WWW Google Com Patents US5855514

pdfcrowd.com open in browser PRO version Are you a developer?
Try out the HTML to PDF API

Patents
Publication number US5855514 A
Publication type Grant
Application number US 08/857,578
Publication date Jan 5, 1999
Filing date May 16, 1997
Priority date May 16, 1997
Fee status Paid
Also published as WO1998051382A1
Inventors Stuart J. Kamille
Original Assignee Stuart J. Kamille
Export Citation BiBTeX, EndNote, RefMan
Patent Citations (33), Referenced by (277), Classifications (11),
Legal Events (5)
External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, Espacenet
CLAIMS (63)
Probability game with insured winning
US 5855514 A
ABSTRACT
A probability game having multiple game pieces with areas which are covered with
a removable concealer and contain a number of void and/or win areas. The game
is controlled by player-made choices with respect to selecting areas to uncover
on the game pieces that are potential winners.
DESCRIPTION
Find prior art Discuss this patent View PDF Download PDF

IMAGES (19)

Sign in
pdfcrowd.com open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API
I claim:
1. A probability game having a plurality of game pieces in which each game piece
comprises a plurality of areas covered with removable concealer, wherein at least
some of the plurality of game pieces containing a combination of void and win
areas so that the plurality of game pieces include potential winners, where a void
area can void a game piece and wherein redemption is controlled by selection of a
ratio of void areas to win areas for the plurality of game pieces and by player-
made choices of when to end the game, and further wherein at least one of the
plurality of game pieces comprises an indication that allows the player to win in
spite of uncovering a predetermined number of voids.
2. The game defined in claim 1 wherein the predetermined number of
voids comprises one void.
3. The game defined in claim 1 wherein said at least one of the plurality
of game pieces comprises a different type of game piece than others of
the plurality of game pieces.
4. The game defined in claim 1 wherein said at least one of the plurality
of game pieces comprises a physically altered game piece.
5. The game defined in claim 4 wherein said at least one the plurality of
game pieces is physically altered by having a indication placed thereon
indicating that the player may win despite uncovering a predetermined
number of voids.
6. The game defined in claim 4 wherein said at least one of the game
pieces comprises a game piece with an appended bar code indicating
that the player may win despite uncovering a predetermined number of
voids.
pieces comprises a game piece with appended digital paper indicating
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is
subject to (copyright or mask work) protection. The (copyright or mask work)
owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent
document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark
Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all (copyright or mask work)
rights whatsoever.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a game; particularly, the present invention is
directed to a game having game pieces (or tickets) with playing surfaces having
areas that are covered with removable material and which are removed as part of
the game by a player.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Recently, lotteries have been used worldwide as a way to generate revenue for
state and local governments. Typically, these lotteries use "dedicated" tickets, or
game pieces. That is, the ticket is either solely a winning ticket or a losing ticket.
The player removes all the material, such as latex, covering a portion of the ticket
to determine if the ticket is either an instant loser or an instant winner. Since the
lotteries are for profit enterprises, there are many more losing tickets than winning
ones. Therefore, dedicated games are more often instant lose games than instant
win games. Nevertheless, they are very popular.
Currently, dedicated game pieces rely solely on imaginative graphics, colors and
themes to stimulate customer sales. A drawback to using dedicated game pieces
is that they provide little variation in the play style. Without skill one need only
remove the covering material to determine if the game piece is a winner or a loser.
Since the style of play is so repetitive, player burnout has become an increasing
problem. Recently there has been interest in other forms of game play which
might rekindle customer interest.
Traditional lottery games rely on scratch off game pieces which are seeded before
voids.
pieces comprises a game piece with an appended sticker indicating that
the player may win despite uncovering a predetermined number of voids.
9. The game defined in claim 4 wherein said at least one the plurality of
game pieces is physically altered by having a printed indication thereon.
10. A method of playing a game having a plurality of game pieces, each game
piece having a plurality of areas covered with removable concealer, wherein at
least some of the plurality of game pieces contain a combination of void and win
areas, comprising the steps of:
maintaining a storage area at a first location to store status data regarding
the plurality of game pieces;
changing status data associated with one of the plurality of game pieces prior
to encountering a void area in the one game piece in response to signaling
from a second location;
uncovering play areas on the one game piece;
signaling a redemption allowed indication for the one game piece based on
the presence of uncovered win areas despite the presence of an uncovered
void area if the status data has been changed.
11. The method defined in claim 10 wherein the step of changing status
data occurs prior to uncovering any play areas on the one game piece.
12. The method defined in claim 10 further comprising the steps of:
reading an identifier from the one game piece;
accessing the storage area based on the identifier;
writing a new status into a location in the storage area
distribution in order to control the number of potential winners. A mix of winners to
losers is prearranged by the customer. Once offered for sale to the public, the
results of the lottery are predictable with an amount set aside to cover the winning
game pieces. This amount is referred to as the prize purse or prize liability.
Because the number of winners is tightly controlled, the sponsor is given great
psychological comfort. After all, if the number of game pieces is limited, then only
that number of winners can be redeemed and no more. As a practical matter,
games of this nature actually redeem at less than the maximum redemption
amount since all of the game pieces are not sold, not played correctly, or
invalidated in some manner.
There is another way to control the number of prizes awarded which uses the laws
of probability. Such a game is commonly referred to as a probability game. Prior
art probability games involve a game in which each game ticket is a potential
winner. Each game piece includes a number of scratch off play areas concealing
win or other symbols. To play the game, an individual removes the concealing
material covering a specified number of the play areas to reveal the symbols
beneath them. The player then determines whether the combination of revealed
symbols results in a winner. A winning game piece may exist where all of the
symbols are the same, add up to, or represent a winning combination. Each
game piece includes at least one such winning combination, which contributes to
the probability game's popularity.
The operation of the laws of probability control the number of players who
successfully find a part of or the entire combination of symbols which produce the
winning result. For instance, the probability of successfully locating the one
location on a game piece which contains a winning symbol is greater if the player
is allowed a number of chances rather than only one.
Probability games, however, poses some potential problems. The most significant
of these problems is that of excessive prize purse liability. Although highly
unlikely, every game piece has the potential of being redeemed. This could lead to
massive redemption and uncontrolled amounts of prize liability. That is, every
writing a new status into a location in the storage area
corresponding to the one game piece.
13. The method defined in claim 10 wherein the step of signaling a
redemption allowed indication comprises the steps of:
reading an identifier from the one game piece;
accessing the storage area based on the identifier;
reading status from a location in the storage area corresponding to
the one game piece, said status indicating redemption is allowed for
the one game piece in spite of presence of an uncovered void area.
14. The method defined in claim 10 wherein the storage area comprises
a database.
15. The method defined in claim 10 wherein the plurality of game pieces
include guaranteed winners, guaranteed losers, and potential winners
and in which probability is controlled by player-made choices with
respect to selecting areas to uncover on the game pieces that are
potential winners.
16. The method defined in claim 15 wherein the plurality of areas in a
portion of the plurality of game pieces comprise a plurality of void areas.
portion of the plurality of game pieces comprise a plurality of win areas.
portion of the plurality of game pieces comprise a plurality of null,
directional or blank areas.
19. The method defined in claim 10 wherein a playing area on at least
one of the plurality of game pieces comprises indicia that directs player
choices to select one or more of the covered playing areas on said at
least one game piece.
player could select the same numbers in a single game and all could claim a
prize. This is not the same as in a game like Keno where the prize is pari-mutual
and distributed among all claimants. In a probability game, the prizes are not pari-
mutual and the sponsor would have to pay off at the stated amount for all the
prizes redeemed. This is potentially very troubling.
Each probability game has two types of prize purse liability associated with it.
The first type of prize purse liability is the amount of liability that is predicted to
occur if the laws of probability operate as expected. This is referred to herein as
the expected prize purse. But because of the chance of an unusual redemption
coincidence, an allowance must be made for the highly unlikely event of massive
redemption as described above. This is referred to as the maximum redemption
liability. The maximum redemption liability is the amount of prize sufficient to
cover all the game pieces if played to the maximum value and redeemed. This
may be a very large number. It is common for lottery games to have five to ten
million game pieces. If everyone had a potential prize value of 100 dollars,
regardless of how remote the chances that all will be redeemed, the maximum
redemption liability would be 1 billion dollars. It is not practical to set aside such a
vast amount of money.
To cover the potential maximum redemption liability, the credit of the sponsor
could be a bank against which these claims could be made. This is similar to the
banking operations of a casino in Nevada or Atlantic City. In games such as
roulette or craps, any outcome is possible. The number of winners and the
amount of their winnings, although predictable to some certainty based upon the
probability, cannot be guaranteed. A limit is therefore established to minimize the
amounts won, no matter the outcome. This limit is further guaranteed by a bank
backed by the credit of the casino. State lotteries do not allow for such banking to
occur. States, when establishing lotteries, do not intend to authorize gamblimg
houses and cannot run an unsecured lottery similiar to one of a gambling house.
The potential large liability may make such a game uninsurable. Insurance
underwriters do not wish to indemnify the prize purse when the liability is
potentially uncontrolled. Because of these difficulties, the development and
20. The method defined in claim 12 wherein the indicia comprises a
directional pointer.
21. The method defined in claim 19 wherein the indicia comprises a
multi-directional pointer that points to at least two of the plurality of
playing areas.
22. The method defined in claim 21 wherein the information comprises a
clue.
23. The method defined in claim 10 wherein at least one of the plurality
of game pieces comprises information to the player to allow the player to
make a more informed decision as to playing areas to uncover in the
future on said at least one game piece.
24. The method defined in claim 10 wherein the game comprises a
probability game.
25. A method of playing a game having a plurality of game pieces, each game
piece having a plurality of areas covered with removable concealer, wherein at
least some of the plurality of game pieces contain a combination of void and win
areas, where a void area can void a game piece, comprising the steps of:
changing at least one of the plurality of game pieces in a predetermined
manner prior to encountering a void area in the at least one game piece;
uncovering play areas on the at least one game piece;
signaling a redemption allowed indication for the at least one game piece
based on the presence of uncovered win areas despite the presence of an
uncovered void area upon determining that the one game piece has been
changed in the predetermined manner.
26. The method defined in claim 25 wherein the step of signaling
comprises the steps of:
deployment of probability games has been slow.
Another problem associated with probability games is fraud and involves a
situation where a player removes the covering material from more than the number
allowed by the game. For instance, where a player is allowed six attempts to find
the winning areas and instead takes seven or eight. Although this problem would
seem apparently easy to handle due to the apparently clear violation of the rules,
the redemption of the tickets is typically handled by clerks. These clerks must be
able to determine the value of a ticket, particularly because the tickets are not like
those of dedicated games, which are either clearly winners or clearly losers. A
probability game ticket could be much harder to read and may lead to mistakes
by clerks. Therefore, what is desired is a way to handle fraudulent play while
eliminating potential mistakes by clerks.
Game pieces are usually verified and authenticated by the use of an encrypted
alphanumeric bar code. The code often appears twice on a ticket, once printed so
that it is visible to the human eye and once printed and concealed on the game
piece, via, for example, latex removable scratch off coating. Various methods have
been used to make game piece redemption simple and secure. In simple form,
authentication takes place when a bar code scanner reads the code printed in the
clear and a clerk compares the code to the number that is concealed.
The currently most successful authentication procedure is a double encryption
process in which a code is printed on the back of the game piece and an
encrypted code placed under the latex on the playing side. After the game has
been played, the playing side code number is revealed and a key code is entered
by, for instance, a clerk which triggers an algorithm that matches the scanned
number to (in the case of a valid ticket) the one printed under the latex. The
success of the authentication assumes that the clerk enters the key numbers
correctly and follows proper redemption procedures.
