CLASSROOM INTERACTION AND

COMUNICATION STRATEGIES IN LEARNING

ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN
MATEJA DAGARIN

STUDIES
IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE
AND LITERATURE IN SLOVENIA
Editors: SMILJANA KOMAR and URO MOZETI
Slovensko drutvo za angleke tudije
Slovene Association For Te Study Of English
ISSN 1581-8918
nglish
anguage
verseas
erspectives and
nquiries
ii1
ELOPE
English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries:
STUDIES IN THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE IN SLOVENIA
Volume I/1-2
Editors
Smiljana Komar
Uro Mozeti
Editorial Board
Duan Gabrovek
Meta Grosman
Darja Hribar
Victor Kennedy
Milena Milojevi Sheppard
Janez Skela
Rastislav utari
Editorial Secretary
Gaper Ilc
Proofreading
Jason Blake
Editorial Policy
ELOPE. English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries is a journal devoted to the research and
academic discussion of linguistic and literary issues from theoretical and applied perspectives regardless
of school of thought or methodology. Its aim is to promote original enquiry into linguistics, literary and
translation studies, language and literature teaching with the main focus on English. ELOPE will publish
two issues per year.
Publishers address
Slovensko drutvo za angleke tudije, Akereva 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana
Design
Gaper Mrak
Cover
Marjan Poganik, Zimsko cvetje, 1994
7,6 x 10,0 cm; colour etching, deep relief
Owner: National gallery, Ljubljana
Photo: Bojan Salaj, National gallery, Ljubljana
Printed by
Birograka Bori, Ljubljana
Number of copies
300
Ljubljana, 2004
ISSN 1581-8918
JiI |N0|l8H |AN0UA0| AN0 |lJ|HAJUH| J|A0HlN0
Ma|e[a 0aar|a
U.|.e.s||, c| |,.||,+.+
|+c.||, c| |c.c+||c.
0|ass|cc lale|acl|ca aaa 0caa|cal|ca 8l|ale|es
|a |ea|a|a |a||s| as a |c|e|a |aaaae
Summary
Te article focuses on the development of interaction in a foreign language classroom.
Teachers can help students to develop their interaction skills and students themselves can
apply various strategies to become eective communicators in a foreign language. Firstly,
dierent teacher and student roles are presented. Secondly, dierent classroom organisation
types for encouraging interaction among dierent participants in the classroom are
described. Next, Flanders Interaction Analysis Categories (FIAC) and Byrnes model for
classroom interaction are given as two models upon which to analyse classroom interaction
and plan activities for developing it. In the nal part some communication strategies are
described and exemplied in detail. If all the techniques and strategies are put into practice,
one can expect an improvement in classroom interaction and furthermore in everyday-life
situations when students communicate with foreign speakers.
Ha/|eaaa |ale|a|c|ja |a |caa||ac|js|e sl|ale|je
p|| aceaja aa|esc|ae |cl lajea je/||a
Povzetek
Prispevek se osredotoi na razvijanje razredne interakcije pri uenju angleine kot tujega
jezika. Na razvoj interakcijskih spretnosti lahko vplivajo uitelji, prav tako pa lahko uenci
sami uporabijo razline strategije, ki so jim v pomo pri govoru v tujem jeziku. Na zaetku
prispevka predstavim raznolike vloge uitelja in uencev v tujejezikovnem razredu. Nato
opiem une oblike, ki spodbujajo interakcijo med udeleenci v unem procesu. Kasneje
predstavim dva modela za analiziranje razredne interakcije in za ustvarjanje dejavnosti,
ki spodbujajo sporazumevanje v razredu; model Flandersovih kategorij interakcijske
analize in Byrnov model razredne interakcije. V zakljunem delu so prikazane nekatere
komunikacijske strategije, s katerimi si uenci pomagajo pri sporazumevanju v tujem
jeziku. e pri pouevanju uporabljamo omenjene tehnike in strategije, lahko priakujemo
uinkovitejo komunikacijo v razredu in v ivljenjskih situacijah, v katerih se bodo uenci
sporazumevali v tujem jeziku.
Ji |+|e,+ |++.|. 0/-.. |/e-./. -! 0...-/. S/-/ee /e- /// - - /.e /-.-e
0|ass|cc lale|acl|ca aaa 0caa|cal|ca 8l|ale|es
|a |ea|a|a |a||s| as a |c|e|a |aaaae
Language learning evolves out of learning how to carry on conversations.
(Hatch)
J. |a|rt1at||ta
Eective classroom interaction has two implications. Te rst one concerns a pleasant
atmosphere in the classroom with friendly relationships among the participants of the
learning process. Te second one, which is mostly described in the article, encourages students
to become eective communicators in a foreign language. Tis can be achieved through
various ways: by implementing dierent student and teacher roles, by exposing students to
a varied classroom organisation, by employing a variety of activities, by helping students to
express themselves and by encouraging their use of communication strategies. If the two
implications are joined, we get a pleasant classroom atmosphere in which students are trying
to communicate in the foreign language.
i. ||tttrttm |a|trtt||ta
Te Cambridge International Dictionary of English denes the verb to interact as to
communicate with or react to (each other). Te New Oxford Dictionary of English denes the
noun interaction as a reciprocal action or inuence. Terefore interaction is more than action
followed by reaction. It includes acting reciprocally, acting upon each other. Rivers (1987, 57)
describes the word through its Latin roots: agere meaning to do and inter meaning among.
It shows us the active and social part of a human being that aects other people through
interaction. Brown (2001, 165) relates interaction to communication, saying, interaction
is, in fact, the heart of communication: it is what communication is all about.
Interaction has a similar meaning in the classroom. We might dene classroom interaction as
a two-way process between the participants in the learning process. Te teacher inuences the
learners and vice versa.
Interaction can proceed harmoniously or it can be fraught with tension. Malamah-Tomas
(1987, 8) states that every interaction situation has the potential for co-operation or conict.
How the situation actually develops depends on the attitudes and intentions of the people
Teacher Students



