
-Timely part submissions with appropriate forms
-When part is red, develops Quick Kaizen/PDCA
PART QUALIFICATION PROCESS
75
After 1 Day late Escalates to SQ Manager/Metrology Manager


After 3 Days Escalates to Plant Manager , Director, and Plant
Metrology Center Manager Level


After 5 Days Escalates to VP level, Manufacturing , P & SQ,
Engineering
Escalation Process:
PART DATA SUBMISSION FORM
76
Data Sheet
77
PART DATA SUBMISSION FORM
PART AVG. WEIGHT SUBMISSIONDATE:
SUBMISSION: BUILD: PHASE:
FIRST PRODUCTION SHIPMENT CERTIFICATION (FPSC) S1 / VP Phase A
PART QUALIFICATION S2 / PVP Phase B
PART INSPECTION STANDARD (PART I/S) V1 / Job 1 Other
INITIAL PROCESS STUDY Post-V1 / Post-Job 1
OTHER
PROCESS:
TOOLING ASSEMBLY SPECIAL MEANS
COMMENTS:
Chrysler SQE/ASME Phone ( )
Chrysler Plant QE Phone ( )
Chrysler Engineer Phone ( )
Plant Mgr. (Supplier) Phone ( )
Quality Mgr. (Supplier) Phone ( )
Data Prepared by: Phone ( )
Email
Email
Email
Email
Email
Email
3
Parts shall meet CP/CPK of 1.33 at V1 and later
2
Parts shall meet PP/PPK per Appendix B of the AQP/PSO Manual at S2 / PVP
NOTES:
1
Parts shall be dimensionally correct f or S1 / VP
PROTOTYPE PRODUCTION
Classif.
Home Line Complete Date: Production Tooling Complete Date:
Variable /
Attribute
Dim.
Correct?
1 PP
2
Char # PPK
2
YES NO TEMP LINE HOMELINE
Meisterbock R/Y/G CP
3
CPK
3 Gage R&R
Acc?
Special Means Not Required Date:
Build Use?
Free
State Fit
QAF
MEASUREMENT RESULTS SUMMARY
Specification /
Tolerance
Characteristic
MFG. LOCATION PART DESCRIPTION
MY/VEHICLE
PART NUMBER
SUPPLIERCODE
SUPPLIERNAME
Results sheet

Form used to
submit data for:
FPSC
Part Qualification
Part I/S
Initial Process
Study

Information
carried over from
data sheet
WHAT IS CRAFTSMANSHIP?
INFLUENCES AND CONCEPTS
CRAFTSMANSHIP REVIEWS
8 CRAFTSMANSHIP INFLUENCES
Design: tolerance stackup, mating parts have different form (Eng)
AAR: colour, gloss, grain (PDO)
Appearance Standards: AS-10169, objective standard which must
be met for conformance (Supplier)
Supplier Process: no spec, boundary samples required, flow lines,
sink marks, squeezeout, etc. (Supplier, SQ)
HMI: human-machine interface, tactile feel of buttons and controls,
sounds made while functioning, efforts to press buttons, etc. (All)
Chrysler Assembly Process: internal practices, mallet scuff marks,
ISD, missing/loose/shy, etc. (Mfg)
Nonconforming Parts: (Supplier, SQ)
Cleanliness: smudge marks, dirt, dust, etc.(All)
What else?
Interior vs Exterior Craftsmanship Philosophies
within Chrysler
Both follow the same principles
Interior managed by dedicated Interior Quality and
Craftsmanship department, interior SQE is part of team
Exterior historically managed by SQ and started later
in product development phase, craftsmanship reviews
held during S2 timeframe
Exterior Craftsmanship Reviews Main areas of
Concentration


Appearance Standards: AS-10169, objective
standard which must be met for conformance
(Supplier)
Supplier Process: no spec, boundary samples
required, flow lines, sink marks, squeezeout, etc.
(Supplier, SQ)
Nonconforming Parts: dimensional issues,
improper materials used, (Supplier, SQ)
CRAFTSMANSHIP FOLLOW UP
Document results of review on PIS
Schedule follow up visits
Maintain craftsmanship PDCA
Ask for boundary samples during supplier visits to gauge
current production
Maintain good communication between advance and
current SQ post-review
83
PROCESS SIGN-OFF
What is PSO?
Verification that the
AQP activities have
been successfully
completed
A review of the
Suppliers process,
from beginning to end

