NS1 Tan-Singapore Marine Clay
NS1 Tan-Singapore Marine Clay
NS1 Tan-Singapore Marine Clay
446
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Undrained Shear Strength (kN/m
2
)
D
e
p
t
h
(
m
)
CIU (Japan)
CIU (Local)
CKoU (Japan)
CKoU (Local)
Field Vane
CPT
DMT
Figure 24. Undrained shear strengths determined using laboratory tests (CIU and CK
o
U) and in-situ tests (DMT
and CPT).
09031-06.qxd 17/Oct/02 4:58 PM Page 446
The ratio s
u
/p
c
appears to remain constant with depth, although the plasticity index (PI) is a function
of depth as shown in Figures 9 and 10. Early work by Skempton (1957) suggested that the undrained
shear strength ratio of normally consolidated clays (s
u
/
vo
) is a linear function of PI for vane shear test
(Figure 26). Bjerrum (1973) subsequently generalised Skemptons linear relationship for overconsoli-
dated clays by replacing the effective overburden stress in the denominator of the undrained shear
strength ratio with the effective preconsolidation pressure p
c
. Referring to Figure 26, it can be seen that
Bjerrums relationship agrees with Skemptons linear equation for PIs less than 40%, but s
u
/p
c
tapers
off rapidly to a nearly constant value thereafter. This insensitivity of s
u
/p
c
to the plasticity index, after
40%, is also observed for Singapore Lower Marine Clay, as well as Ariake and Bangkok clays. However,
the undrained shear strength ratio for Singapore Lower Marine Clay is significantly smaller than the
asymptotic value of s
u
/p
c
0.3 in Bjerrums nonlinear relationship.
It is worthwhile to examine the unusually low undrained shear strength ratio of Singapore marine
clay in greater detail. Jamiolkowski et al. (1985) and Mesri (1989) noted that the undrained shear
strength ratio (s
u
/p
c
) for low OCR clays with low to moderate PI are 0.23 0.04 and 0.22, respectively.
In both cases, s
u
corresponds to the direct simple shear test (DST) condition. Hence, s
u
(DST) 0.21 p
c
for PT clay in Figure 25 is not inconsistent with literature. The unusual feature of Singapore marine clay
is that s
u
from vane shear test is almost the same as that from direct simple shear test! This is readily
seen from the fact that the same undrained shear strength ratio of 0.21 fits both vane shear test in SAC
clay and direct simple shear test in PT clay. It is well known that the average mobilised undrained shear
strength in the field for stability problems such as embankments on soft clay and foundation bearing
capacity is smaller than the s
u
from vane shear test (Bjerrum 1972, Ladd et al. 1977). Mesri (1989) further
noted that this average mobilised strength is approximately equal to the average of K
o
-consolidated
undrained compression (CK
o
UC), K
o
-consolidated undrained extension (CK
o
UE), and direct simple
shear test. Kulhawy & Mayne (1990) demonstrated that the direct simple shear test is approximately the
average of CK
o
UC and CK
o
UE. Combining the observations of Mesri (1989) and Kulhawy & Mayne
(1990), one would expect the s
u
from direct simple shear test to be smaller than that from vane shear test.
The reduction should be approximately the same as that given by Bjerrums correction factor, which is
about 0.8 for PI in the vicinity of 50% (Figure 27). A direct comparison between field vane and DST for
447
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
120 160 80 40 0
30
Undrained Shear Strength (kN/m
2
)
D
e
p
t
h
(
m
)
UCT (Japan-SAC)
UCT (Local-SAC)
Field Vane (SAC)
UCT (PT)
DST (PT)
Field Vane (PT)
0.21 p'c (PT)
0.21 p'c (SAC)
Figure 25. Undrained shear strengths from Pulau Tekong and SAC Sites versus prediction based on p
c
.
09031-06.qxd 17/Oct/02 4:58 PM Page 447
Singapore PT clay in Figure 25 clearly shows that this is not the case. In fact, s
u
from DST is slightly
larger than that from vane shear test! Some data points in Figure 27 also exhibit a correction greater than
unity. The original rationale for correction was strain rate and soil anisotropy. However, it has been
demonstrated in Figures 22 and 23 that Singapore marine clay does not manifest strong anisotropy.