In a dedicated game, since each game piece is dedicated in value (i.e., has only
one possible value), the decoded game piece number can be matched in a
database and the value displayed for the clerk. The game piece can then be
automatically examining the at least one game piece; and
determining that the at least one game piece has been altered in
the predetermined manner.
27. The method defined in claim 25 wherein the game comprises a
probability game.
28. The method defined in claim 25 wherein the step of changing the at
least one game piece comprises physically altering the at least one
game piece.
29. The method defined in claim 28 wherein the step of physically
altering the at least one game piece comprises stamping the at least
one game piece with an indication that indicates that redemption may be
allowed for the at least one game piece despite the presence of an
uncovered void area.
30. The method defined in claim 28 wherein the step of physically
altering said at least one of the plurality of game pieces comprises
printing an indication on said at least one of the plurality of game pieces
indicating that redemption may be allowed for the at least one game
piece despite the presence of an uncovered void area.
least one game piece comprises hole punching the at least one game
piece.
least one game piece comprises dividing a portion of the at least one
game piece.
least one game piece comprises appending an indicator to the at least
one game piece indicating that redemption is allowed for the at least one
game piece despite the presence of an uncovered void area.
redeemed and the number removed from the data base to prevent further attempts
at redemption for that particular piece.
Again, the weak link in this system is the clerk who enters the key code. If the
clerk is clumsy, inefficient or busy, several attempts might be necessary to verify
the piece. If the clerk is dishonest, he can misinform the client and attempt to
suborn the game piece for himself. This has prompted manufacturers to find a
more efficient and secure method of game piece verification and redemption.
Apart from the potential for human error and unscrupulous behavior, this
authentication process is relatively secure. However, there is also a need to have
the game pieces scored (i.e., the amount of winning determined), as well as
authenticated. What is needed is a way to automate the entire process (both
authentication and scoring) without requiring clerk involvement. Once such
automation is achieved, more complicated games could be produced.
The present invention provides for a probability game that controls prize liability
while accommodating the practical problems of player fraud and clerk
mismanagement. The present invention also provides for automating the process
of authentication and scoring.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A probability game is described. The probability game of the present invention has
multiple game pieces. Each game piece has areas which are covered with a
removable concealer that conceals the areas. Each game piece also contains a
number of areas which are either void or win areas. In this way, the group of game
pieces include guaranteed winners, guaranteed losers, and potential winners and
in which the outcome is controlled by the laws of probability through player-made
choices with respect to selecting areas to uncover on the game pieces that
present winning indicia. At least one of the game pieces has an indication that
allows winning in spite of the presence of uncovered void areas.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
game piece despite the presence of an uncovered void area.
34. The method defined in claim 33 wherein the indicator comprises a
barcode.
digital paper indication.
sticker.
37. An apparatus to facilitate playing a game having a plurality of game pieces,
each game piece having a plurality of areas covered with removable concealer,
wherein at least some of the plurality of game pieces contain a combination of
void and win areas so that the plurality of game pieces include potential winners,
where a void area can void a game piece and wherein redemption is controlled by
selection of a ratio of void areas to win areas for the plurality of game pieces and
by player-made choices of when to end the game, the apparatus comprising:
means for storing, at a first location, status data regarding the plurality of
game pieces;
means for changing status data associated with one of the plurality of game
pieces prior to encountering a void area in the one game piece in response to
signaling from a second location;
means for signaling a redemption allowed indication for the one game piece
based on the presence of uncovered win areas despite the presence of
uncovered void areas if the status data has been changed.
38. The apparatus defined in claim 37 wherein the status data is
changed prior to uncovering any play areas on the one game piece.
39. The apparatus defined in claim 37 further comprising:
means for reading an indentifier from the one game piece;
The present invention will be understood more fully from the detailed description
given below and from the accompanying drawings of various embodiments of the
invention, which, however, should not be taken to limit the invention to the specific
embodiments, but are for explanation and understanding only.
FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a partially uncovered game piece of the present
invention.
FIG. 2 illustrates an alternate embodiment of a game piece in which the play
areas run across the bottom of the playing surface of a game.
FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a variable minimum value game piece.
FIG. 4A and 4B illustrate exemplary safe cracker game pieces prior to play and
completely uncovered, respectively.
FIG. 4C illustrates an exemplary layered game.
FIG. 5 is an example of a game piece that contains a multi-directional arrow.
FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate a Ringer game piece unplayed and completely
uncovered, respectively.
FIG. 7A is an uncovered game piece for a Field of Stars game containing multiple
choice directionals.
FIG. 7B illustrates examples of directionals.
FIG. 7C is an alternate embodiment of an uncovered game piece for a Field of
Stars game with a teaser prize in order to add player interest.
FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of playing a game with insurance.
FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate two methods for scoring of game pieces.
FIG. 10 illustrates an example of a bar code.
FIG. 11 illustrates an exemplary bar code for an unplayed game piece.
means for accessing the means for storing based on the identifier,
and
means for writing a new status into a location in the means for
storing corresponding to the one game piece.
40. The apparatus defined in claim 37 wherein the means for signaling a
redemption allowed indication comprises:
means for reading the identifier from the one game piece;
means for accessing the means for storing based on the identifier;
and
means for reading status from a location in the means for storing
corresponding to the one game piece, the status indicating
redemption is allowed for the one game piece in spite of the
presence of an uncovered void area.
41. The apparatus defined in claim 37 wherein the means for storing
comprises a data base.
42. The apparatus defined in claim 37 wherein the plurality of game
pieces include guaranteed winners, guaranteed losers, and potential
winners and in which probability is controlled by player-made choices
with respect to selecting areas to uncover on the game pieces that are
potential winners.
43. The apparatus defined in claim 42 wherein the plurality of areas in a
FIG. 12 illustrates a bar code from a used game piece.
FIG. 13 illustrates an alternative approach to scoring game pieces.
FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate an alternative approach that does not use the circuit.
FIG. 15 illustrates another alternative approach.
FIG. 16 illustrates an example of a game piece.
FIG. 17 illustrates a game piece with the VIRN removed.
FIG. 18 illustrates that a game piece with an additional number appearing in its
code.
FIG. 19 illustrates the use of a number of the card ID representing the number of
winning spots printed on the ticket.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
A probability game is described. In the following description, numerous details are
set forth, such as types of game pieces, directionals, clues, scanner/reading
equipment, etc. It will be apparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that the
present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other
instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form,
rather than in detail, in order to avoid obscuring the present invention.
The following specification includes copyrighted material. Applicant retains all
rights in the copyrighted material included herein, but expressly allows for its
copying for the purpose of copying the patent and its application.
Overview of the Present Invention
The present invention provides for managing a probability game in which every
game piece is not a potential winner and the allocation of prizes is based on
probability. The present invention provides for performing liability management by
46. The apparatus defined in claim 42 wherein a playing area on at least
one of the plurality of game pieces comprises indicia that directs player
choices to select one or more of the covered playing areas on said at
least one game piece.
47. The apparatus defined in claim 46 wherein the indicia comprises a
directional pointer.
48. The apparatus defined in claim 46 wherein the indicia comprises a
multi-directional pointer that points to at least two of the plurality of
playing areas.
49. The apparatus defined in claim 42 wherein at least one of the
plurality of game pieces comprises information to the player to allow the
player to make a more informed decision as to playing areas to uncover
in the future on said at least one game piece.
50. The apparatus defined in claim 48 wherein the information comprises
a clue.
51. An apparatus of playing a probability game having a plurality of game pieces,
each game piece having a plurality of areas covered with removable concealer,
wherein at least some of the plurality of game pieces contain a combination of
void and win areas so that the plurality of game pieces include potential winners,
where a void area can void a game piece and wherein redemption is controlled by
means for storing an indication that at least one of the plurality of game
pieces has been changed in the predetermined manner prior to encountering
a void area in the at least one game piece; and
means for signaling a redemption allowed indication for the at least one game
controlling prize amounts and by the mix of types of game pieces. In such a
system, the probability of winning is controlled by varying the number of void
areas on individual pieces. A void area may be equated to a lose symbol or indicia
that indicates to the player that they have lost. The number of voids are varied
such that the overall ratio of the number of voids to winners is changed to control
the amount of liability. In this manner, the use of multiple voids controls the prize
structure. In another embodiment, the probability of winning can also be controlled
by including multiple winning amounts as well.
Each game piece could contain both void and winning areas. Some game pieces
may have many winning amounts and a single void, while others may have many
void areas and a single prize amount. Still others could have some combination
between these two extremes or be entirely dedicated to either a losing or winning
state. In this manner, the game pieces range from winners to losers. A winning
game piece may exist where all of the symbols are the same, add up to, or
represent a winning combination. The void and win areas are indicated by
symbols or other indicia that are (initially) covered with a concealing, opaque
material.
It should be noted that the term "game piece" may comprise both physical and
virtual embodiments. For instance, game pieces may comprise physical tickets
with playing surfaces (e.g., instant scratchers). On the other hand, they may also
comprise virtual embodiments such as video, television, or other displayed game
pieces. These virtual embodiments may be video, slot or game machine,
computer network (e.g., Internet, World Wide Web, Intranet) video games and
displays, etc. It should be noted that while play areas on physical game pieces
may be covered in a removable concealer like latex, or other opaque material, the
removable concealer in virtual embodiments may take the form of darkened or
unreadable play areas on the display which is not physically uncovered, but
instead is allowed to display the play area in a user viewable format when
selected by the user to be "uncovered." Furthermore, any discussion of a game
piece below encompasses both the physical and virtual embodiments.
The probability game controls redemption by discovering prize amounts. The
piece based on the presence of uncovered win areas despite the presence of
an uncovered void area upon determining that the at least one game piece
has been changed in the predetermined manner.
52. The apparatus defined in claim 51 wherein the means for signaling
comprises:
means for automatically examining the one game piece; and
means for determining that the one game piece has been altered in
the predetermined manner.
53. The apparatus defined in claim 51 wherein the at least one game
piece comprises a hole punch indicating that redemption is allowed
despite the presence of an uncovered void area.
54. The method defined in claim 51 wherein at least game piece
contains a portion that is divided indicating that redemption is allowed
despite the presence of an uncovered void area.
55. The method defined in claim 51 wherein the at least one game
pieces is appended with an indicator indicating that redemption is
allowed for the one game piece despite the presence of an uncovered
void area.
56. An apparatus for playing a game having a plurality of game pieces, each
game piece having a plurality of areas covered with removable concealer, wherein
at least some of the plurality of game pieces contain a combination of void and
win areas so that the plurality of game pieces include potential winners, where a
void area can void a game piece and wherein redemption is controlled by a
a storage system having a storage area at a first location to store status data
regarding the plurality of game pieces, wherein the storage system accesses
the status data to change the status data associated with one of the plurality
The probability game controls redemption by discovering prize amounts. The
redemption may also be controlled by limiting the number of attempts. If the
player cannot find the prize in a limited number of attempts or if a void area is
encountered, the game is over. The present invention uses a variable number of
voids boxed off a game piece ranging from zero to the entire number of spots, or
play areas, on the game piece. Each void area invalidates the game and stops the
play.
Note that certain games may require a number of voids to be uncovered before the
game ends and the player loses. For instance, 2, 3, 4, etc. voids may have to be
uncovered before the game ends.
The present invention also allows for interactive play. Each game piece is played
one spot at a time; however, any spot could void the game piece. Therefore, the
responsibility for careful play rests on the player. That is, the player decides when
to stop or when to go on. The player continues to play by uncovering a winning
amount, encountering a null, directional or blank area or by voiding the game
piece.
