Perm test as a paramatic action in debate.

The environment is resilient

Easterbrook 96 (Gregg, sr editor, The New Republic, former fellow at the
Brookings Institute, A Moement on the !arth, p" #$, %M&
"Fragile environment" has become a welded phrase of the modern lexicon, like "aging hippie" or "fugitive
financier." But the notion of a fragile environment is profoundly wrong.
Individual animals, plants, and people are distressingly fragile. The
environment that contains them is close to indestructible . The living
environment of Earth has survived ice ages; bombardments of
cosmic radiation more deadly than atomic fallout; solar radiation more powerful
than the worst-case projection for oone depletion ; thousand-year periods of
intense volcanism releasing global air pollution far worse than that made by any factory;
reversals of the planet!s magnetic poles ; the rearrangement of continents;
transformation of plains into mountain ranges and of seas into plains; fluctuations of ocean currents and the
et stream; "##-foot vacillations in sea levels; shortening and lengthening of the seasons
caused by shifts in the planetary axis; collisions of asteroids and comets bearing far
more force than man!s nuclear arsenals; and the years without summer that followed these impacts. $et
hearts beat on, and petals unfold still. %ere the environment fragile it would
have e&pired many eons before the advent of the industrial affronts
of the dreaming ape. "uman assaults on the environment, though mischievous, are pinpricks
compared to forces of the magnitude nature is accustomed to resisting.
No extinction: turns their case
The Economist, 09 (The !conomist, %anuar' ($, #))*, +,econd life- Biologists
debate the scale of e.tinction in the world/s tropical forests,0
http-11www"economist"com1node1(#*#2)3#, 4ensel&
A RAR! piece of good news from the world of conseration- the global e.tinction crisis ma' hae been
oerstated" The world is unlikel' to lose ()) species a da' , or half of all species in the
lifetime of people now alie, as some hae claimed" The bad news, though, is that the luck' suriors are tin'
tropical insects that few people care about" The species that are being lost rapidl' are the large ertebrates that
conserationists were worried about in the first place" This new iew of the prospects for biodiersit' emerged
from a s'mposium held this week at the ,mithsonian Institution in 5ashington, 67, but the
controers' oer how bad things reall' are has been brewing since #))2" That was when %oseph 5right of the
,mithsonian Tropical Research Institute in 8anama and 4elene Muller9:andau of the ;niersit' of Minnesota first
suggested that the damage might not be as grim as some feared" The' reasoned that because population growth
is slowing in man' tropical countries, and people are moing to cities, the pressure to cut
down primar' rainforest is falling and agriculturall' marginal land is being abandoned,
allowing trees to grow" This regrown +secondar'0 forest is crucial to the pair/s anal'sis" 5ithin a few
decades of land being abandoned, half of the original biomass has returned " 6epending on
what else is nearb', these new forests ma' then be colonised b' animals and additional plants ,
and thus support man' of the species found in the original forest" 6r 5right and 6r Muller9:andau therefore
reckon that in #)<) reasonabl' unbroken tropical forest will still coer more than a third
of its natural range, and after that date its area=at least in :atin America and Asia=could increase" Much of this
woodland will be secondar' forest, but een so the' suggest that in Africa onl' (29<$> of tropical9forest species will
become e.tinct b' #)<), in Asia, #(9#3> and, in :atin America, fewer still" ?nce forest coer does start
increasing, the rate of extinction should dwindle "
Warmings anthro!ogenic"
#u $9
(et al @ all authors listed" %IA 4; A 6epartment of !colog' and !olutionar' Biolog', ;niersit' of 7olorado, Boulder"
6ABI6 %" 8" M??R! A 6epartment of Geograph', Cing/s 7ollege :ondon" ,!AN8"B;RN, A National 7enter for
Atmospheric Research (N7AR&" R;,,!:: C " M?N,?N @ 7ooperatie Institute for Research in !nironmental ,ciences
(7IR!,&, ;niersit' of 7olorado, Boulder" +:onger growing seasons lead to less carbon seDuestration b' a subalpine
forest0 @ Global 7hange Biolog'E http-11www"mmm"ucar"edu1people1burns1files1gcb()FhuFgrowingseason"pdf&
4uman actiities, such as the burning of fossil fuels andG land use changes, have increased the
atmospheric %& ' ( G concentration oer the past centur'" The increase in 7?G #G and other greenhouse gases is
ver) likel) to have ' caused climate warming at unprecedented rates (I877,G #))H&" While