Production Validation Phase
Verification of Process (VP)
Supplier Readiness
Evaluation (SRE)
First Production
Shipment Certification
(FPSC)
PV Testing
Pre-PSO Meeting
PSO On-Site Visit &
Production
Demonstration Run
PSO Result
Complete PPAP requirements
& submit Dimensional
PSW/PPAP
Complete corrective actions;
reschedule On-Site Visit / PDR
as necessary
5 (Z) 1-4 (N)
5 + PVT (A)
Supplier
Quality Risk
Assessment
(SQRA)
Part
Qualification
Process
(Assembly
Plant Lead)
84
PROCESS SIGN-OFF: BRIEF SUMMARY
FOUR BASIC ACTIVITIES TO PSO:

1.Trial Runs / Supplier Readiness Evaluation (SRE)
Readiness for the PSO On-Site Visit
Yields parts for PV Testing

2.Pre-PSO Meeting
Document review
Evaluate SRE results
Schedule PSO On-Site Visit
85
PROCESS SIGN-OFF: BRIEF SUMMARY
3. PSO On-Site Visit
Review of Suppliers process and facilities
Production Demonstration Run
Initial Process Study

4. PV Testing
Functional testing, et. al.
Select component & system PV (Production
Validation) level testing required by VP:
Only that testing required to ensure the components
function as intended, and which have been agreed
upon between the supplier and the Chrysler Product
Engineer at Production Design Clean-up (PDC), and
documented in the Design Verification Plan and
Report (DVP&R).
Concurrent with other PSO activities
86
MORE INFORMATION
For full information and training on the
Process Sign-Off, please sign up for
PSQPSO200 in TEDS
87
PPAP
PSO Z APPROVAL

Supplier can submit the
dimensional PSW
SQE can enter the dimensional
PPAP into CQMS
Receive partial tool payment (at
the discretion of purchasing)
Still needs an IAA to ship parts
PSO A APPROVAL

Supplier can submit the full PSW
SQE can enter full PPAP into
CQMS
Receive full tooling payment
Can ship parts normally
88
Supplier sends the PSW to the Chrysler SQE
Must copy the Supplier Quality Group mailbox ([email protected])
SQE reviews the PSW for
proper information
Verifies correct part
number, CN, IMDS
number present, etc.
SQE enters PPAP dates &
disposition into CQMS
Supplier enters PPAP
dates & disposition into
CQMS
Medium & High risk parts
Low risk parts
PPAP
89
CQMS - PPAP Submission
Enter a Chrysler part number, click Find. Check box indicates row(s) to update. Enter dates as
MM/DD/YYYY or use the calendar icon. The Disposition is required with Actual Dates.

90
CQMS - PPAP Mass Update
Select an Update Element: Blank Promise Dates, Promise Due Next 30 Days, Not
Approved or All. Enter a CN or enter a Supplier Code and CN Model Year. Click Find.
Optionally enter a Commodity Code or a Deck Code (with Supplier Code and CN Model
Year) for additional filters.
91
CQMS - PPAP Mass Update
Check box indicates row(s) to update. Enter dates as MM/DD/YYYY or use the calendar
icon. The Disposition is required with Actual Dates.
92
LESSONS LEARNED
Ensure lessons learned from the
current program are carried
forward into new programs
Corrective actions for issues
documented in FMEAs, Control
Plans, etc. and added to the quality
documents of other, similar products
Hold a Things Gone Right / Things
Gone Wrong review meeting (30-60
days post launch)
Document TGR/TGW and retain
in an accessible location
Review prior to beginning new
programs
Review AQP meeting minutes and
open issues from previous programs
Keep the Master PFMEA updated as
issues occur
93
FOREVER REQUIREMENTS
1. Proactively communicate with Chrysler.
Know when to raise the red flag.
2. Request approval from Chrysler prior to implementing
any anticipated process changes.
3. Request approval from Chrysler prior to implementing
any internal or Sub-Tier manufacturing location
changes.
4. Watch for sub-tier Supplier issues and tell Chrysler
about them.
5. Notify Chrysler of potential supply / capacity issues