Also, in the present invention, there is no limit to the number of attempts a player
may take. The player continues to play until a void is uncovered or until the player
has collected all the prize (money) that can be obtained or until the player can no
longer stand the risk that their next choice may void the game piece. In this
manner, the player is provided with an incentive to quit playing based on their own
judgment. The player weighs the risk versus the reward and decides whether to
continue. Note that this is very different than the minimum performance required in
the prior art probability game where to control the odds, the prior art games must
require the player to pick a minimum number of times. The present invention frees
the player of this burden.
In fact, in one embodiment, a player playing a game piece in which every spot is a
winner may decide to stop playing and turn in the game piece when he has won
only a portion of the potential prize value. Thus, the present invention allows a
dedicated game piece to have multiple returns due to the player-made choice of
the status data to change the status data associated with one of the plurality
of game pieces prior to encountering a void area in the one game piece in
response to signaling from a second location; and
a terminal coupled to exchange information with the storage system, wherein
the terminal includes an automatic reader which causes access to the
database to obtain status data for the one game piece, the storage system
signaling a redemption allowed indication to the terminal for the one game
piece based on the presence of uncovered win areas despite the presence of
an uncovered void area if the status data has been changed.
57. The apparatus defined in claim 56 wherein the storage system
executes software that determines whether a predetermined number of
allowed void areas or less are identified on the one game piece if the
status data had been changed to indicate that redemption would be
allowed on the one game piece despite the presence of an uncovered
void area.
58. The apparatus defined in claim 56 wherein the automatic reader
reads an identifier from the one game piece and accesses the storage
area based on the identifier, the system writing a new status into the
location in the storage area corresponding to the one game piece as part
of the access.
59. The apparatus defined in claim 57 wherein the automatic reader
reads an identifier from the one game piece and accesses the storage
area based on the identifier, the system reading status from the location
in a storage area corresponding to one game piece based on the
identifier as part of the access.
60. The apparatus defined in claim 58 wherein the plurality of game
pieces include guaranteed winners, guaranteed losers, and potential
winners and in which probability is controlled by player-made choices
with respect to selecting areas to uncover on the game pieces that are
potential winners.
deciding when to quit. This is clearly not present in the prior art.
FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a game piece of the present invention. Referring
to FIG. 1, a game pieces is shown having a playing surface 100 with play areas
101-106. Play areas 101-102 are win areas which contain symbols that indicate
dollar amounts won while play area 106 comprises a void, or lose, area (i.e., play
areas containing a symbol indicating the ticket is void). In this case, playing
surface 100 contains multiple prizes of the same value. In an alternate
embodiment, the multiple prizes may have different values. As a player plays the
game, the player removes the concealing material (e.g., latex) that covers each of
play areas 101-106. The player may stop at any time, and there is no limit to the
number of attempts the player can make. As shown, play areas 101, 102 and 106
have been uncovered, while play areas 103-105 remain covered (indicated by
crosshatched marking for purposes of explanation). Since the player encountered
a void by uncovering play areas 106, the player loses the $1 prizes that are
uncovered.
FIG. 2 illustrates an alternate embodiment in which the play areas run across the
bottom of the playing surface of a game. Referring to FIG. 2, circle play areas 201
are lined up along the bottom of a ship.
The present invention provides for cumulative prize winning. That is, each prize
could be uncovered on a game piece with multiple winning amounts and what
accumulates is the value of the ticket which would be allowed to climb as the
game is being played. One or more void areas on a ticket may be selected and
then cause forfeiture of the entire amount. As the amount climbs, the risk of
selecting a void area increases. Thus, in such a case, the player has a powerful
incentive to stop playing or face the potential loss of his prize. In other words, a
player may settle for far shorter than the maximum amount available. However,
because the player would not know this, player dissatisfaction would be
completely eliminated with the amounts won since the player himself makes the
decision whether to quit.
After accessing the maximum liability, pieces with multiple prizes would have to
potential winners.
be funded to the maximum amount. Although the probability of the game of the
present invention does not provide for all game pieces being winners, the player is
not aware that the game piece they have bought is a seeded loser, and thus the
game would remain interesting to such a person. Therefore, making each game
piece potentially valuable with increased risk for each additional selection, the
game becomes much more involving and more interesting.
It should be noted that with respect to the maximum prize liability, all game
pieces do not have to contain a winner. Some of the game pieces may be
winners, while others be losers, and yet others may be probable winners and
losers. Since not all of the game pieces in the game need to be funded, the
amount of the maximum prize liability can be reduced significantly.
By providing a probability game as described in the present invention, the maximum liability in the prize purse can be
underwritten with an amount less than the amount taken in by sales. This is very important since it allows insurance
underwriters to remain confident that even if a catastrophic break occurred, the game would not cost more than its income.
Types of Game Pieces
In one embodiment, the present invention provides for varying both the odds of selecting a winner and also the amount of the
prize by including prize levels referred herein as losing winners and break-even levels. These levels are less than or equal to
the amount of the purchase price of the game piece. By offering game pieces with less than or equal amounts of the
purchase price, certain "winners" would actually redeem at less than face value or at actual face value.
One embodiment of the present invention includes the following types of game pieces: game pieces that are guaranteed
winners, game pieces that are guaranteed losers, less than purchase price game pieces, equal to purchase price game
pieces, and game pieces with varying winning amounts (determined by probability). The mixing of game pieces gives a
projected redemption.
In one embodiment, a guaranteed winner has no void symbols and only one winning symbol. All of the remaining play areas
on the game piece in the play surface are pass or free trial areas. The player may play all the way through the game piece if
necessary removing all the concealing material from the spots with one or more blank areas offering him a chance to keep on
going. Ultimately, the player uncovers the single winning symbol and the play stops.
A guaranteed losing game piece is one in which there are no winning symbols and either pass or lose symbols.
A minimum value game piece is a winner that either does not compensate the player for the full purchase price (i.e., win a
dollar for a two-dollar purchase) or simply allow him to win only a free game. In the former case, a player has actually lost,
but the sting of the loss is reduced because the player can redeem for a partial refund of the full purchase price. In the latter
case, the player has actually won nothing, but another chance to play.
There are several types of minimum value game pieces. For instance, a minimum value game piece may be a forced
minimum win where there is a single win spot and all others are try again. A minimum value game piece may be forced void
where there are multiple void spots and all others are try again spots. A variable minimum value win game piece is one where
there are varying numbers of values that total less than the purchase amount and both try again and void areas. A guaranteed
minimum value win is where there are varying numbers of value still all totaling less than the purchase price but which also
have a guaranteed minimum value. In one embodiment, the number of redemption at this guaranteed level depends on the
number of such spots on the game piece. Just as with the winning or voids spots, the number of guaranteed minimum value
spots uncovered can be predicted.
FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a variable minimum value game piece. Referring to FIG. 3, a game piece having a playing
surface 300 with play areas 301-306 is shown. Playing areas 301-303 and 306 are uncovered, while play areas 304-305
remain covered (indicated by crosshatching). Note that the maximum accumulated prize is only $1.50, which is less than the
purchase price of the game ticket. A combination game piece such as is shown in FIG. 3 may be included in a probability
game. Pieces of this type may feature a variety of prize values such as break even amounts, some less than break even
game pieces, some winning game pieces and some losing game pieces. Each of the game pieces may have different odds
associated with the probability that a win results. Besides varying the probability of winning or losing by varying the winning
and losing symbols, the amount won or lost could also vary. Thus, winning tickets could all have the same value, or each
ticket might have a different value or the ultimate value might vary through player selection from a field of possible ticket
values as part of the play of the game.
Play area 303 contains an arrow symbol, which is referred to herein as a directional. A directional directs player choices.
Directionals are discussed in more detail below.
A break-even game piece is a winning game piece in which the player wins the purchase price of the game piece. It is
important to remember that these game pieces contain void areas which will prevent many of these potential even money
redemptions because there is a good chance that the game piece will be voided if more than one spot is revealed. Also, there
is a good chance the player will stop before voiding the game piece. This is a neutral outcome to the sponsor since the player
can only get his original purchase price back.
Break-even game pieces may include a forced break-even where a single break-even value win spot is on the game piece and
all others are try again spots. It is also possible to have variable break-even tickets, where there is a varying number of
winning amounts that total the same as the purchase amount and both try again and void areas.
It should be noted that the number of game pieces with varying numbers of winning areas compared to void, or losing, areas
may be adjusted according to research results, client preference, and player psycho-graphic data. If there are many game
pieces with multiple win areas and the chance to increase the award upon discovery of multiple prize areas, then the game is
more exciting. In one embodiment, a game piece includes one or more multipliers, which may or may not have to be
uncovered, that multiplies the prize value (e.g., doubling or tripling the prize value) if encountered.
One embodiment of the game which may be a probability game according the present invention is referred to as Safecracker
and is shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B. Safecracker is a game that has a two-tiered format. The player must pass a first tier before
being allowed through to the second. The game may be viewed as two games: a qualifying game and a pay-off game.
Specifically, the player discovers the combination to a safe before being allowed to try the combination on the safe allowing
him access to the prize. The process of gaining the combination could end up in a void game piece even though the safe held
a prize. Even if the player successfully crosses the first tier (i.e., discovers a combination without encountering a void play
area), there is still risk because the combination the player has obtained might be faulty and end the game once again.
In one embodiment of Safecracker, there are five spots covered with latex in an upper tier and six in a lower tier. Thus, the
upper portion of the playing surface is a five spot playing field. The first choice is among five spots (401-405). FIG. 4A
illustrates an exemplary Safecracker game piece prior to play. Referring to FIGS. 4A and 4B, in the first tier there is only one
void area, 404, and combination numbers, 401, 402, 403, and 405. It should be noted that there could be more than one void
area. Therefore, the probability of choosing the void area on the first attempt is 4 out of 5. The probability changes by one less
for every choice thereafter for both the numerator and the denominator since there are fewer spots to pick from and fewer
numbers to pick from as well. Since, in this case, three numbers will be required to form a complete combination, the actual
probability would be 4/53/42/3 which equals 0.800.750.66 or 0.396=39.6%. In other words, nearly 40% of all the players
will clear the first tier and end up with a combination. Second tier probabilities are straight forward as well. There are six
numbers and in this case only one combination has a reward and the remainder are voids (406-411). The odds are simply 1/6
or 16.6%. Therefore, with this particular combination of symbols (one void in the top tier and five in the second tier), only
39.6%16.6% or 6.59% of players will receive an award.
It should be noted that three numbers do not have to be required for the combination in other embodiments. Combinations of
any size may be used. For instance, combinations may have only three or five or other amounts of digits for the combination.
FIG. 4C illustrates an example of a layered game in which the value of the prize automatically changes. Referring to FIG. 4C,
the player initially rubs off five cards of playing surface 421. Prize values are indicated. If the player does not win with their
original 5 cards, another card may be purchased. To do so, the player moves up to playing surface 422. However, there is a
cost as the prize values go down. Still another card may be purchased and obtained at playing surface 423; however, again,
the potential prize value drops further.
Thus, the probability game of the present invention provides a known number of winners and losers which will yield a known
and predictable total prize liability based on laws of probability. Unlike a banking game, the preprinted game piece can only
yield what is printed on the surface. All choices are not available to the player. The player will not change the amount of prize
offered. Not all game pieces have an equal chance of being winners or of winning an amount greater than the purchase price.
Managing Player Interactive Play
The present invention also sets forth managing individual play of a probability game. The individual play is managed by one or
more of the following: directionals, clues, and insurance.
In one embodiment of the present invention, each of the play areas on play surfaces of individual game pieces may include
symbols that act as directionals. Directionals direct a player to play the game pieces a specific way. In other words, a
directional directs an individual's choice as to which play areas to uncover on a playing surface.
