A Portion of The Medical Practice Act Section
A Portion of The Medical Practice Act Section
A Portion of The Medical Practice Act Section
need to know what these criteria are, get copy; it is probably done in private, but we need
to know if there is a formal decision written decision that explains why they think it is not
baseless or not -Rene Umali 7/3/09 7:27 AM
(there was no new event; there were no facts; I received no notice of any facts or
conduct alleged to warrant suspension) -ShirleyPigottMD 7/3/09 9:43 AM SP
(2) the license holder is given an opportunity to show compliance with all
requirements of law for the retention of the license, at the license holder’s option,
either in writing or through personal appearance at an informal meeting with one or
more representatives of the board.
(b) If the license holder chooses to personally appear and an informal meeting is held,
the board’s staff and the board’s representatives are subject to the ex parte provisions
of Chapter 2001, Government Code, with regard to contacts with board members and
administrative law judges concerning the case.(I think that "Chapter 2001, Government
Code" has been supplanted with "Administrative Procedure Act"; however I cannot find
anything about ex parte provisions. This is important in my case because all three
members of the TMB's Disciplinary Panel listened to my 10 minute litany of Mari
Robinson's crimes on February 6, 2009)
-Greg Abbott, attorney general for Texas, SP knows him minimally; SP wants to get him
to review, give opinion, - Rene Umali 7/3/09 7:46 AM
This is analogous to a "probable cause affidavit" in criminal law. The fact that the analogy
is made might make it feasible to use "the rights of the accused in criminal prosecutions"
clause in the US Constitution: to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to
be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining
witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
1) this formal complaint this is the "allegations" that is formallly sent to the doctor, 2)
assuming that it is analagous to a"probably cause affidavit", medical board actions are
still not under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system but under the Texas APA,
so you need to know what the APA says is the "due process" for actions by the medical
board; in California the Cal APA clearly states that civil code of procedures does not apply!
The federal government has allowed free reign for states to deviate from civil rules of
procedure in administrative hearings. Why? -Rene Umali 7/16/09 7:08 AM
(b) Unless otherwise specified, a proceeding under this subtitle or other applicable law
and a charge against a license holder may be instituted by an authorized representative
of the board.
(c) A charge must be in the form of a written affidavit that: This is what we need! TMB
should keep those affidavits on file and make them subject to review by the legislative
oversight committees
(1) is filed with the board’s records custodian or assistant records custodian; and I
want to see the affidavit and the complaint filed against me which precipitated my
license suspension; there wasn't one!
(2) details the nature of the charge as required by this subtitle or other applicable
law.There wasn't any charge!
(d) The board president or a designee shall ensure a copy of the charges is served on the
respondent or the respondent’s counsel of record.Please ask to see whatever they claim
is the "charge"
(e) The president or designee shall notify the State Office of Administrative Hearings
of a formal complaint.
(f) A formal complaint must allege with reasonable certainty each specific act relied on
by the board to constitute a violation of a specific statute or rule. The formal complaint
must be specific enough to:
(1) enable a person of common understanding to know what is meant by the
formal complaint; and
(2) give the person who is the subject of the formal complaint notice of each
particular act alleged to be a violation of a specific statute or rule.
(g) The board shall adopt rules to promote discovery by each party to a contested
case.