AQP/PSO 7th Edition Manual, Appendix E
94
FOREVER REQUIREMENTS
Changes to the process post-PSO
require submission to Chrysler via the
Forever Requirements system
The Tier 1 Supplier is responsible to
ensure all of their sub-tier Suppliers
follow the Forever Requirements
Submissions to Chrysler always come from
the Tier 1, regardless of what level of sub-
tier is making the change
Full information and training on the
Forever Requirements can be found in
MQCFRR200, available through TEDS
AQP TIMING CHART
Group Activity AQP
Timing Chart scoring
96
SQ DELIVERABLES & TIMING
Shaded deliverables require promise and actual date entries into, or are managed through, the Chrysler Quality
Management System (CQMS)
SQ Deliverable Chrysler Product Creation Process (CPCP) Milestone
Initial Risk Evaluation (IRE) Complete N/A (Source Identified in CQMS + 2 weeks)
Part I/S Parts Identified 22 weeks prior to VP Start of Frame
PFMEA Accepted [PFMEA] 14 weeks prior to VP Start of Frame
Part Inspection Standard (draft) [Part I/S (d)] 10 weeks prior to VP Start of Frame
Component-level Production Validation (PV) Testing Complete VP - Verification of Process Build
Equipment, Fixtures, Facilities, and Gages Complete VP - Verification of Process Build
First Production Shipment Certification (FPSC) Start VP - Verification of Process Build
Gage R&R Complete [Gage R&R] VP - Verification of Process Build
IMDS Submitted VP - Verification of Process Build
Production Tooling Complete [PTC] VP - Verification of Process Build
Station Cycle Time / FTC Compliant VP - Verification of Process Build
Supplier Quality Risk Assessment (SQRA) VP, PVP, & Job 1 Offline
Dimensional Capability Complete [Dim Cap] PVP - Pre-Volume Production (Pre-Series)
Error / Mistake Proofing Implemented PVP - Pre-Volume Production (Pre-Series)
Key Personnel Hiring/Training Complete PVP - Pre-Volume Production (Pre-Series)
Production Demonstration Run (PDR) Complete [PDR] PVP - Pre-Volume Production (Pre-Series)
Production Validation (PV) Testing Complete [PVT] PVP - Pre-Volume Production (Pre-Series)
PPAP Complete [PPAP] PVP - Pre-Volume Production (Pre-Series)
Part Inspection Standard (final) [Part I/S (f)] Job 1 Offline
97
ADDITIONAL TRAINING
Register through TEDS

Process Sign-Off PSQPSO200
Forever Requirements / Resourcing MQCFRR100
Chrysler Quality Management System MQCQMS100
Advanced PFMEA DQIFMA210
Nonconformance Tracking System MQCNCT100
eCIMS DQCZRO100
Warranty Management MQCSWM100
3 Legged 5 Why MQCTLW100
Part Inspection Standard PSQPIS100
98
ADDITIONAL TRAINING
Training CDs available

DQIFMA201 - PFMEA
DQISPC350 - Statistical Process Control
DQIPCA300 - Process Capability Analysis
DQIMPT300 - Error Mistake Proofing
DQICPD400 - Control Plan Development
DQIFMA275 - Design FMEA

Contacts:
Sheri De Hesselle [email protected] 722-1370
Paula Mack [email protected] 722-1370
99
QUESTIONS?
Please visit the AQP/PSO website for electronic versions of the following:
The AQP/PSO 7
th
Edition Manual
AQP Executive Summary and Open Issues forms (including the PTLR)
AQP Timing Chart
PSO forms
FPSC form
Part I/S form
Appearance Approval form and instructions
Supplier PFMEA Audit Summary
Supplier Quality Deliverables Timing Requirements
Part Data Submission form
https://gsp.extra.chrysler.com/qlty/pso/index.html