In one embodiment, directionals take the form of arrows or pointers in the playing areas. Such an arrow may direct a player to
play a particular playing area (remove the concealing material from that playing area). An example of this type of directional is
shown in play area 303 in FIG. 3. In another embodiment, the directional may be a multi-pronged directional arrow (or pointer)
that points to multiple locations or playing areas on the playing surface. These are referred to herein as choice directionals. It
would then be the responsibility of the player to decide among the options provided as to which play area would be
uncovered. Thus, the choice directionals force a player through a series of bridges, extending the play of the game. The odds
of losing are increased by controlling the number of pathways a player must take. In this manner, choice directionals are an
odds control element. Note that although the directionals may be arrows, any pointer indication may provide a similar
function.
FIG. 5 is an example of a game piece that contains a multi-directional arrow. Referring to FIG. 5, the game piece contains
playing surface 500 having play areas 501-506. Play area 501 has a prize symbol (concealed); play area 502 has a void
symbol; play areas 503-505 have uni-direction directional symbols, and play area 506 contains a multi-direction directional
symbol. The multi-directional arrow at play area 506 gives the player the choice of going to play area 503 and 505 next. The
game piece in FIG. 5 is a seeded loser in which there is no way to win. Such a game could be won if insurance is purchased
as described below.
FIGS. 6A and 6B and 7A illustrate two other examples of using choice directionals. FIGS. 6A and 6B illustrate a Ringer game
piece unplayed and completely uncovered, respectively. Referring to FIG. 6B, a choice directional 601, among others, is
shown. FIG. 7A is a game piece (uncovered) for a Field of Stars game in which multiple choice directionals, such as
directional 701, are shown.
In another embodiment, a directional may take the form of hint or clue. For instance, a hint or clue may indicate whether the
player is approaching a win spot or approaching a void area. An example of such a clue directional is a phrase "getting
warmer" or "you're hot". Such indicators direct the player in selecting a play area to uncover.
FIG. 7B illustrates examples of directionals. Referring to FIG. 7B, directionals are shown to include a pointer 711, a verbal
directional such as 712-714 and a thermometer type directional 715, and a gauge type directional 716.
Any type of clue may be used to help a player to reduce the number of potential candidates to be uncovered while playing the
game may constitute a directional. In one embodiment, clues are given outside the playing area on the game piece and may
have to be scratched off. In one embodiment, the more clues used the lower the value of the ticket. That is, as more clues are
used, the value of the game piece decreases.
FIG. 7C is an alternative embodiment of an uncovered game piece for a Field of Stars game with a teaser prize in order to add
player interest. Referring to FIG. 7C, the game piece includes a number of starting arrows to indicate to the player where to
start to play. Note that the game piece may have only one such start arrow. Regardless of which arrow is chosen by the
player, the player is guaranteed to encounter a win area early during the playing of the game piece. This is a teaser prize that
is small in comparison to the prize of the game piece and/or a potential large prize; however, the presence of the teaser prize
raises the price of loss to the player as a winning amount is already being risked by continuing to play. Thus, risk is being
added to the game while not costing the sponsor much at all. After uncovering the teaser prize, directionals direct the player's
choices of the next play areas to uncover, if desired.
As shown in FIG. 7C, each play area may include two (or more) symbols such as an arrow and a prize amount. In one
embodiment, many play areas include one or more symbols.
Insurance
In one embodiment, a player may purchase insurance for the game piece. The insurance may be purchased at the time of
purchasing the game piece or in an alternate embodiment may be purchased prior to encountering a void when playing the
game piece. The insurance may be designed to compensate for a variety of situations. For instance, by paying insurance, the
player may be immune from losing when uncovering their first void area. In another embodiment, insurance can be paid to
enable the player to encounter a predetermined number (e.g., 2, 3, etc.) voids without having the game piece become void.
For example, in the case of the game piece in FIG. 3, if a player had insurance, the void at play area 306 would not void the
game piece and the player would have collected the prizes at play areas 301 and 302.
The use of such an insurance scheme for game pieces requires some form of recording to ensure that a player who pays
insurance gets proper credit for the insurance. In one embodiment, the fact that an insurance fee was paid can be indicated
by using a different type of game piece, such as one with a different color, graphics, etc. In another embodiment, the game
piece may be physically altered, for example, by stamping or printing with some special ink or an indication that sets forth
that insurance has been paid. In another embodiment, the game piece may be physically altered by hole punching, tearing,
etc., the ticket to indicate that insurance has been paid. In still another embodiment, the game piece may be appended with
an indicator such as with a barcode, digital paper indication, or sticker indicating that insurance has been paid for the game
piece.
FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of playing a game with insurance. Referring to FIG. 8, the process to accommodating the
insuring of game pieces includes changing the playing surface in a predetermined manner prior to encountering a void area
(processing block 801). Then, the player uncovers play areas on the playing the surface (processing block 802). Then, a
redemption allowed indication is signaled during redemption where there are uncovered win areas and an uncovered void area
when it is determined that the playing surface has been changed in the predetermined manner to indicate that the insurance
has been paid (processing block 803).
Because the potential for people duplicating the changes to the game piece in an unscrupulous manner to obtain free
insurance, an automated insurance process is more desirable. In such a case, no change need be made to the game piece
itself. In one embodiment, a storage area storing status information for each of the pieces is maintained. Such a storage area
may be a database or other type of storage medium. Upon payment of insurance, the database is accessed typically from a
remote location (over a network) in a manner well-known in the art. In one embodiment, this may be performed from a remote
point of sale terminal such that the system storing the data is accessed through a network other type of communications
medium using a void if removed number (VIRN). At this point, the status in the database for that game piece is changed to
reflect the fact that insurance has been paid. The particular data in the database may be written to indicate that insurance
has been paid. Thereafter, the player may continue playing the game and, when redeeming, an automatic reader or scanner
accesses the database by using, for example, the VIRN and a redemption allowed indication would be signaled based on the
presence of win areas being uncovered despite the presence of an uncovered void area. When gaining access to the
database, the status value is used and software determines that insurance has been paid and the predetermined number of
allowable void areas (or less) were identified on the game piece.
Scoring and Redemption
While the present invention provides more play style, its also places an additional burden on lottery clerks and could cause
confusion at redemption centers. These lottery clerks must now be able to distinguish winning tickets from losing tickets, and
locate and match both winning and losing symbols upon the pieces. The present invention avoids these problems by provided
a method and apparatus for scoring games pieces.
In one embodiment, a remote scoring device is used to determine the amount of winnings. The probability game of the
present invention uses an instant game piece validation process that offers a more efficient, secure method of handling
instant lottery games. The validation process of the present invention automatically moves a ticket through a scanner that
confirms whether a prescribed amount of latex has been removed, or scratched, from the game piece's play area. The game
piece then moves past a bar code scanner that reads the bar code printed on the game piece.
The present invention sets forth scoring methods which use the verification code on the game piece itself as part of scoring
the game piece. All game pieces have identifying numbers which allow the operator to identify the game piece. Each game
piece has matching numbers that are stored in a computer archive (e.g., memory, hard disk, CD-ROM, etc.). When a game
piece is redeemed as a possible winner, that number is used to verify that it is an active game piece.
The present invention provides for using slot and wand readers that are capable of reading alphanumeric characters and bar
coding which is indecipherable to human beings. Slot and wand readers are well-known in the art. In this manner, the present
invention allows game pieces to be printed such that no one but the scanner could read them.
FIGS. 9A and 9B illustrate two methods for scoring of game pieces. Referring to FIG. 9A, a verification number, (VIRN), such
as 901, is scanned by a bar or wand scanner and sent to a computer (not shown) for activation. Each verification number is
unique. In one embodiment, the number is printed and clearly visible on the playing surface. When the game piece is
redeemed, the verification number 901 is rescanned and compared to an indication in a database in memory to see if it is an
active game piece. An additional copy of the verification number 901 may be encrypted under the VIRN area on the card to
prevent swapping the number from game piece to game piece. In one embodiment, each number is encoded for security.
In one embodiment, the bar code or other machine readable code or character is printed under every latex covered play area.
On most spots where a winning value appears, one type of bar code could appear while on blank areas another could occur.
On losing or void areas, a third code could appear. Depending on which codes the scanner sees, the output can be analyzed
and interpreted.
FIG. 9B illustrates a game piece of the present invention that has improved features to facilitate scoring. In one embodiment
of the present invention, the scoring information is divided into small alphanumeric bits that are scattered over the playing
surface of the game piece. Referring to FIG. 9B, the code "12" falls over win areas, such as play areas 902, 903 and 907; the
code "5A" falls over void areas, such as play area 904, and nulls, directionals, blanks, or try again areas have a code of "34,"
such as play areas 905 and 906. Any machine readable code scheme could be used (e.g., ASCII, etc.).
When scoring, the entire surface is scanned and the resulting data stream compared to a matching number in the computer.
In the case of FIG. 9B, the 20 number looks for six numbers and letters to score. For example, if the sequence 12345A is
sent to the computer, then it would be scored as a VOID, while 123434 would be scored as a win. Numbers that remain
covered are not read by the computer and are not scored.
The computer system to perform the scoring uses scanner technology that is currently available, requires little additional
hardware or software modification and requires little clerk retraining.
Thus, the present invention provides a bar code scoring of game pieces using conventional bar code readers, such as wand
scanners and slot scanners, to authenticate and score game pieces such as those commonly used in lottery scratch-off
games or commercial games.
Current scanners read a start symbol in a group of characters and then a stop symbol. In one embodiment, the present
invention removes the stop code from the present authorization code and adds a null or repeating unit that operates as a
place holder to space out the distance between latex covers. These place holders can be changed for every game piece and
can vary on the game piece. An example of a bar code is shown in FIG. 10.
The present invention combines the winning and losing symbols and the authorization code into a single longer code group.
The stop code has been moved to the end of the new longer code. Also, certain code symbols are dedicated to representing,
voids and blank areas. At appropriate places in the authentication code, place holders are incorporated so that win, lose and
blank areas fall under the latex covered play areas on the playing surface. This longer code may be printed under the Void If
Removed Number (VIRN) latex area on the game piece.
An exemplary bar code for an unplayed game piece is shown in FIG. 11. When compared with the VIRN, the scoring program
judges the game pieces unplayed. If the game piece had been played and two spots were removed, the scanner would read
the code shown in FIG. 12. In this example, a group of 56 and 92 appears. When this is compared with a code printed in the
clear area, it triggers a second level authorization which would indicate that a void has been generated. If the scanner sees on
a single group 56, it would trigger a first level of authentication which would indicate a single winner area has been uncovered.
It is important to note that each game piece could have its own unique symbols for win, void and play.
Note that the two different processes are being carried out simultaneously with this equipment. In the first case, the game
piece is being scored. In the second case, it is being authenticated.
The use of this scoring method requires that a game piece covered with latex be scanned or viewed to reveal the winning
areas. The scoring method is vulnerable to misreading latex residue that might remain if a piece were insufficiently cleared of
covering.
Assuming the game piece play area has not been cleared completely of latex and part of the bar code is obscured, since the
machine is comparing a clear code with an obscured one, the reading or scoring device could be programmed to make
certain judgments regarding the second code. If the code nearly matches but one character does not, the device may inform
the player or the clerk to recheck the play area. This could be done by inserting a logical branch in the scoring software
program. In one embodiment, if an indistinguishable number were received, the machine displays a different message than if
the numbers were clearly read.
In an alternative embodiment, infrared (IR), ultraviolet (UV) or colored ink could be used to allow use of much thicker or taller
bars and reduce the chance of latex blockage. In one embodiment, the entire play area is printed with lines that run from top
to bottom, so that a small particle of latex does not obscure the code. In such a case, a fraudulent player could identify a
pattern but would have no idea what the pattern meant. Since each game piece would have different symbols for the win, void
and blank areas, the player could not crack a group of pieces.
