Module 04: Targeting Lecture 15: Shell Targeting 1
Module 04: Targeting Lecture 15: Shell Targeting 1
Module 04: Targeting Lecture 15: Shell Targeting 1
Module04
Lecture15
Module04:Targeting
Lecture15:ShellTargeting1stPart
Keywords:ShiftedTemperature,Enthalpyinterval,shell,shellandtubeheatexchanger
Shell & Tube heat exchangers are common heat transfer equipment used in the process
industries.Theareaandenergytargetingalgorithmusedforheatexchangernetwork(HEN)are
based on the assumption that heat exchange matches are pure counter current flow. So the
targeted values will beclose to real only if heat exchanger employed in HEN areonly of 11
design(1shellpass1tubepass).Thistypeofexchangeroffersthelowestsurfaceforshelland
tube exchanger. However, exchangers employed in industries may be 12 ,14 or even 24
designswhichinvolvescrossflow,concurrentflow,countercurrentfloworpartiallymixedflow.
Thus, the effective temperature difference of heat exchanger is reduced compared to a pure
countercurrentdevice.Thisisaccountedfor,inthedesign,byinductionoftheFTfactorinto
the basic heat exchanger equation,Eq.4.15 In other situation, where one stream isalmost at
constant temperature due to latent heat transfer( boiling/condensation) or T across the
matchisconsiderablyhightheaboveanomalydoesnotappear.
Boththeexperimentalandnumericalresultsshowthattemperaturecrossovercanbeachieved
inshellandtubeheatexchangers(STHX)withL(length)/W(width)4.62andcantbeachieved
anymoreinSTHXswithL/W3.08[3].Theresultsalsoindicatethatheattransferperformance
decreases with L/W decreasing. Thus, for a long STHX, where the temperature range of both
hot and cold streams through the exchanger is large compared to the temperature driving
force,mayexhibittemperaturecross.Whereas,designswithatemperatureapproachorsmall
temperature cross can be accommodated in a single 12 STHX , designs with a large
temperature cross becomes infeasible. A large overall temperature cross requires shells in
seriestoreducethecrossinindividualexchangers[4].
ForSTHXsemployedinaHEN,thenumberofshellsrequiredmaybegreaterthantheminimum
numberofunitspredictedbyno.ofunitstarget,fortwobasicreasons:
1. Thearearequiredforasingleheatexchangermaybeinconvenientlylarge.Toputpack
large area and at the same time to keep the cost of STHX low, long tube STHX are
preferred. This is because, the cost of the shelloften is the largest single cost in the
total exchanger cost. It increases very rapidly with diameter but only linearly with
length. Therefore, unless space or pressure drop limits dictate otherwise, the most
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
economicalexchangerisusuallyoneofrelativelylargelengthtodiameterratioperhaps
12:1foraruleofthumb.
2. Theremaybeatemperaturecrossinasingleshell
BothofthesearelikelytooccurinLongSTHXwithlowtemperaturedrivingforcesandlarge
temperature differences for the streams, which are most likely to occur near the pinch. To
dilutetheeffectoftemperaturecrossinasingleshell,ithastobedistributedintomultishell
increasingthetotalcostofSTHXaseachadditionalshellincursextracapitalcost.Thustargeting
the minimum number of shells are useful and realistic in comparison with number of units
targetasitprovidesbetteropportunitytocomparetwohendesigns.Fig.4.27showsa24STHX.
