Semana 1 Siglo 18
Semana 1 Siglo 18
Semana 1 Siglo 18
In the Classical era of music, one finds a fairly consistent set of harmonic progressions used. This course presents a rich set of progressions. It isn't exhaustive, but it is fairly comprehensive, and makes for an easy approach to composing in the style of a late 18th century composer. These progressions are catalogued as Basic or Sequential. Common chord inversions as well as approaches to chord substitution and insertion within the basic progressions are offered. Once one is familiar with the strategies for substitution and insertion, then one gains a healthy amount of freedom in crafting harmonic progressions that should stay fairly stylistically accurate. Details on all of this are given in the weekly videos.
Basic Progressions
I-V-I
I-IV-V-I
I-VI-II-V-I
I-V65-I One can also used 7th chords in inversions. Unless otherwise noted, dominant 7th chords can be used were dominant triads are illustrated.
The cadential six-four chord: I64-V (This one usually goes to a root position dominant triad rather than a 7th chord.)
The IV6-V progression as well as the V42-I6 progression. Note you can't do a V42-I6 with a dominant triad. You need to 7th in order to do it.
Sequential Progressions
Circle of Fifths
Descending 5-6
Parallel Sixths
Diatonic Substitutions
Dominant Substitutions As seen in the chord chart presented at the beginning of the course, substitutions are possible between the V or and viio chords. It is also possible to substitution V7 with viio7 chords. Both of these chords can have a dominant function, that is, they function to bring the progression back to the tonic chord.
Subdominant Substitutions The substitution of a ii chord for a IV chord is very common. In fact, the ii6 chord is so much more common that the IV chord in classical era music, that the substitution probably should be thought of in reverse: the IV chord occasionally substituting for the ii6. Using the ii6 instead of the IV lends greater authenticity to 18th century style writing.
Tonic Substitutions As seen with the dominant and subdominant substitutions, the nature of substitution is the founded on swapping out one chord for another with which it has a mediant relationship, that is, they are a diatonic third apart. One can also do this with the I and VI chords, but only when preceded by a V chord. For instance, I-IV-V-I cannot be altered into a VI-IV-V-I. Although this is an acceptable progression, in general, the sense of substitution does not exist. However, I-IVV-VI is also possible, and the sense of substitution is very clear. This progressions from V-VI has a distinctive character in classical music, and it is given the name deceptive progression. The name is apt: one feels that they have been cheated of a return to the tonic and are surprised to see the VI chord presented as its substitution. At least, this is what one "should"
feel when hearing this progression in the context of 18th century European music making.
Chromatic Substitutions
Neapolitan 6
Augmented 6
Borrowed Chords
Below are further examples of common secondary dominants. They have been listed by the interval (and direction) separating the 2 chords in the original progression.
Finally, it should be noted that the leading tone chord as well as the fully diminished 7th chord can be used as a substitution for the secondary dominant. These chords are called secondary leading tone chords.
We also know that there is a passing progression often seen with the IV6 chord, so we insert it: I-IV6-[I64-IV]-V-I
We also know that the V chord can be expanded to include a cadential six-four chord, so we add that: I-IV6-[I64-IV]-[I64]-V-I
We also know that we could add a progression within a progression between I and IV chords (a 5th apart) as well as the IV and V chords (a 2nd part). So, we add those in and use nice inversions to smooth out the bass line: I-[V42/IV]-IV6-[I64-IV]-[V65/V-I64]-V-I.
Keyboard Voicing The above principles for voice spacing of SATB more or less apply to keyboard voicing. There are some differences worth noting though. The most obvious is that, with keyboard voicing, one places 3 notes on treble staff and 1 note in the bass. Also, close structure is most frequently encountered because the 3 notes on the treble staff are to be played by a single hand, and hands don't generally stretch much more than an octave or tenth without some form of assistance (like a medieval torture device).
* Doubling of the leading tone is bad practice in general when trying to emulate this style of music. It isn't seen much. The reason for this? Some say composers avoided it so that the leading tone wouldn't be overemphasized. On a more practical level, since the leading tone tends to resolve to the tonic, two leadings tones would both resolve to the tonic at the same time, forcing parallel octaves (see below as to why that's to be avoided). Principles of Voice Leading The principles of voice leading can be summarize as follows: 1. 2. 3. 4. Keep common tones, Move voices by step, if possible, If you can't move by step, move by smallest possible interval, Use contrary motion, if possible.
There are, however, more specific rules used in late 18th century music, particularly with a homorhythmic, homophonic texture like SATB chorale writing. These include:
1. 2. 3. 4.