This may be one reason why the vane shear results are close to that from DST. On a practical note, the
indiscriminate application of Bjerrums correction factor for Singapore marine clay will probably result
in a very conservative design.
4.5 Maximum shear modulus
For shear modulus, only results pertaining to SAC clay would be discussed in some detail below. As shear
modulus was seldom measured in Singapore, it is important to establish an independent source of direct
448
0.0
0.1
0.2
0 20 40 60 80 100
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
Singapore (SAC)
Singapore (PT)
Drammen
Ariake
Bangkok
Louiseville
Skempton (1957)
Bjerrum (1973)
Plasticity Index (PI)
s
u
(
f
i
e
l
d
v
a
n
e
)
/
p
'
c
Figure 26. Undrained shear strength ratio (s
u
/p
c
) versus plasticity index for different clays.
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Plasticity index, PI (%)
V
a
n
e
s
h
e
a
r
t
e
s
t
(
V
S
T
)
c
o
r
r
e
c
t
i
o
n
f
a
c
t
o
r
,
Bjerrum (1972)
s
u
(field) s
u
(VST)
Figure 27. Updated Bjerrum (1972)s field vane shear test correction factor by Ladd et al. (1977).
09031-06.qxd 17/Oct/02 4:58 PM Page 448
measurement of the in-situ shear modulus. For this purpose, the seismic cone test (SCPT) was conducted.
In this test, the shear modulus at a particular depth is estimated from the different arrival times at various
points down a hole. The down-hole shear wave velocity at various depths can thus be calculated for esti-
mation of shear modulus. This test, like the field vane shear test, is very useful in that it is a direct mea-
surement and does not require the introduction of some correlation factor for interpretation. Hence, it
should provide a good benchmark for comparison. The CPT and DMT were also conducted at the SAC
Site to obtain an indirect measure of shear modulus. For CPT, Tanaka & Tanaka (1996) suggested that:
G
max
(q
t
vo
) (6)
where G
max
maximum shear modulus and is an empirical constant. Combining Equations 5 and 6
leads to the following relation:
G
max
N
kt
s
u
(7)
Based on G
max
measured using resonance column test results, Chew et al. (1997) reported a G
max
/s
u
ratio of about 700 for Singapore marine clay. Combining this ratio with N
kt
12 adopted earlier, the
value of is 58. This value of was adopted in the analyses of the CPT results here. For Japanese soft
clays, Tanaka & Tanaka (1996) reported that a good correlation can be obtained using 50. Thus, the
value of 58 appears to be quite reasonable.
For DMT, the equation adopted in this study followed that proposed by Tanaka & Tanaka (1996):
G
max
7.5 E
D
(8)
where E
D
is the dilatometer modulus.
Figure 28 shows the variation in G
max
with depth, measured by the three types of in-situ tests. It can
be seen that all three tests show results reasonably consistent with each other. However the use of the
empirical factors in Equations 7 and 8 to other sites should be regarded with caution because they are
based on very limited test data. Overall, G
max
increases with depth.
449
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
10 60 50 40 30 20 0
G
max
(MPa)
D
e
p
t
h
(
m
)
SCPT
CPT
DMT
Figure 28. Variation of G
max
with depth for in-situ tests conducted at SAC Site.
09031-06.qxd 17/Oct/02 4:58 PM Page 449
450
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
60 50 40 30 20 10 0
G
max
(MPa)
D
e
p
t
h
(
m
)
SCPT
UCT-HET (Japan)
UCT-HET (Local)
CKoU-BE (Japan)
CKoU-BE (Local)
Figure 29. Comparison of G
max
determined from laboratory tests with in-situ seismic cone test.
Besides G
max
, it is also important to appreciate the reduction in shear modulus with strain. To study
this aspect, laboratory tests on undisturbed samples are necessary. Accurate measurement of strain was
achieved by employing a Halls effect strain transducer (HET) (Clayton et al. 1989) to measure the
deformation at the middle one-third of the sample in addition to the usual LVDT. Through appropriate
amplification of the analogue signal and using a 16-bit analogue-digital converter, a quantization error
of less than 0.8 m was achieved. To complement this measurement, bender elements were also used in
some of the tests. In these tests, the element is allowed to protrude 3 mm into the sample. The bender
elements measure the average shear wave velocity propagating between the source and receiver ele-
ment. To assess the effect of sampling disturbance, both undrained compression tests and anisotropi-
cally consolidated recompression tests were carried out.