In one embodiment, the scanner could infer that a bar, even if broken in the middle, was in the appropriate place even if large
blots of latex were covering the play area but the scan and the bar code extended beyond that area (in invisible ink). Since
the underprinted code is encrypted, a fraudulent player would have to obtain the encryption keys and decrypt the code before
inferring which areas were win areas and which are not. To gain access to the encrypted key, the VIRN covering would have
to be removed, voiding the ticket.
In still another alternative embodiment, a finer latex which flakes into smaller particles than those currently in use could be
used so that an entire bar would not be obscured.
FIG. 13 illustrates an alternative approach to scoring game pieces. Referring to FIG. 13, each play area is connected to the
next by a printed circuit. As each play area is uncovered, as indicated by the solid lines, the connection is changed. The
completed card circuit becomes part of the overall circuit which runs from a remote sensing device 1303 through a line 1302
and over the surface of the playing card. The measurement of that completed circuit, including the resistance, conductivity,
etc., are used to provide information regarding the condition of the playing surface. Such information then enables scoring.
Such an approach is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,475,205.
FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate an alternative approach that does not use the circuit. Referring to FIGS. 14A and 14B, a
duplicate of the front play area is printed in readable ink on the back of the playing surface as shown in FIG. 14B. The back is
not to be played by the player. This can be ensured by using material which is not removable. Therefore, the player has
access only to the front of the card. As the player removes the latex, the readable ink covering the play area is also removed.
The remote sensing device and its accompanying equipment compares the front with the back of the playing surface and
matches the electrical signature of both sides. That information is converted into alphanumeric information sent to remote site
for comparison and interpretation.
FIG. 15 illustrates another alternative approach. Referring to FIG. 15, the remote sensing device 1501 is not part of the
original circuit. Instead, the electrical signature is stored in a card and read by an intermediary device, such as reader 1502,
where the electrical signature is converted into alphanumeric code. The alphanumeric code is then sent to a remote sensing
device where it is interpreted. The information is sent back to the intermediary device which displays the results. Note that in
this case, the card stores the information only. It has no direct contact with the remote sensing device 1501 in which the
interpretation takes place. The intermediary device has no electrical connection to the remote sensing device either; however,
it does have a data connection. The electrical information is converted into alphanumeric information before sending it for
analysis. Thus, the devices are not part of the same circuit and the total electrical signature of the circuit is not read.
Information from one circuit is translated into alphanumeric code by a reader and sent to a remote device for authentication
and interpretation. These last two devices have no direct electrical connection with the first.
Scoreable Game Piece
In one embodiment, the present invention provides a scoreable lottery game piece which uses a remote scanning device to
evaluate the score achieved on the game piece. The present invention also provides for preventing additional credits against
the same piece once scanned.
In one embodiment, every piece has a field with symbols covered by latex. When the game has been played the latex would
be removed. An example of the game piece is shown in FIG. 16.
In one embodiment, when the clerk receives the game piece and removes the VIRN exposing a matching code number, an
area that has been imprinted with a slow acting ink is exposed and becomes visible within minutes. FIG. 17 illustrates the
game piece with the VIRN removed. There are a variety of inks which could be used. Iron based (Ferrous and Ferric Sulfide)
inks slowly darken when exposed to the oxygen in the air. Photo sensitive inks (Silver Nitrate) darken when exposed to light.
Certain inks produce different colors which would be visible in wand or scanner light only or would develop under UV light.
Once the view area is cleared by the clerk, the blank area is activated. Printed in a slow developing ink which will slowly
darken when exposed to oxygen or light; the "blank area" will soon develop an additional number (or letters) which will be
scannable. For a short time (e.g., 5 minutes), the scanner can read the card ID and the code on each winning spot. This time
period allows scanning even if the clerk makes an error and needs to rescan the card. Until the ink develops, the scanner will
be able to read the card ID correctly. However, after the short time period, the extra character causes the card to be
invalidated. In an alternate embodiment, a black out field could be used which would obliterate the card code. FIG. 18
illustrates that the group of symbols "Q2" has appeared in the code. This will cause the game piece to be voided.
In the example of FIG. 19, the second number of the card ID (4) represents the number of winning spots printed on the ticket.
This is compared with the number of winning symbols actually uncovered. For instance, the alphanumeric code 7 represents
a winning symbol identifying a winning spot. The number of 7's uncovered by the player is compared with the second number
in the ID. Since they match, the maximum payoff is shown to the clerk. If fewer than 4 "7's" are revealed, a suitable deduction
would be made. As an example, if only 3 winners (3 "7's") were uncovered, the present invention deducts 1 winner in value
from the maximum value.
The use of slowly developing inks allows an interesting variant of the traditional lottery game. In one embodiment, the play
area is revealed by rubbing off the covering and the winning spots slowly develop revealing the prize. The verification then may
proceed.
Layered Decryption
In one embodiment, the present invention uses a decryption key in a multi-layer process to facilitate scoring and
authentication. As a simple example, each game piece has a key associated with it, such as the number 8. The present
invention divides by the uncovered number If that number is 4, then the results of the division is 2. However, in the case that
two key numbers are uncovered, the scanner sees both the number 4 and the number 2. If the same number 8 is divided first
by 4 and then by the number 2, the result of the two division operations equals 1. Thus, if only one winning area is uncovered,
it will decode to a different level or layer than if two numbers are entered. Notice the actual numerical amount is not important
in this example. The fact that the values differ is. Thus, any number could be assigned to a game piece and be divisible by
numbers in the game areas, which are exposed.
Although in this example numbers have been used, letters or combinations of both could be used. Also each game piece is
unaffected by which key number is read first. The key directs the redemption process to a different layer of decryption. A
game piece with four levels of decryption as an example will decrypts to the first level if any one of the four symbols is
uncovered.
Thus, the scoring (counting the number of winning, blank and losing spots) and verifying share the same very reliable method
of authentication. If the revealed numbers under the latex are transported from another game piece in an attempt at forgery,
then the decryption key will yield an invalid authentication code. If void symbols are uncovered, the game piece is voided. If no
winning symbols and no losing ones are uncovered, then the game piece has no value at all.
This method of the present invention does not require installation of new equipment in the redemption facility; however, it does
require the preparation of new algorithmic keys and software to be programmed into the existing equipment, which would be
apparent to those skilled in the art.
In summary, the present invention provides numerous improvements and benefits over the problems of the problems of the
probability game in the prior art. First, by using void and win areas, multiple guesses by players carry risk that was not
presented in earlier probability games. This discourages overplaying the piece. Second, by allowing the player to choose
when to quit, confusion over the prize amounts that are won is avoided. Third, since there is no limit to the number of chances
a player can take, he is much more likely to be satisfied with the outcome. Furthermore, by using a mixture of game pieces
that includes some dedicated game pieces, some probability and some probability with less than or equal to the purchase
price value, the maximum prize purse can be greatly reduced. Because the maximum prize purse can be reduced, a bank is
no longer needed and insurance coverage can be gained for the game. Moreover, by automating the scoring and handling,
clerk confusion and error is eliminated.
Whereas many alterations and modifications of the present invention will no doubt become apparent to a person of ordinary
skill in the art after having read the foregoing description, it is to be understood that any particular embodiment shown and
described by way of illustration is in no way intended to be considered limiting. Therefore, references to details of various
embodiments are not intended to limit the scope of the claims which in themselves recite only those features regarded as
essential to the invention.
Thus, a probability game has been described.
PATENT CITATIONS
Cited Patent Filing date Publication date Applicant Title
US3826499 * Oct 4, 1972 Jul 30, 1974 L Lenkoff
Invisible ink markings in defined areas of a game device
responsive to color changing chemical marker
US4072930 * Aug 20, 1976 Feb 7, 1978 Bally Manufacturing Corporation Monitoring system for use with amusement game devices
US4101129 * Apr 15, 1976 Jul 18, 1978
Bell-Fruit Manufacturing
Company Limited
Gaming machines
US4254404 * Sep 13, 1978 Mar 3, 1981 Kramor Industries Ltd. Paging and servicing system
US4323770 * Jul 16, 1979 Apr 6, 1982
Societe D'etude De Systems
Avances Et D'amenagements
Unit particularly for taking stakes and possibly determining the
winners in a game such as a national lotto game
US4339798 * Dec 17, 1979 Jul 13, 1982 Remote Dynamics Remote gaming system
US4467424 * Jul 6, 1982 Aug 21, 1984 Hedges Richard A Remote gaming system
US4508513 * Dec 27, 1983 Apr 2, 1985 Don Marketing Ltd. Game card device
US4575622 * Jul 29, 1983 Mar 11, 1986 Esac, Inc.
Electronic access control system for coin-operated games and
like selectively accessible devices
US4669729 * Oct 31, 1985 Jun 2, 1987 S.L.S. Incorporated Instant bingo game verification system
US4689742 * May 5, 1986 Aug 25, 1987 Seymour Troy Automatic lottery system
US4756532 * Feb 26, 1987 Jul 12, 1988
Promotional Marketing
Corporation
Playing surface with answers in first field providing answer in
second field
US4764666 * Sep 18, 1987 Aug 16, 1988 Gtech Corporation On-line wagering system with programmable game entry cards
US4768151 * Dec 22, 1986 Aug 30, 1988 Bingo Brain Electronic bingo card manager
US4772025 * Sep 21, 1987 Sep 20, 1988 James Jimmie J Lottery ticket reviewing device
US4815741 * Apr 2, 1987 Mar 28, 1989 Small Maynard E Automated marketing and gaming systems
US4832341 * Aug 21, 1986 May 23, 1989 Upc Games, Inc. High security instant lottery using bar codes
US4833307 * Jul 11, 1988 May 23, 1989 Gonzalez Justiz Clara E Self service dispensing assembly for lottery tickets
US4842278 * Jun 10, 1988 Jun 27, 1989 Victor Markowicz
Hierarchical lottery network with selection from differentiated
playing pools
US4875164 * Oct 23, 1985 Oct 17, 1989 Monfort Jean Jacques Processing system for a gambling game
US4882423 * Mar 30, 1987 Nov 21, 1989 Calpis Food Industry Substance-conjugated complement component C1q
US4892313 * Sep 19, 1988 Jan 9, 1990 James Jimmie J Lottery ticket reviewing device
US4964642 * May 15, 1989 Oct 23, 1990 Longview Corporation Variably scored skill game
US5046737 * Nov 23, 1990 Sep 10, 1991 Douglas Press, Inc. Lottery-type game system with bonus award
US5069453 * Jun 8, 1990 Dec 3, 1991 John R. Koza Ticket apparatus with a transmitter
US5092598 * Oct 2, 1989 Mar 3, 1992 Kamille Stuart J Multivalue/multiplay lottery game
US5094458 * Mar 16, 1990 Mar 10, 1992 Kamille Stuart J Redemption system for multi-piece games
US5265874 * Jan 31, 1992 Nov 30, 1993
International Game Technology
(Igt)
Cashless gaming apparatus and method
US5290033 * Dec 2, 1992 Mar 1, 1994 Bittner Harold G Gaming machine and coupons
US5407199 * May 28, 1993 Apr 18, 1995 Vegas Pull Tabs, Inc. Interactive games and method of playing
US5475205 * Jun 22, 1994 Dec 12, 1995 Scientific Games Inc. Document verification system
US5657991 * Jul 26, 1995 Aug 19, 1997 Media Drop-In Productions, Inc. Interactive bingo-like games and method of playing
GB2185413A * Title not available
* Cited by examiner
REFERENCED BY
Citing Patent Filing date Publication date Applicant Title
US6089976 * Oct 14, 1997 Jul 18, 2000
Casino Data
Systems
Gaming apparatus and method including a player interactive bonus game
US6237913 * Dec 7, 1999 May 29, 2001
Stuart J.
