Dental Research Journal

Dental Research Journal / March 2014 / Vol 11 / Issue 2

154
Review Article
Periodontio-integrated implants: A revolutionary concept
Minkle Gulati
1
, Vishal Anand
2
, Vivek Govila
1
, Nikil Jain
3
, Pavitra Rastogi
2
, Rohit Bahuguna
4
, Bhargavi Anand
4
,
1
Departments of Periodontics, Babu Banarasi Das College of Dental Sciences, Babu Banarasi Das University,
2
Chhatrapati Shahuji Maharaj Medical
University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh,
3
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem,
Tamil Nadu,
4
Department of Prosthodontics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Medical and Dental Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
ABSTRACT
Though the felds of regenerative dentistry and tissue engineering have undergone signifcant
advancements, yet its application to the feld of implant-dentistry is lacking; in the sense that
presently the implants are being placed with the aim of attaining osseointegration without giving
consideration to the regeneration of periodontium around the implant. The following article
reveals the clinical benefts of such periodontio-integrated implants and reviews the relevant
scientific proofs. A comprehensive research to provide scientific evidence supporting the
feasibility of periodontio-integrated implants was carried out using various online resources such
as PubMed, Wiley-Blackwell, Elsevier etc., to retrieve studies published between 1980 and 2012
using the following key words: implant, tissue engineering, periodontium, osseo-integration,
osseoperception, regeneration (and their synonyms) and it was found that in the past three
decades, several successful experiments have been conducted to devise implant supported by the
periodontium that can maintain form, function and potential proprioceptive responses similar to
a natural tooth. Based on these staunch evidences, the possibility of the future clinical use of such
implant can be strongly stated which would revolutionize the implant dentistry and will be favored
by the patients as well. However, further studies are required to validate the same.
Key Words: Implant, osseointegration, periodontium, tissue engineering
INTRODUCTION
Since, the description of the process of osseointegration
by Brnemark et al., dental implants have become
ideal replacements for missing teeth.
[1]
The term
osseointegration was later defned by Albrektsson
et al.
[2]
as the direct contact between living bone and
implant at the light microscope level. This means that
the implants are functionally ankylosed to the bone
without periodontal ligament support. However, despite
good success rates of osseointegrated oral implants,
failures do occur, which can be attributed to the bone
loss due to excessive occlusal load and/or infection.
[3]

Hence, the focus of implant dentistry has changed from
merely obtaining osseointegration to the preservation
and prevention of peri-implant hard and soft tissue loss.
[4]
Currently, lost teeth are being replaced by implants
made of inert biomaterial, which are directly inserted into
the alveolar bone to achieve osseointegration without
considering the regeneration of periodontium. The
feld of oral and periodontal regenerative medicine has
recently undergone signifcant advancements in restoring
as close as possible the architecture and function of lost
structures. However, to date, there has been a major
disconnection between the principles of periodontal
regeneration and oral implant osseointegration: the
presence of a periodontal ligament to allow for a more
dynamic role beyond the functionally ankylosed implant.
[5]
Therefore, an innovative approach is mandatory to
create periodontio-integrated implants i.e., an implant
suspended in the socket through periodontal ligament
as opposed to functionally ankylosed osseointegrated
Received: September 2012
Accepted: June 2013
Address for correspondence:
Dr. Minkle Gulati,
C/O. Mr. Saranpal Singh
Gulati, 54-L, Model Town,
Karnal, Haryana,
India.
E-mail: mink_gulati@
rediffmail.com
Access this article online
Website: http//:drj.mui.ac.ir
Gulati, et al.: Periodontio-integrated implants
155 Dental Research Journal / March 2014 / Vol 11 / Issue 2 155
implants. The authors of the present study believe that
such advancement would revolutionize implant dentistry
and would be signifcantly benefcial to patients.
PERIODONTIO-INTEGRATED
IMPLANTS VERSUS OSSEOINTEGRATED
IMPLANTS
Localized bone loss around osseointegrated implants
represent a clinical challenge.
[6]
Excessive stress
that accumulate at the crestal region of the implants
leads to bone loss at this region.
[7]
This concentration
of stresses at the crestal region is mainly attributed
to the lack of the periodontal ligament, which is
essential for distributing the forces throughout the
length of the root. Periodontal ligament additionally
dissipates these forces through the compression and
redistribution of its fuid elements, as well as through
its fber system and hence provides shock absorption
and cushioning effect to the teeth in response to these
forces.
[8]
Furthermore, the periodontal ligament has a
sensitive proprioceptive mechanism and is therefore
capable of detecting and responding to a wide range
of forces applied to the teeth. When these forces
are transmitted through the periodontal ligament,
they result in the remodeling of the alveolar bone
to allow tooth movements (as seen in orthodontics)
or in the widening of the periodontal ligament space
leading to an increase in tooth mobility in response
to excessive forces (e.g., occlusal trauma).