The maximum shear moduli estimated from the local Halls effect transducer in UCTs conducted on
soil samples retrieved using both samplers are shown in Figure 29 together with data from the seismic
cone tests. In general, the laboratory measurements are much lower than the field measurements at the
same depth. It is also clear that samples retrieved using a local sampling tube provides lower results than
those from the Japanese sampler. To evaluate the effectiveness of the recompression method, bender ele-
ments were used in CK
o
U tests to determine the G
max
for both types of samples. The results are also
shown in Figure 29. It can be seen that the results from such tests are much closer to each other and also
to the values from seismic cone tests. Hence, recompression seems to be able to compensate for some
loss of G
max
arising from sampling disturbance, although it appears to be more effective when applied
to s
u
(Figure 22). In addition, G
max
values have recovered to a large degree by reconsolidation, though
they remain consistently about 1015% lower than those from the in-situ seismic cone tests.
It is worthy to examine the effect of reconsolidation on G
max
in greater detail. The study involves
subjecting samples to isotropic consolidation to different mean effective stress before shearing them in
undrained compression. The parameter G
max
was measured using bender elements and the results are
shown in Figure 30 against the mean effective stress p normalised by the estimated in-situ mean stress
p
0
. When little or no reconsolidation stress is applied, it can be seen that G
max
is significantly lower than
that estimated from seismic cone test. For those samples retrieved using the local tube, the reduction is
even more significant. It is also clear that the difference between the Japanese and local sampling meth-
ods reduces as the reconsolidation stress increases. However, it is significant that G
max
for samples
retrieved using the local and Japanese tube samples are lower than the seismic cone value by about 30%
09031-06.qxd 17/Oct/02 4:58 PM Page 450
and 20%, respectively, even when the samples are re-consolidated to the estimated in-situ stress state.
The difference between G
max
for Japanese and local samplers also reduces with increasing reconsolida-
tion pressure, but a difference of more than 10% still persists after reaching the estimated initial stress
state. These results for G
max
show that reconsolidation can recover, to a large extent, the difference in dis-
turbances between the two types of samplers, but not totally. More importantly, the results indicate that the
G
max
cannot be fully recovered in the laboratory even when the samples are reconsolidated, when compared
to the G
max
measured in-situ using seismic cone tests.
The above results show that the effect of sampling disturbance on G
max
is substantially and not fully
recoverable by reconsolidation. Reconsolidation is also less effective in compensating for loss of G
max
due to sampling disturbance than that achieved for shear strength. As reconsolidation can only recover
effective stress, the above results suggest that in the case of the SAC clay, G
max
depends to a large extent
on the effective stress levels and, to a lesser extent, on the bonding of the soil. The idea that G
max
of marine
clay is strongly dependent on the effective stress level and less dependent on the stress (or strain)
history, is consistent with the results and findings of some previous researchers. For normally consoli-
dated soils, it has been recognised that G
max
is a function of void ratio and effective stress, for example,
Hardin & Black (1968) suggested that:
G
max
F(e) p
0.5
(9)
where F(e) is a function of the void ratio e. In the case of a normally consolidated clay, e is related to p
and thus G
max
can also be related to p alone. For example, Dasari (1996) showed that, for normally con-
solidated kaolin:
G
max
p
0.69
(10)
Comparing Equations 9 and 10 shows that the higher exponent of p in Equation 10 probably accounts for
the effect of the reduction in void ratio with increasing p. For over-consolidated clays, Dasari (1996) fur-
ther suggested that the effects of the overconsolidation ratio (OCR) can be accounted by the relationship:
G
max
OCR
n
p
0.69
(11)
Dasari (1996) adopted a value of approximately 0.2 for n.