Jil |N0|l8H |AN0UA0| AN0 |lJ|HAJUH| J|A0HlN0
involved, and on their interpretations of each others attitudes and intentions. Needless to say,
only when there is co-operation between both sides can communication eectively take place
and learning occur.
Communication is usually undertaken for a purpose. A person has a reason for transmitting
a message to someone else. Nolasco and Arthur (1987, 5) explain some other purposes of
conversation, i.e. the creation and maintenance of social relationships, the negotiation of status
and social roles, as well as deciding on and carrying out joint actions. Te same happens in a
classroom situation; people are gathered there for the purpose of learning. Besides that, people
have other reasons for communicating in the classroom. Since the classroom is a community
of some kind, there is the need to establish and maintain personal relationships. Te teacher
has to establish a rapport with the class, with its individuals, and individual students form
dierent sorts of relationships with the group and with the teacher.
Interaction is mainly achieved by two means of resources: language and non-verbal means of
expression. Non-verbal resources play just as important a part as language does. Tis holds true
for a classroom as well as for other social situations. Te one thing that makes the classroom
dierent from any other social situation is that it has a primary pedagogic purpose. Teachers
spend a lot of time talking, lecturing, asking questions, giving instructions, and so on. Te
teacher does not only use language for these functions, but he or she demonstrates and uses
mime a lot.
l. |tr||t|(ta|t |a ||tttrttm |a|trtt||ta
Tese are the most frequent ways of organising classroom interaction, depending on who
communicates with whom:
a) Teacher learners
b) Teacher learner/a group of learners
c) Learner learner
d) Learners learners
Te rst form of interaction (teacher learners) is established when a teacher talks to the whole
class at the same time. He takes the role of a leader or controller and decides about the type
and process of the activity. Te primary function of such interaction is controlled practising of
certain language structures or vocabulary. Mostly, they are in the form of repeating structures
after the teacher (the model). Tis type of practice is also referred to as a drill.
Te second arrangement is conducted when the teacher refers to the whole class, but expects
only one student or a group of students to answer. It is often used for evaluation of individual
students. Tis arrangement can also be used for an informal conversation at the beginning of
the lesson or for leading students into a less guided activity.
Jl |+|e,+ |++.|. 0/-.. |/e-./. -! 0...-/. S/-/ee /e- /// - - /.e /-.-e
Te third type of interaction is called pair work. Students get an assignment, which they have
to nish in pairs. Te teacher holds the role of a consultant or adviser, helping when necessary.
After the activity, he puts the pairs into a whole group and each pair reports on their work.
Te last type of classroom interaction is called group work. As with pair work, the teachers
function here is that of a consultant and individual groups report on their work as a follow-up
activity.
Te last two ways of organisation are particularly useful for encouraging interaction among
students. In large classes, they present the only possibility for as many students as possible
to use the foreign language. Te research has shown (Long et al. 1976 in Nunan 1991, 51)
that students use more language functions in pair- and group-work than in other forms of
interaction. It has also been proven that students perceive them as the most pleasant ways of
learning, because they feel relaxed and subsequently communicate better (Phillips 1983 in
Hatch 1992, 93). Such work encourages independent learning and gives some responsibility
for learning to students. It approaches real-life communication where students talk to their
peers in small groups or pairs. Nevertheless, whole-class organisation should not be completely
neglected since it is still more appropriate for guided and controlled activities.
1. I|t |t|t l| I|t Ittt|tr |a ||tttrttm |a|trtt||ta
In a traditional classroom the teacher had the dominant role of an all-knowing leader who
lled students empty heads with knowledge. Tis role has changed and the teacher has now
got many roles depending on dierent classroom situations. In a broad sense, he is a facilitator
of learning, which includes the following (Littlewood 1981, 92):
A general overseer of learning, who coordinates the activities so that they form a coherent
progression from lesser to greater communicative ability.
A classroom manager, who is responsible for grouping activities into lessons and for their
overall organisation.
A language instructor, who presents new language, controls, evaluates and corrects
learners performance.
In free communicative activities he will act as a consultant or adviser, helping where
necessary. He may move around the classroom and monitor students progress, strengths
and weaknesses.
Sometimes he will participate in an activity as a co-communicator with the learners. He
may encourage learners without taking their main role.
Tese roles are frequently interrelated and some others (e.g. assessor, observer as explained
in Harmer 2001) could be added. Te roles of a consultant or co-communicator encourage
classroom interaction most, but they need the support of other roles (e.g. for organising and
controlling activities).
JlJ |N0|l8H |AN0UA0| AN0 |lJ|HAJUH| J|A0HlN0
. |a|trtt||ta kat|t|t
Interaction analysis shares characteristics both with discourse and conversation analysis. Some
authors (e.g. Hatch 1992) classify interaction and conversation analysis under the term of
discourse analysis, whereas others dene them separately. Nunan (1992, 161) designed a
scheme with their major dierences:
!+||e 1 0|+/+c|e/|s||cs c| c|scco/se, cc/ie/s+||c/ +/c |/|e/+c||c/ +/+|,s|s (/o/+/ 1992, 11)
Interaction analysis deals with elicited and natural samples of language, but not with the
invented ones. Unlike discourse analysis, interaction analysis is concerned exclusively with
spoken language. Furthermore, a discourse analyst brings to the analytical task a predetermined
set of categories, whereas interaction analysts prefer a discursive, interpretive type of analysis.
Te nal distinction among categories is the focus of analysis. In interaction analysis it is
carried out in linguistic and non-linguistic terms. Tus the interaction analysts examine
rhetorical and social routines realised in speech.
Flanders (1970 in Malamah-Tomas 1987, 201) established ten Interaction Analysis
Categories (FIAC) to describe the teaching and learning processes according to the classroom
language. Tese are as follows (ibid.):
Teacher talk
a) Accepts feeling: Feelings may be positive or negative and their prediction and recalling
are included.
b) Praises or encourages: Tis includes telling jokes, nodding head or using phrases like Go on.
c) Accepts or uses ideas of pupils: Te teacher claries or develops students ideas.
d) Asks questions: Questions may be about content or procedure.
e) Lectures: Gives facts or opinions about content or procedure.
f) Gives directions, commands or orders.
g) Criticizes or justies authority: E.g. statements intended to change pupils behaviour.
Discourse analysis