appro.imatel' half of the emitted anthro* ' !ogenic %& ' ( ' sta)s in the atmos!here ,
the remainder is ' assimilated into terrestrial and ocean ecos)stems (7a9G nadellG et alG ",
#))H&" These natural carbon sinks are vitalG for se+uestering atmospheric %& ' ( ' ,
and )et the strength and longeit' of these sinks ma) be diminishingG (7ramerG et alG ",
#))(E 7anadellG et alG ", #))H," The tendenc) ' for ecos)stem growing seasons to
lengthen in res!onse ' to climate warming - M'neniG et alG ", (**HE 7ao I 5ood9G ward, (**JE
BlackG et alG ", #)))& ma) enhance the strength ' of the terrestrial carbon sink , and
thus diminish the rate ' of atmos!heric %& ' ( ' buildu! " An earlier spring, andG associated
longer growing season ma' increase theG potential time for photos'nthetic 7?G #G uptake b' terres9G trial ecos'stems"
E&tend 'oman (lcala )"* +ood sovereignty is good , framing
agricultural discourse through the lens of sovereignty problematies
and gives an embrace of globaliation food system power relations
and resolves environmental destruction of -apitailism
The ./0N is necessar' to reerse poert' "That/s NwanKe L)*" 7ombating poert' gets
at the root of the drug trade in Me.ico and maks Me.ican farmers a !riorit) rather
than Must two pieces of shit as eer'one preciees them as"
This reDuires 'ou to check )our e!istemological bias" ?ur 1ourgois 02 eidence
speaks to the fantas' of peace time which allows iolence to e.ist in the backdrop and is
a conceded framing +uestion coming out of the (A7"Nour decision should ignore the
low !robabilit) of disaster scenarios and continuing process of genocide that racial
ineDualit' and poert' make inevitable"
Extend Moore 03 food is the ultimate sustainment of life. Food sovreinty is the only way to solve for the
savior of Mexican civilians. Food is the only means of the way out; only econ system they have to put on
the table. Thats the biest thin uni!ue to farmers. The "ac is #ey to producin chane to theuni!ue
opresseion that farmers face everyday. $y shiftin the money from the merida initiatie to Mexican small
hold farmers we are ivin them some type of econ boost% to produvce ariculture to sell for themselves.
&mall farmin is the only way. The only way they sustain life to et food on the table everyday. 'ont let
the ne win on their bullshit scenarios tal#in about how cap still happens outside of this round and at the
end of the day we dont do nythin for Mexicans.
The romalicia tal.s about the perm, we aren*t severance because it
tals soecifically about the food sooverenty and how that*s .ey to
pbrea. down power relations/ when food activists have indep gov,
this brea.s down cap control means they do stuff ont heir own.
#organiation 0rban Tilth and has been closely involved in the 1ccupy
the +arm effort at the 0niversity of -alifornia*s 2ill Tract, considers
himself a food sovereignty activist to achieve positive food system
change. These local groups identify problems as a community and then
see. to solve them through a process of consensus-building and
pressuring local governments. Food $olicy %ouncils have worked on
things like institutional food procurement, the use of urban open space for
agriculture, nutrition education and funding for food banks. 3ore recently,
F$%s are scaling up, coming together to affect policy on the state and federal
levels. &he food movement's shift from security to sovereignty can be
instructive for the broader movements for environmental sanity and
democratic governance. By asking the simple (uestion, )*ho's in charge
here+, food sovereignty elevates the importance that power has in our food
systems. The concept e&pands our critical capacity beyond consumer
choice to consider that we are all 4co-producers5 of the food system.
4-overeignty, is a frame that can be used to think about process in relation to
natural resources, not ust outcomes, and it can help encourage solidarity and
cohesion amongst myriad movements and sectors within the food movement
and outside of it. -ocial movements focused on sovereignty can help build a
more democratic and accountable political system. &his, in turn, would allow
for a more sustainable approach to natural resources, and a more egalitarian
economic system. 6y tal.ing 4sovereignty5 from the start, change-ma.ers can pursue a mutual end goal from any
number of individual struggles. %hen Paul 7aw.en described 4the largest movement on Earth5 in his boo. 6lessed 0nrest, he was
clear that the millions of individual and 821 efforts to help were a movement, but just didn*t act li.e one. 9overeignty, whether of
food or fiber or healthcare, may the concept needed for these many struggles to become the movement that it could be.