[9]
The
osseointegrated dental implants on the other hand,
physiologically differ from natural teeth as they
lack periodontal ligament support and hence when
loaded mechanically, evoke a peculiar sensation,
which has been termed as osseoperception. Hence
the osseointegrated implants not only become a part
of the body but also of the mind and this mental
acceptance named as osseoperception
[10]
has been
described as a kinesthetic oral perception, which is
derived from temporomandibular joint, cutaneous,
muscle, mucosal and periosteal mechanoreceptors
that provides mechanosensory information on oral
kinesthetic sensibility in relation to jaw function
and contacts of artifcial teeth, in the absence of
a functional periodontal mechanoreceptive input.
[11,12]
Furthermore, the passive threshold level of
implants determined by the application of an external
stimulus has been found to be 50 times higher than
that of natural teeth;
[13]
which means that patients
with osseointegrated implants will subjectively feel
tangible sensation only when a force greater than that
required to evoke sensation in natural teeth is applied.
Hence, one of the reasons for the diminished ability
of dental implants to adapt to occlusal trauma can be
attributed to this lack of periodontal proprioceptive
mechanism, which results in microfractures of
the crestal bone and ultimately leads to bone loss.
Moreover, connecting teeth to osseointegrated
implants presents a biomechanical challenge due to
the differential support and mobility provided by the
implant and the tooth and consequently have also
shown a higher rate of failures and complications.
[14]

However, when tooth-implant supported restorations
would be fabricated using support from periodontio-
integrated implants higher success rates can be
expected due to similar resilience of tissues supporting
teeth and implants. Furthermore, considering the use
of osseointegrated implants in growing patients and
the infuence of maxillary and mandibular skeletal and
dental growth on the stability of these implants, it is
recommended to wait for the completion of dental and
skeletal growth
[15]
since, the osseointegrated implants
behave as an ankylosed element and dont follow the
growth and evolution of the jawbones and certainly
not of the alveolar process and hence, may disturb
a normal development of the jawbones, leading
to unesthetic situations, especially in the anterior
region (e.g., resulting in relative infraocclusion
or labioversion).
[16]
Nonetheless, with the provision
of peri-implant tissue remodeling offered by the
periodontio-integrated implants it would not only be
possible to successfully place implants in patients
undergoing craniofacial/skeletal growth process,
but also to move them orthodontically.
[5]
It has been
seen that peri-implant infections progress faster
than the infections around natural teeth. Lindhe et
al.
[17]
demonstrated larger infammatory cell infltrate
and destruction around implants, which extended
more apically when compared with a corresponding
lesion in the gingival tissue around natural teeth.
In addition, the tissues around implants are more
susceptible to plaque-associated infections that spread
into the alveolar bone, primarily due to the lack of
a periodontal ligament, making them more prone
to bone loss. Periodontal ligament by virtue of its
rich vascular supply is a reservoir of defense cells
and undifferentiated mesenchymal cells; hence, the
presence of the periodontal ligament around implants
would not only provide better defensive capacity, but
also enhance repair and regeneration of bone defects
in their vicinity.
[5]
Gulati, et al.: Periodontio-integrated implants
Dental Research Journal / March 2014 / Vol 11 / Issue 2
156
TISSUE ENGINEERING: FOUNDATION
OF PERIODONTIO-INTEGRATED
IMPLANTS
Tissue engineering as defned by Langer and
Vacanti
[18]
is an interdisciplinary feld that applies the
principles of engineering and life sciences for the
development of biological substitutes that restore,
maintain or improve tissue function.
[18]
The main
requirements for producing an engineered tissue are:
The appropriate levels and sequencing of regulatory
signals, the presence and numbers of responsive
progenitor cells, an appropriate extracellular matrix
or carrier construct and an adequate blood supply.
[19]
The discovery of stem cells in periodontal tissue
and the outstanding progress in biomaterial research
has opened up many possibilities for periodontal
regeneration. To achieve successful periodontal
regeneration, it will be necessary to utilize and recruit
progenitor cells that can differentiate into specialized
cells with a regenerative capacity, followed by the
proliferation of these cells and synthesis of the target
specialized connective tissues.
[20]
Because periodontal
ligament-derived cells have multipotential
characteristics, these cells are harvested and utilized
as sources for the regeneration of periodontal
tissues containing bone, cementum and periodontal
ligament.
[21]
Clearly, a tissue-engineering approach
for periodontal regeneration will need to utilize the
regenerative capacity of these cells residing within
the periodontium and would involve the isolation of
such cells and their subsequent proliferation within
a three-dimensional framework. Recent advances
in mesenchymal stem cell isolation, growth factor
biology and biodegradable polymer constructs
have set the stage for successful tissue engineering
of many tissues, of which the periodontium is
considered a prime candidate for such procedures.