Conversation analysis Interaction analysis
Method of generating
data
Invented
Elicited
Naturalistic

Naturalistic Elicited
Naturalistic
Mode Spoken
Written
Spoken


Spoken
Type of analysis Categorical Interpretive Interpretive

Units of analysis Linguistic Non-linguistic Both linguistic and
non-linguistic
Jli |+|e,+ |++.|. 0/-.. |/e-./. -! 0...-/. S/-/ee /e- /// - - /.e /-.-e
Pupil talk
h) Response: Teacher initiates interaction. Freedom to express own ideas is limited.
i) Initiation: Students express their own ideas, initiate a topic, etc.
Silence
j) Silence or confusion: Pauses, short periods of silence, confusion and incomprehension.
An observer may dene the share and type of each participants talk in a classroom interaction
through the categories mentioned above. Conscious use of a variety of categories for pedagogic
or social reasons is one of the aims of the communicative classroom.
.J. k t1t| |tr ||tttrttm |a|trtt||ta
!+||e 2 4 mcce| |c/ c|+ss/ccm |/|e/+c||c/ (8,//e 1987, 10)
Type A activities are focused on accuracy. Tey are controlled by the teacher and done with the
whole class. Drills and traditional language games are most present here.
Type B activities are focused on correct use of language too, but they are directed by learners
and done in pairs or groups (e.g. mini-dialogues).
TEACHER CONTROLLED
WHOLE CLASS ACTIVITIES
A

Drills
Games
Controlled conversation
Listening
Writing

C

Conversation
Discussion
Simulation
Games
Story-telling
Listening
Writing

B

Exercises
Controlled conversation
Role play
Games
Questionnaires
Listening
Writing