Fig.4.27A2Shell4TubepassHeatExchanger
Inthiscase,theliquidsinonetubepassflowsincountercurrentflowtotheshellfluidwhilein
othertubepass;itflowsincocurrenttotheshellfluidasclearfromFig.4.27above.Toaccount
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
for counter and parallel flow in 12 shell and tube heat exchanger, the following analytical
expressionisusedforthedesignofshellandtubeheatexchangerunits:
Q=UATLMFTwhere0<FT<1
.(4.15)
This FT factor is the ratio of the actual mean temperature difference in the 12 SHE to the
counter current TLM for the same terminal temperatures. FT is correlated in terms of two
dimensionless ratios, the ratio of the two heat capacity flow rates (R) and the thermal
effectivenessoftheexchangers(S)whicharegivenby:
.(4.16)
R=(T1T2)/(t2t1)
.(4.17)
S=(t2t1)/(T1t1).(4.18)
Where,
T=Hot
t=cold
1=InletTemperature
2=outlettemperature
PracticaldesignswerelimitedtosomefractionofSmax,thatis:
S=XPSmax,0<XP<1
.(4.19)
Where XP is a constant defined by the designer to satisfy the minimum allowable FT (for
example,forFTmin>0.75,XP=0.9isused).
.(4.20)
(4.21)
Where,
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
AndifR=1,then
(4.22)
Ifexchangersarecountercurrentdevices,thenthenumberofunitsequalsthenumberofshells,
providing individual shells do not exceed some practical upper size limit. If, however,
equipmentisusedthatisnotcompletelycountercurrent,aswiththe12shellandtubeheat
exchanger,then:
NShells>=NUNITS
.(4.23)
Since the number of shells can have a significant influence on the capital cost, it would be
usefultobeabletopredictitasatargetaheadofdesign.Asimplealgorithmcanbedeveloped
(see Appendix G) to target the minimum total number of shells (as a real, i.e. no integer,
number)forastreamsetbasedonthetemperaturedistributionofthecompositecurves.
Thealgorithmstartsbydividingthecompositecurvesintoenthalpyintervalsinthesameway
astheareatargetalgorithm.Theresultingnumberofshellsisgivenby:
NSHELLS=Nk(SK1)
(4.24)
Where,
NSHELLS=totalnumberofshellsoverKenthalpyintervals
Nk = real (or fractional) number of shells resulting from the temperatures of enthalpy
intervalk
Sk=numberofstreamsinenthalpyintervalk
NkisgivenbytheapplicationofEquations15.62to15.64tointervalk.
Inpractice,theintegernumberofshellsisevaluatedfromEquation17.8foreachsideofthe
pinch. This maintains consistency between achieving maximum energy recovery and the
correspondingminimumnumberofunitstargetNUNITS.
Insummary,thenumberofshellstargetcanbecalculatedfromthebasicstreamdataandan
assumedvalueofXP(orequivalently,FTmin).TheFTcorrectionfactorforeachenthalpyinterval
depends both on the assumed value of XP and the temperatures of the interval on the
compositecurves.Itispossibletomodifythesimpleareatargetformulatoobtaintheresulting
increasedoverallarea,ANETWORK,foranetworkof12exchangers.
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
Problem:Fortheheatexchangernetworkproblemgiveninthetablebelow,performnumber
ofshelltargetingusingTmin=100C:
Table4.15Afourstreamproblemforshelltargeting
Stream
HotStream1
ColdStream1
HotStream2
ColdStream2
Steam
CoolingWater
Supply
Temp.
Ts(0C)
250
20
200
140
240
20
Target
Temp.
TT(0C)
40
180
80
230
239
30
0.15
0.0006
0.2
0.0010
0.25
0.0008
0.3
0.0008
0.0030
0.0010
Solution:
Thealgorithmforthecalculationofminimumnumberofshellsisasfollows:
1) UsingProblemTableAnalysis,calculateminimumhotandcoldutilityrequirements.
2) UsinghotandcoldutilityrequirementsandcorrespondingT,theCPvaluesofhotand
coldutilitycanbedetermined.
3) Next step is the calculation of hot balanced composite curve and cold balanced
compositecurve.
4) Determinetheenthalpyintervalsfromthebalancedcompositecurvesassumingvertical
heattransferunits.
5) Foreachenthalpyinterval,computetheinletandoutlettemperatureonbothhotand
coldbalancedcompositecurves.
6) CalculateFT,RandSforeachenthalpyinterval.