.erm do the 0ff as a starting !oint to tackle ca!italism" The
coalitional a!!roach of the affirmative solves best it
addresses it centrali3es racism and addresses the monster
that is ca!italism
Cone prof of systematic theology @ Union Theological Seminary 1980
(ames ). *T)E $+,-. -)/0-) ,1' M,023&M4 5),T '6 T)E7 ),8E T6 &,7 T6 E,-) 6T)E09:
http4;;archive.or;stream;The$lac#-hurch,ndMarxism5hat'oThey)aveTo&ayToEach6ther;$-M<d=vu.txt
3 would li#e to offer the followin suestions in order that the dialoue between the blac# church and marxism miht be deepened.
Both
marxists and black church people must be open to hear what each is
saying regarding their respective projects for justice !ithout an
openness from both sides" there is no way that a meaningful
dialogue can occur #he openness about which $ speak must include
on the part of %arxists a willingness to take seriously the uni&ueness
of black oppression in the world generally and the 'nited (tates in
particular The uni!ueness of blac# oppression is not to be understood theoloically as if blac#s are elected by >od but
only scientifically. $t is a fact that most people who suffer in the world are
people of color and not )uropean *nd it is a fact that the people
responsible for that oppression are white )uropeans Marxists have to be open to
hear the meanin of that fact by as#in whether fascism is inherent in the very nature and structure of western civili?ation. But
marxists and other socialists do not like to focus on their
racism" and they try to make us blacks believe that racism will
be automatically eliminated when capitalism is destroyed $n
every European socialist society I have seen, including Cuba, the elimination of
capitalism has not eliminated racism
This cone 1980 card that was conceded: The fight against capitalism needs to be
an indigenized to include the voices of the oppressed if not we perpetuate white
supremacy in all its manifestations, which means the perm solves, the
morales 13 in our aff incudes the voice of the oppressed indigenous
people of mexixo who are trying to retain their culture and want tto
survive another day, want to put food on their table !hen we use the
reference to "ays mom having to accept capitalisms inf order to
destroy a specific mindest, they do not isolate how tht brings food to
the table at the end of the day,they say nothing of how they solve for
the hungry people
Cone prof of systematic theology @ Union Theological Seminary 1980
(ames ). *T)E $+,-. -)/0-) ,1' M,023&M4 5),T '6 T)E7 ),8E T6 &,7 T6 E,-) 6T)E09:
http4;;archive.or;stream;The$lac#-hurch,ndMarxism5hat'oThey)aveTo&ayToEach6ther;$-M<d=vu.txt
Blacks also observe that marxism is )uropean in origin and
therefore white 5hiteness as such is of course no problem but in the blac# experience whiteness
almost always means racism 3n the past %arxists and other socialists
have been predominantly racist by excluding blacks from their
vision of the new socialist society Some socialists advocated that blac#s should be exported
to ,frica% and others claimed that their vision of a socialist society did not in any way eliminate racial sereation. 6thers% li#e Euene
'ebs% one of the founders of the &ocialist @arty in the early A0th century and a fre!uent @residential candidate% remained ambivalent
on the issue of racism. 5hen the &ocialist @arty did ta#e a stand aainst racism durin the "B0C and "B0D conventions% the stand was
wea# and nothin was done to implement it. The party was concerned not to offend southern white socialists who made it !uite clear
that there was a special place for blac# people and not even socialism can chane that fact. 3 thin# that blacks can
overcome the problem of marxism being white and racist the
same way we overcame the problem of Christianity being white
and racist !e can indigeni+e marxism" that is" reinterpret it for
our situation 5e do not refuse to ride in cars or airplanes% nor do we re=ect any other useful instrument =ust because
they were invented by whites. 5hy then should we re=ect marxism if it proves to be of use in our strule for freedom9 Many white
marxists% especially the communists durin the "BA0 Es% referred to blac# preachers as inorant and to their reliion as superstition% a
description that is not li#ely to win friends amon blac# church people. My comment on this is that 3 am sure that white -hristians%
'emocrats and 0epublicans have said and done worse thins to us% and 3 do not hear blac# -hristians sayin that we should cease
bein -hristians or re=ect 0epublicans and 'emocrats because some whites in these roups call us bad names. !hen