D

Discussion
Games
Role play
Project work
Listening
Reading
Writing

PAIR WORK GROUP WORK







F
L
U
E
N
C
Y














A
C
C
U
R
A
C
Y
LEARNER DIRECTED
Jll |N0|l8H |AN0UA0| AN0 |lJ|HAJUH| J|A0HlN0
Type C activities focus on uency. However, they are controlled by the teacher and done with
the whole-class. Whole-class discussions and storytelling are some of them.
Type D activities are uency activities directed by learners and done in pairs or groups. Tey
present the least controlled type of classroom interaction.
Te role of the teacher varies in each type from an instructor (type A) to a consultant (type
D). Byrnes model oers a comprehensive description for classroom interaction, according
to which teachers can plan activities alternately focusing on accuracy/uency or whole-class/
group-work organisation.
I. |rt|t|tt |tr t|(|a |a1ta|t |a ||tttrttm |a|trtt||ta
1.1 Jeac|e|'s He|p
Teachers can help students to develop their interaction skills in a foreign language. Some of the
ways of teachers help are the following:
a) Asking questions
It is easier for students to answer questions than to initiate a conversation or make up an
independent statement. Te teacher indicates with questions some of the words and language
structures which will appear in the answer. He can ask additional questions to bring the
student to the right answer. Te strategy can be used in retelling stories or descriptions.
Nevertheless, this form of help is still very guided and does not really lead to freedom of
expression. Terefore, it is especially appropriate for beginners. Te example below is taken
from a recorded lesson of ten-year-old children.
T
1
: What colour is the crocodile?
Ss: Green, black and grey.
T: Is it dangerous?
S1: Yes.
T: How long is it?
S2: Six metres.
T: How many legs has it got?
S3: Four.
T: Can it y?
S4: No.
.
(Dagarin 2002)
1
- + |e+c|e.. Ss - s|.ce.|s. S1 - ||e ||.s| s|.ce.|. S? - ||e secc.c s|.ce.|. S3 - ||e |||.c s|.ce.|. +.c sc c..
Jl1 |+|e,+ |++.|. 0/-.. |/e-./. -! 0...-/. S/-/ee /e- /// - - /.e /-.-e
b) Body language
Students can obtain a lot of information from teachers gestures and mime. Te teacher can
help students to express themselves with body language. Te example below is taken from a
lesson in which we described an ostrich. Sometimes students did not know how to continue
speaking and I prompted them by exaggeratedly acting out body movements of animals:
T (I point to my legs and show emphatically their length): Its got
Ss: long legs
S1: It a long neck.
Ss: And a long
S2: He lives in Africa.
S1: It can hard kick.
S3: It can run.
S4: Its got eggs.
S5: Big eggs.
T: It cant (I mime the action of ying with my arms)
Ss: y.
(Ibid.)
c) A topic
Teachers can stimulate students interaction by choosing appropriate topics. Young students
prefer talking about sport, computers, music, dinosaurs, spaceships etc. Students can say a lot
more about a topic of their interest than something they dont really know well.
Johnstone (1989, 9) described some other strategies taken by teachers that might help students
understand the teachers utterance and interact appropriately:
Regular checking of understanding,
Using familiar words,
Applying lower cognitive level,
Immediate repetition,
Recycling of information,
Paraphrase,
Other aspects of redundancy,
Slower, clearer talk,
Exaggerated intonation, emphasis,
Structurally simplied language,
Clarity of discourse markers,
Key vocabulary and structures, notied in advance,
Simple tasks, notied in advance,
Jl |N0|l8H |AN0UA0| AN0 |lJ|HAJUH| J|A0HlN0
Routinisation,
Translation into L1.
Moon (2000, 71) described some of such strategies as well:
Showing genuine interest in and responding positively to pupils answers so as to motivate them
to want to speak, e.g. Yes? with an encouraging smile.
Encouraging attention to language accuracy but in a constructive way.
Using English at a level pupils can understand so that pupils are getting more input.
Helping pupils to express their messages by prompting or cueing pupils to say more (so they are