Kamille
Method and apparatus for redeeming a game piece
US6250685 Dec 31, 1997 Jun 26, 2001
Walker Digital,
Llc
Ticket for instant lottery game and method of playing same
US6296569 * Oct 17, 2000 Oct 2, 2001
Philip
Congello, Jr.
Fractional denomination gaming system and method of playing
US6309299 Sep 13, 1999 Oct 30, 2001 Steve Weiss
Gaming device and method for individual, head to head and tournament
play
US6309300 * May 4, 2000 Oct 30, 2001
International
Game
Technology
Gaming bonus apparatus and method with player interaction
US6346043 * Sep 13, 1999 Feb 12, 2002
International
Game
Technology
Image matching game method and apparatus
US6347996 * Sep 12, 2000 Feb 19, 2002
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Gaming machine with concealed image bonus feature
US6406019 * Dec 18, 2000 Jun 18, 2002
Jeffrey S.
Melcher
Method of determining a lottery winner
US6443843 * Jun 29, 2000 Sep 3, 2002
Walker Digital,
Llc
System to provide game play for products
US6511375 * Jun 28, 2000 Jan 28, 2003 Igt Gaming device having a multiple selection group bonus round
US6572107 Sep 18, 2000 Jun 3, 2003
Walker Digital,
Llc
Ticket for instant lottery game and method of playing same
US6595859 * Apr 21, 1999 Jul 22, 2003
Virtumundo,
Inc.
Internet marketing method and game
US6607437 * Jul 30, 2001 Aug 19, 2003
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Selection feature for a game of chance
US6648754 * Mar 30, 2001 Nov 18, 2003 Igt
Gaming device having an offer and acceptance game with termination limit
wherein the offer is picked by a player
US6676126 Jun 16, 2000 Jan 13, 2004
Walker Digital,
Llc
Lottery game card and method for conducting a lottery game
US6688976 Jun 30, 2000 Feb 10, 2004
Walker Digital,
Llc
Systems and methods wherein a lottery number combination is
associated with a limited number of occurrences
US6722983 * Sep 21, 2001 Apr 20, 2004 Igt Gaming device having multiple selectable changing awards
US6767284 Mar 14, 2000 Jul 27, 2004 John R. Koza Skill games
US6808452 Oct 3, 2003 Oct 26, 2004 Igt
Gaming device having an offer and acceptance game with a termination
limit wherein the offer is picked by a player
US6835132 * Apr 9, 2001 Dec 28, 2004
Aristocrat
Technologies
Australia Pty
Ltd.
Gaming machine with player operable changing graphical bonus amount
indicator
US6840857 Aug 28, 2001 Jan 11, 2005 Manu Ghela Lottery insurance method
US6843722 * Jun 12, 2003 Jan 18, 2005 Igt
Gaming device having a selection-type bonus game that activates a
mechanical device
US6855055 Nov 17, 2003 Feb 15, 2005
Mikohn
Gaming
Corporation
Method for controlling length of casino game
Scientific
US6875105 * Nov 28, 2000 Apr 5, 2005
Scientific
Games Inc.
Lottery ticket validation system
US6879805 * Oct 7, 2002 Apr 12, 2005
Michael L.
Epstein
Test form having a removable opaque layer, and method and apparatus for
printing on the form
US6913535 Apr 16, 2004 Jul 5, 2005 Igt Gaming device having multiple selectable changing awards
US6926273 * Mar 25, 2004 Aug 9, 2005
Mikohn
Gaming
Corporation
Seal card game and method
US6955353 * Mar 14, 2001 Oct 18, 2005
Europrint
Holdings
Limited
Universal lottery game ticket and a lottery game and a method of playing
the lottery game using the ticket
US6960134 Sep 12, 2002 Nov 1, 2005 Igt Alternative bonus games associated with slot machine
US6964608 Oct 17, 2000 Nov 15, 2005 John R. Koza Skill games
US6966836 * Nov 16, 2000 Nov 22, 2005 Ea.Com, Inc. Positive-return gambling
US6971955 * Mar 12, 2003 Dec 6, 2005 Igt
Gaming device having apparatus and method for producing an award
through award elimination or replacement
US6988948 * Oct 18, 2001 Jan 24, 2006
Mikohn
Gaming
Corporation
Casino bonus game using player input
US7040984 Aug 27, 2003 May 9, 2006 Igt Gaming device having a selection game with building awards
US7056213 Sep 11, 2002 Jun 6, 2006 Igt Gaming device having a probability enhancing trigger symbol
US7056214 Nov 12, 2004 Jun 6, 2006 Igt Gaming device having an accumulating award symbol
US7056215 Jul 8, 1998 Jun 6, 2006
Aristocrat
Leisure
Industries Pty
Ltd.
Slot machine game and system with improved jackpot feature
US7066814 Sep 21, 2001 Jun 27, 2006 Igt Gaming device having regenerating multiple award opportunities
US7074127 Sep 12, 2003 Jul 11, 2006 Igt Gaming device having a probability-enhancing trigger symbol
US7090580 Jul 31, 2003 Aug 15, 2006 Igt Gaming device including a game having a wild symbol related award
US7094148 Sep 29, 2004 Aug 22, 2006 Igt Gaming device having a free spin game
US7104888 Nov 12, 2004 Sep 12, 2006 Igt Gaming device having an accumulating award symbol
US7121942 Sep 12, 2002 Oct 17, 2006 Igt
Gaming device including a game having a player selected function based
on symbols in a free spins game
US7139725 * Sep 6, 2000 Nov 21, 2006
Moyersoen
Jean-Francois
Method of offering free products or services over the internet
US7169047 Mar 28, 2002 Jan 30, 2007 Igt Providing an indication of a hidden bonus on a casino gaming apparatus
US7182689 Jul 18, 2003 Feb 27, 2007 Igt Gaming device having a bonus scheme with multiple selection groups
US7192349 * Sep 11, 2002 Mar 20, 2007 Igt Gaming device having multiple round bonus scheme with residual awards
US7220180 Feb 25, 2005 May 22, 2007 Igt Gaming device having multiple selectable changing awards
US7235011 Sep 10, 2003 Jun 26, 2007 Igt
Gaming device having a bonus game with multiple player selectable
award opportunities
US7247093 Sep 12, 2002 Jul 24, 2007 Igt Gaming device having a mechanical secondary display
US7252591 Jul 31, 2002 Aug 7, 2007 Igt Gaming device having symbol stacks
US7258611 Feb 28, 2002 Aug 21, 2007 Igt Gaming device having free game bonus with a changing multiplier
US7273415 * Sep 12, 2002 Sep 25, 2007 Igt Gaming device having a bonus scheme with multiple selection groups
US7303469 Dec 20, 2002 Dec 4, 2007 Igt Gaming device having a multiple selection group bonus round
US7314409 Jul 30, 2003 Jan 1, 2008 Igt Gaming device having a selectable combination bonus game
US7316609 Sep 15, 2003 Jan 8, 2008
Shuffle Master,
Inc.
Reveal-hide-pick-reveal video wagering game feature
US7322887 Oct 1, 2004 Jan 29, 2008 Igt
Gaming device having sequential activations of a game and replay of
previous activations of the game
US7326115 Aug 18, 2005 Feb 5, 2008 Igt
Gaming device and method having a first interactive game which
determines a function of a second wagering game
US7331862 Aug 10, 2006 Feb 19, 2008 Igt Gaming device including a game having a wild symbol related award
US7331866 Aug 10, 2006 Feb 19, 2008 Igt Gaming device including a game having a wild symbol related award
US7331867 Jun 17, 2005 Feb 19, 2008 Igt Gaming device having a re-triggering symbol bonus scheme
US7338366 Sep 11, 2003 Mar 4, 2008 Igt Gaming device having a mechanical secondary display
US7338367 Nov 11, 2004 Mar 4, 2008 Igt Gaming device having an accumulated award selection bonus scheme
US7338369 Jun 2, 2006 Mar 4, 2008 Igt Gaming device having an accumulating award symbol
US7338371 Jul 6, 2004 Mar 4, 2008 Igt High low series gambling game
US7341513 Aug 28, 2003 Mar 11, 2008 Igt
Gaming device having match game with award determined by prediction of
correct matches
US7351141 Apr 28, 2006 Apr 1, 2008 Igt Gaming device having multiple pay slots
US7351146 Oct 5, 2001 Apr 1, 2008 Igt
Gaming device and method for activating multiple paylines upon the wager
of a single credit
US7361087 Jul 9, 2004 Apr 22, 2008 Igt Gaming device having high-low game
US7361088 Sep 12, 2003 Apr 22, 2008 Igt
Gaming device having a game with incremental value disclosure and value
modification
US7371166 * Oct 16, 2000 May 13, 2008 Igt
Gaming device having a multi-round bonus scheme wherein each round
has a probability of success
US7371169 Aug 20, 2003 May 13, 2008 Igt Method and apparatus for determining a gaming device award
US7390264 Aug 30, 2002 Jun 24, 2008
Walker Digital,
Llc
Method and system to incorporate game play into product transactions
US7402103 Oct 16, 2006 Jul 22, 2008 Igt
US7407437 * Sep 15, 2003 Aug 5, 2008
Scientific
Games
International,
Inc.
Word based lottery game
US7413508 May 28, 2003 Aug 19, 2008 Igt Gaming device having a selection award revealing game
US7413510 * Feb 8, 2002 Aug 19, 2008 Igt Gaming device having a related symbol selection game
US7416484 * May 29, 2002 Aug 26, 2008
Bally Gaming,
Inc.
Simulated bonus method in finite-pool award system
US7422213 May 25, 2006 Sep 9, 2008
Milestone
Entertainment
Llc
Games, and methods and apparatus for game play in games of chance
US7431645 * Apr 21, 2005 Oct 7, 2008
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Wagering game with award based on sequencing of connected features
US7435174 Aug 20, 2004 Oct 14, 2008 Igt
Gaming device having a pick reduction game including a trigger selection
indicator
US7455588 Aug 28, 2003 Nov 25, 2008 Igt Gaming device having competing positive and negative outcome events
US7470184 * Oct 20, 2005 Dec 30, 2008 Igt
Gaming device having an offer and acceptance game with a termination
limit wherein the offer is picked by a player
US7470187 Nov 5, 2004 Dec 30, 2008 Igt Gaming device having termination variables
US7470188 Jul 30, 2007 Dec 30, 2008 Igt Gaming device having termination variables
US7473174 Sep 29, 2004 Jan 6, 2009 Igt
Gaming device having a re-triggering symbol bonus scheme with a bonus
symbol accumulation and player selection of accumulation total
US7481708 Jul 25, 2006 Jan 27, 2009 Igt Gaming device having a free spin game
US7488251 Mar 18, 2008 Feb 10, 2009 Igt
Gaming device and method for activating multiple poker hands upon the
wager of a single credit
US7500914 Sep 27, 2004 Mar 10, 2009 Igt
Gaming device with multiple levels which determine the number of
indicators of a symbol generator
US7503850 * Jan 22, 2004 Mar 17, 2009 Igt Gaming device with bonus scheme having multiple award levels
US7507155 Sep 6, 2005 Mar 24, 2009 Igt Gaming device having a selection game with building awards
US7513826 Oct 1, 2004 Apr 7, 2009 Igt Gaming device with changing wild symbols
US7530893 * Feb 10, 2005 May 12, 2009
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Wagering game with dynamic visual gaming indicia
US7544129 Sep 8, 2003 Jun 9, 2009 Igt Gaming device having multiple selection groups with related picks
US7566271 Jul 22, 2004 Jul 28, 2009 Igt
Gaming device having a selection game with multiple groups of potential
outcomes
US7575514 Aug 20, 2004 Aug 18, 2009 Igt Gaming device having a matrix and symbol generator
US7575516 Jun 5, 2006 Aug 18, 2009
Aristocrat
Leisure
Industries Pty
Ltd.
