The document discusses the force theory and evolutionary theory of the origin of the state. The force theory argues that the state originated due to force exerted by the strong over the weak, but it is criticized for justifying despotism and being opposed to individual liberty. The evolutionary theory posits that the state is the product of a slow, steady evolution over a long period of time shaped by factors like kinship, religion, property and defense, force, and political consciousness working together, rather than any single factor alone. This theory is considered more scientific and convincing in explaining the origin of the state.
The document discusses the force theory and evolutionary theory of the origin of the state. The force theory argues that the state originated due to force exerted by the strong over the weak, but it is criticized for justifying despotism and being opposed to individual liberty. The evolutionary theory posits that the state is the product of a slow, steady evolution over a long period of time shaped by factors like kinship, religion, property and defense, force, and political consciousness working together, rather than any single factor alone. This theory is considered more scientific and convincing in explaining the origin of the state.
The document discusses the force theory and evolutionary theory of the origin of the state. The force theory argues that the state originated due to force exerted by the strong over the weak, but it is criticized for justifying despotism and being opposed to individual liberty. The evolutionary theory posits that the state is the product of a slow, steady evolution over a long period of time shaped by factors like kinship, religion, property and defense, force, and political consciousness working together, rather than any single factor alone. This theory is considered more scientific and convincing in explaining the origin of the state.
The document discusses the force theory and evolutionary theory of the origin of the state. The force theory argues that the state originated due to force exerted by the strong over the weak, but it is criticized for justifying despotism and being opposed to individual liberty. The evolutionary theory posits that the state is the product of a slow, steady evolution over a long period of time shaped by factors like kinship, religion, property and defense, force, and political consciousness working together, rather than any single factor alone. This theory is considered more scientific and convincing in explaining the origin of the state.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
FORCE THEORY
According to this theory, the state originated due to force
exerted by the strong over the weak. The idea contained in the statement is that war begat the king. The same view is expressed by Hume, Oppenheim, Jenks-Bernhardy and Trietschke are the exponents of force theory. A number of rulers also believed in this theory. The powerful conquered the weak state is the outcome of the process of aggressive exploitation of the weaker by the stronger. Might without right is antagonist to individual liberty. There were other factors besides force which helped the expansion of the state. Similarly force alone is not the basis of state and it cannot be maintained by force. Criticism Force indeed has played an important part in the origin and development of the state. Some of the greatest empires of today have been established through blood and iron. The theory of force unduly emphasis the principle of the survival of the fittest. It means that might is right and those who are physically weak should go to the wall. It is dangerous to employ such a principle in the internal existence of the state. Every state will be at perpetual war with the rest. This is a condition of chaos, pure and simple endangering the peace and security of the world. The attention and efforts of every state will be directed towards war preparedness and to win the war if it comes. War which is an alias for murder, glorifies brute process, suppressing the moral forces. This is the mean self of man and not his real self. This theory justifies despotism. It is opposed to the idea of freedom. It is too much to believe that the state is created and maintained by sheer force and the spiritual and moral values have absolutely no place in life. The Historical or Evolutionary theory We have so far discussed five theories in explanation of the origin of the state, but no single theory offers an adequate explanation. The theory which explains and is now accepted as a convincing origin of the state, is the Historical or Evolutionary theory. It explains the state is the product of growth, a slow and steady evolution extending over a long period of time and ultimately shaping itself into the complex structure of a modern state. This theory is more scientific. The state is neither the handiwork of God, nor the result of superior physical force, nor the creation of evolution or convention, nor a mere expansion of the family. The state is not a mere artificial mechanical creation but an institution of natural growth or historical evolution says professor Garner. There were a number of factors which helped the evolution of the state. They were kinship, religion, war, migration economic activities and political consciousness. The important factors which contributed to the growth of the state are 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Kinship Kinship is the most important and was based upon blood relationship and kinship was the first strongest bond of unity. Family constituted the first link in the process of the evolution of the state with the expansion of the family arose new families and the multiplication of families led to the formation of clans and tribes. Kinship was the only factor which bound the people together. According to Professor Mac Iver, the magic of names 42 43 Kinship Religion Property and defence Force Political consciousness reinforced the sense of kinship, as the course of generations enlarged the group. The blood bond of sonship changed imperceptibly into the social bond of the wider brotherhood. The authority of the father passes into the power of the chief once more under the aegis of kinship new forms arise which transcend it. Kinship creates society and society at length creates the state. Religion Religion provided the bond of unity in early society. It also affected all walks of life. The worship of a common ancestor and common goods created a sense of social solidarity. There was fear in the hearts of men as far as religion was concerned. Even today we see religious practices, affairs and faith in uniting people. In the early days a number of races are united by religion and unity was essential for the creation of state. Force Force also played an important part in the evolution of the state. It was the use of physical force that was responsible for the growth of kingdoms and empires. Property and Defence Property and depence played a vital role in the evolution of state in ancient times particularly among the people who were nomads and wagabonds and tribals. Prof. Laski has referred to the necessity of acquiring property by the members of society and protecting the property aequired with reference to the population mentioned above. This led to making adjustments in the social system and relationship between the members of different groups. The need to protect property ultimately compelled the ancient people to establish the state. Political consciousness The last is political consciousness arising from the fundamental needs of life for protection and order. When the people settle down on a definite territory in pursuit of their, subsistence and a desire to secure it from encroachment by others. The need for regulating things and persons is felt imminently and this is the essence of political consciousness. Conclusion It follows that many factors helped the growth of the state. No single factor alone was responsible for its origin. Sometimes all and sometimes many of them help the process by which uncivilized society was transformed into a state. Of all the theories which seek to explain the origin of the states, the evolutionary theory is the most satisfactory. It should be noted that no theory pin-points the time at which the state originated as a consequence of many factors working in union at different times. 44 45