[20]
Sonoyama et al.
[22]
demonstrated the possibility
of constructing the entire root/periodontal complex
by inserting a hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate
block coated with periodontal ligament-derived
mesenchymal stromal cells into the tooth sockets
of mini-pigs. Furthermore, to avoid repeated
harvestings of therapeutic cells for each treatment,
successful cryopreservation of the periodontal
ligament derived mesenchymal stromal cells, was
also demonstrated by Seo et al.
[23]
Another possible
option for periodontal ligament regeneration is gene
therapy that comprises the insertion of genes into
an individuals cells in order to promote a specifc
biological effect and requires the use of vectors or
direct delivery methods to transfect the target cells.
[24]
The aim of this review article was to identify and
analyze those studies that investigated the feasibility
of the development of periodontium around an
implant and its functioning in vivo.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To provide the scientifc evidence supporting the
feasibility of periodontio-integrated implants, a
literature search was conducted using various online
resources such as Medline through PubMed, Wiley-
Blackwell, Elsevier, Google scholar etc., to retrieve
studies published between 1980 and 2012 using
the following key words are: implant, tissue
engineering, periodontium, osseointegration,
osseo-perception, regeneration (and their
synonyms). A total of 608 articles were found, out
of which only 17 were considered appropriate to be
included in this review. The results from the studies
that were reviewed are summarized in Table 1
[25-41]
as
well as discussed below.
Evidence based periodontio-integrated implant
dentistry
Extensive research and several experiments have
been carried out to develop periodontal ligament
around an implant, i.e., for the creation of a bio-
root, which would provide ideal conditions for the
implant-supported treatments in future.
[42]
Nyman
et al.
[43]
suggested that the cells of the periodontal
ligament possess the ability to reestablish connective
tissue attachment. Nunez et al.
[44]
have further
validated the regenerative potential of periodontal
ligament-derived cells in a proof of principle study.
Several in vivo experiments have demonstrated
the formation of cementum-like tissue with an
intervening periodontal ligament, when the dental
implants were placed in proximity to tooth roots.
[25,28,31,36]
The mechanism of this phenomenon
appeared to be due to the migration of cementoblast
and periodontal ligament fbroblast precursor cells
towards dental implants due to contact or proximity
of the tooth-related cell populations to those
implants.
[5]
Although partial regeneration of the
periodontium consisting of cementum, periodontal
ligament and alveolar bone, was possible,
application of such methods in patients seemed
impossible due to technical and physical factors.
[42]

Yet, the potential for the clinical implementation of
Gulati, et al.: Periodontio-integrated implants
157 Dental Research Journal / March 2014 / Vol 11 / Issue 2 157
Table 1: Studies demonstrating the feasibility of formation of periodontium around dental implants
Author
and year
Aim Material and method Animal/
human study
Results Conclusion
Buser
et al.
(1990A)
[25]
To determine if
cementum formation
with inserting
collagen fbers can
be accomplished on
dental implants
Titanium implants placed in
the mandible of monkeys, in
areas having retained apical
root portions and later
examined histologically
Animal study Implant surface with
inserting collagen fbers was
achieved around implants
placed in close relationship
to retained roots
Dental implants with a true
PDL can be accomplished
Buser
et al.
(1990b)
[26]
To examine wound
healing events around
titanium implants in the
presence of retained
root tips whose
periodontium could
serve as a source for
cells playing the role in
healing
Hollow cylinder TPS surface
implants placed in the
mandible of monkeys in
areas having retained apical
root portions examined
histologically after a healing
period of 12 months
Animal study Regions where implants
were close to retained roots,
a PDL with collagen fbers
oriented perpendicular
to the implant surface,
inserting into the cementum
on the implant surface as
well as to the opposing
bone was seen
It may be possible to
achieve an anchorage of
certain dental implants with
a periodontium
Caiazza
et al.
(1991)
[27]
To evaluate
experimental PDL for
dental implants
Device made of titanium,
poly (methylmethacrylate)
coated with dacron tissue
implanted in mandibular
bone of rabbits for 3 months
Animal study Dacron flamentous tissue
became incorporated in
the bone at 3 month post-
implantation
Dacron coating provides
a reliable mechanical
anchorage to the implant
and a barrier against
epithelial proliferation and
microbial contamination
Warrer
et al.
(1993)
[28]
To determine if a PDL
can form around the
self-tapping, screw
type titanium dental
implants
Implants inserted in contact
with the PDL of root tips
retained in the mandibular
jaws of 7 monkeys.