Suppliers can access through the Chrysler Portal Reference section of COVISINT
BACKUP
Special Notes for Chrysler SQEs
Managing parts for FIAT
100
Chrysler SQEs Managing Fiat Parts
101
Macro phases legend
Approach / Style / initiative Approval / Sourcing
Technical / Technological Development
Industrialization
Production Ramp Up
Production Tracking (6 months minimum) /
Supplier Containment / Continuos Improvement
6 months 9 - 10 months 1 m
16 - 17 months
Card 0
CSE
Product
Card
Recommendation
IRE
AQP TC
1 m
DaP = OK to Ship
PSO = Process Sign-Off (w/ PDR)
IRE = Initial Risk Evaluation
PS = Pre Series
CSE = Chrysler Source Evaluation
TFU = Tooling Follow Up
VP = Process Verification
AQP TC = AQP Timing Chart Review
SRE = Supplier Readiness Eval.
FPSC = First Prod. Shipment Cert.
Main Deliverables
Main Milestones
SQ Tools
Supplier Tooling Sign Off
5 - 6 months
VP PS
2 m
SRE
DaP
Commercial
Launch
2 m
Job1
PSO
TFU
- Start -
>
Final CAD Mathematics (Step 5)
Article Card
Final Drawings Availability Codep
.
Samples
- Selfqualification
/PPAP (SQ)
- Integrative tests
(E&D)
- Plant Approval
(Plant)
Qualification
Informative System VDDP
AQP TC
FPSC
Pre-PSO
Fiat Sourcing Process
The Chrysler SQE
is required to
support the Fiat
Sourcing Process
in the same
manner as Fiat
SQEs
102
Opening of the Sourcing Agenda
Extraction to the Roll Out
PACKAGES creation
Input Check
Key Stakeholders Meeting
PRE-RFQ
Input Check
RFQ dispatch
Quotation analysis
Technical review
Target setting
Negotiation
Recommendation
Process steps
requiring SQE
involvement
103
Used when the Input check finds a gap in the data
needed to proceed in the sourcing process
The KSM is a meeting among all those with key
responsibilities in the development of major items,
time and strategy management
Its goal is to ensure that all the quotations
received after the RFQ are comparable and
compliant to the requirements
Key Stakeholders Meeting (KSM)
104
PRE RFQ - Supplier Preliminary Data
Profile
The SPDP is a survey where we ask a potential
supplier to provide all the general information
regarding its organizational size and structure
Applies to new suppliers, not yet present in our
data base
Equivalent to the Supplier Pre-Evaluation form
in the Source Evaluation process

105
PRE RFQ - Quality Bid List

All the suppliers involved in the sourcing process
shall be included in the Quality Bid List. If they
are not, the SQE must complete a Business Case
The suitable suppliers will receive the RFQ from
the buyer
An approved Business Case is requested for
every new supplier, containing data about its
Quality System, benchmarks for similar parts and
the PSA (Chrysler personnel will use the CSE)
Chrysler Source Evaluation
106
SCORING

Potential Supplier Assessment




Source Evaluation Tool


60-80% >80% <60%
70-90% >90% <70%
60-80% >80% <60%
70-90% >90% <70%
The new SE tool defaults to
the standard part scores. In
the future, we will add a box to
check for safety components
that will switch the formatting.
107
PRE RFQ - Quality Bid List

80 + = green (ok to bid)
60-79 = yellow (need SQ Sr. Manager or Commodity Managers (Chrysler) approval to bid)
Below 60 = red (need SQ Directors approval to bid)
108
PRE RFQ - Quality Statement of
Requirements

Goals of the QSR:
Inform the supplier about Fiat quality requirements,
including those special requirements linked to the part
construction technology and/or the specific supplier
Obtain from the supplier all the information related to its
Quality system, its standards, its future behaviors
Have the supplier commitment to project feasibility, as
required on the Product Card (Scheda Prodotto).

The supplier shall fulfill and submit the form together
with the quotation, being ready for clarifications during
the Technical Review
109
Technical Review
Attendees
Purchasing: Lead Buyer, SQE, TAG,
E&D,
Logistics: SCD
Technologies: (mandatory only in case of
Stampings)
Quality Risk Assessment for all potential suppliers
strong and weak points, improvement
recommendations to be agreed upon before
sourcing
110
Technical Review procedure regarding the
SQE
The SQE receives the Quality SOR from the supplier
and prepares related questions prior to the meeting,
then verifies the agreement
Any partial agreement from the supplier to our Quality
SOR must be discussed and could result in the
suppliers exclusion from the subsequent stages
Neither the buyer nor the SQE may accept any
technical deviation from the requirements (e.g.
Reliability targets, metrics like ICP and TOC,
Customer profile) without the approval of the model
Vehicle line Team/Platform
When the RASI chart is required, the SQE takes care
that the document is properly shared.
Any deviation in the Technical documentation, with all
the underlying risks, must be accepted under the
approval of the MR only, with the updated
documentation itself
Quality Risk Assessment
111
QUALITY RISK ASSESSMENT