7) Usetheappropriateformulaforthenumberofshellsgiveninthetextabovetoevaluate
thenumberofshells.
Wewillillustratetheabovealgorithmusingbythesolutiongivenbelow.
Step1:ProblemTableAnalysisfordeterminingminimumhotandcoldutilityrequirement
The following table shows the actual and the transition temperatures of hot and cold
streamsaswellasutilitystreams:
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
Table4.16ActualandShiftedtemperaturesfortheprobleminTable4.15
Stream
250
245
40
20
25
180
200
195
80
140
145
230
240
235
239
20
25
30
ShiftedTarget
Temp.TT(0C)
35
185
75
235
234
35
HotStream1
ColdStream1
HotStream2
ColdStream2
Steam
CoolingWater
Thefollowingdiagramshowstheschematicrepresentationofthetemperaturelevelsin
decreasingorderwithstreamsonaverticaltemperaturescale:
H1
0
245 C
0
235 C
2
1450C
5
750C
6
CPCP=0.3
C2
CPCP=0.2
1850C
CPCP=0.25
H2
1950C
CPCP=0.15
350C
7
250C
C1
Fig.4.28Schematicrepresentationoftemperaturelevelsonaverticaltemperature scale
Nextstepistodeterminethesurplusanddeficitofenthalpyineachtemperatureintervalusing
Table4.17:
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
Table4.17Surplusanddeficitenthalpyineachtemperatureinterval
Temperature Interval
CPhot
CPcold
CP(HC)
H
Comments
0
1
1
1
( C)
(MW.K )
(MW.K )
(MW.K )
(MW)
245
1
0.15
0
0.15
1.5
235
2
0.15
0.3
0.15
6
195
3
0.4
0.3
0.1
1
185
4
0.4
0.5
0.1
4
145
5
0.4
0.2
0.2
14
75
6
0.15
0.2
0.05
2
35
7
0
0.2
0.2
2
25
Now,thenextstepistodrawaheatcascadeforthisproblemwithandwithouthotutility:
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
0MW
7.5MW
1.5
1.5
1.5MW
9MW
4.5MW
3MW
1
3.5MW
14
14MW
0MW
14
6.5MW
2
4MW
Heatcascade
withouthotutility
7.5MW
2
4.5MW
12MW
2
2.5MW
10MW
Fig.4.29HeatcascadediagramforTable4.17
Therefore,thecoldutilityusage=10MWandhotutilityusage=7.5MW
Step2:DeterminationofCPvalueforhotandcoldutilitystreams.
CPofhotutility=(7.5/1)=7.5MW/K
Heatcascadewith
hotutility
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
CPofcoldutility=(10/10)=1MW/K
Step3:Determinationofhotbalancedcompositecurveandcoldbalancedcompositecurve:
Fortheconstructionofhotbalancedcompositecurve,thestreamsH1,H2andhotutilitywillbe
considered.