marxists have been forced to face the &uestion of race" they
have always made it secondary to the economic &uestion and
the class struggle 5hile this may be scientifically correct% the way in which
marxists put forward their perspective on race and class is
usually offensive to the victims of racism The blac# church is a nationalist% raceF
oriented institution whose identity is inseparably connected with the strule for freedom in this life as well as the eternal freedom
believed to be comin in >odGs eschatoloical future. )ow then can the blac# church embrace a philosophy which by definition ma#es
the elimination of racism secondary9 This is a critical !uestion and its implications point to the heart of the conflict between the blac#
church and marxism. The !uestion is whether the blac# church in particular and the blac# community enerally has anythin specific
and uni!ue to contribute to the strule for liberation in this society. %arxists seem to deny that we
have anything to contribute" and that is why they seldom turn
to our tradition for insight and guidance ,ike other whites"
they seem to think that they have the whole" pure truth
#he 1ar spin- #he critic can be a good idea" but their author s
have never experience the harms of Capitalism .e poor have
no $dea of their the ideological attachments to capitalism #he
cross-x should prove that the victims of capitalism don/t have
the luxury to stop from the ideas of capitalism #he *ff is the
only step to solve the connections to capital from the position
of the excluded bodies in the status &uo
solves better 4 using ca!italism to fight itself is more effective5
the wa) to target something for results is for )ou to initiall)
fight fire with fire to get the result s )ou want"
6othkrug 90 (8aul, Oounder @ !nironmental Rescue Ound, Monthl' Reiew,
March, 3((()&, p" <J&
No institution is or eer has been a seamless monolith " Although the inherent
mechanism of American capitalism is as 'ou describe it, oriented solel' to profit without regard to
social conseDuences, this does not preclude significant portions of that er' s'stem from Moining
forces with the worldwide effort for the salation of ciiliKation, perhaps een to the e.tent of
furnishing the margin of success for that er' effort "
%ase is a 7isad to the alt
#arms of the 8ac still ha!!en !ost alt
.erm do aff then the alternative
Nothing actuall) ha!!ens to ca!italism !ost alt default to aff on
!resum!tion
7ouble bind* either the alt is so strong that the !erm solves for this
one instance of ca!italism
&r if the link is as strong as the) claim to be which a!!arentl) kills
the !ermutation, the alt isnt strong enough to solve alone"
.erm do the !lan to ex!ose the contradictions in the ca!italist s)stem
The alt alone is coo!ted 4 )ou need a multitude of stand!oints means the
!erm solves: the alt cannot function under a!osituon of one stand!iiint
waiting for knowledge or to garnwer members for the revolution will fail
because we odnt have enough !wer to tackle ca!italism" When the) talk
about how !eo!le will break down ca!italism, itll never ha!!en, because we
talk about food" The alt exluded our uni+ue reason o rfood" .eo!le are t)ing
to sustain life, with food"
The) dro! cards on wh) te alt cant function, elites will functionall) resist,
Elites will resist the ca!mindset: if )ou the 9udge hae a lot of mone) and
someone were to take all that mone), would )ou sit there and let them 9ack
)ou of )our :0 dollar bill; No, )oure gonna get u! and get that mone) back,
or hussle, or call the co!s or do something" Which is exactl what the elites
will do"
%arroll 80 4 Pfounding director of the ,ocial %ustice ,tudies 8rogram at the ;niersit' of Bictoria (5illiam,
+7risis, moements, counter9hegemon'- in search of the new,0 Interface #-#, (2J9(*J, dml&
%ust as hegemon' has been increasingl' organiKed on a transnational basis @
through the globaliKation of Americanism, the construction of global goernance institutions, the emergence of a
transnational capitalist class and so on (,oederberg #))2E 7arroll #)()& @ counter9hegemon' has also
taken on transnational features that go be'ond the classic
No AlternativeNo Worldwide Transition
The lack of s!ecific alternative dooms the < 4 there can be no
worldwide transition and ca!italists will resist transition
<liman, professor of economics, 8ace ;niersit', in $6 QAndrew, +Not b' 8olitics
Alone,0 8resentation at :eft Oorum 7onference, March ((, http-11bit"l'1Db:#%TR