451
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
S
h
e
a
r
m
o
d
u
l
u
s
r
a
t
i
o
G
CIU
(Local)/G
CIU
(Japan)
G
CIU
(Japan)/G
SCPT
G
CIU
(Local)/G
SCPT
p'/p'o
Figure 30. Reconsolidation to different mean effective stress using CIU test.
09031-06.qxd 17/Oct/02 4:58 PM Page 451
Ignoring the effect of OCR, a relation similar to Equation 10 can also be derived for the Singapores
Lower Marine Clay as shown by the results in Figure 31, except that the exponent for the effective stress
is 0.9. Though the results look visually reasonable, it must be pointed out that the plot is log-log and thus
masks some of the scatter. Nevertheless, the plot suggests that for the case of the Singapore Lower
Marine Clay, G
max
is strongly dependent on p and to a lesser extent on OCR. This is consistent with the
results presented that reconsolidation can help to recover the maximum shear modulus substantially but
not completely.
5 CONCLUSIONS
A detailed systematic investigation into Singapore Lower Marine Clay was carried out at two sites, namely
the Singapore Arts Centre (now called The Esplanade) and Pulau Tekong. Laboratory and in-situ tests
were conducted with careful attention to sampling and testing quality. The results have revealed a num-
ber of interesting features of Singapore Lower Marine Clay that are not previously known.
A recent dating carried out for the purpose of the present investigation suggests that the age of
Singapore Lower Marine Clay and Intermediate Clay at Pulau Tekong is much older than previously
thought. The dating suggests that the Intermediate clay is around 24,600 years and the Lower Marine
Clay is at least 28,000 years, much older than the 10,000 to 12,000 years postulated previously.
The Lower Marine Clays at both sites have very high fine content, and more interestingly, do not
exhibit any reduction with depth. X-ray diffraction tests show that the principal mineral is kaolinite,
though the clay from the PT Site also shows an appreciable presence of smectite. The index properties
of the two clays are consistent with this, with the PT clay having a liquid limit between 80% and 100%
which is higher than that of the SAC clay, which has a liquid limit between 60% and 80%. Overall, the
activities of both clays are between 0.5 and 1.0.
The compressibility of the SAC clay was investigated using CRS and conventional oedometer tests.
The effect of sample quality on compressibility was studied as well. Generally, commercial quality sam-
ples subjected to oedometer test indicate OCR in the range between 1.0 and 1.2, while higher quality
samples subjected to the more refined CRS test reveal that OCR is around 1.4 to 1.5. The effect of
sampling is also pronounced on the measured compressibility curve, immediately after p
c
. The test
type carried out also affects this aspect quite significantly. For the clay from the PT Site, the OCR is
452
M
e
a
s
u
r
e
d
G
m
a
x
(
B
e
n
d
e
r
e
l
e
m
e
n
t
)
10
4
10
4
10
3
10
3
10
5
10
5
10
6
10
6
G
max
425(p')
0.9
Figure 31. Relation for G
max
.
09031-06.qxd 17/Oct/02 4:58 PM Page 452
atypically large, greater than 2.5 at most depths. There is some basis to believe that this OCR was
mechanically induced by erosion in this locale.
For undrained shear strength, UCT is shown to be sensitive to sampling quality. The shear strength
profile also shows more variability. However, with isotropic or anisotropic reconsolidation, the differ-
ence in shear strengths arising from samples of differing quality and the variability with depth reduced
very significantly. In particular, the results show little difference between CIU and CK
o
U tests. This
nearly isotropic strength for SAC clay can also be seen from triaxial stress paths. The undrained shear
strength ratio (s
u
/p
c
) for vane shear test (VST) and direct shear test (DST) seems to be insensitive to PI
and equal to about 0.21 for clays at both sites, despite their significant difference in OCR. As the PI for
both clays are greater than 40%, the former observation pertaining to VST is quite consistent with that
made by Bjerrum (1973). The latter observation for DST is consistent with that reported by Mesri
(1989), but very low for VST in comparison with Bjerrum (1973).