Ground sections produced
for histological analysis
3 months after implant
placement
Animal study Neo-cementum deposited
on the implant surface in the
contact area between the
implant and the retained roots,
whereas osseo-integration
was found on the remaining
part of the implant surface
placed without contact to the
retained root tips
PDL can form on self-
tapping, screw type titanium
dental implants in areas
where a void is present
between the surrounding
bone and the implant at the
time of insertion
Takata
et al.
(1994)
[29]
To determine whether
connective tissue
attachment can occur
on implant materials
by repopulating PDL-
derived cells
Bioglass, hydroxyapatite,
titanium alloy and partially
stabilized zirconium
implanted into root cavities
of cat canines where PDL-
derived cells could populate
the surface of the materials
Animal study New connective tissue
attachment occurred on
bioactive materials such as
bioglass and hydroxyapatite,
while little or no cementum
deposition was seen on
bioinert materials such as
titanium alloy and partially
stabilized zirconium
PDL-derived cells can
form new connective
tissue attachments on
implant materials. Yet, it is
infuenced by the bioactivity
of the materials
Piattelli
et al.
(1994
)[30]
To evaluate the
potential of the
different cells of the
forming tooth bud to
induce the formation
of dental hard tissues
and PDL around
titanium implants
Four implants placed in a
pigs mandible near the
tooth buds. A wide artifcial
bone defect created around
one of the implants; all
implants covered with
Gore-Tex membranes.
After 3 months, samples
histologically analyzed
Animal study All implants were covered
by a mineralized tissue with
a histologic appearance
similar to cementum and
separated from the bone
by a periodontal-like space
flled by collagen fbers
Tooth bud cells can induce
formation of dental hard
tissues and PDL around
titanium implants
Urabe
et al.
(2000)
[31]
To assess whether or
not the nature of the
material affects the
migration, proliferation,
and differentiation of
the progenitor cells
for periodontium
formation
The material-specifc
morphogenetic potential of
periodontium-derived cells for
inducing cell migration from
the functioning periodontium
onto bioactive (HA) and
bioinert (TA) material was
histologically evaluated
Animal study Histologically, total
periodontium including
calcifed cementum-like
tissue only formed on HA and
not on TA. Morphometrically,
the length of fbrous
connective tissue formed on
HA was the same as on TA
The bioactivity of the
material does not affect the
migration of periodontium-
derived cells but strongly
infuences cell differentiation
Choi
(2000)
[32]
To investigate whether
a new PDL attachment
can form on titanium
implants
PDL cells obtained from
the teeth of 3 dogs cultured
and attached to the surface
of titanium implants. The
implants placed in the
mandibles of the dogs and
examined histologically
after 3 months
Animal study On some implant surfaces,
a layer of cementum-
like tissue with inserting
collagen fbers had been
achieved
Cultured PDL cells can form
tissue resembling a true
PDL around implants
(Continued )
Gulati, et al.: Periodontio-integrated implants
Dental Research Journal / March 2014 / Vol 11 / Issue 2
158
Table 1: Studies demonstrating the feasibility of formation of periodontium around dental implants (Continued)
Author
and year
Aim Material and Method Animal/
human study
Results Conclusion
Guarnieri
et al.
(2000)
[33]
To evaluate
histologically the
characteristics of
the tissue present
between a titanium
implant and a retained
root
Implant positioned in
contact with root residue of
a mandibular right canine,
lost because of trauma in
a 40-year-old man. The
implant as well as retained
root fragment extracted
after 1 year as a result of
peri-implantitis examined
under the microscope
Human study*
(case-report)
A continuous layer of
cementum adhering to the
implant and innumerable
cementocytes, with a clear
demarcation between dentin
and cementum apposition
on the implant surface was
seen
Further studies are required
to establish whether the
neoformation of cementum
and collagen fbers on an
implant in the presence
of root residues occurs in
humans
Akira et al.
(2005)
[34]
To observe the effect
of remaining PDL
on the healing of the
implant placement
Titanium implants placed
into the tooth socket of
Wistar rats with adhering
PDL after extraction. At 7,
14, 21 and 28 days after
implantation rats perfused
with 4% paraformaldehyde
solution
Animal study Mechanical strength of
the peri-implant ligament
increased markedly from
14 to 28 days. Cementum-
like hard tissues formed on
the surface of the titanium
implants along with many
collagen fber bundles
between the cementum-like
tissues and alveolar bone at
21 and 28 days
Placement of an implant
into a socket with PDL leads
to the formation of new
cementum with functionally
oriented collagen bundles
and development of
adequate mechanical
strength
Parlar
et al.