PlottingofBalancedHotCompositecurve:
Table4.18Actual&Shiftedtemperaturesofhotstreamandhotutility
245
40
35
200
195
80
75
240
235
239
234
H1
1
HU
2
750C
250
CPCP=7.5
Hotstream1
(H1)
Hotstream1
(H2)
Hotutility
(HU)
2450C
2350C
2340C
1950C
ActualTarget
ShiftedSupply
Temperature,TT Temperature,TS
(0C)
(0C)
H2
CPCP=0.25
ShiftedSupply
Temperature,TS
(0C)
ActualSupply
Temperature,TS
(0C)
CPCP=0.15
StreamName
5
350C
Fig.4.30Schematicrepresentationofhotstreamandhotutilityonaverticaltemperaturescale
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
Table4.19Dataforplottingbalancedhotcompositecurve
Temperature
Interval
CPhot
(0C)
245
235
234
195
75
35
(MW.K1)
0.15
7.65
0.15
0.4
0.15
(MW)
1.5
7.65
5.85
48
Cumulative
Q h
69
67.5
59.85
54
PlottingofbalancedColdCompositecurves:
Table4.20Actual&Shiftedtemperaturesofcoldstreamandcoldutility
StreamName
Coldstream1
(C1)
Coldstream1
(C2)
Coldutility
(CU)
ActualSupply
Temperature,TS
(0C)
ShiftedSupply
Temperature,TS
(0C)
ActualTarget
ShiftedSupply
Temperature,TT Temperature,TS
(0C)
(0C)
20
25
180
185
140
145
230
235
20
25
30
35
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
0
235
C
1850C
2
1450C
3
350C
C2
CPCP=1
CPCP=0.2
CPCP=0.3
4
250C
CU
C2
Fig.4.31Schematicrepresentationofcoldstreamandutilityonaverticaltemperaturescale
Table4.21Dataforplottingbalancedcoldcompositecurve
Temperature
Interval
CPhot
(0C)
235
185
145
35
25
(MW.K1)
0.3
0.5
0.2
1.2
(MW)
15
20
22
12
Cumulative
Q h
69
54
34
12
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
300
250
Temperature(0C)
6
5
200
4
150
100
3
2
50
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
H(MW)
Fig.4.32BalancedHotandcoldcompositecurves
Step4&5:Determinetheenthalpyintervalsfromthebalancedcompositecurvesassuming
vertical heat transfer units. For each enthalpy interval, compute the inlet and outlet
temperatureonbothhotandcoldbalancedcompositecurves.
Table4.22Determinationofunknowntemperaturelevels
Enthalpy Interval HotCompositeTi
1
35
6
2
75
12
3
unknown
34
4
unknown
54
5
195
59.85
6
234
HotCompositeTo
75
unknown
unknown
195
234
235
ColdCompositeti
25
unknown
35
145
185
unknown
ColdCompositeto
unknown
35
145
185
unknown
unknown
ShellTargeting1stPart
67.5
69
Module04
235
245
245
Lecture15
unknown
235
235
Now,thenextstepistocalculatetheunknowntemperaturesineachenthalpyinterval
Thq=Thb,rowr(CumQhb,rowrCumQcb,rowq)/CP,hbrows
Where,
Thb,rowr:Temperaturefromhotbalancedcurveintherowr(firstrowafterrowqinwhichthe
temperatureisavailable),Forexample,ifwewanttodeterminethehottemperatureinrow4.
Then,q=4andr=5.
CumQhb,row r:CumQfromhotbalancedcurveintherowr(firstrowafterrowqinwhichthe
temperatureisavailable),Forexample,ifwewanttodeterminethehottemperatureinrow4.
Then,q=4andr=5.
CP,hbrowq:Summationofheatcapacityofthehotstreamsintheintervalinwhichunknown
temperaturesistobedetermined.Fore.g.forrow4,itistheCPofhotstreamsintemperature
interval751950Cofthehotbalancedcurve.
CumQcb, row q: CumQ from cold balanced curve in the row q, for example, if we want to
determinethehottemperatureinrow4.Then,q=4andr=5.
Therefore,
Th4=195(5434)/0.4=145C
Th3=145(3412)/0.4=90C
Similarly,forcalculationofcoldintervaltemperatures,thefollowingequationcanbeused:
Tcq=Tcb,rowr(CumQcb,rowrCumQhb,rowq)/CP,cbrows
Where,
Tcb,rowr:Temperaturefromcoldbalancedcurveintherowr(firstrowafterrowqinwhichthe
temperatureisavailable),Forexample,ifwewanttodeterminethecoldtemperatureinrow2.
Then,q=2andr=3.
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
CumQcb,rowr:CumQfromcoldbalancedcurveintherowr(firstrowafterrowqinwhichthe
temperatureisavailable),Forexample,ifwewanttodeterminethecoldtemperatureinrow2.
Then,q=2andr=3.
CP,cbrowq: Summationofheatcapacityofthecoldstreamsintheintervalinwhichunknown
temperatures is to be determined. For e.g. for row 2, it is the CP of cold streams in
temperatureinterval25350Cofthecoldbalancedcurve.