For shear modulus at small strain (G
max
), the recompression method is quite effective in compensat-
ing for sampling disturbance. However, the shear modulus obtained is consistently lower than that from
seismic cone tests, even when reconsolidated to the in-situ state. For SAC clay, the G
max
value is pro-
portional p
c
0.9
, indicating that this clay is highly dependent on effective stress; thus providing a reason
why recompression seems to work reasonably, but not fully.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We are grateful to the engineers of Housing and Development Board of Singapore for allowing us an
opportunity to conduct site investigation at the Pulau Tekong site. We are also to the contractor, TOA-Jan
De Nul Joint Venture, for rendering various assistances during the site investigation. For the works at the
Singapore Arts Centre (now called The Esplanade), the cooperation of engineers from the then Public
Works Department of Singapore is gratefully acknowledged.
REFERENCES
American Society for Testing and Materials 1994. Standard Methods for Thin-walled Tube Sampling of Soils ASTM
D1587.
Bishop, M.G. 2001. South Sumatra Basic Province, Indonesia: The Lahat/Talang Akar-Cenozoic Total Petroleum
System. Open file report 99-50-S, U.S Geological Survey.
Barden, L., Sides, G.R. & Polping, H.P.W. 1971. The microstructures of some South East Asian marine clays.
In Proceedings of 4th Asian Regional Conference in Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering, Bangkok,
349354.
Bloom, A.L., Broecker, W.S., Chappell, J.M.A., Mathews, R.K. & Mesolella, K. J. 1974. Quaternary sea level fluc-
tuations on a tectonic coast: New
230
Th/
234
U dates from the Huon Peninsula, New Guinea. Quaternary Research
4: 185205.
Bjerrun, L. 1972. Embankments on soft ground. In Proceedings ASCE Specialty Conference on Performance of
Earth and Earth-supported Structures, Lafayette, Vol. 2: 154.
Bjerrum, L. 1973. Problems of sofot mechanics and construction on soft clays. In Proceedings of 8th International
Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, Vol. 3: 111159.
Chew, C.H., Lee, F.H., Lim, S.C., Lim, S.P., Quek, S.T. & Tan, T.S. 1997. Review of Floating Slab Track System for
North-East Line. Stage II: Ground Vibration Study. Prepared for Land Transport Authority, Singapore.
Chong, P.T., Tan T.S., Lee F.H., Yong K.Y. & Tanaka H. 1998. Characterisation of Singapore Lower Marine Clay by
in-situ and laboratory tests. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Problematic Soils, Sendai, 641644.
Chung, S.G., Giao, P. H. & Tanaka, H. 2002. Geotechnical characteristics and engineering problems of Pusan Clays.
In Proceedings of International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils,
Singapore (in press).
Clayton, C.R.I., Khatrust S.A., Bica A.V.D. & Siddique A. 1989. The use of Hall effect semiconductor in geotechnical
instrumentation. Geotechnical Testing Journal 12(1): 6976.
Clayton, C.R.I., Hight D.W. & Hopper R.J. 1992. Progressive destructuring of Bothkennar Clay: Implications for
sampling and reconsolidation procedures. Geotechnique 42(2): 219239.
Dames & Moore 1983. Singapore Mass Rapid Transit System Detailed Geotechnical Study Interpretative Report.
Prepared for Provisional Mass Rapid Transit Authority, Singapore.
Dasari, G.R. 1996. Modelling the Variation of Soil Stiffness During Sequential Construction. PhD Thesis, Cambridge
University.
Dawson A.G. 1992. Ice Age Earth Late Quaternary Geology and Climate. Routledge, London & New York.
Djoenaidi, W.J. 1985. A Compendium of Soil Properties and Correlations. MEng Thesis, University of Sydney.
453
09031-06.qxd 17/Oct/02 4:58 PM Page 453
Dyvik, R. & Madshus C. 1985. Laboratory measurements of G
max
using bender elements. In Proceedings of
the ASCE National Convention: Advances in the Art of Testing Soils Under Cyclic Conditions, Michigan,
186196.
Farrar, D.M. & Coleman, J.D. 1967. The correlation of surface area with other properties of nineteen British clay
soils. Journal of Soil Sciences 18(1): 118124.
Hall, R. 1997. Cenozoic plate tectonic reconstructions of SE Asia. In Fraser, A., Matthews, S.J. & Murphy, R.W.
(eds.): Petroleum Geology of SE Asia. Geological Society of London Special Publication 126: 1123.