(2005)
[35]
To explore the
formation of
periodontal tissues
around titanium
implants
Custom-made, titanium
implant with TPS and
SLA surfaces placed in
9 mongrel dogs. Each
implant submerged into the
center of a dentin chamber
prepared by hollowing roots
and then slitting the cavity
wall to create passages
from the chamber to the
PDL area. Histological
sections analyzed after
4 months
Animal study Newly formed PDL, alveolar
bone, and root cementum
flled the space between
the implant and the wall
of the chamber. Cellular
cementum was deposited
on one TPS and one SLA
implant and on the dentinal
walls of the chamber
Maintenance of original
periodontal tissue domains
prevevnt osseo-integration
of the implants and show
remarkable capacity for new
periodontal tissue formation
at a site where no such
tissues ever existed
Jahangiri
et al.
(2005)
[36]
To investigate the
feasibility of PDL
generation on an
implant surface
Orthodontic tooth
movement initiated for
4-6 weeks to tip the
first premolar roots
into contact with HA
coated titanium implant
placed in the extraction
sites of 6 beagle dogs.
Tooth-to-implant contact
maintained for further 6
weeks and then separated
for 2 weeks. Histological
samples prepared and
subjected to polarized light
microscopy
Animal study Formation of PDL-like
structure with the formation
of cellular cementum on the
implant surfaces, in 4 out of
6 animals
Tooth-to-implant contact
leads to partial generation of
PDL on a bioactive implant
surface
Marei
et al.
(2009)
[37]
To achieve
experimental
formation of
periodontal structure
around titanium
implants utilizing bone
marrow mesenchymal
stem cells
After canine teeth
extraction, immediate
implant placed in 5 goats.
Control site: Implant
with poly DL-Lactide-co-
Glycolide scaffold around
the titanium fxture. Test
site: Implant with same
scaffold but seeded with
autogenous bone marrow-
derived mesenchymal stem
cells. One animal killed 10
days post-operatively and
the others killed after 1
month
Animal study Control site: Early signs
of connective tissue
regeneration around the
implant at 10 days, but
not shown in the 1 month
specimens. Test site:
Periodontal-like tissue
with newly formed bone
demonstrated both at 10
days and after 1 month
Undifferentiated
mesenchymal stem cells are
capable of differentiating to
form cementum, bone and
PDL
(Continued )
Gulati, et al.: Periodontio-integrated implants
159 Dental Research Journal / March 2014 / Vol 11 / Issue 2 159
Table 1: Studies demonstrating the feasibility of formation of periodontium around dental implants (Continued)
Author
and year
Aim Material and Method Animal/
human study
Results Conclusion
Gault et al.
(2010)
[38]
To describe the
technical development
and the clinical
application of so-
called ligaplants,
the combination of
PDL cells with implant
biomaterial
Cells isolated from PDL
and cultured in a bioreactor
on titanium pins and then
implanted in enlarged
dental alveolae in dogs for
55-73 days as well as in
humans
Animal and
Human study*
Dog model: Histological
examination revealed
cells arranged in a typical
ligament-like fashion.
Human patients: Product
safety was ascertained
for 6-60 months. Probing
and motility of the implants
were well integrated with
mechanical properties
similar to those of teeth.
Radiographs demonstrated
the regeneration of
defcient alveolar bone, the
development of a lamina
dura adjacent to a mineral-
devoid space around
the implant and implant
migration in an intact bone
structure
Ligament-anchored
implants, have potential
advantages over osseo-
integrated oral implants
Rinaldi
and
Arana-
Chavez
(2010)
[39]
To describe the
ultrastructure of the
interface between
periodontal tissues
and titanium mini-
implants
Titanium mini-implant
placed between the buccal
roots of the mandibular
frst molar of 24 adult rats.
Ultrastructural analysis
done after 21, 30, 45,
60, 90, and 120 days of
implantation
Animal study Thin cementum-like layer
formed at longer times after
implantation at the areas
in which the PDL was in
contact with the implant
Titanium surface through its
well-known biocompatibility
exerts an effect on the
periodontal ligament to lay
down a cementum-like layer
on the implant surface
Lin et al.
(2011)
[40]
To validate the
possibility of formation
of bioengineered
periodontal tissue
on titanium dental
implants
Test site: PDL derived
autologous DPCs seeded
implants placed in the molar
region of the rat model.
Control site: Non-cell-
seeded implants placed in
the molar region of the rat
model
Animal study Test site: PDL-like
structures containing
condensed collagen fbers
were apparent in 8-12,
and 18-week specimens,
although bioengineered
cementum-like tissue was
observed in only 10%
specimen. Control site: After
8, 12, and 18 weeks, well-
vascularized granulation
tissue formed at new bone-
implant interface
Suggested the potential
to replace missing teeth in
humans with dental implants
augmented with autologous
cell-derived bioengineered
periodontal tissues
Kano et al.
(2012)
[41]
To evaluate the
effects of HA coating
and occlusion on the
regeneration of PDL
around tooth-shaped
titanium implants
HA/OCL, HA+/OCL,
and HA+/OCL+ immediately
implanted into extracted
tooth sockets with
remaining PDL of rat molar
model and the regeneration
of PDL examined
histomorphometrically and
histologically
Animal study HA/OCL implant
interface: Mobility M0-M2,
peri-implant radiolucency,
bony attachment and/or soft
tissue running parallel to
implant surface. HA+/OCL
Implant interface: Direct
bony attachments found.