CumQhb, row q: CumQ from hot balanced curve in the row q, For example, if we want to
determinethehottemperatureinrow2.Then,q=2andr=3.
Tc2=35(126)/1.2=30C
Tc7=235(6967.5)/0.5=230C
Tc8=230(67.559.85)/0.5=204.5C
Therefore,thecompletedenthalpyintervaltablewithallhotandcoldintervaltemperaturesis
showninTable4.23
The unknown temperatures in the above table can be determined by linear interpolation as
illustrated in Lecture problem table analysis part I and thus the following table can be
obtained:
Table4.23Shiftedinletandoutlettemperaturesofeachenthalpyinterval
Enthalpy Interval HotCompositeT2 HotCompositeT1
1
35
75
6
2
75
90
12
3
90
145
34
4
145
195
54
5
195
234
59.85
6
234
235
67.5
7
235
245
69
ColdCompositet1
25
30
35
145
185
204.5
230
ColdCompositet2
30
35
145
185
204.5
230
235
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
Table4.24Actualinletandoutlettemperaturesofeachenthalpyinterval
Enthalpy Interval HotCompositeT2 HotCompositeT1
1
40
80
6
2
80
95
12
3
95
150
34
4
150
200
54
5
200
239
59.85
6
239
240
67.5
7
240
250
69
ColdCompositet1
20
25
30
140
180
199.5
225
ColdCompositet2
25
30
140
180
199.5
225
230
Step6:CalculationofFT,RandSforeachinterval
Now,thevalueofFT,RandScanbecalculatedforeachintervalasshownbelowforthefirst
interval.Thevaluesfortherestoftheintervalsareshowninthefollowingtable:
R=(T1T2)/(t2t1)=(8040)/(2520)=40/5=8
S=(t2t1)/(T1t1)=(2520)/(8020)=5/60=0.08333
Now,R1,Thus,
1
ln 1
Where,
Now,
1
1
1
1
2
2
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
1
1ln 1
Lecture15
1 ln
Thus,
0.91667
65ln 0.33336
7 ln
0.0.0833 9
65
0.08333 9
65
0.96994
Thus,
FT=0.96994>0.75
Hence,
XP=0.9
So,
9
9
14.4
65 1.8
65
=2.6622/15.2622=0.1744
Therefore,
0.2
0.9
0.1744
ln
Thus,
NShells=(1.504/1.7464)=0.8612
So,thenumberofShells=1
ShellTargeting1stPart
Module04
Lecture15
Table4.25TableforFT,R,S,Wandnumberofshellsineachenthalpyinterval
Enthalpy Interval
12
34
54
59.85
67.5
69
8
0.083333
3
0.071429
0.5
0.916667
1.25
0.666667
2
0.330508
0.039216 0.62963
2
0.2
F T
XP
0.96994
0.996497
0.81396
0.993003
0.971654
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.174434
0.328643
2.100199
0.780571
0.476145
8.206353
0.476145
0.579313
0.150123
2.522536
2.798005
0.917169
0.459996
0.387695
Nk(in
integers)
Sk
Thus,
NShells=Nk(SK1)=1(2)+1(2)+3(2)+3(2)+1(1)+1(2)+1(1)=20
References:
1. Smith,R.(2005).ChemicalProcessDesignandIntegration.JohnWiley&SonsLtd,
Chichester,UK.ISBN0471486809/0471486817.
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Utube_heat_exchanger.PNG
3. Jiang, Fuhua and Deng, Xianhe (2011) "Numerical and Experimental Study on
Temperature Crossover in Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers," International Journal of
FoodEngineering:Vol.7:Iss.4,Article7
4. AhmadS.,LinhhoffBandSimthR,1988,TransASMEJHeatTransfer,110:304
5. Ahmad, S. and Smith, R. (1989). Targets and design for minimum number of shells in
heatexchangernetworks,ChemEngResDes,67(5):481494.