pushed to use the language to communicate).
Relating talk to familiar contexts which are meaningful for pupils, thus encouraging them and
making them want to talk, e.g. pupils own news.
Working in partnership with pupils to achieve a common goal.
Tese are some of the strategies a teacher might employ to encourage students communication.
General classroom atmosphere is also important. At every attempt to speak, students are exposed
to the criticism of their listeners and they need high self-esteem to take risks. Te atmosphere
should be supportive and it should prompt students to be creative with the language.
1.2 0caa|cal|ca 8l|ale|es
To say something is often just as important as to say what you would actually like to say
(Corder 1983, 17).
In addition to teachers helping students when interacting in a foreign language, students can
apply a number of strategies to overcome communication diculties. Tarone et al. (1983, 5)
dene communication strategy as a systematic attempt by the learner to express or decode meaning
in the target language, in situations where the appropriate systematic target language rules have not
been formed. Terefore, communication strategies are particularly helpful to beginners, who
do not have many rules formed yet.
Tarone (1983, 65) suggests the following criteria for characterising communication strategies:
a) A speaker desires to communicate a meaning X to a listener.
b) Te speaker believes the linguistic or sociolinguistic structure desired to communicate
meaning X is unavailable, or is not shared with the listener.
c) Te speaker chooses to:
Avoid not attempt to communicate meaning X; or,
Attempt alternate means to communicate meaning X.
Te second choice is more eective than the rst one and it encourages risk taking in learning
and using a foreign language.
Jl |+|e,+ |++.|. 0/-.. |/e-./. -! 0...-/. S/-/ee /e- /// - - /.e /-.-e
Bygate (1987, 42) divides communication strategies into two main parts:
a) Achievement strategies
1. Guessing strategies
2. Paraphrase strategies
3. Co-operative strategies
b) Reduction strategies
4. Avoidance strategies
Both achievement strategies and reduction strategies compensate for a problem of expression.
Te former compensate for a language gap by improvising a substitute and the latter are used
when a part or a complete message is abandoned. Te speaker adapts his utterance to his
language competence by reducing his speaking to what he can express. However, he is still able
to keep the uency of an interaction even though he shortens his speaking turn.
A speaker who deploys guessing strategies probes for a word which he does not know or is not
sure what it means. If the listener recognizes and understands the expression then his strategy
was successful. Tere are various types of guessing strategies:
a) Te speaker can foreignize a mother-tongue word, pronouncing it as though it belonged to
the target language. One of the students in my classroom
2
used this strategy when discussing
students pets. He asked another one: What pasma [peism] is your dog?, because he did not
know the English word breed. Te strategy was successful because students shared the same
mother tongue. However, it would be ineective in a foreign language environment.
b) Te speaker can borrow a word from his mother tongue, without changing it in any
way. Similarly to the rst one, this strategy is very often eective only in a monolingual
environment. Some of the examples are: Can I have edigs, please?, or Its a pig. Its home is
svinjak.
c) Another guessing strategy occurs when a speaker provides a literal translation of his mother-
tongue word. Examples: Big Britain instead of Great Britain, Ostrich no y instead of
Ostrich doesnt y, Driving a bike instead of Riding a bike, Whats the clock? instead
of Whats the time?. Such examples show students creativity, which is an important step
in language learning.
d) A fourth guessing strategy is developed when a student coins a word. He can invent a