Supplier Name: Supplier Code:
Part Number: Part Description:
Project:
Supplier Quality Engineer: Commodity (C;E;M;P):
Buyer: Co-design? (Y/N):
Design Engineer:
ASSESSMENT
CATEGORY
ISSUE
(OBLIGATORY FOR CONDITIONAL
RATING)
RATING
ASSES
SMENT
#
1.
New Process,
Technology and/or
Capacity

A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable.

2. Supplying Location
A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable

3. Facilities/Equipment
A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable

4.
New Design
Responsibility

A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable

5. Quality History
A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable

6.
Key Characteristics
Mgt. (Important,
Critical, Safety/Report
& Legal)

A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable.

7.
Quality Targets
(PPM, IPTV, Quality
Tracking ICP/TOC)

A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable

8. Timing Concerns
A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable

9.
Program
Management

A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable

10. Other (SQE)
A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable

11. Other (TAG)
A = Approved;
C = Conditional;
NS = Not Sourceable


ASSESSMENT PARTICIPANTS:


DATE: SQE (Surname & Signature) TAG (Surname & Signature)


DATE: Buyer (Surname & Signature) Design Engineer (Surname & Signature)




Supplier Project Responsible Name & Signature (Obligatory for Conditional Rating)


NOTE: If one of more Assessment Categories are rated Not Sourceable, the whole Risk Assessment is
considered NOT SOURCEABLE.
New process, technology, tools, capacity:
not present;
new tools
capacity increase/new tooling
new process to the plant
extremely fast production acceleration
new technology to company
new technology to the industry

Supplying location
current supplier
current supplier-new location
new supplier to the division
out of region supplier with more than 2 years
new to region
new to industry
out of region supplier first year imported

Facilities/Equipment
existing facility
new addition/rearrangement to existing
building
new building
new plant

New Design Responsibilities
carryover design
customer is design responsible
source is design & production responsible
contract house is design responsible


Quality History
few past problems; good response
minor problems; poor responses
company requires multiple Qualificazioni
submissions
high PPM or Bills with weight 90
no data-new source
high Warranty or bid list Field Major Disruptions
Top Q supplier

Key Characteristics Mgt. (Important, Critical,
Safety/Report & Legal)
used to manage key characteristics
good for important characteristics, not used to
S/R characteristics
not used to manage key characteristics

Quality Targets (PPM, R/100, Quality Tracking
ICP/TOC)
It means how are the Supplier performances with
respect to the targets

Timing Concerns
no timing concerns
late release/source to plan
PPAP/Qualificazioni late but before Material
Required Date
Full approval after start of saleable vehicles

Program management
past successful launches
Advanced IP
new source; unknown APQP program mgt ability
launch problems/Launch Major Disruptions or
Launch IP
limited program management team
capacity issues with past programs
Initial Risk Evaluation (IRE)
The IRE shall be completed within 1 month of the
sourcing Recommendation
Report the equivalent Monitoring Level to Fiat at this time, using the
following chart:




Document the part risk level from the IRE on the AQP Timing Chart; the
IRE will NOT be added in CQMS
112
SUPPLIER:
SUPPLIER CODE:
PART NUMBER(S):
PART NAME(S):
PART RISK (H/M/L):
#NUM!
FIAT PROGRAM
REVIEW STATUS
#NUM!
CHRYSLER AQP
STATUS
ADVANCE QUALITY PLANNING (AQP)
TIMING CHART
IRE Result Monitoring Level
High Total
Medium
Low
Partial
Advance Quality Planning (AQP)
The AQP Kick-Off Meeting shall be held within 1 month
of the sourcing Recommendation.
Complete the first revision of the AQP Timing Chart, including a status
for each applicable task.
Report the Fiat Program Review Status to Fiat for entry into the VDDP
system
113
#NUM!
FIAT PROGRAM
REVIEW STATUS
#NUM!
CHRYSLER AQP
STATUS
ADVANCE QUALITY PLANNING (AQP)
TIMING CHART
Advance Quality Planning (AQP)
General Notes:
Update the AQP Timing Chart after each AQP Meeting is held.
The Fiat Program Review Status will need to be reported to Fiat once
more following the Supplier Tooling Sign-Off milestone, approximately 6
months before VP
The First Production Shipment Certification (FPSC) process is
followed as normal, beginning at VP
The Chrysler SQE shall support the Fiat Assembly Plant for the
Benestare process
The Part Inspection Standard process is not applicable and not
required for Fiat parts. Completion of a Part I/S is at the discretion of
the Chrysler SQE (Fiat Assembly Plants do not currently follow the
Part I/S process).
114
Using the AQP Timing Chart form
115
115
RISK MITIGTION PLAN
If status is 1, 2, or 3 (Red
or Yellow), you must
provide a Risk Mitigation
Plan
Enter 1-5
STATUS
Commercial
Score Chrysler Definition FIAT Definition
1
Incompl ete/non-exi stant; no recovery pl an i n pl ace and
Hi gh Ri sk to l aunch Job Stopper
2
Incompl ete w/ i nadequate recovery pl an i n pl ace or
Hi gh Ri sk to l aunch Job Stopper ri sk
3
Incompl ete w/ recovery pl an i n pl ace or mi nor i ssues
and Low ri sk to l aunch 2nd Level Issue
4
Incompl ete but progressi ng accordi ng to pl an w/ no or
very mi nor i ssues Pl anned Acti vi ty accordi ng to Project
5
Compl ete and approved Impl emented Acti vi ty
116
#NUM!
FIAT PROGRAM
REVIEW STATUS
#NUM!
CHRYSLER AQP
STATUS
ADVANCE QUALITY PLANNING (AQP)
TIMING CHART
Includes only the 29 tasks shown
below
Tasks used in calculating the FIAT Program Review status:
Review CNs and IAAs (including associated Risk)
TAG Review (Chrysler-purchased tooling only)
Confirm composition and commitment of Core
AQP Team Members
Design Model Status review
eCIMS / Lessons Learned Reviewed
Status of Open Issues from Technical Review Risk
Assessment (FIAT parts only)
Part Number, Description, and Change Level
Production Tooling Complete (PTC)
Advance Quality Planning
Design FMEA
Design Review - Customer Perception targets
Verify deliverables timing to CPCP timing
Volume, ramp-up curve, and product mix verified
and capable - CPV, P.O, SP
Prior PSO Review (similar products)
Error and Mistake Proofing
Production Validation Testing Complete
Control Plan and Process Monitoring
Operating Instructions
Special Characteristics Identified and FPSC
Gage and Test Equipment Evaluation
Incoming & Outgoing Material Certification Plan
Test Sample Sizes and Frequencies
Parts Packaging and Shipment Specifications
Process Flow Diagram & Mfg. Floor Plan
Production Demonstration Run
Process FMEA
Part Delivery Plan Review (for VP, PVP, V1, etc.)
Part Qualification Process (PQP)
Confirm Supplier PPAP Self-Certification status
Use this task to track Fiat
Benestare and matchability
Non-Chrysler Suppliers will
not have this; for Fiat parts,
verify the Suppliers testing
facilities have been
appropriately certified.
Use this task to track Fiat Self-
Qualification and Integrative
testing
Using the AQP Timing Chart form
117
It is strongly recommended that Chrysler personnel tracking Fiat parts
monitor and track the status of all tasks, not just the tasks used in
calculating the Program Review result. A small number of tasks remain
N/A, however.

Tasks on the AQP Timing Chart that are Not Applicable when
managing Fiat Parts:
Part Development Plan Complete
Supplier Quality Risk Assessment (SQRA)
Layered Process Audit
Part Inspection Standard
Please be aware: the Chrysler AQP Status and the Fiat
Program Review status may be different!
Only N/A for Fiat parts
from Non-Chrysler
Suppliers!
Using the AQP Timing Chart form