HA+/OCL+ implant surface:
Soft peri-implant tissue
seen between the implant
and surrounding alveolar
bones which exhibited
alkaline phosphatase with
a distribution and activity
similar to those of the PDL.
Collagen fber bundles were
found functionally oriented
in some regions of the peri-
implant tissue
The remaining PDL tissue
around extracted sockets
has the ability to regenerate
bone and PDL-like tissues
on HA-coated tooth-shaped
implants. Occlusal loads to
the HA-coated implants may
induce regeneration of PDL-
like tissue in the peri-implant
tissue
*Human study. TPS: Titanium plasma sprayed, SLA: Sand blasted with large grit and acid attacked, HA: Hydroxyapatite, TA: Titanium alloy, DPCs:
Dental progenitor cells, HA/OCL: Non-HA-coated without occlusion, HA+/OCL: HA-coated without occlusion, HA+/OCL+: HA-coated with occlusion,
PDL: Periodontal ligament
Gulati, et al.: Periodontio-integrated implants
Dental Research Journal / March 2014 / Vol 11 / Issue 2
160
customized periodontal biomimetic hybrid scaffolds
for engineering human tooth-ligament interfaces has
been demonstrated by Park et al.
[45]
There is indeed a
growing body of evidence validating the signifcant
potential of the in vivo formation of ligamentous
attachments to the biomaterials. Takata et al.,
[29]
in
an animal study examined whether connective tissue
attachment could occur on implant materials by
repopulating periodontal ligament derived cells and
found that while new connective tissue attachment
occurred on bioactive materials such as bioglass and
hydroxyapatite, little or no cementum deposition was
seen on bioinert materials such as titanium alloy and
partially stabilized zirconium, i.e., the formation of
new connective tissue attachment was infuenced by
bioactivity of the materials. Choi,
[32]
placed implants
with the cultured autologous periodontal ligament
cells in the mandibles of the dogs and histologically
revealed that after 3 months of healing, a layer
of cementum-like tissue with inserting collagen
fbers had been achieved on some implant surfaces,
demonstrating that cultured periodontal ligament
cells can form tissue resembling a true periodontal
ligament around implants. In 2005, researchers also
explored the formation of periodontal tissues around
titanium implants using a novel dentin chamber
model, which demonstrated newly formed periodontal
ligament, alveolar bone and root cementum, flling
the space between the implant and the wall of the
chamber. This study displayed a remarkable capacity
for new periodontal tissue formation at a site where
no such tissues ever existed.
[35]
In a yet another
study, implantation of titanium fxture with porous
hollow root-form poly (DL-Lactide-co-Glycolide)
scaffold seeded with autogenous bone marrow-
derived mesenchymal stem cells in goats exhibited
periodontium-like tissue with newly formed bone
both at 10 days and after 1 month, substantiating
that undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells were
capable of differentiating to provide the three critical
tissues required for periodontal tissue regeneration:
Cementum, bone and periodontal ligament around
the titanium implants.
[37]
The cellular seeding
methodology utilizing bioreactors to culture and
maintain the stemness of these cells during the in
vitro culture period before transplantation has allowed
for a spatial distribution of cells over the surfaces
of the prototype implant devices to eventually
form the ligamentous constructs.
[5]
However, it
was a scientifc breakthrough when Gault et al.
[38]

demonstrated for the frst time the tissue engineering
of the periodontal ligament and cementum-like
structures on oral implants in humans, to promote the
formation of implant-ligament biological interfaces
or ligaplants capable of true, functional loading. One
of the interesting facts in the Gault research-work
was that periodontal ligament fbroblasts could be
harvested from hopeless teeth of mature individuals
and cultured in bioreactors to preserve their state of
differentiation. Out of the eight implants inserted,
one implant was still in place and functioning even
after 5 years and even exhibited substantial bone
regeneration in the adjacent bone defect 2 years after
implantation. This implies that future clinical use of
ligaplants might also be able to avoid bone grafting,
its expense, inconvenience and discomfort to the
patient.
[38]
Lately, Kano et al.
[41]
have suggested that
implants surrounded by periodontal ligament-like
tissue could be developed, when immediately after
the extraction, tooth-shaped hydroxyl-apatite coated
titanium implants were placed into the tooth socket
where some periodontal ligament still remained;
maintenance of original periodontal tissue domains
most likely being the cause of prevention of
osseointegration of the implants.