US7582014 Jan 12, 2007 Sep 1, 2009
Aristocrat
Leisure
Industries Pty
Ltd.
Weather Risk
US7584133 Dec 20, 2005 Sep 1, 2009
Weather Risk
Solutions Llc
Financial activity based on tropical weather events
US7584134 Sep 14, 2007 Sep 1, 2009
Weather Risk
Solutions, Llc
Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather
events
US7585218 * Sep 12, 2003 Sep 8, 2009 Igt
Gaming device having multiple selection groups with randomly aligning
advances
US7588494 Sep 5, 2003 Sep 15, 2009 Igt Gaming device having a high-low game
US7593883 Aug 24, 2007 Sep 22, 2009
Weather Risk
Solutions, Llc
US7594850 Mar 19, 2008 Sep 29, 2009 Igt Gaming device having high-low game
US7601058 Jul 14, 2004 Oct 13, 2009 Igt Bonus game
US7635302 * Jun 25, 2004 Dec 22, 2009
Integrated
Group Assets
Inc.
Multiple pricing in a lottery based on variable ratios
US7635303 Jun 28, 2004 Dec 22, 2009
Integrated
Group Assets
Inc.
Lottery ticket dispensing machine for multiple priced tickets based on
variable ratios
US7635304 Jan 26, 2005 Dec 22, 2009
Integrated
Group Assets
Inc.
Multiple levels of participation in a lottery jackpot
US7658673 * Jan 21, 2005 Feb 9, 2010 Igt Gaming device having risk evaluation bonus round
US7666086 * Sep 11, 2003 Feb 23, 2010 Igt
Gaming device having selection picks and selection outcomes determined
based on a wager
US7666089 Sep 30, 2004 Feb 23, 2010 Igt Gaming device having accumulation game with changing selections
US7666094 Jul 30, 2007 Feb 23, 2010 Igt
Gaming system and method for enabling a player to select progressive
awards to try for and chances of winning progressive awards
US7674178 Jul 30, 2007 Mar 9, 2010 Igt
US7674179 Jul 30, 2007 Mar 9, 2010 Igt
US7677971 Jun 6, 2007 Mar 16, 2010 Igt
US7677972 Jul 30, 2007 Mar 16, 2010 Igt
US7682240 Jun 14, 2006 Mar 23, 2010
Walker Digital,
Llc
US7682246 Sep 1, 2005 Mar 23, 2010 Igt
Gaming device and method having free activation mode and free activation
mode with free activation retrigger
US7682248 Jun 6, 2007 Mar 23, 2010 Igt
US7690980 Sep 14, 2006 Apr 6, 2010
Walker Digital,
Llc
US7690986 May 22, 2006 Apr 6, 2010 Igt Gaming device having a probability enhancing trigger symbol
US7690987 Jan 14, 2009 Apr 6, 2010 Igt Gaming device having a free spin game
US7693766 Dec 20, 2005 Apr 6, 2010
Weather Risk
Solutions Llc
Financial activity based on natural events
US7704139 Dec 8, 2003 Apr 27, 2010
Walker Digital,
Llc
US7722047 Jul 5, 2006 May 25, 2010 Igt System and method for playing a game including a mortgaging option
US7722451 Feb 28, 2002 May 25, 2010 Igt
Gaming device having improved offer and acceptance game with masked
offers
US7722455 Jun 14, 2006 May 25, 2010
Walker Digital,
Llc
US7727063 * Jun 16, 2006 Jun 1, 2010
Walker Digital,
Llc
Methods and apparatus for lottery game play aggregation
US7731580 Oct 4, 2004 Jun 8, 2010 Igt Gaming device with multiple orbit award indicator
US7731582 Sep 8, 2003 Jun 8, 2010 Igt Gaming device having an offer and acceptance game with multiple offers
US7731584 Jun 23, 2006 Jun 8, 2010 Igt Gaming device having regenerating multiple award opportunities
US7740533 Oct 25, 2005 Jun 22, 2010 Igt Method and apparatus for playing video poker with a redraw function
US7744454 Nov 12, 2004 Jun 29, 2010 Igt Gaming device having an accumulating award symbol
US7749063 Sep 29, 2004 Jul 6, 2010 Igt Gaming device having free spin mode with symbol elimination
US7749068 * Sep 10, 2003 Jul 6, 2010 Igt
Gaming device having a destination pursuit bonus scheme with advance
US7749068 * Sep 10, 2003 Jul 6, 2010 Igt
and setback conditions
US7753772 Oct 3, 2000 Jul 13, 2010
Walker Digital,
Llc
Systems and methods wherein a player indicates an item that may be
received based on a game event outcome associated with the player
US7758416 Aug 30, 2007 Jul 20, 2010 Igt
Gaming system having a plurality of simultaneously played wagering
games that may trigger a plurality of free games which may be played
simultaneously with the wagering games
US7771265 * Sep 27, 2004 Aug 10, 2010
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Method of operating a casino game having a hidden pattern
US7771266 Sep 11, 2003 Aug 10, 2010 Igt Gaming device having a multiple accumulated symbols game
US7775869 * Sep 27, 2001 Aug 17, 2010
Aristocrat
Technologies,
Inc. Australia
Player choice game feature
US7775874 May 22, 2006 Aug 17, 2010 Igt Gaming device having a probability enhancing trigger symbol
US7780169 * Nov 24, 2004 Aug 24, 2010
Diamond
Game
Enterprises,
Inc.
Pull-tab poker game and pull-tab poker game wagering system
US7780514 * Jun 9, 2008 Aug 24, 2010
Walker Digital,
Llc
Method and apparatus for operating lotteries and for generating and
processing lottery entries
US7780518 Sep 8, 2004 Aug 24, 2010 Igt Method of scoring a video wagering game
US7783542 Oct 31, 2007 Aug 24, 2010
Weather Risk
Solutions, Llc
Financial activity with graphical user interface based on natural peril
events
US7783543 Oct 31, 2007 Aug 24, 2010
Weather Risk
Solutions, Llc
Financial activity based on natural peril events
US7783544 Oct 31, 2007 Aug 24, 2010
Weather Risk
Solutions, Llc
Financial activity concerning tropical weather events
US7785188 Apr 27, 2005 Aug 31, 2010 Igt
Gaming device including a plurality of selectable positions and an
outcome modifier
US7785195 * Mar 25, 2004 Aug 31, 2010 Igt Gaming device having an award offer and termination bonus scheme
US7789743 * Nov 15, 2002 Sep 7, 2010 Igt Method and apparatus for facilitating play of gaming device
US7789747 Jun 29, 2007 Sep 7, 2010 Igt
Gaming device having a re-triggering symbol bonus scheme with a bonus
symbol accumulator
US7798896 * Sep 2, 2003 Sep 21, 2010
Milestone
Entertainment
Llc
Apparatus, systems and methods for implementing enhanced gaming and
prizing parameters in an electronic environment
US7824263 Oct 16, 2006 Nov 2, 2010 Igt
US7850521 Aug 14, 2006 Dec 14, 2010 Igt Gaming device including a game having a wild symbol related award
US7857694 * Jul 7, 2003 Dec 28, 2010
Konami
Gaming, Inc.
Gaming machine, method and computer program for controlling the same,
and computer-readable storage medium having the program stored therein
US7857695 Feb 18, 2008 Dec 28, 2010 Igt Gaming device including a game having a wild symbol related award
US7874912 Sep 12, 2007 Jan 25, 2011 Igt Gaming device having a bonus scheme with multiple selection groups
US7874920 Sep 30, 2005 Jan 25, 2011
Vms Gaming
Inc.
Wagering game with unilateral player selection for developing a group
US7887409 Sep 29, 2004 Feb 15, 2011 Igt Gaming device having game with player selections and award pools
US7901283 * Jun 14, 2007 Mar 8, 2011
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Bonus game for a gaming machine
US7905772 * Mar 16, 2007 Mar 15, 2011 Igt Gaming device having multiple round bonus scheme with residual awards
US7914377 Nov 7, 2006 Mar 29, 2011 Igt Gaming device with dynamic progressive and bonus architecture
US7917420 Jul 31, 2009 Mar 29, 2011
Weather Risk
Solutions Llc
Graphical user interface for financial activity concerning tropical weather
events
US7917421 Aug 28, 2009 Mar 29, 2011
Weather Risk
Solutions Llc
US7922578 Feb 14, 2005 Apr 12, 2011
Okuniewicz
Douglas M
Method for providing an undisplayed outcome of an electronic gaming
device
US7927206 Feb 14, 2008 Apr 19, 2011 Igt Gaming device having a re-triggering symbol bonus scheme
US7942731 Oct 4, 2005 May 17, 2011 Igt Method and apparatus for facilitating game play with a mortgaging option
US7950994 Sep 12, 2005 May 31, 2011 Igt Replacement reel gaming device and method
US7967292 Aug 21, 2009 Jun 28, 2011
Milestone
Entertainment
Llc
Games, and methods for improved game play in games of chance and
games of skill
US7967674 Jan 28, 2008 Jun 28, 2011 Igt
US7967674 Jan 28, 2008 Jun 28, 2011 Igt
US7976382 Jan 29, 2007 Jul 12, 2011 Igt Casino gaming apparatus with a bonus associated with a cash out
US7993195 Jan 15, 2008 Aug 9, 2011 Igt
US8002620 Nov 18, 2004 Aug 23, 2011 Igt
Gaming device providing an award based on a count of outcomes which
meets a condition
US8007357 Jul 6, 2006 Aug 30, 2011 Igt Gaming device having a probability-enhancing trigger symbol
US8012014 Aug 22, 2006 Sep 6, 2011 Igt Gaming system having awards provided based on rate of play
US8021222 Mar 1, 2004 Sep 20, 2011 Igt Game based on speed of play
US8033903 Nov 10, 2006 Oct 11, 2011 Igt Gaming system and method having progressive free games
US8042809 Nov 4, 2009 Oct 25, 2011
Walker Digital,
Llc
US8043153 Dec 23, 2005 Oct 25, 2011 Igt Gaming device having destructive chain reaction events
US8055563 Jul 17, 2009 Nov 8, 2011
Weather Risk
Solutions, Llc
Financial activity based on natural weather events
US8066564 Jan 21, 2008 Nov 29, 2011 Igt Gaming system and method having wager allocation
US8075387 * Oct 2, 2007 Dec 13, 2011
Scientific
Games
International,
Inc.
Multiplier for lottery game
US8079903 Aug 22, 2008 Dec 20, 2011 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device and method of providing selection game
with interdependent award distribution
US8105149 * Nov 10, 2006 Jan 31, 2012 Igt
Gaming system and method providing venue wide simultaneous player
participation based bonus game
US8113943 Mar 10, 2009 Feb 14, 2012 Igt Gaming device with changing wild symbols
US8118659 Mar 10, 2008 Feb 21, 2012
Integrated
Group Assets
Inc.