There are seeral different issues that I/m thinking of when I use the term +sustainable"0 ?ne is that it is hard to imagine that
a break with capitalism will emerge throughout the world all at once" This presents a
er' serious problem of sustainabilit', since histor' has shown, I beliee, that socialism in one countr' is
indeed impossible" 5hat can be done to defend the break with capitalism in the
meantime, against both the ineitable attempt at counter9reolution and capitalism/s
totaliKing tendenc', its tendenc' to swallow up and incorporate eer'thing within
itselfS I do not know" I do not know an'one who knows" But I do know that this is a Duestion that needs to be thought through with e.treme care @ and
now" It cannot be put off until +after the reolution"0 To assume that there will be time,
at that point, to think it through or time to work it out through e.perimentation, is
wishful thinking at best" It is Duite hard to beliee that there will be an' time at all
before the counter9reolution and the tentacles of the capitalist s'stem go to work" In
referring to +sustainabilit',0 I also hae seeral economic problems in mind that must be
confronted" If the emergent new societ' does not +delier the goods,0 and if it does
not moe towards elimination of alienated labor and reduction of working time, there
will be no popular mandate for it @ and indeed, no reason for its continued e.istence"
At this point, it could be kept alie onl' through force, through suppression of mass
opposition, so it would turn into its opposite"
No AlternativeTransition Wars
The) are uni+uel) conceding" Their transition awa) would
uni+uel) cause like wars, an) !lan which we dont gain
root cause acesss to means there will be no colla!se"
%risis within ca!italism doesnt cause it to colla!se, 9ust
causes ma9or war
0frica News =ervice, 6ec (), in $(
IN the late (*th 7entur', the chief author of the 7ommunist Manifesto, Carl Mar., argued that the contradictions of
capitalism would one da' destro' the capitalist s'stem" 4is predictions were followed
b' two world wars in the first half of the #)th 7entur'" The (*(39(*(J Oirst 5orld 5ar was followed b' a
Mar.ist9:eninist reolution in Russia in (*(H and the (*<*9(*3$ ,econd 5orld 5ar was followed b' a Maoist Reolution in 7hina in (*3*" The Great
6epression in the 5est in the (*<)s seemed to indicate that Carl Mar. had been
right" But there is something parado.ical about an economic s'stem which is based on
the law of the Mungle, euphemisticall' referred to as Tthe market forces of suppl' and demandT" It goes through
periodical crises, in which it leaes behind a lot of casualties, but the basic pillars of
the s'stem alwa's remain intact" Because of the attraction of human greed, the s'stem
is also alwa's able to spawn up demagogic disciples who reie its fortunes b' telling
us that an' economic s'stem which does not take into account human selfishness and
indiidual flair and creatiit' in its obMecties is bound to fail"
0nd, ca!italist elites will resist, causing global war: the) will
sto! an) t)!e of !rogression against ca!, onl) an action
within the s)stem can win, thats the 7)a 09 which sa)s
!ragmatism is ke)
#arris, Atlanta 5riter, in $( Q:ee, 8olic' Reiew, 6ecember, p<((<& The intellectual
origins of America9BashingR
This is the immiseriKation thesis of Mar." And it is central to reolutionar' Mar.ism, since if capitalism produces no
widespread miser', then it also produces no fatal internal contradiction- If eer'one is
getting better off through capitalism, who will dream of struggling to oerthrow itS
?nl' genuine miser' on the part of the workers would be sufficient to oerturn the
whole apparatus of the capitalist state, simpl' because, as Mar. insisted, the capitalist
class could not be realisticall' e.pected to relinDuish control of the state apparatus
and, with it, the monopol' of force " In this, Mar. was absolutel' correct" No capitalist
societ' has eer willingl' liDuidated itself, and it is utopian to think that an' eer will"
Therefore, in order to achiee the goal of socialism, nothing short of a complete
reolution would doE and this means, in point of fact, a full9fledged ciil war not Must
within one societ', but across the globe"
%oo!tation is inevitable and !roves the validit) of the criticism
while institutionali3ing change 4 an)thing else is teleolog)
with no chance of success
=tavrakakis 80 (Nannis, 8rof" of Ideolog' and 6iscourse Anal'sis in 6ept" of Go" U
;" of !sse., I%V, Bol 3, No # (#)()&, pgs" #$9#H
http-11KiKekstudies"org1inde."php1iMKs1article1iew1#$)1<<< bb&