Avoid parallel fifths and octaves, as well as fifths and octaves by contrary motion; Avoid doubling the leading tone; Avoid hidden (or direct) fifths and octaves; Avoid using the +2 interval melodically.
Luckily, at least with root position chords, there is a set of algorithms that can be used to create stylistically accurate voice leading. These really only work with root position chords in SATB writing. Once inversions are introduced, there are too many possibilities and considerations. The algorithms for root position chords are given below along with musical illustrations. For chords a fourth or fifth apart, there are two approaches: a common tone approach and a non-common tone approach. With the common tone approach you: 1. move the bass to the root of the next chord, 2. carry over the common tone from the previous chord, 3. move the remaining voices by step or smallest possible interval, 4. try to incorporate contrary motion.
1. move the bass to the root of the next chord, 2. move all of the remaining voices to the nearest chord tone of the next chord, 3. try to incorporate contrary motion.
For chords a third or sixth apart: 1. move the bass to the root of the next chord, 2. carry over the two common tones from the previous chord, 3. move the remaining voice by step to complete the chord.
For chords that are a second apart: 1. move the bass to the root of the next chord, 2. in contrary motion to the bass, move the remaining voices to the nearest chord tone of the next chord.
Making an Accompaniment
If one is familiar and comfortable with creating 4-voice keyboard homorhythmic homophony, then creating an accompaniment pattern is fairly easy. One can simply choose a rhythmic pattern to apply to the left hand and a rhythmic pattern to apply to the right hand. The right hand is usually much more active since it holds the chord. The bass pattern is generally significantly simpler. Nonetheless, patterns do not need to be elaborate. In fact, very elaborate patterns are often not stylistic of Classical era music. Below are some examples. Note that none uses NCTs, but it is possible to incorporate NCTs.
Alberti Bass
Perhaps one of the most characteristic accompaniment patterns in Classical era music is the Alberti bass. Typically, the Alberti bass takes 3 chord tones and projects them in the following pattern: lowest-highest-middle-highest. The pattern is repeated for the duration of the harmonic rhythm. But this particular pattern isn't the only kind of Alberti bass one will find. Within reason, one can be creative with the pattern. But certain things should be kept in mind: 1. the lowest note should always be first, 2. the pattern should only include chord tones, 3. the rhythm should be even but fast enough to allow for all 3 chord tones to sound within the space allowed by the harmonic rhythm.
Circle of Fifths
Descending 5-6
Parallel 6ths
Neighbor Notes Like the passing tone, one steps into and out of neighbor tones. However, one steps out in the opposite direction as one stepped in. There are both upper and lower neighbor tones and combinations of these, sometimes called cambiata or changing tones.
Escape Tone One needn't just step into and out of NCTs. If one steps in and skips out, then the NCT is called an escape tone. Direction doesn't matter: both can go up, both can go down, they can go in opposite directions. However, there is a very characteristic use of escape tones in Baroque and Classical era music involving a step up and a skip down of a third, as seen in the example below.
Appoggiatura Appoggiatura could be described as the opposite of the escape tone in that one leaps into it and steps out of it. Like with the escape tone, direction doesn't matter.
Anticipation The next several NCTs involve a certain degree of either eagerness or laziness. An anticipation is an eager beaver. It moves by step or skip into a NCT, but that NCT turns out to be a chord tone when the following chord sounds. The name is a fitting description of its sound.
Suspension The suspension is a bit lazy. It gets into the NCT by doing nothing. It just stays the same. Then, it resolves downward by step to a chord tone. Note: it must resolve by step. There are a number of different types of suspensions. They are labeled based on their interval from the bass note. For instance, a 4-3 suspension starts a 4th above the bass and resolved downward
by step to the 3rd above the bass. Note that a "3rd" could be a 10th or a 17th, that is, there could be an octave or two between the bass and the suspended note. The 3 main types of suspensions are the 4-3, 7-6, and 9-8.
Sometimes we will see suspensions that resolve upward. This is particularly characteristic at the end of works or sections in Classical era music. These upward-resolving suspensions are called retardations. For our purposes, let's use them only at the end of a work. The example below includes both a 4-3 suspension and a 7-8 retardation.
Pedal Tone This last NCT is truly the laziest of all NCTs we will see. It does nothing. How to get into it? Stay the same. How to get out of it? Stay the same. Take a holiday, cause some dissonance, let the other notes solve the problem. It's all okay. It's like the boss' son of non-chord tones.
The perfect authentic cadence is a conclusive cadence. It is often used at the ends of groups of phrases, sections, and movements to articulate a sense of closure. A perfect authentic cadence must have the following things: 1. A V-I (or V7-I) harmonic progression wherein both the V and I chords are in root position; 2. The tonic note in the melody when the I chord arrives.