target-language word or expression creatively on the basis of his knowledge of the language.
Sometimes he might even produce a correct expression which he did not realise existed in
the target language. Young learners can manipulate language in this way to a great extent.
To provide an example, a nine-year-old student used the expression zero tail, when she
wanted to say that a gorilla does not have a tail.
2
A|| e+(|es |. ||e +.||c|e +.e |+'e. |.c + ..|||e. |.+.sc.|(||c. c| +.c|c.ecc.c|.s c| , |essc.s. S|.ce.|s .e.e
JlI |N0|l8H |AN0UA0| AN0 |lJ|HAJUH| J|A0HlN0
Bygate (1987, 44) divides paraphrase strategies into two main types:
a) Lexical substitution strategy, which involves searching ones knowledge for a synonym or a
more general word (i.e. a superordinate) to express meaning;
b) Circumlocution is applied, when a speaker uses more than one word to express his
meaning (e.g. you clean your teeth with it instead of saying a tooth brush).
Paraphrase strategies are one of the most eective communication strategies, because they can
be applied in a monolingual as well as in a multilingual environment.
A third type of achievement strategies is co-operative strategies. Te speaker searches for
help in dierent ways: He may ask for a translation of his mother-tongue word, he may
point to the object he wants to name or by miming. Young learners very often use these
strategies. In the middle of their utterance they ask for a translation, e.g. Crocodile is kako
se ree ivi or We go tokako se ree maa? (Dagarin 2002).
Avoidance strategies prompt speakers to alter the message in order to avoid communication
trouble. Tey may want to avoid phonemic, grammatical or lexical problems. Nevertheless,
speakers have to be aware that in this case the original intention of their message is partly or
wholly lost.
A speaker may thus (Johnstone 1989, 67):
Take over the role of a listener and respond only in short sentences;
Settle for mainly non-verbal communication;
Avoid or deect topic;
Use minimal expression and risk leaving ambiguous messages;
Include many xed phrases;
Distort reality sometimes it is easier to speak about untrue things;
Avoid interaction by giving a false excuse (e.g. say that he has to leave).
T: Nadja, how was your holiday?
S: Fine.
T: Did you go anywhere?
S: Yes.
T: Did you go to the seaside?
S: No. Paris.
(Dagarin 2002)
Te example above shows how a ten-year-old student avoided taking the lead role in the
interaction and how she responded by answering mainly in short sentences.
Jl |+|e,+ |++.|. 0/-.. |/e-./. -! 0...-/. S/-/ee /e- /// - - /.e /-.-e
Te next example shows a nine-year-old student using only nouns and taking a risk of being
misunderstood.
T: Where were you? Were you at the seaside?
S: No. Grandad.
(Ibid.)
Szulc-Kurpaska (2000, 345) tried out communication strategies of thirty-ve eleven-year
olds, who had been learning English as a foreign language for four years. She found out
that most of the students do not have comprehension problems when listening to a native
speaker. Communication strategies they mainly used when interacting were the use of the
mother tongue and body language. Some of them repeated words after the speaker or were
creative with language by coining new words. Children, compared to adults use miming more
often, because they do not have abstract strategies developed (e.g. contrasting two or more
languages).
Students have to be encouraged to use a variety of communication strategies, especially those
that are eective in multilingual environment as well (e.g. paraphrase strategies). Trough
their use, skills for uency and successful interaction are developed.
. |tat|at|ta
Successful interaction is the basis of positive human relationships among people. Similarly to
everyday-life interaction, students have to be trained to be eective communicators in a foreign
language. We can do this through dierent ways of encouraging classroom interaction.
Firstly, teachers can take on a variety of roles, not always performing the role of an instructor,