[41]
CONCLUSION
Although it has been revealed that generating a
periodontal-like tissue around implants is possible,
still a predictable and feasible method for producing
dental implants with periodontal-like ligament has not
been innovated. A major concern being the rational
application of stem cell based tissue-engineering
technology in clinical practice. Besides, the costs
and time required from a practical standpoint for
such tissue engineering applications is signifcant.
Yet, this revolutionary approach to develop
periodontio-integrated implants; however, opens
up exciting possibilities for both periodontologists
and oral implantologists and offers many interesting
possibilities of utilizing ready-made, off-the-shelf
biological tooth replacements that could be delivered
to serve as hybrid-material-living oral implants.
[5]
REFERENCES
1. Brnemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrm
J, Halln O, et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants in the
treatment of the edentulous jaw. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg
1997;11 Suppl 16:1-175.
2. Albrektsson T, Brnemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrm J.
Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring
Gulati, et al.: Periodontio-integrated implants
161 Dental Research Journal / March 2014 / Vol 11 / Issue 2 161
a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta
Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70.
3. Esposito M, Thomsen P, Ericson LE, Sennerby L, Lekholm U.
Histopathologic observations on late oral implant failures. Clin
Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:18-32.
4. Kurtzman GH, Silverstein LH. Dental implants: Oral hygiene
and maintenance. Implant Dent Today 2007;1(3):48-53.
5. Giannobile WV. Getting to the root of dental implant tissue
engineering. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:747-9.
6. Sennerby L, Rocci A, Becker W, Jonsson L, Johansson LA,
Albrektsson T. Short-term clinical results of Nobel Direct
implants: A retrospective multicentre analysis. Clin Oral Implants
Res 2008;19:219-26.
7. Misch CE. Stress treatment theorem for implant dentistry. In:
Misch CE, editor. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 3
rd
ed. India:
Mosby, Elsevier; 2007. p. 68-91.
8. Carranza FA, Bernard GW. The tooth-supporting structures. In:
Newman MG, editor. Carranzas Clinical Periodontology. 10
th

ed. India: Saunders; 2006. p. 36-57.
9. Palmer R. Teeth and implants. Br Dent J 1999;187:183-8.
10. Associated Branemark Osseointegration Centers. Available at:
http://www.branemark.com/Osseointegration.html [Cited June
20 2013].
11. Klineberg I, Murray G. Osseoperception: Sensory function and
proprioception. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:120-9.
12. Klineberg I, Calford MB, Dreher B, Henry P, Macefeld V, Miles
T, et al. A consensus statement on osseoperception. Clin Exp
Pharmacol Physiol 2005;32:145-6.
13. Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. Comparison between implant-
supported prostheses and teeth regarding passive threshold level.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:549-54.
14. Hita-Carrillo C, Hernndez-Aliaga M, Calvo-Guirado JL. Tooth-
implant connection: A bibliographic review. Med Oral Patol Oral
Cir Bucal 2010;15:e387-94.
15. Percinoto C, Vieira AE, Barbieri CM, Melhado FL, Moreira
KS. Use of dental implants in children: A literature review.
Quintessence Int 2001;32:381-3.
16. Op Heij DG, Opdebeeck H, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M.
Age as compromising factor for implant insertion. Periodontol
2000 2003;33:172-84.
17. Lindhe J, Berglundh T, Ericsson I, Liljenberg B, Marinello C.
Experimental breakdown of peri-implant and periodontal tissues.
A study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:9-16.
18. Langer R, Vacant i JP. Ti ssue engi neeri ng. Sci ence
1993;260:920-6.
19. Slavkin HC, Bartold PM. Challenges and potential in tissue
engineering. Periodontol 2000 2006;41:9-15.
20. Bartold PM, Xiao Y, Lyngstaadas SP, Paine ML, Snead
ML. Principles and applications of cell delivery systems for
periodontal regeneration. Periodontol 2000 2006;41:123-35.
21. Ishikawa I, Iwata T, Washio K, Okano T, Nagasawa T, Iwasaki
K, et al. Cell sheet engineering and other novel cell-based
approaches to periodontal regeneration. Periodontol 2000
2009;51:220-38.
22. Sonoyama W, Liu Y, Fang D, Yamaza T, Seo BM, Zhang C, et al.
Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated functional tooth regeneration
in swine. PLoS One 2006;1:e79.
23. Seo BM, Miura M, Sonoyama W, Coppe C, Stanyon R, Shi S.
Recovery of stem cells from cryopreserved periodontal ligament.
J Dent Res 2005;84:907-12.
24. Intini G. Future approaches in periodontal regeneration: Gene
therapy, stem cells, and RNA interference. Dent Clin North Am
2010;54:141-55.
25. Buser D, Warrer K, Karring T, Stich H. Titanium implants with
a true periodontal ligament: An alternative to osseointegrated
implants? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:113-6.