It is frequently the case that V-I progressions occur at cadences but one or both of the chords are in inversion, or that the melody note on the I chord is the 3rd or 5th scale degree, or that a viio chord is used in substitution for the V chord. In any of these instances, the cadence is not deemed a perfect authentic cadence, but instead an imperfect authentic cadence. Whereas the PAC is a conclusive cadence, the IAC is not. For example, it would be uncommon to see a movement finished with an IAC.
Deceptive Cadence The deceptive cadence occurs when a deceptive progression of V-vi (or V-VI in minor) is placed at a cadence. This is a very inconclusive cadence. In fact, it usually requires immediate action to get the harmonic progression back on track. The deceptive cadence is often found within a phrase rather than just at the end because its instability causes an extension that terminates in a cadence with more conclusive qualities, like an IAC or PAC to be added to the
phrase.
Plagal Cadence Plagal cadences are uncommonly seen in Classical era music. They are often placed in a phrase extension following a more conclusive cadence. They are often used as a reference to a religious context, since the plagal progression of IV-I is commonly used in hymns to sing "Amen."
7. Try to get a single highest note, or less commonly a single lowest note if the direction of the melody generally move downward. 8. Keep things in perspective. Getting a smooth line with clear direction that only uses chord tones via a mixture of stepwise motion and skips is very difficult. In 2:1 counterpoint, the smoothness and clarity of direction can be more easily addressed. Below is an example of a fairly good 1:1 counterpoint. It's fine, but I would criticize the "turbulence" (see below) at in the last 3 measures, and think it might be nice if a skip could be incorporated earlier than the 4th measure. These aren't big issues, and they can be addressed when moving to 2:1 counterpoint.
Tips for 2:1 Counterpoint 1. Use NCTs where possible. This will be a chance to add or further define shape in your 1:1 counterpoint. 2. Use chord tones as well, particularly when the 1:1 counterpoint hasn't provided a clear articulation of the harmony or you are looking for an opportunity for a larger leap, like a 4th, 6th, or octave. Why use a larger leap? There are both practical and expressive reasons. Sometimes a large leap is like pressing a reset button; it changes the register and gives you more options. On the other hand, since large leaps like sixths and octaves are infrequently encountered, they are experienced as expression gestures and capture attention. 3. It is okay to shift the note in the 1:1 melody over to the upbeat if that helps get the right shape. Put another way, the note you add can be on the downbeat or the upbeat. It will generally be on the upbeat, but it doesn't always make sense to do that. 4. Forget your 1:1 counterpoint when it isn't translating well. Sometimes moving from 1:1 to 2:1 counterpoint
opens up opportunities that shouldn't be ignored. Don't feel bad if you ignore your 1:1 counterpoint contour for a few beats to take advantage of something that wasn't foreseeable in a 1:1 setting. Below is a 2:1 setting of the previous 1:1 counterpoint. Take a moment to compare them. Notice that #2 is used in measure 1, beat 2 to help make the dominant function more clearly hear. Note that #2 is used in the second to last bar. The contour is completely changed there, and a much clearer shape is used. This helps address the turbulence issue that I criticized in the 1:1 setting.
Consistency vs. Variety The secret of counterpoint is balancing consistency with variety. Very clear shapes can be very boring. While step-wise movement lends consistency and clarity to a melodic line, well, too much of a good thing can be a bad thing. Leaps should, therefore, be incorporated to add interest.
In general, if you leap a third in one direction you can continue in that direction. If you leap more than a 3rd, then you should move in the opposite direction, generally by step. In effect, you are "filling in the gap" you made.
If you aren't continually sensitive to the shape of the melodic line, you could end up with what I describe as turbulence. Your line goes up and down but never very far and never for any reason, that is, the movement of the line doesn't translate into direction, but instead just simple activity. Just like too much consistency, having too much turbulence is a bad thing for a contrapuntal melodic line.
NCTs by Interval There are only so many ways to move between two intervals with a single additional note. Below is a list of examples of NCTs that are possible between smaller intervals. You can use it as a kind of cheat sheet for moving from 1:1 into 2:1 counterpoint. For larger intervals, you would probably fill in with a chord tone or perhaps an appoggiatura.
NCTS that aren't NCTs Be careful when adding NCTs. They might be NCTs to the harmony that you are trying to project, but are chord tones in related chords. In the example below, one thinks that they are innocently adding an appoggiatura, but actually, the G chord (IV) simple gets changed into a e chord (ii6). These chords substitution nicely for each other, so this isn't a problem. But it is very easy for something similar to happen with the I and iii chords, and these do not substitute for each other. The harmony and its progression are damaged.