but also that of a consultant or a co-communicator. Classroom organisation can also be adapted
more often for one-to-one or group-work arrangement to encourage peer interaction.
Secondly, teachers can observe classroom interaction more consciously (e.g. by action research)
and analyse the gathered data in an interpretive way. Tey may put some of the results of the
research in action and see how dierent strategies can improve students interaction.
Tirdly, classroom interaction can be more eective if a variety of teacher and student talk
is applied in the classroom. Teachers may accept feelings, praise and accept students ideas
instead of merely lecturing, and similarly, students may be encouraged to initiate conversation
more, instead of only responding to teachers.
Fourthly, classroom interaction can be improved through a variety of activities for developing
accuracy or uency and controlled alternately by a teacher and students.
Jll |N0|l8H |AN0UA0| AN0 |lJ|HAJUH| J|A0HlN0
And nally, classroom interaction can be developed by applying dierent strategies for helping
students to communicate. Teachers help students by asking questions, choosing appropriate
topics and providing them with comprehensible input. Students can improve their interaction
skills by deploying a variety of communication strategies.
Tese are some of the ways of encouraging successful classroom interaction. Tey can help
students to become better communicators of a foreign language in and out of the classroom.
||||trt(|
0|cWa, 0. H. 2001. !e+c||/ |, //|/c|(|es 4/ |/|e/+c||ie 4((/c+c| |c /+/o+e /ec+c, w||le l|a|as, NY.
lea|sca |aacal|ca - |caaa.
0,ale, M. 1981. S(e+||/. 0xlc|a. 0xlc|a Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess.
0,|ae, 0. 1981. !ec|/|oes |c/ 0|+ss/ccm |/|e/+c||c/. Ha||cW. |caaa.
0+m|/|ce |/|e//+||c/+| 0|c||c/+/, c| //||s| c/ 008cm. 2000. 0ac||ae. 0ac||ae Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess.
0c|ae|, l. 8. 1983. 8l|ale|es cl 0caa|cal|ca. la |ae|c| aaa Kaspe|, eas., 15-20.
0aa||a, M. 2002. Ha/v|jaaje aslaea spc|a/aevaaja p|| pca|a aa|es|ea je/||a aa /caaj| slcpaj|.
Uapac||s|ea MA 0|sse|lal|ca. |jac|jaaa. |aca|l, cl A|ls.
|ae|c|, 0., aaa Kaspe|, 0., eas. 1983. S|/+|e|es |/ |/|e/|+/o+e 0cmmo/|c+||c/. |caaca. |caaa.
Ha|e|, !. 2001. !|e //+c||ce c| //||s| /+/o+e !e+c||/. Ha||cW. |caaa.
Halc|, |. 1992. 0|scco/se +/c /+/o+e /coc+||c/. 0ac||ae. 0ac||ae Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess.
!c|aslcae, H. 1989. 0cmmo/|c+||ie |/|e/+c||c/ + o|ce |c/ |+/o+e |e+c|e/s. |caaca. 0l|J.
||ll|eWcca, w. 1981. 0cmmo/|c+||ie /+/o+e !e+c||/. 0ac||ae. 0ac||ae Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess.
Ma|aa|J|cas, A. 1981. 0|+ss/ccm |/|e/+c||c/. 0xlc|a. 0xlc|a Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess.
Mcca, !. 2000. 0|||c/e/ /e+//|/ //||s|. 0xlc|a. Mac|||aa He|aeaaa ||J.
Mcca, !., aaa N||c|cv, M., eas. 2000. 8ese+/c| |/|c !e+c||/ //||s| |c co/ /e+//e/s. lecs. Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess lecs.
/eu 0\|c/c 0|c||c/+/, c| //||s| c/ 008cm. 1998. 0xlc|a. 0xlc|a Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess.
Nc|ascc, H., aaa |. A|l|a|. 1981. 0c/ie/s+||c/. 0xlc|a. 0xlc|a Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess.
Naaaa, 0. 1992. 8ese+/c| Ve||ccs |/ /+/o+e /e+//|/. 0ac||ae. 0ac||ae Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess.
------. 1991. /+/o+e !e+c||/ Ve||ccc|c, 4 |e\||cc| |c/ |e+c|e/s. Hee| Hepsleaa. l|eal|ce Ha||.
H|ve|s, w. M. 1981. lale|acl|ca as l|e |e, lc leac||a |aaaae lc| ccaa|cal|ca. la |/|e/+c||ie /+/o+e !e+c||/, ea. w. M. H|ve|s,
0ac||ae. 0ac||ae Ua|ve|s|l, l|ess.
8/a|cKa|pas|a, M. 2000. 0caa|cal|ca 8l|ale|es |a 11Yea|0|as. la Mcca aaa N||c|cv, eas., 345-0.
Ja|cae, |., A. 0. 0c|ea, aaa 0. 0aas. 1983. A c|cse| |cc| al sce |ale||aaaae le||ac|c,. a l|aeWc|| lc| ccaa|cal|ca
sl|ale|es.la |ae|c| aaa Kaspe|, eas., 4-15.
Ja|cae, |. 1983. 8ce l|ca|ls ca l|e acl|ca cl 'ccaa|cal|ca sl|ale,'. la |ae|c| aaa Kaspe|, eas., 1-15.