And this is a success from which transformatie politics has to learn a lot" 4ere, anti*ca!italist readers should overcome their
shock and acknowledge, together with Badiou, the $ontological virtue of ca!ital- Wit e.poses the pure multiple
as the foundation of presentationE it denounces eer' effect of ?ne as a simple, precarious configuration, it dismisses the s'mbolic representations in which the bond found a semblance of being/
(Badiou (***- $29H&" This is the parado. and the challenge Badiou puts forth- W!hiloso!h) has not known until +uite recentl)
how to think in level terms with %a!ital since it has left the field open to its most intimate point, to ain nostalgia for the sacred, to
obsession with 8resence """ It has not cared to recogniKe in a straightforward wa' the absoluteness of the multiple and the non9being of the bond/ (Badiou (***- $J&" MuMi ma' be a concrete
manifestation of this challenge" >t is u! to us to draw the im!lications for !rogressive !olitics
and to channel this a!!arentl) existing !otential in radical democratic
instead of !ost*democratic directions" Indeed, im!erfect acts will alwa)s be,
sooner or later, o!en to some degree of co*o!tation b' established institutions and een b' the market" <entridge has
not managed to change our im!licit com!licit) to !ower structures" /and)s
work has not resulted in a massive weakening of consumerism"#2 Gormle', a Wcelebrit' artist/
most people would associate with a New :abour ision of public art, has not reersed post9political trends"#H Ourthermore, through their aforementioned works and stances, the' hae
undoubtedl' increased their isibilit' and perhaps their Wmarket alue/" B' embracing, howeer, the partial Mouissance of the not9All in terrains where this was considered unimaginable, b)
!artl) restructuring a -limited, !ublic s!ace along these lines, their !ro9ects
address an im!ortant challenge to all of us, een be'ond what the' might or might not be consciousl' enisaging and irrespectie
of whether the' can support this challenge themseles"#J 5h' then disDualif' them from being fitting e.amplesS As for MuMi, it does remain a successful capitalist enterprise due to its creatie and
enMo'able embrace of the logic of lack" But, wh) not see that co*o!tation as a measure of success; Wh)
not see it as a sign of the abilit) of all these acts to !resent the sacrifice of
!hallic en9o)ment and the identification with the lack in the &ther in a wa)
that the status +uo cannot ignore: %ommodification is the simplest !rocess
through which ca!italism can acknowledge the validit) of a criti+ue and make it its own, b'
incorporating it into its own specific mechanisms- hearing the demand e.pressed b' the critiDue, entrepreneurs seek to create products and serices which will satisf' it, and which the' will be able
to sell (Boltanski and 7hiapello #))$- 33#&" %o*o!tation is, at an' rate, unavoidable" 5e are all aware that art has and can certainl' function as ideological
support for the status Duo b' capturing and rendering harmless energies and pressures for change (Ra' #))*b- J)&" Marcuse, among others, warns us that an artistic search for sensibilit' can
become an end in itself Wand thereb' be co9opted into the reigning ethic of consumption/ (4ersch (**J- (H)&" Almost from its inception, psychoanal'sis was also put in the serice of the
engineering of consent, with Oreud/s nephew, !dward Berna's being one of the pioneers of the public relations industr' in the ;," And een ViXekLs Gandhian dictum @ WBe 'ourself the change 'ou
want to see in the world/ @ was recentl' gien a Wreolutionar' indiidualist/ twist in a new Nike campaign- WBe the reolution of 'ou/Y When such co*
o!tation1domestication of a radical act occurs, then transformative orientations need
to re*direct their ob9ectives, with the frontiers of antagonism displaced to a new position" This is what is at stake in an' struggle, which can onl' be an
impure, Wongoing, multiple, and unpredictable/ dialectic between power and resistance (Oleming and ,picer #))J- <)$&"#* ;nless, of course, one enisages it as a dramatic one9off Z la ViXek" But
then we are closer to religion than to politics and ps'choanal'sis" In the :acanian ethical orientation we can onl' hope that the institutionali3ation of lack
will make the unavoidable dialectic between co*o!tation and innovation a
d)namic one, introducing new rh'thms in the (continuous& redistribution of the sensible and permitting the formulation of innoatie post9capitalist alternaties" But here,
er' often, capital is still ahead of us"