Instant online lottery ticket for a linear prize and a position specific prize
US8118666 Jul 15, 2008 Feb 21, 2012 Igt
Gaming system, gaming devices, and method for providing an enhanced
multiple-player bonus redemption game
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a game having
US8128478 Nov 10, 2008 Mar 6, 2012 Igt a first evaluation based on drawn symbols and a second evaluation based
on an order in which the symbols are drawn
US8162739 Apr 28, 2006 Apr 24, 2012 Igt Gaming device having multiple pay slots
US8177620 Dec 19, 2003 May 15, 2012 Igt Gaming device having a modifier activator
US8187082 Sep 11, 2009 May 29, 2012 Igt Bonus game
US8197325 Mar 3, 2009 Jun 12, 2012
Integrated
Group Assets
Inc.
Method and apparatus for providing an instant lottery game and a
supplemental game
US8210929 * Mar 15, 2007 Jul 3, 2012 Igt Gaming device having an award level determination competition
US8214274 Feb 8, 2010 Jul 3, 2012
Weather Risk
Solutions, Llc
Financial activity based on natural events
US8216045 Mar 10, 2008 Jul 10, 2012
Integrated
Group Assets
Inc.
Method and apparatus for providing a lottery
US8221206 Jan 27, 2005 Jul 17, 2012 Igt Gaming device having a partial selectable symbol matrix
US8221207 * Nov 1, 2007 Jul 17, 2012
Universal
Entertainment
Corporation
Gaming machine with selection state repetition between stages
US8226469 Sep 29, 2010 Jul 24, 2012 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a poker game
with a bonus gaming session having re-draw option
US8231456 Oct 17, 2007 Jul 31, 2012 Igt Gaming device and method providing side bet for winning free activations
US8241100 Oct 10, 2007 Aug 14, 2012
Milestone
Entertainment
Llc
Methods and apparatus for enhanced interactive game play in lottery and
gaming environments
US8241108 Jun 28, 2011 Aug 14, 2012 Igt
US8241110 Sep 1, 2004 Aug 14, 2012
Milestone
Entertainment,
LLC
Apparatus, systems and methods for implementing enhanced gaming and
prizing parameters in an electronic environment
US8246443 May 25, 2010 Aug 21, 2012 Igt
Gaming system having a plurality of simultaneously played wagering
games that may trigger a plurality of free games which may be played
simultaneously with the wagering games
US8246444 Jan 27, 2011 Aug 21, 2012 Igt Gaming device having a re-triggering symbol bonus scheme
US8251798 May 20, 2010 Aug 28, 2012 Igt Gaming device having free spin mode with symbol elimination
US8257163 Jun 28, 2011 Sep 4, 2012 Igt
US8262448 Dec 11, 2006 Sep 11, 2012 Igt
Gaming system, method and device including player/dealer role reversal
for modified blackjack game
US8266042 Aug 6, 2008 Sep 11, 2012
Weather Risk
Solutions, Llc
Financial activity based on natural peril events
US8267765 May 13, 2011 Sep 18, 2012 Igt
US8272940 Mar 3, 2008 Sep 25, 2012 Igt
Gaming device having match game with award determined by prediction of
correct matches
US8287364 Nov 13, 2008 Oct 16, 2012 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a game in
which a player collects emblems by positioning accumulators in a field
US8303395 Jul 6, 2010 Nov 6, 2012
Aristocrat
Technologies
Australia Pty
Ltd
US8313371 May 31, 2001 Nov 20, 2012
Bally Gaming,
Inc.
Method and apparatus for awarding component prizes in a gaming
environment
US8337309 Feb 14, 2005 Dec 25, 2012
Okuniewicz
Douglas M
Data based awards for an electronic gaming device
US8348743 Jun 1, 2010 Jan 8, 2013
Walker Digital,
Llc
Methods and apparatus for lottery game play aggregation
US8348753 Aug 3, 2011 Jan 8, 2013 Igt Gaming system having awards provided based on rate of play
US8357034 Nov 8, 2007 Jan 22, 2013 Igt Gaming system and method providing third party promotions
US8360852 Oct 21, 2011 Jan 29, 2013 Igt Gaming system and method having wager allocation
US8371924 Jan 26, 2012 Feb 12, 2013 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a game having
a first evaluation based on drawn symbols and a second evaluation based
on an order in which the symbols are drawn
US8388437 Jul 7, 2011 Mar 5, 2013 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device and method for providing an award based
US8388437 Jul 7, 2011 Mar 5, 2013 Igt
on an outcome counter
US8393946 Apr 15, 2002 Mar 12, 2013
Milestone
Entertainment
Llc
Apparatus and method for game play in an electronic environment
US8398475 Apr 27, 2010 Mar 19, 2013 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device and method providing a first game and a
plurality second wagering games each associated with a separate
activatable component of the first game
US8398484 Dec 21, 2005 Mar 19, 2013
Integrated
Group Assets,
Inc.
Instant online lottery method and system
US8403758 Nov 12, 2010 Mar 26, 2013
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Wagering game with unilateral player selection for developing a group
US8408994 Feb 17, 2010 Apr 2, 2013 Igt
US8414379 Jul 7, 2011 Apr 9, 2013 Igt
meets a condition
US8414385 Dec 13, 2011 Apr 9, 2013 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a selection
game with offer and acceptance features
US8414386 May 24, 2012 Apr 9, 2013 Igt Gaming device and method for providing a game with a budget
US8419546 Aug 30, 2010 Apr 16, 2013 Igt
Gaming system and method for selectively providing an elimination
tournament that funds an award through expected values of unplayed
tournament games of eliminated players
US8435106 Jun 29, 2010 May 7, 2013
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Wagering game with persistent selection state
US8439736 * Sep 27, 2007 May 14, 2013 Cadillac Jack Extended play gaming systems and methods
US8444465 Mar 13, 2005 May 21, 2013 Igt Ultimate four of a kind bonus poker
US8449374 Dec 13, 2011 May 28, 2013
Scientific
Games
International,
Inc.
Multiplier for lottery game
US8449375 Nov 8, 2006 May 28, 2013 Igt Gaming machine and method providing a multi-play high-low game
Integrated
US8460080 Feb 20, 2008 Jun 11, 2013 Group Assets,
Inc.
Method and apparatus for an instant online lottery ticket
US8475265 Sep 28, 2011 Jul 2, 2013 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a multiple
player persistent game
US8480480 * Jan 26, 2011 Jul 9, 2013
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Bonus game for a gaming machine
US8491390 Sep 23, 2011 Jul 23, 2013 Igt Gaming system and method having progressive free games
US8496519 Jul 30, 2008 Jul 30, 2013 Igt
Gaming system and method for providing a bonus event triggered by a
continuous communal game
US8496521 Jan 2, 2013 Jul 30, 2013 Igt Gaming system and method having wager allocation
US8505813 Sep 4, 2009 Aug 13, 2013
Bank Of
America
Corporation
Customer benefit offer program enrollment
US8506378 Sep 21, 2011 Aug 13, 2013 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method providing advertising
messages to players based on a determination of a positive winning
gaming session
US8517827 Sep 27, 2012 Aug 27, 2013 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a game in
which a player collects emblems by positioning accumulators in a field
US8529333 Apr 14, 2011 Sep 10, 2013 Igt Replacement reel gaming device and method
US8529336 Sep 20, 2010 Sep 10, 2013
Milestone
Entertainment
Llc
Apparatus, systems, and methods for implementing enhanced gaming
and prizing parameters in an electronic environment
US8535134 Jan 28, 2009 Sep 17, 2013
Milestone
Entertainment
Llc
Method and system for electronic interaction in a multi-player gaming
system
US8535135 Jul 5, 2012 Sep 17, 2013 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a poker game
with a bonus gaming session having re-draw option
US8562407 Aug 18, 2006 Oct 22, 2013 Igt Gaming device having a free spin game
US8562410 Aug 8, 2012 Oct 22, 2013 Igt
US8562428 Nov 2, 2012 Oct 22, 2013
Bally Gaming,
Inc.
Method and apparatus for awarding component prizes in a gaming
environment
US8602880 Mar 11, 2013 Dec 10, 2013 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a selection
game with offer and acceptance features
US8613649 Dec 21, 2012 Dec 24, 2013 Igt Gaming system having awards provided based on rate of play
US8628395 Jul 19, 2012 Jan 14, 2014
Aristocrat
Technologies
Australia Pty
Ltd
US8641505 Aug 22, 2011 Feb 4, 2014 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a directional
symbol evaluation game
US8641509 Mar 13, 2013 Feb 4, 2014 Igt
meets a condition
US8651944 * Aug 9, 2012 Feb 18, 2014
Cadillac Jack,
Inc.
Electronic gaming device with scrape away feature
US8651947 Nov 9, 2007 Feb 18, 2014 Igt
Gaming system and method providing a multiple-player bonus redemption
game
US8657665 * Jan 25, 2013 Feb 25, 2014
Cadillac Jack,
Inc.
Electronic gaming device with scrape away feature
US8662980 Sep 28, 2011 Mar 4, 2014 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a multiple
player persistent game
US8662982 Sep 28, 2012 Mar 4, 2014 Igt Method and apparatus for attractive bonusing
US8663000 Jun 24, 2013 Mar 4, 2014
Aristocrat
Technologies
Australia Pty
Limited
US8668567 Aug 22, 2012 Mar 11, 2014 Igt Gaming device having free spin mode with symbol elimination
US8672762 Sep 25, 2012 Mar 18, 2014 Igt
Gaming system and method providing a selection game associated with
selectable visually unblocked objects and unselectable visually blocked
objects
US8678900 Aug 24, 2004 Mar 25, 2014 Igt Method, apparatus and system for perpetual bonus game
US8684818 Feb 14, 2012 Apr 1, 2014 Igt
Gaming system, gaming device, and method for providing a replay of
previously played games
Cadillac Jack,
US20090088241 * Sep 27, 2007 Apr 2, 2009
Cadillac Jack,
Inc.
Extended Play Gaming Systems and Methods
US20100093419 * Sep 4, 2009 Apr 15, 2010
Wright Robert
J
Method and apparatus for providing a lottery game with linear position
based prizes
US20110124394 * Jan 26, 2011 May 26, 2011
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Bonus Game For A Gaming Machine
US20120040732 * Oct 25, 2011 Feb 16, 2012
Walker Digital,
Llc
US20120289310 * Jul 23, 2012 Nov 15, 2012 Igt Gaming device having a re-triggering symbol bonus scheme
US20130281191 * May 6, 2013 Oct 24, 2013
Wms Gaming
Inc.
Bonus Game For A Gaming Machine
EP1298612A2 * Sep 27, 2002 Apr 2, 2003 Igt Gaming device
WO2002013930A1 * Jan 2, 2001 Feb 21, 2002
Oberthur
Gaming Tech
Inc
Lottery ticket play action game
WO2005082477A1 * Jan 27, 2004 Sep 9, 2005
Robert J
Wright
A system and method of providing a guarantee in a lottery
* Cited by examiner
CLASSIFICATIONS
U.S. Classification 463/17, 273/139, 463/25, 273/138.1
International Classification A63F9/24, A63F3/06
Cooperative Classification A63F3/0665, A63F3/065, A63F2009/242, A63F3/0685
European Classification A63F3/06F
LEGAL EVENTS
Date Code Event Description
Jul 6, 2010 FPAY Fee payment
Year of fee payment: 12
Maintenance fee
Jul 23, 2002 REMI
Maintenance fee
reminder mailed
Mar 16, 1998 AS Assignment
Owner name: KAMILLE, STUART J., GEORGIA
Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:KAMILLE, KATHLEEN
R.;REEL/FRAME:009036/0931
Effective date: 19980209
Google Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send Feedback
Data provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services
2012 Google

WWW Google Com Patents US5855514

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

WWW Google Com Patents US5855514

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

WWW Google Com Patents US5855514

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

pdfcrowd.com open in browser PRO version Are you a developer?

Try out the HTML to PDF API

You might also like