Hardin, B.O. & Black W.L. 1968. Vibration modulus of normally consolidated clay. Journal of Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Engineering, ASCE 94(SM2): 353369.
Head, K.H. 1986. Manual of Soil Laboratory Testing, Vol. 3, Pentech Press, London.
Hight, D.W. 1985. Evaluation of geotechnical parameters from triaxial tests on offshore clay. Offshore Site
Investigation Advances in Underwater technology and Offshore Engineering, Vol. 3: 253268.
Jamiolkowski, M., Ladd, C.C., Germaine, J.T. & Lancellotta, R. 1985. New developments in field and laboratory
testing of soils. In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,
San Francisco, Vol. 1: 57153.
Kenny, T.C. 1964. Sea level movements and the geological histories of the post-glacial marine soils at Boston,
Nicolet, Ottawa and Oslo. Geotechnique 14: 203230.
Kulhawy, F.H. & Mayne, P.W. 1990. Manual on Estimating Soil Properties for Foundation Design, Report EL-6800,
Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto.
Ladd, C.C., Foote, R., Ishihara, K., Schlosser, F. & Poulos, H.G. 1977. Stress-deformation and strength characteristics.
In Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Tokyo, Vol. 2:
421494.
Leong, E.C., Rahardjo, H. & Tang, S.K. 2002. Characterisation and engineering properties of Singapore residual
soils. In Proceedings of International Workshop on Characterisation and Engineering Properties of Natural Soils,
Singapore (in press).
Leroueil, S., Tavenas, F. & LeBihan, J.P. 1983. Proprietes Caracteristiques des Argiles de lest du Canada. Canadian
Geotechnical Journal 20(4): 681705.
Lunne, T. & Kleven, A. 1981. Role of CPT in North Sea foundation engineering. In Proceedings of the ASCE
National Convention: Cone Penetration Testing and Materials, St. Louis, 76107.
Marchetti, S. 1981. In situ test by flat dilatometer. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE
106(GT3): 299321.
Mesri, G. 1989. A re-evaluation of s
u
(mob) 0.22
p
using laboratory shear tests. Canadian Geotechnical Journal
26(1): 162164.
Mitchell, J.K. 1993. Fundamentals of Soil Behavior. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Pitts, J. 1983. The origin, nature and extent of recent deposits in Singapore. In Proceedings of International Seminar
on Construction Problems in Soft Soils, Singapore. Nanyang Technological Institute, 118.
Pitts J. 1992. Landforms and geomorphic evolution of the islands during the Quaternary. In Gupta, A. & Pitts, J.
(eds.): The Singapore Story: Physical adjustments in a Changing Landscape. Singapore University Press,
Singapore: 83143.
Public Works Department (PWD) 1976. Geology of the Republic of Singapore, Public Works Department,
Singapore.
Shackleton, N.J. 1987. Oxygen isotopes, ice volume and sea level. Quaternary Science Reviews 6: 183190.
Skempton, A.W. 1957. Discussion of Planning and design of New Hong Kong Airport. In Proceedings of
Institution of Civil Engineers 7: 305307.
Tan, S.L. 1983. Geotechnical properties and laboratory testing of soft soils in Singapore. In Proceedings of 1st
International Seminar on Construction Problems in Soft Soils, Nanyang Technological Institute, Singapore, 147.
Tanaka, H. & Tanaka M. 1996. A site investigation method using cone penetration and dilatometer tests. Technical
Note of the Port and Harbour Research Institute, No. 837, Japan. (In Japanese)
Tanaka, H., Sharma P., Tsuchida T. & Tanaka M. 1996. Comparison study on sample quality using several types of
samplers. Soils and Foundations 36(2): 5768.
Tanaka, H. 2000. Sample quality of cohesive soils: lessons from three sites, Ariake, Bothkenaar and Drammen. Soils
and Foundations: 40(4), 5774.
Todo, H., T. Sagae & T. Adachi 1993. Compressibility model for highly sensitive Singapore marine clay. In
Proceedings of 11th Southeast Asian Geotechnical Conference, 251256.
454
09031-06.qxd 17/Oct/02 4:58 PM Page 454