26. Buser D, Warrer K, Karring T. Formation of a periodontal
l i gament ar ound t i t ani um i mpl ant s. J Per i odont ol
1990;61:597-601.
27. Caiazza S, Taruscio D, Ciaralli F, Crateri P, Chistolini P, Bedini
R, et al. Evaluation of an experimental periodontal ligament for
dental implants. Biomaterials 1991;12:474-8.
28. Warrer K, Karring T, Gotfredsen K. Periodontal ligament
formation around different types of dental titanium implants.
I. The self-tapping screw type implant system. J Periodontol
1993;64:29-34.
29. Takata T, Katauchi K, Akagawa Y, Nikai H. New connective
tissue attachment formation on various biomaterials implanted
in roots. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:77-84.
30. Piattelli A, Cordioli GP, Passi P, Trisi P. Formation of dental hard
tissues and periodontal ligament around titanium implants after
tooth-bud injury: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants
1994;9:417-21.
31. Urabe M, Hosokawa R, Chiba D, Sato Y, Akagawa Y.
Morphogenetic behavior of periodontium on inorganic implant
materials: An experimental study of canines. J Biomed Mater
Res 2000;49:17-24.
32. Choi BH. Periodontal ligament formation around titanium
implants using cultured periodontal ligament cells: A pilot study.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:193-6.
33. Guarnieri R, Giardino L, Crespi R, Romagnoli R. Cementum
formation around a titanium implant: A case report. Int J Oral
Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:729-32.
34. Akira M, Koichiro K, Akemi S, Yuji K, Shinji S, Shunji F, et al.
Effect of remaining periodontal ligament on the healing-up of
the implant placement. J Hard Tissue Biol 2005;14:198-200.
35. Parlar A, Bosshardt DD, Unsal B, Cetiner D, Hayta C, Lang
NP. New formation of periodontal tissues around titanium
implants in a novel dentin chamber model. Clin Oral Implants
Res 2005;16:259-67.
36. Jahangiri L, Hessamfar R, Ricci JL. Partial generation of
periodontal ligament on endosseous dental implants in dogs.
Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:396-401.
37. Marei MK, Saad MM, El-Ashwah AM, Ei-Backly RM,
Al-Khodary MA. Experimental formation of periodontal
structure around titanium implants utilizing bone marrow
mesenchymal stem cells: A pilot study. J Oral Implantol
2009;35:106-29.
38. Gault P, Black A, Romette JL, Fuente F, Schroeder K, Thillou F,
et al. Tissue-engineered ligament: Implant constructs for tooth
replacement. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:750-8.
39. Rinaldi JC, Arana-Chavez VE. Ultrastructure of the interface
between periodontal tissues and titanium mini-implants. Angle
Orthod 2010;80:459-65.
Gulati, et al.: Periodontio-integrated implants
Dental Research Journal / March 2014 / Vol 11 / Issue 2
162
40. Lin Y, Gallucci GO, Buser D, Bosshardt D, Belser UC, Yelick
PC. Bioengineered periodontal tissue formed on titanium dental
implants. J Dent Res 2011;90:251-6.
41. Kano T, Yamamoto R, Miyashita A, Komatsu K, Hayakawa T, Sato
M, et al. Regeneration of periodontal ligament for apatite-coated
tooth-shaped titanium implants with and without occlusion using
rat molar model. J Hard Tissue Biol 2012;21:189-202.
42. Ramazanoglu M, Oshida Y (2011). Osseointegration and
Bioscience of Implant Surfaces - Current Concepts at Bone-
Implant Interface, Implant Dentistry A Rapidly Evolving
Practice, Prof. Ilser Turkyilmaz (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-307-658-
4, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/16936. Available from: http://www.
intechopen.com/books/implant-dentistry-a-rapidly-evolving-
practice/osseointegration-and-bioscience-of-implant-surfaces-
current-concepts-at-bone-implant-interface
43. Nyman S, Gottlow J, Karring T, Lindhe J. The regenerative
potential of the periodontal ligament. An experimental study in
the monkey. J Clin Periodontol 1982;9:257-65.
44. Nuez J, Sanz-Blasco S, Vignoletti F, Muoz F, Arzate
H, Villalobos C, et al. Periodontal regeneration following
implantation of cementum and periodontal ligament-derived
cells. J Periodontal Res 2012;47:33-44.
45. Park CH, Rios HF, Jin Q, Bland ME, Flanagan CL, Hollister
SJ, et al. Biomimetic hybrid scaffolds for engineering human
tooth-ligament interfaces. Biomaterials 2010;31:5945-52.
How to cite this article: Gulati M, Anand V, Govila V, Jain N, Rastogi P,
Bahuguna R, et al. Periodontio-integrated implants: A revolutionary
concept. Dent Res J 2014;11:154-62.
Source of Support: Nil. Confict of Interest: None declared.